critical thinking definition in vietnamese

• Special Issues
• Conferences
• Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory Home
• Current Issue
• Browse Articles
• Editorial Board
• Abstracting and Indexing
• Aims and Scope
• American Journal of Educational Research Home
• Social Science
• Medicine & Healthcare
• Earth & Environmental
• Agriculture & Food Sciences
• Business, Management & Economics
• Biomedical & Life Science
• Mathematics & Physics
• Engineering & Technology
• Materials Science & Metallurgy
• Quick Submission
• Apply for Editorial Position
• Propose a special issue
• Launch a new journal
• Authors & Referees
• Advertisers
• Open Access

• Full-Text PDF
• Full-Text HTML
• Full-Text Epub
• Full-Text XML
• Ho Thi Nhat, Nguyen Thi Lien, Nguyen Thi Tinh, Ngo Vu Thu Hang, Nguyen Thu Trang. The Development of Critical Thinking for Students in Vietnamese Schools: From Policies to Practices. American Journal of Educational Research . Vol. 6, No. 5, 2018, pp 431-435. https://pubs.sciepub.com/education/6/5/10 ">Normal Style
• Nhat, Ho Thi, et al. 'The Development of Critical Thinking for Students in Vietnamese Schools: From Policies to Practices.' American Journal of Educational Research 6.5 (2018): 431-435. ">MLA Style
• Nhat, H. T. , Lien, N. T. , Tinh, N. T. , Hang, N. V. T. , & Trang, N. T. (2018). The Development of Critical Thinking for Students in Vietnamese Schools: From Policies to Practices. American Journal of Educational Research , 6 (5), 431-435. ">APA Style
• Nhat, Ho Thi, Nguyen Thi Lien, Nguyen Thi Tinh, Ngo Vu Thu Hang, and Nguyen Thu Trang. 'The Development of Critical Thinking for Students in Vietnamese Schools: From Policies to Practices.' American Journal of Educational Research 6, no. 5 (2018): 431-435. ">Chicago Style

The Development of Critical Thinking for Students in Vietnamese Schools: From Policies to Practices

Developing critical thinking for students has recently gained significant attention in global educational discourse and practices, in response to social demands for autonomous citizens in a knowledge-based economy. In Vietnam, the objective of developing critical thinking for students has now become one of the central focuses in the new general educational program required by the government. However, a critical review of literatures on critical thinking, the new general educational program, and practices of teaching and learning in Vietnamese schools, reveals a number of potential hindrances for the changes, including a lack of clear and detailed guidance in the new program regarding critical thinking, teachers’ beliefs and teaching habits, a passive and examination-oriented learning culture, and traditions of hierarchy and face saving. To make teaching for critical thinking reality, there needs to be cooperation and participation from all parties from policy makers to teacher-training universities, local educational departments, schools, families, teachers and students in establishing a clear schedule for the implementation of a social constructivist approach in teaching and learning.

1. Introduction

Critical thinking is generally conceptualized as cognitive skills at higher thinking level in which individuals demonstrate the abilities to evaluate the values of ideas, arguments, and situations. Along with creative and problem-solving thinking, critical thinking is considered crucial in a knowledge-based economy 1 , since it can help students to become autonomous citizens. Schools around the world therefore are enjoined to teach students how to think critically.

In the wave of reforming its educational system, Vietnam has recently paid significant attention in the development of higher order thinking skills for students. The new general education program, which has been officially promulgated in 2017 and will start taking effect from the academic year of 2019-2020, requires schools to move from a content-based curriculum to a competence-based curriculum approach 2 . The new program clearly states one central focus of schools is to develop critical thinking, creative and problem-solving competence for students. This new program, however, is claimed by many Vietnamese researchers as ambitious due to a range of inhibitive sociocultural factors and established teaching and learning traditions.

Vietnam is a country in the Southeast Asia, where peoples’ thinking and behaviors are significantly influenced by a collective spirit and ‘face saving’ culture. That is, maintaining a harmonious atmosphere in a community and making a good impression on others is deemed crucial in the minds of Vietnamese. People therefore may avoid critical thinking as this could be misunderstood as personal criticism, creating conflicts and breakdown in relationships. As a result, the tradition of respect for harmony and ‘face saving’ may inhibit students’ habits of questioning the ideas of others 3 . Further, as Vietnam is a Confucian-influenced culture, hierarchical traditions between teachers and students have existed in classrooms; this may impede a culture of questioning and interacting, considered to be conductive environments for critical thinking. Consequently, these cultural values should be taken into account when implementing teaching for critical thinking at schools in Vietnam.

This paper will describe changes in the new general education programs regarding critical thinking and analyze potential sociocultural barriers for the changes and suggest possible solutions to reduce the gaps between policies and practices.

What is critical thinking?

Definitions of critical thinking are various. Historically, Socrates – an ancient Greek philosopher – was deemed to be the first to mention this approach to learning through the technique often called ‘Socratic questioning’. The technique highlights the importance of raising appropriate questions for any information that we have received. However, John Dewey – an American philosopher and Psychologist – is often referred to as the father of critical thinking, as he was the first person who coined the term ‘reflective thinking’ [4, 5] 4 , 5 . Dewey claims that ‘reflective thinking’ is the core element in becoming an autonomous learner, as this is an active process showing a persistent and careful consideration of a belief based on supported evidence which later lay the foundation for further conclusions and implications 5 . According to Dewey, the main features of reflective thinking include the abilities of an individual to be the owner of their thinking, to raise questions and to find relevant information, as well as reasoning to support or reject a particular belief.

Understandings about critical thinking have evolved over the years and a critical reviewing of the literature reveals two typical ways of defining the term. One popular understanding that has gained agreement from the majority of educators and researchers is built on the concept of Dewey’s reflective thinking 5 . Thus, critical thinking is understood as the individual ability to inquiry, verify, and evaluate any phenomenon in a thoughtful way before making any decision 6 . Others define critical thinking as the process of “ thinking about thinking ” 7 . The focus of this approach is to unpack what actually underpins critical thinking. For example, Paul (1993) considers critical thinking is a mode of thinking focusing on development of metacognition. Consequently, fundamental critical thinking skills may include skills for identification of the elements, evaluation of assumptions and arguments, classification and interpretations of expressions and ideas, analysis and synthesis, drawing arguments, inferences, and conclusions.

Many researchers consider that providing a succinct definition of critical thinking is difficult as it is complex concept 4 , 5 , 8 . In a nutshell, critical thinking is a kind of higher order thinking skill in which individuals demonstrate their abilities to scientifically and thoughtfully evaluate a phenomenon from different perspectives and in different contexts in order to make a final effective decision. These abilities require people to possess a range of skills such as questioning, inquiry, evaluation, and decision making.

What are the characteristics of a critical thinker?

As critical thinking is an active and purposeful thinking process that requires one to consider and evaluate carefully any phenomenon before making any decision, it requires thinking skills. Showing mastery in skills of investigation, analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization and evaluation is crucial to critical thinkers, as they use metacognition skills to evaluate, make decisions, and successfully solve problems. Further, having a sufficient base knowledge is also vital. It is argued that it is hard to think critically about something if one knows nothing about it 9 . As a result, it is essential that a critical thinker has wide and deep disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge. Critical thinking is also contrasted with an unbalanced view in which weaknesses are more highlighted. Instead, individuals should have abilities to see both the strengths and weaknesses in any given claims 10 . In other words, an open, fair, and constructive mind is the relevant attitude for critical thinking. Additionally, to gain insightful understandings on the phenomenon, individuals should possess a skeptical attitude 11 and the ability to raise appropriate questions for any situation and claim.

There has been concern about the possibility that critical thinking could impede creative thinking 10 . It was reasoned that critical thinking often requires one to closely follow rules in providing arguments and evaluation, while creative thinking may be based on breaking rules to create new things. However, most researchers now believe that critical thinking is one crucial element of creative thinking and problem solving 10 , 12 , 13 . To create new things or solutions for problems, it is important to evaluate carefully what has existed already. Further, when making conclusions and final decision on solutions, critical thinking definitely plays a role. It is suggested that critical thinking can be learnt and teaching critical thinking is not separate from teaching creative and problem solving thinking, as they are generally interwoven 10 , 12 .

Research has shown that students who think critically possess a skeptical, an open/fair attitude, a wide range of knowledge, divergent thinking, and the abilities to question, find relevant evidence and reasons for any assumptions 11 . They should be able to provide their own persuasive arguments, suggest alternative solutions to problems, and evaluate and make final decisions on problems. Therefore, development of critical thinking for students should focus on teaching them both content/knowledge and methods of finding, processing, and evaluating information.

Many ways are suggested to develop critical thinking for students; three major ways have emerged from the practices, including teaching critical thinking directly, indirectly and a combination of both. Direct teaching means critical thinking is taught in a separate subject, while indirect teaching involves the development of critical thinking for students through existing subjects. The third approach combines the two ways. According to Bailin et al. (1999), the combination of direct and indirect teaching approaches for critical thinking development was found to be more successful in teaching critical thinking 14 . It should be noted that many effective practices reflect the use of a social constructivist approach in designing curriculum, teaching, and assessment.

The social constructivist approach considers learning as the consequence of social interactions of members in a particular community; learning is a mediated and situated process. The mediating nature of learning is reflected through the theory of zone of proximal development (ZPD) of Vygotsky. Vygotsky defines ZPD as “the distance between the actual development level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adults’ guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers” [ 15 , p. 86]. The theory of ZPD may suggest that the best learning occur in cooperative and interactive classrooms in which students are central in their learning. They are encouraged to proactively investigate and evaluate phenomenon. The situated nature of learning suggests that learning is influenced by the sociocultural settings in which it is happening 16 , 17 .

A social constructivist approach to learning is appropriate to the development of critical thinking. It is widely accepted that the focus of a transmission teaching model is on imparting knowledge; students are usually passive in their learning. A social constructivist approach encourages students to be agents in their own learning. They need to self- organize, self-regulate, and self-reflect via cooperation and interactions with others. The principles of a social constructivist approach would trigger discussions and debates among students which not only help them gain deep understanding of a phenomenon, but also encourage individual students to voice their own opinions and have opportunities for practicing ‘reflective thinking’.

Using the principle of a social constructivist approach to learning, heuristic teaching methods 18 that are more likely to develop critical thinking for students are suggested: project-based learning, inquiry-based learning, problem-based learning, and questioning. These teaching strategies would create a conductive environment for students to practice skills of investigating, scrutinizing, and evaluating a phenomenon which are essential for students to be critical thinkers 19 .

From 2006 until now, Vietnam has been using a content-based curriculum approach in which the main focus is on transmitting factual knowledge to students rather than giving students the opportunity to gain in-depth understanding, solve problems and make their own decisions. As a result, developing critical thinking appears not to be the main focus in the current curriculum and therefore few teachers have paid attention to the development of this kind of thinking skill for their students. Consequently, critical thinking skills in Vietnamese students appeared weak 20 .

The Vietnamese government has recognized the limitations of a content-based curriculum approach and decided to move to a competence-based curriculum approach. A new general educational curriculum was first drafted in 2015 and officially promulgated in 2017. Nevertheless, apart from core eight specialized competences, including competences in languages, numeracy, social and nature discovery, technology, computing, esthetic and physical, schools in Vietnam will have to focus on forming three major general competences: autonomous and independent learning, communication and cooperation, and creative and problem-solving 2 .

Fostering critical thinking for students is stated in the new general educational program as part of the creative and problem solving competence and under the name ‘independent thinking’ 2 . According to the new program, this kind of thinking is shown through students’ abilities to question, listen and accept information with thoughtful consideration and relevant evidence, evaluating a phenomenon from various perspectives and suggest solutions for problems.

It appears that despite using a different name, the skills that the Vietnamese government expects schools to develop for students in the new program is clearly critical thinking. To foster critical thinking, the new program requires schools to shift from a traditional transmission teaching model towards an interactive teaching approach. Teachers play the role of facilitators while students are agents in their own learning. They are encouraged to actively contribute to classroom activities such as inquiry, solving problems, discussions through working independently and collaboratively 2 , 21 . Although positive changes in policies are evident, it is still a long path to make the innovative objective a reality, due to several challenges from Vietnamese existing sociocultural values and teaching and learning traditions.

Lack of clear description and implementation in policies

As mentioned in the previous section, though the objective of fostering critical thinking is set in the new general educational program, it appears to be subsumed into the creative and problem solving competence. To make the objective reality in teaching practices, it is recommended that critical thinking must be emphasized as the ‘target competence’ 22 . This is because if critical thinking is considered a sub-set of creativity and solving problem competence, it is not considered as important to teachers. Further, Trần Thị Bích Liễu et al. (2016) found that the lack of clear guidance for teachers in terms of teaching for creative thinking competence has contributed to restricted practices 23 . Critical thinking is a new and ambitious objective that needs further documents to guide teachers in how to help students to be critical thinkers in specific subjects.

Teachers’ beliefs and teaching habits

Since 1986, the Vietnam educational system has undergone several reforms, and training courses have been provided for teachers in order to equip them with innovative teaching approaches and techniques. However, research has found that the traditional teaching and learning styles still dominate in Vietnamese schools 16 , 24 , 25 . That is, teachers play the central role in the classroom and do almost activities, while students are passive, simply receiving factual information imparted from teachers. Additionally, the over-dependency on textbooks in teaching and learning was evident and this was found to be one barrier for fostering critical thinking in Vietnamese schools. Research conducted by Ngô Vũ Thu Hằng et al. (2015) revealed that the textbook was used as the main teaching and learning source for both teachers and students in science classrooms at primary level 26 . Teachers tended to use only textbooks to transmit factual information. They interacted with students in class by asking questions; students simply found information in the textbooks to give answers. While critical thinking requires students to access a variety of sources in order to gain deep understanding of a phenomenon from various perspectives, an over-dependence on the textbook by teachers and students could hinder critical thinking development. This suggests that teaching and learning resources should be upgraded and there needs to be a radical shift in the approaches to teaching and learning in Vietnamese schools.

Teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching play a crucial role in the development of critical thinking. Research conducted by Masa (2014) found that some teachers who consider teaching as a process of knowledge transmission limit the possibility for critical thinking development, whereas those who believe that learning is co-constructed through interaction between teacher and students organize more critical thinking activities in their classrooms 8 .

Research reveals further that some Vietnamese teachers possess a biased belief that as critical thinking is considered one of high order thinking skills; it is suitable for teaching only excellent students 27 . If their classrooms have more students with average achievement in learning, then teaching for critical thinking maybe not their focus. Much research has indicated that critical thinking is teachable 18 , and there is empirical evidence for development of critical thinking in students in various achievement categories. Research conducted by Lê Trung Tín and Nguyễn Hữu Châu on Grade 10 students in five provinces in North Vietnam found that students with various learning results made progress in their critical thinking skills after receiving lessons designed in ways that encourage them to raise questions and evaluate and predict information. These authors suggested that teachers should change their established beliefs, because critical thinking could be learned by every student. What teachers should do is to recognize the characteristics of critical thinking in different student groups to design well lessons which cater for every student 27 .

More importantly, for new practices, teachers need support in terms of training and supervision. Research has also found that if teachers receive training in teaching critical thinking, they then perform teaching for critical thinking 19 , 28 . This may suggest that successful implementation of critical thinking development may require professional development specifically focusing on critical thinking and how to help students become critical thinkers.

Innovative approaches for pre-service teachers’ critical thinking development in teacher-training universities were found to have a positive impact on teachers’ practices for critical thinking. Trumbull and Slack (1999) believe that teachers who experienced traditional educational environments would fail to develop constructivist ideas about teaching and learning 28 . This suggests that teacher-training universities must encourage pre-service teachers to think critically through using a social constructivist approach. In other words, to foster practices of teaching for critical thinking in schools, pedagogical universities in Vietnam must reform their own teaching practices in ways that critical thinking is significantly addressed.

Water-rice and Confucian-influenced cultural values

Research has found many sociocultural hindrances to the development of critical thinking for students in Vietnam. These may include a passive learning culture for the sake of examination, face saving, and hierarchical relationships between teachers and students

Passive and examination-oriented learning culture

As the teacher-centered approach to teaching has persisted, Vietnamese students are used to learning passively. They often listen and take notes on what the teacher said and consider teachers’ ideas the most accurate source of information. This could limit chances for students to develop their own thinking, and inhibit the development of critical thinking skills 3 , 25 . Moreover, as teaching and learning in Vietnamese schools are mainly directed by examinations and testing, the focus of teaching and learning is on helping students to pass the exams with high results rather than to apply knowledge in practice. To tackle these challenges, there needs to be radical changes in the teaching and learning culture. A social constructivist approach that makes a revolutionary shift in the roles of the teacher and students should be considered; however, this requires appropriate time and adaptation to be successful in the Vietnamese context [29, 30] 29 , 30 .

Hierarchical relationships an d face saving

Due to the influence of hierarchy in Confucius culture, teachers in Vietnam are considered the most reliable source of knowledge 22 . This may inhibit scientific argument within the classroom between teacher and students. Scientific discussion and argumentation can help students think critically and creatively in order to understand phenomena in depth, the tradition of hierarchy would make Vietnamese students hesitant to question the teacher 31 , 32 . Further, the face saving culture could make students unwilling to voice their own ideas or to give direct arguments or comments to their peers, as they may be afraid of causing conflict 29 , 32 . Ngô Vũ Thu Hằng et al. (2017) showed that the implementation of argumentation is a challenge for both teachers and students in terms of developing critical thinking 33 . Therefore, it is suggested that critical thinking skills such as scientific argumentation should be fostered, practiced and integrated in the curriculum 18 , 33 .

3. References Formats

Development of critical thinking for students is one of the central objectives that schools today need to help students become autonomous citizens in the 21 st century. The Vietnamese government has put significant emphasis on the development of critical thinking for students in the new educational program. However, there are sociocultural factors that may impede the implementation of the new program regarding critical thinking. These include a lack of clear and detailed guidance in the new program, teachers’ beliefs and teaching habits, a passive and examination-oriented learning culture, and traditions of hierarchy and face saving.

To overcome those challenges, there needs to be cooperation and participation from all parties from policy makers to teacher-training universities, local educational departments, schools, families, teachers and students in establishing a clear schedule for the implementation of teaching for critical thinking. Importantly, development of critical thinking must become independent competence rather than being the sub-set of the creative and problem solving competence and it should be integrated into study of all other subjects, as basic as writing in any subject. It is suggested that along with teacher preparation, changes through continuing professional development, innovations and practices for critical thinking must be presented in teacher-training universities where pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience and practice their critical thinking and learn how to teach their students to be critical thinkers in future.

Acknowledgements

This paper was completed with support and funding from Institute for Educational Research, Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam.

Published with license by Science and Education Publishing, Copyright © 2018 Ho Thi Nhat, Nguyen Thi Lien, Nguyen Thi Tinh, Ngo Vu Thu Hang and Nguyen Thu Trang

Cite this article:

Normal style, chicago style.

• Google-plus

• Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Translation of critical – English–Vietnamese dictionary

(Translation of critical from the PASSWORD English-Vietnamese Dictionary © 2015 K Dictionaries Ltd)

Examples of critical

Translations of critical.

Get a quick, free translation!

Word of the Day

hit the road

to leave a place or begin a journey

Searching out and tracking down: talking about finding or discovering things

Learn more with +Plus

• Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
• Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
• Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
• Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
• English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
• English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
• English–Dutch Dutch–English
• English–French French–English
• English–German German–English
• English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
• English–Italian Italian–English
• English–Japanese Japanese–English
• English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
• English–Polish Polish–English
• English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
• English–Spanish Spanish–English
• English–Swedish Swedish–English
• Dictionary +Plus Word Lists
• PASSWORD English–Vietnamese    Adjective
• Translations
• All translations

To add critical to a word list please sign up or log in.

Add critical to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

{{message}}

Something went wrong.

There was a problem sending your report.

• Global (EN)
• Albania (en)
• Algeria (fr)
• Argentina (es)
• Armenia (en)
• Australia (en)
• Austria (de)
• Austria (en)
• Azerbaijan (en)
• Bahamas (en)
• Bahrain (en)
• Bangladesh (en)
• Barbados (en)
• Belgium (en)
• Belgium (nl)
• Bermuda (en)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina (en)
• Brasil (pt)
• Brazil (en)
• British Virgin Islands (en)
• Bulgaria (en)
• Cambodia (en)
• Cameroon (fr)
• Canada (en)
• Canada (fr)
• Cayman Islands (en)
• Channel Islands (en)
• Colombia (es)
• Costa Rica (es)
• Croatia (en)
• Cyprus (en)
• Czech Republic (cs)
• Czech Republic (en)
• DR Congo (fr)
• Denmark (da)
• Denmark (en)
• Ecuador (es)
• Estonia (en)
• Estonia (et)
• Finland (fi)
• France (fr)
• Georgia (en)
• Germany (de)
• Germany (en)
• Gibraltar (en)
• Greece (el)
• Greece (en)
• Hong Kong SAR (en)
• Hungary (en)
• Hungary (hu)
• Iceland (is)
• Indonesia (en)
• Ireland (en)
• Isle of Man (en)
• Israel (en)
• Ivory Coast (fr)
• Jamaica (en)
• Jordan (en)
• Kazakhstan (en)
• Kazakhstan (kk)
• Kazakhstan (ru)
• Kuwait (en)
• Latvia (en)
• Latvia (lv)
• Lebanon (en)
• Lithuania (en)
• Lithuania (lt)
• Luxembourg (en)
• Macau SAR (en)
• Malaysia (en)
• Mauritius (en)
• Mexico (es)
• Moldova (en)
• Monaco (en)
• Monaco (fr)
• Mongolia (en)
• Montenegro (en)
• Mozambique (en)
• Myanmar (en)
• Namibia (en)
• Netherlands (en)
• Netherlands (nl)
• New Zealand (en)
• Nigeria (en)
• North Macedonia (en)
• Norway (nb)
• Pakistan (en)
• Panama (es)
• Philippines (en)
• Poland (en)
• Poland (pl)
• Portugal (en)
• Portugal (pt)
• Romania (en)
• Romania (ro)
• Saudi Arabia (en)
• Serbia (en)
• Singapore (en)
• Slovakia (en)
• Slovakia (sk)
• Slovenia (en)
• South Africa (en)
• Sri Lanka (en)
• Sweden (sv)
• Switzerland (de)
• Switzerland (en)
• Switzerland (fr)
• Taiwan (en)
• Taiwan (zh)
• Thailand (en)
• Trinidad and Tobago (en)
• Tunisia (en)
• Tunisia (fr)
• Turkey (en)
• Turkey (tr)
• Ukraine (en)
• Ukraine (ru)
• Ukraine (uk)
• United Arab Emirates (en)
• United Kingdom (en)
• United States (en)
• Uruguay (es)
• Uzbekistan (en)
• Uzbekistan (ru)
• Venezuela (es)
• Vietnam (en)
• Vietnam (vi)
• Zambia (en)
• Zimbabwe (en)
• Financial Reporting View
• Women's Leadership
• Corporate Finance
• Board Leadership
• Executive Education

Fresh thinking and actionable insights that address critical issues your organization faces.

• Insights by Industry
• Insights by Topic

KPMG's multi-disciplinary approach and deep, practical industry knowledge help clients meet challenges and respond to opportunities.

• Advisory Services
• Audit Services
• Tax Services

Services to meet your business goals

Technology Alliances

KPMG has market-leading alliances with many of the world's leading software and services vendors.

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. That’s why KPMG LLP established its industry-driven structure. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients.

• Our Industries

How We Work

We bring together passionate problem-solvers, innovative technologies, and full-service capabilities to create opportunity with every insight.

• What sets us apart

Careers & Culture

What is culture? Culture is how we do things around here. It is the combination of a predominant mindset, actions (both big and small) that we all commit to every day, and the underlying processes, programs and systems supporting how work gets done.

Relevant Results

Sorry, there are no results matching your search., customer identification program (cip): sec/fincen ria/era proposal.

Proposal to expands customer identity program obligations—verification and documentation—to investment advisers

KPMG Insights:

• “ Closing the Gap ”: Ongoing rulemakings expanding the regulatory perimeter to “close the gap” in regulatory coverage and further mitigate potentially illicit finance activity through the investment adviser sector, specifically RIAs and ERAs.
• Industry Alignment : Proposal would align customer identification programs for investment advisers with those of other financial institutions under the AML/CFT framework.
• Complements AML/CFT Framework: Proposal complements FinCEN’s February 2024 proposed rule to expand the definition of “financial institution” under the AML/CFT framework to include investment advisers and subject them to AML/CFT program and SAR filing requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issue a joint notice of proposed rulemaking to apply customer identification program (CIP) obligations to:

• Investment advisers registered with the SEC (RIAs)
• Investment advisers that report to the SEC as exempt reporting advisers (ERAs)

The obligations would include procedures for:

• Verifying the identity of each customer to the extent “reasonable” and “practicable”.
• Maintaining records of the information used to verify the customer’s identity, including name, address, and other identifying information.   

The proposal complements a separate FinCEN proposal (issued in February 2024) that would expand the definition of “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act to include RIAs and ERAs and subject those entities to AML/CFT (anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism) Program requirements, including obligations to file suspicious activity reports (SARs). At present, the definition of “financial institution” under the AML/CFT framework applies to several categories of financial institutions, including banks, broker dealers, and mutual funds but does not include RIAs or ERAs.

Highlights from the joint proposal are outlined below.

Proposed Rule on CIPs for Investment Advisers. The proposal includes several definitions along with the proposed minimum requirements for investment advisers’ CIPs.

Definitions. The proposal includes the following definitions:

• Account would be defined specifically for investment advisers' CIP obligations as any contractual or business relationship under which investment advisory services are provided, excluding accounts acquired through acquisitions, mergers, or asset purchases.
• Customer would be defined as a person (natural or legal entity) who opens a new account with an investment adviser. Certain exemptions would apply, including for financial institutions regulated by a Federal functional regulator, certain persons listed on U.S. securities exchanges, and persons that have an existing account at the investment adviser.
• Financial Institution would be defined in alignment with the Bank Secrecy Act’s definition and implementing regulations at 31 CFR 1010.100(t).
• RIAs - Any person who is registered or required to register with the SEC under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act.
• ERAs - Any person that is exempt from SEC registration under Section 203(l) or 203(m).

Proposed CIP Requirements. The proposal would require RIAs and ERAs to establish, document, and maintain a written CIP as part of the AML/CFT Program (consistent with the February proposal). The CIP would be required to be appropriate for the investment adviser’s size and business model, but at a minimum incorporate the following:

• Required Information: Name, date of birth (for individuals)/date of formation (for entities), address, and identification number, as well as additional voluntary information based on risk assessments.
• Verification: Two methods for identity verification through: 1) documents (e.g., government-issued ID for individuals, business licenses for entities) and 2) non-documentary means (e.g., contacting the customer, obtaining financial statements). The proposal includes guidance on using these methods based on the risk associated with the account, particularly for customers that are not individuals and pose a heightened risk of identity mis-verification.
• Recordkeeping: Creation and maintenance of records in a bifurcated schedule in which 1) identifying information about a customer is retained while the account remains open and for five (5) years after the account is closed, and 2) information regarding customer identity verification is retained for five (5) years after the record is made.
• Comparison with Government Lists: Procedures for comparing customer information against government lists of known or suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations as designated by relevant authorities.
• Customer Notice: Provision of “adequate” notice to customers that information will be requested to verify their identity, such that a prospective customer is able to view the notice, or is otherwise given notice, prior to opening an account.
• Reliance on another Financial Institution: Allows investment advisers to rely on CIP performed by a contracted, compliant financial institution.

Effective Date. The proposed effective date would be sixty (60) days after the date of a final rule’s publication in the Federal Register. Investment advisers would be required to develop and implement a compliant customer identification program on or before six (6) months from the effective date, but no sooner than the compliance date of the AML/CFT Program and SAR Proposed Rule, if adopted.

Comment Period. SEC and FinCEN seek public comments on the proposed rule with a submission deadline of sixty (60) days after publication in the Federal Register.  

Note: See related KPMG Regulatory Alert, here (Financial Crimes and AML: FinCEN Proposal and Treasury Actions).

Dive into our thinking:

Customer Identification Program (CIP): SEC/FinCEN Proposal

Proposal to expands customer identity program obligations - verification and documentation—to investment advisers

Explore more

Points of View

Insights and analyses of emerging regulatory issues and their impact.

Regulatory Insights View

Series covering regulatory trends and emerging topics

Regulatory Alerts

Quick hitting summaries of specific regulatory developments and their impact.

Get the latest from KPMG Regulatory Insights

KPMG Regulatory Insights is the thought leader hub for timely insight on risk and regulatory developments.

Meet our team

By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement .

Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

Contact KPMG

Job seekers

Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

Office locations

International hotline

You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

Press contacts

Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.