k t problem solving techniques

• Memberships

Kepner Tregoe Method of Problem Solving

Kepner Tregoe Method of Problem Solving: this article explains the Kepner Tregoe Method , also known as the KT-method , developed by Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe in a practical way. Next to what this is, this article also highlights rational processes, the importance of cause and that this method is effective. After reading, you’ll have a basic understanding of this problem solving process. Enjoy reading!

What is the Kepner Tregoe Method?

Problems occur in any given organization. Often there is pressure of time to solve the problems and it is debatable what the right way of solving these problems is.

The Kepner Tregoe method or KT-method is a problem analysis model in which the “problem” is disconnected from the “decision” . An English synonym for this problem solving method is Problem Solving and Decision Making (PSDM).

Traditional thinking pattern

The founders Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe developed a rational working method in the 1960s in which they researched and identified the troubleshooting skills of people.

Throughout the centuries mankind has learned to deal with complexity and to (directly) anticipate on this. As a consequence, the traditional thinking pattern became a part of human nature.

When solving problems people search for the answer to the following four questions:

• What happened?
• Why did it happen?
• How should we act?
• What will be the (future) result?

Kepner Tregoe method: rational processes

To break through this traditional pattern Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe came up with four rational processes in which four fundamental questions are reflected:

1. Situation analysis

This clarifies the problem situation (what happened).

1.1 Problem analysis

Here the actual cause of the problem and the relationship between cause and result are searched for (why did it happen).

1.2 Decision analysis

Based on the decision making criteria, choices are made to arrive at potential problem resolutions (how should we act).

1.3 Potential Problem analysis

Figure 1 – Kepner Tregoe Method Analysis

Distinction

According to the KT-method, different tasks involve different problems, which in turn need different approaches. A situation analysis will clarify the distinctions in all these processes and as a result it will be possible to search for suitable solutions. This situation analysis provides an insight into necessity, priority and urgency of the various tasks.

When it has become clear which tasks are to be prioritized (action list) preparations can be made for potential problems. By using a good problem analysis in advance, a process will be created to prevent future problems or in emergencies, to limit the damage.

The strengths of this method does not stop there. Apart from the fact that problems are specified in terms such as “what, where, when and how big”, the Kepner Tregoe Method focuses on anything that cannot be the cause of the problem.

Certain causes are therefore excluded. Based on a “this is” and “this is not” analysis a clear overview of possible causes can be created and this makes the troubleshooting process consistent.

The Kepner Tregoe Method is efficient

The KT-method deploys an efficient troubleshooting process. Through research Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe discovered that the registration of a problem is not a uniform process. In spite of the available information, people usually process information badly, misinterpret this or overlook important matters.

In addition, Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe examined the discrepancies between successful and less successful troubleshooting.

They discovered that a predetermined logical method facilitates the search for the causes of a problem. In their “Best practice in troubleshooting” , they describe this methodology, which forms the basis for this method.

The Kepner Tregoe Method is Effective

This method is universal and is still used today in many organizations to track down problems and identify potential causes. Apart from the fact that the Kepner Tregoe Method leads to an explanation of problems, it also helps improve mutual understanding within an organization.

It’s Your Turn

What do you think? Is the Kepner Tregoe Method applicable in today’s modern organizations? Do you recognize the practical explanation or do you have more suggestions? What are your success factors for the good Kepner Tregoe Method set up?

Share your experience and knowledge in the comments box below.

More information

• Lussier, R. N.  (2005). Management fundamentals: concepts. applications, skill development . Cengage Learning .
• Payne, S. L. & Marty, C.S. (1966). The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making . Journal of Marketing. Vol. 30 Issue 1, p97.
• Kepner, C. H. & Tregoe, B. B. (1965). The Rational Manager . McGraw-Hill.

How to cite this article: Mulder, P. (2012). Kepner Tregoe Method . Retrieved [insert date] from Toolshero: https://www.toolshero.com/problem-solving/kepner-tregoe-method/

Original publication date: 06/30/2012 | Last update: 12/09/2023

Add a link to this page on your website: <a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/problem-solving/kepner-tregoe-method/”>Toolshero: Kepner Tregoe Method</a>

Did you find this article interesting?

Your rating is more than welcome or share this article via Social media!

Average rating 3.7 / 5. Vote count: 30

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Patty Mulder

Patty Mulder is an Dutch expert on Management Skills, Personal Effectiveness and Business Communication. She is also a Content writer, Business Coach and Company Trainer and lives in the Netherlands (Europe). Note: all her articles are written in Dutch and we translated her articles to English!

Related ARTICLES

Pareto Analysis explained plus example

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) by Peter Checkland

Convergent Thinking: the Definition and Theory

CATWOE Analysis: theory and example

Means End Analysis: the basics and example

Also interesting.

8D Report and template

Fishbone Diagram by Kaoru Ishikawa explained

Crowdsourcing: the meaning, definition and some examples

4 responses to “kepner tregoe method of problem solving”.

I am stunned to read that the Kepner Tregoe Method “…… IS STILL used today in many organizations to track down problems and identify potential causes…..”. I have used it all the time along my career as a manager of organizations, with extreme success. As a tool for identifying problems, as a tool for taking better decisions. So, please, I would appreciate to know what kind of system is being used now instead of an approach like K-T, to have provoked your comment about the existence of an alternative way of thinking.

Other than KT, I also use the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Like KT, it forces discipline and analysis and it helps to explain why decisions are made with understandable background and data. Many of the old Total Quality Management tools are also useful for solving problems and making good management decisions. Nominal Group Technique, Pareto Charts, and weighted multivoting are all quite useful. ITIL is the new way of thinking, but it can be rather dry and robotic unless it is underpinned with good decision tools.

Thank you for your comment and sharing your experience Pete.

Seems that I naturally deal with problems this way without knowing a name for it. In fact, it seems obvious to me that this approach should be taken anyway.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

BOOST YOUR SKILLS

Toolshero supports people worldwide ( 10+ million visitors from 100+ countries ) to empower themselves through an easily accessible and high-quality learning platform for personal and professional development.

By making access to scientific knowledge simple and affordable, self-development becomes attainable for everyone, including you! Join our learning platform and boost your skills with Toolshero.

POPULAR TOPICS

• Change Management
• Marketing Theories
• Problem Solving Theories
• Psychology Theories

ABOUT TOOLSHERO

• Free Toolshero e-book
• Memberships & Pricing

How it works

For Business

Join Mind Tools

Article • 8 min read

The Kepner-Tregoe Matrix

Making unbiased, risk-assessed decisions.

By the Mind Tools Content Team

No matter what position you hold, from the board room to the mailroom, you make decisions every day.

And the end result in business is directly linked to the quality of the decisions made at each point along the way.

So, not surprisingly, decision-making is a universally important competence in business. Some decisions clearly have a greater impact on the business than others, but the underlying skill is the same: the difference is in the scope and depth of the process you go through to reach your decision.

One reason why decision-making can be so problematic is that the most critical decisions tend to have to be made in the least amount of time. You feel pressured and anxious. The time pressure means taking shortcuts, jumping to conclusions, or relying heavily on instinct to guide your way.

Kepner-Tregoe: Taking the Guesswork out of Decision-Making

In your organization, you've probably heard of someone who made it all the way to VP by relying on his gut to make decisions. At the other extreme is the guy who simply can't make a decision because he analyzes the situation to death. The bottom line is, you have to make decisions, and you have to make good decisions. Poor decisions are bad for business. Worse still, one poor decision can lead to others, and so the impact can be compounded and lead to more and more problems down the line.

Thankfully, decision-making is a skill set that can be learned and improved on. Somewhere between instinct and over-analysis is a logical and practical approach to decision-making that doesn't require endless investigation, but helps you weigh up the options and impacts.

One such approach is called the Kepner-Tregoe Matrix. It provides an efficient, systematic framework for gathering, organizing and evaluating decision-making information. The approach was developed by Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe in the 1960s and they first wrote about it in the business classic, The Rational Manager (1965). The approach is well-respected and used by many of the world's top organizations including NASA and General Motors. [1]

The Kepner-Tregoe Approach

The Kepner-Tregoe approach is based on the premise that the end goal of any decision is to make the "best possible" choice. This is a critical distinction: the goal is not to make the perfect choice, or the choice that has no defects. So the decision maker must accept some risk. And an important feature of the Kepner-Tregoe Matrix is to help evaluate and mitigate the risks of your decision.

The Kepner-Tregoe Matrix approach guides you through the process of setting objectives, exploring and prioritizing alternatives, exploring the strengths and weaknesses of the top alternatives, and of choosing the final "best" alternative. It then prompts you to generate ways to control the potential problems that will crop up as a consequence of your decision.

This type of detailed problem and risk analysis helps you to make an unbiased decision. By skipping this analysis and relying on gut instinct, your evaluation will be influenced by your preconceived beliefs and prior experience – it's simply human nature. The structure of the Kepner-Tregoe approach limits these conscious and unconscious biases as much as possible.

The Kepner-Tregoe Matrix comprises four basic steps:

• Situation Appraisal – identify concerns and outline the priorities.
• Problem Analysis – describe the exact problem or issue by identifying and evaluating the causes.
• Decision Analysis – identify and evaluate alternatives by performing a risk analysis for each and then make a final decision.
• Potential Problem Analysis – evaluate the final decision for risk and identify the contingencies and preventive actions necessary to minimize that risk.

Going through each stage of this process will help you come to the "best possible choice", given your knowledge and understanding of the issues that bear on the decision.

How to Use the Tool

The Kepner-Tregoe Matrix is an in-depth approach that can be supported by detailed instruction and worksheets. As an overview of the approach, the following steps show the general principles of how the Kepner-Tregoe approach can apply to a decision-making situation:

1. Prepare a decision statement.

• This is a general overview of what the decision is expected to achieve (the key objective).
• The statement should discuss the action that is required and the result that is desired.

2. Establish strategic requirements ("Must Haves").

• What "musts" will the final decision provide, allow for, include, etc.? For example: we must have 10 percent cost saving, we must include four color choices, the rope must hold 200 lbs.
• These requirements are absolute – there is no compromise.

3. Establish operational objectives ("Want to Haves").

• What do you "want" the final decision to support?
• By identifying the wants you can rank the alternatives according to which ones satisfy the most, or most important, wants.

4. Identify the restraints (Limits).

• What are the things that will limit your ability to do exactly what you want/need?
• These are typically resource constraints like money, materials, and time.

5. Rank the operational objectives and assign relative weights.

• For each "want", assign a rating of 1 – 10 based on the degree of importance.

6. Generate a list of alternatives.

• Think of as many alternative courses of action as you can. Don't be too concerned that they all meet the "musts" and "wants" you just defined. You will rank these alternatives in the next step.
• Brainstorming is a good approach for generating your list of alternatives.

7. Assign a relative score for each alternative.

• First, eliminate any alternatives that do not meet the "musts" – these are not worth considering any further.
• For the first alternative, go through each objective (want) and rate how well the alternative satisfies it using a 1 – 10 scale.
• Multiply the weight of the objective by the satisfaction rating to come up with a weighted score for each objective.
• Add the weighted scores to determine the total weighted score.
• Repeat the process for each alternative.

8. From the total weighted score for each alternative, rank the top two or three alternatives.

• Remember to make sure that the alternatives you choose meet all the "must" criteria.

9. For the top alternatives, generate a list of potential problems (adverse effects) for each.

• Rank the potential problems for each alternative according to probability and significance.
• Obtain a total weighted score for the adverse effect (adversity rating).

10. Analyze the alternative ranking and the adversity rating and make a final decision.

11. decide on mitigating actions for the chosen alternative..

• Look at each of the adverse effects already identified and generate a list of proactive responses to reduce the probability of each.
• Continuously monitor these probabilities and take action as needed.

The Kepner-Tregoe Matrix is a well-respected and systematic approach for making decisions. The matrix process forces users to be well-organized and thorough.

By weighting and ranking both the benefits and risks, it helps you choose the very best alternatives.

Using the Kepner-Tregoe approach requires patience and a commitment: the payoff for the time invested is good, unbiased decision-making that makes good business sense.

[1] Kepner, C. and Tregoe, B. (1965). ' The Rational Manager .' McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Kepner-Tregoe is a trademark of Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. See www.kepner-tregoe.com .

You've accessed 1 of your 2 free resources.

Get unlimited access

Discover more content

Book Insights

The Six Secrets of Change

Michael Fullan

Infographic

Starbursting Infographic

Power Up Your Brainstorming!

Add comment

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!

Gain essential management and leadership skills

Busy schedule? No problem. Learn anytime, anywhere. 

Subscribe to unlimited access to meticulously researched, evidence-based resources.

Join today and take advantage of our 30% offer, available until May 31st .

Sign-up to our newsletter

Subscribing to the Mind Tools newsletter will keep you up-to-date with our latest updates and newest resources.

Subscribe now

Business Skills

Personal Development

Leadership and Management

Member Extras

Most Popular

Latest Updates

Winning Body Language

Business Stripped Bare

Mind Tools Store

About Mind Tools Content

Discover something new today

Nine ways to get the best from x (twitter).

Growing Your Business Quickly and Safely on Social Media

Managing Your Emotions at Work

Controlling Your Feelings... Before They Control You

How Emotionally Intelligent Are You?

Boosting Your People Skills

Self-Assessment

What's Your Leadership Style?

Learn About the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Way You Like to Lead

Recommended for you

An introduction to safeguarding.

The Basics of Good Safeguarding Practice

Business Operations and Process Management

Strategy Tools

Customer Service

Business Ethics and Values

Handling Information and Data

Project Management

Knowledge Management

Self-Development and Goal Setting

Time Management

Presentation Skills

Learning Skills

Career Skills

Communication Skills

Negotiation, Persuasion and Influence

Working With Others

Difficult Conversations

Creativity Tools

Self-Management

Work-Life Balance

Stress Management and Wellbeing

Coaching and Mentoring

Change Management

Team Management

Managing Conflict

Delegation and Empowerment

Performance Management

Leadership Skills

Developing Your Team

Talent Management

Problem Solving

Decision Making

Member Podcast

Victor Leung

Understanding the Kepner-Tregoe Technique - A Guide to Enhanced Problem-Solving and Decision-Making

In the dynamic world of business, the ability to efficiently solve problems and make decisions is crucial for success. The Kepner-Tregoe technique, developed by Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe, is a structured methodology that aids in the systematic analysis and resolution of problems. This blog post delves into the essence of the Kepner-Tregoe technique, exploring its key components and benefits.

What is the Kepner-Tregoe Technique?

The Kepner-Tregoe technique is a problem-solving and decision-making framework that provides a systematic approach for identifying, analyzing, and resolving issues. It consists of four main processes:

Problem Analysis : This process involves defining the problem, understanding its nature, and diagnosing the root cause. By distinguishing between what is known and unknown, the problem is clarified, making it easier to identify potential solutions.

Decision Analysis : This step is crucial for making informed decisions. It involves evaluating alternatives against a set of objectives and identifying the risks associated with each option. This helps in selecting the most feasible and beneficial solution.

Potential Problem (or Opportunity) Analysis : Here, the focus shifts to forecasting future issues or opportunities. This proactive approach helps in preparing for potential challenges and capitalizing on opportunities that may arise from the decision made.

Situation Appraisal : This involves assessing the situation to prioritize issues, plan the next steps, and allocate resources effectively. It helps in managing multiple problems or decisions simultaneously.

Benefits of the Kepner-Tregoe Technique

Enhanced Problem-Solving Skills : The technique fosters a deep understanding of the problem, leading to more effective solutions.

Improved Decision-Making : By systematically evaluating alternatives, the technique ensures that decisions are well-informed and aligned with objectives.

Risk Management : It helps in identifying potential risks and prepares organizations to mitigate them effectively.

Efficient Resource Allocation : By prioritizing issues, the technique ensures that resources are used optimally.

Fosters Team Collaboration : The structured approach encourages teamwork and clear communication, making it easier to reach a consensus.

Implementing the Kepner-Tregoe Technique

To effectively implement the Kepner-Tregoe technique, organizations should:

Train Employees : Provide training to develop the necessary skills for applying the technique.

Encourage a Systematic Approach : Foster a culture where problems are approached methodically, using the Kepner-Tregoe processes.

Utilize in Various Scenarios : Apply the technique across different types of problems and decisions to maximize its benefits.

Regularly Review and Refine : Continuously assess the effectiveness of the technique and make adjustments as needed.

The Kepner-Tregoe technique is a powerful tool for organizations seeking to enhance their problem-solving and decision-making capabilities. By providing a structured approach, it not only leads to better outcomes but also promotes a culture of strategic thinking and collaboration. Implementing this technique can be a game-changer for businesses aiming to navigate complexities with greater confidence and efficiency.

Ready for more?

Knowledge for Professional and Personal Development

Mastering Kepner-Tregoe Methodology for Decision Excellence

The Kepner-Tregoe matrix is a problem-solving technique that helps businesses make better decisions. It focuses on gathering, organizing and evaluating key decision-making information.

Through their research, Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe found that breakdowns in problem solving often stem from people misprocessing information or jumping to conclusions. They developed a predetermined logical method that helps teams find and fix the cause of a problem.

Introduction to Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis

Exploring the kepner-tregoe problem analysis model, steps in kepner-tregoe decision making process, applying kepner-tregoe techniques in business, benefits of kepner-tregoe method in problem solving.

If you want to become a more confident decision maker, you need to learn the right approach to problem solving. Using the Kepner Tregoe method (also known as the KT-method) will help you to develop a structured and systematic process for approaching problems. This approach will not only help you avoid bad decisions, but it will also allow you to identify and understand the root causes of a problem. This is critical to finding the most effective solution.

The KT-method was developed by Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe in the 1960s and is often referred to as the “Kepner-Tregoe Matrix,” the “Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis” and the “Problem Solving and Decision Making Method” (PSDM). This approach was designed to counteract hasty and emotion-driven decision-making by providing a structure for analyzing options.

This method is widely used in the business world for two common but critical types of decisions: capital expenditures and hiring. These large financial commitments are usually complex and require a variety of stakeholders to participate in the decision- making process. Incorporating KT Decision Analysis can ensure that all stakeholder concerns are addressed and a clear and effective plan for action is developed.

Many businesses use the KT-method in product development to help them make data-driven choices. For example, Apple’s engineering team used the KT-method when designing the iPhone X. This enabled them to systematically address engineering challenges such as integrating Face ID into a borderless display. The result was an innovative new feature that also helped to improve customer experience and quality.

Using the KT-method can also help you build a culture of problem solving and error management. At the DURAG GROUP in Hamburg, Germany, employees have embraced this methodology by training and coaching their peers to do so. This has led to a positive change in corporate culture, including the implementation of a clear thinking framework and support structure. This was recognized in 2022 when the DURAG Group won the Kepner-Tregoe Excellence Award for Organizational Culture of Critical Thinking.

Developing a systematic framework to solve problems and make decisions is crucial for any business. The Kepner-Tregoe Problem Analysis model is a powerful tool that helps individuals and teams systematically analyze a problem, determine its causes, and develop effective solutions. This method was developed by Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe in the 1950s, and it is used worldwide in businesses and organizations to improve problem-solving skills.

The Problem Analysis model involves a four-step process that starts with clearly defining the problem. This step is often skipped by immature troubleshooters, who rely on hunches and instincts to diagnose issues. However, jumping to conclusions may lead to an expanded problem or a permanent solution that simply masks the symptoms of the original issue. By taking the time to fully understand what has happened, teams can avoid wasting time and resources by avoiding unnecessary actions.

When determining the causes of a problem, it’s important to isolate the elements that have an impact on the event, while ignoring those that do not. This process is called CATWOE (causal, alternative, technical, logical, environmental). The use of this method allows teams to identify the cause of the problem and find a lasting solution.

KT training teaches the tools and techniques to help you think clearly, resolve problems confidently, and make informed decisions. This one-day workshop is ideal for leaders and employees who are responsible for making decisions or analyzing problems in operations, quality, manufacturing, IT, customer service, research and development, maintenance, and more. Learn to avoid decision-making biases and practice your new skills in a classroom setting, then apply them back on the job. KT delivers clarity and confidence to help you achieve the results you need, every day.

The Kepner-Tregoe decision making model is a structured process that helps people make better decisions. It involves setting clear objectives, assessing and prioritizing alternatives, and creating ways to control potential negative effects. The framework is sometimes referred to as the KT matrix, the KT method or Problem Solving and Decision Making (PSDM). Developed by Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe, it’s an unbiased process that’s designed to limit unconscious biases.

The KT process includes a step called “Situation Appraisal.” This involves evaluating the current state of the problem and identifying possible threats and opportunities. This step is critical to ensuring that the solution addresses the right issues and is effective.

Another critical KT methodology component is the Problem Analysis step, which is used to identify and prioritize possible causes of the problem. This step is important because it helps to ensure that the final solution will resolve the problem and prevent it from occurring again.

KT techniques can be applied to a wide range of business decision-making processes, including project management, customer service, quality assurance, and operations. It’s a useful tool for solving complex problems and improving communication across teams.

Whether you’re an individual making business decisions or leading a team, learning KT methodologies can help you think more clearly and make confident choices. Our KT Decision Analysis course teaches you the key principles of this scalable, systematic decision-making method and provides hands-on practice with an actual case study. The training is ideal for professionals in engineering, quality, manufacturing, IT, customer service, and more.

A structured decision making process is an excellent tool to have in your business arsenal for solving complex problems. It helps you avoid emotional reactions and other biases to come up with more reliable and effective solutions. The Kepner Tregoe method can be applied to a variety of decisions, including personnel decisions, product development, operational improvements and anything else that requires critical thinking skills.

The basic tenets of the Kepner Tregoe model are situation appraisal, problem analysis, decision analysis and potential problem analysis (Hill, 2012). It helps businesses systematically analyze a problem and identify its root causes. The model also teaches managers to evaluate each option and its risks before making a final decision.

Several companies use the Kepner Tregoe technique to improve their operations. For example, Microsoft Customer Service (CSS) implemented the method to reduce incident resolution times and improve customer satisfaction. In just three months, they were able to reduce DTS by an average of 1 day per case and total TMPI by 27 minutes per case. This was a major accomplishment for CSS.

Additionally, Toyota uses the Kepner Tregoe approach to improve production efficiencies and quality. They used the Five Whys technique alongside the Kepner Tregoe methodology to create a lean manufacturing system. This enabled them to produce cars in half the time as their competitors and improve customer satisfaction.

Amazon customer service teams also utilize the Kepner Tregoe technique to resolve customer issues. They follow a structured problem-solving process based on the matrix to determine the cause of an issue and recommend solutions. This ensures that customers get the help they need in a timely manner. Moreover, the company uses this framework to develop an organizational culture of critical questioning and comprehensive decision making.

The Kepner-Tregoe method provides a structured approach to analyzing problems and making decisions. It can help individuals and teams avoid jumping to conclusions or making assumptions based on past experience, which can lead to costly mistakes. This systematic approach to analyzing a problem also reduces the amount of time needed to resolve issues and deliver results.

The process focuses on finding the actual cause of an event instead of searching for the most convenient solution. It also emphasizes identifying potential risks and establishing a plan of action to minimize the negative effects. This method is often marketed as unbiased and limits conscious or unconscious biases. However, it’s important to remember that someone still has to assign relative values for Want objectives and options satisfaction as well as the probability of occurrence of adverse reactions.

Using the Kepner-Tregoe approach can be a great way to improve IT incident management processes and accelerate root cause analysis. Microsoft, for example, used the method to develop its Customer Support Services (CSS) organization and training, resulting in reduced case resolution times and improved customer satisfaction metrics.

Kepner-Tregoe is an excellent tool for analyzing quality and customer service issues. It identifies the “who, what, when, where, and how” of an incident or problem, making it easy for team members to find and identify the causes of an issue. It can also help to distinguish what is and what is not the problem, which is a critical step when solving complex problems. It is also easier to apply than other methodologies like Six Sigma, which requires a deeper understanding of statistical data and analysis. However, both methods have their pros and cons depending on the situation.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Using the Kepner-Tregoe Methodology for Effective Problem-Solving

The Kepner-Tregoe methodology is a problem-solving and decision-making framework that helps individuals and organizations systematically analyze problems, make decisions, and manage risks. Developed by Charles Kepner and Benjamin Tregoe in the 1950s, the methodology has been widely adopted by businesses, governments, and other organizations worldwide. One of the core components of the Kepner-Tregoe methodology is the use of a matrix to identify the root cause of a problem. In this article, we will explore how the matrix works and how it can be used to solve complex problems.

The Kepner-Tregoe methodology consists of four distinct steps: Situation Appraisal, Problem Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Potential Problem Analysis. Each step is designed to help individuals and teams approach complex problems in a structured and systematic way. In this article, we will focus on the Problem Analysis step, which involves identifying the root cause of a problem using a matrix.

The Problem Analysis step begins with defining the problem. This step involves clearly stating the problem and its impact on the organization. Next, the team identifies the symptoms of the problem. Symptoms are the visible or measurable indicators of the problem. Once the symptoms are identified, the team uses a matrix to identify the root cause of the problem.

The matrix used in the Kepner-Tregoe methodology is called the Cause and Effect Analysis matrix, also known as the Ishikawa or fishbone diagram. The matrix is a visual tool that helps individuals and teams identify the underlying causes of a problem. The matrix is structured like a fishbone, with the problem or effect at the head of the fishbone and the potential causes of the problem branching off like a fish’s bones.

To use the matrix, the team first identifies the problem or effect that needs to be analyzed. This is written at the head of the fishbone. Next, the team identifies the major categories of potential causes that may be contributing to the problem. These categories are written on the main branches of the fishbone. Examples of potential categories include people, processes, technology, and the environment.

Once the major categories are identified, the team begins to brainstorm the potential causes within each category. Each potential cause is written on a small branch of the fishbone. The team continues to brainstorm potential causes until all potential causes have been identified.

Once the potential causes have been identified, the team begins to analyze each cause to determine its likelihood of contributing to the problem. This analysis involves evaluating each potential cause based on its ability to explain the symptoms of the problem. The team also considers the likelihood that each potential cause is contributing to the problem and the potential impact of each cause on the organization.

Based on this analysis, the team can identify the root cause of the problem. The root cause is the underlying issue causing the problem’s symptoms. Once the root cause has been identified, the team can develop and implement a solution to address the problem.

In conclusion, the Kepner-Tregoe methodology is a powerful tool for problem-solving and decision-making. The Problem Analysis step, which uses the Cause and Effect Analysis matrix, is a critical methodology component. By using the matrix, teams can systematically identify the root cause of a problem and develop effective solutions. Whether you are an individual or a team member, the Kepner-Tregoe methodology can help you approach complex problems confidently and clearly.

References: Kepner, C. H., & Tregoe, B. B. (2013). The new rational manager. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Research Press. Wu, T. (2019). An overview of the Kepner-Tregoe problem-solving methodology. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship

• More By sensei
• More In Blog

Maximize Efficiency with the Right Plant Layout: A Comprehensive Guide

Harnessing Business Excellence in Manufacturing Through the PDCA Approach

The Fishbone Diagram

Unlock the Power of Continuous Learning with Udemy’s Frequent Sales

How to Ace Your Next Job Interview: Expert Insights and Strategies

Mastering the Trio: Project, Program & Portfolio Management

Behaviors that kill employee motivation

Common Interview Questions for Project Management Roles

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

4M Analysis Process

The purpose of this procedure is to define the steps to do a 4M …

PDCA – A Process Approach

OPL – One Point Lesson Template – Free Download

5S Audit Checklist and Report

Why-Why Analysis

Blog Search

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• About Our Ads

An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services

• Search All AHRQ Sites
• Email Updates

Informing Improvement in Care Quality, Safety, and Efficiency

• Contact DHR

Kepner-Tregoe Matrix

A Kepner-Tregoe matrix is used to find causes of a problem. It isolates the who, what, when, where, and how aspects of an event, keeping the focus on the elements that have an impact on the event and eliminating the elements that do not. This allows you to compare what the problem is, with what it is not, illuminating distinctive features of the problem and pointing out its potential causes.

To clarify what the problem is not about.

When identifying the causes of quality problems.

When brainstorming.

1. DESCRIBE THE EVENT in a clear manner so it can be understood by everyone.

2. PRODUCE AN EMPTY MATRIX of six rows by four columns. Fill the headings of the 4 colums with the following: "performance shortcoming," "is," "is not," and "distinction." Below the top row, fill the row headings of the rows with the following: "what occurs, what objects are affected?," "where does the problem occur?", "when does the problem occur?", "extent of shortcomings?", and "who is involved?"

3. RECORD THE PROBLEM OR EVENT under analysis in the upper left-hand corner of the matrix.

4. DESCRIBE WHAT DID OR DOES OCCUR using the "is" column. Determine the objects affected and what specifically occurs. Determine the location of the event. Determine when the event occurs, whether it has recurred, whether it happens in conjunction with any other events, and any patterns observed.

5. DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE PROBLEM. Think about how many objects had problems and how many problems each object had. Determine the severity of the problems.

6. DETERMINE WHO is involved in the event. However, ensure that this step does not assign blame.

7. IDENTIFY CIRCUMSTANCES that could occur but do not recur using the "is not" column.

8. Examine the "is" and "is not" columns to IDENTIFY WHAT IS DIFFERENT OR UNUSUAL about events where the problem exists versus where it is absent ("is" versus "is not"). Record your observations in the "distinctions" column.

9. FOR EACH DISTINCTION DETERMINE whether it relates to a known change. Examine how the change could have caused the problem. Record all possible causes.

10. TEST ALL POSSIBLE CAUSES BY DETERMINING whether the each item in the "is" and "is not" columns can be explained by the cause. The most likely cause explains every aspect of the problem.

11. PLAN AN EXPERIMENT TO VERIFY THE CAUSE(S) identified, if possible.

Can be used at any stage of a process improvement effort.

Is a useful tool for problem discovery and resolution.

Offers exhaustive process for accurate problem definition.

Is time consuming.

Andersen B. Tools for analyzing the performance shortcoming. In: O'Mara P, editor. Business process improvement toolkit. 2nd ed. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press; 2007. p. 123-55.

Tague N. The tools. In: O'Mara P, editor. The quality toolbox. 2nd ed. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press; 2005. p. 93-521.

Lighter D. Process orientation in health care quality. In: Moore C, editor. Quality management in health care: principles and methods. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004. p. 43-101.

• Director's Corner
• Current Priorities
• Executive Summary
• Research Spotlight
• Research Themes and Findings
• Research Dissemination
• Research Overview
• 2020 Year in Review
• 2019 Year in Review
• Engaging and Empowering Patients
• Optimizing Care Delivery for Clinicians
• Supporting Health Systems in Advancing Care Delivery
• Our Experts
• Search AHRQ-Funded Projects
• AHRQ-Funded Projects Map
• AHRQ Digital Healthcare Research Publications Database
• A Practical Guide for Implementing the Digital Healthcare Equity Framework
• ePROs in Clinical Care
• Guide to Integrate Patient-Generated Digital Health Data into Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care Settings
• Health IT Survey Compendium
• Time and Motion Studies Database
• Health Information Security and Privacy Collaboration Toolkit
• Implementation in Independent Pharmacies
• Implementation in Physician Offices
• Children's Electronic Health Record (EHR) Format
• Project Resources Archives
• Archived Tools & Resources
• National Webinars
• Funding Opportunities
• Digital Healthcare Research Home
• 2018 Year in Review Home
• Research Summary
• Research Spotlights
• 2019 Year in Review Home
• Annual Report Home

• Our Courses

Problem Solving Basics - eLearning

Research shows that the #1 skill organizations will require by 2020 is the ability to solve complex problems. The key to being an effective problem solver is knowing which type of problem you’re trying to solve, the tools to use, and how they complement each other. In this 90-minute, self-paced course, you will learn about the problem solving ecosystem, the basics of the different tools available, and when to employ each tool.

To preview Problem Solving Basics for Free, click  https://ktlms.litmos.com/self-signup/  and enter code: KTPSBPreview

You should take this course if you:

• Feel overwhelmed by the different types of problems you're asked to solve
• Have heard about (and maybe used) many different problem-solving tools, like 5 Whys, Fishbones, Six Sigma, and IS/IS NOTs, but don't know which to choose
• Want a brief overview of Kepner-Tregoe's Problem Analysis, the root cause analysis tool that helped bring home Apollo 13

What you will learn:

• How to identify the type of problem you are trying to solve
• How to choose the right tool to fix each problem
• The pros and cons associated with each tool
• How each tool can work effectively with KT’s Problem Analysis to solve the toughest problems

So what are you waiting for? Get ahead of the pack and improve your problem-solving skills today.

The course is self-paced, 90-minutes long, and you'll have 90 days to complete it once you purchase it. To view the course, your device will need to meet these requirements .

Questions? Email [email protected] for additional information.

Added to your cart:

Essential Operational Management Skills

Table of Contents

What are operational management skills, importance of operations management skills, hard skills for operations managers, soft skills for operations managers, the importance of continuous learning.

In any organization, operational managers are crucial for success. To be a strong operations manager, you need a unique blend of technical expertise, leadership, strategic foresight, and effective communication. This article speaks to all of these required skills, with a special emphasis on the last one: the importance of strong writing across various operations management functions. Excelling in operations management not only requires technical skills and strategic vision but also the ability to convey your ideas, strategies, and analyses through clear and persuasive writing.

Operational management skills encompass the competencies required to plan, direct, and coordinate the operations of an organization. These skills are not limited to the knowledge of business operations but extend to the ability to manage teams, make data-driven decisions, and optimize operational costs for enhanced efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Operations management is pivotal for achieving operational excellence, ensuring quality standards are met, and aligning the operations with the strategic goals of the organization. Effective management of operations directly impacts customer satisfaction, operational costs, and the organization’s ability to compete in the market. Therefore, developing a robust skill set in operations management is crucial for anyone aspiring to excel in this role. 

Learn how to write effectively as an operations manager and improve your career.

Hard skills are technical, teachable abilities that are often industry-specific and crucial for any operations manager aiming for excellence in their role. 

Analytical and Problem-Solving Skills

Operational management is deeply rooted in identifying problems and creating solutions. Writing also plays a pivotal role. Operations managers must not only analyze complex situations but also document their findings, draft reports, and communicate their strategies effectively. The capacity to compose clear analyses and articulate problem-solving methodologies in writing is indispensable for securing stakeholder support and guiding teams.

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Beyond mastering tools like Excel, SQL, or specific data management systems, conveying the implications of data analysis through well-structured reports or presentations is fundamental. This involves crafting compelling narratives around data to inform decision-making processes, highlight trends, and advocate for strategic changes.

Process Improvement

In process improvement, the documentation of current processes, identification of inefficiencies, and proposal of improvements heavily rely on clear and effective writing. From drafting workflow analyses to writing process improvement proposals, the ability to clearly articulate these aspects is crucial for convincing stakeholders of the need for change and for ensuring that improvements are comprehensively understood and implemented.

Project Management

Project management is a core skill for operations managers. With a focus on delivering projects within scope, time, and budget constraints, project management skills ensure that managers can plan, execute, and finalize projects in alignment with the organization's goals. Effective project management also involves risk management, ensuring that potential issues are identified and mitigated early in the project lifecycle.

Financial Acumen

Financial acumen allows managers to budget accurately, forecast operational costs, and identify cost savings opportunities. By effectively managing the financial aspects of operations, managers contribute to the overall financial health of the organization, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently and strategically to support business goals. Operational decisions have significant financial implications, so a strong understanding of finances, risks, and opportunities is crucial for an operational manager.

The ability to write and communicate about these topics effectively is also a key skill. You must be able to create and explain budgets, financial forecasts, and cost-benefit analyses in a manner that is understandable and compelling to all types of stakeholders. The financial reasoning behind your decisions must always be clearly articulated and supported by written evidence. 

Learn more about this in What Does a Financial Writer Do?

Technology Literacy

As technology continually reshapes the landscape of operational management, the ability to document technological implementations, write user guides, and communicate about new systems through written reports or training manuals becomes increasingly valuable. Writing thus becomes a bridge between technological advancements and their practical application within an organization.

Operational Excellence and Risk Management

Achieving operational excellence requires a commitment to continuous improvement and quality management. Operations managers must focus on optimizing business processes, reducing operational costs, and enhancing customer satisfaction. Risk management plays a critical role in this context, as it involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks that could impact the organization’s operations and objectives.

While hard skills are essential for operations manager roles, soft skills such as interpersonal skills, communication skills, and team leadership are equally important. These skills foster a collaborative environment, enhance team performance, and ensure all team members are aligned with the organization's objectives.

Interpersonal Skills

Building strong relationships within and across teams helps create a positive work environment and facilitates the smooth execution of operations. Creating a collaborative environment is key to leveraging the strengths of cross-functional teams.

Communication Skills

Clear and effective communication is crucial for conveying expectations, providing feedback, and ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and engaged. This communication takes place verbally and in writing, so it’s essential to cultivate both skills.

Written communication is especially salient. Operations managers write correctly, clearly, and persuasively, whether it be through email/chat, proposals, or strategic documents, to inspire and lead their teams effectively. Strong writing enhances managers' abilities to influence outcomes and drive collective action toward common objectives.

The business landscape is constantly evolving, making continuous learning an invaluable skill for operations managers. Staying updated on industry trends, emerging technologies, and best practices in operational management is essential for driving innovation and maintaining a competitive edge.

This ongoing educational commitment is vital not just for personal and professional growth but also for organizations to maintain a competitive edge. Within this spectrum of learning, developing robust business writing skills emerges as a critical component. Effective communication, enabled by proficient business writing, is crucial for articulating complex ideas, drafting project proposals, and documenting decisions accurately.

The importance of business writing cannot be overstated, as it plays a pivotal role in both internal and external organizational communications. For internal operations, clarity in writing minimizes misunderstandings, facilitating a seamless workflow and enhancing overall productivity. Externally, it enables stronger stakeholder relationships, opens new avenues for business, and bolsters the organization's image. 

Business writing courses offer a comprehensive curriculum encompassing grammar, tone, style, and document structure, thus preparing operations managers to adapt their messaging for varied audiences, ensuring clarity and actionable communication.

This investment in learning and skill development not only empowers managers but is also indispensable for navigating the complexities of modern business, driving operational success, and achieving sustained organizational growth.

Meet one-on-one with an instructor to review your actual operational documents together.

The skills we’ve outlined above are the foundation of effective operational management for business. These skills empower operations managers to drive efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure customer satisfaction. By focusing on both hard skills and soft skills, operations managers can lead their teams to achieve operational excellence and contribute significantly to the organization’s success.

In a landscape marked by rapid change and technological advancement, the commitment to continuous learning and adaptation is what distinguishes exceptional operations managers. Enrolling in our Executive Summary Writing Course is a great way to improve your communication skills.

By developing a comprehensive skill set and knowing how and when to prioritize key initiatives, operations managers can navigate the complexities of the modern business environment and lead their organizations toward sustainable growth and success.

Related Articles

Communication skills for excellent managers, is grammar or content more important in business writing, guide to selecting credible sources for business writing, get notified of new articles.

• Business Writing Skills (57)
• Business Grammar (52)
• Technical Writing (33)
• Business Writing Resources (26)
• Business Email Writing (17)
• Business Writing Training (12)
• Business Proposals (10)
• Business Report Writing (7)
• Business Proofreading (4)
• Sales Writing (3)
• Executive Summary Writing (2)
• Customer Support Writing (1)
• Bailey Lang (1)
• Elisabeth O'Quinn (14)
• Grace Cuddy (6)
• Haley Larsen (4)
• Kara Latz (10)
• Katie Almeida Spencer (31)
• Malcolm Stiefel (1)
• Mary Cullen (134)
• Samantha Taylor (6)
• Terrance Collins (1)
• Tom DuPuis (10)

Explained: Importance of critical thinking, problem-solving skills in curriculum

F uture careers are no longer about domain expertise or technical skills. Rather, critical thinking and problem-solving skills in employees are on the wish list of every big organization today. Even curriculums and pedagogies across the globe and within India are now requiring skilled workers who are able to think critically and are analytical.

The reason for this shift in perspective is very simple.

These skills provide a staunch foundation for comprehensive learning that extends beyond books or the four walls of the classroom. In a nutshell, critical thinking and problem-solving skills are a part of '21st Century Skills' that can help unlock valuable learning for life.

Over the years, the education system has been moving away from the system of rote and other conventional teaching and learning parameters.

They are aligning their curriculums to the changing scenario which is becoming more tech-driven and demands a fusion of critical skills, life skills, values, and domain expertise. There's no set formula for success.

Rather, there's a defined need for humans to be more creative, innovative, adaptive, agile, risk-taking, and have a problem-solving mindset.

In today's scenario, critical thinking and problem-solving skills have become more important because they open the human mind to multiple possibilities, solutions, and a mindset that is interdisciplinary in nature.

Therefore, many schools and educational institutions are deploying AI and immersive learning experiences via gaming, and AR-VR technologies to give a more realistic and hands-on learning experience to their students that hone these abilities and help them overcome any doubt or fear.

ADVANTAGES OF CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM-SOLVING IN CURRICULUM

Ability to relate to the real world:  Instead of theoretical knowledge, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills encourage students to look at their immediate and extended environment through a spirit of questioning, curiosity, and learning. When the curriculum presents students with real-world problems, the learning is immense.

Confidence, agility & collaboration : Critical thinking and problem-solving skills boost self-belief and confidence as students examine, re-examine, and sometimes fail or succeed while attempting to do something.

They are able to understand where they may have gone wrong, attempt new approaches, ask their peers for feedback and even seek their opinion, work together as a team, and learn to face any challenge by responding to it.

Willingness to try new things: When problem-solving skills and critical thinking are encouraged by teachers, they set a robust foundation for young learners to experiment, think out of the box, and be more innovative and creative besides looking for new ways to upskill.

It's important to understand that merely introducing these skills into the curriculum is not enough. Schools and educational institutions must have upskilling workshops and conduct special training for teachers so as to ensure that they are skilled and familiarized with new teaching and learning techniques and new-age concepts that can be used in the classrooms via assignments and projects.

Critical thinking and problem-solving skills are two of the most sought-after skills. Hence, schools should emphasise the upskilling of students as a part of the academic curriculum.

The article is authored by Dr Tassos Anastasiades, Principal- IB, Genesis Global School, Noida. 

Watch Live TV in English

Watch Live TV in Hindi

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

The Algebra Problem: How Middle School Math Became a National Flashpoint

Top students can benefit greatly by being offered the subject early. But many districts offer few Black and Latino eighth graders a chance to study it.

By Troy Closson

From suburbs in the Northeast to major cities on the West Coast, a surprising subject is prompting ballot measures, lawsuits and bitter fights among parents: algebra.

Students have been required for decades to learn to solve for the variable x, and to find the slope of a line. Most complete the course in their first year of high school. But top-achievers are sometimes allowed to enroll earlier, typically in eighth grade.

The dual pathways inspire some of the most fiery debates over equity and academic opportunity in American education.

Do bias and inequality keep Black and Latino children off the fast track? Should middle schools eliminate algebra to level the playing field? What if standout pupils lose the chance to challenge themselves?

The questions are so fraught because algebra functions as a crucial crossroads in the education system. Students who fail it are far less likely to graduate. Those who take it early can take calculus by 12th grade, giving them a potential edge when applying to elite universities and lifting them toward society’s most high-status and lucrative professions.

But racial and economic gaps in math achievement are wide in the United States, and grew wider during the pandemic. In some states, nearly four in five poor children do not meet math standards.

To close those gaps, New York City’s previous mayor, Bill de Blasio, adopted a goal embraced by many districts elsewhere. Every middle school would offer algebra, and principals could opt to enroll all of their eighth graders in the class. San Francisco took an opposite approach: If some children could not reach algebra by middle school, no one would be allowed to take it.

The central mission in both cities was to help disadvantaged students. But solving the algebra dilemma can be more complex than solving the quadratic formula.

New York’s dream of “algebra for all” was never fully realized, and Mayor Eric Adams’s administration changed the goal to improving outcomes for ninth graders taking algebra. In San Francisco, dismantling middle-school algebra did little to end racial inequities among students in advanced math classes. After a huge public outcry, the district decided to reverse course.

“You wouldn’t think that there could be a more boring topic in the world,” said Thurston Domina, a professor at the University of North Carolina. “And yet, it’s this place of incredibly high passions.”

“Things run hot,” he said.

In some cities, disputes over algebra have been so intense that parents have sued school districts, protested outside mayors’ offices and campaigned for the ouster of school board members.

Teaching math in middle school is a challenge for educators in part because that is when the material becomes more complex, with students moving from multiplication tables to equations and abstract concepts. Students who have not mastered the basic skills can quickly become lost, and it can be difficult for them to catch up.

Many school districts have traditionally responded to divergent achievement levels by simply separating children into distinct pathways, placing some in general math classes while offering others algebra as an accelerated option. Such sorting, known as tracking, appeals to parents who want their children to reach advanced math as quickly as possible.

But tracking has cast an uncomfortable spotlight on inequality. Around a quarter of all students in the United States take algebra in middle school. But only about 12 percent of Black and Latino eighth graders do, compared with roughly 24 percent of white pupils, a federal report found .

“That’s why middle school math is this flashpoint,” said Joshua Goodman, an associate professor of education and economics at Boston University. “It’s the first moment where you potentially make it very obvious and explicit that there are knowledge gaps opening up.”

In the decades-long war over math, San Francisco has emerged as a prominent battleground.

California once required that all eighth graders take algebra. But lower-performing middle school students often struggle when forced to enroll in the class, research shows. San Francisco later stopped offering the class in eighth grade. But the ban did little to close achievement gaps in more advanced math classes, recent research has found.

As the pendulum swung, the only constant was anger. Leading Bay Area academics disparaged one another’s research . A group of parents even sued the district last spring. “Denying students the opportunity to skip ahead in math when their intellectual ability clearly allows for it greatly harms their potential for future achievement,” their lawsuit said.

The city is now back to where it began: Middle school algebra — for some, not necessarily for all — will return in August. The experience underscored how every approach carries risks.

“Schools really don’t know what to do,” said Jon R. Star, an educational psychologist at Harvard who has studied algebra education. “And it’s just leading to a lot of tension.”

In Cambridge, Mass., the school district phased out middle school algebra before the pandemic. But some argued that the move had backfired: Families who could afford to simply paid for their children to take accelerated math outside of school.

“It’s the worst of all possible worlds for equity,” Jacob Barandes, a Cambridge parent, said at a school board meeting.

Elsewhere, many students lack options to take the class early: One of Philadelphia’s most prestigious high schools requires students to pass algebra before enrolling, preventing many low-income children from applying because they attend middle schools that do not offer the class.

In New York, Mr. de Blasio sought to tackle the disparities when he announced a plan in 2015 to offer algebra — but not require it — in all of the city’s middle schools. More than 15,000 eighth graders did not have the class at their schools at the time.

Since then, the number of middle schools that offer algebra has risen to about 80 percent from 60 percent. But white and Asian American students still pass state algebra tests at higher rates than their peers.

The city’s current schools chancellor, David Banks, also shifted the system’s algebra focus to high schools, requiring the same ninth-grade curriculum at many schools in a move that has won both support and backlash from educators.

And some New York City families are still worried about middle school. A group of parent leaders in Manhattan recently asked the district to create more accelerated math options before high school, saying that many young students must seek out higher-level instruction outside the public school system.

In a vast district like New York — where some schools are filled with children from well-off families and others mainly educate homeless children — the challenge in math education can be that “incredible diversity,” said Pedro A. Noguera, the dean of the University of Southern California’s Rossier School of Education.

“You have some kids who are ready for algebra in fourth grade, and they should not be denied it,” Mr. Noguera said. “Others are still struggling with arithmetic in high school, and they need support.”

Many schools are unequipped to teach children with disparate math skills in a single classroom. Some educators lack the training they need to help students who have fallen behind, while also challenging those working at grade level or beyond.

Some schools have tried to find ways to tackle the issue on their own. KIPP charter schools in New York have added an additional half-hour of math time to many students’ schedules, to give children more time for practice and support so they can be ready for algebra by eighth grade.

At Middle School 50 in Brooklyn, where all eighth graders take algebra, teachers rewrote lesson plans for sixth- and seventh-grade students to lay the groundwork for the class.

The school’s principal, Ben Honoroff, said he expected that some students would have to retake the class in high school. But after starting a small algebra pilot program a few years ago, he came to believe that exposing children early could benefit everyone — as long as students came into it well prepared.

Looking around at the students who were not enrolling in the class, Mr. Honoroff said, “we asked, ‘Are there other kids that would excel in this?’”

“The answer was 100 percent, yes,” he added. “That was not something that I could live with.”

Troy Closson reports on K-12 schools in New York City for The Times. More about Troy Closson

• Newsletters

IE 11 Not Supported

Opinion: what is higher ed’s role in providing ai job skills, in addition to programming and technical skills, the next generation of ai developers may also need training in subjects traditionally aligned with liberal-arts education, such as ethics, problem-solving and communication..

WHAT AI WILL DO — AND WHAT IT STILL CAN’T

Critical skills for working in ai, according to ai, ai replacing jobs in higher ed.