critical thinking in nursing references

Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group Quantitative Psychology (2017-SGR-269), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 2 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group on Gender, Identity and Diversity (2017-SGR-1091), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 3 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 4 Multidisciplinary Nursing Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
• PMID: 33029860
• DOI: 10.1111/nup.12332

Critical thinking is a complex, dynamic process formed by attitudes and strategic skills, with the aim of achieving a specific goal or objective. The attitudes, including the critical thinking attitudes, constitute an important part of the idea of good care, of the good professional. It could be said that they become a virtue of the nursing profession. In this context, the ethics of virtue is a theoretical framework that becomes essential for analyse the critical thinking concept in nursing care and nursing science. Because the ethics of virtue consider how cultivating virtues are necessary to understand and justify the decisions and guide the actions. Based on selective analysis of the descriptive and empirical literature that addresses conceptual review of critical thinking, we conducted an analysis of this topic in the settings of clinical practice, training and research from the virtue ethical framework. Following JBI critical appraisal checklist for text and opinion papers, we argue the need for critical thinking as an essential element for true excellence in care and that it should be encouraged among professionals. The importance of developing critical thinking skills in education is well substantiated; however, greater efforts are required to implement educational strategies directed at developing critical thinking in students and professionals undergoing training, along with measures that demonstrate their success. Lastly, we show that critical thinking constitutes a fundamental component in the research process, and can improve research competencies in nursing. We conclude that future research and actions must go further in the search for new evidence and open new horizons, to ensure a positive effect on clinical practice, patient health, student education and the growth of nursing science.

Keywords: critical thinking; critical thinking attitudes; nurse education; nursing care; nursing research.

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

• Attitude of Health Personnel*
• Education, Nursing / methods
• Nursing Process
• Nursing Research / methods

Grants and funding

• PREI-19-007-B/School of Nursing. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. University of Barcelona

• - Google Chrome

Intended for healthcare professionals

• Access provided by Google Indexer
• My email alerts
• BMA member login
• Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution

Search form

• Advanced search
• Search responses
• Search blogs
• News & Views
• Margaret McCartney:...

Nurses are critical thinkers

Rapid response to:

Margaret McCartney: Nurses must be allowed to exercise professional judgment

• Related content
• Article metrics
• Rapid responses

Rapid Response:

The characteristic that distinguishes a professional nurse is cognitive rather than psychomotor ability. Nursing practice demands that practitioners display sound judgement and decision-making skills as critical thinking and clinical decision making is an essential component of nursing practice. Nurses’ ability to recognize and respond to signs of patient deterioration in a timely manner plays a pivotal role in patient outcomes (Purling & King 2012). Errors in clinical judgement and decision making are said to account for more than half of adverse clinical events (Tomlinson, 2015). The focus of the nurse clinical judgement has to be on quality evidence based care delivery, therefore, observational and reasoning skills will result in sound, reliable, clinical judgements. Clinical judgement, a concept which is critical to the nursing can be complex, because the nurse is required to use observation skills, identify relevant information, to identify the relationships among given elements through reasoning and judgement. Clinical reasoning is the process by which nurses observe patients status, process the information, come to an understanding of the patient problem, plan and implement interventions, evaluate outcomes, with reflection and learning from the process (Levett-Jones et al, 2010). At all times, nurses are responsible for their actions and are accountable for nursing judgment and action or inaction.

The speed and ability by which the nurses make sound clinical judgement is affected by their experience. Novice nurses may find this process difficult, whereas the experienced nurse should rely on her intuition, followed by fast action. Therefore education must begin at the undergraduate level to develop students’ critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills. Clinical reasoning is a learnt skill requiring determination and active engagement in deliberate practice design to improve performance. In order to acquire such skills, students need to develop critical thinking ability, as well as an understanding of how judgements and decisions are reached in complex healthcare environments.

As lifelong learners, nurses are constantly accumulating more knowledge, expertise, and experience, and it’s a rare nurse indeed who chooses to not apply his or her mind towards the goal of constant learning and professional growth. Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on the Future of Nursing, stated, that nurses must continue their education and engage in lifelong learning to gain the needed competencies for practice. American Nurses Association (ANA), Scope and Standards of Practice requires a nurse to remain involved in continuous learning and strengthening individual practice (p.26)

Alfaro-LeFevre, R. (2009). Critical thinking and clinical judgement: A practical approach to outcome-focused thinking. (4th ed.). St Louis: Elsevier

The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health, (2010). https://campaignforaction.org/resource/future-nursing-iom-report

Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K. Dempsey, Y. Jeong, S., Noble, D., Norton, C., Roche, J., & Hickey, N. (2010). The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Education Today. 30(6), 515-520.

NMC (2010) New Standards for Pre-Registration Nursing. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council.

Purling A. & King L. (2012). A literature review: graduate nurses’ preparedness for recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(23–24), 3451–3465

Thompson, C., Aitken, l., Doran, D., Dowing, D. (2013). An agenda for clinical decision making and judgement in nursing research and education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50 (12), 1720 - 1726 Tomlinson, J. (2015). Using clinical supervision to improve the quality and safety of patient care: a response to Berwick and Francis. BMC Medical Education, 15(103)

Competing interests: No competing interests

Clinical Nurse Educators' LibGuide

• Keeping up to date This link opens in a new window
• Recent articles from the Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
• Critical thinking and clinical reasoning
• LibGuides Homepage This link opens in a new window

Library support

Library staff can assist you with:

• Literature searching
• Research skills training and support
• EndNote training
• Advice regarding getting published
• Document delivery to obtain full text of journal articles 
• And more... see the  Library website

Contact or visit your local  CLIN Library  to find out more about our full range of services and for assistance with your research project.

Some articles on critical thinking in nursing practice

• Fero, L. J., et al. (2009). "Critical thinking ability of new graduate and experienced nurses." Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(1): 139-148. This paper is a report of a study to identify critical thinking learning needs of new and experienced nurses. Concern for patient safety has grown worldwide as high rates of error and injury continue to be reported. In order to improve patient safety, nurses must be able to recognize changes in patient condition, perform independent nursing interventions, anticipate orders and prioritize. Conclusion. Patient safety may be compromised if a nurse cannot provide clinically competent care. Assessments such as the Performance Based Development System can provide information about learning needs and facilitate individualized orientation targeted to increase performance level. © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Jacob, E., et al. (2018). "Development of an Australian nursing critical thinking tool using a Delphi process." Journal of Advanced Nursing. AIM To develop a critical thinking assessment tool for Australian undergraduate nurses. BACKGROUND Critical thinking is an important skill but difficult to assess in nursing practice. There are often many responses a nurse can make to a clinical problem or situation. Some responses are more correct than others and these decisions have an impact on a patient's care and safety. Differences in a response can relate to the depth of knowledge, experience and critical thinking ability of the individual nurse. DESIGN This study used a Delphi process to develop five clinical case studies together with the most appropriate clinical responses to 25 clinical questions. RESULTS Four rounds of Delphi questions were required to reach consensus on the correct wording and answers for the scenarios. Five case studies have been developed with nursing responses to patient management in rank order from most correct to least correct. CONCLUSION Use of the tool should provide confidence that a nurse has met a certain level of critical thinking ability.
• Ludin, S. M. (2017). "Does good critical thinking equal effective decision-making among critical care nurses? A cross-sectional survey."Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. v. 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.06.002 Background: A critical thinker may not necessarily be a good decision-maker, but critical care nurses are expected to utilise outstanding critical thinking skills in making complex clinical judgements. Studies have shown that critical care nurses' decisions focus mainly on doing rather than reflecting. To date, the link between critical care nurses' critical thinking and decision-making has not been examined closely in Malaysia.
• Simpson, E. and M. Courtney (2002). "Critical thinking in nursing education: literature review." International journal of nursing practice 8(2): 89-98. The need for critical thinking in nursing has been accentuated in response to the rapidly changing health-care environment. Nurses must think critically to provide effective care while coping with the expansion in role associated with the complexities of current health-care systems. This literature review will present a history of inquiry into critical thinking and research to support the conclusion that critical thinking is necessary not only in the clinical practice setting, but also as an integral component of nursing-education programmes to promote the development of nurses' critical-thinking abilities. The aims of this paper are to: (i) review the literature on critical thinking; (ii) examine the dimensions of critical thinking; (iii) investigate the various critical thinking strategies for their appropriateness to enhance critical thinking in nurses; and (iv) examine issues relating to the evaluation of critical-thinking skills in nursing.
• Turner, P. (2005) "Critical thinking in nursing education and practice as defined in the literature". Nursing Education Perspectives 26(5): 272-277. Critical thinking is frequently discussed in nursing education and nursing practice literature. This article presents an analysis of the concept of critical thinking as it applies to nursing, differentiating its use in education and practice literature. Three computerized databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EBSCO) were searched for the years 1981 to 2002, using the keywords critical thinking. References were stratified into two 11-year periods (1981-1991, 1992-2002) to identify changes in the concept over time and integration of the concept differentially into nursing education and nursing practice. A random sample of literature from each stratum was coded for definitions, attributes, surrogate terms, referents, antecedents, and consequences of critical thinking. Critical thinking as a nursing concept has matured since its first appearance in the literature. It is well defined and has clear characteristics. However, antecedents and consequences are not well defined, and many consequences are identical to attributes and surrogate terms. Additional work is needed to clarify the boundaries of the concept of critical thinking in nursing.

Books on critical thinking and clinical reasoning

• << Previous: Recent articles from the Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
• Next: LibGuides Homepage >>
• Last Updated: May 1, 2024 11:54 AM
• URL: https://swslhd.libguides.com/CNE

Log in using your username and password

• Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
• Latest content
• For authors
• Browse by collection
• BMJ Journals More You are viewing from: Google Indexer

You are here

• Volume 10, Issue 1
• Teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking in bachelor nursing students: a scoping review protocol
• Article Text
• Article info
• Citation Tools
• Rapid Responses
• Article metrics

• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-0086 Frida Westerdahl 1 ,
• Elisabeth Carlson 1 ,
• Anne Wennick 1 ,
• Gunilla Borglin 1 , 2
• 1 Department of Care Science , Malmö University , Malmö , Sweden
• 2 Nursing Education , Lovisenberg Diaconal University College , Oslo , Norway
• Correspondence to Frida Westerdahl; frida.nygren{at}mau.se

Introduction Applying critical thinking is essential for nursing students both in an academic and clinical context. Particularly, as critical thinking is a vital part of nurses’ everyday problem-solving and decision-making processes. Therefore, regardless of the topic taught or the setting in which it is taught, it requires teaching strategies especially targeting students’ critical thinking skills and abilities. One challenge with the latter is the difficulties to assess and evaluate the impact of such teaching strategies on the students’ critical thinking disposition. Hence, our objective will be to review published literature on; existing teaching strategies and outcomes assessments targeting nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities.

Methods and analysis Our scoping review will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for scoping studies. Search strategies will be developed in cooperation with an experienced librarian, and adjusted to each individual database for example, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC and ERC. A preliminary search in CINAHL was conducted on the 17 th of July 2019. Peer-reviewed published studies conducted with a qualitative, quantitative or mixed method design and focussing our objectives, will be eligible for inclusion. Included studies will be quality assessed in accordance with their study design. Data will be charted using a standardised extraction form. The qualitative data will be presented through a thematic analyses, and the quantitative data by descriptive numerical analysis. Lastly, nurse educators and nursing students will be consulted for validation of the findings from the scoping review.

Ethics and dissemination Under the Swedish Ethical Review Act (2003:460) this study does not need ethical clearance by a Regional Ethical Review Authority as it not includes any primary empirical data on biological material or sensitive information. The findings will be used to inform the design of a future study aiming to develop an, and subsequently evaluate it, educational intervention targeting teaching strategies focussing on nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities.

• critical thinking abilities
• critical thinking skills
• descriptive numerical analysis
• nurse educators
• thematic analysis

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Strengths and limitations of this study

To ensure rigour and transparency the upcoming scoping review will be based on (1) a solid methodological framework for scoping studies and (2) the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

A minimum of two members of the review team will independently assess study eligibility.

Eligible studies will be quality assessed in accordance with their study design.

To achieve a comprehensive picture of the existing research qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods designs will be included in this scoping review.

One limitation might be the potential risk for publication bias since grey literature will not be included, as this will facilitate charting of teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking skills and abilities as described solely in published research.

Introduction

Applying critical thinking is essential for bachelor nursing students (hereafter nursing students); particularly, considering the complex care situations they regularly will find themselves in after graduation. 1 Care situations that among others require them to work in accordance with established standards 2 to be able to contribute to a safe, evidence based and optimal clinical practice. Given that nursing is based on scientific knowledge, critical thinking is the reasonable reflection to justify nursing actions based on evidence. Skills and abilities in critical thinking have consequently been found to predict nursing competence together with working years, position, title and educational level, that is, Bachelor or Master in Nursing. 3 Critical thinking is, therefore, a crucial component of every registered nurse’s daily activities, aiding problem-solving and decision-making processes. 4

According to Scheffer and Rubenfeld the ability to execute critical thinking in nursing could be seen from two perspectives; habits of the mind (cognition), and skills employed by the critical thinker. 5 Critical thinking can also be seen as a consecutive process including (i) gathering information, (ii) questioning, (iii) analysis and evaluation and (iv) problem-solving and application of theory, that is, the nursing process. 6 This consecutive process of critical thinking needs to be applied both in the clinical area and in the classroom. 7 However, to develop this ability among nursing students is a complex process. To apply critical thinking, the necessary skills and abilities need to be taught and developed during both the students’ clinical placements as well as during their theory courses throughout the nursing education. 4

One challenge with the concept of critical thinking, often highlighted in the literature, and despite its priority within the nursing education, is the interchangeable use of the concepts of critical thinking, clinical reasoning and clinical judgement. 7–9 Concepts that Victor-Chmil describe as; ‘they are not one and the same’ (p 34). It needs to be acknowledged, as the authors of this current protocol do, that critical thinking often is used as a broader term which includes the concepts of clinical reasoning and clinical judgement. 8 According to Alfaro-LeFevre clinical reasoning refers to the process used to solve clinical issues and clinical judgement refers to the outcome or conclusion of this process. 7 Therefore, regardless of the topic taught or the setting in which it is taught, requires teaching strategies especially targeting nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities. For these strategies to be favourable, it requires implementation throughout the nursing education, and thereby reflected in all parts of the nursing programmes’ learning objectives and curricula. 10 It has been outlined that teaching strategies such as, problem-based learning, concept-mapping, case-based learning interventions and reflective writing are often used in nursing programmes to support critical thinking. 6 10 11 However, another challenge with critical thinking, besides the interchangeable use of concepts, is the difficulty to assess and evaluate the impact of different teaching strategies on the students’ critical thinking disposition (ie, skills and abilities) as well as the assessment of the different components in the critical thinking process. 8 Previous reviews in the current research area have only included either experimental studies 12 or randomised clinical trials 13 measuring the effectiveness of teaching strategies. Further, other reviews have involved mixed populations including not only nursing students, but also working nurses and nursing managers 14 and midwifery students. 15 Since critical thinking is a vital part of registered nurses’ problem-solving and decision-making, this ability needs to be taught already during the nursing education. It is therefore necessary to focus the educational context of undergraduate nursing taking an extended approach on how teaching strategies targeting critical thinking are described, experienced and assessed. Hence, our overarching objective will be to review published literature on; existing teaching strategies and outcomes assessments targeting nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities.

Methods and analysis

The upcoming scoping review will address a broad topic (ie, teaching strategies targeting nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities, as well as outcome assessments of such skills and abilities), where a diverse range of study designs can be considered relevant in answering our additionally wide review questions. Our scoping review will therefore be designed in accordance with Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for scoping studies. 16 However, our design will also be informed by other more recent methodological accounts. 17 18 The framework will enable us to identify existing gaps in the literature as well as to summarise, evaluate and disseminate the overall state of research activities within the field. 16 The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR) was used to prepare this protocol. 19 PRISMA-ScR will also form the base for the upcoming scoping review as standardised reporting guidelines can according to Colquhoun et al support the critical appraisals of published reviews by expanding on their transparency and reproducibility. 20

Stage 1: identifying the research question

The research questions for the upcoming scoping review aims for comprehensiveness, that is, they will be broad to cover the breadth of research evidence in our field of focus. As scoping is an iterative methodological process, 16 it is possible for us to decide to add supplementary questions based on the findings emerging during the review process. A modified 21 PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Study Setting) framework will aid us in determining the appropriateness of the research questions, as well as guide us in our database searches ( table 1 ).

• View inline

Framework (PICOS) for determination of eligibility of review questions

Since the subsequent goal of the upcoming scoping review is to further the knowledge and understanding about how nurse educators via teaching strategies can target the development of nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities we will additionally engage in findings of relevance to this. The following tentative research questions were developed to capture the objectives of the upcoming study:

Which are the teaching strategies described in the literature as targeting critical thinking skills and abilities among nursing students?

How are these teaching strategies conceptualised, described and experienced by students and/or nurse educators for example, pros and cons?

Which outcomes are described in the literature as used to assess critical thinking skills and abilities?

Stage 2: identifying relevant studies

The upcoming scoping review will include primary studies utilising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods, published in peer-reviewed journals. This strategy will support us to achieve a comprehensive picture of the existing research focussing peer-reviewed studies on teaching strategies targeting critical thinking skills and abilities among nursing students, as well as on existing research focussing on outcome assessments of such skills and abilities. No limits will be applied concerning publication year, since we aim at conducting a comprehensive overview of published studies. Studies will be excluded if the population is not identifiable, qualitative and quantitative data is not possible to extract in case of mixed method design or published in other languages than English. All reasons for exclusion will be documented.

In our upcoming scoping review the term ‘teaching strategies’ will be used. Thus, our focus is not the overall educational organisation of teaching (ie, educational strategies) or the students’ individual general learning process (ie, learning strategies). However, as we are aware of the commonly interchangeable use in the literature of the terms; teaching strategies, educational strategies and learning strategies, they will all be included in our searches. Here the term teaching strategies are operationalised in accordance with Banning, and as encompassing three different perspectives; (i) the didactic perspective, which is teacher centred and mainly involves lectures; (ii) the facilitative perspective, focussing on self-directed learning making the students articulate their knowledge and lastly (iii) the Socratic perspective which is emphasising student-centredness and use objective questioning from the teacher. 22

The following databases; CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, ERIC and ERC will be used to search for eligible studies. These databases are chosen to cover a comprehensive sample of literature from healthcare science and education. A search strategy for each database will be developed by the review team with assistance from an experienced librarian. Our strategies will include both database specific heading that is, Medical Subject Headings, keywords and synonyms. All specific headings and key words will be combined using the Boolean operators OR as well as AND. To ensure comprehensiveness, included studies reference lists will be manually searched. As outlined by Arksey and O’Malley the search strategy should be an iterative process and the search terms could be adjusted while an increased familiarity with the literature is achieved. For this reason, a preliminary pilot search strategy will be applied to the databases and the first 100 search results will be reviewed by the review team to assess validity. 16 During the review team meetings, adjustments will be applied to the search strategy and search terms until full agreement is reached. Grey literature (ie, literature that is not formally published in sources such as journal articles or books) will not, as described elsewhere, be included in our upcoming scoping study. 23 This will support us to focus on and to chart how teaching strategies targeting skills and abilities such as critical thinking is described in published peer-reviewed research. A draft of a preliminary search in CINAHL conducted on the 17 th of July 2019 is attached in online supplementary file 1 .

Supplemental material

Stage 3: study selection.

The study selection will first consist of a title and abstract scan. If the title and abstract are in line with the scoping review’s objectives and questions to the literature or if the relevance of the study is unclear a full-text review will follow. Retrieved studies from each database are going to be divided equally among a minimum of two reviewers, who independently will conduct the selection process. 17 To facilitate the process, we are going to use the data programme Rayyan. The programme is a mobile and web application developed to facilitate the screening of title and/or abstract as well as the collaboration between the reviewers. 24 During the study selection process, the first reviewer (FW) will be responsible for regularly convoking the review team for discussions concerning uncertainties and to refine the study selection process. 17 Criteria for inclusion can also be applied ad hoc during the process when acquaintance with the field of research is increased. 16 If any disagreements on study inclusion occur, an additional reviewer will be consulted to determine the final inclusion. 17 The study selection process ( figure 1 ) will be accounted for by the PRISMA flow diagram. 25

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Overview study selection process.

Contrary to Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, 16 studies eligible for inclusion in our scoping review are going to be quality assessed. The assessment of the included studies’ quality will allow us to identify where the research itself is of poor quality, that is, identifying gaps in the existing literature review. According to Grant and Booth the lack of quality assessments in scoping reviews are likely to limit the uptake of the findings. 26 Their sentiment is supported by both Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien 17 and Daudt, van Mossel and Scott 18 who state that a quality assessment of included studies will likely result in findings more useful for practice. The quality assessment will be conducted by a minimum of two reviewers, who will use the relevant study design checklists from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). 27 As, CASP lack a checklist for mixed methods studies, the mixed method appraisal tool will be applied. 28 In the case of any ambiguity concerning a study’s quality assessment, an additional reviewer is going to be consulted. No exclusion of eligible studies will be made on behalf of the quality assessment as studies with limited quality nevertheless can provide a valid rationale as guidance as to where more research is required.

Stage 4: charting data

A data charting form would be developed, and piloted on the first 5 to 10 included studies in this review. The piloting will support the team to reach an agreement on extraction consistency. The latter is especially important, as the extraction will be conducted individually and independently by a minimum of two reviewers. 17 A systematic and analytical approach will be utilised to extract the relevant information of each included study. The variables and themes to be included in order to answer the review’s objective and questions to the literature will be established iteratively ( box 1 ). Thus, the data charting form will be updated throughout the review by one of the reviewers (FW) who will also hold regular discussion with the others in the review team. 17

Tentative data charting form

Author and date.

Study title.

Journal full reference.

Aim, objective and/or research questions.

Study and recruitment context (eg, in what country and where people were recruited).

Participant characteristics (eg, age, gender, education year/semester of study, course (ie, theoretical or clinical placement)).

Sampling method.

Number of study participants.

Study design.

Data collection (eg, what data collection methods were used?).

Data analysis (eg, how was the data analysed?).

Described ethical approval and/or considerations. 29

Described teaching strategies and/or interventions targeting review focus.

Described outcomes and assessments.

Most relevant findings.

Study quality appraisal. 27 28

Tentative ethical requirements influenced by Weingarten, Paul and Leibovici.

Was the study approved by a research ethical committee? (Yes/No)

Was informed consent obtained? (Yes/No)

Were adequate measurements taken to protect personal data? (Yes/No)

Is there a declaration on financial support? (Yes/No)

Is there a declaration on potential conflict of interest? (Yes/No)

Influenced by Weingarten, Paul and Leibovici’s substantial contribution to raise the ethical awareness in reviews, an ethical assess form ( box 2 ) was developed for the upcoming scoping review including five requirements. 29 Included studies valued by the review team as not adhering to the ethical requirements will be excluded at this stage of the scoping review process.

Stage 5: collating, summarising and reporting the results

In the fifth stage, an overview and narrative account of variables and information extracted in stage 4 will be presented, and as highlighted by Arksey and O’Malley no evidence grading will be executed. 16 Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien 17 and Daudt, Van Mossel and Scott 18 suggest that the extracted qualitative data should be presented through thematic analysis, since no synthesis of data is required. 16 For this purpose, the thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke will be applied which is a flexible method suitable when the data is broad and allowing for a wide range of analytical options. 30 This cohere with the upcoming scoping review, which will include studies with a wide range of research questions and methods. Quantitative data will be reviewed through basic descriptive numerical analysis and presented in tables and charts to highlight the range of data. 16 If studies with a mixed method design are included in stage 3, the qualitative and quantitative data will be extracted and analysed separately. A minimum of two reviewers will be responsible for this stage of the scoping review process. During the process, meetings with the entire review team will be scheduled by the first reviewer (FW) to discuss and come to agreement concerning analysis and presentation of extracted data.

Stage 6: consultation stage

To validate the findings of this scoping study and make it more useful for practice the optional stage consultation will be applied. For this purpose, the findings from the scoping review will be presented to a group of educators and students connected to a nursing programme as a means to contribute with valuable insights on issues connected to the application and implementation of the findings.

Patient and public involvement

No patients have been involved in the design of this study. However, to conduct a study targeting teaching strategies for critical thinking in nursing education will eventually benefit patients since education is the foundation for raising future nurses and improve patient care.

Ethics and dissemination

Under the Swedish Ethical Review Act (2003:460) 31 this study does not need ethical clearance by a Regional Ethical Review Authority as it does not include any primary empirical data on biological material or sensitive information (eg, ethnicity, political or sexual orientation). However, the issue of ethical consideration in the execution of reviews is raised by Vergnes et al 32 as well as by Weingarten, Paul and Leibovici. 29 They state that without an ethical judgement of the included studies it could result in establishing clinical practise and guidelines based on studies with poor ethical quality and even unethical studies. It could further be seen as a way of increasing the awareness and necessity of high ethical standards in research. To meet these requirements one variable in the charting form will be ethical consideration and for that purpose a tentative checklist for ethical requirements was developed ( box 2 ). The checklist will be tested on a minimum of 10 publications, and revised accordingly if necessary.

The upcoming scoping review will contribute to the advancement of research concerning teaching strategies targeting nursing students’ skills and abilities in critical thinking and the outcome assessment of it. It will also provide an indication of the maturity of the literature by identifying research gaps. Gaining more knowledge of the targeted research area can act as a benchmark to implement new teaching strategies facilitating students’ critical thinking disposition within the nursing education. This will better prepare future nurses for the complex care situations they will approach. Our findings will be used to inform the design of a future study aiming to develop and evaluate an educational intervention targeting teaching strategies focussing on nursing students’ critical thinking skills and abilities. The upcoming scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. We expect to report in late spring 2020.

• Von Colln-Appling C ,
• Cronenwett L ,
• Sherwood G ,
• Barnsteiner J , et al
• Chang Y-J ,
• Kuo S-H , et al
• Andrea Sullivan E ,
• Sullivan EA
• Scheffer BK ,
• Rubenfeld MG
• Alfaro-LeFevre R
• Victor-Chmil J
• Simpson E ,
• Carvalho DPSRP ,
• Azevedo IC ,
• Cruz GKP , et al
• De Oliviera LB ,
• Carbogim FDC , et al
• Zuriguel Pérez E ,
• Lluch Canut MT ,
• Falcó Pegueroles A , et al
• Carter AG ,
• Creedy DK ,
• Sidebotham M
• Colquhoun H ,
• Daudt HML ,
• van Mossel C ,
• Tricco AC ,
• Zarin W , et al
• Colquhoun HL ,
• O'Brien KK , et al
• Mashamba-Thompson TP
• Stoffels M ,
• Peerdeman SM ,
• Daelmans HEM , et al
• Ouzzani M ,
• Hammady H ,
• Fedorowicz Z , et al
• Liberati A ,
• Tetzlaff J , et al
• Fbregues S , et al
• Weingarten MA ,
• Leibovici L
• ↵ Act concerning the ethical review of research involving humans (SFS 2003:460) .
• Vergnes J-N ,
• Marchal-Sixou C ,
• Nabet C , et al

Contributors FW, EC, AW and GB were responsible for the initial design of this study. FW conceptualised the review approach and led the writing of the manuscript. FW, EC, AW and GB contributed to the protocol’s development and approved the final version of this protocol. GB, EC and AW led the supervision of the manuscript preparation.

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Patient consent for publication Not required.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

• Visit Nurse.com on Facebook
• Visit Nurse.com on YouTube
• Visit Nurse.com on Instagram
• Visit Nurse.com on LinkedIn

Nurse.com by Relias . © Relias LLC 2024. All Rights Reserved.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, Christman E, editors. Nursing Fundamentals [Internet]. Eau Claire (WI): Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2021.

Nursing Fundamentals [Internet].

• About Open RN

Chapter 4 Nursing Process

4.1. nursing process introduction, learning objectives.

• Use the nursing process to provide patient care
• Identify nursing diagnoses from evidence-based sources
• Describe the development of a care plan
• Prioritize patient care
• Describe documentation for each step of the nursing process
• Differentiate between the role of the PN and RN

Have you ever wondered how a nurse can receive a quick handoff report from another nurse and immediately begin providing care for a patient they previously knew nothing about? How do they know what to do? How do they prioritize and make a plan?

Nurses do this activity every shift. They know how to find pertinent information and use the nursing process as a critical thinking model to guide patient care. The nursing process becomes a road map for the actions and interventions that nurses implement to optimize their patients’ well-being and health. This chapter will explain how to use the  nursing process  as standards of professional nursing practice to provide safe, patient-centered care.

4.2. BASIC CONCEPTS

Before learning how to use the nursing process, it is important to understand some basic concepts related to critical thinking and nursing practice. Let’s take a deeper look at how nurses think.

Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning

Nurses make decisions while providing patient care by using critical thinking and clinical reasoning.  Critical thinking  is a broad term used in nursing that includes “reasoning about clinical issues such as teamwork, collaboration, and streamlining workflow.” [ 1 ] Using critical thinking means that nurses take extra steps to maintain patient safety and don’t just “follow orders.” It also means the accuracy of patient information is validated and plans for caring for patients are based on their needs, current clinical practice, and research.

“Critical thinkers” possess certain attitudes that foster rational thinking. These attitudes are as follows:

• Independence of thought: Thinking on your own
• Fair-mindedness:  Treating every viewpoint in an unbiased, unprejudiced way
• Insight into egocentricity and sociocentricity:  Thinking of the greater good and not just thinking of yourself. Knowing when you are thinking of yourself (egocentricity) and when you are thinking or acting for the greater good (sociocentricity)
• Intellectual humility:  Recognizing your intellectual limitations and abilities
• Nonjudgmental:  Using professional ethical standards and not basing your judgments on your own personal or moral standards
• Integrity:  Being honest and demonstrating strong moral principles
• Perseverance:  Persisting in doing something despite it being difficult
• Confidence:  Believing in yourself to complete a task or activity
• Interest in exploring thoughts and feelings:  Wanting to explore different ways of knowing
• Curiosity:  Asking “why” and wanting to know more

Clinical reasoning  is defined as, “A complex cognitive process that uses formal and informal thinking strategies to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate the significance of this information, and weigh alternative actions.” [ 2 ]  To make sound judgments about patient care, nurses must generate alternatives, weigh them against the evidence, and choose the best course of action. The ability to clinically reason develops over time and is based on knowledge and experience. [ 3 ]

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning and Clinical Judgment

Inductive and deductive reasoning are important critical thinking skills. They help the nurse use clinical judgment when implementing the nursing process.

Inductive reasoning  involves noticing cues, making generalizations, and creating hypotheses.  Cues  are data that fall outside of expected findings that give the nurse a hint or indication of a patient’s potential problem or condition. The nurse organizes these cues into patterns and creates a generalization. A  generalization  is a judgment formed from a set of facts, cues, and observations and is similar to gathering pieces of a jigsaw puzzle into patterns until the whole picture becomes more clear. Based on generalizations created from patterns of data, the nurse creates a hypothesis regarding a patient problem. A  hypothesis  is a proposed explanation for a situation. It attempts to explain the “why” behind the problem that is occurring. If a “why” is identified, then a solution can begin to be explored.

No one can draw conclusions without first noticing cues. Paying close attention to a patient, the environment, and interactions with family members is critical for inductive reasoning. As you work to improve your inductive reasoning, begin by first noticing details about the things around you. A nurse is similar to the detective looking for cues in Figure 4.1 . [ 4 ]  Be mindful of your five primary senses: the things that you hear, feel, smell, taste, and see. Nurses need strong inductive reasoning patterns and be able to take action quickly, especially in emergency situations. They can see how certain objects or events form a pattern (i.e., generalization) that indicates a common problem (i.e., hypothesis).

Inductive Reasoning Includes Looking for Cues

Example:  A nurse assesses a patient and finds the surgical incision site is red, warm, and tender to the touch. The nurse recognizes these cues form a pattern of signs of infection and creates a hypothesis that the incision has become infected. The provider is notified of the patient’s change in condition, and a new prescription is received for an antibiotic. This is an example of the use of inductive reasoning in nursing practice.

Deductive reasoning  is another type of critical thinking that is referred to as “top-down thinking.” Deductive reasoning relies on using a general standard or rule to create a strategy. Nurses use standards set by their state’s Nurse Practice Act, federal regulations, the American Nursing Association, professional organizations, and their employer to make decisions about patient care and solve problems.

Example:  Based on research findings, hospital leaders determine patients recover more quickly if they receive adequate rest. The hospital creates a policy for quiet zones at night by initiating no overhead paging, promoting low-speaking voices by staff, and reducing lighting in the hallways. (See Figure 4.2 ). [ 5 ]  The nurse further implements this policy by organizing care for patients that promotes periods of uninterrupted rest at night. This is an example of deductive thinking because the intervention is applied to all patients regardless if they have difficulty sleeping or not.

Deductive Reasoning Example: Implementing Interventions for a Quiet Zone Policy

Clinical judgment  is the result of critical thinking and clinical reasoning using inductive and deductive reasoning. Clinical judgment is defined by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) as, “The observed outcome of critical thinking and decision-making. It uses nursing knowledge to observe and assess presenting situations, identify a prioritized patient concern, and generate the best possible evidence-based solutions in order to deliver safe patient care.”  [ 6 ]  The NCSBN administers the national licensure exam (NCLEX) that measures nursing clinical judgment and decision-making ability of prospective entry-level nurses to assure safe and competent nursing care by licensed nurses.

Evidence-based practice (EBP)  is defined by the American Nurses Association (ANA) as, “A lifelong problem-solving approach that integrates the best evidence from well-designed research studies and evidence-based theories; clinical expertise and evidence from assessment of the health care consumer’s history and condition, as well as health care resources; and patient, family, group, community, and population preferences and values.” [ 7 ]

Nursing Process

The nursing process is a critical thinking model based on a systematic approach to patient-centered care. Nurses use the nursing process to perform clinical reasoning and make clinical judgments when providing patient care. The nursing process is based on the Standards of Professional Nursing Practice established by the American Nurses Association (ANA). These standards are authoritative statements of the actions and behaviors that all registered nurses, regardless of role, population, specialty, and setting, are expected to perform competently. [ 8 ]  The mnemonic  ADOPIE  is an easy way to remember the ANA Standards and the nursing process. Each letter refers to the six components of the nursing process:  A ssessment,  D iagnosis,  O utcomes Identification,  P lanning,  I mplementation, and  E valuation.

The nursing process is a continuous, cyclic process that is constantly adapting to the patient’s current health status. See Figure 4.3 [ 9 ]  for an illustration of the nursing process.

The Nursing Process

Review Scenario A in the following box for an example of a nurse using the nursing process while providing patient care.

Patient Scenario A: Using the Nursing Process [ 10 ]

A hospitalized patient has a prescription to receive Lasix 80mg IV every morning for a medical diagnosis of heart failure. During the morning assessment, the nurse notes that the patient has a blood pressure of 98/60, heart rate of 100, respirations of 18, and a temperature of 98.7F. The nurse reviews the medical record for the patient’s vital signs baseline and observes the blood pressure trend is around 110/70 and the heart rate in the 80s. The nurse recognizes these cues form a pattern related to fluid imbalance and hypothesizes that the patient may be dehydrated. The nurse gathers additional information and notes the patient’s weight has decreased 4 pounds since yesterday. The nurse talks with the patient and validates the hypothesis when the patient reports that their mouth feels like cotton and they feel light-headed. By using critical thinking and clinical judgment, the nurse diagnoses the patient with the nursing diagnosis Fluid Volume Deficit and establishes outcomes for reestablishing fluid balance. The nurse withholds the administration of IV Lasix and contacts the health care provider to discuss the patient’s current fluid status. After contacting the provider, the nurse initiates additional nursing interventions to promote oral intake and closely monitor hydration status. By the end of the shift, the nurse evaluates the patient status and determines that fluid balance has been restored.

In Scenario A, the nurse is using clinical judgment and not just “following orders” to administer the Lasix as scheduled. The nurse assesses the patient, recognizes cues, creates a generalization and hypothesis regarding the fluid status, plans and implements nursing interventions, and evaluates the outcome. Additionally, the nurse promotes patient safety by contacting the provider before administering a medication that could cause harm to the patient at this time.

The ANA’s Standards of Professional Nursing Practice associated with each component of the nursing process are described below.

The “Assessment” Standard of Practice is defined as, “The registered nurse collects pertinent data and information relative to the health care consumer’s health or the situation.” [ 11 ]  A registered nurse uses a systematic method to collect and analyze patient data. Assessment includes physiological data, as well as psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, economic, and lifestyle data. For example, a nurse’s assessment of a hospitalized patient in pain includes the patient’s response to pain, such as the inability to get out of bed, refusal to eat, withdrawal from family members, or anger directed at hospital staff. [ 12 ]

The “Assessment” component of the nursing process is further described in the “ Assessment ” section of this chapter.

The “Diagnosis” Standard of Practice is defined as, “The registered nurse analyzes the assessment data to determine actual or potential diagnoses, problems, and issues.” [ 13 ]  A nursing diagnosis is the nurse’s clinical judgment about the  client's  response to actual or potential health conditions or needs. Nursing diagnoses are the bases for the nurse’s care plan and are different than medical diagnoses. [ 14 ]

The “Diagnosis” component of the nursing process is further described in the “ Diagnosis ” section of this chapter.

Outcomes Identification

The “Outcomes Identification” Standard of Practice is defined as, “The registered nurse identifies expected outcomes for a plan individualized to the health care consumer or the situation.” [ 15 ]  The nurse sets measurable and achievable short- and long-term goals and specific outcomes in collaboration with the patient based on their assessment data and nursing diagnoses.

The “Outcomes Identification” component of the nursing process is further described in the “ Outcomes Identification ” section of this chapter.

The “Planning” Standard of Practice is defined as, “The registered nurse develops a collaborative plan encompassing strategies to achieve expected outcomes.” [ 16 ]  Assessment data, diagnoses, and goals are used to select evidence-based nursing interventions customized to each patient’s needs and concerns. Goals, expected outcomes, and nursing interventions are documented in the patient’s nursing care plan so that nurses, as well as other health professionals, have access to it for continuity of care. [ 17 ]

The “Planning” component of the nursing process is further described in the “ Planning ” section of this chapter.

NURSING CARE PLANS

Creating nursing care plans is a part of the “Planning” step of the nursing process. A  nursing care plan  is a type of documentation that demonstrates the individualized planning and delivery of nursing care for each specific patient using the nursing process. Registered nurses (RNs) create nursing care plans so that the care provided to the patient across shifts is consistent among health care personnel. Some interventions can be delegated to Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or trained Unlicensed Assistive Personnel (UAPs) with the RN’s supervision. Developing nursing care plans and implementing appropriate delegation are further discussed under the “ Planning ” and “ Implementing ” sections of this chapter.

Implementation

The “Implementation” Standard of Practice is defined as, “The nurse implements the identified plan.” [ 18 ]  Nursing interventions are implemented or delegated with supervision according to the care plan to assure continuity of care across multiple nurses and health professionals caring for the patient. Interventions are also documented in the patient’s electronic medical record as they are completed. [ 19 ]

The “Implementation” Standard of Professional Practice also includes the subcategories “Coordination of Care” and “Health Teaching and Health Promotion” to promote health and a safe environment. [ 20 ]

The “Implementation” component of the nursing process is further described in the “ Implementation ” section of this chapter.

The “Evaluation” Standard of Practice is defined as, “The registered nurse evaluates progress toward attainment of goals and outcomes.” [ 21 ]  During evaluation, nurses assess the patient and compare the findings against the initial assessment to determine the effectiveness of the interventions and overall nursing care plan. Both the patient’s status and the effectiveness of the nursing care must be continuously evaluated and modified as needed. [ 22 ]

The “Evaluation” component of the nursing process is further described in the “ Evaluation ” section of this chapter.

Benefits of Using the Nursing Process

Using the nursing process has many benefits for nurses, patients, and other members of the health care team. The benefits of using the nursing process include the following:

• Promotes quality patient care
• Decreases omissions and duplications
• Provides a guide for all staff involved to provide consistent and responsive care
• Encourages collaborative management of a patient’s health care problems
• Improves patient safety
• Improves patient satisfaction
• Identifies a patient’s goals and strategies to attain them
• Increases the likelihood of achieving positive patient outcomes
• Saves time, energy, and frustration by creating a care plan or path to follow

By using these components of the nursing process as a critical thinking model, nurses plan interventions customized to the patient’s needs, plan outcomes and interventions, and determine whether those actions are effective in meeting the patient’s needs. In the remaining sections of this chapter, we will take an in-depth look at each of these components of the nursing process. Using the nursing process and implementing evidence-based practices are referred to as the “science of nursing.” Let’s review concepts related to the “art of nursing” while providing holistic care in a caring manner using the nursing process.

Holistic Nursing Care

The American Nurses Association (ANA) recently updated the definition of  nursing  as, “Nursing integrates the art and science of caring and focuses on the protection, promotion, and optimization of health and human functioning; prevention of illness and injury; facilitation of healing; and alleviation of suffering through compassionate presence. Nursing is the diagnosis and treatment of human responses and advocacy in the care of individuals, families, groups, communities, and populations in the recognition of the connection of all humanity.” [ 23 ]

The ANA further describes nursing is a learned profession built on a core body of knowledge that integrates both the art and science of nursing. The  art of nursing  is defined as, “Unconditionally accepting the humanity of others, respecting their need for dignity and worth, while providing compassionate, comforting care.” [ 24 ]

Nurses care for individuals holistically, including their emotional, spiritual, psychosocial, cultural, and physical needs. They consider problems, issues, and needs that the person experiences as a part of a family and a community as they use the nursing process. Review a scenario illustrating holistic nursing care provided to a patient and their family in the following box.

Holistic Nursing Care Scenario

A single mother brings her child to the emergency room for ear pain and a fever. The physician diagnoses the child with an ear infection and prescribes an antibiotic. The mother is advised to make a follow-up appointment with their primary provider in two weeks. While providing discharge teaching, the nurse discovers that the family is unable to afford the expensive antibiotic prescribed and cannot find a primary care provider in their community they can reach by a bus route. The nurse asks a social worker to speak with the mother about affordable health insurance options and available providers in her community and follows up with the prescribing physician to obtain a prescription for a less expensive generic antibiotic. In this manner, the nurse provides holistic care and advocates for improved health for the child and their family.

Review how to provide culturally responsive care and reduce health disparities in the “ Diverse Patients ” chapter.

Caring and the nursing process.

The American Nurses Association (ANA) states, “The act of caring is foundational to the practice of nursing.” [ 25 ]  Successful use of the nursing process requires the development of a care relationship with the patient. A  care relationship  is a mutual relationship that requires the development of trust between both parties. This trust is often referred to as the development of  rapport  and underlies the art of nursing. While establishing a caring relationship, the whole person is assessed, including the individual’s beliefs, values, and attitudes, while also acknowledging the vulnerability and dignity of the patient and family. Assessing and caring for the whole person takes into account the physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual aspects of being a human being. [ 26 ] Caring interventions can be demonstrated in simple gestures such as active listening, making eye contact, touching, and verbal reassurances while also respecting and being sensitive to the care recipient’s cultural beliefs and meanings associated with caring behaviors. [ 27 ]  See Figure 4.4 [ 28 ]  for an image of a nurse using touch as a therapeutic communication technique to communicate caring.

Touch as a Therapeutic Communication Technique

Review how to communicate with patients using therapeutic communication techniques like active listening in the “ Communication ” chapter.

Dr. Jean Watson is a nurse theorist who has published many works on the art and science of caring in the nursing profession. Her theory of human caring sought to balance the cure orientation of medicine, giving nursing its unique disciplinary, scientific, and professional standing with itself and the public. Dr. Watson’s caring philosophy encourages nurses to be authentically present with their patients while creating a healing environment. [ 29 ]

Read more about Dr. Watson’s theory of caring at the  Watson Caring Science Institute .

Now that we have discussed basic concepts related to the nursing process, let’s look more deeply at each component of the nursing process in the following sections.

4.3. ASSESSMENT

Assessment  is the first step of the nursing process (and the first  Standard of Practice  set by the American Nurses Association). This standard is defined as, “The registered nurse collects pertinent data and information relative to the health care consumer’s health or the situation.” This includes collecting “pertinent data related to the health and quality of life in a systematic, ongoing manner, with compassion and respect for the wholeness, inherent dignity, worth, and unique attributes of every person, including but not limited to, demographics, environmental and occupational exposures, social determinants of health, health disparities, physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, cognitive, spiritual/transpersonal, sexual, sociocultural, age-related, environmental, and lifestyle/economic assessments.” [ 1 ]

Nurses assess patients to gather clues, make generalizations, and diagnose human responses to health conditions and life processes. Patient data is considered either subjective or objective, and it can be collected from multiple sources.

Subjective Assessment Data

Subjective data  is information obtained from the patient and/or family members and offers important cues from their perspectives. When documenting subjective data stated by a patient, it should be in quotation marks and start with verbiage such as,  The patient reports.  It is vital for the nurse to establish rapport with a patient to obtain accurate, valuable subjective data regarding the mental, emotional, and spiritual aspects of their condition.

There are two types of subjective information, primary and secondary.  Primary data  is information provided directly by the patient. Patients are the best source of information about their bodies and feelings, and the nurse who actively listens to a patient will often learn valuable information while also promoting a sense of well-being. Information collected from a family member, chart, or other sources is known as  secondary data . Family members can provide important information, especially for individuals with memory impairments, infants, children, or when patients are unable to speak for themselves.

See Figure 4.5 [ 2 ]  for an illustration of a nurse obtaining subjective data and establishing rapport after obtaining permission from the patient to sit on the bed.

Example.  An example of documented subjective data obtained from a patient assessment is,  “The patient reports, ‘My pain is a level 2 on a 1-10 scale.’”

Objective Assessment Data

Objective data  is anything that you can observe through your sense of hearing, sight, smell, and touch while assessing the patient. Objective data is reproducible, meaning another person can easily obtain the same data. Examples of objective data are vital signs, physical examination findings, and laboratory results. See Figure 4.6 [ 3 ]  for an image of a nurse performing a physical examination.

Physical Examination

Example.  An example of documented objective data is,  “The patient’s radial pulse is 58 and regular, and their skin feels warm and dry.”

Sources of Assessment Data

There are three sources of assessment data: interview, physical examination, and review of laboratory or diagnostic test results.

Interviewing

Interviewing includes asking the patient questions, listening, and observing verbal and nonverbal communication. Reviewing the chart prior to interviewing the patient may eliminate redundancy in the interview process and allows the nurse to hone in on the most significant areas of concern or need for clarification. However, if information in the chart does not make sense or is incomplete, the nurse should use the interview process to verify data with the patient.

After performing patient identification, the best way to initiate a caring relationship is to introduce yourself to the patient and explain your role. Share the purpose of your interview and the approximate time it will take. When beginning an interview, it may be helpful to start with questions related to the patient’s  medical diagnoses  to gather information about how they have affected the patient’s functioning, relationships, and lifestyle. Listen carefully and ask for clarification when something isn’t clear to you. Patients may not volunteer important information because they don’t realize it is important for their care. By using critical thinking and active listening, you may discover valuable cues that are important to provide safe, quality nursing care. Sometimes nursing students can feel uncomfortable having difficult conversations or asking personal questions due to generational or other cultural differences. Don’t shy away from asking about information that is important to know for safe patient care. Most patients will be grateful that you cared enough to ask and listen.

Be alert and attentive to how the patient answers questions, as well as when they do not answer a question. Nonverbal communication and body language can be cues to important information that requires further investigation. A keen sense of observation is important. To avoid making inappropriate  inferences , the nurse should validate any cues. For example, a nurse may make an inference that a patient is depressed when the patient avoids making eye contact during an interview. However, upon further questioning, the nurse may discover that the patient’s cultural background believes direct eye contact to be disrespectful and this is why they are avoiding eye contact. To read more information about communicating with patients, review the “ Communication ” chapter of this book.

A  physical examination  is a systematic data collection method of the body that uses the techniques of inspection, auscultation, palpation, and percussion. Inspection is the observation of a patient’s anatomical structures. Auscultation is listening to sounds, such as heart, lung, and bowel sounds, created by organs using a stethoscope. Palpation is the use of touch to evaluate organs for size, location, or tenderness. Percussion is an advanced physical examination technique typically performed by providers where body parts are tapped with fingers to determine their size and if fluid is present. Detailed physical examination procedures of various body systems can be found in the Open RN  Nursing Skills  textbook with a head-to-toe checklist in  Appendix C . Physical examination also includes the collection and analysis of vital signs.

Registered Nurses (RNs)  complete the initial physical examination and analyze the findings as part of the nursing process. Collection of follow-up physical examination data can be delegated to  Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) , or measurements such as vital signs and weight may be delegated to trained  Unlicensed Assistive Personnel (UAP)  when appropriate to do so. However, the RN remains responsible for supervising these tasks, analyzing the findings, and ensuring they are documented .

A physical examination can be performed as a comprehensive, head-to-toe assessment or as a focused assessment related to a particular condition or problem. Assessment data is documented in the patient’s  Electronic Medical Record (EMR) , an electronic version of the patient’s medical chart.

Reviewing Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results

Reviewing laboratory and diagnostic test results provides relevant and useful information related to the needs of the patient. Understanding how normal and abnormal results affect patient care is important when implementing the nursing care plan and administering provider prescriptions. If results cause concern, it is the nurse’s responsibility to notify the provider and verify the appropriateness of prescriptions based on the patient’s current status before implementing them.

Types of Assessments

Several types of nursing assessment are used in clinical practice:

• Primary Survey:  Used during every patient encounter to briefly evaluate level of consciousness, airway, breathing, and circulation and implement emergency care if needed.
• Admission Assessment:  A comprehensive assessment completed when a patient is admitted to a facility that involves assessing a large amount of information using an organized approach.
• Ongoing Assessment:  In acute care agencies such as hospitals, a head-to-toe assessment is completed and documented at least once every shift. Any changes in patient condition are reported to the health care provider.
• Focused Assessment:  Focused assessments are used to reevaluate the status of a previously diagnosed problem.
• Time-lapsed Reassessment:  Time-lapsed reassessments are used in long-term care facilities when three or more months have elapsed since the previous assessment to evaluate progress on previously identified outcomes. [ 4 ]

Putting It Together

Review Scenario C in the following box to apply concepts of assessment to a patient scenario.

Scenario C [5]

Ms. J. is a 74-year-old woman who is admitted directly to the medical unit after visiting her physician because of shortness of breath, increased swelling in her ankles and calves, and fatigue. Her medical history includes hypertension (30 years), coronary artery disease (18 years), heart failure (2 years), and type 2 diabetes (14 years). She takes 81 mg of aspirin every day, metoprolol 50 mg twice a day, furosemide 40 mg every day, and metformin 2,000 mg every day.

Ms. J.’s vital sign values on admission were as follows:

• Blood Pressure: 162/96 mm Hg
• Heart Rate: 88 beats/min
• Oxygen Saturation: 91% on room air
• Respiratory Rate: 28 breaths/minute
• Temperature: 97.8 degrees F orally

Her weight is up 10 pounds since the last office visit three weeks prior. The patient states, “I am so short of breath” and “My ankles are so swollen I have to wear my house slippers.” Ms. J. also shares, “I am so tired and weak that I can’t get out of the house to shop for groceries,” and “Sometimes I’m afraid to get out of bed because I get so dizzy.” She confides, “I would like to learn more about my health so I can take better care of myself.”

The physical assessment findings of Ms. J. are bilateral basilar crackles in the lungs and bilateral 2+ pitting edema of the ankles and feet. Laboratory results indicate a decreased serum potassium level of 3.4 mEq/L.

As the nurse completes the physical assessment, the patient’s daughter enters the room. She confides, “We are so worried about mom living at home by herself when she is so tired all the time!”

Critical Thinking Questions

Identify subjective data.

Identify objective data.

Provide an example of secondary data.

Answers are located in the Answer Key at the end of the book.

4.4. DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis  is the second step of the nursing process (and the second Standard of Practice set by the American Nurses Association). This standard is defined as, “The registered nurse analyzes assessment data to determine actual or potential diagnoses, problems, and issues.” The RN “prioritizes diagnoses, problems, and issues based on mutually established goals to meet the needs of the health care consumer across the health–illness continuum and the care continuum.” Diagnoses, problems, strengths, and issues are documented in a manner that facilitates the development of expected outcomes and a collaborative plan. [ 1 ]

Analyzing Assessment Data

After collection of assessment data, the registered nurse analyzes the data to form generalizations and create hypotheses for nursing diagnoses. Steps for analyzing assessment data include performing data analysis, clustering of information, identifying hypotheses for potential nursing diagnosis, performing additional in-depth assessment as needed, and establishing nursing diagnosis statements. The nursing diagnoses are then prioritized and drive the nursing care plan. [ 2 ]

Performing Data Analysis

After nurses collect assessment data from a patient, they use their nursing knowledge to analyze that data to determine if it is “expected” or “unexpected” or “normal” or “abnormal” for that patient according to their age, development, and baseline status. From there, nurses determine what data are “clinically relevant” as they prioritize their nursing care. [ 3 ]

Example.  In Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter, the nurse analyzes the vital signs data and determines the blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate are elevated, and the oxygen saturation is decreased for this patient. These findings are considered “relevant cues.”

Clustering Information/Seeing Patterns/Making Hypotheses

After analyzing the data and determining relevant cues, the nurse  clusters  data into patterns. Assessment frameworks such as Gordon’s  Functional Health Patterns  assist nurses in clustering information according to evidence-based patterns of human responses. See the box below for an outline of Gordon’s Functional Health Patterns. [ 4 ]  Concepts related to many of these patterns will be discussed in chapters later in this book.

Example.  Refer to Scenario C of the “Assessment” section of this chapter. The nurse clusters the following relevant cues: elevated blood pressure, elevated respiratory rate, crackles in the lungs, weight gain, worsening edema, shortness of breath, a medical history of heart failure, and currently prescribed a diuretic medication. These cues are clustered into a generalization/pattern of fluid balance, which can be classified under Gordon’s Nutritional-Metabolic Functional Health Pattern. The nurse makes a hypothesis that the patient has excess fluid volume present.

Gordon’s Functional Health Patterns [ 5 ]

Health Perception-Health Management:  A patient’s perception of their health and well-being and how it is managed

Nutritional-Metabolic:  Food and fluid consumption relative to metabolic need

Elimination:  Excretory function, including bowel, bladder, and skin

Activity-Exercise:  Exercise and daily activities

Sleep-Rest:  Sleep, rest, and daily activities

Cognitive-Perceptual:  Perception and cognition

Self-perception and Self-concept:  Self-concept and perception of self-worth, self-competency, body image, and mood state

Role-Relationship:  Role engagements and relationships

Sexuality-Reproductive:  Reproduction and satisfaction or dissatisfaction with sexuality

Coping-Stress Tolerance:  Coping and effectiveness in terms of stress tolerance

Value-Belief:  Values, beliefs (including spiritual beliefs), and goals that guide choices and decisions

Identifying Nursing Diagnoses

After the nurse has analyzed and clustered the data from the patient assessment, the next step is to begin to answer the question, “What are my patient’s human responses (i.e., nursing diagnoses)?” A  nursing diagnosis  is defined as, “A clinical judgment concerning a human response to health conditions/life processes, or a vulnerability for that response, by an individual, family, group, or community.” [ 6 ]  Nursing diagnoses are customized to each patient and drive the development of the nursing care plan. The nurse should refer to a care planning resource and review the definitions and defining characteristics of the hypothesized nursing diagnoses to determine if additional in-depth assessment is needed before selecting the most accurate nursing diagnosis.

Nursing diagnoses are developed by nurses, for use by nurses. For example, NANDA International (NANDA-I) is a global professional nursing organization that develops nursing terminology that names actual or potential human responses to health problems and life processes based on research findings. [ 7 ]  Currently, there are over 220 NANDA-I nursing diagnoses developed by nurses around the world. This list is continuously updated, with new nursing diagnoses added and old nursing diagnoses retired that no longer have supporting evidence. A list of commonly used NANDA-I diagnoses are listed in  Appendix A . For a full list of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, refer to a current nursing care plan reference.

NANDA-I nursing diagnoses are grouped into 13 domains that assist the nurse in selecting diagnoses based on the patterns of clustered data. These domains are similar to Gordon’s Functional Health Patterns and include health promotion, nutrition, elimination and exchange, activity/rest, perception/cognition, self-perception, role relationship, sexuality, coping/stress tolerance, life principles, safety/protection, comfort, and growth/development.

Knowledge regarding specific NANDA-I nursing diagnoses is not assessed on the NCLEX. However, analyzing cues and creating hypotheses are part of the measurement model used to assess a candidate’s clinical judgment. Read more about the NCLEX and Next Generation NCLEX in the “ Scope of Practice ” chapter.

Nursing diagnoses vs. medical diagnoses.

You may be asking yourself, “How are nursing diagnoses different from medical diagnoses?” Medical diagnoses focus on diseases or other medical problems that have been identified by the physician, physician’s assistant, or advanced nurse practitioner. Nursing diagnoses focus on the  human response  to health conditions and life processes and are made independently by RNs. Patients with the same medical diagnosis will often  respond  differently to that diagnosis and thus have different nursing diagnoses. For example, two patients have the same medical diagnosis of heart failure. However, one patient may be interested in learning more information about the condition and the medications used to treat it, whereas another patient may be experiencing anxiety when thinking about the effects this medical diagnosis will have on their family. The nurse must consider these different responses when creating the nursing care plan. Nursing diagnoses consider the patient’s and family’s needs, attitudes, strengths, challenges, and resources as a customized nursing care plan is created to provide holistic and individualized care for each patient.

Example.  A medical diagnosis identified for Ms. J. in Scenario C in the “Assessment” section is heart failure. This cannot be used as a nursing diagnosis, but it can be considered as an “associated condition” when creating hypotheses for nursing diagnoses. Associated conditions are medical diagnoses, injuries, procedures, medical devices, or pharmacological agents that are not independently modifiable by the nurse, but support accuracy in nursing diagnosis. The nursing diagnosis in Scenario C will be related to the patient’s response to heart failure.

Additional Definitions Used in NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses

The following definitions of patient, age, and time are used in association with NANDA-I nursing diagnoses:

The NANDA-I definition of a “patient” includes:

• Individual:  a single human being distinct from others (i.e., a person).
• Caregiver:  a family member or helper who regularly looks after a child or a sick, elderly, or disabled person.
• Family:  two or more people having continuous or sustained relationships, perceiving reciprocal obligations, sensing common meaning, and sharing certain obligations toward others; related by blood and/or choice.
• Group:  a number of people with shared characteristics generally referred to as an ethnic group.
• Community:  a group of people living in the same locale under the same governance. Examples include neighborhoods and cities. [ 8 ]

The age of the person who is the subject of the diagnosis is defined by the following terms: [ 9 ]

• Fetus:  an unborn human more than eight weeks after conception, until birth.
• Neonate:  a person less than 28 days of age.
• Infant:  a person greater than 28 days and less than 1 year of age.
• Child:  a person aged 1 to 9 years
• Adolescent:  a person aged 10 to 19 years
• Adult:  a person older than 19 years of age unless national law defines a person as being an adult at an earlier age.
• Older adult:  a person greater than 65 years of age.

The duration of the diagnosis is defined by the following terms: [ 10 ]

• Acute:  lasting less than 3 months.
• Chronic:  lasting greater than 3 months.
• Intermittent:  stopping or starting again at intervals
• Continuous:  uninterrupted, going on without stop.

New Terms Used in 2018-2020 NANDA-I Diagnoses

The 2018-2020 edition of  Nursing Diagnoses  includes two new terms to assist in creating nursing diagnoses: at-risk populations and associated conditions. [ 11 ]

At-Risk Populations  are groups of people who share a characteristic that causes each member to be susceptible to a particular human response, such as demographics, health/family history, stages of growth/development, or exposure to certain events/experiences.

Associated Conditions  are medical diagnoses, injuries, procedures, medical devices, or pharmacological agents. These conditions are not independently modifiable by the nurse, but support accuracy in nursing diagnosis [ 12 ]

Types of Nursing Diagnoses

There are four types of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses: [ 13 ]

• Problem-Focused
• Health Promotion – Wellness

A  problem-focused nursing diagnosis  is a “clinical judgment concerning an undesirable human response to health condition/life processes that exist in an individual, family, group, or community.” [ 14 ]  To make an accurate problem-focused diagnosis, related factors and defining characteristics must be present.  Related factors  (also called etiology) are causes that contribute to the diagnosis.  Defining characteristics  are cues, signs, and symptoms that cluster into patterns. [ 15 ]

A  health promotion-wellness nursing diagnosis  is “a clinical judgment concerning motivation and desire to increase well-being and to actualize human health potential.” These responses are expressed by the patient’s readiness to enhance specific health behaviors. [ 16 ] A health promotion-wellness diagnosis is used when the patient is willing to improve a lack of knowledge, coping, or other identified need.

A  risk nursing diagnosis  is “a clinical judgment concerning the vulnerability of an individual, family, group, or community for developing an undesirable human response to health conditions/life processes.” [ 17 ]  A risk nursing diagnosis must be supported by risk factors that contribute to the increased vulnerability. A risk nursing diagnosis is different from the problem-focused diagnosis in that the problem has not yet actually occurred. Problem diagnoses should not be automatically viewed as more important than risk diagnoses because sometimes a risk diagnosis can have the highest priority for a patient. [ 18 ]

A  syndrome diagnosis  is a “clinical judgment concerning a specific cluster of nursing diagnoses that occur together, and are best addressed together and through similar interventions.” [ 19 ]

Establishing Nursing Diagnosis Statements

When using NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, NANDA-I recommends the structure of a nursing diagnosis should be a statement that includes the  nursing diagnosis  and  related factors  as exhibited by  defining characteristics . The accuracy of the nursing diagnosis is validated when a nurse is able to clearly link the defining characteristics, related factors, and/or risk factors found during the patient’s assessment. [ 20 ]

To create a nursing diagnosis statement, the registered nurse completes the following steps. After analyzing the patient’s subjective and objective data and clustering the data into patterns, the nurse generates hypotheses for nursing diagnoses based on how the patterns meet defining characteristics of a nursing diagnosis.  Defining characteristics  is the terminology used for observable signs and symptoms related to a nursing diagnosis. [ 21 ]  Defining characteristics are included in care planning resources for each nursing diagnosis, along with a definition of that diagnosis, so the nurse can select the most accurate diagnosis. For example, objective and subjective data such as weight, height, and dietary intake can be clustered together as defining characteristics for the nursing diagnosis of nutritional status.

When creating a nursing diagnosis statement, the nurse also identifies the cause of the problem for that specific patient.  Related factors  is the terminology used for the underlying causes (etiology) of a patient’s problem or situation. Related factors should not be a medical diagnosis, but instead should be attributed to the underlying pathophysiology that the nurse can treat. When possible, the nursing interventions planned for each nursing diagnosis should attempt to modify or remove these related factors that are the underlying cause of the nursing diagnosis. [ 22 ]

Creating nursing diagnosis statements has traditionally been referred to as “using PES format.” The  PES  mnemonic no longer applies to the current terminology used by NANDA-I, but the components of a nursing diagnosis statement remain the same. A nursing diagnosis statement should contain the problem, related factors, and defining characteristics. These terms fit under the former PES format in this manner:

Problem (P)  – the patient  p roblem (i.e., the nursing diagnosis)

Etiology (E)  – related factors (i.e., the  e tiology/cause) of the nursing diagnosis; phrased as “related to” or “R/T”

Signs and Symptoms (S)  – defining characteristics manifested by the patient (i.e., the  s igns and  s ymptoms/subjective and objective data) that led to the identification of that nursing diagnosis for the patient; phrased with “as manifested by” or “as evidenced by.”

Examples of different types of nursing diagnoses are further explained below.

Problem-Focused Nursing Diagnosis

A problem-focused nursing diagnosis contains all three components of the  PES format :

Problem (P)  – statement of the patient response (nursing diagnosis)

Etiology (E)  – related factors contributing to the nursing diagnosis

Signs and Symptoms (S)  – defining characteristics manifested by that patient

SAMPLE PROBLEM-FOCUSED NURSING DIAGNOSIS STATEMENT

Refer to Scenario C of the “Assessment” section of this chapter. The cluster of data for Ms. J. (elevated blood pressure, elevated respiratory rate, crackles in the lungs, weight gain, worsening edema, and shortness of breath) are defining characteristics for the NANDA-I Nursing Diagnosis  Excess Fluid Volume . The NANDA-I definition of  Excess Fluid Volume  is “surplus intake and/or retention of fluid.” The related factor (etiology) of the problem is that the patient has excessive fluid intake. [ 23 ]

The components of a  problem-focused nursing diagnosis  statement for Ms. J. would be:

Fluid Volume Excess

Related to excessive fluid intake

As manifested by bilateral basilar crackles in the lungs, bilateral 2+ pitting edema of the ankles and feet, increased weight of 10 pounds, and the patient reports, “ My ankles are so swollen .”

A correctly written problem-focused nursing diagnosis statement for Ms. J. would look like this:

Fluid Volume Excess related to excessive fluid intake as manifested by bilateral basilar crackles in the lungs, bilateral 2+ pitting edema of the ankles and feet, an increase weight of 10 pounds, and the patient reports, “My ankles are so swollen.”

Health-Promotion Nursing Diagnosis

A health-promotion nursing diagnosis statement contains the problem (P) and the defining characteristics (S). The defining characteristics component of a health-promotion nursing diagnosis statement should begin with the phrase “expresses desire to enhance”: [ 24 ]

Signs and Symptoms (S)  – the patient’s expressed desire to enhance

SAMPLE HEALTH-PROMOTION NURSING DIAGNOSIS STATEMENT

Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Ms. J. demonstrates a readiness to improve her health status when she told the nurse that she would like to “learn more about my health so I can take better care of myself.” This statement is a defining characteristic of the NANDA-I nursing diagnosis  Readiness for Enhanced Health Management , which is defined as “a pattern of regulating and integrating into daily living a therapeutic regimen for the treatment of illness and its sequelae, which can be strengthened.” [ 25 ]

The components of a  health-promotion nursing diagnosis  for Ms. J. would be:

Problem (P):  Readiness for Enhanced Health Management

Symptoms (S):  Expressed desire to “learn more about my health so I can take better care of myself.”

A correctly written health-promotion nursing diagnosis statement for Ms. J. would look like this:

Enhanced Readiness for Health Promotion as manifested by expressed desire to “learn more about my health so I can take better care of myself.”

Risk Nursing Diagnosis

A risk nursing diagnosis should be supported by evidence of the patient’s risk factors for developing that problem. Different experts recommend different phrasing. NANDA-I 2018-2020 recommends using the phrase “as evidenced by” to refer to the risk factors for developing that problem. [ 26 ]

A risk diagnosis consists of the following:

As Evidenced By  – Risk factors for developing the problem

SAMPLE RISK DIAGNOSIS STATEMENT

Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Ms. J. has an increased risk of falling due to vulnerability from the dizziness and weakness she is experiencing. The NANDA-I definition of  Risk for Falls  is “increased susceptibility to falling, which may cause physical harm and compromise health.” [ 27 ]

The components of a  risk diagnosis  statement for Ms. J. would be:

Problem (P)  – Risk for Falls

As Evidenced By  – Dizziness and decreased lower extremity strength

A correctly written risk nursing diagnosis statement for Ms. J. would look like this:

Risk for Falls as evidenced by dizziness and decreased lower extremity strength.

Syndrome Diagnosis

A syndrome is a cluster of nursing diagnoses that occur together and are best addressed together and through similar interventions. To create a syndrome diagnosis, two or more nursing diagnoses must be used as defining characteristics (S) that create a syndrome. Related factors may be used if they add clarity to the definition, but are not required. [ 28 ]

A syndrome statement consists of these items:

Problem (P)  – the syndrome

Signs and Symptoms (S)  – the defining characteristics are two or more similar nursing diagnoses

SAMPLE SYNDROME DIAGNOSIS STATEMENT

Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Clustering the data for Ms. J. identifies several similar NANDA-I nursing diagnoses that can be categorized as a  syndrome . For example,  Activity Intolerance  is defined as “insufficient physiological or psychological energy to endure or complete required or desired daily activities.”  Social Isolation  is defined as “aloneness experienced by the individual and perceived as imposed by others and as a negative or threatening state.” These diagnoses can be included under the the NANDA-I syndrome named  Risk for Frail Elderly Syndrome.  This syndrome is defined as a “dynamic state of unstable equilibrium that affects the older individual experiencing deterioration in one or more domains of health (physical, functional, psychological, or social) and leads to increased susceptibility to adverse health effects, in particular disability.” [ 29 ]

The components of a  syndrome nursing diagnosis  for Ms. J. would be:

– Risk for Frail Elderly Syndrome

– The nursing diagnoses of  Activity Intolerance  and  Social Isolation

Additional related factor: Fear of falling

A correctly written syndrome diagnosis statement for Ms. J. would look like this:

Risk for Frail Elderly Syndrome related to activity intolerance, social isolation, and fear of falling

Prioritization

After identifying nursing diagnoses, the next step is prioritization according to the specific needs of the patient. Nurses prioritize their actions while providing patient care multiple times every day.  Prioritization  is the process that identifies the most significant nursing problems, as well as the most important interventions, in the nursing care plan.

It is essential that life-threatening concerns and crises are identified immediately and addressed quickly. Depending on the severity of a problem, the steps of the nursing process may be performed in a matter of seconds for life-threatening concerns. In critical situations, the steps of the nursing process are performed through rapid clinical judgment. Nurses must recognize cues signaling a change in patient condition, apply evidence-based practices in a crisis, and communicate effectively with interprofessional team members. Most patient situations fall somewhere between a crisis and routine care.

There are several concepts used to prioritize, including Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, the “ABCs” (Airway, Breathing and Circulation), and acute, uncompensated conditions. See the infographic in Figure 4.7 [30]  on  The How To of Prioritization .

The How To of Prioritization

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs  is used to categorize the most urgent patient needs. The bottom levels of the pyramid represent the top priority needs of physiological needs intertwined with safety. See Figure 4.8 [31]  for an image of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. You may be asking yourself, “What about the ABCs – isn’t airway the most important?” The answer to that question is “it depends on the situation and the associated safety considerations.” Consider this scenario – you are driving home after a lovely picnic in the country and come across a fiery car crash. As you approach the car, you see that the passenger is not breathing. Using Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs to prioritize your actions, you remove the passenger from the car first due to safety even though he is not breathing. After ensuring safety and calling for help, you follow the steps to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to establish circulation, airway, and breathing until help arrives.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

In addition to using Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and the ABCs of airway, breathing, and circulation, the nurse also considers if the patient’s condition is an acute or chronic problem. Acute, uncompensated conditions generally require priority interventions over chronic conditions. Additionally, actual problems generally receive priority over potential problems, but risk problems sometimes receive priority depending on the patient vulnerability and risk factors.

Example.  Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Four types of nursing diagnoses were identified for Ms. J.:  Fluid Volume Excess, Enhanced Readiness for Health Promotion, Risk for Falls , and  Risk for Frail Elderly Syndrome . The top priority diagnosis is  Fluid Volume Excess  because it affects the physiological needs of breathing, homeostasis, and excretion. However, the  Risk for Falls  diagnosis comes in a close second because of safety implications and potential injury that could occur if the patient fell.

American Nurses Association. (2021).  Nursing: Scope and standards of practice  (4th ed.). American Nurses Association.  ↵

Herdman, T. H., & Kamitsuru, S. (Eds.). (2018).  Nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2018-2020 . Thieme Publishers New York.  ↵

Herdman, T. H., & Kamitsuru, S. (Eds.). (2018).  Nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2018-2020.  Thieme Publishers New York.  ↵

Gordon, M. (2008).  Assess notes: Nursing assessment and diagnostic reasoning.  F.A. Davis Company.  ↵

NANDA International. (n.d.).  Glossary of terms .  https://nanda ​.org/nanda-i-resources ​/glossary-of-terms /  ↵

NANDA International. (n.d.).  Glossary of terms .  https://nanda ​.org/nanda-i-resources ​/glossary-of-terms/   ↵

NANDA International. (n.d.).  Glossary of terms.   https://nanda ​.org/nanda-i-resources ​/glossary-of-terms/   ↵

“The How To of Prioritization” by Valerie Palarski for  Chippewa Valley Technical College  is licensed under  CC BY 4.0   ↵

“ Maslow's hierarchy of needs.svg ” by  J. Finkelstein  is licensed under  CC BY-SA 3.0   ↵

4.5. OUTCOME IDENTIFICATION

Outcome Identification  is the third step of the nursing process (and the third Standard of Practice set by the American Nurses Association). This standard is defined as, “The registered nurse identifies expected outcomes for a plan individualized to the health care consumer or the situation.” The RN collaborates with the health care consumer, interprofessional team, and others to identify expected outcomes integrating the health care consumer’s culture, values, and ethical considerations. Expected outcomes are documented as measurable goals with a time frame for attainment. [ 1 ]

An  outcome  is a “measurable behavior demonstrated by the patient responsive to nursing interventions.” [ 2 ]  Outcomes should be identified before nursing interventions are planned. After nursing interventions are implemented, the nurse will evaluate if the outcomes were met in the time frame indicated for that patient.

Outcome identification includes setting short- and long-term goals and then creating specific expected outcome statements for each nursing diagnosis.

Short-Term and Long-Term Goals

Nursing care should always be individualized and patient-centered. No two people are the same, and neither should nursing care plans be the same for two people. Goals and outcomes should be tailored specifically to each patient’s needs, values, and cultural beliefs. Patients and family members should be included in the goal-setting process when feasible. Involving patients and family members promotes awareness of identified needs, ensures realistic goals, and motivates their participation in the treatment plan to achieve the mutually agreed upon goals and live life to the fullest with their current condition.

The nursing care plan is a road map used to guide patient care so that all health care providers are moving toward the same patient goals.  Goals  are broad statements of purpose that describe the overall aim of care. Goals can be short- or long-term. The time frame for short- and long-term goals is dependent on the setting in which the care is provided. For example, in a critical care area, a short-term goal might be set to be achieved within an 8-hour nursing shift, and a long-term goal might be in 24 hours. In contrast, in an outpatient setting, a short-term goal might be set to be achieved within one month and a long-term goal might be within six months.

A nursing goal is the overall direction in which the patient must progress to improve the problem/nursing diagnosis and is often the opposite of the problem.

Example.  Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Ms. J. had a priority nursing diagnosis of  Fluid Volume Excess.  A broad goal would be, “ Ms. J. will achieve a state of fluid balance. ”

Expected Outcomes

Goals are broad, general statements, but outcomes are specific and measurable.  Expected outcomes  are statements of measurable action for the patient within a specific time frame that are responsive to nursing interventions. Nurses may create expected outcomes independently or refer to classification systems for assistance. Just as NANDA-I creates and revises standardized nursing diagnoses, a similar classification and standardization process exists for expected nursing outcomes. The Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) is a list of over 330 nursing outcomes designed to coordinate with established NANDA-I diagnoses. [ 3 ]

Patient-Centered

Outcome statements are always patient-centered. They should be developed in collaboration with the patient and individualized to meet a patient’s unique needs, values, and cultural beliefs. They should start with the phrase “The patient will…” Outcome statements should be directed at resolving the defining characteristics for that nursing diagnosis. Additionally, the outcome must be something the patient is willing to cooperate in achieving.

Outcome statements should contain five components easily remembered using the “SMART” mnemonic: [ 4 ]

• M easurable
• A ttainable/Action oriented
• R elevant/Realistic

See Figure 4.9 [ 5 ]  for an image of the SMART components of outcome statements. Each of these components is further described in the following subsections.

SMART Components of Outcome Statements

Outcome statements should state precisely what is to be accomplished. See the following examples:

• Not specific:  “The patient will increase the amount of exercise.”
• Specific:  “The patient will participate in a bicycling exercise session daily for 30 minutes.”

Additionally, only one action should be included in each expected outcome. See the following examples:

• “The patient will walk 50 feet three times a day with standby assistance of one and will shower in the morning until discharge”  is actually two goals written as one. The outcome of ambulation should be separate from showering for precise evaluation. For instance, the patient could shower but not ambulate, which would make this outcome statement very difficult to effectively evaluate.
• Suggested revision is to create two outcomes statements so each can be measured: The patient will walk 50 feet three times a day with standby assistance of one until discharge. The patient will shower every morning until discharge.

Measurable outcomes have numeric parameters or other concrete methods of judging whether the outcome was met. It is important to use objective data to measure outcomes. If terms like “acceptable” or “normal” are used in an outcome statement, it is difficult to determine whether the outcome is attained. Refer to Figure 4.10 [ 6 ]  for examples of verbs that are measurable and not measurable in outcome statements.

Figure 4.10

Measurable Outcomes

See the following examples:

• Not measurable:  “The patient will drink adequate fluid amounts every shift.”
• Measurable:  “The patient will drink 24 ounces of fluids during every day shift (0600-1400).”

Action-Oriented and Attainable

Outcome statements should be written so that there is a clear action to be taken by the patient or significant others. This means that the outcome statement should include a verb. Refer to Figure 4.11 [ 7 ]  for examples of action verbs.

Figure 4.11

Action Verbs

• Not action-oriented:  “The patient will get increased physical activity.”
• Action-oriented:  “The patient will list three types of aerobic activity that he would enjoy completing every week.”

Realistic and Relevant

Realistic outcomes consider the patient’s physical and mental condition; their cultural and spiritual values, beliefs, and preferences; and their socioeconomic status in terms of their ability to attain these outcomes. Consideration should be also given to disease processes and the effects of conditions such as pain and decreased mobility on the patient’s ability to reach expected outcomes. Other barriers to outcome attainment may be related to health literacy or lack of available resources. Outcomes should always be reevaluated and revised for attainability as needed. If an outcome is not attained, it is commonly because the original time frame was too ambitious or the outcome was not realistic for the patient.

• Not realistic:  “The patient will jog one mile every day when starting the exercise program.”
• Realistic:  “The patient will walk ½ mile three times a week for two weeks.”

Time Limited

Outcome statements should include a time frame for evaluation. The time frame depends on the intervention and the patient’s current condition. Some outcomes may need to be evaluated every shift, whereas other outcomes may be evaluated daily, weekly, or monthly. During the evaluation phase of the nursing process, the outcomes will be assessed according to the time frame specified for evaluation. If it has not been met, the nursing care plan should be revised.

• Not time limited: “The patient will stop smoking cigarettes.”
• Time limited:  “The patient will complete the smoking cessation plan by December 12, 2021.”

In Scenario C in Box 4.3, Ms. J.’s priority nursing diagnosis statement was  Fluid Volume Excess related to excess fluid intake as manifested by bilateral basilar crackles in the lungs, bilateral 2+ pitting edema of the ankles and feet, an increase weight of 10 pounds, and the patient reports, “My ankles are so swollen.”  An example of an expected outcome meeting SMART criteria for Ms. J. is,  “The patient will have clear bilateral lung sounds within the next 24 hours.”

4.6. PLANNING

Planning  is the fourth step of the nursing process (and the fourth Standard of Practice set by the American Nurses Association). This standard is defined as, “The registered nurse develops a collaborative plan encompassing strategies to achieve expected outcomes.” The RN develops an individualized, holistic, evidence-based plan in partnership with the health care consumer, family, significant others, and interprofessional team. Elements of the plan are prioritized. The plan is modified according to the ongoing assessment of the health care consumer’s response and other indicators. The plan is documented using standardized language or terminology. [ 1 ]

After expected outcomes are identified, the nurse begins planning nursing interventions to implement.  Nursing interventions  are evidence-based actions that the nurse performs to achieve patient outcomes. Just as a provider makes medical diagnoses and writes prescriptions to improve the patient’s medical condition, a nurse formulates nursing diagnoses and plans nursing interventions to resolve patient problems. Nursing interventions should focus on eliminating or reducing the related factors (etiology) of the nursing diagnoses when possible. [ 2 ]  Nursing interventions, goals, and expected outcomes are written in the nursing care plan for continuity of care across shifts, nurses, and health professionals.

Planning Nursing Interventions

You might be asking yourself, “How do I know what evidence-based nursing interventions to include in the nursing care plan?” There are several sources that nurses and nursing students can use to select nursing interventions. Many agencies have care planning tools and references included in the electronic health record that are easily documented in the patient chart. Nurses can also refer to other care planning books our sources such as the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) system. Based on research and input from the nursing profession, NIC categorizes and describes nursing interventions that are constantly evaluated and updated. Interventions included in NIC are considered evidence-based nursing practices. The nurse is responsible for using clinical judgment to make decisions about which interventions are best suited to meet an individualized patient’s needs. [ 3 ]

Direct and Indirect Care

Nursing interventions are considered direct care or indirect care.  Direct care  refers to interventions that are carried out by having personal contact with patients. Examples of direct care interventions are wound care, repositioning, and ambulation.  Indirect care  interventions are performed when the nurse provides assistance in a setting other than with the patient. Examples of indirect care interventions are attending care conferences, documenting, and communicating about patient care with other providers.

Classification of Nursing Interventions

There are three types of nursing interventions: independent, dependent, and collaborative. (See Figure 4.12 [ 4 ]  for an image of a nurse collaborating with the health care team when planning interventions.)

Figure 4.12

Collaborative nursing interventions, independent nursing interventions.

Any intervention that the nurse can independently provide without obtaining a prescription is considered an  independent nursing intervention . An example of an independent nursing intervention is when the nurses monitor the patient’s 24-hour intake/output record for trends because of a risk for imbalanced fluid volume. Another example of independent nursing interventions is the therapeutic communication that a nurse uses to assist patients to cope with a new medical diagnosis.

Example.  Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Ms. J. was diagnosed with  Fluid Volume Excess . An example of an evidence-based independent nursing intervention is,  “The nurse will reposition the patient with dependent edema frequently, as appropriate.” [ 5 ]  The nurse would individualize this evidence-based intervention to the patient and agency policy by stating,  “The nurse will reposition the patient every 2 hours.”

Dependent Nursing Interventions

Dependent nursing interventions  require a prescription before they can be performed. Prescriptions are orders, interventions, remedies, or treatments ordered or directed by an authorized primary health care provider. [ 6 ]  A  primary health care provider  is a member of the health care team (usually a physician, advanced practice nurse, or physician’s assistant) who is licensed and authorized to formulate prescriptions on behalf of the client. For example, administering medication is a dependent nursing intervention. The nurse incorporates dependent interventions into the patient’s overall care plan by associating each intervention with the appropriate nursing diagnosis.

Example.  Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Ms. J. was diagnosed with  Fluid Volume Excess . An example of a dependent nursing intervention is,  “The nurse will administer scheduled diuretics as prescribed.”

Collaborative nursing interventions  are actions that the nurse carries out in collaboration with other health team members, such as physicians, social workers, respiratory therapists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. These actions are developed in consultation with other health care professionals and incorporate their professional viewpoint. [ 7 ]

Example.  Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. Ms. J. was diagnosed with  Fluid Volume Excess . An example of a collaborative nursing intervention is consulting with a respiratory therapist when the patient has deteriorating oxygen saturation levels. The respiratory therapist plans oxygen therapy and obtains a prescription from the provider. The nurse would document “ The nurse will manage oxygen therapy in collaboration with the respiratory therapist ” in the care plan.

Individualization of Interventions

It is vital for the planned interventions to be individualized to the patient to be successful. For example, adding prune juice to the breakfast meal of a patient with constipation will only work if the patient likes to drink the prune juice. If the patient does not like prune juice, then this intervention should not be included in the care plan. Collaboration with the patient, family members, significant others, and the interprofessional team is essential for selecting effective interventions. The number of interventions included in a nursing care plan is not a hard and fast rule, but enough quality, individualized interventions should be planned to meet the identified outcomes for that patient.

Creating Nursing Care Plans

Nursing care plans are created by registered nurses (RNs). Documentation of individualized nursing care plans are legally required in long-term care facilities by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and in hospitals by The Joint Commission. CMS guidelines state, “Residents and their representative(s) must be afforded the opportunity to participate in their care planning process and to be included in decisions and changes in care, treatment, and/or interventions. This applies both to initial decisions about care and treatment, as well as the refusal of care or treatment. Facility staff must support and encourage participation in the care planning process. This may include ensuring that residents, families, or representatives understand the comprehensive care planning process, holding care planning meetings at the time of day when a resident is functioning best and patient representatives can be present, providing sufficient notice in advance of the meeting, scheduling these meetings to accommodate a resident’s representative (such as conducting the meeting in-person, via a conference call, or video conferencing), and planning enough time for information exchange and decision-making. A resident has the right to select or refuse specific treatment options before the care plan is instituted.” [ 8 ]  The Joint Commission conceptualizes the care planning process as the structuring framework for coordinating communication that will result in safe and effective care. [ 9 ]

Many facilities have established standardized nursing care plans with lists of possible interventions that can be customized for each specific patient. Other facilities require the nurse to develop each care plan independently. Whatever the format, nursing care plans should be individualized to meet the specific and unique needs of each patient. See Figure 4.13 [ 10 ]  for an image of a standardized care plan.

Figure 4.13

Standardized Care Plan

Nursing care plans created in nursing school can also be in various formats such as concept maps or tables. Some are fun and creative, while others are more formal.  Appendix B  contains a template that can be used for creating nursing care plans.

4.7. IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERVENTIONS

Implementation  is the fifth step of the nursing process (and the fifth Standard of Practice set by the American Nurses Association). This standard is defined as, “The registered nurse implements the identified plan.” The RN may delegate planned interventions after considering the circumstance, person, task, communication, supervision, and evaluation, as well as the state Nurse Practice Act, federal regulation, and agency policy. [ 1 ]

Implementation of interventions requires the RN to use critical thinking and clinical judgment. After the initial plan of care is developed, continual reassessment of the patient is necessary to detect any changes in the patient’s condition requiring modification of the plan. The need for continual patient reassessment underscores the dynamic nature of the nursing process and is crucial to providing safe care.

During the implementation phase of the nursing process, the nurse prioritizes planned interventions, assesses patient safety while implementing interventions, delegates interventions as appropriate, and documents interventions performed.

Prioritizing Implementation of Interventions

Prioritizing implementation of interventions follows a similar method as to prioritizing nursing diagnoses. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and the ABCs of airway, breathing, and circulation are used to establish top priority interventions. When possible, least invasive actions are usually preferred due to the risk of injury from invasive options. Read more about methods for prioritization under the “ Diagnosis ” subsection of this chapter.

The potential impact on future events, especially if a task is not completed at a certain time, is also included when prioritizing nursing interventions. For example, if a patient is scheduled to undergo a surgical procedure later in the day, the nurse prioritizes initiating a NPO (nothing by mouth) prescription prior to completing pre-op patient education about the procedure. The rationale for this decision is that if the patient ate food or drank water, the surgery time would be delayed. Knowing and understanding the patient’s purpose for care, current situation, and expected outcomes are necessary to accurately prioritize interventions.

Patient Safety

It is essential to consider patient safety when implementing interventions. At times, patients may experience a change in condition that makes a planned nursing intervention or provider prescription no longer safe to implement. For example, an established nursing care plan for a patient states,  “The nurse will ambulate the patient 100 feet three times daily.”  However, during assessment this morning, the patient reports feeling dizzy today, and their blood pressure is 90/60. Using critical thinking and clinical judgment, the nurse decides to not implement the planned intervention of ambulating the patient. This decision and supporting assessment findings should be documented in the patient’s chart and also communicated during the shift handoff report, along with appropriate notification of the provider of the patient’s change in condition.

Implementing interventions goes far beyond implementing provider prescriptions and completing tasks identified on the nursing care plan and must focus on patient safety. As front-line providers, nurses are in the position to stop errors before they reach the patient. [ 2 ]

In 2000 the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a groundbreaking report titled  To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System . The report stated that as many as 98,000 people die in U.S. hospitals each year as a result of preventable medical errors.  To Err Is Human  broke the silence that previously surrounded the consequences of medical errors and set a national agenda for reducing medical errors and improving patient safety through the design of a safer health system. [ 3 ]  In 2007 the IOM published a follow-up report titled  Preventing Medication Errors  and reported that more than 1.5 million Americans are injured every year in American hospitals, and the average hospitalized patient experiences at least one medication error each day. This report emphasized actions that health care systems could take to improve medication safety. [ 4 ]

Read additional information about specific actions that nurses can take to prevent medication errors; go to the “Preventing Medication Errors” section of the “ Legal/Ethical”  chapter of the Open RN  Nursing Pharmacology  textbook.

In an article released by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, errors involving nurses that endanger patient safety cover broad territory. This territory spans “wrong site, wrong patient, wrong procedure” errors, medication mistakes, failures to follow procedures that prevent central line bloodstream and other infections, errors that allow unsupervised patients to fall, and more. Some errors can be traced to shifts that are too long that leave nurses fatigued, some result from flawed systems that do not allow for adequate safety checks, and others are caused by interruptions to nurses while they are trying to administer medications or provide other care. [ 5 ]

The Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) project began in 2005 to assist in preparing future nurses to continuously improve the quality and safety of the health care systems in which they work. The vision of the QSEN project is to “inspire health care professionals to put quality and safety as core values to guide their work.” [ 6 ]  Nurses and nursing students are expected to participate in quality improvement (QI) initiatives by identifying gaps where change is needed and assisting in implementing initiatives to resolve these gaps.  Quality improvement  is defined as, “The combined and unceasing efforts of everyone – health care professionals, patients and their families, researchers, payers, planners and educators – to make the changes that will lead to better patient outcomes (health), better system performance (care), and better professional development (learning).” [ 7 ]

Delegation of Interventions

While implementing interventions, RNs may elect to delegate nursing tasks.  Delegation  is defined by the American Nurses Association as, “The assignment of the performance of activities or tasks related to patient care to unlicensed assistive personnel or licensed practical nurses (LPNs) while retaining accountability for the outcome.” [ 8 ]  RNs are accountable for determining the appropriateness of the delegated task according to condition of the patient and the circumstance; the communication provided to an appropriately trained LPN or UAP; the level of supervision provided; and the evaluation and documentation of the task completed. The RN must also be aware of the state Nurse Practice Act, federal regulations, and agency policy before delegating. The RN cannot delegate responsibilities requiring clinical judgment. [ 9 ]  See the following box for information regarding legal requirements associated with delegation according to the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act.

Delegation According to the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act

During the supervision and direction of delegated acts a Registered Nurse shall do all of the following:

Delegate tasks commensurate with educational preparation and demonstrated abilities of the person supervised.

Provide direction and assistance to those supervised.

Observe and monitor the activities of those supervised.

Evaluate the effectiveness of acts performed under supervision. [ 10 ]

The standard of practice for Licensed Practical Nurses in Wisconsin states, “In the performance of acts in basic patient situations, the LPN. shall, under the general supervision of an RN or the direction of a provider:

Accept only patient care assignments which the LPN is competent to perform.

Provide basic nursing care. Basic nursing care is defined as care that can be performed following a defined nursing procedure with minimal modification in which the responses of the patient to the nursing care are predictable.

Record nursing care given and report to the appropriate person changes in the condition of a patient.

Consult with a provider in cases where an LPN knows or should know a delegated act may harm a patient.

Perform the following other acts when applicable:

Assist with the collection of data.

Assist with the development and revision of a nursing care plan.

Reinforce the teaching provided by an RN provider and provide basic health care instruction.

Participate with other health team members in meeting basic patient needs.” [ 11 ]

Read additional details about the scope of practice of registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) in Wisconsin’s Nurse Practice Act in  Chapter N 6 Standards of Practice .

Read more about the American Nurses Association’s  Principles of Delegation.

Table 4.7 outlines general guidelines for delegating nursing tasks in the state of Wisconsin according to the role of the health care team member.

General Guidelines for Delegating Nursing Tasks

Documentation of Interventions

As interventions are performed, they must be documented in the patient’s record in a timely manner. As previously discussed in the “Ethical and Legal Issues” subsection of the “ Basic Concepts ” section, lack of documentation is considered a failure to communicate and a basis for legal action. A basic rule of thumb is if an intervention is not documented, it is considered not done in a court of law. It is also important to document administration of medication and other interventions in a timely manner to prevent errors that can occur due to delayed documentation time.

Coordination of Care and Health Teaching/Health Promotion

ANA’s Standard of Professional Practice for Implementation also includes the standards  5A   Coordination of Care  and  5B   Health Teaching and Health Promotion . [ 12 ]   Coordination of Care  includes competencies such as organizing the components of the plan, engaging the patient in self-care to achieve goals, and advocating for the delivery of dignified and holistic care by the interprofessional team.  Health Teaching and Health Promotion  is defined as, “Employing strategies to teach and promote health and wellness.” [ 13 ]  Patient education is an important component of nursing care and should be included during every patient encounter. For example, patient education may include teaching about side effects while administering medications or teaching patients how to self-manage their conditions at home.

Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter. The nurse implemented the nursing care plan documented in Appendix C. Interventions related to breathing were prioritized. Administration of the diuretic medication was completed first, and lung sounds were monitored frequently for the remainder of the shift. Weighing the patient before breakfast was delegated to the CNA. The patient was educated about her medications and methods to use to reduce peripheral edema at home. All interventions were documented in the electronic medical record (EMR).

4.8. EVALUATION

Evaluation  is the sixth step of the nursing process (and the sixth Standard of Practice set by the American Nurses Association). This standard is defined as, “The registered nurse evaluates progress toward attainment of goals and outcomes.” [ 1 ]  Both the patient status and the effectiveness of the nursing care must be continuously evaluated and the care plan modified as needed. [ 2 ]

Evaluation focuses on the effectiveness of the nursing interventions by reviewing the expected outcomes to determine if they were met by the time frames indicated. During the evaluation phase, nurses use critical thinking to analyze reassessment data and determine if a patient’s expected outcomes have been met, partially met, or not met by the time frames established. If outcomes are not met or only partially met by the time frame indicated, the care plan should be revised. Reassessment should occur every time the nurse interacts with a patient, discusses the care plan with others on the interprofessional team, or reviews updated laboratory or diagnostic test results. Nursing care plans should be updated as higher priority goals emerge. The results of the evaluation must be documented in the patient’s medical record.

Ideally, when the planned interventions are implemented, the patient will respond positively and the expected outcomes are achieved. However, when interventions do not assist in progressing the patient toward the expected outcomes, the nursing care plan must be revised to more effectively address the needs of the patient. These questions can be used as a guide when revising the nursing care plan:

• Did anything unanticipated occur?
• Has the patient’s condition changed?
• Were the expected outcomes and their time frames realistic?
• Are the nursing diagnoses accurate for this patient at this time?
• Are the planned interventions appropriately focused on supporting outcome attainment?
• What barriers were experienced as interventions were implemented?
• Does ongoing assessment data indicate the need to revise diagnoses, outcome criteria, planned interventions, or implementation strategies?
• Are different interventions required?

Refer to Scenario C in the “Assessment” section of this chapter and Appendix C . The nurse evaluates the patient’s progress toward achieving the expected outcomes.

For the nursing diagnosis  Fluid Volume Excess , the nurse evaluated the four expected outcomes to determine if they were met during the time frames indicated:

The patient will report decreased dyspnea within the next 8 hours.

The patient will have clear lung sounds within the next 24 hours.

The patient will have decreased edema within the next 24 hours.

The patient’s weight will return to baseline by discharge.

Evaluation of the patient condition on Day 1 included the following data: “ The patient reported decreased shortness of breath, and there were no longer crackles in the lower bases of the lungs. Weight decreased by 1 kg, but 2+ edema continued in ankles and calves .” Based on this data, the nurse evaluated the expected outcomes as “ Partially Met ” and revised the care plan with two new interventions:

Request prescription for TED hose from provider.

Elevate patient’s legs when sitting in chair.

For the second nursing diagnosis,  Risk for Falls , the nurse evaluated the outcome criteria as “ Met ” based on the evaluation, “ The patient verbalizes understanding and is appropriately calling for assistance when getting out of bed. No falls have occurred. ”

The nurse will continue to reassess the patient’s progress according to the care plan during hospitalization and make revisions to the care plan as needed. Evaluation of the care plan is documented in the patient’s medical record.

4.9. SUMMARY OF THE NURSING PROCESS

You have now learned how to perform each step of the nursing process according to the ANA Standards of Professional Nursing Practice. Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment are used when assessing the patient, creating a nursing care plan, and implementing interventions. Frequent reassessment, with revisions to the care plan as needed, is important to help the patient achieve expected outcomes. Throughout the entire nursing process, the patient always remains the cornerstone of nursing care. Providing individualized, patient-centered care and evaluating whether that care has been successful in achieving patient outcomes are essential for providing safe, professional nursing practice.

Video Review of Creating a Sample Care Plan [ 1 ]

4.10. LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Learning activities.

(Answers to “Learning Activities” can be found in the “Answer Key” at the end of the book. Answers to interactive activity elements will be provided within the element as immediate feedback.)

Instructions: Apply what you’ve learned in this chapter by creating a nursing care plan using the following scenario. Use the template in   Appendix B   as a guide.

The client, Mark S., is a 57-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital with “severe” abdominal pain that was unable to be managed in the Emergency Department. The physician has informed Mark that he will need to undergo some diagnostic tests. The tests are scheduled for the morning.

After receiving the news about his condition and the need for diagnostic tests, Mark begins to pace the floor. He continues to pace constantly. He keeps asking the nurse the same question (“How long will the tests take?”) about his tests over and over again. The patient also remarked, “I’m so uptight I will never be able to sleep tonight.” The nurse observes that the client avoids eye contact during their interactions and that he continually fidgets with the call light. His eyes keep darting around the room. He appears tense and has a strained expression on his face. He states, “My mouth is so dry.” The nurse observes his vital signs to be: T 98, P 104, R 30, BP 180/96. The nurse notes that his skin feels sweaty (diaphoretic) and cool to the touch.

Critical Thinking Activity:

Group (cluster) the subjective and objective data.

Create a problem-focused nursing diagnosis (hypothesis).

Develop a broad goal and then identify an expected outcome in “SMART” format.

Outline three interventions for the nursing diagnosis to meet the goal. Cite an evidence-based source.

Imagine that you implemented the interventions that you identified. Evaluate the degree to which the expected outcome was achieved: Met – Partially Met – Not Met.

• IV GLOSSARY

The act or process of pleading for, supporting, or recommending a cause or course of action. [ 1 ]

Unconditionally acceptance of the humanity of others, respecting their need for dignity and worth, while providing compassionate, comforting care. [ 2 ]

Groups of people who share a characteristic that causes each member to be susceptible to a particular human response, such as demographics, health/family history, stages of growth/development, or exposure to certain events/experiences. [ 3 ]

Medical diagnoses, injuries, procedures, medical devices, or pharmacological agents. These conditions are not independently modifiable by the nurse, but support accuracy in nursing diagnosis. [ 4 ]

Care that can be performed following a defined nursing procedure with minimal modification in which the responses of the patient to the nursing care are predictable. [ 5 ]

A relationship described as one in which the whole person is assessed while balancing the vulnerability and dignity of the patient and family. [ 6 ]

Individual, family, or group, which includes significant others and populations. [ 7 ]

The observed outcome of critical thinking and decision-making. It is an iterative process that uses nursing knowledge to observe and access presenting situations, identify a prioritized client concern, and generate the best possible evidence-based solutions in order to deliver safe client care. [ 8 ]

A complex cognitive process that uses formal and informal thinking strategies to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate the significance of this information, and weigh alternative actions.  [ 9 ]

Grouping data into similar domains or patterns.

Nursing interventions that require cooperation among health care professionals and unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP).

While implementing interventions during the nursing process, includes components such as organizing the components of the plan with input from the health care consumer, engaging the patient in self-care to achieve goals, and advocating for the delivery of dignified and person-centered care by the interprofessional team. [ 10 ]

Reasoning about clinical issues such as teamwork, collaboration, and streamlining workflow. [ 11 ]

Subjective or objective data that gives the nurse a hint or indication of a potential problem, process, or disorder.

“Top-down thinking” or moving from the general to the specific. Deductive reasoning relies on a general statement or hypothesis—sometimes called a premise or standard—that is held to be true. The premise is used to reach a specific, logical conclusion.

Observable cues/inferences that cluster as manifestations of a problem-focused, health-promotion diagnosis, or syndrome. This does not only imply those things that the nurse can see, but also things that are seen, heard (e.g., the patient/family tells us), touched, or smelled. [ 12 ]

The assignment of the performance of activities or tasks related to patient care to unlicensed assistive personnel while retaining accountability for the outcome. [ 13 ]

Interventions that require a prescription from a physician, advanced practice nurse, or physician’s assistant.

Interventions that are carried out by having personal contact with a patient.

An electronic version of the patient’s medical record.

A lifelong problem-solving approach that integrates the best evidence from well-designed research studies and evidence-based theories; clinical expertise and evidence from assessment of the health care consumer’s history and condition, as well as health care resources; and patient, family, group, community, and population preferences and values. [ 14 ]

Statements of measurable action for the patient within a specific time frame and in response to nursing interventions. “SMART” outcome statements are specific, measurable, action-oriented, realistic, and include a time frame.

An evidence-based assessment framework for identifying patient problems and risks during the assessment phase of the nursing process.

A judgment formed from a set of facts, cues, and observations.

Broad statements of purpose that describe the aim of nursing care.

Employing strategies to teach and promote health and wellness. [ 15 ]

Any intervention that the nurse can provide without obtaining a prescription or consulting anyone else.

Interventions performed by the nurse in a setting other than directly with the patient. An example of indirect care is creating a nursing care plan.

A type of reasoning that involves forming generalizations based on specific incidents.

Interpretations or conclusions based on cues, personal experiences, preferences, or generalizations.

Nurses who have had specific training and passed a licensing exam. The training is generally less than that of a Registered Nurse. The scope of practice of an LPN/LVN is determined by the facility and the state’s Nurse Practice Act.

A disease or illness diagnosed by a physician or advanced health care provider such as a nurse practitioner or physician’s assistant. Medical diagnoses are a result of clustering signs and symptoms to determine what is medically affecting an individual.

Nursing integrates the art and science of caring and focuses on the protection, promotion, and optimization of health and human functioning; prevention of illness and injury; facilitation of healing; and alleviation of suffering through compassionate presence. Nursing is the diagnosis and treatment of human responses and advocacy in the care of individuals, families, groups, communities, and populations in the recognition of the connection of all humanity. [ 16 ]

Specific documentation of the planning and delivery of nursing care that is required by The Joint Commission.

A systematic approach to patient-centered care with steps including assessment, diagnosis, outcome identification, planning, implementation, and evaluation; otherwise known by the mnemonic “ADOPIE.”

Data that the nurse can see, touch, smell, or hear or is reproducible such as vital signs. Laboratory and diagnostic results are also considered objective data.

A measurable behavior demonstrated by the patient that is responsive to nursing interventions. [ 17 ]

The format of a nursing diagnosis statement that includes:

Problem (P) – statement of the patient problem (i.e., the nursing diagnosis)

Etiology (E) – related factors (etiology) contributing to the cause of the nursing diagnosis

Signs and Symptoms (S) – defining characteristics manifested by the patient of that nursing diagnosis

Orders, interventions, remedies, or treatments ordered or directed by an authorized primary health care provider. [ 18 ]

Information collected from the patient.

Member of the health care team (usually a medical physician, nurse practitioner, etc.) licensed and authorized to formulate prescriptions on behalf of the client. [ 19 ]

The skillful process of deciding which actions to complete first, second, or third for optimal patient outcomes and to improve patient safety.

The “combined and unceasing efforts of everyone — health care professionals, patients and their families, researchers, payers, planners, and educators — to make the changes that will lead to better patient outcomes (health), better system performance (care), and better professional development (learning).” [ 20 ]

Developing a relationship of mutual trust and understanding.

A nurse who has had a designated amount of education and training in nursing and is licensed by a state Board of Nursing.

The underlying cause (etiology) of a nursing diagnosis when creating a PES statement.

Patients have the right to determine what will be done with and to their own person.

Principles and procedures in the discovery of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data, and the formulation and testing of a hypothesis.

Information collected from sources other than the patient.

Data that the patient or family reports or data that the nurse makes as an inference, conclusion, or assumption, such as  “The patient appears anxious.”

Any unlicensed personnel trained to function in a supportive role, regardless of title, to whom a nursing responsibility may be delegated. [ 21 ]

Obtaining Subjective Data in a Care Relationship

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

• Cite this Page Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, Christman E, editors. Nursing Fundamentals [Internet]. Eau Claire (WI): Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2021. Chapter 4 Nursing Process.
• PDF version of this title (216M)

In this Page

• NURSING PROCESS INTRODUCTION
• BASIC CONCEPTS
• OUTCOME IDENTIFICATION
• IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERVENTIONS
• SUMMARY OF THE NURSING PROCESS
• LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Other titles in this collection

• Open RN OER Textbooks

Related Items in Bookshelf

• All Textbooks

Bulk Download

• Bulk download content from FTP

Related information

• PMC PubMed Central citations
• PubMed Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

• Chapter 4 Nursing Process - Nursing Fundamentals Chapter 4 Nursing Process - Nursing Fundamentals

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (Explained W/ Examples)

Last updated on August 23rd, 2023

Critical thinking is a foundational skill applicable across various domains, including education, problem-solving, decision-making, and professional fields such as science, business, healthcare, and more.

It plays a crucial role in promoting logical and rational thinking, fostering informed decision-making, and enabling individuals to navigate complex and rapidly changing environments.

In this article, we will look at what is critical thinking in nursing practice, its importance, and how it enables nurses to excel in their roles while also positively impacting patient outcomes.

What is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is a cognitive process that involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information to make reasoned and informed decisions.

It’s a mental activity that goes beyond simple memorization or acceptance of information at face value.

Critical thinking involves careful, reflective, and logical thinking to understand complex problems, consider various perspectives, and arrive at well-reasoned conclusions or solutions.

Key aspects of critical thinking include:

• Analysis: Critical thinking begins with the thorough examination of information, ideas, or situations. It involves breaking down complex concepts into smaller parts to better understand their components and relationships.
• Evaluation: Critical thinkers assess the quality and reliability of information or arguments. They weigh evidence, identify strengths and weaknesses, and determine the credibility of sources.
• Synthesis: Critical thinking involves combining different pieces of information or ideas to create a new understanding or perspective. This involves connecting the dots between various sources and integrating them into a coherent whole.
• Inference: Critical thinkers draw logical and well-supported conclusions based on the information and evidence available. They use reasoning to make educated guesses about situations where complete information might be lacking.
• Problem-Solving: Critical thinking is essential in solving complex problems. It allows individuals to identify and define problems, generate potential solutions, evaluate the pros and cons of each solution, and choose the most appropriate course of action.
• Creativity: Critical thinking involves thinking outside the box and considering alternative viewpoints or approaches. It encourages the exploration of new ideas and solutions beyond conventional thinking.
• Reflection: Critical thinkers engage in self-assessment and reflection on their thought processes. They consider their own biases, assumptions, and potential errors in reasoning, aiming to improve their thinking skills over time.
• Open-Mindedness: Critical thinkers approach ideas and information with an open mind, willing to consider different viewpoints and perspectives even if they challenge their own beliefs.
• Effective Communication: Critical thinkers can articulate their thoughts and reasoning clearly and persuasively to others. They can express complex ideas in a coherent and understandable manner.
• Continuous Learning: Critical thinking encourages a commitment to ongoing learning and intellectual growth. It involves seeking out new knowledge, refining thinking skills, and staying receptive to new information.

Definition of Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is an intellectual process of analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information to make reasoned and informed decisions.

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

Critical thinking in nursing is a vital cognitive skill that involves analyzing, evaluating, and making reasoned decisions about patient care.

It’s an essential aspect of a nurse’s professional practice as it enables them to provide safe and effective care to patients.

Critical thinking involves a careful and deliberate thought process to gather and assess information, consider alternative solutions, and make informed decisions based on evidence and sound judgment.

This skill helps nurses to:

• Assess Information: Critical thinking allows nurses to thoroughly assess patient information, including medical history, symptoms, and test results. By analyzing this data, nurses can identify patterns, discrepancies, and potential issues that may require further investigation.
• Diagnose: Nurses use critical thinking to analyze patient data and collaboratively work with other healthcare professionals to formulate accurate nursing diagnoses. This is crucial for developing appropriate care plans that address the unique needs of each patient.
• Plan and Implement Care: Once a nursing diagnosis is established, critical thinking helps nurses develop effective care plans. They consider various interventions and treatment options, considering the patient’s preferences, medical history, and evidence-based practices.
• Evaluate Outcomes: After implementing interventions, critical thinking enables nurses to evaluate the outcomes of their actions. If the desired outcomes are not achieved, nurses can adapt their approach and make necessary changes to the care plan.
• Prioritize Care: In busy healthcare environments, nurses often face situations where they must prioritize patient care. Critical thinking helps them determine which patients require immediate attention and which interventions are most essential.
• Communicate Effectively: Critical thinking skills allow nurses to communicate clearly and confidently with patients, their families, and other members of the healthcare team. They can explain complex medical information and treatment plans in a way that is easily understood by all parties involved.
• Identify Problems: Nurses use critical thinking to identify potential complications or problems in a patient’s condition. This early recognition can lead to timely interventions and prevent further deterioration.
• Collaborate: Healthcare is a collaborative effort involving various professionals. Critical thinking enables nurses to actively participate in interdisciplinary discussions, share their insights, and contribute to holistic patient care.
• Ethical Decision-Making: Critical thinking helps nurses navigate ethical dilemmas that can arise in patient care. They can analyze different perspectives, consider ethical principles, and make morally sound decisions.
• Continual Learning: Critical thinking encourages nurses to seek out new knowledge, stay up-to-date with the latest research and medical advancements, and incorporate evidence-based practices into their care.

In summary, critical thinking is an integral skill for nurses, allowing them to provide high-quality, patient-centered care by analyzing information, making informed decisions, and adapting their approaches as needed.

It’s a dynamic process that enhances clinical reasoning , problem-solving, and overall patient outcomes.

What are the Levels of Critical Thinking in Nursing?

The development of critical thinking in nursing practice involves progressing through three levels: basic, complex, and commitment.

The Kataoka-Yahiro and Saylor model outlines this progression.

1. Basic Critical Thinking:

At this level, learners trust experts for solutions. Thinking is based on rules and principles. For instance, nursing students may strictly follow a procedure manual without personalization, as they lack experience. Answers are seen as right or wrong, and the opinions of experts are accepted.

2. Complex Critical Thinking:

Learners start to analyze choices independently and think creatively. They recognize conflicting solutions and weigh benefits and risks. Thinking becomes innovative, with a willingness to consider various approaches in complex situations.

3. Commitment:

At this level, individuals anticipate decision points without external help and take responsibility for their choices. They choose actions or beliefs based on available alternatives, considering consequences and accountability.

As nurses gain knowledge and experience, their critical thinking evolves from relying on experts to independent analysis and decision-making, ultimately leading to committed and accountable choices in patient care.

Why Critical Thinking is Important in Nursing?

Critical thinking is important in nursing for several crucial reasons:

Patient Safety:

Nursing decisions directly impact patient well-being. Critical thinking helps nurses identify potential risks, make informed choices, and prevent errors.

Clinical Judgment:

Nursing decisions often involve evaluating information from various sources, such as patient history, lab results, and medical literature.

Critical thinking assists nurses in critically appraising this information, distinguishing credible sources, and making rational judgments that align with evidence-based practices.

Enhances Decision-Making:

In nursing, critical thinking allows nurses to gather relevant patient information, assess it objectively, and weigh different options based on evidence and analysis.

This process empowers them to make informed decisions about patient care, treatment plans, and interventions, ultimately leading to better outcomes.

Promotes Problem-Solving:

Nurses encounter complex patient issues that require effective problem-solving.

Critical thinking equips them to break down problems into manageable parts, analyze root causes, and explore creative solutions that consider the unique needs of each patient.

Drives Creativity:

Nursing care is not always straightforward. Critical thinking encourages nurses to think creatively and explore innovative approaches to challenges, especially when standard protocols might not suffice for unique patient situations.

Fosters Effective Communication:

Communication is central to nursing. Critical thinking enables nurses to clearly express their thoughts, provide logical explanations for their decisions, and engage in meaningful dialogues with patients, families, and other healthcare professionals.

Aids Learning:

Nursing is a field of continuous learning. Critical thinking encourages nurses to engage in ongoing self-directed education, seeking out new knowledge, embracing new techniques, and staying current with the latest research and developments.

Improves Relationships:

Open-mindedness and empathy are essential in nursing relationships.

Critical thinking encourages nurses to consider diverse viewpoints, understand patients’ perspectives, and communicate compassionately, leading to stronger therapeutic relationships.

Empowers Independence:

Nursing often requires autonomous decision-making. Critical thinking empowers nurses to analyze situations independently, make judgments without undue influence, and take responsibility for their actions.

Facilitates Adaptability:

Healthcare environments are ever-changing. Critical thinking equips nurses with the ability to quickly assess new information, adjust care plans, and navigate unexpected situations while maintaining patient safety and well-being.

Strengthens Critical Analysis:

In the era of vast information, nurses must discern reliable data from misinformation.

Critical thinking helps them scrutinize sources, question assumptions, and make well-founded choices based on credible information.

How to Apply Critical Thinking in Nursing? (With Examples)

Here are some examples of how nurses can apply critical thinking.

Assess Patient Data:

Critical Thinking Action: Carefully review patient history, symptoms, and test results.

Example: A nurse notices a change in a diabetic patient’s blood sugar levels. Instead of just administering insulin, the nurse considers recent dietary changes, activity levels, and possible medication interactions before adjusting the treatment plan.

Diagnose Patient Needs:

Critical Thinking Action: Analyze patient data to identify potential nursing diagnoses.

Example: After reviewing a patient’s lab results, vital signs, and observations, a nurse identifies “ Risk for Impaired Skin Integrity ” due to the patient’s limited mobility.

Plan and Implement Care:

Critical Thinking Action: Develop a care plan based on patient needs and evidence-based practices.

Example: For a patient at risk of falls, the nurse plans interventions such as hourly rounding, non-slip footwear, and bed alarms to ensure patient safety.

Evaluate Interventions:

Critical Thinking Action: Assess the effectiveness of interventions and modify the care plan as needed.

Example: After administering pain medication, the nurse evaluates its impact on the patient’s comfort level and considers adjusting the dosage or trying an alternative pain management approach.

Prioritize Care:

Critical Thinking Action: Determine the order of interventions based on patient acuity and needs.

Example: In a busy emergency department, the nurse triages patients by considering the severity of their conditions, ensuring that critical cases receive immediate attention.

Collaborate with the Healthcare Team:

Critical Thinking Action: Participate in interdisciplinary discussions and share insights.

Example: During rounds, a nurse provides input on a patient’s response to treatment, which prompts the team to adjust the care plan for better outcomes.

Ethical Decision-Making:

Critical Thinking Action: Analyze ethical dilemmas and make morally sound choices.

Example: When a terminally ill patient expresses a desire to stop treatment, the nurse engages in ethical discussions, respecting the patient’s autonomy and ensuring proper end-of-life care.

Patient Education:

Critical Thinking Action: Tailor patient education to individual needs and comprehension levels.

Example: A nurse uses visual aids and simplified language to explain medication administration to a patient with limited literacy skills.

Adapt to Changes:

Critical Thinking Action: Quickly adjust care plans when patient conditions change.

Example: During post-operative recovery, a nurse notices signs of infection and promptly informs the healthcare team to initiate appropriate treatment adjustments.

Critical Analysis of Information:

Critical Thinking Action: Evaluate information sources for reliability and relevance.

Example: When presented with conflicting research studies, a nurse critically examines the methodologies and sample sizes to determine which study is more credible.

Making Sense of Critical Thinking Skills

What is the purpose of critical thinking in nursing.

The purpose of critical thinking in nursing is to enable nurses to effectively analyze, interpret, and evaluate patient information, make informed clinical judgments, develop appropriate care plans, prioritize interventions, and adapt their approaches as needed, thereby ensuring safe, evidence-based, and patient-centered care.

Why critical thinking is important in nursing?

Critical thinking is important in nursing because it promotes safe decision-making, accurate clinical judgment, problem-solving, evidence-based practice, holistic patient care, ethical reasoning, collaboration, and adapting to dynamic healthcare environments.

Critical thinking skill also enhances patient safety, improves outcomes, and supports nurses’ professional growth.

How is critical thinking used in the nursing process?

Critical thinking is integral to the nursing process as it guides nurses through the systematic approach of assessing, diagnosing, planning, implementing, and evaluating patient care. It involves:

• Assessment: Critical thinking enables nurses to gather and interpret patient data accurately, recognizing relevant patterns and cues.
• Diagnosis: Nurses use critical thinking to analyze patient data, identify nursing diagnoses, and differentiate actual issues from potential complications.
• Planning: Critical thinking helps nurses develop tailored care plans, selecting appropriate interventions based on patient needs and evidence.
• Implementation: Nurses make informed decisions during interventions, considering patient responses and adjusting plans as needed.
• Evaluation: Critical thinking supports the assessment of patient outcomes, determining the effectiveness of intervention, and adapting care accordingly.

Throughout the nursing process , critical thinking ensures comprehensive, patient-centered care and fosters continuous improvement in clinical judgment and decision-making.

What is an example of the critical thinking attitude of independent thinking in nursing practice?

An example of the critical thinking attitude of independent thinking in nursing practice could be:

A nurse is caring for a patient with a complex medical history who is experiencing a new set of symptoms. The nurse carefully reviews the patient’s history, recent test results, and medication list.

While discussing the case with the healthcare team, the nurse realizes that the current treatment plan might not be addressing all aspects of the patient’s condition.

Instead of simply following the established protocol, the nurse independently considers alternative approaches based on their assessment.

The nurse proposes a modification to the treatment plan, citing the rationale and evidence supporting the change.

This demonstrates independent thinking by critically evaluating the situation, challenging assumptions, and advocating for a more personalized and effective patient care approach.

How to use Costa’s level of questioning for critical thinking in nursing?

Costa’s levels of questioning can be applied in nursing to facilitate critical thinking and stimulate a deeper understanding of patient situations. The levels of questioning are as follows:

• 15 Attitudes of Critical Thinking in Nursing (Explained W/ Examples)
• Nursing Concept Map (FREE Template)
• Clinical Reasoning In Nursing (Explained W/ Example)
• 8 Stages Of The Clinical Reasoning Cycle
• How To Improve Critical Thinking Skills In Nursing? 24 Strategies With Examples
• What is the “5 Whys” Technique?
• What Are Socratic Questions?

Critical thinking in nursing is the foundation that underpins safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

Critical thinking skills empower nurses to navigate the complexities of their profession while consistently providing high-quality care to diverse patient populations.

Reading Recommendation

Potter, P.A., Perry, A.G., Stockert, P. and Hall, A. (2013) Fundamentals of Nursing

Comments are closed.

Medical & Legal Disclaimer

All the contents on this site are for entertainment, informational, educational, and example purposes ONLY. These contents are not intended to be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or practice guidelines. However, we aim to publish precise and current information. By using any content on this website, you agree never to hold us legally liable for damages, harm, loss, or misinformation. Read the  privacy policy  and  terms and conditions.

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

© 2024 nurseship.com. All rights reserved.

Explore Jobs

• Jobs Near Me
• Remote Jobs
• Full Time Jobs
• Part Time Jobs
• Entry Level Jobs
• Work From Home Jobs

Find Specific Jobs

• $15 Per Hour Jobs
• $20 Per Hour Jobs
• Hiring Immediately Jobs
• High School Jobs
• H1b Visa Jobs

Explore Careers

• Business And Financial
• Architecture And Engineering
• Computer And Mathematical

Explore Professions

• What They Do
• Certifications
• Demographics

Best Companies

• Health Care
• Fortune 500

Explore Companies

• CEO And Executies
• Resume Builder
• Career Advice
• Explore Majors
• Questions And Answers
• Interview Questions

The Most Important Logical Thinking Skills (With Examples)

• Logical Skills
• Promotional Skills
• Bookkeeping Skills
• Typing Skills
• Sales Skills
• Science And Math Skills
• Physical Strength And Dexterity Skills
• Customer Service Skills
• Instructional Skills
• Logical-Thinking Skills
• Mechanical Skills
• Memorization Skills
• Motivational Skills
• Artistic Talent

Find a Job You Really Want In

Logical thinking skills like critical-thinking, research, and creative thinking are valuable assets in the workplace. These skills are sought after by many employers, who want employees that take into account facts and data before deciding on an important course of action. This is because such solutions will ensure the organization’s processes can continue to operate efficiently.

So, if you’re a job seeker or employee looking to explore and brush up on your logical thinking skills, you’re in luck. This article will cover examples of logical thinking skills in the workplace, as well as what you can do to showcase those skills on your resume and in interviews.

Key Takeaways:

Logical thinking is problem solving based on reasoning that follows a strictly structured progression of analysis.

Critical thinking, research, creativity, mathematics, reading, active listening, and organization are all important logical thinking skills in the workplace.

Logical thinking provides objectivity for decision making that multiple people can accept.

Deduction follows valid premises to reach a logical conclusion.

It can be very helpful to demonstrate logical thinking skills at a job interview.

What is logical thinking?

10 examples of logical thinking skills, examples of logical thinking in the workplace, what is deductive reasoning, logical thinking in a job interview, logical thinking skills faq, final thoughts.

• Sign Up For More Advice and Jobs

Logical thinking is the ability to reason out an issue after observing and analyzing it from all angles . You can then form a conclusion that makes the most sense. It also includes the ability to take note of reactions and feedback to aid in the formation of the conclusion.

Logical thinking skills enable you to present your justification for the actions you take, the strategies you use, and the decisions you make. You can easily stand in front of your clients, peers, and supervisors and defend your product, service, and course of action if the necessity arises.

Logical thinking is an excellent way of solving complex problems. You can break the problem into smaller parts; solve them individually in a sequence, then present the complete solution. However, it is not infallible.

So, when a problem in the workplace feels overwhelming, you may want to think about it logically first.

Logical thinking skills are a skill set that enables you to reason logically when solving problems. They enable you to provide well-reasoned answers to any issues that arise. They also empower you to make decisions that most people will consider rational.

Critical-thinking skills. If you are a critical thinker, then you can analyze and evaluate a problem before making judgments. You need to improve your critical thinking process to become a logical thinker.

Your critical thinking skills will improve your ability to solve problems. You will be the go-to employee concerning crises. People can rely on you to be reasonable whenever an issue arises instead of letting biases rule you.

Research skills. If you are a good researcher , then you can search and locate data that can be useful when presenting information on your preferred subject.

The more relevant information you have about a particular subject, the more accurate your conclusions are likely to be. The sources you use must be reputable and relevant.

For this reason, your ability to ferret out information will affect how well you can reason logically.

Creative thinking skills. If you are a creative thinker , then you can find innovative solutions to problems.

You are the kind of person that can think outside the box when brainstorming ideas and potential solutions. Your thinking is not rigid. Instead, you tend to look at issues in ways other people have not thought of before.

While logical thinking is based on data and facts, that doesn’t mean it is rigid. You can creatively find ways of sourcing that data or experimenting so that you can form logical conclusions. Your strategic thinking skills will also help enable you to analyze reactions or collect feedback .

Mathematical skills. If you are skilled in mathematics , then you can work well with numbers and represent mathematical ideas using visual symbols. Your brain must be able to compute information.

Business is a numbers game. That means you must have some knowledge of mathematics. You must be able to perform basic mathematical tasks involving addition, subtractions, divisions, multiplications, etc.

So, to become a logical thinker, you must be comfortable working with numbers. You will encounter them in many business-related complex problems. And your ability to understand them will determine whether you can reach an accurate logical conclusion that helps your organization.

Reading skills. If you are a good reader , then you can make sense of the letters and symbols that you see. Your ability to read will determine your competency concerning your logical thinking and reasoning skills.

And that skill set will come in handy when you are presented with different sets of work-related statements from which you are meant to conclude. Such statements may be part of your company policy, technical manual, etc.

Active listening skills. Active listening is an important communication skill to have. If you are an active listener, then you can hear, understand what is being said, remember it, and respond to it if necessary.

Not all instructions are written. You may need to listen to someone to get the information you need to solve problems before you write it down. In that case, your active listening skills will determine how well you can remember the information so that you can use it to reason things out logically.

Information ordering skills. If you have information ordering skills, then you can arrange things based on a specified order following the set rules or conditions. These things may include mathematical operations, words, pictures, etc.

Different organizations have different business processes. The workflow in one organization will be not similar to that of another organization even if both belong to the same industry.

Your ability to order information will depend on an organization’s culture . And it will have a major impact on how you can think and reason concerning solutions to your company problems.

If you follow the wrong order, then no matter how good your problem-solving techniques are your conclusions may be wrong for your organization.

Persuasion skills. Logical thinking can be useful when persuading others, especially in the workplace.

For example, lets say one of your co-workers wants to take a project in an impulsive direction, which will increase the budget. However, after you do your research, you realize a budget increase would be impossible.

You can then use your logical thinking skills to explain the situation to your co-worker , including details facts and numbers, which will help dissuade them from making an uninformed decision.

Decision making skills. Decision making skills go hand and hand with logical thinking, as being able to think logically about solutions and research topics will make it far easier to make informed decisions.

After all, no one likes making a decision that feels like a shot in the dark, so knowing crucial information about the options aviable to you, and thinking about them logically, can improve your confidence around decision making.

Confidence skills. Confidence that stems from an emotional and irrational place will always be fragile, but when you have more knowledge available to you through logical thinking, you can be more confident in your confidence skills.

For instance, if an employee asked you to answer an important question, you will have a lot more confidence in your answer if you can think logically about it, as opposed to having an air of uncertainty.

To improve your logic skills, it would be wise to practice how to solve problems based on facts and data. Below are examples of logical thinking in the workplace that will help you understand this kind of reasoning so that you can improve your thinking:

The human resource department in your organization has determined that leadership skills are important for anyone looking to go into a senior management position. So, it decides that it needs proof of leadership before hiring anyone internally. To find the right person for the senior management position , every candidate must undertake a project that involves a team of five. Whoever leads the winning team will get the senior managerial position.

This example shows a logical conclusion that is reached by your organization’s human resource department. In this case, your HR department has utilized logical thinking to determine the best internal candidate for the senior manager position.

It could be summarized as follows:

Statement 1: People with excellent leadership skills that produce winning teams make great senior managers. Statement 2: Candidate A is an excellent leader that has produced a winning team. Conclusion: Candidate A will make an excellent senior manager .

A marketing company researches working women on behalf of one of their clients – a robotics company. They find out that these women feel overwhelmed with responsibilities at home and in the workplace. As a result, they do not have enough time to clean, take care of their children, and stay productive in the workplace. A robotics company uses this research to create a robot cleaner that can be operated remotely . Then they advertise this cleaner specifically to working women with the tag line, “Working women can do it all with a little bit of help.” As a result of this marketing campaign, their revenues double within a year.

This example shows a logical conclusion reached by a robotics company after receiving the results of marketing research on working women. In this case, logical thinking has enabled the company to come up with a new marketing strategy for their cleaning product.

Statement 1: Working women struggle to keep their homes clean. Statement 2: Robot cleaners can take over cleaning duties for women who struggle to keep their homes clean. Conclusion: Robot cleaner can help working women keep their homes clean.

CalcX. Inc. has created a customer survey concerning its new finance software. The goal of the survey is to determine what customers like best about the software. After reading through over 100 customer reviews and ratings, it emerges that 60% of customers love the new user interface because it’s easy to navigate. CalcX. Inc. then decides to improve its marketing strategy. It decides to train every salesperson to talk about the easy navigation feature and how superior it is to the competition. So, every time a client objects to the price, the sales rep could admit that it is expensive, but the excellent user interface makes up for the price. At the end of the year, it emerges that this strategy has improved sales revenues by 10%.

The above example shows how logical thinking has helped CalcX. Sell more software and improve its bottom line.

Statement 1: If the majority of customers like a particular software feature, then sales reps should use it to overcome objections and increase revenues. Statement 2: 60% of the surveyed customers like the user interface of the new software, and; they think it makes navigation easier. Conclusion: The sales reps should market the new software’s user interface and the fact that it is easy to navigate to improve the company’s bottom line.

A political candidate hires a focus group to discuss hot-button issues they feel strongly about. It emerges that the group is torn on sexual reproductive health issues, but most support the issue of internal security . However, nearly everyone is opposed to the lower wages being paid due to the current economic crisis. Based on the results of this research, the candidate decides to focus on improving the economy and security mechanisms in the country. He also decides to let go of the sexual productive health issues because it would potentially cause him to lose some support.

In this case, the political candidate has made logical conclusions on what topics he should use to campaign for his seat with minimal controversies so that he doesn’t lose many votes.

This situation could be summarized as follows:

Statement 1: Most people find sexual reproductive health issues controversial and cannot agree. Statement 2: Most people feel that the internal security of the country is in jeopardy and something should be done about it. Statement 3: Most people want higher wages and an improved economy. Statement 4: Political candidates who want to win must avoid controversy and speak up on things that matter to people. Conclusion: To win, political candidates must focus on higher wages, an improved economy, and the internal security of the country while avoiding sexual reproductive health matters.

Deductive reasoning is an aspect of logical reasoning. It is a top-down reasoning approach that enables you to form a specific logical conclusion based on generalities. Therefore, you can use one or more statements, usually referred to as premises, to conclude something.

For example:

Statement 1: All mothers are women Statement 2: Daisy is a mother. Conclusion: Daisy is a woman.

Based on the above examples, all mothers are classified as women, and since Daisy is a mother, then it’s logical to deduce that she is a woman too.

It’s worth noting though, that deductive reasoning does not always produce an accurate conclusion based on reality.

Statement 1: All caregivers in this room are nurses. Statement 2: This dog, Tom, is a caregiver . Conclusion: This dog, Tom, is a nurse .

From the above example, we have deduced that Tom, the dog, is a nurse simply because the first statement stated that all caregivers are nurses. And yet, in reality, we know that dogs cannot be nurses. They do not have the mental capacity to become engaged in the profession.

For this reason, you must bear in mind that an argument can be validly based on the conditions but it can also be unsound if some statements are based on a fallacy.

Since logical thinking is so important in the workplace, most job interviewers will want to see you demonstrate this skill at the job interview. It is very important to keep in mind your logical thinking skills when you talk about yourself at the interview.

There are many ways in which an interviewer may ask you to demonstrate your logical thinking skills. For example:

You may have to solve an example problem. If the interviewer provides you a problem similar to one you might find at your job, make sure to critically analyze the problem to deduce a solution.

You may be asked about a previous problem or conflict you had to solve. This classic question provides you the opportunity to show your skills in action, so make sure to highlight the objectivity and logic of your problem solving.

Show your logic when talking about yourself. When given the opportunity to talk about yourself, highlight how logic comes into play in your decision making. This could be in how you picked the job position, why you choose your career or education, or what it is about yourself that makes you a great candidate.

Why is it important to think logically?

It’s important to think logically because it allows you to analyze a situation and come up with a logical solution. It allows for you to reason through the important decisions and solve problems with a better understanding of what needs to be done. This is necessary for developing a strong career.

Why is logic important?

Logic is important because it helps develop critical thinking skills. Critical thinking skills are important because they help you analyze and evaluate a problem before you make a decision. It also helps you improve your problem-solving skills to allow you to make better decisions.

How do you improve your logical thinking skills?

When improving your logical thinking skills make sure you spend time on a creative hobby and practice questioning. Creative hobbies can help reduce stress levels, and lower stress leads to having an easier time focusing on tasks and making logical thinking. Creative hobbies can include things like drawing, painting, and writing.

Another way to improve your logical thinking is to start asking questions about things. Asking questions allows for you to discover new things and learn about new topics you may not have thought about before.

What are logical thinking skills you need to succeed at work?

There are many logical thinking skills you need to succeed in the workplace. Our top four picks include:

Observation

Active Listening

Problem-solving

Logical thinking skills are valuable skills to have. You need to develop them so that you can become an asset to any organization that hires you. Be sure to include them in your resume and cover letter .

And if you make it to the interview, also ensure that you highlight these skills. You can do all this by highlighting the career accomplishments that required you to use logical thinking in the workplace.

It’s Your Yale – Consider Critical Thinking Skills to Articulate Your Work Quality

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Roger Raber has been a content writer at Zippia for over a year and has authored several hundred articles. Having retired after 28 years of teaching writing and research at both the high school and college levels, Roger enjoys providing career details that help inform people who are curious about a new job or career. Roger holds a BA in English from Cleveland State University and a MA from Marygrove college.

Recent Job Searches

• Registered Nurse Jobs Resume Location
• Truck Driver Jobs Resume Location
• Call Center Representative Jobs Resume Location
• Customer Service Representative Jobs Resume
• Delivery Driver Jobs Resume Location
• Warehouse Worker Jobs Resume Location
• Account Executive Jobs Resume Location
• Sales Associate Jobs Resume Location
• Licensed Practical Nurse Jobs Resume Location
• Company Driver Jobs Resume

Related posts

What Is Work-Life Balance? (And How To Improve It)

Artistic Talent: Is It Nature Or Nurture?

The Most Important Dedication and Devotion Skills (With Examples)

How To Improve Your Memory Skills

• Career Advice >
• Resume Skills >
• Defined Skills >
• Logical Thinking Skills