Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
- CAREER BRIEF
- 08 May 2019
Toolkit: How to write a great paper
A clear format will ensure that your research paper is understood by your readers. Follow:
1. Context — your introduction
2. Content — your results
3. Conclusion — your discussion
Plan your paper carefully and decide where each point will sit within the framework before you begin writing.
Collection: Careers toolkit
Straightforward writing
Scientific writing should always aim to be A, B and C: Accurate, Brief, and Clear. Never choose a long word when a short one will do. Use simple language to communicate your results. Always aim to distill your message down into the simplest sentence possible.
Choose a title
A carefully conceived title will communicate the single core message of your research paper. It should be D, E, F: Declarative, Engaging and Focused.
Conclusions
Add a sentence or two at the end of your concluding statement that sets out your plans for further research. What is next for you or others working in your field?
Find out more
See additional information .
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01362-9
Related Articles
How to get published in high impact journals
So you’re writing a paper
Writing for a Nature journal
How religious scientists balance work and faith
Career Feature 20 MAY 24
I’m worried I’ve been contacted by a predatory publisher — how do I find out?
Career Feature 15 MAY 24
How I fled bombed Aleppo to continue my career in science
Career Feature 08 MAY 24
Hunger on campus: why US PhD students are fighting over food
Career Feature 03 MAY 24
Senior Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Senior Postdoctoral Research Fellow required to lead exciting projects in Cancer Cell Cycle Biology and Cancer Epigenetics.
Melbourne University, Melbourne (AU)
University of Melbourne & Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Overseas Talent, Embarking on a New Journey Together at Tianjin University
We cordially invite outstanding young individuals from overseas to apply for the Excellent Young Scientists Fund Program (Overseas).
Tianjin, China
Tianjin University (TJU)
Chair Professor Positions in the School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
SPST seeks top Faculty scholars in Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Chair Professor Positions in the School of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronic Engineering
We are committed to accomplishing the mission of achieving a world-top-class engineering school.
Chair Professor Positions in the School of Mechanical Engineering
Aims to cultivate top talents, train a top-ranking faculty team, construct first-class disciplines and foster a favorable academic environment.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper
- © 2017
- Subhash Chandra Parija 0 ,
- Vikram Kate 1
Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
You can also search for this editor in PubMed Google Scholar
Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
- The book covers all aspects of scientific writing from submission to publishing in detail
- Written and edited by world leaders in the field
- Chapters are easy to understand with essential contents for writing quality scientific research paper and easy to follow algorithms and key points in each chapter
- Chapters highlight the importance of each section of the scientific article
- A comprehensive book which will focus on how to deal with rejected manuscripts, issues of plagiarism and ethical principles of scientific publications
107k Accesses
12 Citations
10 Altmetric
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this book
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
Licence this eBook for your library
Institutional subscriptions
Table of contents (18 chapters)
Front matter, writing a scientific research paper, why write a scientific research paper.
- Subhash Chandra Parija, Vikram Kate
Components and Structure of a Manuscript
- Sitanshu Sekhar Kar, Rakhee Kar
- S. Shyama Prem
Abstract and Keywords
- Vikram Kate, S. Suresh Kumar, Mohsina Subair
Introduction
- Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, Molly Mary Thabah
- B. Vishnu Bhat, S. Kingsley Manoj Kumar, G. Krishna Rao
- R. Ramesh, N. Ananthakrishnan
Discussion and Conclusion
- Zubair H. Aghai, David Carola
- Anup Mohta, Medha Mohta
Figures, Tables and Supporting Material
- Dinker Pai, Soon Kyit Chua, Suneet Sood
Publishing a Scientific Research Paper
Choosing a journal for paper submission and methods of submission.
- Vikram Kate, Madhuri Parija Halder, Subhash Chandra Parija
Revision of an Article and How to Deal with the Rejected Manuscript
- Vikram Kate, Raja Kalayarasan
Authorship and Contributorship
- Akash Shukla, Avinash Supe
Types of Manuscripts
- Rajive Mathew Jose, Kiruthika Sivasubramanian
What Does a Reviewer Look into a Manuscript
- Devinder Mohan Thappa, Malathi Munisamy
Open Access for Publication – Can It Be Chosen?
- Savio George Barreto
Publishing Misconduct Including Plagiarism and Permissions
- C. Adithan, A. Surendiran
- Components of Scientific research paper
- Choosing a journal for paper submission
- Dealing with rejected manuscript
- Authorship and contributorship
- Reviewer’s perspective of the manuscript
- Plagiarism and permissions
About this book
This book covers all essential aspects of writing scientific research articles, presenting eighteen carefully selected titles that offer essential, “must-know” content on how to write high-quality articles. The book also addresses other, rarely discussed areas of scientific writing including dealing with rejected manuscripts, the reviewer’s perspective as to what they expect in a scientific article, plagiarism, copyright issues, and ethical standards in publishing scientific papers. Simplicity is the book’s hallmark, and it aims to provide an accessible, comprehensive and essential resource for those seeking guidance on how to publish their research work.
The importance of publishing research work cannot be overemphasized. However, a major limitation in publishing work in a scientific journal is the lack of information on or experience with scientific writing and publishing. Young faculty and trainees who are starting their research career are in need of a comprehensive guidethat provides all essential components of scientific writing and aids them in getting their research work published.
Editors and Affiliations
Department of microbiology, jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education & research (jipmer), puducherry, india.
Subhash Chandra Parija
Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
Vikram Kate
About the editors
Subhash Chandra Parija is the Director of the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India, and has nearly three and half decades of teaching and research experience in Medical Microbiology. Prof. Parija is a Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) expert, and has been consulted to draft guidelines on food safety for parasites. Prof. Parija was on the Board of MD Examination at Colombo University, Sri Lanka, Sultan Quaboos University, Oman, University of Malaya, Malaysia. He was conferred a D.Sc. for his contributions in the field of Medical Parasitology by Madras University. The author of ten books including the “Text Book of Medical Parasitology,” he has published more than 300 papers in both national and international journals of repute.
Prof. Parija has been honored with more than 25 awards including the Medical Council of India’s Dr. BC Roy National Award and the National Academy of MedicalSciences’ Dr. PN Chuttani Oration Award. Prof. Parija founded the Indian Academy of Tropical Parasitology (IATP), the only professional organization of Medical Parasitologists in India, and initiated the journal Tropical Parasitology.
Vikram Kate is currently the Professor and Head, Department of the Surgery and Senior Consultant General and Gastrointestinal Surgeon at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry. He has contributed more than 25 chapters in reputed surgical gastroenterology and surgery textbooks, and has more than 140 papers to his credit. He is a Past President of the Indian Association of Surgical Gastroenterology. He was awarded the Membership Diploma of the Faculty of Surgical Trainers by the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh. Further, he currently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of The International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research , the official journal of JIPMER.
Professor Kate is Examiner for the M.S./M.Ch./DNB and Ph.D. program for Surgery, Surgical Gastroenterology and Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh. He is a Fellow of Royal College of Surgeons of England, Edinburgh and Glasgow (FRCS, FRCS Ed., FRCS Glasg.), and of the American College of Surgeons (FACS) and the American College of Gastroenterology (FACG). He has been honored with many awards, including the Dr. Mathias Oration (2010), the Prof. N. Rangabashyam Oration (2015), by the Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Chapter of the Association of Surgeons of India and the Silver Jubilee MASICON Oration (2016) by the Nagpur Branch of the Association of Surgeons of India.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title : Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper
Editors : Subhash Chandra Parija, Vikram Kate
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6
Publisher : Springer Singapore
eBook Packages : Medicine , Medicine (R0)
Copyright Information : Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017
Hardcover ISBN : 978-981-10-4719-0 Published: 09 August 2017
Softcover ISBN : 978-981-13-5211-9 Published: 13 December 2018
eBook ISBN : 978-981-10-4720-6 Published: 28 July 2017
Edition Number : 1
Number of Pages : XVII, 195
Number of Illustrations : 12 b/w illustrations, 39 illustrations in colour
Topics : Medicine/Public Health, general
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal
Clara busse.
1 Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr, 27599 Chapel Hill, NC USA
Ella August
2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029 USA
Associated Data
Communicating research findings is an essential step in the research process. Often, peer-reviewed journals are the forum for such communication, yet many researchers are never taught how to write a publishable scientific paper. In this article, we explain the basic structure of a scientific paper and describe the information that should be included in each section. We also identify common pitfalls for each section and recommend strategies to avoid them. Further, we give advice about target journal selection and authorship. In the online resource 1 , we provide an example of a high-quality scientific paper, with annotations identifying the elements we describe in this article.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-020-01751-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Introduction
Writing a scientific paper is an important component of the research process, yet researchers often receive little formal training in scientific writing. This is especially true in low-resource settings. In this article, we explain why choosing a target journal is important, give advice about authorship, provide a basic structure for writing each section of a scientific paper, and describe common pitfalls and recommendations for each section. In the online resource 1 , we also include an annotated journal article that identifies the key elements and writing approaches that we detail here. Before you begin your research, make sure you have ethical clearance from all relevant ethical review boards.
Select a Target Journal Early in the Writing Process
We recommend that you select a “target journal” early in the writing process; a “target journal” is the journal to which you plan to submit your paper. Each journal has a set of core readers and you should tailor your writing to this readership. For example, if you plan to submit a manuscript about vaping during pregnancy to a pregnancy-focused journal, you will need to explain what vaping is because readers of this journal may not have a background in this topic. However, if you were to submit that same article to a tobacco journal, you would not need to provide as much background information about vaping.
Information about a journal’s core readership can be found on its website, usually in a section called “About this journal” or something similar. For example, the Journal of Cancer Education presents such information on the “Aims and Scope” page of its website, which can be found here: https://www.springer.com/journal/13187/aims-and-scope .
Peer reviewer guidelines from your target journal are an additional resource that can help you tailor your writing to the journal and provide additional advice about crafting an effective article [ 1 ]. These are not always available, but it is worth a quick web search to find out.
Identify Author Roles Early in the Process
Early in the writing process, identify authors, determine the order of authors, and discuss the responsibilities of each author. Standard author responsibilities have been identified by The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) [ 2 ]. To set clear expectations about each team member’s responsibilities and prevent errors in communication, we also suggest outlining more detailed roles, such as who will draft each section of the manuscript, write the abstract, submit the paper electronically, serve as corresponding author, and write the cover letter. It is best to formalize this agreement in writing after discussing it, circulating the document to the author team for approval. We suggest creating a title page on which all authors are listed in the agreed-upon order. It may be necessary to adjust authorship roles and order during the development of the paper. If a new author order is agreed upon, be sure to update the title page in the manuscript draft.
In the case where multiple papers will result from a single study, authors should discuss who will author each paper. Additionally, authors should agree on a deadline for each paper and the lead author should take responsibility for producing an initial draft by this deadline.
Structure of the Introduction Section
The introduction section should be approximately three to five paragraphs in length. Look at examples from your target journal to decide the appropriate length. This section should include the elements shown in Fig. 1 . Begin with a general context, narrowing to the specific focus of the paper. Include five main elements: why your research is important, what is already known about the topic, the “gap” or what is not yet known about the topic, why it is important to learn the new information that your research adds, and the specific research aim(s) that your paper addresses. Your research aim should address the gap you identified. Be sure to add enough background information to enable readers to understand your study. Table Table1 1 provides common introduction section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.
The main elements of the introduction section of an original research article. Often, the elements overlap
Common introduction section pitfalls and recommendations
Methods Section
The purpose of the methods section is twofold: to explain how the study was done in enough detail to enable its replication and to provide enough contextual detail to enable readers to understand and interpret the results. In general, the essential elements of a methods section are the following: a description of the setting and participants, the study design and timing, the recruitment and sampling, the data collection process, the dataset, the dependent and independent variables, the covariates, the analytic approach for each research objective, and the ethical approval. The hallmark of an exemplary methods section is the justification of why each method was used. Table Table2 2 provides common methods section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.
Common methods section pitfalls and recommendations
Results Section
The focus of the results section should be associations, or lack thereof, rather than statistical tests. Two considerations should guide your writing here. First, the results should present answers to each part of the research aim. Second, return to the methods section to ensure that the analysis and variables for each result have been explained.
Begin the results section by describing the number of participants in the final sample and details such as the number who were approached to participate, the proportion who were eligible and who enrolled, and the number of participants who dropped out. The next part of the results should describe the participant characteristics. After that, you may organize your results by the aim or by putting the most exciting results first. Do not forget to report your non-significant associations. These are still findings.
Tables and figures capture the reader’s attention and efficiently communicate your main findings [ 3 ]. Each table and figure should have a clear message and should complement, rather than repeat, the text. Tables and figures should communicate all salient details necessary for a reader to understand the findings without consulting the text. Include information on comparisons and tests, as well as information about the sample and timing of the study in the title, legend, or in a footnote. Note that figures are often more visually interesting than tables, so if it is feasible to make a figure, make a figure. To avoid confusing the reader, either avoid abbreviations in tables and figures, or define them in a footnote. Note that there should not be citations in the results section and you should not interpret results here. Table Table3 3 provides common results section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.
Common results section pitfalls and recommendations
Discussion Section
Opposite the introduction section, the discussion should take the form of a right-side-up triangle beginning with interpretation of your results and moving to general implications (Fig. 2 ). This section typically begins with a restatement of the main findings, which can usually be accomplished with a few carefully-crafted sentences.
Major elements of the discussion section of an original research article. Often, the elements overlap
Next, interpret the meaning or explain the significance of your results, lifting the reader’s gaze from the study’s specific findings to more general applications. Then, compare these study findings with other research. Are these findings in agreement or disagreement with those from other studies? Does this study impart additional nuance to well-accepted theories? Situate your findings within the broader context of scientific literature, then explain the pathways or mechanisms that might give rise to, or explain, the results.
Journals vary in their approach to strengths and limitations sections: some are embedded paragraphs within the discussion section, while some mandate separate section headings. Keep in mind that every study has strengths and limitations. Candidly reporting yours helps readers to correctly interpret your research findings.
The next element of the discussion is a summary of the potential impacts and applications of the research. Should these results be used to optimally design an intervention? Does the work have implications for clinical protocols or public policy? These considerations will help the reader to further grasp the possible impacts of the presented work.
Finally, the discussion should conclude with specific suggestions for future work. Here, you have an opportunity to illuminate specific gaps in the literature that compel further study. Avoid the phrase “future research is necessary” because the recommendation is too general to be helpful to readers. Instead, provide substantive and specific recommendations for future studies. Table Table4 4 provides common discussion section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.
Common discussion section pitfalls and recommendations
Follow the Journal’s Author Guidelines
After you select a target journal, identify the journal’s author guidelines to guide the formatting of your manuscript and references. Author guidelines will often (but not always) include instructions for titles, cover letters, and other components of a manuscript submission. Read the guidelines carefully. If you do not follow the guidelines, your article will be sent back to you.
Finally, do not submit your paper to more than one journal at a time. Even if this is not explicitly stated in the author guidelines of your target journal, it is considered inappropriate and unprofessional.
Your title should invite readers to continue reading beyond the first page [ 4 , 5 ]. It should be informative and interesting. Consider describing the independent and dependent variables, the population and setting, the study design, the timing, and even the main result in your title. Because the focus of the paper can change as you write and revise, we recommend you wait until you have finished writing your paper before composing the title.
Be sure that the title is useful for potential readers searching for your topic. The keywords you select should complement those in your title to maximize the likelihood that a researcher will find your paper through a database search. Avoid using abbreviations in your title unless they are very well known, such as SNP, because it is more likely that someone will use a complete word rather than an abbreviation as a search term to help readers find your paper.
After you have written a complete draft, use the checklist (Fig. (Fig.3) 3 ) below to guide your revisions and editing. Additional resources are available on writing the abstract and citing references [ 5 ]. When you feel that your work is ready, ask a trusted colleague or two to read the work and provide informal feedback. The box below provides a checklist that summarizes the key points offered in this article.
Checklist for manuscript quality
(PDF 362 kb)
Acknowledgments
Ella August is grateful to the Sustainable Sciences Institute for mentoring her in training researchers on writing and publishing their research.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Data Availability
Compliance with ethical standards.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The introduction section should be approximately three to five paragraphs in length. Look at examples from your target journal to decide the appropriate length. This section should include the elements shown in Fig. 1. Begin with a general context, narrowing to the specific focus of the paper.
Report results fully & honestly, as pre-specified. Text (story), Tables (evidence), Figures (highlights) Report primary outcomes first. Give confidence intervals for main results. Report essential summary statistics. Leave out non-essential tables and figures; these can be included as supplementary files. Don't start discussion here.
Introduction. This guide provides an overview of the process of preparing and submitting a scholarly manuscript for publication in a psychology journal. Drawing on the experiences of authors of scholarly writings, peer reviewers, and journal editors, we seek to demystify the publication process and to offer advice designed to improve a ...
Write with clarity, objectivity, accuracy, and brevity. 28. Scientific Language -Sentences. •Write direct and short sentences - more professional looking •One idea or piece of information per sentence is sufficient •Avoid multiple statements in one sentence - they are confusing to the reader.
This article provides an overview of writing for publication in peer-reviewed journals. While the main focus is on writing a research article, it also provides guidance on factors influencing journal selection, including journal scope, intended audience for the findings, open access requirements, and journal citation metrics.
impact of your research. Get to know the focus and readership of the journal that you are considering. - general vs. specialized area journal Select 2 or 3 journals in the chosen area with relatively high impact factors. Discuss with your advisor and decide on the journal Find out the journal's submission criteria and format
Look at examples from your target journal to decide the appropriate length. This section should include the elements shown in Fig. 1. Begin with a general context, narrowing to the specific focus of the pa-per. Include five main elements: why your research is im-portant, what is already known about the topic, the gap.
A clear format will ensure that your research paper is understood by your readers. Follow: 1. Context — your introduction. 2. Content — your results. 3. Conclusion — your discussion. Plan ...
The book covers all aspects of scientific writing from submission to publishing in detail. Written and edited by world leaders in the field. Chapters are easy to understand with essential contents for writing quality scientific research paper and easy to follow algorithms and key points in each chapter. Chapters highlight the importance of each ...
The Sections of the Paper. Most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title , Authors and Affiliation , Abstract, Introduction , Methods, Results, Discussion , Acknowledgments, and Literature Cited , which parallel the experimental process. This is the system we will use.
Use Table 1 as a starting point for your outline. Include your visuals (figures, tables, formulas, equations, and al- gorithms), and list your findings. These will constitute the first level of your outline, which will eventually expand as you elabo- rate. The next stage is to add context and structure.
It is very important to formulate the aim of the paper. The aim points to the final conclusion of the paper. The aim and the conclusion are the center of the manuscript where to concentrate all the material. The review of the literature depends on the aim; the research methods depend on the aim, and the discussion.
Start the manuscript preparation by describing the materials and methods, including the planned statistical analysis (~1,000 words or less). This can often be copied from the study protocol. The second step is to describe the results (~350 words). The methods and results are the most important parts of the paper.
Scientific research must begin with a defined research question, which results in a well designed research protocol that plans the overall approach. This foundation should lead to a set of data from which the manuscript can be constructed. Manuscripts submitted to journals for consideration for publication typically have the following components.
The introduction section should be approximately three to five paragraphs in length. Look at examples from your target journal to decide the appropriate length. This section should include the elements shown in Fig. 1. Begin with a general context, narrowing to the specific focus of the paper.
Paragraph 1: Summarize the Findings. The first paragraph of the discussion should be used to summarize the 1 or 2 key findings from the study. You've taken the reader on a long journey so far, so this is a good time to "refresh" in plain language what this study was about and what the key findings were.
Fol low ing the a dv ice o f Ge orge. M. Whitesides, ". . . start with a blank piece. of paper, a nd write down, in any order, all. important id eas that occu r to you conce rn-. ing the paper ...
Select a Tar get Journ al Early in th e Writing Pr ocess. W e recommend th at you select a "target journal"early in the. writing proc ess; a "target journal"is the journal to which you ...
Readers loose interest. A mixed bag of introduction with results, discussion, and conclusion thrown in for good measure. Always keep sections separate to ensure the manuscript flows logically from one section to the next. Has the "used‐car salesman feel" of oversell. Excessive use of expressions such as "novel", "first time ...
We describe here the basic steps to follow in writing a scientific article. We outline the main sections that an average article should contain; the elements that should appear in these sections, and some pointers for making the overall result attractive and acceptable for publication. 1.
for your paper (1). When your ma nuscript is to write, keep the following points in mind: (1) develop an organized outline, (2) focus on cl arity of purpose, (3) be sure to have an. introduction ...
Develop a thesis statement. Create a research paper outline. Write a first draft of the research paper. Write the introduction. Write a compelling body of text. Write the conclusion. The second draft. The revision process. Research paper checklist.
A research paper is a part of academic writing where there is a. gathering of information from different sources. It is based on. author's original research on particular topic, collection of ...