antigone critical essay

Literary Theory and Criticism

Home › Drama Criticism › Analysis of Sophocles’ Antigone

Analysis of Sophocles’ Antigone

By NASRULLAH MAMBROL on July 29, 2020 • ( 0 )

Within this single drama—in great part, a harsh critique of Athenian society and the Greek city-state in general—Sophocles tells of the eternal struggle between the state and the individual, human and natural law, and the enormous gulf between what we attempt here on earth and what fate has in store for us all. In this magnificent dramatic work, almost incidentally so, we find nearly every reason why we are now what we are.

—Victor D. Hanson and John Heath, Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom

With Antigone Sophocles forcibly demonstrates that the power of tragedy derives not from the conflict between right and wrong but from the confrontation between right and right. As the play opens the succession battle between the sons of Oedipus—Polynices and Eteocles—over control of Thebes has resulted in both of their deaths. Their uncle Creon, who has now assumed the throne, asserts his authority to end a destructive civil war and decrees that only Eteocles, the city’s defender, should receive honorable burial. Polynices, who has led a foreign army against Thebes, is branded a traitor. His corpse is to be left on the battlefield “to be chewed up by birds and dogs and violated,” with death the penalty for anyone who attempts to bury him and supply the rites necessary for the dead to reach the underworld. Antigone, Polynices’ sister, is determined to defy Creon’s order, setting in motion a tragic collision between opposed laws and duties: between natural and divine commands that dictate the burial of the dead and the secular edicts of a ruler determined to restore civic order, between family allegiance and private conscience and public duty and the rule of law that restricts personal liberty for the common good. Like the proverbial immovable object meeting an irresistible force, Antigone arranges the impact of seemingly irreconcilable conceptions of rights and responsibilities, producing one of drama’s enduring illuminations of human nature and the human condition.

Antigone is one of Sophocles’ greatest achievements and one of the most influential dramas ever staged. “Between 1790 and 1905,” critic George Steiner reports, “it was widely held by European poets, philosophers, [and] scholars that Sophocles’ Antigone was not only the fi nest of Greek tragedies, but a work of art nearer to perfection than any other produced by the human spirit.” Its theme of the opposition between the individual and authority has resonated through the centuries, with numerous playwrights, most notably Jean Anouilh, Bertolt Brecht, and Athol Fugard grafting contemporary concerns and values onto the moral and political dramatic framework that Sophocles established. The play has elicited paradoxical responses reflecting changing cultural and moral imperatives. Antigone, who has been described as “the first heroine of Western drama,” has been interpreted both as a heroic martyr to conscience and as a willfully stubborn fanatic who causes her own death and that of two other innocent people, forsaking her duty to the living on behalf of the dead. Creon has similarly divided critics between censure and sympathy. Despite the play’s title, some have suggested that the tragedy is Creon’s, not Antigone’s, and it is his abuse of authority and his violations of personal, family, and divine obligations that center the drama’s tragedy. The brilliance of Sophocles’ play rests in the complexity of motive and the competing absolute claims that the drama displays. As novelist George Eliot observed,

It is a very superficial criticism which interprets the character of Creon as that of hypocritical tyrant, and regards Antigone as a blameless victim. Coarse contrasts like this are not the materials handled by great dramatists. The exquisite art of Sophocles is shown in the touches by which he makes us feel that Creon, as well as Antigone, is contending for what he believes to be the right, while both are also conscious that, in following out one principle, they are laying themselves open to just blame for transgressing another.

Eliot would call the play’s focus the “antagonism of valid principles,” demonstrating a point of universal significance that “Wherever the strength of a man’s intellect, or moral sense, or affection brings him into opposition with the rules which society has sanctioned, there is renewed conflict between Antigone and Creon; such a man must not only dare to be right, he must also dare to be wrong—to shake faith, to wound friendship, perhaps, to hem in his own powers.” Sophocles’ Antigone is less a play about the pathetic end of a victim of tyranny or the corruption of authority than about the inevitable cost and con-sequence between competing imperatives that define the human condition. From opposite and opposed positions, both Antigone and Creon ultimately meet at the shared suffering each has caused. They have destroyed each other and themselves by who they are and what they believe. They are both right and wrong in a world that lacks moral certainty and simple choices. The Chorus summarizes what Antigone will vividly enact: “The powerful words of the proud are paid in full with mighty blows of fate, and at long last those blows will teach us wisdom.”

As the play opens Antigone declares her intention to her sister Ismene to defy Creon’s impious and inhumane order and enlists her sister’s aid to bury their brother. Ismene responds that as women they must not oppose the will of men or the authority of the city and invite death. Ismene’s timidity and deference underscores Antigone’s courage and defiance. Antigone asserts a greater allegiance to blood kinship and divine law declaring that the burial is a “holy crime,” justified even by death. Ismene responds by calling her sister “a lover of the impossible,” an accurate description of the tragic hero, who, according to scholar Bernard Knox, is Sophocles’ most important contribution to drama: “Sophocles presents us for the first time with what we recognize as a ‘tragic hero’: one who, unsupported by the gods and in the face of human opposition, makes a decision which springs from the deepest layer of his individual nature, his physis , and then blindly, ferociously, heroically maintains that decision even to the point of self-destruction.” Antigone exactly conforms to Knox’s description, choosing her conception of duty over sensible self-preservation and gender-prescribed submission to male authority, turning on her sister and all who oppose her. Certain in her decision and self-sufficient, Antigone rejects both her sister’s practical advice and kinship. Ironically Antigone denies to her sister, when Ismene resists her will, the same blood kinship that claims Antigone’s supreme allegiance in burying her brother. For Antigone the demands of the dead overpower duty to the living, and she does not hesitate in claiming both to know and act for the divine will. As critic Gilbert Norwood observes, “It is Antigone’s splendid though perverse valor which creates the drama.”

Before the apprehended Antigone, who has been taken in the act of scattering dust on her brother’s corpse, lamenting, and pouring libations, is brought before Creon and the dramatic crux of the play, the Chorus of The-ban elders delivers what has been called the fi nest song in all Greek tragedy, the so-called Ode to Man, that begins “Wonders are many, and none is more wonderful than man.” This magnificent celebration of human power over nature and resourcefulness in reason and invention ends with a stark recognition of humanity’s ultimate helplessness—“Only against Death shall he call for aid in vain.” Death will test the resolve and principles of both Antigone and Creon, while, as critic Edouard Schuré asserts, “It brings before us the most extraordinary psychological evolution that has ever been represented on stage.”

When Antigone is brought in judgment before Creon, obstinacy meets its match. Both stand on principle, but both reveal the human source of their actions. Creon betrays himself as a paranoid autocrat; Antigone as an individual whose powerful hatred outstrips her capacity for love. She defiantly and proudly admits that she is guilty of disobeying Creon’s decree and that he has no power to override divine law. Nor does Antigone concede any mitigation of her personal obligation in the competing claims of a niece, a sister, or a citizen. Creon is maddened by what he perceives to be Antigone’s insolence in justifying her crime by diminishing his authority, provoking him to ignore all moderating claims of family, natural, or divine extenuation. When Ismene is brought in as a co-conspirator, she accepts her share of guilt in solidarity with her sister, but again Antigone spurns her, calling her “a friend who loves in words,” denying Ismene’s selfless act of loyalty and sympathy with a cold dismissal and self-sufficiency, stating, “Never share my dying, / don’t lay claim to what you never touched.” However, Ismene raises the ante for both Antigone and Creon by asking her uncle whether by condemning Antigone he will kill his own son’s betrothed. Creon remains adamant, and his judgment on Antigone and Ismene, along with his subsequent argument with his son, Haemon, reveals that Creon’s principles are self-centered, contradictory, and compromised by his own pride, fears, and anxieties. Antigone’s challenge to his authority, coming from a woman, is demeaning. If she goes free in defiance of his authority, Creon declares, “I am not the man, she is.” To the urging of Haemon that Creon should show mercy, tempering his judgment to the will of Theban opinion that sympathizes with Antigone, Creon asserts that he cares nothing for the will of the town, whose welfare Creon’s original edict against Polynices was meant to serve. Creon, moreover, resents being schooled in expediency by his son. Inflamed by his son’s advocacy on behalf of Antigone, Creon brands Haemon a “woman’s slave,” and after vacillating between stoning Antigone and executing her and her sister in front of Haemon, Creon rules that Antigone alone is to perish by being buried alive. Having begun the drama with a decree that a dead man should remain unburied, Creon reverses himself, ironically, by ordering the premature burial of a living woman.

Antigone, being led to her entombment, is shown stripped of her former confidence and defiance, searching for the justification that can steel her acceptance of the fate that her actions have caused. Contemplating her living descent into the underworld and the death that awaits her, Antigone regrets dying without marriage and children. Gone is her reliance on divine and natural law to justify her act as she equivocates to find the emotional source to sustain her. A husband and children could be replaced, she rationalizes, but since her mother and father are dead, no brother can ever replace Polynices. Antigone’s tortured logic here, so different from the former woman of principle, has been rejected by some editors as spurious. Others have judged this emotionally wrought speech essential for humanizing Antigone, revealing her capacity to suffer and her painful search for some consolation.

The drama concludes with the emphasis shifted back to Creon and the consequences of his judgment. The blind prophet Teiresias comes to warn Creon that Polynices’ unburied body has offended the gods and that Creon is responsible for the sickness that has descended on Thebes. Creon has kept from Hades one who belongs there and is sending to Hades another who does not. The gods confirm the rightness of Antigone’s action, but justice evades the working out of the drama’s climax. The release of Antigone comes too late; she has hung herself. Haemon commits suicide, and Eurydice, Creon’s wife, kills herself after cursing Creon for the death of their son. Having denied the obligation of family, Creon loses his own. Creon’s rule, marked by ignoring or transgressing cosmic and family law, is shown as ultimately inadequate and destructive. Creon is made to realize that he has been rash and foolish, that “Whatever I have touched has come to nothing.” Both Creon and Antigone have been pushed to terrifying ends in which what truly matters to both are made starkly clear. Antigone’s moral imperatives have been affirmed but also their immense cost in suffering has been exposed. Antigone explores a fundamental rift between public and private worlds. The central opposition in the play between Antigone and Creon, between duty to self and duty to state, dramatizes critical antimonies in the human condition. Sophocles’ genius is his resistance of easy and consoling simplifications to resolve the oppositions. Both sides are ultimately tested; both reveal the potential for greatness and destruction.

24 lectures on Greek Tragedy by Dr. Elizabeth Vandiver.

Share this:

Categories: Drama Criticism , Literature

Tags: Analysis of Sophocles’ Antigone , Antigone Analysis , Antigone Criticism , Antigone Essay , Antigone Guide , Antigone Lecture , Antigone PDF , Antigone Summary , Antigone Themes , Bibliography of Sophocles’ Antigone , Character Study of Sophocles’ Antigone , Criticism of Sophocles’ Antigone , Drama Criticism , Essays of Sophocles’ Antigone , Greek Tragedy , Literary Criticism , Notes of Sophocles’ Antigone , Plot of Sophocles’ Antigone , Simple Analysis of Sophocles’ Antigone , Study Guides of Sophocles’ Antigone , Summary of Sophocles’ Antigone , Synopsis of Sophocles’ Antigone , Themes of Sophocles’ Antigone , Tragedy

Related Articles

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Ask LitCharts AI: The answer to your questions

Welcome to the LitCharts study guide on Sophocles's Antigone . Created by the original team behind SparkNotes, LitCharts are the world's best literature guides.

Antigone: Introduction

Antigone: plot summary, antigone: detailed summary & analysis, antigone: themes, antigone: quotes, antigone: characters, antigone: symbols, antigone: theme wheel, brief biography of sophocles.

Historical Context of Antigone

Other books related to antigone.

• Full Title: Antigone
• When Written: Circa 442 B.C.E.
• Where Written: Athens, Greece
• Literary Period: Classical
• Genre: Tragic drama
• Setting: The royal house of Thebes
• Climax: The suicides of Antigone and Haemon
• Antagonist: Creon

Extra Credit for Antigone

World War II Antigone: In 1944, when Paris was occupied by the Nazis, Jean Anouilh produced a version of Antigone in which the audience was able to identify Antigone with the French Resistance fighters and Creon with the occupying forces.

World War II Antigone 2: The German poet and playwright Bertolt Brecht produced a version of the play in German, in 1948, which had even more obvious references to the Nazis. Brecht's version of the play begins in a Berlin air-raid shelter.

Sir Richard C. Jebb, Commentary on Sophocles: Antigone

("Agamemnon", "Hom. Od. 9.1", "denarius")

All Search Options [ view abbreviations ]

Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:

This text is part of:

• Greek and Roman Materials

View text chunked by:

• text : part : section

Table of Contents:

Introduction.

1 Salustius, in his Argument to this play (p. 5), notices that the fortunes of the sisters were differently related by other writers. Mimnermus (c. 620 B.C.) spoke of Ismene having been slain at Thebes by Tydeus, one of the Argive chiefs. Ion of Chios (c. 450 B.C.) said that both sisters were burned in the Theban temple of Hera by Laodamas, son of Eteocles, when Thebes was taken in the later war of the Epigoni. Here, then, we have an Ionian contemporary of Sophocles who did not know the legend of Antigone's deed,—another indication that the legend was of Attic growth.

2 Pind. Ol. 6.15 ; Nem. 9. 24 .

3 Paus. 9.18.3 .

4 With regard to this trilogy, see Introd. to the Oedipus Tyrannus , p. xvi.

5 See note on v. 1044 .

6 See note on v. 1115 .

7 i.e., an effigy. The deuteragonist, who had acted Haemon, had been on the stage, as Messenger, up to v. 1256, and had still to come on as Second Messenger at v. 1278 .

8 In his first, or friendly, speech to Creon ( 998-1032 ) Teiresias says not a word concerning Antigone. Possibly he may be conceived as thinking that the burial of Polyneices would imply, as a consequence, the release of Antigone; though it is obvious that, from Creon's point of view, such an inference would be illogical: Antigone was punished because she had broken the edict; not because the burying of Polyneices was intrinsically wrong.

9 This point might be illustrated by contrast with an able romance, of which the title is borrowed from this play of Sophocles. ‘The New Antigone’ declined the sanction of marriage, because she had been educated by a father who had taught her to regard that institution as wrongful. Such a case was not well suited to do dramatically what the Antigone of Sophocles does,—to raise the question of human law against private conscience in a general form,—because the institution concerned claims to be more than a human ordinance, and because, on the other hand, the New Antigone's opinion was essentially an accident of perverted conscience. The author of the work was fully alive to this, and has said ( Spectator , Nov. 5, 1887 ) that his choice of a title conveyed ‘a certain degree of irony.’

10 Religionsphilosophie , II. 114.

11 El. 1487 ff.

12 Plut. Thes. 29.

13 Aelian Var. Hist. 12. 27.

14 Il. 24.411 ff.

15 Ai. 1332 ff.

16 Paus. 9.32.6 .

17 Mr Long's beautiful picture, ‘Diana or Christ,’ will be remembered by many,— and the more fitly, since it presents a counterpart, not only for Antigone, but also for Creon and for Haemon.

18 From the Niobe of Aeschylus (fr. 157): “ οἱ θεῶν ἀγχίσποροι , ι οἱ Ζηνὸς ἐγγύς : οἷς κατ᾽ ᾿Ιδαῖον πάγον ι Διὸς πατρῴου βωμός ἐστ᾽ ἐν αἰθέρι , ι κοὔπω νιν ἐξίτηλον αἶμα δαιμόνων ”.

19 v. 839 .

20 C. Taylor's translation.

21 Quoted by M. Patin in his Études sur les Tragiques grecs , vol. II., p. 271.

“ πάντας δ᾽ ἐλέγξας καὶ διεξελθὼν φίλους , πατέρα , γεραιάν θ᾽ ἥ σφ᾽ ἔτικτε μητέρα , οὐχ ηὗρε πλὴν γυναικὸς ὅστις ἤθελε θανεῖν πρὸ κείνου μηδ᾽ ἔτ᾽ εἰσορᾶν φάος . ” vv. 15 ff.

23 See especially the note on 1044 .

24 All that we know as to the plot is contained in the first Argument to this play: ‘The story has been used also by Euripides in his Antigone ; only there she is detected with Haemon, and is given in marriage, and bears a son Maion.’ In the scholia at the end of L we also read, ‘this play differs from the Antigone of Euripides in the fact that, there, she was detected through the love of Haemon, and was given in marriage; while here the issue is the contrary’ (i.e. her death). That this is the right rendering of the scholiast's words— “ φωραθεῖσα ἐκείνη διὰ τὸν Αἵμονος ἔρωτα ἐξεδόθη πρὸς γάμον ”—seems probable from a comparison with the statement in the Argument; though others have understood, ‘she was detected, and, owing to the love of Haemon, given in marriage.’ She was detected, not, as in the play of Sophocles, directly by Creon's guards, but (in some way not specified) through the fact that Haemon's love for her had drawn him to her side. Welcker ( Griech. Trag. II. pp. 563 ff.) has sought to identify the Antigone of Euripides with the plot sketched by Hyginus in Fab. 72 . Antigone having been detected, Haemon had been commissioned by Creon to slay her, but had saved her, conveying her to a shepherd's home. When Maion, the son of their secret marriage, had grown to man's estate, he visited Thebes at a festival. This was the moment (Welcker thinks) at which the Antigone of Euripides began. Creon noted in Maion a certain mark which all the offspring of the dragon's seed (“ σπαρτοί ”) bore on their bodies. Haemon's disobedience was thus revealed; Heracles vainly interceded with Creon; Haemon slew his wife Antigone and then himself. But surely both the author of the Argument and the scholiast clearly imply that the marriage of Antigone was contained in the play of Euripides, and formed its conclusion. I therefore agree with Heydemann ( Über eine nacheuripideische Antigone , Berlin, 1868 ) that Hyginus was epitomising some otherwise unknown play. M. Patin ( Études sur les Tragiques grecs , vol. II. p. 277 ) remarks that there is nothing to show whether the play of Euripides was produced before or after that of Sophocles. But he has overlooked a curious and decisive piece of evidence. Among the scanty fragments of the Euripidean Antigone are these lines ( Eur. fr. 165, Nauck ); —“ ἄκουσον : οὐ γὰρ οἱ κακῶς πεπραγότες ι σὺν ταῖς τύχαισι τοὺς λόγους ἀπώλεσαν ”. This evidently glances at the Antigone of Sophocles, vv. 563 f. , where Ismene says, “ οὐδ᾽ ὃς ἂν βλάστη μένει ι νοῦς τοῖς κακῶς πράσσουσιν , ἀλλ᾽ ἐξίσταται ”. (For similar instances of covert criticism, see n. on O. C. 1116 .)

25 Eur. fr. 160, 161, 162 (Nauck) . The most significant is fr. 161, probably spoken by Haemon:—“ ἤρων : τὸ μαίνεσθαι δ᾽ ἄρ᾽ ἦν ἔρως βροτοῖς ”.—Another very suggestive fragment is no. 176, where the speaker is evidently remonstrating with Creon:— ‘Who shall pain a rock by thrusting at it with a spear? And who can pain the dead by dishonour, if we grant that they have no sense of suffering?’ This is characteristic of the difference between the poets. Sophocles never urges the futility of Creon's vengeance, though he does touch upon its ignobleness ( v. 1030 ).

“ quantum ipse feroci Virtute exsuperas , tanto me impensius aecum est Consulere atque omnes metuentem expendere casus . ” Verg. Aen. 12. 19

“ iamiam nec maxima Iuno Nec Saturnius haec oculis pater aspicit aequis . ” Aen. 4. 371

27 Stat. Theb. 12. 679 .

28 Denkmäler , pp. 83 f.

29 From Gerhard, Ant. Bildw. Taf. 73.

30 Mon. Inst. X. 27.

31 Ann. Inst. 176, 1876.

32 See footnote above, p. xxxviii, note 1 (3rd paragraph).

33 “ Περὶ εἰκόνος Ἀντιγόνης κατὰ ἀρχαῖον ὄστρακον , μετὰ ἀπεικονίσματος ”. I am indebted to the kindness of Professor D'Ooge, late Director of the American School at Athens, for an opportunity of seeing this letter.

34 On March 25, 1845, Mendelssohn wrote to his sister:—‘See if you cannot find Punch for Jan. 18 [1845]. It contains an account of Antigone at Covent Garden, with illustrations,—especially a view of the Chorus which has made me laugh for three days.’ In his excellent article on Mendelssohn in the Dictionary of Music , Sir G. Grove has justly deemed this picture worthy of reproduction.

35 Mr George Wotherspoon, who has practically demonstrated the point by setting the Greek words to the music for the Parodos ( vv. 100-161 ). It is only in the last antistrophe, he observes, that the ‘phrasing’ becomes distinctly modern, and less attentive to the Greek rhythms than to harmonic effects.

36 The Greek life of Sophocles says that he served as general ‘in the war against the Anaeans’ (“ ἀναίους ”). Anaea was a place on the mainland, near Prienè. Boeckh supposes that the first expedition was known as ‘the Anaean war,’ and that Sophocles took part in it as well as in the second expedition. To me, I confess, there seems to be far more probability in the simple supposition that “ ἀναίους ” is a corruption of “ σαμίους ”.

37 p. 603 E. Miller, Frag. Hist. II. 46.

38 Arguments against the genuineness have been brought, indeed, by Ritter Fr.( Vorgebliche Strategie d. Sophokles gegen Samos: Rhein. Mus., 1843, pp. 187 ff. ). (1) Ion represents Sophocles as saying,—“ Περικλῆς ποιεῖν με ἔφη , στρατηγεῖν δ᾽ οὐκ ἐπίστασθαι ”. Sophocles (Ritter argues) would have said “ φησί ”, not “ ἔφη ”, if Pericles had been alive. The forger of the fragment intended it to refer to the revolt of Lesbos in 428 B.C.,—forgetting that Sophocles would then be 78. But we reply:—The tense, “ ἔφη ”, can obviously refer to the particular occasion on which the remark was made: ‘Pericles said so [when I was appointed, or when we were at Samos together].’ (2) Ion says of Sophocles, “ οὐ ῥεκτήριος ἦν ”. This (says Ritter) implies that Sophocles was dead; who, however, long survived Ion. [Ion was dead in 421 B.C., Aristoph. Pax 835 .] But here, again, the tense merely refers to the time at which the writer received the impression. We could say of a living person, ‘he was an agreeable man’—meaning that we found him so when we met him.

39 See Curtius, Hist. Gr. II. 472 (Eng. tr.).

40 This fragment of Androtion has been preserved by the schol. on Aristeides, vol. 3, p. 485 (Dind.). Müller, Frag. Hist. IV. 645. The names of two of the ten generals are wanting in the printed texts, but have since been restored, from the MS., by Wilamowitz, De Rhesi Scholiis , P. 13 (Greifswald, 1877). I have observed a remarkable fact in regard to Androtion's list, which ought to be mentioned, because it might be urged against the authenticity of the list, though (in my opinion) such an inference from it would be unfair. Androtion gives (1) the names, (2) the demes of the Generals, but not their tribes. The regular order of precedence for the ten Cleisthenean tribes was this:— 1. Erectheis. 2. Aegeis. 3. Pandionis. 4. Leontis. 5. Acamantis. 6. Oeneis. 7. Cecropis. 8. Hippothontis. 9. Aeantis. 10. Antiochis. Now take the demes named by Androtion. His list will be found to follow this order of the ten tribes,— with one exception, and it is in the case of Sophocles. His deme, Colonus, belonged to the Antiochis, and therefore his name ought to have come last. But Androtion puts it second. The explanation is simple. When the ten tribes were increased to twelve, by the addition of the Antigonis and Demetrias (in or about 307 B.C.), some of the demes were transferred from one tribe to another. Among these was the deme of Colonus. It was transferred from the Antiochis, the tenth on the roll, to the Aegeis, the second on the roll. Hence Androtion's order is correct for his own time (c. 280 B.C.), but not correct for 440 B.C. It is quite unnecessary, however, to infer that he invented or doctored the list. It is enough to suppose that he re-adjusted the order, so as to make it consistent in the eyes of his contemporaries.

41 The Argument to this play, and the “ Βίος Σοφοκλέους ”, have already been cited. See also (1) Strabo 14. p. 638 “ Ἀθηναῖοι δὲ ... πέμψαντες στρατηγὸν Περικλέα καὶ σὺν αὐτῷ Σοφοκλέα τὸν ποιητὴν κακῶς διέθηκαν ἀπειθοῦντας τοὺς Σαμίους ”. (2) Schol. on Aristoph. Pax 696 “ λέγεται δὲ ὅτι ἐκ τῆς στρατηγίας τῆς ἐν Σάμῳ ἠγυρίσατο ” (“ ὁ Σοφοκλῆς ”). (3) Suidas s.v. “ Μέλητος ” [but referring to the Samian “ Μέλισσος ”: cp. Diog. L. 9. 24 ] “ ὑπὲρ Σαμίων στρατηγήσας ἐναυμάχησε πρὸς Σοφοκλῆν τὸν τραγικόν , ὀλυμπιάδι πδ́ ” (Ol. 84 = 444-441 B.C.).—The theory that Sophocles the poet was confused with Sophocles son of Sostratides, strategus in 425 B.C. ( Thuc. 3.115 ), is quite incompatible with the ancient evidence.

42 See Introduction to the Oed. Col. , § 18, p. xli. J. S. III.3

43 Dem. or. 4 § 26 .

44 One of Aelian's anecdotes ( Var. Hist. 3. 8) is entitled, “ ὅτι ὁ Φρύνιχος διά τι ποίημα στρατηγὸς ᾑρέθη ”. Phrynichus, he says, ‘having composed suitable songs for the performers of the war-dance (“ πυρριχισταῖς ”) in a tragedy, so captivated and enraptured the (Athenian) spectators, that they immediately elected him to a military command.’ Nothing else is known concerning this alleged strategia. It is possible that Phrynichus, the tragic poet of c. 500 B.C., was confounded by some later anecdote-monger with the son of Stratonides, general in 412 B.C. ( Thuc. 8.25 ), and that the story was suggested by the authentic strategia of Sophocles. At any rate, the vague and dubious testimony of Aelian certainly does not warrant us in using the case of Phrynichus as an illustration.

45 “ λέλεκται δὲ τὸ δρᾶμα τοῦτο τριακοστὸν δεύτερον ”. Bergk ( Hist. Gr. Lit. III. p. 414) proposes to read, “ δεδίδακται δὲ τὸ δρᾶμα τοῦτο τριακοστόν : δεύτερος ἦν ”. He assumes that Sophocles gained the second prize, because, according to the Parian Chronicle (60), the first prize was gained by Euripides in the archonship of Diphilus (442/1 B.C.). He adds that the word “ εὐδοκιμήσαντα ”, applied to Sophocles in the Argument, would suit the winner of the second prize,—as Aristophanes says of his own “ Δαιταλεῖς ”, which gained the second prize, “ ἄριστ᾽ ἠκουσάτην ” （ Nub. 529) . But two things are wanting to the probability of Bergk's conjecture, viz., (1) some independent reason for thinking that the Antigone was the 30th, rather than the 32nd, of its author's works; and (2) some better ground for assuming that it gained the second prize.

46 See Introd. to Oed. Col. p. xxi. § 3.

47 See Oed. Col. 1405-1413 , and 1770-1772 .

The Annenberg CPB/Project provided support for entering this text.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

Introduction of Antigone

Antigone was written by Sophocles, the great Grecian playwright, and is known as the most popular of the Theban plays trilogy. The play was probably written around 442BC. It is also stated that it was written after the other two plays yet the story of the play occurs before them. It links the storyline of Antigone with that of the play Seven Against Thebes written by Aeschylus, a contemporary of Sophocles. The storyline of the play deals with the issue of the burial of Polynices, the brother of Antigone, who has become the victim of Creon’s enacted law against the burial of a rebel of the state. Antigone buries him and faces the consequences of her act of disobedience to the state laws.

Summary of Antigone

The storyline of the play begins when the invasion by the forces of Argos has been routed out of the city of Thebes. However, it happens that Eteocles and Polynices, the two sons of the famous Oedipus. Eteocles and Polynices were supposed to take turns in ruling the city but Eteocles refuses to step down. They have met their ends in this war from different warring parties. Following the route of the invading army, Creon takes reigns of the city in his hands, issuing a decree that Polynices, as a rebel of the city, does not deserve to be given a proper burial, leaving him to rot in the open, whereas Eteocles was given an honorable burial. He has stated that it will serve as a warning to the traitors of the city. He further adds that no one would try to perform his burial against the state laws and the offenders of this law will invite a death sentence .

On the other hand, both the daughters of Oedipus, Ismene, and Antigone, are aggrieved. They are witnessing the loss of both of their brothers in the war. However, Antigone goes against the laws enacted by the incumbent ruler, Creon. She states that it is an unwritten divine law that death should be given a proper burial. Therefore, a man-made law cannot overrule it. Therefore, she vows that she would violate this man-made law and perform the burial rites of the dead body of her brother, Polynices. However, the sanguine sister, Ismene is aware of Creon’s authority and implores her sister not to defy the city law, though, without any success.

When finally Antigone musters up the courage to fulfill her words about performing the burial rights of her brother’s dead body, she is caught in the middle of the act. The city ruler, Creon, who happens to be her uncle too, becomes infuriated at this insolence and orders to bring Antigone before him. However, she also becomes defiant and argues that she has obeyed the divine laws against the state law but Creon insists that she must face the legal injunctions enacted in this connection. Meanwhile, her sister, Ismene reaches there and pleas Creon to spare her. It is because she is going to be her daughter-in-law due to her being the fiancée of Haemon, Creon’s son. Ismene tells him that she was also involved in the violation of the law hoping she would be punished alongside her sister but Antigone rejects her and says she doesn’t deserve to die. Creon spares Isemene, yet, he stays adamant to punish Antigone and the fact that the city law must be enforced at every cost come what may .

When Haemon comes to know about his father’s obduracy, he also arrives to request him to reconsider the question of his would-be wife stating that “under cover of darkness the city mourns for the girl” On the other hand, the Thebans also consider it a ruler’s intervention instead of the will of God and express sympathy with Antigone for burying her brother. When Creon sees his own son requesting him, he becomes too much angry and reprimands him for interfering in the state matters, though, Haemon argues that it is injustice. Seeing Creon not moving at this, Haemon threatens another death but still, Creon stays adamant.

When Antigone faces the law, she refuses to submit to Creon’s demand. Tiresias, the soothsayer, warns Creon of grave consequences for working against the divine injunctions. Tiresias warns that Polynices require a proper burial and now to punish Antigone for doing the right thing by executing her, will only anger the Gods and bring wrath upon the City of Thebes. But exactly similar to Oedipus, Creon also berates Tiresias for false prophesy and bribery at which Tiresias predicts the death of his son for taking the life of Antigone. Antigone was immured as against the admonition of Tiresias by confining her under the Earth alive and leaving her to die. Antigone reflects on her wrongdoing and regrets her actions for going against the laws of the King and hangs herself. Meanwhile, a messenger reaches the palace to inform Creon about Haemon’s suicide. Haemon commits suicide by stabbing himself and lays in a pool of blood next to Antigone. When Creon’s wife, Eurydice, inquires, the messenger relates the whole story of how Haemon has found Antigone hanging at which he has also committed suicide. When Creon sees the dead body of his son, he becomes much aggrieved but feels more heartbroken when he hears the news of the suicide of his wife, Eurydice, too. Eurydice curses her husband for the loss of their children. In the end, Creon blames himself for how others’ lives were depended on the life of Antigone and how they’d have lived if he wasn’t rash and adamant in following the duties of rule.

Major Themes in Antigone

• Blindness: Antigone demonstrates the thematic strand of blindness in the same way as it is presented in Oedipus Rex. Both, Oedipus and Creon, do not see their inner blindness because of their ego or pride. They do not accept or think that they could be wrong. Creon is furious at Antigone for defying the city law and preferring the divine law to perform burial rites of her slain brother. When things cross limits, Creon berates Tiresias and becomes the victim of his own pride, again believes that he cannot commit a mistake. He has to pay the price of his arrogant blindness resulting in the death of his son as well as his wife.
• Natural Law: Antigone shows the difference between man-made law and natural law through the character of Creon and Antigone. Antigone is well aware of the difference and knows that the state is behind Creon and Creon is after the man-made law, the reason for his insistence that it must be adhered to in performing burial rights of Polynices. However, Antigone does not care and goes for the natural laws in defiance to Creon, or better to say, the state. When Creon goes beyond the limits after he sees Antigone disrespects it, he suffers the consequences of violating the natural laws.
• Political Loyalty and Family Loyalty: The play demonstrates the theme of political loyalty and family fidelity through the characters of Creon, Antigone, and Polynices. Although Polynices knows well that he is fighting against his maternal uncle, yet he goes into the war. Creon is politically loyal to Thebes and so are Ismene and Antigone. However, when it comes to performing final rites, only Antigone comes forward and goes for it despite having political consequences. This is the family loyalty that she performs burial rites of her brother despite the staunch opposition of Creon and her own sister.
• Arrogance: Antigone shows the theme of arrogance as a hubris of the main character, Creon. Creon has enacted a law that the rebel does not deserve a burial. However, Antigone contends that it is a divine law and the divine law must be upheld over every other man-made law. When Creon insists and behaves too arrogantly to give reason a chance, the results are harrowing for him too that his own son kills himself, and then his wife follows suit. And this happens even though Tiresias also warns him of his blunder but his arrogance does not let him listen to any sane voice .
• Femininity: The thematic strand of femininity resides in the title of the play, and in the individual character of Antigone. Ismene shows true and passive femininity when she advises her sister that she should not violate the Creon-made state law of not performing proper burial of the rebel, be it their brother. However, femininity asserts through Antigone who defies the state laws on the logic of complying with the divine laws. She goes on to perform the burial rites of her brother, Polynices.
• Civil Disobedience: The play shows the theme of civil disobedience in two characters; the first is Antigone and the second is Haeman, the son of Creon. When Creon enacts this law that a rebel does not deserve a proper burial, he knows little that it would be violated by his family members. Antigone, despite a warning from Isemen, violates this law and starts civil disobedience, while Haemon, too, goes for civil disobedience knowing full well his headstrong father, the king. The king, later, laments this mass civil disobedience at his own home.
• Free Will and Fate: The play shows the theme of free will and fate through the characters of Antigone and Creon. Creon is bound to enact the city laws but is free to let the violater has his reason. Antigone, on the other hand, is also bound to comply with the divine law and does not care about the consequences of violating the state laws. It seems that though Creon has the choice to leave his niece, yet he goes against it and tries her for violating the laws and faces repercussions which is his fate, while the compliance obduracy is his free will.
• Tyranny: The theme of tyranny is obvious in the character of Creon, who has become a towering personality after banishing Oedipus from the city. However, when he insists on the city law to enact against Antigone for upholding the divine law of performing the burial rites of Polynices, the Thebans first become baffled at his obduracy and later withdraw their consent for making him a ruler, as he has shown a clear proclivity toward tyranny strongly resisted by the city.
• Power : The play shows the use of power through the characters of Creon as well as Tiresias and Creon’s son, Haemon. Creon uses his state power to curb the rebellious spirit of Antigone but she uses her femininity as well as sanguinity to rise against him. Tiresias uses his power of soothsaying to warn Creon, while Creon’s son uses his will to show his father that he can resist him by dying.

  Major Characters in Antigone

• Antigone: The main character as well as the protagonist , Antigone is the daughter of Oedipus and his sister born to Jocasta. In the play, she has been shown a defiant girl who does not consider her sister, Ismene’s advice that her brother Polynices’s dead body should stay lying in the open to comply with the state laws enacted by her uncle and now king, Creon. She, therefore, openly defies and abides by the divine laws that his dead body should be given a proper burial. Her heroic and righteous confrontation against Creon’s hotheaded argumentative force wins her readers’ sympathies following the ignominy of the girls from their father’s side.
• Ismene: Although Ismene is a secondary character after her sister, Antigone, she also seems reasonable in her suggestion which is not only rational but also pragmatic. She knows that Creon would not stop short of enacting the laws that mean the death of Antigone and she has already suffered much; her father was banished, her brother has been killed in the opposite camps and her mother committed suicide. Although she does not help her, she loves her family very much and stands by her sister’s decision.
• Creon: Creon is the third most important character in the play after both sisters. He assumes charge of the city-state of Thebes after banishing Oedipus. However, he has lately become reckless and makes his own law after the fierce battle that the rebels of the city will not be given proper burial rites. Yet, Antigone defies this law saying that it is a man-made law and that divine laws permit all human beings to be given proper burial without any discrimination. Therefore, Creon becomes rash, arrogant, and irrational after he comes to know about this non-compliance to his law from Antigone. Consequently, he suffers for it as his own son commits suicide for sentencing Antigone, his wife, while his mother and Creon’s wife, too, kills herself.
• The Chorus : The Chorus comprises the Theban elders who appear in unison and voice their opinion about what does not seem rational and sanguine in the existing circumstances. When Creon does not accept any rational argument , the Chorus cautions Creon that arrogance has already cost the city dearly. They comment on the mistakes of all parties involved and express sympathy and pity over the prevalent situation.
• Haemon: Haemon’s role in Antigone is very important on account of his being the fiancé of Antigone. He not only stands by her but also proves his words of dying for her, defying his father to prove him wrong. When he commits suicide after his failed attempt to kill his father, Creon still does not believe until his wife, too, goes on the same path.
• Tiresias: The blind soothsayer appears in all the Greek plays. His task comprises making predictions and stating the words of the Oracle in simple words to make his audience understand the wish of the gods. When he tries to make Creon understand, like Oedipus, Creon also alleges that he is scheming against him but Tiresias stays calm and cool and predicts that by staying arrogant and pig-headed, Creon will cause the death of his family members. And this happens when Haemon commits suicide followed by his mother.
• Watchman: The role of the watchman is significant in that he arrests Antigone during the act of the burial of her brother, Polynices. He speaks on the occasion which shows his concern about his own life instead of showing his concern about laws and their compliance.
• Eurydice : Her character in Antigone is critical in that she is Creon’s wife and mother of Haemon. When she sees that her son is no more, she also follows him and commits suicide, causing a severe blow to the hotheadedness of Creon.
• First Messenger: The messenger does his job of relaying the reports of the suicides to the people and the audiences and leaves after that.
• Second Messenger : The second messenger reports the death of Eurydice and leaves the stage.

Writing Style of Antigone

The writing style of Antigone is marked with dignity, grandeur, and sublimity. Although according to H. D. F. Kitto, the translator of the text used in this analysis, it is very difficult to use the same iambic pentameter in English as was used in ancient Greek, it is easy to preserve its rhythm as it is clear from its smooth and melodic reading. The play starts with the usual prologue and becomes highly tragic and serious in tone , while at times, it turns out sarcastic toward Creon and tragic toward Antigone. The end of the play is ultimately tragic and cathartic.

Analysis of Literary Devices in Antigone

• Action: The main action of the novel comprises Antigone’s defiance to the Theban laws enacted by her uncle, Creon. The rising action occurs when Creon threatens her for violating the law punishable to death. The falling action occurs when Creon decides to free Antigone but she has already hanged herself after Haemon kills himself.
• Antagonist : Antigone shows the character of Creon, as the main antagonist on account of his arrogance and miscalculation about the law and for his obstruction of Antigone in performing the rightful burial rites of her brother.
• Allusion : There are various examples of allusions given in the novel. A few examples are given below, i. Driving him back, for hard it is to Strive with the sons of a Dragon. For the arrogant boast of an impious man Zeus hateth exceedingly. (124-128) ii. And then, when Oedipus maintained our state, And when he perished, round his sons you rallied, Still firm and steadfast in your loyalty. (167-169) iii. ‘Is Man. Against Death alone He is left with no defence. But painful sickness he can cure By his own skill. (361-364) iv. Time Thou art strong and ageless, In thy own Olympus Ruling in radiant splendor. (607-610) The first two allusions are related to the Grecian mythology, the third to Oedipus, the fifth to death, and the last again to mythology.
• Conflict : The are two types of conflicts in the play, Antigone. The first one is the external conflict that is going on between man and the world order as Antigone shows through her defiance. Another conflict is in the mind of Antigone as a sister whether she should perform the burial of her brother or not.
• Characters: Antigone presents both static as well as dynamic characters. The young girl, Antigone, is a dynamic character as she goes through a transformation during her growth in the play from an obedient to a disobedient girl. However, the rest of the characters do not see any change in their behavior, as they are static characters such as Creon, Ismene, Haemon, and even Tiresias.
• Climax : The climax takes place when Creon decides to forgive Antigone for defying his law but he arrives too late and she has committed suicide, while Haemon attacks him, though, he fails.
• Dramatic Irony : The play shows dramatic irony through the character of Tiresias. Although he is physically blind, yet he can see through this mind’s eyes the future of the people of Thebes. He has advised Oedipus and now he is advising Creon but both think that he is a blind soothsayer.
• Foreshadowing : The play shows the following example of foreshadowing , i. How many miseries our father caused! And is there one of them that does not fall On us while yet we live? (1-3) These lines of the play show that something tragic is going to happen with the daughters of Oedipus.
• Hyperbole : Hyperbole or exaggeration occurs in the play in the first episode as given in the example below, Antigone: If you keep silent and do not proclaim it. Ismene. Your heart is hot upon a wintry work! (87-88) Here Ismene exaggerates things saying that her heart is hot because of the work of winter which is an exaggeration.
• Imagery : Imagery is used to make readers perceive things involving their five senses. For example, i. Welcome, light of the Sun, the fairest Sun that ever has dawned upon Thebes, the city of seven gates! At last thou art arisen, great Orb of shining day, pouring Light across the gleaming water of Dirke. (100-105) ii. Close he hovered above our houses, Circling around our seven gates, with Spears that thirsted to drink our blood. (116-118) iii. Angry accusations Flew up between us; each man blamed another, And in the end it would have come to blows, For there was none to stop it. (258-262). The above lines from the play show that Sophocles has used different images such as the images of light, sound, color, and again sound.
• Metaphor : Antigone shows good use of various metaphors as given the examples below, i. Angry accusations Flew up between us; each man blamed another. (259-260) ii. For money opens wide the city-gates To ravishers, it drives the citizens To exile , it perverts the honest mind. (296-299) iii. She raised a bitter cry, as will a bird Returning to its nest and finding it Despoiled, a cradle empty of its young. (422-425) iv. But Death comes once again With blood-stained axe, and hews The sapling down; and Frenzy lends her aid, and vengeful Madness. (601-603) The first metaphor shows the accusations compared to birds, the second shows money compared to something magical, and the third shows the cry compared to a bird. The last one shows death compared to an axe.
• Mood : The play, Antigone , shows a very serious and somber mood from the very beginning and turns to tragic and ironic by the end.
• Motif : Most important motifs of the play, Antigone, are the tomb, the bridal bed and death.
• Paradox : The play shows the examples of a paradox as given in the below examples, i. Our brother’s burial.—Creon has ordained Honour for one, dishonour for the other. (21-23) ii. You cannot: you chose life, and I chose death. (555) This example shows the use of paradox as honor and dishonor has been used in the same verse . The second example shows the life and death used in the same sentence.
• Protagonist : Antigone is the protagonist of the play. The play starts with the entry of Antigone and Ismene on the stage and ends with her.
• Rhetorical Questions : The play shows a good use of rhetorical questions at several places as given in the examples below, i. I knew it; therefore I have brought you here, Outside the doors, to tell you secretly. Ismene. What is it? Some dark shadow is upon you. (17-20) ii. What can I do, either to help or hinder? 40 Antigone. Will you join hands with me and share my task? Ismene. What dangerous enterprise have you in mind? Antigone. Will you join me in taking up the body? Ismene. What? Would you bury him, against the law? (40-45) iii. One time it said ‘You fool! Why do you go to certain punishment?’ Another time ‘What? Standing still, you wretch? (225-227) The above excerpts show the use of rhetorical questions posed by different characters; the first by Antigone, the second by Ismene, and the third by Creon.
• Setting : The setting of the play, Antigone , is the front of the palace of Thebes.
• Simile : The novel shows good use of various similes. For example, i. He brought them against our land; And like some eagle screaming his rage From the sky he descended upon us, With his armour about him, shining like snow , With spear upon spear. (111-115) ii. Under your threats That lashed me like a hailstorm, I’d have said I would not quickly have come here again. (390-393) iii. You, lurking like a serpent in my house, Drinking my life-blood unawares; nor did I know that I was cherishing two fiends. (531-533) These are similes as the use of the word “like” shows the comparison between different things. The first shows the rage compared to a screaming eagle and then armor’s shine compared to snow. The second shows the threats likened to a hailstorm and the third one shows the person compared to a snake .
• Symbols: The play shows symbols through characters such as Creon is the symbol of tyranny, Antigone a symbol of defiance, and Ismene a symbol of resignation.

Related posts:

• Antigone Quotes
• Antigone Themes
• Oedipus Rex Characters
• Oedipus Rex Themes
• Oedipus Rex Quotes
• Oedipus The King
• Oedipus at Colonus

Post navigation

The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context Analytical Essay

Introduction, works cited.

While researching texts about Sophocles’ “Antigone”, I found three articles that discussed the historical significance of the story. These articles explored various themes in the story. They explain how Antigone’s past experiences are still relevant in the present. My goal in this paper is to discuss the historical context of the story with regard to its timeless significance.

To achieve this goal, I have organized my paper into three sections and four subsections. In the first section, I give a brief introduction about Sophocles’ “Antigone”. In the second section, I outline three elements that link the story to the present. I explain the reasons that prompt Antigone to defy her king. I discuss Antigone’s actions with regard to present day societies. I end my paper with a third section which explains the timeless themes that are evident in the story.

An understanding of history usually elucidates the present. Antigone’s story is still relevant in the present. Sophocles writes about a fictional king named Oedipus, who rules the city of Thebes (Anouilh 17).

Oedipus is banished from Thebes because he has inadvertently committed incest (Woodruff 92). He has two sons named Polyneices and Eteocles (Braun 62). He also has a daughter named Antigone (Woodruff 22).

After Oedipus is banished, Eteocles banishes his older brother and claims the throne. Polyneices leaves Thebes with plans to overthrow his sibling (Braun 137). He returns and attacks the city with the help of his newfound military. Polyneices and Eteocles kill each other in the midst of the onslaught (Braun 148). Creon, a despot, is later crowned king of Thebes (Woodruff 160).

Creon decrees that Eteocles will be remembered as a hero while his brother will rot in disgrace (Braun 128). Creon is the antagonist in of the story (Woodruff 14). He is a ruthless leader. He can be described as a dictator. His penalty for disobedience is death. Antigone defies Creon by planning to give Polyneices a proper burial (Braun 142).

Sophocles’ opinions about war are evident when the two brothers kill each other in the story (Woodruff 140). Sophocles believes that in war, there are no victories. When countries go to war, every side expects to have casualties. Lives are lost for the sake of petty squabbles. Antigone is also a casualty of war (Anouilh 134). She loses both of her brothers to a conflict that could have easily been resolved.

Failed State

Oedipus represents a failed state (Woodruff 129). He was the king of Thebes. He failed to meet the standards of his people. He was therefore banished shortly after he blinded himself for the atrocities he had committed. He also ruled his father’s kingdom before discovering that he had committed an act of patricide (Braun 31).

Many political leaders have been destroyed by mistakes that they made in the past. For example, a certain Italian minister was accused o having sex with an underage prostitute. Like Oedipus, his statesmen have lost faith in him. His integrity has been compromised.

Freedom of Expression

One of the political elements evident in the story is freedom of expression. Antigone intends to bury her brother in a dignified manner. Creon represents an oppressive regime (Braun 92). He plans to have her punished because her actions are akin to civil disobedience (Woodruff 152).

Creon justifies his cruelty by regarding Polyneices as an enemy of the state (Braun 147). In the present, Polyneices would be regarded as a traitor and a domestic terrorist. Attacking Thebes may be termed as an act of treason (Woodruff 67). However, his sister’s compassion for him is not an act of treason. It is an act of love and honor. Antigone believes in the gods of her people (Anouilh 24). She defies her king because she believes that her actions are justified. She is even willing to die in the name of honor.

Antigone is a symbol of martyrdom (Braun 167). She is willing to die for her beliefs. She believes that she must honor her brother. Creon represents an autocratic government (Woodruff 150). Antigone’s actions drive Creon mad (Anouilh 45). He accuses Antigone’s younger sister, Ismene of committing the same offence (Braun 178). Ismene confesses to burying her brother despite the fact that she was not involved (Woodruff 192).

Ismene’s selfless actions represent family ties. She is willing to die for her sister. Shortly after her confession, Creon discovers the truth. He orders his men to bury Antigone alive in a cave while sparing her sister (Anouilh 67). Creon’s subjects notice a change in his behavior. They assume that he is a lunatic. His son, Haemon is appalled by his actions (Braun 90). Antigone’s simple act of compassion leads to the fall of an empire (Anouilh 78).

Antigone invokes Theban law by stating that Creon’s actions are dishonorable (Braun 126). Antigone’s defiance rallies the people of Thebes (Anouilh 97). Some scholars have argued that Antigone represents the feminist movement (Anouilh 142). She is strong and compassionate. She defies an oppressive king. She also inspires the people of Thebes (Woodruff 165). Sophocles’ story is timeless (Braun 174). It elucidates the present.

Anouilh, Jean. Antigone. Chicago: Illinois, 2004. Print.

Braun, Richard. Antigone: Greek Tragedy in New Translations. New York: New York, 1990. Print.

Woodruff, Paul. Antigone. Los Angeles: California, 2001. Print.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, September 5). The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context. https://ivypanda.com/essays/antigone/

"The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context." IvyPanda , 5 Sept. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/antigone/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context'. 5 September.

IvyPanda . 2018. "The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context." September 5, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/antigone/.

1. IvyPanda . "The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context." September 5, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/antigone/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The “Antigone” by Sophocles and Its Historical Context." September 5, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/antigone/.

• “Antigone” by Sophocles Is a Play Without a Hero
• Creon and Antigone's Debate in Sophocles' Tragedy
• Mythology: The Tragic Hero in Antigone
• Othello as the Outsider
• Neil Simon’s Brighton Beach Memoirs
• "The Sound of a Voice" by Henry Hwang
• The Function of the Soliloquies in Hamlet
• Recurring Theme of Revenge in Hamlet

Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis

Introduction.

The play Antigone is one of the best Greek dramatic works depicting life style of society and human relations between people. Antigone of Sophocles can be characterized as an astonishing achievement of world literature in which people are crushed by the entanglements of law whichever way they turn. Antigone would rather die in respecting filial ties and religious rites than adhere to the letter of the state’s law. Creon, the new ruler, would rather put Antigone – his niece and future daughter-in-law — to death in conformity with his decrees than give in to family members. His son, Haemon, having infuriated his father, would rather die with his betrothed than be an obedient son and citizen. Eurydice would rather kill herself over the loss of her son than live with a cruel husband, Creon. And the brothers Eteocles and Polynices, who started the crises of this play, preferred killing one another to working out their differences in alternate leadership of the state.

I agree with the author of the article “Writing About A Dramatic Structure” and his interpretation of events and dramatic vision of the play. The powerful arguments by Antigone for obedience to a law higher than the state are all the more gripping because of her political helplessness, a mere young woman. Yet she is as fearless, resolute, and vigorous as any fighter for justice. Antigone is an awesome character — and not just in the eyes of Creon. She is terrifying in her honesty. Her civil disobedience at the risk of death astonishes us all. We are frightened by her because of an excess that runs in the family. It is as if she embraces death above all and fits her disobedience to it as a sure instrument. Champion of upholding one vision of law, Antigone talks herself into becoming the fatal victim of law in another sense. Creon too gives in to excess, sticking stubbornly to his image as political authority, while not heeding the humane calls of family. He is to lose family and lose face as ruler. The article allows to understand the uniqueness of the Greek play and its histocial significance, literary structure and its relation to the main theme. Antigone has been an inspirer in other times and places.

The play and the article allow to say that the historical process is also a natural growing process and hence no conflict between law and nature was theoretically possible. It arose in acute form only when the author later rejected society and its conventions as an impediment to the free pleasurable life. Clothes and language, as we have seen, tend to recur in the anthropological pattern of human ‘inventions’. Again, when he uses the analogy of what animals would do to make gods if they could, he seems plainly to be thinking in a context in which men and animals are regarded as comparable. Man in fact is only a special sort of animal, who even when he draws and sculpts represents animals, whether intended as gods or men.

In sum, these insights, of fundamental importance, are all borrowed from the descriptive anthropologists. And then with great skill he subverts them and renders each one of them innocuous. The dramatic method turns out to be spurious; it is really an analytical logical device which takes some existing composite and divides it into its ideal elements and then starts with the supposed elements and builds up the composite again.

Works Cited

Sophocles, Antigone . In McMahan, E., Day, S., Funk, R.W. Literature and the Writing Process (8th Edition). Prentice Hall; 8th edition, 2007, pp. 644-679.

Writing About A Dramatic Structure.. In McMahan, E., Day, S., Funk, R.W. Literature and the Writing Process (8th Edition). Prentice Hall; 8th edition, 2007, p. 641.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2021, September 24). Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis. https://studycorgi.com/sophocles-antigone-critical-analysis/

"Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis." StudyCorgi , 24 Sept. 2021, studycorgi.com/sophocles-antigone-critical-analysis/.

StudyCorgi . (2021) 'Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis'. 24 September.

1. StudyCorgi . "Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis." September 24, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/sophocles-antigone-critical-analysis/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis." September 24, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/sophocles-antigone-critical-analysis/.

StudyCorgi . 2021. "Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis." September 24, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/sophocles-antigone-critical-analysis/.

This paper, “Sophocles’ Antigone: Critical Analysis”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: September 24, 2021 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Antigone Sophocles

Antigone essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Antigone by Sophocles.

Antigone Material

• Study Guide
• Lesson Plan

Join Now to View Premium Content

GradeSaver provides access to 2360 study guide PDFs and quizzes, 11007 literature essays, 2767 sample college application essays, 926 lesson plans, and ad-free surfing in this premium content, “Members Only” section of the site! Membership includes a 10% discount on all editing orders.

Antigone Essays

Ego-centered rulers katelyn white college.

An ego-centered person will always make their decisions based off what will conserve their reputation. Creon, an ego-centered ruler, feels that he must obey the laws set in place by the Gods and does not try to be open minded for his family....

Influence of Antigone on A Doll's House Anonymous

It is very difficult to label something as a first in literature. Much the way inventions are often adaptations of previously patented objects, most authors borrow ideas and techniques form pre-existing media. In order to truly classify something...

The Use of Light and Dark Images in Antigone Meredith Wilf

The "Golden Age" of Greece is notorious for its many contributions to the creative world, especially in its development of the play. These primitive performances strived to emphasize Greek morals, and were produced principally for this purpose....

Batman and Creon: Denied the Glory? NoahDavid Safford

A little boy went to the corner store to pick up the newest edition of his favorite comic; Batman. The boy entered the store and despite his efforts to withhold his excitement, dashed straight to the massive stack of magazines the store had...

Relativist Justice in Antigone Theoderek Wayne

The trio of classic Greek texts, The Last Days of Socrates, Antigone, and The Eumenides all strike a contrast between public and private morality. In each work one person carries forth an unpopular action that he alone believes in, and must later...

Hubris in Antigone and Oedipus Braden Ruddy

The idea of hubris is monumental in a plethora of Greek mythological works. In many ways the excessive pride of certain characters fuels their own destruction. This is certainly true with respect to the characters of Pentheus, Antigone, and...

Bend or Break: Oikos, Polis, and Love in Haemon's Argument with Creon Anonymous

Sophocles' play Antigone centers around a conflict between oikos and polis. Oikos, "home," is the concept of the household, dominated by women and kinship; polis, "city," is the concept of the collective city-state, dominated by men and power or...

Antigone as a Tragic Hero Jeremy J. Parker

It is not often in Greek myth or tragedy that a woman is found portrayed as a tragic hero. However, Sophocles makes the hero of his Antigone, the third and last play in the theme of Oedipus' life, a woman. And though this is out of context for a...

Antigone: An Analysis Adrienne Hudspeth

As the Greek tragedy Antigone builds up to a climax, Creon is warned that "[a]ll men make mistakes, it is only human. But once the wrong is done, a man can turn his back on folly, misfortune too, if he tries to make amends, however low he's...

Consequences of Pride: Creon as the Tragic Hero of Sophocles' Antigone Kathryn Larrivee

While it is likely that Oedipus Rex is the only character who completely embodies Aristotle's idea of a tragic hero, there are many characters who possess enough of his defined characteristics to qualify as the tragic hero of their respective...

Sophocles' Antigone: Lessons in Following the Heart Meg Austin

Sophocles presents us with a high standard of moral courage and character in his play Antigone. Among the many thematic questions raised, Sophocles pursues in depth the issue of whether it is best to obey the law or to follow one's conscience....

Hubris in Greek Mythology Braden Ruddy

Violence and its functions in the odyssey and antigone charles chen.

In both Homer's The Odyssey and Sophocles' Antigone, violence and war seem to be considered honorable; great fighters such as Antilokhos, Akhilleus and Odysseus of The Odyssey and Eteocles of Antigone are glorified and celebrated as exemplary...

Cold Sunlight: Light and Dark Imagery in Antigone Nicole E. DiPaolo

In Sophocles' Antigone, Creon, the King of Thebes, is entrusted to care for Antigone and Ismene, the daughters of the deceased Theban King Oedipus. However, Creon and the strong-willed Antigone clash on the issue of the burial of Antigone and...

Power Struggles Travis Hodges

Fredrick Nietzsche, a renowned German philosopher, believed that one of the strongest governing drives that humans possess is their desire for power. This theme is omnipresent in Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man , Shakespeare's Othello , and Sophocles'...

Respect for Family and Elders: the Moral Lessons of Antigone Ariel Patashnik

Sophocles's Theban plays tell the story of families afflicted by generations of personal tragedy. Unlike epics such as the Iliad , whose portrayals of whole-scale war, death, and destruction convey a sense of near-apocalyptic despair, Sophocles's...

An Examination of Imagery Across Genres: The Tragedy and The Epic Laura Eidem

A tool consistently employed by the Greeks was that of imagery, and within the genre of tragedy and the epic they have demonstrated their mastery of the device. Imagery within tragedy adds a necessary and otherwise unattainable sub-story to the...

Opposing Viewpoints Destroy the Bond between Antigone and Ismene Anonymous

In Sophocles' play Antigone, the two sisters, Antigone and Ismene, have opposing opinions concerning which to value more - the dead or the living. Antigone places greater emphasis on her duty to honor her dead brother, Polynices, while Ismene...

Antigone Travels to WWII France Mandy Geddes

Antigone travels to WWII France

No doubt, the most famous theatrical version of Antigone is the Greek original. Sophocles dramatized Antigone's choice and fate first, but he certainly was not the only playwright to see that Antigone's story is...

Deviation from an Ethical Code in Euripides' Medea Conor J. Judge

At first glance, the system of ethics presented by Euripides in his masterpiece Medea seems to parallel the systems found in several other tragedies of ancient Greek theatre. This system of helping friends and harming enemies, which recurs...

Sophocles' Themes in Antigone and Oedipus Rex Anonymous

Sophocles used his plays to encourage Athenians to take responsibility for their own actions. In the fifth century B.C., Greece was experiencing an era of military exploration, political turmoil and social revolution, including women’s...

Creon and the Alliance of Spears in Antigone Erik Yamada

In Sophocles’ Antigone, Creon makes reference to an “alliance of spears” as a metaphor pertaining to the necessary allegiance a society has to its ruler. Initially he feels his authority must be proven as absolute and in an act of hubris he...

The Non-Sacred Monster: Antigone as a Self-Determined Tragic Hero Loren Cappelson

One of the key thematic threads running through the plays of The Oedipus Cycle is the debate regarding the primary importance between the laws of the gods over those of the State. For example, in both Oedipus Rex and Antigone, the eponymous...

Competing Egos in Antigone Ali Romano

In his play Antigone, Sophocles portrays the character of Creon in a multitude of ways but particularly as proud and uncompromising. Because he is ruler of Thebes, many of his actions drive and shape the course of the drama. Significantly, it is...

• Submissions
• Request Book Reviews
• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Onkar Sharma

Literary Yard

Search for meaning

The Tragedy of Power In Sophocles’ Antigone

MAN AND LAWS OF THE LAND

 By: Gaither Stewart

Antigone, moved by love for her brother and convinced of the injustice of the command, which she believes violates divine law, buries his body secretly. For this crime, Creon orders she be buried alive in a cave.

This complex and bewildering story is the polarization of one of the basic elements of the relationship between man and society—the individual’s challenge to Power … and Power’s reaction to the challenge. Since then, Antigone’s act of burying her brother has been repeated down through the centuries as women have risked all to bury their dead men-warriors.

King Creon: “Shall the mob dictate my policy…. Am I to rule for others, or myself?”

Haemon (King Creon’s son, pleading for the life of his fiancée and Creon’s niece, Antigone, who has violated the king’s law: “A State for one man is no State at all.”

Creon, who has usurped power illegally: “The State is his who rules it, so ‘ tis held.”

Haemon : “As monarch of a desert thou wouldst shine.” Then later, sending his father to the devil, Haemon adds: “Go, consort with friends who like a madman for their mate.”

When Creon, despite his son’s pleas, accusations and threats to join Antigone in death if the king-dictator maintains his edict, the Chorus charges both king and submissive people:

“ Mad are thy subjects all, and even the wisest heart

Straight to folly will fall, at a touch of thy poisoned

“ Yet,” the Chorus adds: “it is ill to disobey

The powers who hold by might the sway.

Thou hast withstood authority,

A self-willed rebel, thou must die.”

The confrontation between Antigone and Creon reflects the dialectics of Western society since the time of the ancient Greeks in all its political, social, moral and legal ramifications. The reading I have given here to the tragedy is socio-political—the individual vs. Power.

The heart of the tragedy lies in Antigone’s free admission that she committed the act—she buried her brother’s body in disobedience of King Creon’s edict that the body was to remain untouched. Since her father-brother Oedipus was unaware of his crime of the murder of his father and of incest with his mother, his crime was excusable. Antigone’s crime on the other hand was a conscious act and therefore inexcusable.

Since Antigone knew and admitted her action but not her guilt as Creon insisted she do, her defiance of Power appears not only as a demand for justice, an expression of the greatest love, a passion for an ideal and conformity to an ethical norm superior to the public one, but also as the head-on collision between individual rights and the requisites of the State. Hers is more than a death urge, at the edge, the limit that humans can hardly cross. It is much more than an act of feminine heroism.

Her act is a symbol of the ideal, the emergence of the higher, individual law vis-a-vis Power, the qualities of good and evil which both the modern political Left and Right would historically claim. This tragedy of 2500 years ago turns on the politics of the private spirit and the violence which political social change exacts on the individual. This is truly the dividing line of the abyss separating individual man and society.

A terrible beauty on the one hand, a terrible ugliness on the other. The clash of private conscience and public welfare. Yet, in modern times, both private conscience and most certainly the concept of public welfare have weakened.

Antigone—first demanding justice, then claiming also that her dead rebel brother stood outside the law—stands on the lip of that abyss before she disappears from the action of the tragedy into a death so un-understood that the Chorus called her “inhuman.”

Antigone admits that she broke the law. But ethical man forgives her in the name of an unwritten law that exists above and beyond the public law that idealists in all times would make part of written law . She is criminal. But only to the extent that her act enters into an ambiguous territory of the very concept of law.

Here we are speaking of the law of the State as opposed to ethical law, “The immutable unwritten laws of heaven,” that however may never be written. In later days and down to our times not even the holy scriptures condemn war unconditionally, which however every thinking man knows is criminal. Antigone is symbolic of an unwritten law, perhaps nonetheless divine, eternal, universal. She exists somewhere in a shadowy realm that contemporary men strain to understand.

Though that unwritten ethical law appears as the most elevated part of man, a law that is near the divine, her defiance borders on what some theorists today would define as terrorism, because of her fanatical longing for death in defense of that law.

Yet, her choice is also not distant from the concept of the divine rights of man that lie in that same shadowy territory. In that sense her choice is transcendental for each of us, because it is linked to the good.

Instead Creon at first justifies his severity in application of the law—though it is his own arbitrary law—in the name of the good of all, as per Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor . His will becomes law. And he would compel the ethical individual to obey his arbitrary law. In his application of the law he exceeds ethical law, basing his authority on his own desire, as in President Bush’s justification for going to war in Iraq: “I want to do this thing!”

The unfolding, the denouement and conclusion of Sophocles’ Antigone not only do not lead to a resolution but to irresolution. In fact, the action intensifies Antigone’s defiance, causing a cycle of death, things go insane with the suicides of her fiancé Haemon and his mother and Creon’s wife.

In that sense the entire cast—Antigone, Haemon, and Creon himself—stand on the edge, at the limit of life, somewhere between life and death. No wonder ambiguity reigns supreme. Antigone evokes laws of heaven and earth, yet exists within the presumption of criminal guilt—which in one view is only grieving for her dead brother—and in a sense not even clearly in opposition to Creon’s edict in the name of the good for all. Strangely, they both claim the gods are on their sides. It is unclear if she a Christ figure, as some philosophers have concluded, a God’s child, emerging from the tomb to live through the millennia until our day.

And Creon himself, was he evil? That too is a real and eternal question: Was his edict another kind of social heroism? Or was his act purely arbitrary, a case of, “I want to do this thing.”

In the end—and as a boon to the conscience of those persons dedicated to the role of the just social state—Creon, the man of State, does come to regrets . Though here I am tempted to argue with myself, I recognize that Creon understands and appreciates Antigone’s stance and that he also knows that she too appreciates his position. Here we stand before the familiar old duality of life: between what we think we desire to do and what we actually do. Between enlightenment and madness. Illusion and delusion.

Meanwhile, in Sophocles, the Chorus, that is, the public and society, discerning or not, vacillates in its support, first for the man of State and Power, then for the higher right. For the Chorus, Antigone is less than human. She is one who no longer counts, somewhere out of the world, a substratum, to be compared to the unconsidered masses, non- represented , non-participating, non-voting majority of America who take no role in the exercise of Power.

At the end of Sophocles’ tragedy, one wonders which gods and what kind of gods they are all appealing to if they all believe they are acting within the mandate of the gods. However that may be, in my reading, Creon is the representative of arbitrary Power which the oppressed, for whatever their reasons, have the divine right to doubt, question and bring down.

Freedom requires that man act polemically, precisely in order to realize himself and a just society. In order to reject the fatalism that leads us to accept that what will come to pass will come to pass. People die but others must go on.

Life will go on.

One must live. One must participate in order to be part of continuing life. When the laws of the land are in conflict with justice, when Mother State is no longer the just mother, then acts which Power labels criminal and which in fact can become violent and revolutionary become not only just, but necessary.

In my reading, Antigone is representative of the conflictual revolutionary ideal.

One recalls the proverb, “if you strike at the king, you must kill the king.”

Providence, Rhode Island, February 2007

Re-worked in Buenos Aires, September 2007

Gaither Stewart, Senior Editor of The Greanville Post , and Cyrano’s Journal Today , is a novelist and journalist based in Italy, now on a three-month stay in Paris. His stories, essays and dispatches are read widely throughout the Internet on many leading venues. His latest novel is Lily Pad Roll, second volume in his Europe Trilogy ( Punto Press/ Trepper & Katz Impact Books ).

Share this:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Related posts.

Essay Literary criticism

Dorothy parker: america’s most treasured wit.

A Modern Look at Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice

Literary criticism Essay

Don’t Cancel The Great Gatsby

Type your email…

• Archaeology/History
• Books Reviews
• Content Marketing
• Global Politics
• Literary criticism
• LiteraryArt
• Non-Fiction
• Video Interviews

Recent Posts

• A Woman’s Coffin
• ‘Heinrich Böll, Group Portrait with Lady’ and other poems
• ‘One More Day’ and other poems
• Unpicking the confused tautology that is self love
• ‘It comes with the job’ and other poems

Recent Comments

Home — Essay Samples — Literature — Antigone — An Analysis of Power, Authority and Truth in Antigone, a Play by Sophocles

An Analysis of Power, Authority and Truth in Antigone, a Play by Sophocles

• Categories: Antigone Sophocles Truth

About this sample

Words: 1885 |

10 min read

Published: Oct 22, 2018

Words: 1885 | Pages: 4 | 10 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Literature Philosophy

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 859 words

12 pages / 5520 words

3 pages / 1534 words

4 pages / 1725 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Antigone, a classic Greek tragedy written by Sophocles, explores the concept of defiance and its consequences. The play centers around the conflict between Antigone, the daughter of Oedipus, and King Creon as they clash over the [...]

One of the most prevalent themes in Sophocles' tragedy, Antigone, is the concept of hubris. Hubris, a term originating from ancient Greek literature, refers to excessive pride or arrogance that often leads to the downfall of a [...]

In the tragic play Antigone by Sophocles, foreshadowing is a powerful storytelling device that not only adds depth and complexity to the plot, but also provides hints and clues about the future events in the play. [...]

Antigone, a play written by the ancient Greek playwright Sophocles, has long been a subject of debate and discussion among scholars, philosophers, and literary critics. At the heart of this debate lies the question of whether [...]

Sophocles's Theban plays tell the story of families afflicted by generations of personal tragedy. Unlike epics such as the Iliad, whose portrayals of whole-scale war, death, and destruction convey a sense of near-apocalyptic [...]

In Antigone, Antigone perseveres through all her hardships and decisions with her morals and set of values. Antigone throughout the play is noticed to transform from being stubborn and underestimated to courageous and [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

critical book reviews

• Mar 29, 2020

Antigone - critical review

Antigone, by Sophocles, is one most famous tragedies from ancient Greece and is still performed today all across the world. Sophocles was born (it is estimated) in 495BC and died in 405BC. He was thirty years younger than Aeschylus, his earlier playwright 'rival'. Notably, Sophocles had a high status in Athens and knew a lot of important people. He became general of Athens in 441BC and therefore an experienced politician: holding responsibilities and office of the city of Athens, therefore controlling the politics of around 300 thousand people. Therefore, through Antigone, we seem to see his own political philosophy coming through in the play. Notably, all these plays would be performed once a year during 'The Dionysia' in which, in theory, every male citizen was present and they would watch these plays for three days before deciding which one was the most favoured. After the three days, they would then vote on important matters of the state: for example whether to go to war. Therefore, the plays were hugely significant in influencing the politics of the region, and Sophocles clearly tries to guide people's perception of what it means to be a good ruler and attitudes to laws through his tragedy 'Antigone.' The play is set in Thebes, which is a days journey away from Athens (where it would have been performed) and was unique in the way it wasn't a port city: which creates a sense of claustrophobia and heightens the intensity of the play, since it was a city of tyrants in which the generals were not elected but instead one family held power and tried to stay on to it. Creon, literally meaning 'the ruler', is portrayed by Sophocles as an archetype of exactly NOT what a good ruler should be. He only comes into power because of Antigone's brothers both dying, and therefore does not win it through democracy (which was the method in which was taken in Athens.) Not only was Thebes geographically unique in the way it was not close to the sea, but this claustrophobia is symbolised in Antigone through having no other people from different cities, which not only makes Antigone unique to other Greek Tragedies but further exaggerates the hostility of having a dangerous ruler in Thebes since there was no influence from another city. Therefore, by Sophocles using a state in which is very confined to the ruling of a biological family, whom he suggests are not rightful rulers, accompanied by the setting of which there is no democracy and it seems no escape, Sophocles is showing the people of Athens what should be avoided and the importance of democracy and freedom. The main topic of the novel is the conflict between laws of the state in conflict with a higher, external and eternal law of the Gods. This conflict is symbolised by the two most notable characters of the play: Antigone, who refuses to go against the eternal law that one should bury their relatives' bodies, and Creon, who symbolises the importance of law you can make in the state. Therefore, it becomes a political play for what should be illegal and legal and how that is decided. Sophocles was famous for 'divided catastrophe', in which the protagonist dies in the middle but the play goes on. In Antigone, however, obviously not only are their many deaths but the most notable death of Antigone's brother Polynices happens before the play even begins: and therefore the whole play revolves around the consequences of death and if the means to get to it influences what happens after it. The fact that Polynices fights for the conflicting side of Creon makes him decide that he should be denied the right of being buried that all men are granted. Sophocles stresses the importance of this eternal law and the fact it is higher than the state not only through the character of Antigone, who refuses to submit to Creon's contrasting law but also through the Chorus. In the middle of the play, the Chorus talks about all the achievements of man: stating that man is the greatest being, however, argues that if one should forget about the Gods, then he will fall from his high place and status. This urges that although man's achievements and their existence itself should be celebrated, they should not try and overcome the laws of the Gods. This is shown through the plot by the tragic ending of Creon losing his last child and his wife, which symbolises Zeus' striking his thunderbolt at Creon, who disobeyed these unwritten laws that a higher than those of the state. Furthermore, not only does Sophocles display the importance of eternal law, but also displays the means of deciding laws of the state through the idea it should be very inclusive and democratic, which contrasts with how Creon determines rules and his failure determines that this egotistic strategy fails. Creon says that he is a strong leader and being a leader is superior to friendship, and his decision to decide that Polynices should not be buried is a way of him displaying his superiority, perhaps not only to the state but also against the Gods. He decides death sentences and laws without talking of summoning the chorus, court or any people of the state: without any core beliefs or philosophy that he uses to justify his decisions (Aristotle, in his 'poetics', argued that he was 'consistently inconsistent'), apart from his urge for power. Sophocles was very interested in how far human moral decision making affects predestined fate. Creon seems to have no predestined fate, but his tragic end is completely brought about by his attitude as a leader. Sophocles therefore, shows that humans are powerful, but not necessarily in a positive way, as they can bring out such a tragic end that not even the Gods predestined. It argues that even if humans aren't predestined life of tragedy, they can determine their own fate with this ending if they act in this hedonistic manner. In the last scene, Creon recognises this, saying that his wrong judgement causes the tragedy, which is a way of Sophocles reminding those watching of this dangerous attribute of humankind and that it can lead to destruction. This political theory of the positivity of collectively instead of individuality is further pressed by Haemon, Antigone's fiance, who it has been argued represent Sophocles views on politics the most out of all the characters. Within the play, his speech of political theory advocating the importance of rulers compromising with people and having collective agreement juxtaposes Creon's attitude to being a ruler, which ends in his destruction. Therefore, both through speech and through the plot, Sophocles reminds those watching of what it takes to be a good ruler, which is especially significant due to the aftermath events of the performances in which decisions were made about rulers, laws and wars by the people. With a teenage girl at the centre of the play, one cannot ignore the theme of gender. It is unusual to have a teenage girl at the centre of the play, especially with such authority and fighting for the importance of the immortal Gods. The Greeks believed that teenage girls suffered from almost lunacy until they were married off, and believed that their wombs attacked and affected their decisions. I thought Sophocles however, through Antigone's hysteria and crudeness, although possibly overwhelming and controversial, was him defending that they should not be dismissed as mad and unimportant, as the argument that Antigone puts forward is extremely significant. Antigone's defence of the higher natural law is at the centre of the play and therefore Sophocles was not dismissing her importance at all, but rather heightening it. He did include a sense that she was more overwrought than the other characters, especially the other female characters such as the wife of Creon, but I thought that in a sense, he was defending this lunacy view of teenage girls, through portraying her justice and her loyalty to the God's, in comparison to the ignorance of Creon. Overall, the play shows the dangers of humankind in terms of their possible egotism and strive for power. It reminds the spectators of the power and influence of the Gods, and that men should make decisions of the state together and considerably in alignment with that of the unwritten, fixed, natural laws that are universal to all states.

Jump to navigation

Call for book chapters - Critical Food Cultures from the Global South

Usually, the narratives around food habits and culinary practices are structured around individual tastes. However, the narratives can be and need to be structured much beyond individual tastes. Historically, it has been observed that individual and collective food habits and culinary practices are driven by various social, cultural, gendered, sexual, racial, caste, geographical, commercial, and political factors. These factors provoke us to go beyond the stereotypical scientific narratives of consumption and unpack the various social dynamics and power structures that are associated with our daily food habits and culinary practices. With respect to these arguments, this edited book will generate an interwoven, multidisciplinary and planetary archive on critical food studies. The edited book will typically include chapters on critical introductions, histories of creole foods, sociologies of culinary practices and food habits, psychological impacts of food habits and culinary practices, transoceanic food habits and culinary practices, representations of food in literatures (both fiction and non-fiction), politics of food habits and culinary practices, and cultural impacts of food habits and culinary practices.

Scope and Rationale

• The proposed book will focus on the diverse socio-historical aspects of food habits and culinary practices.
• A lot of empirical research works are being conducted on culinary cultures and kitchen spaces across the globe and this proposed book have the potential to attract contributors from different parts of the world (namely the Global South).
• The proposed book will unpack how different social, political, cultural, economic, racial, gendered, caste, geographical and several other factors contribute towards daily food habits and culinary practices in an intersectional manner.

Submission of book chapter abstract Please could you submit a 250 word abstract alongside a chapter title and keywords to us (email below) by 30th June 2024. Please could you submit a short 50-100 word biography with your institutional email address. Timelines Submission of abstract: 30th June 2024 Decision: 31st July 2024 Submission of book proposal to publisher: 15th August 2024 Submission of book chapter: 25th November 2024 Review process: 1st December 2024 to 28th February 2025

Publisher: Peter Lang

Lead Book Editors

Dr Sayan Dey [email protected]

Dr Gurpinder Singh Lalli [email protected]  

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

Press Pause on the Silicon Valley Hype Machine

By Julia Angwin

Ms. Angwin is a contributing Opinion writer and an investigative journalist.

It’s a little hard to believe that just over a year ago, a group of leading researchers asked for a six-month pause in the development of larger systems of artificial intelligence, fearing that the systems would become too powerful. “Should we risk loss of control of our civilization?” they asked.

There was no pause. But now, a year later, the question isn’t really whether A.I. is too smart and will take over the world. It’s whether A.I. is too stupid and unreliable to be useful. Consider this week’s announcement from OpenAI’s chief executive, Sam Altman, who promised he would unveil “new stuff” that “ feels like magic to me.” But it was just a rather routine update that makes ChatGPT cheaper and faster .

It feels like another sign that A.I. is not even close to living up to its hype. In my eyes, it’s looking less like an all-powerful being and more like a bad intern whose work is so unreliable that it’s often easier to do the task yourself. That realization has real implications for the way we, our employers and our government should deal with Silicon Valley’s latest dazzling new, new thing. Acknowledging A.I.’s flaws could help us invest our resources more efficiently and also allow us to turn our attention toward more realistic solutions.

Others voice similar concerns. “I find my feelings about A.I. are actually pretty similar to my feelings about blockchains: They do a poor job of much of what people try to do with them, they can’t do the things their creators claim they one day might, and many of the things they are well suited to do may not be altogether that beneficial,” wrote Molly White, a cryptocurrency researcher and critic , in her newsletter last month.

Let’s look at the research.

In the past 10 years, A.I. has conquered many tasks that were previously unimaginable, such as successfully identifying images, writing complete coherent sentences and transcribing audio. A.I. enabled a singer who had lost his voice to release a new song using A.I. trained with clips from his old songs.

But some of A.I.’s greatest accomplishments seem inflated. Some of you may remember that the A.I. model ChatGPT-4 aced the uniform bar exam a year ago. Turns out that it scored in the 48th percentile, not the 90th, as claimed by OpenAI , according to a re-examination by the M.I.T. researcher Eric Martínez . Or what about Google’s claim that it used A.I. to discover more than two million new chemical compounds ? A re-examination by experimental materials chemists at the University of California, Santa Barbara, found “ scant evidence for compounds that fulfill the trifecta of novelty, credibility and utility .”

Meanwhile, researchers in many fields have found that A.I. often struggles to answer even simple questions, whether about the law , medicine or voter information . Researchers have even found that A.I. does not always improve the quality of computer programming , the task it is supposed to excel at.

I don’t think we’re in cryptocurrency territory, where the hype turned out to be a cover story for a number of illegal schemes that landed a few big names in prison . But it’s also pretty clear that we’re a long way from Mr. Altman’s promise that A.I. will become “ the most powerful technology humanity has yet invented .”

Take Devin, a recently released “ A.I. software engineer ” that was breathlessly touted by the tech press. A flesh-and-bones software developer named Carl Brown decided to take on Devin . A task that took the generative A.I.-powered agent over six hours took Mr. Brown just 36 minutes. Devin also executed poorly, running a slower, outdated programming language through a complicated process. “Right now the state of the art of generative A.I. is it just does a bad, complicated, convoluted job that just makes more work for everyone else,” Mr. Brown concluded in his YouTube video .

Cognition, Devin’s maker, responded by acknowledging that Devin did not complete the output requested and added that it was eager for more feedback so it can keep improving its product. Of course, A.I. companies are always promising that an actually useful version of their technology is just around the corner. “ GPT-4 is the dumbest model any of you will ever have to use again by a lot ,” Mr. Altman said recently while talking up GPT-5 at a recent event at Stanford University.

The reality is that A.I. models can often prepare a decent first draft. But I find that when I use A.I., I have to spend almost as much time correcting and revising its output as it would have taken me to do the work myself.

And consider for a moment the possibility that perhaps A.I. isn’t going to get that much better anytime soon. After all, the A.I. companies are running out of new data on which to train their models, and they are running out of energy to fuel their power-hungry A.I. machines . Meanwhile, authors and news organizations (including The New York Times ) are contesting the legality of having their data ingested into the A.I. models without their consent, which could end up forcing quality data to be withdrawn from the models.

Given these constraints, it seems just as likely to me that generative A.I. could end up like the Roomba, the mediocre vacuum robot that does a passable job when you are home alone but not if you are expecting guests.

Companies that can get by with Roomba-quality work will, of course, still try to replace workers. But in workplaces where quality matters — and where workforces such as screenwriters and nurses are unionized — A.I. may not make significant inroads.

And if the A.I. models are relegated to producing mediocre work, they may have to compete on price rather than quality, which is never good for profit margins. In that scenario, skeptics such as Jeremy Grantham, an investor known for correctly predicting market crashes, could be right that the A.I. investment bubble is very likely to deflate soon .

The biggest question raised by a future populated by unexceptional A.I., however, is existential. Should we as a society be investing tens of billions of dollars, our precious electricity that could be used toward moving away from fossil fuels, and a generation of the brightest math and science minds on incremental improvements in mediocre email writing?

We can’t abandon work on improving A.I. The technology, however middling, is here to stay, and people are going to use it. But we should reckon with the possibility that we are investing in an ideal future that may not materialize.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

Julia Angwin, a contributing Opinion writer and the founder of Proof News , writes about tech policy. You can follow her on Twitter or Mastodon or her personal newsletter .

What is Yelp? Understanding its Impact on Businesses and Consumers

This essay about Yelp explores its evolution as a critical platform in the digital age that influences consumer choices and business reputations. It highlights Yelp’s role as a forum where users review and rate businesses, shaping public perception and guiding consumer behavior. The text discusses the challenges businesses face on Yelp, including managing negative feedback and the platform’s efforts to combat biased reviews. It also addresses criticisms regarding Yelp’s market dominance and revenue model, emphasizing the platform’s significant impact on modern commerce and the importance of a positive reputation.

How it works

In today’s digital landscape, where each interaction online informs our preferences and views, platforms like Yelp have become critical hubs of community and opinion. Since its launch in 2004, Yelp has transformed into a crucial online forum—a modern-day marketplace where users and businesses converge to exchange experiences, influence reputations, and guide consumer behavior.

At its core, Yelp functions as a digital podium where users leverage their narratives to appraise and critique businesses ranging from quaint bistros to upscale boutiques. It’s prized for its egalitarian nature, where each critique, whether it extols an exquisite meal or criticizes subpar service, carries weight in shaping public perception.

Yelp stands as a guiding light for discerning customers amidst a myriad of choices, revealing the best in dining, services, and undiscovered locales. With their smartphones as compasses, users navigate through real-world experiences, steered by the collective insights of the community. Yelp not only offers a rich repository of user-generated reviews and star ratings but also provides visual appetites with snapshots of user experiences.

Beyond being a mere convenience, Yelp serves as a pivotal arena for businesses, where online reputations are built and could either rocket a business to prominence or drag it into obscurity. High praise and positive feedback can draw crowds and elevate a business’s status, while negative feedback can be detrimental, deterring potential clientele and damaging longstanding reputations.

Yet, mastering Yelp’s landscape comes with its challenges. Businesses must engage proactively, responding to feedback and upholding exceptional customer service to protect against the potential damage of negative reviews. In today’s era, active reputation management is essential for survival.

Despite its benefits, Yelp has faced scrutiny. Accusations of biased reviews, manipulated rankings, and controversial advertising practices have tainted its reputation. While Yelp has introduced measures like sophisticated algorithms to eliminate fake reviews and set guidelines against manipulation, doubts remain.

Furthermore, Yelp’s prominent role in the review industry has sparked debates about its competitive practices and potential suppression of innovation due to its market dominance. Critics have also questioned the platform’s impartiality given its advertising-driven revenue model.

In the intricate web of modern commerce and consumerism, Yelp plays a significant role, influencing business strategies and consumer choices alike, and reinforcing the importance of maintaining an outstanding reputation. As we adapt to the evolving dynamics of the digital realm, it is evident that within Yelp’s domain, the power of consumer voice is paramount, and maintaining a positive public image is crucial.

Cite this page

What Is Yelp? Understanding Its Impact on Businesses and Consumers. (2024, May 21). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/what-is-yelp-understanding-its-impact-on-businesses-and-consumers/

"What Is Yelp? Understanding Its Impact on Businesses and Consumers." PapersOwl.com , 21 May 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/what-is-yelp-understanding-its-impact-on-businesses-and-consumers/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). What Is Yelp? Understanding Its Impact on Businesses and Consumers . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/what-is-yelp-understanding-its-impact-on-businesses-and-consumers/ [Accessed: 21 May. 2024]

"What Is Yelp? Understanding Its Impact on Businesses and Consumers." PapersOwl.com, May 21, 2024. Accessed May 21, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/what-is-yelp-understanding-its-impact-on-businesses-and-consumers/

"What Is Yelp? Understanding Its Impact on Businesses and Consumers," PapersOwl.com , 21-May-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/what-is-yelp-understanding-its-impact-on-businesses-and-consumers/. [Accessed: 21-May-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). What Is Yelp? Understanding Its Impact on Businesses and Consumers . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/what-is-yelp-understanding-its-impact-on-businesses-and-consumers/ [Accessed: 21-May-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers