poster presentation healthcare

• Cancer Nursing Practice
• Emergency Nurse
• Evidence-Based Nursing
• Learning Disability Practice
• Mental Health Practice
• Nurse Researcher
• Nursing Children and Young People
• Nursing Management
• Nursing Older People
• Nursing Standard
• Primary Health Care
• RCN Nursing Awards
• Nursing Live
• Nursing Careers and Job Fairs
• CPD webinars on-demand
• --> Advanced -->

• Clinical articles
• CPD articles
• CPD Quizzes
• Expert advice
• Clinical placements
• Study skills
• Clinical skills
• University life
• Person-centred care
• Career advice
• Revalidation

how to series    

How to develop and present a conference poster, davina calbraith freelance research nurse, national centre for social research, brentwood, england.

• To understand the requirements of an effective conference poster design

• To obtain practical advice on developing and presenting a conference poster

• To enhance your poster development and presentation skills

Rationale and key points

Conference posters can be used by nurses to disseminate the findings of studies, audits or service improvement projects. Despite the lack of robust evidence on what an optimal poster should include, the literature contains several sources of useful information on the topic. A conference poster requires thorough and systematic preparation; authors will need to determine what message they want to convey, what the aim of their poster is, and how they will ensure precision, clarity, brevity and visual appeal. This article provides a step-by-step guide to assist nurses in developing optimal poster content and design, and in delivering effective poster presentations.

• A conference poster needs to be clear and make sense without additional explanation.

• To develop an engaging and attractive poster, it is important to find a balance between text and image.

• Being prepared to answer challenging questions is essential for optimal poster presentations.

Reflective activity

‘How to’ articles can help to update your practice and ensure it remains evidence based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of:

1. How reading this article will improve your poster development or presentation skills.

2. How you could use this information to educate nursing students or colleagues wanting to develop a conference poster.

Nursing Standard . doi: 10.7748/ns.2020.e11468

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

[email protected]

None declared

Calbraith D (2020) How to develop and present a conference poster. Nursing Standard. doi: 10.7748/ns.2020.e11468

Disclaimer Please note that information provided by Nursing Standard is not sufficient to make the reader competent to perform the task. All clinical skills should be formally assessed according to local policy and procedures. It is the nurse’s responsibility to ensure their practice remains up to date and reflects the latest evidence

Published online: 03 August 2020

career pathways - communication - interpersonal skills - mature students - methodology - presentation skills - professional - research - students

User not found

Want to read more?

Already have access log in, 3-month trial offer for £5.25/month.

• Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
• RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
• NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
• Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
• A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you. Find out more

01 May 2024 / Vol 39 issue 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIGITAL EDITION

• LATEST ISSUE
• SIGN UP FOR E-ALERT
• WRITE FOR US
• PERMISSIONS

Share article: How to develop and present a conference poster

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience.

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

• COVID Information
• Patient Care
• Referring Providers
• Price Transparency
• Employee Resources

Creating and Presenting Posters

There are many opportunities to showcase your research work at Vanderbilt and outside Vanderbilt. This area of our website is focusing on showcasing your work via poster presentations. We have listed some resources that will assist you in creating an exceptional poster. Also, we have provided pictures and information about posters that have been presented by nurses from VUMC.If you need further assistance with your poster, contact our office via email at [email protected]

Creating & Presenting a Poster

• Creating a Successful Poster Presentation 2015 (Poster design & presentation tips)
• Ten quick notes for designing good posters
• PowerPoint presentation on creating an effective poster
• Step-by-step poster making tipsArticle on how to create an effective poster (Vickie Miracle)
• Article on how to create an effective poster presentation (Rose O. Sherman)
• Article on the then steps to a successful poster presentation

(All templates can be re-sized)

• Nursing Research Poster template, 36 x 42 (average size)
• Nursing Research Poster template, 36 x 48 (longer horizontal size)
• Nursing Research Poster template, 48 x 48 (square)
• Nursing Research Poster template, 56 x 42 (large)
• Poster Samples
• VUMC Poster T emplates
• VUMC Poster Printing Service  

Note: Due to COVID-19, Office hours might vary E-mail EBP and Research office

Phone: (615) 875-3343 Address: 2611 West End Ave, Suite 328 Nashville, TN 37203

Graduate Nursing Poster Presentation Toolkit: Examples

• Step by Step
• Visualizations & Images

Examples from the 7th National DNP Conference

• Examples from the Seventh National Doctors of Nursing Practice Conference Poster Presentations Browse through the posters to see how other nurses have designed their posters.

Felician Graduate Symposium Examples

• Felician Graduate Symposium Posters 2019 Felician University Libraries Archives

NJLA 2019: Incorporating UDL at FUL by Kaitlyn Clohosey

• Kaitlyn Clohosey UDL Poster

Sample from Animate Your Science

How to Design an Award-Winning Scientific Conference Poster

Examples from Other Schools

• Poster Samples from University of Texas at Austin
• Scientific Posters Cornell University, Columbia University, Purdue University, UCLA, and more
• “Quantitative Analysis of Artifacts in Volumetric DSA: The Relative Contributions of Beam Hardening and Scatter to Vessel Dropout Behind Highly Attenuating Structures” James R. Hermus, Timothy P. Szczykutowicz, Charles M. Strother, and Charles Mistretta. Departments of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, and Radiology: University of Wisconsin-Madison
• “Self-Care Interventions for the Management of Mouth Sores in Hematology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy” Stephanie L. Dinse and Catherine Cherwin. School of Nursing: University of Wisconsin-Madison
• “Enhancing the Fluorescence of Wisconsin Infrared Phytofluor: Wi-Phy for Potential Use in Infrared Imaging" Jerad J. Simmons and Katrina T. Forest. Department of Bacteriology: University of Wisconsin-Madison

Chat - Slide 60sec

• << Previous: Visualizations & Images
• Last Updated: Jan 31, 2024 3:10 PM
• URL: https://felician.libguides.com/gradnursingpostertoolkit

Home Blog Design How to Design a Winning Poster Presentation: Quick Guide with Examples & Templates

How to Design a Winning Poster Presentation: Quick Guide with Examples & Templates

How are research posters like High School science fair projects? Quite similar, in fact.

Both are visual representations of a research project shared with peers, colleagues and academic faculty. But there’s a big difference: it’s all in professionalism and attention to detail. You can be sure that the students that thrived in science fairs are now creating fantastic research posters, but what is that extra element most people miss when designing a poster presentation?

This guide will teach tips and tricks for creating poster presentations for conferences, symposia, and more. Learn in-depth poster structure and design techniques to help create academic posters that have a lasting impact.

Let’s get started.

Table of Contents

• What is a Research Poster?

Why are Poster Presentations important?

Overall dimensions and orientation, separation into columns and sections, scientific, academic, or something else, a handout with supplemental and contact information, cohesiveness, design and readability, storytelling.

• Font Characteristics
• Color Pairing
• Data Visualization Dimensions
• Alignment, Margins, and White Space

Scientific/Academic Conference Poster Presentation

Digital research poster presentations, slidemodel poster presentation templates, how to make a research poster presentation step-by-step, considerations for printing poster presentations, how to present a research poster presentation, final words, what is a research poster .

Research posters are visual overviews of the most relevant information extracted from a research paper or analysis.   They are essential communication formats for sharing findings with peers and interested people in the field. Research posters can also effectively present material for other areas besides the sciences and STEM—for example, business and law.

You’ll be creating research posters regularly as an academic researcher, scientist, or grad student. You’ll have to present them at numerous functions and events. For example:

• Conference presentations
• Informational events
• Community centers

The research poster presentation is a comprehensive way to share data, information, and research results. Before the pandemic, the majority of research events were in person. During lockdown and beyond, virtual conferences and summits became the norm. Many researchers now create poster presentations that work in printed and digital formats.

Let’s look at why it’s crucial to spend time creating poster presentations for your research projects, research, analysis, and study papers.

Research posters represent you and your sponsor’s research 

Research papers and accompanying poster presentations are potent tools for representation and communication in your field of study. Well-performing poster presentations help scientists, researchers, and analysts grow their careers through grants and sponsorships.

When presenting a poster presentation for a sponsored research project, you’re representing the company that sponsored you. Your professionalism, demeanor, and capacity for creating impactful poster presentations call attention to other interested sponsors, spreading your impact in the field.

Research posters demonstrate expertise and growth

Presenting research posters at conferences, summits, and graduate grading events shows your expertise and knowledge in your field of study. The way your poster presentation looks and delivers, plus your performance while presenting the work, is judged by your viewers regardless of whether it’s an officially judged panel.

Recurring visitors to research conferences and symposia will see you and your poster presentations evolve. Improve your impact by creating a great poster presentation every time by paying attention to detail in the poster design and in your oral presentation. Practice your public speaking skills alongside the design techniques for even more impact.

Poster presentations create and maintain collaborations

Every time you participate in a research poster conference, you create meaningful connections with people in your field, industry or community. Not only do research posters showcase information about current data in different areas, but they also bring people together with similar interests. Countless collaboration projects between different research teams started after discussing poster details during coffee breaks.

An effective research poster template deepens your peer’s understanding of a topic by highlighting research, data, and conclusions. This information can help other researchers and analysts with their work. As a research poster presenter, you’re given the opportunity for both teaching and learning while sharing ideas with peers and colleagues.

Anatomy of a Winning Poster Presentation

Do you want your research poster to perform well?  Following the standard layout and adding a few personal touches will help attendees know how to read your poster and get the most out of your information. 

The overall size of your research poster ultimately depends on the dimensions of the provided space at the conference or research poster gallery. The poster orientation can be horizontal or vertical, with horizontal being the most common.  In general, research posters measure 48 x 36 inches or are an A0 paper size.

A virtual poster can be the same proportions as the printed research poster, but you have more leeway regarding the dimensions. Virtual research posters should fit on a screen with no need to scroll, with 1080p resolution as a standard these days. A horizontal presentation size is ideal for that.

A research poster presentation has a standard layout of 2–5 columns with 2–3 sections each. Typical structures say to separate the content into four sections; 1. A horizontal header 2. Introduction column, 3. Research/Work/Data column, and 4. Conclusion column. Each unit includes topics that relate to your poster’s objective.  Here’s a generalized outline for a poster presentation:

• Condensed Abstract 
• Objectives/Purpose
• Methodology
• Recommendations
• Implications
• Acknowledgments
• Contact Information 

The overview content you include in the units depends on your poster presentations’ theme, topic, industry, or field of research. A scientific or academic poster will include sections like hypothesis, methodology, and materials. A marketing analysis poster will include performance metrics and competitor analysis results.

There’s no way a poster can hold all the information included in your research paper or analysis report. The poster is an overview that invites the audience to want to find out more. That’s where supplement material comes in. Create a printed PDF handout or card with a QR code (created using a QR code generator ). Send the audience to the best online location for reading or downloading the complete paper.

What Makes a Poster Presentation Good and Effective? 

For your poster presentation to be effective and well-received, it needs to cover all the bases and be inviting to find out more. Stick to the standard layout suggestions and give it a unique look and feel. We’ve put together some of the most critical research poster-creation tips in the list below. Your poster presentation will perform as long as you check all the boxes.

The information you choose to include in the sections of your poster presentation needs to be cohesive. Train your editing eye and do a few revisions before presenting. The best way to look at it is to think of The Big Picture. Don’t get stuck on the details; your attendees won’t always know the background behind your research topic or why it’s important.

Be cohesive in how you word the titles, the length of the sections, the highlighting of the most important data, and how your oral presentation complements the printed—or virtual—poster.

The most important characteristic of your poster presentation is its readability and clarity. You need a poster presentation with a balanced design that’s easy to read at a distance of 1.5 meters or 4 feet. The font size and spacing must be clear and neat. All the content must suggest a visual flow for the viewer to follow.

That said, you don’t need to be a designer to add something special to your poster presentation. Once you have the standard—and recognized—columns and sections, add your special touch. These can be anything from colorful boxes for the section titles to an interesting but subtle background, images that catch the eye, and charts that inspire a more extended look. 

Storytelling is a presenting technique involving writing techniques to make information flow. Firstly, storytelling helps give your poster presentation a great introduction and an impactful conclusion. 

Think of storytelling as the invitation to listen or read more, as the glue that connects sections, making them flow from one to another. Storytelling is using stories in the oral presentation, for example, what your lab partner said when you discovered something interesting. If it makes your audience smile and nod, you’ve hit the mark. Storytelling is like giving a research presentation a dose of your personality, and it can help turning your data into opening stories .

Design Tips For Creating an Effective Research Poster Presentation

The section above briefly mentioned how important design is to your poster presentation’s effectiveness. We’ll look deeper into what you need to know when designing a poster presentation.

1. Font Characteristics

The typeface and size you choose are of great importance. Not only does the text need to be readable from two meters away, but it also needs to look and sit well on the poster. Stay away from calligraphic script typefaces, novelty typefaces, or typefaces with uniquely shaped letters.

Stick to the classics like a sans serif Helvetica, Lato, Open Sans, or Verdana. Avoid serif typefaces as they can be difficult to read from far away. Here are some standard text sizes to have on hand.

• Title: 85 pt
• Authors: 65 pt
• Headings: 36 pt
• Body Text: 24 pt
• Captions: 18 pt

If you feel too prone to use serif typefaces, work with a font pairing tool that helps you find a suitable solution – and intend those serif fonts for heading sections only. As a rule, never use more than 3 different typefaces in your design. To make it more dynamic, you can work with the same font using light, bold, and italic weights to put emphasis on the required areas.

2. Color Pairing

Using colors in your poster presentation design is a great way to grab the viewer’s attention. A color’s purpose is to help the viewer follow the data flow in your presentation, not distract. Don’t let the color take more importance than the information on your poster.

Choose one main color for the title and headlines and a similar color for the data visualizations. If you want to use more than one color, don’t create too much contrast between them. Try different tonalities of the same color and keep things balanced visually. Your color palette should have at most one main color and two accent colors.

Black text over a white background is standard practice for printed poster presentations, but for virtual presentations, try a very light gray instead of white and a very dark gray instead of black. Additionally, use variations of light color backgrounds and dark color text. Make sure it’s easy to read from two meters away or on a screen, depending on the context. We recommend ditching full white or full black tone usage as it hurts eyesight in the long term due to its intense contrast difference with the light ambiance.

3. Data Visualization Dimensions

Just like the text, your charts, graphs, and data visualizations must be easy to read and understand. Generally, if a person is interested in your research and has already read some of the text from two meters away, they’ll come closer to look at the charts and graphs. 

Fit data visualizations inside columns or let them span over two columns. Remove any unnecessary borders, lines, or labels to make them easier to read at a glance. Use a flat design without shadows or 3D characteristics. The text in legends and captions should stay within the chart size and not overflow into the margins. Use a unified text size of 18px for all your data visualizations.

4. Alignment, Margins, and White Space

Finally, the last design tip for creating an impressive and memorable poster presentation is to be mindful of the layout’s alignment, margins, and white space. Create text boxes to help keep everything aligned. They allow you to resize, adapt, and align the content along a margin or grid.

Take advantage of the white space created by borders and margins between sections. Don’t crowd them with a busy background or unattractive color.

Calculate margins considering a print format. It is a good practice in case the poster presentation ends up becoming in physical format, as you won’t need to downscale your entire design (affecting text readability in the process) to preserve information.

There are different tools that you can use to make a poster presentation. Presenters who are familiar with Microsoft Office prefer to use PowerPoint. You can learn how to make a poster in PowerPoint here.

Poster Presentation Examples

Before you start creating a poster presentation, look at some examples of real research posters. Get inspired and get creative.

Research poster presentations printed and mounted on a board look like the one in the image below. The presenter stands to the side, ready to share the information with visitors as they walk up to the panels.

With more and more conferences staying virtual or hybrid, the digital poster presentation is here to stay. Take a look at examples from a poster session at the OHSU School of Medicine .

Use SlideModel templates to help you create a winning poster presentation with PowerPoint and Google Slides. These poster PPT templates will get you off on the right foot. Mix and match tables and data visualizations from other poster slide templates to create your ideal layout according to the standard guidelines.

If you need a quick method to create a presentation deck to talk about your research poster at conferences, check out our Slides AI presentation maker. A tool in which you add the topic, curate the outline, select a design, and let AI do the work for you.

1. One-pager Scientific Poster Template for PowerPoint

A PowerPoint template tailored to make your poster presentations an easy-to-craft process. Meet our One-Pager Scientific Poster Slide Template, entirely editable to your preferences and with ample room to accommodate graphs, data charts, and much more.

Use This Template

2. Eisenhower Matrix Slides Template for PowerPoint

An Eisenhower Matrix is a powerful tool to represent priorities, classifying work according to urgency and importance. Presenters can use this 2×2 matrix in poster presentations to expose the effort required for the research process, as it also helps to communicate strategy planning.

3. OSMG Framework PowerPoint Template

Finally, we recommend presenters check our OSMG Framework PowerPoint template, as it is an ideal tool for representing a business plan: its goals, strategies, and measures for success. Expose complex processes in a simplified manner by adding this template to your poster presentation.

Remember these three words when making your research poster presentation: develop, design, and present. These are the three main actions toward a successful poster presentation. 

The section below will take you on a step-by-step journey to create your next poster presentation.

Step 1: Define the purpose and audience of your poster presentation

Before making a poster presentation design, you’ll need to plan first. Here are some questions to answer at this point:

• Are they in your field? 
• Do they know about your research topic? 
• What can they get from your research?
• Will you print it?
• Is it for a virtual conference?

Step 2: Make an outline

With a clear purpose and strategy, it’s time to collect the most important information from your research paper, analysis, or documentation. Make a content dump and then select the most interesting information. Use the content to draft an outline.

Outlines help formulate the overall structure better than going straight into designing the poster. Mimic the standard poster structure in your outline using section headlines as separators. Go further and separate the content into the columns they’ll be placed in.

Step 3: Write the content

Write or rewrite the content for the sections in your poster presentation. Use the text in your research paper as a base, but summarize it to be more succinct in what you share. 

Don’t forget to write a catchy title that presents the problem and your findings in a clear way. Likewise, craft the headlines for the sections in a similar tone as the title, creating consistency in the message. Include subtle transitions between sections to help follow the flow of information in order.

Avoid copying/pasting entire sections of the research paper on which the poster is based. Opt for the storytelling approach, so the delivered message results are interesting for your audience. 

Step 4: Put it all together visually

This entire guide on how to design a research poster presentation is the perfect resource to help you with this step. Follow all the tips and guidelines and have an unforgettable poster presentation.

Moving on, here’s how to design a research poster presentation with PowerPoint Templates . Open a new project and size it to the standard 48 x 36 inches. Using the outline, map out the sections on the empty canvas. Add a text box for each title, headline, and body text. Piece by piece, add the content into their corresponding text box.

Transform the text information visually, make bullet points, and place the content in tables and timelines. Make your text visual to avoid chunky text blocks that no one will have time to read. Make sure all text sizes are coherent for all headings, body texts, image captions, etc. Double-check for spacing and text box formatting.

Next, add or create data visualizations, images, or diagrams. Align everything into columns and sections, making sure there’s no overflow. Add captions and legends to the visualizations, and check the color contrast with colleagues and friends. Ask for feedback and progress to the last step.

Step 5: Last touches

Time to check the final touches on your poster presentation design. Here’s a checklist to help finalize your research poster before sending it to printers or the virtual summit rep.

• Check the resolution of all visual elements in your poster design. Zoom to 100 or 200% to see if the images pixelate. Avoid this problem by using vector design elements and high-resolution images.
• Ensure that charts and graphs are easy to read and don’t look crowded.
• Analyze the visual hierarchy. Is there a visual flow through the title, introduction, data, and conclusion?
• Take a step back and check if it’s legible from a distance. Is there enough white space for the content to breathe?
• Does the design look inviting and interesting?

An often neglected topic arises when we need to print our designs for any exhibition purpose. Since A0 is a hard-to-manage format for most printers, these poster presentations result in heftier charges for the user. Instead, you can opt to work your design in two A1 sheets, which also becomes more manageable for transportation. Create seamless borders for the section on which the poster sheets should meet, or work with a white background.

Paper weight options should be over 200 gsm to avoid unwanted damage during the printing process due to heavy ink usage. If possible, laminate your print or stick it to photographic paper – this shall protect your work from spills.

Finally, always run a test print. Gray tints may not be printed as clearly as you see them on screen (this is due to the RGB to CMYK conversion process). Other differences can be appreciated when working with ink jet plotters vs. laser printers. Give yourself enough room to maneuver last-minute design changes.

Presenting a research poster is a big step in the poster presentation cycle. Your poster presentation might or might not be judged by faculty or peers. But knowing what judges look for will help you prepare for the design and oral presentation, regardless of whether you receive a grade for your work or if it’s business related. Likewise, the same principles apply when presenting at an in-person or virtual summit.

The opening statement

Part of presenting a research poster is welcoming the viewer to your small personal area in the sea of poster presentations. You’ll need an opening statement to pitch your research poster and get the viewers’ attention.

Draft a 2 to 3-sentence pitch that covers the most important points:

• What the research is
• Why was it conducted
• What the results say

From that opening statement, you’re ready to continue with the oral presentation for the benefit of your attendees.

The oral presentation

During the oral presentation, share the information on the poster while conversing with the interested public. Practice many times before the event. Structure the oral presentation as conversation points, and use the poster’s visual flow as support. Make eye contact with your audience as you speak, but don’t make them uncomfortable.

Pro Tip: In a conference or summit, if people show up to your poster area after you’ve started presenting it to another group, finish and then address the new visitors.

QA Sessions 

When you’ve finished the oral presentation, offer the audience a chance to ask questions. You can tell them before starting the presentation that you’ll be holding a QA session at the end. Doing so will prevent interruptions as you’re speaking.

If presenting to one or two people, be flexible and answer questions as you review all the sections on your poster.

Supplemental Material

If your audience is interested in learning more, you can offer another content type, further imprinting the information in their minds. Some ideas include; printed copies of your research paper, links to a website, a digital experience of your poster, a thesis PDF, or data spreadsheets.

Your audience will want to contact you for further conversations; include contact details in your supplemental material. If you don’t offer anything else, at least have business cards.

Even though conferences have changed, the research poster’s importance hasn’t diminished. Now, instead of simply creating a printed poster presentation, you can also make it for digital platforms. The final output will depend on the conference and its requirements.

This guide covered all the essential information you need to know for creating impactful poster presentations, from design, structure and layout tips to oral presentation techniques to engage your audience better . 

Before your next poster session, bookmark and review this guide to help you design a winning poster presentation every time. 

Like this article? Please share

Cool Presentation Ideas, Design, Design Inspiration Filed under Design

Related Articles

Filed under Google Slides Tutorials • April 23rd, 2024

How to Align Objects in Google Slides

Optimize your layouts by learning how to align objects in Google Slides presentations. Step-by-step guide with screenshots.

Filed under Design • January 11th, 2024

How to Use Figma for Presentations

The powerful UI/UX prototyping software can also help us to craft high-end presentation slides. Learn how to use Figma as a presentation software here!

Filed under Design • December 28th, 2023

Multimedia Presentation: Insights & Techniques to Maximize Engagement

Harnessing the power of multimedia presentation is vital for speakers nowadays. Join us to discover how you can utilize these strategies in your work.

Leave a Reply

Your browser is unsupported

We recommend using the latest version of IE11, Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

School of Public Health

Poster guide for students, elements of a good poster heading link copy link.

Research posters serve as a medium for conveying key elements of your research in a comprehensive, creative, and engaging way to help publicize your research and spark discussion. Your poster can be circulated well beyond the conference date, and making it appear professional and compelling will help present your research in a more effective way. The below resources can help you create an organized, properly formatted, and attractive research poster.

Poster File Setup

• When using PowerPoint, create your presentation on a single slide.
• PowerPoint slides have a maximum size of 56 inches. Therefore, a desired 3×5 feet poster requires 18 inch x 30 inch slide size. A desired 4×6 feet poster requires 24 x 36 inch slide size. Posters can be printed at 200% to achieve the desired size. Confirm the file size limit and type for your conference/event.
• To prevent cropping when printing, set a 1-inch margin around the edges of the poster.
• To reduce file size, you can save your file as a pdf.
• SPH Poster PowerPoint Template 
• Posters created in PowerPoint for Mac are approximately equivalent to those created in PowerPoint for Windows. There can be issues when transferring the poster file from Mac to PC (i.e., fonts, colors, and sizing may change) and media file compatibility (i.e., images may not open) may not be exact. For this reason, we recommend you test your final poster slides with peers.

Poster Content

• Background – Contextual information/Problem definition/Rationale for study or evaluation
• Aims – Goals/Objectives/Choice of a particular solution for evaluation
• Methods – Design/Procedures for data collection/Procedures for implementation
• Results – Findings
• Conclusion – Implications/Interpretation/Impact of results and findings
• What is this research contributing?
• What did the research find?
• What does the research recommend?
• Separate the major sections of your research into small blocks of supporting text to enhance readability.
• Keep your poster text concise to improve its readability and entice engagement.
• When including visual elements such as graphs or charts, create simple and effective data displays that are easy to see and understand.
• See last tab for examples and additional resources.
• Printed or projected posters should be legible at 3-4 feet and the title should be legible at least 6 feet away from the poster.
• Virtual posters should be clearly legible when viewed on a standard size monitor at 100%.
• The poster title should be centered at the top of the poster and the title font size should typically be larger, for example a 3×5 printed poster’s title font should be between 60pt and 96pt.
• Use easily legible fonts such as Arial or Times New Roman.
• Use a consistent font, color, and size for all the headlines (though not necessarily sub headlines if your poster has any).
• Use a dark font color to ensure that your text will show up well against a white background (yellow on white makes the text very difficult to read). Bright or light colors will not stand out. Using a dark color (navy blue, burgundy, forest green, etc.) will be easier for the reader to see.
• Title: 60-96 pt
• Headers: 34-40 pt
• Sub headers: 32-40 pt
• Body text: 20-24 pt
• References 10-12pt
• Look at any pictures that are to be included at full size (e.g. if you’re making a poster at half size, use the Zoom feature to look at the pictures at 200%). The pictures may look fine on your screen at 33%, but could be pixilated when they are printed out full size on the poster.
• Do not copy and paste images into PowerPoint . Save the image separately and use the Insert function in PowerPoint to include it in your poster file.
• Charts and graphs can be copied and pasted into PowerPoint since these are not images.
• Photo images should be set at 125-200 dpi in JPEG format. Do not use .TIF in PowerPoint.
• Images that contain cartoons, illustrations, scanned text, drawings or charts should be 225 dpi in .GIF format.
• The SPH logo should be affixed at the top left-hand corner of your poster. UIC and other SPH departmental specific logos are available for download here ( u se formal lockup, informal lockup, or STK versions).

Spacing and Layout

• Use 1-inch margins around your poster when creating it in PowerPoint.
• Use columns to present your information.
• Use the ruler on the side of the PowerPoint slide (this can be added using the View tab and clicking on Ruler ). If you have a lot of text boxes, pictures, or graphs, you might also want to use the Grid and Guides option. The top and bottom of each text box should be aligned so that the border of the poster is consistent throughout. Tip: Double-click on the text box to check and modify size.
• Try to keep the spacing between sections equal at least within a column and keep the spacing between the columns consistent. The spacing does not have to be large (¾” looks fine), and do not go too large – a space of more than 2” between the columns makes the poster look like there isn’t enough information on it.
• Justifying text (evenly distributing between the margins) can make the poster look more professional.

Tips for Creating Accessible Poster Presentations

• Use a font size that is easily legible.
• Always use a contrasting background.
• Use plain language.
• When presenting, always describe the images on your poster.
• Speak loudly, clearly, and directly at a moderate pace.
• Consider creating supplemental presentation handouts, such as copies of your poster.
• Refer to the American Public Health Association’s Accessible Poster Presentations website for more tips.
• Words in ALL CAPS are not compatible with screen readers.
• Do not rely on colors or sensory characteristics to alone convey meaning.
• Use controls for audio.
• Use text instead of images of text.
• See the Adobe website for the Check Accessibility tool . This Adobe tool makes it easy to create accessible PDFs and check the accessibility of existing PDFs. You can create PDFs to meet common accessibility standards, such as Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 and PDF/UA (Universal Access, or ISO 14289).
• See the UIC Information Technology Resources page for more information on accessibility.

Additional Resources

• Ebook: Designing Science Presentations: A Visual Guide to Figures, Papers, Slides, Posters and More . Available to UIC students (requires NetID login).
• Harvard’s The Art and Science of Designing a Poster
• Health Services Research article “ Preparing and Presenting Effective Research Posters .” This resource offers recommendations about effectively conveying scientific, statistical, and methodological information.
• Posterpresentations.com . This website contains many poster templates with various designs and color schemes. When creating your research poster, be sure to include the UIC SPH logo .
• Information about creating accessible posters: American Public Health Association’s Accessible Poster Presentations
• Scientific Poster Design . This PowerPoint by Cornell Engineering offers further suggestions about creating an optimal poster.
• Video: “ Making a better research poster ” by American Journal Experts
• Video: “ How to create a better research poster in less time ” by Mike Morrison
• Video: “ Designing Research Posters ” by UW-Madison DesignLab
• NYU guide to Poster Basics
• Writing a Poster Abstract
• Expanding Applicability of Presentations at Public Health Conferences (Available to UIC students; requires NetID login)

UIC SPH Poster Templates Heading link Copy link

• Poster Templates UIC SPH poster examples. You are encouraged to edit and optimize your text and visual elements for your research.
• UIC Logos Use formal lockup, informal lockup, or STK versions
• Research and Scholarship Week Poster Showcase UIC Poster Showcase on the Research and Scholarship Day website

Sample Poster Layout Heading link Copy link

A sample poster layout for presentations, conferences, etc.

Poster Guide for Students PDF Guide

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Clin Med (Lond)
• v.11(2); 2011 Apr

Poster presentations at medical conferences: an effective way of disseminating research?

Jr goodhand.

Digestive Diseases Clinical Academic Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary's University, London

Department of Gastroenterology, Guys and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London

This study aimed to ascertain the value of posters at medical meetings to presenters and delegates. The usefulness of posters to presenters at national and international meetings was evaluated by assessing the numbers of delegates visiting them and the reasons why they visited. Memorability of selected posters was assessed and factors influencing their appeal to expert delegates identified. At both the national and international meetings, very few delegates (<5%) visited posters. Only a minority read them and fewer asked useful questions. Recall of content was so poor that it prevented identification of factors improving their memorability. Factors increasing posters' visual appeal included their scientific content, pictures/graphs and limited use of words. Few delegates visit posters and those doing so recall little of their content. To engage their audience, researchers should design visually appealing posters by presenting high quality data in pictures or graphs without an excess of words.

Introduction

The purpose of poster presentations is to communicate the results of clinical and scientific research. 1 Over the last decade the number of delegates, accepted abstracts and poster presentations at the Digestive Diseases Week (DDW) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) meetings has risen. 2 However, the value of posters to both presenters and delegates is uncertain. Although supporters of the medium claim that posters facilitate discussion between interested parties, 3 – 5 as a result of previous experiences, it has been hypothesised that the value of poster sessions is overrated, that few delegates attend poster presentations and that their recall of contents is poor. This study aimed to identify features of posters that increase their visual appeal and memorability.

Three experiments were conducted to assess these hypotheses.

• Experiment 1: Seven researchers presented posters in the plenary (n=1) and sessions covering neoplasia (2), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (2), endoscopy (1) and biliary disease (1) at the BSG meeting in 2001. During the 90-minute poster session a record was made of the number of people attending each poster and whether they glanced at the title, read it, asked a question or were visiting for primarily social reasons. Note was made if any question was useful to the presenter. The presenters were asked to remain neutral towards delegates, neither encouraging nor discouraging interaction.
• Experiment 2: Five researchers presented posters in the IBD (n=1), gastrointestinal physiology (1), and molecular biology (3) sections at the BSG meeting in 2003. The same posters were then presented, by the same presenters at the DDW two months later. The outcomes were recorded as in Experiment 1.

Summary of poster characteristics. Each assessor's scores for scientific merit, originality and visual appeal were ranked. Overall rank was determined by the sum of the rank scores (1 denotes the group's favourite, and 6 the least preferred poster). *Denotes the poster that was awarded a distinction by the American Gastroenterology Association (AGA). The AGA request that poster presenters disclose any conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Delegates known to the investigators were invited to take part in Experiment 3 before leaving the UK; they were not told about the later cold-calling. Permission for the photographs was obtained from the poster presenters.

Statistical methods

Analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 16, Chicago, Illinois) and Prism Software (version 4, San Diego, California). Two-tailed p-values <0.05 were considered significant. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions of delegates visiting each poster for each purpose. Differences in discrete visits between the BSG and DDW meetings were sought using Mann–Whitney U tests. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to identify differences in recall scores. Although the number of posters assessed was not large, collectively across posters and assessors, the numbers of observations were normally distributed, with comparable variances, allowing for parametric analyses. Associations were sought using Pearson correlation coefficients between scientific merit, originality and visual appeal. Univariate regression analysis was undertaken to detect poster characteristics influencing aesthetic scores and to guide the order of entry into a multiple linear regression model ( Table 2 ) incorporating forwards stepwise protocols to account for interacting and/or confounding variables.

Multivariate linear regression of poster features that influenced visual appeal. Univariate analysis was used to identify poster features that influenced visual appeal and to guide the order of entry into the multivariate model. The sums of scores for scientific merit and originality were combined in the model as scientific content. Checks were made on existing significant variables each time a further explanatory poster feature was identified to ensure that their presence in the model was still required.

Resultitles

Experiment 1.

Of the 1,800 delegates, 13 (4–26) median (range) glanced at each poster, and 11 (5–18) scrutinised them; <5% of delegates read any of the posters. Only four (2–7) questions were asked at each poster. Of these, only two delegates (7% of all questioners) raised points useful to the presenters. Eight(4–19) delegates visited each poster primarily to socialise. More visits to female (37%) than male (22%) presenters were social (p=0.005), while more delegates visiting males' posters simply glanced at the poster (39% ν 15%, p=0.01). The purposes of visits were independent of the grade of presenter, the poster's location, or whether it was the plenary poster or not. More visits to the plenary poster were social (51% ν 20%, p=0.003).

Experiment 2

There were no differences in the number or purposes of visits between the BSG and DDW in 2003 ( Fig 1 ). At the BSG, <1.5%, and at the DDW <0.3%, delegates read any of the posters. The total number of useful questions was 10 at the BSG and five at the DDW. More delegates read the posters at the 2001 (11 (5–18)) than the 2003 (5 (1–15)) BSG meeting (p<0.05).

Comparison of visits to five posters presented at both the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and the Digestive Diseases Week (DDW) meetings in 2003. Visits were classified according to the most interactive category fulfilled; for example, glancing at the title, followed by reading the poster and then asking a question, was classified as asking a question only. Data presented are medians and ranges, differences were sought using the Mann–Whitney U test (n/s denotes not significant).

Experiment 3

Delegates remembered very little when phoned about posters two weeks later. Recall of poster contents was equally poor for the poster of distinction (median 3.5 range (0–12), maximum 18), as for the delegates' highest (2.5 (0–11)) and lowest (2 (0–9)) ranked posters. Analyses of the data with any measure of recall ability as the primary outcome was therefore futile.

Aesthetic and originality scores were positively correlated (r=0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.44; p<0.0001), as were aesthetic and scientific merit scores (r=0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.39; p=0.02). There was also a significant association between the variable derived by the sum of these scores, termed scientific content, and aesthetic score (r=0.31, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; p<0.0001) but this accounted for only 9.7% of the variation in aesthetic score.

Multivariate analysis confirmed that after adjusting for the number of words (per m 2 ), and pictures, the aesthetic score was significantly influenced by the perceived scientific content ( Table 2 ). Similarly, after adjusting for the other cited variables, the addition of a picture or graph increased the visual appeal, as did less overcrowding with words. The delegates favourite posters (ranked one and two) contained an average of 326 words per m 2 compared with 782 for the posters ranked five and six ( Table 1 ).

Poster presentation should be a two-way process. For the presenter, work is potentially peer-reviewed by experts in their field. Conversely, for the delegate, posters should convey a concise overview of novel research. Only 45% presented abstracts reach full publication. 6 Publication rates of abstracts submitted to the BSG seem to be falling, implying that for more and more research, poster presentations are the only opportunity to share research findings. 2 Qualitative data report that about 75% of researchers believe posters to be useful, most citing visual appeal as the key determinant of success. 3 , 5 Against this view, our surveys, like that of Salzl and colleagues, 5 showed that few delegates visit posters during designated sessions and even fewer ask useful questions. A potential criticism of these findings is that the data were simply uninteresting to most delegates. However, the plenary poster, presumably chosen for its importance, attracted no more visitors than the others.

Even having been asked to scrutinise posters carefully, expert delegates recalled little of their contents two weeks later. There are several possible explanations for this. Firstly, delegates may not have been interested in the presented data. This seems unlikely as we selected posters specifically relevant to their interest in IBD. Furthermore, recall scores for the poster of distinction were no different from those of the other posters. Taking part in the study may have been distracting but delegates were asked to comment in detail on originality and scientific merit. Finally, it is likely that researchers routinely visiting posters at meetings select and focus on those of highest interest, presumably remembering their contents, but discarding what they do not need to recall.

It is clear that the perceived scientific merit and originality of posters correlates with visual appeal. Although a causal relationship is not certain, this implies that flawed science can be dressed up to improve its apparent scientific merit and that sloppy presentation, regardless of the quality of the work, detracts from it. Persuading delegates to stop and read posters is the first step towards interaction. The literature is awash with helpful, but mostly untested, anecdotal tips for preparing an eye-catching, easy to read, comprehensible poster. 7 – 12 Poster features that are visually appealing have been identified. Overcrowding has a negative impact on visual appeal. The ideal number of words appears to be 300–400 per m 2 . Assessors also preferred graphs or pictures to tables but no clear messages about preferred colours emerged.

Conclusions

In view of the time and money invested in presenting posters at medical meetings, ways need to be devised to improve their value to presenters and delegates alike. Posters carry a potential which is not currently being realised.

Acknowledgements

All authors participated in study design, collection and analysis of data and approved the final proof. CLG performed the multivariate analysis. We gratefully acknowledge all the poster presenters and visiting delegates who took part. JRG's research was funded by National Association of Crohn's and Colitis and MW's by Broad Medical Research Programme.

• Log In Username Enter your ACP Online username. Password Enter the password that accompanies your username. Remember me Forget your username or password ?
• Privacy Policy
• Career Connection
• Member Forums

© Copyright 2024 American College of Physicians, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572 800-ACP-1915 (800-227-1915) or 215-351-2600

If you are unable to login, please try clearing your cookies . We apologize for the inconvenience.

Preparing a Poster Presentation

Posters are a legitimate and popular presentation format for research and clinical vignettes. They efficiently communicate concepts and data to an audience using a combination of visuals and text. Most scientific meeting planners take advantage of the popularity and communication efficiency of poster presentations by scheduling more poster than oral presentations. Poster presentations allow the author to meet and speak informally with interested viewers, facilitating a greater exchange of ideas and networking opportunities than with oral presentations. Poster presentations often are the first opportunities for young investigators to present their work at important scientific meetings and preparatory for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Poster Production Timeline

In order to be successful, certain prerequisites must be met. First, you must have a desire to be scholastically effective and be willing to put the time into the design and production of the poster. Second, you need organizational skills. Like any other endeavor associated with deadlines, you must be able to deliver the product on time. Posters are associated with more deadlines than oral presentations, due to the necessary interaction with graphic artists, graphic production, and the needs of the meeting itself. Organizational skills are also needed to create a concise and logically structured graphic and text presentation of the research or vignette. In order to help you achieve these goals, this article addresses poster planning, production, and presentation. It may be helpful to create a poster production timeline .

• Determine if your poster will be judged at the scientific meeting. If so, ask for the judging criteria , which will be immensely helpful for you to plan and construct the poster.
• Know the rules . It is your responsibility to know the physical requirements for the poster including acceptable size and how it will be displayed. A 4' × 4' display area cannot accommodate a 6' × 6' poster and a 3' × 3' poster will look insignificant in an 8' × 8' display area. All scientific programs that sponsor a poster session will send you information on the display requirements at the time your poster is accepted for presentation. Review and follow the instructions precisely. However, be warned that not all scientific programs will automatically tell you how the poster will be displayed. Some programs provide a cork/tack-board system that allows you to display your poster by fastening it to a solid display board with stickpins. This gives you the option of displaying your poster as many individual parts (components of the poster, such as abstract, methods, graphics, conclusion, are fastened individually to the display board) or as one piece. Other programs "hang" their posters from a frame by large spring clips. This means that the poster must be created as a single unit and cannot be too heavy for the clips or too light such that it will curl upwards like a window shade. A few programs still use easels to display posters, mandating that the poster be constructed of or placed on a firm backing that can be supported in this way. The point is, find out how the poster will be displayed and engineer a poster that best meets the requirements.
• Determine exactly how the poster will be produced. Will you hire a graphic artist for partial or complete production? Does your institution provide graphic services to your department? Will you need to do this yourself? If payment is required, who will pay for the production? Regardless of who is doing the work and how it will be financed, only you can determine the individual tasks and set the deadlines. Make sure your deadlines include sufficient time to revise the poster if you find mistakes or otherwise need to make changes prior to the scientific meeting. Finally, if you are working with a graphic artist, make your timetable after consultation with him/her so it is realistic and he/she understands your time constraints.
• Compile a list of components that will appear on the poster. There are common elements to all posters, whether they are research presentations or clinical vignettes. At the top center, the poster should display the title, authors, and institutional affiliations. Any necessary acknowledgments can also be placed here. Many scientific programs will insist that the abstract be included on the poster and will specify its location (i.e., upper right corner).

Scientific posters should follow the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) .

• The Introduction presents the background and the purpose of the research. The background information typically consists of a statement summarizing the current knowledge in an area, what knowledge is missing, and how this research project addresses the knowledge gap. A hypothesis can be included in the Introduction.
• The Methods section should specifically address the following areas: research design, research setting, number of patients enrolled in the study, and how they were selected. The Methods section should also include a description of the intervention (if appropriate), a description of the outcome variables and how they were measured, and the method of statistical analysis.
• The Results section includes the quantitative data. This section usually begins with a description of the subjects in the study and a description of those who were not included because they failed to meet the inclusion criteria or dropped out. Include the frequencies of the most important outcome variables. Consider comparisons of the outcome variables between various subgroups within the study (treated vs. untreated, young vs. old, male vs. female, and so forth). Numerical results should include standard deviations or 95% confidence limits and the level of statistical significance should be indicated.
• Finally, in the Discussion section, state concisely what can be concluded from the study and its implications. Make sure that the conclusions are supported by the data presented in the Results and do not present unsubstantiated personal opinion.

Clinical vignette posters generally have three components: Introduction, Case Description, and Discussion. A short Introduction typically describes the context of the case and explains its relevance and importance. When describing the case, follow the basic rules of medical communication by describing in sequence the history, physical examination, investigative studies, and patient's progress and outcome. The main purpose of the discussion is to review why decisions were made and to extract the lesson from the case. Be wary of boasting that your case is the "first" to describe a particular phenomenon, since even the most thorough searches often fail to reveal all instances of similar cases. Keep in mind that the best research and clinical vignette posters are those that make a small number of points (even just one) clearly and succinctly.

As you review your content, make decisions on what can be displayed pictorially. Posters that are mainly text discourage others from visiting and reviewing your work. Make your presentation as visual as possible; not only does it make your poster more appealing, but information can be transmitted more efficiently with a picture, figure, or graph. For example, information on patient demographics could be represented as a pie chart, frequencies of outcomes as bar graphs, and comparisons of means and statistical significance as tables. Clinical vignettes offer an excellent opportunity to display clinical photographs that illustrate important points of pattern recognition.

Finally, find out if you are required to be present during the poster session. Most scientific meetings schedule a period of time for the author to stand by the poster during the session. This enables you to answer questions about your work and, in some situations, is part of the judging process. Find out if and when this is scheduled.

A Few Tips on Poster Appearance:

Avoid clutter.

Limit your poster presentation to a few main ideas. It's better to present a few of your findings well than present all of your findings poorly. Arrange your poster components to read from left to right and top to bottom. Emphasize important points on the poster with lines, frames or boxes, and arrows.

Keep the lettering simple.

Use no more than three different font sizes; the largest for the poster title, second-largest for section titles, and smallest for text. For all lettering, use both upper- and lowercase letters. Words composed of all uppercase letters are difficult to read. The smallest font should be large enough so it is easily read from a distance of 3 to 5 feet (usually, 24-point font).

Keep the colors simple.

Too much color can be distracting, while too little color can be boring and lifeless. Use color mainly to highlight important elements.

You will need to decide how your poster will be constructed. Your budget and available graphic art resources will most likely influence this decision. At one end of the spectrum, you can inexpensively produce a poster with a graphics software package (such as PowerPoint) and a color printer. Your output will be limited to individual components that measure 8" × 11" to 11" × 17". These components will probably need to be mounted on a stiff backing, such as poster board or foam core, to effectively display them. At the other, more expensive end of the spectrum, you can work with the graphic arts department at your institution. They can use sophisticated software programs, such as Quark, to design and create a poster. The electronic version of the poster can be sent by e-mail to a printing or service bureau. Service bureaus produce a variety of visual products including posters, slides, signs, and limited print editions of books. They can print any size poster with all its component parts as a single unit usually within 24 to 48 hours. The cost of this service is difficult to estimate because it is dependent on a number of variables including poster size, use of color, resolution of the print (dpi, or dots per inch), whether it is laminated, or backed with foam core. A moderately priced poster may cost from $500 to $600. The staff in your graphic arts department can help you pick the options that are within your budget.

At the time of production, it is your responsibility to review the first draft, or copy, of the poster. This is your best chance to correct errors and make changes to improve the accuracy and visual attractiveness of the poster. Use the Poster Checklist  to aid your review. In addition, have a colleague help you proofread. It's a good idea to have someone unfamiliar with the research or case help you because he or she will quickly identify areas that are confusing or ambiguous. It's a good idea to have someone who is expert in spelling and grammar review the poster as well. As mentioned previously, schedule the proofreading early enough in the process so that you have time to make any corrections or changes prior to the meeting.

As you prepare to travel to the scientific meeting, consider the following tips:

• Arrange for a proper carrying case for your poster. A worthy investment can prevent damage to your poster and your reputation.
• Don't check your poster as luggage. Carry the poster with you at all times. Better your clothes get lost than your poster.
• Come with some basic equipment. Although these items are typically provided at scientific meetings, you may not have quick access to them. Bring with you:
• Push pins, tacks, or stapler
• Know where and when to set up your poster. The room or area reserved for posters is usually noted in the meeting program. Arrive early to set up your poster. This will allow you to adapt to any surprises in the physical layout or unannounced changes in the method of displaying the poster. Additionally, it's easier to put up your poster when there are fewer people competing for space and equipment. Most scientific programs assign a unique identifying number to your poster that corresponds to location of the poster in the display area. Find out what your number is and place your poster in the corresponding spot.
• Know when to "stand-by" your poster. The time will be listed in the meeting program. Arrive on time and stay until the end of scheduled time. Don't wander off; you may miss the judges, your next fellowship director, or your next partner or employer.
• Know when to take your poster down. Meeting rooms turn-over fast. Have a clear understanding when the poster session is over and when the poster must come down. Failure to take the poster down at the appointed time can result in the hotel or convention staff (not so gently) removing it.
• Be prepared to promote yourself. Consider bringing handouts and business cards for those who visit your poster. Use this opportunity to "network" with other professionals who share similar academic interests.

This final section provides examples of what makes a poster effective. As you study the examples, note that they share similar characteristics:

• Organized and easy to follow the flow of information
• Easy to read, using large font size and are not overly dense with text
• Attractive, due to judicious use of colors, use of graphics, and arrangement

Listed below are a number of important poster characteristics and examples illustrating those characteristics:

• Use of a poignant attention getter
• Use of graphics  to communicate data
• Well organized  poster with easy to follow flow of information
• Overly dense  presentation of content

Category: Takemi News

Exploring the intersections of global health: a recap of the takemi poster presentation day.

On May 7, 2024, the Takemi Program welcomed students, faculty, and experts to the Takemi Poster Presentation Day. This event showcased research and facilitated discussions around three overarching themes: infectious diseases, mental health and social determinants, and health policy and database. The session took place in the Kresge Atrium at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Infectious diseases: Confronting global health threats Dr. Adam Abdullahi’s findings regarding the…

Continue reading “Exploring the intersections of global health: A recap of the Takemi Poster Presentation Day”

May 5-8, 2024

• Upcoming Conferences & Events

Award Winners

The ISPOR Research Presentation Podium and Poster Awards were established in 1998 to recognize the scientific merit of podium and poster presentations at ISPOR’s conferences.

ISPOR Judges evaluated podium and poster presentations within the top 5% of accepted abstracts, which were based on abstract peer reviewed scores, and were eligible for a presentation award.

Evaluations of scientific merit were based upon the following criteria:

QUALITY OF RESEARCH STUDY

• Research design is appropriate and transparent
• Data sources are appropriate and transparent
• Data analyses are appropriate and transparent
• Results are included and are transparent and comprehensible
• Uncertainty of results is addressed appropriately
• Conclusions are consistent with the results

QUALITY OF PRESENTATION

• Objectives/research questions are clearly stated, and objectives are addressed
• Factual information is kept separate from interpretations or implications / unbiased presentations
• Implications, as presented, are easy to understand
• Clarity of presentation

THE RECIPIENTS ARE…

BEST GENERAL POSTER RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS

EE223: Cost-Effectiveness of Olorofim in Invasive Aspergillosis Patients Lacking Suitable Alternative Treatment Options from a US Payer Perspective Presenting Author: Belinda Lovelace, F2G Inc., USA

HSD72: Baseline A1C and BMI Trends for People with Type 2 Diabetes Receiving First-Time GLP-1 Ra Prescriptions Presenting Author: Patricia Rodriguez, Truveta Inc., USA

PT29: A Methodologic Solution to Missing Deauville Scores Using Imaging Report Data to Classify Lymphoma Treatment Response in Real-World Data Presenting Author: Richard Swain, Cardinal Health, USA

BEST STUDENT POSTER RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS

EE416: Cost-Effectiveness of Sulbactam-Durlobactam Compared to Colistin in Treating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections in Critical Care Setting in the United States: A Decision Analysis Presenting Author: Abiodun Ologunowa, University of Rhode Island, USA

EE481: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Tirzepatide Versus Placebo for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity Presenting Author: Man Tang, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, USA

PT41: Comparative Analysis of Reintervention Rates in Mesh Versus No Mesh Hernia Repair Using Electronic Health Records Presenting Author: Grishma Kc, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA

BEST NEW INVESTIGATOR POSTER RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS

MSR24: A Case Study Using Keynote-010 to Compare and Evaluate Long-Term Survival Estimates from Two Classes of Piecewise Models Presenting Author: Connor Davies, Costello Medical, USA

PT15: Machine Learning Vs Traditional Statistics: Developing a Novel Proxy for HPV-Associated LA SCCHN Presenting Author: David Fox, Genentech, USA

PT19: Developing a Bespoke Neural Network Model for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Dementia: A Fit-for-Purpose Machine Learning Study Presenting Author: Colton Frazer, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, USA

BEST GENERAL PODIUM RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS

P48: Automating Economic Modelling: Potential of Generative AI for Updating Excel-Based Cost-Effectiveness Models Presenting Author: William Rawlinson, Estima Scientific Ltd, UK

P56: Extraction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Severity Scores from Unstructured Clinical Notes Using a Retriever-Reader Architecture Presenting Author: Lawrence Rasouliyan, OMNY Health, USA

P60: Evaluating Dynamic Treatment Using a Target Trial: The Real-World Effectiveness of Adding Oral Selexipag to a Double Oral Therapy for the Treatment of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Presenting Author: Wenze Tang, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, USA

BEST STUDENT PODIUM RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS

P18: Assessing the Value of Revascularization Strategies for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Propensity Score-Weighted Evaluation Presenting Author: Hanke Zheng, University of Southern California, USA

P49: Examination of Age-Related Medical Complications Among Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease in Texas Medicaid Presenting Author: Gloria Odonkor, The University of Texas at Austin, USA

BEST NEW INVESTIGATOR PODIUM RESEARCH PRESENTATIONS

P22: Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life during Pregnancy: Exploring the Psychometric Properties of PROMIS to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life Presenting Author: Jason Raad, University of Pittsburgh, USA

Presentation Award Judge Acknowledgment

ISPOR would like to thank the ISPOR 2024 judges who have volunteered their time and expertise in judging the podium and poster presentations.  

Mahip Acharya, PhD, USA Saleh Alyahya, PhD, Saudi Arabia Rito Bergemann, MD, PhD, Germany Murtuza Bharmal, BPharm, MS, PhD, USA Kaustuv Bhattacharya, PhD, USA Mark Bounthavong, PharmD, PhD, MPH, USA Michael Buck, PhD, USA Wendy Cheng, PhD, MPH, USA Marie Chivers, MPharm, PhD, United Kingdom  Divyan Chopra, MS, PhD, USA Raj Desai, PhD, USA Ruth Dixon, PhD, USA Djeneba Audrey Djibo, PhD, USA Adeola Famuboni, BSc, MSc, United Kingdom Salisu Garba, PhD, USA Omkar Ghodke, B.Pharm, USA Swarnali Goswami, PhD, USA Kashfa Iqbal, MA Economics, United Kingdom Shrividya Iyer, PhD, USA Boshen Jiao, PhD, MPH, USA Dakshu Jindal, PhD, MA, USA Maja Kuharic, MPharm, PhD, Msc, MPharm, USA Steven Kymes, PhD, USA Betsy Lahue, MPH, USA Kavita Lamror, MBBS, MPH, USA Niying Li, PhD, USA Juliana Lui, PhD, Hong Kong Munkh-Erdene Luvsan, PhD, Mongolia Esprit Ma, MPH, USA Prajakta Masurkar, PhD, MPharm, USA Andrew Mumford, BSc, United Kingdom Sharanya Murty, MS, PhD, USA Rupali Naik, PhD, MBA, BPharm, USA Abiodun Ologunowa, MS, BPharm, USA Ellen Olson, MD, MBA, USA Semra Ozdemir, PhD, USA I-Wen Pan, PhD, USA Feng (Johnson) Qian, PhD, MBA, MS, MD, USA Sreeram Ramagopalan, PhD, United Kingdom Ralitsa Raycheva, MEcon, PhD, Bulgaria Olga Sanchez-Solino, MD, Spain Aylin Sertkaya, PhD, USA Xue Song, PhD, USA Baoying Tan, MS, China  Deepika Thakur, PhD, MPharmacy, Canada  Soham Yande, BS, PhD, USA Lixia Yao, PhD, USA Summera Qiheng Zhou, MSc, USA

• News & Media

School of Nursing & Health Sciences Hosts Spring 2024 DNP Poster Presentation Event

Holy Family University Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students enrolled in the School of Nursing & Health Sciences presented the results of their scholarly research projects at the DNP Poster Presentation event at the University’s Newtown East campus on May 15, 2024. The pre-commencement event is hosted annually to highlight the scholarship of the soon-to-be graduates.

Five students presented their DNP Scholarly Projects. They will be awarded their DNP degrees during commencement exercises on May 18, 2024. Faculty member Elaine Maruca, DNP, RN, FNP-BC, CNE provided oversight, serving as the students’ project advisor and primary investigator.

The DNP presentations included:

Andrea Hamburg - The Effect of Health Literacy for Parents who use the Internet and Social Media for Medical Information; Faculty Advisor: Dr. Elaine Maruca

Ann Mathew - Improving Knowledge of Pain Management with a Cultural Assessment Tool in the Long-Term Care Setting; Faculty Advisor: Dr. Elaine Maruca

Bryan Hill - The Effect of Evidence-Based Education on Attitudes Regarding Statin Use in Patients; Faculty Advisor: Dr. Elaine Maruca

Danielle Hill - The Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Protocol in a Pediatric Emergency Department; Faculty Advisor: Dr. Elaine Maruca

Katherine West Mohr - The Effect of Leadership Training on the Leadership Skills and Attitudes of Nurse Practitioners in an Outpatient Clinic; Faculty Advisor: Dr. Elaine Maruca

“I am extremely proud of our Holy Family DNP graduates,” said Dean of the School of Nursing & Health Sciences Dr. Margaret Harkins. “They have successfully handled the rigor of the program and have acquired advanced knowledge and practice skills that will not only positively impact patients and communities but will position them for leadership roles in healthcare.”

Due to the limited number of spaces each semester, admission to Holy Family University’s DNP program is highly competitive. For more information (including admission requirements), please visit the  program website   or contact Graduate Admissions at 267-341-3327 or  [email protected]  .

A Journey of Support

Find Your Program

Explore Our Campus

Explore Resources

Start Your Application

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Hear Her Campaign
• Signs and Symptoms
• Pregnancy-Related Deaths in the United States
• Providing Care
• Pregnant and Postpartum People
• Resources for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) People who are Pregnant or Postpartum
• Campaign Resources
• Hear Personal Stories of Pregnancy-Related Complications
• Campaign Resources for American Indian and Alaska Native Communities
• Unexpected Pregnancy Complications: Allyson Felix's Story
• News Media Resources
• Health Care Professionals
• Health Care Professional Videos
• Campaign Resources for Health Care Professionals
• Clinical Resources and Tools
• Health Care Professionals who serve AIAN People who are Pregnant or Postpartum
• Maternal Mortality Prevention
• About Reproductive Health

Hear Her® Campaign Posters and Handouts for Health Care Professionals

At a glance.

CDC's Hear Her campaign includes posters, handouts, and palm cards designed for health care professionals who interact with people who are pregnant or postpartum. These resources are available to download, print, or order.

Posters and Palm Cards

Available in the following sizes: 11 x 17 Poster | 8.5 x 11 Poster | 5 x 7 Palm Cards For materials intended for patients and caregivers who support patients, visit the Hear Her campaign .

Additional Campaign Resources for Health Care Professionals‎‎

Shareable graphics‎‎, social media‎, to order materials‎, hear her campaign.

Hear Her® supports CDC's efforts to prevent pregnancy-related deaths by sharing potentially life-saving messages about urgent maternal warning signs.

For Everyone

Health care providers.

• History, Facts & Figures
• YSM Dean & Deputy Deans
• YSM Administration
• Department Chairs
• YSM Executive Group
• YSM Board of Permanent Officers
• FAC Documents
• Current FAC Members
• Appointments & Promotions Committees
• Ad Hoc Committees and Working Groups
• Chair Searches
• Leadership Searches
• Organization Charts
• Faculty Demographic Data
• Professionalism Reporting Data
• 2022 Diversity Engagement Survey
• State of the School Archive
• Faculty Climate Survey: YSM Results
• Strategic Planning
• Mission Statement & Process
• Beyond Sterling Hall
• COVID-19 Series Workshops
• Previous Workshops
• Departments & Centers
• Find People
• Biomedical Data Science
• Health Equity
• Inflammation
• Neuroscience
• Global Health
• Diabetes and Metabolism
• Policies & Procedures
• Media Relations
• A to Z YSM Lab Websites
• A-Z Faculty List
• A-Z Staff List
• A to Z Abbreviations
• Dept. Diversity Vice Chairs & Champions
• Dean’s Advisory Council on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex Affairs Website
• Minority Organization for Retention and Expansion Website
• Office for Women in Medicine and Science
• Committee on the Status of Women in Medicine Website
• Director of Scientist Diversity and Inclusion
• Diversity Supplements
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Recruitment
• By Department & Program
• News & Events
• Executive Committee
• Aperture: Women in Medicine
• Self-Reflection
• Portraits of Strength
• Mindful: Mental Health Through Art
• Event Photo Galleries
• Additional Support
• MD-PhD Program
• PA Online Program
• Joint MD Programs
• How to Apply
• Advanced Health Sciences Research
• Clinical Informatics & Data Science
• Clinical Investigation
• Medical Education
• Visiting Student Programs
• Special Programs & Student Opportunities
• Residency & Fellowship Programs
• Center for Med Ed
• Organizational Chart
• Leadership & Staff
• Committee Procedural Info (Login Required)
• Faculty Affairs Department Teams
• Recent Appointments & Promotions
• Academic Clinician Track
• Clinician Educator-Scholar Track
• Clinican-Scientist Track
• Investigator Track
• Traditional Track
• Research Ranks
• Instructor/Lecturer
• Social Work Ranks
• Voluntary Ranks
• Adjunct Ranks
• Other Appt Types
• Appointments
• Reappointments
• Transfer of Track
• Term Extensions
• Timeline for A&P Processes
• Interfolio Faculty Search
• Interfolio A&P Processes
• Yale CV Part 1 (CV1)
• Yale CV Part 2 (CV2)
• Samples of Scholarship
• Teaching Evaluations
• Letters of Evaluation
• Dept A&P Narrative
• A&P Voting
• Faculty Affairs Staff Pages
• OAPD Faculty Workshops
• Leadership & Development Seminars
• List of Faculty Mentors
• Incoming Faculty Orientation
• Faculty Onboarding
• Past YSM Award Recipients
• Past PA Award Recipients
• Past YM Award Recipients
• International Award Recipients
• Nominations Calendar
• OAPD Newsletter
• Fostering a Shared Vision of Professionalism
• Academic Integrity
• Addressing Professionalism Concerns
• Consultation Support for Chairs & Section Chiefs
• Policies & Codes of Conduct
• First Fridays
• Fund for Physician-Scientist Mentorship
• Grant Library
• Grant Writing Course
• Mock Study Section
• Research Paper Writing
• Establishing a Thriving Research Program
• Funding Opportunities
• Join Our Voluntary Faculty
• Child Mental Health: Fostering Wellness in Children
• Faculty Resources
• Research by Keyword
• Research by Department
• Research by Global Location
• Translational Research
• Research Cores & Services
• Program for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Team Science (POINTS)
• CEnR Steering Committee
• Experiential Learning Subcommittee
• Goals & Objectives
• Issues List
• Print Magazine PDFs
• Print Newsletter PDFs
• YSM Events Newsletter
• Social Media
• Patient Care

INFORMATION FOR

• Residents & Fellows
• Researchers

Students and Faculty Mentors Celebrated at Student Research Day

Student research day scientific poster session, student research day, shelli farhadian, md, phd, and john k. forrest, md, peter aronson, md, c.n.h. long professor of medicine (nephrology) and professor of cellular and molecular physiology.

On May 7, 2024, students and faculty mentors were celebrated at Yale School of Medicine’s (YSM) Student Research Day (SRD), an annual tradition at YSM since 1988. Five medical students (Chinye Ijile, Amanda Lieberman, Kingson Lin, Victoria Marks, and Jamieson O’Marr) made thesis presentations, and over 75 students, from across Yale’s health profession schools, displayed scientific posters and engaged with attendees during the poster session.

“Today we’re showcasing a diverse range of mentored research—spanning from fundamental basic science, to implementation science—performed by student investigators from across the health professions schools,” Associate Dean for Student Research Sarwat Chaudhry, MD, professor of medicine (general medicine), said in opening remarks. Associate Dean for Student Research Erica Herzog, MD, PhD, John Slade Ely Professor of Medicine (pulmonary) and professor of pathology, added, “We take immense pride in Yale’s deep-rooted tradition of embedding research within medical education. For our students, experience in scientific investigation isn't merely a stepping stone towards a successful residency match or a career in academic research; it's foundational training for their lifelong commitment to medicine.”

Farr Lecture

The Lee E. Farr MD Endowed Lectureship and the presentation of the Dr. John N. Forrest, Jr., Mentorship Award, which bookended the student thesis presentations, honored YSM faculty for their outstanding mentorship. In introducing Peter Aronson, MD, C.N.H. Long Professor of Medicine (Nephrology) and professor of cellular and molecular physiology, as the Farr lecturer, Nancy J. Brown, MD, Jean and David W. Wallace Dean and C.N.H. Long Professor of Internal Medicine, explained that the lecture aims to stimulate thinking and to inspire students to strive to achieve more effective leadership and educational roles in society. Brown said that Aronson, who has been at YSM for 50 years since joining as a nephrology fellow in 1974, “epitomizes these qualities as a physician-scientist, educator, mentor, and colleague. As such, there is no one more fitting to speak at today’s event.”

As chief of the Section of Nephrology from 1987-2002, Brown said, Aronson nurtured the development of numerous physician-scientists, both as faculty and fellows, many of whom became recognized leaders—and many of whom remain at Yale and were present on SRD. “It goes without saying” Brown concluded, “that Dr. Aronson’s stewardship is one reason for the enduring strength of Yale’s 200-year tradition of medical student research,” noting he had been part of the tradition for one quarter of the 200 years. (In comments after Aronson spoke, Herzog noted several of his student evaluations simply said GOAT: “Greatest Of All Time.”)

Using his own experiences as examples in his lecture titled From Sugar to Salt to Stones: Serendipitous Journey as Mentee and Mentor, Aronson noted the importance of chance events and serendipitous research findings in determining the course of his academic development and research career. ( This article describes his remarks in detail .) In closing, Aronson honored the late John N. Forrest, Jr., professor emeritus of medicine and the founding director of YSM’s Office of Student Research (OSR). Forrest, he said, “exemplified extraordinary commitment to the process of education and mentorship,” adding “we should all be inspired by his example of what is most gratifying in academic medicine.”

Dr. John N. Forrest, Jr., Mentorship Award

Chaudhry similarly honored John N. Forrest, Jr. in introducing the mentorship award established to recognize his legacy. “As many of you know, Dr. Forrest died earlier this year, and so this year’s Forrest Prize holds special meaning.” OSR “was his pride and joy,” Chaudhry said, adding that since starting their roles as associate deans of student research in 2020, “Dr. Herzog and I have continually been impressed by Dr. Forrest’s care and foresight in establishing the Office of Student Research. Dr. Forrest’s legacy lives on in the enduring strength of YSM’s medical student research program.”

Before Forrest’s son, John K. Forrest, MD, associate professor of medicine (cardiovascular medicine), announced the award recipient— Shelli Farhadian, MD, PhD, assistant professor of medicine (infectious diseases); assistant professor, epidemiology of microbial diseases —he shared, “My family and I are grateful to the numerous people who reached out after our father’s passing. Some of the most touching correspondence we received were from medical students, residents, and fellows whom he had mentored while at Yale. There is no greater evidence of the lasting impact that mentorship plays in the lives of young physicians that the words contained in those letters.”

Turning to the awardee, Forrest said, “Dr. Farhadian is an exemplary mentor,” and pointed to her role “in shaping the careers of her mentees, many of whom have garnered multiple awards and recognition, and published first author manuscripts under her tutelage.”

He then shared what a student wrote about Farhadian: “Dr. Farhadian is such a fantastic mentor and person. As my mentor she encouraged me to apply for grants and submit to conferences and journals and has always made herself available to answer any questions that I have. She also facilitates an environment in which her mentees feel comfortable coming to her with questions and offers help in connecting me with doctors in my fields of interest. Beyond my research with Dr. Farhadian, she has also proved to be an invaluable resource in terms of developing as a student and a future doctor. She is an inspiring woman in medicine, and I hope to become as caring and capable as a doctor and mentor as she models.”

Upon receiving the award, Farhadian said, “It means a great deal for me to receive this award in Dr. Forrest’s name. I was lucky to cross paths with Dr. Forrest when I was an intern, and I will always remember how kind he was to everyone in the hospital, no matter how small their role.” Farhadian added, “I feel very lucky to have had my own exceptional research mentors along the way, and I have tried to emulate them when mentoring my own trainees.”

Student Thesis Presentations

Chinye Ijile

Medicaid Coverage for Undocumented Children in Connecticut: A Political History

Faculty mentor: Naomi Rogers, PhD, professor in the history of medicine and of history; acting chair, Spring 2024, History of Medicine

Amanda Lieberman

Multilevel Barriers to Methadone for HIV Prevention Among People Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan

Faculty mentor: Frederick Altice, MD, MA, professor of medicine (infectious diseases) and of epidemiology (microbial diseases)

Kingson Lin, MD-PhD

Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Novel MGMT-Dependent, MMR-Independent Agents for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)

Faculty mentors: Ranjit Bindra, MD, PhD, Harvey and Kate Cushing Professor of Therapeutic Radiology and professor of pathology; and Seth Herzon, PhD, Milton Harris ’29 Ph.D. Professor of Chemistry

• Victoria Marks

Association between Medical Insurance, Access to Care, and Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Uveal Melanoma in the United States

Faculty mentor: Michael Leapman, MD, MHS, associate professor of urology; assistant professor, chronic disease epidemiology

Jamieson O’Marr

Ballistic and Explosive Orthopaedic Trauma Epidemiology and Outcomes in a Global Population

Faculty mentor: Brianna Fram, MD, assistant professor of orthopaedics & rehabilitation

Featured in this article

• Frederick Lewis Altice, MD, MA
• Peter S. Aronson, MD
• Ranjit S. Bindra, MD, PhD
• Nancy J. Brown, MD
• Sarwat Chaudhry, MD
• Shelli Farhadian, MD, PhD
• John K Forrest, MD, FACC, FSCAI
• Brianna R. Fram, MD
• Erica Herzog, MD, PhD
• Seth Herzon, PhD
• Chinye Ijeli
• Michael S. Leapman, MD, MHS
• Amanda Liberman
• Kingson Lin
• Jamieson O'Marr, MS
• Naomi Rogers, PhD

Related Links

• Student Research Day Program