The Mind and the Body Term Paper
Is mind and the body the same, thesis/problem statement, purpose/significance of the study, background of the union between the mind and body, literature review, leibnitz arguments on mind and body, mauriee merleau arguments on mind and body.
The historical perception of the distinction between the body and mind is traceable back to the Greek philosophers. In a close link to Rene Descartes’ theory (1650), the principal of philosophy claims that the human being compromises for the mind and body, which seem to be two distinct and separate substances.
On comparison, the mind does the thinking and thus is the source of reasoning, recognizing, desiring, consciousness and willpower, but it is distinctively immaterial and physically un-extendable. Conversely, the body is material and extendable to accommodate feelings and sensation. Many theories distinguish the body and mind but in most instances end-up creating the “mind-body problem,” thus the need for discussions or counterarguments.
“To think that the mind and the body are distinct substances creates problems, yet to think that they are the same offers no solution either.” This is a research investigating and analyzing the different arguments on philosophical nature of the mind and body by various philosophers, with the aim of providing a personal point of view regarding the subject matter.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the consequences and key concepts involved in the development of the mind-body philosophy and offer personal suggestions or opinions over the issue of relationship between the mind and body.
Objectives of the study
This term paper lays down the need for researching the background of the understanding of various theories over the relationship as presented by different great philosophers such as Rene Descartes, John Locke, Leibnitz and, Mauriee Merleau-Ponty. The study is equally an assessment of other issues in relation to personal understanding of the topic.
Significance of the study
The key topics to be covered entail the focus over relationship between the mind and the body. This is in the aim of finding the reasonable argument and conclusion
The Procedure of the Study/Research Methodology
The paper highly utilizes the literature reviews to enable better understanding of the topic. Preparation of the research over the chosen topic also enhances and quantifies the research as a study topic and prepare for respondents.
Information collected will equally tabulate and assist in ranking the findings form various philosophers over a wide period, and help to narrow the scope to the objectives of the study analysis. The analysis will then draw the conclusion from generally analyzed data in the literature review.
The research findings will entail data collected through websites analysing the concerns of some philosophers, as well as books concern with the study area and, observation of the proceedings over the specified data collection period. For the study analysis, the collected data and studies discerns patterns and formulate principles that might guide future action of the study subject.
In this case-study of mind and body the research checks the background information, progress, surveillance and examination of current state of matter and the involvement with other related cases. The analysis of records regarding internal as well as external consequences is equally important.
Comparison of various philosophical points of views offers better understanding and analysis. This term paper will therefore attempt to find or describe aspects of the relationship between the mind and body as theories of various philosophers explain.
There are various theories explaining how the treatment of exceptional aspects fit into Descartes’ theory of material dualism, which forms a strong basis, ever the debate concerning the relationship between the body and the mind. The theory however lacks full explanation of the interaction or union, thus the tentative results.
Various other philosophers have emerged with different perspectives concerning the debate nullifying or supporting the possible facet of Descartes’ philosophy. There are many misconceptions between the union of the body and mind, and the general casual interaction among the Descartes’ readers. Recent philosophers have indicated a strong curious expression with regard to the substantiated unison or intermingling of the body and mind, indicating the theory as un-credential in comparison to other arguments.
A consideration of the interpretation for the first view indicates that an event or substance belongs to the interconnection because of the immediate casual effects the substance has on the mind.
The twenty first century philosophers as well as readers may disagree with Descartes theory out of curiosity or opposition to the dualist theory of the body and mind. The philosophy of mind provides phenomenal character in the line of thoughts that provides a wide range of mental events, which keep stringing the difference between the physical events and conscious experiences.
Ability to consider the face value of these striking differences calls for support or agreement with the dualism. Today the readers and researchers have some interest on the philosophy of dualism and thus the work of Descartes as the person who represented the tradition to modern philosophy.
Rene Descartes arguments on mind and body
The comparison of the two elements of life seems to be the conflict of the inquiry of whether the mind and the body are distinct substances, or they are the same. Arguably, his mind causes the mental state of affairs while body causes the physical state. Then the question is on the correspondence regarding the physical and mental state.
The proposal by Rene Descartes’ is a theory of interactions gets the reference with the intention of asserting that the two are distinct states, which interact by mutually influencing over each other as a result of the function of the pineal gland based in the brain (Moyal, 289, 1991). According to Moyal on the theory of Rene Descartes (290, 1990), the mutual gland seems to be the focal point of influence between mind and the body.
Scientifically the gland produces a solution: melatonin, which is an important neurotransmitter that assists to regulate sleep and forms part of the brain or body. From the scientific point of view, the Pineal gland is not a bridge between the mind and other special material objects, and therefore it is not a real solution to interaction between the body and mind.
Considering various philosophical principals of Descartes, there are many confusing claims regarding body and mind. The claims initially indicates that everything in the world is classifiable into two states namely, thinking and bodily substance.
People react by thinking through things and properties while the other side of living comprises of the body and its characteristics such as shape, size, motion or position. Where would we place the emotions, sensations or passions such as joy, sadness, love, pleasure, smell, taste and feeling? The categorization of the aspects fumbles people, making them to wonder how to classify certain features to the union between the mind and body.
Considering Descartes’ definition of substance, in the practicable sense, the substances do not depend on other substances. Although not clearly indicated in the specification that there exist two distinct types of substances into which all other aspects falls into, the Descartes tries to indirectly or implicitly indicate that certain quality or attribute requires a precise substance for existence.
For instance, in line with Moyal (293, 1991), this means that each substance exists within a principal attribute that constitute its essence with all the other properties of the substance referencing this attribute. For instance, imagination, sensation and, will are intelligible properties referencing the mind or thinking.
According to Descartes’ definitions of the relationships between mind and body, thinking entails understanding, and being in charge of what occurs within. Being aware of the occurrence offers the consideration of ability for existence of meaning, which is a strong indication that there is a connection between thinking and the sensory mechanism.
John Locke arguments on mind and body
Considering John Locke argument regarding the body and mind, he conveys a constant idea that a human being comprise of the conscious mind and a memory, which can extend to reflect the past as a way of enhancing or finding the personal identity.
Through this argument, he does not imply that the human being has the ability to remember each and every minor detail of past experiences, but it means that ability to posses a personal identity can link the conscious understandings to physical state or appearance (Ashcraft, 220, 1991).
This is how the conscious mind joins the physical appearance of the body to come together and form the human experience of life. He places the mind and body as material substances, which come together to give one an experience nurturing human identity.
According to Ashcraft (221, 1991), on John Locke’s theory, the existence of two material substances in the same mental substance as explained by Rene Descartes is inexistence. He specifies that consciousness unite action in the same physical being. The memory and material experiences are similar in a human being, although it is possible to distinguish consciousness from thinking, such as in the instance of Rene Descartes’ insinuation.
In line with Ashcraft (221, 1991), considering Locke’s theory, “thinking, reflection, memory and, intelligence,” uniquely combine to form the human physique but this cannot occur without the presence of consciousness. Consciousness is therefore a unique attribute in each individual human being meaning that it is not possible to inherit or share another’s body or consciousness.
“There is a huge gap between subjective and objective experience,” (Ashcraft, 220, 1991). Ideally, the investigation pertain the relevance of the physical and mental connection in an individual or consciousness. The investigation of how well an objective processes to become subjective is still tentative among many philosophers.
According to Ashcraft (221, 1991), considering Locke’s theory, “subjectivity is the reality and immediacy of individual experience of consciousness, including memory and the capacity for reasoned reflection.” The outside world is independent of the mind. Real sensation comes from the presence of real objects.
In line with Locke, the world is made of two kinds of substances namely the soul and body. The body provides an immediate idea of the soul. People understand the bodies through sensation while understand the soul through reflection. Contemplation infests in the soul as material nourishments while the soul is immaterial. From this perception, there is formation of mental operations and spiritual souls.
Locke’s theory therefore supports the interaction between the body and the mind as real beings. All the ideas we posses are because of the actions of the body on the mind. This means that the body acts on the soul causing some changes. He argues out that people’s perception of existence lacks clarity over the reality of existing soul. They tend to be sure of the existing physical body and the soul.
The existence of the soul and its related actions is more realistic in nature than the material body. The reality of things regarding material bodies does not exist in the knowledge of the bodies we possess. The knowledge therefore comprises of secondary qualities lacking proper representation of reality (Ashcraft, 220, 1991).
The difficulty that Locke lacks solution for regards his perception of the effects on the bodies lacking interference on the mind or consciousness. His theory of representation, which indicates that people perceive the reality of mental images as a representation of the physical substances lacks substantiation.
Classification of attributes of life as matter or conscious entities is tricky but the reality is that essence of nature is consciousness regardless of its existence as matter or soul. His conclusion has commonsense attributing to existence of two substances namely mental and material. Material substances are the primary quantities as essentially active elements of matter and embodiments of the secondary qualities.
The connection between Locke and Descartes’ theories involves their conclusion over the existence of a third substance form the sense of experiences. The third matter is existence of consciousness as a fundamental premise from which the other aspects derive but remains an indistinct or hazy idea and thus remains enclosed in empirical attributes.
Considering Leibnitz thesis on mind and body, there is no body-mind interaction, but a formal relationship pertaining harmony, correspondence or parallelism. His contribution spans a number of topics of this philosophy mainly, materialism, interaction between the mind and body and idealism.
One of the conspicuous topics observes relationship between the body and mind where he denies existence of the interaction but ascertains a pre-established harmony. The earlier discussions of the seventeenth century over the connection between the mind and body spans a great context considered as dualism. This indicated that these are two distinct substances.
Leibnitz remains fundamentally opposed to the aspects of dualism indicating his perception of only one substance of life, thus the mind and body comprising of the same substance but metaphysically distinct. His metaphysical assumption is existence of a distinct substance from the body. Certain mental states may coordinate body states and vices versa. Considering Descartes’ perspective, there is an existence of interaction between the body and the mind.
According to Jolley (112, 2004), on Leibniz’s theory, no state can influence the other thus the technical denial of inter-substantiation. Every state of a substance emerges from an initial substance and its programming occurs at the initial stages during the creation to ensure conformity to natural states of the preceding events. This is the language of minds and body where the natural states occur in mutual coordination.
The reality of metaphysical relationship is the mutual conformity or coordination of mind and body, which seem to be the real casual relationship.
Substances may not casually interact, but their state accommodates each other in a way that implies existence of a casual interaction among them. Leibniz’s theory however conforms to existence of mental events, which influence bodily events. “One particular substance has no physical influence on another … nevertheless, one is quite right to say that my will is the cause of this movement of my arm.”
He continues to state that, “for the one expresses distinctly what the other expresses more confusedly, and one must ascribe the action to the substance whose expression is more distinct.” This is an explanation of what he explains to be metaphysical reality. Every existing substance is available to the entire universe but we only perceive a portion of it distinctly and the rest unconsciously, hence the confusion (Jolley, 112, 2005).
The argument is on existence of programmed substances, which are active or passive at the pertinent moment with incidence of real considerable relations. According to Leibniz’s theory, “nature of an individual substance or of a complete being is to have a notion that is sufficient to contain and to allow us to deduce from it all the predicates of the subject to which this notion is attributed.”
The problem with this theory is on the explanation of the complete concept theory where there seem to be an assumption pertaining lack of a genuine possibility over casual determination. His implication is on the existence of casual interaction between two beings, which requires transmission or transposition of the parts.
Evidently, Leibniz drew a parallel perception with respect to consciousness. However, he lacks clear distinction between conscious and unconscious vision. He initially has a clear care and uniformity to but his commitment lacks clear justification and perception. The Leibnizian theory only supports perception but at close range, there are fundamental divides between consciousness and unconsciousness.
He states, “Insensible perceptions are as important to [the science of minds, souls, and soul-like substances] as insensible corpuscles are to natural science, and it is just as unreasonable to reject the one as the other on the pretext that they are beyond the reach of our senses” (Jolley, 112, 2005).
Most philosophers illustrate the attitude that highly portrays rationalism as a problem on assumption that it ignores situations and nature of thoughts by indicating the world as a mere property of the reflecting mind. Merleau arguments on mind and body strongly reject this approach of rationalism/intellectualism.
Like Leibnitz, Merleau sets out his points to expose the problematic nature of dualism set by the traditional philosophers regarding the body and mind. He has a strong attention to the significance of the body in connection to the world, self and others.
This is a strong emphasis regarding the body’s ability to act independently rather than as influenced by other traits. He picks the problem of dualism in relation to the mind and body as a real problem, because when considering the body as an object links to consideration of the world as objective. Problems regarding the body are general to the whole outside world since it is entirely distinguishable from the philosophical area under discussion (Merleau-Ponty Maurice & Baldwin, 72, 2004).
Merleau criticizes the, philosophers who tend to ignore the situation regarding the delegation styles regarding contemplation. They disregard the world as an immanent property of a reflecting mind. This is illustrative of the traditional philosopher Descartes when he indicates that he is able to indentify people walking in the streets because of their ability to judge them as real men other than dressed ghosts or dummies.
He is able to understand through the sole power of judgement in the mind from what he believes to be passive (Merleau-Ponty Maurice & Baldwin, 10, 2004). This is a priority awarded to the mental above the physical state thus the support for dualism. This aspect lacks a touch over the problem of meaningful judgement.
Merleau refutes rationalism/intellectualism because of the implication of the cultural world as an illusion due to ignorance of the interconnection between the object and the act. Perception is not because of a single body organ but an act through relevant organs. From the philosophical point of view, Merleau lacks a simpler denial over the subjected cognitive relationship between the subject and object, but highly wishes to portray them as phenomenological primitive facts concerning body and mind.
“Empiricism cannot see that we need to know what we are looking for, otherwise we would not be looking for it, and intellectualism fails to see that we need to be ignorant of what we are looking for, or equally again we should not be searching” (Merleau-Ponty Maurice & Baldwin, 28, 2004). If the philosophers were able to constitute terms of duality relationally, then the philosopher would accept them since it would be a support to the “inter-individual world.”
Merleau would support the relation between subject and object through his suggestion that, “the demand for a pure description excludes equally the procedure of analytical reflection on the one hand, and that of scientific explanation on the other.” The discovery of the interior concerning the subject and object is achievable through avoidance of some of the earlier philosophical tendencies.
In close relation to Merleau-Ponty argument, today there are fundamental arguments forming divergence contained by the body, but indicate lack of thorough perception and subjectivity. If the embodied divergence causes the capacity for perception including language along with reflection, then similar divergence ensures that people are not able to overcome similar divergences entirely.
On a different perspective he indicates that people’s “reflection recuperates everything except itself as an effort of recuperation; it clarifies everything except its own role” (Merleau-Ponty Maurice & Baldwin, 72, 2004).
The counter arguments of dualism focus on quantum physics considering that consciousness and awareness has influence over body cells, which influence behaviour. The support upon consciousness as the key determinant of behaviour is an aspect that seems to sustain dualism where the action of the mind is determined by the consciousness, but end up blowing it up. This is for the reason that dualism argue for the existence of a soul and the value of freewill to accompany the soul.
Dualism supports that the mind works independently because in the cases of damage or alteration of its behaviour, awareness still detects functionality of the brain for instance, an altered personality due to illness. There need not to be any influence over awareness especially in distinction from the sensory organ. Awareness is different from memory or personality thus the fiction behind separation of awareness from the physical body.
Ashcraft, Richard. “John Locke: critical assessments, Volume 1.” Routledge Publishers.1991
Jolley, Nicholas. “Leibniz.” Routledge Publishers, 2005
Merleau-Ponty Maurice & Baldwin. “Merleau-Ponty: basic writings” Routledge Publishers.2004
Moyal, George. “Rene Descartes: Critical Assessments, Volume 1.” Routledge Publishers.1991
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2018, June 27). The Mind and the Body. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mind-and-the-body/
"The Mind and the Body." IvyPanda , 27 June 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/the-mind-and-the-body/.
IvyPanda . (2018) 'The Mind and the Body'. 27 June.
IvyPanda . 2018. "The Mind and the Body." June 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mind-and-the-body/.
1. IvyPanda . "The Mind and the Body." June 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mind-and-the-body/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "The Mind and the Body." June 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-mind-and-the-body/.
- Descartes's Argument for Dualism and Arnauld's Response
- The Concept of Dualism in the History of Philosophy
- Dualism in Religion and Science Nowadays
- American Pragmatism and Analytic Philosophy
- Skepticism and Relativism
- Hobbes and Descartes: the Existence of Soul Debate
- Free Will and Determinism According to William James and Jean-Paul Sartre
- Disagreements in Science
Essay on A Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body
Students are often asked to write an essay on A Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.
Let’s take a look…
100 Words Essay on A Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body
Introduction.
The phrase “A Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body” comes from the Latin saying “Mens sana in corpore sano”. It means that mental and physical health are interconnected.
The Connection
A healthy body can help foster a healthy mind. Regular exercise, balanced diet, and adequate sleep contribute to physical health, which in turn supports mental well-being.
Mental Health
A healthy mind is free from stress and can think clearly. It’s important to engage in activities that stimulate the mind, like reading, puzzles, and creative arts.
In conclusion, maintaining a balance between physical and mental health is essential. Both support each other in making us healthier and happier.
250 Words Essay on A Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body
The interconnection of physical and mental health.
The adage “A healthy mind in a healthy body” is a profound truth that underscores the symbiotic relationship between physical and mental health. It implies that mental well-being is intrinsically tied to physical health, and vice versa, thus indicating the need for a holistic approach to health.
The Role of Physical Health
Physical health plays an integral role in maintaining a healthy mind. Regular physical activity stimulates the release of endorphins, the body’s natural mood elevators, which can help to reduce stress and anxiety. Moreover, a well-nourished and rested body can better cope with mental challenges, thereby enhancing mental resilience.
Mental Health’s Impact on Physical Wellness
Conversely, mental health significantly influences physical wellness. Persistent stress or anxiety can lead to physical symptoms such as headaches, sleep disorders, and a weakened immune system. Therefore, nurturing mental health, through practices like mindfulness and therapy, is equally essential for overall well-being.
The Importance of Balance
Achieving a balance between physical and mental health is crucial. This balance can be attained by incorporating regular exercise, a balanced diet, adequate sleep, and stress management techniques into one’s lifestyle. Simultaneously, fostering a positive mindset, emotional resilience, and strong social connections contribute to mental health, which in turn, supports physical health.
In conclusion, the concept of a healthy mind in a healthy body emphasizes the inseparable nature of physical and mental health. It underlines the importance of nurturing both aspects equally to ensure overall well-being. As future leaders, it is incumbent upon college students to understand and apply this concept in their lives, setting a precedent for holistic health.
500 Words Essay on A Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body
The interplay of physical and mental health.
The ancient Romans had a saying, “Mens sana in corpore sano,” which translates to “A healthy mind in a healthy body.” This concept is not only a cornerstone of ancient wisdom, but it’s also a fundamental aspect of modern psychology and medicine. It underlines the intrinsic link between physical health and mental well-being, suggesting that holistic health is not merely about the absence of disease, but also the maintenance of mental fitness.
The Symbiotic Relationship
The symbiotic relationship between a healthy mind and body is multifaceted. It is a reciprocal relationship where the health of one component can substantially affect the other. For instance, regular physical exercise not only strengthens our heart, lungs, and muscles, but also releases endorphins, natural mood-lifting chemicals, which reduce stress and anxiety.
Conversely, mental stress can have significant impacts on physical health. Chronic stress can lead to conditions like heart disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes. Therefore, maintaining a healthy mind is crucial for a healthy body and vice versa.
Physical Health’s Impact on Mental Well-being
Physical health directly impacts mental well-being. Regular physical activity is associated with lower rates of depression and anxiety across all age groups. Exercise is not just about aerobic capacity and muscle size. Sure, exercise strengthens our heart and lungs, but it also protects against a host of mental health issues.
Exercise also promotes better sleep, which is another critical factor in mental health. Lack of sleep or poor-quality sleep is linked to an array of mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, and mood disorders.
Mental Health’s Influence on Physical Wellness
On the other hand, mental health significantly influences physical health. Mental illnesses, such as depression and anxiety, can affect the immune system, making one more susceptible to infections and diseases. They can also lead to unhealthy behaviors like overeating, under-eating, or substance abuse, leading to detrimental effects on physical health.
Strategies for Achieving a Healthy Mind in a Healthy Body
Achieving a healthy mind in a healthy body requires a balanced approach to physical health and mental well-being. Regular exercise, a balanced diet, adequate sleep, and good social relationships are vital components of this balance.
Mindfulness practices, such as meditation, yoga, and breathing exercises, can also help improve mental health by reducing stress and promoting relaxation. Similarly, seeking professional help when needed, whether for physical health problems or mental health issues, is crucial in maintaining overall health.
In conclusion, a healthy mind and a healthy body are inextricably linked. The interplay between the two is so fundamental that it’s impossible to achieve the optimal function of one without the other. Through a balanced approach to physical health and mental well-being, it’s possible to achieve a healthy mind in a healthy body, promoting overall health and well-being.
That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.
If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:
- Essay on A Happy Worker Is a Productive Worker
- Essay on Life of a Great Man
- Essay on A Great Man
Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .
Happy studying!
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Mind in a Physical World : An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation
This book, based on Jaegwon Kim's 1996 Townsend Lectures, presents the philosopher's current views on a variety of issues in the metaphysics of the mind—in particular, the mind-body problem, mental causation, and reductionism.
This book, based on Jaegwon Kim's 1996 Townsend Lectures, presents the philosopher's current views on a variety of issues in the metaphysics of the mind—in particular, the mind-body problem, mental causation, and reductionism. Kim construes the mind-body problem as that of finding a place for the mind in a world that is fundamentally physical. Among other points, he redefines the roles of supervenience and emergence in the discussion of the mind-body problem. Arguing that various contemporary accounts of mental causation are inadequate, he offers his own partially reductionist solution on the basis of a novel model of reduction. Retaining the informal tone of the lecture format, the book is clear yet sophisticated.
- Permissions
- Cite Icon Cite
Mind in a Physical World : An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation By: Jaegwon Kim https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001 ISBN (electronic): 9780262277105 Publisher: The MIT Press Published: 1998
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
Table of Contents
- Preface Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0001 Open the PDF Link PDF for Preface in another window
- 1: The Mind-Body Problem Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0002 Open the PDF Link PDF for 1: The Mind-Body Problem in another window
- 2: The Many Problems of Mental Causation Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0003 Open the PDF Link PDF for 2: The Many Problems of Mental Causation in another window
- 3: Mental Causation Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0004 Open the PDF Link PDF for 3: Mental Causation in another window
- 4: Reduction and Reductionism Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0005 Open the PDF Link PDF for 4: Reduction and Reductionism in another window
- Notes Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0006 Open the PDF Link PDF for Notes in another window
- References Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0007 Open the PDF Link PDF for References in another window
- Index Doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.003.0008 Open the PDF Link PDF for Index in another window
- Open Access
A product of The MIT Press
Mit press direct.
- About MIT Press Direct
Information
- Accessibility
- For Authors
- For Customers
- For Librarians
- Direct to Open
- Media Inquiries
- Rights and Permissions
- For Advertisers
- About the MIT Press
- The MIT Press Reader
- MIT Press Blog
- Seasonal Catalogs
- MIT Press Home
- Give to the MIT Press
- Direct Service Desk
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Statement
- Crossref Member
- COUNTER Member
- The MIT Press colophon is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Information Science and Technology
- Social Issues
Home Essay Samples Life Healthy Lifestyle
Having A Healthy Mind In A Healthy Body
Table of contents, drink plenty of water, get a good nights sleep, eat good meals, deep breathing, avoid toxins, in conclusion.
*minimum deadline
Cite this Essay
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below
- Relationship
- Perseverance
Related Essays
Need writing help?
You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need
*No hidden charges
100% Unique Essays
Absolutely Confidential
Money Back Guarantee
By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails
You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic
Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.
Home / Essay Samples / Philosophy / Rene Descartes / The Views Of René Descartes On The Body And Mind
The Views Of René Descartes On The Body And Mind
- Category: Life , Philosophy
- Topic: Famous Person , Rene Descartes
Pages: 2 (1098 words)
Views: 1466
- Downloads: -->
--> ⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.
Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?
are ready to help you with your essay
You won’t be charged yet!
Philosophy of Education Essays
Good and Evil Essays
Human Nature Essays
Truth Essays
Carl Jung Essays
Related Essays
We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Your essay sample has been sent.
In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.
samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->