Access a world-class UC Berkeley education known for academic rigor and pioneering advancements in public health, exemplified by innovations like Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR). CBPR, pioneered at Berkeley Public Health, empowers communities in research, addressing health disparities and fostering community engagement for health improvement.
We have a legacy of tackling critical public health issues with innovative ideas and community impact. Our expertise spans environmental health, influencing policies on air quality, water quality, toxic substances, and climate change on a global scale, as well as infectious disease research, where we played a pivotal role in understanding HIV/AIDS and shaping public health responses. Additionally, our contributions to nutrition and food policy, especially regarding childhood obesity and food marketing, have left a lasting mark on public health improvement.
At UC Berkeley School of Public Health, health equity and social justice are part of our DNA. For more than 75 years, we’ve been pushing boundaries and challenging the status quo. We believe that universities exist not only for the generation of knowledge and education of students, but for the betterment of our community and the world. In the next decade, we plan to harness our commitment to antiracism and community engagement to become the world’s leading school of public health for social impact.
Develop personally and professionally, gaining the knowledge, skills, and confidence to drive change in the public health landscape. Our graduates hold major positions in health departments, hospitals, national and international organizations, in local, state, and federal government, in voluntary health organizations, in the corporate sector, and in health care and health promotion organizations. Top employers of Berkeley Public Health Online alumni include: Genentech, UCSF, and Kaiser.
Access a flexible online format designed to accommodate the busy schedules of working professionals, allowing you to balance education with career and life. Despite being online, learners have access to the same tools, instructors, resources, and lessons used on-campus.
Average salary of graduates (2023) – $111,830
Visit the Online MPH program page for more information about concentrations, admissions, frequently asked questions, and more.
Request Information
Online and Onsite | Part-Time | 4 – 9 Years
Custom Track
As the most advanced, professional qualification in public health, the DrPH prepares early- to mid-career domestic and international public health professionals to assume leadership roles in public health policy and practice positions as well as in health services delivery settings.
The Schoolwide DrPH program is a flexible, part-time program delivered online with the option of taking onsite courses.
Students are expected to remain in relevant public health employment throughout their studies.
The DrPH program is built around foundational competencies that focus on leadership, analytical skills, communication, policy, management, and program design and evaluation. Instruction is delivered through an integrated sequence of problem-based learning classes that address current public health challenges and provide students with opportunities to apply skills in a close to real-life setting.
*For international students (pending SEVP approval) :
The DrPH allows professionals to continue improving health and saving lives while pursuing their studies wherever they are in the world.
countries represented in the program
faculty advising students
departments offering courses in the program
students in a cohort
Visit the Graduate Employment Outcomes Dashboard to learn about Bloomberg School graduates' employment status, sector, and salaries.
Sample organizations.
Students in the DrPH Program complete a minimum of 30 credits of foundational course work taken by all DrPH students to meet the CEPH foundational DrPH competencies, which include a minimum of 6 credits of data analysis course work. Students also take an additional 27 credits of course work related to their concentration or track, and a minimum of 7 proposal and thesis credits. Overall, the DrPH requires a minimum total of 64 credits for graduation.
concentrations & tracks
min. credits of course work
min. credits for proposal & thesis
practicum & dissertation
Environmental Health Concentration (2 tracks available)
Global Health: Policy & Evaluation Concentration
Health Equity & Social Justice Concentration
Health Policy & Management Concentration (4 tracks available)
Implementation Science Concentration
Women's & Reproductive Health Concentration
For the general admissions requirements see our How to Apply page. The specific program also requires:
MPH or other health-related master's degree; students who have not completed coursework in Biostatistics and Epidemiology may need to take additional coursework concurrent with the 57 didactic credits required for the DrPH.
Minimum 3 years of professional, full-time public health experience in the applicant's area of interest by the Dec. 1st application deadline.
Standardized test scores are not required and not reviewed for this program. If you have taken a standardized test such as the GRE, GMAT, or MCAT and want to submit your scores, please note that they will not be used as a metric during the application review. Applications will be reviewed holistically based on all required application components.
This program currently does not qualify for F-1 or J-1 student sponsorship. Legal Permanent Residents and non-immigrants who are otherwise physically present in the U.S. and in a status that allows for full or part-time study, may pursue this program.
Mark Bittle is the Chair of the schoolwide Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) program and a senior scientist in the Department of Health Policy and Management. He currently serves as director for the School's Master of Health Administration and the Master of Applied Science in Population Health Management. His work focuses on the organizational and management factors that influence physician alignment and managing change in complex organizations.
Renee M. Johnson is Deputy Chair of the schoolwide Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) program. She is also Associate Professor & Vice Chair for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Mental Health. She co-directs NIH-funded Drug Dependence Epidemiology Training Program and previously served on the MPH Executive Board. Her work addresses substance use, injury and violence, overdose prevention, and adolescent health.
Part-time DrPH students pay by the credit and finance their graduate studies through a variety of funding options ranging from paying out of pocket, to utilizing employer tuition remission benefits, financial aid , external scholarships, and military funding.
Bloomberg American Health Initiative DrPH Fellowships
The Bloomberg American Health Initiative offers 8-10 highly competitive fellowships for incoming DrPH students currently working with U.S. organizations on the front lines of one of the Bloomberg American Health Initiative’s five focus areas: addiction and overdose, environmental challenges, obesity and the food system, risks to adolescent health, and violence. A separate application process is required for consideration. Please note that only about 12% of fellowship applicants receive an award. It is important that applicants consider additional funding means prior to applying for the DrPH Program.
For further details regarding eligibility and the application process, please visit the Bloomberg American Health Initiative website.
Questions about the program? We're happy to help.
Katie Cruit, MS DrPH Program Manager
Madison Nuzzo, BS DrPH Administrative Coordinator
Sheryl Flythe, BS Program Adviser
Janet Carn, M.Ed. Program Adviser
Ashley Conroy-Tabrizi, MAT Program Adviser
A gift to our program will amplify student scholarships, support thesis research, and cultivate innovation.
Mph in epidemiology.
The MPH in Epidemiology (MPH-EPI) provides a curriculum that allows students to gain advanced skills in biostatistics and epidemiology as well as other core public health areas. Using a cohort-based model, students will complete this program on a part-time basis over the course of two years. About one third of the coursework is completed on campus and two thirds are completed online.
Students in the MPH Generalist (MPH-GEN) will complete coursework in a part-time, fully online program over two years. The program enables students to pursue a rigorous MPH degree while working and living anywhere in the world. It is designed to give students the knowledge, skills, and applied experience to play a leadership role in solving challenging and urgent public health problems, at home and on a global level.
Experience University of Idaho with a virtual tour. Explore now
Helping to ensure U of I is a safe and engaging place for students to learn and be successful. Read about Title IX.
Review the events calendar.
The largest Vandal Family reunion of the year. Check dates.
U of I's web-based retention and advising tool provides an efficient way to guide and support students on their road to graduation. Login to SlateConnect.
Center for excellence in teaching and learning.
Physical Address: 875 Perimeter Dr. Moscow, ID 83844
Mailing Address: 875 Perimeter Dr. Moscow, ID 83844
Phone: 208-885-0968
Email: [email protected]
At University of Idaho, our online college courses and degree programs are backed with the same quality of education as our on-campus programs. The only difference? You gain added flexibility to complete your coursework during times that fit your schedule. Take an individual class through Independent Study in Idaho (ISI) or enroll in an undergraduate or graduate degree program with Campus 360. Through online learning at U of I, you earn your education how and when you want.
Discover fully online undergraduate and graduate programs. Study online and earn your degree at your own pace from the university ranked No. 1 Best Public Value University in the West by US. News & World Report.
Through Campus 360, you have the option to choose from online undergraduate degree or certificate programs, including Bachelor of Business Administration and Bachelor of Psychology — all completely online.
Looking to continue your education? Discover our online master’s degrees and certificate programs covering environmental science, public administration, statistics and more!
Self-paced online college courses available anytime, anywhere. Open to all learners who want to enroll in classes at University of Idaho. Take up to a year to complete.
You don’t have to compromise to earn your degree on campus. We bring the scientific classroom to you, no matter where you are in the world. Complete a graduate program in engineering, mathematics or statistics, obtain a certificate or take on an individual course.
Need help deciding between online degree programs or whether a course will transfer to another college? Reach out to us!
Ready to take the first step toward an exciting future through online college courses or a fully online degree program?
Learn why you should choose University of Idaho , or visit the links below to get started with online admissions.
What is the difference between campus 360 and independent study.
Campus 360 is your hub for finding undergraduate and graduate degrees and certifications fully online. Independent Study (ISI), also fully online, offers individual courses rather than degree programs. This option is ideal for those looking to earn credits to transfer to another campus, resolve on-campus scheduling conflicts or quickly satisfy prerequisites. Because ISI does not require students to actively earn a degree through U of I, students from other institutions may take as many courses as they need and apply them to an institution outside of U of I.
Asynchronous learning is a type of online learning format that allows you to complete your coursework and exams on your own schedule. While you may log in to finish coursework at your leisure, instructors set a deadline for assignments. This format gives you the flexibility to earn your education while meeting your responsibilities outside of school.
Campus 360 and Independent Study (ISI) courses and programs are not all offered asynchronously. It is important to review your class schedule and syllabus for each class you enroll in to ensure you do not miss out on any synchronous components, such as live lectures. Your academic advisor can help you determine which courses have synchronous components.
Fill out the Request for Information form . This lets us quickly answer any specific questions you have about University of Idaho’s online learning options. For admissions-related inquiries, speak with an admissions counselor.
Graduates with an MPH in Epidemiology can become epidemiologists, data scientists or public health consultants, working to prevent and control diseases on a global scale.
Accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH), the MPH in Epidemiology is a 42 credit, STEM designated program. This program offers small class sizes and opportunities to work with faculty conducting epidemiologic research to address complex public health problems. The MPH in Epidemiology program is designed for students seeking to acquire skills in the fundamental methods of disease investigation and prevention in large populations. In addition to foundational public health knowledge, courses in this program emphasize basic and advanced epidemiologic and biostatical principles and their application to current problems in public health. Graduates of this program are ready to serve as epidemiologists in public health research or practice settings such as health departments, academia, industry and research institutions.
This program is part of the Western Regional Graduate Program (WRGP), a tuition-savings program that makes out-of-state graduate studies more affordable for students. Through WRGP, you will receive a reduced tuition rate, giving you more educational options for your money.
Kristen Clements-Nolle Graduate Director of Epidemiology Email: [email protected]
Distance learning in higher education during covid-19.
COVID-19’s pandemic has hastened the expansion of online learning across all levels of education. Countries have pushed to expand their use of distant education and make it mandatory in view of the danger of being unable to resume face-to-face education. The most frequently reported disadvantages are technological challenges and the resulting inability to open the system. Prior to the pandemic, interest in distance learning was burgeoning, as it was a unique style of instruction. The mini-review aims to ascertain students’ attitudes about distant learning during COVID-19. To accomplish the objective, articles were retrieved from the ERIC database. We utilize the search phrases “Distance learning” AND “University” AND “COVID.” We compiled a list of 139 articles. We chose papers with “full text” and “peer reviewed only” sections. Following the exclusion, 58 articles persisted. Then, using content analysis, publications relating to students’ perspectives on distance learning were identified. There were 27 articles in the final list. Students’ perspectives on distant education are classified into four categories: perception and attitudes, advantages of distance learning, disadvantages of distance learning, and challenges for distance learning. In all studies, due of pandemic constraints, online data gathering methods were selected. Surveys and questionnaires were utilized as data collection tools. When students are asked to compare face-to-face and online learning techniques, they assert that online learning has the potential to compensate for any limitations caused by pandemic conditions. Students’ perspectives and degrees of satisfaction range widely, from good to negative. Distance learning is advantageous since it allows for learning at any time and from any location. Distance education benefits both accomplishment and learning. Staying at home is safer and less stressful for students during pandemics. Distance education contributes to a variety of physical and psychological health concerns, including fear, anxiety, stress, and attention problems. Many schools lack enough infrastructure as a result of the pandemic’s rapid transition to online schooling. Future researchers can study what kind of online education methods could be used to eliminate student concerns.
The pandemic of COVID-19 has accelerated the spread of online learning at all stages of education, from kindergarten to higher education. Prior to the epidemic, several colleges offered online education. However, as a result of the epidemic, several governments discontinued face-to-face schooling in favor of compulsory distance education.
The COVID-19 problem had a detrimental effect on the world’s educational system. As a result, educational institutions around the world developed a new technique for delivering instructional programs ( Graham et al., 2020 ; Akhmadieva et al., 2021 ; Gaba et al., 2021 ; Insorio and Macandog, 2022 ; Tal et al., 2022 ). Distance education has been the sole choice in the majority of countries throughout this period, and these countries have sought to increase their use of distance education and make it mandatory in light of the risk of not being able to restart face-to-face schooling ( Falode et al., 2020 ; Gonçalves et al., 2020 ; Tugun et al., 2020 ; Altun et al., 2021 ; Valeeva and Kalimullin, 2021 ; Zagkos et al., 2022 ).
Britannica defines distance learning as “form of education in which the main elements include physical separation of teachers and students during instruction and the use of various technologies to facilitate student-teacher and student-student communication” ( Simonson and Berg, 2016 ). The subject of distant learning has been studied extensively in the fields of pedagogics and psychology for quite some time ( Palatovska et al., 2021 ).
The primary distinction is that early in the history of distant education, the majority of interactions between professors and students were asynchronous. With the advent of the Internet, synchronous work prospects expanded to include anything from chat rooms to videoconferencing services. Additionally, asynchronous material exchange was substantially relocated to digital settings and communication channels ( Virtič et al., 2021 ).
Distance learning is a fundamentally different way to communication as well as a different learning framework. An instructor may not meet with pupils in live broadcasts at all in distance learning, but merely follow them in a chat if required ( Bozkurt and Sharma, 2020 ). Audio podcasts, films, numerous simulators, and online quizzes are just a few of the technological tools available for distance learning. The major aspect of distance learning, on the other hand, is the detailed tracking of a student’s performance, which helps to develop his or her own trajectory. While online learning attempts to replicate classroom learning methods, distant learning employs a computer game format, with new levels available only after the previous ones have been completed ( Bakhov et al., 2021 ).
In recent years, increased attention has been placed on eLearning in educational institutions because to the numerous benefits that have been discovered via study. These advantages include the absence of physical and temporal limits, the ease of accessing material and scheduling flexibility, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the solution. A number of other studies have demonstrated that eLearning is beneficial to both student gains and student performance. However, in order to achieve the optimum results from eLearning, students must be actively participating in the learning process — a notion that is commonly referred to as active learning — throughout the whole process ( Aldossary, 2021 ; Altun et al., 2021 ).
The most commonly mentioned negatives include technological difficulties and the inability to open the system as a result, low teaching quality, inability to teach applicable disciplines, and a lack of courses, contact, communication, and internet ( Altun et al., 2021 ). Also, misuse of technology, adaptation of successful technology-based training to effective teaching methods, and bad practices in managing the assessment and evaluation process of learning are all downsides of distance learning ( Debeş, 2021 ).
The epidemic forced schools, colleges, and institutions throughout the world to close their doors so that students might practice social isolation ( Toquero, 2020 ). Prior to the pandemic, demand for distance learning was nascent, as it was a novel mode of education, the benefits and quality of which were difficult to judge due to a dearth of statistics. But, in 2020, humanity faced a coronavirus pandemic, which accelerated the shift to distant learning to the point that it became the only viable mode of education and communication ( Viktoria and Aida, 2020 ). Due to the advancements in digital technology, educators and lecturers have been obliged to use E-learning platforms ( Benadla and Hadji, 2021 ).
In remote education settings for higher education, activities are often divided into synchronous course sessions and asynchronous activities and tasks. In synchronous courses, learners participate in interactive and targeted experiences that help them develop a fundamental grasp of technology-enhanced education, course design, and successful online instruction. Asynchronous activities and tasks, on the other hand, include tests, group work assignments, group discussion, feedback, and projects. Additionally, asynchronous activities and tasks are carried out via interactive video-based activities, facilitator meetings, live webinars, and keynote speakers ( Debeş, 2021 ).
According to Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė (2021) , ICT should be attractive for learners. Additionally, student satisfaction with ODL has a statistically significant effect on their future choices for online learning ( Virtič et al., 2021 ). According to Avsheniuk et al. (2021) , the majority of research is undertaken to categorize students’ views and attitudes about online learning, and studies examining students’ perspectives of online learning during the COVID-19 epidemic are uncommon and few. There is presently a dearth of research on the impact on students when schools are forced to close abruptly and indefinitely and transition to online learning communities ( Unger and Meiran, 2020 ). So that, the mini-review is aimed to examining the students’ views on using distance learning during COVID-19.
In order to perform the aim, the articles were searched through ERIC database. We use “Distance learning” AND “University” AND “COVID” as search terms. We obtained 139 articles. We selected “full text” and “Peer reviewed only” articles. After the exclusion, 58 articles endured. Then content analyses were used to determine articles related to students’ voices about distance learning. In the final list, there were 27 articles ( Table 1 ).
Table 1. Countries and data collection tools.
In the study, a qualitative approach and content analyses were preferred. Firstly, the findings related to students’ attitudes and opinions on distance learning were determined. The research team read selected sections independently. Researchers have come to a consensus on the themes of perception and attitudes, advantages of distance learning, disadvantages of distance learning, and challenges for distance learning. It was decided which study would be included in which theme/s. Finally, the findings were synthesized under themes.
Only 3 studies ( Lassoued et al., 2020 ; Viktoria and Aida, 2020 ; Todri et al., 2021 ) were conducted to cover more than one country. Other studies include only one country. Surveys and questionnaires were mostly used as measurement tools in the study. Due to pandemic restrictions, online data collection approaches were preferred in the data collection process.
Students’ views on distance learning are grouped under four themes. These themes are perception and attitudes, advantages of distance learning, disadvantages of distance learning, and challenges for distance learning.
Students’ attitudes toward distance learning differ according to the studies. In some studies ( Mathew and Chung, 2020 ; Avsheniuk et al., 2021 ), it is stated that especially the students’ attitudes are positive, while in some studies ( Bozavlı, 2021 ; Yurdal et al., 2021 ) it is clearly stated that their attitudes are negative. In addition, there are also studies ( Akcil and Bastas, 2021 ) that indicate that students’ attitudes are at a moderate level. The transition to distance learning has been a source of anxiety for some students ( Unger and Meiran, 2020 ).
When the students’ satisfaction levels are analyzed, it is obvious from the research ( Gonçalves et al., 2020 ; Avsheniuk et al., 2021 ; Bakhov et al., 2021 ; Glebov et al., 2021 ; Todri et al., 2021 ) that the students’ satisfaction levels are high. In some studies, it is pronounced that the general satisfaction level of the participants is moderate ( Viktoria and Aida, 2020 ; Aldossary, 2021 ; Didenko et al., 2021 ) and low ( Taşkaya, 2021 ).
When students compare face-to-face and online learning methods, they state that online learning has opportunities to compensate for their deficiencies due to the pandemic conditions ( Abrosimova, 2020 ) and but they prefer face-to-face learning ( Gonçalves et al., 2020 ; Kaisar and Chowdhury, 2020 ; Bakhov et al., 2021 ). Distance learning is not sufficiently motivating ( Altun et al., 2021 ; Bozavlı, 2021 ), effective ( Beltekin and Kuyulu, 2020 ; Bozavlı, 2021 ), and does not have a contribution to students’ knowledge ( Taşkaya, 2021 ). Distance education cannot be used in place of face-to-face instruction ( Aldossary, 2021 ; Altun et al., 2021 ).
It is mostly cited advantages that distance learning has a positive effect on achievement and learning ( Gonçalves et al., 2020 ; Lin and Gao, 2020 ; Aldossary, 2021 ; Altun et al., 2021 ; Şahin, 2021 ). In addition, in distance learning, students can have more resources and reuse resources such as re-watching video ( Önöral and Kurtulmus-Yilmaz, 2020 ; Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ; Martha et al., 2021 ).
Distance learning for the reason any time and everywhere learning ( Adnan and Anwar, 2020 ; Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ; Todri et al., 2021 ). There is no need to spend money on transportation to and from the institution ( Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ; Nenakhova, 2021 ). Also, staying at home is safe during pandemics and less stressful for students ( Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ).
Distance learning cannot guarantee effective learning, the persistence of learning, or success ( Altun et al., 2021 ; Benadla and Hadji, 2021 ). Students state that they have more works, tasks, and study loads in the distance learning process ( Mathew and Chung, 2020 ; Bakhov et al., 2021 ; Didenko et al., 2021 ; Nenakhova, 2021 ). Group working and socialization difficulties are experienced in distance learning ( Adnan and Anwar, 2020 ; Bozavlı, 2021 ; Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ). The absence of communication and face-to-face interaction is seen a disadvantage ( Didenko et al., 2021 ; Nenakhova, 2021 ).
It is difficult to keep attention on the computer screen for a long time, so distance-learning negatively affects concentration ( Bakhov et al., 2021 ; Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ). In addition, distance education prompts some physical and psychological health problems ( Kaisar and Chowdhury, 2020 ; Taşkaya, 2021 ).
Devices and internet connection, technical problems are mainly stated as challenges for distance learning ( Abrosimova, 2020 ; Adnan and Anwar, 2020 ; Mathew and Chung, 2020 ; Bakhov et al., 2021 ; Benadla and Hadji, 2021 ; Didenko et al., 2021 ; Lamanauskas and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, 2021 ; Nenakhova, 2021 ; Taşkaya, 2021 ; Şahin, 2021 ). In addition, some students have difficulties in finding a quiet and suitable environment where they can follow distance education courses ( Taşkaya, 2021 ). It is a disadvantage that students have not the knowledge and skills to use the technological tools used in distance education ( Lassoued et al., 2020 ; Bakhov et al., 2021 ; Didenko et al., 2021 ).
The purpose of this study is to ascertain university students’ perceptions about distant education during COVID-19. The study’s findings are intended to give context for developers of distant curriculum and higher education institutions.
According to Toquero (2020) , academic institutions have an increased need to enhance their curricula, and the incorporation of innovative teaching methods and tactics should be a priority. COVID-19’s lockout has shown the reality of higher education’s current state: Progressive universities operating in the twenty-first century did not appear to be prepared to implement digital teaching and learning tools; existing online learning platforms were not universal solutions; teaching staff were not prepared to teach remotely; their understanding of online teaching was sometimes limited to sending handbooks, slides, sample tasks, and assignments to students via email and setting deadlines for submission of completed tasks ( Didenko et al., 2021 ).
It is a key factor that student satisfaction to identify the influencers that emerged in online higher education settings ( Parahoo et al., 2016 ). Also, there was a significant positive relationship between online learning, social presence and satisfaction with online courses ( Stankovska et al., 2021 ). According to the findings, the attitudes and satisfaction levels of the students differ according to the studies and vary in a wide range from positive to negative attitudes.
According to the study’s findings, students responded that while online learning is beneficial for compensating for deficiencies during the pandemic, they would prefer face-to-face education in the future. This is a significant outcome for institutions. It is not desirable for all students to take their courses entirely online. According to Samat et al. (2020) , the one-size-fits-all approach to ODL implementation is inapplicable since it not only impedes the flow of information delivery inside the virtual classroom, but it also has an impact on psychological well-being because users are prone to become disturbed.
In distance learning, students can have more resources and reuse resources such as re-watching videos. So, distance learning has a positive effect on achievement and learning. Alghamdi (2021) stated that over the last two decades, research on the influence of technology on students’ academic success has revealed a range of good and negative impacts and relationships, as well as zero effects and relationship.
The result also shows that distance education prompts some physical and psychological health problems. Due to the difficulty of maintaining focus on a computer screen for an extended period of time, remote education has a detrimental effect on concentration. There is some evidence that students are fearful of online learning in compared to more traditional, or in-person, in-class learning environments, as well as media representations of emergencies ( Müller-Seitz and Macpherson, 2014 ).
Unsatisfactory equipment and internet connection, technical difficulties, and a lack of expertise about remote learning technology are frequently cited as distance learning issues. Due to the pandemic’s quick move to online education, many schools have an insufficient infrastructure. Infrastructure deficiency is more evident in fields that require laboratory work such as engineering ( Andrzej, 2020 ) and medicine ( Yurdal et al., 2021 ).
To sum up, students’ opinions and levels of satisfaction vary significantly, ranging from positive to negative. Distance learning for the reason any time and everywhere learning. Distance learning has a positive effect on achievement and learning. Staying at home is safe during pandemics and less stressful for students. Distance education prompts some physical and psychological health problems such as fear, anxiety, stress, and losing concentration. Due to the pandemic’s quick move to online education, many schools have an insufficient infrastructure. Future researchers can investigate what distance education models can be that will eliminate the complaints of students. Students’ positive attitudes and levels of satisfaction with their distant education programs have an impact on their ability to profit from the program. Consequently, schools wishing to implement distant education should begin by developing a structure, content, and pedagogical approach that would improve the satisfaction of their students. According to the findings of the study, there is no universally applicable magic formula since student satisfaction differs depending on the country, course content, and external factors.
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
This manuscript has been supported by the Kazan Federal University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abrosimova, G. A. (2020). Digital literacy and digital skills in university study. Int. J. High. Educ. 9, 52–58. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n8p52
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Adnan, M., and Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: students perspectives. J. Pedagog. Soc. Psychol. 1, 45–51. doi: 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Akhmadieva, R. S., Mikhaylovsky, M. N., Simonova, M. M., Nizamutdinova, S. M., Prokopyev, A. I., and Ostanina, S. S. (2021). Public relations in organizations in sportsman students view: development of management tools or healthy and friendly relations formation. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 16, 1272–1279. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc3.43
Akcil, U., and Bastas, M. (2021). Examination of university students’ attitudes towards e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic process and the relationship of digital citizenship. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 13:e291. doi: 10.30935/CEDTECH/9341
Aldossary, K. (2021). Online distance learning for translation subjects: tertiary level instructors’ and students’ perceptions in Saudi Arabia. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 22:6.
Google Scholar
Alghamdi, A. (2021). COVID-19 mandated self-directed distance learning: experiences of Saudi female postgraduate students. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 18:014. doi: 10.53761/1.18.3.14
Altun, T., Akyıldız, S., Gülay, A., and Özdemir, C. (2021). Investigating education faculty students’ views about asynchronous distance education practices during COVID-19. Psycho Educ. Res. Rev. 10, 34–45.
Andrzej, O. (2020). Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown — building automation courses case study. Educ. Sci. 10:292.
Avsheniuk, N., Seminikhyna, N., Svyrydiuk, T., and Lutsenko, O. (2021). ESP students’ satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in ukraine. Arab World Engl. J. 1, 222–234. doi: 10.24093/awej/covid.17
Bakhov, I., Opolska, N., Bogus, M., Anishchenko, V., and Biryukova, Y. (2021). Emergency distance education in the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic: experience of Ukrainian universities. Educ. Sci. 11:364. doi: 10.3390/educsci11070364
Beltekin, E., and Kuyulu, İ (2020). The effect of coronavirus (COVID19) outbreak on education systems: evaluation of distance learning system in Turkey. J. Educ. Learn. 9:1. doi: 10.5539/jel.v9n4p1
Benadla, D., and Hadji, M. (2021). EFL students affective attitudes towards distance e-learning based on moodle platform during the COVID-19 the pandemic: perspectives from Dr. Moulaytahar university of Saida, Algeria. Arab World Engl. J. 1, 55–67. doi: 10.24093/awej/covid.4
Bozavlı, E. (2021). Is foreign language teaching possible without school? Distance learning experiences of foreign language students at Ataturk university during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arab World Engl. J. 12, 3–18. doi: 10.24093/awej/vol12no1.1
Bozkurt, A., and Sharma, R. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian J. Distance Educ. 15:2020.
Debeş, G. (2021). Distance learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: advantages and disadvantages. Int. J. Curr. Instr. 13, 1109–1118.
Didenko, I., Filatova, O., and Anisimova, L. (2021). COVID-19 lockdown challenges or new era for higher education. Propós. Represent. 9:e914. doi: 10.20511/pyr2021.v9nspe1.914
Falode, O. C., Chukwuemeka, E. J., Bello, A., and Baderinwa, T. (2020). Relationship between flexibility of learning, support services and students’ attitude towards distance learning programme in Nigeria. Eur. J. Interact. Multimed. Educ. 1:e02003. doi: 10.30935/ejimed/8320
Gaba, A. K., Bhushan, B., and Kant Rao, D. (2021). Factors influencing the preference of distance learners to study through online during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J. Distance Educ. 16:2021.
Glebov, V. A., Popov, S. I., Lagusev, Y. M., Krivova, A. L., and Sadekova, S. R. (2021). Distance learning in the humanitarian field amid the coronavirus pandemic: risks of creating barriers and innovative benefits. Propós. Represent. 9:e1258. doi: 10.20511/pyr2021.v9nspe3.1258
Gonçalves, S. P., Sousa, M. J., and Pereira, F. S. (2020). Distance learning perceptions from higher education students—the case of Portugal. Educ. Sci. 10:374. doi: 10.3390/educsci10120374
Graham, S. R., Tolar, A., and Hokayem, H. (2020). Teaching preservice teachers about COVID-19 through distance learning. Electron. J. Res. Sci. Math. Educ. 24, 29–37.
Insorio, A. O., and Macandog, D. M. (2022). Video lessons via youtube channel as mathematics interventions in modular distance learning. Contemp. Math. Sci. Educ. 3:e22001. doi: 10.30935/conmaths/11468
Kaisar, M. T., and Chowdhury, S. Y. (2020). Foreign language virtual class room: anxiety creator or healer? Engl. Lang. Teach. 13:130. doi: 10.5539/elt.v13n11p130
Lamanauskas, V., and Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2021). Distance lectures in university studies: advantages, disadvantages, improvement. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 13:e309. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/10887
Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., and Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020). An exploratory study of the obstacles for achieving quality in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Sci. 10:232. doi: 10.3390/educsci10090232
Lin, X., and Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian J. Distance Educ. 15, 169–179. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3881614
Martha, A. S. D., Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., and Suhartanto, H. (2021). Assessing undergraduate students’ e-learning competencies: a case study of higher education context in Indonesia. Educ. Sci. 11:189. doi: 10.3390/educsci11040189
Mathew, V. N., and Chung, E. (2020). University students’ perspectives on open and distance learning (ODL) implementation amidst COVID-19. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 16, 152–160. doi: 10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11964
Müller-Seitz, G., and Macpherson, A. (2014). Learning during crisis as a ‘war for meaning’: the case of the German Escherichia coli outbreak in 2011. Manag. Learn. 45, 593–608.
Nenakhova, E. (2021). Distance learning practices on the example of second language learning during coronavirus epidemic in Russia. Int. J. Instr. 14, 807–826. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14347a
Önöral, Ö, and Kurtulmus-Yilmaz, S. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on dental education in cyprus: preclinical and clinical implications with E-learning strategies. Adv. Educ. 7, 69–77.
Palatovska, O., Bondar, M., Syniavska, O., and Muntian, O. (2021). Virtual mini-lecture in distance learning space. Arab World Engl. J. 1, 199–208. doi: 10.24093/awej/covid.15
Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., and Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. J. Market. High. Educ. 26, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511
Samat, M. F., Awang, N. A., Hussin, S. N. A., and Nawi, F. A. M. (2020). Online distance learning amidst COVID-19 pandemic among university students: a practicality of partial least squares structural equation modelling approach. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 16, 220–233.
Simonson, M., and Berg, G. A. (2016). Distance Learning. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Available online at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/distance-learning (accessed November 14, 2011).
Stankovska, G., Dimitrovski, D., and Ibraimi, Z. (2021). “Online learning, social presence and satisfaction among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic,” in Paper Presented at the Annual International Conference of the Bulgarian Comparative Education Society (BCES) , (Sofia), 181–188.
Şahin, M. (2021). Opinions of university students on effects of distance learning in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Afr. Educ. Res. J. 9, 526–543. doi: 10.30918/aerj.92.21.082
Tal, C., Tish, S., and Tal, P. (2022). Parental perceptions of their preschool and elementary school children with respect to teacher-family relations and teaching methods during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Pedagog. Res. 7:em0114. doi: 10.29333/pr/11518
Taşkaya, S. M. (2021). Teacher candidates’ evaluation of the emergency remote teaching practices in turkey during COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Progress. Educ. 17, 63–78. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.5
Todri, A., Papajorgji, P., Moskowitz, H., and Scalera, F. (2021). Perceptions regarding distance learning in higher education, smoothing the transition. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 13:e287. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/9274
Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: the Philippine context. Pedagog. Res. 5:em0063. doi: 10.29333/pr/7947
Tugun, V., Bayanova, A. R., Erdyneeva, K. G., Mashkin, N. A., Sakhipova, Z. M., and Zasova, L. V. (2020). The opinions of technology supported education of university students. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 15, 4–14. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i23.18779
Unger, S., and Meiran, W. (2020). Student attitudes towards online education during the COVID-19 viral outbreak of 2020: distance learning in a time of social distance. Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci. 4, 256–266. doi: 10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.107
Valeeva, R., and Kalimullin, A. (2021). Adapting or changing: the COVID-19 pandemic and teacher education in Russia. Educ. Sci. 11:408. doi: 10.3390/educsci11080408
Viktoria, V., and Aida, M. (2020). comparative analysis on the impact of distance learning between Russian and Japanese university students, during the pandemic of COVID-19. Educ. Q. Rev. 3:438–446. doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.03.04.151
Virtič, M. P., Dolenc, K., and Šorgo, A. (2021). Changes in online distance learning behaviour of university students during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, and development of the model of forced distance online learning preferences. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 10, 393–411. doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.393
Yurdal, M. O., Sahin, E. M., Kosan, A. M. A., and Toraman, C. (2021). Development of medical school students’ attitudes towards online learning scale and its relationship with E-learning styles. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 22, 310–325. doi: 10.17718/tojde.961855
Zagkos, C., Kyridis, A., Kamarianos, I., Dragouni, K E., Katsanou, A., Kouroumichaki, E., et al. (2022). Emergency remote teaching and learning in greek universities during the COVID-19 pandemic: the attitudes of university students. Eur. J. Interact. Multimed. Educ. 3:e02207. doi: 10.30935/ejimed/11494
Keywords : ICT, distance learning, COVID-19, higher education, online learning
Citation: Masalimova AR, Khvatova MA, Chikileva LS, Zvyagintseva EP, Stepanova VV and Melnik MV (2022) Distance Learning in Higher Education During Covid-19. Front. Educ. 7:822958. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
Received: 26 November 2021; Accepted: 14 February 2022; Published: 03 March 2022.
Reviewed by:
Copyright © 2022 Masalimova, Khvatova, Chikileva, Zvyagintseva, Stepanova and Melnik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alfiya R. Masalimova, [email protected]
† ORCID: Alfiya R. Masalimova, orcid.org/0000-0003-3711-2527 ; Maria A. Khvatova, orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-8805 ; Lyudmila S. Chikileva, orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-9041 ; Elena P. Zvyagintseva, orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-0805 ; Valentina V. Stepanova, orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-0962 ; Mariya V. Melnik, orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-4628
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
If you're a public health professional seeking a leadership role, earning an online Ph.D. in public health can help you advance your career. Leaders in this field work to shape the future of ...
Discover the benefits of an online doctorate in public health degree and how to choose the best program for your career goals.
Online Programs. There has never been a more meaningful time to study public health. And with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School Hybrid Campus, accessing our state-of-the-art curriculum and being part of our community has never been easier! Become a public health leader from any device, anywhere in the world. Our hybrid campus promises to offer ...
Lead the way toward healthier, more resilient communities with an online Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) degree from Walden. In this CEPH-accredited program, you'll enhance your leadership and critical thinking skills while gaining deep insight into 21st-century public health challenges from a domestic and global perspective.
An online Ph.D. in public health can lead to new and exciting career opportunities. Here, we list the best programs available.
The PhD in public health online gives you a flexible way to earn an advanced credential. Compare schools, review programs, and take your next step for 2024.
Learning Outcomes. Our online PhD in Public Health degree program is designed to prepare graduates to: Apply ethical decision-making in public health research. Design public health research proposals that are evidence based and competitive. Critically evaluate scholarly literature in public health and related disciplines.
Learn what to expect from earning an online Ph.D. in public health, from courses to career outlook, including public health jobs and salaries for graduates.
The IU Online Doctor of Public Health in Global Health Leadership is a three-year, cohort-based distance education program. It leverages relationships with international schools and programs and includes opportunities to collaborate with faculty and scholars around the world. As a student in the program, you'll take classes via real-time video ...
Walden's online PhD in Public Health Epidemiology specialization teaches strategies and skills necessary for maintaining the health of communities.
Through innovative research, education, and policy leadership, public health specialists prevent disease and ensure that people possess the information and tools needed to lead healthy lives. A Ph.D. in public health online program prepares you for careers in education, research, and management. These professionals can also work with small towns and communities, international nonprofits, and ...
The PhD in Public Health meets the needs of those wishing to gain a deep and critical insight into public health theory, research and practice and to develop or enhance research skills whilst fulfilling their existing responsibilities. The programme is offered part-time and combines innovative distance learning with face-to-face teaching at an ...
Why an Online Doctorate in Public Health? At all degree levels, professionals in the public health field work to prevent disease and promote individual, family, and community health. Public health doctoral programs align with these core concerns and build additional skills in research, policymaking, program development, and program evaluation.
Become a leader and make a difference in the world of public health. Learn how to effectively drive change by earning a Doctor of Public Health degree.
The online Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) program from the Milken Institute School of Public Health (SPH) — ranked No. 11 for best public health school in the United States — is an interdisciplinary leadership training program that prepares experienced public health professionals to drive the global conversation around today's biggest public health challenges.
The PhD in Health Policy and Management is a full-time doctoral program that trains its students to conduct original investigator-initiated research through a combination of coursework and research mentoring.
Unlock new opportunities with our Online PhD in Public Health. Advance your knowledge, impact communities, and shape the future. Apply today!
Designed for Changemakers. Berkeley Public Health has a legacy of tackling critical public health issues with innovative ideas and community impact. Our renowned 27-month Online Master of Public Health is designed to empower you to drive positive change in public health regardless of your location or career stage.
The part-time DrPH program prepares early- to mid-career public health professionals for leadership roles in public health policy and practice positions as well as in health services delivery settings.
Students in the MPH Generalist (MPH-GEN) will complete coursework in a part-time, fully online program over two years. The program enables students to pursue a rigorous MPH degree while working and living anywhere in the world. It is designed to give students the knowledge, skills, and applied experience to play a leadership role in solving ...
Online Master's and Doctoral Programs List The University of Idaho's online graduate degrees reflect our mission of making education accessible across the state and nation and responding to changing employment demands. Delivering the quality instruction expected of a research university, our online master's and doctoral programs are taught by our esteemed faculty members and build upon ...
Online Learning at University of Idaho At University of Idaho, our online college courses and degree programs are backed with the same quality of education as our on-campus programs. The only difference? You gain added flexibility to complete your coursework during times that fit your schedule.
Graduates with an MPH in Epidemiology can become epidemiologists, data scientists or public health consultants, working to prevent and control diseases on a global scale. Accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH), the MPH in Epidemiology is a 42 credit, STEM designated program ...
Students' perspectives and degrees of satisfaction range widely, from good to negative. Distance learning is advantageous since it allows for learning at any time and from any location. Distance education benefits both accomplishment and learning. Staying at home is safer and less stressful for students during pandemics.