Explore 150 fascinating debate topics, from politics to AI to silly banter. This list will provide engaging conversations and thought-provoking debates.
Practicing debate is a personal growth powerhouse activity! It trains you to think deeply about a topic, communicate persuasively , and become flexible with your perspectives. It also trains your critical thinking and public speaking skills.
While two people could debate anything, finding the right topic can bring passion and inspiration to the conversation, where there is a fire in the room, and everyone is learning and expanding their worldview.
Below, you’ll find all the best debate topics for different situations.
Debating with friends can be a fun and provocative way to connect. Try any of these prompts with a friend. Consider flipping a coin to see who gets which side.
Whether you’re setting up a debate for a club, a class, or a friend group, here are some of the most popular debate topics of the day. These are also phenomenal debate topics you can use as an office activity.
Some European countries 1 https://www.topuniversities.com/student-info/student-finance/how-much-does-it-cost-study-europe offer free college tuition for their residents. The top American colleges 2 https://www.hmc.edu/admission/afford/cost-of-attendance/ cost up to $264,000 for four years of tuition. Is it worth it?
Examining the causes of climate change sparks critical conversations on environmental responsibility, sustainable practices, and their global impact.
This debate explores income inequality and the well-being of workers, addressing social and economic implications for individuals and society.
Universal healthcare debates touch on public health, social justice, and the role of government in ensuring healthcare access for all citizens.
Online privacy is important to about 90% of people 3 https://surfshark.com/attitude-on-privacy . So, this is a topic that almost everyone has some stake in. With the increasing prevalence of data breaches and surveillance, this topic explores the challenges of safeguarding personal information in the modern digital landscape.
This debate addresses the balance between free speech and curbing misinformation, hate speech, and harmful content on widely-used platforms.
The ethical considerations surrounding animal testing and the pursuit of scientific advancement raise questions about the treatment of animals and the value of research outcomes.
If political campaigns have free reign on social media, we’re doomed to highly influenced and manipulated elections. Is it worth it?
What is intelligence? How many types are there, and what are the best ways to measure it? Debates on standardized testing focus on its impact on educational quality, student stress, and alternative methods of assessing academic achievement.
Exploring media censorship involves discussing freedom of expression, cultural sensitivity, and the need to protect societal values.
Should we solve our problems on Earth before bringing them to Mars? This topic considers the value of space exploration in scientific discovery, technological advancements, and international collaboration.
The more the government taxes gas, the less people will drive. This will benefit the environment, but oil companies won’t like it. This debate addresses environmental concerns, infrastructure funding, and incentivizing alternative transportation methods to reduce emissions.
Statistics show that debate is super positive for students. One study 4 https://www.dropbox.com/s/qlfetvs9tmq9amx/Journal-of-Adolescence-Mezuk-et-al%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0 found that of the students with the highest risk factors, 72% of those who participated in high school debate successfully graduated, while only 43% of non-debaters graduated.
Not to mention, the more debate rounds a student participated in, the likelier they were to graduate.
Plus, the more students engaged in debate, the higher they scored on the ACT.
This section is for teachers who want to bring some debate topics into the classroom. The topics will be salient for your students to ensure they feel invested and inspired in their debate.
Here are some fascinating debate topics to get your brain turning.
If you liked those questions, here are 255 more philosophical questions .
Sometimes, it’s great to turn the practice of debate toward topics that are just fun! Here are some topics that won’t help change the world but are fun to debate for the sake of debate.
Debate can be a super fun form of conversation. Though if you don’t just want to boost your debate skills but also your overall conversation skills so that you can build more meaningful relationships, you might enjoy this free training:
Do you struggle with small talk? Do you often run out of things to say or feel awkward and self-conscious in social situations? 💪 Speak so people listen, 🤐 No more awkward silences, 🚫 No more small talk.
For any US reader, the political climate is hot! Here are a few debate prompts that might stoke some lively debate.
They aren’t for the faint of heart and could hopefully result in some charged conversations—to create more understanding and insight.
At what age can people make informed, intelligent decisions? Should we empower youth more? Plus, the earlier people start voting, the more likely they’ll vote later. Some juicy topics!
This is a huge one, especially with all the shootings over the past years. About 40% of Americans 5 https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/09/13/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/ say there is a gun in their household. Gun control debates tackle public safety, the Second Amendment, and measures to reduce gun-related violence.
About 60% of Americans 6 https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/02/most-americans-favor-the-death-penalty-despite-concerns-about-its-administration/ support the death penalty, even though nearly 80% agree that there is some risk that an innocent person will be unrightly put to death. If that’s not grounds for an interesting debate, I don’t know what is!
Here are more stats:
Try out these topics for some hot political debates to explore your deeper philosophies around politics. These topics are specific to the US government system but might provide interesting debate to folks from any country.
Try out these debate topics to explore new domains of thought and conversation that you might not normally touch on.
If you liked those questions, here are 110 more mind-blowing questions to get you thinking about life.
These debate topics are sure to bring out some chuckles from you and your debate adversary.
If you’re new to debate or want some starter topics, here are some topics everyone can relate to. These topics are especially good for kids, high schoolers, and students.
If you want to get silly, goofy, and playful, then try out these debate topics.
Debate topics can include climate change, healthcare reform, education, and the impact of technology on society.
Good topics to debate about encompass subjects like social justice, privacy in the digital age, and the influence of media on society.
Fun debate topics may revolve around topics like the best movie genre, the existence of extraterrestrial life, and the merits of pizza toppings.
Popular debate topics often include gun control, immigration policy, climate change, and the role of technology in daily life.
Good debate topics for high school students can include issues like the importance of standardized testing, the impact of social media on mental health, and the relevance of classic literature in the modern curriculum.
Best of luck setting up your debate!
If you hope to become a better debater, it can also help to invest in your oration skills. If you’re interested, here’s a great article to help boost your public speaking.
Popular guides, how to deal with difficult people at work.
Do you have a difficult boss? Colleague? Client? Learn how to transform your difficult relationship. I’ll show you my science-based approach to building a strong, productive relationship with even the most difficult people.
Science of People offers over 1000+ articles on people skills and nonverbal behavior.
It’s a privilege to be in your inbox. We promise only to send the good stuff.
[Editor’s Note: This is Part One of a three-part article. Click to read Part Two and Part Three .]
How can we pay teachers more? The question was raised this week by an American Center for Transforming Education reader. The premise of the question is teachers are not adequately paid, a frequently heard argument. But what is the reality? The teacher pay debate will be examined in a three-part article.
When respondents are not provided any salary information for context, an Education Next poll found 72% of the general population believes public school teacher salaries should increase. When provided with teacher salary information, that percentage fell to 56 — yet still over half of those surveyed felt teachers were underpaid. Forty percent said salaries should “stay about the same,” while only five percent felt a decrease in teacher pay was in order.
Most other professions don’t encounter public polls assessing whether employees are overpaid, adequately paid, or underpaid. So why the pay debate regarding public educators? Is it primarily because these teachers are government employees funded by taxpayer money? Likely not, since the salaries of post office or department of motor vehicle licensing personnel are seldom a subject of discussion (with the possible exception of those times when one is standing in a long, slow-moving line or experiencing less than stellar customer service at the post office or DMV).
Conversely, public school teacher pay provokes strong and sometimes emotionally heated opinions. A combination of at least three key factors is likely at work. First is the sheer number of teachers per state. In some communities, K-12 public education is among the largest employer, and teachers are more visible than professionals in other industries. Second is the life-shaping influence a teacher can have on students — and subsequently their entire family. Third, teacher unions possess a boisterous megaphone to proclaim their members are underpaid, which keeps the issue in the headlines.
Factor three requires special focus because teacher unions’ influence on the public education system is highly problematic. Teachers pay dues, and in turn, teacher unions negotiate for increased teacher pay and benefits, year-after-year. If demands aren’t met, teachers strike — to the detriment of students and their parents.
Teacher unions maintain their dominance through political action, providing substantial funding to candidates in exchange for support and advancement of their agenda. For example , just prior to the 2020 November election, the National Education Association had raised $23 million, with 99% allocated to Democratic candidates. The American Federation of Teachers pumped nearly $10.7 million into the 2020 election, with 98.6% donated toward Democrats. It’s no wonder that Democratic party elected officials cater to teacher union agendas, especially when those unions promote a narrative of harmful teacher working conditions (including outright danger in a COVID-19 era) and near poverty level pay.
Teaching is a noble profession, and public appreciation of what teachers do fuel a passionate belief with many that teachers should be paid more. However, the more teachers earn, the more money their unions receive, and union control grows — hence, a mutually beneficial financial and power relationship. But the fundamental question remains. Beyond the public opinion polls and teacher union narrative, what is the reality of K-12 public school teacher pay? This question will be examined in Part Two of this series.
10 education questions for the biden-trump debate.
Tonight, President Biden and former President Trump will face off in the first of two scheduled presidential debates. This debate is atypical in all sorts of ways: It’s happening in June rather than after Labor Day, it’ll take place without an audience, and it’s the first presidential rematch since 1956. All of this will produce some unusual dynamics.
For all that, though, the substance of the debate will come down to the business of answering questions and sketching a vision for voters. After four years in which education has loomed large in the national discourse—from school closures to school masking to school choice to Critical Race Theory to student loan forgiveness to campus protests—it’d be good to hear them speak to some of these issues.
After four years in which education has loomed large in the national discourse—from school closures ... [+] to school masking to school choice to Critical Race Theory to student loan forgiveness to campus protests—it’d be good to hear them speak to some of these issues.
In no particular order, here are ten questions I’d love to hear Trump and Biden address.
1) Public confidence in the value of a college degree has plunged to historic lows, with only 36% of adults saying they have “quite a lot” or a “great deal” of confidence in American higher education. Why do you think that’s happened and what, if anything, can Washington do about it?
2) Since the pandemic, chronic absenteeism has skyrocketed in K-12 schooling. Last year, across the nation, more than a quarter of students missed four or more weeks of school. How concerned are you about this situation, and what should schools, parents, and public officials do to address it?
3) In light of research that’s raised significant concerns about the effects of smartphones and social media on youth well-being, mental health, and academic performance, there’s a growing push to ban smartphones in schools. What do you think of those efforts and what response, if any, is called for on the part of the federal government?
Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024.
4) New research by scholars at the American Institutes for Research, Harvard University, and Stanford University suggests that the $190 billion in emergency pandemic aid for schools had a very modest positive effect. The researchers estimate that $1,000 in aid per pupil, or about 7 percent of what America’s schools spent on each student last year, raised math scores by about 3 percent and had no effect on reading achievement. Is this a satisfactory rate of return for taxpayers? If not, what would it take to do better?
5) President Trump, you’ve repeatedly said that you would bar federal funds from going to schools or colleges that require vaccinations. Do you mean to say that would ban schools from such efforts even when it comes to combating smallpox or measles? Can you explain what grants a president the legal authority to impose such a requirement and how you’d enforce it?
6) President Biden, you’ve pursued a sweeping student loan forgiveness strategy that analysts at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School have estimated will transfer more than half a trillion dollars of debt from borrowers to taxpayers. Two questions: First, if the goal is to aid those in need, why include graduate borrowers who’ve used public funds to pursue pricey, lucrative degrees? Second, the dollars in question would be enough to triple the Pell Grant program for low-income college students for decades. Can you explain why forgiving loans to borrowers, many of whom earn $100,000 or more a year, is a better use of those funds?
7) Over the past four years, states have legislated an historic expansion of school choice—primarily by adopting and expanding voucher programs and education savings accounts. President Trump, when in office, your administration pushed to promote private educational choice. Meanwhile, President Biden, you have expressed opposition to voucher programs and your administration has sought to reduce federal support for charter schooling. Can you explain your thoughts regarding the promise and the risks of educational choice, and what role you’d like to see Washington play in all this?
8) President Trump, you’ve called for abolishing the U.S. Department of Education. Can you explain what that would entail? Does that mean that you’d like to end federal aid for students with special needs, schools serving low-income students, and Pell Grants for low-income college-goers?
9) President Biden, when you ran for president in 2020, you said that you were spurred to run by the ugliness of the white supremacist, anti-Semitic conflagration that transpired at the University of Virginia in 2017. Over the past year, of course, scores of college campuses have seen encampments, occupations, anti-Semitic rallies, and documented acts of anti-Semitic violence by anti-Israel protesters. Do you find this ongoing activity as troubling as you did the events in Charlottesville? Why or why not?
10) If you had to point to a school or college that you think is getting it right today, what would it be? And what would it take to provide that kind of schooling to many more youth?
Anyway, those are my ten, though it wouldn’t be any great trick to supersize that list.
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
We want to provide announcements, events, leadership messages and resources that are relevant to you. Your selection is stored in a browser cookie which you can remove at any time using “Clear all personalization” below.
Debate me: Voters want to see candidates face off, but many politicians seek to avoid debates. | iStock/Pat Shrader
Debates can play an important role in democratic elections. They educate voters and give politicians a chance to set themselves apart from their opponents. Yet it’s not always easy to get candidates to agree to face off with each other.
That poses a problem in countries like Sierra Leone, where voters do not have many sources of election information. In 2012, an NGO in the small West African nation ran an experiment to see if it could generate more demand for debates by sponsoring them among parliamentary candidates in 14 races. Recordings of the debates were screened at large public gatherings.
Surveys found that people who watched the debates were more knowledgeable about the candidates and tended to vote for those who performed better on stage. The debates also seemed to influence the candidates: 18 months after the election, MPs who had participated in a debate spent more discretionary funds on development projects in their constituency.
But that success didn’t translate into a move for more debates. “Despite the national electoral commission saying that Sierra Leone should make debates mandatory going forward, it didn’t happen,” says Katherine Casey , a professor of political economy at Stanford Graduate School of Business who has done extensive research in the country. “We were trying to think about why.”
With Rachel Glennerster of the University of Chicago, Casey ran another experiment during Sierra Leone’s 2018 parliamentary elections to discern what incentives might push politicians to debate one another. They found that simply guaranteeing a public platform for disseminating debates dramatically increased candidates’ participation.
At first, they set out to test whether the absence of debates resulted more from candidates who didn’t want to debate or voters who weren’t interested in debates. To test candidates’ incentives to debate, they privately reached out to candidates in 72 races and asked if they were interested in debating. Those who expressed interest were asked to contact their rivals and settle on a day and time. In three-quarters of races, at least one candidate was interested in having a debate. However, only a few of these candidates were able to persuade their rivals to join them, suggesting that candidates could not be expected to organize debates on their own, particularly if the apparent frontrunner believed they had little to gain from debating.
“This makes intuitive sense, as debates are sort of zero-sum events in which one person wins and the others lose,” Casey says. “At the end of the day, we had interest from more than one candidate in only about one-third of races.”
These outcomes changed dramatically when poiticians’ willingness to debate became a matter of public record. The researchers established a platform for debates where voters could see whether candidates chose to take part. When an hour of radio time was offered to those running for office, participation in debates rose from roughly 33% to 70%.
Frontrunners, who had often declined to take part in radio debates, joined in when a video platform was introduced. “If you didn’t participate, then voters would assume you’re probably not very good, and they would update their beliefs accordingly,” Casey says. “This was a low-cost, low-tech intervention that completely flipped the incentives around.”
Next, the researchers probed voters’ interest in debates. Coordinating with local movie halls, they scheduled screenings of recorded video debates. They distributed free tickets randomly, starting with residents who lived near the cinema and moving outward to a distance of 15 miles. Each voucher was geotagged, enabling the researchers to see how far viewers had come to watch the debates.
Nearly 60% of people who lived nearby and received a ticket attended a screening. Among ticketholders who lived between two and eight miles away, roughly 30% attended. “These are pretty significant numbers,” Casey says, particularly considering that the daily wage for many participants was just over $2 and travel cost roughly 50 cents per mile.
Reinforcing these findings, the cinema continued to show the debate after the researchers had left, and people continued to attend the screenings, even when they had to pay for admission. “This suggests the demand side doesn’t seem to be the problem,” Casey says. “Voters have a strong desire for political information.”
These experiments created significant incentives for politicians to take part in a debate. Considering that foreign donors and NGOs already spend lots of money to bolster civic institutions in emerging democracies like Sierra Leone, Casey notes that this provides a relatively inexpensive way to magnify their impact. One hour of radio airtime cost just $200, and enlisting local cinemas was an inexpensive way to “amplify the effect of these interventions,” she says.
These findings emphasize the critical importance of debates, particularly in races where information is hard to come by. Yet even in wealthy, established democracies, like the United States, debates are not a sure thing: the frequency of debates for Senate seats, for example, has dropped over the last 20 years, sparking concerns about democratic backsliding.
“Opening up a debate platform is a straightforward way to support the democratic process, particularly — but not exclusively — in low-income countries,” Casey says. “If voters have no information and you provide them with a little, then this can have a very big impact.”
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Essay about Money is more Important than Education. Money isn't exciting on its own. What matters is what money can accomplish for you. You have more flexibility and options when you have money. When you have a strong salary or financial resources, you have the freedom to choose where and how you wish to live. When you don't have much money ...
March 10, 2024 by Iweham. Explore the ongoing debate about whether education holds more value than money. This comprehensive article delves into the advantages of education, its impact on personal growth, and the role of money in achieving success. In the eternal debate of education is Better than Money, both sides have valid points to consider.
In the riveting debate surrounding the value of Money is Better than Education, it becomes apparent that both factors hold immense significance in different contexts. While money can provide comfort, financial stability, and the means to pursue dreams, education enriches lives, empowers minds, and paves the way for personal and societal growth.
Reasons education is better. Education can be likened to a light that illuminates whenever darkness is looming. It is preferable to have the keys (education) in your hand that can open any form of doors for you than to just have money. Reduces Child Mortality: According to UNESCO, a child born to a mother who can read is 50 percent more likely ...
Short term money does not matter. The first study examined outcomes of School Improvement Grants (SIG), which were funded for $7 billion as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of ...
11 Greatest Debate Topics Of All Time. 1. The Existence of a Higher Power: God vs. Atheism. Theological Arguments: Explore philosophical and theological arguments for the existence of God, such as the cosmological, teleological, and moral arguments.
For: Debate On Money Is Better Than Education Financial Stability. Financial stability is crucial for individuals to lead a secure and comfortable life. Money provides the means to meet basic needs such as food, shelter, and healthcare. It ensures that individuals can afford a decent standard of living and have access to essential resources.
The School Spending Debate: What Difference Does A Dollar Make? : NPR Ed It's one of the loudest debates in education: whether spending more money adds up to better test scores and graduation rates.
School uniforms are important at school. Education should be free for everyone. All student loan debts should be forgiven. Private schools are better than public schools. Tuition fees are too expensive. Homework is an important part of education. All exams should be replaced with coursework. School meals should be free for all.
Write your speech for or against the motion. OUTLINE/PLAN. Vocatives (Make sure to always keep this simple and appropriate to the question.) Example: Mr. Chairman, Panel of Judges, Headmasters, Members of Staff of both Schools, Guests, Fellow Students, Ladies and Gentlemen. 2.
Nov 22 by KidsInTheHouse2. The debate over whether education should be free or paid is continuous, and it's hardly possible that it'll ever end. The supporters of both sides vary, and each position has its pros and cons. This short essay will review them as objectively as possible and try to give you some answers on which argument is the best.
1. Choose a Topic For Your Debate. Also called a resolution or a motion, the topic is sometimes chosen to debate. This is usually the case in a school activity to practice debating skills. The resolution or motion is usually centered around a true or false statement or a proposal to change the current situation.
An effective argument begins with a provable, debatable claim, similar to the thesis statement of a persuasive essay you might have been asked to write for class. In order for there to be a debate, two different and mutually exclusive positions need to be evaluated against each other. Step 1: Write Your Case. Establish a Clear Position Statement
100 Great Education Debate Topics. Education Debate Topics and Ideas to get you started. It can be difficult to choose an education debate topic that is both interesting and relevant, but this list of 100 education debate topics should help get you started! Education debates can cover a wide range of topics, from early childhood education all ...
Flexible, mass stream and open-source learning, he argues, will revolutionize the landscape of education. "In the future, you could go to university having done the first year of content online. You could then come and have the campus experience for two years, before going on to get a job in the industry where you become a continuous learner ...
Education gives the ability to create new ideas, have a well-rounded understanding and think for yourself to form your own opinions. With education someone can learn what they need to live a successful life; however, money does not teach you what you need in life. Education also teaches you how to contribute to society.
A debater loses points for finishing more than 15 seconds before the allotted time, or 15 seconds after the allotted time. During each presentation, the debater must speak fluently, use gestures, accentuate keywords, and maintain a good posture. And this brings us to the parameters for judging a debate.
In this section, we'll explore how to develop debating skills and unlock your potential. 1. Research and Stay Informed. Start by researching a wide range of topics and staying up-to-date with current events. Read reputable sources, explore different perspectives, and deepen your knowledge on various subjects.
Many young people marry for money rather than love. Security is more important than happiness. Materialism influences education, too. Students acquire knowledge not for its own sake, but for a bigger wage. Students choose business courses rather than liberal arts for the sake of earning big money in the future.
Practicing debate is a personal growth powerhouse activity! It trains you to think deeply about a topic, communicate persuasively, and become flexible with your perspectives.It also trains your critical thinking and public speaking skills.. While two people could debate anything, finding the right topic can bring passion and inspiration to the conversation, where there is a fire in the room ...
Money Provides Security for Future Generations. Money can provide security for future generations. With money, you can invest in your children's education and ensure they have a better future ...
Education is better than money for several key reasons: 1) Education provides lifelong skills and knowledge that allow one to secure meaningful employment and earn money, whereas money alone will eventually run out. 2) Without a strong educational foundation, it is nearly impossible to land a good job and earn a stable income to support oneself and one's family. 3) Education brings intrinsic ...
The teacher pay debate will be examined in a three-part article. When respondents are not provided any salary information for context, an Education Next poll found 72% of the general population believes public school teacher salaries should increase. When provided with teacher salary information, that percentage fell to 56 — yet still over ...
For all that, though, the substance of the debate will come down to the business of answering questions and sketching a vision for voters. After four years in which education has loomed large in ...
The debates also seemed to influence the candidates: 18 months after the election, MPs who had participated in a debate spent more discretionary funds on development projects in their constituency.