literature synthesis

Literature Syntheis 101

How To Synthesise The Existing Research (With Examples)

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewer: Eunice Rautenbach (DTech) | August 2023

One of the most common mistakes that students make when writing a literature review is that they err on the side of describing the existing literature rather than providing a critical synthesis of it. In this post, we’ll unpack what exactly synthesis means and show you how to craft a strong literature synthesis using practical examples.

This post is based on our popular online course, Literature Review Bootcamp . In the course, we walk you through the full process of developing a literature review, step by step. If it’s your first time writing a literature review, you definitely want to use this link to get 50% off the course (limited-time offer).

Overview: Literature Synthesis

• What exactly does “synthesis” mean?
• Aspect 1: Agreement
• Aspect 2: Disagreement
• Aspect 3: Key theories
• Aspect 4: Contexts
• Aspect 5: Methodologies
• Bringing it all together

What does “synthesis” actually mean?

As a starting point, let’s quickly define what exactly we mean when we use the term “synthesis” within the context of a literature review.

Simply put, literature synthesis means going beyond just describing what everyone has said and found. Instead, synthesis is about bringing together all the information from various sources to present a cohesive assessment of the current state of knowledge in relation to your study’s research aims and questions .

Put another way, a good synthesis tells the reader exactly where the current research is “at” in terms of the topic you’re interested in – specifically, what’s known , what’s not , and where there’s a need for more research .

So, how do you go about doing this?

Well, there’s no “one right way” when it comes to literature synthesis, but we’ve found that it’s particularly useful to ask yourself five key questions when you’re working on your literature review. Having done so,  you can then address them more articulately within your actual write up. So, let’s take a look at each of these questions.

1. Points Of Agreement

The first question that you need to ask yourself is: “Overall, what things seem to be agreed upon by the vast majority of the literature?”

For example, if your research aim is to identify which factors contribute toward job satisfaction, you’ll need to identify which factors are broadly agreed upon and “settled” within the literature. Naturally, there may at times be some lone contrarian that has a radical viewpoint , but, provided that the vast majority of researchers are in agreement, you can put these random outliers to the side. That is, of course, unless your research aims to explore a contrarian viewpoint and there’s a clear justification for doing so. 

Identifying what’s broadly agreed upon is an essential starting point for synthesising the literature, because you generally don’t want (or need) to reinvent the wheel or run down a road investigating something that is already well established . So, addressing this question first lays a foundation of “settled” knowledge.

Need a helping hand?

2. Points Of Disagreement

Related to the previous point, but on the other end of the spectrum, is the equally important question: “Where do the disagreements lie?” .

In other words, which things are not well agreed upon by current researchers? It’s important to clarify here that by disagreement, we don’t mean that researchers are (necessarily) fighting over it – just that there are relatively mixed findings within the empirical research , with no firm consensus amongst researchers.

This is a really important question to address as these “disagreements” will often set the stage for the research gap(s). In other words, they provide clues regarding potential opportunities for further research, which your study can then (hopefully) contribute toward filling. If you’re not familiar with the concept of a research gap, be sure to check out our explainer video covering exactly that .

3. Key Theories

The next question you need to ask yourself is: “Which key theories seem to be coming up repeatedly?” .

Within most research spaces, you’ll find that you keep running into a handful of key theories that are referred to over and over again. Apart from identifying these theories, you’ll also need to think about how they’re connected to each other. Specifically, you need to ask yourself:

• Are they all covering the same ground or do they have different focal points  or underlying assumptions ?
• Do some of them feed into each other and if so, is there an opportunity to integrate them into a more cohesive theory?
• Do some of them pull in different directions ? If so, why might this be?
• Do all of the theories define the key concepts and variables in the same way, or is there some disconnect? If so, what’s the impact of this ?

Simply put, you’ll need to pay careful attention to the key theories in your research area, as they will need to feature within your theoretical framework , which will form a critical component within your final literature review. This will set the foundation for your entire study, so it’s essential that you be critical in this area of your literature synthesis.

If this sounds a bit fluffy, don’t worry. We deep dive into the theoretical framework (as well as the conceptual framework) and look at practical examples in Literature Review Bootcamp . If you’d like to learn more, take advantage of our limited-time offer to get 60% off the standard price.

4. Contexts

The next question that you need to address in your literature synthesis is an important one, and that is: “Which contexts have (and have not) been covered by the existing research?” .

For example, sticking with our earlier hypothetical topic (factors that impact job satisfaction), you may find that most of the research has focused on white-collar , management-level staff within a primarily Western context, but little has been done on blue-collar workers in an Eastern context. Given the significant socio-cultural differences between these two groups, this is an important observation, as it could present a contextual research gap .

In practical terms, this means that you’ll need to carefully assess the context of each piece of literature that you’re engaging with, especially the empirical research (i.e., studies that have collected and analysed real-world data). Ideally, you should keep notes regarding the context of each study in some sort of catalogue or sheet, so that you can easily make sense of this before you start the writing phase. If you’d like, our free literature catalogue worksheet is a great tool for this task.

5. Methodological Approaches

Last but certainly not least, you need to ask yourself the question: “What types of research methodologies have (and haven’t) been used?”

For example, you might find that most studies have approached the topic using qualitative methods such as interviews and thematic analysis. Alternatively, you might find that most studies have used quantitative methods such as online surveys and statistical analysis.

But why does this matter?

Well, it can run in one of two potential directions . If you find that the vast majority of studies use a specific methodological approach, this could provide you with a firm foundation on which to base your own study’s methodology . In other words, you can use the methodologies of similar studies to inform (and justify) your own study’s research design .

On the other hand, you might argue that the lack of diverse methodological approaches presents a research gap , and therefore your study could contribute toward filling that gap by taking a different approach. For example, taking a qualitative approach to a research area that is typically approached quantitatively. Of course, if you’re going to go against the methodological grain, you’ll need to provide a strong justification for why your proposed approach makes sense. Nevertheless, it is something worth at least considering.

Regardless of which route you opt for, you need to pay careful attention to the methodologies used in the relevant studies and provide at least some discussion about this in your write-up. Again, it’s useful to keep track of this on some sort of spreadsheet or catalogue as you digest each article, so consider grabbing a copy of our free literature catalogue if you don’t have anything in place.

Bringing It All Together

Alright, so we’ve looked at five important questions that you need to ask (and answer) to help you develop a strong synthesis within your literature review.  To recap, these are:

• Which things are broadly agreed upon within the current research?
• Which things are the subject of disagreement (or at least, present mixed findings)?
• Which theories seem to be central to your research topic and how do they relate or compare to each other?
• Which contexts have (and haven’t) been covered?
• Which methodological approaches are most common?

Importantly, you’re not just asking yourself these questions for the sake of asking them – they’re not just a reflection exercise. You need to weave your answers to them into your actual literature review when you write it up. How exactly you do this will vary from project to project depending on the structure you opt for, but you’ll still need to address them within your literature review, whichever route you go.

The best approach is to spend some time actually writing out your answers to these questions, as opposed to just thinking about them in your head. Putting your thoughts onto paper really helps you flesh out your thinking . As you do this, don’t just write down the answers – instead, think about what they mean in terms of the research gap you’ll present , as well as the methodological approach you’ll take . Your literature synthesis needs to lay the groundwork for these two things, so it’s essential that you link all of it together in your mind, and of course, on paper.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Literature Review Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

excellent , thank you

Thank you for this significant piece of information.

This piece of information is very helpful. Thank you so much and look forward to hearing more literature review from you in near the future.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• University of Oregon Libraries
• Research Guides

How to Write a Literature Review

• 6. Synthesize
• Literature Reviews: A Recap
• Reading Journal Articles
• Does it Describe a Literature Review?
• 1. Identify the Question
• 2. Review Discipline Styles
• Searching Article Databases
• Finding Full-Text of an Article
• Citation Chaining
• When to Stop Searching
• 4. Manage Your References
• 5. Critically Analyze and Evaluate

Synthesis Visualization

Synthesis matrix example.

• 7. Write a Literature Review

• Synthesis Worksheet

About Synthesis

Approaches to Synthesis

You can sort the literature in various ways, for example:

How to Begin?

Read your sources carefully and find the main idea(s) of each source

Look for similarities in your sources – which sources are talking about the same main ideas? (for example, sources that discuss the historical background on your topic)

Use the worksheet (above) or synthesis matrix (below) to get organized

This work can be messy. Don't worry if you have to go through a few iterations of the worksheet or matrix as you work on your lit review!

Four Examples of Student Writing

In the four examples below, only ONE shows a good example of synthesis: the fourth column, or  Student D . For a web accessible version, click the link below the image.

Long description of "Four Examples of Student Writing" for web accessibility

• Download a copy of the "Four Examples of Student Writing" chart

Click on the example to view the pdf.

From Jennifer Lim

• << Previous: 5. Critically Analyze and Evaluate
• Next: 7. Write a Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: Aug 12, 2024 11:48 AM
• URL: https://researchguides.uoregon.edu/litreview

Contact Us Library Accessibility UO Libraries Privacy Notices and Procedures

1501 Kincaid Street Eugene, OR 97403 P: 541-346-3053 F: 541-346-3485

• Visit us on Facebook
• Visit us on Twitter
• Visit us on Youtube
• Visit us on Instagram
• Report a Concern
• Nondiscrimination and Title IX
• Accessibility
• Privacy Policy
• Find People

The Sheridan Libraries

• Write a Literature Review
• Sheridan Libraries
• Evaluate This link opens in a new window

Get Organized

• Lit Review Prep Use this template to help you evaluate your sources, create article summaries for an annotated bibliography, and a synthesis matrix for your lit review outline.

Synthesize your Information

Synthesize: combine separate elements to form a whole.

Synthesis Matrix

A synthesis matrix helps you record the main points of each source and document how sources relate to each other.

After summarizing and evaluating your sources, arrange them in a matrix or use a citation manager to help you see how they relate to each other and apply to each of your themes or variables.  

By arranging your sources by theme or variable, you can see how your sources relate to each other, and can start thinking about how you weave them together to create a narrative.

• Step-by-Step Approach
• Example Matrix from NSCU
• Matrix Template
• << Previous: Summarize
• Next: Integrate >>
• Last Updated: Jul 30, 2024 1:42 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.jhu.edu/lit-review

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Working with sources
• Synthesizing Sources | Examples & Synthesis Matrix

Synthesizing Sources | Examples & Synthesis Matrix

Published on July 4, 2022 by Eoghan Ryan . Revised on May 31, 2023.

Synthesizing sources involves combining the work of other scholars to provide new insights. It’s a way of integrating sources that helps situate your work in relation to existing research.

Synthesizing sources involves more than just summarizing . You must emphasize how each source contributes to current debates, highlighting points of (dis)agreement and putting the sources in conversation with each other.

You might synthesize sources in your literature review to give an overview of the field or throughout your research paper when you want to position your work in relation to existing research.

Table of contents

Example of synthesizing sources, how to synthesize sources, synthesis matrix, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about synthesizing sources.

Let’s take a look at an example where sources are not properly synthesized, and then see what can be done to improve it.

This paragraph provides no context for the information and does not explain the relationships between the sources described. It also doesn’t analyze the sources or consider gaps in existing research.

Research on the barriers to second language acquisition has primarily focused on age-related difficulties. Building on Lenneberg’s (1967) theory of a critical period of language acquisition, Johnson and Newport (1988) tested Lenneberg’s idea in the context of second language acquisition. Their research seemed to confirm that young learners acquire a second language more easily than older learners. Recent research has considered other potential barriers to language acquisition. Schepens, van Hout, and van der Slik (2022) have revealed that the difficulties of learning a second language at an older age are compounded by dissimilarity between a learner’s first language and the language they aim to acquire. Further research needs to be carried out to determine whether the difficulty faced by adult monoglot speakers is also faced by adults who acquired a second language during the “critical period.”

Scribbr Citation Checker New

The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:

• Missing commas and periods
• Incorrect usage of “et al.”
• Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
• Missing reference entries

To synthesize sources, group them around a specific theme or point of contention.

As you read sources, ask:

• What questions or ideas recur? Do the sources focus on the same points, or do they look at the issue from different angles?
• How does each source relate to others? Does it confirm or challenge the findings of past research?
• Where do the sources agree or disagree?

Once you have a clear idea of how each source positions itself, put them in conversation with each other. Analyze and interpret their points of agreement and disagreement. This displays the relationships among sources and creates a sense of coherence.

Consider both implicit and explicit (dis)agreements. Whether one source specifically refutes another or just happens to come to different conclusions without specifically engaging with it, you can mention it in your synthesis either way.

Synthesize your sources using:

• Topic sentences to introduce the relationship between the sources
• Signal phrases to attribute ideas to their authors
• Transition words and phrases to link together different ideas

To more easily determine the similarities and dissimilarities among your sources, you can create a visual representation of their main ideas with a synthesis matrix . This is a tool that you can use when researching and writing your paper, not a part of the final text.

In a synthesis matrix, each column represents one source, and each row represents a common theme or idea among the sources. In the relevant rows, fill in a short summary of how the source treats each theme or topic.

This helps you to clearly see the commonalities or points of divergence among your sources. You can then synthesize these sources in your work by explaining their relationship.

If you want to know more about ChatGPT, AI tools , citation , and plagiarism , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• ChatGPT vs human editor
• ChatGPT citations
• Is ChatGPT trustworthy?
• Using ChatGPT for your studies
• What is ChatGPT?
• Chicago style
• Paraphrasing

 Plagiarism

• Types of plagiarism
• Self-plagiarism
• Avoiding plagiarism
• Academic integrity
• Consequences of plagiarism
• Common knowledge

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Synthesizing sources means comparing and contrasting the work of other scholars to provide new insights.

It involves analyzing and interpreting the points of agreement and disagreement among sources.

You might synthesize sources in your literature review to give an overview of the field of research or throughout your paper when you want to contribute something new to existing research.

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

Topic sentences help keep your writing focused and guide the reader through your argument.

In an essay or paper , each paragraph should focus on a single idea. By stating the main idea in the topic sentence, you clarify what the paragraph is about for both yourself and your reader.

At college level, you must properly cite your sources in all essays , research papers , and other academic texts (except exams and in-class exercises).

Add a citation whenever you quote , paraphrase , or summarize information or ideas from a source. You should also give full source details in a bibliography or reference list at the end of your text.

The exact format of your citations depends on which citation style you are instructed to use. The most common styles are APA , MLA , and Chicago .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Ryan, E. (2023, May 31). Synthesizing Sources | Examples & Synthesis Matrix. Scribbr. Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/synthesizing-sources/

Is this article helpful?

Eoghan Ryan

Other students also liked, signal phrases | definition, explanation & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, how to find sources | scholarly articles, books, etc., get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Literature Synthesis: Guide To Synthesise & Write Literature Review

Literature synthesis is a crucial skill for researchers and scholars, allowing them to integrate findings from multiple sources into a coherent analysis. Mastering literature synthesis will enhance your research and writing skills. 

This guide will walk you through the process of synthesising and writing a literature review, providing practical steps and insider tips. Learn how to:

• organise your sources,
• identify key themes, and
• create a cohesive narrative that highlights both agreements and disagreements within the existing literature.

Literature Synthesis vs Literature Review

You may be familiar with literature review, and the term literature synthesis may throw you off a bit. Are they a similar thing, or something different from each other?

If you are still unsure about how literature synthesis is different from literature review, here are a couple of points to think about: 

Approach To Sources

One difference is the approach to sources. In a literature review, you might describe each source separately, detailing its findings and contributions.

With synthesis, you combine the ideas from multiple sources to highlight relationships and gaps.

One example would be you may find that several studies agree on a particular theme but use different methodologies to reach their conclusions.

Organisation

A second difference is the organization. Literature reviews typically follow a structured format, summarizing each source in a new paragraph.

In contrast, synthesis requires organising sources around key themes or topics. This might involve using a synthesis matrix to align findings and theories from different sources into a cohesive analysis.

How To Evaluate Literature

Evaluating the literature also differs. When you write a literature review, you summarise and describe the existing research. Synthesis goes further by:

• critically evaluating the sources,
• identifying points of agreement and disagreement, and
• assessing the overall state of knowledge.

You need to address the methodological approaches used and how they relate to your research questions.

In terms of purpose, a literature review provides an overview of what’s known about a topic. It sets the stage for your research by summarising existing knowledge.

Synthesis, meanwhile, aims to create new insights by combining and contrasting different sources. This process helps you identify research gaps and questions that need further investigation.

Writing Process

Finally, the writing process differs. A literature review involves compiling summaries, often following a step-by-step guide.

With synthesis, you need to integrate:

• theories, and
• methodologies from various sources.

This involves weaving together different perspectives into a single, cohesive narrative that supports your research aims.

How To Perform Literature Synthesis?

Performing literature synthesis can be daunting, but by breaking it down step by step, you can create a comprehensive and coherent analysis of your topic.

Here’s a guide to help you through the process, with insider details and practical examples that will make your task easier.

Organise Your Sources

First, you need to gather and organise your sources. Start by conducting a thorough search of the existing literature on your topic, using

• research guides,
• library databases, and
• academic journals to find relevant sources.

There are plenty of AI tools that can help with process as well – make sure you check out my guide on best AI tools for literature review.

Record the main points of each source in a summary table. This table should include columns for:

• the author,
• publication year,
• key points,
• methodologies used, and

By organising your sources in this way, you’ll have a clear overview of the existing literature.

Identify Themes

Once you have your sources organised, it’s time to start synthesising the literature. This means combining the ideas and findings from multiple sources to create a cohesive analysis.

Begin by identifying the key themes that emerge from your sources. These themes will form the basis of your synthesis.

Suppose you are you’re researching job satisfaction, In this case, you might find recurring themes such as work-life balance, salary, and workplace environment.

Create A Synthesis Matrix

Next, create a synthesis matrix. This tool helps you organize the key points from each source under the identified themes.

Each row in the matrix represents a source, and each column represents a theme.

By filling in the matrix, you can see how different sources relate to each theme. This will help you identify similarities and differences between the sources.

Write Your Literature Synthesis

With your synthesis matrix in hand, you can start writing your literature synthesis.

Begin each paragraph with a clear topic sentence that identifies the theme you’re discussing. Then, weave together the findings from different sources, highlighting points of agreement and disagreement.

One way you may write this include: “While Franz (2008) found that salary is a major factor in job satisfaction, Goldstein (2012) argued that work-life balance plays a more significant role.”

Critically Evaluate Your Sources

Be sure to critically evaluate the sources as you synthesize the literature. This means assessing the methodologies used in each study and considering their impact on the findings.

Let’s say you found that most studies on job satisfaction used qualitative methods , you might question whether the findings would differ if quantitative methods were used. Addressing these methodological differences can help you identify research gaps and areas for further study.

Don’t Just Summarise

As you write your paragraphs, avoid simply summarising each source. Instead, combine the key points from multiple sources to create a more comprehensive analysis.

If we reuse Franz (2008) as example, rather than describing Franz’s study in one paragraph and Goldstein’s study in another, integrate their findings to show how they relate to each other.

This approach will make your synthesis more cohesive and easier to follow.

Address The Broader Context Of The Topic

To create a strong synthesis, you also need to address the broader context of your research. This means considering the theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence that underpin your topic.

If you’re researching job satisfaction, you might discuss how different theories of motivation relate to your findings. By integrating these broader perspectives, you can provide a more comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge.

Keep Questioning Yourself

Throughout the writing process, keep the five key questions in mind:

• What’s broadly agreed upon within the current research?
• Where do the disagreements lie?
• Which theories are central to your research topic?
• Which contexts have been covered, and which haven’t?
• What types of research methodologies have been used?

Addressing these questions will help you create a more thorough and insightful synthesis.

Revise & Edit

Finally, revise and edit your work. This means checking for clarity, coherence, and logical flow. Make sure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and that all sentences within the paragraph relate to that topic.

Remove any unnecessary information and ensure that your synthesis is well-organised and easy to follow.

Your Guide To Synthesise Literature

Performing literature synthesis may seem overwhelming, but by following this step-by-step guide, you can create a comprehensive and cohesive analysis of your topic.

Use tools like summary tables and synthesis matrices to organise your sources, and focus on combining the key points from multiple sources to create a strong synthesis.

With careful planning and critical evaluation, you can produce a literature synthesis that provides valuable insights into your field of study.

Dr Andrew Stapleton has a Masters and PhD in Chemistry from the UK and Australia. He has many years of research experience and has worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow and Associate at a number of Universities. Although having secured funding for his own research, he left academia to help others with his YouTube channel all about the inner workings of academia and how to make it work for you.

Thank you for visiting Academia Insider.

We are here to help you navigate Academia as painlessly as possible. We are supported by our readers and by visiting you are helping us earn a small amount through ads and affiliate revenue - Thank you!

2024 © Academia Insider

How to Synthesize Written Information from Multiple Sources

Shona McCombes

Content Manager

B.A., English Literature, University of Glasgow

Shona McCombes is the content manager at Scribbr, Netherlands.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

On This Page:

When you write a literature review or essay, you have to go beyond just summarizing the articles you’ve read – you need to synthesize the literature to show how it all fits together (and how your own research fits in).

Synthesizing simply means combining. Instead of summarizing the main points of each source in turn, you put together the ideas and findings of multiple sources in order to make an overall point.

At the most basic level, this involves looking for similarities and differences between your sources. Your synthesis should show the reader where the sources overlap and where they diverge.

Unsynthesized Example

Franz (2008) studied undergraduate online students. He looked at 17 females and 18 males and found that none of them liked APA. According to Franz, the evidence suggested that all students are reluctant to learn citations style. Perez (2010) also studies undergraduate students. She looked at 42 females and 50 males and found that males were significantly more inclined to use citation software ( p < .05). Findings suggest that females might graduate sooner. Goldstein (2012) looked at British undergraduates. Among a sample of 50, all females, all confident in their abilities to cite and were eager to write their dissertations.

Synthesized Example

Studies of undergraduate students reveal conflicting conclusions regarding relationships between advanced scholarly study and citation efficacy. Although Franz (2008) found that no participants enjoyed learning citation style, Goldstein (2012) determined in a larger study that all participants watched felt comfortable citing sources, suggesting that variables among participant and control group populations must be examined more closely. Although Perez (2010) expanded on Franz’s original study with a larger, more diverse sample…

Step 1: Organize your sources

After collecting the relevant literature, you’ve got a lot of information to work through, and no clear idea of how it all fits together.

Before you can start writing, you need to organize your notes in a way that allows you to see the relationships between sources.

One way to begin synthesizing the literature is to put your notes into a table. Depending on your topic and the type of literature you’re dealing with, there are a couple of different ways you can organize this.

Summary table

A summary table collates the key points of each source under consistent headings. This is a good approach if your sources tend to have a similar structure – for instance, if they’re all empirical papers.

Each row in the table lists one source, and each column identifies a specific part of the source. You can decide which headings to include based on what’s most relevant to the literature you’re dealing with.

For example, you might include columns for things like aims, methods, variables, population, sample size, and conclusion.

For each study, you briefly summarize each of these aspects. You can also include columns for your own evaluation and analysis.

The summary table gives you a quick overview of the key points of each source. This allows you to group sources by relevant similarities, as well as noticing important differences or contradictions in their findings.

Synthesis matrix

A synthesis matrix is useful when your sources are more varied in their purpose and structure – for example, when you’re dealing with books and essays making various different arguments about a topic.

Each column in the table lists one source. Each row is labeled with a specific concept, topic or theme that recurs across all or most of the sources.

Then, for each source, you summarize the main points or arguments related to the theme.

The purposes of the table is to identify the common points that connect the sources, as well as identifying points where they diverge or disagree.

Step 2: Outline your structure

Now you should have a clear overview of the main connections and differences between the sources you’ve read. Next, you need to decide how you’ll group them together and the order in which you’ll discuss them.

For shorter papers, your outline can just identify the focus of each paragraph; for longer papers, you might want to divide it into sections with headings.

There are a few different approaches you can take to help you structure your synthesis.

If your sources cover a broad time period, and you found patterns in how researchers approached the topic over time, you can organize your discussion chronologically .

That doesn’t mean you just summarize each paper in chronological order; instead, you should group articles into time periods and identify what they have in common, as well as signalling important turning points or developments in the literature.

If the literature covers various different topics, you can organize it thematically .

That means that each paragraph or section focuses on a specific theme and explains how that theme is approached in the literature.

Source Used with Permission: The Chicago School

If you’re drawing on literature from various different fields or they use a wide variety of research methods, you can organize your sources methodologically .

That means grouping together studies based on the type of research they did and discussing the findings that emerged from each method.

If your topic involves a debate between different schools of thought, you can organize it theoretically .

That means comparing the different theories that have been developed and grouping together papers based on the position or perspective they take on the topic, as well as evaluating which arguments are most convincing.

Step 3: Write paragraphs with topic sentences

What sets a synthesis apart from a summary is that it combines various sources. The easiest way to think about this is that each paragraph should discuss a few different sources, and you should be able to condense the overall point of the paragraph into one sentence.

This is called a topic sentence , and it usually appears at the start of the paragraph. The topic sentence signals what the whole paragraph is about; every sentence in the paragraph should be clearly related to it.

A topic sentence can be a simple summary of the paragraph’s content:

“Early research on [x] focused heavily on [y].”

For an effective synthesis, you can use topic sentences to link back to the previous paragraph, highlighting a point of debate or critique:

“Several scholars have pointed out the flaws in this approach.” “While recent research has attempted to address the problem, many of these studies have methodological flaws that limit their validity.”

By using topic sentences, you can ensure that your paragraphs are coherent and clearly show the connections between the articles you are discussing.

As you write your paragraphs, avoid quoting directly from sources: use your own words to explain the commonalities and differences that you found in the literature.

Don’t try to cover every single point from every single source – the key to synthesizing is to extract the most important and relevant information and combine it to give your reader an overall picture of the state of knowledge on your topic.

Step 4: Revise, edit and proofread

Like any other piece of academic writing, synthesizing literature doesn’t happen all in one go – it involves redrafting, revising, editing and proofreading your work.

Checklist for Synthesis

•   Do I introduce the paragraph with a clear, focused topic sentence?
•   Do I discuss more than one source in the paragraph?
•   Do I mention only the most relevant findings, rather than describing every part of the studies?
•   Do I discuss the similarities or differences between the sources, rather than summarizing each source in turn?
•   Do I put the findings or arguments of the sources in my own words?
•   Is the paragraph organized around a single idea?
•   Is the paragraph directly relevant to my research question or topic?
•   Is there a logical transition from this paragraph to the next one?

Further Information

How to Synthesise: a Step-by-Step Approach

Help…I”ve Been Asked to Synthesize!

Learn how to Synthesise (combine information from sources)

How to write a Psychology Essay

Literature Review How To

• Things To Consider
• Synthesizing Sources
• Video Tutorials
• Books On Literature Reviews

What is Synthesis

What is Synthesis? Synthesis writing is a form of analysis related to comparison and contrast, classification and division. On a basic level, synthesis requires the writer to pull together two or more summaries, looking for themes in each text. In synthesis, you search for the links between various materials in order to make your point. Most advanced academic writing, including literature reviews, relies heavily on synthesis. (Temple University Writing Center)  

How To Synthesize Sources in a Literature Review

Literature reviews synthesize large amounts of information and present it in a coherent, organized fashion. In a literature review you will be combining material from several texts to create a new text – your literature review.

You will use common points among the sources you have gathered to help you synthesize the material. This will help ensure that your literature review is organized by subtopic, not by source. This means various authors' names can appear and reappear throughout the literature review, and each paragraph will mention several different authors. 

When you shift from writing summaries of the content of a source to synthesizing content from sources, there is a number things you must keep in mind: 

• Look for specific connections and or links between your sources and how those relate to your thesis or question.
• When writing and organizing your literature review be aware that your readers need to understand how and why the information from the different sources overlap.
• Organize your literature review by the themes you find within your sources or themes you have identified. 
• << Previous: Things To Consider
• Next: Video Tutorials >>
• Last Updated: Nov 30, 2018 4:51 PM
• URL: https://libguides.csun.edu/literature-review

Report ADA Problems with Library Services and Resources

Library Guides

Literature reviews: synthesis.

• Criticality

Synthesise Information

So, how can you create paragraphs within your literature review that demonstrates your knowledge of the scholarship that has been done in your field of study?  

You will need to present a synthesis of the texts you read.  

Doug Specht, Senior Lecturer at the Westminster School of Media and Communication, explains synthesis for us in the following video:  

Synthesising Texts  

What is synthesis? 

Synthesis is an important element of academic writing, demonstrating comprehension, analysis, evaluation and original creation.  

With synthesis you extract content from different sources to create an original text. While paraphrase and summary maintain the structure of the given source(s), with synthesis you create a new structure.  

The sources will provide different perspectives and evidence on a topic. They will be put together when agreeing, contrasted when disagreeing. The sources must be referenced.  

Perfect your synthesis by showing the flow of your reasoning, expressing critical evaluation of the sources and drawing conclusions.  

When you synthesise think of "using strategic thinking to resolve a problem requiring the integration of diverse pieces of information around a structuring theme" (Mateos and Sole 2009, p448). 

Synthesis is a complex activity, which requires a high degree of comprehension and active engagement with the subject. As you progress in higher education, so increase the expectations on your abilities to synthesise. 

How to synthesise in a literature review: 

Identify themes/issues you'd like to discuss in the literature review. Think of an outline.  

Read the literature and identify these themes/issues.  

Critically analyse the texts asking: how does the text I'm reading relate to the other texts I've read on the same topic? Is it in agreement? Does it differ in its perspective? Is it stronger or weaker? How does it differ (could be scope, methods, year of publication etc.). Draw your conclusions on the state of the literature on the topic.  

Start writing your literature review, structuring it according to the outline you planned.  

Put together sources stating the same point; contrast sources presenting counter-arguments or different points.  

Present your critical analysis.  

Always provide the references. 

The best synthesis requires a "recursive process" whereby you read the source texts, identify relevant parts, take notes, produce drafts, re-read the source texts, revise your text, re-write... (Mateos and Sole, 2009). 

What is good synthesis?  

The quality of your synthesis can be assessed considering the following (Mateos and Sole, 2009, p439):  

Integration and connection of the information from the source texts around a structuring theme. 

Selection of ideas necessary for producing the synthesis. 

Appropriateness of the interpretation.  

Elaboration of the content.  

Example of Synthesis

Original texts (fictitious): 

Synthesis: 

Animal experimentation is a subject of heated debate. Some argue that painful experiments should be banned. Indeed it has been demonstrated that such experiments make animals suffer physically and psychologically (Chowdhury 2012; Panatta and Hudson 2016). On the other hand, it has been argued that animal experimentation can save human lives and reduce harm on humans (Smith 2008). This argument is only valid for toxicological testing, not for tests that, for example, merely improve the efficacy of a cosmetic (Turner 2015). It can be suggested that animal experimentation should be regulated to only allow toxicological risk assessment, and the suffering to the animals should be minimised.   

Bibliography

Mateos, M. and Sole, I. (2009). Synthesising Information from various texts: A Study of Procedures and Products at Different Educational Levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education,  24 (4), 435-451. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178760 [Accessed 29 June 2021].

• << Previous: Structure
• Next: Criticality >>
• Last Updated: Nov 18, 2023 10:56 PM
• URL: https://libguides.westminster.ac.uk/literature-reviews

CONNECT WITH US

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 7: Synthesizing Sources

Learning objectives.

At the conclusion of this chapter, you will be able to:

• synthesize key sources connecting them with the research question and topic area.

7.1 Overview of synthesizing

7.1.1 putting the pieces together.

Combining separate elements into a whole is the dictionary definition of synthesis.  It is a way to make connections among and between numerous and varied source materials.  A literature review is not an annotated bibliography, organized by title, author, or date of publication.  Rather, it is grouped by topic to create a whole view of the literature relevant to your research question.

Your synthesis must demonstrate a critical analysis of the papers you collected as well as your ability to integrate the results of your analysis into your own literature review.  Each paper collected should be critically evaluated and weighed for “adequacy, appropriateness, and thoroughness” ( Garrard, 2017 ) before inclusion in your own review.  Papers that do not meet this criteria likely should not be included in your literature review.

Begin the synthesis process by creating a grid, table, or an outline where you will summarize, using common themes you have identified and the sources you have found. The summary grid or outline will help you compare and contrast the themes so you can see the relationships among them as well as areas where you may need to do more searching. Whichever method you choose, this type of organization will help you to both understand the information you find and structure the writing of your review.  Remember, although “the means of summarizing can vary, the key at this point is to make sure you understand what you’ve found and how it relates to your topic and research question” ( Bennard et al., 2014 ).

As you read through the material you gather, look for common themes as they may provide the structure for your literature review.  And, remember, research is an iterative process: it is not unusual to go back and search information sources for more material.

At one extreme, if you are claiming, ‘There are no prior publications on this topic,’ it is more likely that you have not found them yet and may need to broaden your search.  At another extreme, writing a complete literature review can be difficult with a well-trod topic.  Do not cite it all; instead cite what is most relevant.  If that still leaves too much to include, be sure to reference influential sources…as well as high-quality work that clearly connects to the points you make. ( Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley, 2005 ).

7.2 Creating a summary table

Literature reviews can be organized sequentially or by topic, theme, method, results, theory, or argument.  It’s important to develop categories that are meaningful and relevant to your research question.  Take detailed notes on each article and use a consistent format for capturing all the information each article provides.  These notes and the summary table can be done manually, using note cards.  However, given the amount of information you will be recording, an electronic file created in a word processing or spreadsheet is more manageable. Examples of fields you may want to capture in your notes include:

• Authors’ names
• Article title
• Publication year
• Main purpose of the article
• Methodology or research design
• Participants
• Measurement
• Conclusions

  Other fields that will be useful when you begin to synthesize the sum total of your research:

• Specific details of the article or research that are especially relevant to your study
• Key terms and definitions
• Strengths or weaknesses in research design
• Relationships to other studies
• Possible gaps in the research or literature (for example, many research articles conclude with the statement “more research is needed in this area”)
• Finally, note how closely each article relates to your topic.  You may want to rank these as high, medium, or low relevance.  For papers that you decide not to include, you may want to note your reasoning for exclusion, such as ‘small sample size’, ‘local case study,’ or ‘lacks evidence to support assertion.’

This short video demonstrates how a nursing researcher might create a summary table.

7.2.1 Creating a Summary Table

  Summary tables can be organized by author or by theme, for example:

For a summary table template, see http://blogs.monm.edu/writingatmc/files/2013/04/Synthesis-Matrix-Template.pdf

7.3 Creating a summary outline

An alternate way to organize your articles for synthesis it to create an outline. After you have collected the articles you intend to use (and have put aside the ones you won’t be using), it’s time to identify the conclusions that can be drawn from the articles as a group.

  Based on your review of the collected articles, group them by categories.  You may wish to further organize them by topic and then chronologically or alphabetically by author.  For each topic or subtopic you identified during your critical analysis of the paper, determine what those papers have in common.  Likewise, determine which ones in the group differ.  If there are contradictory findings, you may be able to identify methodological or theoretical differences that could account for the contradiction (for example, differences in population demographics).  Determine what general conclusions you can report about the topic or subtopic as the entire group of studies relate to it.  For example, you may have several studies that agree on outcome, such as ‘hands on learning is best for science in elementary school’ or that ‘continuing education is the best method for updating nursing certification.’ In that case, you may want to organize by methodology used in the studies rather than by outcome.

Organize your outline in a logical order and prepare to write the first draft of your literature review.  That order might be from broad to more specific, or it may be sequential or chronological, going from foundational literature to more current.  Remember, “an effective literature review need not denote the entire historical record, but rather establish the raison d’etre for the current study and in doing so cite that literature distinctly pertinent for theoretical, methodological, or empirical reasons.” ( Milardo, 2015, p. 22 ).

As you organize the summarized documents into a logical structure, you are also appraising and synthesizing complex information from multiple sources.  Your literature review is the result of your research that synthesizes new and old information and creates new knowledge.

7.4 Additional resources:

Literature Reviews: Using a Matrix to Organize Research / Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota

Literature Review: Synthesizing Multiple Sources / Indiana University

Writing a Literature Review and Using a Synthesis Matrix / Florida International University

 Sample Literature Reviews Grid / Complied by Lindsay Roberts

Select three or four articles on a single topic of interest to you. Then enter them into an outline or table in the categories you feel are important to a research question. Try both the grid and the outline if you can to see which suits you better. The attached grid contains the fields suggested in the video .

Literature Review Table  

Test Yourself

• Select two articles from your own summary table or outline and write a paragraph explaining how and why the sources relate to each other and your review of the literature.
• In your literature review, under what topic or subtopic will you place the paragraph you just wrote?

Image attribution

Literature Reviews for Education and Nursing Graduate Students Copyright © by Linda Frederiksen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Literature Reviews

• 5. Synthesize your findings
• Getting started
• Types of reviews
• 1. Define your research question
• 2. Plan your search
• 3. Search the literature
• 4. Organize your results

How to synthesize

Approaches to synthesis.

• 6. Write the review
• Artificial intelligence (AI) tools
• Thompson Writing Studio This link opens in a new window
• Need to write a systematic review? This link opens in a new window

Contact a Librarian

Ask a Librarian

In the synthesis step of a literature review, researchers analyze and integrate information from selected sources to identify patterns and themes. This involves critically evaluating findings, recognizing commonalities, and constructing a cohesive narrative that contributes to the understanding of the research topic.

Here are some examples of how to approach synthesizing the literature:

💡 By themes or concepts

🕘 Historically or chronologically

📊 By methodology

These organizational approaches can also be used when writing your review. It can be beneficial to begin organizing your references by these approaches in your citation manager by using folders, groups, or collections.

Create a synthesis matrix

A synthesis matrix allows you to visually organize your literature.

Topic: ______________________________________________

Topic: Chemical exposure to workers in nail salons

• << Previous: 4. Organize your results
• Next: 6. Write the review >>
• Last Updated: Aug 20, 2024 3:37 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.duke.edu/litreviews

Services for...

• Faculty & Instructors
• Graduate Students
• Undergraduate Students
• International Students
• Patrons with Disabilities

• Harmful Language Statement
• Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
• Support the Libraries

A Guide to Evidence Synthesis: What is Evidence Synthesis?

• Meet Our Team
• Our Published Reviews and Protocols
• What is Evidence Synthesis?
• Types of Evidence Synthesis
• Evidence Synthesis Across Disciplines
• Finding and Appraising Existing Systematic Reviews
• 0. Develop a Protocol
• 1. Draft your Research Question
• 2. Select Databases
• 3. Select Grey Literature Sources
• 4. Write a Search Strategy
• 5. Register a Protocol
• 6. Translate Search Strategies
• 7. Citation Management
• 8. Article Screening
• 9. Risk of Bias Assessment
• 10. Data Extraction
• 11. Synthesize, Map, or Describe the Results
• Evidence Synthesis Institute for Librarians
• Open Access Evidence Synthesis Resources

What are Evidence Syntheses?

What are evidence syntheses.

According to the Royal Society, 'evidence synthesis' refers to the process of bringing together information from a range of sources and disciplines to inform debates and decisions on specific issues. They generally include a methodical and comprehensive literature synthesis focused on a well-formulated research question.  Their aim is to identify and synthesize all  of the scholarly research on a particular topic, including both published and unpublished studies. Evidence syntheses are conducted in an unbiased, reproducible way to provide evidence for practice and policy-making, as well as to identify gaps in the research. Evidence syntheses may also include a meta-analysis, a more quantitative process of synthesizing and visualizing data retrieved from various studies. 

Evidence syntheses are much more time-intensive than traditional literature reviews and require a multi-person research team. See this PredicTER tool to get a sense of a systematic review timeline (one type of evidence synthesis). Before embarking on an evidence synthesis, it's important to clearly identify your reasons for conducting one. For a list of types of evidence synthesis projects, see the next tab.

How Does a Traditional Literature Review Differ From an Evidence Synthesis?

How does a systematic review differ from a traditional literature review.

One commonly used form of evidence synthesis is a systematic review.  This table compares a traditional literature review with a systematic review.

Video: Reproducibility and transparent methods (Video 3:25)

Reporting Standards

There are some reporting standards for evidence syntheses. These can serve as guidelines for protocol and manuscript preparation and journals may require that these standards are followed for the review type that is being employed (e.g. systematic review, scoping review, etc). ​

• PRISMA checklist Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
• PRISMA-P Standards An updated version of the original PRISMA standards for protocol development.
• PRISMA - ScR Reporting guidelines for scoping reviews and evidence maps
• PRISMA-IPD Standards Extension of the original PRISMA standards for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data.
• EQUATOR Network The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is an international initiative that seeks to improve the reliability and value of published health research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting and wider use of robust reporting guidelines. They provide a list of various standards for reporting in systematic reviews.

Video: Guidelines and reporting standards

PRISMA Flow Diagram

The  PRISMA  flow diagram depicts the flow of information through the different phases of an evidence synthesis. It maps the search (number of records identified), screening (number of records included and excluded), and selection (reasons for exclusion).  Many evidence syntheses include a PRISMA flow diagram in the published manuscript.

See below for resources to help you generate your own PRISMA flow diagram.

• PRISMA Flow Diagram Tool
• PRISMA Flow Diagram Word Template
• << Previous: Our Published Reviews and Protocols
• Next: Types of Evidence Synthesis >>
• Last Updated: Aug 5, 2024 2:03 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.cornell.edu/evidence-synthesis

Academic Research: Literature Synthesis

• Research Information Guide
• Research Ethics
• Planning Research
• Study Design
• Data Analysis
• Self-Guided Learning
• Planning Search
• Literature Analysis
• Literature Synthesis
• Information Resources
• Citation Management
• Data Management Plan
• Writing Guidelines
• Academic Writing
• Medical Writing
• Literature Review
• Academic Publication
• Self-Guided learning

Literature synthesis is a process of analyzing various material (textual, statistical, graphical, programming, and other) to understand the studied phenomenon by defining the differences, similarities, relationships, and new ideas, which emerge after interpreting published information, statements, arguments.  Analysis of published literature is a process of asking questions about the information, meaning, goal, and implication of published research. Questions based on -  what, why, when, where, who - provide an insight for analysis of published literature, evaluation, and interpretation.   

Four synthesis types are defined from integrative literature reviews

• Research agenda - identified from the critical analysis through the provocative question or proposition that is used for the next studies
• Conceptual constructs - provides an analysis of the classification of constructs to classify previous research, which provided the direction for new theories
• Alternative models or conceptual frameworks - new thinking about the published topics. Alternative models and conceptions are proposed deriving from critical analysis and synthesis
• Metatheory - integration, and synthesis of literature review provides the foundation for further development of the metatheory across the theoretical domains

Adapted from  Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples.  Human resource development review ,  4 (3), 356-367.

Literature Annotation   

• Passive - light process (e.g., underlining and highlighting)
• Active - thought-process (e.g., questions, observation, summary, and other
• SIFT annotation - symbols, imagery, figurative language, tone, theme)

Questions 

• What are the question and answer?
• What are the main ideas and findings in the article?
• What are the unique methods and techniques?
• What are the patterns in the published literature?
• Is there a collaborative pattern in published research? 
• How this article relevant to the study?
• What are the important concepts?
• Individual interpretation 

Image Annotation 

• Ramisa A, Yan F, Moreno-Noguer F, Mikolajczyk K. BreakingNews: Article Annotation by Image and Text Processing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2018 May;40(5):1072-1085. Epub 2017 Jun 30. PMID: 28682246.
• Pelka O, Nensa F, Friedrich CM. Annotation of enhanced radiographs for medical image retrieval with deep convolutional neural networks. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206229. PMID: 30419028; PMCID: PMC6231616.

Critically Appraised Topic

Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) - is a “summary of a search and critical appraisal of the literature related to a focused clinical question, which should be kept in an easily accessible place so that it can be used to help make clinical decisions” Dawes, M. (2005). Critically appraised topics and evidence-based medicine journals. Singapore Medical Journal, 46(9), 442.

"5S" Pyramid of Evidence Resources

Graph by Dr. Tmanova. 

Based on the "5S" Pyramid of Evidence Resources from the Indiana University School of Medicine Libraries, the Dartmouth /Yale EBM Page Generator and Haynes RB, ACP J Club 2006;145(3):A8.

What is a Scientific Knowledge?

• Description - observational analysis of the phenomenon by describing its characteristics 
• Analysis - evaluating the studies phenomenon to conclude by testing assumptions through the analytical processes by evaluating studies characteristics 
• Correlation - analysis of relationships among studied phenomena
• Comparison - analysis of the differences and similarities 
• Prediction - predictive forecast on emerging phenomenon based on information and knowledge
• Control/validation - correlation, cause-effect
• Categorization - typology, specification 
• Explanation - study hypothesis, research questions - what, when, why, how, where, who

Selected key concept on scientific information cycle and management at Information Management guide  !  Note: additional resources on the information management and knowledge management are at the designing phase. 

EBM Appraisal Tools

• Critical Appraisal Checklist, CASP
• Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Studies Sheet
• Diagnostics 
• Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
• Systematic review
• IDP Review Sheet 

Citation management, annotation, and synthesis 

Tools useful for information and citation management, annotation, and synthesis: 

• EndNote 
• Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative reviews of the literature: Methods and purposes.  International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET) ,  7 (3), 62-70.
• Klopper, R., Lubbe, S., & Rugbeer, H. (2007). The matrix method of literature review.  Alternation ,  14 (1), 262-276. For more books and journals, browse  DML Book Catalog  and  DML A-Z Journal Catalog , and  DML Database Catalog . Schedule  Consultation  on finding associated sources. 

Services We Offer

Research Information Ask the Library Clinical Support CME / CE Links Copyright Overview Interlibrary Loan Library Instruction Suggest a Purchase

Resources Available

Information by specialty.

Academic Research Information Guide Current Events: COVID-19 Current Events: Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Internal Medicine Portal Military Sites Pediatrics Portal Professional Reading (In Progress) All Other Portals

Information for You

Other questions.

Disclaimer: The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the Department of Defense, Defense Health Agency of non-U.S. Government sites or the information, products, or services contained therein. Although the Darnall Medical Library, WRNMMC may or may not use these sites as additional distribution channels for Department of Defense information, it does not exercise editorial control over all of the information that you may find at these locations. Such hyperlinks are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this website.

• << Previous: Literature Analysis
• Next: Information Resources >>
• Last Updated: Jul 8, 2024 4:27 PM
• URL: https://wrnmmc.libguides.com/sci_initiative_ar

Darnall Medical Library | Walter Reed NMMC | Building 1, Room 3458 | 8955 Wood Road | Bethesda, MD 20889 | 301-295-1184/85 | Open Monday-Friday, 0700-1630

After-hours access to the library is available to WRNMMC Staff via the CDO at 301-295-4611.

Literature Review Basics

• What is a Literature Review?
• Synthesizing Research
• Using Research & Synthesis Tables
• Additional Resources

Synthesis: What is it?

First, let's be perfectly clear about what synthesizing your research isn't :

• - It isn't  just summarizing the material you read
• - It isn't  generating a collection of annotations or comments (like an annotated bibliography)
• - It isn't  compiling a report on every single thing ever written in relation to your topic

When you  synthesize  your research, your job is to help your reader understand the current state of the conversation on your topic, relative to your research question.  That may include doing the following:

• - Selecting and using representative work on the topic
• - Identifying and discussing trends in published data or results
• - Identifying and explaining the impact of common features (study populations, interventions, etc.) that appear frequently in the literature
• - Explaining controversies, disputes, or central issues in the literature that are relevant to your research question
• - Identifying gaps in the literature, where more research is needed
• - Establishing the discussion to which your own research contributes and demonstrating the value of your contribution

Essentially, you're telling your reader where they are (and where you are) in the scholarly conversation about your project.

Synthesis: How do I do it?

Synthesis, step by step.

This is what you need to do  before  you write your review.

• Identify and clearly describe your research question (you may find the Formulating PICOT Questions table at  the Additional Resources tab helpful).
• Collect sources relevant to your research question.
• Organize and describe the sources you've found -- your job is to identify what  types  of sources you've collected (reviews, clinical trials, etc.), identify their  purpose  (what are they measuring, testing, or trying to discover?), determine the  level of evidence  they represent (see the Levels of Evidence table at the Additional Resources tab ), and briefly explain their  major findings . Use a Research Table to document this step.
• Study the information you've put in your Research Table and examine your collected sources, looking for  similarities  and  differences . Pay particular attention to  populations ,   methods  (especially relative to levels of evidence), and  findings .
• Analyze what you learn in (4) using a tool like a Synthesis Table. Your goal is to identify relevant themes, trends, gaps, and issues in the research.  Your literature review will collect the results of this analysis and explain them in relation to your research question.

Analysis tips

• - Sometimes, what you  don't  find in the literature is as important as what you do find -- look for questions that the existing research hasn't answered yet.
• - If any of the sources you've collected refer to or respond to each other, keep an eye on how they're related -- it may provide a clue as to whether or not study results have been successfully replicated.
• - Sorting your collected sources by level of evidence can provide valuable insight into how a particular topic has been covered, and it may help you to identify gaps worth addressing in your own work.
• << Previous: What is a Literature Review?
• Next: Using Research & Synthesis Tables >>
• Last Updated: Sep 26, 2023 12:06 PM
• URL: https://usi.libguides.com/literature-review-basics

Writing in the Health and Social Sciences

• Journal Publishing
• Style and Writing Guides
• Readings about Writing
• Resources for Dissertation Authors
• Citation Management and Formatting Tools

Systematic Literature Reviews: Steps & Resources

Literature review & systematic review steps.

• What are Literature Reviews?
• Conducting & Reporting Systematic Reviews
• Finding Systematic Reviews
• Tutorials & Tools for Literature Reviews

What are Systematic Reviews? (3 minutes, 24 second YouTube Video)

These steps for conducting a systematic literature review are listed below . 

Also see subpages for more information about:

• The different types of literature reviews, including systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis methods
• Tools & Tutorials
• Develop a Focused Question
• Scope the Literature  (Initial Search)
• Refine & Expand the Search
• Limit the Results
• Download Citations
• Abstract & Analyze
• Create Flow Diagram
• Synthesize & Report Results

1. Develop a Focused   Question 

Consider the PICO Format: Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome

Focus on defining the Population or Problem and Intervention (don't narrow by Comparison or Outcome just yet!)

"What are the effects of the Pilates method for patients with low back pain?"

Tools & Additional Resources:

• PICO Question Help
• Stillwell, Susan B., DNP, RN, CNE; Fineout-Overholt, Ellen, PhD, RN, FNAP, FAAN; Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek, PhD, RN, CPNP/PMHNP, FNAP, FAAN; Williamson, Kathleen M., PhD, RN Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical Question, AJN The American Journal of Nursing : March 2010 - Volume 110 - Issue 3 - p 58-61 doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368959.11129.79

2. Scope the Literature

A "scoping search" investigates the breadth and/or depth of the initial question or may identify a gap in the literature. 

Eligible studies may be located by searching in:

• Background sources (books, point-of-care tools)
• Article databases
• Trial registries
• Grey literature
• Cited references
• Reference lists

When searching, if possible, translate terms to controlled vocabulary of the database. Use text word searching when necessary.

Use Boolean operators to connect search terms:

• Combine separate concepts with AND  (resulting in a narrower search)
• Connecting synonyms with OR  (resulting in an expanded search)

Search:  pilates AND ("low back pain"  OR  backache )

Video Tutorials - Translating PICO Questions into Search Queries

• Translate Your PICO Into a Search in PubMed (YouTube, Carrie Price, 5:11) 
• Translate Your PICO Into a Search in CINAHL (YouTube, Carrie Price, 4:56)

3. Refine & Expand Your Search

Expand your search strategy with synonymous search terms harvested from:

• database thesauri
• reference lists
• relevant studies

Example: 

(pilates OR exercise movement techniques) AND ("low back pain" OR backache* OR sciatica OR lumbago OR spondylosis)

As you develop a final, reproducible strategy for each database, save your strategies in a:

• a personal database account (e.g., MyNCBI for PubMed)
• Log in with your NYU credentials
• Open and "Make a Copy" to create your own tracker for your literature search strategies

4. Limit Your Results

Use database filters to limit your results based on your defined inclusion/exclusion criteria.  In addition to relying on the databases' categorical filters, you may also need to manually screen results.  

• Limit to Article type, e.g.,:  "randomized controlled trial" OR multicenter study
• Limit by publication years, age groups, language, etc.

NOTE: Many databases allow you to filter to "Full Text Only".  This filter is  not recommended . It excludes articles if their full text is not available in that particular database (CINAHL, PubMed, etc), but if the article is relevant, it is important that you are able to read its title and abstract, regardless of 'full text' status. The full text is likely to be accessible through another source (a different database, or Interlibrary Loan).  

• Filters in PubMed
• CINAHL Advanced Searching Tutorial

5. Download Citations

Selected citations and/or entire sets of search results can be downloaded from the database into a citation management tool. If you are conducting a systematic review that will require reporting according to PRISMA standards, a citation manager can help you keep track of the number of articles that came from each database, as well as the number of duplicate records.

In Zotero, you can create a Collection for the combined results set, and sub-collections for the results from each database you search.  You can then use Zotero's 'Duplicate Items" function to find and merge duplicate records.

• Citation Managers - General Guide

6. Abstract and Analyze

• Migrate citations to data collection/extraction tool
• Screen Title/Abstracts for inclusion/exclusion
• Screen and appraise full text for relevance, methods, 
• Resolve disagreements by consensus

Covidence is a web-based tool that enables you to work with a team to screen titles/abstracts and full text for inclusion in your review, as well as extract data from the included studies.

• Covidence Support
• Critical Appraisal Tools
• Data Extraction Tools

7. Create Flow Diagram

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram is a visual representation of the flow of records through different phases of a systematic review.  It depicts the number of records identified, included and excluded.  It is best used in conjunction with the PRISMA checklist .

Example from: Stotz, S. A., McNealy, K., Begay, R. L., DeSanto, K., Manson, S. M., & Moore, K. R. (2021). Multi-level diabetes prevention and treatment interventions for Native people in the USA and Canada: A scoping review. Current Diabetes Reports, 2 (11), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-021-01414-3

• PRISMA Flow Diagram Generator (ShinyApp.io, Haddaway et al. )
• PRISMA Diagram Templates  (Word and PDF)
• Make a copy of the file to fill out the template
• Image can be downloaded as PDF, PNG, JPG, or SVG
• Covidence generates a PRISMA diagram that is automatically updated as records move through the review phases

8. Synthesize & Report Results

There are a number of reporting guideline available to guide the synthesis and reporting of results in systematic literature reviews.

It is common to organize findings in a matrix, also known as a Table of Evidence (ToE).

• Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews
• Download a sample template of a health sciences review matrix  (GoogleSheets)

Steps modified from: 

Cook, D. A., & West, C. P. (2012). Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach.   Medical Education , 46 (10), 943–952.

• << Previous: Citation Management and Formatting Tools
• Next: What are Literature Reviews? >>
• Last Updated: Aug 13, 2024 4:59 PM
• URL: https://guides.nyu.edu/healthwriting

Literature Review: A Self-Guided Tutorial for NUR 288

• Literature Reviews: A Recap
• Peer-Review
• Reading the Literature
• Developing Research Questions
• 2. Review discipline styles
• Super Searching
• Finding the Full Text
• Citation Searching
• Evaluating online information
• When to stop searching
• How to cite your sources following APA
• In-Text Citations
• Keeping track of your references
• Annotating Articles Tip
• 5. Critically analyze and evaluate
• How to review the literature

Using a synthesis matrix

• 7. Write literature review

Synthesize : combine separate elements to form a whole.

Why use a synthesis matrix? 

• A synthesis matrix helps you record the main points of each source and document how sources relate to each other.
• After summarizing and evaluating your sources, arrange them in a matrix or use a citation manager to help you see how they relate to each other and apply to each of your themes or variables.  
• By arranging your sources by theme or variable, you can see how your sources relate to each other, and can start thinking about how you weave them together to create a narrative.

A synthesis matrix visually represents your research by organizing your sources by themes:

Add each article citation to the Source column and begin to identify the theme(s) from the article. 

Use the Excel template below to help you evaluate your sources, create article summaries for an annotated bibliography, and a synthesis matrix for your lit review outline. From John Hopkins Sheridan Libraries.  

NOTE : There are several tabs at the bottom of the Excel spreadsheet to help guide you with this method.

• Literature Review Prep - with Synthesis Matrix
• << Previous: How to review the literature
• Next: 7. Write literature review >>
• Last Updated: Aug 22, 2024 10:27 AM
• URL: https://libguides.wccnet.edu/literature_review

We apologize for any inconvenience as we update our site to a new look.

• Walden University
• Faculty Portal

Using Evidence: Synthesis

Synthesis video playlist.

Note that these videos were created while APA 6 was the style guide edition in use. There may be some examples of writing that have not been updated to APA 7 guidelines.

Basics of Synthesis

As you incorporate published writing into your own writing, you should aim for synthesis of the material.

Synthesizing requires critical reading and thinking in order to compare different material, highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. When writers synthesize successfully, they present new ideas based on interpretations of other evidence or arguments. You can also think of synthesis as an extension of—or a more complicated form of—analysis. One main difference is that synthesis involves multiple sources, while analysis often focuses on one source.

Conceptually, it can be helpful to think about synthesis existing at both the local (or paragraph) level and the global (or paper) level.

Local Synthesis

Local synthesis occurs at the paragraph level when writers connect individual pieces of evidence from multiple sources to support a paragraph’s main idea and advance a paper’s thesis statement. A common example in academic writing is a scholarly paragraph that includes a main idea, evidence from multiple sources, and analysis of those multiple sources together.

Global Synthesis

Global synthesis occurs at the paper (or, sometimes, section) level when writers connect ideas across paragraphs or sections to create a new narrative whole. A literature review , which can either stand alone or be a section/chapter within a capstone, is a common example of a place where global synthesis is necessary. However, in almost all academic writing, global synthesis is created by and sometimes referred to as good cohesion and flow.

Synthesis in Literature Reviews

While any types of scholarly writing can include synthesis, it is most often discussed in the context of literature reviews. Visit our literature review pages for more information about synthesis in literature reviews.

Didn't find what you need? Email us at [email protected] .

• Previous Page: Analysis
• Next Page: Citing Sources Properly
• Office of Student Disability Services

Walden Resources

Departments.

• Academic Residencies
• Academic Skills
• Career Planning and Development
• Customer Care Team
• Field Experience
• Military Services
• Student Success Advising
• Writing Skills

Centers and Offices

• Center for Social Change
• Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
• Office of Degree Acceleration
• Office of Research and Doctoral Services
• Office of Student Affairs

Student Resources

• Doctoral Writing Assessment
• Form & Style Review
• Quick Answers
• ScholarWorks
• SKIL Courses and Workshops
• Walden Bookstore
• Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
• Student Safety/Title IX
• Legal & Consumer Information
• Website Terms and Conditions
• Cookie Policy
• Accessibility
• Accreditation
• State Authorization
• Net Price Calculator
• Contact Walden

Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Synthesizing Sources

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

When you look for areas where your sources agree or disagree and try to draw broader conclusions about your topic based on what your sources say, you are engaging in synthesis. Writing a research paper usually requires synthesizing the available sources in order to provide new insight or a different perspective into your particular topic (as opposed to simply restating what each individual source says about your research topic).

Note that synthesizing is not the same as summarizing.  

• A summary restates the information in one or more sources without providing new insight or reaching new conclusions.
• A synthesis draws on multiple sources to reach a broader conclusion.

There are two types of syntheses: explanatory syntheses and argumentative syntheses . Explanatory syntheses seek to bring sources together to explain a perspective and the reasoning behind it. Argumentative syntheses seek to bring sources together to make an argument. Both types of synthesis involve looking for relationships between sources and drawing conclusions.

In order to successfully synthesize your sources, you might begin by grouping your sources by topic and looking for connections. For example, if you were researching the pros and cons of encouraging healthy eating in children, you would want to separate your sources to find which ones agree with each other and which ones disagree.

After you have a good idea of what your sources are saying, you want to construct your body paragraphs in a way that acknowledges different sources and highlights where you can draw new conclusions.

As you continue synthesizing, here are a few points to remember:

• Don’t force a relationship between sources if there isn’t one. Not all of your sources have to complement one another.
• Do your best to highlight the relationships between sources in very clear ways.
• Don’t ignore any outliers in your research. It’s important to take note of every perspective (even those that disagree with your broader conclusions).

Example Syntheses

Below are two examples of synthesis: one where synthesis is NOT utilized well, and one where it is.

Parents are always trying to find ways to encourage healthy eating in their children. Elena Pearl Ben-Joseph, a doctor and writer for KidsHealth , encourages parents to be role models for their children by not dieting or vocalizing concerns about their body image. The first popular diet began in 1863. William Banting named it the “Banting” diet after himself, and it consisted of eating fruits, vegetables, meat, and dry wine. Despite the fact that dieting has been around for over a hundred and fifty years, parents should not diet because it hinders children’s understanding of healthy eating.

In this sample paragraph, the paragraph begins with one idea then drastically shifts to another. Rather than comparing the sources, the author simply describes their content. This leads the paragraph to veer in an different direction at the end, and it prevents the paragraph from expressing any strong arguments or conclusions.

An example of a stronger synthesis can be found below.

Parents are always trying to find ways to encourage healthy eating in their children. Different scientists and educators have different strategies for promoting a well-rounded diet while still encouraging body positivity in children. David R. Just and Joseph Price suggest in their article “Using Incentives to Encourage Healthy Eating in Children” that children are more likely to eat fruits and vegetables if they are given a reward (855-856). Similarly, Elena Pearl Ben-Joseph, a doctor and writer for Kids Health , encourages parents to be role models for their children. She states that “parents who are always dieting or complaining about their bodies may foster these same negative feelings in their kids. Try to keep a positive approach about food” (Ben-Joseph). Martha J. Nepper and Weiwen Chai support Ben-Joseph’s suggestions in their article “Parents’ Barriers and Strategies to Promote Healthy Eating among School-age Children.” Nepper and Chai note, “Parents felt that patience, consistency, educating themselves on proper nutrition, and having more healthy foods available in the home were important strategies when developing healthy eating habits for their children.” By following some of these ideas, parents can help their children develop healthy eating habits while still maintaining body positivity.

In this example, the author puts different sources in conversation with one another. Rather than simply describing the content of the sources in order, the author uses transitions (like "similarly") and makes the relationship between the sources evident.

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Synthesis and Application of Ti/La Based Composite Catalyst for Triglyceride Conversion into Biodiesel

• Original Paper
• Published: 20 August 2024

Cite this article

• Hamza Zahoor 1 ,
• Romana Khan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-0914 2 ,
• Sadia Nasreen 3 ,
• Syed Nasir Shah 4 ,
• Raja Muhammad Asif Khan 5 ,
• Muhammad Usman 6 &
• Ihsanullah Sohoo 7  

Explore all metrics

The search for substitute fuels has motivated researchers to explore alternate attractive options such as conversion of used oils to biodiesel. This study is focused on the production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil by developing a porcelain supported titanium and lanthanum oxide based composite catalyst. This heterogeneous composite catalyst was synthesized by the wet-impregnation method. The reaction procedure as well as reaction parameters like methanol to oil molar ratio, different catalyst loading, reaction temperature, reaction time, and reusability of catalyst was investigated. The results show that with the help of Ti: La: Porcelain, the yield of biodiesel produced was 94% at ≥ 90 ° C in 7 h. For both catalysts, 5 wt% of catalyst based on oil, 36:1 methanol/oil molar ratio was reused 5 times with regeneration. Different characterization of porcelain supported titanium and lanthanum Oxides before and after trans-esterification were performed using x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) techniques. The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique was used to analyze synthesized biodiesel. The physiochemical properties of the synthesized biodiesel were performed as well, and color changes were also scrutinized. A static immersion test of copper, aluminum, zinc, iron and stainless steel in the blend of prepared biodiesel/diesel was conducted at room temperature (25 –27 °C) for 720 h utilizing the conventional method of measuring weight loss. The findings of the study revealed that blend of biodiesel/diesel sample was less corrosive to these materials compared to literature at room temperature.

Biodiesel synthesis from low grade waste cooking oil was studied.

Developed a heterogeneous composite catalyst titanium and lanthanum oxide.

Supported catalyst on porcelain support for recovery and recycling.

Catalyst characterization using SEM, EDX, X-ray diffraction, BET surface area and Hammett indicators.

The results show using Ti: La: Porcelain catalyst the biodiesel produced was 94% at ≥ 90 ° C in 7 h under optimum conditions.

The blend of biodiesel/diesel produced was of good quality and less corrosive compared to literature at room temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Optimized Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) using Calcium Oxide (CaO) Nano-catalyst

Production of waste vegetable oil biodiesel using calcined periwinkle shells as catalyst

Alumina supported zinc oxide catalyst for production of biodiesel from kesambi oil and optimization to achieve highest yields of biodiesel, explore related subjects.

• Environmental Chemistry

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abdoli, M.A.F., Ghobadian, M.B., Fayyazi, E.: Effective parameters on biodiesel production from feather fat oil as a cost-effective feedstock. Int. J. Environ. Reseach. 8 (1), 139–148 (2014). https://doi.org/10.22059/IJER.2014.703

Article   Google Scholar  

Sahani, S., Roy, T., Sharma, Y.C.: Clean and efficient production of biodiesel using barium cerate as a heterogeneous catalyst for the biodiesel production; kinetics and thermodynamic study. J. Clean. Prod. 237 , 117699 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117699

Sharman, Y.C., Singh, B.: Development of biodiesel: Current scenario. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 , 1646–1651 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.009

Chen, C.L., Huang, C.C., Tran, D.T., Chang, J.S.: Biodiesel synthesis via heterogeneous catalysis using modified strontium oxides as the catalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 113 , 8–13 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.142

Semwal, S., Arora, A.K., Badoni, R.P., Tuli, D.K.: Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 102 , 2151–2161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.080

Lee, A.F., Bennett, J.A., Manayil, J.C., Wilson, K.: Heterogeneous catalysis for sustainable biodiesel production via esterification and transesterification. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 , 7887–7916 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00189C

Banerjee, S., Rout, S., Banerjee, S., Atta, A., Das, D.: Fe 2 O 3 nanocatalyst aided transesterification for biodiesel production from lipid-intact wet microalgal biomass: A biorefinery approach. Energy. Conv. Manag. 195 , 844–853 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.060

Gupta, A.R., Yadav, S.V., Rathod, V.K.: Enhancement in biodiesel production using waste cooking oil and calcium diglyceroxide as a heterogeneous catalyst in presence of ultrasound. Fuel. 158 , 800–806 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.064

Maneerung, T., Kawi, S., Dai, Y., Wang, C.H.: Sustainable biodiesel production via transesterification of waste cooking oil by using CaO catalysts prepared from chicken manure. Energy. Conv. Manag. 123 , 487–497 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.071

Tran, T.T.V., Kaiprommarat, S., Kongparakul, S., Reubroycharoen, P., Guan, G., Nguyen, M.H.: Green biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using an environmentally benign acid catalyst. Waste Manage. 52 , 367–374 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.053 Samart, C.

Vyas, A.P., Verma, J.L., Subrahmanyam, N.: A review on FAME production processes. Fuel. 89 , 1–9 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.014

Yusoff, M.F.M., Xu, X., Guo, Z.: Comparison of fatty acid methyl and ethyl esters as biodiesel base stock: A review on processing and production requirements. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 91 , 525–531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-014-2443-0

Azad, A.K., Rasul, M.G.M., Khan, M.K., Sharma, S.C., Mofijur, M., Bhuiya, M.M.K.: Prospects, feedstocks and challenges of biodiesel production from beauty leaf oil and castor oil: A nonedible oil sources in Australia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 61 , 302–318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.013

(a)Zabeti, M., Daud, W.M.A.W., Aroua, M.K.: Optimization of the activity of CaO/Al 2 O 3 catalyst for biodiesel production using response surface methodology. Applied Catalysis A: General 366: 154–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.06.047 . (b) Zabeti, M., Daud, W.M.A.W., Aroua, M.K., Activity of solid catalysts for biodiesel production: a review. Fuel Processing Technology 90: 770–777. (2009) https://doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.03.010

Zabeti, M., Daud, W.M.A.W., Aroua, M.K.:) Biodiesel production using alumina-supported calcium oxide: An optimization study. Fuel Processing Technology 91: 243–248 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.10.004

Kim, M., DiMaggio, C., Salley, S.O., Ng, K.Y.S.: A new generation of zirconia supported metal oxide catalysts for converting low grade renewable feedstocks to biodiesel. Bioresour. Technol. 118 , 37–42 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.035

DiSerio, M., Carotenuto, G., Cucciolito, M.E., Lega, M., Ruffo, F., Tesser, R., Trifuoggi, M.: Shiff base complexes of zinc (II) as catalysts for biodiesel production, (2012). J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 353 : 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2011.11.012

Yan, F., Yuan, Z., Lu, P., Luo, W., Yang, L., Deng, L.: Fe–Zn double-metal cyanide complexes catalyzed biodiesel production from high-acid-value oil. Renew. Energy. 36 , 2026–2031 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.10.032

Chen, W., Huang, Z., Liu, Y., He, Q.: Preparation and characterization of a novel solid base catalyst hydroxyapatite loaded with strontium. Catal Commun. 9 , 516–521 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2007.02.011

Teng, G., Gao, L., Xiao, G., Liu, H., Lv, J.: Biodiesel preparation from jatropha curcas oil catalyzed by hydrotalcite loaded with K 2 CO 3 . Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162 , 1725–1736 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-8953-9

Liu, H., Su, L., Liu, F., Li, C., Solomon, U.U.: Cinder supported K 2 CO 3 as catalyst for biodiesel production. Appl. Catal. B. 106 , 550–558 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.06.015

Shiratori, Y., Quang-Tuyen, T., Umemura, Y., Kitaoka, T., Sasaki, K.: Paper- structured catalyst for the steam reforming of biodiesel fuel. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 38 , 11278–11287 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.080

Nasreen, S., Liu, H., Skala, D., Waseem, A., Wan, L.: Preparation of biodiesel from soybean oil using La/Mn oxide catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 131 , 290–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.11.029

Sun, H., Ding, Y., Duan, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Lou, H.: Transesterification of sunflower oil to biodiesel on ZrO 2 supported La 2 O 3 catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 101 , 953–958 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.089 Zheng, X.

Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Teo, S.H., Rashid, U., Islam, A., Hussien, M.Z., Lee, K.T.: Transesterification of Jatropha curcas crude oil to biodiesel on calcium lanthanum mixed oxide catalyst: Effect of stoichiometric composition. Energy. Conv. Manag. 88 , 1290–1296 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.075

Rabiah, N.M.F., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Rashid, U., Teo, S.H., Shajaratun, N.Z.A., Islam, A.: Production of biodiesel from non-edible Jatropha curcas oil via transesterification using Bi 2 O 3 –La 2 O 3 catalyst. Energy. Conv. Manag. 88 , 1257–1262 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.072

Carlucci, C., Degennaro, L., Luisi, R.: Titanium dioxide as a catalyst in biodiesel production. Catalysts. 9 , 75–100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9010075

Prabhahar, P. R.S.S., Benitha V.S., Nagarajan J.: Improved yield of palm oil biodiesel through nano catalytic transesterification. Mater. Today: Proc. 46 , 8433–8437 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.473

Ahmad, I., Khan, M.A., Shakirullah, M., Ishaq, M., Ahmad, R., Urrehman, H.: Study on influence of catalyst on product distribution during liquefaction of Pakistani coal. Energy. Conv. Manag. 48 , 2502–2507 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.04.015 Ur rehman, S.

Dai, Y.M., Lin, J.H., Chen, H.C., Chen, C.C.: Potential of using ceramics wastes as a solid catalyst in biodiesel production. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 91 , 427–433 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.06.026

Sahani, S., Roy, T., Sharma, Y.C.: Smart waste management of waste cooking oil for large scale high quality biodiesel production using Sr-Ti mixed metal oxide as solid catalyst: Optimization and E-metrics studies. Waste Manage. 108 , 189–201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.036

Roy, T., Sahani, S., Sharma, Y.C.: Green synthesis of biodiesel from Ricinus communis oil (castor seed oil) using potassium promoted lanthanum oxide catalyst: Kinetic, thermodynamic and environmental studies. Fuel. 274 , 117644 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117644

Nasreen, S., Nafees, M., Jaffar, M.M., Qurashi, L., Tabraiz, A.S., Khan, R.: Comparison and effect of Cinder supported with Manganese and Lanthanum oxide for biodiesel production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 42 , 18389–18396 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.157

López-Gayarre, F., López-Colina, C., Serrano-López, M., García Taengua, A.E., López Martínez, A.: Assessment of properties of recycled concrete by means of a highly fractioned factorial design of experiment. Constr. Build. Mater. 25 , 3802–3809 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.039

Malaviya, A., Shetty, M., Varghese, M., Bhatia, P.: Laboratory Scale production of bio-oil from Oscillatoria algae and its application in production of biodiesel. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol. 8 (2), 243–250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST218228

Al-Marzouki, H., Jeffery, C., Khater, G.: Evaluation of Saudi pegmatite and its use in porcelain industry. Process. Application Ceram. 6 , 133–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2298/PAC1203133A

Lee, C.S., Park, S.W., Kwon, S.I.: An experimental study on the atomization and combustion characteristics of biodiesel-blended fuels. Energy Fuels. 19 , 2201–2208 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef050026h

Fraer, R., Dinh, H., McCormick, R.L., Chandler, K., Buchholz, B.: Operating experience and teardown analysis for engines operated on biodiesel blends (B20), NREL/CP-540-38509. Presented at the 2005 SAE Commercial Vehicle Engineering Conference, Rosemont, Illinois. (2005)

Maleque, M.A., Masjuki, H.H., Haseeb, A.: Effect of mechanical factors on tribological properties of palm oil methyl ester blended lubricant. Wear. 239 , 117–125 (2000)

Kalam, M.A., Masjuki, H.H.: Biodiesel from palmoil—an analysis of its properties and potential. Biomass Bioenerg. 23 , 471–479 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00085-5

Maru, M.M., Lucchese, M.M., Legnani, C., Quirino, W.G., Balbo, A., Aranha, I.B., Costa, L.T., Vilani, C., deSena, L., Damasceno, J.C., Cruz, T.D.S., Lidízio, L.R., Silva, R.F., Jorio, O., Achete, C.A.: Biodiesel compatibility with carbon steel and HDPE parts. Fuel Process. Technol. 90 , 1175–1182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.05.014

Kaul, S., Saxena, R.C., Kumar, A., Negi, M.S., Bhatnagar, A.K., Goyal, H.B., Gupta, A.K.: Corrosion behavior of biodiesel from seed oils of Indian origin on diesel engine parts. Fuel Process. Technol. 88 , 303–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.10.011

Tsuchiya, T., Shiotani, H., Goto, S., Sugiyama, G., Maeda, A.: Japanese standards for diesel fuel containing 5% FAME: Investigation of acid generation in FAME blended diesel fuels and its impact on corrosion, ed: SAE Technical Paper (2006). https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-3303

Afolabi, A.S.: Synergistic inhibition of potassium chromate and sodium nitrite on mild steel in chloride and sulphide media. Leonardo Electron. J. Practices Technol. 11 , 143–154 (2007)

Google Scholar  

Nasreen, S., Liu, H., Khan, R., Zhu, X., Skala, D.: Transesterification of soybean oil catalyzed by Sr-doped cinder. Energy Convers. Managemen. 95 , 272–280 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.006

Changmai, B., Vanlalveni, C., Ingle, A.P., Bhagat, R., Rokhum, S.L.: Widely used catalysts in biodiesel production: A review. RSC Adv. 10 , 41625–41679 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA07931F

Rizwanul, F.I., Ong, H., Mahlia, T., Mofijur, M., Silitonga, A., Rahman, S.: State of the art of catalysts for biodiesel production. Front. Energy Res. 8 , 101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00101 Ahmad, A.

Kondamudi, N., Mohapatra, S.K., Misra, M.: Quintinite as a bifunctional heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel synthesis. Appl. Catal. A. 393 , 36–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.11.025

Alsharifi, M., Znad, H., Hena, S., Ang, M.: Biodiesel production from canola oil using novel Li/TiO 2 as a heterogeneous catalyst prepared via impregnation method. Renew. Energy. 114 , 1077–1089 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.117

Abbas, J., Hussain, S., Iqbal, M.J., Nadeem, H., Qasim, M., Hina, S. Hafeez, F.: Oil industry waste: A potential feedstock for biodiesel production. Environ. Technol. 37 , 2082–2087 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1141997

Alhassan, F.H., Rashid, U., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.: Synthesis of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel via effectual recyclable bi-functional Fe 2 O 3 MnOSO 4 2– /ZrO 2 nanoparticle solid catalyst. Fuel. 142 , 38–45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.038

Mansir, N., Teo, S.H., Mijan, N.-A., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.: Efficient reaction for biodiesel manufacturing using bi-functional oxide catalyst. Catal Commun. 149 , 106201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2020.106201

Banerjee, S., Sahani, S., Sharma, Y.C.: Process dynamic investigations and emission analyses of biodiesel produced using Sr–Ce mixed metal oxide heterogeneous catalyst. J. Environ. Manage. 248 , 109218 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.119

Hardi, J., Sosidi, H., Ridhay, A., Agus, A.Y.: Production of biodiesel based on moringa seed oil at varied reaction times by using CaO catalyst from chicken eggshells. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1763 (012054) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1763/1/012054

Ho, W.W.S., Ng, H., Gan, H.K., Tan, S. SH: Evaluation of palm oil mill fly ash supported calcium oxide as a heterogeneous base catalyst in biodiesel synthesis from crude palm oil. Energy. Conv. Manag. 88 , 1167–1178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.061

Embong, N.H., Hindryawati, N., Bhuyar, P., Govindan, N., Rahim, M.H.A., Maniam, G.P.: (enhanced biodiesel production via esterification of palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) using rice husk ash (NiSO 4 )/SiO 2 catalyst. Appl. Nanosci. 13 , 2241–2249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-01922-4

Encinar, J.M., Pardal, A., Martínez, G.: Transesterification of rapeseed oil in subcritical methanol conditions. Fuel Processing Technology 94: 40–46, (2012). (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.10.018

Widayat., Fernanda, A.A.A., Silvie, E.S.: Palm Kernel Shell Biochar Catalyst for Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1053: 012064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1053/1/012064

Palitsakun, S., Koonkuer, K., Topool, B., Seubsai, A., Sudsakorn, K.: Transesterification of Jatropha oil to biodiesel using SrO catalysts modified with CaO from waste eggshell. Catal Commun. 149 , 106233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2020.106233

Kunjachan, C., Kurian, M.: Cerium oxide-based nanostructures as efficient catalysts for transesterification of methylacetate with n-butanol. Clean. Eng. Technol. 4 , 100232 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100232

Ahmad, M.S., Cheng, C.K., Bhuyar, P., Atabani, A., Pugazhendhi, A., Chi, N.T.L.: Effect of reaction conditions on the lifetime of SAPO-34 catalysts in methanol to olefins process–A review. Fuel. 283 , 118851 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118851 Witoon, T., Lim, J.W., Juan, J.C.

Kestigian, M., Ward, R.: The Preparation of lanthanum titanium oxide, LaTiO31. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 , 6027–6027 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01652a044

Benbertal, D., Mosset, A., Trombe, J.C.: Synthèse Et structure cristalline d’un nouveau silicate de lanthane et de titane. Mater. Res. Bull. 29 , 47–54 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(94)90104-X

Kahlenberg, V., Krüger, H.: LaAlSiO5 and apatite-type La9. 71 (Si0. 81Al0. 19O4) 6O2—the crystal structures of two synthetic lanthanum alumosilicates. Solid State Sci. 6 , 553–560 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.03.019

Singh, B., Korstad, J., Sharma, Y.C.: A critical review on corrosion of compression ignition (CI) engine parts by biodiesel and biodiesel blends and its inhibition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 , 3401–3408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.042

Hu, E., Xu, Y., Hu, X., Pan, L., Jiang, S.: Corrosion behaviors of metals in biodiesel from rapeseed oil and methanol. Renew. Energy. 37 , 371–378 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.07.010

Kugelmeier, C.L., Monteiro, M.R., da Silva, R., Kuri, S.E., Sordi, V.L., Della Rovere, A.C.: Corrosion behavior of carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum and copper upon exposure to biodiesel blended with petrodiesel. Energy. 226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120344

Fazal, M.A., Haseeb, A.S.M.A., Masjuki, H.H.: Comparative corrosive characteristics of petroleum diesel and palm biodiesel for automotive materials. Fuel Process. Technol. 91 , 1308–1315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.04.016

Gleiter, A., Riegert, G., Zweschper, T., Busse, G.: Ultrasound lock-in thermography for advanced depth resolved defect selective imaging. Insight-non-destructive testing and Condition Monitoring 49 : 272: 1354–2575. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2007.49.5.272

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Taxila for providing the materials, equipment and space used in this study.

No funding is received for this research.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Taxila, Rawalpindi, 47080, Pakistan

Hamza Zahoor

Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan

Romana Khan

Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Taxila, Rawalpindi, 47080, Pakistan

Sadia Nasreen

Research and Development Centre, Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA), P.O. Box 564, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Syed Nasir Shah

Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences (SNS), National University of Sciences and Technology H-12, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

Raja Muhammad Asif Khan

Institute for Water Resources and Water Supply, Hamburg University of Technology, Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 3, 20173, Hamburg, Germany

Muhammad Usman

Circular Resource Engineering and Management (CREM), Institute of Environmental Technology and Energy Economics, Hamburg University of Technology, Blohmstr. 15, 21079, Hamburg, Germany

Ihsanullah Sohoo

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romana Khan .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zahoor, H., Khan, R., Nasreen, S. et al. Synthesis and Application of Ti/La Based Composite Catalyst for Triglyceride Conversion into Biodiesel. Waste Biomass Valor (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-024-02689-9

Download citation

Received : 21 May 2024

Accepted : 04 August 2024

Published : 20 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-024-02689-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Wet-impregnation method
• Composite heterogenous catalyst
• Static immersion test
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Synthesis of multinational marine aquaculture and clean energy co-location

Marine co-location, i.e., multiple fixed ocean activities operating in the same place and at the same time, can maximize the space- and resource-use efficiency in crowded seascapes. While interest grows, commercial use is nascent and the collective benefits or limitations of co-locating aquatic food and clean energy remains scattered throughout the literature. In this study, we synthesize multinational findings of co-location scientific publications ( N  = 102) to better understand the patterns and knowledge gaps at the co-located ocean food-energy nexus. We track and compare food (aquaculture) and energy (tidal, offshore wind, and wave) co-located ocean activities, noting the focus (e.g., ecological), motivation (e.g., impact/risk), and assessment type (e.g., modeling), as well as nine key metrics of interest (depth, distance from shore, aquaculture yield, etc.), mainly for aquaculture co-location. We found the number of annual co-location publications increased over time and space but are largely concentrated in the North Sea ( n  = 39). We also found about half of publications include aquaculture, one-third of publications report at least one metric – reporting aquaculture yield was particularly rare ( n  = 1) – and few studies focused on impact/risk  (n  = 7). However, conducting a targeted  post-hoc  evaluation of North Sea gray literature ( N  = 61), due to this region’s importance in the field, showed more coverage of impacts/risk (e.g., liability) and similar attention to aquaculture. Of the scientific papers that did report metrics, the ranges of depth and distance exceeded those reported for standalone sectors, indicating co-location could be facilitating a “push” of ocean activities into farther offshore and/or deeper exposed waters. Ultimately, while aquaculture is commonly cited in the co-location literature, the shortage of metrics, like aquaculture yield, and possible impact/risk evaluations – though gray literature can provide critical insights – emphasizes the need for knowledge sharing and modeling to address and explore the uncertainty, especially for co-located aquaculture production. This study provides a needed snapshot of marine co-location, particularly in emerging regions, highlighting gaps in understanding aquaculture-energy potential in the oceans.