Table of contents. What not to include in your discussion section. Step 1: Summarize your key findings. Step 2: Give your interpretations. Step 3: Discuss the implications. Step 4: Acknowledge the limitations. Step 5: Share your recommendations. Discussion section example. Other interesting articles.
PDF Discussion Section for Research Papers
The discussion section is one of the final parts of a research paper, in which an author describes, analyzes, and interprets their findings. They explain the significance of those results and tie everything back to the research question(s). In this handout, you will find a description of what a discussion section does, explanations of how to ...
How to Write Discussions and Conclusions
Begin with a clear statement of the principal findings. This will reinforce the main take-away for the reader and set up the rest of the discussion. Explain why the outcomes of your study are important to the reader. Discuss the implications of your findings realistically based on previous literature, highlighting both the strengths and ...
8. The Discussion
The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because it: Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under investigation;
6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript
Example: This study explored a comprehensive list of adverse effects associated with the novel drug 'X'. However, long-term studies may be needed to confirm its safety, especially regarding major cardiac events. 5. Implications for future research—how to explore further¹⁻² Locate areas of your research where more investigation is needed.
Discussion Section of a Research Paper: Guide & Example
The discussion section of a research paper is where the author analyzes and explains the importance of the study's results. It presents the conclusions drawn from the study, compares them to previous research, and addresses any potential limitations or weaknesses. The discussion section should also suggest areas for future research.
PDF 7th Edition Discussion Phrases Guide
Papers usually end with a concluding section, often called the "Discussion.". The Discussion is your opportunity to evaluate and interpret the results of your study or paper, draw inferences and conclusions from it, and communicate its contributions to science and/or society. Use the present tense when writing the Discussion section.
How to Write the Discussion Section of a Research Paper
The discussion section provides an analysis and interpretation of the findings, compares them with previous studies, identifies limitations, and suggests future directions for research. This section combines information from the preceding parts of your paper into a coherent story. By this point, the reader already knows why you did your study ...
How to Write a Discussion Section for a Research Paper
Begin the Discussion section by restating your statement of the problem and briefly summarizing the major results. Do not simply repeat your findings. Rather, try to create a concise statement of the main results that directly answer the central research question that you stated in the Introduction section.
How to Write an Effective Discussion in a Research Paper; a Guide to
How to Write an Effective Discussion in a Research Paper; a Guide to Writing the Discussion Section of a Research Article April 2022 DOI: 10.33552/OAJAP.2022.05.000609
How To Write A Dissertation Discussion Chapter
Step 1: Restate your research problem and research questions. The first step in writing up your discussion chapter is to remind your reader of your research problem, as well as your research aim (s) and research questions. If you have hypotheses, you can also briefly mention these.
Discussion Section Examples and Writing Tips
This discussion example is from an engineering research paper. The authors are restating their aims first, which is to compare different types of storm-tracking software. Then, they are providing a brief summary of the methods. Here, they are testing different storm-tracking software under different conditions to see which performs the best.
Discussion
Discussion Section. The overall purpose of a research paper's discussion section is to evaluate and interpret results, while explaining both the implications and limitations of your findings. Per APA (2020) guidelines, this section requires you to "examine, interpret, and qualify the results and draw inferences and conclusions from them ...
Guide to Writing the Results and Discussion Sections of a ...
Tips to Write the Results Section. Direct the reader to the research data and explain the meaning of the data. Avoid using a repetitive sentence structure to explain a new set of data. Write and highlight important findings in your results. Use the same order as the subheadings of the methods section.
(PDF) How to Write an Effective Discussion
The discussion section, a systematic critical appraisal of results, is a key part of a research paper, wherein the authors define, critically examine, describe and interpret their findings ...
Organizing Academic Research Papers: 8. The Discussion
Organization and Structure. Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. Use the ...
How to Start a Discussion Section in Research? [with Examples]
The examples below are from 72,017 full-text PubMed research papers that I analyzed in order to explore common ways to start writing the Discussion section. Research papers included in this analysis were selected at random from those uploaded to PubMed Central between the years 2016 and 2021. Note that I used the BioC API to download the data ...
Research Guides: Writing a Scientific Paper: DISCUSSION
Papers that are submitted to a journal for publication are sent out to several scientists (peers) who look carefully at the paper to see if it is "good science". These reviewers then recommend to the editor of a journal whether or not a paper should be published. Most journals have publication guidelines. Ask for them and follow them exactly.
How to write a discussion section?
The discussion section can be written in 3 parts: an introductory paragraph, intermediate paragraphs and a conclusion paragraph. For intermediate paragraphs, a "divide and conquer" approach, meaning a full paragraph describing each of the study endpoints, can be used. In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice ...
How To Write a Discussion for a Research Paper in 7 Steps
Step 2: Interpret Your Results. In the next step, talk about what your findings really mean. Share why the information you gathered is important. Connect each result to the questions you were trying to answer and the goals you set for your research.
PDF Discussion and Conclusion Sections for Empirical Research Papers
In an empirical research paper, the purpose of the Discussion section is to interpret the results and discuss their implications, thereby establishing (and often qualifying) the practical and scholarly significance of the present study. It may be helpful to think of the Discussion section as the inverse of the introduction to an empirical ...
Exploration of the creative processes in animals, robots, and ...
This paper provides a platform for a reflective discussion: ethologists, neuroscientists, philosophers, and bioinformaticians converge in a multidisciplinary dialogue.
A Narrative Review of LGBTQ+ Marketing Scholarship
When participants were recruited for qualitative research the sample sizes achieved ranged from nine (Mikkonen, 2010) to 63 (Gudelunas, 2011), with an average of 23 participants per qualitative paper. Most (70%) of the participants in the qualitative studies were LGBTQ+.
MISATO: machine learning dataset of protein-ligand complexes for
MISATO is a database for structure-based drug discovery that combines quantum mechanics data with molecular dynamics simulations on ~20,000 protein-ligand structures. The artificial intelligence ...
NeurIPS 2024 Call for Papers
First, we expect papers to fully describe their methodology, and any tool that is important to that methodology, including the use of LLMs, should be described also. For example, authors should mention tools (including LLMs) that were used for data processing or filtering, visualization, facilitating or running experiments, and proving theorems.
How to Write a Discussion Section
Table of contents. What not to include in your discussion section. Step 1: Summarise your key findings. Step 2: Give your interpretations. Step 3: Discuss the implications. Step 4: Acknowledge the limitations. Step 5: Share your recommendations. Discussion section example.
The Hunger Games: a Parable of Societal Struggle and Survival
In the realm of contemporary literature, few works have ignited as fervent a discussion as Suzanne Collins's "The Hunger Games." This dystopian saga, set in the fictional world of Panem, has transcended its genre, weaving a narrative tapestry that intertwines themes of power, inequality, and the human spirit's resilience in the face of oppression.
Full article: Managing knowledge flows within open innovation
1. Introduction. This paper discusses open innovation (abbreviated OI) from a knowledge flow perspective. As attention to OI constantly growing, including in practice by many firms (Enkel et al., Citation 2009), in particular issues related to firm openness and innovation capacity became foci in OI research (Le et al., Citation 2019).The definision of the concept has been shifted to the ...
Cubic millimetre of brain mapped in spectacular detail
Credit: Google Research & Lichtman Lab (Harvard University). Renderings by D. Berger (Harvard University) Researchers have mapped a tiny piece of the human brain in astonishing detail.
COMMENTS
Table of contents. What not to include in your discussion section. Step 1: Summarize your key findings. Step 2: Give your interpretations. Step 3: Discuss the implications. Step 4: Acknowledge the limitations. Step 5: Share your recommendations. Discussion section example. Other interesting articles.
The discussion section is one of the final parts of a research paper, in which an author describes, analyzes, and interprets their findings. They explain the significance of those results and tie everything back to the research question(s). In this handout, you will find a description of what a discussion section does, explanations of how to ...
Begin with a clear statement of the principal findings. This will reinforce the main take-away for the reader and set up the rest of the discussion. Explain why the outcomes of your study are important to the reader. Discuss the implications of your findings realistically based on previous literature, highlighting both the strengths and ...
The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because it: Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under investigation;
Example: This study explored a comprehensive list of adverse effects associated with the novel drug 'X'. However, long-term studies may be needed to confirm its safety, especially regarding major cardiac events. 5. Implications for future research—how to explore further¹⁻² Locate areas of your research where more investigation is needed.
The discussion section of a research paper is where the author analyzes and explains the importance of the study's results. It presents the conclusions drawn from the study, compares them to previous research, and addresses any potential limitations or weaknesses. The discussion section should also suggest areas for future research.
Papers usually end with a concluding section, often called the "Discussion.". The Discussion is your opportunity to evaluate and interpret the results of your study or paper, draw inferences and conclusions from it, and communicate its contributions to science and/or society. Use the present tense when writing the Discussion section.
The discussion section provides an analysis and interpretation of the findings, compares them with previous studies, identifies limitations, and suggests future directions for research. This section combines information from the preceding parts of your paper into a coherent story. By this point, the reader already knows why you did your study ...
Begin the Discussion section by restating your statement of the problem and briefly summarizing the major results. Do not simply repeat your findings. Rather, try to create a concise statement of the main results that directly answer the central research question that you stated in the Introduction section.
How to Write an Effective Discussion in a Research Paper; a Guide to Writing the Discussion Section of a Research Article April 2022 DOI: 10.33552/OAJAP.2022.05.000609
Step 1: Restate your research problem and research questions. The first step in writing up your discussion chapter is to remind your reader of your research problem, as well as your research aim (s) and research questions. If you have hypotheses, you can also briefly mention these.
This discussion example is from an engineering research paper. The authors are restating their aims first, which is to compare different types of storm-tracking software. Then, they are providing a brief summary of the methods. Here, they are testing different storm-tracking software under different conditions to see which performs the best.
Discussion Section. The overall purpose of a research paper's discussion section is to evaluate and interpret results, while explaining both the implications and limitations of your findings. Per APA (2020) guidelines, this section requires you to "examine, interpret, and qualify the results and draw inferences and conclusions from them ...
Tips to Write the Results Section. Direct the reader to the research data and explain the meaning of the data. Avoid using a repetitive sentence structure to explain a new set of data. Write and highlight important findings in your results. Use the same order as the subheadings of the methods section.
The discussion section, a systematic critical appraisal of results, is a key part of a research paper, wherein the authors define, critically examine, describe and interpret their findings ...
Organization and Structure. Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. Use the ...
The examples below are from 72,017 full-text PubMed research papers that I analyzed in order to explore common ways to start writing the Discussion section. Research papers included in this analysis were selected at random from those uploaded to PubMed Central between the years 2016 and 2021. Note that I used the BioC API to download the data ...
Papers that are submitted to a journal for publication are sent out to several scientists (peers) who look carefully at the paper to see if it is "good science". These reviewers then recommend to the editor of a journal whether or not a paper should be published. Most journals have publication guidelines. Ask for them and follow them exactly.
The discussion section can be written in 3 parts: an introductory paragraph, intermediate paragraphs and a conclusion paragraph. For intermediate paragraphs, a "divide and conquer" approach, meaning a full paragraph describing each of the study endpoints, can be used. In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice ...
Step 2: Interpret Your Results. In the next step, talk about what your findings really mean. Share why the information you gathered is important. Connect each result to the questions you were trying to answer and the goals you set for your research.
In an empirical research paper, the purpose of the Discussion section is to interpret the results and discuss their implications, thereby establishing (and often qualifying) the practical and scholarly significance of the present study. It may be helpful to think of the Discussion section as the inverse of the introduction to an empirical ...
This paper provides a platform for a reflective discussion: ethologists, neuroscientists, philosophers, and bioinformaticians converge in a multidisciplinary dialogue.
When participants were recruited for qualitative research the sample sizes achieved ranged from nine (Mikkonen, 2010) to 63 (Gudelunas, 2011), with an average of 23 participants per qualitative paper. Most (70%) of the participants in the qualitative studies were LGBTQ+.
MISATO is a database for structure-based drug discovery that combines quantum mechanics data with molecular dynamics simulations on ~20,000 protein-ligand structures. The artificial intelligence ...
First, we expect papers to fully describe their methodology, and any tool that is important to that methodology, including the use of LLMs, should be described also. For example, authors should mention tools (including LLMs) that were used for data processing or filtering, visualization, facilitating or running experiments, and proving theorems.
Table of contents. What not to include in your discussion section. Step 1: Summarise your key findings. Step 2: Give your interpretations. Step 3: Discuss the implications. Step 4: Acknowledge the limitations. Step 5: Share your recommendations. Discussion section example.
In the realm of contemporary literature, few works have ignited as fervent a discussion as Suzanne Collins's "The Hunger Games." This dystopian saga, set in the fictional world of Panem, has transcended its genre, weaving a narrative tapestry that intertwines themes of power, inequality, and the human spirit's resilience in the face of oppression.
1. Introduction. This paper discusses open innovation (abbreviated OI) from a knowledge flow perspective. As attention to OI constantly growing, including in practice by many firms (Enkel et al., Citation 2009), in particular issues related to firm openness and innovation capacity became foci in OI research (Le et al., Citation 2019).The definision of the concept has been shifted to the ...
Credit: Google Research & Lichtman Lab (Harvard University). Renderings by D. Berger (Harvard University) Researchers have mapped a tiny piece of the human brain in astonishing detail.