methods and methodologies for research in digital writing and rhetoric

• Words, Language & Grammar

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric, Volume 2: Centering Positionality in Computers and Writing Scholarship (Volume 2) (Practices & Possibilites)

Methods and Methodologies  explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research. The contributors to the two volumes of this edited collection explore how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo, and address inequities. In some cases, they do so by using familiar digital technologies in novel ways. In other cases, they explain the use of relatively new or less familiar technologies such as digital mapping apps, Twitter bots, audio-visual captions, and computer programming code. By reflecting on the lessons that emerged from their work—and in particular on their own positionality—the authors provide methodological narratives that are personal, professional, and individual yet foundational. By combining attention to human positionality and digital technology,  Methods and Methodologies  addresses important social issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric.

• ISBN-10 1646423887
• ISBN-13 978-1646423880
• Publisher The WAC Clearinghouse
• Publication date June 15, 2023
• Language English
• Dimensions 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
• Print length 220 pages
• See all details

Editorial Reviews

About the author.

Victor Del Hierro  is assistant professor of Digital Rhetoric and Technical Communication in the English department at the University of Florida and associate director of the TRACE Innovation Initiative. His research focuses on the intersection between hip-hop, technical communication, and community. Previous work has been published in  Communication Design Quarterly ,  Composition Studies Journal , and   Bilingual Review .

Crystal VanKooten  is associate professor of Writing and Rhetoric at Oakland University in Rochester, MI, where she teaches courses in the Professional and Digital Writing major and in first-year writing. She serves as comanaging editor of  The Journal for Undergraduate Multimedia Projects  ( JUMP+ ) and her publications appear in journals that include  College English, Computers and Composition, Enculturation,  and  Kairos . She is the author of  Transfer across Media: Using Digital Video in the Teaching of Writing.

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ The WAC Clearinghouse (June 15, 2023)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 220 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1646423887
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1646423880
• Reading age ‏ : ‎ 18 years and up
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 12 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
• #4,477 in Rhetoric (Books)
• #47,548 in Writing Reference
• #342,514 in Textbooks (Special Features Stores)

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

No customer reviews

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

• Oakland University
• Oakland University Alumni Association
• Class Notes

OU professor co-edits book spotlighting digital research on social issues in writing and rhetoric

Share this story

Crystal VanKooten, acting chair and associate professor in Oakland University’s Department of Writing and Rhetoric, is co-editor of a new book called “Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric.” 

Featuring the work of scholars from around the country, the two-volume set explores how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo and address inequities. The authors provide methodological narratives that address important social issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric.

Diverse topics comprise 18 chapters, including, “Social Network Analysis and Feminist Methodology”; “Developing a Black Feminist Research Ethic”; “Reflections on a Hip-Hop DJ Methodology”; “Trauma-Informed Scholarship in Digital Research and Design”; and “Language Policing to Language Curiosity.” 

Both volumes are published online by the WAC Clearinghouse, an open-access educational website supported by more than 150 charitable contributors, institutional sponsors, and roughly 180 volunteer editors, editorial staff members, reviewers, and editorial board members. Print copies are available for purchase from the University Press of Colorado, as well as on Amazon. 

Along with Dr. VanKooten, the collection is edited by Victor Del Hierro, assistant professor in the Department of English at the University of Florida. Dr. Del Hierro is associate director of the department’s TRACE Innovation Initiative , a research endeavor that highlights scholarly contributions at the intersection of writing, digital media and ecocriticism.

Dr. VanKooten teaches courses in the Professional and Digital Writing major and in first-year writing at Oakland University and serves as co-managing editor of The Journal for Undergraduate Multimedia Projects (JUMP+). Her work focuses on digital media composition, exploring how technologies shape composition practices, pedagogy, and research. She has been published in scholarly journals including College English, Computers and Composition, Enculturation, and Kairos.

In 2020, Dr. VanKooten published a digital book, “Transfer across Media: Using Digital Video in the Teaching of Writing,” which is  available online from Computers and Composition Digital Press. The book is a qualitative research project that provides an in-depth look at the experiences of 18 first-year students as they completed different kinds of video composition assignments in their writing courses.

Learn more about Dr. VanKooten’s work at her faculty web page .

Quicksearch

• All Results
• Digital Collections
• Archives or Manuscripts
• New Arrivals

Select Data Source

Advanced Search

Limit results by, books+ search results, methods and methodologies for research in digital writing and rhetoric : centering positionality in computers and writing scholarship, available from:.

• For Authors

digitalculturebooks

Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice

Douglas Eyman

Buy this book | Read for free online

About the Book

The goal of Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice is to gather, synthesize, and critique current work that stakes a claim to “digital rhetoric” as field or methodological approach. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice argues for a view of digital rhetoric as an emergent, interdisciplinary field of practice that has developed in parallel forms in a wide range of disciplines, including rhetoric and writing, composition, technical communication, digital game studies, literacy studies, media (and new media) studies, and human-computer interaction, among others. After tracing developments in these fields and providing a working definition of “digital rhetoric” and its relationship to digital literacy, new media, and digital humanities approaches, Digital Rhetoric examines theories of digital rhetoric, research methods for digital rhetoric scholarship, and a series of case studies of digital rhetoric practice. In addition to a synthesis and critique of current work on “digital rhetoric,” this project calls for the development of new theoretical frameworks and new “born-digital” research methods.

About the Author

Douglas Eyman is Assistant Professor of English at George Mason University and Senior Editor of the open access scholarly journal Kairos: Rhetoric, Technology, Pedagogy .

(Stanford users can avoid this Captcha by logging in.)

• Send to text email RefWorks EndNote printer

Methods and methodologies for research in digital writing and rhetoric : centering positionality in computers and writing scholarship

Available online, at the library.

SAL3 (off-campus storage)

More options

• Contributors

Description

Creators/contributors, contents/summary.

• Volume 1. Section 1, The journey and the destination : accessing stories of digital writing researchers ; Section 2, Memory and documentation : digital archives and multimodal methods of preservation
• volume 2. Section 3, Ethics and intangibles : unique challenges of digital research ; Section 4, Digital tools for understandinng discourse, process, and writing : languaging across modalities.

Bibliographic information

Browse related items.

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

visualization and digication

"digital rhetorics" at sbu, digitizing rhetorical methods.

Eyman begins by delineating the differences between the New Critical method of “close reading” with Franco Moretti’s contemporary supposition of “distant reading.”  Close reading—methods of analyzing the formal qualities of a text—has traditionally been associated with print text; yet, Eyman claims that it nearly always acts as a fundamental method within digital contexts. As an aside too, digital contexts have expanded our abilities to close-read; check out Amanda Visconti’s dissertation on Ulysses .

However, Eyman also claims that instead of reading the “text-as object” as most New Critics might, reading the formal qualities of a digital text must “include those [qualities] specific to different media.”

Eyman also describes the inverse of close reading—Franco Moretti’s concept of “distant reading.”Eyman explains that “distant reading takes a long view, examining the text as one among many and considering a much larger corpus whose contexts and relationships give rise to different forms of meaning.”  Seeing reading, according to Franco Moretti, as “a condition of knowledge” allows scholars to form a methodology that creates connections between computational analytics and data visualizations.

It also seems that Kurt Vonnegut did, however, have his own view of “distant reading” before Moretti: check it out!

The evolving field of digital composition engages multiple modes and media; thereby digital composition and rhetorics emerge as collaborative activities that provide broad opportunities for publication and circulation.  Eyman recognizes, then, that from professional writing and research, digital rhetoric follows two research traditions: genre studies and usability.

Genre studies privilege “a multilayered approach of both micro- and macro-level interactions,” while usability takes both system and user into account and therefore “provides a methodology for studying both writing practices and writing pedagogies.”  By engaging these methods, Eyman contends that theorizing new digital methods will account for modes of professional composition and rhetoric as well as the multimodal, multimedia networks of the digital world. Thus, Eyman notes an increasing amount of research that suggests, obviously, that the very definition of writing and composition have changed in the digital age.

The chapter concludes by explaining a variety of interdisciplinary methods that may be appropriate for assembling digital rhetoric methods. I have listed them below.

1.) C.O.D.E and Network Administration Tools: the study of the networks of digital rhetoric both material and immaterial. C.O.D.E. stands for “Comprehensive Online Document Evaluation,” and unfolds both the geographies and owners of networked systems.

2.) Studying Web Usage via Server Log Analysis: this method analyzes the log files of users; server log analysis reveals quantitative data that shows the change in a site’s traffic data. This shows the relationship between a digital text and its audience.

3.) Social Network Analysis: this is a research approach that focuses on patterns of relationships among people, and it studies relationships in context with other relationships in a network.

4.) Hypertext Network Analysis:  HNA is a form of social network analysis that only looks at nodes and ties of digital texts as instantiated in websites and web links. Basically, it analyzes hyperlinks.

5.) Bibliometrics and Cybermetrics: these methods trace the use and value of texts through citation analysis.

6.) Content Analysis: this method is similar to social network analysis, except it focuses on the relationships within an individual text rather than between texts.

7.) Data Visualization: a method used to structure data in ways that visually reveal patterns.

Despite the fact that Eyman is hopeful that many of these methods can be assimilated for digital rhetoric methods, he does cite a few complicating factors. First, he identifies accessibility as an issue: “Accessibility can be impeded by intellectual property gatekeeping (restricted access to networks and texts that circulate in  and through those restricted systems, as well as cost-prohibited fees on certain content), but it is also an issue when considering the format of the rhetorical objects themselves.” Second, Eyman also claims that the ephemeral nature of digital texts makes tracking and tracing difficult.

1.) How do some of Nakamura’s claims complicate the theorization of digital rhetoric methodologies?  What other elements should we consider here?

2.) The lack of traceable exigence within digital rhetoric seems to be a problematic factor. The inability to trace origins fosters a synthesis of roles within immediate rhetorical situations. While classical or modernist views of rhetorical situations rely on the stability of such categories as “rhetor,” “audience,” and “message,” postmodernist and immediate views of rhetorical situations assume these divisions are arbitrary and in constant flux.

How can our methodologies account for this? How does the lack of origin change the ways in which we study rhetoric? Explain.

3.)  How might a consideration of these methods help us to do the work of defining Digital Rhetoric as an emerging field?

4.) Eyman’s move towards interdisciplinary methods suggests collaborative, cross-disciplinary research.  Yet, how do these methods complicate global versus local forms of knowledge? Can you think of positive and negative consequences of this?  How does this affect the field of the humanities in general?

5.) Do you have any specific concerns regarding any of the methods outlined by Eyman?

Works Cited

Gries, Laurie E. “Iconographic Tracking: A Digital Research Method for Visual Rhetoric and Circulation Studies.” Computers and Composition 30.4 (2013): 332–348. ScienceDirect. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.

4 thoughts on “ Digitizing Rhetorical Methods ”

Fantastic job on summarizing the highlights of the material and for finding the Kurt Vonnegut video!

Thank you:)

Thanks for the great summary and insights. I think that both close and distant reading of texts has their place in their analysis. This is especially true give the different learning styles of readers. As usual, the true picture of a text’s meaning and message will lie somewhere in between. (P.S. Thanks for sharing that great book on the visuals of distant reading.)

Thanks Phyllis. And thank you for asking a question, too! It helped me out during my discussion!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• DRC Roundup September 2024
• Blog Carnival 22: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Literacy, Multimodality, & The Writing Center”
• Digitizing Tutor Observations: A Look into Self-Observations of Asynchronous Tutoring
• AI (kind of) in the Writing Center
• How My Role at the Writing Center Shaped My Digital Literacies
• Beyond the Hype: Writing Centers and the AI Revolution in Higher Education
• Investigating the Impact of Multimodality in the Writing Center
• On Building (and Leaving) a Multiliteracy Center

Digital Rhetoric, Digital Methods

In this limited run podcast, DRC fellows, Laura McCann, a PhD candidate in Rhetoric at Carnegie Mellon University, and Laura Leigh Menard, a PhD candidate in Rhetoric and Writing Studies at Bowling Green State University, sit down with digital rhetoricians to talk in depth about their research methods and methodologies. The goal for this podcast is to provide nitty gritty details about how leading and innovative scholars in the fields of rhetoric, composition, and technical communication do their work. Their interviews dig into how these scholars define and understand digital rhetoric projects, how they go about identifying and then collecting their data, and what theories/approaches/and practical tools they use to analyze the (sometimes unwieldly) data that they collected.

This podcast series is meant for anyone interested in learning more about digital rhetoric methods & methodologies. The scholars they interview work with diverse approaches, ranging from X to supervised machine learning and artificial intelligence. Any one of these methods can seem overwhelming when you first begin. Their goal in designing this podcast series was to detail how these scholars got started, what resources they turned to as they learned and developed their methodological approaches, lessons they’ve learned long the way, and what advice they’d offer future scholars of digital rhetoric.

The four interviews include their talks with Dr. Laura Gonzales, an Assistant Professor of Digital Writing and Cultural Rhetorics at the University of Florida specializing in user experience, technical communication and multi-lingual digital tools and technologies; Dr. S. Scott Graham, an Associate Professor at the University of Texas at Austin studying bioscience and health policy through AI and machine learning; Dr. Caddie Alford, an Assistant Professor at Virginia Commonwealth University specializing in social media culture, feminism, and writing pedagogies; and Dr. Wilfredo Flores, an assistant professor and former DRC Fellow at the University of North Carolina specializing in digital cultural rhetorics, and colonial intimacies between science, technologies, and medicine.

They both hope you enjoy and learn from the interviews with these impressive scholars. Engage with us online on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram @SweetlandDRC.

I am a PhD student in the Rhetoric and Writing Studies program at Bowling Green State University.

Laura McCann is a Rhetoric PhD candidate at Carnegie Mellon University working within the rhetoric of health and medicine, technical communication, and digital rhetorics. Her current project studies master narratives of infertility and the rhetorical strategies patients employ to make sense of these disruptive medical experiences.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

enculturation

A journal of rhetoric, writing, and culture, search form, you are here, methodologies and methods for research in digital rhetoric.

Crystal VanKooten , Oakland University

(Published November 22, 2016)

In 1992, Gesa Kirsch characterized research in the field of rhetoric and composition using the phrase methodological pluralism : writing researchers were drawing from a variety of research traditions and fields, including literary studies, history, education, linguistics, psychology, sociology, and anthropology (“Pluralism” 247). Debates about practices, epistemology, and ideology related to the various methodologies for inquiry into writing and its processes were then just beginning, yet similar discussions continue today, and even more so as the study of rhetorical practice shifts to focus on texts composed in and through the digital medium. Just as it was in 1992, current approaches to methodology shape how we might observe and analyze texts, acts of composition, and learning—our methods affect what new knowledge we are able to make. Methodological considerations take on particular significance for the growing group of scholars who study, practice, and teach digital rhetoric. Digital rhetoricians examine, create, and theorize digital texts and the myriad practices surrounding them, a process that, in its complexity, necessitates developing new and hybrid methodologies. 

Literacy researchers and videographers Bump Halbritter and Julie Lindquist describe methodology as “a way of imagining inquiries into particular questions” (174); methodology is the big picture of how research is theorized and framed, and it encompasses the systems that inform particular research practices, which are the research methods themselves. Those methods, the particular practices, for Halbritter and Lindquist, “are examples of local processes; methodologies are examples of global operations” (174). Digital humanist Tom Scheinfeldt has talked about the “seasonal shifting between methodological and theoretical work” in fields as they emerge over time (57). Digital Humanities (DH) scholars, he points out, “traffic less in new theories than in new methods,” playing with digital materials, tools, techniques, and modes (58). Is digital rhetoric, then, like DH, in a similar place of methodological experimentation? What are the global operations , the methodologies, of digital rhetoric? Subsequently, what are the local processes that those studying digital rhetoric are using to enact methodologies? And when we begin to take stock of the methodologies and methods of digital rhetoric, how might a consideration of these operations and processes help us to do the work of defining digital rhetoric as an emerging field? 

In this article, I use a case study to work toward answers, examining the research methodologies and methods of the thirty presenters at the Indiana Digital Rhetoric Symposium (IDRS), held at Indiana University in April 2015. My analysis of their work reveals that the methodologies and methods of digital rhetoric are rooted most firmly in rhetorical theory and the analysis of written and digital texts, but these methods are beginning to expand to include more experimental, interdisciplinary approaches to research that include digital composition, empirical observation, and self-definition.  

Research Methods

I started my inquiry into the methodologies and methods of digital rhetoric by mapping out several research questions: 

1. What research methodologies (global operations) and methods (local processes) are in use by digital rhetoricians? 

2. How do research methodologies and methods define the work of digital rhetoric? 

3. Are researchers in digital rhetoric drawing on methodologies from other fields? 

4. What might distinguish the methods of digital rhetoricians from other methods in the digital humanities, rhetoric and composition, or other fields?

To address these questions, I treated the work of the thirty speakers at the IDRS as a case study, as one site that can speak to how we are defining and enacting methods and methodologies for digital rhetoric.

First, I examined the content of the IDRS presentations as represented in the IDRS abstracts , asking questions about what methods and methodologies I could observe being used. I supplemented information from the abstracts with other descriptions of digital rhetoric scholarship and research found via a web search and a library database search. To find this additional information, I googled the names of the speakers on the IDRS program and read through the results, which included professional and school-based websites, CVs, academia.edu profiles, and Facebook and Twitter profiles. Through the library, I looked up the presenters’ books and articles and scanned the abstracts. 

After examining and taking notes on this data set, which included the IDRS abstracts, presenters’ web materials, and books and articles authored by IDRS participants, I wrote up a phrase for each presenter that described his or her methodological approach to research (I used multiple phrases for the work of some IDRS presenters that fell into multiple categories), and I grouped each person’s work with other similar work. Online, some IDRS participants talked directly about a methodological orientation for their research, and others did not. When needed, I intuited methodological stance(s) based on what I saw and read. Once presenters were grouped based on over-arching methodology, I put together lists of particular methods and modes of delivery used for each group based on what I could observe in the work. I also compiled a list of academic fields with which each presenter was affiliated. Four over-arching categories of methodological approaches emerged from this analysis: 1) hermeneutics, 2) digital composition, 3) empirical observation of human experience, and 4) self-definition. I explore each of these methodologies, along with their related methods and modes of delivery, in detail below.   

Hermeneutics

The first methodological approach to digital rhetoric can be labeled hermeneutics : the science and theory of textual interpretation, often related to biblical, literary, or philosophical texts. The work of twenty-three out of thirty IDRS presenters fits within this category, and the methods employed within this methodology include analysis of written theoretical texts (notably rhetorical theory) along with analysis of digital or material texts, all used to theorize aspects of digital-rhetorical experience. These twenty-three scholars weave together analysis of written and digital texts to theorize about how digital texts communicate and about the practices that users and authors participate in when they compose or consume digital texts, and they deliver their work via book and article manuscripts and oral conference presentations. 

As Table 1 indicates, those using a hermeneutic approach to digital rhetoric are drawing most often from written rhetorical theory, but also at times from composition theory, philosophy, social theory, and law writing to articulate their own theories. The digital and material sites of analysis, in contrast, include a wide range: these scholars are looking closely at social networking sites and activities (Facebook, Twitter, and other online discussion forums); at webpages, algorithms, and the code behind webpages; at mobile, interactive, and GPS software, applications, and devices; at photography; at works of architecture and sound art, and even, in a few cases, at historical texts. The sites of analysis for hermeneutic inquiry are diverse, but they are all linked to how digital texts communicate to authors and audiences—through the web, through mobile devices, and through images, structures, and sounds. 

Digital Composition

The second methodological approach that came to the fore in this case study is digital composition. Digital composition as methodology for inquiry involves various methods, some of which begin to become visible through the work of seven IDRS presenters. Through the use of non-discursive, alternate forms of analysis and synthesis, these methods go beyond using digital composition only for delivery. Methods include, for example, the combination of modes of expression such as words, images, and sounds as a form of analysis, as well as the creation, collection, juxtaposition, and repurposing of media assets and objects as synthesis. Additionally, these methods are enacted in digitally-mediated spaces: on video and audio, in digital books, through repurposed digital objects like the Gameboy camera, or through digital sculpture. As Table 2 indicates, there are seven examples of IDRS scholars and researchers that use digital composition as a methodology for inquiry. Notably, five out of seven use a form of video, perhaps in part because hardware and software for video composition have become more accessible and usable in the past decade—a video author no longer needs a computer lab or specialized equipment to experiment, analyze, and compose with video. 

It is noticeable that only seven of thirty IDRS participants are using digital composition itself as a methodology in highly visible ways. In 2004, computers and writing scholar Cheryl Ball stated:

composition and new media scholars write about how readers can make meaning from images, typefaces, videos, animations, and sounds, but most scholars don’t compose with these media. It is evident from the scholarship available that compositionists are interested in new media. Yet, they do not seem to value creating new media texts for scholarly publications to explore the multimodal capabilities of new technologies. (407) 

The multimodal capabilities that Ball references include the ability of digital composition to function as methodology , as a site for various local processes and methods of inquiry, including those listed above and more. However, based on the findings of this case study, Ball could still be talking to many digital rhetoricians in 2015: relatively few of today’s scholars in digital rhetoric are doing the work of digital composition and exploring its methodological potential. Composing with and using digital media for analysis as academics, of course, is complex. There are tenure requirements. There are the kinds of texts that journals solicit and publish. There is the learning curve for new or unfamiliar technologies and the extended time required to use many digital tools. There can be a bias against multimodal, digital scholarship and in favor of written scholarship. Even so, along with Ball, I continue to call digital rhetoricians to do the work of enacting scholarship through digital composition, to use composing with multiple and digital modes of expression as a methodology for inquiry into how digital texts communicate. Digital composition is a way of making new knowledge that digital rhetoric might tap into with more regularity. 

Empirical Observation of Human Experience with Digital Texts and Digital Composition

Seven IDRS presenters are doing empirical, observational work of others’ experiences with digital texts and digital composition. As shown in Table 3, the various empirical methods they use include direct observation and analysis of community or classroom experiences, interviews, observation and aggregation of online discussions through corpus analysis, and ethnography. While the line between hermeneutics and empirical observation can sometimes blur, what sets an empirical approach apart from other methodologies is a focus on observing or documenting human experience with digital texts. Where others seek evidence in written theoretical texts and digital objects, empirical researchers do so through direct observation of others, at times using interviews, pedagogical documents, or compilations of records of online interaction. 

The use of empirical methods for digital rhetoric parallels the turn to methodological diversification that has been occurring in rhetoric and composition more broadly over the past several decades. Kirsch tells us that currently in writing studies, “no longer do scholars apologize for using, adapting, or borrowing methods that originated in the social sciences,” but instead, writing researchers offer critiques, insights, reflections, explanations, and arguments for new, hybrid approaches to research ( Foreword xv). Empirical research based on systematic observation has thus become more and more common in rhetoric and composition, and more and more rigorous, and this shift is beginning to show itself in digital rhetoric, as well. 

In 1996, computers and writing scholar Scott DeWitt pointed out the dearth of empirical research that addressed what was then called “hypertext” and composing practices. DeWitt wrote that within computers and composition studies, “ we see only a sparse tendency towards carefully designed empirical research studies—where research questions and research methodologies are explicitly stated and collected data analyzed, as well as where student experiences are revealed, and pedagogical agendas exposed” (70). Like Ball, DeWitt could still be making these same comments today about digital rhetoricians, nineteen years later, as this case study reveals. While some of the work in digital rhetoric parallels the turn to empirical research within rhetoric and composition, there is a need for more carefully designed empirical studies that focus on digital composition and rhetorical expression in digital spaces, on the uses of technologies inside and outside of schools, and on the teaching of digital rhetoric so that theories and practices can move beyond the anecdotal. More empirical observation would allow digital rhetoricians to look systematically across multiple experiences with digital texts and to be more clear about why and how they choose sites and methods of inquiry. 

Self-Definition

The final category that came to the fore in this case study is the methodology of doing self-definitional work, of defining what digital rhetoric is and how digital rhetoric is enacted. Two IDRS presenters, Doug Eyman and Elizabeth Losh, are doing this work most directly in ways that were evident in the IDRS abstracts and other published work. In Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice , for example, Eyman turns to definitions through a discussion of rhetorical and media theory and through examining pedagogical materials including course descriptions and syllabi. Losh, in Virtualpolitik , explores four areas of the study of digital rhetoric: 1) the conventions of new digital genres, 2) public rhetoric, 3) the emerging discipline of digital rhetoric, and 4) mathematical theories of communication from information science (47). At IDRS, Losh then extended this work through analysis of the complex texts of online transnational remixers who compose on Twitter, YouTube, and within online games. Both Eyman and Losh invite digital rhetoricians to extend our inquiries—to look to the pedagogical, to public discourse, to information science, and to online spaces to extend definitions of what digital rhetoric is and how it is enacted. 

Digital Rhetoric as an Emerging Field

The findings thus far provide one answer to the first research question of what methodologies and methods digital rhetoricians use. To summarize, most of the scholars in the case study are using a hermeneutic approach to digital rhetoric, discussing how digital texts communicate as they draw on rhetorical and other written theories and on the analysis of digital texts and their uses in various spaces. Some within the sample are exploring multimodal forms of analysis and synthesis through composing digital texts, and others are using qualitative and empirical methods to begin to more systematically inquire into how humans use digital technologies to communicate and persuade. A few are defining digital rhetoric as it emerges as a field stemming from and related to several other fields and discourses.

As illustrated in Table 4, most of the IDRS presenters use rhetorical theory in their research – twenty do so directly. Even so, there are voices from other fields in the mix: from composition, philosophy, communication, programming, architecture, and law, for example. In this way, perhaps digital rhetoric may be headed in a similar direction as the Digital Humanities. Matthew Kirschenbaum has explained that DH projects are interdisciplinary and collaborative at their core, they “ depend on networks of people” (6) that aren’t necessarily from the same discipline. The work of IDRS presenters shows some movement in such a collaborative, cross-disciplinary direction: some of the work is already collaborative; some of the work relies on knowledge not only from rhetoric but from other fields and disciplines.  

Below, Figure 1 represents how this case study has helped me to think about digital rhetoric’s relationship to sister fields and discourses as it begins to emerge as a field of study of its own. The work of digital rhetoric shows some movement toward a “methodological experimentation with digital tools” phase, like that which is occurring in the Digital Humanities; digital rhetoric also includes some interdisciplinary work as is more common in DH. From rhetoric and composition, digital rhetoricians bring a recently developed openness to new and diverse research methods. But what makes digital rhetoric unique is a strong foundation in rhetorical theory that speaks to how and why authors might compose and experiment with tools or design new or hybrid methods for inquiry. 

Figure 1: Digital rhetoric’s relationship to sister fields and discourses

Limitations 

Of course, drawing conclusions about the status of digital rhetoric as an emerging field based on one case study has limitations, one of which is the sites for data collection. I drew from IDRS participants’ published or public scholarship, examining IDRS presentations, peer-reviewed journal articles and books, and online self-published materials. Excluded from the data set is work that is in progress, unpublished, or that occurs within the classroom. For some, digital composition, experimentation with digital tools, and empirical observation might occur in alternate, less publically visible spaces. A second limitation may be the terminologies in use to solicit, define, and classify the work of digital rhetoric. Some scholars, for example, explicitly call themselves digital rhetoricians , and many of these individuals responded to the IDRS call for papers. Others within communications, rhetoric and composition, information science, or related fields might be participating in the kind of work that is labeled digital rhetoric here, but instead using shifted labels and terminologies such as computers and writing , digital composition , digital humanities , digital media , multimodal composition , new literacies, new media , and more. The specific terminologies in use, then, may have limited the data set in some ways.  

Using the work of the presenters at IDRS as a case study reveals that the methodologies and methods for digital rhetoric—both the global operations and the local processes—are in flux; they are as yet emerging. Many digital rhetoricians take a hermeneutic approach to research through analysis of written theory and digital examples, and this aligns us with more traditional methodologies within the humanities and within English departments. Some digital rhetoricians are beginning to use digital composition as a methodology, to design new methods for observation and data collection in digital spaces, and to draw on fields outside of rhetoric and writing that have built knowledge about the digital. This movement mirrors the current methodological experimentation phase of the Digital Humanities, which looks across disciplinary boundaries more readily. These new methodological movements for digital rhetoric are located in somewhat unfamiliar spaces, spaces populated by colleagues from the learning and social sciences, from cinema studies and design, and from information science. Even amidst such uncertainty, however, it is exciting to see where digital rhetoric might go from here, to see who digital rhetoricians might work with and what they will compose, and to see the new and assembled methodologies and methods that they might design to learn more about how digital texts are composed and experienced in the world.

Ball, Cheryl E. “Show, Not Tell: The Value of New Media Scholarship.” Computers and Composition , vol. 21, no. 4, Jan. 2004, pp. 403–425.

Dewitt, Scott Lloyd. “The Current Nature of Hypertext Research in Computers and Composition Studies: An Historical Perspective.” Computers and Composition , vol. 13, no. 1, 1996, pp. 69–84.

Eyman, Douglas. Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice . University of Michigan Press, 2015. muse.jhu.edu , https://muse.jhu.edu/book/40755 .

Halbritter, Bump, and Julie Lindquist. “Time, Lives, and Videotape: Operationalizing Discovery in Scenes of Literacy Sponsorship.” College English , vol. 75, no. 2, Nov. 2012, pp. 171–198.

Kirsch, Gesa. “Foreword: New Methodological Challenges to Writing Studies Researchers.” Writing Studies Research in Practice: Methods and Methodologies , edited by Lee Nickoson and Mary P. Sheridan, Southern Illinois UP, 2012, pp. xi–xvi.

---. “Methodological Pluralism: Epistemological Issues.” Methods and Methodology in Composition Research , edited by Patricia A. Sullivan and Gesa Kirsch, Southern Illinois UP, 1992, pp. 247–269.

Kirschenbaum, Matthew. “What Is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments?” ADE Bulletin , Sept. 2015, pp. 1–7.

Losh, Elizabeth M. Virtualpolitik: an Electronic History of Government Media-Making in a Time of War, Scandal, Disaster, Miscommunication, and Mistakes . MIT P, 2009.

Scheinfeldt, Tom. “Theory, Method, and Digital Humanities.” Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities , edited by Dan Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt, U of Michigan P, 2013, pp. 55–9. muse.jhu.edu , http://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/833159 .

Crystal VanKooten

[email protected]

Faculty Writing, Rhetoric, and Cultures Rhetoric and Writing

Crystal VanKooten is an Associate Professor at Michigan State University, where she teaches courses in the Professional and Public Writing major, Rhetoric and Writing graduate programs, and in first-year writing, and serves as co-managing editor of The Journal for Undergraduate Multimedia Projects (JUMP+). Dr. VanKooten’s work focuses on digital media composition through an engagement with how technologies shape composition practices, pedagogy, and research. Her publications appear in journals that include College English, Computers and Composition, Enculturation, and Kairos. VanKooten’s digital book, Transfer across Media: Using Digital Video in the Teaching of Writing, was funded by a Conference on College Composition and Communication Emergent Research/er Award and is available online from Computers and Composition Digital Press. The book is a qualitative research project that provides an in-depth look at the experiences of eighteen first-year students as they completed different kinds of video composition assignments in their writing courses.

Transfer Across Media

Methods and methodologies for research in digital writing and rhetoric.

Centering Positionality in Computers and Writing Scholarship, Volume 1

Centering Positionality in Computers and Writing Scholarship, Volume 2

Publications

VanKooten, Crystal. “Experimentation, Integration, Play: Developing Digital Voice through Audio Storytelling.” Amplifying Soundwriting, edited by Kyle D. Stedman, Courtney S. Danforth, and Michael J. Faris, WAC Clearinghouse, 2022, https://wac.colostate.edu/books/practice/soundwriting/

VanKooten, Crystal and Elizabeth G. Allan. ‚”Searching for Street’s ‚”Mix” of Literacies through Composing Video: Conceptions of Literacy and Moments of Transfer in Basic Writing.” Literacy in Composition Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, Feb. 2021, pp. 39-59. https://licsjournal.org/index.php/LiCS/article/view/856

VanKooten, Crystal. “A Research Methodology of Interdependence through Video as Method.” Computers and Composition vol. 54, December 2019, pp. 1-17.

"Singer, Writer" by Crystal VanKooten (Kairos 21.1 Inventio)

"Singer, Writer: A Choric Exploration of Sound and Writing." Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy vol. 21, no. 1, 2016

• Architecture and Design
• Asian and Pacific Studies
• Business and Economics
• Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
• Computer Sciences
• Cultural Studies
• Engineering
• General Interest
• Geosciences
• Industrial Chemistry
• Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Library and Information Science, Book Studies
• Life Sciences
• Linguistics and Semiotics
• Literary Studies
• Materials Sciences
• Mathematics
• Social Sciences
• Sports and Recreation
• Theology and Religion
• Publish your article
• The role of authors
• Promoting your article
• Abstracting & indexing
• Publishing Ethics
• Why publish with De Gruyter
• How to publish with De Gruyter
• Our book series
• Our subject areas
• Your digital product at De Gruyter
• Contribute to our reference works
• Product information
• Tools & resources
• Product Information
• Promotional Materials
• Orders and Inquiries
• FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
• Repository Policy
• Free access policy
• Open Access agreements
• Database portals
• For Authors
• Customer service
• People + Culture
• Journal Management
• How to join us
• Working at De Gruyter
• Mission & Vision
• De Gruyter Foundation
• De Gruyter Ebound
• Our Responsibility
• Partner publishers

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.

Refresh your browser window to try again.

Product Key Features

• Number of Pages 236 Pages
• Publication Name Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric, Volume 1 : Centering Positionality in Computers and Writing Scholarship
• Language English
• Publication Year 2023
• Type Textbook
• Author Victor Del Hierro
• Format Trade Paperback
• Item Height 0.8 in
• Item Weight 13 Oz
• Item Length 9 in
• Item Width 6 in

Additional Product Features

• Intended Audience Scholarly & Professional
• LCCN 2022-050587
• Illustrated Yes
• Volume Number Vol. 1
• Synopsis Methods and Methodologies explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research. The contributors to the two volumes of this edited collection explore how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo, and address inequities. In some cases, they do so by using familiar digital technologies in novel ways. In other cases, they explain the use of relatively new or less familiar technologies such as digital mapping apps, Twitter bots, audio-visual captions, and computer programming code. By reflecting on the lessons that emerged from their work--and in particular on their own positionality--the authors provide methodological narratives that are personal, professional, and individual yet foundational. By combining attention to human positionality and digital technology, Methods and Methodologies addresses important social issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric., Methods and Methodologies explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research., Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research. The contributors 10 each volume of this edited collection, explore how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo, and address inequities. In some cases, they do so by using familiar digital technologies in novel ways. In other cases, they explain the use of relatively new or less familiar technologies such as digital mapping apps. Twitter bots, audio-visual captions, and computer programming code. By reflecting on the lessons that emerged from their work-and in particular on their own positionality-the authors provide methodological narratives that are personal, professional, and individual yet foundational. By combining attention to human positionality and digital technology, Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric addresses important social, issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric.
• LC Classification Number PN171.O55M48 2022

Nonfiction Writing Paperbacks Books

Nonfiction writing paperbacks books in arabic, nonfiction travel writing paperbacks books, nonfiction writing paperbacks books in english, nonfiction writing illustrated paperbacks books, writing antiquarian & collectible books.

Accessibility Tools

• Invert colors
• Dark contrast
• Light contrast
• Low saturation
• High saturation
• Highlight links
• Highlight headings
• Screen reader

Join Our Mailing List My Cart

Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric, Volume 1

Centering positionality in computers and writing scholarship, edited by crystal vankooten and victor del hierro.

Practices and Possibilities  Series Copublished with the WAC Clearinghouse

Methods and Methodologies  explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research. The contributors to the two volumes of this edited collection explore how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo, and address inequities. In some cases, they do so by using familiar digital technologies in novel ways. In other cases, they explain the use of relatively new or less familiar technologies such as digital mapping apps, Twitter bots, audio-visual captions, and computer programming code. By reflecting on the lessons that emerged from their work—and in particular on their own positionality—the authors provide methodological narratives that are personal, professional, and individual yet foundational. By combining attention to human positionality and digital technology,  Methods and Methodologies  addresses important social issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric.

View Volume 2 here

This book is also available as an open access ebook through the WAC Clearinghouse . 

Crystal VanKooten  is associate professor of Writing and Rhetoric at Oakland University in Rochester, MI, where she teaches courses in the Professional and Digital Writing major and in first-year writing. She serves as comanaging editor of  The Journal for Undergraduate Multimedia Projects  (JUMP+) and her publications appear in journals that include  College English, Computers and Composition, Enculturation,  and  Kairos . She is the author of  Transfer across Media: Using Digital Video in the Teaching of Writing.

Victor Del Hierro  is assistant professor of Digital Rhetoric and Technical Communication in the English department at the University of Florida and associate director of the TRACE Innovation Initiative. His research focuses on the intersection between hip-hop, technical communication, and community. Previous work has been published in  Communication Design Quarterly, Composition Studies Journal , and  Bilingual Review .

• Paperback Price: $27.95
• Paperback ISBN: 978-1-64642-382-8
• Publication Month: June
• Publication Year: 2023
• Discount Type: Short
• Author: edited by Crystal VanKooten and Victor Del Hierro
• ECommerce Code: 978-1-64642-382-8

Related Titles

Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric, Volume 2

Negotiating the Intersections of Writing and Writing Instruction

The Invisible Professor

Adapting VALUEs

Masking Inequality with Good Intentions

Labor-Based Grading Contracts, Second Edition

Browse related titles tagged under:.

• Crystal VanKooten
• Victor Del Hierro
• WAC Clearinghouse
• Composition Rhetoric and Writing Studies
• 2022–2023 Copublications and Distributed Titles

Find a Book

• Book Catalog
• Our Authors
• How to Buy Copies
• Request Desk and Exam Copies
• About our Ebooks
• Rights and Permissions
• Publishing Partners
• Submissions
• Author Materials
• Publication Process
• MMU Scholar Mini Grants
• Our Commitment to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice
• A Statement on Indigenous Land and Colonial Spaces
• Our Members
• Become an Institutional Member
• Board of Trustees
• News & Features
• Support the Press
• Make a Donation
• Ways to Give
• Friends of the Press

• Daily Deals
• Help & Contact

• Watch List Expand watch list Loading... Sign in to see your user information
• Recently Viewed
• Bids/Offers
• Purchase History
• Saved Searches
• Saved Sellers
• Expand Basket Loading... Something went wrong. View basket for details.

Picture 1 of 1

Methods and methodologies for research in digital writing and rhetoric, volume 2 : centering positionality in computers and writing scholarship by crystal vankooten (2023, trade paperback).

• Great Book Prices Store (312909)
• 96.6% positive Feedback
• See all details

Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.

Refresh your browser window to try again.

All listings for this product

Item 1 methods and methodologies for research in writing and rhetoric : centering p... methods and methodologies for research in writing and rhetoric : centering p..., item 2 methods and methodologies for research in writing and rhetoric : centering p... methods and methodologies for research in writing and rhetoric : centering p..., about this product, product identifiers.

• Publisher Parlor Press
• ISBN-10 1646423887
• ISBN-13 9781646423880
• eBay Product ID (ePID) 19059121755

Product Key Features

• Number of Pages 220 Pages
• Language English
• Publication Name Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric, Volume 2 : Centering Positionality in Computers and Writing Scholarship
• Publication Year 2023
• Type Textbook
• Author Crystal Vankooten
• Format Trade Paperback
• Item Height 0.8 in
• Item Weight 12 Oz
• Item Length 9 in
• Item Width 6 in

Additional Product Features

• Intended Audience Scholarly & Professional
• LCCN 2022-050587
• Illustrated Yes
• Volume Number Vol. 2
• Synopsis Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research. The contributors to each volumes of this edited collection explore how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo, and address inequities. In some cases, they do so by using familiar digital technologies in novel ways. In other cases, they explain the use of relatively new or less familiar technologies such as digital mapping apps, Twitter bots, audio-visual captions, and computer programming code. By reflecting on the lessons that emerged from their work-and in particular on their own positionality-the authors provide methodological narratives that are personal, professional, and individual yet foundational. By combining attention to human positionality and digital technology, Methods and Methodologies for Research in Digital Writing and Rhetoric addresses important social issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric., Methods and Methodologies explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research. The contributors to the two volumes of this edited collection explore how digital technologies can be used to solve problems, challenge the status quo, and address inequities. In some cases, they do so by using familiar digital technologies in novel ways. In other cases, they explain the use of relatively new or less familiar technologies such as digital mapping apps, Twitter bots, audio-visual captions, and computer programming code. By reflecting on the lessons that emerged from their work--and in particular on their own positionality--the authors provide methodological narratives that are personal, professional, and individual yet foundational. By combining attention to human positionality and digital technology, Methods and Methodologies addresses important social issues and questions related to writing and rhetoric., Methods and Methodologies explores how researchers theorize, design, enact, reflect on, and revise digital writing research.
• LC Classification Number PN171.O55M48 2022

Best-selling in Adult Learning & University

Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best-selling in Adult Learning & University

Secrets Of Mental Math: The Mathemagician's Guide to Lightening Calculation and Amazing Maths Tricks by Arthur Benjamin, Michael Shermer (Paperback, 2006)

The psychology of money: timeless lessons on wealth, greed, and happiness by morgan housel (paperback, 2020), ks2 maths 10-minute weekly workouts - year 5 by cgp books (paperback, 2017), code of practice for in-service inspection and testing of electrical equipment by the institution of engineering and technology (paperback, 2020).

• £41.96 Used

Measurement by Paul Lockhart (Paperback, 2014)

The hairy bikers eat to beat type 2 diabetes: 80 delicious & filling recipes to get your health back on track by hairy bikers (paperback, 2020), musculoskeletal assessment: joint range of motion, muscle testing, and function by hazel clarkson (spiral bound, 2020), save on adult learning & university.

Trending price is based on prices over last 90 days.

Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Save on Adult Learning & University

AQA Psychology for A Level Year 1 & AS Revision Guide: 2nd Edition - Paperback

Prince2® 7 - managing successful projects, aqa a level physics revision guide by jim breithaupt (paperback 2017), diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : dsm-5-tr hardcover, pearson edexcel as and a level mathematics statistics and mechanics year 1/as p, basics of dental technology: a step by step approach by tony johnson (english) p, you may also like.

Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- You may also like

Paperback Writing & Usage Guides

Non-fiction paperback fiction & writing books, non-fiction paperback fiction & travel writing books, non-fiction rhetoric paperback fiction & books, writing non-fiction hardcover books, non-fiction penguin writing fiction & books.