should everyone be entitled to free health care essay

Argumentative Essay: Healthcare Should Be Free

Imagine how helpless you would feel if you needed medical attention but could not get it because you were uninsured and could not afford the medical bill. Wouldn’t that make you feel dependent and unsupported because you can't receive the support you are entitled to? The US spends about $12,530 per person’s healthcare. Although the government provides its citizens with healthcare equally, not everyone needs the money for their healthcare, while others need more money than what is already provided to them. I think the American government should collectively spend for all of its citizens and make healthcare free for all Americans.. Healthcare is a human right that we should all be entitled to regardless of our class. It would save thousands of lives every year. Although many people argue that healthcare would increase the debt rate, free healthcare decreases the spending of the US.  Free healthcare should be enforced morally and logistically to all Americans. 

Healthcare should be provided to everyone at no cost because it is a basic human right that all Americans should be entitled to. In the article “Should All Americans Have the Right (Be Entitled) to Health Care?” It says, “The Declaration of Independence states that all men have “unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” [42] which necessarily entails having the health care needed to preserve life and pursue happiness.” This shows that healthcare is a right that all Americans should be entitled to. In this sentence, the author explains that the Declaration of Independence states that all men have the right to “Life, Liberty, and Pursuit to Happiness” this shows that healthcare is also considered a right, which falls into life and the pursuit of happiness. 

Healthcare saves thousands of lives which enforces the right to life and pursuit of happiness in the future. Free healthcare could save lives because many people die from illnesses they never got cured because of the cost of healthcare. In the article “Should All Americans Have the Right (Be Entitled) to Health Care?” Says, “According to a study from Harvard researchers, “lack of health insurance is associated with as many as 44,789 deaths per year,” which translates into a 40% increased risk of death among the uninsured.“ This proves that many people die because they were uninsured. This part of the passage shows a 40% increased risk of death among people who cannot get insured due to the lack of medical support given to the uninsured who can also not afford the medical bill. According to the “Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,” the number of people under the age of 65 who were uninsured at the time of the interview was 31.2 million people. This shows that many Americans under the age of 65 are uninsured and probably can not afford the medical bill. 

A common argument against this position is that free healthcare for all Americans would increase US debts. In the article “Should America Have Universal Health Care?” It says “From a study funded by the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, under a single-payer system where everyone has a right to healthcare, private and public healthcare spending could be lowered over 10 years by over 1.8 trillion dollars. This would be due to lower prescription and administrative drug costs.” Some people argue that free healthcare for all Americans would increase US debts. However, the text explains that providing free healthcare does not increase the spending of the US. Instead, It lowered the spending by $1.8 trillion because it lowered the price of drugs prescribed to patients. 

In conclusion, healthcare should be free for all Americans. All Americans should be provided free healthcare because it is a basic human right that all Americans should be entitled to. It would also save lives because many people die from illnesses they never got cured of due to the medical support they needed but did not receive and that was because they were uninsured. Logistically and Morally, Healthcare is a fundamental right that all Americans should be entitled to despite their income and what they can afford. This is an issue that requires us to come together and fight for our rights!

Related Samples

• Personal Narrative Essay: My Trip To New York
• Persuasive Essay on Why College Should Be Free
• Research Paper on Major Depressive Disorder
• Free Essay Example about Clothing Over Time
• Essay Sample on Creativity
• Research Paper Example: Connection Between the Chemistry of the Brain and Mental Illness
• Essay About Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother
• Healthcare in the United States Essay Example
• Research Paper on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
• Every Experience Creates the Identity You Seek

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

Exploring what works, what doesn’t, and why.

Healthcare is a human right – but not in the United States

• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Twitter
• Share on Facebook
• Share on WhatsApp
• Share through Email

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson in June is just the latest blow to health rights in the United States. National medical associations in the U.S. agree that abortion is essential to reproductive healthcare. So why would abortion not be protected as such? Because the U.S. does not, and never has, protected a right to health.  

Good health is the foundation of a person’s life and liberty. Injury and disease are always disruptive, and sometimes crippling. We might have to stop working, cancel plans, quarantine, hire help, and in cases of long-term disability, build whole new support systems to accommodate a new normal.

The U.S. remains the only high-income nation in the world without universal access to healthcare. However, the U.S. has signed and ratified one of the most widely adopted international treaties that includes the duty to protect the right to life. Under international law, the right to life simply means that humans have a right to live, and that nobody can try to kill another. Healthcare, the United Nations says, is an essential part of that duty. In 2018, the U.N. Committee on Civil and Political Rights said the right to life cannot exist without equal access to affordable healthcare services (including in prisons), mental health services, and notably, access to abortion. The U.N. committee mentioned health more than a dozen times in its statement on the right to life.

Sign up for Harvard Public Health

Delivered to your inbox weekly.

• Email address By clicking “Subscribe,” you agree to receive email communications from Harvard Public Health.
• Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The bottom line is: the U.S. can’t claim to protect life if it fails to protect health. And it has consistently failed on all three of the U.N.’s measures— the latest being access to abortion.

In the U.S., our debates around healthcare, and especially abortion, are hampered by a lack of right to health. Instead, the Supreme Court in 1973 protected access to abortion through the rights to privacy and due process, not health. Privacy is mentioned only twice by the U.N. committee commentary on the right to life.

Since Dobbs, several state legislatures have declared it fair game to criminalize abortion procedures even in cases where pregnancy threatens maternal health or life. Despite ample evidence that restrictive abortion laws lead to spikes in maternal mortality and morbidity—core public health indicators—the Court prior to the Dobb’s decision has defended abortion as merely a matter of privacy, not health or life. We know this is a myth. Abortion is deeply tied to the ability to stay healthy and in some cases, alive.

Regardless, our political parties remain deeply polarized on access to healthcare, including abortion. But lawmakers should know there is historical backing in the U.S. for elevating a right to health. None other than U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt, first proposed healthcare as a human right in his State of the Union address in 1944, as part of his ‘Second Bill of Rights.’ His list featured aspirational economic and social guarantees to the American people, like the right to a decent home and, of course, the right to adequate medical care.

Eleanor Roosevelt later took the Second Bill of Rights to the U.N., where it contributed to the right to health being included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. The right to health is now accepted international law, and is part of numerous treaties, none of which the U.S. Senate has seen fit to ratify. The U.S. conservative movement has historically declared itself averse to adopting rights that might expand government function and responsibility. In contrast, state legislatures in red states are keen to expand government responsibility when it comes to abortion. The conservative movement condemns government interference in the delivery of healthcare—except when it comes to reproductive health. The American Medical Association has called abortion bans a “direct attack” on medicine, and a “brazen violation of patients’ rights to evidence-based reproductive health services.”

Excepting access to abortion, U.S. lawmakers have largely left healthcare to the markets, rather than government. True, the government funds programs like Medicaid and Medicare but these programs vary significantly in quality and access by state, falling far short of providing fair, equitable, universal access to good healthcare.

The only two places where the U.S. government accepts some responsibility for the provision of healthcare are 1) in prisons and mental health facilities; and 2) in the military. While healthcare services in the U.S. prison system are notoriously deficient, they nevertheless exist and are recognized as an entitlement, underpinning the right to life. As an example, in 2005 a federal court seized control of the failing healthcare system in California’s Department of Corrections citing preventable deaths. In the military, free healthcare is an entitlement, and the quality of that care is deemed good enough even for the U.S. president.

So why doesn’t everyone in the U.S. have the same rights?

It is an uphill battle in a country that sees health and healthcare as a private matter for markets and individuals to navigate. But if we want to improve public health in the U.S. we need to start legislating healthcare as a right—and recognize that achieving the highest possible standards of public health is a legitimate government function.

photo: Tony Gutierrez / AP Photo

More in Equity

When death doesn’t count

Periods and patriarchy

For Black Americans, homeownership can mean better health

• Read the Journal
• Submit an Article

Free Healthcare in the United States: A Possible Solution to Public Health Disparities

Nov 23, 2020 | Author Hala Atassi , Public Health Policy

Access to healthcare is one of the remarkable indicators that defines the quality of people’s lives. Despite the thousands of advanced technologies and countless healthcare clinics and hospitals, many people still cannot afford healthcare or health insurance. This has been a global concern for years, which many countries have resolved. However, the United States has yet to significantly progress towards making healthcare more accessible to low-income communities. There are many solutions to this problem that can be implemented today, upon which millions of suffering Americans depend.

Some studies have shown over the years that expensive health care is due to the high cost of defensive medicine, or in other words, physicians ordering expensive tests that may be unnecessary, as a way to deflect legal responsibility from themselves. Deviating from defensive medicine in the healthcare industry might impact physicians economically, but more importantly, it will help achieve affordable healthcare. 

Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act of 2010) is one program that focuses on extending healthcare to Americans and reducing public health disparities. This program lays down a foundation that people under the age of 26 will receive accessible care from their parent or guardian’s health care plans. Afterward, they must pay for their health care plan. Also, the program stipulates that the government provides free healthcare to retired adults from age 55 to 64, to avoid any insurance plan complications. Essentially, Obamacare seeks to expand access to healthcare care, regardless of the scale of one’s medical diagnosis, to ultimately save lives that would have been lost due to the inability to pay expensive medical bills.

Easier access to healthcare will result in a healthier nation. The healthcare system is one of the most important components in life, as the United States’ economy cannot be fully efficient and benefit all people until everyone can access quality, affordable healthcare. Free healthcare (or at least cheaper healthcare) would be the most effective system for America, which other countries like Switzerland and Singapore have demonstrated. The money spent by citizens on their healthcare could be redirected to other social support systems in America, like expanding access to nutritious foods as well. Although free healthcare has many perks, it also has disadvantages. Most notably, overloading health services with a large number of patients would overwhelm already busy healthcare systems. Patients may overuse the perk of free healthcare, leaving not taxpayers to suffer, but rather medical professionals and healthcare systems. Even so, the perceptible advantages of affordable healthcare outweigh the disadvantages. As it is, years of attempts to ameliorate the United States healthcare system have failed the American people, and the situation remains devastating and life-threatening for low-income communities. There should be no debate though as to whether America needs to redesign the public health system, as healthcare is a human right, and nobody should be dying because they cannot afford to live, especially when the government has the economic means to take care of them.

Bibliography:

Gerisch, Mary. “Health Care As a Human Right.” American Bar Association , www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/the-state-of-healthcare-in-the-united-states/health-care-as-a-human-right/. 

“Free Health Care Policies.” World Health Organization , World Health Organization, 2020, www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/free-health-care-policies. 

Gologorsky, Beverly. “Health Care in the US Should Be Affordable and Accessible.” The Nation , 9 May 2019, www.thenation.com/article/archive/tom-dispatch-health-care-should-be-affordable-and-accessible/. 

Luhby, Tami. “Here’s How Obamacare Has Changed America.” CNN , Cable News Network, 8 July 2019, www.cnn.com/2019/07/08/politics/obamacare-how-it-has-changed-america/index.html.

Recent Posts

• Zero-Covid: A Crisis in Shanghai
• Treatments for Fetal Rh Anemia
• Health Inequity and Racial Disparities in Covid-19, Gun Violence, and HIV/AIDS Cases
• Abortion Rights Are up in the Air Again: It’s All on the Line in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
• The History of Racial Disparities and Discrimination in the U.S. Healthcare System

A business journal from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

Knowledge at Wharton Podcast

Does the u.s. need universal health care, december 8, 2020 • 11 min listen.

Wharton's Robert Hughes explains the moral and social benefits of universal health care and how such a system might look in the U.S.

• Public Policy

Wharton’s Robert Hughes speaks with Wharton Business Daily on SiriusXM about the need for universal health care in the U.S.

Nothing quite exposes the inequalities that exist in American society more than the health care system. It’s a complex combination of private insurance, public programs and politics that drives up costs, creating significant barriers to lifesaving medical treatment for large segments of the population. In America, access to quality health care often depends on income, employment and status.

Why Should Healthcare Be Free?

Robert Hughes, professor of business ethics and legal studies at Wharton, is an advocate for universal health care coverage. Drawing deeply on his research in philosophy, Hughes believes that equal access to medical care is beneficial for both liberty and social stability. Health, he says, should not be tied to wealth.

“I think it’s very disturbing that people have to go to GoFundMe in order to get their medical treatments paid for. It creates a power imbalance,” he said, referring to the crowdsourcing platform used to help raise money for patient bills. “That’s why I say that truly universal health care would be good for people’s liberty. Because you’re not really free if you’re depending on charity, especially discretionary charity like the kind you see on GoFundMe, for a basic need like health care.”

Hughes recently joined the Wharton Business Daily radio show on SiriusXM to discuss universal health care in the context of the presidential election. (Listen to the podcast at the top of this page.) President-elect Joe Biden has said he will protect and rebuild the Affordable Care Act , which has been under attack since it was enacted in 2010 under President Barack Obama.

Does the U.S. Hhave Universal Healthcare Now That Obamacare Exists?

The ACA, commonly referred to as Obamacare, brought the U.S. closer to providing universal health care through subsidized private health insurance, but Hughes said there’s still a wide gap. He believes policymakers should ensure that everyone has coverage and access to the same needed treatments.

“It’s very disturbing that people have to go to GoFundMe in order to get their medical treatments paid for. It creates a power imbalance.”

“I think it’s totally feasible for us to change the health care system, if we all were willing to do the right thing. But we’re not all willing to do the right thing,” Hughes said.

The professor argued the case for universal health care in a paper titled “ Egalitarian Provision of Necessary Medical Treatment ,” which was published last year in the Journal of Ethics. (The author-accepted version is  here .) He examined the health care systems of the U.K., Australia and Canada, concluding that Canada’s single-payer system is the most advantageous for the U.S.

Private insurance would still exist under such a setup, but it could not be used to pay for treatments already covered under universal health care. This provision would eliminate wealth as the controlling factor in health.

Why Doesn’t the U.S. Have Free Healthcare?

“I don’t understand why there’s so much resistance to the idea of truly universal health insurance in the United States, given that this is something that other industrial countries just do,” Hughes said.

He acknowledged that the U.S. doesn’t have the “political will” to change a system that’s been entrenched since the end of World War II, when employers began offering health insurance to their workers instead of higher wages.

“We can’t wave a magic wand and go back to 1946,” he said. “I don’t see the United States completely uprooting all these insurances. And that means we might need to create a model that keeps a lot of what we have, making it more accessible to more people, rather than creating all new institutions from scratch.”

Knowledge at Wharton interviewed Hughes in 2019 about his paper. For an in-depth look into his research and advocacy, read the interview here .

More From Knowledge at Wharton

From Amazon to Uber: Why Platform Accountability Requires a Holistic Approach

Should ESG Be Politicized? Why ESG Has Become an Easy Target

How Social Insurance Drives Credit Card Debt

Looking for more insights.

Sign up to stay informed about our latest article releases.

Home — Essay Samples — Government & Politics — Health Care Reform — For and Against Health Care for Everyone: Research-Based Argumentative

For and Against Health Care for Everyone: Research-based Argumentative

• Categories: Affordable Care Act Health Care Reform Universal Health Care

About this sample

Words: 1051 |

Published: Apr 17, 2023

Words: 1051 | Pages: 2 | 6 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

• Expert in: Nursing & Health Government & Politics

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 569 words

5 pages / 2147 words

5 pages / 2390 words

1 pages / 629 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Health Care Reform

AIDS, or Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, is a chronic, potentially life-threatening condition caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Since the first cases were reported in the early 1980s, AIDS has become a global [...]

Cancer, a term that strikes fear into the hearts of many, is a disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Its impact is not just physical but extends to emotional, social, and economic realms, leaving a profound mark on [...]

Infectious diseases have had a significant impact on human societies, shaping the course of events and influencing the development of public health policies. The Great Influenza, also known as the Spanish flu, was a devastating [...]

Penis size has been a topic of interest and concern for many men. It is often associated with masculinity, self-esteem, and sexual confidence. As a result, the market for penis enlargement products has grown significantly, with [...]

We all know going to the doctor’s sucks. Paying that $20 at front is your least favorite thing. Someone doesn't want to get the best pill, or the best surgery because of the prices. They think universal health care will help [...]

As a consequence of the success of decades of public-health investments and efforts that have reduced the burden of infectious disease, chronic diseases are rising as the top healthcare threat in emerging markets. Likewise, with [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Essay on Free Healthcare

Students are often asked to write an essay on Free Healthcare in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Free Healthcare

Introduction.

Free healthcare means medical services are provided without cost. It’s a system where the government pays for citizens’ health needs.

Benefits of Free Healthcare

Free healthcare ensures everyone gets medical attention, regardless of their financial status. It reduces health inequalities and promotes a healthier society.

Challenges of Free Healthcare

However, free healthcare can lead to long waiting times and may lower the quality of care. It can also put financial pressure on the government.

Despite challenges, free healthcare is essential for a fair society. It ensures everyone has access to medical care.

250 Words Essay on Free Healthcare

Free healthcare, a concept that advocates for the provision of health services without the direct charge to the patient, has been a subject of global debate. It is considered a fundamental human right by many, while others express concerns about its economic feasibility and quality.

Economic Implications

One of the primary arguments against free healthcare is the potential economic strain. Critics argue that it could lead to increased taxes and government spending, potentially destabilizing the economy. However, proponents counter this by stating that the economic benefits, such as reduced sick days and increased productivity, may outweigh the costs.

Healthcare Quality and Accessibility

Another concern is the potential decline in the quality of healthcare due to overburdened facilities and staff. However, proponents argue that free healthcare would increase accessibility, particularly for low-income individuals, leading to overall improved public health.

Universal Human Right

Advocates for free healthcare often cite the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that everyone has a right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being. They argue that free healthcare is a moral obligation of societies to ensure the well-being of all their members.

In conclusion, free healthcare is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. It requires careful consideration of economic implications, healthcare quality, and moral obligations. As future leaders, it is important for us to continue this discussion with empathy and critical thinking.

500 Words Essay on Free Healthcare

The idea of free healthcare has been a contentious topic for decades, stirring debates among policymakers, healthcare professionals, and citizens alike. In essence, free healthcare implies that the government provides medical services without charging the end-users. The concept is rooted in the belief that healthcare is a fundamental human right, irrespective of one’s financial standing. However, while the idea may seem ideal on the surface, it is critical to delve into its implications, advantages, and challenges.

Advantages of Free Healthcare

Undoubtedly, the most significant advantage of free healthcare is the universal access it provides. It ensures that every citizen, regardless of their socio-economic status, has the right to receive necessary medical attention. This can lead to a healthier society, as people are more likely to seek preventative care and treatment for illnesses when cost is not a barrier.

Furthermore, free healthcare can alleviate financial stress associated with medical costs. In many countries, medical debt is a leading cause of bankruptcy. Free healthcare can eliminate this burden, allowing individuals to allocate their resources to other essential areas such as education or housing.

Despite its potential benefits, free healthcare also presents significant challenges. The most prominent is the financial strain on the government. Funding free healthcare requires substantial public expenditure, which can lead to increased taxes or cuts in other public services.

Moreover, free healthcare may lead to longer wait times for procedures and treatments due to increased demand. This could potentially result in a lower standard of care if the system becomes overwhelmed. Additionally, there’s a risk of overuse or misuse of services since they are freely accessible, leading to inefficiencies in the system.

Free Healthcare: A Balancing Act

Given the advantages and challenges, implementing free healthcare requires a delicate balancing act. Policymakers must ensure that the provision of free healthcare does not compromise the quality of care or place an undue financial burden on the state.

One potential solution could be a hybrid healthcare system, where basic healthcare is provided for free, while additional services are charged. This could strike a balance between ensuring universal access to healthcare and maintaining the sustainability of the system.

In conclusion, free healthcare is a complex issue that necessitates careful consideration of its potential benefits and drawbacks. While it promises universal access and financial relief, it also poses significant challenges in terms of funding and service delivery. As such, a nuanced approach, potentially incorporating elements of both free and paid healthcare, may offer the most viable solution for achieving health equity and fiscal responsibility. The debate surrounding free healthcare underscores the broader question of how societies choose to prioritize and allocate resources, highlighting the interplay between economics, ethics, and public policy.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Free Education
• Essay on Free College Education
• Essay on Frankenstein

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

High quality, affordable health care is the right of every American

As the number of uninsured americans rises, aamc president and ceo darrell g. kirch, md, urges policymakers to push forward..

As I approach the end of my tenure at the AAMC, I’m often asked about the high point of my 13 years as president and CEO. Without reservation, I reply that it was when the AAMC made its final push to endorse and secure passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). I was proud that the AAMC Board of Directors stepped up to take a strong public stand on this legislation while many other organizations stayed on the sidelines waiting to see how the politics would play out.

As the voice of academic medicine, the AAMC has long held that high quality, affordable health care is the right of every American. The AAMC released a document in 2008, Principles for U.S. Health Care Reform: A Guide for Policy Makers , underscoring the crisis of access, cost, and quality in the nation’s health care system, well before the ACA was passed in 2010.

The evidence is overwhelming that people with health insurance have a huge advantage . People without coverage are more likely to suffer declines in overall health — the result of little or no preventive care and delays in care that cause more severe problems or hospitalizations. Other studies have shown improvements in self-reported health and certain health outcomes measures in individuals who live in states that expanded their Medicaid program .

Given our commitment to the well-being of our patients, supporting the ACA was an ethical, not a partisan, decision. It was gratifying to see the numbers of uninsured Americans decline to historically low levels after the ACA took effect in January 2014. The number of uninsured nonelderly Americans dropped from over 44 million in 2013 to just below 27 million in 2016 .

Given this impressive success, it is distressing to see our progress show signs of regressing. The Kaiser Family Foundation reported that the number of uninsured people jumped by nearly 700,000 people in 2017 . This was the first increase in uninsured Americans since the ACA first extended insurance coverage to millions more people. In addition, another study found that the number of children in the United States without health insurance increased in 2017 for the first time in more than a decade .

Without access to affordable coverage, we will see more Americans forego or delay necessary medical care, putting millions of lives at risk and driving up costs to the system.

And the decline continued last year. A Gallup survey showed that by the close of 2018, 13.7% of adults in the country had no health insurance, up from 10.9% at the end of 2016. This marked the highest uninsured rate since 2014, when the major provisions of the ACA went into effect. The greatest increase in the uninsured occurred among women, younger adults, and low income persons.

The impact on people who have lost their insurance has even greater implications today than before the ACA. Health care costs are the highest they have ever been, compounded by a dramatic rise in pharmaceutical costs. We have seen an uptick in media stories about tragedies resulting from families unable to afford treatment or prescriptions. In 2017, more than 1 in 4 uninsured adults said they delayed or went without health care due to cost factors .

Teaching hospitals have been on the front line to help uninsured Americans. AAMC members provide 31% of all hospital charity care and 25% of all Medicaid inpatient services, while comprising only 5% of the acute care, general service hospitals in the country. But the safety net we provide is not enough to close the access gap for the uninsured. Only public policy intervention can do that.

A call for responsible health care legislation

In a report last year, the Commonwealth Fund attributed the declining uninsured rate largely to federal actions that reduced ACA outreach and enrollment funding, along with a failure to address health plan affordability in the individual market . Shorter open-enrollment periods also contributed to fewer individuals purchasing insurance.

A Kaiser Family Foundation analysis points to several factors behind the recent rise in people without insurance: 1) their state did not expand Medicaid; 2) they are subject to immigrant eligibility restrictions; 3) their income makes them ineligible for financial assistance; 4) they are eligible but the insurance options are unaffordable; or 5) they lack the knowledge to obtain coverage.

As of January, Americans no longer have to pay a penalty if they don’t carry insurance, which has resulted in rising premiums. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that this will lead to about 8 million more uninsured people in 2027 . In addition, state policy changes are precipitating declines in people covered by Medicaid, and 14 states still have not opted for any Medicaid expansion.

Watching our efforts unravel to improve health care accessibility is beyond troubling. We took a strong stand on the Texas federal court’s effort to declare the ACA unconstitutional and will follow this case closely through the appeals process. The AAMC is committed to supporting policies that seek to increase coverage, as was intended when the ACA was passed.

The AAMC is urging the federal government to enact policies that extend ACA coverage gains and improve cost protections on individual market and employer plans.

Dismantling any of its provisions is a disaster for the health care system, unless it is part of another comprehensive reform package providing equal or better coverage. We have yet to see such a package, including during the “repeal and replace” debate.

Now 20 months away from the next presidential election, health care continues to be a top issue for voters, as it was in the 2018 midterms. Without access to affordable coverage, we will see more Americans forego or delay necessary medical care, putting millions of lives at risk and driving up costs to the system.

As such, the AAMC is urging the federal government to enact policies that extend ACA coverage gains and improve cost protections on individual market and employer plans. Or if legislators come up with alternate strategies in the interest of our patients, we would consider supporting that as well.

With the 2020 election in sight, I am hopeful that health care will remain in the spotlight. We must stand by our guiding principles to avoid going backward. The AAMC will continue to work with policymakers to ensure that all Americans receive the comprehensive insurance coverage and high-quality health care they need and deserve.

AZexplained.com is an online place directory that helps people get the information they need on a place. It’s currently in beta stage.

RECENT UPDATED

Saraval Industries Corp.

Bonner’s Restaurant

MD Sunrise Farm

State of North Dakota: Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Services Division

LDJ Capital – New York HQ

Martin’s point health care.

CleanTech Cleaning & Restoration, LLC.

Perla Soto, Monarch Real Estate

Burleigh county human resource.

• Privacy Policy

Why Healthcare Should Be Free? Research Paper

Introduction, works cited.

• Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience that health care should be free for everyone.
• Thesis Statement: Given the current state of health care, the US should adopt a system that covers all citizens.
• Organizational Pattern: Monroe’s Motivated Sequence.
• Has anyone here ever been uncovered by health insurance when seeking a new workplace or working part-time?
• In a time when it feels something has gone wrong, what we rely on is health care that is affordable – why not make it free?
• Think about how much risk you take with no health insurance, especially when an average visit to a doctor costs you more than $60 (Fay par. 8).
• Today, I would like to speak about the reasons a free health care system is the solution to the situation we are witnessing.

The current health care issues in the US are drastic and affect us all

• In 2007, the percentage of bankrupt persons due to uncovered medical bills was 62% (Tamkins par. 2).
• Many of them were insured but lost their money due to coverage gaps.
• Health insurance can take, e.g., $150 a month.
• One of the reasons for it is that top health insurance CEOs’ salaries sum up to tens of millions (Eastwood par. 1).
• Other reasons are excess lab testing and malpractice (Wagner par. 17).
• The ACA was aimed at reducing the percentage of uninsured (“Key Facts About the Uninsured Population” par. 1).
• Still, many people remain uninsured because they still cannot afford it.

Transition: Surely our health care system needs improvement, but there is a tangible solution to it.

Let us see how we can benefit from a free health care system

• The system would not be entirely free, but the costs would be reduced (Nicholson par. 2-6).
• It would also concern tests and prescription drugs.
• Every citizen would be covered by health care.
• Health care would be provided when you seek a new job or do not suffer chronically.

Transition: The benefits of free health care being observed, let us see how free health care has been applied to practice.

Massachusetts health program provides health care to nearly all citizens

• Free insurance was given to those beyond the poverty level (Pallarito par. 1-4).
• Young adults seeking a job were insured.
• Death rates were declined by 4.5%.

Transition: A free health care system can literally save lives.

• Today, I have discussed why the US needs free health care, the benefits of it and how it was implemented by Massachusetts.
• The unaffordability and uninsuredness make your fellow citizens suffer.
• You will probably live longer if you are a Massachusetts resident – but the reform should cover the entire country.
• Honest health care that is affordable for everyone is the step that will unite us on the way to our dream.

Eastwood, Brian. Top health insurance CEO pay exceeds $10 million in 2014 . 2015. Web.

Fay, Bill. Doctor Visit Costs . n.d. Web.

“ Key Facts about the Uninsured Population. ” The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . Kaiser Family Foundation. 2015. Web.

Nicholson, David. “ The world needs free healthcare for all, says the ex-NHS boss. ” The Guardian . Guardian News and Media Limited. 2014. Web.

Pallarito, Karen. “ Massachusetts health care reform law lowered death rates, study finds. ” CBSNews . CBS Interactive Inc. 2014. Web.

Tamkins, Theresa. Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies . 2009. Web.

Wagner, Neil. Health Insurance: Millions Spent on Salaries, Not Care . 2010. Web.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, January 17). Why Healthcare Should Be Free? https://ivypanda.com/essays/why-healthcare-should-be-free/

"Why Healthcare Should Be Free?" IvyPanda , 17 Jan. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/why-healthcare-should-be-free/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Why Healthcare Should Be Free'. 17 January.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Why Healthcare Should Be Free?" January 17, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/why-healthcare-should-be-free/.

1. IvyPanda . "Why Healthcare Should Be Free?" January 17, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/why-healthcare-should-be-free/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Why Healthcare Should Be Free?" January 17, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/why-healthcare-should-be-free/.

• Diabetes Issues: Insulin Price and Unaffordability
• Holistic Care for the Chronically Ill Patients
• The Role of Language in Cultural Studies
• Families With a Chronically Ill Child: Issues and Techniques
• Weight Control for Chronically Mentally Ill People
• Chronically Ill Older Adults' Care and Management
• The Intentions and the Causes of the Monroe Doctrine
• Muse's of Marylyn Monroe
• The Probable Cause of Marilyn Monroe’s Death
• Reformed Epistemology Analysis
• Arlington Community and Healthy Living Conditions
• Australian Health Promotion Program' Evaluation
• Supporting the Health Needs of Patients With Parkinson’s, Preeclampsia, and Postpartum Depression
• Public Health Systems: England and Egypt
• Pender's Health Promotion Model Application

Some people think health care should be free for everyone. Other think that people should pay their medical cost themselves. Discuss both sides and give your opnion.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

• Restatement of thesis
• Prediction or recommendation

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

• In conclusion
• To conclude
• To summarize
• In a nutshell

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ » — a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

• Check your IELTS essay »
• Find essays with the same topic
• View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
• Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

the most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In many countries, online shopping is becoming more and more popular. some people think that this is having a negative impact on society. to what extent do you agree or disagree, more and more athletes are using drugs to enhance their performance. what do you think are the reasons and effects of this, people who live in large cities face a range of problems in their daily life. what are the most significant of these problems how can these problems be tackled, do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages.