the four step model of business problem solving is

• Search Search Please fill out this field.

What Is the PDCA Cycle?

How the pdca cycle works, the pdca cycle and kaizen, benefits of the pdca cycle, examples of the pdca cycle, the bottom line.

• Business Essentials

What Does PDCA Stand For in Business? Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle is a four-step problem-solving iterative technique used to improve business processes. Originally developed by American physicist Walter A. Shewhart during the 1920s, the cycle draws its inspiration from the continuous evaluation of management practices and management’s willingness to adopt and disregard unsupported ideas.

The method was popularized by quality control pioneer Dr. W. Edwards Deming in the 1950s who coined the term “Shewhart” Cycle after his mentor. It was Deming who realized the PDCA Cycle could be used to improve production processes in the United States during World War II.

Key Takeaways

• The PDCA Cycle is a four-step technique that is used to solve business problems.
• Many managers unknowingly use the PDCA Cycle as it encompasses much of the same framework as strategic management.
• The last step of the PDCA Cycle (act) calls for corrective actions to stimulate and sustain continuous business improvement.
• The PDCA process is similar to the Japanese business philosophy of Kaizen.
• Many large corporations, such as Toyota and Nike, have seen dramatic growth after implementing PDCA or Six Sigma methodologies.

The PDCA Cycle can help differentiate a company from its competitors, particularly in today’s corporate world, where businesses are always searching for ways to streamline their processes, reduce costs, increase profits, and improve customer satisfaction.

Many managers apply the PDCA Cycle unknowingly to help direct their organizations as it encompasses the basic tenets of strategic planning. The four components of the PDCA Cycle are outlined below.

A well-defined project plan provides a framework for operations. Importantly, it should reflect the organization’s mission and values. It should also map the project's goals and clearly indicate the best way to attain them.

This is the step where the plan is set in motion. The plan was made for a reason, so it is important for players to execute it as outlined. This stage can be broken down into three sub-segments, including training of all personnel involved in the project, the actual process of doing the work, and recording insights, or data, for future evaluation.

Typically, there should be two checks throughout the project. First, checks alongside implementation ensure the project's objectives are being met. Second, a more comprehensive review of the project carried out upon completion addresses the successes and failures so that future adjustments can be made.

The final step is to take corrective action once past mistakes have been identified and resolved. The PDCA Cycle is repeated and can be redefined perhaps to better results under new guidelines.

Given its cyclical nature, the PDCA Cycle is something businesses can institute once and then use to continuously iterate and improve their operations.

The PDCA process is similar to the Japanese business philosophy of Kaizen , which, when translated, means "change for the better" or "continuous improvement." Kaizen is where all employees are involved in improving productivity by finding efficiencies in the work environment. Like the PDCA cycle, Kaizen aims for continuous improvement through small, incremental changes.

Examples of changes that might be made through Kaizen or PDCA are using new systems, eliminating waste, or implementing just-in-time delivery. Not all changes need to be small or incremental.

The concept behind PDCA and Kaizen is that the culture of an organization changes as the employees learn to be problem solvers and critical thinkers. The PDCA cycle tests employees' ideas, adjusts them, and then implements them if they have potential. The cycle is an iterative process that continually tests concepts and promotes improvements.

Companies looking to enhance their internal and external processes often deploy the PDCA methodology to minimize errors and maximize outcomes. Once established, companies can repeat the PDCA Cycle and make it a standard operating procedure. The final stage of the methodology, "Act," takes corrective actions and makes the methodology ideal for continuous improvement efforts.

Lean methods like PDCA and Kaizen helped Nike to double its profits from around $100 billion in 2015 to over $200 billion in 2021.

The Mayo Clinic

The Mayo Clinic, a nonprofit, world-class hospital and research center, conducted a quality improvement study that looked at wait times for patients who were possible candidates for large cochlear implant surgery. The idea was to employ Kaizen principles to remove barriers and improve access for patients.

The study looked at the refining of specific treatments, the management of patient records, and waiting room times. Ultimately, there were positive outcomes for patients.  Among the results, median cycle time for candidacy testing decreased from 7.3 to 3 hours, and total inventory of clinic stock was reduced by 31%.

Is PDCA the Same As Total Quality Management (TQM)?

Total quality management (TQM), which is the precursor to Six Sigma , includes the philosophy of PDCA, but it goes one step further.

According to Smartsheet, which quotes Marlon Walters, the Founder and CEO of Horizon Group Consulting, "With TQM, you have to wait for your customers to confirm that it’s good. With Six Sigma, at the end of the day, you don’t guess if your product is better. You know it. If you properly identify your market and your product has the best fit for the niche, you know you have the best product from a process perspective."

Kaizen, or PDCA, is more of a philosophy for how to organize the larger workplace and how to engage coworkers. It is less about waiting for customer feedback or results. Both PDCA and TQM consider the whole company responsible for continuous improvement.

What Is the Difference Between PDCA and Six Sigma?

The difference between PDCA and Six Sigma is that Six Sigma is an all-encompassing management principle that includes PDCA as part of its structure. PDCA explains how to enact Six Sigma, it is the plan, do, act, check process. Six Sigma calls this the DMAIC method (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control).

According to Walters, PDCA is people-oriented while Six Sigma is process-based. For example, the term "define" in Six Sigma removes the human element, and the term "measure" puts the focus on data.

What Is the Difference Between PDCA and PDSA?

PDCA stans for plan, do, check, act, whereas PDSA stands for plan, do, study, act. They are both iterative, four-stage problem-solving models used to improve a process. The main difference between the two is that PDCA, which was developed before the PDSA model, has the "check" stage. In this stage, the team determines whether what they intended to achieve has actually occurred by checking expected results with the actual results. So, PDCA has a built-in check for every cycle in the process.

The PDCA Cycle, PDSA, Kaizen, and Six Sigma are all proven ways to continuously improve processes. Many companies including Nike, Toyota, the Mayo Clinic, and many others have seen dramatic growth after employing one or more of these iterative strategies. The concept changes the culture of a business so that all stakeholders have input and can act as problem solvers and critical thinkers. The result is more ideas for change.

PubMed.gov. " Application of Kaizen Principles to a Large Cochlear Implant Practice: A Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative at Mayo Clinic. " Accessed June 3, 2021.

FXSSI. " TOP 10 Most Profitable Companies in the World in 2021. " Accessed June 3, 2021.

Macrotrends. " NIKE Market Cap 2006-2021 | NKE ." Accessed June 3, 2021.

Smartsheet. " A Quality Principle: Everything You Need to Know about Total Quality Management ." Accessed June 3, 2021.

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Your Privacy Choices

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Share Podcast

The Right Way to Solve Complex Business Problems

Corey Phelps, a strategy professor at McGill University, says great problem solvers are hard to find. Even seasoned professionals at the highest levels of organizations regularly...

• Apple Podcasts

Corey Phelps, a strategy professor at McGill University, says great problem solvers are hard to find. Even seasoned professionals at the highest levels of organizations regularly fail to identify the real problem and instead jump to exploring solutions. Phelps identifies the common traps and outlines a research-proven method to solve problems effectively. He’s the coauthor of the book, Cracked it! How to solve big problems and sell solutions like top strategy consultants.

Download this podcast

Welcome to the IdeaCast from Harvard Business Review. I’m Curt Nickisch.

Problem-solving is in demand. It’s considered the top skill for success at management consulting firms. And it’s increasingly desired for everyone, not just new MBA’s.

A report from the World Economic Forum predicts that more than one-third of all jobs across all industries will require complex problem-solving as one of their core skills by 2020.

The problem is, we’re often really bad at problem-solving. Our guest today says even the most educated and experienced of senior leaders go about it the wrong way.

COREY PHELPS: I think this is one of the misnomers about problem-solving. There’s this belief that because we do it so frequently – and especially for senior leaders, they have a lot of experience, they solve problems for a living – and as such we would expect them to be quite good at it. And I think what we find is that they’re not. They don’t solve problems well because they fall prey to basically the foibles of being a human being – they fall prey to the cognitive biases and the pitfalls of problem-solving.

CURT NICKISCH: That’s Corey Phelps. He says fixing these foibles is possible and almost straightforward. You can improve your problem-solving skills by following a disciplined method.

Corey Phelps is a strategy professor at McGill University. He’s also the co-author of the book “Cracked It: How to Solve Big Problems and Sell Solutions like Top Strategy C onsultants.” Corey thanks for coming on the show.

COREY PHELPS: Thank you for the opportunity to talk.

CURT NICKISCH: Another probably many, many biases that prevent people from solving big problems well.

COREY PHELPS: Absolutely.

CURT NICKISCH: What are some of the most common, or your favorite stumbling blocks?

COREY PHELPS: Well, one of my favorites is essentially the problem of jumping to solutions or the challenge of jumping to solutions.

CURT NICKISCH: Oh, come on Corey. That’s so much fun.

COREY PHELPS: It is, and it’s very much a result of how our brains have evolved to process information, but it’s my favorite because we all do it. And especially I would say it happens in organizations because in organizations when you layer on these time pressures and you layer on these concerns about efficiency and productivity, it creates enormous, I would say incentive to say “I don’t have time to carefully define and analyze the problem. I got to get a solution. I got to implement it as quick as possible.” And the fundamental bias I think is, is illustrated beautifully by Danny Kahneman in his book “Thinking, Fast and Slow,” is that our minds are essentially hardwired to think fast.

We are able to pay attention to a tiny little bit of information. We can then weave a very coherent story that makes sense to us. And then we can use that story to jump very quickly to a solution that we just know will work. And if we just were able to move from that approach of what Kahneman and cognitive psychologists called “System 1 thinking” to “System 2 thinking” – that is to slow down, be more deliberative, be more structured – we would be able to better understand the problem that we’re trying to solve and be more effective and exhaustive with the tools that we want to use to understand the problem before we actually go into solution-generation mode.

CURT NICKISCH: Complex problems demand different areas of expertise and often as individuals we’re coming to those problems with one of them. And I wonder if that’s often the problem of problem-solving, which is that a manager is approaching it from their own expertise and because of that, they see the problem through a certain way. Is that one of the cognitive biases that stop people from being effective problem solvers?

COREY PHELPS: Yeah. That’s often referred to as the expertise trap. It basically colors and influences what we pay attention to with respect to a particular problem. And it limits us with respect to the tools that we can bring to bear to solve that problem. In the world of psychology, there’s famous psychologist, Abraham Maslow, who is famous for the hierarchy of needs. He’s also famous for something that was a also known as MaSlow’s axiom, Maslow’s law. It’s also called the law of the instrument, and to paraphrase Maslow, he basically said, “Look, I suppose if the only tool that you have in your toolkit is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”

His point is that if you’re, for example, a finance expert and your toolkit is the toolkit of let’s say, discounted cash flow analysis for valuation, then you’re going to see problems through that very narrow lens. Now, one of the ways out of this, I think to your point is collaboration becomes fundamentally important. And collaboration starts with the recognition that I don’t have all of the tools, all of the knowledge in me to effectively solve this. So I need to recruit people that can actually help me.

CURT NICKISCH: That’s really interesting. I wonder how much the fact that you have solved a problem before it makes you have a bias for that same solution for future problems?

COREY PHELPS: Yeah, that’s a great question. What you’re alluding to is analogical reasoning, and we know that human beings, one of the things that allows us to operate in novel settings is that we can draw on our past experience. And we do so when it comes to problem solving, often times without being conscious or mentally aware of it. We reach into our memory and we ask ourselves a very simple question: “Have I seen a problem like this before?”

And if it looks familiar to me, the tendency then is to say, “Okay, well what worked in solving that problem that I faced before?” And then to say, “Well, if it worked in that setting, then it should work in this setting.” So that’s reasoning by analogy.

Reasoning by analogy has a great upside. It allows human beings to not become overwhelmed by the tremendous novelty that they face in their daily lives. The downside is that if we don’t truly understand it at sort of a deep level, whether or not the two problems are similar or different, then we can make what cognitive psychologists called surface-level analogies.

And we can then say, “Oh, this looks a lot like the problem I faced before, that solution that worked there is going to easily work here.” And we try that solution and it fails and it fails largely because if we dug a little bit deeper, the two problems actually aren’t much alike at all in terms of their underlying causes.

CURT NICKISCH: The starkest example of this, I think, in your book is Ron Johnson who left Apple to become CEO of JC Penney. Can you talk about that a little bit and what that episode for the company says about this?

COREY PHELPS: So yes, its – Ron Johnson had been hired away from Target in the United States to, by Steve Jobs to help create Apple stores. Apple stores are as many people know the most successful physical retailer on the planet measured by, for example, sales per square foot or per square meter. He’s got the golden touch. He’s created this tremendously successful retail format for Apple.

So the day that it was announced that Ron Johnson was going to step into the CEO role at JC Penney, the stock price of JC Penney went up by almost 18 percent. So clearly he was viewed as the savior. Johnson moves very, very quickly. Within a few months, he announces that he has a strategic plan and it basically comes in three parts.

Part number one is he’s going to eliminate discount pricing. JC Penney had been a very aggressive sales promoter. The second piece of it is he’s going to completely change how they organize merchandise. It’s no longer going to be organized by function – so menswear, housewares, those sorts of things. It’s going to be organized by boutique, so there’s going to be a Levi’s boutique, a Martha Stewart Boutique, a Joe Fresh Boutique and so on.

And it would drop the JC P enney name, they would call it JCP. And he rolls this out over the course of about 12 months across the entire chain of over 1100 stores. What this tells us, he’s so confident in his solution, his strategic transformation, that he doesn’t think it’s worth it to test this out on one or two pilot stores.

CURT NICKISCH: Yeah, he was quoted as saying: “At Apple, we didn’t test anything.”

COREY PHELPS: We didn’t test. Yes. What worked at Apple, he assumed would work at JC Penney. And the critical thing that I think he missed is that JC Penney customers are very different from Apple store customers. In fact, JC Penney customers love the discount. They love the thrill of hunting for a deal.

CURT NICKISCH: Which seems so fundamental to business, right? Understanding your customer. It’s just kind of shocking, I guess, to hear the story.

COREY PHELPS: It is shocking and especially when you consider that Ron Johnson had spent his entire career in retail, so this is someone that had faced, had seen, problems in retailers for decades – for over three decades by the time that he got to JC Penney. So you would expect someone with that degree of experience in that industry wouldn’t make that leap of, well, what worked at Apple stores is going to work at JC Penney stores, but in fact that’s exactly what happened.

CURT NICKISCH: In your book, you essentially suggest four steps that you recommend people use. Tell us about the four steps then.

COREY PHELPS: So in the book we describe what we call the “Four S method,” so four stages, each of which starts with the letter “s”. So the first stage is “state the problem.” Stating the problem is fundamentally about defining what the problem is that you are attempting to solve.

CURT NICKISCH: And you probably would say don’t hurry over that first step or the other three are going to be kind of pointless.

COREY PHELPS: Yeah, that’s exactly the point of of laying out the four s’s. There’s a tremendous amount of desire even amongst senior executives to want to get in and fix the problem. In other words, what’s the trouble? What are the symptoms? What would define success? What are the constraints that we would be operating under? Who owns the problem? And then who are the key stakeholders?

Oftentimes that step is skipped over and we go right into, “I’ve got a hypothesis about what I think the solution is and I’m so obsessed with getting this thing fixed quickly, I’m not going to bother to analyze it particularly well or test the validity of my assumptions. I’m going to go right into implementation mode.”

The second step, what we call “structure the problem” is once you have defined the problem, you need to then start to identify what are the potential causes of that problem. So there are different tools that we talked about in the book that you can structure a problem for analysis. Once you’ve structured the problem for analysis and you’ve conducted the analysis that helps you identify what are the underlying causes that are contributing to it, which will then inform the third stage which is generating solutions for the problem and then testing and evaluating those solutions.

CURT NICKISCH: Is the danger that that third step – generating solutions – is the step that people spend the most time on or have the most fun with?

COREY PHELPS: Yeah. The danger is, is that what that’s naturally what people gravitate towards. So we want to skip over the first two, state and structure.

CURT NICKISCH: As soon as you said it, I was like, “let’s talk about that more.”

COREY PHELPS: Yeah. And we want to jump right into solutioning because people love to talk about their ideas that are going to fix the problem. And that’s actually a useful way to frame a discussion about solutions – we could, or we might do this – because it opens up possibilities for experimentation.

And the problem is that when we often talk about what we could do, we have very little understanding of what the problem is that we’re trying to solve and what are the underlying causes of that problem. Because as you said, solution generation is fun. Look, the classic example is brainstorming. Let’s get a bunch of people in a room and let’s talk about the ideas on how to fix this thing. And again, be deliberate, be disciplined. Do those first stages, the first two stages – state and structure – before you get into the solution generation phase.

CURT NICKISCH: Yeah. The other thing that often happens there is just the lack of awareness of just the cost of the different solutions – how much time, or what they would actually take to do.

COREY PHELPS: Yeah, and again, I’ll go back to that example I used of brainstorming where it’s fun to get a group of people together and talk about our ideas and how to fix the problem. There’s a couple challenges of that. One is what often happens when we do that is we tend to censor the solutions that we come up with. In other words, we ask ourselves, “if I say this idea, people are gonna, think I’m crazy, or people going to say: that’s stupid, that’ll never work, we can’t do that in our organization. It’s going to be too expensive, it’s going to take too much time. We don’t have the resources to do it.”

So brainstorming downside is we we self-sensor, so that’s where you need to have deep insight into your organization in terms of A. what’s going to be feasible, B. what’s going to be desirable on the part of the people that actually have the problem, who you’re trying to solve the problem for and C. from a business standpoint, is it going to be financially attractive for us?

So applying again a set of disciplined criteria that help you choose amongst those ideas for potential solutions. Then the last stage of the process which is selling – because it’s rare in any organization that someone or the group of people that come up with the solution actually have the power and the resources to implement it, so that means they’re going to have to persuade other people to buy into it and want to help.

CURT NICKISCH: Design thinking is another really different method essentially for solving problems or coming up with solutions that just aren’t arrived at through usual problem-solving or usual decision-making processes. I’m just wondering how design thinking comes to play when you’re also outlining these, you know, disciplined methods for stating and solving problems.

COREY PHELPS: For us it’s about choosing the right approach. You know what the potential causes of a problem are. You just don’t know which ones are operating in the particular problem you’re trying to solve. And what that means is that you’ve got a theory – and this is largely the world of strategy consultants – strategy consultants have theories. They have, if you hear them speak, deep understanding of different types of organizational problems, and what they bring is an analytic tool kit that says, “first we’re going to identify all the possible problems, all the possible causes I should say, of this problem. We’re going to figure out which ones are operating and we’re going to use that to come up with a solution.” Then you’ve got problems that you have no idea what the causes are. You’re in a world of unknown unknowns or unk-unks as the operations management people call them.

CURT NICKISCH: That’s terrible.

COREY PHELPS: In other words, you don’t have a theory. So the question is, how do you begin? Well, this is where design thinking can be quite valuable. Design thinking says: first off, let’s find out who are the human beings, the people that are actually experiencing this problem, and let’s go out and let’s talk to them. Let’s observe them. Let’s immerse ourselves in their experience and let’s start to develop an understanding of the causes of the problem from their perspective.

So rather than go into it and say, “I have a theory,” let’s go the design thinking route and let’s actually based upon interactions with users or customers, let’s actually develop a theory. And then we’ll use our new understanding or new insight into the causes of the problem to move into the solution generation phase.

CURT NICKISCH: Problem-solving – we know that that’s something that employers look for when they’re recruiting people. It is one of those phrases that, you know, I’m sure somebody out there has, has the title at a company Chief Problem Solver instead of CEO, right? So, it’s almost one of those phrases that so over used it can lose its meaning.

And if you are being hired or you’re trying to make a case for being on a team that’s tackling a problem, how do you make a compelling case that you are a good problem solver? How can you actually show it?

COREY PHELPS: It’s a great question and then I have two answers to this question. So one is, look at the end of the day, the proof is in the pudding. In other words, can you point to successful solutions that you’ve come up with – solutions that have actually been effective in solving a problem? So that’s one.

The second thing is can you actually articulate how you approach problem-solving? In other words, do you follow a method or are you reinventing the wheel every time you solve a problem? Is it an ad hoc approach? And I think this issue really comes to a head when it comes to the world of strategy consulting firms when they recruit. For example, Mckinsey, you’ve got the Mckinsey problem-solving test, which is again, a test that’s actually trying to elicit the extent to which people are good applicants are good at solving problems

And then you’ve got the case interview. And in the case interview, what they’re looking at is do you have a mastery over certain tools. But what they’re really looking at is, are you actually following a logical process to solve this problem? Because again, what they’re interested in is finding- to your point – people that are going to be good at solving complex organizational problems. So they’re trying to get some evidence that they can demonstrate that they’re good at it and some evidence that they follow a deliberate process.

CURT NICKISCH: So even if you’re not interviewing at a consulting firm, that’s a good approach, to show your thinking, show your process, show the questions you ask?

COREY PHELPS: Yeah, and to your point earlier, at least if we look at what recruiters of MBA students are saying these days, they’re saying, for example, according to the FT’s recent survey, they’re saying that we want people with really good problem solving skills, and by the same token, we find that that’s a skill that’s difficult for us to recruit for. And that reinforces our interest in this area because the fundamental idea for the book is to give people a method. We’re trying to equip not just MBA students but everybody that’s going to face complex problems with a toolkit to solve them better.

CURT NICKISCH: Corey, this has been really great. Thank you.

COREY PHELPS: Thanks for the opportunity. I appreciate it.

CURT NICKISCH: That’s Corey Phelps. He teaches strategy at McGill University, and he co-wrote the book “Cracked It: How to Solve Big Problems and Sell Solutions Like Top Strategy Consultants.”

This episode was produced by Mary Dooe. We got technical help from Rob Eckhardt. Adam Buchholz is our audio product manager.

Thanks for listening to the HBR IdeaCast. I’m Curt Nickisch.

• Subscribe On:

Latest in this series

This article is about decision making and problem solving, partner center.

206-659-6067

• Driving Solutions Strategic Intensive
• Growth Framework Reset
• Business Base Camp Consultation

4 Steps for Business Problem Solving to Get Results

“What are we supposed to do here?” is a question I use to gauge a team’s thinking as we tackle problems together.

It is important to remember that problem-solving is a skill that can be applied to various situations in life, including those we encounter in business. Sometimes, we may experience a never-ending and frustrating challenge, with one obstacle after another. In such cases, revisiting the steps to problem-solving can be helpful, as they provide a valuable framework to approach the problem. 

Following four simple steps can strengthen our problem-solving skills and become more effective at overcoming obstacles and achieving success.

But wait a moment. How do we determine if the perceived “problem” is a problem?

Maybe it’s not the root cause but rather a symptom, and ironing that out creates a cycle of other similar situations endlessly popping up. Solving the same thing(s) repeatedly indicates that these are symptoms.  Focus is required to find the real problem  and determine if you want to be committed to a practical solution that will stick.

Options always exist to solve a symptom or a recurring issue that has a process in place for resolution.

We can keep using resources and energy to solve the persistent problem or improve practices to use fewer resources and energy. There is another option, too: take time to find and fix the more profound problem (I call that a root cause).

Solving a root cause takes more up-front commitment, creates more time, frees up resources to explore other initiatives, and saves money over time. When we prioritize problems through the lens of our one-year comprehensive strategy AND the company mission, we choose what to work on that supports keeping all work on track (i.e., time and budget).

Fortunately, practical methods are available to help you break free from any difficult situation. Whether it’s a common or complex issue, you can rely on proven methods that guarantee results. Don’t waste time on fancy and complicated solutions; choose straightforward and effective problem-solving methods that will help you easily overcome any obstacle.

There’s no trick or gimmick to the steps. There is work. We do have to bring the will, the drive, and the commitment to become proficient at problem-solving, a skill that needs improvement at all levels of business today.

To lead by example, add value to the company and the team, and meet goals, one must have a specific mindset—a Curiosity Mindset.

• A Curiosity Mindset involves being open.
• A willingness to seek out information from people and sources.
• To include unusual or different sources and opinions.
• The ability to sift information for reliability.
• The capacity to connect seemingly unrelated information to find THE custom solution for your problem.

Have you ever heard the colloquialism “can’t see the forest for the trees”? This common pitfall diminishes a Curiosity Mindset and detracts from the problem-solving process.

Achieving success requires more than just completing daily tasks. It’s crucial to take time to review our business goals and reach beyond our usual routines to truly solve any problem. Unforeseen problems may arise, but we can choose to keep moving forward and not let them bring us to a standstill. By practicing new skills and expanding our abilities, we can turn challenges into second nature and add to our natural gifts.

Embracing change and taking on something new takes courage, but it’s the only way to grow and succeed. We can overcome any obstacle and achieve our goals with perseverance and determination.

Take these steps the next time you have a significant outcome and a problem standing in your way. Your commitment and responsibility will make it happen.

With a Curiosity Mindset, we commit to being open to answers and information beyond the core group. This requires a definitive process applicable to a single problem and any that occurs in business. (Of course, there will always be difficulties that crop up. Such is life!)

The 4 Steps to Problem-Solving in Business:

• Recognize there is a problem
• Collect data
• Gather solutions
• Choose a solution

These are the steps, whether looking at long-term objectives three to five years out or solving a problem that can better support how people do work in your company. It seems simple, and you may know this to be true, yet do you really do the work of each step to know you are doing the right work right now?

Let’s look at each step to assess whether you are overlooking something or trying to find a shortcut that may be creating more resistance or slowing you down: 

1. Recognize there’s a problem

You can decide something needs doing, yet, getting it done means taking action. What you prioritize is what you value.

Not only do you need to decide whether change will make a positive difference, your commitment to doing the work to take action on the best solution matters too. Problems may be identified that when solved:

• Improve efficiency to create more time to do important work
• Increase profitability by streamlining or are no longer necessary
• Increase relevance as markets and customer needs shift
• Align the deliverables more to the mission bringing your teams together

How do you take action to determine if the problem is a one worth solving? Schedule time for a  Present Retreat™ with 10 questions to create accountability  that focuses on reflection, assessment, and prioritization for what’s happening in your business right now. Even if you only do this one time, it will give you a different perspective.

2. Understand what data is necessary

How do you get data for consideration, and how do you obtain uncommon data? 

• Standard: search on the internet, financials, and forecasts, competing products.
• Uncommon: ask the people closest to the problem, listen for what customers are seeking, looking at a problem to solve in relationship to how it aligns to your mission and goals.

Are you constantly using the same internal reports? If so, do other people have the same problem, and what have they done about it? Get out of your data and collect someone else’s reports and data.

You could take advantage of your business overview and plan to make informed decisions. A  detailed explanation of the two pillars of business success  is available if you need more information. Sometimes, when we encounter a promising solution or opportunity, we might end up trying to solve problems that do not require solving. To avoid this, we must ensure that any solution we consider aligns with our business overview and growth strategy. This way, we can identify which problems do not need solving by simply looking at the data.

3. Gather solutions

Now you have the problems that — when prioritized — will reach a new outcome. And there is data that reinforces it is a problem worth solving with a commitment to prioritize making the change. These are the basic constraints to find the most impactful solutions.

• Possible solutions now have the following requirements:
• Solve the problem.
• Align to current business goals.
• Create momentum for long term (three to five year) objectives.
• Elevate what we are already doing to be better, what we are best at in the world.

In the companies I have worked with, this is the step where the most failure occurs. Without constraints there are too many solutions, brand-new ideas (that sort of solve the initially identified problem), and more work is created out of the excitement that comes with open-ended possibilities.

Solutions that fit just these four constraints align to doing the right work and being able to do as much work as possible. Anything that doesn’t pass these requirements isn’t a viable solution.

Letting problems that don’t matter to the business’ purpose and goals is freeing. There is more time and energy to explore solutions that can make a difference. You still may fail and yes it is important to fail fast; however, iterating where the chance of failure is significantly higher is a waste of time and not worth the potential loss of confidence. 

4. Choose a solution and take action

Which one makes the most sense and presents the greatest opportunity to address everything about the problem? Get it implemented and observe the results.

Don’t forget: decisions without action keep you exactly where you are. Even if just the first step of the solution is designed and communicated, and the actions are assigned for completion — this will get things moving. Each subsequent action to move toward a completed solution will adjust for the feedback, data, and new information that comes from learning as you go.

There will be mistakes and setbacks, and that is part of the process. Here are top tips I received when I asked a group of business owners to share how they  bounce back and keep going .

Sometimes, repetition of these steps is necessary to find a working solution.

In business, reaching your end goal is great, can be messy and takes time. Sometimes, you need more data, new information comes up, or a different solution works better. We iterate and build on what we know. To improve problem-solving skills, follow these steps daily for 30 days, even for simple problems. Build a Curiosity Mindset and a new skill simultaneously.

***********************************************************************************

Jess Dewell is a professional who has been navigating the intersection of operations and strategy for more than twenty years. She helps organizations move forward by identifying the sweet spot where strategy catalyzes operations, fosters innovation, and drives businesses to the forefront of their industries.

Jess is committed to helping businesses turn challenges into scalable opportunities and constraints into springboards for growth. Contact her for a complimentary call, or find her on LinkedIn and Twitter . Check out her Driving Solutions Strategic Intensive program if you need help with strategic growth challenges.

Listen to the BOLD Business Podcast

Search Blogs and Podcasts

More Posts in This Category

How it works

For Business

Join Mind Tools

Article • 8 min read

The FOCUS Model

A simple, efficient problem-solving approach.

By the Mind Tools Content Team

Are your business processes perfect, or could you improve them?

In an ever-changing world, nothing stays perfect for long. To stay ahead of your competitors, you need to be able to refine your processes on an ongoing basis, so that your services remain efficient and your customers stay happy.

This article looks the FOCUS Model – a simple quality-improvement tool that helps you do this.

About the Model

The FOCUS Model, which was created by the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), is a structured approach to Total Quality Management (TQM) , and it is widely used in the health care industry.

The model is helpful because it uses a team-based approach to problem solving and to business-process improvement, and this makes it particularly useful for solving cross-departmental process issues. Also, it encourages people to rely on objective data rather than on personal opinions, and this improves the quality of the outcome.

It has five steps:

• F ind the problem.
• O rganize a team.
• C larify the problem.
• U nderstand the problem.
• S elect a solution.

Applying the FOCUS Model

Follow the steps below to apply the FOCUS Model in your organization.

Step 1: Find the Problem

The first step is to identify a process that needs to be improved. Process improvements often follow the Pareto Principle , where 80 percent of issues come from 20 percent of problems. This is why identifying and solving one real problem can significantly improve your business, if you find the right problem to solve.

According to a popular analogy, identifying problems is like harvesting apples. At first, this is easy – you can pick apples up from the ground and from the lower branches of the tree. But the more fruit you collect, the harder it becomes. Eventually, the remaining fruit is all out of reach, and you need to use a ladder to reach the topmost branches.

Start with a simple problem to get the team up to speed with the FOCUS method. Then, when confidence is high, turn your attention to more complex processes.

If the problem isn't obvious, use these questions to identify possible issues:

• What would our customers want us to improve?
• How can we improve quality ?
• What processes don't work as efficiently as they could?
• Where do we experience bottlenecks in our processes?
• What do our competitors or comparators do that we could do?
• What frustrates and irritates our team?
• What might happen in the future that could become a problem for us?

If you have several problems that need attention, list them all and use Pareto Analysis , Decision Matrix Analysis , or Paired Comparison Analysis to decide which problem to address first. (If you try to address too much in one go, you'll overload team members and cause unnecessary stress.)

Step 2: Organize a Team

Your next step is to assemble a team to address the problem.

Where possible, bring together team members from a range of disciplines – this will give you a broad range of skills, perspectives, and experience to draw on.

Select team members who are familiar with the issue or process in hand, and who have a stake in its resolution. Enthusiasm for the project will be greatest if people volunteer for it, so emphasize how individuals will benefit from being involved.

If your first choice of team member isn't available, try to appoint someone close to them, or have another team member use tools like Perceptual Positioning and Rolestorming to see the issue from their point of view.

Keep in mind that a diverse team is more likely to find a creative solution than a group of people with the same outlook.

Step 3: Clarify the Problem

Before the team can begin to solve the problem, you need to define it clearly and concisely.

According to " Total Quality Management for Hospital Nutrition Services ," a key text on the FOCUS Model, an enthusiastic team may be keen to attack an "elephant-sized" problem, but the key to success is to break it down into "sushi-sized" pieces that can be analyzed and solved more easily.

Use the Drill Down technique to break big problems down into their component parts. You can also use the 5 Whys Technique , Cause and Effect Analysis , and Root Cause Analysis to get to the bottom of a problem.

Record the details in a problem statement, which will then serve as the focal point for the rest of the exercise ( CATWOE can help you do this effectively.) Focus on factual events and measurable conditions such as:

• Who does the problem affect?
• What has happened?
• Where is it occurring?
• When does it happen?

The problem statement must be objective, so avoid relying on personal opinions, gut feelings, and emotions. Also, be on guard against "factoids" – statements that appear to be facts, but that are really opinions that have come to be accepted as fact.

Step 4: Understand the Problem

Once the problem statement has been completed, members of the team gather data about the problem to understand it more fully.

Dedicate plenty of time to this stage, as this is where you will identify the fundamental steps in the process that, when changed, will bring about the biggest improvement.

Consider what you know about the problem. Has anyone else tried to fix a similar problem before? If so, what happened, and what can you learn from this?

Use a Flow Chart or Swim Lane Diagram to organize and visualize each step; this can help you discover the stage at which the problem is happening. And try to identify any bottlenecks or failures in the process that could be causing problems.

As you develop your understanding, potential solutions to the problem may become apparent. Beware of jumping to "obvious" conclusions – these could overlook important parts of the problem, and could create a whole new process that fails to solve the problem.

Generate as many possible solutions as you can through normal structured thinking, brainstorming , reverse brainstorming , and Provocation . Don't criticize ideas initially – just come up with lots of possible ideas to explore.

Step 5: Select a Solution

The final stage in the process is to select a solution.

Use appropriate decision-making techniques to select the most viable option. Decision Trees , Paired Comparison Analysis , and Decision Matrix Analysis are all useful tools for evaluating your options.

Once you've selected an idea, use tools such as Risk Analysis , "What If" Analysis , and the Futures Wheel to think about the possible consequences of moving ahead, and make a well-considered go/no-go decision to decide whether or not you should run the project.

People commonly use the FOCUS Model in conjunction with the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle. Use this approach to implement your solutions in a controlled way.

The FOCUS Model is a simple quality-improvement tool commonly used in the health care industry. You can use it to improve any process, but it is particularly useful for processes that span different departments.

The five steps in FOCUS are as follows:

People often use the FOCUS Model in conjunction with the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, which allows teams to implement their solution in a controlled way.

Bataldan, P. (1992). 'Building Knowledge for Improvement: an Introductory Guide to the Use of FOCUS-PDCA,' Nashville: TN Quality Resource Group, Hospital Corporation of America.

Schiller, M., Miller-Kovach, M., and Miller-Kovach, K. (1994). 'Total Quality Management for Hospital Nutrition Services,' Aspen Publishers Inc. Available here .

You've accessed 1 of your 2 free resources.

Get unlimited access

Discover more content

Book Insights

Stolen Focus: Why You Can’t Pay Attention

By Johann Hari

Active Listening

Hear What People are Really Saying

Add comment

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!

Get 30% off your first year of Mind Tools

Great teams begin with empowered leaders. Our tools and resources offer the support to let you flourish into leadership. Join today!

Sign-up to our newsletter

Subscribing to the Mind Tools newsletter will keep you up-to-date with our latest updates and newest resources.

Subscribe now

Business Skills

Personal Development

Leadership and Management

Member Extras

Most Popular

Latest Updates

The Role of a Facilitator

How to Manage Passive-Aggressive People

Mind Tools Store

About Mind Tools Content

Discover something new today

How can i manage passive-aggressive team members.

Dealing with passive aggression when it takes over your team

Written Communication

Discover how to construct an effective message, and test and hone your writing skills

How Emotionally Intelligent Are You?

Boosting Your People Skills

Self-Assessment

What's Your Leadership Style?

Learn About the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Way You Like to Lead

Recommended for you

Novel ways of networking video.

Video Transcript

Animated Video

Business Operations and Process Management

Strategy Tools

Customer Service

Business Ethics and Values

Handling Information and Data

Project Management

Knowledge Management

Self-Development and Goal Setting

Time Management

Presentation Skills

Learning Skills

Career Skills

Communication Skills

Negotiation, Persuasion and Influence

Working With Others

Difficult Conversations

Creativity Tools

Self-Management

Work-Life Balance

Stress Management and Wellbeing

Coaching and Mentoring

Change Management

Team Management

Managing Conflict

Delegation and Empowerment

Performance Management

Leadership Skills

Developing Your Team

Talent Management

Problem Solving

Decision Making

Member Podcast

What is Problem Solving? (Steps, Techniques, Examples)

By Status.net Editorial Team on May 7, 2023 — 5 minutes to read

What Is Problem Solving?

Definition and importance.

Problem solving is the process of finding solutions to obstacles or challenges you encounter in your life or work. It is a crucial skill that allows you to tackle complex situations, adapt to changes, and overcome difficulties with ease. Mastering this ability will contribute to both your personal and professional growth, leading to more successful outcomes and better decision-making.

Problem-Solving Steps

The problem-solving process typically includes the following steps:

• Identify the issue : Recognize the problem that needs to be solved.
• Analyze the situation : Examine the issue in depth, gather all relevant information, and consider any limitations or constraints that may be present.
• Generate potential solutions : Brainstorm a list of possible solutions to the issue, without immediately judging or evaluating them.
• Evaluate options : Weigh the pros and cons of each potential solution, considering factors such as feasibility, effectiveness, and potential risks.
• Select the best solution : Choose the option that best addresses the problem and aligns with your objectives.
• Implement the solution : Put the selected solution into action and monitor the results to ensure it resolves the issue.
• Review and learn : Reflect on the problem-solving process, identify any improvements or adjustments that can be made, and apply these learnings to future situations.

Defining the Problem

To start tackling a problem, first, identify and understand it. Analyzing the issue thoroughly helps to clarify its scope and nature. Ask questions to gather information and consider the problem from various angles. Some strategies to define the problem include:

• Brainstorming with others
• Asking the 5 Ws and 1 H (Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How)
• Analyzing cause and effect
• Creating a problem statement

Generating Solutions

Once the problem is clearly understood, brainstorm possible solutions. Think creatively and keep an open mind, as well as considering lessons from past experiences. Consider:

• Creating a list of potential ideas to solve the problem
• Grouping and categorizing similar solutions
• Prioritizing potential solutions based on feasibility, cost, and resources required
• Involving others to share diverse opinions and inputs

Evaluating and Selecting Solutions

Evaluate each potential solution, weighing its pros and cons. To facilitate decision-making, use techniques such as:

• SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats)
• Decision-making matrices
• Pros and cons lists
• Risk assessments

After evaluating, choose the most suitable solution based on effectiveness, cost, and time constraints.

Implementing and Monitoring the Solution

Implement the chosen solution and monitor its progress. Key actions include:

• Communicating the solution to relevant parties
• Setting timelines and milestones
• Assigning tasks and responsibilities
• Monitoring the solution and making adjustments as necessary
• Evaluating the effectiveness of the solution after implementation

Utilize feedback from stakeholders and consider potential improvements. Remember that problem-solving is an ongoing process that can always be refined and enhanced.

Problem-Solving Techniques

During each step, you may find it helpful to utilize various problem-solving techniques, such as:

• Brainstorming : A free-flowing, open-minded session where ideas are generated and listed without judgment, to encourage creativity and innovative thinking.
• Root cause analysis : A method that explores the underlying causes of a problem to find the most effective solution rather than addressing superficial symptoms.
• SWOT analysis : A tool used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to a problem or decision, providing a comprehensive view of the situation.
• Mind mapping : A visual technique that uses diagrams to organize and connect ideas, helping to identify patterns, relationships, and possible solutions.

Brainstorming

When facing a problem, start by conducting a brainstorming session. Gather your team and encourage an open discussion where everyone contributes ideas, no matter how outlandish they may seem. This helps you:

• Generate a diverse range of solutions
• Encourage all team members to participate
• Foster creative thinking

When brainstorming, remember to:

• Reserve judgment until the session is over
• Encourage wild ideas
• Combine and improve upon ideas

Root Cause Analysis

For effective problem-solving, identifying the root cause of the issue at hand is crucial. Try these methods:

• 5 Whys : Ask “why” five times to get to the underlying cause.
• Fishbone Diagram : Create a diagram representing the problem and break it down into categories of potential causes.
• Pareto Analysis : Determine the few most significant causes underlying the majority of problems.

SWOT Analysis

SWOT analysis helps you examine the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats related to your problem. To perform a SWOT analysis:

• List your problem’s strengths, such as relevant resources or strong partnerships.
• Identify its weaknesses, such as knowledge gaps or limited resources.
• Explore opportunities, like trends or new technologies, that could help solve the problem.
• Recognize potential threats, like competition or regulatory barriers.

SWOT analysis aids in understanding the internal and external factors affecting the problem, which can help guide your solution.

Mind Mapping

A mind map is a visual representation of your problem and potential solutions. It enables you to organize information in a structured and intuitive manner. To create a mind map:

• Write the problem in the center of a blank page.
• Draw branches from the central problem to related sub-problems or contributing factors.
• Add more branches to represent potential solutions or further ideas.

Mind mapping allows you to visually see connections between ideas and promotes creativity in problem-solving.

Examples of Problem Solving in Various Contexts

In the business world, you might encounter problems related to finances, operations, or communication. Applying problem-solving skills in these situations could look like:

• Identifying areas of improvement in your company’s financial performance and implementing cost-saving measures
• Resolving internal conflicts among team members by listening and understanding different perspectives, then proposing and negotiating solutions
• Streamlining a process for better productivity by removing redundancies, automating tasks, or re-allocating resources

In educational contexts, problem-solving can be seen in various aspects, such as:

• Addressing a gap in students’ understanding by employing diverse teaching methods to cater to different learning styles
• Developing a strategy for successful time management to balance academic responsibilities and extracurricular activities
• Seeking resources and support to provide equal opportunities for learners with special needs or disabilities

Everyday life is full of challenges that require problem-solving skills. Some examples include:

• Overcoming a personal obstacle, such as improving your fitness level, by establishing achievable goals, measuring progress, and adjusting your approach accordingly
• Navigating a new environment or city by researching your surroundings, asking for directions, or using technology like GPS to guide you
• Dealing with a sudden change, like a change in your work schedule, by assessing the situation, identifying potential impacts, and adapting your plans to accommodate the change.
• How to Resolve Employee Conflict at Work [Steps, Tips, Examples]
• How to Write Inspiring Core Values? 5 Steps with Examples
• 30 Employee Feedback Examples (Positive & Negative)

Master the 7-Step Problem-Solving Process for Better Decision-Making

Discover the powerful 7-Step Problem-Solving Process to make better decisions and achieve better outcomes. Master the art of problem-solving in this comprehensive guide. Download the Free PowerPoint and PDF Template.

StrategyPunk

Introduction.

Mastering the art of problem-solving is crucial for making better decisions. Whether you're a student, a business owner, or an employee, problem-solving skills can help you tackle complex issues and find practical solutions. The 7-Step Problem-Solving Process is a proven method that can help you approach problems systematically and efficiently.

The 7-Step Problem-Solving Process involves steps that guide you through the problem-solving process. The first step is to define the problem, followed by disaggregating the problem into smaller, more manageable parts. Next, you prioritize the features and create a work plan to address each. Then, you analyze each piece, synthesize the information, and communicate your findings to others.

By following this process, you can avoid jumping to conclusions, overlooking important details, or making hasty decisions. Instead, you can approach problems with a clear and structured mindset, which can help you make better decisions and achieve better outcomes.

In this article, we'll explore each step of the 7-Step Problem-Solving Process in detail so you can start mastering this valuable skill. At the end of the blog post, you can download the process's free PowerPoint and PDF templates .

Step 1: Define the Problem

The first step in the problem-solving process is to define the problem. This step is crucial because finding a solution is only accessible if the problem is clearly defined. The problem must be specific, measurable, and achievable.

One way to define the problem is to ask the right questions. Questions like "What is the problem?" and "What are the causes of the problem?" can help. Gathering data and information about the issue to assist in the definition process is also essential.

Another critical aspect of defining the problem is identifying the stakeholders. Who is affected by it? Who has a stake in finding a solution? Identifying the stakeholders can help ensure that the problem is defined in a way that considers the needs and concerns of all those affected.

Once the problem is defined, it is essential to communicate the definition to all stakeholders. This helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that there is a shared understanding of the problem.

Step 2: Disaggregate

After defining the problem, the next step in the 7-step problem-solving process is to disaggregate the problem into smaller, more manageable parts. Disaggregation helps break down the problem into smaller pieces that can be analyzed individually. This step is crucial in understanding the root cause of the problem and identifying the most effective solutions.

Disaggregation can be achieved by breaking down the problem into sub-problems, identifying the contributing factors, and analyzing the relationships between these factors. This step helps identify the most critical factors that must be addressed to solve the problem.

A tree or fishbone diagram is one effective way to disaggregate a problem. These diagrams help identify the different factors contributing to the problem and how they are related. Another way is to use a table to list the other factors contributing to the situation and their corresponding impact on the issue.

Disaggregation helps in breaking down complex problems into smaller, more manageable parts. It helps understand the relationships between different factors contributing to the problem and identify the most critical factors that must be addressed. By disaggregating the problem, decision-makers can focus on the most vital areas, leading to more effective solutions.

Step 3: Prioritize

After defining the problem and disaggregating it into smaller parts, the next step in the 7-step problem-solving process is prioritizing the issues that need addressing. Prioritizing helps to focus on the most pressing issues and allocate resources more effectively.

There are several ways to prioritize issues, including:

• Urgency: Prioritize issues based on their urgency. Problems that require immediate attention should be addressed first.
• Impact: Prioritize issues based on their impact on the organization or stakeholders. Problems with a high impact should be given priority.
• Resources: Prioritize issues based on the resources required to address them. Problems that require fewer resources should be dealt with first.

It is important to involve stakeholders in the prioritization process, considering their concerns and needs. This can be done through surveys, focus groups, or other forms of engagement.

Once the issues have been prioritized, developing a plan of action to address them is essential. This involves identifying the resources required, setting timelines, and assigning responsibilities.

Prioritizing issues is a critical step in problem-solving. By focusing on the most pressing problems, organizations can allocate resources more effectively and make better decisions.

Step 4: Workplan

After defining the problem, disaggregating, and prioritizing the issues, the next step in the 7-step problem-solving process is to develop a work plan. This step involves creating a roadmap that outlines the steps needed to solve the problem.

The work plan should include a list of tasks, deadlines, and responsibilities for each team member involved in the problem-solving process. Assigning tasks based on each team member's strengths and expertise ensures the work is completed efficiently and effectively.

Creating a work plan can help keep the team on track and ensure everyone is working towards the same goal. It can also help to identify potential roadblocks or challenges that may arise during the problem-solving process and develop contingency plans to address them.

Several tools and techniques can be used to develop a work plan, including Gantt charts, flowcharts, and mind maps. These tools can help to visualize the steps needed to solve the problem and identify dependencies between tasks.

Developing a work plan is a critical step in the problem-solving process. It provides a clear roadmap for solving the problem and ensures everyone involved is aligned and working towards the same goal.

Step 5: Analysis

Once the problem has been defined and disaggregated, the next step is to analyze the information gathered. This step involves examining the data, identifying patterns, and determining the root cause of the problem.

Several methods can be used during the analysis phase, including:

• Root cause analysis
• Pareto analysis
• SWOT analysis

Root cause analysis is a popular method used to identify the underlying cause of a problem. This method involves asking a series of "why" questions to get to the root cause of the issue.

Pareto analysis is another method that can be used during the analysis phase. This method involves identifying the 20% of causes responsible for 80% of the problems. By focusing on these critical causes, organizations can make significant improvements.

Finally, SWOT analysis is a valuable tool for analyzing the internal and external factors that may impact the problem. This method involves identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the issue.

Overall, the analysis phase is critical for identifying the root cause of the problem and developing practical solutions. By using a combination of methods, organizations can gain a deeper understanding of the issue and make informed decisions.

Step 6: Synthesize

Once the analysis phase is complete, it is time to synthesize the information gathered to arrive at a solution. During this step, the focus is on identifying the most viable solution that addresses the problem. This involves examining and combining the analysis results for a clear and concise conclusion.

One way to synthesize the information is to use a decision matrix. This involves creating a table that lists the potential solutions and the essential criteria for making a decision. Each answer is then rated against each standard, and the scores are tallied to arrive at a final decision.

Another approach to synthesizing the information is to use a mind map. This involves creating a visual representation of the problem and the potential solutions. The mind map can identify the relationships between the different pieces of information and help prioritize the solutions.

During the synthesis phase, it is vital to remain open-minded and consider all potential solutions. Involving all stakeholders in the decision-making process is essential to ensure everyone's perspectives are considered.

Step 7: Communicate

After synthesizing the information, the next step is communicating the findings to the relevant stakeholders. This is a crucial step because it helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that the decision-making process is transparent.

One effective way to communicate the findings is through a well-organized report. The report should include the problem statement, the analysis, the synthesis, and the recommended solution. It should be clear, concise, and easy to understand.

In addition to the report, a presentation explaining the findings is essential. The presentation should be tailored to the audience and highlight the report's key points. Visual aids such as tables, graphs, and charts can make the presentation more engaging.

During the presentation, it is essential to be open to feedback and questions from the audience. This helps ensure everyone agrees with the recommended solution and addresses concerns or objections.

Effective communication is vital to ensuring the decision-making process is successful. Stakeholders can make informed decisions and work towards a common goal by communicating the findings clearly and concisely.

The 7-step problem-solving process is a powerful tool for helping individuals and organizations make better decisions. By following these steps, individuals can identify the root cause of a problem, prioritize potential solutions, and develop a clear plan of action. This process can be applied to various scenarios, from personal challenges to complex business problems.

Through disaggregation, individuals can break down complex problems into smaller, more manageable parts. By prioritizing potential solutions, individuals can focus their efforts on the most impactful actions. The work step allows individuals to develop a clear action plan, while the analysis step provides a framework for evaluating possible solutions.

The synthesis step combines all the information gathered to develop a comprehensive solution. Finally, the communication step allows individuals to share their answers with others and gather feedback.

By mastering the 7-step problem-solving process, individuals can become more effective decision-makers and problem-solvers. This process can help individuals and organizations save time and resources while improving outcomes. With practice, individuals can develop the skills to apply this process to a wide range of scenarios and make better decisions in all areas of life.

7-Step Problem-Solving Process PPT Template

Free powerpoint and pdf template, executive summary: the 7-step problem-solving process.

The 7-Step Problem-Solving Process is a robust and systematic method to help individuals and organizations make better decisions by tackling complex issues and finding practical solutions. This process comprises defining the problem, disaggregating it into smaller parts, prioritizing the issues, creating a work plan, analyzing the data, synthesizing the information, and communicating the findings.

By following these steps, individuals can identify the root cause of a problem, break it down into manageable components, and prioritize the most impactful actions. The work plan, analysis, and synthesis steps provide a framework for developing comprehensive solutions, while the communication step ensures transparency and stakeholder engagement.

Mastering this process can improve decision-making and problem-solving capabilities, save time and resources, and improve outcomes in personal and professional contexts.

Please buy me a coffee.

I'd appreciate your support if my templates have saved you time or helped you start a project. Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to show your appreciation and help me continue creating high-quality templates that meet your needs.

7-Step Problem-Solving Process PDF Template

7-step problem-solving process powerpoint template, global bites: pestle insights into nestlé (free ppt).

Download our free PPT template for in-depth PESTLE insights into Nestlé's global strategy. Learn more today!

PESTLE Analysis: Decoding Reddit's Landscape (Free PPT)

Decode Reddit's global influence with our free PowerPoint PESTLE Analysis. Explore the hub of vibrant discussions and ideas.

Navigating the Terrain: A PESTLE Analysis of Lululemon (Free PowerPoint)

Explore Lululemon's business terrain with our free PESTLE analysis PowerPoint. Instant access!

The Art of Strategic Leadership: 5 Keys to Success by Willie Peterson

Explore Willie Peterson's 5 crucial strategies for strategic leadership. Master learning, customer focus, and effective storytelling.

• Rosters & E-Bidding

Have a Research Question?

• Research Tools
• Explore Topics
• Stay Informed
• Publications

Easy Problem Solving Using the 4-step Method

June 7, 2017  by  Jennifer Haury Category:  Guest Author ,  Management

At a recent hospital town forum, hospital leaders are outlining the changes coming when a lone, brave nurse raises her hand and says, “We just can’t take any more changes. They are layered on top of each other and each one is rolled out in a different way. We are exhausted and it’s overloading us all.”  

 “Flavor of the Month” Fatigue

Change fatigue. You hear about it in every industry, from government sectors to software design to manufacturing to healthcare and more. When policy and leadership changes and process improvement overlap it’s no surprise when people complain about “flavor of the month,” and resist it just so they can keep some routine to their days.

In a time where change is required just to keep up with the shifting environment, one way to ease fatigue is to standardize HOW we change. If we use a best practice for solving problems, we can ensure that the right people are involved and problems are solved permanently, not temporarily. Better yet, HOW we change can become the habit and routine we long for.

The 4-step Problem Solving Method

The model we’ve used with clients is based on the A3 problem-solving methodology used by many “lean” production-based companies. In addition to being simpler, our 4-step method is visual, which helps remind the user what goes into each box.

The steps are as follows

• Develop a Problem Statement
• Determine Root Causes
• Rank Root Causes in Order of Importance
• Create an Action Plan

Step 1: Develop a Problem Statement

Developing a good problem statement always seems a lot easier than it generally turns out to be.  For example, this statement: “We don’t have enough staff,” frequently shows up as a problem statement. However, it suggests the solution—“GET MORE STAFF” — and fails to address the real problem that more staff might solve, such as answering phones in a timely manner.

The trick is to develop a problem statement that does not suggest a solution.  Avoiding the following words/phrases: “lack of,” “no,” “not enough,” or “too much” is key. When I start to fall into the trap of suggesting a solution, I ask: “So what problem does that cause?” This usually helps to get to a more effective problem statement.

Once you’ve developed a problem statement, you’ll need to define your target goal, measure your actual condition, then determine the gap. If we ran a restaurant and our problem was: “Customers complaining about burnt toast during morning shift,” the target goal might be: “Toast golden brown 100% of morning shift.”

Focus on a tangible, achievable target goal then measure how often that target is occurring. If our actual condition is: “Toast golden brown 50% of the time,” then our gap is: “Burnt toast 50% of the time.” That gap is now a refined problem to take to Step 2.

Step 2:  Determine Root Causes

In Step 2, we want to understand the root causes. For example, if the gap is burnt toast 50% of the time, what are all the possible reasons why?

This is when you brainstorm. It could be an inattentive cook or a broken pop-up mechanism. Cooks could be using different methods to time the toasting process or some breads toast more quickly.  During brainstorming, you’ll want to include everyone in the process since observing these interactions might also shed light on why the problem is occurring.

Once we have an idea of why, we then use the 5-why process to arrive at a root cause.  Ask “Why?” five times or until it no longer makes sense to ask. Root causes can be tricky.  For example, if the pop up mechanism is broken you could just buy a new toaster, right? But if you asked WHY it broke, you may learn cooks are pressing down too hard on the pop up mechanism, causing it to break. In this case, the problem would just reoccur if you bought a new toaster.

When you find you are fixing reoccurring problems that indicates you haven’t solved for the root cause. Through the 5-why process, you can get to the root cause and fix the problem permanently.

Step 3: Rank Root Causes

Once you know what’s causing the problem (and there may be multiple root causes), it’s time to move to Step 3 to understand which causes, if solved for, would close your gap. Here you rank the root causes in order of importance by looking at which causes would have the greatest impact in closing the gap.

There may be times when you don’t want to go after your largest root cause (perhaps because it requires others to change what they are doing, will take longer, or is dependent on other things getting fixed, etc). Sometimes you’ll find it’s better to start with a solution that has a smaller impact but can be done quickly.

Step 4: Create an Action Plan

In Step 4 you create your action plan — who is going to do what and by when. Documenting all of this and making it visible helps to communicate the plan to others and helps hold them accountable during implementation.

This is where your countermeasures or experiments to fix the problem are detailed. Will we train our chefs on how to use a new “pop-up mechanism” free toaster? Will we dedicate one toaster for white bread and one for wheat?  

Make sure to measure your results after you’ve implemented your plan to see if your target is met. If not, that’s okay; just go through the steps again until the problem is resolved.

Final Thoughts

Using the 4-step method has been an easy way for teams to change how they solve problems. One team I was working with started challenging their “solution jumps” and found this method was a better way to avoid assumptions which led to never really solving their problems.  It was easy to use in a conference room and helped them make their thinking visual so everyone could be involved and engaged in solving the problems their team faced. 

Do you have a problem-solving method that you use at your worksite?  Let us know in the comments below. 

MRSC is a private nonprofit organization serving local governments in Washington State. Eligible government agencies in Washington State may use our free, one-on-one Ask MRSC service to get answers to legal, policy, or financial questions.

About Jennifer Haury

Jennifer Haury is the CEO of All Angles Consulting, LLC and guest authored this post for MRSC.

Jennifer has over 28 years learning in the healthcare industry (17 in leadership positions or consulting in performance improvement and organizational anthropology) and is a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt.

She is a trusted, experienced leader with a keen interest in performance improvement and organizational anthropology. Jennifer is particularly concerned with the sustainability of continuous improvement programs and the cultural values and beliefs that translate into behaviors that either get in our own way or help us succeed in transforming our work.

The views expressed in guest columns represent the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of MRSC.

Blog Archives

Weekly e-news.

Get the latest local government news, analysis, and training opportunities in Washington State with MRSC’s Weekly Insights .

Related Materials

A New Economic Development Strategy for Clallam County

Strategic Planning

How it works

Transform your enterprise with the scalable mindsets, skills, & behavior change that drive performance.

Explore how BetterUp connects to your core business systems.

We pair AI with the latest in human-centered coaching to drive powerful, lasting learning and behavior change.

Build leaders that accelerate team performance and engagement.

Unlock performance potential at scale with AI-powered curated growth journeys.

Build resilience, well-being and agility to drive performance across your entire enterprise.

Transform your business, starting with your sales leaders.

Unlock business impact from the top with executive coaching.

Foster a culture of inclusion and belonging.

Accelerate the performance and potential of your agencies and employees.

See how innovative organizations use BetterUp to build a thriving workforce.

Discover how BetterUp measurably impacts key business outcomes for organizations like yours.

A demo is the first step to transforming your business. Meet with us to develop a plan for attaining your goals.

• What is coaching?

Learn how 1:1 coaching works, who its for, and if it's right for you.

Accelerate your personal and professional growth with the expert guidance of a BetterUp Coach.

Types of Coaching

Navigate career transitions, accelerate your professional growth, and achieve your career goals with expert coaching.

Enhance your communication skills for better personal and professional relationships, with tailored coaching that focuses on your needs.

Find balance, resilience, and well-being in all areas of your life with holistic coaching designed to empower you.

Discover your perfect match : Take our 5-minute assessment and let us pair you with one of our top Coaches tailored just for you.

Research, expert insights, and resources to develop courageous leaders within your organization.

Best practices, research, and tools to fuel individual and business growth.

View on-demand BetterUp events and learn about upcoming live discussions.

The latest insights and ideas for building a high-performing workplace.

• BetterUp Briefing

The online magazine that helps you understand tomorrow's workforce trends, today.

Innovative research featured in peer-reviewed journals, press, and more.

Founded in 2022 to deepen the understanding of the intersection of well-being, purpose, and performance

We're on a mission to help everyone live with clarity, purpose, and passion.

Join us and create impactful change.

Read the buzz about BetterUp.

Meet the leadership that's passionate about empowering your workforce.

For Business

For Individuals

GROW model for coaching: achieve goals and boost performance

Jump to section

What is the GROW model for coaching?

Benefits of using the grow model, applying the grow model in coaching , beyond the coaching session: using grow in everyday life, watching your success with the grow model for coaching.

The GROW model for coaching is a framework used by coaches and managers to guide individuals and teams toward achieving their goals and unlocking their full potential. This model provides a step-by-step approach to coaching conversations, making them more focused and effective.

If you’re looking for a solution-focused coaching model for yourself or clients that produces results, the GROW model may be a great fit. 

The GROW coaching model was designed to transcend the impact of traditional coaching models. Sir John Whitmore first developed GROW coaching in the late 1980s. He expanded on his ideas in his 1992 book, Coaching For Performance , which was originally meant to serve as a guide for both coaches and managers. 

Whitmore worked closely with two other individuals to build what is now known as the GROW model. Performance coaching expert and speaker Alan Fine, with contributing author Graham Alexander, built on Sir John Whitmore's GROW model image. Together, the three created a coaching framework that has improved the lives of many. 

GROW is an acronym with each part symbolizing one of the four steps of the GROW coaching model:

O bstacles or O ptions

W ay forward or W ill

Using the GROW model for coaching helps leaders and team members increase performance. It can also help you succeed in personal development. 

Following the GROW model coaching plan can yield several benefits. You can follow the GROW model yourself or with the support of a professional coach. These benefits include increased productivity and improved self-esteem . 

The GROW model can also create a more positive workplace environment by increasing your engagement. GROW coaching for performance improvement can help those trying to awaken their human potential . 

The GROW model was designed to be multifunctional and work for various objectives:

• A senior leader onboarding a new leader
• A nutrition coach helping clients stay motivated to lose weight
• A business mentor aiming to improve their mentoring sessions
• A manager wanting higher productivity within their team
• A career advisor helping clients explore job options
• A tennis coach teaching players to increase performance outcomes
• An online peer tutoring group seeking study improvements

A randomized control study found that even virtual GROW sessions improved subjective well-being . Below, we’ll examine some of this coaching model’s benefits and then discuss exactly how to apply this framework.

Improved clarity and focus on goals

Learning how to focus on your goals can be challenging with all of life’s distractions. The GROW coaching model encourages you to keep your goals at the forefront of your mind. 

One way you can focus better is by including steps toward your goals in your daily schedule . By doing something small for your goals every day, you’re prioritizing your future. 

The GROW model is also a perfect tool for any mindset coach who wants to help their clients stay on track. Coaches can use it to help others find purpose and clarify the goals they value most. 

Enhanced self-awareness and problem-solving skills

Developing self-awareness is a key component of the GROW coaching model. With each coaching session, you can learn more about yourself. 

Maybe you’ve been job-hopping because you need more intellectual challenges in your career field . Or maybe you’ve put off chasing your goals because you struggle with imposter syndrome . With the right coaching skills , you can learn to address underlying obstacles and move in the right direction.  

The GROW model also improves problem-solving strategies . As a result, you learn how to form your own conclusions and think independently. 

Increased motivation and commitment

It’s easy to get excited about initial goal-setting and coaching sessions. Yet staying committed to them is far more difficult. Coaching conversations using the GROW model encourage you to stick to your objectives.

Coaches provide motivation and inspiration through difficult times. Throughout your coaching journey, you’ll discuss each session’s goal and your overall progress. Having either a coaching team or an individual coach by your side can be uplifting and build motivation. 

Boosted empowerment and ownership of personal growth

Taking ownership of your personal development isn’t always easy. The GROW model makes taking accountability feel natural and turns transitions into transformation . Coaches empower you and help you improve your self-determination .

To take ownership of personal growth, acknowledge your responsibilities outside of coaching sessions. This ownership is required to make the most of the GROW model. Adopting a coaching mindset means realizing that your future and success are in your own hands. 

Qualities that make a great coach include innovating and finding what works best for clients. Executive coaches can use GROW model coaching to enhance engagement in coaching sessions. Leadership coaches, business coaches, and other coaching professionals can use the GROW model as well. 

GROW can be applied to each session goal with a client to generate more effective results. Using individual or team development plans, here’s how coaches and coaches can jointly execute this model.  

1. Setting SMART goals

It’s essential that goal-setting is done correctly. SMART goals are an integral part of the GROW coaching model framework. SMART is an acronym that stands for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. The SMART goal model is more effective because it takes the ambiguity out of setting goals.

If you haven’t determined your goals yet, you can work out your ideas during a coaching session. The goals you set will be the basis of your coaching process moving forward.

2. Exploring current reality

The reality phase of the GROW process involves examining your current strengths, challenges, and obstacles. Collectively, these things are known as your “current reality.” 

During your coaching session, your coach will likely ask several GROW model questions. When you answer questions about your current reality, your coach can better understand how to help you. 

Your coach’s GROW model questions may be similar to these examples:

• What are the greatest obstacles you need to overcome?
• What prompted you to seek out GROW model performance coaching?
• If you’ve tried another coaching model before, what elements were lacking?
• Which coaching leadership style do you thrive under?
• How do you cope with stress and anxiety caused by challenges?
• What are the benefits of achieving your goals?
• What actions are you taking right now to achieve your goals?
• Where can you go for support?

These are also excellent questions to ask yourself. Looking inward prompts you to think about how to achieve a new reality. 

3. Generating options and solutions

Developing your problem-solving skills is necessary for overcoming problems. Work with your coach to brainstorm ideas and set a session goal to think of solutions to potential obstacles. 

In this phase, you’ll come up with ways to utilize your strengths and resources. Thinking about this will result in options and possibilities for you moving forward. It’s helpful to have alternative plans for roadblocks that may come up. 

Creativity is one of the most important GROW coaching skills for a reason. Unique challenges call for unique innovations. Challenge yourself to think creatively and solve problems from a new perspective. 

4. Developing a will to act or a way forward

Will or way forward is the final step of the GROW process. When you envision the way forward, you make your dreams more than a concept. Instead, they become a possibility within reach. This final step ultimately determines the success of the process. 

Willpower is the internal drive that ensures you stick to your plans. The GROW model increases willpower by having you put a voice to your actions. Rather than just saying “I want to,” your mentality switches to “I will.” 

Your personal development can be fueled by action planning and commitment strategies. An action plan consists of feasible steps to achieve your goal. 

Wrap up your coaching sessions by stating how you’ll execute your action plan. Having a coach helps you stick to your word and follow through. 

GROW coaching ideology isn’t exclusive to coaching sessions. You can apply the GROW model to other areas of life. 

Applying GROW to different areas

The best thing about knowledge is that it’s easily transferable. For example, the GROW model encourages better communication skills. Increased communication skills can lead to improved relationships.

The GROW process can also be used to achieve personal goals , including health goals and financial goals . You can even use the GROW coaching model to beat your high score in a game or to learn a new language. Whatever your goals may be, you can use GROW coaching tools to achieve them. 

Self-coaching techniques using the GROW framework

By internalizing the coaching mindset, you can take matters into your own hands and coach yourself using the GROW framework. Self-coaching requires self-reflection and deep thinking about your goals and values. You’ll also need to be highly aware of your strengths and weaknesses . 

As long as you have self-motivation , self-coaching can work. Use the GROW model to ask yourself coaching questions and stick to your action plan. You can start journaling to keep track of your milestones and obstacles. Measuring success and progress is essential for staying on the right path. 

Building self-discipline and accountability for goal achievement

One of the most important things taught by the GROW model is how to hold yourself accountable for your life and current reality. As you achieve personal growth, you may naturally assume more responsibility for your life. Accountability also means learning from your mistakes and making better decisions in the future. 

For instance, if you fail to achieve your goal, you must examine why. What caused your procrastination ? Do you need to overcome fear of failure or address a lack of motivation ? 

Make a list of things you can change to achieve your goal next time. The GROW coaching process can teach you the lasting discipline you need to do better in the future.

The GROW model for coaching delivers transformative results. From improved productivity to better self-esteem, its benefits are evident. It’s also inspired many to change their lives. 

To spark change in your life, consider connecting with certified coaches who use the GROW model in their coaching framework. By signing up for 1:1 coaching sessions, you’re committing to working on self-improvement . Over time, you can better yourself as well as your team members. 

Mikayla Balk

Mikayla Balk is a content writer focusing on emotional wellness and mental health. She’s previously written for True. Women’s Health and Behavioral Health of New York. Her passions include mental health advocacy, travel, animals, and nature photography. Mikayla holds a B.A. in Writing and Philosophy from Grand Valley State University.

5 coaching frameworks to develop your team

Can you get an internship after college yes, and here’s how, 10 examples of principles that can guide your approach to work, 15 career goals examples to inspire you to set your own, how to break bad habits: 7 tips to succeed, the secret to developing managers that help your business thrive, how performance reviews can reinforce gender bias: 5 steps to avoid it, learn types of gestures and their meanings to improve your communication, young men lag in developing this key skill that’s linked to achievement and success, stay connected with betterup, get our newsletter, event invites, plus product insights and research..

3100 E 5th Street, Suite 350 Austin, TX 78702

• Platform Overview
• Integrations
• Powered by AI
• BetterUp Lead
• BetterUp Manage™
• BetterUp Care™
• Sales Performance
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Case Studies
• Why BetterUp?
• About Coaching
• Find your Coach
• Career Coaching
• Communication Coaching
• Life Coaching
• News and Press
• Leadership Team
• Become a BetterUp Coach
• BetterUp Labs
• Center for Purpose & Performance
• Leadership Training
• Business Coaching
• Contact Support
• Contact Sales
• Privacy Policy
• Acceptable Use Policy
• Trust & Security
• Cookie Preferences

How to unlock the full value of data? Manage it like a product

Our recently published article in Harvard Business Review , “A better way to put your data to work,” details how to establish a sustainable path to value. The key is to manage data just as you would a consumer product. Here, we present a visual summary of this approach.

Today’s predominant—and largely unsuccessful—approaches to data

Organizations typically employ either a grassroots or big-bang data strategy—neither of which enables them to make the most of their data investments.

Grassroots approach

In a grassroots approach, individual teams must piece together the data and technologies they need. This approach results in significant duplication of efforts and a tangle of bespoke technology architectures that are costly to build, manage, and maintain.

Big-bang strategy

At organizations employing the big-bang strategy, a centralized team extracts, cleanses, and aggregates data en masse. This approach can eliminate some of the rework that occurs, but it’s often not aligned with business use cases and therefore fails to support end users’ specific needs. End users often struggle to confirm that the data provide the necessary level of governance and quality, which limits the time savings. Later work on new use cases that are aligned with business value often triggers a grassroots approach and its associated problems.

These strategies fail to lay the foundation for current and future use cases that will create value.

A better approach: Managing data like a product

We find that when companies instead manage data like a consumer product—be it digital or physical—they can realize near-term value from their data investments and pave the way for quickly getting more value tomorrow.

Data products provide all the data on one entity

A data product delivers a high-quality, ready-to-use set of data that people across an organization can easily access and apply to different business challenges. For example, a data product could provide a 360-degree view of an important entity, such as customers, employees, product lines, or branches. Or it could deliver a given data capability, such as a digital twin that replicates the operation of real-world assets.

Data products are wired to enable standard types of consumption

Data products incorporate the wiring necessary for different business systems, such as digital apps or reporting systems, to “consume” the data. Each type of business system has its own set of requirements for how data is stored, processed, and managed; we call these “consumption archetypes.”

While an organization might have hundreds of use cases on its road map, they typically fit one of five primary consumption archetypes. Data products built to support one or more of these consumption archetypes can easily be applied to multiple business applications with similar archetypes.

Data products enable more speed and efficiency

Teams using data products don’t have to waste time searching for data, processing it into the right format, and building bespoke data sets and data pipelines—an effort that ultimately creates an architectural mess and governance challenges.

The benefits of this approach can be significant:

• New business use cases can be delivered as much as 90 percent faster.
• Total cost of ownership, including technology, development, and maintenance costs, can decline by 30 percent.
• The risk and data-governance burden can be reduced.

Getting started with data products

Success in product development requires an operating model that ensures dedicated management and funding, the establishment of standards and best practices, performance tracking, and quality assurance. Success with data products is no different.

• Dedicated management and funding. Each data product should have a product manager and a team consisting of data engineers, data architects, data modelers, data platform engineers, and site reliability engineers who are funded to build and continually improve their product and enable new use cases. These teams should sit within a data utility group inside business units. This organizational structure gives them ready access to the experts they need (including business subject-matter, operational, process, legal, and risk experts) to develop useful and compliant data products. In addition, it gives the teams access to user feedback, which helps them continue to improve products and identify new uses.
• Standards and best practices. We find organizations are most successful when they institute standards and best practices for building data products across the organization. This work is typically handled by a data center of excellence. Establishing standards and best practices includes defining how teams will document data provenance, audit data use, and measure data quality, as well as designing how the necessary technologies should fit together for each consumption archetype so they can be reused across all data products.
• Performance tracking. To confirm that their products meet end-user needs and are continually improving, data product teams should measure the value of their work. Relevant metrics may include the number of monthly users for a given product, the number of times a product is reused across the business, satisfaction scores from surveys of data users, and the return on investment of use cases enabled.
• Quality assurance. Because quality issues can erode end-user trust and retention, data product teams closely manage data definitions (for instance, whether the definition of customer data is limited to active customers or includes active and former customers), availability, and access controls that meet the right level of governance for each use case. To confirm data integrity, they work closely with data stewards who own data source systems.

For a deeper look at how leaders can manage data as they manage a product, read “A better way to put your data to work ,” on hbr.org .

Veeral Desai is a senior expert in McKinsey’s Sydney office, where Tim Fountaine is a senior partner; Kayvaun Rowshankish is a partner in the New York office.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

The data-driven enterprise of 2025

Breaking through data-architecture gridlock to scale AI

Designing data governance that delivers value