The Field Grade Leader
Organizational leadership in the us army, a case for mastering the humble argumentative essay.
There I wa s…I t was 201 3 , I was an aviation battalion S-3 in Afghanistan, and my boss had just given me less than 24 hours to write an argumentative essay. S omeone at a higher headquarters wanted to redeploy one of our aerial medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) helicopter companies without replac ing it . My boss believed this decision would se vere ly impede MEDEVAC in our area of operations and t he division commander agreed. He said he would take the issue to his boss and asked us to provide a short paper summarizing our analysis and recommendation . The writing fell to me. I had thought I ’ d left the argumentative essay behind two years earlier when I graduated from the Command and General Staff College (CGSC) . But once again, I found myself crafting a thesis , gathering evidence, and writing an argument .
Don ’ t raise your voice, improve your argument.
― Desmond Tutu
Reflecting on this and other experience s , I realize d that argumentative writing is one of the most important skills I learned at CGSC . The argumentative essay is a simple , yet powerful tool. It is writing an author uses to convince the reader of something. At its heart is the thesis —a claim that the author wants the persuade the reader is true. To do so, the author presents evidence —reasons that the reader should accept the author ’ s thesis. Evidence can be facts, logical arguments, data, or stories (like the one I used at the beginning of this essay to convince you of my thesis). Though argumentative writing is common in academia, many overlook its practical usefulness.
For field grade officers, the ability to write well and persuade others is indispensable . There are three reasons why. First, most field grade work involves persuading peers and seniors rather than ordering around subordinates. Second, argumentative essays are everywhere in field grade life. Many routine field grade tasks are argumentative essays in disguise. Third, most field grades will serve on a general staff where persuasive writing will be vital to their success. CGSC graduates shouldn ’ t abandon the argumentative essay . Instead, they should aspire to master it.
A rgumentation — whether written or not— is something field grade officers must do well . C aptains succeed by leading Soldiers they outrank , but majors succeed by influencing those they do not. Recommending a course of action , for example, requires a field grade officer to convince a commander that the unit should do something (thesis) based on a staff analysis (evidence). Battalion S-3s and XOs create opportunities b y persuading their peers to work together, influencing the brigade to push back on a task, or convincing the division to allocate training resources . Moreover, email is the primary way much of this field grade work gets done , and commanders pay attention to how well their officers write . Field grades who can deliver a compelling argument have a crucial advantage over those who cannot.
Another reason to master this tool is that m any f ield grade tasks are a r g u mentative essays in disg uise. Award writing is a good exampl e . Award recommendations are nothing more than argumentative essay s . The r ecommender argues that someone should receive an award (thesis ) and gives reasons why the approval authority should agree (evidence). F ield grade leaders routinely write letters of recommenda tion for subordinates competing for nominative positions , applying to graduate school, or transition ing to civilian jobs . The writer argue s that an organization should accept or hire a person (thesis) and provides reasons why (evidence). E valuation reports are the most impactful argumentative essays that field grade officers write . R aters and senior raters advise boards whether a Soldier should be promoted (thesis) and why the Soldier ’ s performance and potential justif y that recommendation (evidence) .
A final reason for mastering the argumentative essay is that persuasive writing is vital for success on a general staff . P ersonal interactions between general officers and those they senior rate are infrequent. Con sequently, f i eld grade officers ’ reputation s are based main ly on thei r writing skills—for better or worse . Moreover, s enior leaders rarely have time to read l engthy staff products , so staff officers must write with concision and clarity . The MEDEVAC essay I wrote for my division commander in Afghanistan was two pages . A three-star I worked for preferred single-page information papers. I once drafted a recommendation for a four-star commander to send to the Army c hief of s taff. My boss told me to “ keep it at the four-star level , ” which mean t I had to make an argument in three to four sentences .
I expect this year’s CGSC graduates will have similar experiences. Accordingly, I advise them to build on the argumentative writing foundations laid at CGSC . There are three ways to do this . First, write often . Contributing to the professional discourse in journals and online forums is a great way to hone writing skills while adding to our professional body of knowledge. Second, read widely . Good writers are avid readers because it exposes them to effective (and not-so-effective) writing. Finally , study writing and argumentation . I recommend the following resources to start :
- Effective argumentation blends clear thinking , logic, and reasoning. Oxford Guide to Effective Argument and Critical Thinking Oxford Guide covers all three .
- The Elements of Styl e, Fourth Edition is a staple writing guide, but I also recommend The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century .
- There are excellent resources on the internet as well, including this video of Steven Pinker, author of The Sense of Style .
- M ost universities host online writing labs . Among the best are Purdue University , Excelsior College , and the University of Toronto . Importantly, online writing labs cater to students , not professionals. To understand how professional writing differs from student writing, I recommend this video from the University of Chicago.
To the CGSC class of 2020 , I say congratulations! M any of you may be looking forward to leaving the argumentative essay behind . To be sure, you are finished with academic essays (for now, at least). But writing and arguing will be essential to your success as a field grade leader . Rather than abandoning the argumentative essay at graduation , I hope you instead resolve to master it .
Lieutenant Colonel Trent J. Lythgoe is an Army Aviation Officer and Assistant Professor at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. He is pursuing a Ph.D. in Political Science at the University of Kansas.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The CGSC’s preferred citation style is Chicago shortened footnotes and bibliography.17 Access the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) online through the Combined Arms Research Library (CARL). Appendix B describes the basics of Chicago style and how to cite sources CMS does not cover (e.g., military doctrine).
It can help all Army professionals craft writing that meets Army standards by being clear, concise, well-organized, and easy to read and understand.1 This guide’s central idea is that writing is a process, not a product.2 Whether composing academic essays at Fort Leavenworth or professional products in a tactical unit, the process is the same ...
Click here for the standard rubric for argumentative essays used in the Distance Education Program. Note: This is a generalized rubric. Each course director tailors this rubric to specific course material. However, from this rubric, students should see how the short essay fundamentals above combine with essay content to result in the essay grade.
Main points clearly support the thesis and are accurately described using an ASA format. Analysis reflects critical thinking, ties supporting evidence to assertions, and makes a persuasive argument. Competing ideas or divergent views are acknowledged.
ASSIGNMENT: Persuasive Essay Requirement: Write effectively as defined by the Army standard is “understood by the reader in a single, rapid reading and is free of errors in substance,...
Will the knowledge of past military history help make our military members, and our military as a whole, more successful in present or future encounters? Should military professionals have to study this history to make themselves more rounded individuals? Will this knowledge help them make more informed military decisions?
Writing in the Army Style. BUFORD’S MESSAGE TO REYNOLDS GETTYSBURG (1863) Learning Objectives. Describe the Army writing standards IAW AR 25-50. Explain the meaning and importance of BLUF. Understand how to write in the active voice. Explain the steps in the writing process. Army Leadership Requirements Model. ADP/ADRP 6-22.
The argumentative essay is a simple, yet powerful tool. It is writing an author uses to convince the reader of something. At its heart is the thesis—a claim that the author wants the persuade the reader is true. To do so, the author presents evidence—reasons that the reader should accept the author’s thesis.
Your essay must be in Times New Roman, 12pt font, double-spaced, APA 6th edition format without an abstract, tables, charts, etc. The essay must be a minimum of three pages and no longer than...
The Assertion - Support - Analysis Framework is the central organizing concept of USAWC essays and forum posts. Students should use an Assertion-Support-Analysis (A-S-A) model for main body paragraph construction of written requirements, and in formulating many of the online asynchronous forum posts.