research abstract of child and adolescent development

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Research on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century

Robert crosnoe, monica kirkpatrick johnson.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Issue date 2011 Aug.

Recent methodological advances have allowed empirical research on adolescence to do better justice to theoretical models. Organized by a life course framework, this review covers the state of contemporary research on adolescents' physical, psychological, interpersonal, and institutional pathways; how these pathways connect within primary ecological contexts; and how they relate to broader patterns of societal stratification and historical change. Looking forward, it also emphasizes three future challenges/opportunities, including efforts to illuminate biosocial processes, link adolescence to other life stages, and account for the influence of major social changes (e.g., the new media).

Keywords: development, life course, transition to adulthood, inequality

Introduction

First coined by Hall (1904) only a century ago, adolescence was “created” by the convergence of multiple trends, including labor and schooling laws, that extended dependency beyond childhood and delayed entry into adult roles ( Modell & Goodman 1990 ). Adolescence as a period of dependency and preparation for adulthood has since been reinforced through more recent social changes, including economic restructuring and changing cultural norms about parenting ( Goldin & Katz 2008 , Settersten et al. 2005 ). Research on adolescence has also changed dramatically. This review discusses recent developments in this literature, being cognizant of their historical underpinnings while focusing on the future. Given our background in the life course tradition, as well as the inherent importance of transitions, trajectories, and context to understanding this life stage, we use a life course framework to organize our review. Owing to space constraints, we focus primarily on American adolescents.

In his 1989 review, Dornbusch wrote that research on adolescence was turning from psychologists studying “individual adolescents carrying out their developmental tasks” (p. 233) to contextual approaches emphasizing transactions between adolescents and their environments. This trend has since intensified, reflecting refinements of theoretical models, including human ecology ( Bronfenbrenner & Morris 1998 ) and the life course paradigm ( Elder 1998 ). A central imagery of the latter, our focus here, is of lives as a tapestry of three threads—developmental trajectories (physical and psychological growth), social pathways (sequences of institutional roles and activities), and social convoys (continuity and change in interpersonal relations)—situated in settings of daily life, larger structures of society, and the broader sweep of history.

Unfortunately, studying this dynamic, multilayered model of adolescence has taxed methodological and data resources ( Elder & Giele 2009 ). Recently, however, data sets on children have aged into adolescence (e.g., Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth), and data sets on adolescents have aged into adulthood (e.g., National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, or Add Health). Data sets are also integrating biological, behavioral, and setting data. At the same time, significant advances in longitudinal and multilevel modeling have allowed researchers to capture individual and population trajectories and to identify person-context effects ( Bollen & Curran 2006 , Bryk et al. 2002 ). Of note is that qualitative and mixed methods research projects are also increasingly emphasizing context, longitudinal change, and the multiple strands of adolescent development ( Giordano et al. 2006 ).

In other words, sociologists are making progress on a more holistic understanding of adolescents in society. In reviewing this progress, we focus on each of the three main strands of the adolescent life course before turning to the ways in which their interweaving is embedded in ecological contexts and both reflects and contributes to population-level inequalities.

Three Threads in the Life Course Tapestry

Exhaustively reviewing recent research on the three main strands of the life course is impossible. As just one example, the United States has a high teen pregnancy rate that contributes to the overall rate of nonmarital fertility, and early parenthood relates to past and future socioeconomic disadvantages in complex ways ( Mollborn 2007 ). As a result, this topic could fill an entire review article, and in fact has ( Furstenberg 2003 ). Also regrettably left out are issues such as disordered eating and bullying. Consequently, this review should be viewed as an effort to put forward a limited set of illustrative examples of new ways to think about old issues.

Developmental Trajectories

Adolescence is a period of rapid change. This change is dramatically crystallized in the flood of hormonal activity and rapid physiological development that constitutes puberty ( Susman et al. 2003 ). Great psychological and emotional change also occurs during adolescence. In the years following puberty, adolescents are faced with the task of establishing their own identity separate from their parents, which may be stressful ( Kroger 2007 ). At the same time, rates of risky behavior (e.g., substance use, delinquency, sexual activity) also rise markedly, especially among boys ( Bachman et al. 2002 ). A hallmark of adolescence is that maturation can occur at different velocities in different domains of development, so that youth may look or feel like adults in some ways but not in others.

Beginning with puberty, a great deal of attention has been focused on pubertal timing, following earlier work outside the United States ( Stättin & Magnusson 1990 ). Primarily among girls, going through puberty earlier than the norm is associated with a host of adjustment problems, including risky sex and delinquency. Sociologists have elucidated many mechanisms underlying these patterns, which are not entirely hormonal or biological in nature. One concerns premature self- and other-perceptions of early maturers, especially girls, as adults. In other words, they are adult-like physically and, as a result, may engage in actions or put themselves in situations that are ahead of their emotional or cognitive capacities ( Cavanagh 2004 , Haynie 2003 ). Another mechanism is increased distress related to growing size in the context of strict norms about female body weight ( Ge et al. 2001 ). These socioemotional difficulties in early adolescence can then disrupt academic functioning ( Cavanagh et al. 2007 ). Pubertal timing, therefore, represents an intersection of biological, emotional, social, and institutional processes.

Turning to mental health, adolescence marks the emergence of gender differences in depression—with girls higher than boys—that persist for decades ( Hankin et al. 2007 ). Efforts to explain this trend have focused primarily on social psychological phenomena, including gender differences in self-concept, management of daily stressors, experiences of puberty, and the rigidity and enforcement of societal standards of appearance and behavior ( Martin 1996 , Rosenfield et al. 2000 ). A particularly insightful sociological approach to adolescent depression, regardless of gender, concerns how it is interpreted by others. For example, depression can be strongly stigmatized in social groups when it is perceived as mental illness as opposed to a health problem, leading depressed youth to be isolated from others just when they need more support ( Martin et al. 2007 ). Indeed, social responses to adolescent distress influence whether it can have long-term effects on other areas of life, including education ( McLeod & Fettes 2007 ). Thus, socialized perspectives on depression and other psychological constructs reveal insight into the complex dance between self and other that characterizes adolescence.

Identity development is another psychological process that has been studied from a variety of angles. The consensus is that it is a highly social process, with young people slowly integrating the different pieces of themselves that they come to understand through social interactions into a cohesive sense of who they are and where they fit in the world ( Kroger 2007 ). In the past two decades, considerable research has centered on the development of group-based identities. For example, racial identity taps into the significance and meaning attached to race within individuals' overall senses of self. According to work by Sellers and associates (1998) on African American youth, racial identity has four dimensions: ( a ) salience (how much race is part of one's self-concept), ( b ) centrality (whether one defines him or herself through race), ( c ) regard (the degree of positive or negative feelings about one's race), and ( d ) ideology (beliefs about how someone of a certain race should act). Across minority groups, these dimensions tend to increase as adolescence unfolds and are strongly related to mental health ( Mandara et al. 2009 , Umaña-Taylor et al. 2009 ). For the most part, the benefits of racial identity are strongest when minority adolescents have reached the achieved stage of identity development, meaning that they have committed to a particular identity after exploring what it means and what alternative identities might be possible ( Seaton et al. 2006 ). Similar research has been done on sexual identity, tracing the gradual process by which adolescents come to see themselves as homosexual and the role that this process plays in healthy development ( Russell & Sigler-Andrews 2003 ).

As for risky behavior, understanding why adolescents become more reckless even as they develop critical thinking skills has long been a major activity of adolescence researchers. One explanation is that adolescence is a time of heightened sensitivity to social influences and greater propensity toward emotional stimulation. These developmental changes have traditionally been viewed as by-products of identity development, but recent neurological research is shedding new light on this phenomenon ( Dahl & Spear 2004 ). Specifically, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies suggest that increased risky behavior during adolescence reflects different rates of growth in the brain's socioemotional and cognitive control systems. After puberty, dopamine receptors increase rapidly in regions that control sensation-seeking, which encourages behaviors that bring some emotional or sensory reward ( Steinberg 2008 ). Peer approval is one such reward, and ample evidence indicates that engaging in some level of dangerous behavior can elicit peer esteem and popularity ( Allen et al. 2005 , Kreager & Staff 2009 ). Importantly, structural changes of equivalent magnitude do not occur in the prefrontal cortex, which controls cognition, until adolescents approach young adulthood. That enhanced self-regulation skills tend to come after the increased propensity toward sensation-seeking helps to explain the increase in risky behavior that characterizes the years between the end of childhood and the start of adulthood ( Dahl & Spear 2004 , Steinberg 2008 ). Clearly, other factors are also at work, including changing cultural norms about permissible behavior and increasing opportunities for engaging in certain behaviors, but neurological development is certainly a piece of the puzzle.

As is evident even from this very selective discussion, adolescent development crosses many different psychological, physiological, cognitive, and behavioral domains. As a result, understanding one domain often requires consideration of others.

Social Pathways

Beyond the family, two key institutions structure the social pathways of adolescence. Beginning with schools, sociologists have traditionally studied the organization of high schools via academic tracks (e.g., vocational, college preparatory). As formal tracking has been largely dismantled ( Lucas 2001 ), new organizational schemas have been identified, including patterns of course-taking, critical courses (e.g., advanced math), and course trajectories ( Gamoran & Hannigan 2000 , McFarland 2006 , Riegle-Crumb 2006 ). Math is a clear example, as it is highly structured and strongly predicts educational and occupational attainment ( Adelman 2006 , Frank et al. 2008 , Riegle-Crumb 2006 ). Case studies have yielded new insights on the implications of curricular structure. McFarland (2006) , for example, examined student flow across math courses in two high schools, one characterized by five math trajectories with fewer lower-ability courses over time, and the other with a branching tree structure in which students move from a single trunk into four eventual trajectories of increasing differentiation. In each structure, specific courses represent critical junctions between trajectories and in math persistence altogether.

Thus, students' school pathways are far more complex than the traditional view of tracking suggests. Studying these pathways also reveals new insights into gender differences in education. Girls have been surpassing boys in most academic domains in secondary and postsecondary education for some time, especially among African Americans. Research on coursework trajectories suggests that girls have now also closed the gap with boys in math and science in terms of the course credits they accrue in high school. However, despite their advantage in college enrollment and graduation ( Buchman & DiPrete 2006 ), they remain underrepresented in these curricula in college ( Riegle-Crumb 2006 ).

Studies in the past decade have also emphasized the changing role of higher education in adolescents' lives. Expectations to earn four-year and graduate degrees have risen dramatically, faster than actual attainment ( Jacob & Wilder 2010 , Reynolds et al. 2006 ). In line with a “college for all” norm ( Rosenbaum 2001 ), expectations to complete college have become less tied to social class and previous achievement ( Goyette 2008 , Reynolds et al. 2006 , Schneider & Stevenson 1999 ). More than 80% of high school seniors in 2008 reported that they would probably or definitely earn a four-year college degree ( Bachman et al. 2009 ). Some of the least educationally ambitious students may have dropped out of school before senior year and, therefore, would be absent from such statistics, but educational expectations are actually even higher when measured at eighth or tenth grade instead ( Goyette 2008 , Jacob & Wilder 2010 ). The rise in expectations to earn a college degree has been even steeper among girls, who now expect BAs at higher rates than boys, with little difference within gender between blacks and whites ( Jacob & Wilder 2010 ).

Commonly cited explanations for rising educational expectations include ( a ) an increase in the earnings payoff to college (versus high school) graduation; ( b ) expanding higher education options, including online degrees and community colleges; and ( c ) trends in the educational attainment of parents ( Berg 2007 , Goldin & Katz 2008 , Goyette 2008 , Schneider & Stevenson 1999 ). Regarding the latter, the relative risk aversion thesis suggests that adolescents strive for at least as much education as their parents have. As parents' average education levels rise across cohorts, therefore, so do adolescents' educational expectations ( Breen & Goldthorpe 1997 ).

Paid work is another institution shaping adolescence, with nearly all high school students employed during the school year at some point while in high school ( Apel et al. 2007 , Mortimer 2003 , National Research Council 1998 ). Building on foundational studies from the 1980s and 1990s, recent research has elucidated the mix of risks and benefits of paid work for adolescents. Although adolescent work often starts earlier, most studies focus on high school, when employment is more likely to occur in the formal sector and for longer hours. Moreover, school-year employment continues to garner the most attention, despite higher rates of summer employment ( Mortimer 2003 , Perreira et al. 2007 ). These foci reflect concerns about potentially competing demands of school and employment, key institutions that structure the social pathways of adolescence. The question is whether (or under what conditions) employment facilitates educational attainment and builds human capital useful later in the labor market or whether employment, especially working 20 h or more per week, can distract from academic pursuits and foster various problem behaviors, including delinquency and substance use ( Lee & Staff 2007 , McMorris & Uggen 2000 , Mortimer 2003 , Paternoster et al. 2003 ).

In the past two decades, a major activity has been in understanding the variable meaning and consequence of paid work in adolescence. For example, the outcomes linked to work hours depend on the goal of working, including saving for college and supporting the self or family ( Marsh 1991 , Newman 1996 ). Recent evidence indicates that work can promote educational attainment among those with low academic promise ( Staff & Mortimer 2007 ) and among poor and/or minority students ( Entwisle et al. 2005 ). For example, teenagers in Newman's (1999) ethnography of fast food workers often rejected the delinquency of peers in choosing to work, and their jobs brought them coworkers and supervisors that supported and rewarded their educational pursuits. Along these same lines, Lee & Staff (2007) compared adolescents who work intensively and those who do not do so but who share similar preexisting background characteristics. They found no effect on dropout among adolescents with backgrounds indicative of a high propensity to work intensively. These students tended to be from socioeconomically disadvantaged families and have weaker school performance. Additional studies indicate that the association between intensive employment and substance use is largely limited to whites ( Johnson 2004 ) and that intensive employment can actually help curb substance use and delinquency for adolescents with earlier histories of these problem behaviors ( Apel et al. 2007 ).

More effort also has been devoted to promoting causal inference in research on adolescent employment. Both spuriousness and bidirectionality are concerns in studies of work hour effects on adolescent behavior. Longitudinal studies adjusting for known covariates, including lagged measures of the outcome, often indicate that that preexisting differences account for many observed effects ( Schoenhals et al. 1998 , Warren et al. 2000 ). Links to substance use and some academic outcomes, however, persist ( McMorris & Uggen 2000 , Mortimer & Johnson 1998 , Paternoster et al. 2003 , Schoenhals et al. 1998 ). Other techniques, such as fixed and random effects models and propensity score matching, have revealed no evidence of work hour effects on adolescent behavior or effects only on adolescents with low or moderate propensities to work ( Lee & Staff 2007 , Paternoster et al. 2003 ), but they have been applied to a limited set of behavioral dimensions to date.

Thus, research is moving toward a clearer picture of how developmental, educational, human capital, and behavioral outcomes are linked to employment in adolescence. The same can be said of studies on other social pathways of adolescents (e.g., academic pathways).

Social Convoys

Adolescence is a time of both quantitative and qualitative change in the matrix of social relationships. In particular, the push and pull between parents and peers has been a dominant theme of research on adolescence for years.

Over time, the normative break with parents in adolescence has been reconceptualized as a renegotiation of parent and child roles, not disengagement. In other words, adolescents may spend less time with, and seek more autonomy from, parents, but they typically do so in the context of stable strong connections and parental influence ( Larson et al. 1996 ). Similar trends extend to other family relationships (e.g., with siblings and grandparents), which may loosen more in terms of shared time than in emotional bonds ( Crouter et al. 2004 , King et al. 2003 ).

The idea of parent-adolescent renegotiation has led to new ways of thinking about oft-studied issues. One of the best examples concerns parental monitoring. The general consensus has long been that adolescents engage in fewer problem behaviors when their parents keep close track of what they do and with whom they associate, in part because monitoring constrains opportunities to engage in such behaviors and in part because it helps to develop adolescent self-control ( Browning et al. 2005 , Hay 2006 ). Yet, Stättin & Kerr (2000) have argued that the most common indicator of parental monitoring—parental knowledge about adolescents' activities and peers—may be an effect of adolescent behavior more than a cause. In other words, well-behaved adolescents share their lives with their parents, creating the appearance of monitoring being behaviorally protective. More likely, this link is reciprocal—monitoring promoting prosocial behavior that, in turn, increases parent-adolescent relationship quality, adolescents' openness to parental monitoring, and adolescents' willingness to self-disclose to parents ( Fletcher et al. 2004 , Yau et al. 2009 ). This debate has driven home the need to think of adolescents' developmental trajectories and social convoys as intertwined over time.

Along these same lines, adolescents are increasingly viewed as eliciting parenting, not just being shaped by it. For example, changes in U.S. antipoverty policy that emphasize the role of fathers have brought attention to nonresident fathers ( Furstenberg 2007 ). Although the assumption is that having involved fathers is good for adolescents, this link partially reflects the tendency for nonresident fathers to be more involved in the lives of well-adjusted adolescents ( Hawkins et al. 2007 ). As another example, the normative increase in parent-child conflict during adolescence is less pronounced for second- or later-born children, as parents learn what to expect from their first-born children ( Shanahan et al. 2007 ). Another line of research that views both sides of the parent-adolescent relationship concerns the degree to which the characteristics and behaviors of parents and adolescents are aligned. Consider that religious mismatches within the family (e.g., religious mother and nonreligious adolescent, or vice versa) appear to engender adolescent problem behavior ( Pearce & Haynie 2004 ). Approaching parent-adolescent relationships as evolving, two-sided, and mutually influential, therefore, is crucial.

Of course, peers continue to be a primary focus of research on adolescence. Much of this research concerns how friends influence each other and how adolescents select into different kinds of friendships, but more attention is now being paid to the larger peer groupings in which these friendships are embedded. For example, boys are at greater risk for emotional distress when they are members of networks that are large and cohesive, but girls are at greater risk in networks that are large and noncohesive. This gendered pattern reflects differences in the interpersonal styles of girls and boys ( Falci & McNeely 2009 ). As another example, friendships tend to have greater influence on adolescent delinquency when they are embedded in dense networks ( Haynie 2001 ). Many social and institutional settings, such as schools and neighborhoods, can also be thought of as peer contexts, in that they organize the friendship market and serve as a center of youth culture ( Harding 2009 ). Peer relations and dynamics within such contexts may be better characterized by qualitative groupings of youth (e.g., crowds) as opposed to quantitatively measurable collectives (e.g., networks). Indeed, many meaningful peer groups are fluid but matter because they provide common identity and serve as the practical universe of potential friends ( Akerlof & Kranton 2002 , Brown & Klute 2003 ). Barber and associates (2001) , for example, used the archetypal characters from the movie The Breakfast Club (e.g., the jock, the rebel, the princess) as a way of organizing data collection on such peer crowds. Importantly, interpersonal processes that occur within larger bands of peers seem to do as much, if not more, to predict the positive and negative mental health and educational outcomes of adolescents than intimate friendships, especially in the long term.

Historically, scholars studied another key peer relation—romantic relationships—in terms of major developmental tasks (e.g., preparation for adult relationships), leading to a focus on their benefits ( Shulman & Collins 1998 ). Later, risks took the spotlight, including links of girls' dating with depression, stress, and abuse, and more attention was paid to the consequences of stricter norms about appropriate dating (and sexual) behavior for girls ( Hagan & Foster 2001 , Joyner & Udry 2000 , Kreager & Staff 2009 ). Increasingly, however, scholars have recognized that adolescent romance may be developmentally positive or negative depending on the characteristics of the partners, the quality of the relationship, and the context in which it occurs. For example, romantic relationships may foster early sexual activity but also reduce the psychological strain of sex and increase contraceptive use. They may be especially important as buffers against the potential harm of weak bonds with parents or as a stand-ins for close friends ( Giordano et al. 2006 , Manlove et al. 2007 , McCarthy & Casey 2008 ). Importantly, although boys were long thought to be less oriented to and affected by romance, emerging evidence suggests that boys may have equally strong ties to their partners as girls and be more influenced by them. Along with their lower confidence in their romantic skills, these qualities might leave boys vulnerable emotionally to the vicissitudes of adolescent romance ( Giordano et al. 2006 ).

An emerging task is to add a wider variety of extrafamilial and other familial relationships to this traditional focus on parents and peers. Taking such a holistic view of overlapping relationships as they evolve is the best way to capture the concept of social convoys.

The Social Embeddedness of Adolescence

As alluded to throughout the prior discussion, the three main strands of the life course play out—and come together—within social contexts, ranging from small primary and secondary groups (e.g., families) to larger societal institutions (e.g., schools) to macro-level social structures, such as stratification systems based on gender, race, and class. Here, we highlight some recent explorations of this social embeddedness of adolescence.

The Ecological Contexts of Adolescence

Because adolescents have limited mobility, neighborhoods can powerfully structure their lives physically and socially. As a result, studies of neighborhood effects have proliferated in recent years, aided by neighborhood data in specific locales (e.g., Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, L.A. Family and Neighborhood Survey), on the national level (e.g., Add Health), and through demonstration projects moving low-income families to new communities (e.g., the Moving to Opportunity, or MTO, experiment), as well as by qualitative studies of neighborhoods and communities. Most of these studies focus on neighborhood disadvantage and adolescent risk-taking ( Bellair & Roscigno 2000 , Browning et al. 2005 , Dance 2002 , Harding 2003 , Kling et al. 2007 ).

Motivating much of this research is Wilson's (1996) perspective on spatially concentrated disadvantage, which is thought to disrupt networks of social capital that socialize and supervise youth and to hinder the effectiveness of local institutions (e.g., schools, churches) and informal networks in providing social control. Contemporary scholars have sought to identify the mechanisms involved in these processes. For example, Browning and associates (2005) reported that adolescents in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty experienced sexual onset earlier than others but that higher neighborhood collective efficacy delayed sexual onset, at least among adolescents experiencing lower levels of parental monitoring. These findings suggest conditional effects between neighborhood conditions and family functioning, appearing to contradict prior studies downplaying the possibility of multiplicative contextual influences ( Cook et al. 2002 ). Importantly, studies such as another by Browning and associates (2008) raise the issue of rates of risky sex in turn affecting the concentration of STD risk in neighborhoods, with individuals shaping context. Such micro-to-macro examples are rare but need more attention.

As in all examinations of contextual effects, causality has been a concern in neighborhood research. Browning and associates (2005) have argued that findings varying by level of neighborhood exposure suggest true effects. In line with this argument, Harding (2003) reported that neighborhood poverty effects on adolescents persisted when propensity score matching was employed. He also noted that controlling for individual-level factors may obscure real neighborhood effects if they are affected by neighborhood features themselves, a point echoed by Chuang and associates (2005) in arguing that parents may adjust their parenting based on neighborhood conditions. Indeed, instead of isolating neighborhood effects by controlling individual, economic, and family factors, Bellair & Roscigno (2000) have advocated for viewing labor market opportunities as preceding neighborhood disadvantage, family income, and adolescent attachments, all of which affect adolescent behavior. In other words, instead of controlling for family income, family structure, and adolescents' attachments to family, school, and peers to evaluate the link between local labor market conditions and delinquency, they map the effects of local labor market conditions on delinquency through its effects on family income and structure and adolescents' attachments.

With an experimental design, MTO revealed compelling findings about the implications of switching from low-income to middle-income neighborhoods for adolescents. Interestingly, the benefits of such moves were limited to girls, including improvements in mental health and decreases in delinquency. The qualitative components of the experiment suggested several mechanisms underlying these gendered effects, including girls' greater freedom from sexual fears, boys' (especially minority boys') greater difficulty integrating into new peer networks, and boys' continued strong ties to peers from their former communities ( Clampet-Lundquist et al. 2006 , Kling et al. 2007 ). Outside MTO, other qualitative studies of minority youth have detailed the gendered dilemma of youth adaptation to neighborhood disadvantage, especially crime. Girls must live up to feminized social expectations of them while trying to survive often violent conditions, and boys must develop fearsome personae that protect them on the streets but may disadvantage them in other contexts ( Dance 2002 , Jones 2010 ).

Another major ecological setting of adolescence is the school, where young people spend a large proportion of their waking hours. Scholars continue to decipher the effects of the organizational structure of schools (e.g., size, sector, and racial and socioeconomic composition) on student outcomes (see Arum 2000 for a recent review). Yet, the past decade has witnessed considerably more interest in the normative and social climate of schools, as captured by the rates of behaviors and social characteristics in the student body as a whole. These aggregated aspects of the student body tap into the value systems and opportunity structures to which adolescents are exposed on a daily basis, socializing them as well as affecting their ability to act on or against their own proclivities ( Crosnoe 2011 ). For example, adolescents attending schools in which a high proportion of their fellow students come from single-parent homes transition to first sex earlier than others, as this feature of the student body indicates reduced parental supervision of adolescents and their peers and also speaks to normative understandings of sexual relationships and families among students ( Harris et al. 2002 ). As another example, the average body size of students in a school sets the standard of comparison for adolescents' self-evaluations, affecting whether their own body size has implications for their socioemotional functioning ( Crosnoe 2011 ). As a final example, behavioral patterns in the student body as a whole can constrain or strengthen close friends' similarities on substance use ( Cleveland & Wiebe 2003 ). The peer culture of the school, therefore, provides opportunities that condition selection and socialization processes. Importantly, schools do not just expose students to a student body, they also organize peer subsets within the student body through activity and curricular offerings. Consider that the aforementioned Breakfast Club groups ( Barber et al. 2001 ) often arise from extracurricular activities. Moreover, Frank and associates (2008) used school transcripts to identify adolescents sharing the same social and academic space in school, peer groups that were significantly related to student outcomes.

As for the connection between neighborhoods and schools, ethnographic work has been especially insightful. For example, several studies have illuminated the unique challenges faced by working class and low-income African American youth, especially boys, as they simultaneously navigate their neighborhoods and their schools with very different sets of racialized expectations for youth. For such boys, the tough and seemingly defiant posture that they develop among peers in their neighborhoods is often misconstrued and viewed negatively by the middle-class personnel in their schools, leading to academic marginalization and fueling pernicious ideas about the oppositional culture of minority youth ( Dance 2002 , Carter 2006 ).

The point of this neighborhood and school research is that ecological settings create social networks and contexts in which the powerful peer and family processes of adolescence operate. Thus, going beyond structural dimensions of such settings to capture social processes is important.

Adolescence and Social Stratification

The adolescent population is quite diverse in terms of race/ethnicity, social class, and other markers of social location. Especially among sociologists, such diversity has motivated a great deal of research concerning the ways that adolescents' experiences are both a product of and contributor to major systems of social stratification ( Morgan 2005 ).

In part because adolescence is a relatively healthy period in the life course, major health disparities are less common and consistent during this stage compared with others ( Crockett & Peterson 1993 ). Indeed, adolescents from historically disadvantaged minority groups often are similar to or lower than whites in rates of many risky health behaviors, such as drinking ( Harris et al. 2006 ). Yet, the recent rise in obesity has also been problematic from a long-term health perspective, particularly for African American and Latino/a youth ( Ogden et al. 2010 ). Thus, adolescence may play a positive and negative role in race/ethnic disparities across the life course.

On a structural level, school segregation continues to be an issue of great interest ( Rothstein 2004 ). Studies of school composition suggest that racial desegregation has academic benefits for both white and non-white students by exposing them to different ways of thinking and by leading to greater equity in school resources. Yet, students may also feel lowered senses of belonging and perceive more discrimination in diverse schools ( Goldsmith 2004 , Johnson et al. 2001 , Rumberger & Palardy 2005 ). Progress in school desegregation has also often come with increased within-school segregation ( Mickelson 2001 ). Recently, Parents Involved , in which the Supreme Court curtailed use of race in school assignment, has shifted attention from race to socioeconomic status. Efforts to socioeconomically desegregate schools, however, also demonstrate a mixture of benefits and risks, with research suggesting that academic gains might be accompanied by psychosocial problems and that socioeconomically integrating schools would not alter levels of racial segregation ( Crosnoe 2009 , Reardon et al. 2006 ).

On an interpersonal level, Ogbu's (1997) oppositional culture thesis—which, among other things, argues that African American and Latino/a peers de-emphasize achievement and equate it with acting white—has continued to generate debate. Quantitative examinations have provided little evidence of this phenomenon ( Ainsworth-Darnell & Downey 1998 , Harris 2006 ). Mixed methods examinations have suggested that it does occur occasionally but with some important caveats: ( a ) It is rooted in schools' long-term misunderstanding of minority group culture, and ( b ) it is not racialized but instead happens in youth culture more generally, in ways that are manifested differently by race and class ( Carter 2006 , Tyson et al. 2005 ). In total, research on oppositional culture has probably done less to unpack race/ethnic achievement gaps than it has to illuminate the nexus of youth culture and schooling.

For the most part, research on socioeconomic disparities has continued to focus on socioeconomic disadvantage (e.g., poverty), especially after the contentious public debate about welfare reform ( Gennetian et al. 2008 ). Much of this research suggests that poverty is clearly detrimental to adolescents but perhaps less so than it is for children ( Duncan et al. 1998 ). At the same time, the past decade has also witnessed significant advances in our understanding of socioeconomic advantage. Lareau's (2004) work has been enormously influential. This research has demonstrated that middle-class parents tend to follow an approach to parenting, concerted cultivation, that prioritizes providing children cognitively and socially stimulating activities at home and in formal organizations that develop skills, enhance their senses of entitlement, and teach them how to work institutional systems. Such parenting is so well aligned with the American educational system that it gives their children a competitive edge in school. Initially, Lareau focused on elementary school, but her basic insights have been replicated in studies of adolescence ( Crosnoe & Huston 2007 , Kim & Schneider 2005 ). Moreover, Lareau's recent follow-up of her sample in young adulthood revealed that parenting-related socioeconomic advantages persisted into adolescence and beyond.

Turning to immigration, traditional assimilation perspectives posited improved outcomes for the descendants of immigrants compared with immigrants themselves. Yet, newer research suggests that the foreign- and U.S.-born children of immigrants outperform third-plus-generation youth, despite higher levels of socioeconomic disadvantage among immigrants. Evidence of this immigrant paradox is more consistent among adolescents than children ( Glick & Hohmann-Marriott 2007 , Kao 1999 , Portes & Rumbaut 2001 , Suarez-Orozco et al. 2009 ). This age difference could reflect adolescents' greater time to adapt to American schools and culture. It could also reflect biases in high school data sets, as immigrants from many regions are more likely to drop out of or bypass school ( Oropesa & Landale 2009 ). Perhaps more importantly, evidence of the immigrant paradox varies widely according to national origin, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. For example, adolescents whose parents emigrated from Asia best illustrate the immigrant paradox, at least in the academic realm. Asia is a region in which migration is positively selective on education and income, but, beyond socioeconomic status, Asian immigrant parents tend to have high standards of academic success, go to great lengths to secure educational opportunities for adolescents, and are highly planful (especially financially) about education ( Kao 2004 , Zhou 2009 ). This diversity in immigrant outcomes has supported theoretical reconceptualizations, such as segmented assimilation ( Portes & Zhou 1993 ), contending that the outcomes of assimilation depend on the context in which it occurs.

Of course, the adolescent population is stratified by factors beyond race and family background that also shape trajectories into adulthood. Two examples are obesity and homosexuality. Because of the stigma of obesity in American culture, obese youth are at heightened risk for psychosocial difficulties, which appear to disrupt their educational trajectories ( Crosnoe 2011 ). Similarly, same-sex-attracted youth often face strong social sanctions during high school that can filter into multiple domains, including academic progress ( Pearson et al. 2007 , Russell & Joyner 2001 ). In both cases, adolescents' characteristics position them on a social hierarchy to create short-term problems with long-term consequences. These stratifying processes are similar to gender, race, class, and immigration in that their significance in adolescence may create and reinforce unequal life chances.

New Directions for Research on Adolescence

Attempts by sociologists and other scholars over the past two decades to answer many of the tough questions about adolescence have raised additional questions. Having looked back, therefore, we now look forward. Given the space allowed, we have decided to focus on three specific future directions that touch on particularly provocative and timely debates and discussions in the field.

Biosocial Processes

In recent years, the integration of biomarkers with psychological and social data has helped empirical activity catch up with developmental theory. The sociological value of this activity is not in establishing genetic effects on adolescent behavior but instead in understanding the interplay of genes and environment at work in adolescent behavior ( Guo et al. 2008 ).

Understanding latent genetic influences has been aided by the creation of sibling samples, which allow assessments of sibling similarity in behavioral or other outcomes across sibling pairs of different degrees of genetic relatedness. Analyses of data from one such sample, the Nonshared Environment in Adolescent Development project, have elucidated the ways in which genetic traits select adolescents into different relationships and elicit different kinds of parenting. They have also demonstrated how the experiences that siblings have outside the home differentiate them on developmental outcomes, despite their genetic relatedness ( Reiss et al. 2000 ). Research on Add Health's diverse sibling pairs subsample has been particularly insightful about variability in shared environment and observed heritability of behaviors across social settings ( Boardman et al. 2008 ). For example, adolescent aggression is genetically influenced in both socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged communities, but the effects of shared environments (e.g., social influences experienced by both siblings) are significantly stronger in disadvantaged communities ( Cleveland 2003 ).

Turning to specific genetic influences, the collection of genetic data in behavioral studies has encouraged deeper exploration of gene-environment interactions. For example, Caspi and associates (2003) , drawing on biological and psychosocial data from New Zealand, reported that stressful life events had a larger impact on depression among youth with short alleles of the 5-HTT promoter polymorphism, which reduces efficiency of serotonin reuptake in the brain. Research by Guo and associates (2008) with the genetic data in Add Health demonstrated that the significance for delinquency of DRD2 alleles, which reduce efficiencies in the dopaminergetic system, is weaker in families with well-organized routines. Such studies push for a transactional view of biology, development, and environment.

Particularly important are genetically informed studies comparing adolescence with other life stages. For example, Dick and associates (2006) , working with genetic and psychosocial data from the United States, reported that the presence of a gene-regulating neurotransmitters, GABRA2, was associated with conduct disorder in adolescence and then with alcohol use in young adulthood. Thus, a genetic predisposition toward risky behavior is manifested differently across stages. A sociological interpretation is that entry into new settings across the transition from adolescence to adulthood might account for such changes.

As for other biomarkers, cortisol is a central hormone in stress response. Because cortisol levels tend to decline over the day, flatter diurnal patterns may signal health risks through the overactivation of physiological stress response ( Susman 2006 ). Efforts to integrate saliva samples and time diaries have revealed that minority youth report higher levels of chronic stress and demonstrate flatter cortisol patterns across the day than whites. Thus, identifying biological mechanisms underlying links between environmental stress and adolescent health may shed light on the role of adolescence in health disparities ( DeSantis et al. 2007 ). Similarly, immunological processes provide a window into environmental effects on youth. For example, McDade (2001) has combined samples of Epstein-Barr virus antibodies with lifestyle data. This work indicates that the stress that adolescents feel from modernization in developing countries is manifested in reduced immune functioning. Like neuroscience, this biomarker research is more common outside sociology, but it touches on core sociological questions, such as the effects of social integration on life chances, thereby representing a growth area for sociologists.

The nature versus nurture debate, therefore, seems to be dying. Indeed, research on adolescence is turning to the synergistic interplay between nature and nurture. Sociologists interested in adolescence have a significant role to play in uncovering the complexities of this interplay moving forward.

Linking Life Stages

Adolescence is better understood when it is viewed within the full life course, and we are now well poised to theorize and empirically evaluate linkages between adolescence and other life stages ( Johnson et al. 2011 ). As noted in the opening section of this review, advances in longitudinal sampling and modeling have facilitated asking and answering questions that involve processes unfolding over time and across contexts. At least in some domains (e.g., education, work), scholars of adolescence are accustomed to thinking about how adolescent experiences affect adult life. Both looking back to childhood and looking forward to adulthood, however, will enable us to elucidate the role of adolescence in the life course.

For example, initial curricular placements and academic achievement in high school are recognized as important to concurrent and future well-being. Yet, the past decade has also witnessed greater emphasis on understanding proximate and distal factors involved in producing varying levels of high school achievement. By following Baltimore schoolchildren from first grade into early adulthood, Alexander and associates (2007) were able to capture the full educational career and, in the process, identify critical periods. Socioeconomic disparities in academic progress at the start of high school were traced back to corresponding disparities in place at the start of first grade and to summer learning differences by socioeconomic status during the elementary school years. These ninth grade differences were then linked to curricular track, high school completion, and college attendance. Their interpretation emphasized how foundational the skills are that are learned in the early years of schooling and the ways in which the in-school and out-of-school settings and experiences that stratify early learning can have lasting, even accumulating, consequences for the life course. Exclusive focus on the adolescent years, and particularly the high school years, misses these processes set in motion much earlier and likely obscures the best points of intervention ( Heckman 2006 ).

As another example, pubertal timing may be a conduit in the connection between disadvantage in childhood and adulthood. Consider that family adversity is among the myriad biological and environmental factors accelerating pubertal timing ( Belsky et al. 2007 ). Cavanagh and associates (2007) have reported that early pubertal timing during middle school is linked to lower grades and the likelihood of course failure at the start of high school, and that as a result, high school completion and the grades of those who graduate are also affected. By stepping back to view longer-term processes, we see additional mechanisms through which family disadvantage impacts children's success in adolescence and adulthood, operating via biological and social processes, as well as their complex interactions.

Finally, charting individual trajectories over time provides important context for understanding what is observed in adolescence. The influential differentiation between life course persistence and adolescence desistance in criminal behavior is one example ( Moffitt 1993 ). Another concerns adolescent substance use, which is embedded within a variety of long-term trajectories that have distinct meaning and consequence. Following cohorts of adolescents in the Monitoring the Future Surveys into adulthood, Schulenberg and associates (2005) linked different patterns of substance use to the pathways through which adolescents transition into adulthood. Levels of substance use in adolescence anticipated the configuration of role transitions young people experienced in the years immediately following, but were also shaped by them. Young people who worked and did not attend school during these years binge drank more frequently during high school. Those who moved away from home for college were less frequent binge drinkers in high school but quickly caught up. These patterns suggest the varied settings and conditions that different adult statuses bring but also the potential for psychosocial preparation for these statuses during adolescence.

The life course paradigm emphasizes that development is lifelong and that no life stage can be understood in isolation. These examples highlight the advances that can be made if we rise to the challenge posed in this life course principle.

Social Change

Of course, linkages among life stages are also shaped by broader changes in the structure of society. Economic restructuring, for example, is dramatically affecting education and employment in young adulthood and beyond, and we need to better understand what this means for adolescents. Changes in the relative size of the manufacturing and service sectors have occurred in such a way as to reduce the availability of jobs with benefits, increase the income premium of higher education, and create greater fluidity between jobs ( Goldin & Katz 2008 ). Furthermore, Fullerton & Wallace (2007) characterized a set of interrelated changes occurring since the 1970s, including declining unionization, downsizing, growing use of contingent labor, and organizational restructuring as a “flexible turn in U.S. labor relations (p. 201),” which has eroded workers' perceptions of job security. Such changes are increasing the importance of adolescents' educational experiences in the status attainment process, thereby magnifying the significance of all of the factors discussed in this review that matter to these experiences.

In this context, the process of becoming adult has clearly changed, with scholars suggesting that adolescence has been extended to older ages or even that a new life stage should be recognized ( Settersten et al. 2005 ). Demands for and returns to education have risen, and relatedly, the period of dependency and semi-autonomy has lengthened. We know young people are staying in school longer, more often combining employment with higher education, and marrying later ( Bernhardt et al. 2001 , Fitzpatrick & Turner 2007 , U.S. Census Bureau 2006 ). Although race/ethnic and socioeconomic variability in these patterns has long been recognized ( Settersten et al. 2005 ), we are only just beginning to address a number of other important questions related to these broad social changes, including what they mean for the achievement of social and financial autonomy and relationships with others, including parents, and what we need to equip adolescents with in order for them to successfully navigate the transition to adulthood.

Two major collaborative efforts have laid an important foundation for understanding the implications of these social changes for adolescence. The first is the MacArthur Research Network on Transitions to Adulthood and Public Policy ( Settersten et al. 2005 ). It has reported, among other things, that parents, especially those with more resources, increasingly support their children through the transition to adulthood financially and otherwise. About one-third of 18–34 year olds in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics received cash support from their parents, at an average of just over $3,400 per year ( Schoeni & Ross 2005 ). This and other forms of ongoing material assistance (e.g., support of higher education pursuits, allowing children to remain in the home, assistance in establishing independent households, providing childcare) may be yet another way in which parents' level of education and income can affect the status attainment of their children. The second effort is the Society for Research on Adolescence's Study Group on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century ( Larson et al. 2002 ). One of its reports has argued that changes in family size, structure, and relationships; increased participation in school and after-school activities; and the advent of the Internet have created new opportunities for adolescents to develop more flexible social skills and capacities to move between diverse social worlds. It also notes, however, that those from families in poverty and those in elite families are more deprived when it comes to the social experience that builds these skills.

Another major social change concerns the transformation of social interaction though new media and technologies. The Pew Internet and American Life Project has reported that, in 2009, 75% of 12–17 year olds had cell phones and 93% went online ( Lenhart et al. 2010 ). The report also indicated that 76% of families with adolescents now had broadband access at home. Adolescents also go online via cell phones and portable gaming devices, in addition to computers at home. These technologies offer new opportunities for leisure, shopping, and staying in touch with others, as well as broader access to information and support. Roughly one-third of adolescents in the Pew study who went online used the Internet to gather information on health, dieting, or physical fitness, and 17% looked online for information about sensitive health topics, such as those related to drug use, mental health, and sex ( Lenhart et al. 2010 ).

Importantly, the Internet can also be thought of as a new kind of peer context. A recent study of 800 American youth revealed that, for most youth, new media technologies are used primarily to maintain and extend friendship networks ( Ito et al. 2010 ). Moreover, the Internet provides opportunities for socially isolated youth to connect with others in meaningful ways while also enabling the peer cultures of high school—including negative dimensions, such as bullying and gossiping—to follow young people home ( Crosnoe 2011 , Raskauskas & Stoltz 2007 ). Thus, new media represent a potential context of resource and risk related to peers.

Other potential risks ranging from driving accidents related to texting or talking on cell phones to exposure to questionable online content or social interactions (e.g., pornography, gambling, sexual solicitation) have concerned parents, educators, and lawmakers. Debates continue over whether risks can also accrue from the potentially sensitive or identifying information, including pictures and videos, adolescents post online about themselves and one another, or whether this is a healthy part of adolescents' self-expression and identity exploration. Nearly three-quarters of online youth use a social networking Web site such as Facebook or MySpace ( Lenhart et al. 2010 ). A recent content analysis of teenagers' MySpace pages indicated that 40% of adolescent users restricted access to their pages to identified friends. Yet, 10% of adolescent users who did not restrict access posted their full name, and many more listed their hometowns and the name of their schools, which could be used to identify them ( Hinduja & Patchin 2008 ).

Relevant empirical evidence about these concerns, however, is rare, and the topic is notably absent from the top sociological publishing outlets. Yet, sociologists have much to contribute, as adolescents' use of new media raises important questions about social networks, personal relationships, and identity development. What are the implications of cell phone use or online communication for parental monitoring and peer interactions? Do electronic interactions replace or complement face-to-face interactions? Do online venues provide a safe or dangerous place for identity work? As an example highlighting the potential work to be done, Blais and associates (2008) reported that Internet activity was related to changes in the quality of best friendships and romantic relationships over the course of a year among Canadian adolescents. Specifically, use of instant messaging, which occurs with known others, enhanced these relationships, but visits to chat rooms, which primarily involve communicating with strangers, were associated with worsening relationship quality over time. As these findings suggest, we will need to be specific about the types of media being used when we attempt to understand their implications for today's adolescents.

As is evident from this review, the rich sociological tradition of research on adolescence has continued into the new century. Still, the sociology of adolescence may be at something of a crossroads. The mapping of the human genome and the increasing sophistication of brain imaging are reshaping the scientific agenda in ways that, at first glance, do not tap into the traditional strengths of sociologists. At the same time, the renewed interest in childhood as a critical period—generated by findings that early interventions bring greater long-term returns to investments than those targeting adolescence ( Heckman 2006 )—has shifted attention to earlier stages. Another way of looking at these developments, however, is that they are opportunities. Indeed, sociologists are well-positioned to demonstrate how biological processes cannot be understood absent a firm sociological understanding of the environment in which they play out over time, explain how the long reach of childhood is channeled through adolescence, and identify ways in which adolescence produces turning points and deflections in the life course.

Summary Points.

Research on adolescence has moved in a sociological direction by emphasizing the role of context in shaping adolescents' lives and the link between adolescent development and societal inequality, fueled in part by recent advances in data collection and methodology.

Early childhood experiences are very important to long-term health, educational, and behavioral trajectories, but adolescent experiences play key roles in this process by magnifying or deflecting children's trajectories.

Many of the major developmental trajectories of adolescence, including those related to puberty, risky behavior, academic achievement, health, and identity development, reflect a complex interplay of biology, personal agency, and environment.

Adolescents' navigation of institutional systems, such as school and work, have become increasingly complex and interrelated, with high school coursework more consequential to long-term outcomes in the globalized economy and paid work during adolescence becoming more common and potentially either risky or beneficial for educational attainment depending on motivation, background, and academic competence.

Adolescents tend to spend less time with parents and other relatives and seek more autonomy while becoming more immersed in expanding peer networks, including romantic networks, but they typically do so while maintaining strong emotional ties to their families.

Although much of the research on school and neighborhood effects on adolescent behavior has focused on the structural features of these contexts, more attention is being paid to the ways in which they organize peer groups that differ widely in terms of norms, values, and behavioral opportunities, as well as the ways families affect and respond within them.

Gender, race, social class, and immigration stratify adolescents' lives, with poor and/or minority youth particularly vulnerable in the educational system, through a variety of structural inequalities and interpersonal processes, but immigrant youth often demonstrate a high level of resilience in the face of similar risks.

Acknowledgments

Support for R.C. came from a faculty scholar award from the William T. Grant Foundation, as well as a center grant to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD042849; PI: Mark Hayward). The authors thank Anna Thornton for her help with this review.

Disclosure Statement : The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding, or financial holdings that might be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this review.

Literature Cited

• Adelman C. The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School through College. Washington, DC: U.S. Dep. Educ; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ainsworth-Darnell J, Downey D. Assessing racial/ethnic differences in school performance. Am Sociol Rev. 1998;63:536–53. [ Google Scholar ]
• Akerlof GE, Kranton RA. Identity and schooling: some lessons for the economics of education. J Econ Lit. 2002;40:1167–201. [ Google Scholar ]
• Alexander K, Entwisle D, Olson L. Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. Am Sociol Rev. 2007;72:167–80. [ Google Scholar ]
• Allen JP, Porter MR, McFarland CF, Marsh P, McElhaney KB. The two faces of adolescents' success with peers: adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Dev. 2005;76:747–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00875.x. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Apel R, Bushway S, Brame R, Haviland AM, Nagin DS, Paternoster R. Unpacking the relationship between adolescent employment and antisocial behavior: a matched samples comparison. Criminology. 2007;45:67–97. [ Google Scholar ]
• Arum R. Schools and communities: ecological and institutional dimensions. Annu Rev Sociol. 2000;26:395–418. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bachman JG, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM. Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Responses from the Nation's High School Seniors. Ann Arbor, MI: Inst. Soc. Res; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bachman JG, O'Malley P, Schulenberg J, Johnston LD, Bryant A, Merline A. The Decline of Substance Use in Young Adulthood: Changes in Social Activities, Roles, and Beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barber BL, Eccles JS, Stone MR. Whatever happened to the jock, the brain, and the princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. J Adolesc Res. 2001;16:429–55. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bellair PE, Roscigno VJ. Labor market opportunity and adolescent delinquency. Soc Forces. 2000;78:1509–38. [ Google Scholar ]
• Belsky J, Steinberg LD, Houts R, Friedman S, DeHart G, et al. Family rearing antecedents of pubertal timing. Child Dev. 2007;78:1302–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01067.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Berg GA. Lessons from the Edge: For-Profit and Nontraditional Higher Education in America. New York: Praeger; 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bernhardt A, Morris M, Handcock MS, Scott MA. Divergent Paths: Economic Mobility in the New American Labor Market. New York: Russell Sage Found; 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Blais JJ, Craig WM, Pepler D, Connolly J. Adolescents online: the importance of internet activity choices to salient relationships. J Youth Adolesc. 2008;37:522–36. [ Google Scholar ]
• Boardman JD, Saint Onge JM, Haberstick BC, Timberlake DS, Hewitt JK. Do schools moderate the genetic determinants of smoking? Behav Genet. 2008;38:234–46. doi: 10.1007/s10519-008-9197-0. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Breen R, Goldthorpe JH. Explaining educational differentials: towards a formal rational action theory. Ration Soc. 1997;9:275–305. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bronfenbrenner U, Morris P. The ecology of developmental processes. In: Damon W, Lerner RM, editors. Handbook of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley; 1998. pp. 993–1028. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown BB, Klute C. Friendships, cliques, and crowds. In: Adams G, Berzonsky MD, editors. Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2003. pp. 330–48. [ Google Scholar ]
• Browning CR, Burrington LA, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood structural inequality, collective efficacy, and sexual risk behavior among urban youth. J Health Soc Behav. 2008;49:269–85. doi: 10.1177/002214650804900303. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Browning CR, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Sexual initiation in early adolescence: the nexus of parental and community control. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70:758–78. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW, Congdon RT. Hierarchical Linear Models. Chicago: Sci. Softw. Inc; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Buchmann C, DiPrete TA. The growing female advantage in college completion. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71:515–41. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carter P. Keepin' It Real: School Success Beyond Black and White. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Craig IW, et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science. 2003;301:386–89. doi: 10.1126/science.1083968. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cavanagh SE. The sexual debut of girls in early adolescence: the intersection of race, pubertal timing, and friendship group dynamics. J Res Adolesc. 2004;14:285–312. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cavanagh SE, Riegle-Crumb C, Crosnoe R. Early pubertal timing and the education of girls. Soc Psychol Q. 2007;70:186–98. doi: 10.1177/019027250707000207. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chuang YC, Ennett ST, Bauman KE, Foshee VA. Neighborhood influences on adolescent cigarette and alcohol use: mediating effects through parent and peer behaviors. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46:187–204. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600205. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Clampet-Lundquist S, Edin K, Kling J, Duncan G. IRS Work Pap 509. Princeton Univ; 2006. Moving at-risk teenagers out of high-risk neighborhoods: why girls fare better than boys. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cleveland HH. Disadvantaged neighborhoods and adolescent aggression: behavioral genetic evidence of contextual effects. J Res Adolesc. 2003;13:211–38. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cleveland HH, Wiebe RP. The moderation of adolescent–to–peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use by school levels of substance use. Child Dev. 2003;74:279–91. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00535. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cook TD, Herman M, Phillips M, Settersten RA., Jr Some ways in which neighborhoods, nuclear families, friendship groups and schools jointly affect changes in early adolescent development. Child Dev. 2002;73:1283–309. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00472. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Crockett LJ, Petersen AC. Adolescent development: health risks and opportunities for health promotion. In: Millstein SG, Petersen AC, Nightingale EO, editors. Promoting the Health of Adolescents: New Directions for the 21st Century. New York: Oxford; 1993. pp. 13–37. [ Google Scholar ]
• Crosnoe R. Low-income students and the socioeconomic composition of public high schools. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;74:709–30. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400502. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Crosnoe R. Fitting In, Standing Out: Navigating the Social Challenges of High School to Get an Education. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Crosnoe R, Huston A. Socioeconomic status, schooling, and the developmental trajectories of adolescents. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:1097–1110. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1097. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Crouter AC, Head MR, McHale SM, Tucker CJ. Family time and the psychosocial adjustment of adolescent siblings and their parents. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66:147–62. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dahl RE, Spear LP. Adolescent brain development: vulnerabilities and opportunities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1021:1–22. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.001. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dance J. Tough Fronts: The Impact of Street Culture on Schooling. London: Routledge Falmer; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• DeSantis A, Adam EK, Doane L, Mineka S, Zinbarg R, Craske M. Racial/ethnic differences in cortisol diurnal rhythms in a community sample of adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.006. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dick DM, Bierut L, Hinrichs A, Fox L, Bucholz KK, et al. The role of GABRA2 in risk for conduct disorder and alcohol and drug dependency across developmental stages. Behav Genet. 2006;36:577–90. doi: 10.1007/s10519-005-9041-8. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dornbusch SM. The sociology of adolescence. Annu Rev Sociol. 1989;15:233–59. [ Google Scholar ]
• Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J, Yeung WJ, Smith JR. How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children? Am Sociol Rev. 1998;63:406–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Elder GH., Jr The life course as developmental theory. Child Dev. 1998;69:1–12. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Elder GH Jr, Giele JZ, editors. The Craft of Life Course Research. New York: Guilford; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Entwisle DR, Alexander KL, Olson LS. Urban teenagers: work and dropout. Youth Soc. 2005;37:3–32. [ Google Scholar ]
• Falci C, McNeely C. Too many friends: social integration, network cohesion and adolescent depressive symptoms. Soc Forces. 2009;87:2031–2061. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fitzpatrick MD, Turner SE. Blurring the boundary: changes in the transition from college participation to adulthood. In: Danzinger S, Rouse C, editors. The Price of Independence: The Economics of Early Adulthood. New York: Russell Sage Found; 2007. pp. 107–37. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fletcher AC, Steinberg LD, Williams-Wheeler M. Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Dev. 2004;75:781–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00706.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Frank KA, Schiller KS, Riegle-Crumb C, Mueller AS, Crosnoe R, et al. The social dynamics of mathematics coursetaking in high school. Am J Sociol. 2008;113:1645–96. doi: 10.1086/587153. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fullerton AS, Wallace M. Traversing the flexible turn: U.S. workers' perceptions of job security, 1977–2002. Soc Sci Res. 2007;36:201–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Furstenberg FF. Teenage childbearing as a public issue and private concern. Annu Rev Sociol. 2003;29:23–29. [ Google Scholar ]
• Furstenberg FF. Should government promote marriage? J Policy Anal Manag. 2007;26:956–60. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gamoran A, Hannigan EC. Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2000;22:241–54. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ge X, Elder GH, Jr, Regnerus M, Christine C. Pubertal transitions, perceptions of being overweight, and adolescents' psychological maladjustment: gender and ethnic differences. Soc Psychol Q. 2001;64:363–75. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gennetian LA, Lopoo LM, London AS. Maternal work hours and adolescents' school outcomes among low-income families in four urban counties. Demography. 2008;45:31–43. doi: 10.1353/dem.2008.0003. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Giordano PC, Longmore MA, Manning WD. Gender and the meanings of adolescent romantic relationships: a focus on boys. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71:260–87. [ Google Scholar ]
• Glick JE, Hohmann-Marriott B. Academic performance of young children in immigrant families: the significance of race, ethnicity, and national origin. Int Migr Rev. 2007;41:371–402. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goldin C, Katz LF. The Race between Technology and Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press; 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goldsmith PA. Schools' racial mix, students' optimism, and the black-white and Latino-white achievement gaps. Sociol Educ. 2004;77:121–47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goyette KA. College for some to college for all: social background, occupational expectations, and educational expectations over time. Soc Sci Res. 2008;37:461–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.02.002. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guo G, Roettger M, Cai T. The integration of genetic propensities into social control models of delinquency and violence among male youths. Am Sociol Rev. 2008;73:543–68. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hagan J, Foster H. Youth violence and the end of adolescence. Am Sociol Rev. 2001;66:874–99. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hall GS. Adolescence. New York: Appleton; 1904. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hankin BL, Mermelstein R, Roesch L. Sex differences in adolescent depression: stress exposure and reactivity models. Child Dev. 2007;78:279–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00997.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harding DJ. Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: the effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. Am J Sociol. 2003;109:676–719. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harding DJ. Violence, older peers, and the socialization of adolescent boys in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;74:445–64. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400306. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harris A. I (don't) hate school: revisiting oppositional culture theory of blacks' resistance to schooling. Soc Forces. 2006;85:797–833. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harris KM, Duncan GJ, Boisjoly J. Evaluating the role of “nothing to lose” attitudes on risky behavior in adolescence. Soc Forces. 2002;80:1005–39. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harris KM, Gordon-Larsen P, Chantala K, Udry JR. Longitudinal trends in race/ethnic disparities in leading health indicators from adolescence to young adulthood. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:74–81. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.1.74. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hawkins D, Amato P, King V. Nonresident father involvement and adolescent well-being: father effects or child effects? Am Sociol Rev. 2007;72:990–1010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hay C. Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: a test of self-control theory. Criminology. 2006;39:707–36. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haynie DL. Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? Am J Sociol. 2001;106:1013–1057. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haynie DL. Contexts of risk? Explaining the link between girls' pubertal development and their delinquency involvement. Soc Forces. 2003;82:355–97. [ Google Scholar ]
• Heckman J. Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science. 2006;312(5782):1900–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1128898. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Personal information and adolescents on the Internet: a quantitative content analysis of MySpace. J Adolesc. 2008;31:125–46. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.004. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ito M, Baumer S, Bittanti M, Boyd D, Cody R, et al. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jacob BA, Wilder T. NBER Work Pap No 15683. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res; 2010. Educational expectations and attainment. [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson MK. Further evidence on adolescent employment and substance use: differences by race and ethnicity. J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45:187–97. doi: 10.1177/002214650404500205. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson MK, Crosnoe R, Elder GH., Jr Student attachment and academic engagement: the role of race and ethnicity. Sociol Educ. 2001;74:318–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson MK, Crosnoe R, Elder GH., Jr Insights on adolescence from a life course perspective. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21:273–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00728.x. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones N. Between Good and Ghetto: African American Girls and Inner City Violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Joyner K, Udry JR. You don't bring me anything but down: adolescent romance and depression. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41:369–91. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kao G. Parental influences on the educational outcomes of immigrant youth. Int Migr Rev. 2004;38:427–49. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kao G. Psychological well-being and educational achievement among immigrant youth. In: Hernandez DJ, editor. Children of Immigrants: Health, Adjustment, and Public Assistance. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad; 1999. pp. 410–77. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim DH, Schneider B. Social capital in action: alignment of parental support in adolescents' transition to postsecondary education. Soc Forces. 2005;84:1181–206. [ Google Scholar ]
• King V, Silverstein M, Elder GH, Jr, Bengtson VL, Conger RD. Relations with grandparents: rural Midwest versus urban southern California. J Fam Issues. 2003;24:1044–1069. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kling J, Liebman J, Katz L. Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica. 2007;75:83–119. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kreager DA, Staff J. The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Soc Psychol Q. 2009;72:143–64. doi: 10.1177/019027250907200205. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kroger J. Identity Development: Adolescence through Adulthood. 2nd Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lareau A. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press; 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Larson R, Brown BB, Mortimer J, editors. Adolescents' preparation for the future: perils and promise (special issue) J Res Adolesc. 2002;12(1):1–166. [ Google Scholar ]
• Larson RW, Richards MH, Moneta G, Holmbeck G, Duckett E. Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: disengagement and transformation. Dev Psychol. 1996;32:744–54. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee JC, Staff J. When work matters: the varying impact of work intensity on high school dropout. Sociol Educ. 2007;80:158–78. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social Media and Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Res Cent; 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lucas SR. Effectively maintained inequality: education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. Am J Sociol. 2001;106:1642–90. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mandara J, Gaylord-Harden NK, Richards MH, Ragsdale BL. The effects of changes in racial identity and self-esteem on changes in African American adolescents' mental health. Child Dev. 2009;80:1660–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01360.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Manlove J, Ryan S, Franzetta K. Contraceptive use patterns across teens' sexual relationships: the role of relationships, partners, and sexual histories. Demography. 2007;44:603–21. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0031. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Marsh HW. Employment during high school: character building or a subversion of academic goals? Sociol Educ. 1991;64:172–89. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin JK, Pescosolido BA, Olafsdottir S, Mcleod JD. The construction of fear: Americans' preferences for social distance from children and adolescents with mental health problems. J Health Soc Behav. 2007;48:50–67. doi: 10.1177/002214650704800104. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin K. Puberty, Sexuality, and the Self: Boys and Girls at Adolescence. New York: Routledge; 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCarthy B, Casey T. Love, sex, and crime: adolescent romantic relationships and offending. Am Sociol Rev. 2008;73:944–69. [ Google Scholar ]
• McDade TW. Lifestyle incongruity, social integration, and immune function in Samoan adolescents. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:1351–62. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00414-7. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McFarland DA. Curricular flows: trajectories, turning points, and assignment criteria in high school math careers. Sociol Educ. 2006;79:177–205. [ Google Scholar ]
• McLeod JD, Fettes DL. Trajectories of failure: the educational careers of children with mental health problems. Am J Sociol. 2007;113:653–701. doi: 10.1086/521849. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McMorris BJ, Uggen C. Alcohol and employment in the transition to adulthood. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41:276–94. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mickelson R. Subverting Swann: first- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. Am Educ Res J. 2001;38:215–52. [ Google Scholar ]
• Modell J, Goodman M. Historical perspectives. In: Feldman SS, Elliott GR, editors. At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press; 1990. pp. 93–122. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moffitt TE. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:674–701. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mollborn S. Making the best of a bad situation: material resources and teenage parenthood. J Marriage Fam. 2007;69:92–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00347.x. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Morgan SL. On the Edge of Commitment: Educational Attainment and Race in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mortimer JT. Working and Growing Up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press; 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mortimer JT, Johnson MK. Adolescent part-time work and educational achievement. In: Borman K, Schneider B, editors. The Adolescent Years: Social Influences and Educational Challenges. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press; 1998. pp. 183–206. [ Google Scholar ]
• Natl. Res. Counc. Protecting Youth at Work. Washington, DC: Natl Acad. Press; 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Newman KS. Working poor: low-wage employment in the lives of Harlem youth. In: Graber JA, Brooks-Gunn J, Petersen AC, editors. Transitions through Adolescence: Interpersonal Domains and Context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996. pp. 323–43. [ Google Scholar ]
• Newman KS. No Shame in my Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. New York: Russell Sage Found; 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ogbu JU. African American education: a cultural-ecological perspective. In: McAdoo HP, editor. Black Families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997. pp. 234–50. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ogden C, Carroll M, Curtin L, Lamb M, Flegal K. Prevalence of high body mass index in U.S. children and adolescents 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:242–49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2012. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oropesa RS, Landale N. Why do immigrant youths who never enroll in U.S. schools matter? Sociol Educ. 2009;82:240–66. doi: 10.1177/003804070908200303. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Paternoster R, Bushway S, Brame R, Apel R. The effect of teenage employment on delinquency and problem behaviors. Soc Forces. 2003;82:297–335. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pearce LD, Haynie DL. Intergenerational religious dynamics and adolescent delinquency. Soc Forces. 2004;82:1553–72. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pearson J, Muller C, Wilkinson L. Adolescent same-sex attraction and academic outcomes: the role of school attachment and engagement. Soc Probl. 2007;54:523–42. doi: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.4.523. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Perreira KM, Harris KM, Lee D. Immigrant youth in the labor market. Work Occup. 2007;34:5–34. [ Google Scholar ]
• Portes A, Rumbaut RG. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press; 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Portes A, Zhou M. The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants among post-1965 immigrant youth. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci. 1993;530:740–98. [ Google Scholar ]
• Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD. Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:564–75. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Reardon SF, Yun YT, Kurlaender M. Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2006;28:49–75. [ Google Scholar ]
• Reiss D, Neiderhiser JM, Hetherington EM, Plomin R. The Relationship Code: Deciphering Genetic and Social Patterns in Adolescent Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press; 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Reynolds J, Stewart M, Sischo L, McDonald R. Have adolescents become too ambitious? High school seniors' educational and occupational plans, 1976–2000. Soc Probl. 2006;53:186–206. [ Google Scholar ]
• Riegle-Crumb C. The path through math: course-taking trajectories and student performance at the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity. Am J Educ. 2006;113:101–22. doi: 10.1086/506495. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rosenbaum J. Beyond College for All: Career Paths for the Forgotten Half. New York: Russell Sage Found; 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rosenfield S, Vertefuille J, McAlpine D. Gender stratification and mental health: an exploration of dimensions of the self. Soc Psychol Q. 2000;63:208–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rothstein R. Class and Schools: Using Social, Economic, and Educational Reform to Close the Black-White Achievement Gap. New York: Teachers Coll. Press; 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rumberger RW, Palardy GJ. Does segregation still matter? The impact of social composition on academic achievement in high school. Teach Coll Rec. 2005;107:1999–2045. [ Google Scholar ]
• Russell ST, Joyner K. Adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk: evidence from a national study. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1276–81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1276. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Russell ST, Sigler-Andrews N. Adolescent sexuality and positive youth development. In: Perkins D, Borden L, Keith J, Villarruel FA, editors. Positive Youth Development: Beacons, Challenges, and Opportunities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003. pp. 146–61. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schneider B, Stevenson D. The Ambitious Generation: America's Teenagers, Motivated but Directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press; 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schoenhals M, Tienda M, Schneider B. The educational and personal consequences of adolescent employment. Soc Forces. 1998;77:723–62. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schoeni RF, Ross KE. Material assistance from families during the transition to adulthood. See Settersten et al. 2005;2005:417–53. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schulenberg JE, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Johnston LD. Early adult transitions and their relation to well-being and substance use. See Settersten et al. 2005;2005:417–53. [ Google Scholar ]
• Seaton EK, Sellers RM, Scottham KM. The status model of racial identity development in African American adolescents: evidence of structure, trajectories, and well-being. Child Dev. 2006;77:1416–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00944.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sellers R, Smith M, Shelton J, Rowley S, Chavous T. Multidimensional model of racial identity: a reconceptualization of African American racial identity. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2:18–39. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_2. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Settersten RA Jr, Furstenberg FF Jr, Rumbaut RG, editors. On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research and Public Policy. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shanahan L, McHale SM, Osgood DW, Crouter AC. Conflict frequency with mothers and fathers from middle childhood to late adolescence: within- and between-families comparisons. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:539–50. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.539. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shulman S, Collins WA, editors. Romantic Relationships in Adolescence: Developmental Perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Staff J, Mortimer JT. Educational and work strategies from adolescence to early adulthood: consequences for educational attainment. Soc Forces. 2007;85:1169–94. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0057. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stättin H, Kerr M. Parental monitoring: a reinterpretation. Child Dev. 2000;71:1070–83. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00210. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stättin H MagnussonD. Pubertal Maturation in Female Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990. [ Google Scholar ]
• Steinberg LD. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008;28:78–106. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suarez-Orozco C, Rhodes J, Milburn M. Unraveling the immigrant paradox: academic engagement and disengagement among recently arrived immigrant youth. Youth Soc. 2009;41:151–85. [ Google Scholar ]
• Susman EJ. Psychobiology of persistent antisocial behavior: stress, early vulnerabilities and the attenuation hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:376–89. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.08.002. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Susman EJ, Dorn LD, Schiefelbein VL. Puberty, sexuality, and health. In: Lerner RM, Easterbrooks MA, Mistry J, editors. Handbook of Psychology: Vol 6 Developmental Psychology. New York: Wiley; 2003. pp. 295–324. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tyson K, Darity W, Castellino DR. It's not a ‘black thing’: understanding the burden of acting white and other dilemmas of high achievement. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70:582–605. [ Google Scholar ]
• Umaña-Taylor AJ, Gonzales-Backen MA, Guimond AB. Latino adolescents' ethnic identity: Is there a developmental progression and does growth in ethnic identity predict growth in self-esteem? Child Dev. 2009;80:391–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01267.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• U.S. Census Bur. Table MS-2 Estimated Median Age at First Marriage, By Sex: 1890 to the Present. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bur; 2006. http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/ms2.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Warren JR, LePore PC, Mare RD. Employment during high school: consequences for students' grades in academic courses. Am Educ Res J. 2000;37:943–69. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilson WJ. When Work Disappears. New York: Vintage; 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yau JP, Tasopoulos-Chan M, Smetana JG. Disclosure to parents about everyday activities among American adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, and European backgrounds. Child Dev. 2009;80:1481–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01346.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhou M. Contemporary Chinese American: Immigration, Ethnicity, and Community Transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ Press; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (119.8 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on the Neurobiological and Socio-behavioral Science of Adolescent Development and Its Applications; Backes EP, Bonnie RJ, editors. The Promise of Adolescence: Realizing Opportunity for All Youth. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2019 May 16.

The Promise of Adolescence: Realizing Opportunity for All Youth.

• Hardcopy Version at National Academies Press

2 Adolescent Development

A dolescence is a period of significant development that begins with the onset of puberty 1 and ends in the mid-20s. Consider how different a person is at the age of 12 from the person he or she is at age 24. The trajectory between those two ages involves a profound amount of change in all domains of development—biological, cognitive, psychosocial, and emotional. Personal relationships and settings also change during this period, as peers and romantic partners become more central and as the adolescent moves into and then beyond secondary school or gains employment.

Importantly, although the developmental plasticity that characterizes the period makes adolescents malleable, malleability is not synonymous with passivity. Indeed, adolescents are increasingly active agents in their own developmental process. Yet, as they explore, experiment, and learn, they still require scaffolding and support, including environments that bolster opportunities to thrive. A toxic environment makes healthy adolescent development challenging. Ultimately, the transformations in body, brain, and behavior that occur during adolescence interact with each other and with the environment to shape pathways to adulthood.

Each stage of life depends on what has come before it, and young people certainly do not enter adolescence with a “blank slate.” Rather, adolescent development is partly a consequence of earlier life experiences. However, these early life experiences are not determinative, and the adaptive plasticity of adolescence marks it as a window of opportunity for change through which mechanisms of resilience, recovery, and development are possible. ( Chapter 3 discusses this life-course perspective on development in detail.) This chapter explores three key domains of adolescent development: puberty, neurobiological development, and psychosocial development. Within each domain, we highlight processes that reflect the capacity for adaptive plasticity during adolescence and beyond, marking adolescence as a period of unique opportunity for positive developmental trajectories.

Puberty, a normative developmental transition that all youth experience, is shaped by both social and biological processes. Although often misconstrued as an abrupt, discrete event, puberty is actually a gradual process occurring between childhood and adolescence and one that takes many years to complete ( Dorn and Biro, 2011 ). Biologically, puberty involves a series of complex alterations at both the neural and endocrine levels over an extended period that result in changes in body shape (morphology), including the maturation of primary and secondary sex characteristics during late childhood and early adolescence and, ultimately, the acquisition of reproductive maturity ( Dorn and Biro, 2011 ; Natsuaki et al., 2014 ).

Two biological components of puberty, adrenarche and gonadarche , are relevant in understanding the link between puberty and adolescent wellbeing. Adrenarche, which typically begins between ages 6 and 9, refers to the maturation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, during which the levels of adrenal androgens (e.g., dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulfate) begin to increase. While adrenarche begins in late childhood, levels of adrenarchal hormones continue to rise throughout adolescence, peaking in the early 20's ( Blakemore et al., 2010 ). Adrenal androgens contribute to the growth of pubic and axillary hair. Gonadarche typically begins in early adolescence, at approximately ages 9 to 11, and involves the reactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis (for a review, see Sisk and Foster, 2004 ). 2 The rise of gonadal steroid hormones to adult levels occurs as a result of HPG reactivation and is primarily responsible for breast and genital development in girls.

The consequence of these complex changes in HPA and HPG axes at the neuroendocrine level is a coordinated series of visible, signature changes in body parts. These include a growth spurt, changes in skin (e.g., acne) and in body odor, the accumulation of body fat (in girls), the appearance of breast budding (in girls) and enlargement of testes and increased penis size (in boys), the growth of pubic and axillary hair, the growth of facial hair (in boys), and the arrival of the first period (i.e., menarche, in girls). Key pubertal events are highlighted in Figure 2-1 ; however, as discussed next, there is a great deal of variation in the timing and tempo of these events.

Key pubertal events across adolescence.

It is useful to distinguish three distinct yet interrelated ways to conceptualize individual differences in pubertal maturation. Pubertal status refers to how far along adolescents are in the continuum of pubertal maturation at any given moment. For instance, if an 11-year-old girl has just experienced menarche, she is considered to have advanced pubertal status because menarche is the last event that occurs in the process of the female pubertal transition. Pubertal status is inherently confounded with age, because older adolescents are more likely to have attained advanced pubertal status.

Pubertal timing , on the other hand, refers to how mature an adolescent is when compared to his or her same-sex peers who are of the same age. In other words, pubertal timing always includes a reference group of one's peers. For example, a girl who experiences menarche at age 10 may be an earlier maturer in the United States, because her menarcheal timing is earlier than the national average age for menarche nationwide, which was found to be 12.4 years in a cohort of girls born between 1980 and 1984 ( McDowell et al., 2007 ). Only 10 percent of girls in the United States are estimated to have experienced menarche before 11.11 years of age ( Chumlea et al., 2003 ), suggesting that the girl in this example would be considered to have early pubertal timing. Unlike pubertal status, pubertal timing is not confounded by age because, by definition, pubertal timing is inherently standardized within same-sex, same-age peers typically residing in the same country.

Pubertal tempo is a within-the-individual metric that refers to how quickly a person completes these sets of pubertal changes. For example, some boys may experience a deepening of their voice and the development of facial, axillary, and pubic hair all within a matter of months, whereas other boys may have a gap of several years between voice-deepening and the development of facial hair. Pubertal tempo has gained more attention recently with the rise of sophisticated longitudinal methodology and the resulting availability of longitudinal data on pubertal maturation (e.g., Ge et al., 2003 ; Marceau et al., 2011 ; Mendle et al., 2010 ).

Regardless of the metric used, most of the research on adolescent pubertal development has focused on girls. We know comparatively little about the processes, correlates, and outcomes of pubertal maturation in boys, except for the well-replicated findings that girls typically begin and complete puberty before boys. Evidence is now emerging that the relationship between puberty and structural brain development in the amygdala and hippocampus region may differ by sex ( Satterthwaite et al., 2014 ; Vijayakumar et al., 2018 ). These sex differences in associations between brain development and puberty are relevant for understanding psychiatric disorders characterized by both hippocampal dysfunction and prominent gender disparities during adolescence.

It is also important to consider the pubertal development of transgender and gender-nonconforming youth. Transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals usually identify as a gender other than the one they were assigned at birth ( Sylvia Rivera Law Project, 2012 ). Individuals who are gender-nonconforming may identify as transgender, genderqueer, gender-fluid, gender-expansive, or nonbinary. Puberty is a time that can be enormously stressful, and the fear of developing—or the actual development of—secondary sexual characteristics that do not match a child's gender identity can be intense and even destabilizing ( de Vries et al., 2011 ). Some transgender and gender-nonconforming youth might take medications that block puberty. Although puberty blockers have the potential to ease the process of transitioning, the long-term health effects of these drugs are not yet known ( Boskey, 2014 ; Kreukels and Cohen-Kettenis, 2011 ).

The Role of Early Experiences on Pubertal Timing and Tempo

As noted earlier, the timing and rate of pubertal development vary greatly. The age at which someone matures is due to a combination of genetic and environmental influences (e.g., Mustanski et al., 2004 ). Early life experiences, including social risks and disadvantages, have been shown to accelerate pubertal tempo and lower the age of pubertal timing ( Marshall and Tanner, 1969 ). Specifically, accelerated pubertal tempo and early pubertal timing have been associated with stressors, including childhood sexual abuse and physical abuse, obesity, prematurity, light exposure, father absence, and exposure to endocrine disruptors (such as chemicals in plastics, pesticides, hair-care products, and many meat and dairy items) (see e.g., Steinberg, 2014 , pp. 54–55). This section reviews the literature on associations between these early experiences and normative variations in pubertal timing and tempo. We close this section with a brief discussion of these associations as a marker of adaptive plasticity.

Maltreatment

One of the most widely studied early experiences related to pubertal development is child maltreatment, and in particular, sexual abuse. A series of studies shows that the age of menarche tends to be lower for girls who experienced child sexual abuse as compared to girls who have not experienced this ( Bergevin et al., 2003 ; Natsuaki et al., 2011 ; Romans et al., 2003 ; Turner et al., 1999 ; Wise et al., 2009 ). Trickett and Putnam (1993) suggested that the trauma of child sexual abuse introduces physiological as well as psychological consequences for children, including accelerated maturation by premature activation of the HPA and HPG axes. In addition, some studies have observed a relationship between childhood physical abuse and early maturation, though less robustly and less consistently than for sexual abuse ( Bergevin et al., 2003 ; Wise et al., 2009 ), and these studies do not always control for the possibility of concurrent sexual abuse (e.g., Romans et al., 2003 ).

In one of the few studies to examine pubertal development longitudinally in adolescents with maltreatment histories, Mendle and colleagues (2011) followed a sample of 100 girls in foster care at four points in time over 2 years, beginning in the spring of their final year of elementary school. The previously established association between sexual abuse and earlier onset of maturation and earlier age at menarche was replicated, and in addition, physical abuse was found to be related to a more rapid tempo of pubertal development. A recent longitudinal study of 84 sexually abused girls and matched-comparison girls replicated the association between sexual abuse and earlier pubertal onset (including breast development and pubic hair; Noll et al., 2017 ). Further, using this same sample, childhood sexual abuse predicted earlier pubertal development which, in turn, was associated with higher levels of internalizing symptoms such as depression and anxiety concurrently and 2 years later ( Mendle et al., 2014 ). A third study with this sample found that earlier-maturing girls were more anxious in the pre- and peri-menarche periods than their later-maturing peers; however, their anxiety declined after menarche, suggesting a time-limited effect on mental health and the potential for recovery upon completion of pubertal maturation, as girls enter later adolescence ( Natsuaki et al., 2011 ).

The association between sexual abuse and earlier pubertal development was recently replicated using a large population-based sample of adolescents, the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health 3 ( N = 6,273 girls). In that study, child sexual abuse predicted earlier menarche and development of secondary sexual characteristics, whereas other types of maltreatment did not ( Mendle et al., 2016 ). The distinctive role for early pubertal timing suggests that the heightened sexual circumstances of puberty may be especially challenging for girls whose lives have already been disrupted by adverse early experiences, yet also suggests a potential opportunity for intervention and resilience, particularly in later adolescence, once pubertal development is complete. However, the vast majority of research in this area has focused solely on girls, and we know very little about whether maltreatment is also associated with earlier pubertal timing in boys.

Other Family and Health Factors

Other family factors that may be stress-inducing yet much less extreme than maltreatment have also been associated with pubertal timing and tempo. For example, Quinlan (2003) found that the number of caretaking transitions a child experiences was associated with earlier menarche. Sung and colleagues (2016) found that exposure to greater parental harshness (but not unpredictability) during the first 5 years of life predicted earlier menarche; and a recent meta-analysis found that father absence was significantly related to earlier menarche ( Webster et al., 2014 ), although genetic confounding may play a role in this association ( Barbaro et al., 2017 ).

Health factors that may affect the metabolic system are also predictive of pubertal timing. For example, in girls, low birth weight ( Belsky et al., 2007 ) and obesity/higher body mass index (BMI) ( Wagner et al., 2015 ) have both been associated with earlier pubertal maturation. For boys, overweight (BMI ≥ 85th and < 95th percentile) has been associated with earlier pubertal maturation, whereas obesity (BMI ≥ 95th percentile) was associated with later pubertal maturation ( Lee et al., 2016 ), suggesting a complex association between aspects of the metabolic system and puberty in boys.

Environmental Exposures

Recently, researchers have examined whether a child's exposure to chemicals is related to pubertal maturation by serving as an endocrine disruptor (see e.g., Lomniczi et al., 2013 ; Simonneaux et al., 2013 ; Steingraber, 2007 ). In the first longitudinal study of age of pubertal timing and exposure to persistent organic pollutants—chemicals used in flame retardants—researchers found that the age at pubertal transition was consistently older in participants who were found to have higher chemical concentrations in collected blood samples ( Windham et al., 2015 ). The effects of neuroendocrine disruptors on girls' pubertal timing may begin during the prenatal period, as there is evidence that female reproductive development is affected by phthalate or bisphenol A exposure during specific critical periods of development in the mother's uterus ( Watkins et al., 2017 ).

Accelerated Maturation and Adaptive Plasticity

It is clear that early experiences can factor into accelerated pubertal timing and tempo, and theorists suggest that this may be adaptive. According to Mendle and colleagues (2011, p. 8) , “age at certain stressful life transitions represents a dose-response relationship with maturation, with earlier ages at these events associated with earlier development (e.g., Ellis and Garber, 2000 ).” Belsky et al. (1991) posited that children who are raised in harsh, stressful environments may have accelerated pubertal development to compensate for a mistrust of commitment and of investment in social relationships. According to Belsky and colleagues, early pubertal timing may serve the evolutionary biological purpose of elongating the window for reproductivity and fertility, to permit more conceptions in a lifetime. Thus, the well-documented association between adverse early life experiences and early pubertal development may itself be an adaptive response, one that reflects the plasticity in neurobiological systems during adolescence to adapt to the specific socio-cultural context.

The Social Context of Pubertal Maturation

Despite the role that stressful early life events play in accelerating pubertal timing, it is important to note that adolescence is also a period of potential for recovery. Even when an adolescent has experienced early adversity and this has precipitated earlier pubertal maturation, the social context in which that adolescent is developing can ultimately change the trajectory of their outcomes—for better or worse. For example, closer and less conflict-laden parent-child relationships can reduce associations between pubertal maturation and behavior problems, while more conflict-laden and less close relationships exacerbate them ( Booth et al., 2003 ; Dorn et al., 2009 ; Fang et al., 2009 ). Parental knowledge of an adolescent child's whereabouts and activities also plays a role, as the influence of pubertal timing on problematic outcomes is weakened when such parental knowledge of adolescent whereabouts and activities is high, and it is amplified when knowledge is low ( Marceau et al., 2015 ; Westling et al., 2008 ). During early childhood, a secure infant-mother attachment can buffer girls from the later effects of harsh environments on earlier pubertal maturation ( Sung et al., 2016 ).

The Context of Biological Sex and Gender Norms

The biological changes of puberty take place in social and cultural contexts, and these dynamic person-context interactions have implications for adolescent development. For instance, the physical changes associated with pubertal maturation affect an adolescent's self-image as much as the way he or she is treated and responded to by others ( Graber et al., 2010 ), and culturally grounded gender norms may make these associations more salient for girls than boys. Indeed, in the United States, although menstruation is acknowledged as a normal biological event, it is nevertheless often accompanied by feelings of shame and the need to conceal it from others, particularly males ( Stubbs, 2008 ). As a result, the arrival of a girl's first menstrual cycle is often accompanied by embarrassment and ambivalence ( Brooks-Gunn et al., 1994 ; Moore, 1995 ; Tang et al., 2003 ), as well as by negative feelings ( Rembeck et al., 2006 ), including anxiety, surprise, dismay, panic, and confusion ( Brooks-Gunn and Ruble, 1982 ; Ruble and Brooks-Gunn, 1982 ).

The arrival of puberty has other social consequences, such as changing dynamics and maturing relationships with parents, siblings, and peers, as well as the emergence of peer relationships with adults. Pubertal maturation is associated with a higher incidence of sexual harassment, both by peers of the same gender and across genders ( McMasters et al., 2002 ; Petersen and Hyde, 2009 ; Stattin and Magnusson, 1990 ). Social consequences may be exacerbated among youth experiencing early pubertal timing.

The increase in pubertal hormones (e.g., estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone) and the changes they drive, such as the emergence of secondary sex characteristics, is also associated with the development of substance use ( Auchus and Rainey, 2004 ; Grumbach, 2002 ; Grumbach and Styne, 2003 ; Havelock et al., 2004 ; Matchock et al., 2007 ; Oberfield et al., 1990 ; Terasawa and Fernandez, 2001 ; Young and Altemus, 2004 ). At the same time, the causal direction of these findings is somewhat mixed ( Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2013 ; Dawes et al., 1999 ; Marceau et al., 2015 ), with variation by sex. In girls, relatively early pubertal timing and faster pubertal tempo often mark an increased risk for adolescent substance use ( Cance et al., 2013 ; Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2013 ; Costello et al., 2007 ; Lee et al., 2014 ). By contrast, in boys later pubertal timing and/or slower pubertal tempo mark an increased risk for substance use ( Davis et al., 2015 ; Marceau et al., 2015 ; Mendle and Ferrero, 2012 ). This striking gender difference in associations between pubertal maturation and substance use highlights how the same biological event (pubertal maturation) can lead to very different outcomes as a function of one's biological sex.

Puberty and Stress Sensitivity

Puberty-related hormones influence the way adolescents adjust to their environment, for example by experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety. One mechanism through which this might occur is in pubertal hormones' ability to alter sensitivity to stress, making adolescent girls particularly sensitive to exogenous stressors. Recent studies using salivary cortisol as an index of stress regulation have documented heightened stress reactivity and delayed post-stress recovery in pubescent adolescents ( Gunnar, et al., 2009 ; Stroud et al., 2004 ; Walker et al., 2004 ). Cortisol is a steroid hormone released by the HPA axis, and disruption to this axis has been implicated in the development of symptoms of depression and anxiety (e.g., Gold and Chrousos, 2002 ; Guerry and Hastings, 2011 ; Sapolsky, 2000 ).

In fact, cortisol secretion is closely intertwined with age, puberty, and sex, which together appear to contribute to adolescent girls' vulnerability to external stressors ( Walker et al., 2004 ; Young and Altemus, 2004 ). As will be discussed in Chapter 3 , cortisol, along with neuroendocrine, autonomic, immune, and metabolic mediators, usually promotes positive adaptation in the body and the brain, such as efficient operation of the stress response system. However, when cortisol is over- or under-produced it can, along with the other mediators, produce negative effects on the body and brain, such as forming insulin resistance and remodeling the brain circuits that alter mood and behavior. At the same time, as will be shown in Chapter 3 , interventions during adolescence have the potential to mediate the harmful effects of stress.

In summary, puberty is shaped by both biological and social processes. Biologically, puberty occurs over an extended period during which neuroendocrine alterations result in the maturation of primary and secondary sex characteristics and the acquisition of reproductive maturity. The timing and tempo of pubertal development varies greatly, and the age at which an adolescent matures depends upon a combination of genetic and environmental influences, including early life experiences. Socially, pubertal maturation and its accompanying physical changes affect how adolescents perceive themselves and how they are treated by others, and early pubertal timing especially has been shown to have social consequences. While we know a great deal about the biological processes of puberty, much of the research, particularly on the role of adverse early experiences, is based on studies of girls rather than boys and excludes transgender and gender-nonconforming youth. Thus, it is important to monitor whether or not conclusions drawn from the extant research are relevant for both girls and boys, and to consider how further study of puberty in boys, transgender youth, and gender-nonconforming youth may deepen our understanding of these dynamic processes.

Despite this limitation, research on associations between stress exposure and pubertal timing and tempo makes clear the importance of early experiences and highlights the role of social determinants of health. Stressful living conditions are related to earlier pubertal timing and accelerated pubertal tempo. While early puberty may be an evolutionarily adaptive response to context that reflects neurobiological plasticity, there are important consequences that suggest it may not be adaptive in terms of supporting a long-term path to health and well-being for youth living in the 21st century. Structural changes that disrupt the systemic factors that increase risk for early puberty (e.g., resource deprivation) as well as supportive relationships can mitigate the risks associated with early puberty, can foster positive outcomes, and may promote adolescents' capability for resilience.

• NEUROBIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT

Adolescence is a particularly dynamic period of brain development, second only to infancy in the extent and significance of the neural changes that occur. The nature of these changes—in brain structures, functions, and connectivity—allows for a remarkable amount of developmental plasticity unique to this period of life, making adolescents amenable to change. 4 These normative developments are required to prepare the brain so it can respond to the demands and challenges of adolescence and adulthood, but they may also increase vulnerability for risk behavior and psychopathology ( Paus et al., 2008 ; Rudolph et al., 2017 ). To understand how to take advantage of this versatile adolescent period, it is first important to recognize how and where the dynamic changes in the brain are taking place; Figure 2-2 shows structures and regions of the brain that have been the focus of adolescent developmental neuroscience.

Brain areas important to adolescent development. SOURCE: iStock.com/James Kopp.

In the following sections, we summarize current research on structural and functional brain changes taking place over the course of adolescence. Our summary begins with a focus on morphological changes in gray and white matter, followed by a discussion of structural changes in regions of the brain that have particular relevance for adolescent cognitive and social functioning. We then discuss current theoretical perspectives that attempt to account for the associations between neurobiological, psychological, and behavioral development in adolescence.

Notably, the field of adolescent neuroscience has grown quickly over the past several decades. Advances in technology continue to provide new insights into neurobiological development; however, there is still a lack of agreed-upon best practices, and different approaches (e.g., in equipment, in statistical modeling) can result in different findings ( Vijayakumar et al., 2018 ). Our summary relies on the most recent evidence available and, per the committee's charge, we focus on neurobiological changes that make adolescence a period of unique opportunity for positive development. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review of the literature; moreover, studies tend to use “typically” developing adolescents, which limits our ability to comment on whether or how these processes may change for young people with developmental delays or across a broader spectrum of neurodiversity.

High Plasticity Marks the Window of Opportunity

Studies of adolescent brain development have traditionally focused on two important processes: changes in gray matter and changes in myelin. Gray matter is comprised of neural cell bodies (i.e., the location of each nerve cell's nucleus), dendrites, and all the synapses, which are the connections between neurons. Thus, increases or decreases in gray matter reflect changes in these elements, representing, for instance, the formation or disappearance of synapsis (also known as “synaptogenesis” and “synaptic pruning”). New learning and memories are stored in dynamic synaptic networks that depend equally on synapse elimination and synapse formation. That is, unused connections and cells must be pruned away as the brain matures, specializes, and tailors itself to its environment ( Ismail et al., 2017 ).

White matter, on the other hand, is comprised of myelin. Myelin is the fatty sheath around the long projections, or axons, that neurons use to communicate with other neurons. The fatty myelin insulates the axonal “wire” so that the signal that travels down it can travel up to 100 times faster than it can on unmyelinated axons ( Giedd, 2015 ). With myelination, neurons are also able to recover quickly from firing each signal and are thereby able to increase the frequency of information transmission ( Giedd, 2015 ). Not only that, myelinated neurons can more efficiently integrate information from other input neurons and better coordinate their signaling, firing an outgoing signal only when information from all other incoming neurons is timed correctly ( Giedd, 2015 ). Thus, the increase in white matter is representative of the increase in quality and speed of neuron-to-neuron communication throughout adolescence. This is comparable to upgrading from driving alone on a single-lane dirt road to driving on an eight-lane paved expressway within an organized transportation/transit authority system, since it increases not only the amount of information trafficked throughout the brain but also the brain's computational power by creating more efficient connections.

Recent advances in neuroimaging methods have greatly enhanced our understanding of adolescent brain development over the past three decades. In the mid-2000s developmental neuroscientists described differential changes in gray matter (i.e., neurons) and white matter (i.e., myelin) over the course of adolescence. Specifically, gray-matter volume was believed to follow an inverted-U shape, peaking in different regions at different ages and declining over the course of late adolescence and adulthood ( Lenroot and Giedd, 2006 ). In contrast, cortical white matter, which reflects myelin growth, was shown to increase steadily throughout adolescence and into early adulthood, reflecting increased connectivity among brain regions ( Lenroot and Giedd, 2006 ). The proliferation of neuroimaging studies, particularly longitudinal studies following children over the course of adolescence, has enabled researchers to examine these processes in more detail and across a larger number of participants ( Vijayakumar et al., 2018 ).

Analyses of about 850 brain scans from four samples of participants ranging in age from 7 to 29 years (average = 15.2 years) confirm some previous trends, disconfirm others, and highlight the complexity in patterns of change over time. Researchers found that gray-matter volume was highest in childhood, decreased across early and middle adolescence, and began to stabilize in the early twenties; this pattern held even after accounting for intracranial and whole brain volume ( Mills et al., 2016 ). Additional studies of cortical volume have also documented the highest levels occurring in childhood with decreases from late childhood throughout adolescence; the decrease appears to be due to the thinning of the cortex ( Tamnes et al., 2017 ). Importantly, this finding contrasts with the “inverted-U shape” description of changes in gray-matter volume and disconfirms previous findings of a peak during the onset of puberty ( Mills et al., 2016 ).

For white-matter volume, on the other hand, researchers found that across samples, increases in white-matter volume occurred from childhood through mid-adolescence and showed some stabilizing in late adolescence ( Mills et al., 2016 ). This finding generally confirms patterns observed in other recent studies, with the exception that some researchers have found continued increases in white-matter volume into early adulthood (versus stabilizing in late adolescence; e.g., Aubert-Broche et al., 2013 ). Figure 2-3 shows these recent findings related to gray and white matter.

Cortical gray- and white-matter volume, ages 5 to 30. NOTES: Age in years is measured along the x-axis and brain measure along the y-axis (raw values (mm 3 ). Best fitting models are represented by the solid lines. Dashed lines represent 95-percent confidence (more...)

The widely held belief about a peak in cortical gray matter around puberty followed by declines throughout adolescence was based on the best available evidence at the time. New studies show steady declines in cortical volume beginning in late childhood and continuing through middle adolescence. While the decrease in volume is largely due to cortical thinning rather than changes in surface area, there appear to be complex, regionally specific associations between cortical thickness and surface area that change over the course of adolescence ( Tamnes et al., 2017 ). Discrepant findings can be attributed to a number of factors including head motion during brain imaging procedures (more common among younger participants), different brain imaging equipment, and different approaches to statistical modeling ( Tamnes et al., 2017 ; Vijayakumar et al., 2018 ). There do appear to be converging findings regarding overall directions of change; however, inconsistencies in descriptions of trajectories, peaks, and regional changes will likely continue to emerge as researchers work toward agreed-upon best practices ( Vijayakumar et al., 2018 ). Importantly, though, as Mills and colleagues (2016, p. 279) point out, it is critical to acknowledge that “it is not possible to directly relate developmental changes in morphometric MRI measures to changes in cellular or synaptic anatomy” (also see Mills and Tamnes, 2014 ). In other words, patterns of change in overall gray- or white-matter volume do not provide insight into the specific ways in which neural connections (e.g., synapses, neural networks) may change within the adolescent brain.

In fact, some neural circuity, consisting of networks of synaptic connections, is extremely malleable during adolescence, as connections form and reform in response to a variety of novel experiences and stressors ( Ismail et al., 2017 ; Selemon, 2013 ). Gray-matter reduction in the cortex is associated with white-matter organization, indicating that cortical thinning seen in adulthood may be a result of both increased connectivity of necessary circuitry and pruning of unnecessary synapses ( Vandekar et al., 2015 ). Thus, adolescent brains can modulate the strength and quality of neuronal connections rapidly to allow for flexibility in reasoning and for leaps in cognition ( Giedd, 2015 ).

Structural Changes in the Adolescent Brain

Two key neurodevelopmental processes are most reliably observed during adolescence. First, there is evidence of significant change and maturation in regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) involved in executive functioning and cognitive and impulse control capabilities ( Crone and Steinbeis, 2017 ; Steinberg, 2005 ). In other words, areas of the brain that support planning and decision-making develop significantly during the second decade of life. Second, there is evidence of improved connectivity 5 within and between the cortical (i.e., outer) and subcortical (i.e., inner) regions of the brain. Moreover, in both the cortical and subcortical regions, there are age-related and hormone-related changes in neural activity and structure, such as increased volume and connectivity ( Gogtay et al., 2004 ; Østby et al., 2009 ; Peper and Dahl, 2013 ; Wierenga et al., 2014 ).

Over the course of adolescence, regions of the PFC undergo protracted development and significant remodeling. Cortical circuits, especially those that inhibit behavior, continue to develop, enhancing adolescents' capacity for self-regulation ( Caballero and Tseng, 2016 ). Compared to adults, adolescents have a significantly less mature cortical system and tend to utilize these regions less efficiently, and this impacts their top-down cognitive abilities including planning, working memory, impulsivity control, and decision-making ( Casey and Caudle, 2013 ). Ongoing development of structures and connections within the cortical regions corresponds to more efficient balancing of inputs and outputs as adolescents interact with the world.

Changes within subcortical brain regions are also reflected in adolescent capabilities. For instance, increased volume in certain subregions of the hippocampus may predict greater capacity for memory recall and retention in adolescents ( Tamnes et al., 2014 ). Adolescents also display heightened activity in the hippocampus, compared with adults, and differential reward processing in the striatum, which is part of the basal ganglia and plays an important role in motivation and perception of reward. This neural activity may explain their increased sensitivity to rewards and contribute to their greater capacity for learning and habit formation, particularly when incentivized by positive outcomes ( Davidow et al., 2016 ; Sturman and Moghaddam, 2012).

Another subcortical structure, the amygdala, undergoes significant development during puberty and gains new connections to other parts of the brain, such as the striatum and hippocampus ( Scherf et al., 2013 ). The amygdala modulates and integrates emotional responses based on their relevance and impact in context. In conjunction with the amygdala's substantial development, adolescents show higher amygdala activity in response to threat cues 6 than do children or adults ( Fuhrmann et al., 2015 ; Hare et al., 2008 ; Pattwell et al., 2012 ). Consequently, they are prone to impulsive action in response to potential threats 7 ( Dreyfuss et al., 2014 ). Changes in the hippocampus and amygdala may be responsible for suppressing fear responses in certain contexts ( Pattwell et al., 2011 ). Such fearlessness can be adaptive for adolescents as they explore new environments and make important transitions—such as entering college or starting a new job away from home. Children and adults do not tend to show the same kind of fear suppression as adolescents, suggesting that this is unique to this stage of development ( Pattwell et al., 2011 ).

A Neurodevelopmental Perspective on Risk-Taking

In recent years, researchers have worked to reconcile contemporary neuroscience findings with decades of behavioral research on adolescents. There has been a particular emphasis on understanding “risky” behavior through the lens of developmental neuroscience. Risk-taking can be driven by a tendency for sensation-seeking, in which individuals exhibit an increased attraction toward novel and intense sensations and experiences despite their possible risks ( Steinberg, 2008 ; Zuckerman and Kuhlman, 2000 ). This characteristic is heightened during adolescence and is strongly associated with reward sensitivity and drive ( Cservenka et al., 2013 ) as well as the rise in dopamine pathways from the subcortical striatum to the PFC ( Wahlstrom et al., 2010 ). Ironically, as executive function improves, risk-taking based on sensation-seeking also rises, likely due to these strengthened dopamine pathways from the striatum to the PFC regions ( Murty et al., 2016 ; Wahlstrom et al., 2010 ). Despite these stronger sensation-seeking tendencies, however, by mid-adolescence most youth are able to perform cognitive-control tasks at the same level as adults, signaling their capacity for executive self-control ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ).

Risk-taking can also be driven by impulsivity, which includes the tendency to act without thinking about consequences (impulsive action) or to choose small, immediate rewards over larger, delayed rewards (impulsive choice) ( Romer et al., 2017 ). Impulsive action, which is based on insensitivity to risk, is a form of risk-taking that peaks during early adolescence and is inversely related to working memory ability ( Romer et al., 2011 ). It may also be a consequence of asynchronous limbic-PFC maturation, which is described below. Notably, impulsive actions are seen most frequently in a subgroup of adolescents with pre-existing impairment in self-control and executive function ( Bjork and Pardini, 2015 ). In contrast, impulsive choice behaviors, which are made under conditions of known risks and rewards, do not peak in adolescence. Instead, impulsive choice declines from childhood to adulthood, reflecting the trend of increasing, prefrontal-regulated executive functions throughout adolescence ( van den Bos et al., 2015 ). Interestingly, when given the choice between two risky options with ambiguous reward guarantees, adolescents are more inclined to explore the riskier option than are adults ( Levin and Hart, 2003 ), showing a greater tolerance for ambiguities in reward and stronger exploratory drive ( Tymula et al., 2012 ).

Theoretical models have emerged to explain how neurobiological changes map onto normative “risk” behaviors in adolescence. While some argue that these models and accompanying metaphors may be overly simplistic (e.g., Pfeifer and Allen, 2012 ), the models are nevertheless utilized frequently to guide and interpret research (e.g., Steinberg et al., 2018 ). We briefly discuss two of them here: the “dual systems” model and the “imbalance” model.

The “dual systems” model ( Shulman et al., 2016 ; Steinberg, 2008 ) represents “the product of a developmental asynchrony between an easily aroused reward system, which inclines adolescents toward sensation seeking, and still maturing self-regulatory regions, which limit the young person's ability to resist these inclinations” ( Steinberg et al., 2018 ). The “reward system” references subcortical structures, while the “self-regulatory regions” refer to areas like the PFC. Proponents of the dual-systems model point to recent findings on sensation seeking and self-regulation from a study of more than 5,000 young people spanning ages 10 to 30 across 11 countries. A similar pattern emerged across these settings. In 7 of 11 countries there was a peak in sensation seeking in mid-to-late adolescence (around age 19) followed by a decline. Additionally, there was a steady rise in self-regulation during adolescence; self-regulation peaked in the mid-20s in four countries and continued to rise in five others. The researchers note that there were more similarities than differences across countries and suggest that the findings provide strong support for a dual-systems account of sensation seeking and self-regulation in adolescence.

A second model, the “imbalance” model, shifts the focus away from an orthogonal, dual systems account and instead emphasizes patterns of change in neural circuitry across adolescence. This fine-tuning of circuits is hypothesized to occur in a cascading fashion, beginning within subcortical regions (such as those within the limbic system), then strengthening across regions, and finally occurring within outer areas of the brain like the PFC ( Casey et al., 2016 ). This model corresponds with observed behavioral and emotional regulation—over time, most adolescents become more goal-oriented and purposeful, and less impulsive ( Casey, 2015 ). Proponents of the imbalance model argue that it emphasizes the “dynamic and hierarchical development of brain circuitry to explain changes in behavior throughout adolescence” ( Casey et al., 2016 , p. 129). Moreover, they note that research stemming from this model focuses less on studying specific regions of the brain and more on how information flows within and between neural circuits, as well as how this flow of information shifts over the course of development (e.g., “temporal changes in functional connectivity within and between brain circuits,” p. 129).

Rethinking the “Mismatch” Between the Emotional and Rational Brain Systems

Regardless of whether one of these two models more accurately represents connections between adolescent neurobiological development and behavior, both perspectives converge on the same point: fundamental areas of the brain undergo asynchronous development throughout adolescence. Moreover, adolescent behavior, especially concerning increased risk-taking and still-developing self-control, has been notably attributed to asynchronous development within and between subcortical and cortical regions of the brain. The former drives emotion, and the latter acts as the control center for long-term planning, consideration of outcomes, and level-headed regulation of behavior ( Galván et al., 2006 ; Galván, 2010 ; Mueller et al., 2017 ; Steinbeis and Crone, 2016 ). Thus, if connections within the limbic system develop faster than those within and between the PFC region, 8 the imbalance may favor a tendency toward heightened sensitivity to peer influence, impulsivity, risk-taking behaviors, and emotional volatility ( Casey and Caudle, 2013 ; Giedd, 2015 ; Mills et al., 2014 ).

Indeed, adolescents are more impulsive in response to positive incentives than children or adults, although they can suppress these impulses when large rewards are at stake. Adolescents are also more sensitive than children or adults to the presence of peers and to other environmental cues, and show a heightened limbic response to threats ( Casey, 2015 ). As the cortical regions continue to develop and activity within and across brain regions becomes more synchronized, adolescents gain the capacity to make rational, goal-directed decisions across contexts and conditions.

The idea of asynchrony or “mismatch” between the pace of subcortical development and cortical development implies that these developmental capacities are nonoptimal. Yet, even though they are associated with impulsivity and risk-taking, we should not jump to the conclusion that the gap in maturation between the emotion and control centers of the brain is without developmental benefit. As Casey (2015, p. 310) notes, “At first glance, suggesting that a propensity toward motivational or emotional cues during adolescence is adaptive may seem untenable. However, a heightened activation into action by environmental cues and decreased apparent fear of novel environments during this time may facilitate evolutionarily appropriate exploratory behavior.” While an adolescent's “heart over mind” mentality may compromise judgment and facilitate unhealthy behaviors, it can also spawn creativity and exploration. Novelty seeking can be a boon to adolescents, spurring them to pursue exciting, new directions in life ( Spear, 2013 ).

If properly monitored and cushioned by parents and the community, adolescents can learn from missteps and take advantage of what can be viewed as developmental opportunities . Indeed, because adolescents are more sensitive to rewards and their decision-making ability may skew more toward seeking the positive benefits of a choice and less toward avoiding potential risks, this tendency can enhance learning and drive curiosity ( Davidow et al., 2016 ). To avoid stereotyping all adolescents as “underdeveloped” or “imbalanced,” it is important to recognize the nuances in the different types of risk-taking behavior and to counterbalance a focus on negative outcomes by observing the connections between risk-taking and exploration, curiosity, and other attributes of healthy development ( Romer et al., 2017 ).

The “mismatch” model provides one way of understanding adolescents' capacity for self-control and involvement in risky behavior. A better model of adolescent neurobiological development, some argue, is a “lifespan wisdom model,” prioritizing the significance of experience on brain maturation that can only be gained through exploration ( Romer et al., 2017 ). Indeed, growing evidence shows that adolescents have a distinctive ability for social and emotional processing that allows them to adapt readily to the capricious social contexts of adolescence, and equips them with flexibility in adjusting their motivations and prioritizing new goals ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ; Nigg and Nagel, 2016 ).

Despite differences between neurobiological models, there is agreement that distinctions between adolescent and adult behaviors necessitate policies and opportunities intended to address adolescent-specific issues. With their heightened neurocognitive capacity for change, adolescents are in a place of both great opportunity and vulnerability. Key interventions during this period may be able to ameliorate the impact of negative experiences earlier in life, providing many adolescents with a pivotal second chance to achieve their full potential and lead meaningful, healthy, and successful lives ( Guyer et al., 2016 ; see also Chapter 3 ).

Cognitive Correlates of Adolescent Brain Development

Reflective of the ongoing changes in the brain described above, most teens become more efficient at processing information, learning, and reasoning over the course of adolescence ( Byrnes, 2003 ; Kuhn, 2006 , 2009 ). The integration of brain regions also facilitates what is called “cognitive control,” the ability to think and plan rather than acting impulsively ( Casey, 2015 ; Casey et al., 2016 ; Steinberg, 2014 ).

Changes in components of cognitive control, such as response selection/inhibition and goal selection/maintenance, along with closely associated constructs such as working memory, increase an individual's capacity for self-regulation of affect and behavior ( Ochsner and Gross, 2005 ). Importantly, each of these aspects of cognitive control appears to have distinct developmental trajectories, and each may be most prominently associated with distinct underlying regions of the cortex ( Crone and Steinbeis, 2017 ). For example, although the greatest developmental improvements in response inhibition and interference control may be observed prior to adolescence, improvements in flexibility, error monitoring, and working memory are more likely to occur throughout the second decade of life ( Crone and Steinbeis, 2017 ). This suggests different developmental trajectories, whereby more basic, stimulus-driven cognitive control processes develop earlier than do more complex cognitive control processes, which rely on internal and abstract representation ( Crone and Steinbeis, 2017 ; Dumontheil et al., 2008 ).

Those functions that do continue to show significant developmental change during adolescence seem to especially rely on the capacity for abstract representation, which is a capacity that has been found to undergo a distinctive increase during adolescence ( Dumontheil, 2014 ). The capacity for abstract representation can relate to both temporal and relational processes, that is, to both long-term goals and to past or future events (temporal) and to representing higher-order relationships between representations (relational) as distinct from simple stimulus features ( Dumontheil, 2014 ). From early through late adolescence (into adulthood), this increase in abstract thinking ability makes teens better at using evidence to draw conclusions, although they still have a tendency to generalize based on personal experience—something even adults do. Adolescents also develop greater capacity for strategic problem-solving, deductive reasoning, and information processing, due in part to their ability to reason about ideas that may be abstract or untrue; however, these skills require scaffolding and opportunities for practice ( Kuhn, 2009 ).

Recent research on cognitive development during adolescence has focused on both cognitive and emotional (or “affective”) processing, particularly to understand how these processes interact with and influence each other in the context of adolescent decision making. First, the capacity for abstract representation and for affective engagement with such representations ( Davey et al., 2008 ) increases the capacity for self-regulation of emotions in order to achieve a goal ( Ochsner and Gross, 2005 ). Indeed, the capacity to regulate a potent, stimulus-driven, short-term response may rely on the ability to mentally represent and affectively engage with a longer-term goal. Furthermore, such stimulus-driven, affective influences on cognitive processing, including on decision making, risk-taking, and judgment, change significantly over the course of adolescence ( Hartley and Somerville, 2015 ; Steinberg, 2005 ).

Beyond individual capacities for cognitive regulation, the social and emotional context for cognitive processing matters a great deal. The presence of peers and the value of performing a task influence how motivating certain contexts may be and the extent to which cognitive processing is recruited ( Johnson et al., 2009 ). Moreover, there is increasing evidence that some of these changes in cognitive and affective processing are linked to the onset of puberty ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ). Researchers have found that adolescents do better than young adults on learning and memory tasks when the reward systems of the brain are engaged ( Davidow et al., 2016 ).

These changes in cognitive functioning may have adaptive qualities as part of normative adolescent development, even though they also make some individuals more vulnerable to psychopathology, such as depression and anxiety disorders. Notably, the flexibility of the frontal cortical network may be greater in adolescence than in adulthood ( Jolles and Crone, 2012 ). Such flexibility may result in an improved ability to learn to navigate the increasingly complex social challenges that are part of adolescents' social worlds, and as adolescents encounter increasing opportunities for autonomy it may prove to be adaptive. In addition, the ability to shift focus in a highly motivated way could allow more learning, problem solving, and use of creativity ( Kleibeuker et al., 2016 ). Of particular relevance, such emerging abilities may also determine the degree to which an individual can take advantage of new learning opportunities, including mental health–promoting interventions. With the right supports, this capacity for flexibility and adaptability can foster deep learning, complex problem-solving skills, and creativity ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ; Hauser et al., 2015 ; Kleibeuker et al., 2012 ).

The extensive neurobiological changes in adolescence enable us to reimagine this period as one of remarkable opportunity for growth. Connections within and between brain regions become stronger and more efficient, and unused connections are pruned away. Such developmental plasticity means adolescents' brains are adaptive; they become more specialized in response to environmental demands. The timing and location of the dynamic changes are also important to understand. The onset of puberty, often between ages 10 and 12, brings about changes in the limbic system region resulting in increased sensitivity to both rewards and threats, to novelty, and to peers. In contrast, it takes longer for the cortical regions, implicated in cognitive control and self-regulation, to develop ( Steinberg et al., 2018 ).

Adolescent brains are neither simply “advanced” child brains, nor are they “immature” adult brains—they are specially tailored to meet the needs of this stage of life ( Giedd, 2015 ). Indeed, the temporal discrepancy in the specialization of and connections between cortical and subcortical brain regions makes adolescence unique. The developmental changes heighten sensitivity to reward, willingness to take risks, and the salience of social status, propensities that are necessary for exploring new environments and building nonfamilial relationships. Adolescents must explore and take risks to build the cognitive, social, and emotional skills they will need to be productive adults. Moreover, the unique and dynamic patterns of brain development in adolescence foster flexible problem-solving and learning ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ). Indeed, adolescence is a seminal period for social and motivational learning ( Fuligni, 2018 ), and this flexibility confers opportunity for adaptability and innovation.

While developmental plasticity in adolescence bears many advantages, as with all aspects of development the environment matters a great deal. The malleable brains of adolescents are not only adaptable to innovation and learning but also vulnerable to toxic experiences, such as resource deprivation, harsh, coercive or antisocial relationships, and exposure to drugs or violence. All of these can “get under the skin” as adolescents develop, or more precisely interact with the brain and body to influence development (see Chapter 3 ).

What is more, the majority of mental illnesses—including psychotic and substance use disorders—begin by age 24 ( Casey, 2015 ; Giedd, 2015 ). This means that we have a collective responsibility to ask, “How can we create the kinds of settings and supports needed to optimize development during this period of life?” This goes well beyond simply keeping youth out of harm's way, and instead signals an urgent need to consider how we design the systems with which adolescents engage most frequently to meet their developmental needs. Notably, scholars studying adolescent developmental neuroscience suggest the next generation of research should consider questions that shift from understanding risk to understanding thriving, and context-specific opportunities to promote it. Such questions for the field include, “How does brain development create unique opportunities for learning and problem solving?,” “Is the adolescent brain more sensitive to some features of the social environment than others?,” and “Are trajectories of change [in cognitive control and emotional processing] steeper or quicker during some periods than others, potentially providing key windows for input and intervention?” ( Fuligni et al., 2018 , p. 151).

• PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ADOLESCENCE

As described above, young people develop increased cognitive abilities throughout adolescence. These cognitive abilities provide the capacity for other aspects of psychosocial development that occur during the period. This section describes the psychosocial developmental tasks—including developing identity and a capacity for self-direction—that adolescents complete during their transition to adulthood. Understanding one's self, understanding one's place in the world, and understanding one's capacity to affect the world (i.e., agency) are all processes that begin to take shape during adolescence in tandem with the physiological, neurobiological, and cognitive changes discussed above.

The trajectory of social and emotional development in adolescence may perhaps be best characterized as a time of increasing complexity and integration. As is true of their neurobiological development during the period, adolescents' capacity for understanding and engaging with self, others, and societal institutions requires both integration and deepening. It requires adolescents to integrate multiple perspectives and experiences across contexts, and also to deepen their ability to make sense of complex and abstract phenomena.

This section begins with a summary of developmental trends in adolescent self- and identity development at a broad level, followed by a brief discussion of how these trends reflect recent findings from developmental neuroscience. From there, we discuss group-specific social identities. While there are many critical dimensions of social identity (e.g., gender, social class, religion, immigration status, disability, and others), we use race and sexuality as exemplars given the recent, monumental shifts in racial/ethnic demographics and in the social and political climate around sexual minority status in the United States. The focus on race and sexuality is not intended to minimize other dimensions of identity; indeed, identity development is a salient process for all adolescents regardless of social group memberships. Moreover, as we discuss below, developmental scientists are increasingly calling for research that examines the intersectional nature of identities, both at the individual level as well as in ways that reflect membership in multiple groups that have historically experienced marginalization ( Santos and Toomey, 2018 ).

Finding an answer to the question, “Who am I?” is often viewed as a central task of adolescence. Decades ago, Erik Erikson (1968) argued that during adolescence, youth take on the challenge of developing a coherent, integrated, and stable sense of themselves, and that failing to do so may make the transition to adult roles and responsibilities more difficult. Erikson's concept of identity development assumes opportunities for exploration and choice and may or may not generalize across global contexts ( Arnett, 2015 ; Syed, 2017 ). However, it has utility in the United States, where societal structures and dominant values such as independence and individuality encourage identity exploration.

Closely related to the question, “Who am I?” is the question, “ How do I see myself?” ( Harter, 2012 ). McAdams (2013) describes the developmental trajectory of “self” using a set of sequential metaphors: the “social actor” in childhood (because children engage in action) grows to become a “motivated agent” in adolescence (because teens are more purposeful and agent-driven, guided by values, motives, and hopes), and finally an “autobiographical author” in emerging adulthood, a time when young people work on building a coherent self-narrative. Studies of youth across the span of adolescence show that, for many young people, the sense of self and identity become more integrated, coherent, and stable over time ( Harter, 2012 ; Klimstra et al., 2010 ; Meeus et al., 2010 ). Importantly, theory suggests and empirical evidence supports the idea that having a more “achieved” identity and integrated sense of self relates to positive well-being in adulthood and even throughout the life course (e.g., Kroger and Marcia, 2011 ; Meca et al., 2015 ; Schwartz et al., 2011 ).

While there is great variability across youth, there are also some distinct developmental trends in the emergence of self and identity. In early adolescence, young teens' self-definitions are increasingly differentiated relative to childhood. They see themselves in multiple ways across various social and relational contexts, for example one way when with their family and another way when with close friends in the classroom. Although a young adolescent may carry a great number of “abstractions” about his or her self, these labels tend to be fragmented and sometimes even contradictory ( Harter, 2012 ). For instance, a 13-year-old may view herself as shy and quiet in the classroom, as loud and bubbly with close friends, and as bossy and controlling with her younger siblings. Longitudinal studies suggest that some perceptions of self (e.g., academic self-concept) decline in early adolescence as youth transition to middle school; however, there is a great deal of individual variability, variability across domains (e.g., academic vs. behavioral self-concept), and variability by gender (higher athletic self-concept among males vs. females; Cole et al., 2001 ; Gentile et al., 2009 ).

In middle adolescence, teens may still hold onto multiple and disjointed abstractions of themselves; however, their growing cognitive abilities allow for more frequent comparisons among the inconsistencies, and heightened awareness of these contradictions can create some stress ( Brummelman and Thomaes, 2017 ; Harter, 2012 ). In this period, youth may also be more aware that their conflicting self-characterizations tend to occur most often across different relationship contexts. As in early adolescence, discrepancies between real and ideal selves can create stress for some youth, but as teens develop deeper meta-cognitive and self-reflection skills, they are better able to manage the discrepancies. To continue with the same hypothetical teen introduced above at age 13, at age 16 she might view being shy and quiet in the classroom and loud and bubbly with friends as parts of a more holistic, less fragmented sense of self.

Older adolescents have greater abilities to make sense of their multiple abstractions about self. They can reconcile what seem like contradictory behaviors by understanding them in context ( Harter, 2012 ). For instance, older teens are more likely to view their different patterns of behavior across settings as reflecting a positive trait like “flexibility,” or they may characterize themselves as “moody” if they vacillate between positive and negative emotions in different situations. While peers are still important in late adolescence, youth may rely on them less when making self-evaluations; they also have greater capacity for perspective-taking and attunement to others, especially in the context of supportive relationships.

Emerging adulthood provides additional opportunities for experimenting with vocational options, forming new friendships and romantic relationships, and exercising more independent decision-making ( Arnett, 2015 ; Harter, 2012 ; Schwartz et al., 2005 ). Many young adults shift from “grand” visions of possible selves to visions that are narrower and directly related to immediate opportunities. New experiences across contexts—like attending college or transitioning into the workforce—can shape whether emerging adults develop an authentic and integrated sense of self.

With the normative development of heightened sensitivity to social information, some youth may rely heavily on peer feedback in self-evaluation; however, parents still play an important role in supporting a positive sense of self, especially when they are attuned to youths' needs and couple their high expectations with support ( Harter, 2012 ). Indeed, secure and supportive relationships with parents can help early and middle adolescents develop a clear sense of self ( Becht et al., 2017 ) and can buffer youth who are socially anxious against harsh self-criticism ( Peter and Gazelle, 2017 ).

Identity and Self: A Neurobiological Perspective

Recent advances in developmental neuroscience appear to complement decades of behavioral research on youth. For instance, the integrated-circuitry model of adolescent brain development discussed in the previous section ( Casey et al., 2016 ), along with other models emphasizing the growing integration within and between emotionally sensitive brain regions (e.g., the limbic system) and those involved in planning and decision making (e.g., the cortical regions), correspond with the observation that adolescents develop a more coherent sense of self over time and experience. Likewise, changes observed in social and affective regions of the brain during adolescence align with behavioral tendencies toward exploration and trying new things ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ; Flannery et al., 2018 ). Although the evidence base is still growing, recent studies document how self-evaluation and relational identity processes are linked with regions of the brain like the ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) (which plays a role in the inhibition of emotional responses, in decision making, and in self-control) and the rostral/perigenual anterior cingulate cortex (which plays a role in error and conflict detection processes). In particular, activity in these regions increases from childhood through adolescence in a manner consistent with changes in identity development ( Pfeifer and Berkman, 2018 ).

Recent theoretical models of value-based decision making suggest specific ways in which identity development and neural development are linked in adolescence ( Berkman et al., 2017 ; Pfeifer and Berkman, 2018 ). An important premise is that while adolescents may be more sensitive to social stimuli such as peer norms and to rewarding outcomes such as tangible gains, their sense of self is still a critical factor influencing their behavior. In other words, while social norms and tangible gains and costs represent some of the “value inputs,” their construal of self and identity are also factors in their decision making. Moreover, neural evidence, like the activation observed in the vmPFC during self- and relational identity tasks, suggests that identity and self-related processes may play a greater role in value-based decision making during adolescence than they do in childhood ( Pfeifer and Berkman, 2018 ).

Social Identities in Adolescence

As many youth work toward building a cohesive, integrated answer to the question, “Who am I?,” the answer itself is shaped by membership across multiple social identity groups: race, ethnicity, nationality, sexuality, gender, religion, political affiliation, ability status, and more. Indeed, in the context of increasingly complex cognitive abilities and social demands, youth may be more likely to contest, negotiate, elaborate upon, and internalize the meaning of membership in racial/ethnic, gender, sexual, and other social identity groups (e.g., Umaña-Taylor et al., 2014 ). From a developmental perspective, these tasks are paramount in a pluralistic, multiethnic and multicultural society like the United States, which, as discussed in Chapter 1 , is more diverse now than in previous generations.

Ethnic-Racial Identity. Currently, our nation's population of adolescents is continuing to increase in diversity, with no single racial or ethnic group in the majority. A burgeoning area of study over the past two decades concerns ethnic-racial identity (ERI), and research in this field has found that for most youth, particularly adolescents of color, ERI exploration, centrality, and group pride are positively related to psychosocial, academic, and even health outcomes ( Rivas-Drake et al., 2014 ). ERI is multidimensional—it includes youths' beliefs about their group and how their race or ethnicity relate to their self-definition—both of which may change over time ( Umaña-Taylor et al., 2014 ). For immigrant youth, developing their own ERI may involve an internal negotiation between their culture of origin and that of their new host country, and most immigrant youth show a great deal of flexibility in redefining their new identity ( Fuligni and Tsai, 2015 ). Regardless of country of origin, making sense of one's ERI is a normative developmental process that often begins in adolescence ( Williams et al., 2012 ). Indeed, given that research has consistently found ERI to be associated with adaptive outcomes, dimensions of ERI can be understood as components of positive youth development ( Williams et al., 2014 ).

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. One of the distinctive aspects of adolescence is the emergence and awareness of sexuality, and a related aspect is the emerging salience of gender roles and expression. Adolescence is also a time when identities or sense of self related to gender and sexuality are developed and solidified ( Tolman, 2011 ), and this occurs in a period during which sexuality and gender norms are learned and regulated by peers ( Galambos et al., 1990 ). In this developmental context, LGBTQ youth begin to understand their sexual and gender identities.

The growing societal acceptance and legal recognition of LGBTQ youth is implicated in the recent observed drop in the age at which most of these young people “come out,” that is, disclose their same-sex sexual identities. Less than a generation ago, LGBTQ people in the United States typically came out as young adults in their 20s; today the average age at coming out appears to be around 14, according to several independent studies ( Russell and Fish, 2017 ).

In the context of such changes and growing acceptance and support for LGBTQ youth developing their sexual identity, it might be expected that the longstanding health and behavior disparities between these adolescents and heterosexual and cis-gender adolescents would be lessening. Yet multiple recent studies challenge that conclusion. Things do not appear to be getting “better” for LGBTQ youth: rather than diminishing, health disparities across multiple domains appear to be stable if not widening ( Russell and Fish, 2017 ). This pattern may be explained by several factors, including greater visibility and associated stigma and victimization for LGBTQ youth, just at the developmental period during which youth engage in more peer regulation and bullying in general, especially regarding sexuality and gender ( Poteat and Russell, 2013 ). In fact, a meta-analysis of studies of homophobic bullying in schools showed higher levels of homophobic bullying in more recent studies ( Toomey and Russell, 2016 ). These patterns point to the importance of policies and programs that help schools, communities, and families understand and support LGBTQ (and all) youth (see Chapter 7 ).

Identity Complexity. Beyond race, gender, or sexuality alone, having a strong connection to some dimension of social identity—which could also be cultural, religious, or national—appears to be important for psychological well-being in adolescence ( Kiang et al., 2008 ). Recent research also suggests that young adolescents benefit from having a more complex, multifaceted identity that goes beyond stereotypical expectations of social-group norms, especially when it comes to inclusive beliefs ( Knifsend and Juvonen, 2013 ). For instance, a youth who identifies as a Black, 13-year-old, transgender female who plays volleyball and loves gaming is apt to have more positive attitudes toward other racial/ethnic groups than she would if she viewed racial/ethnic identity and other social identities as necessarily convergent (such as the notion that “playing volleyball and being a gamer are activities restricted to youth from specific racial/ethnic groups”; Knifsend and Juvonen, 2014 ).

However, context is still important, and the association between identity complexity and inclusive beliefs in early adolescence tends to be stronger for youth who have a diverse group of friends ( Knifsend and Juvonen, 2014 ). Among college-age students there is also variation by race and ethnicity. For instance, the positive association between having a complex social identity and holding more inclusive attitudes toward others has been found most consistently among students who are members of the racial/ethnic majority; for members of racial/ethnic minority groups, convergence between racial/ethnic identity and other in-group identities is not related to attitudes toward other racial/ethnic groups ( Brewer et al., 2013 ). Beyond outgroup attitudes, there is evidence that social identity complexity has implications for youths' own perceptions of belonging; for instance, Muslim immigrant adolescents (ages 15 to 18) with greater identity complexity reported a stronger sense of identification with their host country ( Verkuyten and Martinovic, 2012 ).

Social Identity and Neurobiology

Cultural neuroscience provides some insight into how social identity development may manifest at the neurobiological level, although there is still much work to be done to understand the deep associations between biology and culture ( Mrazek et al., 2015 ). In adolescence, evidence suggests, areas of the brain attuned to social information may be undergoing shifts that heighten youths' social sensitivity ( Blakemore and Mills, 2014 ), and of course, adolescents' “social brains” develop in a cultural context. For instance, we know the amygdala responds to stimuli with heightened emotional significance; in the United States, where negative stereotypes about Blacks contribute to implicit biases and fears about them, amygdala sensitivity to Black faces has been documented in adult samples ( Cunningham et al., 2004 ; Lieberman et al., 2005 ; Phelps et al., 2000 ).

In a study of children and adolescents (ages 4 to 16) in the United States, Telzer and colleagues (2013) found that amygdala activation in response to racial stimuli, such as images of Black faces, was greater in adolescence than during childhood. They suggest that identity processes reflecting heightened sensitivity to race, along with biological changes (e.g., those stemming from puberty) related to a “social reorientation” of the amygdala, may be among the mechanisms that explain these race-sensitive patterns of activation in adolescence ( Telzer et al., 2013 ). Importantly, neural activation appears to vary based on the context of social experiences. Specifically, the amygdala activation observed in response to Black faces was attenuated for youth who had more friends and schoolmates of a race differing from their own (i.e., cross-race friends).

The foregoing findings converge with psychobehavioral studies that demonstrate the importance of school and friendship diversity. Attending diverse middle schools and having more cross-race friends is associated with more positive attitudes toward outsider groups, less social vulnerability, greater social and academic competence, and better mental health ( Graham, 2018 ; Williams and Hamm, 2017 ). Adolescence is a period of transformation in social cognition ( Blakemore and Mills, 2014 ; Giedd, 2015 ), so in light of the findings from psychobehavioral and cultural neuroscience research on the benefits of diversity, important questions may be asked about whether adolescence is a critical period for providing exposure to difference. For instance, should we expect the benefits of exposure to diversity to be maximized if such exposure occurs during adolescence, or are benefits most likely with cumulative exposure that begins well before this period? 9

Identity Development in Context

Identity development takes place in specific socio-cultural, political, and historical contexts. As an example, consider recent cultural and political shifts regarding same-sex relationships in the United States: in the period of one generation there has been dramatic social change regarding understanding and awareness of LGBTQ lives and issues. For context, consider that less than 20 years ago, marriage between same-sex couples was just beginning to be recognized anywhere in the world (the first country to do so was the Netherlands in 2001); less than 20 years later, 25 countries have legalized same-sex marriage, and recent surveys show that most young people in the United States approve of same-sex marriages ( Pew Research Center, 2015 ). Moreover, the identity language and labels used among youth who are often placed under the umbrella of LGBTQ have continued to rapidly evolve. A growing number of LGBTQ youth say they have a nonbinary gender identity (i.e., neither male nor female) or sexual identity (e.g., pansexual, bisexual, queer) ( Hammack, 2018 ). Indeed, young people appear to be leading a movement toward challenging existing categories and constructing new identities.

Meanwhile, in the past decade there has been a dramatic change in public awareness and understanding of transgender identities. Popular attention to the gender changes of a number of celebrities coincided with growing emergence and awareness of transgender children. 10 Thus, a subject that was literally unknown by most people in the United States has within a decade become the subject of public discussion and political debate. School systems are grappling with gender change and accommodations for transgender students, and the typical developmental challenges of adolescence are being navigated by a growing number of openly transgender, gender-nonbinary, or gender-nonconforming adolescents ( Wilson et al, 2017 ).

Developmental scientists have recently called for a deeper investigation of the ways in which intersecting axes of oppression shape youth development, often referred to as “intersectionality” ( Crenshaw, 1990 ; Santos and Toomey, 2018 ; Velez and Spencer, 2018 ). Indeed, against a backdrop of social stratification and oppression, relationships between identity, experience, and behavior may not operate the same way for all youth ( Spencer, 1995 ). For example, the way in which knowledge is socially constructed contributes to maintaining systems and structures that control and exclude marginalized populations such as people with disabilities ( Peña et al., 2016 ). Smart and Smart (2007) argue that society has historically viewed people with disabilities from a medical perspective, in which individuals were labeled as ill, dysfunctional, and in need of medical treatment. This approach perpetuates an ableist worldview that suggests people with disabilities should strive toward an able-bodied norm, reflecting society's perceptions that certain abilities are essential to fully function in the world ( Hutcheon and Wolbring, 2012 ). This example highlights why an intersectional perspective is important for understanding adolescent psychosocial development in context, both for considering systemic factors that shape opportunities and for broadening the range of questions, values, samples, and experiences that have been defined and studied from a dominant-group perspective ( Syed et al., 2018 ). Ultimately, intersectional approaches and related integrative models are needed to understand how youth development in context can lead to further marginalization for some youth ( Causadias and Umaña-Taylor, 2018 ) or to adaptability and resilience for others ( Gaylord-Harden et al., 2018 ; Suárez-Orozco et al., 2018 ).

We have long considered identity exploration as a hallmark of adolescence. An adolescent's identity is an emerging reflection of his or her values, beliefs, and aspirations, and it can be constructed and reconstructed over time and experience. Multiple factors—family, culture, peers, media—shape identity development, but young people are also active agents in the process. Movement toward stability and coherence is normative, yet there remain dynamic elements that shape the relationship between identity and behavior; teens often select activities that feel identity-congruent, and may interpret and respond to a given situation based on aspects of identity that are salient in the moment ( Oyserman, 2015 ; Oyserman and Destin, 2010 ). This has implications for adolescents' experiences in important contexts such as school. Identity processes are connected to a larger set of self-development characteristics, including self-regulation, self-efficacy, and a sense of agency, all of which youth need to help develop and commit to meaningful goals. Ensuring that adolescents understand how all identities can be consistent with their current academic choices and future educational and vocational aspirations is an important consideration for the education system and is discussed further in Chapter 6 .

Recent neuroscientific findings suggest that changes in social and affective regions of the brain correspond to developmental changes in identity development. Moreover, identity and self-related processes may play a greater role in decision making during adolescence than they do in childhood. Youth may also experience identity congruence, affirmation, or marginalization through their interpersonal interactions with policies, sociopolitical events, and historical factors. Ultimately, how adolescents' multifaceted identities are manifested—neurobiologically, behaviorally, and otherwise—and the role identity plays in their overall well-being depend a great deal on experiences in context. This requires us to reflect on the nature of the contexts in which adolescents are developing their identities.

Consider, for example, that a youth's likelihood of involvement in extremist organizations may be heightened as they search for meaningful in-groups, if they accept group beliefs without questioning them (i.e., identity foreclosure), and/or if they feel their personal or group identities are under threat ( Dean, 2017 ; Schwartz et al., 2009 ). As Schwartz and colleagues note, “providing mainstream paths for young people, within the cultural constraints of their society, can help to alleviate the anger, frustration, and hopelessness leading many young people [towards extremism]” ( Schwartz et al., 2009 , p. 553). While the overwhelming majority of adolescents do not become involved in extremist groups, acknowledging this possibility underscores how the significant opportunities afforded by identity exploration in adolescence can be thwarted by conditions that increase the likelihood of marginalization.

Adolescent Capacity for Self-Direction

As adolescents ask, “Who am I?” their growing cognitive capacities also permit reflection on themselves in relation to a broader collective: “What is my role in my school? my community? my society?” As adolescents grow older, they have more opportunities to make their own choices in domains that matter for future outcomes, and their capacity to make such choices also increases; Box 2-1 describes youths' perspectives on this emerging autonomy, agency, and independence.

Youth Perspectives: Sense of Agency, Purpose, and Autonomy.

In the following section, we discuss developmental changes in autonomy, purpose, and agency in adolescence. One might think of these three things not only as competencies that develop within adolescents, but also as resources or opportunities they need to thrive as they transition into adult roles. Framing them as both capacities of the individual youth and as characteristics afforded by supportive settings reminds us that developmental pathways that lead to thriving in adulthood are not forged by adolescents alone, but instead require alignment between youths' strengths and the resources available in their environments.

Striving for Autonomy While Remaining Connected

For most adolescents, establishing a level of independence and self-sufficiency is normative. This typically involves individuating from one's family. However, gaining a sense of autonomy does not mean that adolescents strive to become detached from their family. Indeed, the developmental task for most teens is about establishing a balance between autonomy and connection ( McElhaney et al., 2009 ). While many adolescents would like more autonomy for making decisions, this varies by age and domain ( Daddis, 2011 ; Smetana, 2011 ). Most youth report having enough autonomy when it comes to making moral decisions, but younger adolescents tend to desire more autonomy for personal matters (e.g., hairstyle and clothing choices) and conventional matters (e.g., cursing/swearing) than older teens. This increase in desired autonomy among younger teens maps onto findings that older teens report having more autonomy across multiple domains than their younger peers.

Not only do young adolescents have less autonomy than older youth, they also tend to overestimate how much autonomy their peers have; in other words, younger adolescents tend to think their friends are allowed to have more control over their choices and behaviors than they actually do. Adolescents who think they have low levels of autonomy over decisions also tend to believe their friends have more autonomy, whereas adolescents who feel they have enough autonomy are less influenced by perceptions of their peers ( Daddis, 2011 ).

Autonomy and Culture

The concept of “autonomy” implies independence, which generally is accepted as a core value among cultures oriented toward individualism. In contrast, one might expect youth from cultures oriented toward collectivism and interdependence to be more inclined toward harmonious, less conflictual relationships with parents and a lower desire for individuation. However, evidence suggests that teens in many cultures, both those labeled “individualist” and those labeled “collectivist,” strive to develop autonomy, and levels of parent-teen conflict are similar in immigrant and nonimmigrant families ( Fuligni and Tsai, 2015 ; Tsai et al., 2012 ). Studies of youth from multiple ethnic backgrounds in the United States, including those who are U.S.-born and those from immigrant families, show that most adolescents express a desire to have control over personal choices ( Phinney et al., 2005 ). Importantly, while youth across cultural backgrounds identify autonomy as important, there can be culturally relevant variations in how autonomy is defined. For example, some adolescents from Asian American heritage groups describe autonomy through the lens of “interdependence” ( Russell et al., 2010 ).

Examining Autonomy and Culture “Under the Skin”

While all teens may desire autonomy from their parents and seek identities and self-definitions that go beyond their role in the family, adolescents in immigrant families in the United States may have a stronger sense of family obligation relative to youth in nonimmigrant families. Recent findings from the field of cultural neuroscience demonstrate the integration between biology and sociocultural context ( Telzer et al., 2010 ; Fuligni and Telzer, 2013 ). In one study, White and Latinx older adolescents participated in laboratory-based tasks in which they were asked to allot cash rewards to themselves or to their families; during the task their patterns of brain activity were observed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). While youth from both groups allotted cash rewards to family at the same rate, among Latinx youth the “reward centers” of the brain were more activated when they contributed to family, whereas White youth showed more brain activity in the reward centers when allotting cash to themselves. Across both groups, those who felt a stronger sense of family identification and who felt fulfilled by contributing to family had more activation in the reward centers of the brain when allotting cash to their family. Thus, the cultural meaning that youth and families make around issues of autonomy, connection, and obligation are connected to neurobiological responses in the context of family contribution.

Some studies show linkages between broad cultural orientations, such as being more individually or more collectively oriented, and patterns of neural response ( Mrazek et al., 2015 ). Moreover, cultural neuroscientists posit that developmental growth and transitions in neural activity shape the transmission of cultural values, like preference for social hierarchy ( Mrazek et al., 2015 ). In addition to the vmPFC and the anterior cingulate cortex regions of the brain implicated in personal identity development, researchers speculate that the temporoparietal junction may be implicated in culturally embedded identities that orient youth toward independence or interdependence ( Cheon et al., 2011 ; Mrazek et al., 2015 ; Saxe et al., 2009 ).

Finding Meaning and Taking Action: Purpose and Agency

Purpose has been defined as “a stable and generalized intention to accomplish something that is at once meaningful to the self and of consequence to the world beyond the self” ( Damon et al., 2003 , p. 121) and also as “a central, self-organizing life aim that organizes and stimulates goals, manages behaviors, and provides a sense of meaning” ( McKnight and Kashdan, 2009 , p. 242). Thus, one's sense of purpose can be oriented toward life aims that are self-focused or toward aims that transcend the self ( Sumner et al., 2018 ; Yeager et al., 2012 ). Higher scores on measures of purpose are generally associated with more positive psychological wellbeing, a more consolidated identity, a deeper sense of meaning, and fewer health-compromising behaviors; a sense of purpose is also positively correlated with religiosity and spirituality ( Burrow and Hill, 2011 ; Sumner et al., 2018 ). Moreover, there is evidence that purpose helps explain associations between identity commitment and positive youth adjustment ( Burrow and Hill, 2011 ).

For all adolescents, developing a sense of purpose requires some support, particularly while their sense of orientation toward the future is still under development ( Steinberg et al., 2009 ). For adolescents who experience marginalization—by virtue of membership in one or more groups that experience systemic oppression ( García Coll et al., 1996 ; Causadias and Umaña-Taylor, 2018 )—developing a sense of purpose may be compromised if structural discrimination makes links between present action and future outcomes unpredictable (e.g., for adolescents with an undocumented immigration status) ( Gonzales, 2016 ; Sumner et al., 2018 ). Adolescents experiencing marginalization may internalize such messages as they become more aware of their own external realities; the messages may also be reinforced through family socialization practices. For example, researchers studying low-income White adolescents suggest that parents' messages of “isolation and threat, helplessness and hopelessness, and live fast, die young,” which may be adaptive in the short-term and in the immediate settings where the families live, can compromise youth's sense of purpose, hope, and agency ( Jones et al., 2018 ).

Agency to Take Action

Adolescents' growing competencies in flexible problem-solving, their awareness of and concern with others, and their openness to exploration and novelty ( Crone and Dahl, 2012 ) make adolescence a particularly opportune time to allow for agency and leadership ( Flanagan and Christens, 2011 ). Indeed, young people have been at the helm of social movements for centuries. For some youth, active civic engagement may be an adaptive means for coping with systemic injustice, particularly for those in historically marginalized communities ( Diemer and Rapa, 2016 ; Ginwright et al., 2006 ; Hope and Spencer, 2017 ). In a recent multi-methods study of middle and late adolescents in seven community organizations (four in the United States, two in Ireland, and one in South Africa), many of which served low-income or working class communities, researchers documented multiple benefits of civic engagement. Findings suggest the context of youth organizing promoted the skills of critical thinking and analysis, social and emotional learning, and involvement in community leadership and action ( Watts, 2018 ; Watts et al., 2011 ).

In relation to research on community leadership and action, recent work has examined the construct of “critical consciousness” among adolescents ( Watts et al., 2011 ). Contemporary definitions of critical consciousness, grounded in the work of Brazilian educator Paolo Freire (1970) , include the elements of critical reflection, motivation, and action ( Diemer et al., 2015 ). These core concepts have informed the development of new measures of critical consciousness for middle and late adolescents (e.g., Diemer et al., 2017 ; McWhirter and McWhirter, 2016 ; Thomas et al., 2014 ). Youth with higher levels of critical consciousness are more likely to recognize injustice and may feel a greater sense of agency or efficacy in responding to it ( Diemer and Rapa, 2016 ; Shedd, 2015 ). Critical consciousness is also positively associated with vocational and educational attainment ( Diemer et al., 2010 ; Luginbuhl et al., 2016 ; McWhirter and McWhirter, 2016 ).

Capacity for Self-Direction as a Developmental Opportunity

While there is general agreement about the benefits of purpose and agency in adolescence, ongoing work is needed to better understand the circumstances under which they are best fostered and the way they relate to other processes (e.g., critical consciousness) and to behavior (e.g., volunteering, social activism). For instance, do opportunities for critical reflection contribute to an adolescent's sense of purpose? Are community service or civic action necessary for building an adolescents' belief in their own agency to create change?

Additional research might determine whether a sense of purpose that transcends the self has greater positive impact on an adolescent than one that is more self-focused. Current work in this area suggests that a self-transcendent sense of purpose better predicts academic regulation, performance, and persistence among high school students ( Yeager et al., 2014 ); however, whether this extends beyond the school context is unclear. As research methods and methods in studies of critical consciousness continue to advance (e.g., Diemer et al., 2015 ), we may have a better understanding of how this particular kind of agency develops across adolescence, and for whom and under what conditions greater critical consciousness is most beneficial. Finally, an emerging body of work on adolescents' contribution mindset (i.e., giving to others; Fuligni and Telzer, 2013 ) and value-based decision making ( Pfeifer and Berkman, 2018 ) may provide some insight into the neurobiological correlates underlying the cognitive and social skills needed for developing purpose.

Over the course of adolescence, youth gain the cognitive skills needed to reflect on complex questions about their aims in life and their role in the world. They can question the legitimacy and fairness of everyday experiences and of social institutions. Indeed, the social systems they must navigate—schools, employment, health care, justice—are quite complex and often require them to engage in independent decision making. Two important questions stemming from this reality are, “What experiences are needed to support adolescents' agency as they transition into adult roles?” and “What might our society look like if all adolescents felt a sense of commitment to something personally meaningful and goal-directed that extends beyond the self?” ( Bronk, 2014 ).

Supporting opportunities for autonomy and agency and fostering a sense of purpose may help adolescents explore meaningful questions about who they are, and about their place in the world and their capacity to shape it. Continuing shifts in the social, cultural, economic, and technological contexts in which today's adolescents are developing require thoughtful consideration as to how, when, and where adolescents can find and act upon ideas and issues they find meaningful. For example, religion has traditionally been a context where youth have found purpose and meaning, and religious involvement is associated with civic engagement ( Furrow et al., 2004 ; Pew Research Center, 2019 ; Sumner et al., 2018 ). Religion can also be protective against stressors like discrimination and against negative mental health outcomes ( Hope et al., 2017 ). However, adolescents and young adults today are less likely to be religiously engaged than those in earlier generations ( Pew Research Center, 2018 ). If faith-based institutions are playing a less central role in the lives of greater numbers of today's adolescents, this brings to the fore questions about the alternative settings and experiences to which youth are turning and whether these settings play a comparable role in fostering involvement and purpose.

Although there is great variation in how the skills of autonomy, purpose, and agency manifest and how they are defined and valued, adolescents should be afforded opportunities—in families, schools, or out-of-school settings—to develop them. Such skills not only are important to support the transition to adulthood, but also make adolescence itself a period that fosters a propensity to choose their own paths in life and to shape the roles they want to play in their communities ( Fuligni, 2018 ).

Adolescence, spanning the period from the onset of puberty to adulthood, is a formative period where changes in cognition, affect, and interpersonal behavior occur alongside the most extensive biological transitions since infancy, especially with respect to pubertal and brain development. Collectively, the pubertal, neurobiological, cognitive, and psychosocial changes occurring during adolescence mark this as a period of great opportunity for adolescents to flourish and thrive.

While often thought of as a time of turmoil and risk for young people, adolescence is more accurately viewed as a developmental period rich with opportunity for youth to learn and grow. If provided with the proper supports and protection, normal processes of growth and maturation can lead youth to form healthy relationships with their peers and families, develop a sense of identity and self, and experience enriching and memorable engagements with the world. Adolescence thus forms a critical bridge between childhood and adulthood and is a critical window of opportunity for positive, life-altering development. As a positive window of opportunity, adolescence marks a period of optimism, where the assets of youth and their development may be capitalized for the betterment of society.

Important questions emerge from these findings. What are the “windows of opportunity” for promoting a positive developmental trajectory and adaptive plasticity? What are the mechanisms that shape developmental trajectories, for better or worse, during adolescence and over the life course? To begin to answer these, in the next chapter we consider the emerging science of epigenetics as it reveals the ongoing plasticity of the brain and the reciprocal influences of brain on body and vice versa.

The average child in the United States experiences the onset of puberty between the age of 8 and 10 years.

HPG hormones can bind within cell nuclei and change the transcription and expression of genes to regulate further hormone production, brain function, and behavior ( Melmed et al., 2012 ; Sisk and Foster, 2004 ). The process begins in the brain when a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is secreted from the hypothalamus. The activation of GnRH is not unique to the pubertal transition; GnRH is also active during pre- and perinatal periods of development but undergoes a quiescent period during the first year of postnatal life until it reawakens during the pubertal transition. GnRH stimulates the pituitary gland to secrete luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormones (FSH), which then stimulate the ovary and testes to secrete estradiol and testosterone.

For more information on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, see https://www ​.cpc.unc.edu ​/projects/addhealth .

See Chapter 3 for a discussion of the adaptive plasticity of adolescence and the potential of interventions during adolescence to mediate deficiencies from earlier life periods.

“Connectivity” refers to the formation of synapses, or connections between neurons; groups of interconnected neurons form circuit-like neural networks.

The threat cues used in the research cited here were pictures of “fearful faces,” which serve as a social cue of impending danger.

Impulsive action in response to potential threat was assessed using a “go/no-go” task. Simply put, this is a task in which participants are presented with two types out of three facial emotions (“happy” or “calm” or “fearful”) that are randomly assigned as “go” (stimulate action = press a button) or “no-go” (inhibit action = do not press button).

While there may be asynchronous development of circuits within specific regions of the brain during adolescence, this does not mean that these regions are “fixed” by the end of adolescence; instead, people retain the ability for neural plasticity and change throughout the life course (see Chapter 3 ).

For instance, rodent models suggest that empathy is shaped by social context (e.g., rats usually assist members of their own genetic strain, but will extend their prosocial behavior to unrelated peers if they are raised together; Bartal et al., 2011 ; Meyza et al., 2017 ).

See, for example, “Beyond ‘He' or ‘She': The Changing Meaning of Gender and Sexuality,” TIME Magazine, March 16, 2017.

• Cite this Page National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on the Neurobiological and Socio-behavioral Science of Adolescent Development and Its Applications; Backes EP, Bonnie RJ, editors. The Promise of Adolescence: Realizing Opportunity for All Youth. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2019 May 16. 2, Adolescent Development.
• PDF version of this title (5.9M)

In this Page

Recent activity.

• Adolescent Development - The Promise of Adolescence Adolescent Development - The Promise of Adolescence

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Child and Adolescent Development

• First Online: 28 January 2017

Cite this chapter

• Rosalyn H. Shute 3 &
• John D. Hogan 4  

12k Accesses

For school psychologists, understanding how children and adolescents develop and learn forms a backdrop to their everyday work, but the many new ‘facts’ shown by empirical studies can be difficult to absorb; nor do they make sense unless brought together within theoretical frameworks that help to guide practice. In this chapter, we explore the idea that child and adolescent development is a moveable feast, across both time and place. This is aimed at providing a helpful perspective for considering the many texts and papers that do focus on ‘facts’. We outline how our understanding of children’s development has evolved as various schools of thought have emerged. While many of the traditional theories continue to provide useful educational, remedial and therapeutic frameworks, there is also a need to take a more critical approach that supports multiple interpretations of human activity and development. With this in mind, we re-visit the idea of norms and milestones, consider the importance of context, reflect on some implications of psychology’s current biological zeitgeist and note a growing movement promoting the idea that we should be listening more seriously to children’s own voices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

School-Age Development

Children’s Developmental Needs During the Transition to Kindergarten: What Can Research on Social-Emotional, Motivational, Cognitive, and Self-Regulatory Development Tell Us?

Achenbach, T. M. (2009). The Achenbach system of empirically based assessment (ASEBA): Development, findings, theory, and applications . Burlington, VT: Research Center for Children, Youth and Families, University of Vermont.

Google Scholar  

Ainsworth, M. D., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41 , 49–67.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-5) (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

Book   Google Scholar  

Ames, L. B. (1996). Louise bates Ames. In D. N. Thompson & J. D. Hogan (Eds.), A history of developmental psychology in autobiography (pp. 1–23). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Anderson, V., Spencer-Smith, M., & Wood, A. (2011). Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. Brain, 134 , 2197–2221. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr103 .

Annan, J., & Priestley, A. (2011). A contemporary story of school psychology. School Psychology International, 33 (3), 325–344. doi: 10.1177/0143034311412845 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Aries, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life (R. Baldick, Trans.). New York: Random House.

Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1 (2), 68–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x .

Arnett, J. J. (2013). The evidence for Generation We and against Generation Me. Emerging adulthood, 1 , 5–10. doi: 10.1177/2167696812466842 .

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development . New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Bjorklund, D. E., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). The origins of human nature: Evolutionary developmental psychology . Washington, DC: APA.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.

Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary developmental theory of the origins and function of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17 , 271–301. doi: 10.1017/S0954579405050145 .

British Psychological Society. (2011). Response to the American Psychiatric Association: DSM-5 development . Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.bps.org.uk/news/british-psychological-still-has-concerns-over-dsm-v

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). Chapter 17: The ecology of developmental processes. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 535–584). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology . London: Routledge. (Original work published 1994)

Burns, M. K. (2011). School psychology research: Combining ecological theory and prevention science. School Psychology Review, 40 (1), 132–139.

Byers, L., Kulitja, S., Lowell, A., & Kruske, S. (2012). ‘Hear our stories’: Child-rearing practices of a remote Australian Aboriginal community. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 20 , 293–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01317.x .

Cefai, C. (2011). Chapter 2: A framework for the promotion of social and emotional wellbeing in primary schools. In R. H. Shute, P. T. Slee, R. Murray-Harvey, & K. L. Dix (Eds.), Mental health and wellbeing: Educational perspectives (pp. 17–28). Adelaide: Shannon Research press.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures . The Hague/Paris: Mouton.

Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs . Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Crain, W. (2010). Theories of development: Concepts and applications (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Darwin, C. (1877). A biographical sketch of an infant. Mind, 2 , 285–294.

Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 , Article 429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2005). Research on learning: Implications for teaching. Edited and abridged extracts . Melbourne: DET. Retrieved October 8, 2014, from www.det.vic.gov.au

Elkind, D. (2011). Developmentally appropriate practice: Curriculum and development in early education (C. Gestwicki, Guest editorial, 4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society . New York: Norton.

Freud, S. (2005). The unconscious . London, UK: Penguin.

Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: Is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27 , 17–24.

Gredler, M. E. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: Is it too late? Educational Psychology Review, 24 , 113–131. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9183-6 .

Greene, S. (2006). Child psychology: Taking account of children at last? The Irish Journal of Psychology, 27 (1/2), 8–15.

Guenther, J. (2015). Analysis of national test scores in very remote Australian schools: Understanding the results through a different lens. In H. Askell-Williams (Ed.), Transforming the future of learning with educational research . Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Hall, G. S. (1883). The contents of children’s minds. Princeton Review, 11 , 249–272.

Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vol. 1–2). New York: D. Appleton.

Heary, C., & Guerin, S. (2006). Research with children in psychology: The value of a child-centred approach. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 27 (1/2), 6–7.

Hindman, H. D. (2002). Child labor: An American history . Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Hogan, J. D. (2003). G. Stanley Hall: Educator, innovator, pioneer of developmental psychology. In G. Kimble & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. V, pp. 19–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Iossifova, R., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2013). When the body is time: Spatial and temporal deixis in children with visual impairments and sighted children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 , 2173–2184.

Jantz, P. B., & Plotts, C. A. (2014). Integrating neuropsychology and school psychology: Potential and pitfalls. Contemporary School Psychology, 18 , 69–80. doi: 10.1007/s40688-013-0006-2 .

Jarvis, J. (2011). Chapter 20: Promoting mental health through inclusive pedagogy. In R. H. Shute, P. T. Slee, R. Murray-Harvey, & K. L. Dix (Eds.), Mental health and wellbeing: Educational perspectives (pp. 237–248). Adelaide: Shannon Research press.

Jiang, X., Kosher, H., Ben-Arieh, A., & Huebner, E. S. (2014). Children’s rights, school psychology, and well-being assessments. Social Indicators Research, 117 , 179–193. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0343-6 .

Jones, M. C. (1924). A laboratory study of fear: The case of Peter. Pedagogical Seminary, 31 , 308–315.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2012). Perspectives on the dynamic development of cognitive capacities: Insights from Williams syndrome. Current Opinion in Neurology, 25 , 106–111. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283518130 .

Kennedy, H. (2006). An analysis of assessment and intervention frameworks in educational psychology services, in Scotland. Past, present and possible worlds. School Psychology International, 27 (5), 515–534. doi: 10.1177/0143034306073396 .

Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (1), 1–21.

Lansdown, G., Jimerson, S. R., & Shahrooz, R. (2014). Children’s rights and school psychology: Children’s right to participation. Journal of School Psychology, 35 , 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.12.006 .

Lorenz, K. (1961). King Solomon’s ring (M. K. Wilson, Trans.). London: Methuen.

Magai, C., & McFadden, S. H. (1995). The role of emotions in social and personality development: History, theory and research . New York: Plenum.

Matthews, S. H. (2007). A window on the ‘new’ sociology of childhood. Sociology Compass, 1 , 322–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00001.x .

Moon, C., Lagerkrantz, H., & Kuhl, P. K. (2013). Language experience in utero affects vowel perception after birth: A two-country study. Acta Paediatrica, 102 , 156–160. doi: 10.1111/apa.12098 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Moriceau, S., & Sullivan, R. M. (2005). Neurobiology of infant attachment. Developmental Neurobiology, 47 (3), 230–242. doi: 10.1002/dev.20093 .

Nsamenang, A. B. (2006). Cultures in early childhood care and education . Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education . Retrieved May 6, 2014, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147442e.pdf

O’Donnell, J. (1985). The origins of behaviorism. American psychology, 1870–1920 . New York: New York University Press.

Oberklaid, F. (2011). Is my child normal? Retrieved October 2, 2014, from http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/2011/september/is-my-child-normal/

Overton, W. F., & Ennis, M. D. (2006). Developmental and behavior-analytic theories: Evolving into complementarity. Human Development, 49 , 143–172. doi: 10.1159/000091893 .

Packenham, M., Shute, R. H., & Reid, R. (2004). A truncated functional behavioral assessment procedure for children with disruptive classroom behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 27 (1), 9–25.

Perry, B. D. (1997). Incubated in terror: Neurodevelopmental factors in the “cycle of violence”. In J. D. Osofky (Ed.), Children in a violent society . New York: Guilford.

Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. (1979). Growing up in Polynesia . Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Romer, D. (2010). Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: Implications for prevention. Developmental Psychobiology, 52 (3), 263–276. doi: 10.1002/dev.20442 .

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rousseau, J. J. (1914). Emile on education (Foxley, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1762)

Rutherford, A. (2009). Beyond the box: B. F. Skinner’s technology of behaviour from laboratory to life, 1950s to 1970s . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). La Mesa, CA: Sattler.

Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness . New York: Free Press.

Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children in Society, 15 (2), 107–117.

Shute, R. H. (2015). Transforming the future of learning: People, positivity and pluralism (and even the planet). In H. Askell-Williams (Ed.), Transforming the future of learning with educational research . Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Shute, R. H. (2016). ‘Promotion with parents is challenging’. The role of teacher communication skills and parent-teacher partnerships in school-based mental health initiatives. In R. H. Shute & P. T. Slee (Eds.), Mental health through schools: The way forward . Hove: Routledge.

Shute, R. H., & Slee, P. T. (2015). Child development: Theories and critical perspectives . Hove: Routledge.

Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1982). The child study movement: Early growth and development of the symbolized child. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 17). New York: Academic.

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior . Acton, MA: Copley Publishing.

Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behaviour scales (Vineland II) (2nd ed.). Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Pearson Australia.

Spears, B., Slee, P., Campbell, M., & Cross, D. (2011). Educational change and youth voice: Informing school action on cyberbullying. Centre for Strategic Education, Seminar Series Paper 208 . Melbourne, VIC, Australia: CSE.

Strauss, E., Sherman, E. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (3rd ed., pp. 46–52). Retrieved October 8, 2014, from http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar_url?hl=en&q=http://www.iapsych.com/articles/strauss2006.pdf&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0m5ZgjHj9p9Ew9NuSmlUnv9CWiUA&oi=scholarr&ei=ZQUuVKLUGOKsjAKiuoDoBw&ved=0CCQQgAMoADAA

Teo, T. (1997). Developmental psychology and the relevance of a critical metatheoretical reflection. Human Development, 40 , 195–210.

Thelen, E., & Adolph, K. E. (1992). Arnold L. Gesell: The paradox of nature and nurture. Developmental Psychology, 28 , 368–380.

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Timimi, S., Moncrieff, J., Jureidini, J., Leo, J., Cohen, D., Whitfield, C., … White, R. (2004). A critique of the international consensus statement on ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7 , 59–63.

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. Accessed October 31, 2014, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20 , 158–177.

Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3 , 1–14.

Weaver, I. C., et al. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7 , 847–854.

Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn . Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1988)

Yell, M. (1998). The law and special education . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Additional Sources

Fancher, R. E., & Rutherford, A. (2012). Pioneers of psychology (4th ed.). New York: Norton.

Kessen, W. (1979). The American child and other cultural inventions. American Psychologist, 34 , 815–820.

Parke, R. D., Ornstein, P. A., Rieser, J. J., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (Eds.). (1994). A century of developmental psychology . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Thompson, D. N., Hogan, J. D., & Clark, P. M. (2012). Developmental psychology in historical perspective . Chichester: Wiley.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia

Rosalyn H. Shute

St John’s University, Jamaica, NY, USA

John D. Hogan

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalyn H. Shute .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia

Monica Thielking

St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York, USA

Mark D. Terjesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Shute, R.H., Hogan, J.D. (2017). Child and Adolescent Development. In: Thielking, M., Terjesen, M. (eds) Handbook of Australian School Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_4

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_4

Published : 28 January 2017

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-45164-0

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-45166-4

eBook Packages : Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Adolescent development

Affiliation.

• 1 Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA. [email protected]
• PMID: 11148300
• DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83

This chapter identifies the most robust conclusions and ideas about adolescent development and psychological functioning that have emerged since Petersen's 1988 review. We begin with a discussion of topics that have dominated recent research, including adolescent problem behavior, parent-adolescent relations, puberty, the development of the self, and peer relations. We then identify and examine what seem to us to be the most important new directions that have come to the fore in the last decade, including research on diverse populations, contextual influences on development, behavioral genetics, and siblings. We conclude with a series of recommendations for future research on adolescence.

Publication types

• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
• Adolescent Behavior / psychology*
• Cultural Diversity
• Parent-Child Relations
• Psychology, Adolescent
• Puberty / physiology