thesis about distance learning in the philippines

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Study Protocol

Assessing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, shift to online learning, and social media use on the mental health of college students in the Philippines: A mixed-method study protocol

Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft

Affiliation College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines

Roles Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines, Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines

Roles Methodology

Affiliation Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

• Leonard Thomas S. Lim, 
• Zypher Jude G. Regencia, 
• J. Rem C. Dela Cruz, 
• Frances Dominique V. Ho, 
• Marcela S. Rodolfo, 
• Josefina Ly-Uson, 
• Emmanuel S. Baja

• Published: May 3, 2022
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267555
• Peer Review
• Reader Comments

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic declared by the WHO has affected many countries rendering everyday lives halted. In the Philippines, the lockdown quarantine protocols have shifted the traditional college classes to online. The abrupt transition to online classes may bring psychological effects to college students due to continuous isolation and lack of interaction with fellow students and teachers. Our study aims to assess Filipino college students’ mental health status and to estimate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, the shift to online learning, and social media use on mental health. In addition, facilitators or stressors that modified the mental health status of the college students during the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine, and subsequent shift to online learning will be investigated.

Methods and analysis

Mixed-method study design will be used, which will involve: (1) an online survey to 2,100 college students across the Philippines; and (2) randomly selected 20–40 key informant interviews (KIIs). Online self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) including Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Brief-COPE will be used. Moreover, socio-demographic factors, social media usage, shift to online learning factors, family history of mental health and COVID-19, and other factors that could affect mental health will also be included in the SAQ. KIIs will explore factors affecting the student’s mental health, behaviors, coping mechanism, current stressors, and other emotional reactions to these stressors. Associations between mental health outcomes and possible risk factors will be estimated using generalized linear models, while a thematic approach will be made for the findings from the KIIs. Results of the study will then be triangulated and summarized.

Ethics and dissemination

Our study has been approved by the University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board (UPMREB 2021-099-01). The results will be actively disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals, social media, print and broadcast media, and various stakeholder activities.

Citation: Lim LTS, Regencia ZJG, Dela Cruz JRC, Ho FDV, Rodolfo MS, Ly-Uson J, et al. (2022) Assessing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, shift to online learning, and social media use on the mental health of college students in the Philippines: A mixed-method study protocol. PLoS ONE 17(5): e0267555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267555

Editor: Elisa Panada, UNITED KINGDOM

Received: June 9, 2021; Accepted: April 11, 2022; Published: May 3, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Lim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This project is being supported by the American Red Cross through the Philippine Red Cross and Red Cross Youth. The funder will not have a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as a global pandemic, and the Philippines is one of the 213 countries affected by the disease [ 1 ]. To reduce the virus’s transmission, the President imposed an enhanced community quarantine in Luzon, the country’s northern and most populous island, on March 16, 2020. This lockdown manifested as curfews, checkpoints, travel restrictions, and suspension of business and school activities [ 2 ]. However, as the virus is yet to be curbed, varying quarantine restrictions are implemented across the country. In addition, schools have shifted to online learning, despite financial and psychological concerns [ 3 ].

Previous outbreaks such as the swine flu crisis adversely influenced the well-being of affected populations, causing them to develop emotional problems and raising the importance of integrating mental health into medical preparedness for similar disasters [ 4 ]. In one study conducted on university students during the swine flu pandemic in 2009, 45% were worried about personally or a family member contracting swine flu, while 10.7% were panicking, feeling depressed, or emotionally disturbed. This study suggests that preventive measures to alleviate distress through health education and promotion are warranted [ 5 ].

During the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers worldwide have been churning out studies on its psychological effects on different populations [ 6 – 9 ]. The indirect effects of COVID-19, such as quarantine measures, the infection of family and friends, and the death of loved ones, could worsen the overall mental wellbeing of individuals [ 6 ]. Studies from 2020 to 2021 link the pandemic to emotional disturbances among those in quarantine, even going as far as giving vulnerable populations the inclination to commit suicide [ 7 , 8 ], persistent effect on mood and wellness [ 9 ], and depression and anxiety [ 10 ].

In the Philippines, a survey of 1,879 respondents measuring the psychological effects of COVID-19 during its early phase in 2020 was released. Results showed that one-fourth of respondents reported moderate-to-severe anxiety, while one-sixth reported moderate-to-severe depression [ 11 ]. In addition, other local studies in 2020 examined the mental health of frontline workers such as nurses and physicians—placing emphasis on the importance of psychological support in minimizing anxiety [ 12 , 13 ].

Since the first wave of the pandemic in 2020, risk factors that could affect specific populations’ psychological well-being have been studied [ 14 , 15 ]. A cohort study on 1,773 COVID-19 hospitalized patients in 2021 found that survivors were mainly troubled with fatigue, muscle weakness, sleep difficulties, and depression or anxiety [ 16 ]. Their results usually associate the crisis with fear, anxiety, depression, reduced sleep quality, and distress among the general population.

Moreover, the pandemic also exacerbated the condition of people with pre-existing psychiatric disorders, especially patients that live in high COVID-19 prevalence areas [ 17 ]. People suffering from mood and substance use disorders that have been infected with COVID-19 showed higher suicide risks [ 7 , 18 ]. Furthermore, a study in 2020 cited the following factors contributing to increased suicide risk: social isolation, fear of contagion, anxiety, uncertainty, chronic stress, and economic difficulties [ 19 ].

Globally, multiple studies have shown that mental health disorders among university student populations are prevalent [ 13 , 20 – 22 ]. In a 2007 survey of 2,843 undergraduate and graduate students at a large midwestern public university in the United States, the estimated prevalence of any depressive or anxiety disorder was 15.6% and 13.0% for undergraduate and graduate students, respectively [ 20 ]. Meanwhile, in a 2013 study of 506 students from 4 public universities in Malaysia, 27.5% and 9.7% had moderate and severe or extremely severe depression, respectively; 34% and 29% had moderate and severe or extremely severe anxiety, respectively [ 21 ]. In China, a 2016 meta-analysis aiming to establish the national prevalence of depression among university students analyzed 39 studies from 1995 to 2015; the meta-analysis found that the overall prevalence of depression was 23.8% across all studies that included 32,694 Chinese university students [ 23 ].

A college student’s mental status may be significantly affected by the successful fulfillment of a student’s role. A 2013 study found that acceptable teaching methods can enhance students’ satisfaction and academic performance, both linked to their mental health [ 24 ]. However, online learning poses multiple challenges to these methods [ 3 ]. Furthermore, a 2020 study found that students’ mental status is affected by their social support systems, which, in turn, may be jeopardized by the COVID-19 pandemic and the physical limitations it has imposed. Support accessible to a student through social ties to other individuals, groups, and the greater community is a form of social support; university students may draw social support from family, friends, classmates, teachers, and a significant other [ 25 , 26 ]. Among individuals undergoing social isolation and distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, social support has been found to be inversely related to depression, anxiety, irritability, sleep quality, and loneliness, with higher levels of social support reducing the risk of depression and improving sleep quality [ 27 ]. Lastly, it has been shown in a 2020 study that social support builds resilience, a protective factor against depression, anxiety, and stress [ 28 ]. Therefore, given the protective effects of social support on psychological health, a supportive environment should be maintained in the classroom. Online learning must be perceived as an inclusive community and a safe space for peer-to-peer interactions [ 29 ]. This is echoed in another study in 2019 on depressed students who narrated their need to see themselves reflected on others [ 30 ]. Whether or not online learning currently implemented has successfully transitioned remains to be seen.

The effect of social media on students’ mental health has been a topic of interest even before the pandemic [ 31 , 32 ]. A systematic review published in 2020 found that social media use is responsible for aggravating mental health problems and that prominent risk factors for depression and anxiety include time spent, activity, and addiction to social media [ 31 ]. Another systematic review published in 2016 argues that the nature of online social networking use may be more important in influencing the symptoms of depression than the duration or frequency of the engagement—suggesting that social rumination and comparison are likely to be candidate mediators in the relationship between depression and social media [ 33 ]. However, their findings also suggest that the relationship between depression and online social networking is complex and necessitates further research to determine the impact of moderators and mediators that underly the positive and negative impact of online social networking on wellbeing [ 33 ].

Despite existing studies already painting a picture of the psychological effects of COVID-19 in the Philippines, to our knowledge, there are still no local studies contextualized to college students living in different regions of the country. Therefore, it is crucial to elicit the reasons and risk factors for depression, stress, and anxiety and determine the potential impact that online learning and social media use may have on the mental health of the said population. In turn, the findings would allow the creation of more context-specific and regionalized interventions that can promote mental wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and methods

The study’s general objective is to assess the mental health status of college students and determine the different factors that influenced them during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, it aims:

• To describe the study population’s characteristics, categorized by their mental health status, which includes depression, anxiety, and stress.
• To determine the prevalence and risk factors of depression, anxiety, and stress among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine, and subsequent shift to online learning.
• To estimate the effect of social media use on depression, anxiety, stress, and coping strategies towards stress among college students and examine whether participant characteristics modified these associations.
• To estimate the effect of online learning shift on depression, anxiety, stress, and coping strategies towards stress among college students and examine whether participant characteristics modified these associations.
• To determine the facilitators or stressors among college students that modified their mental health status during the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine, and subsequent shift to online learning.

Study design

A mixed-method study design will be used to address the study’s objectives, which will include Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) and an online survey. During the quarantine period of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines from April to November 2021, the study shall occur with the population amid community quarantine and an abrupt transition to online classes. Since this is the Philippines’ first study that will look at the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine, and subsequent shift to online learning, the online survey will be utilized for the quantitative part of the study design. For the qualitative component of the study design, KIIs will determine facilitators or stressors among college students that modified their mental health status during the quarantine period.

Study population

The Red Cross Youth (RCY), one of the Philippine Red Cross’s significant services, is a network of youth volunteers that spans the entire country, having active members in Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. The group is clustered into different age ranges, with the College Red Cross Youth (18–25 years old) being the study’s population of interest. The RCY has over 26,060 students spread across 20 chapters located all over the country’s three major island groups. The RCY is heterogeneously composed, with some members classified as college students and some as out-of-school youth. Given their nationwide scope, disseminating information from the national to the local level is already in place; this is done primarily through email, social media platforms, and text blasts. The research team will leverage these platforms to distribute the online survey questionnaire.

In addition, the online survey will also be open to non-members of the RCY. It will be disseminated through social media and engagements with different university administrators in the country. Stratified random sampling will be done for the KIIs. The KII participants will be equally coming from the country’s four (4) primary areas: 5–10 each from the national capital region (NCR), Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao, including members and non-members of the RCY.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for the online survey will include those who are 18–25 years old, currently enrolled in a university, can provide consent for the study, and are proficient in English or Filipino. The exclusion criteria will consist of those enrolled in graduate-level programs (e.g., MD, JD, Master’s, Doctorate), out-of-school youth, and those whose current curricula involve going on duty (e.g., MDs, nursing students, allied medical professions, etc.). The inclusion criteria for the KIIs will include online survey participants who are 18–25 years old, can provide consent for the study, are proficient in English or Filipino, and have access to the internet.

Sample size

A continuity correction method developed by Fleiss et al. (2013) was used to calculate the sample size needed [ 34 ]. For a two-sided confidence level of 95%, with 80% power and the least extreme odds ratio to be detected at 1.4, the computed sample size was 1890. With an adjustment for an estimated response rate of 90%, the total sample size needed for the study was 2,100. To achieve saturation for the qualitative part of the study, 20 to 40 participants will be randomly sampled for the KIIs using the respondents who participated in the online survey [ 35 ].

Study procedure

Self-administered questionnaire..

The study will involve creating, testing, and distributing a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ). All eligible study participants will answer the SAQ on socio-demographic factors such as age, sex, gender, sexual orientation, residence, household income, socioeconomic status, smoking status, family history of mental health, and COVID-19 sickness of immediate family members or friends. The two validated survey tools, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Brief-COPE, will be used for the mental health outcome assessment [ 36 – 39 ]. The DASS-21 will measure the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress [ 40 ], while the Brief-COPE will measure the students’ coping strategies [ 41 ].

For the exposure assessment of the students to social media and shift to online learning, the total time spent on social media (TSSM) per day will be ascertained by querying the participants to provide an estimated time spent daily on social media during and after their online classes. In addition, students will be asked to report their use of the eight commonly used social media sites identified at the start of the study. These sites include Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, and social messaging sites Viber/WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger with response choices coded as "(1) never," "(2) less often," "(3) every few weeks," "(4) a few times a week," and “(5) daily” [ 42 – 44 ]. Furthermore, a global frequency score will be calculated by adding the response scores from the eight social media sites. The global frequency score will be used as an additional exposure marker of students to social media [ 45 ]. The shift to online learning will be assessed using questions that will determine the participants’ satisfaction with online learning. This assessment is comprised of 8 items in which participants will be asked to respond on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree.’

The online survey will be virtually distributed in English using the Qualtrics XM™ platform. Informed consent detailing the purpose, risks, benefits, methods, psychological referrals, and other ethical considerations will be included before the participants are allowed to answer the survey. Before administering the online survey, the SAQ shall undergo pilot testing among twenty (20) college students not involved with the study. It aims to measure total test-taking time, respondent satisfaction, and understandability of questions. The survey shall be edited according to the pilot test participant’s responses. Moreover, according to the Philippines’ Data Privacy Act, all the answers will be accessible and used only for research purposes.

Key informant interviews.

The research team shall develop the KII concept note, focusing on the extraneous factors affecting the student’s mental health, behaviors, and coping mechanism. Some salient topics will include current stressors (e.g., personal, academic, social), emotional reactions to these stressors, and how they wish to receive support in response to these stressors. The KII will be facilitated by a certified psychologist/psychiatrist/social scientist and research assistants using various online video conferencing software such as Google Meet, Skype, or Zoom. All the KIIs will be recorded and transcribed for analysis. Furthermore, there will be a debriefing session post-KII to address the psychological needs of the participants. Fig 1 presents the diagrammatic flowchart of the study.

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267555.g001

Data analyses

Quantitative data..

Descriptive statistics will be calculated, including the prevalence of mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, stress, and coping strategies. In addition, correlation coefficients will be estimated to assess the relations among the different mental health outcomes, covariates, and possible risk factors.

Several study characteristics as effect modifiers will also be assessed, including sex, gender, sexual orientation, family income, smoking status, family history of mental health, and Covid-19. We will include interaction terms between the dichotomized modifier variable and markers of social media use (total TSSM and global frequency score) and shift to online learning in the models. The significance of the interaction terms will be evaluated using the likelihood ratio test. All the regression analyses will be done in R ( http://www.r-project.org ). P values ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Qualitative data.

After transcribing the interviews, the data transcripts will be analyzed using NVivo 1.4.1 software [ 50 ] by three research team members independently using the inductive logic approach in thematic analysis: familiarizing with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing the themes, defining and naming the themes, and producing the report [ 51 ]. Data familiarization will consist of reading and re-reading the data while noting initial ideas. Additionally, coding interesting features of the data will follow systematically across the entire dataset while collating data relevant to each code. Moreover, the open coding of the data will be performed to describe the data into concepts and themes, which will be further categorized to identify distinct concepts and themes [ 52 ].

The three researchers will discuss the results of their thematic analyses. They will compare and contrast the three analyses in order to come up with a thematic map. The final thematic map of the analysis will be generated after checking if the identified themes work in relation to the extracts and the entire dataset. In addition, the selection of clear, persuasive extract examples that will connect the analysis to the research question and literature will be reviewed before producing a scholarly report of the analysis. Additionally, the themes and sub-themes generated will be assessed and discussed in relevance to the study’s objectives. Furthermore, the gathering and analyzing of the data will continue until saturation is reached. Finally, pseudonyms will be used to present quotes from qualitative data.

Data triangulation.

Data triangulation using the two different data sources will be conducted to examine the various aspects of the research and will be compared for convergence. This part of the analysis will require listing all the relevant topics or findings from each component of the study and considering where each method’s results converge, offer complementary information on the same issue, or appear to contradict each other. It is crucial to explicitly look for disagreements between findings from different data collection methods because exploration of any apparent inter-method discrepancy may lead to a better understanding of the research question [ 53 , 54 ].

Data management plan.

The Project Leader will be responsible for overall quality assurance, with research associates and assistants undertaking specific activities to ensure quality control. Quality will be assured through routine monitoring by the Project Leader and periodic cross-checks against the protocols by the research assistants. Transcribed KIIs and the online survey questionnaire will be used for recording data for each participant in the study. The project leader will be responsible for ensuring the accuracy, completeness, legibility, and timeliness of the data captured in all the forms. Data captured from the online survey or KIIs should be consistent, clarified, and corrected. Each participant will have complete source documentation of records. Study staff will prepare appropriate source documents and make them available to the Project Leader upon request for review. In addition, study staff will extract all data collected in the KII notes or survey forms. These data will be secured and kept in a place accessible to the Project Leader. Data entry and cleaning will be conducted, and final data cleaning, data freezing, and data analysis will be performed. Key informant interviews will always involve two researchers. Where appropriate, quality control for the qualitative data collection will be assured through refresher KII training during research design workshops. The Project Leader will check through each transcript for consistency with agreed standards. Where translations are undertaken, the quality will be assured by one other researcher fluent in that language checking against the original recording or notes.

Ethics approval.

The study shall abide by the Principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). It will be conducted along with the Guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), E6 (R2), and other ICH-GCP 6 (as amended); National Ethical Guidelines for Health and Health-Related Research (NEGHHRR) of 2017. This protocol has been approved by the University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board (UPMREB 2021-099-01 dated March 25, 2021).

The main concerns for ethics were consent, data privacy, and subject confidentiality. The risks, benefits, and conflicts of interest are discussed in this section from an ethical standpoint.

Recruitment.

The participants will be recruited to answer the online SAQ voluntarily. The recruitment of participants for the KIIs will be chosen through stratified random sampling using a list of those who answered the online SAQ; this will minimize the risk of sampling bias. In addition, none of the participants in the study will have prior contact or association with the researchers. Moreover, power dynamics will not be contacted to recruit respondents. The research objectives, methods, risks, benefits, voluntary participation, withdrawal, and respondents’ rights will be discussed with the respondents in the consent form before KII.

Informed consent will be signified by the potential respondent ticking a box in the online informed consent form and the voluntary participation of the potential respondent to the study after a thorough discussion of the research details. The participant’s consent is voluntary and may be recanted by the participant any time s/he chooses.

Data privacy.

All digital data will be stored in a cloud drive accessible only to the researchers. Subject confidentiality will be upheld through the assignment of control numbers and not requiring participants to divulge the name, address, and other identifying factors not necessary for analysis.

Compensation.

No monetary compensation will be given to the participants, but several tokens will be raffled to all the participants who answered the online survey and did the KIIs.

This research will pose risks to data privacy, as discussed and addressed above. In addition, there will be a risk of social exclusion should data leaks arise due to the stigma against mental health. This risk will be mitigated by properly executing the data collection and analysis plan, excluding personal details and tight data privacy measures. Moreover, there is a risk of psychological distress among the participants due to the sensitive information. This risk will be addressed by subjecting the SAQ and the KII guidelines to the project team’s psychiatrist’s approval, ensuring proper communication with the participants. The KII will also be facilitated by registered clinical psychologists/psychiatrists/social scientists to ensure the participants’ appropriate handling; there will be a briefing and debriefing of the participants before and after the KII proper.

Participation in this study will entail health education and a voluntary referral to a study-affiliated psychiatrist, discussed in previous sections. Moreover, this would contribute to modifications in targeted mental-health campaigns for the 18–25 age group. Summarized findings and recommendations will be channeled to stakeholders for their perusal.

Dissemination.

The results will be actively disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals, social media, print and broadcast media, and various stakeholder activities.

This study protocol rationalizes the examination of the mental health of the college students in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic as the traditional face-to-face classes transitioned to online and modular classes. The pandemic that started in March 2020 is now stretching for more than a year in which prolonged lockdown brings people to experience social isolation and disruption of everyday lifestyle. There is an urgent need to study the psychosocial aspects, particularly those populations that are vulnerable to mental health instability. In the Philippines, where community quarantine is still being imposed across the country, college students face several challenges amidst this pandemic. The pandemic continues to escalate, which may lead to fear and a spectrum of psychological consequences. Universities and colleges play an essential role in supporting college students in their academic, safety, and social needs. The courses of activities implemented by the different universities and colleges may significantly affect their mental well-being status. Our study is particularly interested in the effect of online classes on college students nationwide during the pandemic. The study will estimate this effect on their mental wellbeing since this abrupt transition can lead to depression, stress, or anxiety for some students due to insufficient time to adjust to the new learning environment. The role of social media is also an important exposure to some college students [ 55 , 56 ]. Social media exposure to COVID-19 may be considered a contributing factor to college students’ mental well-being, particularly their stress, depression, and anxiety [ 57 , 58 ]. Despite these known facts, little is known about the effect of transitioning to online learning and social media exposure on the mental health of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the Philippines that will use a mixed-method study design to examine the mental health of college students in the entire country. The online survey is a powerful platform to employ our methods.

Additionally, our study will also utilize a qualitative assessment of the college students, which may give significant insights or findings of the experiences of the college students during these trying times that cannot be captured on our online survey. The thematic findings or narratives from the qualitative part of our study will be triangulated with the quantitative analysis for a more robust synthesis. The results will be used to draw conclusions about the mental health status among college students during the pandemic in the country, which will eventually be used to implement key interventions if deemed necessary. A cross-sectional study design for the online survey is one of our study’s limitations in which contrasts will be mainly between participants at a given point of time. In addition, bias arising from residual or unmeasured confounding factors cannot be ruled out.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its accompanying effects will persistently affect the mental wellbeing of college students. Mental health services must be delivered to combat mental instability. In addition, universities and colleges should create an environment that will foster mental health awareness among Filipino college students. The results of our study will tailor the possible coping strategies to meet the specific needs of college students nationwide, thereby promoting psychological resilience.

Investigating blended learning interactions in Philippine schools through the community of inquiry framework

• Published: 16 February 2023

Cite this article

• Juliet Aleta R. Villanueva   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-244X 1   na1 ,
• Petrea Redmond   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-1206 2   na1 ,
• Linda Galligan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-8690 3 &
• Douglas Eacersall   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-1240 4  

21k Accesses

2 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This article reports on an exploratory case study that applied the Community of Inquiry framework in the K-12 Philippine setting, where there are limited studies on blended learning interactions and experiences. The study examined blended learning interactions across three schools in the Philippine K-12 system to investigate the following: (1) what is the nature of interactions in the blended learning classes? and (2) how do the interactions indicate learning communities as outcomes of blended learning? A mixed method approach to data collection was undertaken, which included student surveys, focus group discussions, teacher interviews, and class observations. The constant comparative analysis uncovered thick descriptions of blended learning interactions. Findings uncovered three themes on blended learning across levels of interactions within the Community of Inquiry presences: (i) best of both worlds, (ii) learning anytime and anywhere, and (iii) learning with technology. Descriptive statistics indicated high mean ratings across the presences, revealing positive experiences afforded by the use of various technologies and social media. The study concluded that learning communities are an outcome of blended learning interactions. A Developmental Model for K-12 Blended Learning Communities was recommended to inform teacher professional development on pedagogies and practices supportive of learning community building in contexts where blended learning may continue to thrive.

Similar content being viewed by others

How Hybrid Learning Can Enhance the Student Experience and Teaching Outcomes in the Wake of COVID-19: A Case Study of a Business School in the United Kingdom

Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of a sense of community in blended education

Linlin Pei, Cindy Poortman, … Nieck Benes

Students’ Learning Outcomes and Emerging Practices of Blended Learning: A Case Study

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Research into K-12 blended learning is a relatively young field. Scholarship in blended learning (BL) is dominated by the United States, with minimal reports from New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and South Africa (Barbour, 2018 ). Research in other contexts has been encouraged (Hu et al., 2019 ), and extensive studies should be undertaken on K-12 because of the mixed results on the benefits of BL (Poirier et al., 2019 ). Thus, this research focuses on the Philippines. Pre-pandemic, BL in the Philippines emerged under the Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) to accommodate secondary-level students and adult learners (Villanueva, 2021 ). The observed growth coincided with the Department of Education’s shift from a 10-year primary and secondary education to a 12-year program, referred to as the K-12 Enhanced Basic Education program, which promotes quality education for all. This shift entailed implementing much-needed policies and reforms, including a commitment to invest in technology to improve access to quality education. The integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in K-12 schools was anticipated to enable computerization programs, flexible learning options, and the use of educational technologies and online learning resources (Bonifacio, 2013 ). The key to the definition of BL is the extent of learner control and the personalization of learning it provides students, which distinguishes BL from technology-rich learning environments (Staker & Horn, 2014 ). Beyond studies that advocate for the successful implementation of BL programs is the challenge of bridging the divide among varied settings—contexts supportive of BL and contexts in which BL is emerging as a viable option. As such, this study aims to understand BL experiences in the context of Filipino students and their teachers and pursues two research questions: (1) what is the nature of interactions in blended learning classes? and (2) how do these indicate the learning communities are outcomes of BL?

By examining BL interactions, this study aims to present outcomes that bear implications for further research related to ICT integration and BL implementation in selected schools in the Philippines. The following section presents a brief literature review on BL; a description of the exploratory case study undertaken; and the results of this study, describing the nature of BL interactions through the Community of Inquiry framework (CoI) and emerging themes of this study. The remaining sections present the study's outcomes, including recommendations for future practice and research through a proposed Developmental Model of K-12 BL, highlighting learning community building.

Literature review

Learning communities and the coi framework.

Research into BL and online learning attested to the formation of learning communities wherein knowledge construction and social learning occur through interaction, collaboration, and personal accountability (Swan, 2002 ). A learning community may be described and understood as a set of interactions among community members to arrive at a common goal. Swan ( 2002 ) sought to extend the thinking along the lines of learning community building through interactivity discussed in Moore ( 1989 ), namely, interaction with content, interaction with instructors, and interaction with students. Swan ( 2003 ) outlined a practical way to appreciate the interrelatedness of these varied interactions (Fig.  1 ).

Interactivity and learning online by Swan ( 2003 ). Note. Adapted from “Learning effectiveness online: What the research tells us,” by K. Swan, in J. Bourne and J.C. Moore, Elements of quality online education, practice and direction (p. 17), 2003. Copyright 2003 by Sloan Center for Online Education . Reprinted with permission.

Key findings from these studies point to the value of interaction and harnessing opportunities among members of a learning community. In this instance, both teachers and learners were responsible for teaching, learning, and related social interactions. As such, the CoI has been associated with social constructivism, which claims that knowledge is constructed among members or participants of the learning community, in which interaction and collaboration are primarily mediated by communication and technology. The interplay of the three elements or presences was deemed necessary for a productive online learning community (Arbaugh et al., 2010 ). Cognitive presence (CP) is “the extent to which learners are able to construct and confirm meaning through sustained reflection and discourse in a critical community of inquiry” (Garrison et al., 2001 , p. 11). Social presence (SP) “is the ability of participants to identify with a group, communicate openly in a trusting environment, and develop personal and affective relationships progressively by way of projecting their individual personalities” (Garrison, 2017 , p. 25). Teaching presence (TP) is “the design, facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile learning outcomes” (Anderson et al., 2001 , p. 5). In the overlaps among the presences, specific aspects of the educational experience are addressed: setting the climate, selecting content, and supporting discourse to facilitate deep learning (Garrison et al., 2000 ; Swan & Ice, 2010 ).

However, a gap in the research is in the context of learning communities at the K-12 levels, which have increasingly adopted blended and online learning and flexible modes of delivery, particularly in non-Western contexts (Barbour & Reeves, 2009 ; Christensen et al., 2013 ). Despite sustained interest in the CoI, according to Befus ( 2016 ), few research endeavors have been completed in the context of K-12 teachers and students. This study aims to address this gap by focusing on the nature of BL interactions leading to the formation of learning communities.

BL models, benefits, and issues

In developed and industrialized countries, definitions and models of BL capture growing practices and acceptance at the higher education and K-12 levels. BL is the “thoughtful integration of classroom face-to-face learning experiences with online learning experiences” (Garrison & Kanuka, 2004 , p. 96). Often considered synonymous with hybrid learning, BL employs any combination of delivery methods, such as face-to-face instruction with synchronous or asynchronous modes, through the integration of technology tools for learning (Picciano et al., 2013 ). The number of models of K-12 BL programs is increasing with the advancement of technology and web 2.0 tools for learning. These models represent the extent to which the personalization of learning is afforded by the curriculum and how teachers tailor their teaching to increase academic engagement (Staker & Horn, 2014 ) while completing the learning modalities within a prescribed schedule or as allowed by the teacher (Halverson et al., 2017 ). Using these models, schools determine how to streamline BL offerings to accommodate students’ college or career goals, including credit recovery and advanced placement (Barbour et al., 2011 ). Graham ( 2009 ) allocated BL into categories of blends based on various examples observed primarily in higher education (Fig.  2 ).

Copyright 2009 by IGI Global. Adapted with permission

Categories of Blends. Note. Adapted from “Blended Learning Models” by C.R. Graham, in M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed) Encyclopedia of Information and Science Technology (p. 376), 2009, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Thus far, all these models and categories characterize BL in terms of the degree of blendedness, delivery modes, and use of technology and other resources but are largely reported in developed countries (Halverson et al., 2012 ). With the pandemic forcing a rapid shift of course delivery to online and remote learning, new directions for BL as a productive new normal are being considered (Megahed & Ghoneim, 2022 ), even in settings with very limited resources (Shohel et al., 2022 ). Hence, further studies are recommended to provide insights into the actual experiences and perspectives of K-12 teachers and students in contexts where BL is emerging (Villanueva, 2021 ). Research in these areas informs BL practices and the professional development of teachers.

BL in the Philippines

A brief review of the K-12 system in the Philippines revealed that within the public schools, there are alternative learning programs targeting independent learners, youths in difficult circumstances, and potential school leavers ( DepEd Order No. 54 s.12 , Phils). These programs under the ADM provide access and flexibility to the current basic education offerings via assistance from ICTs (Seameo-Innotech, 2019 ). One type of ADM is the Open High School Program, which aims to enable youth and adults to continue and complete a secondary education outside of the usual classroom delivery ( Open High School System Act 2014 (Phils) s.2277). Another type of ADM is the eLearning Program, adopted selectively in city school districts. This program capitalizes on the strengths of BL delivery and support from current stakeholders.

Cultural barriers and issues relating to quality access and infrastructure for BL and ICT integration in the K-12 setting are present in the Philippines (Aguinaldo, 2013 ; Kubota et al., 2018 ). Despite these, some Filipino teachers hold favorable attitudes and positive perceptions toward ICT use in their classrooms and high regard for the innovation it provides (Cajilig, 2009 ; Dela Rosa, 2016 ). Some students have gained motivation and confidence while learning with the supplementary use of digital technologies in their classes (Aguinaldo, 2013 ; Carreon, 2018 ); hence, selected schools have provided access to marginalized populations, for which BL and flexible learning options are emerging (Villanueva, 2021 ).

This study aims to determine whether teachers and students experience the same benefits of BL in settings such as the Philippines, in which ICT integration remains a challenge. As such, positive outcomes of this study may be highlighted so that schools may be able to capitalize on their strengths while taking note of strategies and recommendations to further justify BL where conditions allow it to succeed.

Methodology

This study implemented an exploratory case study in three BL classes, which allowed for the exploration of the phenomenon as the major area of interest (Zainal, 2007 ). The BL classes comprised a single case, which was selected through snowball and convenience sampling with the assistance of school principals and teachers in an urban school district. This district was supervised by the Department of Education Central Office. The classes were further delimited to a specific year level and a cohort of learners so that course content and topics were familiar and understandable to the researcher, who was the primary data collection instrument in the qualitative aspects of the research design (Merriam, 2009 ; Stake, 1995 ).

The schools were designated letter codes X, Y, and Z (Table 1 ), with a range of student and teacher participants for the mixed method data collection. Qualitative methods were used primarily to collect data from various sources while being concerned with the search for meaning through multiple views (Creswell, 2012 ). This study included student focus group discussions (FGDs), teacher interviews, and class observations. The quantitative data collection was undertaken through surveys from the sample size indicated in Table 1 .

Data collection and analysis

The data collection was undertaken for 6 months at a time convenient to the participants and under the guidelines set by the school district office to avoid disrupting class schedules. As such, the researcher worked around the realities of data collection in the natural setting of the participants, given their class schedules, deadlines, and major school activities; hence, there are differences in the number of student participants across data collection methods in Table 1 .

Surveys are an effective means to evaluate individual experiences, perceptions, or beliefs and their relationship to the phenomenon under study (Creswell, 1998 ). The researcher found value in using surveys as valid means to establish the profile of the blended learning programs and research participants and gauge their general perception and satisfaction with their BL experiences. Two surveys were administered at different stages of the data collection phase. The first survey was the CoI Survey Part 1, with 35 items adapted from the Likert-scaled instrument validated through an empirical study on higher education by Arbaugh et al. ( 2008 ). This survey measured the overall educational experiences of students through the categories of CP, SP, and TP. A bilingual version was developed from the original open-source survey to ensure proper use among Filipino secondary-level students. This accommodation was provided in consideration of students exposed to the use of English and Filipino as the medium of instruction in their schools. The CoI Survey Part 2 comprised open-ended questions designed to elicit responses on BL interactions. To gauge overall satisfaction, this study administered an adapted version of the “BL Toolkit Survey Instrument” (n.d.), an open-source survey on BL for students. The adaptation comprised six items from the original toolkit and was modified for the K-12 setting, for example, using emojis in the rating scale and corresponding descriptors (e.g., definitely not to definitely , much worse to much better ). In both surveys, data collection on student profiles was included in determining the access to and use of the internet, digital devices, and ICTs. The data analysis from the surveys comprised descriptive statistics, namely, mean, median, and standard deviation for the CoI Survey Part 1 n  = 40 participant responses. These were used in support of qualitative results on CP, SP, and TP.

FGDs are useful, especially when there is limited time for data collection and research participants will be able to offer valuable information (Creswell, 2012 ). In this study, the FGD was undertaken with eight groups to collect additional information and assist the researcher in interpreting class observations. In these FGDs, member checks were undertaken to collect feedback on descriptions of BL interactions and the manifestations of the presences midway through the data collection.

When collected in case study research, interview data become sources of descriptions and interpretations with multiple viewpoints (Stake, 1995 ). A case study affords a flexible flow of questioning (Yin, 2009 ) while the researcher remains able to guide the participant to elicit information through increasingly specific types of questions (Creswell, 2012 ). Due consideration of participants’ views and the researcher’s intent and direction was accommodated in this study. During the interview sessions, teachers were encouraged to share anecdotes and narrate experiences on BL or explain further through follow-up questions, which were open-ended in nature and aligned with the student CoI Survey Part 2 and FGD questions.

The data generated from the quantitative measures were analyzed and reported in conjunction with the qualitative findings in the form of thick descriptions of BL interactions. Thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative data from selected items of the survey results, FGD, interview responses, and class observations. This article covers the results based on the data analysis suggested by Miles and Huberman ( 1994 ). Inferences were formed by coding and writing summaries, teasing out themes, and creating memos (Merriam, 2009 ; Miles & Huberman, 1994 ). The researcher ensured that safeguards for trustworthiness and integrity were used and that ethical protocols were followed throughout the study.

BL as the best of both worlds

BL as the best of both worlds held similar meanings among the students. First, it provided opportunities for students to learn independently and engage in cooperative or collaborative work. A substantial part of students’ “learning on my own” is interactions with content when online. Cooperative learning for the students meant interacting with peers during small-group work while at school, where interacting with their teachers was equally important. When online, they collaborated by relying on each other’s strengths to complete what was required.

CP: Interaction with content

Findings revealed CP’s manifestations because students were actively engaged in their learning and others to accomplish activities. Among all items in the CoI Survey Part 1, CP items gained the highest mean ratings among all the elements. For example, Items CP 24 and CP25 (Table 2 ) revealed that most students described their BL experiences as challenging but triggering their curiosity and motivation to explore questions. The lowest mean score, 3.63, was for Item CP23. Overall, students found that while engaging with the varied content their critical thinking was challenged through the BL face-to-face learning activities, online modules, quizzes, and assessments.

Students generally appreciated the content prepared and posted by their teachers in their school’s learning management system (LMS) and Facebook (FB) Messenger, as well as reading materials in face-to-face classes. In face-to-face lessons, interaction with content was observed during classroom observations, where the content was provided by the teacher during lectures and discussions through the blackboard or whiteboard, a projector, or a television. When online, most students liked the idea of searching for additional content related to current lessons, which can be undertaken conveniently.

Interaction with content also meant that their BL experiences entailed “learning by myself.” To Sheila and Aimee of School X, this kind of interaction involved finding online assessments, which became their “source of knowledge” and a way to challenge themselves “without being taught exactly about it.” Aimee explained that studying on her own was sometimes preferred  "because I feel I can understand more.”

However, Rachel from School Y mentioned that “not everything was really provided in the platforms.” Thus, interaction with content also meant that students actively searched for online content beyond their virtual classrooms as a way to explore and discover knowledge. Some students compared their online search for content as more satisfying than looking at textbooks, where the information and examples were “limited.” Learning from video content became part of their routine as they began to discern which lectures provided additional explanations for their lessons. Students also indicated that through self-study, they practiced more than without it and gained mastery; therefore, their opportunity to achieve higher grades increased. By accomplishing schoolwork online, students perceived that their class preparation improved.

SP: Interaction with peers

Students across class groups generally described that being online and independent studying was “easier,” “fun,” or “challenging.” Going online was an opportunity to interact and socialize and was thus beneficial socially and academically. For the block section of Grade 10 students, being face-to-face in school made them feel part of the school community, where their “small class” ran alongside classes of “regular students.” They had an opportunity to join competitions as a way to make themselves known and engage in school clubs as part of their student life. Likewise, the quantitative results indicated positive ratings of the SP items in the survey. Item SP14 on Affective Expression gained the highest mean rating and lowest standard deviation among all survey items (Table 2 ). Most of the student responses demonstrated the ease of communicating and interacting online through FB Messenger and the LMS platform, as observed in all three items under Interactive Communication, SP17-SP19. These results also demonstrate that online communication among K-12 students is an excellent way to interact and learn. Items under Group Cohesion indicated disparate results, namely, in Item SP20, about trust among classmates and peers while interacting and learning together. Schools X and Y revealed trust maintenance, despite disagreements or issues, among groupmates in the survey. School Z attested to having fewer online and face-to-face collaborations, although connectedness was perceived within their group.

Cooperative learning and collaborative work occurred online and face-to-face, as indicated by most students. Joey of School X said, “You can really see us still buzzing 11:00 at night, still talking about how we are going to do things the following day.” For the students, collaborative work meant engaging in face-to-face small-group work. Ms. Lota was a Filipino language teacher at School X and perceived that face-to-face class time was a better way to conduct cooperative learning, believing that group work was more difficult online than in face-to-face situations. Data from student FGDs indicated otherwise. When online and working together on projects, students collaborated by relying on each other’s strengths to complete what was required. Students from School X described working collaboratively as helping others understand lessons and monitoring each other’s work through the aid of technology.

All teachers viewed the online work as an opportunity for students to do work without much intervention or discussions directed by the teacher. Students noticed their teachers as sometimes being present online and said, “We know they are online, but usually, they let us do the work.” However, for the group of open high school students in School Z, collaborating online was rare owing to the difficulty in finding a common time to be online. Mia said, “I think it’s messier when we have groupings.” Other students stated that some were busy with domestic work or caring for their family members. Home responsibilities were not, however, considered by students as a barrier to their learning. Diego recounted, “I’m comfortable working by myself because I am able to focus.” Doing individual work did not prevent them from asking for help as they continued communicating with their peers about their lessons by private messaging, texting, or email.

TP: Interaction with teachers

The TP findings provided evidence of teachers fulfilling their main function to ensure student learning and content engagement. Students appreciated the teaching through content selected and organized by their teachers and students’ interactions with their teachers. The CoI Survey results of TP revealed that students perceived that all teacher participants in the study were cognizant of their role in organizing the expected topics to be covered and the corresponding content and assessments to make BL worth their time. In the Design and Organization category were Items TP1 and TP2, which related to how the teachers set the curriculum and communicate subject topics and goals. Item TP4 pertained to the communication of time parameters and received the highest mean rating, 4.25, in that category (Table 2 ). The timelines were perceived to provide structure and focus for the work that students would complete individually or in groups. However, students mentioned that they rarely received online feedback, revealed by the results of Item TP13, with a mean rating of 3.57, under the Direct Instruction category. Thus, receiving feedback was a general concern among the students. Item TP6, in the Facilitating Discourse category, received the highest mean rating, 4.30, among all the TP items on the CoI Survey. The item pertained to student questions and discussions encouraged during the classroom observation. Students’ online conversations were mainly conducted in their group chats to help each other understand lessons, indicating TP was driven by students.

Data from teacher participants supported students’ views of their BL experiences, as well as their positive experiences of their concrete actions. Teachers mentioned posting links in their LMS or through FB groups, which students described as useful information they appreciated. Ms. Lota ensured that her learning activities were posted accordingly, with clear instructions and deadlines. Mr. Bobby, another language teacher, posted additional activities using Google Classroom and in “every mode made possible” to provide the information directly to his students. Ms. Jessie, the science teacher, posted additional reminders to guide first-year BL students. Hence, BL experiences across the classes were perceived by the students as “learning more.”

Teachers expressed that when face-to-face, “we really see students recite and participate.” Sienna of School X noticed that sometimes, self-study was insufficient, stating that “the face-to-face sessions help us understand more [than the online sessions]” because they saw their teacher explain the homework. Class times were also ways to complete administrative tasks. Mr. Earl of School X observed that teachers received and checked submissions and provided general feedback face-to-face. Students of School Y also mentioned that being in school meant opportunities to resolve interpersonal issues with the guidance of their Homeroom Adviser or Guidance Counselor.

Learning anytime, anywhere

For students, BL mostly meant staying connected for easy access to the information they needed, regardless of location, learning anytime and anywhere. They went as far as saying that studying can occur while “at a relative’s house,” “by the river or amidst nature,” and “while on family vacation without having to bring books.” Teachers also observed the flexibility that BL afforded the students, and one teacher said, “They can work and fit their schedule around their learning more easily.” This observation was especially true for some students who had domestic responsibilities at home or day jobs. Flexibility for students also meant that they managed their time for studying and recreational activities. Teresa of School X stated, “You don’t always get pressured because your time is yours. You decide how to schedule your time.” Even an intermittent internet connection did not pose much of a problem for students, who mentioned, “We have classmates located in mountainous areas where internet is not always good. While at school, we tell them in advance that if they can go online at a certain time, we will just give the detailed points.” As such, students relied consistently on chatting using FB Messenger, accessed through their inexpensive mobile plans.

Two homeroom advisers mentioned that an open line of communication was valuable for various reasons. Mr. Bobby said, “I cannot just abandon them to do things on their own. It’s hard for me only to see them face-to-face. I need to have a connection with them always, anytime, from wherever they are.” Ms. Jessie remarked, “I also contact parents or guardians because they have a major responsibility over their children. They help the teachers remind their children to do the assessments.” For Mr. Earl, an eLearning Coordinator, staying connected was important for monitoring technical glitches and ensuring issues could be resolved immediately to sustain learning.

However, the view of learning anytime, anywhere implied different notions of time and space to learn and work among the teachers and students. Ms. Jessie perceived that BL benefited her students with learning needs, who were afforded extended time to complete their work because “the class is 24 hours open.” Teachers also believed that BL students had “more time” to do schoolwork than regular students or in traditional classrooms. Some students, however, shared an additional perspective on this notion of “more time.” Students from Class X indicated that teachers assumed that the students had “more time;” thus, their amount of academic work was more than for their face-to-face classes. Having additional work made the students feel that their time to comply with the academic requirements was limited. Thus, for most of the students, BL was also described as “challenging” and a way to learn responsibility and time management.

Learning with technology

The BL Toolkit survey demonstrated that most students in the FGD reported on their access to laptops/gadgets and the internet and the frequency of the types of technology they used to complete their online work. Results based on n = 21 responses across three schools are depicted in Fig.  3 .

Results from blended learning survey: internet access. Note . Adapted from “Investigating Experiences and Outcomes in K-12 Blended Learning Classes through the Community of Inquiry Framework” by J.A. Villanueva, 2020, p. 131. ( https://eprints.usq.edu.au/40350/ ). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern Queensland.

The aforementioned provided an overall picture of student experiences of BL and ICT use. The CoI Survey Part 1 did not investigate student ICT use in detail, such as how they accessed the internet and used various ICTs for interaction and learning.

An item in the CoI Survey Part 2 collected student profiles to determine the frequency of use of selected ICTs and applications while engaged in BL (Fig.  4 ).

Results from CoI survey part 2: frequency of ICT use. Note . Adapted from “Investigating Experiences and Outcomes in K-12 Blended Learning Classes through the Community of Inquiry Framework” by J.A. Villanueva, 2020, p. 131. ( https://eprints.usq.edu.au/40350/ ). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern Queensland

As revealed above, the use of the LMS and group chats on FB Messenger were the primary means for students to accomplish their online work. Text messaging was sometimes used, and group emails were used the least. The students’ top three preferences were group chats and the LMS platform, because they are officially sanctioned by the school, and other ICT applications. Students indicated that they used other educational websites and applications. Students also mentioned using programs they had learned through their ICT subjects, such as Github, Circuito, and Photoshop, and other sites accessed at their preference or depending on the content that was covered in class, for example, Wikipedia, Khan Academy, YouTube, and Google Scholar.

The results of the Blended Learning Toolkit included those from items related to BL satisfaction, interaction, and technology. One item considered the extent to which technology affected the students’ interactions with their classmates and teachers (Fig.  5 ).

Results from blended learning toolkit survey items on technology and blended learning. Note . Adapted from “Investigating Experiences and Outcomes in K-12 Blended Learning Classes through the Community of Inquiry Framework” by J.A. Villanueva, 2020, p. 132. ( https://eprints.usq.edu.au/40350/ ). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern Queensland.

In Fig.  5 , most students recognized the effect of technology on their interactions with their teachers and classmates. Most students responded that technology produced “a little better” to “much better” effect on their BL interactions with teachers and classmates. These results indicate a positive effect on the students’ BL interactions.

The results on student satisfaction and preference for BL are depicted in Fig.  6 . Most students were satisfied with their BL classes and wanted to continue with BL rather than attending regular daily class sessions. Regarding the level of student satisfaction with BL, most students generally perceived technology as a positive contribution to their BL interactions. These findings elucidate the role of technology in their daily lives as students and as adolescent learners participating in BL.

Items from blended learning survey with student participants. Note . Adapted from “Investigating Experiences and Outcomes in K-12 Blended Learning Classes through the Community of Inquiry Framework” by J.A. Villanueva, 2020, p. 133. ( https://eprints.usq.edu.au/40350/ ). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern Queensland.

Some students expressed, “I like the online study,” mainly due to the use of ICTs “to encounter a new method of learning which is a great way to test my mind” and “It’s like motivation to study every day.” Students enjoyed the challenge of using ICT applications such as video editing and photo editing. In contrast with these positive experiences of BL related to technology, one subject teacher said, “There is also the problem of internet connection. It has to be very good.” Thus, technology use was dependent on good internet access.

Teachers and students perceived BL as either “different,” “emerging,” “innovative,” or a “new adventure.” Teachers’ explanations were related to the use of technology. Mr. Wilfred posited that implementing BL helped him “keep abreast with the 21 st -century trends” and “devise different teaching approaches.” Mr. Earl had used BL for 4 years and said that BL was “by far, the most challenging way of teaching.” As an ICT subject teacher and the eLearning Coordinator of School X, he perceived that the biggest challenge was “to gain the commitment of the teachers to grasp and embrace the program.”

BL was described as an opportunity for teachers and students to improve their skills for using technology. Teachers perceived that they were able to enhance their ICT skills and think of other strategies to teach. Mr. Bobby said, “There is so much more to learn and discover. It helps teachers innovate teaching strategies and techniques.” A student expressed an appreciation for honing her skills through BL and said, “I can use my training on self-studying for future use and the talent I acquired from using applications, especially in college.” Beyond learning ICT skills, a few students stated that BL was a means of improving their leadership skills, group work skills, socialization, and behavior.

What is the nature of interaction in BL classes?

Unlike most studies on BL, which have focused on either face-to-face and online work or comparisons between these modes of delivery (Halverson et al., 2014 ), this study examined interactions in a more integrative way. In doing so, this research revealed that students and teachers viewed their face-to-face and online experiences as positive. They sensed continuity in their activities, lessons, and communications because teachers and students used offline and online activities to keep connected. Teachers performed these actions consciously, but students seemed to perform them intuitively and incidentally. For homeroom teachers in this study, social interactions provided opportunities to build rapport and relationships while keeping connected. These important community building processes have been observed in face-to-face adult communities or organizations (Manalili, 2013 ; Peck, 2010 ) and in higher education (Villanueva & Librero, 2010 ). This study demonstrated similar findings in the context of the Philippine K-12 system; thus, this study adds to the data on BL in Asia and in the K-12 context.

BL interactions were also perceived as a means for students to socialize, creating a feeling of connectedness for students. A sense of community has been observed among adult members of virtual and fully online learning communities, as well as in blended and fully online courses (Chatterjee & Correia, 2020 ; Liu, 2007 ; Shea, 2006 ). These studies, however, were mostly undertaken in higher education settings. This study revealed that BL promoted a sense of community among K-12 students. The feeling of connectedness is due to varied interactions, especially with their teachers and peers, which are perceived by high school students and teachers to be important. Thus far, this study has established that student satisfaction, perceived learning, and a sense of community are outcomes of K-12 BL interactions. Contrastingly, other studies revealed that these outcomes are not solely attributed to BL but are influenced by the role of technology (Deutsch, 2010 ; Lomicka & Lord, 2007 ; Velasquez et al., 2013 ) and the choice of media (Deng & Tavares, 2013 ; Milošević et al., 2015 ). These aspects are further analyzed in the following sections.

Use of social media

Being transparent regarding their social media profiles and comments was an accepted practice among the teachers and students. Interactions using FB Messenger group chat sustained communication and learning between teachers and students. These findings reinforced prior findings in support of social media as a powerful tool for interaction, learning, and keeping connected, although these studies were mostly undertaken with adults (Bowers-Campbell, 2008 ; Milošević et al., 2015 ; Waiyahong, 2014 ). Facebook is an inexpensive, practical means to stay connected in the Philippines; therefore, the teachers and students maximized its use. When chatting over social media, social interactions are generally accepted as part of learning because adolescent learners seem to undertake this naturally through exposure to Facebook on their mobile phones.

This study provided evidence of the effective use of Facebook for learning through mobile phones at a time when government officials in the Philippines questioned its use in class-related work and classrooms (Hernando-Malipot, 2019 ). The positive experiences of BL established in this study reinforce the current actions implemented in these BL classes to set guidelines to monitor proper usage of Facebook rather than have a blanket policy of non-usage.

Role of technology

Similar to findings from research on blended and online learning in higher education, this study found that technology provided motivation and was a positive medium for the attainment of shared goals. These findings support those of K-12 research on BL in Western countries, as reported by Staker and Horn ( 2012 ). In the Philippine setting, the added motivation among high school students can be attributed to the satisfaction of searching online, learning ICT skills, and being able to experience them independently. The study found that the opportunity to use computers, digital devices, and programs available in their school environment also attracted students to BL programs while allowing for flexibility and autonomy in learning. This study reported on the overall positive perception of the use of technology and the experience of BL. These positive outcomes also resulted in positive views on the role of technology in the students’ current and future careers. As such, this study should be able to leverage additional support for the integration of ICTs in schools and for policies in the distribution and use of educational ICT applications and devices among Filipino secondary-level students. The support needed is further justified by recent shifts to distance education and online learning in higher education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the literature, access to the internet and computers were reported as major barriers to blended and online learning in the Philippines and overall ICT integration in classrooms (Aguinaldo, 2013 ; Barbour et al., 2011 ; Kubota et al., 2018 ). However, this study revealed that pre-pandemic, forms of BL programs were used in the public school system (Appendix A). Residing in an urban area with sufficient access to technology enabled the BL programs to sustain and enhance learning experiences among K-12 teachers and students. The use of LMS platforms and FB Messenger combined with the student’s choice of ICT applications and online sources demonstrated the enabling role of technology in BL interactions while students were learning independently and with others. Despite the shift to entirely online and remote learning during the pandemic, schools will probably gradually open in the forthcoming school year, with an increased value placed on the use of ICTs in teaching and learning. As such, the BL programs documented in this study demonstrate that pedagogy and technology use as developmental and at different stages. K-12 schools may consider and learn from these BL programs and consider learning community building, as discussed in the next section.

How do the interactions indicate learning communities as outcomes of BL?

This study revealed forms of interaction in the context of K-12 learners provide a sense of community, a construct examined in higher education research (McMillan & Chavis, 1986 ; Rovai, 2002 ). This study showed how teachers use offline and online activities to keep connected as a learning community: teachers did so consciously, and students seemed to do so intuitively and incidentally. For homeroom teachers in this study, social interactions provided opportunities to build rapport and relationships while keeping connected. These important processes of community building have been observed in face-to-face adult communities or organizations (Hope & Timmel, 1984 ; Peck, 2010 ) and distance education classes (Murphy & Rodríguez-Manzanares, 2012 ). This study affirmed that community building was also observable in the context of the Philippine K-12 system. This study found that the process of learning community building is dynamic and evolving as teachers and students continue to enact and experience what it means to be a learning community within the conditions afforded by their BL classes and through their choice and use of technologies. Moreover, the findings illuminated evidence of learning communities as outcomes of K-12 BL classes through the CoI presences and corresponding levels of interaction, where connectedness and learning socially with peers were reinforced in both face-to-face and online interactions.

The dynamics of learning community building, indicated by the BL programs in the Philippines, aligned with other those of models of BL in research outside the Philippines on the use of ICTs and pedagogies (Appendix A). Graham ( 2009 ) discussed the categories and levels of blendedness in Western countries because these relate to interaction and technology use and access (Fig.  1 ). Enabling blends were described as focusing on access and convenience issues to ensure both modes deliver “equivalent” learning experiences; enhancing blends resulted to positive changes to pedagogy through additional resources (Graham, 2009 ). This study found meaning in these categories to further understand and appreciate BL in its emergent stages and in relation to learning community building and the role of technology. An enabling blend was indicated through BL at the class level of open high school students in School Z, where the time and space allowed for face-to-face interactions once per week in school. The use of FB Messenger addresses the issue of access. Moreover, FB was used to maintain open, interactive communication between teachers and students in School Z. An enhancing blend was demonstrated by School Y students and teachers who were willing to invest time engaging with content in their LMS and anticipate interacting with their peers and teachers. A transformative blend was indicated by School X, a block section of high school students who have been classmates for more than 3 years in a Science high school, through face-to-face and online collaborations facilitated by the teacher or driven by students and enriched through the use of various ICTs.

This study suggests that further investigation of learning communities is required. The outcomes of the K-12 BL interactions through the three elements of the CoI framework, specifically CP, SP, and TP, along with its intersections, require further research (Parker & Herrington, 2015 ; Peacock & Cowan, 2016 ). The CoI elements have been validated as distinct measures of educational experiences in higher education for almost two decades (Castellanos-Reyes, 2019), and further research in the K-12 setting has been recommended (Befus, 2019; Garrison, 2017 ). Such studies increase the appreciation for BL through evidence supportive of the dynamics of learning community building across the categories of blends, illustrated by the CoI framework embedded in Fig.  7 .

Developmental model of K-12 blended learning communities by Villanueva ( 2020 ). Note. Adapted from “Blended Learning Models” by C.R. Graham, in M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed), Encyclopedia of Information and Science Technology ( p. 376), 2009, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

On the basis of a developmental model, this study posits that as teachers and students, in enabling blends and enhancing blends, enact learning community building and engage in constructivist learning, the intersections of the CoI presences increase in prominence. This model serves to guide, inform, and influence K-12 BL practices as interactions within BL classes and/or programs, which have the potential to become transformative blends. In improving the understanding of learning community building as a developmental process within K-12 BL, the aforementioned model is therefore recommended for further application and research, especially in non-Western contexts and developing countries in Asia where BL have promising possibilities.

Limitations

This research was an exploratory case study. Hence, the findings and results are only generalizable to the specific population and context of the Philippine K-12 system where BL classes and programs have been implemented. The study was conducted with a limited number of participants, and consent was provided by their parents. Data collection was also within the boundaries of time accorded by the selected K-12 schools to conform to the Department of Education Division Office's protocols for data collection. For example, the face-to-face class observations were challenging to schedule because these coincided with major school activities, assessments, and examinations. The stored data of online classes were subject to what students or teachers were willing to share and discuss. However, these still contributed to having a sufficient amount of data collected through the student FGD and teacher interviews to explore the presences in relation to community building. Despite these limitations, the results and their applicability in the study context are valid. The validity is based on the triangulation of data afforded by the qualitative methodology applied.

This study examined BL interactions through three surrounding themes and with corresponding elements of the CoI framework across levels of interaction. The themes included BL as the best of both worlds, learning anytime and anywhere, and learning with technology. These themes have been referred to in higher education research on BL, which found relevance in the Philippine K-12 setting even before the shift to remote and online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The evidence attested to the essential value or important meanings of BL among Filipino students and their teachers.

Opportunities for technology integration and BL was evidenced by different BL programs implemented at three public schools in the Philippines: (a) a regular school with teacher-driven BL class under an open high school program; (b) a premier Science High School with a parallel BL block section for each level, and (c) a regular school with a school-wide BL at the high school levels. The last two schools had eLearning Programs supported by the city’s government and the Schools Division Office. Conditions in these schools are representative of those in the city schools or municipal school districts selected by the Department of Education in the Philippines. These BL programs have thrived within settings that allowed teachers and students to gain positive teaching and learning experiences. In the case of the Philippine K-12 system, BL programs were initiated at the classroom and school district levels, and its main drivers are students, teachers, and school leaders.

This study established the importance of using other measures of BL to complement the CoI Survey based on Arbaugh et al.’s ( 2008 ) CoI instrument validated in higher education. The results from the open-source BL Toolkit Survey and the CoI instrument adapted for Filipino K-12 teachers and students, which included open-ended questions, revealed aspects of BL that held unique meanings among the participants in this study. For example the interactions with teachers alongside the use of ICTs, were found to be equally valuable to secondary school students. The results indicated the role of technology and the stakeholders’ support of technology as enabling conditions within the school system to ensure teacher and student participation in BL programs.

The results justify BL as an innovation deserving support within the Philippine educational system. The outcomes point to apply to maintaining current classroom pedagogies or gradually infusing constructivist teaching approaches under the guidance of this study’s proposed Developmental Model of K-12 Learning Community Building. With further research to generate advocacy for supportive mechanisms and enabling conditions to succeed, BL may prove to be beneficial to other teachers and students. Studies highlighting BL practices at the K-12 could become more widespread and facilitate better ways to teach and learn in the Philippines. Studies leading to measurable outcomes could then be undertaken, using quantitative studies using dual language instruments and covering other student populations and research locales. Thus, how to advocate for BL through the CoI framework may be included in teacher professional development to inform the stakeholders of the direct and indirect benefits of these BL programs.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Aguinaldo, B. E. (2013). Implementing blended learning in an impoverished academic institution using a bricolage approach model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3 (2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.266

Article   Google Scholar  

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, L., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11 (3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (COI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13 (1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006

Barbour, M., Brown, R., Waters, L., Hoey, R., Hunt, J. L., Kennedy, K., Ounsworth, C., Powell, A. & Trimm, T. (2011). Online and blended learning: A survey of policy and practice from K-12 schools around the world . International Association for K-12 Online Learning.

Barbour, M., & Reeves, T. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52 (2), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009

Barbour, M. (2018). A history of K–12 distance, online, and blended learning worldwide. In K. Kennedy & R. E. Ferdig (Eds.), Handbook of research on K–12 online and blended learning (2nd ed., pp. 21–40). Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press.

Befus, M. (2016). Conducting a multivocal thematic synthesis on an extensive body of literature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42 (2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2789B

Blended Learning Toolkit Survey Instrument. (n.d.). https://blended.online.ucf.edu/2011/06/07/survey-instruments/

Bonifacio, A. L. (2013). Developing Information Communication Technology (ICT) curriculum standards for K-12 schools in the Philippines . [Paper presentation] The Sixth Conference of MIT's Learning International Networks Consortium, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. https://linc.mit.edu/linc2013/proceedings/Session7/Session7Bonifacio.pdf

Bowers-Campbell, J. (2008). Cyber “pokes”: Motivational antidote for developmental college readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39 (1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2008.10850313

Cajilig, N. (2009). Integration of information and communication technology in mathematics teaching in Metro Manila public secondary schools. Education Quarterly, 67 (1), 79–91.

Google Scholar  

Carreon, J. T. (2018). Facebook as integrated blended learning tool in technology and livelihood education exploratory. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5 (2), 19–25.

Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the Community of Inquiry framework. TechTrends . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7

Chatterjee, R., & Correia, A. P. (2020). Online students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning and sense of community. American Journal of Distance Education, 34 (1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479

Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013 ). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction to the theory of hybrids . Clayton Christensen Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/Is-K-12-blended-learning-disruptive.pdf

Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative research and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.

Creswell, J. (2012). Collecting qualitative data. In Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 204–235). Pearson Education, Inc.

Dela Rosa, J. P. O. (2016). Experiences, perceptions and attitudes on ICT integration: A case study among novice and experienced language teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 12 (3), 37–57.

DepEd Order No. 54 s.12 . (Phils). Policy guidelines on the implementation of alternative delivery modes https://www.deped.gov.ph/2012/06/15/do-54-s-2012-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-alternative-delivery-modes-adms/ .

Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68 , 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028

Deutsch, N. (2010). Instructor experiences with implementing technology in blended learning courses . CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 375–382). IGI Global.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the twenty-first century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice . Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33 (3), 381–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723166

Halverson, L. R., Spring, K. J., Huyett, S., Henrie, C. R., & Graham, C. R. (2017). Blended learning research in higher education and K-12 settings. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1–30). Springer International Publishing.

Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20 , 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004

Hernando-Malipot, M. (2019, July 1). DepEd discourages use of social media in classrooms; potential cyber threat cited, News. Manila Bulletin . https://news.mb.com.ph/2019/07/01/deped-discourages-use-of-social-media-in-classrooms-potential-cyber-threat-cited/

Hope, A., & Timmel, S. (1984). Training for transformation: A handbook for community workers . Mambo Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Hu, M., Arnesen, K., Barbour, M. K., & Leary, H. (2019). A newcomer’s lens: A look at K-12 online and blended learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5 (2), 123–144. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/j/JOLR/v/5/n/2/

Kubota, K., Yamamoto, R., & Morioka, H. (2018). Promoting ICT education in developing countries: Case study in the Philippines [Paper presentation]. International Conference for Media in Education, Busan, Republic of Korea. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228655099

Liu, S., Gomez, J., Khan, B., & Yen, C.-J. (2007). Toward a learner-oriented community college online course dropout framework. International Journal on ELearning, 6 (4), 519–542. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21789/

Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. System, 35 (2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.11.002

Manalili, A. G. (2013). Ang proseso ng pag-oorganisa ng pamayanan na mula sa tao para sa tao. Daluyan: Journal ng Wikang Filipino, 19 (1), 64–97.

McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14 (1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1%3c6::AID-JCOP2290140103%3e3.0.CO;2-I

Megahed, N., & Ghoneim, E. (2022). Blended learning: the new normal for post-Covid-19 pedagogy. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.291980

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation . Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

Milošević, I., Živković, D., Arsić, S., & Manasijević, D. (2015). Facebook as virtual classroom—Social networking in learning and teaching among Serbian students. Telematics and Informatics, 32 (4), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.003

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2012). Rapport in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13 (1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1057

Open High School System Act 2014s s. 2277 . (Philippines). https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/1930116434!.pdf

Parker, J., & Herrington, J. (2015). Setting the climate in an authentic online community of learning . [Paper presentation].Annual Meeting of the Australian Association of Research in Education, Freemantle, Western Australia. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED593827.pdf

Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2016). From presences to linked influences within communities of inquiry. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17 (5), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2602

Peck, M. S. (2010). The different drum: Community making and peace . Simon and Schuster.

Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2013). Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880310

Poirier, M., Law, J. M., & Veispak, A. (2019). A spotlight on lack of evidence supporting the integration of blended learning in K-12 education: A systematic review. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 11 (4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2019100101

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79

Seameo-Innotech. (2019). Re-examining the responsiveness of secondary level alternative delivery modes: Case studies of selected open high school program (OHSP) schools in the Philippines serving marginalized learners. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/portfolio_page/re-examining-the-responsiveness-of-secondary-level-alternative-delivery-modes/

Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10 (1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i1.1774

Shohel, M. M. C., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Azim, F., Naomee, I., Rahman, M. S., & Siddik, M. A. B. (2022). Blended learning space for primary and secondary education: challenges and opportunities in resource-constrained contexts. In T.L. Driscoll (Ed), Designing Effective Distance and Blended Learning Environments in K-12 (pp. 187–222). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6829-3.ch012

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research . Sage.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning . Clayton Christensen Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2014). Blended learning in the K-12 education sector. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dzuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 287–303). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880310

Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2 (1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000005016

Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness online: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction (pp. 13–45), Vol. 4 in the Sloan C Series . Sloan Center for Online Education.

Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13 (1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.003

Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2013). An investigation of practices and tools that enabled technology-mediated caring in an online high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14 (5), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1465

Villanueva, J. A. R. (2020). Investigating experiences and outcomes of K–12 blended learning classes through the Community of Inquiry framework [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland]. USQ ePrints. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/40350/

Villanueva, J. A. R. (2021). Teaching presence in K–12 blended learning classes under the alternative delivery mode. International Journal on Online Distance and eLearning, 7 (1), 31–52. https://ijodel.com/index.php/ijodel/article/view/33

Villanueva, J. A. R., & Librero, A. F. D. (2010). Building a sense of community at the UP Open University community site. [Paper presentation]. ICT2010 Singapore Conference, SIM University, Singapore.

Villanueva, J., Redmond, P., & Galligan, L. (2022). Manifestations of cognitive presence in blended learning classes of the Philippine K-12 system. Online Learning, 26 (1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.302

Waiyahong, N. (2014). The use of “Facebook” to build an LIS student learning community. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147 , 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.124

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods . Sage.

Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. UTM Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5 (1), 1–6. https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/165

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on a dissertation made possible through the assistance of the U.P. Open University Faculty of Education and the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs of the University of the Philippines-System.

This study was funded by the University of the Philippines-System through a Doctoral Study Grant under the Faculty, REPS and Administrative Staff Development Program.

Author information

Petrea Redmond, Linda Galligan and Douglas Eacersall have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Faculty of Education, University of the Philippines Open University, Los Banos, Philippines

Juliet Aleta R. Villanueva

School of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Baker Street, Toowoomba, QLD, 4031, Australia

Petrea Redmond

School of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Baker Street, Toowoomba, QLD, 4031, Australia

Linda Galligan

Library Services, University of Southern Queensland, Baker Street, Toowoomba, QLD, 4031, Australia

Douglas Eacersall

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliet Aleta R. Villanueva .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The authors received approval from the ethics review board of the University of Southern Queensland for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Supplementary file2 (docx 22 kb), rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Villanueva, J.A.R., Redmond, P., Galligan, L. et al. Investigating blended learning interactions in Philippine schools through the community of inquiry framework. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09826-4

Download citation

Received : 30 May 2022

Revised : 18 January 2023

Accepted : 19 January 2023

Published : 16 February 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09826-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Blended learning
• Community of inquiry
• Philippine schools
• Learning communities
• Open high school
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Subscribe Now

Distance learning in the Philippines: A year of hits and misses

Already have Rappler+? Sign in to listen to groundbreaking journalism.

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

REMOTE EDUCATION. Parents and students return the modules to teachers at the Araullo High School in Manila on Tuesday, July 13, as the school year came to a close.

Every morning, Adelaide Dolar would ask a favor: could she charge her mobile phone at her neighbor’s house? She didn’t have electricity at home, and her children needed her gadget for online class work. She did this for the whole duration of the school year 2020-2021. 

The pandemic made it difficult for financially struggling families like hers to fulfill their children’s needs for distance learning, the 43-year-old vendor from Batangas province told Rappler in an interview on Sunday, July 18.

Despite this, she made sure that her children would not miss school the past year, when the government enforced a remote setup due to pandemic lockdowns.

Her three children – all basic education students – were enrolled under the modular learning system. The eldest, who was in Grade 10, needed to occasionally attend online classes. The younger ones, however, couldn’t just answer the modules distributed by the school; they also needed to watch video lessons uploaded on YouTube or do research for their classes.

With a meager income of P300 ($5.91) a day from selling afternoon snacks to her neighbors, Dolar had to budget this amount between their meals and an allotment of mobile data   for her children’s online classes.

“If they have online classes, I need to have P200 for internet ‘load.’ If my eldest son needs to attend a Google meet, I need to buy internet load worth P50 per hour. Of course, there’s also research that needs to be done, so the P50 load won’t be enough – that’s why we’re spending P200 for it. It will be registered for three days,” she said.

To make a living, Dolar and her husband sell snacks every afternoon in their neighborhood. Her husband has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, so he cannot help that much with household finances. Dolar also does laundry services just to get by.

Not good for mental health

Aside from the financial burden brought by remote education, Dolar said that her children’s mental health had been affected. Without teachers explaining the lessons to students, she had to change her morning routine so she could guide and motivate her children to answer their learning modules. That delayed her preparation of food she would sell in the afternoon.

“They’re looking for the [in-person] school. They said in-person classes are better. They miss their interaction with their classmates. They are unmotivated to study. What will happen next school year? Will we be in this kind of situation again?” Dolar asked.

“They were culture-shocked. They are not used to this kind of situation. They’re hoping to interact with their teachers and their classmates,” she added.

In a recent video interview released by the Ateneo School of Government, Professor Carmel Abao said that aside from the issue of accessibility, remote learning also had an impact on students’ mental health.

“There’s an issue on the impact of this kind of learning on mental health. I still think that this is not advisable. Our kids are not made for this kind of isolation. Even if you do perform well in online learning, it’s different if you’re able to see, feel, and talk with your classmates,” she said.

Students didn’t learn as much

In a Rappler Talk interview on Friday, July 16, senior high school graduate Cheska Avenido said she found the remote learning setup really difficult.

“Besides the adjustment under the new modes of learning, sometimes we ask ourselves if studying during a pandemic is still worth it, because there are a lot of uncertainties,” she said.

Dolar shared that sentiment, saying her children didn’t learn that much in the remote setup, as she could not teach them properly. Though Dolar graduated with a degree in computer science, she wasn’t able to practice any related profession.

“I think they’re learning, but learning with teachers is far way better. Sometimes, I find it really hard to understand their lessons. Face-to-face classes is still the best way to go,” Dolar said.

Aside from the school system being unprepared for the shift, remote education also posed a major challenge for students who did not have anyone to facilitate learning at home, or whose parents were not capable of guiding them due to lack of knowledge. (READ:  Parents bear the brunt of distance learning as classes shift online )

Dolar said that, most times, she was the one attending her children’s online classes, especially in mathematics, so she could explain the concepts to them when answering their modules.

An online survey conducted by the multisectoral group Movement for Safe, Equitable, Quality and Relevant Education (SEQuRE) found that 86.7% of students under modular learning, 66% under online learning, and 74% under blended learning said they “learned less” under the alternative modes of learning compared with the traditional face-to-face setup.

The survey also found that only 5.4% under the blended learning, 5.7% under modular learning, and 9.1% under online learning “learned more.”

The survey was conducted from June 25 to July 12 among 1,278 teachers, 1,299 Grades 4 to 12 students, and 3,172 parents.

Teachers’ Dignity Coalition chairperson Benjo Basas said in a Rappler interview that, while the teachers would always do their best to teach students under any circumstance, they didn’t have any control on how students would respond.

“Either of those modalities, whether online or modular, it was difficult to learn. It’s difficult for the students. It’s also difficult for the teachers because we’re not trained for this system,” he said.

In March, senators questioned a report from the Department of Education (DepEd) that said 99% of public school students obtained a passing grade in the first quarter of the school year (October-December 2020).

The lawmakers were baffled by the high passing rate because many students struggled with distance learning. They cited instances when it was the parents or household members who ended up answering the exercises in the learning modules.

In remote learning, some students pay someone else to do their classwork

Education Undersecretary Diosdado San Antonio said it was likely that teachers were being considerate and therefore gave students high passing rates.

When pandemic is over, Basas said, teachers would have a tougher job because the students will need to catch up on the level of learning that corresponds to their grade or class.

“We have a lot of catching up to do because we’re promoting students to the next level even though we’re unsure if they do actually learn. But then we cannot do something about it because we’re asked to be considerate since we’re in a pandemic,” he said.

Erroneous modules, not enough gadgets

Education advocates have said that the pandemic highlighted the gaps in the Philippine education system. This was evident in the erroneous learning modules distributed to public school students during the pandemic.

“Painful” grammatical errors ,  wrong math equations , and depictions of  gender stereotypes  alarmed a public already worried over the quality of education that over 24 million students were receiving during the pandemic.

Aside from learning module blunders, Ateneo’s Abao said the pandemic exposed the “cracks” in the country’s education system.

“If the problem before the pandemic was the lack of classrooms, the problem now is the lack of computers. We have a problem with the quantity and quality which were magnified by the pandemic,” she said.

Better than academic freeze

Still, there were those who appreciated that the Department of Education (DepEd) and the Commission on Higher Education were able to go ahead with the school year amid the pandemic.

Dolar said that, even though the implementation was flawed, distance learning was still better than having an academic break. (READ: School time out during a pandemic? Pros and cons of an academic break )

“They have nothing to do at home, that’s why it’s okay to have distance learning. But we hope that they can improve the implementation and provide support to parents, teachers, and students,” she said.

Professor Jayeel Cornelio, director of Ateneo de Manila University’s development studies program, said that while remote education provided an opportunity for those in the academe to be creative, it would not be as effective if not all had equal access to the tools needed for the digital shift.

“As a professor, [remote education for me] is a good. We take advantage of every platform available, but the question is – who is winning and losing here? The reality is that if you come from an elite private school, you can easily cope with it. But we cannot say that flexible learning is the way to go for small private schools and state universities,” he said.

Students and teachers remain safe from the virus while they continue learning from their homes. Despite the challenges brought by remote learning, senior high school graduate Avenido said she still felt unsafe to return to face-to-face classes.

“I’d be comfortable to return to face-to-face classes if the government finds better solutions to our pandemic problems. If they can find ways to contain virus spread and ramp up vaccination, it’s the only way I will feel safe to join face-to-face classes,” she said.

Over a year into the pandemic, the Philippines is still struggling to contain the deadly virus that has so far infected more than 1.5 million and has killed over 26,000 of its population. The country is bracing for a possible surge in infections, as the threat of a more virulent Delta variant looms.

Finding local solutions

Regina Sibal, lead convenor of education advocacy group Aral Pilipinas, said that, aside from the slow response, the government’s top-down approach in its policy making was another barrier in the reopening of schools. She said that the government should not be implementing a “blanket rule” across the country.

“Our remote learning now is for all schools and no provision is given to other areas that are able to do face-to-face classes. Disparity in education access has been more pronounced now, especially in marginalized areas that lack resources,” she said.

Sibal said that what government should be doing now is to provide local communities with guidelines on finding solutions specific to their areas and situations. (READ: Empower LGUs to make decisions on school opening – advocacy group )

President Rodrigo Duterte turned down several times calls for face-to-face classes due to the threat of the pandemic.

Education Secretary Leonor Briones, however, was hopeful the DepEd would get the go signal to start limited face-to-face classes in some 100 schools it had identified. She was banking on the vaccination of teachers and the planned inoculation of students.

Are PH schools ready for face-to-face classes during pandemic?

The DepEd had said that it was preparing for “the delivery of quality education no matter what the circumstances will be in the coming months.”

Public schools in the country will start classes for school year 2021-2022 on September 13 , while private schools can start as early as June since they closed the past school year earlier.

“Enhanced”  blended distance learning will continue to be implemented. But will the government make it right for millions of students this time around? – Rappler.com

Editors’ Note: All Filipino quotes were translated into English .

Add a comment

Please abide by Rappler's commenting guidelines .

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

How does this make you feel?

Related Topics

Bonz Magsambol

Recommended stories, {{ item.sitename }}, {{ item.title }}, education in the philippines, over 1,500 chinese secured student visas in cagayan in 2023 – bi .

Cagayan schools deny allegations on Chinese students

UP 2024 college admission results are out

CHED urged to probe ‘degree for sale’ scheme in Cagayan

State university’s special courses bring hope to Iligan inmates

Checking your Rappler+ subscription...

Upgrade to Rappler+ for exclusive content and unlimited access.

Why is it important to subscribe? Learn more

You are subscribed to Rappler+

Home — Essay Samples — Education — Online Vs. Traditional Classes — New Reality: Online Distance Learning in Philippines

New Reality: Online Distance Learning in Philippines

• Categories: Distance Education E-Learning Online Vs. Traditional Classes

About this sample

Words: 549 |

Published: Feb 11, 2023

Words: 549 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Table of contents

Online learning, advantages and disadvantages of online learning, philippines and online learning.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Education

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1154 words

5 pages / 2159 words

3 pages / 1540 words

1 pages / 553 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Online Vs. Traditional Classes

As a college student, the choice between taking courses online or in-person can be a difficult one. While online classes provide flexibility and convenience, they also come with their own set of challenges. In this essay, we [...]

Online education has become an increasingly popular option for students seeking to further their education and obtain a degree. With the advancement of technology, the accessibility and convenience of online education have made [...]

Most of the college using the electronic textbook which purchase from some website or using the PowerPoint nowadays. A traditional textbook is made by hundreds of pages of information, but all of this information is being write [...]

E-Learning Industry. (2021). E-learning Statistics and Facts For 2021. 5(4).

Education on top priority Today, education stands on top of the priority list. Anywhere you go or anything you want to achieve in your life, you require education. The opportunities to get educated and earn degrees are [...]

At times when you’ve had to decide on your education, did you ever stop to think about whether you prefer attending to conventional classes or taking online classes? Attending to conventional classes at a school is probably the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Mount Ruang Erupts in Indonesia, Spewing Lava Thousands of Feet Into the Sky

Hundreds of earthquakes were detected in the weeks preceding the eruption of the volcano in North Sulawesi province. Hundreds of people were evacuated.

By Christine Hauser

Mount Ruang, a volcano in Indonesia, erupted on Tuesday, spewing fiery lava and ash thousands of feet into the night sky and forcing the evacuation of hundreds of people in the North Sulawesi province, according to the authorities and local news reports.

The volcano erupted at about 7:19 p.m. local time, Antara, the national news agency, reported. The country’s National Disaster Mitigation Agency said on Wednesday that more than 800 people in nearby villages were displaced by the eruption, many using ferries and taking shelter in churches and community centers.

The authorities said supplies such as mats, blankets, cleaning materials, and tents were needed, and that more shelters might be opening for people fleeing the volcano.

Indonesia is the world’s largest archipelago nation. It is spread across what is known as the Ring of Fire, where tectonic plates clash under the surface of the Pacific Ocean and spawn earthquakes and eruptions from volcanoes.

Mount Ruang is a stratovolcano , or a steep, conical volcano that has built up over years in layers from explosive eruptions of lava, rock fragments, ash and other properties.

“It is in a part of the world where there are a lot of active volcanoes,” said Dr. Tracy K.P. Gregg , who chairs the geology department at the University at Buffalo.

Its last major eruption was in 2002, when the column of lava and ash that it spewed reached up to 17 miles, Dr. Gregg said.

She said the volcano in 2002 measured 4, a “large” volcano on the Volcanic Explosivity Index, a scale used to measure the strength of an eruption by looking at several factors, such as duration, ash volume and plume height. Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991 measured 6 on the index. Mount St. Helens in the United States in 1980 measured 5.

“So it is a little bit smaller than that,” she said of Mount Ruang. Right now, it is not as violent as the previous eruption, she added, but the volcano cannot be fully assessed while it is in progress.

More than 300 volcanic earthquakes were detected over a period of at least two weeks preceding the eruption of Mount Ruang.

It is not immediately clear why the volcano erupted when it did. “Every volcano has its own personality,” she said.

In the past few years, several volcanoes in Indonesia have erupted. In December, 2023, the bodies of 11 hikers were found on the slopes of Mount Marapi on the island of Sumatra, after an eruption that spewed an ash column of nearly 3,000 meters — about 10,000 feet high.

In December 2022, more than 1,900 people were evacuated from the area surrounding Mount Semeru as it erupted. In an eruption there the previous December , more than 50 people were killed and hundreds more were injured.

Christine Hauser is a reporter, covering national and foreign news. Her previous jobs in the newsroom include stints in Business covering financial markets and on the Metro desk in the police bureau. More about Christine Hauser

Philippine E-Journals

Home ⇛ aide interdisciplinary research journal ⇛ vol. 3 no. 1 (2022), modular distance learning in the area of education during the new normal: a systematic review.

JONATHAN P. ROQUE

Discipline: Education

In the Philippines, attempting to push through education despite the fatal pandemic caused by Covid-19 has proven difficult. Despite several objections, the Department of Education (DepEd) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) accepted and implemented the flexible blended learning model, despite the risk of open courses due to the virus. Modular (Printed), Modular (Digital), Online, Educational TV, Radio-Based Instruction, Home Schooling, and Blended Learning are the many learning modes. Using the systematic review, the study aims to determine the main educational experiences that used the Modular Distance Learning approach to promote educational knowledge within the Higher Education stage. Modular Distance Learning is implemented for those living in rural areas or provinces where internet connection is only available for a few. The usage of Modules created by teachers with various tasks and learning activities based on fundamental learning abilities is known as modular distance learning. Thus, the main findings of the study revealed that the implementation of modular distance learning or distance education resulted in a significant improvement in students’ knowledge of the specific content covered, despite the fact that both technical and non-technical problems occur during their teaching in distance learning.

Share Article:

ISSN 2960-365X (Online)

ISSN 2945-4603 (Print)

• Citation Generator
• ">Indexing metadata
• Print version

Copyright © 2024  KITE E-Learning Solutions |   Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic | Terms and Conditions