example of research interview schedule

All Formats

Table of Contents

Schedule template bundle, free 10+ research interview schedule templates in pdf, 1. research interview schedule template, 2. qualitative research interview schedule, 3. validating qualitative research interview schedule, 4. environment research interview schedule, 5. psychiatric research interview schedule, 6. research interview schedule example, 7. future research interview schedule, 8. research associates interview schedule, 9. operational research interview schedule, 10. education & research interview schedule, 11. engineering research interview schedule, features of a research interview, types of research interviews, stages of a research interview, advantages of a research interview, disadvantages of a research interview, research templates.

A research interview is a conversation in which questions are asked in order to get information. The interviewer is usually a professional or paid researcher, sometimes trained who, in an alternating series of usually brief questions and answers, puts questions to the interviewee. They can be compared with surveys where an interviewer asks a group of individuals and observes the resulting conversation between interviewees, or surveys that are more anonymous and limit participants to a range of predefined choice of answer.

• Google Docs

• Interviews are finished by the interviewer depending on the answers or responses that the interviewee provides to be conformed to and performed.
• Interviews are a much more private research form than survey questions.
• The respondent works directly with the interviewer in their interview.
• Unlike mail surveys, the interviewer has the chance to ask follow-up questions or to probe them.
• Interviews are rendered much easier for the interviewee, particularly if opinions and/or observations are that which is being sought.
• Interviews are generally time-consuming and demanding on resources.
• The interviewer is supposed to be a part of the measuring instrument and needs to be well trained in responding to any contingency.
• Interviews include a chance for face-to-face interaction between two or more people which leads to reduced conflicts.

Informal, Conversational interview

General interview guide approach, standardized, open-ended interview, closed, fixed-response interview.

• Thematization: it defines the topic of research and the purpose of the research.
• Designing: It refers to the plan that is developed for the study design.
• Interviewing: It the process of interviewing with the help of a guide.
• Transcription: It refers to the process of preparing the interview material for analysis .
• Analyzing: it refers to the process of deciding the objective, the subject matter, the proper nature and methods of assessment.
• Verifying: this is the stage where the researcher ascertains the validity of the findings of the interview.
• Reporting: this is the last stage where the reporting of the study findings takes place according to academic criteria.

Depth of Detail

Tailored questions, perceptions of people, better reports, complications in planning, missing information, coding issues, more in research templates, editable research flowchart template, research poster template for keynote, education research agenda template, research agenda template, legal research methodology ppt template, medical research template, research template, qualitative research template, psychology research template, college research template.

• FREE 10+ Research Data Collection Form Templates in MS Word | PDF
• FREE 10+ Research Information Sheet Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 10+ Research Development Plan Templates in Google Docs | MS Word | Pages | PDF
• FREE 10+ Quantitative Research Report Templates in MS Word | PDF
• 10+ Academic Research Report Templates in PDF | DOC
• FREE 10+ Educational Research Ethics Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Resource Tracking Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Clinical Research Ethics Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Code of Human Research Ethics Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Documentary Research Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Academic Research Ethics Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Artistic Research Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Null Hypothesis Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Research Hypothesis Templates in PDF | MS Word
• FREE 11+ Research Ethics Templates in PDF | MS Word

File Formats

Word templates, google docs templates, excel templates, powerpoint templates, google sheets templates, google slides templates, pdf templates, publisher templates, psd templates, indesign templates, illustrator templates, pages templates, keynote templates, numbers templates, outlook templates.

The Interview Method In Psychology

Saul Mcleod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Interviews involve a conversation with a purpose, but have some distinct features compared to ordinary conversation, such as being scheduled in advance, having an asymmetry in outcome goals between interviewer and interviewee, and often following a question-answer format.

Interviews are different from questionnaires as they involve social interaction. Unlike questionnaire methods, researchers need training in interviewing (which costs money).

How Do Interviews Work?

Researchers can ask different types of questions, generating different types of data . For example, closed questions provide people with a fixed set of responses, whereas open questions allow people to express what they think in their own words.

The researcher will often record interviews, and the data will be written up as a transcript (a written account of interview questions and answers) which can be analyzed later.

It should be noted that interviews may not be the best method for researching sensitive topics (e.g., truancy in schools, discrimination, etc.) as people may feel more comfortable completing a questionnaire in private.

There are different types of interviews, with a key distinction being the extent of structure. Semi-structured is most common in psychology research. Unstructured interviews have a free-flowing style, while structured interviews involve preset questions asked in a particular order.

Structured Interview

A structured interview is a quantitative research method where the interviewer a set of prepared closed-ended questions in the form of an interview schedule, which he/she reads out exactly as worded.

Interviews schedules have a standardized format, meaning the same questions are asked to each interviewee in the same order (see Fig. 1).

   Figure 1. An example of an interview schedule

The interviewer will not deviate from the interview schedule (except to clarify the meaning of the question) or probe beyond the answers received.  Replies are recorded on a questionnaire, and the order and wording of questions, and sometimes the range of alternative answers, is preset by the researcher.

A structured interview is also known as a formal interview (like a job interview).

• Structured interviews are easy to replicate as a fixed set of closed questions are used, which are easy to quantify – this means it is easy to test for reliability .
• Structured interviews are fairly quick to conduct which means that many interviews can take place within a short amount of time. This means a large sample can be obtained, resulting in the findings being representative and having the ability to be generalized to a large population.

Limitations

• Structured interviews are not flexible. This means new questions cannot be asked impromptu (i.e., during the interview), as an interview schedule must be followed.
• The answers from structured interviews lack detail as only closed questions are asked, which generates quantitative data . This means a researcher won’t know why a person behaves a certain way.

Unstructured Interview

Unstructured interviews do not use any set questions, instead, the interviewer asks open-ended questions based on a specific research topic, and will try to let the interview flow like a natural conversation. The interviewer modifies his or her questions to suit the candidate’s specific experiences.

Unstructured interviews are sometimes referred to as ‘discovery interviews’ and are more like a ‘guided conservation’ than a strictly structured interview. They are sometimes called informal interviews.

Unstructured interviews are most useful in qualitative research to analyze attitudes and values. Though they rarely provide a valid basis for generalization, their main advantage is that they enable the researcher to probe social actors’ subjective points of view.

Interviewer Self-Disclosure

Interviewer self-disclosure involves the interviewer revealing personal information or opinions during the research interview. This may increase rapport but risks changing dynamics away from a focus on facilitating the interviewee’s account.

In unstructured interviews, the informal conversational style may deliberately include elements of interviewer self-disclosure, mirroring ordinary conversation dynamics.

Interviewer self-disclosure risks changing the dynamics away from facilitation of interviewee accounts. It should not be ruled out entirely but requires skillful handling informed by reflection.

• An informal interviewing style with some interviewer self-disclosure may increase rapport and participant openness. However, it also increases the chance of the participant converging opinions with the interviewer.
• Complete interviewer neutrality is unlikely. However, excessive informality and self-disclosure risk the interview becoming more of an ordinary conversation and producing consensus accounts.
• Overly personal disclosures could also be seen as irrelevant and intrusive by participants. They may invite increased intimacy on uncomfortable topics.
• The safest approach seems to be to avoid interviewer self-disclosures in most cases. Where an informal style is used, disclosures require careful judgment and substantial interviewing experience.
• If asked for personal opinions during an interview, the interviewer could highlight the defined roles and defer that discussion until after the interview.
• Unstructured interviews are more flexible as questions can be adapted and changed depending on the respondents’ answers. The interview can deviate from the interview schedule.
• Unstructured interviews generate qualitative data through the use of open questions. This allows the respondent to talk in some depth, choosing their own words. This helps the researcher develop a real sense of a person’s understanding of a situation.
• They also have increased validity because it gives the interviewer the opportunity to probe for a deeper understanding, ask for clarification & allow the interviewee to steer the direction of the interview, etc. Interviewers have the chance to clarify any questions of participants during the interview.
• It can be time-consuming to conduct an unstructured interview and analyze the qualitative data (using methods such as thematic analysis).
• Employing and training interviewers is expensive and not as cheap as collecting data via questionnaires . For example, certain skills may be needed by the interviewer. These include the ability to establish rapport and knowing when to probe.
• Interviews inevitably co-construct data through researchers’ agenda-setting and question-framing. Techniques like open questions provide only limited remedies.

Focus Group Interview

Focus group interview is a qualitative approach where a group of respondents are interviewed together, used to gain an in‐depth understanding of social issues.

This type of interview is often referred to as a focus group because the job of the interviewer ( or moderator ) is to bring the group to focus on the issue at hand. Initially, the goal was to reach a consensus among the group, but with the development of techniques for analyzing group qualitative data, there is less emphasis on consensus building.

The method aims to obtain data from a purposely selected group of individuals rather than from a statistically representative sample of a broader population.

The role of the interview moderator is to make sure the group interacts with each other and do not drift off-topic. Ideally, the moderator will be similar to the participants in terms of appearance, have adequate knowledge of the topic being discussed, and exercise mild unobtrusive control over dominant talkers and shy participants.

A researcher must be highly skilled to conduct a focus group interview. For example, the moderator may need certain skills, including the ability to establish rapport and know when to probe.

• Group interviews generate qualitative narrative data through the use of open questions. This allows the respondents to talk in some depth, choosing their own words. This helps the researcher develop a real sense of a person’s understanding of a situation. Qualitative data also includes observational data, such as body language and facial expressions.
• Group responses are helpful when you want to elicit perspectives on a collective experience, encourage diversity of thought, reduce researcher bias, and gather a wider range of contextualized views.
• They also have increased validity because some participants may feel more comfortable being with others as they are used to talking in groups in real life (i.e., it’s more natural).
• When participants have common experiences, focus groups allow them to build on each other’s comments to provide richer contextual data representing a wider range of views than individual interviews.
• Focus groups are a type of group interview method used in market research and consumer psychology that are cost – effective for gathering the views of consumers .
• The researcher must ensure that they keep all the interviewees” details confidential and respect their privacy. This is difficult when using a group interview. For example, the researcher cannot guarantee that the other people in the group will keep information private.
• Group interviews are less reliable as they use open questions and may deviate from the interview schedule, making them difficult to repeat.
• It is important to note that there are some potential pitfalls of focus groups, such as conformity, social desirability, and oppositional behavior, that can reduce the usefulness of the data collected.

For example, group interviews may sometimes lack validity as participants may lie to impress the other group members. They may conform to peer pressure and give false answers.

To avoid these pitfalls, the interviewer needs to have a good understanding of how people function in groups as well as how to lead the group in a productive discussion.

Semi-Structured Interview

Semi-structured interviews lie between structured and unstructured interviews. The interviewer prepares a set of same questions to be answered by all interviewees. Additional questions might be asked during the interview to clarify or expand certain issues.

In semi-structured interviews, the interviewer has more freedom to digress and probe beyond the answers. The interview guide contains a list of questions and topics that need to be covered during the conversation, usually in a particular order.

Semi-structured interviews are most useful to address the ‘what’, ‘how’, and ‘why’ research questions. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses can be performed on data collected during semi-structured interviews.

• Semi-structured interviews allow respondents to answer more on their terms in an informal setting yet provide uniform information making them ideal for qualitative analysis.
• The flexible nature of semi-structured interviews allows ideas to be introduced and explored during the interview based on the respondents’ answers.
• Semi-structured interviews can provide reliable and comparable qualitative data. Allows the interviewer to probe answers, where the interviewee is asked to clarify or expand on the answers provided.
• The data generated remain fundamentally shaped by the interview context itself. Analysis rarely acknowledges this endemic co-construction.
• They are more time-consuming (to conduct, transcribe, and analyze) than structured interviews.
• The quality of findings is more dependent on the individual skills of the interviewer than in structured interviews. Skill is required to probe effectively while avoiding biasing responses.

The Interviewer Effect

Face-to-face interviews raise methodological problems. These stem from the fact that interviewers are themselves role players, and their perceived status may influence the replies of the respondents.

Because an interview is a social interaction, the interviewer’s appearance or behavior may influence the respondent’s answers. This is a problem as it can bias the results of the study and make them invalid.

For example, the gender, ethnicity, body language, age, and social status of the interview can all create an interviewer effect. If there is a perceived status disparity between the interviewer and the interviewee, the results of interviews have to be interpreted with care. This is pertinent for sensitive topics such as health.

For example, if a researcher was investigating sexism amongst males, would a female interview be preferable to a male? It is possible that if a female interviewer was used, male participants might lie (i.e., pretend they are not sexist) to impress the interviewer, thus creating an interviewer effect.

Flooding interviews with researcher’s agenda

The interactional nature of interviews means the researcher fundamentally shapes the discourse, rather than just neutrally collecting it. This shapes what is talked about and how participants can respond.

• The interviewer’s assumptions, interests, and categories don’t just shape the specific interview questions asked. They also shape the framing, task instructions, recruitment, and ongoing responses/prompts.
• This flooding of the interview interaction with the researcher’s agenda makes it very difficult to separate out what comes from the participant vs. what is aligned with the interviewer’s concerns.
• So the participant’s talk ends up being fundamentally shaped by the interviewer rather than being a more natural reflection of the participant’s own orientations or practices.
• This effect is hard to avoid because interviews inherently involve the researcher setting an agenda. But it does mean the talk extracted may say more about the interview process than the reality it is supposed to reflect.

Interview Design

First, you must choose whether to use a structured or non-structured interview.

Characteristics of Interviewers

Next, you must consider who will be the interviewer, and this will depend on what type of person is being interviewed. There are several variables to consider:

• Gender and age : This can greatly affect respondents’ answers, particularly on personal issues.
• Personal characteristics : Some people are easier to get on with than others. Also, the interviewer’s accent and appearance (e.g., clothing) can affect the rapport between the interviewer and interviewee.
• Language : The interviewer’s language should be appropriate to the vocabulary of the group of people being studied. For example, the researcher must change the questions’ language to match the respondents’ social background” age / educational level / social class/ethnicity, etc.
• Ethnicity : People may have difficulty interviewing people from different ethnic groups.
• Interviewer expertise should match research sensitivity – inexperienced students should avoid interviewing highly vulnerable groups.

Interview Location

The location of a research interview can influence the way in which the interviewer and interviewee relate and may exaggerate a power dynamic in one direction or another. It is usual to offer interviewees a choice of location as part of facilitating their comfort and encouraging participation.

However, the safety of the interviewer is an overriding consideration and, as mentioned, a minimal requirement should be that a responsible person knows where the interviewer has gone and when they are due back.

Remote Interviews

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote interviewing for research continuity. However online interview platforms provide increased flexibility even under normal conditions.

They enable access to participant groups across geographical distances without travel costs or arrangements. Online interviews can be efficiently scheduled to align with researcher and interviewee availability.

There are practical considerations in setting up remote interviews. Interviewees require access to internet and an online platform such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams or Skype through which to connect.

Certain modifications help build initial rapport in the remote format. Allowing time at the start of the interview for casual conversation while testing audio/video quality helps participants settle in. Minor delays can disrupt turn-taking flow, so alerting participants to speak slightly slower than usual minimizes accidental interruptions.

Keeping remote interviews under an hour avoids fatigue for stare at a screen. Seeking advanced ethical clearance for verbal consent at the interview start saves participant time. Adapting to the remote context shows care for interviewees and aids rich discussion.

However, it remains important to critically reflect on how removing in-person dynamics may shape the co-created data. Perhaps some nuances of trust and disclosure differ over video.

Vulnerable Groups

The interviewer must ensure that they take special care when interviewing vulnerable groups, such as children. For example, children have a limited attention span, so lengthy interviews should be avoided.

Developing an Interview Schedule

An interview schedule is a list of pre-planned, structured questions that have been prepared, to serve as a guide for interviewers, researchers and investigators in collecting information or data about a specific topic or issue.

• List the key themes or topics that must be covered to address your research questions. This will form the basic content.
• Organize the content logically, such as chronologically following the interviewee’s experiences. Place more sensitive topics later in the interview.
• Develop the list of content into actual questions and prompts. Carefully word each question – keep them open-ended, non-leading, and focused on examples.
• Add prompts to remind you to cover areas of interest.
• Pilot test the interview schedule to check it generates useful data and revise as needed.
• Be prepared to refine the schedule throughout data collection as you learn which questions work better.
• Practice skills like asking follow-up questions to get depth and detail. Stay flexible to depart from the schedule when needed.
• Keep questions brief and clear. Avoid multi-part questions that risk confusing interviewees.
• Listen actively during interviews to determine which pre-planned questions can be skipped based on information the participant has already provided.

The key is balancing preparation with the flexibility to adapt questions based on each interview interaction. With practice, you’ll gain skills to conduct productive interviews that obtain rich qualitative data.

The Power of Silence

Strategic use of silence is a key technique to generate interviewee-led data, but it requires judgment about appropriate timing and duration to maintain mutual understanding.

• Unlike ordinary conversation, the interviewer aims to facilitate the interviewee’s contribution without interrupting. This often means resisting the urge to speak at the end of the interviewee’s turn construction units (TCUs).
• Leaving a silence after a TCU encourages the interviewee to provide more material without being led by the interviewer. However, this simple technique requires confidence, as silence can feel socially awkward.
• Allowing longer silences (e.g. 24 seconds) later in interviews can work well, but early on even short silences may disrupt rapport if they cause misalignment between speakers.
• Silence also allows interviewees time to think before answering. Rushing to re-ask or amend questions can limit responses.
• Blunt backchannels like “mm hm” also avoid interrupting flow. Interruptions, especially to finish an interviewee’s turn, are problematic as they make the ownership of perspectives unclear.
• If interviewers incorrectly complete turns, an upside is it can produce extended interviewee narratives correcting the record. However, silence would have been better to let interviewees shape their own accounts.

Recording & Transcription

Design choices.

Design choices around recording and engaging closely with transcripts influence analytic insights, as well as practical feasibility. Weighing up relevant tradeoffs is key.

• Audio recording is standard, but video better captures contextual details, which is useful for some topics/analysis approaches. Participants may find video invasive for sensitive research.
• Digital formats enable the sharing of anonymized clips. Additional microphones reduce audio issues.
• Doing all transcription is time-consuming. Outsourcing can save researcher effort but needs confidentiality assurances. Always carefully check outsourced transcripts.
• Online platform auto-captioning can facilitate rapid analysis, but accuracy limitations mean full transcripts remain ideal. Software cleans up caption file formatting.
• Verbatim transcripts best capture nuanced meaning, but the level of detail needed depends on the analysis approach. Referring back to recordings is still advisable during analysis.
• Transcripts versus recordings highlight different interaction elements. Transcripts make overt disagreements clearer through the wording itself. Recordings better convey tone affiliativeness.

Transcribing Interviews & Focus Groups

Here are the steps for transcribing interviews:

• Play back audio/video files to develop an overall understanding of the interview
• Format the transcription document:
• Add line numbers
• Separate interviewer questions and interviewee responses
• Use formatting like bold, italics, etc. to highlight key passages
• Provide sentence-level clarity in the interviewee’s responses while preserving their authentic voice and word choices
• Break longer passages into smaller paragraphs to help with coding
• If translating the interview to another language, use qualified translators and back-translate where possible
• Select a notation system to indicate pauses, emphasis, laughter, interruptions, etc., and adapt it as needed for your data
• Insert screenshots, photos, or documents discussed in the interview at the relevant point in the transcript
• Read through multiple times, revising formatting and notations
• Double-check the accuracy of transcription against audio/videos
• De-identify transcript by removing identifying participant details

The goal is to produce a formatted written record of the verbal interview exchange that captures the meaning and highlights important passages ready for the coding process. Careful transcription is the vital first step in analysis.

Coding Transcripts

The goal of transcription and coding is to systematically transform interview responses into a set of codes and themes that capture key concepts, experiences and beliefs expressed by participants. Taking care with transcription and coding procedures enhances the validity of qualitative analysis .

• Read through the transcript multiple times to become immersed in the details
• Identify manifest/obvious codes and latent/underlying meaning codes
• Highlight insightful participant quotes that capture key concepts (in vivo codes)
• Create a codebook to organize and define codes with examples
• Use an iterative cycle of inductive (data-driven) coding and deductive (theory-driven) coding
• Refine codebook with clear definitions and examples as you code more transcripts
• Collaborate with other coders to establish the reliability of codes

Ethical Issues

Informed consent.

The participant information sheet must give potential interviewees a good idea of what is involved if taking part in the research.

This will include the general topics covered in the interview, where the interview might take place, how long it is expected to last, how it will be recorded, the ways in which participants’ anonymity will be managed, and incentives offered.

It might be considered good practice to consider true informed consent in interview research to require two distinguishable stages:

• Consent to undertake and record the interview and
• Consent to use the material in research after the interview has been conducted and the content known, or even after the interviewee has seen a copy of the transcript and has had a chance to remove sections, if desired.

Power and Vulnerability

• Early feminist views that sensitivity could equalize power differences are likely naive. The interviewer and interviewee inhabit different knowledge spheres and social categories, indicating structural disparities.
• Power fluctuates within interviews. Researchers rely on participation, yet interviewees control openness and can undermine data collection. Assumptions should be avoided.
• Interviews on sensitive topics may feel like quasi-counseling. Interviewers must refrain from dual roles, instead supplying support service details to all participants.
• Interviewees recruited for trauma experiences may reveal more than anticipated. While generating analytic insights, this risks leaving them feeling exposed.
• Ultimately, power balances resist reconciliation. But reflexively analyzing operations of power serves to qualify rather than nullify situtated qualitative accounts.

Some groups, like those with mental health issues, extreme views, or criminal backgrounds, risk being discredited – treated skeptically by researchers.

This creates tensions with qualitative approaches, often having an empathetic ethos seeking to center subjective perspectives. Analysis should balance openness to offered accounts with critically examining stakes and motivations behind them.

Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities.  Qualitative research in Psychology ,  2 (4), 281-307.

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questionnaire . Cambridge University Press

Madill, A. (2011). Interaction in the semi-structured interview: A comparative analysis of the use of and response to indirect complaints. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8 (4), 333–353.

Maryudi, A., & Fisher, M. (2020). The power in the interview: A practical guide for identifying the critical role of actor interests in environment research. Forest and Society, 4 (1), 142–150

O’Key, V., Hugh-Jones, S., & Madill, A. (2009). Recruiting and engaging with people in deprived locales: Interviewing families about their eating patterns. Social Psychological Review, 11 (20), 30–35.

Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice . Sage.

Schaeffer, N. C. (1991). Conversation with a purpose— Or conversation? Interaction in the standardized interview. In P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, & N. A. Mathiowetz (Eds.), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 367–391). Wiley.

Silverman, D. (1973). Interview talk: Bringing off a research instrument. Sociology, 7 (1), 31–48.

Root out friction in every digital experience, super-charge conversion rates, and optimize digital self-service

Uncover insights from any interaction, deliver AI-powered agent coaching, and reduce cost to serve

Increase revenue and loyalty with real-time insights and recommendations delivered to teams on the ground

Know how your people feel and empower managers to improve employee engagement, productivity, and retention

Take action in the moments that matter most along the employee journey and drive bottom line growth

Whatever they’re are saying, wherever they’re saying it, know exactly what’s going on with your people

Get faster, richer insights with qual and quant tools that make powerful market research available to everyone

Run concept tests, pricing studies, prototyping + more with fast, powerful studies designed by UX research experts

Track your brand performance 24/7 and act quickly to respond to opportunities and challenges in your market

Explore the platform powering Experience Management

• Free Account
• For Digital
• For Customer Care
• For Human Resources
• For Researchers
• Financial Services
• All Industries

Popular Use Cases

• Customer Experience
• Employee Experience
• Employee Exit Interviews
• Net Promoter Score
• Voice of Customer
• Customer Success Hub
• Product Documentation
• Training & Certification
• XM Institute
• Popular Resources
• Customer Stories

Market Research

• Artificial Intelligence
• Partnerships
• Marketplace

The annual gathering of the experience leaders at the world’s iconic brands building breakthrough business results, live in Salt Lake City.

• English/AU & NZ
• Español/Europa
• Español/América Latina
• Português Brasileiro
• REQUEST DEMO
• Experience Management
• Qualitative Research Interviews

Try Qualtrics for free

How to carry out great interviews in qualitative research.

11 min read An interview is one of the most versatile methods used in qualitative research. Here’s what you need to know about conducting great qualitative interviews.

What is a qualitative research interview?

Qualitative research interviews are a mainstay among q ualitative research techniques, and have been in use for decades either as a primary data collection method or as an adjunct to a wider research process. A qualitative research interview is a one-to-one data collection session between a researcher and a participant. Interviews may be carried out face-to-face, over the phone or via video call using a service like Skype or Zoom.

There are three main types of qualitative research interview – structured, unstructured or semi-structured.

• Structured interviews Structured interviews are based around a schedule of predetermined questions and talking points that the researcher has developed. At their most rigid, structured interviews may have a precise wording and question order, meaning that they can be replicated across many different interviewers and participants with relatively consistent results.
• Unstructured interviews Unstructured interviews have no predetermined format, although that doesn’t mean they’re ad hoc or unplanned. An unstructured interview may outwardly resemble a normal conversation, but the interviewer will in fact be working carefully to make sure the right topics are addressed during the interaction while putting the participant at ease with a natural manner.
• Semi-structured interviews Semi-structured interviews are the most common type of qualitative research interview, combining the informality and rapport of an unstructured interview with the consistency and replicability of a structured interview. The researcher will come prepared with questions and topics, but will not need to stick to precise wording. This blended approach can work well for in-depth interviews.

Free eBook: The qualitative research design handbook

What are the pros and cons of interviews in qualitative research?

As a qualitative research method interviewing is hard to beat, with applications in social research, market research, and even basic and clinical pharmacy. But like any aspect of the research process, it’s not without its limitations. Before choosing qualitative interviewing as your research method, it’s worth weighing up the pros and cons.

Pros of qualitative interviews:

• provide in-depth information and context
• can be used effectively when their are low numbers of participants
• provide an opportunity to discuss and explain questions
• useful for complex topics
• rich in data – in the case of in-person or video interviews , the researcher can observe body language and facial expression as well as the answers to questions

Cons of qualitative interviews:

• can be time-consuming to carry out
• costly when compared to some other research methods
• because of time and cost constraints, they often limit you to a small number of participants
• difficult to standardize your data across different researchers and participants unless the interviews are very tightly structured
• As the Open University of Hong Kong notes, qualitative interviews may take an emotional toll on interviewers

Qualitative interview guides

Semi-structured interviews are based on a qualitative interview guide, which acts as a road map for the researcher. While conducting interviews, the researcher can use the interview guide to help them stay focused on their research questions and make sure they cover all the topics they intend to.

An interview guide may include a list of questions written out in full, or it may be a set of bullet points grouped around particular topics. It can prompt the interviewer to dig deeper and ask probing questions during the interview if appropriate.

Consider writing out the project’s research question at the top of your interview guide, ahead of the interview questions. This may help you steer the interview in the right direction if it threatens to head off on a tangent.

Avoid bias in qualitative research interviews

According to Duke University , bias can create significant problems in your qualitative interview.

• Acquiescence bias is common to many qualitative methods, including focus groups. It occurs when the participant feels obliged to say what they think the researcher wants to hear. This can be especially problematic when there is a perceived power imbalance between participant and interviewer. To counteract this, Duke University’s experts recommend emphasizing the participant’s expertise in the subject being discussed, and the value of their contributions.
• Interviewer bias is when the interviewer’s own feelings about the topic come to light through hand gestures, facial expressions or turns of phrase. Duke’s recommendation is to stick to scripted phrases where this is an issue, and to make sure researchers become very familiar with the interview guide or script before conducting interviews, so that they can hone their delivery.

What kinds of questions should you ask in a qualitative interview?

The interview questions you ask need to be carefully considered both before and during the data collection process. As well as considering the topics you’ll cover, you will need to think carefully about the way you ask questions.

Open-ended interview questions – which cannot be answered with a ‘yes’ ‘no’ or ‘maybe’ – are recommended by many researchers as a way to pursue in depth information.

An example of an open-ended question is “What made you want to move to the East Coast?” This will prompt the participant to consider different factors and select at least one. Having thought about it carefully, they may give you more detailed information about their reasoning.

A closed-ended question , such as “Would you recommend your neighborhood to a friend?” can be answered without too much deliberation, and without giving much information about personal thoughts, opinions and feelings.

Follow-up questions can be used to delve deeper into the research topic and to get more detail from open-ended questions. Examples of follow-up questions include:

• What makes you say that?
• What do you mean by that?
• Can you tell me more about X?
• What did/does that mean to you?

As well as avoiding closed-ended questions, be wary of leading questions. As with other qualitative research techniques such as surveys or focus groups, these can introduce bias in your data. Leading questions presume a certain point of view shared by the interviewer and participant, and may even suggest a foregone conclusion.

An example of a leading question might be: “You moved to New York in 1990, didn’t you?” In answering the question, the participant is much more likely to agree than disagree. This may be down to acquiescence bias or a belief that the interviewer has checked the information and already knows the correct answer.

Other leading questions involve adjectival phrases or other wording that introduces negative or positive connotations about a particular topic. An example of this kind of leading question is: “Many employees dislike wearing masks to work. How do you feel about this?” It presumes a positive opinion and the participant may be swayed by it, or not want to contradict the interviewer.

Harvard University’s guidelines for qualitative interview research add that you shouldn’t be afraid to ask embarrassing questions – “if you don’t ask, they won’t tell.” Bear in mind though that too much probing around sensitive topics may cause the interview participant to withdraw. The Harvard guidelines recommend leaving sensitive questions til the later stages of the interview when a rapport has been established.

More tips for conducting qualitative interviews

Observing a participant’s body language can give you important data about their thoughts and feelings. It can also help you decide when to broach a topic, and whether to use a follow-up question or return to the subject later in the interview.

Be conscious that the participant may regard you as the expert, not themselves. In order to make sure they express their opinions openly, use active listening skills like verbal encouragement and paraphrasing and clarifying their meaning to show how much you value what they are saying.

Remember that part of the goal is to leave the interview participant feeling good about volunteering their time and their thought process to your research. Aim to make them feel empowered , respected and heard.

Unstructured interviews can demand a lot of a researcher, both cognitively and emotionally. Be sure to leave time in between in-depth interviews when scheduling your data collection to make sure you maintain the quality of your data, as well as your own well-being .

Recording and transcribing interviews

Historically, recording qualitative research interviews and then transcribing the conversation manually would have represented a significant part of the cost and time involved in research projects that collect qualitative data.

Fortunately, researchers now have access to digital recording tools, and even speech-to-text technology that can automatically transcribe interview data using AI and machine learning. This type of tool can also be used to capture qualitative data from qualitative research (focus groups,ect.) making this kind of social research or market research much less time consuming.

Data analysis

Qualitative interview data is unstructured, rich in content and difficult to analyze without the appropriate tools. Fortunately, machine learning and AI can once again make things faster and easier when you use qualitative methods like the research interview.

Text analysis tools and natural language processing software can ‘read’ your transcripts and voice data and identify patterns and trends across large volumes of text or speech. They can also perform khttps://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/sentiment-analysis/

which assesses overall trends in opinion and provides an unbiased overall summary of how participants are feeling.

Another feature of text analysis tools is their ability to categorize information by topic, sorting it into groupings that help you organize your data according to the topic discussed.

All in all, interviews are a valuable technique for qualitative research in business, yielding rich and detailed unstructured data. Historically, they have only been limited by the human capacity to interpret and communicate results and conclusions, which demands considerable time and skill.

When you combine this data with AI tools that can interpret it quickly and automatically, it becomes easy to analyze and structure, dovetailing perfectly with your other business data. An additional benefit of natural language analysis tools is that they are free of subjective biases, and can replicate the same approach across as much data as you choose. By combining human research skills with machine analysis, qualitative research methods such as interviews are more valuable than ever to your business.

Related resources

Market intelligence 10 min read, marketing insights 11 min read, ethnographic research 11 min read, qualitative vs quantitative research 13 min read, qualitative research questions 11 min read, qualitative research design 12 min read, primary vs secondary research 14 min read, request demo.

Ready to learn more about Qualtrics?

Qualitative Research 101: Interviewing

5 Common Mistakes To Avoid When Undertaking Interviews

By: David Phair (PhD) and Kerryn Warren (PhD) | March 2022

Undertaking interviews is potentially the most important step in the qualitative research process. If you don’t collect useful, useable data in your interviews, you’ll struggle through the rest of your dissertation or thesis.  Having helped numerous students with their research over the years, we’ve noticed some common interviewing mistakes that first-time researchers make. In this post, we’ll discuss five costly interview-related mistakes and outline useful strategies to avoid making these.

Overview: 5 Interviewing Mistakes

• Not having a clear interview strategy /plan
• Not having good interview techniques /skills
• Not securing a suitable location and equipment
• Not having a basic risk management plan
• Not keeping your “ golden thread ” front of mind

1. Not having a clear interview strategy

The first common mistake that we’ll look at is that of starting the interviewing process without having first come up with a clear interview strategy or plan of action. While it’s natural to be keen to get started engaging with your interviewees, a lack of planning can result in a mess of data and inconsistency between interviews.

There are several design choices to decide on and plan for before you start interviewing anyone. Some of the most important questions you need to ask yourself before conducting interviews include:

• What are the guiding research aims and research questions of my study?
• Will I use a structured, semi-structured or unstructured interview approach?
• How will I record the interviews (audio or video)?
• Who will be interviewed and by whom ?
• What ethics and data law considerations do I need to adhere to?
• How will I analyze my data? 

Let’s take a quick look at some of these.

The core objective of the interviewing process is to generate useful data that will help you address your overall research aims. Therefore, your interviews need to be conducted in a way that directly links to your research aims, objectives and research questions (i.e. your “golden thread”). This means that you need to carefully consider the questions you’ll ask to ensure that they align with and feed into your golden thread. If any question doesn’t align with this, you may want to consider scrapping it.

Another important design choice is whether you’ll use an unstructured, semi-structured or structured interview approach . For semi-structured interviews, you will have a list of questions that you plan to ask and these questions will be open-ended in nature. You’ll also allow the discussion to digress from the core question set if something interesting comes up. This means that the type of information generated might differ a fair amount between interviews.

Contrasted to this, a structured approach to interviews is more rigid, where a specific set of closed questions is developed and asked for each interviewee in exactly the same order. Closed questions have a limited set of answers, that are often single-word answers. Therefore, you need to think about what you’re trying to achieve with your research project (i.e. your research aims) and decided on which approach would be best suited in your case.

It is also important to plan ahead with regards to who will be interviewed and how. You need to think about how you will approach the possible interviewees to get their cooperation, who will conduct the interviews, when to conduct the interviews and how to record the interviews. For each of these decisions, it’s also essential to make sure that all ethical considerations and data protection laws are taken into account.

Finally, you should think through how you plan to analyze the data (i.e., your qualitative analysis method) generated by the interviews. Different types of analysis rely on different types of data, so you need to ensure you’re asking the right types of questions and correctly guiding your respondents.

Simply put, you need to have a plan of action regarding the specifics of your interview approach before you start collecting data. If not, you’ll end up drifting in your approach from interview to interview, which will result in inconsistent, unusable data.

2. Not having good interview technique

While you’re generally not expected to become you to be an expert interviewer for a dissertation or thesis, it is important to practice good interview technique and develop basic interviewing skills .

Let’s go through some basics that will help the process along.

Firstly, before the interview , make sure you know your interview questions well and have a clear idea of what you want from the interview. Naturally, the specificity of your questions will depend on whether you’re taking a structured, semi-structured or unstructured approach, but you still need a consistent starting point . Ideally, you should develop an interview guide beforehand (more on this later) that details your core question and links these to the research aims, objectives and research questions.

Before you undertake any interviews, it’s a good idea to do a few mock interviews with friends or family members. This will help you get comfortable with the interviewer role, prepare for potentially unexpected answers and give you a good idea of how long the interview will take to conduct. In the interviewing process, you’re likely to encounter two kinds of challenging interviewees ; the two-word respondent and the respondent who meanders and babbles. Therefore, you should prepare yourself for both and come up with a plan to respond to each in a way that will allow the interview to continue productively.

To begin the formal interview , provide the person you are interviewing with an overview of your research. This will help to calm their nerves (and yours) and contextualize the interaction. Ultimately, you want the interviewee to feel comfortable and be willing to be open and honest with you, so it’s useful to start in a more casual, relaxed fashion and allow them to ask any questions they may have. From there, you can ease them into the rest of the questions.

As the interview progresses , avoid asking leading questions (i.e., questions that assume something about the interviewee or their response). Make sure that you speak clearly and slowly , using plain language and being ready to paraphrase questions if the person you are interviewing misunderstands. Be particularly careful with interviewing English second language speakers to ensure that you’re both on the same page.

Engage with the interviewee by listening to them carefully and acknowledging that you are listening to them by smiling or nodding. Show them that you’re interested in what they’re saying and thank them for their openness as appropriate. This will also encourage your interviewee to respond openly.

Need a helping hand?

3. Not securing a suitable location and quality equipment

Where you conduct your interviews and the equipment you use to record them both play an important role in how the process unfolds. Therefore, you need to think carefully about each of these variables before you start interviewing.

Poor location: A bad location can result in the quality of your interviews being compromised, interrupted, or cancelled. If you are conducting physical interviews, you’ll need a location that is quiet, safe, and welcoming . It’s very important that your location of choice is not prone to interruptions (the workplace office is generally problematic, for example) and has suitable facilities (such as water, a bathroom, and snacks).

If you are conducting online interviews , you need to consider a few other factors. Importantly, you need to make sure that both you and your respondent have access to a good, stable internet connection and electricity. Always check before the time that both of you know how to use the relevant software and it’s accessible (sometimes meeting platforms are blocked by workplace policies or firewalls). It’s also good to have alternatives in place (such as WhatsApp, Zoom, or Teams) to cater for these types of issues.

Poor equipment: Using poor-quality recording equipment or using equipment incorrectly means that you will have trouble transcribing, coding, and analyzing your interviews. This can be a major issue , as some of your interview data may go completely to waste if not recorded well. So, make sure that you use good-quality recording equipment and that you know how to use it correctly.

To avoid issues, you should always conduct test recordings before every interview to ensure that you can use the relevant equipment properly. It’s also a good idea to spot check each recording afterwards, just to make sure it was recorded as planned. If your equipment uses batteries, be sure to always carry a spare set.

4. Not having a basic risk management plan

Many possible issues can arise during the interview process. Not planning for these issues can mean that you are left with compromised data that might not be useful to you. Therefore, it’s important to map out some sort of risk management plan ahead of time, considering the potential risks, how you’ll minimize their probability and how you’ll manage them if they materialize.

Common potential issues related to the actual interview include cancellations (people pulling out), delays (such as getting stuck in traffic), language and accent differences (especially in the case of poor internet connections), issues with internet connections and power supply. Other issues can also occur in the interview itself. For example, the interviewee could drift off-topic, or you might encounter an interviewee who does not say much at all.

You can prepare for these potential issues by considering possible worst-case scenarios and preparing a response for each scenario. For instance, it is important to plan a backup date just in case your interviewee cannot make it to the first meeting you scheduled with them. It’s also a good idea to factor in a 30-minute gap between your interviews for the instances where someone might be late, or an interview runs overtime for other reasons. Make sure that you also plan backup questions that could be used to bring a respondent back on topic if they start rambling, or questions to encourage those who are saying too little.

In general, it’s best practice to plan to conduct more interviews than you think you need (this is called oversampling ). Doing so will allow you some room for error if there are interviews that don’t go as planned, or if some interviewees withdraw. If you need 10 interviews, it is a good idea to plan for 15. Likely, a few will cancel , delay, or not produce useful data.

5. Not keeping your golden thread front of mind

We touched on this a little earlier, but it is a key point that should be central to your entire research process. You don’t want to end up with pages and pages of data after conducting your interviews and realize that it is not useful to your research aims . Your research aims, objectives and research questions – i.e., your golden thread – should influence every design decision and should guide the interview process at all times. 

A useful way to avoid this mistake is by developing an interview guide before you begin interviewing your respondents. An interview guide is a document that contains all of your questions with notes on how each of the interview questions is linked to the research question(s) of your study. You can also include your research aims and objectives here for a more comprehensive linkage. 

You can easily create an interview guide by drawing up a table with one column containing your core interview questions . Then add another column with your research questions , another with expectations that you may have in light of the relevant literature and another with backup or follow-up questions . As mentioned, you can also bring in your research aims and objectives to help you connect them all together. If you’d like, you can download a copy of our free interview guide here .

Recap: Qualitative Interview Mistakes

In this post, we’ve discussed 5 common costly mistakes that are easy to make in the process of planning and conducting qualitative interviews.

To recap, these include:

If you have any questions about these interviewing mistakes, drop a comment below. Alternatively, if you’re interested in getting 1-on-1 help with your thesis or dissertation , check out our dissertation coaching service or book a free initial consultation with one of our friendly Grad Coaches.

Psst… there’s more (for free)

This post is part of our dissertation mini-course, which covers everything you need to get started with your dissertation, thesis or research project. 

You Might Also Like:

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• Sample Research

FREE 10+ Research Interview Schedule Samples in PDF

If you are a novice researcher, perhaps you feel that some of your tasks which include qualitative inquiry are complex and daunting as you become more than a little overwhelmed and anxious at the process. Don’t worry because it’s just a natural way to feel and also it appears to be a healthy attitude to adopt provided that individual research projects are unique. In this article, we will discuss some ways you can create your research interview schedule for your work, plus we have some schedule samples that you can use. Keep on reading!

Research Interview Schedule

Free 10+ research interview schedule samples, 1. research interview schedule template, 2. research program interview schedule, 3. operational research interview schedule, 4. research candidates interview schedule, 5. sample interview schedule, 6. research interview schedule sample, 7. psychiatric research interview schedule, 8. environment research interview schedule,  9. research interview schedule format, 10. qualitative interview schedule, 11. simple research interview schedule, what is a research interview schedule, how to create a research interview schedule, 1. determine the number of candidates in a day, 2. identify the number of hours being provided for each candidate, 3. designate a proper location for the interview, 4. prepare a list of questions , 4. include the time and date, which type of interview uses an interview schedule, what is the purpose of an interview schedule in qualitative research, can a research method be an interview, how long should a research interview last.

Size: 58 KB

Size: 21 KB

Size: 71 KB

Size: 27 KB

Size: 52 KB

Size: 250 KB

Size: 626 KB

Size: 50 KB

Size: 144 KB

Size: 31 KB

A research interview schedule is typically a list comprising a set of methodical questions that have been arranged, to act as a guide for interviewers, investigators, and researchers in gathering essential information or data about a particular topic or issue.

Usually, we think that the interview seems simple and self-evident. So, what are the things you need to do when arranging an interview? In order to create a comprehensive research interview schedule, below are some beneficial tips you must consider: 

When you arrange an interview, you need to think carefully and determine the maximum number of candidates in a day that you are planning for a research interview. This is a very important way to initiate order and peace when setting up a research interview for your company or organization. 

Secondly, you need to be able to identify the exact number of hours being provided for each candidate. If it’s for a research interview for an individual, you may set the interview at least 30-40 minutes. While you may add another 40 minutes or an hour if you are interviewing a group . 

The next step you need to consider is designating a proper location for the interview.The common choice for interviews is a quiet and private enclosed meeting room inside the company office. Or you can opt for a glass conference room or in a typical staff room. For your convenience or preference especially during pandemic times, you can use an online meeting software like Google Meet, Skype, or Zoom.

One of the most important aspects in creating a research interview schedule is preparing a list of questions. Include questions that are clear and neutral. Also, be careful when using “why” questions. Write questions that are descriptive, relational, and casual that research projects usually address.

Don’t forget the specific time and date in your interview schedule. It is recommended that you set the time during the day or afternoon. As the interviewer, you should make the initial contact with potential candidates as you inform them about the interviews usually 3-4 days before the start of the interview session.

A structured interview is a type of interview that uses a set of prepared closed-ended questions in the form of an interview that the interviewer has while he or she reads out precisely as worded.

The purpose of the interview schedule is to give rules and agreement for interviewers to use questions and record answers in a rational way towards all interviewees and to facilitate the process of accomplishing through the interview effortlessly.

Yes. Generally, an interview is a qualitative research technique that involves asking open-ended questions to respondents and extracting out integral data about a subject.

Typically, a research interview lasts for an individual or group in between 30 minutes to several hours to complete.

Designing an effective research interview schedule is one of the powerful tools available in various aspects of a business firm, and research organizations, being vital in reaching success. According to Stake, Alvesson and Sköldberg, each researcher needs to embrace the articulation of the nature of their data collection and analysis process and reflexivity is key to this pursuit. To help you in becoming organized,we provide you some schedule samples here available in various formats. Click the templates in this article and start downloading now!

Related Posts

Free 10+ content validity samples & templates in pdf, free 10+ construct validity samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ code of human research ethics samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ biography research report samples and templates in pdf, free 10+ system documentation samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ process document samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ action research samples & templates in pdf, free 10+ longitudinal research samples & templates in pdf | ms word, free 10+ causal research samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ client discovery samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ null hypothesis samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 9+ product knowledge samples & templates in pdf, free 10+ software documentation samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 10+ exploratory research samples & templates in pdf | ms word, free 10+ experimental research samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 7+ sample college schedule templates in pdf, free 8+ sample time schedule templates in pdf ms word, free 6+ sample college schedule templates in google docs ..., free 10+ sample interview questions in word pdf.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Structured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples

Structured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples

Published on January 27, 2022 by Tegan George and Julia Merkus. Revised on June 22, 2023.

A structured interview is a data collection method that relies on asking questions in a set order to collect data on a topic. It is one of four types of interviews .

In research, structured interviews are often quantitative in nature. They can also be used in qualitative research if the questions are open-ended, but this is less common.

While structured interviews are often associated with job interviews, they are also common in marketing, social science, survey methodology, and other research fields.

• Semi-structured interviews : A few questions are predetermined, whereas the other questions aren’t planned.
• Unstructured interviews : None of the questions are predetermined.
• Focus group interviews : The questions are presented to a group instead of one individual.

Table of contents

What is a structured interview, when to use a structured interview, advantages of structured interviews, disadvantages of structured interviews, structured interview questions, how to conduct a structured interview, how to analyze a structured interview, presenting your results, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about structured interviews.

Structured interviews are the most systematized type of interview. In contrast to semi-structured or unstructured interviews, the interviewer uses predetermined questions in a set order.

Structured interviews are often closed-ended. They can be dichotomous, which means asking participants to answer “yes” or “no” to each question, or multiple-choice. While open-ended structured interviews do exist, they are less common.

Asking set questions in a set order allows you to easily compare responses between participants in a uniform context. This can help you see patterns and highlight areas for further research, and it can be a useful explanatory or exploratory research tool.

Structured interviews are best used when:

• You already have a very clear understanding of your topic, so you possess a baseline for designing strong structured questions.
• You are constrained in terms of time or resources and need to analyze your data efficiently.
• Your research question depends on strong parity between participants, with environmental conditions held constant.

A structured interview is straightforward to conduct and analyze. Asking the same set of questions mitigates potential biases and leads to fewer ambiguities in analysis. It is an undertaking you can likely handle as an individual, provided you remain organized.

Differences between different types of interviews

Make sure to choose the type of interview that suits your research best. This table shows the most important differences between the four types.

Reduced bias

Increased credibility, reliability and validity, simple, cost-effective and efficient, formal in nature, limited flexibility, limited scope.

It can be difficult to write structured interview questions that approximate exactly what you are seeking to measure. Here are a few tips for writing questions that contribute to high internal validity :

• Define exactly what you want to discover prior to drafting your questions. This will help you write questions that really zero in on participant responses.
• Avoid jargon, compound sentences, and complicated constructions.
• Be as clear and concise as possible, so that participants can answer your question immediately.
• Do you think that employers should provide free gym memberships?
• Did any of your previous employers provide free memberships?
• Does your current employer provide a free membership?
• a) 1 time; b) 2 times; c) 3 times; d) 4 or more times
• Do you enjoy going to the gym?

Structured interviews are among the most straightforward research methods to conduct and analyze. Once you’ve determined that they’re the right fit for your research topic , you can proceed with the following steps.

Step 1: Set your goals and objectives

Start with brainstorming some guiding questions to help you conceptualize your research question, such as:

• What are you trying to learn or achieve from a structured interview?
• Why are you choosing a structured interview as opposed to a different type of interview, or another research method?

If you have satisfying reasoning for proceeding with a structured interview, you can move on to designing your questions.

Step 2: Design your questions

Pay special attention to the order and wording of your structured interview questions . Remember that in a structured interview they must remain the same. Stick to closed-ended or very simple open-ended questions.

Step 3: Assemble your participants

Depending on your topic, there are a few sampling methods you can use, such as:

• Voluntary response sampling : For example, posting a flyer on campus and finding participants based on responses
• Convenience sampling of those who are most readily accessible to you, such as fellow students at your university
• Stratified sampling of a particular age, race, ethnicity, gender identity, or other characteristic of interest to you
• Judgment sampling of a specific set of participants that you already know you want to include

Step 4: Decide on your medium

Determine whether you will be conducting your interviews in person or whether your interview will take pen-and-paper format. If conducted live, you need to decide if you prefer to talk with participants in person, over the phone, or via video conferencing.

Step 5: Conduct your interviews

As you conduct your interviews, be very careful that all conditions remain as constant as possible.

• Ask your questions in the same order, and try to moderate your tone of voice and any responses to participants as much as you can.
• Pay special attention to your body language (e.g., nodding, raising eyebrows), as this can bias responses.

After you’re finished conducting your interviews, it’s time to analyze your results.

• Assign each of your participants a number or pseudonym for organizational purposes.
• Transcribe the recordings manually or with the help of transcription software.
• Conduct a content or thematic analysis to look for categories or patterns of responses. In most cases, it’s also possible to conduct a statistical analysis to test your hypotheses .

Transcribing interviews

If you have audio-recorded your interviews, you will likely have to transcribe them prior to conducting your analysis. In some cases, your supervisor might ask you to add the transcriptions in the appendix of your paper.

First, you will have to decide whether to conduct verbatim transcription or intelligent verbatim transcription. Do pauses, laughter, or filler words like “umm” or “like” affect your analysis and research conclusions?

• If so, conduct verbatim transcription and include them.
• If not, conduct intelligent verbatim transcription, which excludes fillers and fixes any grammar issues, and is often easier to analyze.

The transcription process is a great opportunity for you to cleanse your data as well, spotting and resolving any inconsistencies or errors that come up as you listen.

Coding and analyzing structured interviews

After transcribing, it’s time to conduct your thematic or content analysis . This often involves “coding” words, patterns, or themes, separating them into categories for more robust analysis.

Due to the closed-ended nature of many structured interviews, you will most likely be conducting content analysis, rather than thematic analysis.

• You quantify the categories you chose in the coding stage by counting the occurrence of the words, phrases, subjects or concepts you selected.
• After coding, you can organize and summarize the data using descriptive statistics .
• Next, inferential statistics allows you to come to conclusions about your hypotheses and make predictions for future research. 

When conducting content analysis, you can take an inductive or a deductive approach. With an inductive approach, you allow the data to determine your themes. A deductive approach is the opposite, and involves investigating whether your data confirm preconceived themes or ideas.

Content analysis has a systematic procedure that can easily be replicated , yielding high reliability to your results. However, keep in mind that while this approach reduces bias, it doesn’t eliminate it. Be vigilant about remaining objective here, even if your analysis does not confirm your hypotheses .

After your data analysis, the next step is to combine your findings into a research paper .

• Your methodology section describes how you collected the data (in this case, describing your structured interview process) and explains how you justify or conceptualize your analysis.
• Your discussion and results sections usually address each of your coded categories, describing each in turn, as well as how often they occurred.

If you conducted inferential statistics in addition to descriptive statistics, you would generally report the test statistic , p -value , and effect size in your results section. These values explain whether your results justify rejecting your null hypothesis and whether the result is practically significant .

You can then conclude with the main takeaways and avenues for further research.

Example of interview methodology for a research paper

Let’s say you are interested in healthcare on your campus. You attend a large public institution with a lot of international students, and you think there may be a difference in perceptions based on country of origin.

Specifically, you hypothesize that students coming from countries with single-payer or socialized healthcare will find US options less satisfying.

There is a large body of research available on this topic, so you decide to conduct structured interviews of your peers to see if there’s a difference between international students and local students.

You are a member of a large campus club that brings together international students and local students, and you send a message to the club to ask for volunteers.

Here are some questions you could ask:

• Do you find healthcare options on campus to be: excellent; good; fair; average; poor?
• Does your home country have socialized healthcare? Yes/No
• Are you on the campus healthcare plan? Yes/No
• Have you ever worried about your health insurance? Yes/No
• Have you ever had a serious health condition that insurance did not cover? Yes/No
• Have you ever been surprised or shocked by a medical bill? Yes/No

After conducting your interviews and transcribing your data, you can then conduct content analysis, coding responses into different categories. Since you began your research with the theory that international students may find US healthcare lacking, you would use the deductive approach to see if your hypotheses seem to hold true.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Student’s  t -distribution
• Normal distribution
• Null and Alternative Hypotheses
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Data cleansing
• Reproducibility vs Replicability
• Peer review
• Prospective cohort study

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Placebo effect
• Hawthorne effect
• Hindsight bias
• Affect heuristic
• Social desirability bias

A structured interview is a data collection method that relies on asking questions in a set order to collect data on a topic. They are often quantitative in nature. Structured interviews are best used when: 

• You already have a very clear understanding of your topic. Perhaps significant research has already been conducted, or you have done some prior research yourself, but you already possess a baseline for designing strong structured questions.
• You are constrained in terms of time or resources and need to analyze your data quickly and efficiently.

More flexible interview options include semi-structured interviews , unstructured interviews , and focus groups .

The four most common types of interviews are:

• Structured interviews : The questions are predetermined in both topic and order. 
• Semi-structured interviews : A few questions are predetermined, but other questions aren’t planned.

The interviewer effect is a type of bias that emerges when a characteristic of an interviewer (race, age, gender identity, etc.) influences the responses given by the interviewee.

There is a risk of an interviewer effect in all types of interviews , but it can be mitigated by writing really high-quality interview questions.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

George, T. & Merkus, J. (2023, June 22). Structured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/structured-interview/

Is this article helpful?

Tegan George

Other students also liked, semi-structured interview | definition, guide & examples, unstructured interview | definition, guide & examples, what is a focus group | step-by-step guide & examples, what is your plagiarism score.

Introduction to Research Methods

6 qualitative research and interviews.

So we’ve described doing a survey and collecting quantitative data. But not all questions can best be answered by a survey. A survey is great for understanding what people think (for example), but not why they think what they do. If your research is intending to understand the underlying motivations or reasons behind peoples actions, or to build a deeper understanding on the background of a subject, an interview may be the more appropriate data collection method.

Interviews are a method of data collection that consist of two or more people exchanging information through a structured process of questions and answers. Questions are designed by the researcher to thoughtfully collect in-depth information on a topic or set of topics as related to the central research question. Interviews typically occur in-person, although good interviews can also be conducted remotely via the phone or video conferencing. Unlike surveys, interviews give the opportunity to ask follow-up questions and thoughtfully engage with participants on the spot (rather than the anonymous and impartial format of survey research).

And surveys can be used in qualitative or quantitative research – though they’re more typically a qualitative technique. In-depth interviews , containing open-ended questions and structured by an interview guide . One can also do a standardized interview with closed-ended questions (i.e. answer options) that are structured by an interview schedule as part of quantitative research. While these are called interviews they’re far closer to surveys, so we wont cover them again in this chapter. The terms used for in-depth interviews we’ll cover in the next section.

6.1 Interviews

In-depth interviews allow participants to describe experiences in their own words (a primary strength of the interview format). Strong in-depth interviews will include many open-ended questions that allow participants to respond in their own words, share new ideas, and lead the conversation in different directions. The purpose of open-ended questions and in-depth interviews is to hear as much as possible in the person’s own voice, to collect new information and ideas, and to achieve a level of depth not possible in surveys or most other forms of data collection.

Typically, an interview guide is used to create a soft structure for the conversation and is an important preparation tool for the researcher. You can not go into an interview unprepared and just “wing it”; what the interview guide allows you to do is map out a framework, order of topics, and may include specific questions to use during the interview. Generally, the interview guide is thought of as just that — a guide to use in order to keep the interview focused. It is not set in stone and a skilled researcher can change the order of questions or topics in an interviews based on the organic conversation flow.

Depending on the experience and skill level of the researcher, an interview guide can be as simple as a list of topics to cover. However, for consistency and quality of research, the interviewer may want to take the time to at least practice writing out questions in advance to ensure that phrasing and word choices are as clear, objective, and focused as possible. It’s worth remembering that working out the wording of questions in advance allows researchers to ensure more consistency across interview. The interview guide below, taken from the wonderful and free textbook Principles of Sociological Inquiry , shows an interview guide that just has topics.

Alternatively, you can use a more detailed guide that lists out possible questions, as shown below. A more detailed guide is probably better for an interviewer that has less experience, or is just beginning to work on a given topic.

The purpose of an interview guide is to help ask effective questions and to support the process of acquiring the best possible data for your research. Topics and questions should be organized thematically, and in a natural progression that will allow the conversation to flow and deepen throughout the course of the interview. Often, researchers will attempt to memorize or partially memorize the interview guide, in order to be more fully present with the participant during the conversation.

6.2 Asking good Questions

Remember, the purposes of interviews is to go more in-depth with an individual than is possible with a generalized survey. For this reason, it is important to use the guide as a starting point but not to be overly tethered to it during the actual interview process. You may get stuck when respondents give you shorter answers than you expect, or don’t provide the type of depth that you need for your research. Often, you may want to probe for more specifics. Think about using follow up questions like “How does/did that affect you?” or “How does X make you feel?” and “Tell me about a time where X…”

For example, if I was researching the relationship between pets and mental health, some strong open-ended questions might be: * How does your pet typically make you feel when you wake up in the morning? * How does your pet generally affect your mood when you arrive home in the evening? * Tell me about a time when your pet had a significant impact on your emotional state.

Questions framed in this manner leave plenty of room for the respondent to answer in their own words, as opposed to leading and/or truncated questions, such as: * Does being with your pet make you happy? * After a bad day, how much does seeing your pet improve your mood? * Tell me about how important your pet is to your mental health.

These questions assume outcomes and will not result in high quality research. Researchers should always avoid asking leading questions that give away an expected answer or suggest particular responses. For instance, if I ask “we need to spend more on public schools, don’t you think?” the respondent is more likely to agree regardless of their own thoughts. Some wont, but humans generally have a strong natural desire to be agreeable. That’s why leaving your questions neutral and open so that respondents can speak to their experiences and views is critical.

6.3 Analyzing Interview Data

Writing good questions and interviewing respondents are just the first steps of the interview process. After these stages, the researcher still has a lot of work to do to collect usable data from the interview. The researcher must spend time coding and analyzing the interview to retrieve this data. Just doing an interview wont produce data. Think about how many conversations you have everyday, and none of those are leaving you swimming in data.

Hopefully you can record your interviews. Recording your interviews will allow you the opportunity to transcribe them word for word later. If you can’t record the interview you’ll need to take detailed notes so that you can reconstruct what you heard later. Do not trust yourself to “just remember” the conversation. You’re collecting data, precious data that you’re spending time and energy to collect. Treat it as important and valuable. Remember our description of the methodology section from Chapter 2, you need to maintain a chain of custody on your data. If you just remembered the interview, you could be accused of making up the results. Your interview notes and the recording become part of that chain of custody to prove to others that your interviews were real and that your results are accurate.

Assuming you recorded your interview, the first step in the analysis process is transcribing the interview. A transcription is a written record of every word in an interview. Transcriptions can either be completed by the researcher or by a hired worker, though it is good practice for the researcher to transcribe the interview him or herself. Researchers should keep the following points in mind regarding transcriptions: * The interview should take place in a quiet location with minimal background noise to produce a clear recording; * Transcribing interviews is a time-consuming process and may take two to three times longer than the actual interview; * Transcriptions provide a more precise record of the interview than hand written notes and allow the interviewer to focus during the interview.

After transcribing the interview, the next step is to analyze the responses. Coding is the main form of analysis used for interviews and involves studying a transcription to identify important themes. These themes are categorized into codes, which are words or phrases that denote an idea.

You’ll typically being with several codes in mind that are generated by key ideas you week seeking in the questions, but you can also being by using open coding to understand the results. An open coding process involves reading through the transcript multiple times and paying close attention to each line of the text to discover noteworthy concepts. During the open coding process, the researcher keeps an open mind to find any codes that may be relevant to the research topic.

After the open coding process is complete, focused coding can begin. Focused coding takes a closer look at the notes compiled during the open coding stage to merge common codes and define what the codes mean in the context of the research project.

Imagine a researcher is conducting interviews to learn about various people’s experiences of childhood in New Orleans. The following example shows several codes that this researcher extrapolated from an interview with one of their subjects.

6.4 Using interview data

The next chapter will address ways to identify people to interview, but most of the remainder of the book will address how to analyze quantitative data. That shouldn’t be taken as a sign that quantitative data is better, or that it’s easier to use interview data. Because in an interview the researcher must interpret the words of others it is often more challenging to identify your findings and clearly answer your research question. However, quantitative data is more common, and there are more different things you can do with it, so we spend a lot of the textbook focusing on it.

I’ll work through one more example of using interview data though. It takes a lot of practice to be a good and skilled interviewer. What I show below is a brief excerpt of an interview I did, and how that data was used in a resulting paper I wrote. These aren’t the only way you can use interview data, but it’s an example of what the intermediary and final product might look like.

The overall project these are drawn from was concerned with minor league baseball stadiums, but the specific part I’m pulling from here was studying the decline and rejuvenation of downtown around those stadiums in several cities. You’ll see that I’m using the words of the respondent fairly directly, because that’s my data. But I’m not just relying on one respondent and trusting them, I did a few dozen interviews in order to understand the commonalities in people’s perspectives to build a narrative around my research question.

Excerpt from Notes

Excerpt from Resulting Paper

How many interviews are necessary? It actually doesn’t take many. What you want to observe in your interviews is theoretical saturation , where the codes you use in the transcript begin to appear across conversations and groups. If different people disagree that’s fine, but what you want to understand is the commonalities across peoples perspectives. Most research on the subject says that with 8 interviews you’ll typically start to see a decline in new information gathered. That doesn’t mean you won’t get new words , but you’ll stop hearing completely unique perspectives or gain novel insights. At that point, where you’ve ‘heard it all before’ you can stop, because you’ve probably identified the answer to the questions you were trying to research.

6.5 Ensuring Anonymity

One significant ethical concern with interviews, that also applies to surveys, is making sure that respondents maintain anonymity. In either form of data collection you may be asking respondents deeply personal questions, that if exposed may cause legal, personal, or professional harm. Notice that in the excerpt of the paper above the respondents are only identified by an id I assigned (Louisville D) and their career, rather than their name. I can only include the excerpt of the interview notes above because there are no details that might lead to them being identified.

You may want to report details about a person to contextualize the data you gathered, but you should always ensure that no one can be identified from your research. For instance, if you were doing research on racism at large companies, you may want to preface people’s comments by their race, as there is a good chance that white and minority employees would feel differently about the issues. However, if you preface someones comments by saying they’re a minority manager, that may violate their anonymity. Even if you don’t state what company you did interviews with, that may be enough detail for their co-workers to identify them if there are few minority managers at the company. As such, always think long and hard about whether there is any way that the participation of respondents may be exposed.

6.6 Why not both?

We’ve discussed surveys and interviews as different methods the last two chapters, but they can also complement each other.

For instance, let’s say you’re curious to study people who change opinions on abortion, either going from support to opposition or vice versa. You could use a survey to understand the prevalence of changing opinions, i.e. what percentage of people in your city have changed their views. That would help to establish whether this is a prominent issue, or whether it’s a rare phenomenon. But it would be difficult to understand from the survey what makes people change their views. You could add an open ended question for anyone that said they changed their opinion, but many people won’t respond and few will provide the level of detail necessary to understand their motivations. Interviews with people that have changed their opinions would give you an opportunity to explore how their experiences and beliefs have changed in combination with their views towards abortion.

6.7 Summary

In the last two chapters we’ve discussed the two most prominent methods of data collection in the social sciences: surveys and interviews. What we haven’t discussed though is how to identify the people you’ll collect data from; that’s called a sampling strategy. In the next chapter

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Simpson A, Hannigan B, Coffey M, et al. Cross-national comparative mixed-methods case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and co-ordination: Collaborative Care Planning Project (COCAPP). Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Feb. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 4.5.)

Cross-national comparative mixed-methods case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and co-ordination: Collaborative Care Planning Project (COCAPP).

Appendix 2 interview schedule example (service user), collaborative care planning project, semistructured interview schedule, service user/patient version 2: 8 february 2013.

Introduce yourself and explain nature of the study:

Hi. My name is XXXX. Thank you for meeting with me today.

You kindly agreed to take part in the COCAPP research project and I am here today to ask you a few questions about your experience of care planning and co-ordination. It should take about 45 minutes at most. There are no right or wrong answers. We just want to know what you think about the way your care has been planned and co-ordinated.

Remind the person that they have already given their consent to be interviewed and check that they are still OK with that. Remind them their name will not be used and they will not be identified in any way. They may stop at any time.

Check digital recorder and microphone are working and sound levels are adequate.

I am just going to read out the code number for you in this study so that your name can be left out of it and the interview remains anonymous.

Read out participant code and date

Prompts: Do you have a written care plan? Is it working for you? What did you find helpful? Less helpful? Do you understand your care plan? Would a care plan in different formats be helpful (e.g. as a phone app?) Are you aware of your care being planned? How are you involved in the planning of your care? What would help you to be more involved? Does your care plan include a focus on your abilities, assets, skills, strengths? If so, could you give me some examples? Do you feel ownership of your care plan – is it yours (or the service’s plan for you)? What is important for you? When and how often do you refer to your care plan? Some actions in your care plan may be about things for you to do – how helpful is that?

Prompts: Do you have care review meetings? How helpful are they? What did you find helpful? Less helpful? Do you have enough time? Who was involved in those reviews? Do you have any choice about the timing, venue or who chairs the meeting? How were you involved? Could you contribute? Were your views listened to? Are your wishes and preferences taken on board? What would help you to be more involved? Have you had any experience of meetings with your care co-ordinator to prepare for review meetings or the use of a prompt list?

Prompt: How did you first meet him/her? Do you have a good relationship with him/her? How long have you had this care co-ordinator? Have you had others? Was that similar or different? What did they do well/less well? Do you feel able to be open/express your fears with your care co-ordinator? Do you feel you trust your care co-ordinator?

Are you aware of your care being co-ordinated? What does that mean to you?

Prompt: Do you meet up? Does s/he phone you at all? Anything else? What is most helpful? What do they help you with? Are there things you would like more help with? What sort of things? How often do you see him/her?

Prompt: Like who? Social worker? Mental Health Nurse? Psychologist? Occupational therapist? Support worker? What has that been like? Does there appear to be communication between these different workers? Is your care co-ordinator involved in that? What information have you been given about other forms of support (e.g. support groups, peer support, user groups)?

Prompt: Thank you, that’s helpful. For many people, recovery is generally seen as a personal journey . . . one that may involve developing hope, a secure base and supportive relationships, being more in control of your life and care, social inclusion, how you develop coping skills, and self-management . . . often despite still have symptoms of mental illness etc. [ask next question]

Prompt: Have you been encouraged to develop a Personal Recovery Plan? A Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP)? Have there been things that have helped your Recovery? Are there things you think might have helped your Recovery? Are your achievements recognised? If you made a progress is it recognised, valued and recorded?

Prompt: What sort of thing would you have liked the Care Co-ordinator to have done more?

Prompt: Was there anything that was unhelpful? Intrusive?

Prompt: Did you think your care was tailored towards you and your individual needs? What does personalised care mean to you? Could you give me an example of where you think your care was personalised? In what way was it not focused on you as an individual? Do you feel in charge of your care and support?

Prompts: How has your safety been addressed in your care plan or by your care co-ordinator? Have any other aspects of safety or risk been discussed with you?

Prompt: Who is that? Are there others? Was s/he involved in the planning of your care? In what way? Would you have liked them to have been involved more? Can you give me an example? Have they been involved too much?

Prompt: Anything that could be done differently or a new approach to doing things? Can you tell me more about that idea? How would that improve things?

Prompt: Is there anything we have not asked you that we should have?

OK, that’s the end of the interview. Thank you very much for your time.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License .

• Cite this Page Simpson A, Hannigan B, Coffey M, et al. Cross-national comparative mixed-methods case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and co-ordination: Collaborative Care Planning Project (COCAPP). Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Feb. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 4.5.) Appendix 2, Interview schedule example (service user)
• PDF version of this title (2.7M)

Other titles in this collection

• Health Services and Delivery Research

Recent Activity

• Interview schedule example (service user) - Cross-national comparative mixed-met... Interview schedule example (service user) - Cross-national comparative mixed-methods case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and co-ordination: Collaborative Care Planning Project (COCAPP)

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

Candidates: Are you interviewing and need support?

Templates & tips to streamline interview scheduling

Interview scheduling is one of the biggest time sinks for recruiting teams.

With back and forth calls, changing schedules, and sudden cancellations, most recruiting teams are on a journey to streamline scheduling. For those at the beginning of their process improvement, we’ve provided the simplest form of scheduling efficiency… templates.

This is the ultimate set of templates for many aspects of interview scheduling , including setting up an interview via email, detailed agendas, and simple tracking sheets for scheduling and organizing meetings with multiple candidates.

In this article you’ll find:

• Email invite templates
• A variety of interview schedule templates
• Tips for scheduling interviews

For those looking to fully automate the interview scheduling process, we also walk through more comprehensive SaaS solutions that can help take scheduling off your to-do list .

Interview schedule email template

When contacting a candidate for a job interview, your email message should be informative and professional with an upbeat tone that is consistent with your company’s culture. This template provides a basic outline for an email invitation, including a clear subject line, your business name and the position applied for, and details about time and location of the interview. You may choose to include the name of the person conducting the interview, items the candidate should bring, or other information. Edit the template as needed to fit the company, position, and applicant.

Download Interview Schedule Email Template

Phone interview schedule email template

Phone interviews are an antiquated way for hiring managers to first get in touch with a candidate. For phone interviews, you’ll likely initiate contact with applicants via email or text. Use this template to create a custom script. Keep your message brief and professional to streamline the process and ensure clear communication with candidates.

Download Phone Interview Schedule Email Template

A more streamlined option is to replace the manager phone screen with on-demand video interviewing . This removes the need for scheduling entirely, and allows both sides of the hiring table to work on their own time, which accelerates this early stage of the interview process, and allows more candidates to be considered.

Sample interview schedule template

View a sample interview time schedule from start to finish, with each part of the interview itemized and assigned a given number of minutes. An interview agenda can keep the conversation on track and ensure essential items are not overlooked. Use this schedule outline to develop your own interview plan, including time for introductions, specific questions, and closing details.

Download a Sample and Blank Interview Schedule Template

Sample interview schedule for questions

This example interview template is organized into three sections: an opening, body, and closing. Each portion of the interview is assigned a time frame to help keep the process on schedule. The opening focuses on welcoming a candidate and building rapport. The body constructs the bulk of the interview, and the closing provides time for summary, candidate questions, and explaining the next steps.

Download Sample Interview Schedule for Questions Template

Interview appointment schedule template

This blank interview schedule template is a simple Excel spreadsheet for listing applicant names, interview dates and times, and key details. Customize the template by adding or removing columns to suit your needs. An appointment schedule makes it easy to keep track of interviews, get a quick overview of who is scheduled at a specific time period, or search for particular details.

Download Interview Appointment Schedule Template

Brief interview schedule template

Use this brief interview schedule form as-is or expand it to suit your needs. The template is divided into sections for the interview opening, body, and closing, with checkboxes that provide a visual reference of completed parts. Use the space at the top for information about the applicant and the position applied for. Add your interview questions to complete the template.

Download Brief Interview Schedule Template

Candidate interview agenda template

When doing multiple interviews for several candidates, scheduling can get complicated. This template is designed to help organize people, activities, and locations during a day of interviews. You can break down the who, what, and where for each interview on an hourly basis, and include lunch breaks, meetings, or other tasks you need to complete throughout the day. The template’s table format helps you create an easy-to-read schedule of events.

Download a Sample and Blank Candidate Interview Agenda Template

Tips for interview scheduling

Using templates for interview scheduling–from initial email contact to planning the structure of an interview–allows you to create an interview process that is both efficient and thorough. Once you prepare your basic templates, you can quickly modify them to create custom documents for each job or candidate. You can also go into an interview feeling prepared instead of guessing how much time is available for each phase while creating a positive first impression for the applicant.

As you schedule interviews, here are a few tips to keep in mind:

• Start with Written Contact: Sending an email or text allows you to include all necessary information and gives the candidate a chance to respond thoughtfully. You also reduce the risk of catching the candidate at a bad time, which could happen if you initiate contact by phone. An added benefit is that all the details they need to remember are in the message so they can reference them later.
• Be Flexible: Unless you are scheduling a group interview, and several people need to be available at a given time, offer candidates several time slots. They can select a time that works with their schedule, which will help make them more focused during the interview. Thereby increasing the chances that you will have a better meeting. Make sure times are adjusted to accommodate candidates who live in other time zones and are interviewing remotely.
• Consider Questions Carefully: Whether you’re asking behavioral questions (how an applicant has handled different work scenarios) or situational questions (how a candidate might handle hypothetical situations), only ask questions that relate to hiring and that the equal employment opportunity standards consider appropriate. In an attempt to be personable, an interviewer may inadvertently ask a question about gender, age, race, family status that could be interpreted as discriminatory. Plan questions in advance and focus on a candidate’s goals, performance, problem-solving abilities, skills and competencies, and other elements related to the position.
• Review Your Process: Consider reviewing the efficiency of your email communications and the effectiveness of your interview questions and structure. After conducting interviews, you can rate the candidates as well as the process to help streamline your hiring procedures and conduct more effective interviews in the future.

Following a standardized structure can help organize the interview and determine the allotted time for opening statements, questions and discussion, and concluding summaries. Even for unstructured interviews, which may not include predetermined questions, the conversation should have some structure. Simply schedule a specific time frame for different elements of the process, such as introducing the candidate to the company, engaging in conversation and discussion, and reviewing the next steps in the interview process.

Streamline scheduling interviews with applicants using automation

When a candidate’s status is updated in your ATS, they will automatically receive a text or email, similar to the templates we’ve shared with you, inviting them to schedule an interview time. Automated text reminders will be sent, and rescheduling, whether triggered by the hiring manager or candidate, is all handled automatically – helping reduce no-show rates.

Plus, with on-demand video interviewing, the need for scheduling is eliminated, as candidates can take the interview on their own time, and hiring managers and recruiters can look back at answers and assessments when it’s convenient for them. Beyond ease, you also are evaluating candidates consistently and based on core competencies necessary to perform well in a certain role, backed by IO psychology.

Want to learn more about taking scheduling off your to-do list?

• Human Potential Intelligence
• For Candidates
• For Hiring Managers
• HireVue Blog
• Tools for Universities

WHY HIREVUE

• Our Science
• Integrations Partners
• Customer Awards
• Legal Center
• Press & News
• Modern Hire

© 2024 HireVue, Inc. All rights reserved.

• Terms of Use
• AI Ethical Principles
• AI Explainability Statement

Researched by Consultants from Top-Tier Management Companies

Powerpoint Templates

Icon Bundle

Kpi Dashboard

Professional

Business Plans

Swot Analysis

Gantt Chart

Business Proposal

Marketing Plan

Project Management

Business Case

Business Model

Cyber Security

Business PPT

Digital Marketing

Digital Transformation

Human Resources

Product Management

Artificial Intelligence

Company Profile

Acknowledgement PPT

PPT Presentation

Reports Brochures

One Page Pitch

Interview PPT

All Categories

Top 5 Interview Schedule Templates with Samples and Examples

Aishwarya Pillai

It is the interview season for your as a recruiter, and you are looking for the perfect candidate to join your team. You have sifted through countless resumes and cover letters, and finally, you have shortlisted a handful of candidates that appear a perfect fit.

Now, comes the next step of scheduling interviews.

As you grapple with the question, here are top employment application templates, with which HR managers can streamline their recruitment process using a standardized format for collecting relevant information from job seekers. Access these templates with a click here.  

But where do you start for interviews? How do you ensure that the interviews are conducted effectively and efficiently? This is where interview schedule templates come in.

Interview schedule templates are pre-designed documents that help structure and organize your interview process. They give a clear outline of the number of candidates and their scheduled slots for the interview.

Sometimes, it also includes an outline of the interview questions, the order in which they should be asked, and the time allotted for each question. These interview schedule templates save time and ensure required information is in one place, making the evaluation more objective and efficient.

This blog examines top 5 interview schedule templates with samples and examples. Whether new to hiring or a seasoned pro, these templates will help you streamline your interview process and find the perfect candidate for the job.

The 100% customizable nature of the templates provides you with the desired flexibility to edit your presentations. The content-ready slides give you the much-needed structure . 

Let’s explore these templates now!

Template 1: Recruitment Process In HRM Interview Appointment Schedule For Hiring Candidate

Our content-ready Interview Appointment Schedule template is the perfect scheduling deck you need to ensure you have a flawless recruitment process. The slide encompasses details of the hiring process, including the applicant’s name, scheduled date, start and end time, applied position, and interviewer’s name. The start and end time of each of the scheduled interviews is also mentioned. The slide has a neat, organized look which will smooth out your interview process.

Download Now!

Template 2: Information Collected Relating Products Primary Data Schedule Interview

SlideTeam's Information Collected Relating Products Primary Data Schedule Interview template is a four-stage graphic to showcase your data most engagingly. It covers topics like Information Collected, Relating Products, Primary Data, and Schedule of Interviews. Use this graphic to make your message clear and visually engaging. You can also use this slide to showcase your knowledge of the varied strategies for recruitment, employee retention, etc. With this graphic, your message is sure to be well-received!

Template 3: Time Schedule For Conducting Multiple Interviews Hiring Candidates

This slide helps HR schedule interviews efficiently, saving time and ensuring a smooth hiring process. The template has an additional column for remarks to highlight crucial points, aiding in effective decision-making. With this timetable, interviews will proceed like clockwork, starting and finishing at the allotted time. Use this presentation template as a helpful guide to navigate and discuss the Employee Panel, Manager Panel, and Director Interview. It is a valuable tool to help you prepare and understand each interview process. Our slides are 100% customizable to help you shape the template according to your needs. 

Template 4: Security Hacker Interview Schedule For New Professionals PPT Pictures

This slide shows interview schedule for new employees hired as ethical hackers, security consultants, and IT security analysts. The PPT Pre-set contains well-laid points that explain the interview schedule, eligibility criteria, and the job description of a security consultant job. SlideTeam has provided additional points under some columns to give a defined structure to the template.

The use of this template also works to make the hiring process more streamlined by making relevant information available in a single slide. The content-rich template includes customizable icons and frames to insert images. Use this tool to deliver a thorough and informative presentation!

Template 5: Hacking IT Interview Schedule For New Professionals

Looking to hire new employees to stop hacking? Check out our Hacking IT Interview Schedule For New Professionals slide! It displays the interview schedule for hiring ethical hackers, security consultants, and IT security analysts. This template can help you navigate and discuss job roles such as a security analyst, certified ethical hacker, and a security consultant. The slide saves you tons of paperwork as all critical, sensitive information can be added to this one slide. This template comes with customizable, topic-relevant icons; combined with the 100% editable and customizable feature, this makes this presentation template an awesome presentation and business management tool. Download this template now to ensure a smooth hiring process and staff the right professionals for your team!

ROAD TO BETTER RECRUITMENT STARTS HERE!

In conclusion, interview schedules streamline the interview process with their emphasis on creating a defined structure for the candidate’s information to be filled in. This saves much time as a major pain point of recruiters is not being able to see the consolidated picture, as it were! 

Our interview schedules come in especially handy, when managers across departments conduct the interviews. 

SlideTeam’s interview schedule templates come with a highly-sophisticated design to look professional and suit organization taste. These templates come with all the relevant content to ease the work of the hiring managers. 

FAQs on Interview Scheduling

What is an interview schedule and questionnaire.

An interview schedule is like a checklist of planned questions. It helps interviewers gather information about candidates seeking to join their organization. It streamlines the interviewing process, making it more efficient and effective, ultimately improving the quality of the hires as well. It also helps keep all relevant information in one place.

A questionnaire, on the other hand, is a type of research tool that uses a set of questions on a particular topic. Unlike an interview schedule, the candidate fills out a questionnaire, which the interviewer later evaluates. It doesn't involve face-to-face interaction between the interviewer and the interviewee.

What are types of interview schedules?

The two types of interview schedules are:

• In-depth interview schedule: It is designed for open-ended interviews, which gather detailed information on serious or sensitive topics. The questions are open-ended, meaning the interviewer can ask for additional details or clarification, and have no YES/NO or one-word answers. 
• Structured Interview Schedule: It has a list of questions that the interviewer will use to interview the interviewee. This type of schedule also comes with dedicated space for the interviewer to record the answers that the interviewee provides. 

How do I make an interview schedule?

There are specific steps that a recruiter should follow to make an interview schedule. These include:

• Decide the type of interview schedule you plan to make
• Consider the candidate profile and list points you would want to know about them
• Create an opening statement to put the candidate at ease
• Determine questions you wish to ask the candidate
• Create a closing statement to review the information the candidate shared with you
• Leave space for notes

How do interview schedule templates improve an organization’s hiring?

Interview schedule templates can significantly improve an organization's hiring process  by providing a consistent and structured approach to interviewing candidates. According to a study conducted by Glassdoor, a well-structured interview process can lead to a better candidate experience and higher retention rates.

Here are some statistics that support the benefits of using interview schedule templates:

• According to a survey by LinkedIn, 83% of talent acquisition leaders say that the interview process is essential in creating a positive candidate experience.
• Another study by Glassdoor found that organizations with a robust interview process improve their quality of hire by 70%.
• A survey by SHRM revealed that organizations that use structured interviews are twice as likely to make accurate hiring decisions.
• A report by Aberdeen Group found that organizations with a standardized interview process have a 62% greater chance of hiring top talent.

Related posts:

• Top 50 Time Management Templates to Boost Your Productivity (Best Tips Included)
• Top 20 Task Management Templates to Align Your Business Activities
• Top 10 Social Media Schedule Template with Samples and Examples
• Top 5 Training Outline Template with Examples and Samples

Liked this blog? Please recommend us

Top 5 Weekly Status Update Templates with Examples and Samples

Must-Have Goal Calendar Templates with Examples and Samples

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA - the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Digital revolution powerpoint presentation slides

Sales funnel results presentation layouts

3d men joinning circular jigsaw puzzles ppt graphics icons

Business Strategic Planning Template For Organizations Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Future plan powerpoint template slide

Project Management Team Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Brand marketing powerpoint presentation slides

Launching a new service powerpoint presentation with slides go to market

Agenda powerpoint slide show

Four key metrics donut chart with percentage

Engineering and technology ppt inspiration example introduction continuous process improvement

Meet our team representing in circular format

50+ SAMPLE Interview Schedule Templates in PDF | MS Word

Interview schedule templates | ms word, 50+ sample interview schedule templates, what is an interview schedule, tick tock: when to conduct interviews, the basic parts of an interview schedule, how to make an effective interview schedule, what are the advantages of an interview schedule, how many interviews and candidates are there in one job, what is a panel interview.

Conversations for Scheduling Interviews

Interview Schedule Format

Interview Schedule of Shortlisted Candidates

Social Interview Schedule

Scientist Interview of Schedule

Interview Agenda Schedule Template

Sample Candidate Interview Schedule

Admissions Test and Interview Schedule

Simple Interview Schedule Template

B.Ed. Interview Schedule

Qualitative Interview Schedule

On-Campus Interview Schedule

Interview Schedule for Recruitment Template

Revised Interview Schedule Template

Sample Interview Schedule Template

Basic Interview Schedule

Iinterview Research Schedule Template

Formal Interview Schedule Template

Interview Schedule for Teaching Posts

Interview Schedule for Assistant Professor

Interview Schedule for Office

Online Interview Schedule

nterview Schedule for Applicants

Lecturer Post Interview Schedule

Interview Schedule for Faculty Positions

Interview Admissions Schedule

Public Officer Interview Schedule

Assistant Teachers Interview Schedule

Stakeholder Interview Schedule

Interview Schedule for Post of Scientist

Interview Schedule for PhD Admission

Interview Schedule for Post Officer

Standard Interview Schedule Template

Project Scientist Interview Schedule

Institute Interview Schedule Template

Interview Schedule for Shortlisted Candidates

Placement Interview Schedule

Department Wise Schedule of Interviews

Physics Interview Schedule

Inspector Schedule of Interview

Interview Schedule for Junior Executive

Printable Interview Schedule Template

Commission Interview Schedule

Presentation and Interview Schedule

College Interview Schedule Template

Subject Interview Schedule

Project Engineers Interview Schedule

Head Office Interview Schedule

Interview Date Schedule Template

Interview Schedule for Example

Why are interview schedules needed, step 1: understand the interview’s purpose, step 2: look for a sample template, step 3: outline the list of questions, step 4: associate time in your interview, step 5: keep an easy and organized interview schedule.

• A flexible interview and experience
• Clarity of questions
• Saves time and effort in gathering data
• Editable features
• Easy reference

Share This Post on Your Network

File formats, word templates, google docs templates, excel templates, powerpoint templates, google sheets templates, google slides templates, pdf templates, publisher templates, psd templates, indesign templates, illustrator templates, pages templates, keynote templates, numbers templates, outlook templates, you may also like these articles, 11+ sample printable schedule in ms word.

Welcome to the ultimate guide for crafting a winning daily routine! In this article, we delve into the art of designing a Sample Schedule that seamlessly blends productivity and…

50+ SAMPLE Daily Schedules in PDF | MS Word

How much time do you spend on completing your daily task at work? You could not probably tell because there are many factors affecting productivity and efficiency in the workplace.…

browse by categories

• Questionnaire
• Description
• Reconciliation
• Certificate
• Spreadsheet

Information

• privacy policy
• Terms & Conditions