sustainable products literature review

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Int J Environ Res Public Health

Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior toward Green Products: A Systematic Literature Review

Andreea barbu.

1 Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Business Engineering and Management, University Politehnica of Bucharest, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania

2 Academy of Romanian Scientists, RO-050044 Bucharest, Romania

Ștefan-Alexandru Catană

3 Faculty of Business and Administration, Department of Business Administration, University of Bucharest, RO-030167 Bucharest, Romania

Dana Corina Deselnicu

Lucian-ionel cioca.

4 Faculty of Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management Department, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, RO-550025 Sibiu, Romania

Alexandra Ioanid

Associated data.

Not applicable.

In the last few decades, humans have consumed more resources than in all of previous history. Hence, we are living in times in which the topic of environmental protection is a global concern. The paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review on consumer behavior, as well as identifying the main factors that interfere with consumer behavior toward green products. A total of 37 studies were found and systematized using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The papers were selected only if they featured research on consumer perceptions of green products. Using this search strategy, a literature analysis was performed based on papers extracted from Web of Science, Emerald Insights, Springer Link, and Science Direct. As a result, various factors that influence consumer behavior toward green products were identified, such as social norms, natural environmental orientation, the company’s perceived green image, green product characteristics, perceived risks and inconvenience of buying green products, perceived benefits of buying green products, institutional trust, sociodemographic characteristics, and consumer confidence. Even though completing a systematic literature review is not something new in academic research, the novelty of this paper is found in its theme: consumer behavior toward green products. Although the analyzed articles highlight quite varied reasons, the articles emphasize that the green products should take into account the needs, expectations, and perceptions of customers.

1. Introduction

In the last few decades, humans have consumed more resources than in all of previous history. Hence, we are living in times in which the topic of environmental protection is a global concern. There are estimations that almost 70% of the planet’s greenhouse gas footprint depends on which products customers choose and whether they use and dispose of them in a sustainable manner [ 1 ]. Thus, consumers are becoming more interested in environmental topics and reflecting their interest in their decision to buy green products [ 2 ]. The United Nations Environment Programme (2011) [ 3 ] has estimated that the green products market doubles annually. Another international study has indicated that 73% of consumers across 60 countries are determined to pay more for sustainable products [ 4 ]. In a survey developed by Harvard Business Review [ 1 ], 65% of the consumers surveyed said they want to buy eco-friendly products, but only 26% of them do so, thus this is a contradictory desire.

The topic of increasing consumer interest in green products has rapidly expanded globally over the last few years [ 5 ]. The global market for green products is estimated at USD 44 trillion, more than half of global GDP [ 6 ]. The global market for low-carbon environmental goods and services is estimated at EUR 4.2 trillion [ 7 ]. Moreover, the global green technology and sustainability market size was valued at USD 11.49 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow to USD 13.76 billion in 2022 [ 8 ]. This phenomenon is facilitated by the COVID-19 pandemic when the heightened attention to hygiene and wellness led to increasing demand for safe products for both consumers’ families and the environment [ 9 ]. In Romania, a European Union country with an emerging economy, 73% of the consumers state that they are willing to pay more for green food grown without chemical fertilizers and pesticides, 49% would agree to pay more for renewable energy, and 36% would pay more for products with biodegradable components [ 10 ].

The state-of-art review confirms the absence of a universal, effective, and well-structured definition of a green product [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Although there is no internationally recognized definition, a green product (or ecological product/eco-friendly product/sustainable product) is “a sustainable product designed to minimize its environmental impacts during its whole life-cycle and even after it is of no use” [ 15 ]. In essence, a green product has two main characteristics: reducing waste and maximizing resource efficiency [ 16 ]. The literature analyzed focused on green products from a variety of viewpoints, presenting both their benefits and barriers [ 17 ]. Researchers have linked ecological products with environmental protection [ 18 ], sustainability [ 19 ], reduced wastage during production [ 20 ], social quality [ 21 ], economic benefits [ 22 ], low energy consumption [ 23 ], low emissions [ 24 ], less packaging [ 14 ], etc. However, other authors have revealed the negative aspects of sustainable products as follows: higher price [ 25 ], costly green certifications [ 26 ], and the short durability of the product [ 27 ].

Many researchers have explored consumer behavior toward the green products topic and have presented different viewpoints on this subject. First of all, the green products consumers use contribute to the protection of the environment by consumers’ refusal to buy products that are harmful to the environment [ 28 , 29 ]. Secondly, a green consumer can be defined as an individual who adopts environmentally-friendly behaviors and buys green products rather than standard products [ 30 ]. Thirdly, consumers with environmental awareness are not only interested in the consumption process, but also in the production, the scarcity of consumed resources, and post-use processes of products [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].

Against this background, this paper seeks to identify and analyze the factors that influence consumer behavior toward green products. To achieve the aims of the paper, the authors employed a systematic literature review. Even though completing a systematic literature review is not something new in academic research, the novelty of this paper is in its theme: consumer behavior toward green products. Although the analyzed articles highlight quite varied reasons, the topic of green products should take into account the needs, expectations, and perceptions of customers. Moreover, to determine the main factors that influence consumer behavior toward green products, the authors of this paper also analyzed if the factors treated by each of the analyzed paper confirmed the existing correlations between these factors and the consumer behavior toward green products.

This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the Materials and Methods. The Results and Discussion are presented in Section 3 and Section 4 , respectively. Section 5 summarizes this study and illustrates the Conclusions, along with their limitations and research perspectives.

2. Materials and Methods

In order to achieve the aims of the paper, the authors carried out a systematic literature review that encompassed several phases ( Figure 1 ), based on the methodology presented by Glogovețan et al. (2022) [ 34 ]. Firstly, the authors of this paper designed the plan for the scientific research by setting the research objectives. Secondly, they defined the conceptual boundaries. The main identified research directions are composed of consumer behavior regarding green products.

Phases of the systematic literature review.

Thirdly, the authors used the inclusion and exclusion criteria reported by [ 34 , 35 ] and they performed a literature analysis through a combination of the following keywords ( Figure 2 ) in several electronic databases such as Web of Science, Science Direct, Springer Link, SAGE, and Emerald Insight.

Keywords used for search strategy.

The initial search generated 119 papers, of which 37 titles fit the considered criteria ( Table 1 ); therefore, they were analyzed further. The articles were evaluated to identify if they deal with consumer perception on green products.

The methodological criteria.

Source: [ 34 , 35 ].

The publications were selected only if they featured research on consumer perceptions regarding green products and were retained for further analysis only if they simultaneously fulfilled the eight methodological criteria ( Table 1 ) proposed by [ 34 ] and [ 35 ]. The final set of articles included in the present systematic literature review consists of 37 publications.

To achieve the goal of this paper, the authors divided the results of their analysis into three sections. The first section presents the methodology used in the reviewed studies and other significant information about the analyzed articles. The second section presents the main factors influencing consumer behavior toward green products observed by the authors in the reviewed studies, while the third part contains a brief analysis of each determined dimension.

3.1. Revision of the Studies

Out of the 37 reviewed articles ( Table 2 ), 5 of them were published in 2022, and 13 were published in 2021, while the rest covered the years 2017–2020. These articles were published in journals with the main focus being on business strategy and the environment (14), sustainability (11), consumer services (5), cleaner production (4), environmental psychology, and public health (3). The majority of the papers presented quantitative studies, with some of them also containing qualitative research.

Basic information of the reviewed articles.

Note: * total number of citations on Google Scholar on 1 August 2022.

Out of the 37 papers, 4 of them presented a literature review about different variables that can influence green product purchasing behavior. Moreover, in these papers, a variety of statistical procedures were used, such as the ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis test, the Mann–Whitney U test, Pearson’s Chi-square test, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test, personal interview and focus group discussions, multivariate data analysis techniques using structural equation modelling, and multiple regression analyses.

3.2. The Main Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

The analysis of the reviewed papers revealed a series of factors that can influence consumer behavior toward green products. 111 factors were analyzed, with most of them being quite similar in form and meaning. However, the authors of this paper were able to group these factors according to their form and meaning into eight main categories: social norms, natural environmental orientation, a company’s perceived green image, green product characteristics, perceived risks and inconvenience of buying green products, perceived benefits of buying green products, institutional trust, sociodemographic characteristics, and consumer confidence ( Figure 3 ):

Factors influencing consumer behavior toward green products.

Regarding the results of the analyzed studies, the authors of this paper also analyzed if the factors assessed by each paper confirmed the existing correlations and the buying behavior toward green products. Comments based on these correlations will be made in the following subsections, for each main category of identified factors.

3.3. Social Norms and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

The reviewed papers highlighted that in the context of green product consumption, social norms describe the way society views environmental issues [ 47 ]. In addition, social norms refer to how people think and act pro-environmentally [ 72 ]. The reviewed studies present the role of social norms in predicting pro-environmental behavior and changing people’s green behaviors [ 41 , 47 , 53 , 62 , 72 ]. The results indicate that people are significantly influenced by society’s actions regarding pro-environmental issues and the way society presents normality in this context.

The factors that were grouped in this category also refer to green product knowledge [ 40 , 50 , 63 , 65 ], natural environmental orientation [ 67 ], green habit [ 67 ], knowledge about environmental damage and pollution [ 71 ], attitudes toward environmental protection [ 71 ], environmental concern habit [ 40 ], environmental consciousness [ 37 , 58 , 61 , 64 ], attitudes toward environmental issues [ 64 ], green trust [ 40 , 50 , 54 , 66 ] green involvement [ 54 ], environmental beliefs [ 59 , 60 ], environmental awareness [ 5 , 50 , 59 ], environmental concerns [ 36 , 58 , 59 ], green attitudes [ 50 , 61 ], drive for environmental responsibility [ 36 , 42 ], perceived ecological value [ 44 ], green practices [ 46 ], green product awareness [ 44 , 45 ], and consumer social responsibility [ 54 ].

All of the identified factors influence consumer behavior toward green products. Thus, to make positive changes in people’s behavior toward green products, it is necessary to make changes at a societal level regarding the attitudes toward environmental issues and also to educate people in this regard.

3.4. A Company’s Perceived Image and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

Corporate image refers to the overall impressions of the organization’s stakeholders, as well as how stakeholders perceive the firm as a business [ 38 ].

In the last few years, environmental issues such as global warming and environmental damage have represented real concerns for people all over the world [ 73 ]. People have tried to be more responsible with their actions and have attempted to buy environmentally-friendly products [ 74 ]. In this context, companies have been forced to modify their services or products, offering clients solutions that would also meet the environmental protection needs. Thus, they have started to invest in building a strong green image or a green brand for their businesses, and therefore they are trying to influence the consumer behavior of buying green products [ 75 ].

The reviewed papers that addressed this topic also highlighted that a company’s perceived green image is built around several concepts such as eco-certification origin [ 43 ], brand image [ 40 , 48 ], brand love [ 48 ], brand loyalty [ 48 ], brand trust [ 66 ], green brand associations [ 5 ], green brand attitude [ 5 ], green brand knowledge [ 66 ], green communication [ 39 ], social media [ 42 ], and product innovation and segmentation [ 50 ].

However, not all the studies demonstrated that all of these concepts influence consumer behavior toward green products. For example, [ 40 ], as well as [ 69 ], argues that green brand knowledge, environmental knowledge, consumers’ environmental attitudes and green knowledge do not influence attitudes toward using green products, but investing in brand trust and brand image are key actions that influence consumer behavior [ 5 ].

3.5. Green Product Characteristics and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

It is almost impossible to talk about green products without mentioning their characteristics or attributes. Cheung and To (2019) [ 64 ] found out that green product information can be a key determinant of consumers’ green purchase behavior. Zhang and Dong (2020) [ 55 ] claim that a green product needs to be credible in order to be appreciated by potential buyers, so the eco-label can affect the consumers’ buying behavior [ 55 ]. In addition, besides eco-labels, consumers are taking into account other aspects such as the quality of the green products [ 45 , 51 , 55 , 57 , 70 ] or the awareness about green products [ 44 , 45 , 54 , 55 ], with all of them having a significant impact on consumer behavior toward green products.

After analyzing the selected papers, the authors of this research concluded that consumer behavior toward green products can be influenced by the following product characteristics: price [ 45 , 57 ], quality [ 45 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 64 , 70 , 71 ], availability [ 45 , 46 , 55 , 68 ], packaging [ 55 ], eco-label [ 45 , 46 , 55 ], material [ 46 ], functional value [ 46 ], and green product information [ 64 ].

The availability of green products is an important factor that can positively influence consumer behavior toward green products [ 45 ]. This factor can also influence the consumers’ buying behavior, because they can choose between different types of green products or different brand names. In addition, the perceived quality of green products can impact consumers’ green purchasing intentions [ 46 , 64 ], with the packaging also playing an important role in influencing the perceived quality of green products [ 45 ].

3.6. Perceived Risks and Inconvenience of Buying Green Products and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

Perceived risk refers to the subjective evaluation of customers regarding the possible consequences of wrong purchasing decisions [ 70 ], while perceived inconvenience of buying green products refers to aspects such as: the price, difficulty in evaluating them depending on how ecological they are, difficulty in finding green products in regular stores, and additional time and effort to get to the specialized stores where they are marketed [ 60 ].

In their research, Caniëls et al. (2021) [ 60 ] started from the idea that higher perceived inconvenience is associated with a negative attitude towards buying green products. Their paper highlights that green products are more expensive than normal products, they are not easy to find in stores and it is also hard to determine their actual degree of “greenness”. Therefore, consumers need to make an extra effort in order to find green products, to analyze the specifications written on the label and their relevance, and of course, to buy them at a higher price. Furthermore, the analyzed paper also focuses on the relationship between the inconvenience of buying green products, pro-environmental beliefs, and social values. According to the consumers’ pro-environmental beliefs, the green buying behavior of young people who perceive the high inconvenience of buying green products is largely influenced by the social value attached to buying green products [ 60 ]. Moreover, Wasaya et al. (2021) [ 51 ] state that those customers who attach great importance to the environment, who are aware of its problems, have a risk perception in their mind that the product or service they use will not be according to the claims they have made. This situation generates uncertainty and brings negative changes regarding the attitudes of customers regarding the purchase of products or services. Thus, the perceived risk becomes a subjective assessment of potential clients that is associated with the possible consequences of wrong decisions. Regarding the types of perceived risks, Wang (2017) [ 70 ] states that they can refer to product performance, social aspects, psychological aspects, physical aspects, and loss of time.

Regarding this section, by analyzing the selected papers of this study, the authors found out that consumer behavior toward green products can be influenced by the following factors: green perceived risk [ 51 , 70 ], perception of recycled product risk and uncertainty [ 71 ], and perceived inconvenience of buying green products [ 60 ].

Sun et al. (2018) [ 71 ] analyzed the case of recycled products and discovered that the perception of recycled products risk is negatively related to the perception of quality for recycled products and positively to the pro attitude toward environmental protection. Their results showed that concepts such as risk and uncertainty associated with green products negatively influence consumers’ buying behavior. Wasaya et al. (2021) [ 51 ] also highlight that there is a negative and significant relationship between environmental awareness and green perceived risk.

3.7. Perceived Benefits of Buying Green and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

Regarding the attitude toward eco-social benefits, Cheung and To (2019) [ 64 ] claim that this concept measures the degree to which the potential consumers of green products agree that purchasing those products will bring social benefits and have a positive moral value.

When it comes to the relationship between the benefits of green products and consumer behavior toward green products, the authors of this paper extracted from the selected papers some important factors that can be grouped into a single dimension: attitude toward eco-social benefits [ 64 ], company benefit belief, personal benefit belief [ 47 ], and perceived consumer effectiveness [ 38 , 40 ]

Concern for the environment may lead consumers to maximize the eco-social benefits. Buying eco-friendly products brings them more psychological benefits, and they perceive life improvement through using green products [ 64 ]. In addition, as green products consume less energy, consumers believe that green products can bring even more benefits, while their attitude towards environmental protection will also be improved. Therefore, this study asks how a consumer’s target knowledge (the belief that the consumer will benefit from good quality) and agent knowledge (the belief that the company will benefit from it) are associated with their purchase intentions from companies, following environmentally sound practices.

Besides personal benefit beliefs, company benefit beliefs significantly predicted purchase intentions [ 47 ]. In their research, Ham et al. (2022) claim that the company benefit belief is one of the strongest predictors of purchase intentions across all generations. In the case of the companies that use corporate social responsibility and also green marketing, potential customers are more attracted to buy from them and seem to appreciate their efforts to be eco-friendly. Moreover, if a customer believes that a company implements green practices, he/she is willing to support that company and buy green products from it [ 47 ].

Perceived consumer effectiveness becomes an important predictor of green purchase behavior, with it being even more significant than environmental attitudes alone [ 38 ]. Perceived consumer effectiveness positively influences green purchase behavior and also the company’s perceived green image [ 38 ]. Wang et al. (2019) [ 40 ] highlight the fact that companies should attach environmental protection labels to green product packaging to enhance perceived consumer effectiveness. Thus, by specifying such information on the label, such as resources saved or carbon emissions reduced, companies can encourage consumers to contribute to the protection of the environment by purchasing green products.

3.8. Institutional Trust and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

Institutional trust refers to trust in institutions, whether we are considering governments or companies. This is an important aspect to be studied in the case of green product buying behavior, mainly when consumers do not have enough knowledge or time to analyze their options regarding green products [ 68 ].

In the papers selected for this study, the authors found that there is a significant relationship between institutional trust and consumer behavior toward green products, with this relationship being mediated by factors such as institutional trust [ 68 ] and government support [ 44 ].

In their paper, Ricci et al. (2018) studied the trust-to-go-green concept and discovered that institutional trust in food supply chain-related actors influences the attitudes of consumers towards green products and also the concern about the environmental and health-related impacts of agricultural practices. Their results indicate that the more consumers trust supply chain-related actors, the more they would be willing to buy green food [ 68 ].

An important role is played by government support, which should act in the sense of promoting a sustainable market, and positively influencing consumer attitudes toward green products [ 76 ]. Al-Kumaim et al. (2021) [ 44 ] analyzed the relationship between government support and purchase intention toward green products purchase behavior. According to them, one of the government’s roles is to provide guiding principles to consumers that can affect their buying attitudes based on the health and safety values of green products. In addition, the government’s policies regarding the environment positively impact consumers’ attitudes toward green products [ 44 , 77 ] the government’s support and institutional trust play an important role in consumer behavior toward green products.

When green companies manage to raise the consumers’ level of trust in institutions, they can also improve the consumers’ probability to choose green products [ 68 ]. Thus, institutional trust can be considered as an important factor that can be used to promote green acquisitions to consumers who are not particularly involved in eco-friendly behavior [ 68 ].

3.9. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

Sociodemographic characteristic seems to also be an important factor that can influence consumer behavior regarding green product acquisitions [ 52 , 55 ]. This dimension was represented in the specialty literature by items such as age [ 47 ], gender, education, number of children [ 40 ], place of residence, or financial situation [ 40 , 52 ].

When it comes to the influence of gender on green product acquisition, Witek and Kuźniar (2021) [ 52 ] highlighted the fact that women are more sensitive about environmental issues than men, more interested in health and living in a safe environment, and more interested in buying eco-products than men, even if they need to pay higher prices for green products.

Even if some pieces of research have demonstrated that age does not influence green behaviors [ 36 ], the results obtained by Witek and Kuźniar (2021) [ 52 ] show that the older age the of consumers, the greater the social pressure for purchasing green products, and older consumers expressing green purchase intentions [ 47 ]. Thus, older people seem to be more responsible in addressing environmental problems through actions than the younger generation [ 47 ].

Regarding the impact of education on green product acquisition, there is still room for improvement. The results obtained by Witek and Kuźniar (2021) [ 52 ] did not support the hypothesis according to which education has a positive impact on the consumers’ green purchase intentions, while other studies show the opposite [ 40 , 78 , 79 ].

Income [ 40 ] and personal financial situation are factors that can influence green behavior too, as the personal financial situation highly influences the consumers’ willingness to pay more for green products [ 52 ]. The number of children has an impact on the frequency of green product purchases as well, as mothers are very concerned about their children’s health and safety, which is why they tend to buy more green products [ 52 ].

3.10. Consumer Confidence and Consumer Behavior toward Green Products

Consumer self-confidence is associated with buying intention, as well as green product quality and price perceptions [ 57 ]. Self-confidence is related to a positive experience in supermarkets or other marketplaces [ 76 ].

By analyzing the papers selected for this research, the authors of this paper discovered that some similar concepts that can influence consumer behavior toward green products could be grouped into consumer confidence [ 37 ], consumer protection confidence, and consumer self-confidence [ 57 ].

To predict consumers’ purchase decisions, it is necessary to understand consumer confidence, which is an indicator of customers’ evaluations of the national economy and their financial situation [ 80 ]. In their research, Han et al. (2022) [ 37 ] discussed consumer confidence and its positive relationship with green purchase intention. They found that this relationship is partially mediated by environmental and status consciousness. Moreover, they highlighted that the results of their paper can help retailers in developing better marketing tactics by understanding how consumer confidence fluctuations can influence the major economic growth-driven environmental challenges.

In their paper, D’Souza et al. (2020) [ 57 ] discussed the level of the consumers’ perceived ability to make sound decisions and also the ability to acquire and use information by looking at consumer self-confidence and consumer protection self-confidence.

When it comes to consumer self-confidence, manufacturers, and retailers need to analyze the consumers’ confidence in their ability to obtain and understand green product information, their ability to choose the right product based on that information, their confidence regarding how their choices correspond with their expectations, and how they can improve satisfaction [ 57 ].

Similarly, regarding consumer protection self-confidence, it is important to analyze the marketers’ strategies used to persuade consumers to buy green products and also the level of consumers’ confidence in dealing with these strategies and consumers’ rights. Thus, through their paper, D’Souza et al. (2020) [ 57 ] claim that consumer self-confidence moderates the relationship between the price and the quality of green products in the decision to buy green products, highlighting the fact that consumer protection confidence has no moderating effect on these relationships. In addition, consumer self-confidence can modify consumers’ purchasing intentions.

4. Discussion

This systematic review reveals the most important factors influencing consumer behavior of green products. From the analysis of the selected 37 papers, a series of common characteristics were identified, highlighting various representative factors for this field, even if the methodologies used in these studies were different or the results obtained were somewhat contradictory regarding the relationship between the studied variables. Thus, the most used factors in influencing user behavior toward green products could be grouped into eight distinct categories: social norms, a company’s perceived green image, green product characteristics, perceived risks and inconvenience of buying green products, perceived benefits of buying green products, institutional trust, sociodemographic characteristics, and consumer confidence.

This grouping made by the authors of this paper, as well as the establishment of the eight categories of factors, can be seen as a new contribution to the specialty literature, thus coming in as a gap analysis that has the role of both filtering, extracting, and presenting the most representative factors that influence consumer behavior regarding the purchase of green products.

Although in the past, social norms represented one of the most used factors influencing consumers’ environmental behaviors [ 81 ], this concept is still an important one when it comes to making consumers act pro-environmentally [ 41 , 47 , 53 , 62 , 72 , 82 ]. Letting people know how others act regarding the protection of the environment can be the key to how social norms can influence green buying behavior [ 81 ]. Consumers need to choose products that do not harm the environment and take care of their buying behavior as well. Their attitude towards using and buying green products can influence other members of society, which is why they need to be responsible for their actions. Consumer social responsibility is positively related to green purchasing intention [ 54 ], therefore “people must be aware of their role in reducing ecological issues and respond appropriately” [ 83 ].

Even if the majority of the papers from our study have shown that the subjective norms directly affect consumer behavior toward green products [ 36 , 51 , 54 , 61 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 71 ], there is evidence to support the fact that this factor does not directly impact green purchase intention, but it indirectly relates to future purchase intention [ 38 , 43 , 66 ]. This relationship is mediated by a company’s perceived green image when a green corporate image is a long-term goal for the management. In a competitive market, the green image could play a key role in building a company’s brand, which can differentiate a company’s offerings from competing ones [ 47 ], with the image of a company being valuable for increasing customer satisfaction [ 84 ]. Thus, companies should focus on communication and green marketing techniques which deliver information that influences consumer behavior to be more eco-friendly [ 85 ].

Also, making consumers aware of green product information can be a key determinant of green purchase behavior [ 64 ]. Most of the time, when customers are concerned about the environment and its preservation, they tend to buy green products if these products have eco-certifications or are produced under eco-certification schemes and respect rigorous regulations [ 45 , 46 , 49 , 55 ].

For the potential customers who find the green product characteristics on the eco-labels, the decision to buy the product is easy to make, with this analysis making them pay even higher prices for green products that might cause less harm to the environment [ 64 ]. Thus, if the information regarding green product characteristics convinces consumers that their attributes, designs, and functions are beneficial to them or the environment [ 45 ], people are willing to pay more for that functional value.

When it comes to green product buying behavior, perceived risk is also a factor that should be analyzed [ 51 , 60 , 70 , 71 ]. This perceived risk is consumers’ valuation, which is associated with the possible consequences of wrong decisions [ 86 ]. The analyzed scientific papers of this research topic highlight that risks and uncertainty regarding green products negatively influence potential customers’ buying behavior, with environmental awareness being an important factor that can affect green perceived risk [ 51 ]. Therefore, in order to reduce risks, consumers can use different strategies, such as pre-purchase deliberation, seeking additional information, reliance on brand image, personal recommendations, or the security of warranties [ 70 ].

Also, the perceived benefits of buying green products can influence consumers’ behavior toward green products [ 38 , 40 , 47 , 64 ]. Perceived consumer effectiveness refers to the consumer’s belief that the efforts of his/her actions can make significant differences in solving environmental problems [ 87 ]. Therefore, consumers who think that their choices to buy green products will bring benefits to the environment tend to buy more green products [ 40 ].

Although trust is considered to be an important factor that can influence consumer behavior [ 88 , 89 ], there is still a lot of debate about how institutional trust can affect consumer behavior toward green products, especially when trust levels may be influenced both positively and negatively [ 90 ]. Ricci et al. (2018) [ 68 ] highlight the fact that institutional trust can influence consumer risk perception and attitudes, with the level of trust negatively affecting those variables [ 91 ]. Concerning the relationship between trust and consumer attitudes, several studies have shown that the higher the level of consumer trust, the higher the probability to develop a positive attitude and, thus, choosing products with eco-friendly characteristics [ 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ].

This research also revealed that sociodemographic characteristics can be important factors that influence consumer behavior toward green products [ 52 , 55 ]. While the results obtained by Witek and Kuźniar (2021) [ 52 ] showed no relationship between the consumers’ education and their buying behavior toward green products, other studies claim the opposite [ 58 , 78 , 79 ]. In addition, sociodemographic characteristics such as gender [ 47 ], age [ 52 ] or personal financial situation [ 47 ] can influence consumer behavior toward green products, while other studies claim they are not important when it comes to the final decision of buying green products [ 63 , 96 , 97 ]. Moreover, our analysis showed that there is a positive relationship between consumer confidence and consumer behavior toward green products [ 37 , 57 ], with this being one of the factors that can significantly influence potential customers’ behavior.

The papers from the specialty literature that separately analyze the interaction between various factors and the attitude of consumers and their behavior regarding the purchase of green products make the mission of researchers, and also merchants, quite difficult in terms of understanding and managing these situations. On one hand, researchers who want to make important contributions to the green products industry should start from a clear set of factors that generally influence the purchase of green products. After understanding these concepts and how they are correlated with the perceptions of potential consumers, they should customize them for specific green product industries and test if the same types of correlations exist in their case. However, if there is not a clear enough basis regarding the main factors from which their analysis must start, then the future results that will be obtained by them could be incomplete or less relevant for all those who want to know more about generic green products. On the other hand, green product traders must research the existing case studies in the specialized literature to analyze the type of variables taken into account for testing the conceptual models presented in the scientific works. They must understand the basic concepts used, check if they all match their types of specialized green products, and if the conclusions and directions formulated by the authors of the papers present information that could be useful to them in the case of the industries in which they are used. The efforts of retailers should first focus on papers that present the basic concepts absolutely necessary in managing the behavior of customers interested in green products, and only then should they focus on specific case studies. Thus, this paper comes as a cornerstone in the green products industry in order to be able to create an overview necessary for both researchers and green product traders in relation to the main factors that can determine the purchase of green products.

5. Conclusions

Considering that in the last few decades humans have consumed more resources than in all of previous history, the topic of environmental protection is a global concern. In this vein, consumers’ interest in green products has witnessed an impressive rise.

From a theoretical point of view, this paper provides valuable new insights into the expansion of the scientific literature on consumer perceptions on green products. In this line, the green products acquisition process should take into account the factors influencing consumer behavior. Moreover, the paper discusses the positive and negative influence of several key factors that influence consumers’ behavior toward green products: social norms, natural environmental orientation, company’s perceived green image, green product characteristics, perceived risks and inconvenience of buying green products, perceived benefits of buying green products, institutional trust, sociodemographic characteristics, and consumer confidence.

From a practical point of view, the topic of green products should take into account the needs, expectations, and perceptions of consumers. Firstly, by taking into consideration all the factors influencing consumer behavior, companies from the ecological sector should design and implement several strategies to target interested consumers. Secondly, government authorities should support and promote a culture of green products. Thirdly, companies should create a good institutional image, highlighting that consumers should choose products that do not harm the environment.

The present study has certain limitations. First of all, considering the research strategy (which takes into account only papers that fit into the mentioned criteria), the authors of this paper may have omitted some pertinent articles. This brings about the possibility that the removed papers include information that could affect our conclusions. Secondly, there is a need for future research related to factors influencing the consumer behavior toward green products, considering the discrepancy between nations or areas. Thirdly, since this study was based on only some of the factors that influence consumer behavior toward green products, future research should be conducted to identify and analyze other important factors.

Funding Statement

The publication of this article has been funded by the University Politehnica of Bucharest (UPB) through the PubArt Programme.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Ș.-A.C. and A.B.; literature review, Ș.-A.C. and A.B.; data curation, Ș.-A.C., A.B., D.C.D., L.-I.C. and A.I.; formal analysis, Ș.-A.C., A.B., D.C.D., L.-I.C. and A.I.; methodology, A.B., D.C.D. and Ș.-A.C.; supervision, L.-I.C. and D.C.D.; writing—original draft, Ș.-A.C. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, Ș.-A.C., A.B., D.C.D., L.-I.C. and A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, consumer responses to sustainable product branding strategies: a literature review and future research agenda.

Baltic Journal of Management

ISSN : 1746-5265

Article publication date: 28 August 2023

Issue publication date: 5 September 2023

This literature review aims to synthesise the research on various sustainable product branding activities and their impact on consumer responses to sustainable products and brands.

Design/methodology/approach

This literature review is semi-systematic and can be classified as a domain-based review. The search strategy was systematic and well-defined.

The authors identified four themes: building brand equity, brand communication, product development and third-party labels and ratings, within the sustainable product branding activities that influence consumers' responses to sustainable products and brands. The study's findings revealed diverse, and not always favourable, types of behavioural and attitudinal responses from consumers. As for the positive consumer responses, the authors found positive attitudes towards brands, willingness to pay a premium price and positive word-of-mouth intentions. As for the negative consumer responses, the authors found perceived greenwashing, negative brand evaluations and resistance to sustainable products with unfamiliar third-party labels. Several future research propositions and implications for research and practice are discussed.

Originality/value

Despite the large number of studies that look at sustainable branding strategies, there is a gap in terms of synthesising the knowledge on consumer responses to sustainable product branding strategies. This paper intends to fill this gap.

• Literature review
• Consumer behaviour
• Sustainable product branding

Acknowledgements

Rezvani Acknowledges the funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions, grant agreement No. 843441.

Fatemi, H. , Leijerholt, U. , Rezvani, Z. and Schnittka, O. (2023), "Consumer responses to sustainable product branding strategies: a literature review and future research agenda", Baltic Journal of Management , Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 525-542. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-11-2022-0412

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Products: A Systematic Literature Review

2023, Sustainability

Due to the growing concern towards natural resource depletion and the increasing levels of waste generation caused by economic growth, sustainable consumption has gained the attention of both governments and society. Despite this, the market share of sustainable products remains low, and studies analysing the factors influencing consumers’ perception of sustainable products provide inconclusive results. This work aims to help bridge this gap by summarising the main literature results and focusing on practical implications. We perform a systematic literature review to identify the factors influencing consumers’ perception of sustainable products. Next, we classify these factors according to the triple bottom line framework, to provide a holistic perspective on the subject and present useful suggestions for companies. The findings suggest that most studies adopt a partial perspective on sustainability, focusing on only one of the sustainability dimensions or considering a single product category. The results also show that there are numerous factors that can influence consumer perception across all three sustainability dimensions. To increase the market share of sustainable products, companies should try and target new customer segments, by adopting a holistic approach to sustainability and analysing how consumers manage the trade-offs between the factors related to different sustainability dimensions. From a practical perspective, this study provides managers with a solid starting point to identify and assess the value of sustainable products in relation to the sustainability dimensions and the characteristics of the target customer segments.

Related Papers

International Journal of Consumer Studies

Daniel Hanss

An important step in promoting sustainable consumption is to find out how consumers understand the concept of sustainability. In this paper, we report on a study among Norwegian consumers in which we explored their understanding of sustainability at two levels. First, we investigated consumers' understanding of the general sustainability concept; specifically, we studied how important the following five sustainability dimensions are in consumers' conception of sustainability: the environmental, social, economic, temporal and the developmental dimension. Second, we investigated how consumers' understanding of sustainability manifests itself in consumption decisions: We studied consumers' opinions about how important various attributes are for sustainable products and which product labels they consider indicative of sustainable products. We found that all five sustainability dimensions occurred as elements of consumers' understanding of the sustainability concept. The environmental dimension, the social dimension and the developmental dimension were particularly outstanding. With regard to attributes that are important for sustainable products, consumers placed high emphasis on recyclability of the packaging, fair payment of producers, low energy use and low carbon dioxide emissions during production and shipping. Humane animal treatment was also considered an important attribute of sustainable products. The product labels that were considered most indicative of sustainable products were the Nordic Swan and the Norwegian Debio label. Consumers' judgments of how indicative the labels are of sustainable products were related positively to familiarity with the labels.

Business Strategy and the Environment

Caroline Oates

Claudio Camfield , Patricia Piceti

This study aims to bring a contribution to academic research in marketing, specifically consumer behavior turned to the green and sustainable consumption. It was used a systematic methodology for the literature review from 1992 to April 2015, at the ProQuest database and the main filter was directed at the joint search of the three main keywords "consumerism, sustainability and consumer behavior." outputs were checked for many items outside of the marketing area, however, after all the filtering 27 articles remained, which were used for the analysis. As main results in the marketing area, in particular to consumerism, sustainability and consumer behavior, it was showed the existence of a direction to research involving green marketing, sustainable, ethical and social consumption, in which most of the analysis involves internal and external factors that influence attitudes and behaviors of consumers to buy green products, sustainable, ecological, organic, recycled and also links to social responsibility.

Contextus (FEAAC/UFC)

This article investigates how consumers perceive the trade-offs involved in sustainable consumption. It consists of an exploratory field study, with a qualitative approach, in which 9 consumers who declared themselves adept at sustainable consumption were interviewed. Most of the interviewees were aware that there are trade-offs involved in this consumption. Nevertheless, it was observed that they tend to simplify the concepts addressed, emphasizing the environmental aspect, in particular, the disposal of waste. This trend is reflected in consumption practices, which are highly focused on reuse to the detriment of other aspects of sustainability such as saving resources and non-consumption

Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing

Ellis Jones

Global journal for research analysis

M L Ashok Ashok

As resources are limited and scarce while human wants are unlimited, it is important for the marketers to utilize the resources effectively and efficiently without wastage as well as to achieve the organization's objective. Green marketing is inevitable for the attainment of long-term mission and vision of an organization. There has been rising awareness among the consumers all over the world concerning protection of the environment. The last decade has seen a progressive increase in the environmental consciousness across the globe and consumers are becoming more concerned about it. However, despite positive forecasts, demand for eco-friendly products has not shown enough growth as expected. Thus, this study endeavors to explore why people do not buy environmentally friendly products by finding out which are the main constraints impeding them to translate their green intentions into actual purchase behavior. Needless to say, paramount significance is going to be attached to eco-...

Sustainability

Gerrit Antonides

IAEME PUBLICATION

IAEME Publication

Environmental issues have gained importance in our daily lives as well as in the business organisations. With the growing concerns, consumers too have become aware of the environmental issues like global warming, exhaustion of the natural resources, climate changes etc. As a result of this, business organisations have directed their attention towards sustainable or environmental friendly products. The present study aims at understanding the concept of sustainable products and the behaviour of students of Gauhati University students towards it. For the purpose of the study, primary and secondary data has been collected.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH CULTURE SOCIETY

m.sumathy Mohan

Consumer behaviour plays a major character in an Organic food products segment. The sellers of organic foods need to be ground-breaking and dynamic in order to complete with the changing purchase behaviour in the Organic food products market among rural and urban residents. The importance of organic food products was ignored for quite a long period. As results of environmental sustainability and its importance is shifted towards Organic food products rather than conventional farming. Today, many societies have assumed their duty to protect our surroundings. Thus, products and production process become cleaner. More companies introduce green products and it helps to change the polluted world. “Go green”, because they realize that they can cut pollution and increase profits at the same time. Green marketing is a creative opportunity to innovate in ways that induce a difference and at the same time achieve business success. This paper investigates consumer perception towards eco-friendly merchandise. Environmental related perception factors. Producers marketing related perception factors and Personality related perception factors are the major contributors to the formulation of perception towards Eco friendly products.

Aldara César

Sustainable consumption requires that people, companies, and nations promote correct use of their resources in the interest of environmental protection and ecosystem integrity. Given the relevance of this subject, the main objective of the present study was to provide an overview of the literature on sustainable consumption, going beyond knowledge related to consumer behavior, and addressing questions connected with the role of companies and public policies in the promotion of sustainable consumption. To achieve that, a systematic literature review was carried out by selecting 114 articles published over the past ten years, from Web of Science categories with an environmental focus. The study allowed for showing the state of the art of the subject, as well as suggestions for future studies based on gaps in the literature. It was found that there is a concentration of studies oriented toward surveying and understanding consumer behavior at the expense of those focused on examining co...

RELATED PAPERS

Memoires de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale (MIFAO)

Gabolde Luc

Loretta TanyaDyarini

Praxis Educativa

Ewa Bielska

Interdisciplinary Environmental Review

Mustafa Ökmen

Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman

Mohammad Subhi

irdayanti Cibro

The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Robert Schilz

Waclaw Marzantowicz

Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis

SARA BELÉN PRIETO NOGAL

Clinical Ophthalmology

Marisa Meloni

Sixth International Conference on Advances in Applied Science and Environmental Technology - ASET 2017

Sıtkı Akincioğlu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Kishan or biki shah

rtytrewer htytrer

Theory and Society

Thomas Schnelle

Journal of Computational Chemistry

Jeffrey Skolnick

Frontiers in Psychiatry

John Basson

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences

Khaled Azab

The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture

shailesh sawant

Primoz Simoncic

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Daniel Marelli

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Sustainability in the dairy industry: a systematic literature review

• Review Article
• Published: 21 June 2020
• Volume 27 , pages 33527–33542, ( 2020 )

Cite this article

• Alexandre André Feil   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-3351 1 ,
• Dusan Schreiber 2 ,
• Claus Haetinger 3 ,
• Ângela Maria Haberkamp 4 ,
• Joice Inês Kist 1 ,
• Claudete Rempel 1 ,
• Alisson Eduardo Maehler 5 ,
• Mario Conill Gomes 5 &
• Gustavo Rodrigo da Silva 1  

5146 Accesses

35 Citations

Explore all metrics

The dairy industry can contribute to global food security in a sustainable way by efficiently converting milk into dairy ingredients and products, even though they are polluting on a large scale. In this context, this study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review on sustainable indicators and dairy industries. The methodology used has a qualitative and quantitative approach and its technical procedure was the systematic literature review. The bases of journals consulted, using the keywords “sustainability indicator” and “dairy industry” which resulted in 130 valid scientific articles. The main results show that the sustainability indicators in the dairy industry are emerging and lacking research; being found seven papers, that highlight 12 indicators of the environmental, 11 of the social and eight economic dimensions, that may be considered fragile and initial. The studied problems are related to wastewater treatment methods, electric power consumption, efficiency of the industrial plant, among others, and the benefits on the theme are related to solutions to the difficulties, such as electricity reduction, sustainable practices. Among others, it is concluded that the dairy industries address the sustainability theme since 2011, with an ambiguous trend, being found evidence of the fragility of the sustainability indicators was found, mainly in the initial stage of their conception, when considering holistic approach (triple bottom line).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

The Sustainability Challenge of Dairy Livestock Systems

Sustainability in the Dairy Sector in Turkey: A Case Study Approach

Set of sustainability indicators for the dairy industry

Aguirre-Villegas HA, Milani FX, Kraatz S, Reinemann DJ (2012) Life cycle impact assessment and allocation methods development for cheese and whey processing. A Soc Agricul Biol Eng. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41363

Akoum O, Jaffrin MY, Ding LH, Frappart M (2004) Treatment of dairy process waters using a vibrating filtration system and NF and RO membranes. J Membr Sci 235:111–122

CAS   Google Scholar  

Alkhatim HS, Alcaina MI, Soriano E, Iborra MI, Lora J, Arnal J (1998) Poster: treatment of whey effluents from dairy industries by nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 119(1–3):177–183

Arbeli Z, Brenner A, Abeliovich A (2006) Treatment of high-strength dairy wastewater in an anaerobic deep reservoir: analysis of the methanogenic fermentation pathway and the rate-limiting step. Water Res 40(19):3653–3659

Audic JL, Chaufer B, Daufin G (2003) Non-food applications of milk components and dairy co-products: a review. Lait 83(6):417–438

Augustin MA, Udabage P, Juliano P, Clarke PT (2013) Towards a more sustainable dairy industry: integration across the farm–factory interface and the dairy factory of the future. Int Dairy J 31(1):2–11

Google Scholar  

Aydiner C, Sen U, Topcu S, Ekinci D, Altinay AD, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Keskinler B (2014) Techno-economic viability of innovative membrane systems in water and mass recovery from dairy wastewater. J Membr Sci 458:66–75

Aydiner C, Sen U, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Dogan EC (2016) Hierarchical prioritization of innovative treatment systems for sustainable dairy wastewater management. J Clean Prod 112:4605–4617

Bai X, Ren X, Khanna NZ, Zhou N, Hu M (2018) Comprehensive water footprint assessment of the dairy industry chain based on ISO 14046: a case study in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 132:369–375

Balannec B, Gésan-Guiziou G, Chaufer B, Rabiller-Baudry M, Daufin G (2002) Treatment of dairy process waters by membrane operations for water reuse and milk constituents concentration. Desalination 147(1–3):89–94

Balannec B, Vourch M, Rabiller-Baudry M, Chaufer B (2005) Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration. Sep Purif Technol 42(2):195–200

Barać Ž, Muminović S (2013) The impact of capital investments on dairy processing industry features: evidence from Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia. Mljekarstvo 63(3):140–149

Baran J (2013) Efficiency of the production scale of polish dairy companies based on data envelopment analysis. Oeconomia 12(2):5–13

Barford JP, Cail RG, Callander IJ, Floyd EJ (1986) Anaerobic digestion of high-strength cheese whey utilizing semicontinuous digesters and chemical flocculant addition. Biotechnol Bioeng 28(11):1601–1607

Barnes AP (2006) Does multi-functionality affect technical efficiency? A non-parametric analysis of the Scottish dairy industry. J Environ Manag 80:287–294

Barry JA (1982) Alcohol production from cheese whey. Dairy Indu Int 47(10):19–22

Baskaran K, Palmowski LM, Watson BM (2003) Wastewater reuse and treatment options for the dairy industry. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 3(3):85–91

Berlin J (2002) Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese. Int Dairy J 12(11):939–953

Berlin J, Sonesson U, Tillman AM (2007) A life cycle based method to minimise environmental impact of dairy production through product sequencing. J Clean Prod 15(4):347–356

Bhadouria BS, Sai VS (2011) Utilization and treatment of dairy effluent through biogas generation-a case study. Int J Environ Sci 1(7):1621

Blanc P, Goma G (1989) Propionic acid and biomass production using continuous ultrafiltration fermentation of whey. Biotechnol Lett 11(3):189–194

Blaskó B (2011) An analysis of the Hungarian dairy industry in the light of sustainability. Region Bus Stud 3(1):699–711

Blok V, Long TB, Gaziulusoy AI, Ciliz N, Lozano R, Huisingh D, Boks C (2015) From best practices to bridges for a more sustainable future: Advances and challenges in the transition to global sustainable production and consumption: Introduction to the ERSCP stream of the special volume. J Clean Prod 108:19–30

Boening PH, Larsen VF (1982) Anaerobic fluidized bed whey treatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 14:2539–2556

Boiral O, Guillaumie L, Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Tayo Tene CV (2018) Adoption and outcomes of ISO 14001: A systematic review. Int J Manag Rev 20(2):411–432

Bosco F, Chiampo F (2010) Production of polyhydroxyalcanoates (PHAs) using milk whey and dairy wastewater activated sludge: production of bioplastics using dairy residues. J Biosci Bioeng 109(4):418–421

Boulton AC, Rushton J, Wathes CM, Wathes DC (2011) Past trends and future challenges for a sustainable UK dairy industry. R Agric Soc England J 172:1–7

Bourlakis M, Maglaras G, Gallear D, Fotopoulos C (2014) Examining sustainability performance in the supply chain: the case of the Greek dairy sector. Ind Mark Manag 43(1):56–66

Brião VB, Granhen Tavares CR (2007) Effluent generation by the dairy industry: preventive attitudes and opportunities. Braz J Chem Eng 24(4):487–497

Brião VB, Salla ACV, Miorando T, Hemkemeier M, Favaretto DPC (2019) Water recovery from dairy rinse water by reverse osmosis: giving value to water and milk solids. Resour Conserv Recycl 140:313–323

Burgaud JL (1969) Les eaux résiduaires dans l'industrie laitière. Lait 49(487):417–433

Buys L, Mengersen K, Johnson S, van Buuren N, Chauvin A (2014) Creating a sustainability scorecard as a predictive tool for measuring the complex social, economic and environmental impacts of industries, a case study: assessing the viability and sustainability of the dairy industry. J Environ Manag 133:184–192

Carvalho A, Matos HA, Gani R (2013) SustainPro - A tool for systematic process analysis, generation and evaluation of sustainable design alternatives. Comput Chem Eng 50:8–27

Challis C, Tierney M, Todd A, Wilson E (2017) Human factors in dairy industry process control for energy reduction. J Clean Prod 168:1319–1334

Champagne CP, Goulet J, Lachance RA (1990) Production of bakers' yeast in cheese whey ultrafiltrate. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(2):425–430

Chmiel H, Mavrov V, Belieres E (2000) Reuse of vapour condensate from milk processing using nanofiltration. Filtration & separation 37(3):24–27

Cocci AA, Burke BF, Landine RC, Blickenstaff DL (1991) Anaerobic-aerobic pretreatment of a dairy waste; a case history. Dairy Food Environ Sanitation 11(9):505–509

Cox GC, Miller EJ (1986) Comparative energy efficiencies of the dairy manufacturing and processing industry: Australia and New Zealand. Engineering costs and production economics 10(4):293–303

Daneshi A, Esmaili-Sari A, Daneshi M, Baumann H (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions of packaged fluid milk production in Tehran. J Clean Prod 80:150–158

Daufin G, Escudier JP, Carrere H, Berot S, Fillaudeau L, Decloux M (2001) Recent and emerging applications of membrane processes in the food and dairy industry. Food Bioprod Process 79(2):89–102

Demirel B, Yenigun O, Onay TT (2005) Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review. Process Biochem 40(8):2583–2595

Djekic I, Smigic N, Glavan R, Miocinovic J, Tomasevic I (2018) Transportation sustainability index in dairy industry–fuzzy logic approach. J Clean Prod 180:107–115

Drescher K, Maurer O (1999) Competitiveness in the European dairy industries. Agribusiness: An International Journal 15(2):163–177

Eide MH (2002) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(2):115–126

Eide MH, Homleid JP, Mattsson B (2003) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of cleaning-in-place processes in dairies. LWT-Food Sci Technol 36(3):303–314

Fantin V, Buttol P, Pergreffi R, Masoni P (2012) Life cycle assessment of Italian high quality milk production. A comparison with an EPD study. J Clean Prod 28:150–159

Farizoglu B, Uzuner S (2011) The investigation of dairy industry wastewater treatment in a biological high performance membrane system. Biochem Eng J 57:46–54

Farizoglu B, Keskinler B, Yildiz E, Nuhoglu A (2004) Cheese whey treatment performance of an aerobic jet loop membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 39(12):2283–2291

Feitz AJ, Lundie S, Dennien G, Morain M, Jones M (2007) Generation of an industry-specific physico-chemical allocation matrix. Application in the dairy industry and implications for systems analysis (9 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(2):109–117

Flysjö A, Thrane M, Hermansen JE (2014) Method to assess the carbon footprint at product level in the dairy industry. Int Dairy J 34(1):86–92

Frigon JC, Breton J, Bruneau T, Moletta R, Guiot SR (2009) The treatment of cheese whey wastewater by sequential anaerobic and aerobic steps in a single digester at pilot scale. Bioresour Technol 100(18):4156–4163

Gast J, Gundolf K, Cesinger B (2017) Doing business in a green way: a systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. J Clean Prod 147:44–56

Gavala HN, Kopsinis H, Skiadas IV, Stamatelatou K, Lyberatos G (1999) Treatment of dairy wastewater using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Agric Eng Res 73(1):59–63

Genç S, Yıldırım N (2017) Sustainable dairy industry by using renewable energy source. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 13(3):665–670

Glover JL, Champion D, Daniels KJ, Dainty AJD (2014) An institutional theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 152:102–111

Gonçalves NP, Maderi TR, Santos PF (2017) Avaliação das práticas ambientais em indústrias de laticínios–estudo de caso. Periódico Eletrônico Fórum Ambiental da Alta Paulista 13(2):66–77

González Siso MI (1996) The biotechnological utilization of cheese whey: a review. Bioresour Technol 57(1):1–11

González-García S, Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013a) Using life cycle assessment methodology to assess UHT milk production in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 442:225–234

González-García S, Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013b) Environmental life cycle assessment of a dairy product: the yoghurt. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(4):796–811

Grochowska R, Szczepaniak I (2019) Sustainability business models in milk processing. Considerations based on the polish experience. J Agribus Rural Dev 52(2):111–122

Haast J, Britz TJ, Novello JC, Verwey EW (1985) Anaerobic digestion of deproteinated cheese whey. J Dairy Res 52:457–467

Houldsworth DW (1980) Demineralization of whey by means of ion exchange and electrodialysis. Int J Dairy Technol 33(2):45–51

Huang J, Xu CC, Ridoutt BG, Liu JJ, Zhang HL, Chen F, Li Y (2014) Water availability footprint of milk and milk products from large-scale dairy production systems in Northeast China. J Clean Prod 79:91–97

Hwang DC, Damodaran S (1995) Selective precipitation and removal of lipids from cheese whey using chitosan. J Agric Food Chem 43(1):33–37

IDF International Dairy Federation. (2018). Bulletin of the IDF N° 494/ 2018: The World Dairy Situation. https://store.fil-idf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WDS2018Preview-1.pdf . Accessed 05 may 2019

Irfan ZB, Mondal M (2016) Water footprint analysis in dairy industry in India. Int J Environ Sci Dev 7(8):591–594

Jalali S, Wohlin C (2012) Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing In Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement. ESEM 12:29–38

Jokandan MJ, Aghbashlo M, Mohtasebi SS (2015) Comprehensive exergy analysis of an industrial-scale yogurt production plant. Energy 93:1832–1851

Kalyuzhnyi SV, Martinez EP, Martinez JR (1997) Anaerobic treatment of high-strength cheese-whey wastewaters in laboratory and pilot UASB-reactors. Bioresour Technol 60(1):59–65

Kasmi M (2018) Biological processes as promoting way for both treatment and valorization of dairy industry effluents. Waste Biomass Valorization 9(2):195–209

Kim D, Thoma G, Nutter D, Milani F, Ulrich R, Norris G (2013) Life cycle assessment of cheese and whey production in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1019–1035

Kosikowski FV (1979) Whey utilization and whey products. J Dairy Sci 62:1149–1160

Kothari R, Kumar V, Pathak VV, Tyagi VV (2017) Sequential hydrogen and methane production with simultaneous treatment of dairy industry wastewater: bioenergy profit approach. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(8):4870–4879

Koyuncu I, Turan M, Topacik D, Ates A (2000) Application of low pressure nanofiltration membranes for the recovery and reuse of dairy industry effluents. Water Sci Technol 41(1):213–221

Labbé JI, Ramos-Suárez JL, Hernández-Pérez A, Baeza A, Hansen F (2017) Microalgae growth in polluted effluents from the dairy industry for biomass production and phytoremediation. J Environ Chem Eng 5(1):635–643

Lhanafi S, Anfar Z, El Alem NE, Chebli B, Benafqir M (2020) Methanisation: a promising green technology to manage organic wastes in the Moroccan dairy industry. Mater Today: Proceedings 22:57–60

Li Y, Mathiyazhagan K (2018) Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod 172:2931–2941

Lima LP, Ribeiro GB, Perez R (2018) The energy mix and energy efficiency analysis for Brazilian dairy industry. J Clean Prod 181:209–216

Loubère L, Ratinaud P (2013). Documentation IRaMuTeQ 0.6 alpha 3 version 0.1. 2013. http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/documentation_iramuteq_21_12_2013.pdf . Accessed 01 may 2019

Luo J, Ding L, Qi B, Jaffrin MY, Wan Y (2011) A two-stage ultrafiltration and nanofiltration process for recycling dairy wastewater. Bioresour Technol 102(16):7437–7442

Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D, Mangla SK, Garg CP (2017) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod 140:1686–1698

Malaspina F, Stante L, Cellamare CM, Tilche A (1995) Cheese whey and cheese factory wastewater treatment with a biological anaerobic - aerobic process. Water Sci Technol 32(12):59–72

Malaspina F, Cellamare CM, Stante L, Tilche A (1996) Anaerobic treatment of cheese whey with a downflow-upflow hybrid reactor. Bioresour Technol 55(2):131–139

Méndez R, Blazquez R, Lorenzo F, Lema JM (1989) Anaerobic treatment of cheese whey: start-up and operation. Water Sci Technol 21(12):1857–1860

Meneses YE, Flores RA (2016) Feasibility, safety, and economic implications of whey-recovered water in cleaning-in-place systems: a case study on water conservation for the dairy industry. J Dairy Sci 99(5):3396–3407

Miller EJ (1984) Energy use in the New Zealand dairy processing industry. Energy in agriculture 3:307–312

Mockaitis G, Ratusznei SM, Rodrigues JA, Zaiat M, Foresti E (2006) Anaerobic whey treatment by a stirred sequencing batch reactor (ASBR): effects of organic loading and supplemented alkalinity. J Environ Manag 79(2):198–206

Monroy O, Vazquez F, Derramadero JC, Guyot JP (1995) Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of cheese wastewater with national technology in Mexico: the case of “El Sauz”. Water Sci Technol 32(12):149–156

Muangrat R, Onwudili JA, Williams PT (2011) Alkaline subcritical water gasification of dairy industry waste (whey). Bioresour Technol 102(10):6331–6335

Muehlhoff E, Bennett A, McMahon D (2013) Milk and dairy products in human nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

Mukhopadhyay R, Talukdar D, Chatterjee BP, Guha AK (2003) Whey processing with chitosan and isolation of lactose. Process Biochem 39(3):381–385

Munir MT, Yu W, Young BR (2014) Can exergy be a useful tool for the dairy industry? Comp Aided Chem Eng 33:1129–1134

Nanda S, Reddy SN, Hunter HN, Butler IS, Kozinski JA (2015) Supercritical water gasification of lactose as a model compound for valorization of dairy industry effluents. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(38):9296–9306

Nguyen MH, Durham RJ (2004) Status and prospects for cleaner production in the dairy food industry. Aust J Dairy Technol 59(2):171

Nisa, S. (2017). Sustainable business model in dairy sector. Int J Manag Res, 5(5)

OECD/FAO (2018) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2018–2027, OECD Publishing. Paris/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2018-en Accessed 17 may 2019

Book   Google Scholar  

Orhon D, Görgün E, Germirli F, Artan N (1993) Biological treatability of dairy wastewaters. Water Res 27(4):625–633

Özbay A, Demirer GN (2007) Cleaner production opportunity assessment for a milk processing facility. J Environ Manag 84(4):484–493

Öztürk I, Eroglu V, Ubay G, Demir I (1993) Hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (HUASBR) treatment of dairy effluents. Water Sci Technol 28(2):77–85

Papoutsopoulou SV, Ekateriniadou LV, Kyriakidis DA (1994) Genetic construction of Xanthomonas campestris and xanthan gum production from whey. Biotechnol Lett 16(12):1235–1240

Pappa I, Illiopoulos C, Massouras T (2019) On sustainability of a dairy sector in crisis. Int J Food Syst Dyn 10(2):130–150

Passeggi M, López I, Borzacconi L (2012) Modified UASB reactor for dairy industry wastewater: performance indicators and comparison with the traditional approach. J Clean Prod 26:90–94

Place SE, Mitloehner FM (2010) Invited review: contemporary environmental issues: a review of the dairy industry's role in climate change and air quality and the potential of mitigation through improved production efficiency. J Dairy Sci 93(8):3407–3416

Popović R, Panić D (2018) Technical efficiency of Serbian dairy processing industry. Econ Agric 65(2):569–581

Prazeres AR, Carvalho F, Rivas J (2012) Cheese whey management: a review. J Environ Manag 110:48–68

Quijera JA, Labidi J (2013) Pinch and exergy based thermosolar integration in a dairy process. Appl Therm Eng 50(1):464–474

Quijera JA, Alriols MG, Labidi J (2011) Integration of a solar thermal system in a dairy process. Renew Energy 36(6):1843–1853

Rad SJ, Lewis MJ (2014) Water utilisation, energy utilisation and waste water management in the dairy industry: a review. Int J Dairy Technol 67(1):1–20

Radha K, Thomas A, Sathian CT (2014) Application of nano technology in dairy industry: prospects and challenges-a review. Indian J Dairy Sci 67(5):367–374

Rafiee S, Khoshnevisan B, Mohammadi I, Aghbashlo M, Clark S (2016) Sustainability evaluation of pasteurized milk production with a life cycle assessment approach: an Iranian case study. Sci Total Environ 562:614–627

Ramirez CA, Patel M, Blok K (2006) From fluid milk to milk powder: energy use and energy efficiency in the European dairy industry. Energy 31(12):1984–2004

Rao M, Bhole AG (2002) Removal of organic matter from dairy industry wastewater using low-cost adsorbents. Indian Chemical Engineer 44(1):25–28

Riera FA, Suárez A, Muro C (2013) Nanofiltration of UHT flash cooler condensates from a dairy factory: characterisation and water reuse potential. Desalination 309:52–63

Salzman S, Scarborough H, Allinson G (2017) Exploring the economic viability of using constructed wetlands to manage waste-water in the dairy industry. Austr J Environ Manag 24(3):276–288

Sampaio RE, Mancini MC (2007) Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para a síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Rev Bras Fis 11(1):83–89

Santos HCM, Maranduba HL, Almeida Neto JA, Rodrigues LB (2017) Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(4):3470–3482

Sarkar B, Chakrabarti PP, Vijaykumar A, Kale V (2006) Wastewater treatment in dairy industries-possibility of reuse. Desalination 195(1–3):141–152

Satolo EG, Campos RSD, Ussuna GDA, Simon AT, Mac-Lean PAB, Braga Júnior SS (2020) Sustainability assessment of logistics activities in a dairy: an example of an emerging economy. Production 30

Schütz, R. E. (2018). O Inglês como idioma internacional. Inglês Made in Brazil. http://www.sk.com.br/sk-ingl.html . Accessed 05 may 2019

Severino AJ (2007) Metodologia do Trabalho Científico, 23rd edn. Cortez, São Paulo

Sharma VK, Chandana P, Bhardwaj A (2015) Critical factors analysis and its ranking for implementation of GSCM in Indian dairy industry. J Manuf Technol Manag 26(6):911–922

Sharma VK, Chandna P, Bhardwaj A (2017) Green supply chain management related performance indicators in agro industry: a review. J Clean Prod 141(1):1194–1208

Sharma AK, Sharma C, Mullick SC, Kandpal TC (2018) Financial viability of solar industrial process heating and cost of carbon mitigation: a case of dairy industry in India. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 27:1–8

Shay LK, Wegner GH (1986) Nonpolluting conversion of whey permeate to food yeast protein. J Dairy Sci 69(3):676–683

Singh G, Tyagi VV, Singh PJ, Pandey AK (2020) Estimation of thermodynamic characteristics for comprehensive dairy food processing plant: an energetic and exergetic approach. Energy 194:116799

Soboh R, Lansink A, Dijk G (2014) Efficiency of European dairy processing firms. Wageningen J Live Sci 70-71:53–59

Sorgüven E, Özilgen M (2012) Energy utilization, carbon dioxide emission, and exergy loss in flavored yogurt production process. Energy 40(1):214–225

Soufiyan MM, Aghbashlo M, Mobli H (2017) Exergetic performance assessment of a long-life milk processing plant: a comprehensive survey. J Clean Prod 140:590–607

Switzenbaum MS, Danskin SC (1982) Anaerobic expanded bed treatment of whey. Agricultural Wastes 4(6):411–426

Thoma G, Popp J, Nutter D, Shonnard D, Ulrich R, Matlock M, Adom F (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions from milk production and consumption in the United States: a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment circa 2008. Int Dairy J 31:S3–S14

Thongplew N, van Koppen CK, Spaargaren G (2016) Transformation of the dairy industry toward sustainability: the case of the organic dairy industries in the Netherlands and Thailand. Environ Dev 17:6–20

Tiwari S, Behera CR, Srinivasan B (2016) Simulation and experimental studies to enhance water reuse and reclamation in India’s largest dairy industry. J Environ Chem Eng 4(1):605–616

Tonelli F, Evans S, Taticchi P (2013) Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions. Int J Bus Innov Res 7(2):143c163

Torres López ER, Doval Leira R, Galera MM, Bello Bugallo PM (2017) Integrated environmental permit through best available techniques: evaluation of the dairy industry. J Clean Prod 162:512–528

Üçtuğ FG (2019) The environmental life cycle assessment of dairy products. Food Eng Rev:1–18

Van den Berg L, Kennedy KJ (1983) Dairy waste treatment with anaerobic stationary fixed film reactors. Water Sci Technol 15(8–9):359–368

Van der Horst HC, Timmer JMK, Robbertsen T, Leenders J (1995) Use of nanofiltration for concentration and demineralization in the dairy industry: model for mass transport. J Membr Sci 104(3):205–218

Veleva V, Ellenbecker M (2001) Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J Clean Prod 9(6):519–549

Venkatraman K, Achi M (2004) To eliminate the disposal of salty whey from a dairy industry into the sewer in an environmental, social and economical way–a case study from dairy farmers, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia. Int J Environ Technol Manag 4(4):365–374

Vlontzos G, Theodoridis A (2013) Efficiency and productivity change in the Greek dairy industry. Agric Econ Rev 14(389-2016-23494):14–28

Von Keyserlingk MAG, Martin NP, Kebreab E, Knowlton KF, Grant RJ, Stephenson M, Smith SI (2013) Invited review: sustainability of the US dairy industry. J Dairy Sci 96(9):5405–5425

Vourch M, Balannec B, Chaufer B, Dorange G (2005) Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis of model process waters from the dairy industry to produce water for reuse. Desalination 172(3):245–256

Vourch M, Balannec B, Chaufer B, Dorange G (2008a) Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 219(1–3):190–202

Vourch M, Balannec B, Chaufer B, Dorange G (2008b) Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 219(1–3):190–202

Xu T, Flapper J, Kramer KJ (2009) Characterization of energy use and performance of global cheese processing. Energy 34(11):1993–2000

Yan JQ, Lo KV, Liao PH (1989) Anaerobic digestion of cheese whey using up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Biol Wastes 27(4):289–305

Yildirim N, Genc S (2017) Energy and exergy analysis of a milk powder production system. Energy Convers Manag 149:698–705

Yorgun MS, Balcioglu IA, Saygin O (2008) Performance comparison of ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis on whey treatment. Desalination 229(1–3):204–216

Zall RR (1984) Trends in whey fractionation and utilization, a global perspective. J Dairy Sci 67(11):2621–2629

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Universidade do Vale do Taquari – Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Alexandre André Feil, Joice Inês Kist, Claudete Rempel & Gustavo Rodrigo da Silva

Universidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Dusan Schreiber

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, campus Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil

Claus Haetinger

Ângela Maria Haberkamp

Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Alisson Eduardo Maehler & Mario Conill Gomes

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre André Feil .

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Feil, A.A., Schreiber, D., Haetinger, C. et al. Sustainability in the dairy industry: a systematic literature review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27 , 33527–33542 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09316-9

Download citation

Received : 18 November 2019

Accepted : 14 May 2020

Published : 21 June 2020

Issue Date : September 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09316-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Sustainability
• Dairy industry
• Cleaner production
• Environmental science
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research