term paper linguistics

Zum Inhaltsbereich Zur Hauptnavigation Zum Footer Zur Suche

• Die Anglistik und Amerikanistik

Fakultäten und Einrichtungen

Sie sind hier: Practical Guidelines for Writing a Paper in Linguistics

Fakultäten und Institute

• Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften Fakultät 1
• Architektur Fakultät 2
• Bauingenieurwesen Fakultät 3
• Maschinenwesen Fakultät 4
• Georessourcen und Materialtechnik Fakultät 5
• Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik Fakultät 6
• Philosophische Fakultät Fakultät 7
• Wirtschaftswissenschaften Fakultät 8
• Medizin Fakultät 10

Institut suchen:

Einrichtungen.

• Universitätsbibliothek
• Center für Lehr- und Lernservices
• Hochschulsport
• Zentrale Hochschulverwaltung
• Alle Einrichtungen

Sie sind hier:

• Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten
• Sprachwissenschaft

Sub-Navigation

• Eins nach dem anderen: Einführungswoche
• Auslandsaufenthalte
• Abschlussarbeiten
• Prüfungsinformationen
• Sie sind hier: Sprachwissenschaft
• Literaturwissenschaft
• Formulare & Ressourcen
• Sprechstundensystem

Practical Guidelines for Writing a Paper in Linguistics

English Linguistics Team, RWTH Aachen University

This guide is meant as a resource for writing papers in linguistics at our department and is generally applicable to all levels of our programs. While individual instructors and seminars may at times ask for different approaches to be utilized, the guidelines presented here are generally widely agreed upon by the staff members of the English Linguistics department. Any expectations your instructor has that are not covered in this document will typically be addressed in class. If you are uncertain about any aspect of your paper, your supervisor/instructor is the best person to speak to, as they will be the one grading your paper.

Please note that there are similar guidelines for writing term papers in literary studies. If you’re already familiar with those, you will see that there is significant overlap between these two resources – as linguistics and literary studies are related disciplines, many academic conventions are similar across both. However, if you work through these materials carefully, you will still notice that there are discipline specific differences to take into account when writing your paper. This an important learning opportunity: different (sub-)disciplines organize their communication in different ways.

Part 1: Typical contents and structure

Learn about different kinds of academic papers, their requirements, and what you should look out for in guiding your line of argumentation and language use.

1. What is the purpose of a student paper? – General considerations

When looking at academic papers written at university, there are necessarily always two different angles to consider. The one that many students are most focused on is, of course, the fact that writing an academic paper is a type of exam that you will need to pass in order to get your degree. As this aspect has the most immediate impact on your current situation, it makes sense that you might be focusing on that!

The angle that your instructors will place more emphasis on, however, is how writing a successful academic paper will allow you to practice a variety of skills that will be essential in your future careers: It is our job to offer you assistance in learning how to conduct (and understand!) scientific research, and, as such, the kinds of “results” we are looking for in a successful paper in linguistics can be best defined in terms of the skillsets they highlight.

Accordingly, your paper should demonstrate…

• your ability to understand and engage with current scientific research from your chosen branch of linguistic research: You can identify a research topic that is embedded in ongoing debates and that successfully integrates basic underlying theories and assumptions.
• that you know how to find and understand previous research in the field and can summarize relevant points for an informed audience.
• that you can write a coherent and well-rounded text in which you discuss a manageable selection of this research from a particular perspective (i.e. with a certain goal in mind that you pursue systematically and consistently throughout the paper).
• an understanding of certain formal standards of academic discourse (i.e. clear and register-appropriate English, text formatting, conventional ways of citation and referencing, sensible structuring of the paper, and a reader-directed way of making your goals, methodology, analyses and results transparent).

All these are skills that possible future employers will be looking for from candidates with a degree in linguistics. Even more importantly, assessing the reliability of scientific research, being able to communicate your assessment, and identifying gaps in lines of argumentation are skills that will also help you successfully navigate the great wealth of information we are constantly exposed to as part of our everyday lives.

2. Theoretical or empirical; quantitative or qualitative? – How to pick the approach that’s right for your topic

One of the first things you need to consider for any kind of paper in the sciences is whether you’ll need to follow a theoretical or an empirical approach. Neither is inherently “better” than the other, but they do require specific skillsets and can be used to different effects. In your degree, you will be required to write both, so even if you instinctively feel that you’re more interested in the one or the other, do make sure to invest time in studying both! While you may have classes that explicitly require you to write the one or the other kind of paper, in actual scientific practice you will decide which approach to pick based on your choice of topic.

Theoretical papers are focused on summarizing and comparing previous research done about a certain issue/topic. Here, you will not be asked to collect and/or analyze your own data, but rather to look at the work other researchers have done and to discuss that. Theoretical papers are great for getting to grips with a topic that has been investigated by many scholars in the past, and that is still fairly contested. You’ll want to identify different positions that scholars have taken, introduce their reasoning for their respective positions, but also to evaluate the soundness of their arguments. Accordingly, more of the paper should be dedicated to a review of previous research – and this includes empirical investigations – than in an empirical paper. In such a review, make sure to structure your discussion into topical sections that make sense to you and help you answer your research question, rather than to just compile a long list of summaries.

Empirical papers , by contrast, will require you to conduct your own data analysis. While you will, of course, still want to discuss previous research done on your topic, you will then need to come up with your own methodology for how to investigate the phenomenon you’re interested in. This kind of data collection can take many different forms (e.g. working with a corpus, with survey data, with experiment data), and you can usually decide which makes the most sense for you by looking at previous related studies.

If you’ve decided to work empirically, one further very important decision you’ll have to make in planning your project is whether you’ll be working quantitatively, qualitatively, or following a mixed-method approach. In a quantitative analysis , you’ll typically be looking for features that you can *count* (=that are quantifiable!). This is frequently (but not always!) done with the help of computational tools, and usually with the aim of testing for statistical significance. By contrast, a qualitative approach involves the analysis of features that are not countable (=that lend a specific quality!). This is often done manually while still using tools to make the work easier. Since you don’t have any countable categories here, many types of statistical tests will not work for this type of analysis. As such, the goal here usually is a better understanding of a complex phenomenon via discussion in light of related research. In a mixed-method approach, finally, you utilize aspects of both quantitative and qualitative analysis to target phenomena that are not countable themselves, but that can be fruitfully approximated and discussed via related quantifiable phenomena.

3. What’s your focus? – Developing and framing your topic

When writing a paper at university, you’ll typically be given some kind of direction for your research – if you’re writing a term paper in a seminar, for instance, your instructor likely will expect the paper to have a focus that’s related to the course contents. Some may have fairly specific instructions for choosing a topic, while others may prefer to have you come up with a topic of your own. However, even if they suggest a general topic to focus on, this likely will be much too broad in scope to be adequately addressed in a single paper. As such, you’ll have to narrow down your topic further – but make sure to speak to your instructor about your ideas to determine whether the topic you’re considering is a suitable choice for the course and the scope of the paper!

Probably the most important conceptual step in planning your paper is to distinguish between:

• a general topic you are interested in, and
• a very specific goal that you pursue in your paper.

It is one of the most common mistakes to confuse those two things, leading to students writing about a certain topic (or area) without having a precise goal in mind: Sometimes students get lost in the literature on the topic or in specific aspects of the topic that are not immediately relevant to their own investigation. Usually, it will be helpful to come up with a clearly phrased research question about your topic – that way, you have something to go back to if you get confused during the writing process. Such a research question should always specify a) the phenomenon you’re investigating/discussing and also b) what you are trying to find out.

4. What do you want to report? – Typical structure of a paper

The structure of your paper should always reflect your particular way of dealing with the topic you’ve chosen, specifically your line of argumentation. Every academic paper is framed by an introduction and a conclusion section. The ‘main body’ in-between is then structured according to your own preferences. Based on what we discussed in the previous section, think about what you want the focus of your research to be, and what kind of structure that necessitates. It is generally neither advisable to have only one huge section between the introduction and the conclusion nor to have a fragmentation into multiple sections per page, as either of those can make it challenging to maintain your focus. Rather, your argumentation should stretch over several, relatively equally weighed sections. The particular focus of your paper should also show in relative page quantity: Depending on whether you’re writing a theoretical or an empirical paper , it may make sense to give different weight to different sections. In the following, we’ll go through each of these options and what they typically entail.

a. Theoretical Papers

Introduction

This section of a paper in linguistics should be used to “frame” for your research: Here, your readers will expect to find information on how the paper relates to the larger area of research, its structure, and what you are going to do in order to reach your goal. Even in a theoretical paper, you’d usually start with a more “general” introduction first, before delving into the more detailed discussion of the literature you’re assessing in the following sections. This general introduction should not make up more than 20% of the overall word count.

For this purpose, you should conduct a literature review of the subject matter by reading up and reporting on what others have done in this area of research, and which research gaps remain. As we discussed in the previous section, you should approach your paper with a specific research question in mind, and your literature review should reflect this – don’t spend too much time explaining terms or concepts that are only tangentially related to your project. Once you have identified said research gaps, you should then make sure to clearly state your research question that aims to address one of those gaps. Here, it is crucial that you don’t overreach – if you promise to cover too much ground here, you will not be able to adequately answer your research question by the end of the paper. As a beginner, it’s also advisable to get your instructor’s feedback on the feasibility of your research question.

Additionally, many resources will tell you to state your “motivation” for asking your research question – don’t be confused by this phrasing: You are *not* being asked to state your endless love and passion for whatever the topic of the paper is, but rather to explain why the question you’re asking is relevant to current research. If you are passionate about your term paper topic you are welcome to also mention it, but “I think it’s neat” isn’t the kind of argument your readers will be looking for.

Sections discussing previous research findings

After the more general introduction, you may want to dive deeper into discussing the phenomenon/phenomena you’re investigating. In a theoretical paper, these sections usually make up a substantial part of the word count, sometimes up to 40-50%. Here, you should clearly define any concepts relevant to your research aim and give any background information (linguistic or non-linguistic) that a reader may need to understand your discussion. These sections should then delve into the more in-depth analysis of your chosen topic: Often, this is done in separate sections for each of the categories under investigation (i.e. each linguistic theory, language phenomenon, research paper, or register to be compared), before considering these “results” in direct comparison with one another. Give each section a meaningful title and organize them in a way that helps you answer your research question.

Generally, you can often use your topical focus to determine the structure of this part of your paper: You are comparing two major theories on language and how they conceptualize grammar? You’ll likely want to have dedicated sections for each approach’s position. By contrast, if you are comparing the findings of 4 experimental studies, you’ll want to group them by other criteria: Did some of them use the same methodology? What kinds of experiment materials were used? Find commonalities and/or differences between the categories you want to evaluate, and use these as the elements that structure your sections. This will also help to develop your discussion later on in the paper. The most important thing here is to use a structure that makes sense for your topic, so do make sure to discuss this with your instructor!

Discussion (and conclusion)

In this section, you’ll want to put the findings you described in the previous section into context by considering them in comparison with one another and/or in the context of previously discussed categories. This section usually makes up for up to 30-40% of the overall word count in both theoretical and empirical papers, so make sure to give it sufficient weight!

As your paper should be aiming to be part of a larger scientific discussion on a certain topic, this is the part where you can describe not only the work others have done, but also your own evaluation of said work: Do you see any issues with the studies you looked at? Were their methodologies clear and transparent? Did you spot any biases in their data collection or analysis? Don’t be afraid to point out such things if you notice them – engaging critically with previous research is an important part of academic research! For this purpose, you should go back to the research you reported on and consider these in a larger scientific context: Did different researchers come to the same conclusions? Are there differences? What kinds of real-world implications do these findings have?

Depending on the overall length of your paper and also your own personal preference, you might choose to have your conclusion integrated into this section, or as a separate section at the end of the paper. In this (sub)section, your readers will expect to find a brief summary of your results that highlights any areas that are still underexplored (and thus might make good targets for future research!) Try to be critical of your own approach here, as well: There is no such thing as a “perfect” scientific study, and one important skill for a researcher is to meaningfully reflect on their own work and its limitations. As such, it is more valuable here to point out any issues your research may have, rather than to pretend that everything worked perfectly.

Bibliography (and appendices)

After the end of the actual text of your paper, you’ll need to include a list of every source you referenced in your paper. There are specific requirements to this, which you can find in section 3.5.

b. Empirical Papers

Generally, empirical papers tend to follow the so-called IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results and, Discussion & conclusio n). In this structure, the introduction should be used to “frame” for your research: Here, your readers will expect to find information on how the paper relates to the larger area of research, its structure, and what you are going to do in order to reach your goal. In an empirical paper, this section usually does not make up more than 20% of the overall wordcount.

For this purpose, you should conduct a literature review of the subject matter by reading up and reporting on what others have done in this area of research, and which research gaps remain. As we discussed in earlier sections, you should approach your paper with a specific research question in mind, and your literature review should reflect this – don’t spend too much time explaining terms or concepts that are only tangentially related to your project. Once you have identified research gaps, you should then make sure to clearly state your research question (and/or hypotheses) that aims to address one of those gaps. Here, it is crucial that you don’t overreach – if you promise to cover too much ground here, you will not be able to adequately answer your research question by the end of the paper. As a beginner, it’s also advisable to get your instructor’s feedback on the feasibility of your research question.

If the introduction outlines the “why” of your research, the methods section discusses the “how” of it: Think of this section as justification for the things you have done for the paper. Your readers will expect to be informed about the composition and limitations of any data you may be using, how you worked with this data, and about any tools you might have used for your project. In an empirical paper, this section can sometimes take up to 30% of your overall word count, especially if you are working with datasets you’ve collected/annotated yourself.

What exactly you should be reporting on in your methods section very much depends on the kind of empirical work you did:

• If you conducted an experimental or questionnaire study: Who are your subjects and what demographic features did they share? What kind of materials and tools (including, for example, survey scales, stimuli, text material or equipment for recording) did you use? How were they administered (were you in a room with the participants? If so, what did it look like?)
• If you ran a corpus study: What kind of corpus did you use (e.g. size, kind, composition)? How did you find the thing you’re interested in in the corpus? How did you process and analyze your data? Did you use some kind of corpus tool?
• If you used a discourse analysis approach: How did you select the materials to look at? What kinds of features did you consider, and how did you look for them? Did you use any tools for your analysis, and how did they work?

Regardless of your approach, you’ll need to then give an overview of all categories and explain how you assigned a particular response (e.g. in an experimental study) or a particular instance (e.g. in a corpus study) to a particular category. You may want to include summary tables of your data, but do not present the results of your analysis at this stage.

After describing how you conducted your research in the methods section, your results section should describe what you found out, going from the simple to the complex. In empirical papers, this section typically makes up ~20% of the overall word count. This section is where you’ll want to offer a summary of what you found out in your analysis, commonly supplemented by tables or visualizations. Here, it is very important that your tables/figures are part of the line of argumentation – you by no means have to write a sentence each to describe every single value in your table, but the most striking results should definitely be mentioned in the text of your paper! Do not include tables and figures you do not refer to in the text. If your analysis allows for any kind of statistical testing, you’d want to report on the results of those tests towards the end of this section. State what type of test you have used and present the relevant measures (e.g. p-value, F-value, degrees of freedom, effect size, confidence intervals), and, if it is not obvious why you used a particular test, explain your decision. Finally, you’ll then want to state what the statistical analysis suggests, i.e. how the results should be interpreted.

In this section, you’ll want to put the results you described in the previous section into context by considering them in light of previous research. This section usually makes up for up to 30% of the overall word count in both theoretical and empirical papers, so make sure to give it sufficient weight.

As your paper should be aiming to be part of a larger scientific discussion on a certain topic, this is the part where you can describe not only the work others have done, but also your own evaluation of said work: Do you see any issues with the studies you looked at? Were their methodologies clear and transparent? Did you spot any biases in their data collection or analysis? Don’t be afraid to point out such things if you notice them – engaging critically with previous research is an important part of academic research! For this purpose, you should go back to the research you reported on in your theoretical background (in your introduction) and compare this with your own findings: Did other researchers find similar results? Were there differences? What kinds of real-world implications do your findings have?

Depending on the overall length of your paper and also your own personal preference, you might choose to have your conclusion integrated into this section, or as a separate section at the end of the report. In this (sub)section, your readers will expect to find a brief summary of your results that highlights any areas that are still underexplored (and thus might make good targets for future research!) Try to be critical of your own approach here, as well: There is no such thing as a “perfect” scientific study, and one important skill for a researcher is to meaningfully reflect on their own work and its limitations. As such, it is more valuable here to point out any issues your research may have, rather than to pretend that everything worked perfectly.

After the end of the actual text of your paper, you’ll need to include a list of every source you referenced in your paper. There are specific requirements to this, which you can find in section 3.5. Depending on the kind of paper you wrote, you might want to also include appendices and/or online supplements: Common materials to be included are, for instance, extensive datasets, annotation schemes, R scripts, experiment materials, etc. There are currently no specific formal requirements for appendices, so make sure to discuss this with your instructor. You can find some additional input on appendices in section 3.4.

5. What are you trying to accomplish? – Notes on lines of argumentation

It’s very easy to get sidetracked during writing, as you will have read much more about your chosen topic than you need to report on – telling the difference between a finding you actually need for your argumentation and one that you just thought particularly neat can be a struggle, especially if it’s your first time working with a particular area of linguistics. As we established in section 1.3, your paper should always be targeted towards answering a specific research question . This question should be designed to provide guidance not only for a reader to know what you’re trying to accomplish, but also as a point of reference for yourself to help with actually staying on topic. Beyond making sure your writing is on target topic wise, there are some tools you can use to make your line of argumentation clearer to your readers – in the following, we’ll go through some essentials:

The first and probably simplest way of making your line of argumentation appear more coherent is by guiding the argumentation with the help of words/phrases that express the logical relationships you want to highlight. Do make sure that the word/phrase you’re using is actually expressing the logical relationship that you want to express: “therefore”, “thus”, and “consequently” may have a certain amount of overlap in meaning, but they are by no means fully synonymous!

Next, you’ll want to be very explicit in your paper when attributing claims : Is your paper reporting on someone else’s experiment? On your own? Is a certain theory about language use you’re discussing something that you came up with yourself, or rather something that others have claimed in the past? If you are too vague about these details, your line of argumentation will suffer. Additionally, this kind of misattribution can, in severe enough cases, be considered plagiarism (section 2.2), so make sure to be clear about this in your writing.

Lastly, one of the most common issues with lines of argumentation arises from a lack of hedging devices . When writing a paper in linguistics, you are participating in academic discourse, and you may come to interesting conclusions about your subject matter. However, in academia we try to avoid absolute statements: Let’s look at an example “L2 students overuse [feature]” – this statement is almost certainly incorrect, regardless of which feature you are referring to, simply because it makes such a broad claim. It claims (intentionally or unintentionally) that every language user who is part of this group of “L2 students” would behave in exactly the described way. Instead, you’ll want to use language that relativizes your claim, like “Studies have indicated that L2 students of [language] tend to use [feature] more frequently than L1 students. ” – here, it is clear that you are not trying to make a statement with a universal truth claim, but rather are describing a documented phenomenon.

6. How can you say this? – Notes on language competence and register

At our department, you will, by default, be writing papers in English. These papers (typically) are not part of your language competence module, so your language competence will only make up a minor part of your overall grade. However, one major goal in the degree programs at our department is to train you to be effective communicators in an English-language learning/working environment – if you are having trouble using English for such purposes, you’ll likely have a hard time in many of the careers our degrees are supposed to qualify you for. Additionally, it must be pointed out that many other areas of your paper will inevitably be affected by poor language competence as well. When writing a paper that is (tens of) thousands of words long, it can very easily happen that you may not spot one or two small mistakes. That is to be expected, and as researchers we ourselves are familiar with that problem. However, if the mistakes are more common or more severe, the clarity and transparency of your academic writing will be impacted. If you are reading a paper that has lots of spelling or grammar mistakes, it’s very likely that you, as the reader, have to use your “best guess” at what the author is trying to tell you. In academic writing, this is exactly what we are trying to avoid!

To minimize this risk, many students make use of the automatic spell- and grammar checks that many text editors offer. These can be very helpful tools, but do make sure to use your own best judgement: Such tools are not infallible, and may offer unhelpful suggestions especially when it comes to specialized vocabulary and/or register conventions. Make sure to plan enough time to proof-read your paper thoroughly!

Along similar lines, we also expect your paper to be register appropriate . This, too, is a skill that possible future employers will expect of you, and it is one that will furthermore enable you to meaningfully participate in academic discourse. If this is currently challenging for you, probably the best way to practice is by reading academic papers, and paying attention to the way they use language (some of which we discussed in the previous section). Please be aware that not every text you will encounter at university will be an example of the register you’ll be trying to adhere to in your paper: lecture slides are a different register, and so are guidelines like this!

Part 2: Notes on the research process

Here you can find some strategies for making your research process more streamlined and accessible.

1. Finding and reading literature

One of the most fundamental skills you will need to acquire in order to successfully complete your studies is finding and understanding scientific sources. Before we get started, we of course need to have a topic we want to research. The way many less experienced people may then start researching this is by just typing the exact phrasing of their topic into a search engine or library system. This may give you some results, but likely not very many and you’ll almost definitely miss out on some relevant information. As this process is a new challenge for many students, we’ll go over two ways of finding relevant sources:

Option 1 – start from one well-founded source using a snowball method : Maybe you read an article about your chosen topic in class, or you encountered the topic in an article you found yourself. Whatever the case, you can use this first article as your starting point. Look at the sources it cites. Many of them may be useful for you – make a list of such sources and try looking for them in a database. The term “database” can, in this case, refer to both a library system and/or any other kind of online database. It’s usually a good idea to start by searching the library database first, as a university typically has access to many sources that are not freely available on the web. You can find our main library catalogue here , and our departmental library catalogue here . To look at digital contents offered by either, you’ll have to be within the university network (via eduroam or VPN) to access those contents. If you don’t know how to use a VPN, check out the ITC help page on the topic. Once you’ve found a handful of suitable sources that way, you can look at their lists of references in turn.

Option 2 – searching for your topic in databases directly. As we established, simply entering your chosen topic is unlikely to work very well. Since term paper topics need to be fairly specific, they can’t cover that much ground. This means that most relevant sources will not have the exact same focus as your paper – and as such won’t have the exact same title, either. Instead, check the beginning of one paper related to your topic: often you will find a list of keywords. If you do, write those down. If an article does not do this itself, try looking for a definition of your chosen topic in a grammar or database, and create your list of keywords from there. Such keywords can be fairly specific, but you can also make use of more general terms to start with. By not limiting yourself to the exact wording and focus of your paper, you’ll catch a wider range of sources!

Once you've found a number of sources related to your topic, you have to figure out which ones are the most useful for you. Reading scientific publications can be very time consuming if you’re not yet used to the register (rest assured, it will come easier as you practice more!), so don’t start by reading every single one of them start to back in a random order. Try grouping them thematically to deal with them one group at a time by looking at just the abstracts (or introductions) and keywords. Once you’re happy with your selection, start reading – this is going to take time and attention, so do make sure to plan accordingly! While you’re reading, think back to what we discussed about the typical structure of a research paper:

• What do the sources set out to do, and why?
• What methods do they use?
• What kinds of results did they get?
• Were there any issues with or limitations to their approach?
• What’s the structure of the text? How does it reflect the author’s line of argumentation?

If you’re a beginner, you might try actually writing out answers to each of these questions for each paper you read. As you gain more experience, this kind of assessment will start happening more and more intuitively. The answers to these questions will give you a good overview of the sources you looked at and make it easier to compare them.

While you’re doing this, you might even want to start compiling a list of quotes (direct or indirect) that you want to use for your paper. Many students like to keep a text file in which they collect such quotes – this can be a great way to make the process easier for you, but do make sure to always (!) write down which publication/page a certain quote is from, as you’ll need to report this in your paper. You can find more info on using sources in section 3.4 and 3.5.

2. Being careful of plagiarism

As we have established in section 1.1 and 1.4 Introduction, your goal in writing a paper should be to participate in the academic discussion on a specific topic/issue. One core part of that is, of course, crediting the work that others have done. There are a variety of materials you can work with during your studies in order to better understand good academic practice, and there you will often see this issue framed as being about “avoiding” plagiarism. To offer a complementary perspective, let’s look at you will want to *do* rather than at what you want to *avoid doing* for now:

Step 1 – keep track of what you read : in preparation of writing your paper, you will usually read many different articles/journals/handbooks/websites. Keep a list of all the sources you already looked at and make a short note which ones you want to use for what (maybe one of them has a great definition of a concept, another uses a method you’d like to try replicating, etc.). Highlight any quotes you think you might want to use later. You may think you’ll remember which source claimed what next week, but you’ll just as often forget as you’ll remember.

Step 2 – while writing, keep checking in with yourself : is that a claim you are making yourself, or is it one you read somewhere? Some students tend to express concern over not having enough of their “own thoughts” in a paper and try to conceal said (perceived!) lack of own initiative by being very vague about what is their own claim and what isn’t. This is not recommended! We talked briefly about attributing claims in section 1.5, and it’s much better practice to be very clear about this.

Step 3 – make sure that not only your direct quotes are cited appropriately, but also any other resource you made use of: In academia, it’s considered good practice to also include references for things other than direct quotes. This is crucial for avoiding plagiarism, and for making sure that all previous work is appropriately credited.

• Indirect quotes (instances where you paraphrase and/or summarize another researcher’s work in your own words)
• Sources where you found the data you used (Corpora, survey materials, experiment designs, websites, novels, etc.)
• Specialized tools you made use of (Corpus tools, data analysis tools, annotation tools, visualization tools, etc.) This does not mean that you’ll have to include a reference for the text editor you used to write your paper, but if you used a particular MS Excel extension or R package to conduct your statistical testing, you’ll want to mention those.

Step 4 – check that the references in your text match your bibliography: Your bibliography/list of sources should include everything that appears in your text – but nothing else. If you read an article but didn’t end up using it, it should not appear in your list of sources. Similarly, the in-text citation style we use (3.4) is fairly uninformative without the full note at the end: If you go to e.g. Google Scholar, you will find dozens of publications that could have the in-text reference “(Miller 2010, 5)”, so we need the additional information to understand which publication you are referring to.

Finally, we should briefly address the concept of “common knowledge” - there are some concepts that you can assume your readers will not need you to define. What is accepted as “common knowledge” depends on the context: If you’re writing a term paper in an advanced seminar on corpus linguistics, you may not have to define what a corpus is in general terms. However, if you’re writing a paper on corpus design, you might want to include a source for this. For less experienced writers, it’s usually safest to include a source if you’re unsure whether something truly can be considered common knowledge.

3. Identifying the best tools for the task

Depending on the kind of research question you are asking in your paper, you may want to make use of specialized tools for your research project. What kind of tool is best suited to your purposes very much depends on the kind of analysis you’re trying to perform, and there is a great variety of different tools for linguistic (and related fields of!) analysis: Have a look at previous studies in related areas of research – what kinds of tools did they use? Can you access those anywhere? Once you’ve gotten a first idea of what’s out there, it’s also a good idea to consult your instructor about this – they will usually have worked with at least some of the tools you are considering and can give you a better idea of what the advantages and disadvantages of these tools are.

In some of your classes, you will also be asked to use specific tools – be prepared to install and practice using new software on your devices. Please also note that there are some tools that cannot be installed on Android/IOS devices, so do make sure you’ve got access to a device with a Windows/macOS/Linux operating system for your course work . Wherever possible, we are committed to using tools that are free to use for you, even if that may sometimes come at the cost of the tool looking less “sleek” than paywalled alternatives. As such, it’s always worth checking with your instructor whether there might be an alternative tool that is not paywalled for students before paying for something yourself!

4. Documenting your steps

If your project involves any kind of analysis/annotation, it is considered good practice to carefully document your steps. That way, readers of your paper can better understand what you did and thus better assess the validity and/or scope of your findings. As such, you should keep a record of any criteria you use to conduct your analysis and how you dealt with any unclear cases you encountered. This record should be briefly reported on in your methods section, as the strength of your analysis can only be understood if the analysis is made transparent.

The datasets you worked on themselves should also be archived and added as an appendix or online supplement to your paper – if you’re working with data gathered from real people, you will of course need to make sure that the data is anonymized appropriately before working with it! If you did your annotation/analysis in a file format that does not lend itself well to being printed/turned into a PDF (or if the files simply have too many pages), you can speak to your instructor about including them as an online supplement to your paper instead. In those cases, you often can simply add a page to the end of your paper listing all the materials contained in your online supplement and a password protected link/QR code to where you stored them.

Additionally, we’d recommend regularly saving copies of your project work in at least two places – if your computer breaks at the wrong time, you might otherwise end up losing weeks or months of work! As a student at our university, you are eligible for a free Sciebo account , this cloud-based service is one good solution for backing up your files.

Part 3: The formatting

Read about formatting conventions for papers in linguistics, and learn how to reference others' work appropriatiely.

1. Formatting your document

In actual practice in academia, most journals or publishing houses you might want to work with will have very specific requirements, but these guidelines should be sufficient for any paper you’ll need to write at university. Doing the formatting may be easier or more difficult depending on what text editing software you use, as different tools each have their own strengths and weaknesses. As a student at our university, you should have access to a free MS Word account as part of the university’s Microsoft 365 subscription . However, it is equally as possible to write your paper using a non-paywalled alternative such as Open Office.

Your paper should always start with a title page. The exact layout here is less important than making sure that all the necessary information is included:

• Your name, matriculation number, degree program, and university email address
• Your instructor’s name (for papers with multiple examiners, such as final theses, you should specify who is your first *and* who is your second examiner!), which department(s) they work for, and, if applicable, what class you took
• What kind of paper you are submitting (seminar paper, BA thesis, project report, etc.)
• The actual title of your paper
• The date and place of submission

In longer papers, some instructors may require you to include a brief abstract – think of this as something between a summary and a cover blurb. You’ll want to outline what your research is about, what methods you used, and offer a general comment about your results. Typically, this should not take more than 200-300 words. For a shorter paper (such as a seminar paper with ~5000 words) you likely won’t have to write an abstract, but for a longer paper (such as a BA thesis with ~15000 words) this is more common. In addition to the abstract, you may choose to add some keywords to help your readers understand the scope and focus of your research. Make sure to speak to your instructor or thesis supervisor about whether this makes sense for your project!

After the title page, you will need to include a table of contents . Many text editors allow you to generate one automatically, which can make your work much easier! If your paper includes more than 3-5 tables and/or figures, you may also want to generate a list of figures.

The main body of text in your paper should be formatted in a legible font and font size: Calibri or Times New Roman, 12pt, are both popular choices. Your pages should have sensible margins and include page numbers counting from the first page of the actual text – if you’re not sure how to do that, you can find tutorials for most text editors on YouTube. Also, make sure to use full justification (Blocksatz), and 1.5 line spacing. Within the sections of your paper as we discussed them in 1.4, use paragraphs to structure the flow of your text. A paragraph is commonly understood to represent one unit of argumentation. Look back over the structure of these guidelines, and you will see that a paragraph break always corresponds to a shift in topic. Paragraphs can sometimes be shorter and sometimes be longer, but try to avoid going to either extreme: If you have one paragraph that runs for several pages, your line of argumentation can more easily become muddled, but if you haven’t got any paragraphs longer than three sentences, you’re probably not being very clear either. Make use of bulleted or numbered lists as an alternative structuring device if necessary.

The list of sources at the end of your paper is usually formatted one pt smaller than the main body of the text, and with a hanging first line. In linguistics, all sources (print media, online sources, both primary and secondary literature) are usually included in *one* alphabetical list. You can find more information about the conventions for bibliographies in section 3.5.

2. Using examples

Whenever you need to exemplify a linguistic construction that you talk about, such examples are set off from the text, numbered consecutively, indented, and ideally put in italics:

(1) This is an example.

Unlike in example (1), it is usually preferable to identify the source from which your examples are chosen, i.e. it is always better to cite attested or authentic (corpus) examples. This enhances the empirical credibility of your paper. For instance, your example may be taken from a reference grammar, an online source with a clear author, an actual corpus of English, or an established English Dictionary. In such cases, you briefly mention the source right after the example and provide the full reference of the corpus in the bibliography:

(2) I’m going back to Denmark for two weeks. (ICE-GB: S1A-089 #093:1:B)

For examples taken from an online source (other than a more conventional corpus), you have to cite them in-text like any other online source and have to include the full reference in the list of sources at the end of your paper. If you refer to single words and their inflections from another language (or from the English language itself), you can integrate them with the running text, by indicating them in italics . If you include examples in languages other than English or German, you should think about using glosses at a level of detail that is feasible and necessary to make your examples transparent. When in doubt, talk to your instructor about this.

3. Choosing visualizations

Sometimes it is necessary to include tables and figures into your paper. If you think they might disturb the flow of the text (because they are too long or elaborate), you can put them into an appendix at the end of the paper. More often, however, illustrative material can be placed in the sections where you discuss it.

In those cases, it is important that all figures and tables get their own consecutive numbering (Fig. 5 or Tab. 2), and every figure or table also has a caption (e.g. “Tab. 1: Interrogative pronouns in English”)! If you integrate tables or figures from other articles, make sure you cut out the original numbers and labels and integrate the material properly with your own text (i.e. a ‘Fig. 4’ in the original article may be your ‘Fig. 1’, in keeping with your counts). Also, make sure to credit the original author (e.g. “Tab. 1: Interrogative pronouns in English, following [Author] [Year], [Page]”)! Do not include tables and figures you do not refer to in the text, and vice versa make sure you do not mention any tables or figures that are not included in your paper.

4. Using references

While we already discussed the importance of properly using sources in section 2.2, let’s take a look at different ways of integrating references in your own text. In the following, all examples are indented, but not numbered.

Direct quotes can be integrated directly with your own running text, even within sentences:

• The author suggests that “the use of the pronominal forms […] through time constitutes a change in the typological tendencies in English” (Laitinen 2008, 155).

As this example demonstrates, the original quote is framed by “…”, and the quote closes before the reference is given and the sentence is concluded with a full stop. If the quote itself ends with a full stop in the original, you can either adopt the same practice or place the full stop in front of the quotation marks, the reference then standing behind the quote without any punctuation afterwards (but don’t insert two full stops!). As can also be seen above, if it is necessary to leave out some material of the quote, […] can instead be inserted into the quote. In general, one should avoid changing the wording of quotes, but if this is absolutely necessary, then the substituted material also appears in […]. Sometimes, such changes become necessary because the original authors use an abbreviation that your readers may not know and that you may wish to spell out within the quotation. In the following example, the original abbreviation CLI has been replaced by [cross-linguistic influence]:

• “Salience and [cross-linguistic influence] seem to interact in the acquisition of the English definite article by Finnish speakers” (Jarvis and Pavlenko 2008, 185).

Try to avoid quotations from third sources, i.e. something like (Croft 2003, 17, cited in Evans and Green 2006, 122). Quote from the original source and list this source in the reference section at the end of the paper if at all possible. This entails that you also consult the original source and check whether the original quotation fits the argumentative context in which you want to use it. Finally, also try to avoid long quotations. As a rule of thumb, if a quote is longer than three lines, set it apart from the text as an extra paragraph, indented and with smaller font type. You don’t need to use quotation marks then, but don’t let these quotes stand on their own. Always discuss and integrate them in your own text. Your paper should not become a collection of quotes and it is recommended to use direct quotes selectively and only where it is necessary and sensible.

Text-internal references serve a variety of different purposes. The most straightforward one is that of indirect quotation. In these situations, you paraphrase someone else’s claims, opinions, or statements, and it is here that discourse markers like “according to X”, “following X”, “in keeping with X”, etc. come into play:

• According to Croft (2003, 59-62), word order patterns …
• In contrast to previous work (e.g. Chomsky 1969; 1973), I claim …

Note that the use of f. / ff. sometimes used to abbreviate ‘the immediately following page/pages’ is uncommon, so it should be entirely avoided. ‘ff.’ in particular is unspecific. Simply spell out the actual stretch of pages (e.g. Croft (2003, 59-62)) but try to avoid citing many larger stretches of text and be as specific as possible with your references. You will likely come across in-text citations using cf., which means ‘compare’ and is sometimes also used to mean ‘see also’. Do not use this for simple references but really only for those cases where you want to draw a comparison between what you write and another work. In contrast to the citation styles used by some other disciplines, in a linguistic papers “cf.” is *not* used in a standard reference!

Sources of equal importance are given in chronological rather than in alphabetical order within the text. All references within the text as well as the sources of direct quotes should be made explicit in the text itself (author(s) year, page(s)). This is in contrast to how footnotes are used in other disciplines such as history. In linguistics, footnotes are only used for:

• additional information that is useful to know but would disturb the smooth flow of the main text (e.g. additional references to secondary sources, counter positions in the literature)
• further explications that enable a better understanding of terminology, quotations and minor aspects of the topic

5. Compiling a bibliography

All references made in the text, i.e. all works cited or referred to in the text, are listed in alphabetical order at the end of the paper. This section is usually called References or Bibliography. As we discussed in section 2.2, all works that appear in your bibliography should be mentioned somewhere in your paper, and, conversely, all references in the text should be listed in the bibliography. At our department, we use the Chicago Manual of Style (Author Date) to format our lists of sources. You can find their online citation guide here .

If you decide to make use of generative AI tools for your paper, it is essential that you report this in your text and your bibliography. Here, you can follow the guidelines for citing dictionaries for single word prompts, any more extensive engagement with such tools must be documented and a protocol added as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Oftentimes you can make your work quite a bit easier by using a reference manager to help you keep track of your sources. As a student at our university, you can get access to three common reference managers. You can read about their respective strengths and weaknesses here and you can find a lot of helpful tutorials on how to use them online. If you’d like to start using one but are intimidated by the idea of having to figure out a new tool by yourself, the university library also offers courses to get you started on working with these tools.

• Selbstständigkeitserklärung (pdf: 32 kb)

Letzte Aktualisierung: 04.04.2024

• RWTH Startseite
• Kontakt und Lagepläne
• Datenschutzerklärung
• Barrierefreiheitserklärung

Soziale Medien

• Fremdsprachendidaktik
• Fachgruppe Literaturwissenschaft, Sprachwissenschaft & Philosophie

• | Intranet
• | Portals
• | ULB Catalogue

Term paper guidelines

The files listed below offer guidelines  for academic writing and research in both English Linguistics and Literary Studies:

English Linguistics

• Term paper guidelines (English), short version (146 KB, pdf, 21.01.2016)
• Term paper guidelines (English), long version (341 KB, pdf, 21.01.2016)
• Video tutorial "How to format a termpaper" [MP4] (96 MB, mp4, 17.01.2017)
• How to do a digital presentation (55 KB, pdf, 10.12.2020)

Literary Studies

• Style Sheet Literary Studies 2021 (546 KB, pdf, 06.01.2021)

Quick links

• Directories
• Make a Gift

Some Guidelines for Writing Linguistics Papers

By Fritz Newmeyer

1.         STRIVE FOR CLARITY .  Be clear!  A technical linguistics paper is not a mystery story -- there should never be any surprises. Say what your conclusion is going to be at the beginning of the paper with a few words on how you plan to get to the conclusion.  A good typical opening for a paper is something like:

In this paper, I will argue that a voiced segment must be bound in its governing category. This conclusion challenges previous work by Kenstowicz (1983) and Postal (1987), who maintain that such segments are invisible to all syntactic constraints.  My argument will take the following form. In section 2, I will show that [d] and [o] are 'alpha-emitters', and thus free in COMP. In section 3, I will establish that being free in COMP entails the property of counterjunctive trijacency (CT). Section 4, shows how, given the natural assumption that CT is sigma-sensitive, the effect of being subject to CT and that of being bound in one's governing category are notational variants. The final section, section 5, generalizes [d] and [o] to all voiced segments and speculates on the implications of the general findings in this paper for Gricean implicature.

Summarize in an analogous fashion at the end.  In fact, the first paragraph of a paper and the last can be virtually identical. Each section should be like a mini-paper in itself, previewing what will be said and summarizing at the end.

Your paper should be peppered with phrases like I will now argue..., As we have seen... , etc.  Anything to baby the reader is fine!

Almost all papers refer to the work of others, either to adopt or to challenge some principle proposed elsewhere. That's fine, of course, but it is absolutely essential that the reader understand whether a particular point is your own contribution or whether it is that of the author being cited. It is surprising how easy it is to confuse the reader, if you present someone else's idea in one paragraph and discuss the idea in the next, without saying at the beginning of the second paragraph if you are continuing to present the other author's ideas or are beginning to challenge them.

Avoid using deictic this as in all-too-common passages like This suggests that we must abandon the UCP. Invariably there is more than one potential antecedent for this . Write instead: The failure of coreference to hold between the subject and the object trace in sentence (89) suggests that we must abandon the UCP.

2.      EXAMPLES. The reader should never be in doubt as to the relevance of a particular example and should know why it is being given before  reading it. In other words, as the reader encounters an example or set of examples, they should already know what to be looking for. They shouldn't have to wait until after reading the examples to find out why they are there.

It should be clear when you give an example whether you thought of the example yourself or if you are citing somebody else's example.

Never break up a sentence of text with an example. Examples should follow a full sentence of text, which should end in a colon.

An example in the text itself should be in italics (or underlined) followed by the gloss, if necessary, in quotation marks. For example:  The German word Buch 'book' is neuter.

NONENGLISH EXAMPLES.  Examples from other languages should consist of (1) The sentence itself; (2) A word-for-word or morpheme-for-morpheme translation, containing the relevant grammatical information; (3) The actual translation:

3.      IN-TEXT CITATIONS. Use the author-date format: Chomsky (1981) and Lakoff (1983) agree that language exists.   Use small letters after the date if there is more than one reference per year for any author, as in Chomsky (1963a) .

If you are giving a direct quotation, you must use quotation marks, and put the author, date, and page number after the quotation. It’s the law! Also, it's not enough to change a word here or there in a quotation and decide that you now don't need to use quotation marks. In fact, you still do. But there is very rarely any reason to put a direct quote in a paper. It is always much better to paraphrase the material that you want to cite in your own words. Even so, you still have to give a citation to the author you are paraphrasing.

4.      FOOTNOTES .   Footnotes should always be contentful. Something like See Selkirk (1980) belongs in the main text, not in a footnote. Footnotes are normally reserved for little bits of extra clarification or material for further thought that would be digressions if they were put in the main text.

The first footnote is often an acknowledgement. By tradition, term papers do not have acknowledgements, MA theses sometimes do, while Ph D dissertations, articles, and books invariably do. However, if you rely heavily on an individual for data , even in a term paper, there should be an acknowledgement to that effect.

5.      REFERENCES. There is no single agreed upon format for references in the bibliography -- just copy a format from a journal article if you are unsure. But make sure that you include page numbers for articles and publisher and city for books.

After you have finished the paper, make sure that every paper or book that you cited in the main text has a reference in the reference list.

6 .        PERSON, NUMBER, AND VOICE .  It is best to write in the first person singular:  I will argue that... .  Personally, I find the first person plural very pompous sounding:  (e.g. We will argue that... ).

Above all, avoid the agentless passive construction. Never use phraseology like  It has been argued that ... You would be amazed how often it is really not clear who has done the arguing.

7 .        THE ONLY "PROOFS" ARE IN MATHEMATICAL LINGUISTICS. You should avoid using the word prove as in I will prove in this paper that tense has its own maximal projection. Proofs are attributes of deductive systems, not empirical science.  It is much better to use instead expressions such as attempt to establish , argue convincingly , suggest , and so on.

•   Facebook
•   Twitter
•   Newsletter

Writing up a Corpus-Linguistic Paper

• First Online: 05 May 2021

Cite this chapter

• Stefan Th. Gries   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-3958 3 , 4 &
• Magali Paquot   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-5074 5  

2 Citations

In this chapter, we provide a brief characterization of what we consider the best and most common structure that empirical corpus-linguistic papers can and should have. In particular, we first introduce the four major parts of a corpus linguistics paper: “Introduction”, “Methods”, “Results”, and “Discussion”. Since the nature of corpus data and corpus techniques makes the two sections very field-specific, we then focus more particularly on the “Methods” and “Discussion” sections of a typical quantitative corpus linguistic paper. We provide recommendations that span the research cycle from data description to analyzing the dataset and reporting the results of statistical tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Corpus Linguistic Analysis: How Far Can We Go?

Corpus Linguistics: Methods, Theory and Practice by Tony McEnery and Andrew Hardie

Corpus Linguistics: Some (Meta-)Pragmatic Reflections

This is also a means of bringing credit and recognition to all those involved in corpus compilation.

See Gries ( in press ) for more information about how to carry out the tasks of retrieval and annotation discussed above.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Google Scholar  

Berez-Kroeker, A., Gawne, L., Kung, S., et al. (2017). Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics, 56 (1), 1–18.

Article   Google Scholar  

BNC Consortium. (2001). The British National Corpus, version 2 (BNC World) . Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/ . Accessed 30 August 2019.

Branco, A., Cohen, K. B., Vossen, P., Ide, N., & Calzolari, N. (2017). Replicability and reproducibility of research results for human language technology : Introducing an LRE special section. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51 (1), 1–5.

Cleveland, W., & McGill, R. (1985). Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science, 229 (4716), 828–833.

Fox, J. (2003). Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8 (15), 1–27.

Fox, J., & Hong, J. (2009). Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the effects package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32 (1), 1–24.

Fuoli, M., & Hommerberg, C. (2015). Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluation expressions. Corpora, 10 (3), 315–349.

Gries, S. Th. (2013). Statistics for linguistics with R (2nd rev. & ext. ed.). Boston/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Book   Google Scholar  

Gries, S. Th. (2016a). Variationist analysis: Variability due to random effects and autocorrelation. In P. Baker & J. A. Egbert (Eds.), Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research (pp. 108–123). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

Gries, S. Th. (2016b). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R. 2nd rev. & ext. ed. New York & London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Gries, S. Th. (in press). Managing synchronic corpus data with the British National Corpus (BNC). In A.L. Berez-Kroeker, B. McDonnell, E. Koller, & L. Collister (Eds.), MIT open handbook of linguistic data management . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modeling . Berlin/New York: Springer.

Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2015). An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods . New York: Palgrave.

Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.

Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3 (1), 61–94.

Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (4), 655–687.

Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmid, H. (1994). Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. Proceedings of international conference on new methods in language processing , Manchester, UK.

Spooren, W., & Degand, L. (2010). Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6 (2), 241–266.

Tufte, E. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics Press: Cheshire, CT.

Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54 (8), 594–604.

Wulff, S., Gries, S. Th., & Lester, N. A. (2018). Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners: Where and how German and Spanish learners differ from native speakers. In A. Tyler, L. Huan, & H. Jan (Eds.), What does applied cognitive linguistics look like? Answers from the L2 classroom and SLA studies (pp. 97–118). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Elphick, C. S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1 (1), 3–14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Stefan Th. Gries

Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany

FNRS - Université catholique de Louvain, Centre for English Corpus Linguistics Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Magali Paquot

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Th. Gries .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

FNRS Centre for English Corpus Linguistics, Language and Communication Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Gries, S.T., Paquot, M. (2020). Writing up a Corpus-Linguistic Paper. In: Paquot, M., Gries, S.T. (eds) A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_26

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_26

Published : 05 May 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-46215-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-46216-1

eBook Packages : Religion and Philosophy Philosophy and Religion (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Humanities Faculty

• Chair of English Linguistics
•   University of bamberg
• English and American Studies

Term Papers and Final Theses

• Stylesheet for term papers and final theses in English Linguistics (348.8 KB)
• Information on Bachelor theses in English Linguisitics (Information only available in German)
• Guidelines concerning the length of final theses (Information only available in German)  
• Access to web services, linguistic corpora and data bases (VC Linguistic Resources)
• Declaration of independent authorship (18.0 KB)

• How It Works
• PhD thesis writing
• Master thesis writing
• Bachelor thesis writing
• Dissertation writing service
• Dissertation abstract writing
• Thesis proposal writing
• Thesis editing service
• Thesis proofreading service
• Thesis formatting service
• Coursework writing service
• Research paper writing service
• Architecture thesis writing
• Computer science thesis writing
• Engineering thesis writing
• History thesis writing
• MBA thesis writing
• Nursing dissertation writing
• Psychology dissertation writing
• Sociology thesis writing
• Statistics dissertation writing
• Buy dissertation online
• Write my dissertation
• Cheap thesis
• Cheap dissertation
• Custom dissertation
• Dissertation help
• Pay for thesis
• Pay for dissertation
• Senior thesis
• Write my thesis

211 Research Topics in Linguistics To Get Top Grades

Many people find it hard to decide on their linguistics research topics because of the assumed complexities involved. They struggle to choose easy research paper topics for English language too because they think it could be too simple for a university or college level certificate.

All that you need to learn about Linguistics and English is sprawled across syntax, phonetics, morphology, phonology, semantics, grammar, vocabulary, and a few others. To easily create a top-notch essay or conduct a research study, you can consider this list of research topics in English language below for your university or college use. Note that you can fine-tune these to suit your interests.

Linguistics Research Paper Topics

If you want to study how language is applied and its importance in the world, you can consider these Linguistics topics for your research paper. They are:

• An analysis of romantic ideas and their expression amongst French people
• An overview of the hate language in the course against religion
• Identify the determinants of hate language and the means of propagation
• Evaluate a literature and examine how Linguistics is applied to the understanding of minor languages
• Consider the impact of social media in the development of slangs
• An overview of political slang and its use amongst New York teenagers
• Examine the relevance of Linguistics in a digitalized world
• Analyze foul language and how it’s used to oppress minors
• Identify the role of language in the national identity of a socially dynamic society
• Attempt an explanation to how the language barrier could affect the social life of an individual in a new society
• Discuss the means through which language can enrich cultural identities
• Examine the concept of bilingualism and how it applies in the real world
• Analyze the possible strategies for teaching a foreign language
• Discuss the priority of teachers in the teaching of grammar to non-native speakers
• Choose a school of your choice and observe the slang used by its students: analyze how it affects their social lives
• Attempt a critical overview of racist languages
• What does endangered language means and how does it apply in the real world?
• A critical overview of your second language and why it is a second language
• What are the motivators of speech and why are they relevant?
• Analyze the difference between the different types of communications and their significance to specially-abled persons
• Give a critical overview of five literature on sign language
• Evaluate the distinction between the means of language comprehension between an adult and a teenager
• Consider a native American group and evaluate how cultural diversity has influenced their language
• Analyze the complexities involved in code-switching and code-mixing
• Give a critical overview of the importance of language to a teenager
• Attempt a forensic overview of language accessibility and what it means
• What do you believe are the means of communications and what are their uniqueness?
• Attempt a study of Islamic poetry and its role in language development
• Attempt a study on the role of Literature in language development
• Evaluate the Influence of metaphors and other literary devices in the depth of each sentence
• Identify the role of literary devices in the development of proverbs in any African country
• Cognitive Linguistics: analyze two pieces of Literature that offers a critical view of perception
• Identify and analyze the complexities in unspoken words
• Expression is another kind of language: discuss
• Identify the significance of symbols in the evolution of language
• Discuss how learning more than a single language promote cross-cultural developments
• Analyze how the loss of a mother tongue affect the language Efficiency of a community
• Critically examine how sign language works
• Using literature from the medieval era, attempt a study of the evolution of language
• Identify how wars have led to the reduction in the popularity of a language of your choice across any country of the world
• Critically examine five Literature on why accent changes based on environment
• What are the forces that compel the comprehension of language in a child
• Identify and explain the difference between the listening and speaking skills and their significance in the understanding of language
• Give a critical overview of how natural language is processed
• Examine the influence of language on culture and vice versa
• It is possible to understand a language even without living in that society: discuss
• Identify the arguments regarding speech defects
• Discuss how the familiarity of language informs the creation of slangs
• Explain the significance of religious phrases and sacred languages
• Explore the roots and evolution of incantations in Africa

Sociolinguistic Research Topics

You may as well need interesting Linguistics topics based on sociolinguistic purposes for your research. Sociolinguistics is the study and recording of natural speech. It’s primarily the casual status of most informal conversations. You can consider the following Sociolinguistic research topics for your research:

• What makes language exceptional to a particular person?
• How does language form a unique means of expression to writers?
• Examine the kind of speech used in health and emergencies
• Analyze the language theory explored by family members during dinner
• Evaluate the possible variation of language based on class
• Evaluate the language of racism, social tension, and sexism
• Discuss how Language promotes social and cultural familiarities
• Give an overview of identity and language
• Examine why some language speakers enjoy listening to foreigners who speak their native language
• Give a forensic analysis of his the language of entertainment is different to the language in professional settings
• Give an understanding of how Language changes
• Examine the Sociolinguistics of the Caribbeans
• Consider an overview of metaphor in France
• Explain why the direct translation of written words is incomprehensible in Linguistics
• Discuss the use of language in marginalizing a community
• Analyze the history of Arabic and the culture that enhanced it
• Discuss the growth of French and the influences of other languages
• Examine how the English language developed and its interdependence on other languages
• Give an overview of cultural diversity and Linguistics in teaching
• Challenge the attachment of speech defect with disability of language listening and speaking abilities
• Explore the uniqueness of language between siblings
• Explore the means of making requests between a teenager and his parents
• Observe and comment on how students relate with their teachers through language
• Observe and comment on the communication of strategy of parents and teachers
• Examine the connection of understanding first language with academic excellence

Language Research Topics

Numerous languages exist in different societies. This is why you may seek to understand the motivations behind language through these Linguistics project ideas. You can consider the following interesting Linguistics topics and their application to language:

• What does language shift mean?
• Discuss the stages of English language development?
• Examine the position of ambiguity in a romantic Language of your choice
• Why are some languages called romantic languages?
• Observe the strategies of persuasion through Language
• Discuss the connection between symbols and words
• Identify the language of political speeches
• Discuss the effectiveness of language in an indigenous cultural revolution
• Trace the motivators for spoken language
• What does language acquisition mean to you?
• Examine three pieces of literature on language translation and its role in multilingual accessibility
• Identify the science involved in language reception
• Interrogate with the context of language disorders
• Examine how psychotherapy applies to victims of language disorders
• Study the growth of Hindi despite colonialism
• Critically appraise the term, language erasure
• Examine how colonialism and war is responsible for the loss of language
• Give an overview of the difference between sounds and letters and how they apply to the German language
• Explain why the placement of verb and preposition is different in German and English languages
• Choose two languages of your choice and examine their historical relationship
• Discuss the strategies employed by people while learning new languages
• Discuss the role of all the figures of speech in the advancement of language
• Analyze the complexities of autism and its victims
• Offer a linguist approach to language uniqueness between a Down Syndrome child and an autist
• Express dance as a language
• Express music as a language
• Express language as a form of language
• Evaluate the role of cultural diversity in the decline of languages in South Africa
• Discuss the development of the Greek language
• Critically review two literary texts, one from the medieval era and another published a decade ago, and examine the language shifts

Linguistics Essay Topics

You may also need Linguistics research topics for your Linguistics essays. As a linguist in the making, these can help you consider controversies in Linguistics as a discipline and address them through your study. You can consider:

• The connection of sociolinguistics in comprehending interests in multilingualism
• Write on your belief of how language encourages sexism
• What do you understand about the differences between British and American English?
• Discuss how slangs grew and how they started
• Consider how age leads to loss of language
• Review how language is used in formal and informal conversation
• Discuss what you understand by polite language
• Discuss what you know by hate language
• Evaluate how language has remained flexible throughout history
• Mimicking a teacher is a form of exercising hate Language: discuss
• Body Language and verbal speech are different things: discuss
• Language can be exploitative: discuss
• Do you think language is responsible for inciting aggression against the state?
• Can you justify the structural representation of any symbol of your choice?
• Religious symbols are not ordinary Language: what are your perspective on day-to-day languages and sacred ones?
• Consider the usage of language by an English man and someone of another culture
• Discuss the essence of code-mixing and code-switching
• Attempt a psychological assessment on the role of language in academic development
• How does language pose a challenge to studying?
• Choose a multicultural society of your choice and explain the problem they face
• What forms does Language use in expression?
• Identify the reasons behind unspoken words and actions
• Why do universal languages exist as a means of easy communication?
• Examine the role of the English language in the world
• Examine the role of Arabic in the world
• Examine the role of romantic languages in the world
• Evaluate the significance of each teaching Resources in a language classroom
• Consider an assessment of language analysis
• Why do people comprehend beyond what is written or expressed?
• What is the impact of hate speech on a woman?
• Do you believe that grammatical errors are how everyone’s comprehension of language is determined?
• Observe the Influence of technology in language learning and development
• Which parts of the body are responsible for understanding new languages
• How has language informed development?
• Would you say language has improved human relations or worsened it considering it as a tool for violence?
• Would you say language in a black populous state is different from its social culture in white populous states?
• Give an overview of the English language in Nigeria
• Give an overview of the English language in Uganda
• Give an overview of the English language in India
• Give an overview of Russian in Europe
• Give a conceptual analysis on stress and how it works
• Consider the means of vocabulary development and its role in cultural relationships
• Examine the effects of Linguistics in language
• Present your understanding of sign language
• What do you understand about descriptive language and prescriptive Language?

List of Research Topics in English Language

You may need English research topics for your next research. These are topics that are socially crafted for you as a student of language in any institution. You can consider the following for in-depth analysis:

• Examine the travail of women in any feminist text of your choice
• Examine the movement of feminist literature in the Industrial period
• Give an overview of five Gothic literature and what you understand from them
• Examine rock music and how it emerged as a genre
• Evaluate the cultural association with Nina Simone’s music
• What is the relevance of Shakespeare in English literature?
• How has literature promoted the English language?
• Identify the effect of spelling errors in the academic performance of students in an institution of your choice
• Critically survey a university and give rationalize the literary texts offered as Significant
• Examine the use of feminist literature in advancing the course against patriarchy
• Give an overview of the themes in William Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”
• Express the significance of Ernest Hemingway’s diction in contemporary literature
• Examine the predominant devices in the works of William Shakespeare
• Explain the predominant devices in the works of Christopher Marlowe
• Charles Dickens and his works: express the dominating themes in his Literature
• Why is Literature described as the mirror of society?
• Examine the issues of feminism in Sefi Atta’s “Everything Good Will Come” and Bernadine Evaristos’s “Girl, Woman, Other”
• Give an overview of the stylistics employed in the writing of “Girl, Woman, Other” by Bernadine Evaristo
• Describe the language of advertisement in social media and newspapers
• Describe what poetic Language means
• Examine the use of code-switching and code-mixing on Mexican Americans
• Examine the use of code-switching and code-mixing in Indian Americans
• Discuss the influence of George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” on satirical literature
• Examine the Linguistics features of “Native Son” by Richard Wright
• What is the role of indigenous literature in promoting cultural identities
• How has literature informed cultural consciousness?
• Analyze five literature on semantics and their Influence on the study
• Assess the role of grammar in day to day communications
• Observe the role of multidisciplinary approaches in understanding the English language
• What does stylistics mean while analyzing medieval literary texts?
• Analyze the views of philosophers on language, society, and culture

English Research Paper Topics for College Students

For your college work, you may need to undergo a study of any phenomenon in the world. Note that they could be Linguistics essay topics or mainly a research study of an idea of your choice. Thus, you can choose your research ideas from any of the following:

• The concept of fairness in a democratic Government
• The capacity of a leader isn’t in his or her academic degrees
• The concept of discrimination in education
• The theory of discrimination in Islamic states
• The idea of school policing
• A study on grade inflation and its consequences
• A study of taxation and Its importance to the economy from a citizen’s perspectives
• A study on how eloquence lead to discrimination amongst high school students
• A study of the influence of the music industry in teens
• An Evaluation of pornography and its impacts on College students
• A descriptive study of how the FBI works according to Hollywood
• A critical consideration of the cons and pros of vaccination
• The health effect of sleep disorders
• An overview of three literary texts across three genres of Literature and how they connect to you
• A critical overview of “King Oedipus”: the role of the supernatural in day to day life
• Examine the novel “12 Years a Slave” as a reflection of servitude and brutality exerted by white slave owners
• Rationalize the emergence of racist Literature with concrete examples
• A study of the limits of literature in accessing rural readers
• Analyze the perspectives of modern authors on the Influence of medieval Literature on their craft
• What do you understand by the mortality of a literary text?
• A study of controversial Literature and its role in shaping the discussion
• A critical overview of three literary texts that dealt with domestic abuse and their role in changing the narratives about domestic violence
• Choose three contemporary poets and analyze the themes of their works
• Do you believe that contemporary American literature is the repetition of unnecessary themes already treated in the past?
• A study of the evolution of Literature and its styles
• The use of sexual innuendos in literature
• The use of sexist languages in literature and its effect on the public
• The disaster associated with media reports of fake news
• Conduct a study on how language is used as a tool for manipulation
• Attempt a criticism of a controversial Literary text and why it shouldn’t be studied or sold in the first place

Finding Linguistics Hard To Write About?

With these topics, you can commence your research with ease. However, if you need professional writing help for any part of the research, you can scout here online for the best research paper writing service.

There are several expert writers on ENL hosted on our website that you can consider for a fast response on your research study at a cheap price.

As students, you may be unable to cover every part of your research on your own. This inability is the reason you should consider expert writers for custom research topics in Linguistics approved by your professor for high grades.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment * Error message

Name * Error message

Email * Error message

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future.

Ukraine Live Updates

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essays Samples >
• Essay Types >
• Term Paper Example

Linguistics Term Papers Samples For Students

34 samples of this type

No matter how high you rate your writing skills, it's always a good idea to check out a competently written Term Paper example, especially when you're dealing with a sophisticated Linguistics topic. This is precisely the case when WowEssays.com catalog of sample Term Papers on Linguistics will come in handy. Whether you need to think up a fresh and meaningful Linguistics Term Paper topic or examine the paper's structure or formatting peculiarities, our samples will provide you with the required data.

Another activity area of our write my paper website is providing practical writing assistance to students working on Linguistics Term Papers. Research help, editing, proofreading, formatting, plagiarism check, or even crafting completely unique model Linguistics papers upon your request – we can do that all! Place an order and buy a research paper now.

Good Example Of Term Paper On French American English Dialect

The knife has fallen down. (zwart 1997) term papers example, free languages in brazil term paper example, intercultural communication.

Don't waste your time searching for a sample.

Get your term paper done by professional writers!

Just from $10/page

Good Example Of Types Of Body Language Term Paper

Body language as a way of knowing, term paper on origins of language, introduction.

This paper examines and discusses research into the origin of human language, considering religion-based ideas, anthropological and genetic evidence, as well as archaeological (indirect) evidence, that researchers have used in attempting to determine when language was first used by humans as a means of communication. It also considers the way language(s) evolved, spread and diversified, and some impacts that language has had on our culture and society.

Language Origins

Example of term paper on unconventional computer, official languages in canada term paper example, it and public policy, motivations of code-switching term paper examples, motivations of code-switching, sana alseayedlin 612term paper term papers examples, a comparative study of pragmatic properties of the english and chinese language, free reflections on the teaching of a second language term paper example, the understanding of business communication issues plays a major role in the term paper samples, business communication issues in an international business situation, examination questions term paper, question one, how the environment plays a role in learning term paper examples, term paper on community health nursing, community health nurse, a complex and a classical society and their effect world term paper examples, a complex society and a classical society and their effect to the world, interpersonal communication term paper, term paper on letters of thomas more, example of term paper on making connections and consulting guest speakers for career and internship opportunities, multicultural and multilanguage exposure term paper example, causes and effects of ebonics term paper, example of the kawaii culture term paper, religious symbolism term paper sample, good example of note as regards the selection of the country term paper.

International management

Multiculturalism In Canada Term Papers Example

Mexico: etiquette and country overview term paper example, example of trip advisor vrio term paper, good end of program outcome paper term paper example, effectiveness of written, verbal, nonverbal and electronic communication, good term paper about an acquired neurological language disorder: aphasia, discussing the causes, symptoms, treatments, and prognosis through modern medicine, freedom of speech term papers examples, free term paper about he that loves reading has everything within his reach, personal employment portfolio.

[Institution Title]

~William Goodwin

My Personal Philosophy

Online website for clothing store term paper example, swot analysis of an online business.

The name of the company is Jordaz and it is located at Jersey Shore Broadwalk. It is a small clothing store, which is planning to go online and engage in e-commerce. The concept of going online can be supported by performing a SWOT analysis and identifying the strengths, opportunities, weaknesses and threats.

Strengths- An e- commerce website is a unique factor for company that differentiates it from competitors.

Free term paper on the role nonverbal behavior plays in the way we use language, the protestant reformation term paper.

The beginning of the Protestant Reformation is usually associated with Martin Luther publishing his “95 Theses” in 1517 (Reformation). As was a common practice at the time, Luther posted his document on the church door as a sign that he wished to debate the topics listed. He was a German Augustinian monk and a lecturer at the University in Wittenberg. His bold move challenged some of the practices of the Catholic Church at that time as well as some of the specific church practices, or Doctrines.

The Programming Process Term Paper

The objective of computer programming is to develop electronic solutions for a particular company. In today’s world, most companies use software systems in order to run their processes efficiently. Companies store their source data details in the system and perform transactions on them through computers. The software users expect certain outputs and reports from a computer system.

Steps in the Programming Process

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline