assignment of lease duty

Assignment Of Leases And Rents

Jump to Section

What is an assignment of leases and rents.

The assignment of leases and rents, also known as the assignment of leases rents and profits, is a legal document that gives a mortgage lender right to any future profits that may come from leases and rents when a property owner defaults on their loan. This document is usually attached to a mortgage loan agreement.

Assignment of leases and rents allows lenders to a degree of financial protection in case a loan default occurs. This document is an agreement made between a borrower and a lender of mortgage loans. It often details an exact amount the lender will be entitled to if a default happens.

Common Sections in Assignments Of Leases And Rents

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignments Of Leases And Rents. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment Of Leases And Rents Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.9 10 d368735dex109.htm ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS , Viewed October 4, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignments Of Leases And Rents?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignments of leases and rents work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of leases and rents?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignments of leases and rents. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers

I have practiced civil law for 13 years and have concentrated my practice serving the construction and real estate industries.

Steve has 20+ years of IP and litigation experience, including 10+ years of experience at two of the most prestigious large U.S. law firms, Greenberg Traurig LLP, (AMLAW 10) and Sheppard Mullin LLP (AMLAW 100). Steve has been a licensed U.S. Patent and Trademark Office registered attorney and litigator since 2002. Steve’s extensive experience and interpersonal skills have given him the skills that allow him to provide his clients with the very best quality and service. Steve has successfully represented clients achieve their goals in a variety of IP, patent, trademark and trade secret disputes. He has successfully obtained many hundreds, if not over a thousand, valid and enforceable U.S. and international patents and trademarks applications for his clients over the years. As a result, he has strong, longstanding relationships with many of the Examiners at the USPTO and works with an international team of foreign associates to secure foreign rights and litigate abroad whenever needed. Many of Steve’s clients have been a client of Partners Law Group for 5+ years. More than a few have been clients for 15+ years. Steve prides himself on providing accurate results and efficiency-driven advice on complicated IP, litigation, and real estate matters in a clear and concise way; helping his clients make the best decisions possible when dealing with complex and sensitive legal matters. Steve has successfully negotiated hundreds of complicated licensing and pre-litigation IP, patent, trademark, business, real estate cases and matters for various clients large and small. Steve’s IP practice focuses on all aspects of intellectual property and covers various technical disciplines. He has extensive experience in medical devices, pharmaceuticals, internet or business methods and processes, broadband and 5G technologies, data acquisition, migration, monitoring and protection, piracy, nutritional supplements, sports and nutrition products, herbal products, pharmaceuticals, orthodontics, and surgical procedures and devices, health-related products to computer hardware and software, music, and mobile device applications, hardware and software, business methods, industrial machinery, mechanical devices to other technologies he understands and believes he can help the client achieve his or her goals.

30+ Years counseling clients in entertainment, media and the arts and representing them in transactional, structural and strategic matters.

I have experience with the protection and monetization of intellectual property, negotiating license agreements that have earned several hundred thousand dollars in revenue, and I have negotiated multiple multi-million dollar agreements. Additionally, I have worked with various client to incorporate intellectual property strategies into their underlying business plans. I have been working remotely for over seven years and I have a home office dedicated to my work. I am available to travel to clients on an as needed basis. I enjoy working with clients in this manner because the costs are reduced, and I have the freedom to travel to my clients as needed.

Hello! I'm an attorney who practices mainly landlord/tenant law (eviction, both plaintiff and defendant side); and criminal law (misdemeanor). I also work as appearance counsel to fill in at hearing when conflicts arise for other lawyers.

Since 2005, I have been practicing commercial real estate law. I have worked for AM 100 Law firms and highly respected in-house corporate real estate legal departments. I come with a broad array of experience and can get on the ground running immediately. I pride myself in the quality and efficiency of my work product.

In her professional life, Song Lo brings in a depth experience as general counsel to various companies and organizations in business and the real estate arena. Over the last 26 years, she has advised both companies and individuals in the areas of corporate investments, real estate development and contracts across multiple markets.Song has extensive experience in understanding how the law impacts companies wherever they might be in their age and stage. Important to investor and entrepreneur efforts, she has advised in the acquisition and transfer of shareholder stocks and assisted in the restructuring of private companies. Her specific areas of expertise are in corporate organization, mergers and acquisitions, employment, investments and real estate development. Specifically in real estate, Song participated in all aspects of development including pre-development and successfully gaining entitlements necessary for residential, senior housing and commercial projects. She holds experience both as legal counsel and as co-developer of real estate development projects. She was an owner and developer of senior cooperatives in Minnesota, with the LifeStyle Communities Group, promoting innovation and active living for all seniors. And, she brings all of this experience to the table at Raven Enterprise Group and RJP Development to enhance and support its services to consult and develop meaningful real estate development projects.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Real Estate lawyers by top cities

• Austin Real Estate Lawyers
• Boston Real Estate Lawyers
• Chicago Real Estate Lawyers
• Dallas Real Estate Lawyers
• Denver Real Estate Lawyers
• Houston Real Estate Lawyers
• Los Angeles Real Estate Lawyers
• New York Real Estate Lawyers
• Phoenix Real Estate Lawyers
• San Diego Real Estate Lawyers
• Tampa Real Estate Lawyers

Assignment Of Leases And Rents lawyers by city

• Austin Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Boston Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Denver Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Houston Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• New York Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

• Find a Lawyer
• Ask a Lawyer
• Research the Law
• Law Schools
• Laws & Regs
• Newsletters
• Justia Connect
• Pro Membership
• Basic Membership
• Justia Lawyer Directory
• Platinum Placements
• Gold Placements
• Justia Elevate
• Justia Amplify
• PPC Management
• Google Business Profile
• Social Media
• Justia Onward Blog
• Handling Subleases and Assignments as a Landlord

After you have completed the often long process of screening and moving in a new tenant, sometimes tenants inform you that they wish to end their lease early, typically due to reasons such as a job change or moving in with a significant other. This can be disheartening when you have put in the work to get the vacancy filled, and it may be tempting to minimize the additional work you may have to do to get the unit rented again by agreeing to a tenant’s proposal to sublease or assign their tenancy to a new person of their choosing. While there can be benefits to subleases and assignments, and in some places you cannot outright ban or unreasonably refuse a sublease, there are some pitfalls to be aware of with both options, as well as an alternative that may be preferable. It has also become increasingly popular for tenants to use their units for short-term vacation rentals, a practice which additionally carries a number of downsides for landlords.

When a tenant wants to leave their lease early or temporarily, and proposes to have a substitute tenant of their choosing live in the rental in their place and pay rent to the original tenant, this is called a sublease. For example, your original tenant may be a college student who plans to study abroad for a semester, but wishes to return after that. Another example may be if the original tenant wishes to rent out part of the unit, perhaps just one bedroom, in order to help them cover their expenses. In order to give you more control of these situations should they arise, it is best to have a clause in your lease specifying whether subleases are allowed, and if so, setting forth a requirement for the tenant to obtain your written permission or meet other criteria before subleasing the rental. Be sure to check state and local law regarding subleases, as some jurisdictions do not allow you to unreasonably deny requests to sublease, even if your individual lease does not permit them. It is also wise to require a subtenant to undergo the same screening process as the original tenant with regard to credit history, income, and other factors, but as always you should not make your decisions based on discriminatory factors.

Landlords should thoroughly screen potential subtenants and assignees even if the time left on a lease or periodic rental agreement is short. A bad subtenant or assignee can wreak a lot of havoc in a short amount of time or even refuse to leave once the lease or rental agreement is up.

The primary advantage of allowing a sublease is that you will presumably have an uninterrupted stream of income for the rental unit, which won’t sit vacant while you find a new tenant. Especially if the sublease request has come from a good and trustworthy long term tenant, then it may be worthwhile to grant the request and trust their judgment regarding who the subtenant is, subject to meeting your screening requirements. Your original tenant will also remain responsible for any failure to pay rent during the subtenancy, as well as any damage to the property. The downsides of allowing a sublease include that because the original tenant, rather than you, will be the subtenant’s landlord, it may be difficult to enforce the terms of the lease in the event of any violations. The subtenant may also refuse to leave at the agreed-upon time, potentially making it necessary for you to evict both them and the original tenant.

Assignments

An assignment is similar to a sublease in that it involves someone new taking the place of the original tenant, but the original tenant in these cases does not intend to return. The assignee assumes the legal place of the original tenant in the lease, meaning that they are renting from you rather than the original tenant. This means that the assignee is typically responsible for all of the original tenant’s general obligations under the lease, which allows you to pursue legal action against them in the event of a violation. Further, if the assignee fails to pay rent , you can actually pursue payment from the original tenant. Therefore, an assignment allows you the advantage of an uninterrupted supply of income for the unit without requiring you to do as much work to find a new tenant, and permits you to hold the original tenant responsible if the assignee does not follow through on their obligation to pay rent.

• The original tenant remains liable for the rent (the subtenant is liable to the original tenant)
• The original tenant remains liable for lease violations
• The landlord must evict the original tenant in order to evict the subtenant

Assignment:

• The assignee becomes liable for the rent, and the original tenant is only liable if the assignee does not pay
• The assignee becomes liable for lease violations
• The assignee can be evicted for any reason for which the original tenant could have been evicted

Creating a New Tenancy

While allowing a sublease or assignment may be advisable in some situations, in many cases the best and simplest option is to terminate the original tenant’s lease in writing and begin a new lease with the new tenant. This may still allow you to take advantage of the original tenant’s legwork in identifying a replacement tenant provided that the new tenant meets your requirements, but gives all the parties the added benefit of clarity when it comes to the legal relationship between you and the new tenant, especially if things go awry after they move in.

Short-Term Rentals

Particularly in competitive rental markets and large cities, tenants are turning to short-term rental services like Airbnb to rent out the units they themselves rent, and make a profit by collecting a fee from their guests. Many landlords disfavor this practice due to the increased wear and tear on the rental, people they haven’t screened using their property, and possible liability issues, among other things. Further, a number of cities have begun to highly regulate if not outright prohibit short-term vacation rentals of this nature. If you do not wish to allow tenants to host short-term vacation renters, once you have checked your local laws on the topic, it is best to clearly prohibit this practice in your written lease or rental agreement, and distinguish this type of rental from more standard subleases.

Last reviewed October 2023

Landlord - Tenant Law Center Contents   

• Landlord - Tenant Law Center
• Tenants' Legal Rights & Duties
• Screening Tenants & Legal Compliance for Landlords
• Preparing Leases and Rental Agreements
• Rent Rules & Related Legal Concerns for Landlords
• Security Deposits & Related Legal Requirements for Landlords
• Rental Property Management & Legal Considerations for Landlords
• Preparing Rental Property for a New Tenancy & Related Legal Concerns
• Recordkeeping Practices for Landlords & Legal Implications
• Setting Rules for Co-Tenants and Guests as a Landlord
• Repairing and Maintaining Rental Property as a Landlord
• Protecting Tenant Safety as a Landlord & Legal Obligations
• Addressing Health Hazards as a Landlord & Legal Obligations
• Providing Property Security as a Landlord & Avoiding Legal Liability
• When Landlords Have a Legal Right of Entry to Rental Units
• Ending a Tenancy as a Landlord & Related Legal Considerations
• The Tenant Move-Out Process & Legal Requirements for Landlords
• Handling Abandoned Tenant Property as a Landlord
• Resolving a Dispute With Your Tenant
• The Eviction Legal Process for Landlords
• Working With a Landlord Lawyer
• Landlords' Legal Rights & Duties — FAQs
• Housing Discrimination Law
• Eviction Laws and Forms: 50-State Survey
• Find a Landlord Tenant Lawyer

Related Areas   

• Consumer Protection Law Center
• Civil Rights and Discrimination Legal Center
• Foreclosure Law Center
• Animal and Dog Law Center
• Related Areas
• Bankruptcy Lawyers
• Business Lawyers
• Criminal Lawyers
• Employment Lawyers
• Estate Planning Lawyers
• Family Lawyers
• Personal Injury Lawyers
• Estate Planning
• Personal Injury
• Business Formation
• Business Operations
• Intellectual Property
• International Trade
• Real Estate
• Financial Aid
• Course Outlines
• Law Journals
• US Constitution
• Regulations
• Supreme Court
• Circuit Courts
• District Courts
• Dockets & Filings
• State Constitutions
• State Codes
• State Case Law
• Legal Blogs
• Business Forms
• Product Recalls
• Justia Connect Membership
• Justia Premium Placements
• Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
• Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
• Testimonials

.

This residential lease assignment is between , an individual (the " Original Tenant ") and an individual (the " New Tenant ").

On or about , the Original Tenant and (the " Landlord ") entered into a lease agreement (the " Lease ").

The Lease covers the property located at , , , and more particularly described as follows: (the " Premises ").

Under section of the Lease, the Original Tenant is permitted to assign its interest in the Lease, with the consent of the Landlord.

The Original Tenant wishes to assign to the New Tenant's his or her rights in, and delegate all of his or her obligations under, the Lease, and the New Tenant wishes to accept this assignment.

The parties therefore agree as follows:

1. ASSIGNMENT.

The Original Tenant assigns to the New Tenant of all his or her rights in, and delegates to the New Tenant all of his or her obligations under, the Lease. This transfer will become effective as of (the " Effective Date "), and will continue until the present term of the Lease ends.

2. ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS AND DUTIES.

After the Effective Date, the New Tenant shall assume all rights and duties under the Lease, including the obligation to pay rent under the Lease when it is due.   The Original Tenant will have no further obligations under the Lease   The Original Tenant will remain bound to the Landlord under the Lease, notwithstanding the assignment . However, the Original Tenant remains responsible for obligations accruing before the Effective Date.

3. REIMBURSEMENT.

On or before the Effective Date, the New Tenant shall pay to the Original Tenant, which is the sum of:

• (a)  the security deposit held by the Landlord under the Lease; and
• (b)  the rent or other deposits paid in advance by the Original Tenant for any period after the effective date of this assignment.

4. INDEMNIFICATION.

• (a) The Original Tenant shall indemnify the New Tenant from all damages, liabilities, expenses, claims, or judgments (including interest and reasonable attorneys' fees) (collectively, "Claims" ) arising out of the Original Tenant's failure to perform his or her obligations under the Lease before the Effective Date.
• (b) The New Tenant shall indemnify the Original Tenant from all Claims relating to the Lease, except if those costs arise from the Original Tenant's failure to perform his or her duties under the Lease before the Effective Date.
• (c) The New Tenant shall indemnify the Original Tenant from all Claims attributable to the acts or omissions of the New Tenant or his or her agents, contractors, or employees with respect to the Premises or any activities on the Premises. This indemnification will survive the termination of the Lease and this assignment.

5. CONTINUING EFFECTIVENESS OF LEASE.

This assignment is made on the understanding that all other terms of the Lease remain in full effect, including the prohibition against further assignments and subleases without the Landlord's express written consent.

6. ORIGINAL TENANT'S REPRESENTATIONS.

The Original Tenant represents that he or she:

• (a) has the power and authority to enter into and carry out this assignment;
• (b) has not previously assigned his or her rights under the Lease;
• (c) is the lawful and sole owner of the interests assigned under this assignment;
• (d) the interests assigned under this assignment are free from all encumbrances;
• (e) except for the Landlord and the Original Tenant, there are no parties in possession or occupancy of the Premises or any part of them, and there are no parties with possessory rights on the Premises or any part of them; and
• (f) has performed all obligations and made all required payments under the Lease.

7. CONDITION OF PREMISES.

The New Tenant has examined and inspected the Premises and accepts them "as is" and in its present condition with all faults. Except as provided in this assignment, the Original Tenant makes no representations, covenants, or guaranties about the status, nature, or condition of the Lease or the Premises.

8. INTERPRETATION .

In interpreting the language of this assignment, the parties shall be treated as having drafted this assignment after meaningful negotiations. The language in this assignment will be construed as to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either party.

9. GOVERNING LAW .

• (a) Choice of Law. The laws of the state of govern this assignment (without giving effect to its conflicts of law principles).
• (b) Choice of Forum. Both parties consent to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in County, .

10. AMENDMENTS.

No amendment to this assignment will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by a party or its authorized representative.

11. COUNTERPARTS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.

• (a) Counterparts. The parties may execute this agreement in any number of counterparts, each of which is an original but all of which constitute one and the same instrument.
• (b) Electronic Signatures . This agreement, agreements ancillary to this agreement, and related documents entered into in connection with this agreement are signed when a party's signature is delivered by facsimile, email, or other electronic medium. These signatures must be treated in all respects as having the same force and effect as original signatures.

12. SEVERABILITY.

If any one or more of the provisions contained in this assignment is, for any reason, held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, that invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provisions of this assignment, but this assignment will be construed as if those invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained in it, unless the deletion of those provisions would result in such a material change so as to cause completion of the transactions contemplated by this assignment to be unreasonable.

13. NOTICES.

• (a) Writing; Permitted Delivery Methods . Each party giving or making any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted by this assignment shall give that notice in writing and use one of the following types of delivery, each of which is a writing for purposes of this assignment: personal delivery, mail (registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return-receipt requested), nationally recognized overnight courier (fees prepaid), facsimile, or email.
• (b) Addresses. A party shall address notices under this section to a party at the following addresses:
• If to the Original Tenant:
• If to the New Tenant:
• (c) Effectiveness. A notice is effective only if the party giving notice complies with subsections (a) and (b) and if the recipient receives the notice.

14. WAIVER.

No waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this assignment will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right, or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure, right, or remedy will be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right, or remedy, whether or not similar, and no waiver will constitute a continuing waiver, unless the writing so specifies.

15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This agreement constitutes the final agreement of the parties. It is the complete and exclusive expression of the parties' agreement about the subject matter of this agreement. All prior and contemporaneous communications, negotiations, and agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter of this agreement are expressly merged into and superseded by this agreement. The provisions of this agreement may not be explained, supplemented, or qualified by evidence of trade usage or a prior course of dealings. Neither party was induced to enter this agreement by, and neither party is relying on, any statement, representation, warranty, or agreement of the other party except those set forth expressly in this agreement. Except as set forth expressly in this agreement, there are no conditions precedent to this agreement's effectiveness.

16. HEADINGS.

The descriptive headings of the sections and subsections of this assignment are for convenience only, and do not affect this agreement's construction or interpretation.

17. EFFECTIVENESS.

This assignment will become effective when all parties have signed it. The date this assignment is signed by the last party to sign it (as indicated by the date associated with that party's signature) will be deemed the date of this assignment.

18. NECESSARY ACTS; FURTHER ASSURANCES.

Each party shall use all reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions necessary or desirable to consummate and make effective the transactions this assignment contemplates or to evidence or carry out the intent and purposes of this assignment.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

Each party is signing this agreement on the date stated opposite that party's signature.

ORIGINAL TENANT

[PAGE BREAK HERE]

LANDLORD'S CONSENT AND RELEASE

As Landlord under the Lease, I hereby consent to this assignment of the Lease, and to the New Tenant's assumption of the Original Tenant's obligations under the Lease, including the obligation to pay rent when it is due. As of the Effective Date, I release the Original Tenant from all liability for obligations (including rent payments) under the Lease. However, the Original Tenant remains primarily obligated as tenant under the Lease and I do not waive or relinquish any rights under the Lease against either the Original Tenant or the New Tenant.

Attach a copy of the Lease as Exhibit A

Free Assignment of Residential Lease Template

Simplify lease transfers with an assignment of residential lease agreement. with the landlord's approval, smoothly transfer your lease responsibilities to a new tenant while documenting the arrangement comprehensively..

Complete your document with ease

What's an assignment of residential lease?

Related templates

Assignment of Agreement

Transfer work responsibilities efficiently with an assignment of agreement. Facilitate a smooth transition from one party to another.

Assignment of Commercial Lease

Transfer your commercial lease to a new tenant smoothly. Create an assignment of a commercial lease to clearly articulate the new tenant's rights, responsibilities, and obligations.

Cohabitation Agreement

Step into a new chapter of your life securely with a cohabitation agreement. Start your commitment on the right track with your significant other.

Land Co-ownership Agreement

Define the rights and responsibilities of a property owner with a land co-ownership agreement. Safeguard investments and clarify land usage guidelines.

Landlord Consent to Assignment

Facilitate lease transfers with a landlord consent to assignment form. Provide tenant and landlord information, along with the rental property address, and grant permission for the lease transfer easily.

Landlord Consent to Sublease

Obtain approval from the landlord to sublet a space with a sublease agreement. Use our template to clearly lay out the lease terms, obligations of the new tenant, payment, and other essential details.

Commercial Lease Assignment and Sublet Provisions

A balancing act for landlords and tenants, july 2020 by adam f. aldrich.

This article identifies common problems involved in commercial lease transfers through assignments and subleases. It offers both landlords and tenants tips for solving these problems when negotiating assignment and sublease provisions in leases.

The modern commercial lease is a complex, integrated document that attempts to balance the competing interests of the landlord and tenant. As a result, commercial leases are the subject of much negotiation and are never “one size fits all.” In fact, commercial leases are one of the least standardized documents in real estate practice.

When any commercial lease is to be transferred in part through a sublet or in its entirety through an assignment, the issues multiply. The transfer provisions, which once seemed moot, become operative to determine whether the lease can be transferred and, if so, under what conditions. If, during lease negotiations, the parties overlooked the lease transfer provisions or gave them cursory consideration, they may be unpleasantly surprised by the result. While landlords and tenants have divergent economic interests with respect to transferring the lease, their legitimate concerns can be appropriately addressed through thoughtfully crafted transfer provisions.

This article explores common problems, issues, and solutions encountered in commercial lease transfers through assignments and subleases. It is intended to be useful both to the lawyer who infrequently encounters lease transfer problems and the seasoned practitioner who deals with lease transfer issues every day.

Distinguishing Between an Assignment and Sublease

Assignments and subleases have fundamental differences that are frequently misunderstood. A lease is both a conveyance of an interest in property and a contract. 1 After executing the lease, the landlord and tenant are bound to one another by privity of contract and by privity of estate. As a result, they may each enforce the provisions of the written lease through privity of contract and the promises that arise from privity of estate. 2 Privity of contract allows enforcement of the lease provisions, while privity of estate allows enforcement of only those promises that run with the land. 3

Whether the landlord, tenant/assignor, and subtenant/assignee call their arrangement an assignment or a sublease, courts typically look at the substance of the transaction. In an assignment, a tenant transfers its entire interest in the lease. 4 After assigning its interest in the lease, the assignee has privity of estate with the landlord, but the assignee and the landlord are not in privity of contract unless the assignee assumes the tenant’s obligations under the lease. 5 Assignment of the lease ends the original tenant’s rights to possession, but absent an express release under the lease terms, its liability under the lease continues. 6 This means the original tenant remains secondarily liable for the assignee’s obligations under the lease. Thus, the tenant/assignor may find itself liable at a future date if the assignee fails to perform its obligations under the lease.

In a sublease, however, the tenant transfers less than the remaining term or less than the tenant’s entire interest in the lease, leaving the original tenant with a reversionary interest in the lease. 7 The relationship between the original landlord and the original tenant, including both privity of contract and privity of estate, remains intact, thereby creating the relationship of landlord and tenant between the original tenant (sublandlord) and the new tenant (subtenant). The original landlord and the subtenant have no privity of estate or privity of contract with one another, so the original tenant remains liable for the actions and omissions of the subtenant. 8 However, the subtenant’s rights will terminate with the original lease or when the landlord declares a forfeiture of the tenant’s lease term. 9

A third, less common type of transfer is a partial assignment of a lease. Such assignments are called assignments “pro tanto,” not subleases, because they grant possession of a portion of the leased premises to the new tenant for the balance of the lease term. 10 The landlord now has two tenants and, in effect, two leases. There is little guiding case law on this hybrid lease transfer, so it is not entirely clear whether the assignee has a contractual relationship with the landlord. 11 Due to the vagaries and uncertainties that can result when a transfer of possession encompasses less than all of the space, partial assignments should be avoided. To avoid assignments pro tanto, landlords should consider prohibiting assignments of less than the original tenant’s entire interest in the lease. If a landlord proceeds with a partial assignment, it should clearly document the arrangement, including the rights and remedies of the landlord, original tenant, and new tenant, and acknowledge the transaction as a partial assignment and not a sublease. 12

The accompanying table illustrates the many differences between an assignment, sublease, and partial assignment. 13

Restrictions on Assignments and Subleases

Colorado law favors the free transferability of rights. 14 As a result, landlords frequently attempt to limit the tenant’s right to transfer the lease by including lease provisions specifically restricting the tenant’s right to assign or sublet. Under Colorado law, outright prohibitions against assignments are permissible and are not considered invalid restraints on alienation. 15 Even if outright prohibitions on assignments or subletting are enforced, such provisions “are construed against the restriction.” 16 This means a court generally will construe such stipulations “against the party invoking them.” 17 A breach of the restriction against transfer does not terminate the lease, 18 but may give rise to a claim for default. 19 Generally, tenants in commercial leases negotiate exceptions to strict prohibitions against assignments or subletting because transfer provisions may be their only viable exit strategy if they find they can no longer afford the space or no longer need it.

Consent to Assignments and Subleases

Recognizing that absolute prohibitions are neither favored by the courts nor acceptable to most tenants, some landlords include modified prohibitions in their leases that limit the tenant’s rights to transfer the lease and, if a transfer is permitted, allow the landlord to enforce the lease against both the original tenant and the new tenant to the maximum extent possible. Such provisions may reserve to the landlord, either in its sole discretion or without unreasonably withholding its consent, the right to approve a proposed lease transfer. Although the reservation of the landlord’s right to approve a proposed assignment or sublease is for the landlord’s benefit, 20 the landlord is bound to the standards set out in the lease for consents to an assignment or sublease. 21 Accordingly, once the landlord has established the standards for its consent in the lease, it cannot object to a proposed assignment or sublease if the tenant has met the appropriate requirements.

It is well established in Colorado law that “without a freely negotiated provision in the lease giving the landlord an absolute right to withhold consent, a landlord’s decision to withhold consent must be reasonable.” 22 Thus, if a lease contains a provision against subletting or assignment, but is silent on a landlord’s right to withhold consent, Colorado law forbids the landlord from withholding its consent unreasonably if the tenant tenders a suitable subtenant or assignee to the landlord. 23

Disputes often arise as to what is a ‘‘reasonable” withholding of the landlord’s consent. This debate has led to the enunciation of specific standards of reasonableness. If a lease provision “requires that consent to an assignment will not be unreasonably or arbitrarily withheld, a landlord is held to the standard of conduct of a reasonably prudent person.” 24 Therefore, a landlord must only consider “those factors that relate to a landlord’s interest in preserving the value of the property,” 25 which do not include “[a]rbitrary considerations of personal taste, convenience, or sensibility . . . .” 26 Whether a landlord has acted reasonably is a fact-specific inquiry. 27 Most courts have held that the tenant bears the burden of proving that the landlord acted unreasonably in withholding consent, 28 but some courts have required the landlord to prove it acted reasonably. 29 Courts have been divided on a tenant’s right to terminate a lease where the landlord has been found to have unreasonably withheld consent. 30

There are several reliable rules that courts follow in determining whether a landlord acted reasonably. First, a landlord cannot refuse consent for racial or other discriminatory reasons. 31

Second, a landlord may not deny consent to improve its general economic position or to receive increased rent. 32 However, a landlord may deny consent to protect its interest in the value, condition, and operation of the property or the performance of lease covenants. 33 For example, in Cafeteria Operators L.P. v. AMCAP/Denver Limited Partnership , the tenant leased the premises to run a cafeteria-style restaurant. 34 After several failed attempts to operate the restaurant, the tenant marketed the space to prospective subtenants, including non-cafeteria restaurant owners. 35 When a non-cafeteria restaurant owner expressed interest in subleasing the premises, the tenant sought the landlord’s approval to the proposed sublease, but the landlord refused. The Court found that the landlord reasonably withheld consent because the proposed sublessee would have changed the “character” of the shopping center by operating “the largest restaurant of its kind, raising concerns about lighting, maintenance, traffic, and parking.” 36 Moreover, the subtenant would sell alcohol and stay open late, and its proposed occupancy raised “concerns about security, safety of patrons, and parking requirements.” 37 Similarly, the Court in List v. Dahnke found that the landlord reasonably withheld consent where the landlord determined that a Thai-American restaurant operated by the assignee would not be successful at that location, but the Court did not identify the facts that led the landlord to such conclusion. 38

Third, a court may make a finding of unreasonableness if a landlord refuses consent to a proposed transfer without obtaining relevant information to make its decision. 39 Before making the decision, the landlord should obtain sufficient information on the transferee’s financial condition; the transferee’s experience in operating its business; how the premises are to be used; projected sales, gross income, and income per square foot; and, in the case of a sublease, the size of the subleased space. 40

Fourth, courts may consider how long it takes the landlord to make the decision on the requested assignment. If the landlord instantly refuses consent or waits too long to make a decision, the court could make a finding of unreasonableness. 41 Conversely, if the tenant fails to allow the landlord a reasonable amount of time to issue a decision, the withholding of consent can be found reasonable. 42 In Parr v. Triple L&J Corp. , the Court found that the landlord unreasonably withheld consent when it deferred making a decision on the proposed assignment, thereby delaying the sale of the tenant’s business until the prospective buyer withdrew his offer. 43 The tenant sought approval from the landlord for an assignment of the lease as part of the sale of its business. The landlord requested all personal and financial information on the proposed assignee and the assignee’s business plan, and the tenant provided prompt responses that demonstrated the assignee’s experience in restaurant management and “perfect credit score.” 44 Because the landlord unreasonably withheld consent, the landlord was held liable to the tenant under a breach of contract theory, as well as for lost profits on the sale of its business. 45

Similarly, the Court in Bert Bidwell Investors Corp. v. LaSalle and Schiffer, P.C. addressed whether the landlord unreasonably withheld consent to the tenant’s request to transfer the lease where the assignee was “ready, willing, and able to assume the lease as written, and to use the premises for the same business as that of the tenants.” 46 The landlord ultimately refused consent because it “didn’t like” the proposed assignee. 47 Based on the lease, which required the landlord’s consent to assign, the landlord argued that it “had the right to relet the premises as it saw fit and to be arbitrary in doing so.” 48 Relying on List , the Court found that the landlord acted unreasonably in refusing to accept the proposed new tenant. 49 Nevertheless, parties may create their own standards and definition of reasonableness, and if they do, courts will enforce and apply such standards. 50

As these cases illustrate, if a landlord wishes to withhold consent absent a sole and unconditional contractual right to do so, it must have fact-based reasons for doing so and cannot arbitrarily withhold or delay its consent. The landlord should communicate its decision in writing to the tenant and enumerate all fact-based reasons to preserve all arguments for reasonableness. 51 Before making the request to assign or sublet the premises, the tenant should gather information about the proposed assignee’s or subtenant’s financial status, business acumen, and proposed operations, and then submit this information to the landlord, along with an assignment or sublease document signed by the tenant and assignee or subtenant. While the landlord must still consent to the transaction, 52 such documentation places the tenant in a stronger position to rebut any superficial or arbitrary reasons the landlord may proffer for denying consent. And if litigation ensues, it will be critical for the tenant’s case to show that it supplied the landlord with as much information as possible concerning the assignee’s or subtenant’s financial status and operations, to avoid having the trier of fact determine that the landlord acted reasonably in denying consent due to a lack of information from the tenant.

Recapture, Termination, and Renewal Rights

Leases may grant the landlord the right to terminate the lease and to retake the tenant’s space if the tenant wishes to assign its lease or sublet its space, or if the tenant transfers the lease without the landlord’s consent. Replacing the tenant by recapturing the premises can benefit both the landlord and the tenant, but each party will want to weigh the pros and cons of such an agreement.

Terminating the lease allows the landlord to eliminate existing lease weaknesses and to enter into a new lease with a potentially better tenant on a clean slate. Moreover, recapturing the premises and directly leasing it to the proposed assignee can save the landlord substantial dollars in tenant improvements that can be passed on to the new tenant through reduced or free rent for a portion of the lease term. But the landlord must pay close attention to market conditions before terminating the lease. Terminating the lease in a strong market when space is at a premium and rents are high allows the landlord to enter into a new lease with a new tenant at a higher rate, but the landlord may take a loss on its investment in the premises in a down market when rates are depressed and there is an oversupply of space.

The tenant, on the other hand, risks losing its investment in its business and the leased premises. Before requesting a transfer, the tenant should closely scrutinize the lease to determine the potential outcome. Under some leases, the act of notifying the landlord of an intent to assign or sublet can trigger the recapture provision. 53 Similarly, if the lease is assigned without the landlord’s consent, it may trigger the recapture right if that right is expressly provided in the lease. 54 Landlords should closely review the recapture language before terminating the lease because restraints on alienation and lease forfeitures are disfavored. 55

When a tenant violates the transfer provisions by transferring the lease without the landlord’s consent, the landlord should send a notice of default to the tenant and demand that the default be cured by nullifying the transfer, 56 unless the lease provides that transferring the lease is an automatic termination. If the tenant is unable to nullify the transfer when it receives the notice, it could be liable for default damages incurred by the landlord. 57 If the tenant does not cure the default and the landlord will not approve (and has the right not to approve) the assignee or subtenant, the landlord may terminate the lease (or the tenant’s right to possession) if the lease so permits. 58 If the landlord fails to terminate the lease 59 or accepts rent after breach of the anti-assignment clause, 60 it may be deemed to have waived the right to terminate. Once the lease is terminated as a result of the default, the landlord must consider its duty to mitigate damages. 61

If the space is recaptured and the lease terminated, the tenant’s lease obligations will be terminated with respect to all recaptured space, including the payment of rent. 62 Moreover, the tenant will no longer have privity of contract or estate with the landlord, assignee, or subtenant because the lease will be terminated as to the tenant. 63 If the landlord recaptures the premises, the tenant is spared the rent expense while it finds a transferee. But if the landlord does not recapture, the tenant can make a transfer without fear that the landlord will then exercise its recapture rights.

Another important issue is whether an option to renew contained in a lease assigned or subleased to a third party remains exercisable following the transfer. If the assigned lease gives the original tenant a renewal option, the assignee can extend the term unless the renewal option is reserved from the assignment. 64 If a tenant/sublandlord grants its subtenant an option to renew based on the tenant’s option in the prime lease, the subtenant is dependent on the tenant/sublandlord for a lease extension because it does not have contractual privity with the landlord. 65 If the tenant/sublandlord refuses to exercise its renewal option so as to enable the subtenant to take advantage of the rights that were granted to it, the tenant may be liable to the subtenant. 66 To protect its option to renew, the subtenant should request or require a recognition agreement from the landlord when negotiating a sublease, whereby the landlord agrees to recognize the sublease if the prime lease terminates due to the tenant/sublandlord’s default. 67

The Impact of Bankruptcy Proceedings on Assignments and Subleases

Bankruptcy laws can have a significant impact on commercial leases when the tenant files for bankruptcy protection. Generally, a trustee is appointed to administer the bankruptcy estate, except in Chapter 11 cases where the debtor-in-possession is the tenant. 68 For debtors with executory contracts and/or unexpired leases, 11 USC § 365 contains a series of rules that govern those documents. Section 365 of the bankruptcy code provides the tenant/debtor with the statutory right to assume or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases to which it is a party, subject to objections by creditors and other parties-in-interest, and ultimately the court’s approval. 69 The debtor may, in turn, assign the lease if the assignee provides “adequate assurance of future performance.” 70 During the period between filing the bankruptcy petition and the date on which the lease is assumed or rejected, the tenant must continue to pay rent and perform the material terms of the lease. 71 It should be noted that written waivers of § 362’s automatic stay have been found to be unenforceable unless they are part of a previous bankruptcy proceeding. 72 Thus, landlords should not assume that a waiver in the lease is enforceable if the tenant files for bankruptcy.

From the debtor’s perspective, the right to reject the lease is “vital to the basic purpose of Chapter 11” because it can free the tenant from the obligation to pay all future rent under the lease. 73 If a lease is rejected with bankruptcy court approval, the debtor has no legal interest in the lease or the leased premises, and it must vacate the leased premises. If, however, the debtor fails to vacate the premises, the landlord can file a motion to lift the automatic stay so it can file or continue an eviction action in state court. If the debtor rejects the lease, the landlord may have a claim for “rejection damages” pursuant to 11 USC § 502(b)(6), subject to the mitigation-of-damages duty. 74

As a condition to assuming the lease, the debtor must cure all monetary defaults and provide adequate assurances of future performance under the lease. 75 A debtor who assumes the lease may be able to assign the lease free of restrictions on transfer set forth in the lease and over the landlord’s objection, 76 which may turn out to be a significant right for the debtor if it holds a below-market lease with sufficient time remaining on the lease term. However, a bankruptcy court has discretion to reject an assignment if it finds, for example, that the assignment would disrupt the tenant mix by changing the image of a shopping center or violating the use restriction in the lease. 77 A landlord may favorably view the debtor’s assumption because it assures continuation of the lease and the cure of existing defaults. But if the tenant is holding a below-market lease, the landlord may favor rejection to enable it to negotiate a new lease. A landlord may object to the debtor’s attempted lease assumption if the landlord disagrees with the debtor’s plan to cure the default or believes the debtor has not provided adequate assurance that the default will be cured or the debtor will perform in the future.

Section 365(b)(3)(C) of the bankruptcy code provides specific protections for “a lease of real property in a shopping center” by providing that no assignment can occur without assurances that use clauses and other provisions vital to the operation of the shopping center will continue to be performed, “including (but not limited to) provisions such as a radius, location, use, or exclusivity provision, and will not breach any such provision contained in any other lease, financing agreement, or master agreement relating to such shopping center.” The purpose of § 365(b)(3)(C) “is to preserve the landlord’s bargained-for protections with respect to premises use and other matters that are spelled out in the lease with the debtor-tenant.” 78 Moreover, § 365(b)(3)(D) requires adequate assurance “that assumption or assignment of such lease will not disrupt any tenant mix or balance in such shopping center.” Despite the bankruptcy code’s language protecting shopping centers, some bankruptcy courts have found lease provisions that limit the use of the shopping center premises to be per se restraints on alienation. 79 To avoid an adverse ruling if a shopping center tenant files for bankruptcy, a landlord should arm itself with as much evidence and expert testimony as possible to show a disruption in tenant mix or a real potential for violating other tenants’ rights if an assignment is allowed. 80

While a tenant’s bankruptcy filing places the lease in limbo, a landlord can be proactive by approaching the tenant to determine whether it intends to reject or assume the lease. Landlords and tenants should not treat the existing lease as a static document that presents the tenant with a “take it or leave it” proposition for assumption. If the tenant voices concerns about the current lease, the landlord can renegotiate the lease to entice the tenant to assume a modified lease (subject to court approval) that keeps the tenant in the premises and paying rent.

Negotiating Lease Transfer Provisions

Negotiating lease transfer provisions is an important process for both the landlord and the tenant because, at some time in the future, the landlord or the tenant may be forced to accept a previously unknown or undesirable counterparty to the lease. It is critical that attorneys impress upon their respective clients the short-term and long-term ramifications that could result from their negotiations of the lease transfer provisions. Landlords and tenants should consider the following issues when negotiating assignment and subletting provisions.

The Landlord’s Perspective

• The landlord’s primary objective in negotiating assignment and subleasing provisions is control , including control over the mix of tenants and control over the use of the leased premises. Thus, the landlord will use the transfer provisions to protect its interests in the premises.
• A landlord’s foremost concern is almost always the tenant’s ability to pay rent, in full, on a timely basis. A landlord should negotiate requirements that a prospective assignee or subtenant must meet, such as minimum net worth and minimum gross sales.
• The landlord can protect itself by including a right to recapture the premises if a tenant seeks to assign its lease or to sublet its premises. However, landlords should carefully consider whether to include language that terminates the lease automatically upon receipt of an assignment request because it could constitute a restraint on alienation, which is disfavored, and the landlord may prefer the leasehold to continue. 81
• The landlord should keep the original tenant on the hook. Landlords should oppose any transfer provision that relieves the original tenant of its obligations under the lease upon an assignment. Having a tenant with a vested interest in the assignee’s ability to perform the lease is helpful to ensure that a lease is transferred to a worthy transferee. Additionally, in the event the assignee does default, if the original tenant’s liability has been preserved, the landlord’s chances of recovery are improved.
• The landlord should limit the use rights of a subsequent assignee or subtenant. A landlord should seek to protect its right to control the mix of tenants, particularly in retail settings, so as not to violate exclusive use provisions. 82 Moreover, exclusives and use restrictions held by other tenants at a shopping center must be considered in conjunction with a potential change in use that may occur upon assignment or subletting.
• The landlord should seek to share in excess rent. 83 For example, where a tenant assigns its lease or subleases its premises, it may be paid more than the amount the tenant is obligated to pay the landlord under the lease. If the assignment or sublease had not been entered into, those same financial accommodations would theoretically have been available to the landlord if it had leased directly to the assignee or subtenant. Accordingly, a landlord should seek the right to share in this excess financial consideration along with the tenant, or if it has the leverage, to obtain 100% of such excess.

The Tenant’s Perspective

• The tenant’s goal is maintaining flexibility. The tenant’s ability to maintain flexibility through the lease largely depends on its leverage to negotiate favorable lease terms. A new business seeking space in a desirable retail shopping center may have little or no leverage to negotiate the transfer provisions, but a large corporation leasing significant space may have considerable negotiating strength. Thus, it is imperative that the tenant’s leasing broker and attorney understand the market forces at play in any lease negotiation.
• The tenant should seek flexibility to share the leased premises or certain portions of it (i.e., floor space, utilities, and parking) with its related entities and affiliates with which it has a business relationship, without having to seek the landlord’s consent in each instance. This issue is particularly important for large companies with divisions that operate under different business names.
• The tenant should also seek flexibility to restructure its organization without the landlord and the lease acting as an impediment to such alteration, by negotiating into the lease specific language permitting such changes. The tenant’s ability to reorganize its business, either through a merger, consolidation, or sale, could be delayed or impeded by the landlord under the transfer provisions if these provisions are not properly negotiated at the letter of intent stage or before the lease is executed.
• The tenant should maintain an exit strategy if the premises no longer satisfy its business needs because it has outgrown the space or needs less space. This is particularly important in the era of COVID-19. For example, start-up companies can quickly outgrow their leased premises, but if the landlord does not have more space available, the company must seek out new or additional space, frequently at a higher rate. Conversely, a change in economic forces can cause the tenant’s business to quickly retract. Thus, prospective tenants should be mindful to negotiate termination and rights of first refusal options for newly available space in the same building, with the end goal of ensuring that the size of their leased space does not impair their business objectives. 84
• The tenant should insist that the landlord’s right to approve a lease transfer not be unreasonably withheld, if the landlord insists on reserving such right. The lease should detail the specific standards the tenant must meet to obtain approval, such as the transferee’s minimum net worth and minimum business experience.
• Counsel for the tenant should attempt to include a provision for automatically releasing the tenant and any guarantor from further liability at the time of the lease transfer or after the transfer occurs if the assignee or sublessee can meet or exceed certain financial marks, such as net worth, sales, or revenue.
• The tenant should negotiate (1) the right to revoke a transfer request during a defined period after the landlord issues a notice to terminate and recapture the premises, and (2) a reasonable period to vacate the premises before the tenant will be subject to eviction proceedings if the tenant does not revoke the transfer request. Where the landlord insists on a termination and recapture provision, this rescission right provides a tenant the flexibility to stop the recapture process according to the tenant’s particular circumstances and commercial exigencies.

The relationships established between the parties to a lease, sublease, or assignment can be complicated. While the ability to transfer the lease can be a valuable tool for the tenant, the landlord’s interest in protecting its investment by choosing its occupants is equally compelling. However, a balance can be struck that provides the tenant the flexibility it needs while preserving the landlord’s control and minimizing its risk. During lease negotiations, both parties should recognize that changing circumstances during the lease term could trigger the need to assign the lease or sublet the premises. If thoughtful attention is given to negotiating the transfer provisions, the parties can assure themselves that, if the need arises to transfer the lease, their respective interests will be reasonably protected.

Thank you for your interest in Colorado Lawyer!

You have reached your maximum number of free articles.

For unlimited access to Colorado Lawyer articles, log in to your CBA account or join the Colorado Bar Association. For technical support, email [email protected] .

Adam F. Aldrich is the founder of Aldrich Legal, LLC, a Denver-based law firm focused on real estate and business transactions and litigation—(303) 325-5683. Coordinating Editor: Christopher D. Bryan .

Explore This Issue

Resources for Pro Se Litigation in the US District Court for the District of Colorado

Access to justice by kristen l. mix.

The Colorado Appellate Courts’ Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion

Judges’ corner by gilbert m. román and lino lipinsky de orlov.

The Perpetual Discussion

The sidebar by mark levy, related topics.

1 . Schneiker v. Gordon , 732 P.2d 603, 606 (Colo. 1987) (recognizing the “dual nature of a lease” as both a contract and a conveyance of an interest in land).

2 . Id. at 606–07.

3 . Shaffer v. George , 171 P. 881, 882 (Colo. 1917).

4 . Gordon Inv. Co. v. Jones , 227 P.2d 336, 340 (Colo. 1951).

5 . Shaffer , 171 P. at 882.

6 . Roget v. Grand Pontiac, Inc. , 5 P.3d 341, 345 (Colo.App. 1999) (“after the assignment, the assignee becomes primarily liable for the obligations under the contract, while the assignor remains secondarily liable”).

7 . Gordon Inv. Co. , 227 P.2d at 340.

8 . J.E. Martin, Inc. v. Interstate 8th St. , 585 P.2d 299, 301 (Colo.App. 1978) (“the delegation of duties under a lease and their assumption by a third person do not absolve the original lessee, absent the lessor’s knowledge and consent, simply by virtue of the conduct of the lessee and third party”). See also 1 Friedman and Randolph Jr., Friedman on Leases § 7:7.2 (Practising Law Institute 5th ed. 2013).

9 . V.O.B. Co. v. Hang It Up, Inc. , 691 P.2d 1157, 1159 (Colo.App. 1984).

10 . Friedman and Randolph Jr. , supra note 8 at § 7:4.2.

11 . Barbuti, “Assignments Pro Tanto And Why To Avoid Them,” 22 The Practical Real Estate Lawyer 24, 24–25 (Sept. 2006).

12 . Id. at 24.

13 . Id. at 23 (reprinted in part).

14 . Parrish Chiropractic Ctrs., P.C. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. , 874 P.2d 1049, 1052 (Colo. 1994) (“Contract rights generally are assignable, except where assignment is prohibited by contract or by operation of law or where the contract involves a matter of personal trust or confidence”).

15 . Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Lindauer , 280 P.2d 444, 447 (Colo. 1955). See also Malouff v. Midland Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n , 509 P.2d 1240, 1243 (Colo. 1973) (recognizing that “[t]he common law doctrine of restraints on alienation is a part of the law in Colorado”).

16 . Friedman and Randolph Jr., supra note 8 at § 7:3.3. See also Malouff , 509 P.2d at 1243 (holding “that the question of the invalidity of a restraint depends upon its reasonableness in view of the justifiable interests of the parties”).

17 . Beck v. Giordano , 356 P.2d 264, 265 (Colo. 1960).

18 . Lindauer , 280 P.2d at 447.

19 . Fink v. Montgomery Elevator Co. of Colo. , 421 P.2d 735, 738 (Colo. 1966).

20 . Routt Cty. Mining Co. v Stutheit , 72 P.2d 692, 693 (Colo. 1937).

21 . Parr v. Triple L & J Corp. , 107 P.3d 1104 (Colo.App. 2004).

22 . Cafeteria Operators L.P. v. AMCAP/Denver Ltd. P’ship , 972 P.2d 276, 278 (Colo.App. 1998).

23 . Id. See also Basnett v. Vista Vill. Mobile Home Park , 699 P.2d 1343, 1346 (Colo.App. 1984) (holding that a landlord may not unreasonably refuse consent under a silent consent clause because that result “incorporates the principles of fair-dealing and reasonableness and also preserves freedom of contract”), rev’d on other grounds , 731 P.2d 700 (Colo. 1987).

24 . List v. Dahnke , 638 P.2d 824, 825 (Colo.App. 1981).

25 . Cafeteria Operators L.P. , 972 P.2d at 279.

26 . List , 638 P.2d at 825.

28 . Ring v. Mpath Interactive, Inc. , 302 F.Supp.2d 301, 305 (S.D.N.Y. 2004); Toys “R” Us, Inc., No. 88 C 10349, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14878 at *111 (N.D.Ill. Sept. 29, 1995); Restatement (Second) of Prop.—Landlord and Tenant § 15.2 cmt. g (American Law Inst. 1976).

29 . E.g., Campbell v. Westdahl , 715 P.2d 288, 293 (Ariz.Ct.App. 1985).

30 . Friedman and Randolph Jr., supra note 8 at § 7:3.4 (citing cases).

31 . Cent. Bus. Coll. v. Rutherford , 107 P. 279, 280 (Colo. 1910); List , 638 P.2d at 825 (dictum).

32 . Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc. , 709 P.2d 837, 845 (Cal. 1985).

33 . Id. at 845. See also Econ. Rentals, Inc. v. Garcia , 819 P.2d 1306, 1317 (N.M. 1991).

34 . Cafeteria Operators L.P. , 972 P.2d at 277.

36 . Id. at 279.

38 . List , 638 P.2d at 825.

39 . Toys “R” Us, Inc. , U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14878 at *124 (landlord’s refusal before it has relevant information that should be obtained in making the consent decision may be unreasonable).

40 . Shaffer, The Sublease and Assignment Deskbook at 80–81 (American Bar Ass’n 2d ed. 2016).

41 . Compare Parr , 107 P.3d at 1107 (affirming trial court’s ruling that the landlord unreasonably withheld consent where the landlord delayed consent, which caused the proposed assignees to withdraw their offer to purchase the business) with Toys “R” Us, Inc. , 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14878 at *124 (landlord’s refusal before it has relevant information that should be obtained in making the consent decision may be unreasonable).

42 . Fahrenwald v. LaBonte , 653 P.2d 806, 811 (Idaho Ct.App. 1982).

43 . Parr , 107 P.3d at 1106.

45 . Id. at 1107.

46 . Bert Bidwell Inv. Corp. v. LaSalle and Schiffer , P.C., 797 P.2d 811 (Colo.App. 1990).

47 . Id. at 811.

48 . Id. at 812.

50 . Toys “R” Us, Inc. , 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14878 at *115 (citations omitted) (“where a lease contains provisions giving further meaning to a reasonableness clause, the standard of reasonableness varies”); Shaffer, supra note 40 at 80–81.

51 . Golden Eye, LTC v. Fame Co. , No. 0603166/2007, 2008 N.Y. Misc 8571 at *16 (N.Y. Gen Term Jan. 16, 2008) (“the Court may not determine reasonableness if withholding consent is based on grounds that were not included in the letter refusing consent”).

52 . Shaffer, supra note 40 at 74–75.

53 . Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. v. Marathon Dev. Cal., Inc. , 826 P.2d 710 (Cal. 1992).

54 . Lindauer , 280 P.2d at 447.

55 . Murphy v. Traynor , 135 P.2d 230, 231 (Colo. 1943).

56 . Shoemaker v. Shaug , 490 P.2d 439, 441 (Wash.Ct.App. 1971) (finding that the tenant was not in default of the anti-assignment provision because it could reassign the lease back to itself).

57 . La Casa Nino, Inc. v. Plaza Esteban , 762 P.2d 669, 672 (Colo. 1988) (citing Schneiker v. Gordon , 732 P.2d 603 (Colo. 1987)).

58 . Gordon Inv. Co. , 227 P.2d at 260–61 (tenant’s subletting was held a breach that permitted landlord to terminate the lease).

59 . Shakey’s Inc. v. Caple , 855 F.Supp. 1035, 1043–44 (E.D.Ark. 1994) (holding that the landlord was estopped from terminating a lease on account of an unapproved sublease because the landlord did not act promptly).

60 . Merkowitz v. Mahoney , 121 Colo. 38, 42 (Colo. 1949) (“It is the general rule that any act done by a landlord, with knowledge of an existing right of forfeiture, which recognizes the existence of the lease is a waiver of the right to enforce the forfeiture”); Werner v. Baker , 693 P.2d 385, 387 (Colo.App. 1984) (“the lessor’s acceptance of rent accruing after the breach of an anti-assignment clause, with knowledge of the breach, constitutes a waiver of the right to terminate the lease for breach of that clause”). Cf. Nouri v. Wester & Co. , 833 P.2d 848, 851 (Colo.App. 1992) (holding that waiver of conditions against assignment by accepting rent did not carry over to other provisions in the lease).

61 . La Casa Nino, Inc. , 762 P.2d at 672.

62 . Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. , 826 P.2d 710.

63 . Schneiker , 732 P.2d at 611.

64 . Friedman and Randolph Jr., supra note 8 at §§ 7:5.1 and 7:7.1.

65 . Tiger Crane Martial Arts Inc. v. Franchise Stores Realty Corp. , 235 A.D.2d 994, 995 (N.Y.App.Div. 1997) (“It is well settled that where, as here, a sublease is expressly made subject to the terms of a master lease, the subtenant has no legal right to compel the tenant to exercise an option for renewal of the entire demised premises in order to permit the subtenant to exercise an option for renewal of its subleased premises, absent proof of an agreement on the part of the tenant to exercise its option to renew for the benefit of the subtenant or evidence of special circumstances entitling the subtenant to such relief”).

66 . Burgess Pic-Pac, Inc. v. Fleming Cos. , 190 W. Va. 169, 175 (W.Va. 1993) (discussing liability of sublandlord to subtenant for failure to exercise renewal option after request from subtenant).

67 . Senn, Commercial Real Estate Leases: Preparation, Negotiation, and Forms , § 13.14 (Wolters Kluwer 6th ed. 2019).

68 . 11 USC § 1107.

69 . 11 USC § 365(a).

70 . 11 USC § 365(f)(2)(B).

71 . 11 USC § 365(d)(3).

72 . In re DB Capital Holdings, LLC , 454 B.R. 804, 816 (Bankr. D.Colo. 2011) (“waivers, unless they were part of a previous bankruptcy proceeding . . . should not be enforced”).

73 . NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco , 465 U.S. 513, 528 (1984); 11 USC § 502(b)(6).

74 . In re Shane Co. , 464 B.R. 32, 38–41 (Bankr. D.Colo. 2012) (discussing damages claim under 11 USC § 502(b)(6)).

75 . 11 USC § 365(b)(1).

76 . 11 USC § 365(f); In re Bricker Systems, Inc. , 44 B.R. 952 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1984) (recognizing that § 365(f) invalidates restrictions on assignment of contracts or leases by a debtor or trustee and allows assignment of assumed contracts at a later date).

77 . In re Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. , 135 B.R. 941 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1991); In re Martin Paint Stores , 199 B.R. 258 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996), aff’d , S. Blvd., Inc. v. Martin Paint Stores , 207 B.R. 57 (S.D.N.Y. 1997).

78 . In re Trak Auto Corp. , 367 F.3d 237, 244 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal citation omitted).

79 . In re Bradlee Stores, Inc. , No. 00-16033, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14755 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2001) (holding that restriction on assignment violated the anti-assignment provisions of § 365(f)); In re Rickel Home Ctrs., Inc. , 240 B.R. 826, 832 (D.Del. 1998) (striking restrictive use provision).

80 . In re Trak Auto Group , 367 F.3d at 242 (enforcing use provision concerning the sale of automobile parts and accessories in shopping center lease); In re J. Peterman Co. , 232 B.R. 366 (Bankr. E.D.Ky. 1999) (rejecting assignment of shopping center lease where proposed assignment would violate radius restriction in lease and assignee did not sell similar merchandise as the original tenant). But see In re Toys “R” Us, Inc. , 587 B.R. 304, 307 (Bankr. E.D.Va. 2018) (overruling landlord’s objection to the debtor’s assignment on the grounds that it would violate the exclusivity provision of another lease in the shopping center and would disrupt the shopping center’s tenant mix and balance).

81 . Friedman and Randolph Jr., supra note 8 at § 7:1.1.

82 . In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc. , 127 B.R. 744, 752–54 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1991) (discussing rights of landlord to protect the tenant mix at the shopping center in the context of the lease and a subsequent bankruptcy filing of the tenant).

83 . Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. , 826 P.2d 710 (upholding the landlord’s contractual right to capture excess rent).

84 . For an interesting discussion on the assignability of rights of first refusal, see Mitchell, “Can a Right of First Refusal Be Assigned?” 985 U. Chi. L. Rev. (2001).

As these cases illustrate, if a landlord wishes to withhold consent absent a sole and unconditional contractual right to do so, it must have fact-based reasons for doing so and cannot arbitrarily withhold or delay consent.

NSW Land Registry Services

Registrar general's guidelines.

• Deposited plans
• Strata schemes
• Community schemes
• Water dealings
• Land dealings
• Common features
• Deeds Index Particulars
• Documents lodged
• Acknowledgment
• Agreements contracts
• Agricultural goods mortgages
• Bills of sale
• Book debts (assignment of)
• Causes, writs and orders of court
• Change of name - deed poll
• Conveyances
• General Frame
• Guardianships
• Memorials (Acts of Parliament)
• Power of attorney
• Re-registration
• Release or removal
• Resumptions and acquisitions
• Statutory declaration
• Survivorship
• RGs website change logs

Assignment of lease

ADIS Code -  LASS

An assignment of lease, including a sub-lease, is a transfer of the lease by the lessee, ie the assignor, to a new lessee, ie the assignee. The lessor is usually not a party to the assignment.

The affected lease or sub-lease is not required. For an assignment of a lease affecting Kosciuszko National Park .

Lodgment requirements

Stamp duty -  Required. If not marked Registration insisted upon , is prohibited.

Any alteration to the term or rent must be marked.

Registration copy - Required. If unacceptable, Registration insisted upon  is prohibited.

Statement of Title Particulars form  - Not required.

NOS form  - Not required.

Index Particulars form (completion)

(A) Lodging Party - Must be completed.

(B) Instrument - Lease - Assignment of

(C) Locality -  Not required.

Link Conveyance - Not required.

Principal Deed - The registered affected lease or sub-lease.

(D) Indexing -  The assignor and the assignee, and the sub-lessor for an assignment of a sub-lease.

(E) Certification -  Required.

Document requirements 

Date: must be dated with the date of execution. If not dated advise the lodging party. If a date is not furnished, indicate Registration insisted upon  and include the reason.

Name: the full names (initials are acceptable) of the assignor and the assignee are required. Advise the lodging party of any discrepancies in names.

Operative clause: "... hereby assigns...".

Principal Deed: the number of the affected lease or sub-lease as stated in the assignment must be identical to the number stated on the IPF. If affecting a sub-lease, the head lease number is also required.

Execution: by the assignor. A power of attorney must be registered, The assignee does not have to sign.

Attestation: required. Must be witnessed by a person of 18 years of age or older who is not a party to the document.

IPF: must be completed.

Staff processing information

A Deeds search may be made for the head lease number.

CA Not required

Locality: nil.

Link Conveyance: nil.

Principal Deed: required. The registered number of the lease or sub-lease being assigned, and the registered number of the head lease for an assignment of a sub-lease.

Noting: "Affecting [description of the land]".

If the assignment affects:

• an interest, state: "interest in" (or Noting Code: "I"
• a share, state: "[fraction] share"
• part of the land, state: "[affected land description]"
• the land description relies on an attached plan, state: "see attached plan" (or Noting Code: "PL").

V: the assignor, and the sub-lessor for an assignment of a sub-lease, deceased estates or trusts, and any variations thereof.

P: the assignee, deceased estates or trusts, and any variations thereof.

NSW Land Registry Services Office of the Registrar General Accessibility Sitemap Privacy Access to information Copyright Disclaimer Contact us

Cookies on GOV.UK

We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services.

We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.

You have accepted additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

You have rejected additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

• Business tax
• Stamp duty and other tax on property
• SDLT on specific transactions

Stamp Duty Land Tax on Leasehold sales

Find out about Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) on leasehold properties.

You do not pay SDLT if you buy a property in:

• Scotland from 1 April 2015 — you pay Land and Buildings Transaction Tax
• Wales from 1 April 2018 — you pay Land Transaction Tax (LTT)

The amount of SDLT you pay when you buy a leasehold property, depends on if it’s an existing lease (an assigned lease) or a new one.

Assigned leases

Residential and non-residential properties are leasehold or freehold.

A developer builds some flats and sells them on 99 year leases. You buy one of the 99 year leases and sell it when it still has 88 years to run. You assign the lease to the new owner for the rest of the period.

The new owner pays a lump sum for the assignment of the lease and pays SDLT on this amount.

In most cases, use the same rates and thresholds to work out the amount of SDLT as you would if you bought a freehold property (residential or non-residential freehold).

Filling in the SDLT return

The rules for filling in the SDLT return for an assigned lease are the same as the rules for a freehold property. Fill in a return if the sale price is £40,000 or more, even if no SDLT is due.

If you buy a new lease, the SDLT you pay depends on the amount of:

• the premium
• any rent due

New leases with a nominal rent

When you buy a new lease and pay a premium, but only a nominal rent (a peppercorn for example), calculate SDLT on the amount of the premium only. This applies for both a residential or non-residential lease.

Calculate the SDLT on the premium in the same way as you would for the sale price of a freehold property. Fill in an SDLT return if the sale price is £40,000 or more, even if no SDLT is due. If the lease is less than 7 years and no tax is due, you do not need to do a return.

New leases with more than a nominal rent

If you buy a new lease, pay a premium and more than a nominal rent, work out the SDLT on:

• the value of rent payable over the term of the lease at present day prices (net present value ( NPV ))

Normally, you only pay SDLT on the rent if it’s high. It depends on the length of the lease, for example £4,500 a year for a 99 year lease.

Calculations for residential or non-residential leases

There are different rules to work out the SDLT on new residential and non-residential leases.

Residential property is:

• a building used or suitable to use as a private home
• a building adapted to use as a private home
• land that’s the garden or grounds of a private home (including a right or interest in that land)

If you buy 6 or more separate properties in one transaction, it counts as non-residential.

New residential leases

When you buy a new residential lease, work out both the amount due on the premium and on the rent. Add them together for the total amount due.

SDLT on the premium

Work out the SDLT on the premium as if it was the sale price of a freehold property. Do not take into account the level of the rent due under the lease.

You pay a premium of £275,000 on a new residential lease, you pay  SDLT  at the rate of 0% on the first £250,000 and 5% on the rest (£25,000). The amount you pay is £1,250.

If you purchased a new residential lease before 23 September 2022, different SDLT rates and thresholds applied .

The NPV of the rent

If the NPV of the rent is more than the SDLT NPV threshold on residential property, the buyer pays SDLT on the rent in addition to any SDLT due on the premium.

Where SDLT is due on the NPV , you must calculate the tax at a flat rate of 1% on the amount of the NPV that’s over the SDLT NPV threshold. If you’ve already used the threshold, for example with a linked lease, then use 1% on the total NPV to calculate the tax.

You are granted a new residential lease. The  NPV  of the rent under the lease is £260,000, the amount of the  NPV  that’s over the £250,000 residential threshold is £10,000. Pay  SDLT  on £10,000 at 1%. Add this to the amount of  SDLT  due on the premium.

Fill in the return

For new leases, fill in the SDLT return even if there’s no SDLT due, unless either the lease is for:

• 7 years or more, the premium is less than £40,000 and the annual rent is less than £1,000
• less than 7 years and you do not pay SDLT on any part of the premium or rent

Fill in the SDLT return online and calculate and pay any tax due.

Calculate SDLT on new non-residential leases

The amount of SDLT due when you buy a new non-residential lease depends on the amounts of the premium (or purchase price of the lease) and rent you pay under the lease.

The premium

If the annual rent for the lease (not the NPV ) is less than £1,000, as a buyer you pay SDLT on the premium. This is at the same rate you would pay on the sale price of a freehold non-residential property. This means you’ll only have to pay SDLT if the premium is more than the threshold.

From 17 March 2016 you do not have to pay SDLT on the premium for annual rents of £1,000 or more if the premium is under the £150,000 non-residential threshold. The ‘£1,000 rule’ has been abolished from this date.

You pay a premium of £280,000 for some office space. The SDLT due would be calculated as follows:

If the NPV of the rent is over the non-residential SDLT threshold (£150,000), you pay SDLT on the rent as well as on the premium.

The NPV of the rent for a non-residential lease is £5,100,000. The SDLT due would be calculated as follows:

Calculate the NPV of the rent

Use the SDLT lease transactions calculator to work out the NPV and the amount of any SDLT due. Select ‘residential’ or ‘non-residential’ as appropriate, for the property type. Make sure you’ve these details to hand:

• effective date of the transaction — usually the date of completion
• start and end dates as shown in the lease
• total premium payable (for non-residential or mixed used properties)
• rent payable in each of the first 5 years, if you know it

If the term of the lease is longer than 5 years, the calculator will work out the amount of SDLT due by taking the highest rent payable in the first 5 years. It will apply that amount to each year of the rest of the term.

If VAT is payable on the rent

Include any VAT payable on the rent in the NPV calculation. Use the rates:

• 1 January 2010 to 3 January 2011 inclusive — 17.5%
• 4 January 2011 onwards — 20%

All or part of rent unknown or uncertain

When you buy a lease, you may not know how much the rent will be each year, for example because the amount depends on how well the business does.

In this case, when you work out the NPV of the rent, estimate what the rent will be to calculate the SDLT due. Then, recalculate the NPV when either:

• you know the actual amount of the rent
• the first 5 years have passed

If your recalculation shows that the NPV is more than the amount you used on your original SDLT return, tell HMRC and pay any extra tax due.

Write to the Birmingham Stamp Office within 30 days of the review date to tell them the revised figure for the NPV . Include the extra payment due. You must write even if you made the original notification online.

If your recalculation shows that you overestimated the NPV and paid too much SDLT , write to claim a refund.

Term of lease is unknown or indefinite

If you do not know the term of the lease or it’s not definite, count it as a lease for a fixed term of one year to calculate the NPV . If it carries on after the end of the first year, count it as a lease for a fixed term of 2 years and so on for as long as it continues. This is a ‘growing lease’.

If the lease is a growing lease, fill in the SDLT return if either:

• SDLT is due when the lease is granted
• SDLT becomes due as the lease continues

If a tenancy carries on from one period to the next it’s called a ‘periodic tenancy’ (unless either party gives notice to end it). This is the most common example of an indefinite lease.

Lease surrendered and new lease granted on the same property

There are special rules to use when a landlord surrenders a lease early and grants a new lease to the same tenant for the same property.

Original lease granted on or after 1 December 2003

If the rent for the new lease is higher than the rent for the old one, calculate the NPV for the period covering:

• the start of the new lease
• the date when the old lease was due to end — use only the amount of rent increase

This is an overlap period and you may be able to claim overlap relief .

Original lease granted before 1 December 2003

If the original lease was a ‘Stamp Duty lease’ and granted before SDLT was introduced on 1 December 2003, use the whole rent for the term of the new lease to calculate the NPV .

Original lease granted on or after 17 March 2016

If the rent for the new lease is higher than the rent for the old one, calculate the NPV for the period covering the:

• start of the new lease
• date when the old lease was due to end — use only the amount of rent increase

The monthly rent increases by £200 at the start of the new lease, and the old lease is due to end 12 months later, the amount of rent taken into account for this period is £2,400. Then, take into account the full rent due for the rest of the term of the new lease.

If you have problems with the calculation, contact the Birmingham Stamp Office .

Guidance is available on the reform of structure, rates and thresholds for non-residential land transactions .

Example calculations have been added to 'SDLT on the Premium' and 'The NPV of the rent' sections, showing the new Stamp Duty Land Tax rates introduced on 23 September 2022.

The Section about SDLT on the premium has been updated as the Stamp Duty Land Tax holiday rates ended on 30 September 2021.

The title of the page has been changed to Stamp Duty Land Tax on Leasehold sales.

Purchase deadlines extended for reduced rates for Stamp duty Land Tax.

The government has temporarily increased the nil rate bands of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax from £125,000 to £500,000.

From 1 April 2018 SDLT will no longer apply in Wales. You'll pay Land Transaction Tax which is dealt with by the Welsh Revenue Authority.

First published.

Related content

Is this page useful.

• Yes this page is useful
• No this page is not useful

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.

To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. We’ll send you a link to a feedback form. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. Don’t worry we won’t send you spam or share your email address with anyone.

Your choices on cookies

This website uses cookies that are necessary to make the website work. You can also choose to set optional analytics cookies that are described below.

You can find more information on how we use our cookies in our Cookie Statement . You can change your cookie preferences at any time by clicking the Cookie preferences link in the footer of every page on this website.

Necessary Cookies and Preferences Cookies

Necessary cookies are used so that the basic functions of this website work. They are limited to only those that are strictly necessary. For example, we set a session cookie on your device to store a session's status in between http requests to enable better performance.

You can disable these cookies by changing your browser settings but this may affect how this website functions for you.

Preferences cookies allow a website to remember the choices you have made when you save your cookie preferences.

Analytics cookies

These cookies are used to help us understand how website visitors use this website. They are set by a third-party service provided by Google. The service collects and reports information to us in a way that does not directly identify you as a website user. For example, the service provides summary reports to us that help us to understand which pages our website visitors access most often. This enables us to keep improving the website.

You can help us to continue to improve our website by turning analytics cookies on. You can change your mind and turn them off at any point in the future by clicking the Cookie Statement quick link in the footer of every page on this website. When you save your analytics cookies choice below, a cookie will be saved on your device to remember your choice.

This website uses cookies in order for our feedback functionality to work. You can choose to set these optional survey cookies that are described below.

Survey cookies

Survey cookies are set by a third-party service provided by Qualtrics. These cookies are required in order for our feedback functionality to work.

The survey cookies collect information about the page you are providing feedback from. When you save your survey cookies choice below, a cookie will be saved on your device to remember your choice. These cookies are set as session cookies and will be deleted once you close this browsing session.

We welcome your feedback and you can help us to continue to improve our website by turning survey cookies on.

This website uses cookies in order for our video functionality to work. You can choose to set these optional video cookies that are described below.

YouTube cookies

YouTube cookies are set by a third-party service provided by YouTube, a company owned by Google. These cookies are required in order for our video functionality to work.

When you save your YouTube cookies choice below, Revenue will save a cookie on your device to remember your choice. This Revenue cookie is set as a session cookie and will be deleted once you close this browsing session. YouTube may set cookies directly according to YouTube's own cookies policy .

Tá an chuid seo den suíomh idirlín ar fáil i mBéarla amháin i láthair na huaire.

Stamp Duty and leases

• Residential houses and apartments

Agreements, assignments and surrenders

• Difference between a lease and a licence
• Paying Stamp Duty on residential leases
• Varying a lease
• Transitional arrangements

Agreement for lease

Instead of executing (signing, sealing or both) a lease, you may execute an agreement for lease. An agreement for lease sets out the terms that would be included in a lease.

You must pay Stamp Duty if the agreement is for:

• a period no longer than 35 years, or for an indefinite period
• any period over 35 years where you have paid 25% or more of the consideration in the agreement
• the lease of a residential house or apartment where the annual rent is €50,000 or greater.

You must pay Stamp Duty on the consideration and period set out in the agreement.

If the agreement was executed (signed, sealed or both) before 17 December 2023, please refer to Section 2.6 of the TDM Schedule 1 - Stamp Duties on Instruments for the previous thresholds.

Assignment of a lease

Leases are between a landlord and a tenant. If a tenant assigns (transfers) the lease to another person, Stamp Duty must be paid on the assignment. You treat an assignment the same way as a purchase of property.

Mary leases the premises in which she conducts her accountancy business from John. She entered into the lease in 2015. The period of the lease is 20 years. She pays €10,000 in rent each year.

Her business is doing well and she needs to move to a bigger premises. Tom agrees to pay Mary market value, that is, €20,000 to take over the lease.

The instrument (usually called a Deed of Assignment) to transfer the lease is executed on 2 February 2019. Tom pays Stamp Duty on this Deed. He pays Stamp Duty on €20,000. The Stamp Duty rate is the rate applicable to transfers of non-residential property.

Once the lease is assigned to Tom, Tom takes over all the obligations in the lease, for example, to pay rent to the landlord.

Surrender of a lease

A surrender of a lease is not the same as an assignment of a lease. Once you surrender your lease to the landlord, it ceases to exist.

For further information, please see Exchanges, partitions, releases and surrenders .

Next: Difference between a lease and a licence

Published: 28 March 2024 Please rate how useful this page was to you Print this page

• Stamp Duty and Property
• Paying the Duty
• Guide to Revenue Online Service (ROS)
• Stamp Duty on the Revenue Online Service (ROS)
• Notes for guidance - Stamp Duty 2023 These notes explain each section of the Stamp Duties Consolidation Act as amended by subsequent Acts up to and including the Finance (No.2) Act 2023
• Information about Revenue
• Role of Revenue
• Customer service commitments
• Press office
• Statistics on income, tax and duties
• Revenue museum
• Revenue centenary
• Using revenue.ie
• Accessibility statement
• Re-use of public sector information
• Cookie preferences
• COVID-19 Information
• Statutory obligations
• Freedom of Information
• Data protection
• Protected disclosures
• Procurement
• Regulation of Lobbying Act
• Official Languages Act
• Child Safeguarding Statement
• Gender pay gap
• Reporting tax evasion (shadow economy activity)
• Drug and tobacco smuggling
• Consultations and submissions
• Submission to the Commission on Taxation and Welfare
• Modernising Ireland's administration of Value-Added Tax (VAT)
• Communications
• Fraudulent emails and SMS (text messages)
• Website feedback
• Tax education
• Central Register of Beneficial Ownership of Trusts (CRBOT)
• External Links
• WhoDoesWhat
• WhoDoesWhat (Irish)

How Do You Assign or Transfer a Commercial Lease?

By Jessica Dinh Lawyer

Updated on December 15, 2023 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

• 1. Seek Your Landlord’s Consent 

2. Deed of Assignment

3. transferring a retail lease, key takeaways.

If you lease a commercial property to operate your business, there may be situations where you need to transfer the lease. There are usually two situations when a tenant will transfer (also known as an assignment ) a commercial lease to another party (the assignee) before the end of a lease term. Namely, where the tenant is:

• selling their business, and the purchaser agrees to accept the existing lease rather than enter into a new lease with the landlord; or
• is proposing to exit the lease and has found a party who will take on the existing lease.

This article explains how the transfer of a commercial lease works. It also explains the critical terms of the deed of assignment from the perspective of the landlord, tenant and assignee.

1. Seek Your Landlord’s Consent 

As soon as you propose an assignment as a tenant, you should:

• review the existing lease to identify if the lease can be assigned;
• identify the requirements of landlord’s consent upon assignment; and
• correspond with the landlord or agent as to consent and approval of the proposed assignee under the lease. 

When seeking your landlord’s consent for the assignment, the proposed new tenant must usually provide their financial and business references to the landlord.

Can a Landlord Refuse to Assign a Retail Lease? 

If the lease is a retail lease, the landlord will not be able to withhold consent to an assignment unreasonably. The retail legislation (different in each state) provides the grounds on which the landlord can withhold their consent. These generally include the:

• assignee proposes to change the permitted use;
• assignee has financial resources or retailing skills that are inferior to the assignor, and
• assignor has not complied with the relevant steps, per the retail legislation in that particular state, including providing a disclosure statement.

Ensure that you check the retail legislation in that particular state when carrying out an assignment.

After obtaining the landlord’s consent, a deed of consent to assignment is prepared (deed of consent).

A deed of consent is a legal document that outlines that the:

• landlord confirms their consent to the transfer of lease;
• tenant agrees to transfer their entire interest in the lease to the assignee from a specific date (the assignment date); and
• assignee, or new tenant, agrees to assume the rights and obligations of the lease as if they were the original tenant (such as repairs, security and payment of rent and outgoings) from the assignment date. This will continue until the end of the lease term and during any option or renewal terms.

The Landlord

Generally, the landlord’s key concern is that the transfer does not affect their rights under the lease. The landlord can address this concern by ensuring that the original tenant (assignor) has complied with all of their obligations under the lease until the assignment date. The landlord will have the right to take action against the tenant after the assignment date for any existing breach of the lease. 

Additionally, the landlord will want to make sure that the assignee can comply with the lease obligations. This will often involve an assessment of the assignee as a tenant. The landlord will thoroughly examine the information before confirming their consent to the transfer. This might include: 

• financial statements; 
• business history; and 
• professional references. 

Finally, there is usually an agreement about who is liable for the costs of the deed of assignment. The landlord’s lawyer usually prepares the agreement. However, the outgoing tenant or the incoming tenant pays these costs, not the landlord.

The deed of assignment usually requires the assignee to give the relevant security and guarantees.

The Outgoing Tenant

As the outgoing tenant, your key concern is to be released from your obligations under the lease from the assignment date. The deed of assignment can address this concern by specifying that:

• the tenant is released from any claims or liabilities under the lease from the assignment date (provided that there is not an existing breach of the lease); and
• if the tenant has provided any security, it is to be returned or refunded.

It is important for you to remember that you are bound to the terms of the lease until the transfer of the commercial lease is formalised through the deed of assignment. Accordingly, you should continue to comply with your obligations under the lease until the assignment date.

On that note, a landlord might not agree to release you entirely from your obligations if the retail legislation in your state does not prevent this. This means that if the new tenant defaults, you could be responsible for fulfilling the lease obligations. In that case, you would need guarantees or an indemnity from the new tenant.

If the transfer of deed has to be registered, typically with retail leases, you (the assignor) usually organise the registration of the transfer, whose costs are divided with the new tenant  (the assignee).

The Assignee

The new tenant’s, or the assignee’s, key concern is for the landlord to accept the transfer of the commercial lease from the assignment date. The deed of assignment can address this concern by providing that:

• the landlord accepts the assignee as tenant from the assignment date;
• the landlord will observe their obligations specified in the lease in favour of the assignee; and
• if required in the relevant state, the parties sign a transfer of lease form and register the transfer at the land titles office.

The assignee should ensure that they have reviewed the contents of the commercial lease (including the disclosure statement if it is a retail lease). Then, they must review the lease before signing the deed of assignment. This is because the assignee will need to comply with the obligations of the tenant from the assignment date. These obligations may include the provision of security and a personal guarantee.

A personal guarantee is taken on by an individual to guarantee the obligations of another individual or entity. For example, the assignee providing may provide a personal guarantee where a particular party becomes a guarantor. If you cannot meet your obligations (such as to pay the lease), then the guarantor will have to meet that obligation themselves.

Before finalising the deed of assignment, it is important that the landlord, assignor and assignee agree on who bears the costs of preparing, negotiating and registering the deed of assignment. Generally, you, as the assignee, will bear the costs. However, you may choose to add a cap or exclude negotiation costs. 

If the lease you are transferring is a retail lease, the tenant will typically need to give the assignee a disclosure statement. This statement also includes details of any changes to the disclosure statement that the landlord provided when the lease was first entered into.

The disclosure statement outlines the vital information that the assignee needs to know, including the:

• current annual rent under the lease;
• current estimated outgoings payable under the lease;
• term of the lease and any options to renew; and
• details of the premises. 

Generally, the tenant may request an updated disclosure statement from the landlord before the transfer of the commercial lease. The landlord has an obligation to provide the updated disclosure statement, usually within 14 days from the date of the request.

The disclosure statement requirements differ between the states and territories. For example, in:

• New South Wales, the assignee must receive the disclosure statement at least seven days before the date of the transfer; and
• Victoria and Queensland, the assignee must receive the disclosure statement at least seven days before the assignor requests the landlord’s consent.

The consequences of failing to provide a disclosure statement also differ between the states and territories. For example, the assignee may:

• withhold payment of rent;
• seek compensation from the landlord; or
• terminate the lease within a specific timeframe.

It is essential for all parties to be aware of the requirements and consequences of the disclosure statement provisions in their particular state or territory.

Additionally, transferring a lease may also lead to stamp duty implications . Stamp duty is a tax imposed on the purchase of assets and transactions of property. Therefore, if you are transferring a lease, you will commonly have to pay stamp duty. It is important that you are aware of the circumstances where you, as a tenant, will be required to pay stamp duty.

A factsheet that sets out the three ways to end a commercial lease in Australia: surrendering your lease, assigning it or subletting it.

Whether you are a landlord, tenant or assignee, it is crucial that you understand your rights and obligations when transferring a commercial lease. Further, the transfer of a retail lease leads to additional requirements and consequences related to the disclosure statement. Finally, you need to be aware of the steps you should take to ensure a smooth assignment.

If you need assistance with drafting or reviewing the terms of a deed of assignment, our experienced leasing lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page .

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Protecting your retail business: understanding your legal obligations, demystifying startup funding: strategies for growth, accc enforcement and priorities: key takeaways for in-house counsel, sponsoring overseas workers for your hospitality business, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

Deadlines for the Option to Renew a Lease in NSW

10 Things a Tenant Should Know Before Signing a Lease

How Will the Changes to the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) Affect My Business?

I’m Selling a Business. How Do I Transfer the Lease?

We’re an award-winning law firm

2023 Fast Firms - Australasian Lawyer

2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Employer of Choice Winner - Australasian Lawyer

Assignment of Lease Explained

• December 1, 2023

Understanding the complexities surrounding the assignment of a lease is crucial for both tenants and landlords. Within the UK, various situations might compel a tenant to transfer their lease to another party. In this guide we will delve into the essentials, helping you understand every facet of a lease assignment.

What is an Assignment of Lease?

In the world of property management and real estate, the concept of an “assignment of lease” is fundamental. It involves a tenant, known as the assignor, transferring their entire legal interest in a property to another individual or entity, called the assignee. This process is common in both residential and commercial contexts and plays a significant role in maintaining the fluidity of property interests, especially in a dynamic market.

When a tenant signs a lease, they agree to specific commitments, including paying rent and maintaining the property, which are enforceable for a set period. However, various circumstances may prompt a tenant to vacate the property before the lease term expires. Herein lies the importance of the assignment of lease.

Through lease assignment, the original tenant can exit the property and pass on the responsibility to a third party, who then assumes the role of the tenant with all its incumbent responsibilities. It’s important to note that while the new tenant steps into the shoes of the original tenant, the lease terms remain unchanged.

For instance, if an individual rents a flat and later decides to move out before the lease’s expiration due to reasons such as relocating for a job or changing living situations, they may opt for an assignment of the lease. This strategy allows another person to take over the living space and adhere to the responsibilities under the original lease, ensuring that the flat does not remain unoccupied and the landlord continues to receive rent payments. This seamless transition can be especially beneficial in residential areas with high demand for housing, as it minimises financial instability for the landlord and provides immediate accommodation for those in need of a home.

Key Components of Lease Assignment

• Assignor and Assignee: The existing tenant (assignor) and the new tenant (assignee) are the primary parties in this agreement. Their willingness to transfer and assume the lease’s obligations, respectively, drives the assignment process.
• Landlord’s Role: While not a direct party to the assignment, the landlord plays a pivotal role. Most lease agreements stipulate that landlords must provide consent before any assignment takes place. This clause protects the landlord’s interests, ensuring the new tenant is reliable and meets the required standards.
• Legal Documentation: The process requires several legal documents, including the initial lease agreement and a deed of assignment. The latter must clearly articulate that all rights and responsibilities have been transferred to the new tenant. This precision prevents future disputes regarding the terms of the lease.
• Liabilities: The assignment of lease doesn’t inherently absolve the original tenant of responsibilities. Depending on the agreement’s terms, the assignor might remain liable if the assignee fails to fulfil the lease obligations. This potential continued liability underscores the importance of thorough assignee vetting.

The Legal Ground

The legality surrounding the assignment of a lease is rooted in UK property law. It necessitates compliance with various statutory requirements and often involves complex legal procedures. Consequently, parties usually engage solicitors to ensure that the assignment aligns with legal protocols, protecting the interests of all involved parties.

The assignment of a lease is a nuanced process, influenced by factors unique to each situation. Whether prompted by personal, business, or financial changes, lease assignments facilitate flexibility in property occupancy and use. Understanding this concept is crucial for tenants seeking an early exit from a lease, individuals looking for established lease properties, and landlords wishing to maintain continuous tenancy and income streams.

Understanding the Deed of Assignment of Tenancy

A “deed of assignment tenancy” is a legal document that evidences the transfer of lease obligations from the current tenant to another. It is an essential part of the lease assignment process, binding the new tenant to the terms stated in the original lease.

Landlord’s Checks Before Permitting Assignment of a Lease

The assignment of a lease, while beneficial in maintaining continuous occupancy and consistent rent payments, necessitates thorough due diligence on the part of the landlord. Before consenting to an assignment, it’s imperative for landlords to conduct comprehensive checks, mirroring the depth of evaluation done during the initial tenant screening process. These checks are crucial in mitigating potential risks and safeguarding the landlord’s investment.

Detailed Assessment of the Prospective Assignee

Landlords should ascertain the financial stability and reliability of the assignee. This assessment often involves:

• Credit Checks: This allows landlords to have a clearer understanding of the prospective assignee’s credit history, highlighting their ability to keep up with regular rent payments and financial commitments.
• Employment Verification: Landlords typically require proof of ongoing, stable employment. This verification helps ensure that the new tenant has a consistent income stream capable of covering the rent and other associated costs.
• References: Previous landlords or property managers can provide insights into the assignee’s behaviour, paying habits, and overall reliability. Personal references might also be necessary to form a more comprehensive view of the prospective tenant.

Review of the Assignee’s Intent

Understanding the prospective tenant’s reasons for seeking the property and their long-term intentions can provide reassurance. For instance, landlords should feel more comfortable knowing that the assignee plans to reside in the property for an extended period and doesn’t intend to sublet without permission or engage in unlawful activities.

Examination of Financial Documentation

Landlords may request documentation such as bank statements or savings accounts to further verify the assignee’s ability to afford the property. This scrutiny is particularly pertinent in higher-rent areas or for properties with higher maintenance costs.

Ensuring Contractual Compliance

It’s important for the landlord to confirm that the assignee understands and agrees to the terms set out in the original lease. The assignee must comply with all existing conditions, and any deviation needs to be negotiated with and approved by the landlord.

Legal Considerations

Given the legal complexities surrounding lease assignments, landlords often seek legal advice during this process. Lawyers can help ensure that the assignment adheres to local property laws, the original lease’s terms, and that the landlord’s interests are thoroughly protected throughout the transition.

By conducting these comprehensive checks, a landlord exercises due diligence, significantly reducing the likelihood of issues arising from the assignment of the lease. This meticulous approach helps maintain the property’s revenue stream, upholds community standards, and ensures the continued preservation and value of the property investment. It’s a proactive measure, providing the landlord with peace of mind that they are handing over their property to a reliable and responsible assignee.

Costs Involved in Lease Assignment

The process of lease assignment, while a practical solution for tenants looking to transfer their lease obligations, does entail various costs that both the assignor (original tenant) and assignee (new tenant) need to consider. These expenses contribute to a seamless transfer process, ensuring all legalities are properly managed, and all parties are adequately protected. Understanding these costs is essential as it prevents unexpected surprises and allows for a more transparent transaction.

Costs for the Assignor

• Advertising Costs: If the landlord does not immediately have a new tenant, the original tenant may need to advertise the property. This could involve online listings, printed materials, or hiring an estate agent to expedite the process, all of which incur costs.
• Tenant Screening Costs: The assignor might opt to conduct preliminary screenings of potential assignees, which include credit checks, reference checks, and other background investigations to ensure they’re presenting a reliable tenant to the landlord.
• Legal Fees: The legal intricacies of transferring a lease require the involvement of legal professionals. The assignor typically bears the cost for legal consultations, drafting the deed of assignment, and any related legal documentation.
• Landlord’s Administrative Fees: Some landlords charge an administrative fee for processing a lease assignment, covering the time and resources they expend to conduct their checks and modify their records.
• Potential Liability Costs: If the assignee fails to meet the lease obligations, and depending on the terms of the assignment, the original tenant may remain partially liable. This contingent liability could lead to future costs.

Costs for the Assignee

• Security Deposit: It’s standard practice for the new tenant to provide a security deposit before moving in. In some cases, the assignee reimburses the original tenant for the initial deposit, depending on its condition and any agreement between the parties.
• Advance Rent: The assignee may need to pay the first month’s rent in advance, similar to standard leasing arrangements.
• Legal Fees: Assignees also incur legal fees. They need legal counsel to review the terms of the lease, ensure the assignment is conducted correctly, and understand their new responsibilities and liabilities.
• Stamp Duty: Depending on the property’s value and the lease’s remaining duration, the assignee might need to pay Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) on the premium or the rent of the lease.

Shared Costs

In some instances, both parties negotiate and equally share specific costs, such as those for legal consultations, to ensure fairness and mutual satisfaction in proceeding with the transaction.

Both assignors and assignees must factor in these expenses to accurately assess whether a lease assignment is a financially viable option. It is advisable to consult with real estate professionals and legal advisors to understand all potential charges fully. Having a clear, upfront understanding of these costs allows both parties to make informed decisions, ensuring a smooth, transparent, and fair transition process.

Does Assignment Create a New Tenancy?

No, an assignment does not create a new tenancy. It merely transfers the existing tenant’s rights and obligations to the new tenant, who then steps into the shoes of the original tenant under the same lease terms.

The Necessity of Legal Assistance

It is highly advisable to engage a solicitor during the assignment of a lease. A solicitor can provide necessary legal advice, prepare the deed of assignment of lease, and ensure compliance with various property and contract laws.

Deed of Assignment vs Tenancy Agreement

While they might sound similar, a deed of assignment is not the same as a tenancy agreement. The former refers to the document transferring existing lease rights to a new tenant, while the latter is a contract outlining the terms between a landlord and tenant for new occupancy.

Parties Involved in Signing the Deed of Assignment

The deed of assignment of lease is typically signed by the outgoing tenant, the incoming tenant, and sometimes, the landlord, especially when their consent is a prerequisite for the lease transfer.

Landlord’s Consent to Lease Assignment

A landlord can refuse to consent to assign a lease, but this refusal must be reasonable. Scenarios for justifiable refusal might include the prospective tenant’s inability to meet financial commitments or proposed use of the property that violates lease terms.

Lease Assignment vs Subletting

• Lease assignment involves the complete transfer of the tenant’s rights to another party.
• Subletting occurs when the tenant temporarily hands over the property rights to another party but retains some rights or eventually plans to return.

Financial Responsibilities in Lease Assignment

Typically, the outgoing tenant or the incoming tenant covers the costs related to the assignment of lease, such as legal fees, administrative charges, and any leasehold improvements. The specific arrangements may vary based on mutual agreements.

Assigning a Lease Without a Deed: Is It Possible?

No, a lease assignment must be evidenced by a deed to be legally binding. The deed of assignment tenancy is crucial as it protects the interests of all parties involved and provides legal clarity.

The Meaning of ‘Assignment’ in Rent Context

In the context of renting, ‘assignment’ refers to transferring the existing tenant’s lease obligations and rights to another party. The assignee assumes responsibility for rent payments and adherence to the lease terms.

Advantages of Assigning a Lease

There are several benefits associated with the assignment of a lease, including:

• Flexibility for the tenant needing to vacate the property before lease termination.
• Minimal interruption in rent payments for the landlord.
• Opportunity for another tenant to occupy the premises without having to negotiate a new lease.

Stamp Duty and Lease Assignment

Stamp duty on assignment of lease may apply depending on the premium paid and the lease’s yearly rent. It’s important to consult a solicitor to understand any potential tax implications.

Post-Assignment Liabilities for Tenants

After the assignment of a lease, the original tenant is generally released from future liabilities. However, they may remain liable if the new tenant defaults, depending on specific lease terms or if guarantees were provided.

Essential Documents for Lease Assignment

In the process of a lease assignment, several critical documents must be prepared, reviewed, and signed to ensure a legally binding transfer of rights and responsibilities from the original tenant (assignor) to the new tenant (assignee). These documents are crucial in defining the terms of the assignment, protecting the interests of all parties involved, and complying with legal standards. Here are the essential documents required for a successful lease assignment:

1. The Original Lease Agreement

• Before any transfer, all parties must review the original lease. It’s vital to understand any clauses or terms that could impact the assignment, such as conditions requiring the landlord’s consent for any lease transfer.
• The original lease agreement serves as the foundation for the assignment, outlining the terms and obligations that the assignee will need to adhere to.

2. Deed of Assignment of Lease

• This legal document formally transfers the lease obligations from the assignor to the assignee. It must clearly state the terms under which the lease is assigned, including any continuing liabilities of the assignor, if applicable.
• It should be comprehensive, detailing the rights and responsibilities of all parties and any guarantees provided by the assignor.
• The deed is usually drafted by a solicitor to ensure that it complies with legal standards and adequately protects everyone’s interests.

3. Landlord’s Consent to Assignment

• Most leases require the landlord’s formal approval for any assignment to occur. This document is the landlord’s written agreement, permitting the transfer from the current tenant to the new one.
• It may come with conditions the assignee must satisfy, which should be clearly outlined in the consent form.

4. Assignee’s Letter of Acceptance

• This document is proof that the assignee understands and agrees to the terms set out in the original lease and the deed of assignment.
• The letter may restate key lease terms for clarity and will affirm the assignee’s commitment to abide by all the lease conditions and responsibilities.

5. Legal Advisories

• Though not a formal part of the lease assignment, documentation of legal advice received by both the assignor and assignee (and possibly the landlord) is crucial.
• These advisories ensure each party has been informed of their legal rights and obligations, potentially offering protection in the event of future disputes.

6. Inventory List

• If relevant, an inventory list detailing the condition of the property, especially for furnished rentals, would be necessary. This document helps manage expectations and responsibilities concerning the property’s state and contents at the time of the assignment.

7. Proof of Assignee’s Financial Stability

• While not always formally part of the assignment documentation, evidence of the assignee’s ability to meet financial commitments (like bank statements or employment confirmation) often needs to be submitted to the landlord during the assignment process.

The process of assigning a lease is a complex legal transaction that requires strict adherence to procedural standards. These essential documents ensure that the assignment progresses smoothly, with clear understanding and agreement from all parties involved. Both assignor and assignee should seek legal counsel to ensure their interests are protected, and all documents are in order, further underscoring the importance of each document’s role in this pivotal real estate process.

Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) Requirements

Yes, an EPC is generally required for a lease assignment, especially if the building is to be sold or rented out. This certificate ensures that the property meets the necessary energy efficiency standards.

Registering an Assignment of Lease

Registration of an assignment of lease is crucial. It validates the change of tenant under the lease, making it legally binding and enforceable. This process usually involves submitting the deed of assignment to the appropriate land registry.

Timeframe for Assigning a Lease

Assigning a lease can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months, depending on factors like obtaining the landlord’s consent, the new tenant’s credibility, and the speed of legal processes.

Embracing the Benefits of Lease Assignment

Whether you’re a tenant seeking flexibility or a landlord desiring continued occupancy, lease assignment offers solutions that can cater to your individual needs, promoting ease and continuity in the leasing process.

If you’re considering a lease assignment, it’s paramount to seek professional advice to navigate the complexities involved. The information contained in this article should be used for information purposes only and should not be relied upon in place of specific legal advice.

Related Blog Posts

Spotlight on Sheffield

Located in South Yorkshire, England, Sheffield is a city renowned for its rich industrial history and vibrant cultural landscape.

Rental Yields Rise Across All Regions

In this article, we delve into the latest data from Dataloft, highlighting the performance of rental yields in various regions and exploring the factors contributing to this positive trajectory.

Average Rent in the UK Rises by 8.3%

In this article, we delve into the facts behind this increase, explore Zoopla’s predictions for the future, and discuss what this means for UK landlords.

• Practical Law

Is SDLT chargeable on the assignment of a lease?

Practical law resource id 0-521-5057  (approx. 3 pages).

• Landlord and Tenant
• Taxation - Land and Buildings
• Real Estate Finance and Investment
• SDLT and LTT

• 01992 300333

Make an enquiry

• --> Pay online -->