- Thesis Action Plan New
- Academic Project Planner
Literature Navigator
Thesis dialogue blueprint, writing wizard's template, research proposal compass.
- See Success Stories
- Access Free Resources
- Why we are different
- All Products
- Coming Soon
What Is Formulation of Hypothesis in Research? Key Concepts and Steps
Formulating a hypothesis is a crucial part of any research project. It acts like a roadmap, guiding the direction of the study. By making a prediction based on existing knowledge, researchers can design experiments and collect data to test their ideas. This article will explore the key concepts and steps involved in creating a solid hypothesis.
Key Takeaways
- A hypothesis is a prediction that guides the research process.
- Formulating a hypothesis helps focus data collection and analysis.
- Background research is essential for developing a good hypothesis.
- There are different types of hypotheses, like null and alternative.
- Ethical considerations are important when making a hypothesis.
Understanding the Concept of Hypothesis in Research
A hypothesis is a statement that predicts what you expect to find in your research. It is a testable statement that explains what is happening or observed. The hypothesis proposes the relationship between the various participating variables. In scientific research, a hypothesis must meet certain criteria to be considered acceptable. If a hypothesis is disregarded, the research may be rejected by the scientific community.
Importance of Hypothesis Formulation in Research
Guiding the research process.
Formulating a hypothesis is crucial as it guides the entire research process . It provides a clear direction and helps you stay focused on your research objectives. By having a hypothesis, you can systematically plan your study and ensure that every step is aligned with your research goals.
Providing a Focus for Data Collection
A well-defined hypothesis helps in determining what data needs to be collected. It acts as a blueprint, ensuring that you gather relevant information that directly addresses your research question. This focused approach not only saves time but also enhances the efficiency of your research.
Facilitating Data Analysis
When you have a hypothesis, it simplifies the data analysis process. You can use statistical methods to test your hypothesis and draw meaningful conclusions. This is particularly important in hypothesis testing , where you assess the validity of your assumptions based on the collected data.
Investigating Background Research
Reviewing existing literature.
Before you start your research, it's crucial to review existing literature . This step helps you understand what has already been studied and where there might be gaps. You can use various sources like books, academic journals, and online databases. Knowing how to find literature efficiently will save you time and effort.
Identifying Research Gaps
Once you've reviewed the literature, the next step is identifying research gaps . These are areas that haven't been explored yet or need further investigation. Recognizing these gaps can inspire focused and relevant research questions. Discussing your ideas with peers or mentors can also help refine your questions.
Formulating Research Questions
After identifying the gaps, you can start formulating your research questions . These questions should be specific and feasible. They will guide your entire research process, from data collection to analysis. A well-defined research question is the foundation of a strong research proposal .
Developing a Theoretical Framework
A [ theoretical framework provides the theoretical assumptions](https://resources.nu.edu/c.php?g=1109615&p=10328334) for the larger context of a study, and is the foundation or 'lens' by which a study is developed. It helps you understand the theories related to your research topic and integrate them into your hypothesis formulation. This framework must demonstrate an understanding of theories and concepts that are relevant to the topic of your research paper and that relate to your study's objectives. Creating an effective theoretical framework involves establishing a research design aligned with objectives , ensuring quality and rigor in data collection.
Steps in Formulating a Hypothesis
Formulating a hypothesis is a crucial step in the research process. It involves several key steps that help in shaping a clear and testable statement. Each step is essential for ensuring that your hypothesis is well-founded and researchable.
Identifying Variables
The first step in formulating a hypothesis is identifying the variables involved in your study. Variables are the elements that you will measure, manipulate, or control in your research. These can be classified into independent variables (which you manipulate) and dependent variables (which you measure). Understanding the difference between these variables is fundamental to demystifying research .
Establishing Relationships Between Variables
Once you have identified your variables, the next step is to establish the relationships between them. This involves determining how the independent variable might affect the dependent variable. This step is crucial for creating clear statements and focusing on specific research questions. It is important to distinguish and formulate clear objectives in research to ensure that your hypothesis is testable.
Predicting Outcomes
The final step in formulating a hypothesis is predicting the outcomes of your research. This involves making an educated guess about what you expect to happen during your experiment. This step is often referred to as stating your hypothesis . Your prediction should be based on existing literature and theoretical frameworks related to your research topic. This is crucial for informed decision-making in research and helps in designing experiments to test hypotheses effectively.
Types of Hypotheses in Research
When conducting research, you will encounter various types of hypotheses, each serving a unique purpose in guiding your investigation . Understanding these types will help you formulate your own hypotheses more effectively.
Testing the Hypothesis
Testing hypotheses is a crucial part of research. It’s where you see if your ideas hold up in the real world. Good clinical research starts from a plausible hypothesis supported by contemporary scientific knowledge that makes a testable prediction. Let's explore the main steps in hypothesis testing:
Common Challenges in Hypothesis Formulation
When formulating a hypothesis, it's crucial to remain objective. Bias can skew your results and lead to incorrect conclusions. To avoid this, challenge your assumptions and evaluate how likely they are to affect your decisions and actions .
Creating untestable hypotheses is a common pitfall. Hypotheses that can't be empirically tested, either due to abstract constructs or lack of measurement methods, pose significant challenges. Ensure all variables can be measured or manipulated with existing research methods.
Research often involves complex variables that can be difficult to define and measure. Clearly operationalize abstract concepts and consider the feasibility of empirical testing during the hypothesis formulation stage .
Examples of Hypotheses in Various Research Fields
Hypotheses in social sciences.
In social sciences, hypotheses often explore relationships between social behaviors and societal factors. For instance, a hypothesis might state that increased social media use leads to higher levels of anxiety among teenagers. This type of hypothesis helps in understanding complex social dynamics and can guide interventions.
Hypotheses in Natural Sciences
Natural sciences frequently use hypotheses to explain natural phenomena. For example, a hypothesis in biology might propose that [a specific gene affects flower color ](https://www.examples.com/english/hypothesis.html), predicting that altering this gene will change the flower's hue. Such hypotheses are crucial for advancing scientific knowledge and can lead to significant discoveries.
Hypotheses in Applied Sciences
In applied sciences, hypotheses are often practical and solution-oriented. An example could be hypothesizing that a new type of renewable energy source will reduce carbon emissions more effectively than current methods. These hypotheses drive innovation and can result in real-world applications that address pressing issues.
Ethical Considerations in Hypothesis Formulation
Ensuring integrity and honesty.
When formulating a hypothesis, it is crucial to maintain integrity and honesty . This means you should honestly report data, results, methods, and procedures . Avoid manipulating data to fit your hypothesis, as this compromises the validity of your research. Remember, both the question and the hypothesis should be formulated before the study is planned and should not be generated retrospectively based on data .
Avoiding Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a serious ethical violation in research. Always give proper credit to the original authors of the ideas and findings you use. This not only respects the intellectual property of others but also upholds the academic standards of your work. Ethical considerations in Ph.D. thesis research are essential for protecting participants' rights, maintaining integrity, and upholding academic standards .
Respecting Confidentiality
Respecting the confidentiality of your research participants is paramount. Ensure that personal information is kept secure and used only for the purposes of your study. This is especially important when dealing with sensitive data. Ethical considerations and unforeseen variables in experimental research emphasize integrity, transparency, and adaptability .
When forming a hypothesis, it's crucial to think about the ethical side of things. This means making sure your research is fair and honest. If you're a student struggling with this, don't worry! Our Thesis Action Plan can guide you through every step. Visit our website to learn more and get started today.
In summary, formulating a hypothesis is a crucial step in the research process. It involves investigating background research, developing a theory, and determining how to test it. This process helps researchers make predictions and guide their studies. By following these steps, researchers can create testable hypotheses that provide a clear direction for their work. Understanding how to formulate a hypothesis is essential for conducting effective and meaningful research.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the steps in formulating a hypothesis.
To form a hypothesis, researchers usually follow these steps: 1. Investigate background research in the area of interest. 2. Develop or examine a theory. 3. Decide how the theory will be tested and predict what the researcher expects to find based on previous studies.
Why is formulating a hypothesis important in research?
Formulating a hypothesis is crucial because it guides the research process, provides a focus for data collection, and makes it easier to analyze data.
What is a hypothesis in research?
A hypothesis is a predictive statement about what the researcher expects to find when testing the research question. It is based on background research and theories.
What are the characteristics of a good hypothesis?
A good hypothesis should be clear, testable, and based on existing theories or knowledge. It should also be specific and focused on a particular relationship between variables.
What are the different types of hypotheses in research?
There are several types of hypotheses, including null hypotheses, alternative hypotheses, and directional vs. non-directional hypotheses.
How do researchers test a hypothesis?
Researchers test a hypothesis by designing experiments, collecting data, and analyzing the results to see if they support the hypothesis.
What challenges do researchers face when formulating a hypothesis?
Common challenges include avoiding bias, ensuring the hypothesis is testable, and dealing with complex variables.
What ethical considerations are involved in formulating a hypothesis?
Researchers must ensure integrity and honesty, avoid plagiarism, and respect confidentiality when formulating a hypothesis.
Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: A Fun and Informative Guide
Unlocking the Power of Data: A Review of 'Essentials of Modern Business Statistics with Microsoft Excel'
Discovering Statistics Using SAS: A Comprehensive Review
Why AI is the Key to Unlocking Your Full Research Potential
Master’s Thesis Research Overload? How to Find the Best Sources—Fast
Abstract vs. Introduction: Which One Sets the Tone for Your Thesis?
Thesis Action Plan
- Rebels Blog
- Blog Articles
- Affiliate Program
- Terms and Conditions
- Payment and Shipping Terms
- Privacy Policy
- Return Policy
© 2024 Research Rebels, All rights reserved.
Your cart is currently empty.
Quantitative Research in Mass Communications : R and RStudio
7 formulating research questions and hypotheses, 7.1 introduction to research questions and hypotheses.
In the realm of academic research, particularly within the field of mass communications, the formulation of research questions and hypotheses is a foundational step that sets the direction and scope of a study. These elements are crucial not only for guiding the research process but also for defining the study’s objectives and expectations. This section highlights the significance of research questions and hypotheses and elucidates the role they play in framing a study.
The Importance of Research Questions and Hypotheses in Guiding Research
Defining the Research Focus: Research questions serve as the cornerstone of any study, clearly outlining the specific issue or phenomenon that the research aims to explore. They help narrow down the broad area of interest into a focused inquiry that can be systematically investigated.
Guiding Methodology: The nature of the research question—whether it seeks to describe, compare, or determine cause and effect—directly influences the choice of research design, methods, and analysis techniques. Well-formulated questions ensure that the research methodology is appropriately aligned with the study’s objectives.
Facilitating Hypothesis Formulation: In quantitative research, hypotheses often stem from the research questions, proposing specific predictions or expectations based on theoretical foundations or previous studies. Hypotheses provide a testable statement that guides the empirical investigation and analysis.
7.1.1 Overview of the Role These Elements Play in Framing a Study
Structuring the Research Framework: Together, research questions and hypotheses establish the conceptual framework for a study, defining its boundaries and specifying the variables of interest. This framework serves as a blueprint, guiding all subsequent steps of the research process.
Informing Literature Review: Research questions and hypotheses inform the scope and focus of the literature review, directing attention to relevant theories, concepts, and empirical findings. This ensures that the review is tightly integrated with the study’s aims and contributes to building a solid theoretical foundation.
Determining Data Collection and Analysis: The formulation of research questions and hypotheses has direct implications for data collection methods, sampling strategies, and analytical techniques. They dictate what data are needed, how they should be collected, and the statistical tests or analytical approaches required to address the research questions and test the hypotheses.
Communicating the Study’s Purpose: Research questions and hypotheses effectively communicate the purpose and direction of the study to the academic community, stakeholders, and the broader public. They articulate the study’s contribution to knowledge, its relevance to theoretical debates or practical issues, and the potential implications of the findings.
In summary, research questions and hypotheses are indispensable components of the research process, serving as the guiding light for the entire study. They provide clarity, direction, and purpose, ensuring that the research is coherent, focused, and methodologically sound. By meticulously crafting these elements, researchers in mass communications lay the groundwork for meaningful and impactful studies that advance our understanding of complex media landscapes and communication dynamics.
7.2 Understanding Research Questions
Research questions are the foundation of any scholarly inquiry, guiding the direction and focus of the study. In mass communications research, where topics can range from analyzing media effects to understanding audience behaviors, formulating effective research questions is crucial for defining the scope and objectives of a study. This section delves into the definition and characteristics of a good research question, distinguishes between exploratory and descriptive research questions, and discusses strategies for developing clear and focused questions.
Definition and Characteristics of a Good Research Question
Definition: A research question is a clearly formulated question that outlines the issue or problem your study aims to address. It sets the stage for the research design, data collection, and analysis, directing the inquiry toward a specific goal.
Characteristics of a Good Research Question:
- Clarity: It should be clearly stated, avoiding ambiguity and ensuring that the research focus is understandable to others.
- Relevance: The question should be significant to the field of study, addressing gaps in the literature or emerging issues in mass communications.
- Researchability: It must be possible to answer the question through empirical investigation, using available research methods and tools.
- Specificity: A good question is specific, targeting a particular aspect of the broader topic to make the research manageable and focused.
Distinction Between Exploratory and Descriptive Research Questions
Exploratory Research Questions: These questions are used when little is known about the topic or phenomenon. Exploratory questions aim to investigate and gain insights into a subject, seeking to understand how or why something happens. In mass communications, an exploratory question might ask, “How do emerging social media platforms influence political engagement among young adults?”
Descriptive Research Questions: Descriptive questions aim to describe the characteristics or features of a subject. They are used when the goal is to provide an accurate representation or count of a phenomenon. A descriptive research question in mass communications might be, “What are the predominant themes in news coverage of environmental issues?”
Developing Clear and Focused Research Questions
- Specificity: Your research question should be narrowly tailored to address a specific issue within the broader field of mass communications. This specificity helps in defining the study’s scope and focusing the research efforts.
- Feasibility: Consider the practical aspects of answering your research question, including the availability of data, time constraints, and resource limitations. A feasible question is one that can be realistically investigated within the parameters of your study.
- Literature Review: Conduct a thorough review of existing research to identify gaps or unresolved questions in the field. This can inspire focused and relevant research questions.
- Consultation: Discuss your ideas with peers, mentors, or experts in mass communications. Feedback can help refine your questions and ensure they are both specific and feasible.
- Pilot Studies: Small-scale pilot studies or preliminary investigations can provide insights that help in formulating or refining your research questions.
Crafting clear and focused research questions is a critical step in the research process, setting the stage for meaningful and impactful inquiry. By ensuring that your questions are specific, feasible, and relevant to the field of mass communications, you lay the groundwork for a study that can contribute valuable insights to our understanding of media and communication phenomena.
7.3 Types of Research Questions
In the pursuit of scientific inquiry within mass communications, research questions serve as the navigational compass guiding the research process. These questions can be broadly categorized into two types: nondirectional and directional. Each type serves a distinct purpose and is formulated based on the nature of the study and the specific objectives the researcher aims to achieve. This section explores the definitions, uses, and strategies for crafting both nondirectional and directional research questions.
Nondirectional Research Questions
Definition: Nondirectional research questions are open-ended queries that explore the existence of a relationship between variables without specifying the anticipated direction of this relationship. They are used when the literature does not strongly suggest which outcome is expected or when exploring new or under-researched areas.
When to Use Them: Employ nondirectional questions when previous research is inconclusive, conflicting, or absent. They are particularly useful in exploratory studies where the aim is to uncover patterns, relationships, or phenomena without presupposing outcomes.
Crafting Questions:
- Focus on Exploration: Phrase your question to emphasize exploration, such as “Is there a relationship between social media usage and political participation among young adults?”
- Avoid Implied Direction: Ensure the wording does not inadvertently suggest a presumed direction of the relationship. The question should remain open to any outcome, whether positive, negative, or neutral.
Directional Research Questions
Definition: Directional research questions specify the expected direction of the relationship between variables. These questions are based on predictions that are often derived from theoretical frameworks or existing literature.
Purposes: Directional questions are used when there is sufficient theoretical or empirical basis to hypothesize a particular outcome. They guide the research towards testing specific hypotheses, making them suitable for studies aiming to confirm or refute theoretical predictions.
Formulating Questions:
- Specify Expected Outcomes: Clearly articulate the anticipated direction of the relationship in the question. For example, “Does increased exposure to environmental news lead to higher levels of environmental activism among viewers?”
- Ground in Literature: Ensure that the directionality implied by your question is supported by theoretical rationales or empirical evidence from previous research. This alignment strengthens the justification for expecting a particular outcome.
7.4 Strategies for Formulating Research Questions
Regardless of the type, crafting effective research questions requires a deep understanding of the topic at hand, a thorough review of the existing literature, and a clear articulation of the research’s goals. Here are some strategies to consider:
- Engage with Current Research: Immerse yourself in the latest studies and debates within the field of mass communications to identify trends, gaps, and areas ripe for investigation.
- Consult Theoretical Frameworks: Draw on established theories to guide the formulation of your questions, whether seeking to explore uncharted territory (nondirectional) or test specific propositions (directional).
- Iterative Refinement: Research questions often evolve during the initial stages of a study. Be prepared to refine your questions as you delve deeper into the literature and sharpen your study’s focus.
By thoughtfully selecting the type of research question that best suits the aims and scope of your study, you lay a solid foundation for a coherent, rigorous, and insightful exploration of mass communications phenomena.
7.5 Operationalization of Concepts
Operationalization is a critical process in the research design phase, particularly in quantitative studies within the realm of mass communications. It involves defining the abstract concepts or variables in measurable terms, determining how they will be observed, measured, or manipulated within the study. This section outlines the essence of operationalization, its pivotal role in research, the steps involved in operationalizing variables, and provides examples pertinent to mass communications research.
Defining Operationalization and Its Significance in Research
Definition: Operationalization is the process by which researchers define how to measure or manipulate the variables of interest in a study. It transforms theoretical constructs into measurable indicators, allowing for empirical observation and quantitative analysis.
Significance: The operationalization of concepts is fundamental to ensuring the reliability and validity of a study. By clearly specifying how variables are measured, researchers enable the replication of the study, enhance the clarity and coherence of their research design, and facilitate the objective analysis of findings.
Steps to Operationalize Variables
Identify the Key Concepts: Begin by clearly identifying the key concepts or variables you intend to study. In mass communications, this might include phenomena like media influence, audience engagement, or digital literacy.
Define the Variables Conceptually: Provide clear, conceptual definitions for each variable, drawing on existing literature or theoretical frameworks to delineate the boundaries of the concept.
Specify the Variables Operationally: Decide on the specific operations, techniques, or instruments you will use to measure or manipulate each variable. This includes determining the type of data to be collected, the scale of measurement, and the method of data collection.
Develop or Select Measurement Instruments: Choose or develop instruments that accurately measure your operationalized variables. This could involve creating surveys, designing experiments, or developing coding schemes for content analysis.
Pilot Test: Conduct a pilot test of your measurement instruments to ensure they effectively capture the operationalized variables. Adjustments based on feedback from the pilot test can improve the reliability and validity of the measures.
Examples of Operationalizing Common Variables in Mass Communications Research
Audience Engagement: Conceptually defined as the level of interaction and involvement an individual has with media content. Operationally, it could be measured through the number of social media shares, comments, or time spent viewing content.
Media Influence on Public Opinion: Conceptually, this refers to the impact media content has on shaping individuals’ attitudes and beliefs. Operationally, it could be measured by changes in attitudes before and after exposure to specific media messages, using pretest-posttest surveys.
Digital Literacy: Conceptually defined as the ability to find, evaluate, create, and communicate information using digital technologies. Operationally, digital literacy could be measured through a questionnaire assessing skills in these areas, with items rated on a Likert scale.
Operationalization is a cornerstone of rigorous research methodology, bridging the gap between theoretical concepts and empirical evidence. By meticulously defining and measuring variables, researchers in mass communications can ground their studies in observable reality, enhancing the validity of their findings and contributing meaningful insights into the complex dynamics of media and communication.
7.6 Developing Hypotheses
In the framework of quantitative research, particularly within the expansive field of mass communications, hypotheses serve as pivotal elements that further refine and operationalize the research questions. This section elucidates the definition and function of hypotheses in quantitative research, explores the relationship between research questions and hypotheses, and outlines the criteria that make a hypothesis testable.
Definition and Function of Hypotheses in Quantitative Research
Definition: A hypothesis is a predictive statement that proposes a possible outcome or relationship between two or more variables. It is grounded in theory or prior empirical findings and serves as a basis for scientific inquiry.
Function: The primary function of a hypothesis is to provide a specific, testable proposition derived from the broader research question. Hypotheses guide the research design, data collection, and analysis process, offering a clear focus for empirical investigation. They enable researchers to apply statistical methods to test the proposed relationships or effects, thereby contributing to the accumulation of scientific knowledge.
The Relationship Between Research Questions and Hypotheses
From Questions to Hypotheses: Research questions set the stage for the research by identifying the key phenomena or relationships of interest. Hypotheses take this a step further by specifying the expected direction or nature of these relationships based on theoretical or empirical groundwork. Essentially, while research questions identify “what” the study aims to explore, hypotheses propose “how” these explorations will unfold.
Complementarity: Research questions and hypotheses are complementary, with the former providing a broad inquiry framework and the latter offering a focused, conjectural answer that can be empirically tested. This synergy ensures that the research is both guided by curiosity and anchored in a framework that facilitates systematic investigation.
Criteria for a Testable Hypothesis
For a hypothesis to effectively contribute to the research process, it must be testable. The following criteria are essential for constructing a hypothesis that can be empirically evaluated:
Specificity: A testable hypothesis must clearly and specifically define the variables involved and the expected relationship between them. This clarity ensures that the hypothesis can be directly linked to observable and measurable outcomes.
Empirical Referents: The variables within the hypothesis must have empirical referents – that is, they must be capable of being measured or manipulated in the real world. This allows the hypothesis to be subjected to empirical testing.
Predictive Nature: A testable hypothesis should make a predictive statement about the expected outcome of the study, enabling the research to confirm or refute the proposed relationship or effect based on empirical evidence.
Grounding in Theory or Prior Research: The hypothesis should be grounded in existing theoretical frameworks or empirical findings, providing a rationale for the expected relationship or outcome. This grounding not only lends credibility to the hypothesis but also ensures that it contributes to the ongoing academic discourse.
Falsifiability: Finally, a testable hypothesis must be falsifiable. This means it should be possible to conceive of an outcome that would contradict the hypothesis, allowing for the possibility of it being disproven through empirical evidence.
Developing well-crafted hypotheses is a critical step in the quantitative research process, particularly in mass communications, where the rapid evolution of media technologies and platforms continually opens new avenues for inquiry. By adhering to these criteria, researchers can ensure that their hypotheses are not only testable but also meaningful, contributing valuable insights to our understanding of complex media landscapes and their impacts on society.
7.7 Types of Hypotheses
In the empirical research landscape, especially within the domain of mass communications, hypotheses are indispensable tools that guide the investigative process. They are typically categorized into null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses, each serving a distinct role in framing the research inquiry. This section provides definitions for these two types of hypotheses, discusses their roles in research, and offers guidance on formulating them effectively.
Null Hypotheses (H0)
Definition: The null hypothesis (H0) posits that there is no difference, effect, or relationship between the variables under investigation. It represents a statement of skepticism or neutrality, suggesting that any observed differences or relationships in the data are due to chance rather than a systematic effect.
Role in Research: The null hypothesis serves as a benchmark for testing the existence of an effect or relationship. By attempting to disprove or reject the null hypothesis through statistical analysis, researchers can provide evidence supporting the presence of a meaningful effect or relationship. The null hypothesis is foundational in hypothesis testing, enabling researchers to apply statistical methods to determine the likelihood that observed data could have occurred under the null condition.
Formulating Null Hypotheses: Null hypotheses are formulated as statements of no difference or no relationship. For example, in a study examining the impact of social media usage on political engagement, a null hypothesis might state, “There is no difference in political engagement levels between users and non-users of social media.”
Alternative Hypotheses (H1)
Definition: The alternative hypothesis (H1) is the counter proposition to the null hypothesis. It posits that there is a significant difference, effect, or relationship between the variables being studied. The alternative hypothesis reflects the researcher’s theoretical expectation or prediction about the outcome of the study.
Complementing Null Hypotheses: The alternative hypothesis directly complements the null hypothesis by specifying the expected effect or relationship that the research aims to demonstrate. While the null hypothesis posits the absence of an effect, the alternative hypothesis asserts its presence, guiding the direction of the study’s empirical investigation.
Crafting Alternative Hypotheses: Alternative hypotheses are crafted to predict specific outcomes based on the research question and theoretical framework. They should clearly articulate the anticipated direction or nature of the relationship or difference between variables. Continuing the earlier example, an alternative hypothesis might state, “Users of social media exhibit higher levels of political engagement than non-users.”
7.8 Strategic Formulation of Hypotheses
The formulation of null and alternative hypotheses is a strategic exercise that sets the stage for empirical testing. Effective hypotheses are:
- Specific and Concise: Clearly define the variables and the expected relationship or difference, avoiding ambiguity.
- Empirically Testable: Ensure that the hypotheses can be tested using available research methods and data.
- Theoretically Grounded: Base your hypotheses on existing literature, theories, or preliminary evidence, providing a rationale for the expected outcomes.
In mass communications research, where the interplay of media, technology, and society offers a rich tapestry of phenomena to explore, the thoughtful formulation of null and alternative hypotheses is crucial. It not only delineates the scope of the investigation but also ensures that the research contributes meaningful insights into the dynamics of communication processes and their impacts.
7.9 Directional and Nondirectional Hypotheses
In the nuanced world of quantitative research, particularly within the field of mass communications, hypotheses serve as a bridge between theoretical inquiry and empirical investigation. They are typically formulated as either directional or nondirectional, each with specific implications for the study’s design and analysis. This section clarifies the distinction between these two types of hypotheses and provides guidance on when to use each, complemented by examples from mass communications research.
Understanding the Distinction and When to Use Each Type
Directional Hypotheses: Directional hypotheses specify the expected direction of the relationship or difference between variables. They are based on theoretical predictions or empirical evidence suggesting a particular outcome. Directional hypotheses are used when prior research or theory provides a strong basis for anticipating the direction of the effect.
Nondirectional Hypotheses: Nondirectional hypotheses indicate that a relationship or difference exists between variables but do not specify the direction. They are appropriate when there is uncertainty about the expected outcome or when previous studies have yielded mixed or inconclusive results.
Examples of Both Directional and Nondirectional Hypotheses in Mass Communications Research
- “Individuals who frequently engage with news content on social media platforms will exhibit higher levels of political awareness than those who do not engage with news content on these platforms.” This hypothesis predicts a specific direction of the relationship between social media news engagement and political awareness.
- “Exposure to environmental documentaries will increase viewers’ concern for environmental issues more than exposure to traditional news coverage of the same issues.” This hypothesis specifies an expected difference in the effect of two types of media content on environmental concern.
- “There is a relationship between the frequency of smartphone use for social media and the level of social isolation experienced by young adults.” This hypothesis suggests a relationship exists but does not predict whether more frequent use increases or decreases social isolation.
- “The introduction of interactive digital learning tools in communication courses affects students’ academic performance.” This hypothesis indicates that an effect is expected but does not specify whether the effect is positive or negative on academic performance.
7.10 Deciding Between Directional and Nondirectional Hypotheses
The choice between directional and nondirectional hypotheses hinges on several factors:
- Theoretical Basis: Strong theoretical foundations or extensive empirical evidence supporting a specific outcome favor the use of directional hypotheses.
- Research Objectives: Exploratory studies aiming to identify patterns or relationships might initially employ nondirectional hypotheses, especially in emerging areas of mass communications where less is known.
- Statistical Considerations: Directional hypotheses allow for more focused statistical tests (e.g., one-tailed tests), which can be more powerful in detecting specified effects. However, they require a strong justification for predicting the direction of the effect.
By carefully considering these factors, researchers in mass communications can effectively choose the type of hypothesis that best suits their study’s objectives and theoretical framework. Whether directional or nondirectional, the formulation of hypotheses is a critical step in the research process, guiding empirical inquiry and contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the dynamic field of mass communications.
7.11 Criteria for Good Research Questions and Hypotheses
In the rigorous academic landscape of mass communications research, the construction of research questions and hypotheses serves as the bedrock upon which studies are built and conducted. These foundational elements not only guide the direction of the research but also determine its scope, focus, and potential contribution to the field. To ensure the effectiveness and integrity of research, certain criteria must be met. This section outlines the essential qualities of good research questions and hypotheses: clarity and precision, relevance to the field of study, and researchability with empirical testing potential.
Clarity and Precision
Definition: Clarity in research questions and hypotheses means that they are stated in a straightforward and unambiguous manner, easily understood by those within and outside the field. Precision involves the specific delineation of the variables and constructs involved, leaving no room for misinterpretation.
Importance: Clear and precise formulations allow for a focused investigation, guiding the research design, data collection, and analysis process. They ensure that the study addresses the intended concepts and relationships directly and effectively.
Strategies for Achieving Clarity and Precision:
- Use specific, defined terms and avoid jargon that may not be universally understood.
- Clearly specify the variables or phenomena being studied and their expected relationships.
- Ensure that hypotheses are directly testable, with defined criteria for confirmation or refutation.
Relevance to the Field of Study
Definition: Relevance implies that the research questions and hypotheses address significant issues, gaps, or debates within the field of mass communications. They should contribute to advancing understanding, theory, or practice in meaningful ways.
Importance: Research that is relevant to the field is more likely to receive attention from scholars, policymakers, and practitioners, and to secure funding and publication opportunities. It ensures that the study contributes to the ongoing discourse and development of mass communications as a discipline.
Strategies for Ensuring Relevance:
- Conduct a thorough review of current literature to identify gaps, emerging trends, or unresolved questions.
- Align research questions and hypotheses with theoretical frameworks or pressing societal issues.
- Consider the practical implications and potential impact of the research on the field.
Researchability and Empirical Testing Potential
Definition: Researchability refers to the feasibility of addressing the research questions and testing the hypotheses through empirical methods. This includes the availability of data, appropriateness of methodology, and the potential for gathering evidence to support or refute the hypotheses.
Importance: For research to contribute to the body of knowledge, it must be capable of being rigorously investigated using empirical methods. Research questions and hypotheses with high empirical testing potential allow for the derivation of meaningful, verifiable insights.
Strategies for Enhancing Researchability:
- Ensure that the variables involved can be accurately measured or observed using existing tools or methods.
- Design hypotheses that are testable within the constraints of time, resources, and ethical considerations.
- Consider the practical aspects of data collection, including access to participants, media content, or archival resources.
Crafting research questions and hypotheses that are clear and precise, relevant to the field, and amenable to empirical investigation is crucial for conducting impactful research in mass communications. These criteria not only guide the research process but also enhance the study’s validity, reliability, and contribution to the field, fostering a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics that shape media and communication in society.
7.12 Common Mistakes to Avoid in Formulating Research Questions and Hypotheses
When embarking on a research project, especially in a field as dynamic as mass communications, the formulation of research questions and hypotheses is a critical step that sets the stage for the entire study. However, researchers, particularly those new to the field, may encounter pitfalls that can compromise the clarity, relevance, and feasibility of their research. This section highlights common mistakes to avoid in the formulation process, ensuring that research questions and hypotheses are both robust and actionable.
Formulating Questions and Hypotheses That Are Too Broad or Vague
Issue: Broad or vague questions and hypotheses lack specificity and focus, making it difficult to define the scope of the study or determine the appropriate methodology for investigation.
Impact: They can lead to an unwieldy research project with diffuse objectives, posing challenges in data collection, analysis, and interpretation of findings.
Avoidance Strategy: Narrow down the research topic by focusing on specific aspects, populations, or contexts. Use the literature review to identify gaps and refine the research focus to a manageable scope.
Confusing Research Questions with Interview or Survey Questions
Issue: There is a distinction between overarching research questions that guide a study and the specific questions posed in interviews or surveys. Confusing the two can lead to a misalignment between the study’s objectives and the data collection process.
Impact: This confusion can result in collecting data that do not effectively address the research questions, undermining the study’s ability to generate meaningful insights.
Avoidance Strategy: Clearly delineate between the broad research questions that frame your study and the specific items or prompts used in data collection instruments. Ensure that each interview or survey question is directly linked to and serves the purpose of answering the overarching research questions.
Creating Untestable Hypotheses
Issue: Hypotheses that are not empirically testable, either due to the abstract nature of the constructs involved or the lack of available methods for measurement, pose significant challenges to the research process.
Impact: Untestable hypotheses cannot be substantiated or refuted through empirical evidence, limiting the study’s contribution to the field and its scientific merit.
Avoidance Strategy: Ensure that all variables in the hypothesis can be measured or manipulated with existing research methods. Operationalize abstract concepts clearly and consider the feasibility of empirical testing during the hypothesis formulation stage.
7.13 Best Practices for Robust Formulation
Alignment with Theoretical Frameworks: Ground your research questions and hypotheses within established theories or models in mass communications, ensuring they contribute to the broader academic dialogue.
Consultation with Peers and Mentors: Engage in discussions with peers, mentors, or experts in the field to refine your research questions and hypotheses, leveraging their insights to avoid common pitfalls.
Pilot Testing: Consider conducting a pilot study or preliminary analysis to test the feasibility of your research questions and hypotheses, allowing for adjustments before the full-scale study.
By avoiding these common mistakes and adhering to best practices, researchers can formulate research questions and hypotheses that are clear, focused, and empirically testable. This careful preparation enhances the quality and impact of research in mass communications, contributing valuable insights into the complex interplay between media, technology, and society.
- Research Process
- Manuscript Preparation
- Manuscript Review
- Publication Process
- Publication Recognition
- Language Editing Services
- Translation Services
Step-by-Step Guide: How to Craft a Strong Research Hypothesis
- 4 minute read
- 406.8K views
Table of Contents
A research hypothesis is a concise statement about the expected result of an experiment or project. In many ways, a research hypothesis represents the starting point for a scientific endeavor, as it establishes a tentative assumption that is eventually substantiated or falsified, ultimately improving our certainty about the subject investigated.
To help you with this and ease the process, in this article, we discuss the purpose of research hypotheses and list the most essential qualities of a compelling hypothesis. Let’s find out!
How to Craft a Research Hypothesis
Crafting a research hypothesis begins with a comprehensive literature review to identify a knowledge gap in your field. Once you find a question or problem, come up with a possible answer or explanation, which becomes your hypothesis. Now think about the specific methods of experimentation that can prove or disprove the hypothesis, which ultimately lead to the results of the study.
Enlisted below are some standard formats in which you can formulate a hypothesis¹ :
- A hypothesis can use the if/then format when it seeks to explore the correlation between two variables in a study primarily.
Example: If administered drug X, then patients will experience reduced fatigue from cancer treatment.
- A hypothesis can adopt when X/then Y format when it primarily aims to expose a connection between two variables
Example: When workers spend a significant portion of their waking hours in sedentary work , then they experience a greater frequency of digestive problems.
- A hypothesis can also take the form of a direct statement.
Example: Drug X and drug Y reduce the risk of cognitive decline through the same chemical pathways
What are the Features of an Effective Hypothesis?
Hypotheses in research need to satisfy specific criteria to be considered scientifically rigorous. Here are the most notable qualities of a strong hypothesis:
- Testability: Ensure the hypothesis allows you to work towards observable and testable results.
- Brevity and objectivity: Present your hypothesis as a brief statement and avoid wordiness.
- Clarity and Relevance: The hypothesis should reflect a clear idea of what we know and what we expect to find out about a phenomenon and address the significant knowledge gap relevant to a field of study.
Understanding Null and Alternative Hypotheses in Research
There are two types of hypotheses used commonly in research that aid statistical analyses. These are known as the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis . A null hypothesis is a statement assumed to be factual in the initial phase of the study.
For example, if a researcher is testing the efficacy of a new drug, then the null hypothesis will posit that the drug has no benefits compared to an inactive control or placebo . Suppose the data collected through a drug trial leads a researcher to reject the null hypothesis. In that case, it is considered to substantiate the alternative hypothesis in the above example, that the new drug provides benefits compared to the placebo.
Let’s take a closer look at the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis with two more examples:
Null Hypothesis:
The rate of decline in the number of species in habitat X in the last year is the same as in the last 100 years when controlled for all factors except the recent wildfires.
In the next experiment, the researcher will experimentally reject this null hypothesis in order to confirm the following alternative hypothesis :
The rate of decline in the number of species in habitat X in the last year is different from the rate of decline in the last 100 years when controlled for all factors other than the recent wildfires.
In the pair of null and alternative hypotheses stated above, a statistical comparison of the rate of species decline over a century and the preceding year will help the research experimentally test the null hypothesis, helping to draw scientifically valid conclusions about two factors—wildfires and species decline.
We also recommend that researchers pay attention to contextual echoes and connections when writing research hypotheses. Research hypotheses are often closely linked to the introduction ² , such as the context of the study, and can similarly influence the reader’s judgment of the relevance and validity of the research hypothesis.
Seasoned experts, such as professionals at Elsevier Language Services, guide authors on how to best embed a hypothesis within an article so that it communicates relevance and credibility. Contact us if you want help in ensuring readers find your hypothesis robust and unbiased.
References
- Hypotheses – The University Writing Center. (n.d.). https://writingcenter.tamu.edu/writing-speaking-guides/hypotheses
- Shaping the research question and hypothesis. (n.d.). Students. https://students.unimelb.edu.au/academic-skills/graduate-research-services/writing-thesis-sections-part-2/shaping-the-research-question-and-hypothesis
Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review?
How to Write an Effective Problem Statement for Your Research Paper
You may also like.
Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?
Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!
A Must-see for Researchers! How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing
Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions
Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?
A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing
6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript
How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
How to Write a Hypothesis: A Step-by-Step Guide
Introduction
An overview of the research hypothesis, different types of hypotheses, variables in a hypothesis, how to formulate an effective research hypothesis, designing a study around your hypothesis.
The scientific method can derive and test predictions as hypotheses. Empirical research can then provide support (or lack thereof) for the hypotheses. Even failure to find support for a hypothesis still represents a valuable contribution to scientific knowledge. Let's look more closely at the idea of the hypothesis and the role it plays in research.
As much as the term exists in everyday language, there is a detailed development that informs the word "hypothesis" when applied to research. A good research hypothesis is informed by prior research and guides research design and data analysis , so it is important to understand how a hypothesis is defined and understood by researchers.
What is the simple definition of a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a testable prediction about an outcome between two or more variables . It functions as a navigational tool in the research process, directing what you aim to predict and how.
What is the hypothesis for in research?
In research, a hypothesis serves as the cornerstone for your empirical study. It not only lays out what you aim to investigate but also provides a structured approach for your data collection and analysis.
Essentially, it bridges the gap between the theoretical and the empirical, guiding your investigation throughout its course.
What is an example of a hypothesis?
If you are studying the relationship between physical exercise and mental health, a suitable hypothesis could be: "Regular physical exercise leads to improved mental well-being among adults."
This statement constitutes a specific and testable hypothesis that directly relates to the variables you are investigating.
What makes a good hypothesis?
A good hypothesis possesses several key characteristics. Firstly, it must be testable, allowing you to analyze data through empirical means, such as observation or experimentation, to assess if there is significant support for the hypothesis. Secondly, a hypothesis should be specific and unambiguous, giving a clear understanding of the expected relationship between variables. Lastly, it should be grounded in existing research or theoretical frameworks , ensuring its relevance and applicability.
Understanding the types of hypotheses can greatly enhance how you construct and work with hypotheses. While all hypotheses serve the essential function of guiding your study, there are varying purposes among the types of hypotheses. In addition, all hypotheses stand in contrast to the null hypothesis, or the assumption that there is no significant relationship between the variables .
Here, we explore various kinds of hypotheses to provide you with the tools needed to craft effective hypotheses for your specific research needs. Bear in mind that many of these hypothesis types may overlap with one another, and the specific type that is typically used will likely depend on the area of research and methodology you are following.
Null hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no effect or relationship between the variables being studied. In statistical terms, it serves as the default assumption that any observed differences are due to random chance.
For example, if you're studying the effect of a drug on blood pressure, the null hypothesis might state that the drug has no effect.
Alternative hypothesis
Contrary to the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is a significant relationship or effect between variables.
Using the drug example, the alternative hypothesis would posit that the drug does indeed affect blood pressure. This is what researchers aim to prove.
Simple hypothesis
A simple hypothesis makes a prediction about the relationship between two variables, and only two variables.
For example, "Increased study time results in better exam scores." Here, "study time" and "exam scores" are the only variables involved.
Complex hypothesis
A complex hypothesis, as the name suggests, involves more than two variables. For instance, "Increased study time and access to resources result in better exam scores." Here, "study time," "access to resources," and "exam scores" are all variables.
This hypothesis refers to multiple potential mediating variables. Other hypotheses could also include predictions about variables that moderate the relationship between the independent variable and dependent variable .
Directional hypothesis
A directional hypothesis specifies the direction of the expected relationship between variables. For example, "Eating more fruits and vegetables leads to a decrease in heart disease."
Here, the direction of heart disease is explicitly predicted to decrease, due to effects from eating more fruits and vegetables. All hypotheses typically specify the expected direction of the relationship between the independent and dependent variable, such that researchers can test if this prediction holds in their data analysis .
Statistical hypothesis
A statistical hypothesis is one that is testable through statistical methods, providing a numerical value that can be analyzed. This is commonly seen in quantitative research .
For example, "There is a statistically significant difference in test scores between students who study for one hour and those who study for two."
Empirical hypothesis
An empirical hypothesis is derived from observations and is tested through empirical methods, often through experimentation or survey data . Empirical hypotheses may also be assessed with statistical analyses.
For example, "Regular exercise is correlated with a lower incidence of depression," could be tested through surveys that measure exercise frequency and depression levels.
Causal hypothesis
A causal hypothesis proposes that one variable causes a change in another. This type of hypothesis is often tested through controlled experiments.
For example, "Smoking causes lung cancer," assumes a direct causal relationship.
Associative hypothesis
Unlike causal hypotheses, associative hypotheses suggest a relationship between variables but do not imply causation.
For instance, "People who smoke are more likely to get lung cancer," notes an association but doesn't claim that smoking causes lung cancer directly.
Relational hypothesis
A relational hypothesis explores the relationship between two or more variables but doesn't specify the nature of the relationship.
For example, "There is a relationship between diet and heart health," leaves the nature of the relationship (causal, associative, etc.) open to interpretation.
Logical hypothesis
A logical hypothesis is based on sound reasoning and logical principles. It's often used in theoretical research to explore abstract concepts, rather than being based on empirical data.
For example, "If all men are mortal and Socrates is a man, then Socrates is mortal," employs logical reasoning to make its point.
Let ATLAS.ti take you from research question to key insights
Get started with a free trial and see how ATLAS.ti can make the most of your data.
In any research hypothesis, variables play a critical role. These are the elements or factors that the researcher manipulates, controls, or measures. Understanding variables is essential for crafting a clear, testable hypothesis and for the stages of research that follow, such as data collection and analysis.
In the realm of hypotheses, there are generally two types of variables to consider: independent and dependent. Independent variables are what you, as the researcher, manipulate or change in your study. It's considered the cause in the relationship you're investigating. For instance, in a study examining the impact of sleep duration on academic performance, the independent variable would be the amount of sleep participants get.
Conversely, the dependent variable is the outcome you measure to gauge the effect of your manipulation. It's the effect in the cause-and-effect relationship. The dependent variable thus refers to the main outcome of interest in your study. In the same sleep study example, the academic performance, perhaps measured by exam scores or GPA, would be the dependent variable.
Beyond these two primary types, you might also encounter control variables. These are variables that could potentially influence the outcome and are therefore kept constant to isolate the relationship between the independent and dependent variables . For example, in the sleep and academic performance study, control variables could include age, diet, or even the subject of study.
By clearly identifying and understanding the roles of these variables in your hypothesis, you set the stage for a methodologically sound research project. It helps you develop focused research questions, design appropriate experiments or observations, and carry out meaningful data analysis . It's a step that lays the groundwork for the success of your entire study.
Crafting a strong, testable hypothesis is crucial for the success of any research project. It sets the stage for everything from your study design to data collection and analysis . Below are some key considerations to keep in mind when formulating your hypothesis:
- Be specific : A vague hypothesis can lead to ambiguous results and interpretations . Clearly define your variables and the expected relationship between them.
- Ensure testability : A good hypothesis should be testable through empirical means, whether by observation , experimentation, or other forms of data analysis.
- Ground in literature : Before creating your hypothesis, consult existing research and theories. This not only helps you identify gaps in current knowledge but also gives you valuable context and credibility for crafting your hypothesis.
- Use simple language : While your hypothesis should be conceptually sound, it doesn't have to be complicated. Aim for clarity and simplicity in your wording.
- State direction, if applicable : If your hypothesis involves a directional outcome (e.g., "increase" or "decrease"), make sure to specify this. You also need to think about how you will measure whether or not the outcome moved in the direction you predicted.
- Keep it focused : One of the common pitfalls in hypothesis formulation is trying to answer too many questions at once. Keep your hypothesis focused on a specific issue or relationship.
- Account for control variables : Identify any variables that could potentially impact the outcome and consider how you will control for them in your study.
- Be ethical : Make sure your hypothesis and the methods for testing it comply with ethical standards , particularly if your research involves human or animal subjects.
Designing your study involves multiple key phases that help ensure the rigor and validity of your research. Here we discuss these crucial components in more detail.
Literature review
Starting with a comprehensive literature review is essential. This step allows you to understand the existing body of knowledge related to your hypothesis and helps you identify gaps that your research could fill. Your research should aim to contribute some novel understanding to existing literature, and your hypotheses can reflect this. A literature review also provides valuable insights into how similar research projects were executed, thereby helping you fine-tune your own approach.
Research methods
Choosing the right research methods is critical. Whether it's a survey, an experiment, or observational study, the methodology should be the most appropriate for testing your hypothesis. Your choice of methods will also depend on whether your research is quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods. Make sure the chosen methods align well with the variables you are studying and the type of data you need.
Preliminary research
Before diving into a full-scale study, it’s often beneficial to conduct preliminary research or a pilot study . This allows you to test your research methods on a smaller scale, refine your tools, and identify any potential issues. For instance, a pilot survey can help you determine if your questions are clear and if the survey effectively captures the data you need. This step can save you both time and resources in the long run.
Data analysis
Finally, planning your data analysis in advance is crucial for a successful study. Decide which statistical or analytical tools are most suited for your data type and research questions . For quantitative research, you might opt for t-tests, ANOVA, or regression analyses. For qualitative research , thematic analysis or grounded theory may be more appropriate. This phase is integral for interpreting your results and drawing meaningful conclusions in relation to your research question.
Turn data into evidence for insights with ATLAS.ti
Powerful analysis for your research paper or presentation is at your fingertips starting with a free trial.
COMMENTS
A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.
Formulating a hypothesis is a fundamental step in the scientific method that helps guide research and experimentation. By gathering observations, evaluating potential causes, and developing testable statements, researchers can create hypotheses that are both meaningful and falsifiable.
Formulating a hypothesis is a crucial step in the research process. It involves several key steps that help in shaping a clear and testable statement. Each step is essential for ensuring that your hypothesis is well-founded and researchable.
Formulating a hypothesis …is important to narrow a question down to one that can reasonably be studied in a research project. The formulation of the hypothesis basically varies with the kind of research project conducted: QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE
Whether directional or nondirectional, the formulation of hypotheses is a critical step in the research process, guiding empirical inquiry and contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the dynamic field of mass communications.
Brevity and objectivity: Present your hypothesis as a brief statement and avoid wordiness. Clarity and Relevance: The hypothesis should reflect a clear idea of what we know and what we expect to find out about a phenomenon and address the significant knowledge gap relevant to a field of study.
This procedure consists of making observations, formulating hypotheses, and designing experiments, which in turn lead to additional observations, hypotheses, and experiments in repeated cycles (Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\)).
Step 2: Formulate a hypothesis. After deciding to learn more about an observation or a set of observations, scientists generally begin an investigation by forming a hypothesis, a tentative explanation for the observation (s).
Introduction. An overview of the research hypothesis. Different types of hypotheses. Variables in a hypothesis. How to formulate an effective research hypothesis. Designing a study around your hypothesis. Introduction. The scientific method can derive and test predictions as hypotheses.
How Do You Formulate (Important) Hypotheses? Part I. Getting Started. We want to begin by addressing a question you might have had as you read the title of this chapter. You are likely to hear, or read in other sources, that the research process begins by asking research questions.