unit of analysis in research proposal

Skip to main content
Skip to primary sidebar
Skip to footer
QuestionPro

Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research Research Tools and Apps

Unit of Analysis: Definition, Types & Examples

A unit of analysis is what you discuss after your research, probably what you would regard to be the primary emphasis of your research.

The unit of analysis is the people or things whose qualities will be measured. The unit of analysis is an essential part of a research project. It’s the main thing that a researcher looks at in his research.

A unit of analysis is the object about which you hope to have something to say at the end of your analysis, perhaps the major subject of your research.

In this blog post, we will explore and clarify the concept of the “unit of analysis,” including its definition, various types, and a concluding perspective on its significance.

What is a unit of analysis?

A unit of analysis is the thing you want to discuss after your research, probably what you would regard to be the primary emphasis of your research.

The researcher plans to comment on the primary topic or object in the research as a unit of analysis. The research question plays a significant role in determining it. The “who” or “what” that the researcher is interested in investigating is, to put it simply, the unit of analysis.

In his 2001 book Man, the State, and War, Waltz divides the world into three distinct spheres of study: the individual, the state, and war.

Understanding the reasoning behind the unit of analysis is vital. The likelihood of fruitful research increases if the rationale is understood. An individual, group, organization, nation, social phenomenon, etc., are a few examples.

LEARN ABOUT: Data Analytics Projects

Types of “unit of analysis”

In business research, there are almost unlimited types of possible analytical units. Data analytics and data analysis are closely related processes that involve extracting insights from data to make informed decisions. Even though the most typical unit of analysis is the individual, many research questions can be more precisely answered by looking at other types of units. Let’s find out,

1. Individual Level

The most prevalent unit of analysis in business research is the individual. These are the primary analytical units. The researcher may be interested in looking into:

Employee actions
Perceptions
Attitudes or opinions.

Employees may come from wealthy or low-income families, as well as from rural or metropolitan areas.

A researcher might investigate if personnel from rural areas are more likely to arrive on time than those from urban areas. Additionally, he can check whether workers from rural areas who come from poorer families arrive on time compared to those from rural areas who come from wealthy families.

Each time, the individual (employee) serving as the analytical unit is discussed and explained. Employee analysis as a unit of analysis can shed light on issues in business, including customer and human resource behavior.

For example, employee work satisfaction and consumer purchasing patterns impact business, making research into these topics vital.

Psychologists typically concentrate on research on individuals. This research may significantly aid a firm’s success, as individuals’ knowledge and experiences reveal vital information. Thus, individuals are heavily utilized in business research.

2. Aggregates Level

Social science research does not usually focus on people. However, by combining individuals’ reactions, social scientists frequently describe and explain social interactions, communities, and groupings. Additionally, they research the collective of individuals, including communities, groups, and countries.

Aggregate levels can be divided into Groups (groups with an ad hoc structure) and Organizations (groups with a formal organization).

The following levels of the unit of analysis are made up of groups of people. A group is defined as two or more individuals who interact, share common traits, and feel connected to one another.

Many definitions also emphasize interdependence or objective resemblance (Turner, 1982; Platow, Grace, & Smithson, 2011) and those who identify as group members (Reicher, 1982) .

As a result, society and gangs serve as examples of groups. According to Webster’s Online Dictionary (2012), they can resemble some clubs but be far less formal.

Siblings, identical twins, family, and small group functioning are examples of studies with many units of analysis.

In such circumstances, a whole group might be compared to another. Families, gender-specific groups, pals, Facebook groups, and work departments can all be groups.

By analyzing groups, researchers can learn how they form and how age, experience, class, and gender affect them. When aggregated, an individual’s data describes the group they belong to.

Sociologists study groups like economists and businesspeople to form teams to complete projects. They continually research groups and group behavior.

Organizations

The next level of the unit of analysis is organizations, which are groups of people set up formally. Organizations could include businesses, religious groups, parts of the military, colleges, academic departments, supermarkets, business groups, and so on.

The social organization includes things like sexual composition, styles of leadership, organizational structure, systems of communication, and so on. (Susan & Wheelan, 2005; Chapais & Berman, 2004) . (Lim, Putnam, and Robert, 2010) say that well-known social organizations and religious institutions are among them.

Moody, White, and Douglas (2003) say social organizations are hierarchical. Hasmath, Hildebrandt, and Hsu (2016) say social organizations can take different forms. For example, they can be made by institutions like schools or governments.

Sociology, economics, political science, psychology, management, and organizational communication are some social science fields that study organizations (Douma & Schreuder, 2013) .

Organizations are different from groups in that they are more formal and have better organization. A researcher might want to study a company to generalize its results to the whole population of companies.

One way to look at an organization is by the number of employees, the net annual revenue, the net assets, the number of projects, and so on. He might want to know if big companies hire more or fewer women than small companies.

Organization researchers might be interested in how companies like Reliance, Amazon, and HCL affect our social and economic lives. People who work in business often study business organizations.

LEARN ABOUT: Data Management Framework

3. Social Level

The social level has 2 types,

Social Artifacts Level

Things are studied alongside humans. Social artifacts are human-made objects from diverse communities. Social artifacts are items, representations, assemblages, institutions, knowledge, and conceptual frameworks used to convey, interpret, or achieve a goal (IGI Global, 2017).

Cultural artifacts are anything humans generate that reveals their culture (Watts, 1981).

Social artifacts include books, newspapers, advertising, websites, technical devices, films, photographs, paintings, clothes, poems, jokes, students’ late excuses, scientific breakthroughs, furniture, machines, structures, etc. Infinite.

Humans build social objects for social behavior. As people or groups suggest a population in business research, each social object implies a class of items.

Same-class goods include business books, magazines, articles, and case studies. A business magazine’s quantity of articles, frequency, price, content, and editor in a research study may be characterized.

Then, a linked magazine’s population might be evaluated for description and explanation. Marx W. Wartofsky (1979) defined artifacts as primary artifacts utilized in production (like a camera), secondary artifacts connected to primary artifacts (like a camera user manual), and tertiary objects related to representations of secondary artifacts (like a camera user-manual sculpture).

The scientific study of an artifact reveals its creators and users. The artifact researcher may be interested in advertising, marketing, distribution, buying, etc.

Social Interaction Level

Social artifacts include social interaction. Such as:

Eye contact with a coworker
Buying something in a store
Friendship decisions
Road accidents
Airline hijackings
Professional counseling
Whatsapp messaging

A researcher might study youthful employees’ smartphone addictions. Some addictions may involve social media, while others involve online games and movies that inhibit connection.

Smartphone addictions are examined as a societal phenomenon. Observation units are probably individuals (employees).

Anthropologists typically study social artifacts. They may be interested in the social order. A researcher who examines social interactions may be interested in how broader societal structures and factors impact daily behavior, festivals, and weddings.

LEARN ABOUT: Level of Analysis

Even though there is no perfect way to do research, it is generally agreed that researchers should try to find a unit of analysis that keeps the context needed to make sense of the data.

Researchers should consider the details of their research when deciding on the unit of analysis.

They should remember that consistent use of these units throughout the analysis process (from coding to developing categories and themes to interpreting the data) is essential to gaining insight from qualitative data and protecting the reliability of the results.

QuestionPro does much more than merely serve as survey software. We have a solution for every sector of the economy and every kind of issue. We also have systems for managing data, such as our research repository, Insights Hub.

LEARN MORE FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

The Best Email Survey Tool to Boost Your Feedback Game

May 7, 2024

Top 10 Employee Engagement Survey Tools

15 Best Customer Experience Software of 2024

May 2, 2024

Unit of analysis: definition, types, examples, and more

Last updated

16 April 2023

Reviewed by

Cathy Heath

Make research less tedious

Dovetail streamlines research to help you uncover and share actionable insights

What is a unit of analysis?

A unit of analysis is an object of study within a research project. It is the smallest unit a researcher can use to identify and describe a phenomenon—the 'what' or 'who' the researcher wants to study.

For example, suppose a consultancy firm is hired to train the sales team in a solar company that is struggling to meet its targets. To evaluate their performance after the training, the unit of analysis would be the sales team—it's the main focus of the study.

Different methods, such as surveys , interviews, or sales data analysis, can be used to evaluate the sales team's performance and determine the effectiveness of the training.

Units of observation vs. units of analysis

A unit of observation refers to the actual items or units being measured or collected during the research. In contrast, a unit of analysis is the entity that a researcher can comment on or make conclusions about at the end of the study.

In the example of the solar company sales team, the unit of observation would be the individual sales transactions or deals made by the sales team members. In contrast, the unit of analysis would be the sales team as a whole.

The firm may observe and collect data on individual sales transactions, but the ultimate conclusion would be based on the sales team's overall performance, as this is the entity that the firm is hired to improve.

In some studies, the unit of observation may be the same as the unit of analysis, but researchers need to define both clearly to themselves and their audiences.

Unit of analysis types

Below are the main types of units of analysis:

Individuals – These are the smallest levels of analysis.

Groups – These are people who interact with each other.

Artifacts –These are material objects created by humans that a researcher can study using empirical methods.

Geographical units – These are smaller than a nation and range from a province to a neighborhood.

Social interactions – These are formal or informal interactions between society members.

Importance of selecting the correct unit of analysis in research

Selecting the correct unit of analysis helps reveal more about the subject you are studying and how to continue with the research. It also helps determine the information you should use in the study. For instance, if a researcher has a large sample, the unit of analysis will help decide whether to focus on the whole population or a subset of it.

Examples of a unit of analysis

Here are examples of a unit of analysis:

Individuals – A person, an animal, etc.

Groups – Gangs, roommates, etc.

Artifacts – Phones, photos, books, etc.

Geographical units – Provinces, counties, states, or specific areas such as neighborhoods, city blocks, or townships

Social interaction – Friendships, romantic relationships, etc.

Factors to consider when selecting a unit of analysis

The main things to consider when choosing a unit of analysis are:

Research questions and hypotheses

Research questions can be descriptive if the study seeks to describe what exists or what is going on.

It can be relational if the study seeks to look at the relationship between variables. Or, it can be causal if the research aims at determining whether one or more variables affect or cause one or more outcome variables.

Your study's research question and hypothesis should guide you in choosing the correct unit of analysis.

Data availability and quality

Consider the nature of the data collected and the time spent observing each participant or studying their behavior. You should also consider the scale used to measure variables.

Some studies involve measuring every variable on a one-to-one scale, while others use variables with discrete values. All these influence the selection of a unit of analysis.

Feasibility and practicality

Look at your study and think about the unit of analysis that would be feasible and practical.

Theoretical framework and research design

The theoretical framework is crucial in research as it introduces and describes the theory explaining why the problem under research exists. As a structure that supports the theory of a study, it is a critical consideration when choosing the unit of analysis. Moreover, consider the overall strategy for collecting responses to your research questions.

Common mistakes when choosing a unit of analysis

Below are common errors that occur when selecting a unit of analysis:

Reductionism

This error occurs when a researcher uses data from a lower-level unit of analysis to make claims about a higher-level unit of analysis. This includes using individual-level data to make claims about groups.

However, claiming that Rosa Parks started the movement would be reductionist. There are other factors behind the rise and success of the US civil rights movement. These include the Supreme Court’s historic decision to desegregate schools, protests over legalized racial segregation, and the formation of groups such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). In short, the movement is attributable to various political, social, and economic factors.

Ecological fallacy

This mistake occurs when researchers use data from a higher-level unit of analysis to make claims about one lower-level unit of analysis. It usually occurs when only group-level data is collected, but the researcher makes claims about individuals.

For instance, let's say a study seeks to understand whether addictions to electronic gadgets are more common in certain universities than others.

The researcher moves on and obtains data on the percentage of gadget-addicted students from different universities around the country. But looking at the data, the researcher notes that universities with engineering programs have more cases of gadget additions than campuses without the programs.

Concluding that engineering students are more likely to become addicted to their electronic gadgets would be inappropriate. The data available is only about gadget addiction rates by universities; thus, one can only make conclusions about institutions, not individual students at those universities.

Making claims about students while the data available is about the university puts the researcher at risk of committing an ecological fallacy.

The lowdown

A unit of analysis is what you would consider the primary emphasis of your study. It is what you want to discuss after your study. Researchers should determine a unit of analysis that keeps the context required to make sense of the data. They should also keep the unit of analysis in mind throughout the analysis process to protect the reliability of the results.

What is the most common unit of analysis?

The individual is the most prevalent unit of analysis.

Can the unit of analysis and the unit of observation be one?

Some situations have the same unit of analysis and observation. For instance, let's say a tutor is hired to improve the oral French proficiency of a student who finds it difficult. A few months later, the tutor wants to evaluate the student's proficiency based on what they have taught them for the time period. In this case, the student is both the unit of analysis and the unit of observation.

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 11 January 2024

Last updated: 15 January 2024

Last updated: 17 January 2024

Last updated: 12 May 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 18 May 2023

Last updated: 25 November 2023

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next.

Users report unexpectedly high data usage, especially during streaming sessions.

Users find it hard to navigate from the home page to relevant playlists in the app.

It would be great to have a sleep timer feature, especially for bedtime listening.

I need better filters to find the songs or artists I’m looking for.

Log in or sign up

Get started for free

Community Blog

Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.

The Unit of Analysis Explained

By DiscoverPhDs
October 3, 2020

The unit of analysis refers to the main parameter that you’re investigating in your research project or study. Example of the different types of unit analysis that may be used in a project include:

Individual people
Groups of people
Objects such as photographs, newspapers and books
Geographical unit based on parameters such as cities or counties
Social parameters such as births, deaths, divorces

The unit of analysis is named as such because the unit type is determined based on the actual data analysis that you perform in your project or study.

For example, if your research is based around data on exam grades for students at two different universities, then the unit of analysis is the data for the individual student due to each student having an exam score associated with them.

Conversely if your study is based on comparing noise level data between two different lecture halls full of students, then your unit of analysis here is the collective group of students in each hall rather than any data associated with an individual student.

In the same research study involving the same students, you may perform different types of analysis and this will be reflected by having different units of analysis. In the example of student exam scores, if you’re comparing individual exam grades then the unit of analysis is the individual student.

On the other hand, if you’re comparing the average exam grade between two universities, then the unit of analysis is now the group of students as you’re comparing the average of the group rather than individual exam grades.

These different levels of hierarchies of units of analysis can become complex with multiple levels. In fact, its complexity has led to a new field of statistical analysis that’s commonly known as hierarchical modelling.

As a researcher, you need to be clear on what your specific research questio n is. Based on this, you can define each data, observation or other variable and how they make up your dataset.

A clarity of your research question will help you identify your analysis units and the appropriate sample size needed to obtain a meaningful result (and is this a random sample/sampling unit or something else).

In developing your research method, you need to consider whether you’ll need any repeated observation of each measurement. You also need to consider whether you’re working with qualitative data/qualitative research or if this is quantitative content analysis.

The unit of analysis of your study is the specifically ‘who’ or what’ it is that your analysing – for example are you analysing the individual student, the group of students or even the whole university. You may have to consider a different unit of analysis based on the concept you’re considering, even if working with the same observation data set.

In Finland, all new PhD holders are given a traditional Doctoral Hat and Doctoral Sword during a Conferment Ceremony, symbolising the freedom of research.

Scrivener for Academic Writing and Journals

Find out how you can use Scrivener for PhD Thesis & Dissertation writing to streamline your workflow and make academic writing fun again!

What is an Appendix Dissertation explained

A thesis and dissertation appendix contains additional information which supports your main arguments. Find out what they should include and how to format them.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Browse PhDs Now

When you should and shouldn’t capitalise the names of chemical compounds and their abbreviations is not always clear.

Dr Pujada obtained her PhD in Molecular Cell Biology at Georgia State University in 2019. She is now a biomedical faculty member, mentor, and science communicator with a particular interest in promoting STEM education.

Sammy is a second year PhD student at Cardiff Metropolitan University researching how secondary school teachers can meet the demands of the Digital Competence Framework.

Join Thousands of Students

Unit of Analysis: Definition, Types & Examples

Introduction

A unit of analysis is the smallest level of analysis for a research project. It’s important to choose the right unit of analysis because it helps you make more accurate conclusions about your data.

What Is a Unit of Analysis?

A unit of analysis is the smallest element in a data set that can be used to identify and describe a phenomenon or the smallest unit that can be used to gather data about a subject. The unit of analysis will determine how you will define your variables, which are the things that you measure in your data.

If you want to understand why people buy a particular product, you should choose a unit of analysis that focuses on buying behavior. This means choosing a unit of analysis that is relevant to your research topic and question .

For example, if you want to study the needs of soldiers in a war zone, you will need to choose an appropriate unit of analysis for this study: soldiers or the war zone. In this case, choosing the right unit of analysis would be important because it could help you decide if your research design is appropriate for this particular subject and situation.

Why is Choosing the Right Unit of Analysis Important?

The unit of analysis is important because it helps you understand what you are trying to find out about your subject, and it also helps you to make decisions about how to proceed with your research.

Choosing the right unit of analysis is also important because it determines what information you’re going to use in your research. If you have a small sample, then you’ll have to choose whether or not to focus on the entire population or just a subset of it.

If you have a large sample, then you’ll be able to find out more about specific groups within your population. For example, if you want to understand why people buy certain types of products, then you should choose a unit of analysis that focuses on buying behavior.

This means choosing a unit of analysis that is relevant to your research topic and question.

Unit of Analysis vs Unit of Observation

Unit of analysis is a term used to refer to a particular part of a data set that can be analyzed. For example, in the case of a survey, the unit of analysis is an individual: the person who was selected to take part in the survey.

Unit of analysis is used in the social sciences to refer to the individuals or groups that have been studied. It can also be referred to as the unit of observation.

Unit of observation refers to a specific person or group in the study being observed by the researcher. An example would be a particular town, census tract, state, or other geographical location being studied by researchers conducting research on crime rates in that area.

Unit of analysis refers to the individual or group being studied by the researcher. An example would be an entire town being analyzed for crime rates over time.

Types of “Unit of Analysis”

The unit of analysis is a way to understand and study a phenomenon. There are four main types of unit of analysis: individuals, groups, artifacts (books, photos, newspapers), and geographical units (towns, census tracts, states).

Individuals are the smallest level of analysis. For example, an individual may be a person or an animal. A group can be composed of individuals or a collection of people who interact with each other. For example, an individual might go to college with other individuals or a family might live together as roommates.
An artifact is anything that can be studied using empirical methods—including books and photos but also any physical object like knives or phones.
A geographical unit is smaller than an entire country but larger than just one city block or neighborhood; it may be smaller than just two houses but larger than just two houses in the same street.
Social interactions include dyadic relations (such as friendships or romantic relationships) and divorces among many other things such as arrests.

Examples of Each Type of Unit of Analysis

Individuals are the smallest unit of analysis. An individual is a person, animal, or thing. For example, an individual can be a person or a building.
Artifacts are the next largest units of analysis. An artifact is something produced by human beings and is not alive. For example, a child’s toy is an artifact. Artifacts can include any material object that was produced by human activity and which has meaning to someone. Artifacts can be tangible or intangible and may be produced intentionally or accidentally.
Geographical units are large geographic areas such as states, counties, provinces, etc. Geographical units may also refer to specific locations within these areas such as cities or townships.
Social interaction refers to interactions between members of society (e.g., family members interacting with each other). Social interaction includes both formal interactions (such as attending school) and informal interactions (such as talking on the phone).

How Does a Social Scientist Choose a Unit of Analysis?

Social scientists choose a unit of analysis based on the purpose of their research, their research question, and the type of data they have. For example, if they are trying to understand the relationship between a person’s personality and their behavior, they would choose to study personality traits.

For example, if a researcher wanted to study the effects of legalizing marijuana on crime rates, they may choose to use administrative data from police departments. However, if they wanted to study how culture influences crime rates, they might use survey data from smaller groups of people who are further removed from the influence of culture (e.g., individuals living in different areas or countries).

Factors to Consider When Choosing a Unit of Analysis

The unit of analysis is the object or person that you are studying, and it determines what kind of data you are collecting and how you will analyze it.

Factors to consider when choosing a unit of analysis include:

What is your purpose for studying this topic? Is it for a research paper or an article? If so, which type of paper do you want to write?
What is the most appropriate unit for your study? If you are studying a specific event or period of time, this may be obvious. But if your focus is broader, such as all social sciences or all human development, then you need to determine how broad your scope should be before beginning any research process (see question one above) so that you know where to start in order for it to be effective (see question three below).
How do other people define their units? This can be helpful when trying to understand what other people mean when they use certain terms like “social science” or “human development” because they may define those terms differently than what you would expect them to.
The nature of the data collected. Is it quantitative or qualitative? If it’s qualitative, what kind of data is collected? How much time was spent observing each participant/examining their behavior?
The scale used to measure variables. Is every variable measured on a one-to-one scale (like measurements between people)? Or do some variables only take on discrete values (like yes/no questions)?

The unit of analysis is the smallest part of a data set that you analyze. It’s important to remember that your data is made up of more than just one unit—you have lots of different units in your dataset, and each of those units has its own characteristics that you need to think about when you’re trying to analyze it.

Connect to Formplus, Get Started Now - It's Free!

Data Collection
research questions
unit of analysis
Olayemi Jemimah Aransiola

Projective Techniques In Surveys: Definition, Types & Pros & Cons

Introduction When you’re conducting a survey, you need to find out what people think about things. But how do you get an accurate and...

Research Summary: What Is It & How To Write One

Introduction A research summary is a requirement during academic research and sometimes you might need to prepare a research summary...

What is Field Research: Meaning, Examples, Pros & Cons

Introduction Field research is a method of research that deals with understanding and interpreting the social interactions of groups of...

The McNamara Fallacy: How Researchers Can Detect and to Avoid it.

Introduction The McNamara Fallacy is a common problem in research. It happens when researchers take a single piece of data as evidence...

Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection

Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. try formplus and transform your work productivity today..

Choosing the Right Unit of Analysis for Your Research Project

Table of content.

Understanding the Unit of Analysis in Research
Factors to Consider When Selecting the Right Unit of Analysis
Common Mistakes to Avoid

A research project is like setting out on a voyage through uncharted territory; the unit of analysis is your compass, guiding every decision from methodology to interpretation.

It’s the beating heart of your data collection and the lens through which you view your findings. With deep-seated experience in research methodologies , our expertise recognizes that choosing an appropriate unit of analysis not only anchors your study but illuminates paths towards meaningful conclusions.

The right choice empowers researchers to extract patterns, answer pivotal questions, and offer insights into complex phenomena. But tread carefully—selecting an ill-suited unit can distort results or obscure significant relationships within data.

Remember this: A well-chosen unit of analysis acts as a beacon for accuracy and relevance throughout your scholarly inquiry. Continue reading to unlock the strategies for selecting this cornerstone of research design with precision—your project’s success depends on it.

Engage with us as we delve deeper into this critical aspect of research mastery.

Key Takeaways

Your research questions and hypotheses drive the choice of your unit of analysis, shaping how you collect and interpret data.
Avoid common mistakes like reductionism , which oversimplifies complex issues, and the ecological fallacy , where group-level findings are wrongly applied to individuals.
Consider the availability and quality of data when selecting your unit of analysis to ensure your research is feasible and conclusions are valid.
Differentiate between units of analysis (what you’re analyzing) and units of observation (what or who you’re observing) for clarity in your study.
Ensure that your chosen unit aligns with both the theoretical framework and practical considerations such as time and resources.

The unit of analysis in research refers to the level at which data is collected and analyzed. It is essential for researchers to understand the different types of units of analysis, as well as their significance in shaping the research process and outcomes.

Definition and Importance

With resonio, the unit of analysis you choose lays the groundwork for your market research focus. Whether it’s individuals, organizations, or specific events, resonio’s platform facilitates targeted data collection and analysis to address your unique research questions. Our tool simplifies this selection process, ensuring that you can efficiently zero in on the most relevant unit for insightful and actionable results.

This crucial component serves as a navigational aid for your market research. The market research tool not only guides you in data collection but also in selecting the most effective sampling methods and approaches to hypothesis testing. Getting robust and reliable data, ensuring your research is both effective and straightforward.

Choosing the right unit of analysis is crucial, as it defines your research’s direction. resonio makes this easier, ensuring your choice aligns with your theoretical approach and data collection methods, thereby enhancing the validity and reliability of your results.

Additionally, resonio aids in steering clear of errors like reductionism and ecological fallacy, ensuring your conclusions match the data’s level of analysis

Difference between Unit of Analysis and Unit of Observation

Understanding the difference between the unit of analysis and observation is key. Let us clarify this distinction: the unit of analysis is what you’ll ultimately analyze, while the unit of observation is what you observe or measure during the study.

For example, in using resonio for educational research, individual test scores are the units of analysis, while the students providing these scores are the units of observation.

This distinction is essential as it clarifies the specific aspect under scrutiny and what will yield measurable data. It also emphasizes that researchers must carefully consider both elements to ensure their alignment with research questions and objectives .

Types of Units of Analysis: Individual, Aggregates, and Social

Choosing the right unit of analysis for a research project is critical. The types of units of analysis include individual, aggregates, and social.

Individual: This type focuses on analyzing the attributes and characteristics of individual units, such as people or specific objects.
Aggregates: Aggregates involve analyzing groups or collections of individual units, such as neighborhoods, organizations, or communities.
Social: Social units of analysis emphasize analyzing broader social entities, such as cultures, societies, or institutions.

When selecting the right unit of analysis for a research project, researchers must consider various factors such as their research questions and hypotheses , data availability and quality, feasibility and practicality, as well as the theoretical framework and research design .

Each of these factors plays a crucial role in determining the most appropriate unit of analysis for the study.

Research Questions and Hypotheses

The research questions and hypotheses play a crucial role in determining the appropriate unit of analysis for a research project. They guide the researcher in identifying what exactly needs to be studied and analyzed, thereby influencing the selection of the most relevant unit of analysis.

The alignment between the research questions/hypotheses and the unit of analysis is essential to ensure that the study’s focus meets its intended objectives. Furthermore, clear research questions and hypotheses help define specific parameters for data collection and analysis, directly impacting which unit of analysis will best serve the study’s purpose.

It’s important to carefully consider how each research question or hypothesis relates to different potential units of analysis , as this connection will shape not only what you are studying but also how you will study it .

Data Availability and Quality

When considering the unit of analysis for a research project, researchers must take into account the availability and quality of data. The chosen unit of analysis should align with the available data sources to ensure that meaningful and accurate conclusions can be drawn.

Researchers need to evaluate whether the necessary data at the chosen level of analysis is accessible and reliable. Ensuring high-quality data will contribute to the validity and reliability of the study , enabling researchers to make sound interpretations and draw robust conclusions from their findings.

Choosing a unit of analysis without considering data availability and quality may lead to limitations in conducting thorough analysis or drawing valid conclusions. It is crucial for researchers to assess both factors before finalizing their selection, as it directly impacts the feasibility, accuracy, and rigor of their research project.

Feasibility and Practicality

When considering the feasibility and practicality of a unit of analysis for a research project, it is essential to assess the availability and quality of data related to the chosen unit.

Researchers should also evaluate whether the selected unit aligns with their theoretical framework and research design. The practical aspects such as time, resources, and potential challenges associated with analyzing the chosen unit must be thoroughly considered before finalizing the decision.

Moreover, it is crucial to ensure that the selected unit of analysis is feasible within the scope of the research questions and hypotheses. Additionally, researchers need to determine if the chosen unit can be effectively studied based on existing literature and sampling techniques utilized in similar studies.

By carefully evaluating these factors, researchers can make informed decisions regarding which unit of analysis will best suit their research goals.

Theoretical Framework and Research Design

The theoretical framework and research design establish the structure for a study based on existing theories and concepts. It guides the selection of the unit of analysis by providing a foundation for understanding how variables interact and influence one another.

Theoretical frameworks help to shape research questions , hypotheses, and data collection methods, ensuring that the chosen unit of analysis aligns with the study’s objectives. Research design serves as a blueprint outlining the procedures and techniques used to gather and analyze data, allowing researchers to make informed decisions regarding their unit of analysis while considering feasibility, practicality, and data availability .

Researchers often make the mistake of reductionism, where they oversimplify complex phenomena by focusing on one aspect. Another common mistake is the ecological fallacy, where conclusions about individual behavior are made based on group-level data.

Reductionism

Reductionism occurs when a researcher oversimplifies a complex phenomenon by analyzing it at too basic a level. This can lead to the loss of important nuances and details critical for understanding the broader context.

For instance, studying individual test scores without considering external factors like teaching quality or student motivation is reductionist. By focusing solely on one aspect, researchers miss out on comprehensive insights that may impact their findings.

In research projects, reductionism limits the depth of analysis and may result in skewed conclusions that don’t accurately reflect the real-world complexities. It’s essential for researchers to avoid reductionism by carefully selecting an appropriate unit of analysis that allows for a holistic understanding of the phenomenon under study.

Ecological Fallacy

The ecological fallacy involves making conclusions about individuals based on group-level data . This occurs when researchers mistakenly assume that relationships observed at the aggregate level also apply to individuals within that group.

For example, if a study finds a correlation between high levels of education and income at the city level, it doesn’t mean the same relationship applies to every individual within that city.

This fallacy can lead to erroneous generalizations and inaccurate assumptions about individuals based on broader trends. It is crucial for researchers to be mindful of this potential pitfall when selecting their unit of analysis, ensuring that their findings accurately represent the specific characteristics and behaviors of the individuals or entities under investigation.

Selecting the appropriate unit of analysis is critical for a research project’s success, shaping its focus and scope. Researchers must carefully align the chosen unit with their study objectives to ensure relevance.

The impact on findings and conclusions from this choice cannot be understated. Correctly choosing the unit of analysis can considerably influence the direction and outcomes of a research undertaking.

Robert Koch

I write about AI, SEO, Tech, and Innovation. Led by curiosity, I stay ahead of AI advancements. I aim for clarity and understand the necessity of change, taking guidance from Shaw: 'Progress is impossible without change,' and living by Welch's words: 'Change before you have to'.

Privacy Overview
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Additional Cookies

This website uses cookies to provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookies are small text files that are cached when you visit a website to make the user experience more efficient. We are allowed to store cookies on your device if they are absolutely necessary for the operation of the site. For all other cookies we need your consent.

You can at any time change or withdraw your consent from the Cookie Declaration on our website. Find the link to your settings in our footer.

Find out more in our privacy policy about our use of cookies and how we process personal data.

Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot properly without these cookies.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as additional cookies.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Request consultation

Do you need support in running a pricing or product study? We can help you with agile consumer research and conjoint analysis.

Looking for an online survey platform?

Conjointly offers a great survey tool with multiple question types, randomisation blocks, and multilingual support. The Basic tier is always free.

Research Methods Knowledge Base

Navigating the Knowledge Base
Five Big Words
Types of Research Questions
Time in Research
Types of Relationships
Types of Data

Unit of Analysis

Two Research Fallacies
Philosophy of Research
Ethics in Research
Conceptualizing
Evaluation Research
Measurement
Research Design
Table of Contents

Fully-functional online survey tool with various question types, logic, randomisation, and reporting for unlimited number of surveys.

Completely free for academics and students .

One of the most important ideas in a research project is the unit of analysis . The unit of analysis is the major entity that you are analyzing in your study. For instance, any of the following could be a unit of analysis in a study:

individuals
artifacts (books, photos, newspapers)
geographical units (town, census tract, state)
social interactions (dyadic relations, divorces, arrests)

Why is it called the ‘unit of analysis’ and not something else (like, the unit of sampling)? Because it is the analysis you do in your study that determines what the unit is . For instance, if you are comparing the children in two classrooms on achievement test scores, the unit is the individual child because you have a score for each child. On the other hand, if you are comparing the two classes on classroom climate, your unit of analysis is the group, in this case the classroom, because you only have a classroom climate score for the class as a whole and not for each individual student. For different analyses in the same study you may have different units of analysis. If you decide to base an analysis on student scores, the individual is the unit. But you might decide to compare average classroom performance. In this case, since the data that goes into the analysis is the average itself (and not the individuals’ scores) the unit of analysis is actually the group. Even though you had data at the student level, you use aggregates in the analysis. In many areas of social research these hierarchies of analysis units have become particularly important and have spawned a whole area of statistical analysis sometimes referred to as hierarchical modeling . This is true in education, for instance, where we often compare classroom performance but collected achievement data at the individual student level.

Cookie Consent

Conjointly uses essential cookies to make our site work. We also use additional cookies in order to understand the usage of the site, gather audience analytics, and for remarketing purposes.

For more information on Conjointly's use of cookies, please read our Cookie Policy .

Which one are you?

I am new to conjointly, i am already using conjointly.

6. Sampling

6.1. Units of Analysis

Man wearing a hat, orange jacket, and backpack looking out to the sea using binoculars.

Learning Objectives

Describe units of analysis.
Discuss how we can study the same topic using different units of analysis.

Before you can decide on a sampling strategy, you must define the unit of analysis of your scientific study. The unit of analysis refers to the person, collective, or object that you are focusing on and want to learn about through your research. As depicted in Figure 6.1 , your unit of analysis would be the type of entity (say, an individual) you’re interested in. Your sample would be a group of such entities (say, a group of individuals you survey)—which, collectively, stand in for the population you wish to study.

Cartoon depictions of a large group of people representing a population. Six of them are selected to represent the sample.

Typical units of analysis include individuals, groups, organizations, and countries. For instance, if we are interested in studying people’s shopping behavior, their learning outcomes, or their attitudes toward new technologies, then the unit of analysis is likely to be the individual . If we want to study characteristics of street gangs or teamwork in organizations, then the unit of analysis is probably the group . If our research is directed at understanding differences in national cultures, then our unit of analysis could be the country . In the latter two examples, even though specific individuals—the group or country’s leaders—may have a greater say over what these groups or countries do, for the sake of analysis, researchers typically think of those decisions as reflecting a collective decision rather than any one individual’s decision.

Even inanimate objects can serve as units of analysis. For instance, if we wish to study how two or more individuals engage with each other during social interactions, the unit of analysis might be each conversation , and not the individual speakers. If we wanted to track how depictions of people of color have changed in popular culture over time, we could focus on a film or television show as a unit of analysis.

Our choice of a particular unit of analysis will depend on our research question. For instance, if we wish to study why certain neighborhoods have high crime rates, then our unit of analysis becomes the neighborhood —not crimes or criminals committing such crimes—because the object of our inquiry is the neighborhood and not the people living in it. If, however, we wish to compare the prevalence of different types of crimes—homicide versus robbery versus assault, for example—across neighborhoods, our unit of analysis could very well be the crime . If we wish to study why criminals engage in illegal activities, then the unit of analysis becomes the individual (i.e., the criminal).

Now let’s consider a completely different kind of sociological study. If we want to examine why some business innovations are more successful than others, then our unit of analysis is an innovation —such as the invention of a new method for charging phones. If, however, we wish to study how some tech companies develop innovative products more consistently than others, then the unit of analysis is the organization . As you can see, two related research questions within the same study may have entirely different units of analysis.

Determining the appropriate unit of analysis is important because it influences what type of data you should collect for your study and whom you collect it from. If your unit of analysis is the organization, then you usually will want to collect organizational-level data—that is, data that has to do with the organization, such as its size, personnel structure, or revenues. Data may come from a variety of sources, such as financial records or surveys of directors or executives, who are presumed to be representing their organization when they answer your survey questions. Meanwhile, if your unit of analysis is a website, you will want to collect data about different sites, such as how one kind of site compares to others in terms of traffic. We could use the term “site-level” data—just like we’d use the term “individual-level” data when individuals are the unit of analysis. We could also talk about “lower” and “higher” levels of analysis—with individual-level data existing on a lower level than group-level data, which may, in turn, be on a lower level than national data (see the discussion of micro , meso , and macro levels of analysis in Chapter 3: The Role of Theory in Research ). It is important to note that “higher” does not imply “better” in this case. We’re just talking about whether we’re looking at smaller or larger groupings of data.

Frequently, the unit of analysis is what we observe in our research—the source of our data—but that is not always the case. In fact, sometimes we want to make a distinction between units of analysis and units of observation . The unit of analysis is what we really want to study, but sometimes we have to get at it indirectly, by observing something else. For example, surveys often ask questions about families to understand their family structure, income, and various aspects of their well-being, but they need to get information about the family through individuals—specifically, the respondent who is answering survey questions on behalf of the family. In this case, the unit of analysis for the survey’s family-related questions would be the family, but the unit of observation would be the individual. Likewise, in our earlier examples, we talked about studying organizations and websites as our units of analysis, but doing so might involve talking to individuals—the directors of those organizations, or the users of those websites, respectively.

Analyzing multiple types of units of observation can give us a fuller picture of our unit of analysis. For example, if you are conducting research about what makes particular social media apps more addictive than others, then examining differences between the apps in terms of their functionality ( app as the unit of observation) would tell you one thing, but surveying individuals about their usage of apps ( user as the unit of observation) would clarify other aspects of that question. Furthermore, it is often a good idea to collect data from a lower level of analysis and sum up, or aggregate , that data, converting it into higher-level data. This can give you a bigger-picture perspective on your unit of analysis. For instance, to study teamwork in organizations, you can survey individuals in different teams and measure how much conflict or cohesion they perceive on their teams. You can then average their individual scores to create a “team-level” score on those particular ratings. Note, however, that issues can arise when we move in the opposite direction—from a higher to a lower level of analysis (see the sidebar Deeper Dive: Ecological Fallacies ).

Ultimately, the unit of analysis will help you determine both the population you are interested in and the sample that you will study to arrive at any conclusions about that population. So you need to choose it wisely. For example, let’s say you’re interested in the average pay of chief executive officers (CEOs) at companies across the nation. The unit of analysis would be the CEO, and the population would be all individuals in the country who work as company CEOs. But the unit of analysis would be different for a very similar research question: the average amount that U.S. companies pay their CEOs. In this case, the unit of analysis is actually the company because you are interested in how much companies pay their CEOs—not how much individuals are paid as CEOs. The difference is subtle, but the main point is that your unit of analysis is linked to whatever population you actually want to say something about—in this example, either individual CEOs, or companies that have CEOs.

Deeper Dive: Ecological Fallacies

A mismatch between the unit of analysis and the unit of observation can create issues for researchers. Let’s say you want to compare the residents of different states (your unit of analysis is the individual ), but you only have access to state-level data (your unit of observation is the state ). This is a problem because you generally do not want to be making claims about a lower level of analysis based only on aggregated data at a higher level—in this example, drawing conclusions about individuals based on the states where they reside. For instance, the fact that the population of a state is, on average, wealthier than the rest of the country does not mean that residents of that state are more likely to be rich than the average American. It may be that a small contingent of superrich people have pulled up the average wealth of the state, but its many other residents actually tend to be poorer than the average American. (As you might know from your statistics classes, in this situation, mean wealth—the group’s average—differs dramatically from median wealth—how much money the person smack in the middle of the income distribution has.) This logical error—making claims about the nature of individuals based on data from the groups they belong to—is called an ecological fallacy .

Émile Durkheim’s classic study of suicide is often mentioned as an example of an ecological fallacy. One of the pioneers of the field of sociology, Durkheim argued in his 1897 book Suicide that societies in which individuals struggled to feel they belonged—that is, populations with low levels of social integration—would experience more suicide. Ideally, the unit of analysis for such a study would be the individual. Specifically, we would want to study individuals and the factors that contributed to their deaths by suicide. But Durkheim did not have individual-level data. Instead, he had higher-level data about the number of suicides in each country. To test his theory that social integration safeguarded individuals against suicide, Durkheim compared countries that were mostly Protestant to those that were mostly Catholic. The idea was that Protestantism was a more individualistic and unstructured faith than Catholicism, and so the two varieties of religious belief could stand in for less and more social integration, respectively.

Durkheim’s analysis concluded that suicide was indeed higher in Protestant-majority countries. The problem was that his data only allowed him to say that Protestant countries were more likely to have higher suicide rates—not that Protestant individuals were more likely to commit suicide. To conclude the latter would have been an ecological fallacy, and yet that was the question that Durkheim truly wanted to answer. To his credit, Durkheim also tested his theory by studying suicide rates across localities within countries—another level of analysis (Selvin 1958). (Replicating your analysis across different types of data is a good way to check the robustness of your findings, as we will discuss in later chapters.) Durkheim found the same pattern of higher levels of Protestant belief correlating with higher suicide rates within counties, giving further credence to his theory. Although flawed, Durkheim’s analysis made creative use of the data that was available to him at the time, and his work continues to inspire researchers, including those studying the growing rates of suicide among less educated Americans since 2000 (Case and Deaton 2020).

Key Takeaways

A unit of analysis is a member of the larger group you wish to be able to say something about at the end of your study. A unit of observation is a member of the population that you actually observe.
When researchers confuse their units of analysis and observation, they may commit an ecological fallacy—that is, when we make possibly inaccurate claims about the nature of individuals based on data from the groups they belong to.

The Craft of Sociological Research by Victor Tan Chen; Gabriela León-Pérez; Julie Honnold; and Volkan Aytar is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Another point to consider when designing a research project, and which might differ slightly in qualitative and quantitative studies, has to do with units of analysis and units of observation. These two items concern what you, the researcher, actually observe in the course of your data collection and what you hope to be able to say about those observations. Table 3.1 provides a summary of the differences between units of analysis and observation.

Unit of Analysis

A unit of analysis is the entity that you wish to be able to say something about at the end of your study, probably what you would consider to be the main focus of your study.

Unit of Observation

A unit of observation is the item (or items) that you actually observe, measure, or collect in the course of trying to learn something about your unit of analysis. In a given study, the unit of observation might be the same as the unit of analysis, but that is not always the case. Further, units of analysis are not required to be the same as units of observation. What is required, however, is for researchers to be clear about how they define their units of analysis and observation, both to themselves and to their audiences. More specifically, your unit of analysis will be determined by your research question. Your unit of observation, on the other hand, is determined largely by the method of data collection that you use to answer that research question.

To demonstrate these differences, let us look at the topic of students’ addictions to their cell phones. We will consider first how different kinds of research questions about this topic will yield different units of analysis. Then we will think about how those questions might be answered and with what kinds of data. This leads us to a variety of units of observation.

If I were to ask, “Which students are most likely to be addicted to their cell phones?” our unit of analysis would be the individual. We might mail a survey to students on a university or college campus, with the aim to classify individuals according to their membership in certain social classes and, in turn, to see how membership in those classes correlates with addiction to cell phones. For example, we might find that students studying media, males, and students with high socioeconomic status are all more likely than other students to become addicted to their cell phones. Alternatively, we could ask, “How do students’ cell phone addictions differ and how are they similar? In this case, we could conduct observations of addicted students and record when, where, why, and how they use their cell phones. In both cases, one using a survey and the other using observations, data are collected from individual students. Thus, the unit of observation in both examples is the individual. But the units of analysis differ in the two studies. In the first one, our aim is to describe the characteristics of individuals. We may then make generalizations about the populations to which these individuals belong, but our unit of analysis is still the individual. In the second study, we will observe individuals in order to describe some social phenomenon, in this case, types of cell phone addictions. Consequently, our unit of analysis would be the social phenomenon.

Another common unit of analysis in sociological inquiry is groups. Groups, of course, vary in size, and almost no group is too small or too large to be of interest to sociologists. Families, friendship groups, and street gangs make up some of the more common micro-level groups examined by sociologists. Employees in an organization, professionals in a particular domain (e.g., chefs, lawyers, sociologists), and members of clubs (e.g., Girl Guides, Rotary, Red Hat Society) are all meso-level groups that sociologists might study. Finally, at the macro level, sociologists sometimes examine citizens of entire nations or residents of different continents or other regions.

A study of student addictions to their cell phones at the group level might consider whether certain types of social clubs have more or fewer cell phone-addicted members than other sorts of clubs. Perhaps we would find that clubs that emphasize physical fitness, such as the rugby club and the scuba club, have fewer cell phone-addicted members than clubs that emphasize cerebral activity, such as the chess club and the sociology club. Our unit of analysis in this example is groups. If we had instead asked whether people who join cerebral clubs are more likely to be cell phone-addicted than those who join social clubs, then our unit of analysis would have been individuals. In either case, however, our unit of observation would be individuals.

Organizations are yet another potential unit of analysis that social scientists might wish to say something about. Organizations include entities like corporations, colleges and universities, and even night clubs. At the organization level, a study of students’ cell phone addictions might ask, “How do different colleges address the problem of cell phone addiction?” In this case, our interest lies not in the experience of individual students but instead in the campus-to-campus differences in confronting cell phone addictions. A researcher conducting a study of this type might examine schools’ written policies and procedures, so his unit of observation would be documents. However, because he ultimately wishes to describe differences across campuses, the college would be his unit of analysis.

Social phenomena are also a potential unit of analysis. Many sociologists study a variety of social interactions and social problems that fall under this category. Examples include social problems like murder or rape; interactions such as counselling sessions, Facebook chatting, or wrestling; and other social phenomena such as voting and even cell phone use or misuse. A researcher interested in students’ cell phone addictions could ask, “What are the various types of cell phone addictions that exist among students?” Perhaps the researcher will discover that some addictions are primarily centred on social media such as chat rooms, Facebook, or texting, while other addictions centre on single-player games that discourage interaction with others. The resultant typology of cell phone addictions would tell us something about the social phenomenon (unit of analysis) being studied. As in several of the preceding examples, however, the unit of observation would likely be individual people.

Finally, a number of social scientists examine policies and principles, the last type of unit of analysis we will consider here. Studies that analyze policies and principles typically rely on documents as the unit of observation. Perhaps a researcher has been hired by a college to help it write an effective policy against cell phone use in the classroom. In this case, the researcher might gather all previously written policies from campuses all over the country, and compare policies at campuses where the use of cell phones in classroom is low to policies at campuses where the use of cell phones in the classroom is high.

In sum, there are many potential units of analysis that a sociologist might examine, but some of the most common units include the following:

Individuals
Organizations
Social phenomena.
Policies and principles.

Table 4.1 Units of analysis and units of observation: A hypothetical study of students’ addictions to cell phones.

Research Methods, Data Collection and Ethics Copyright © 2020 by Valerie Sheppard is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Research Design Review

A discussion of qualitative & quantitative research design, qualitative data analysis: the unit of analysis.

As discussed in two earlier articles in Research Design Review (see “The Important Role of ‘Buckets’ in Qualitative Data Analysis” and “Finding Connections & Making Sense of Qualitative Data” ), the selection of the unit of analysis is one of the first steps in the qualitative data analysis process. The “unit of analysis” refers to the portion of content that will be the basis for decisions made during the development of codes. For example, in textual content analyses, the unit of analysis may be at the level of a word, a sentence (Milne & Adler, 1999), a paragraph, an article or chapter, an entire edition or volume, a complete response to an interview question, entire diaries from research participants, or some other level of text. The unit of analysis may not be defined by the content per se but rather by a characteristic of the content originator (e.g., person’s age), or the unit of analysis might be at the individual level with, for example, each participant in an in-depth interview (IDI) study treated as a case. Whatever the unit of analysis, the researcher will make coding decisions based on various elements of the content, including length, complexity, manifest meanings, and latent meanings based on such nebulous variables as the person’s tone or manner.

Deciding on the unit of analysis is a very important decision because it guides the development of codes as well as the coding process. If a weak unit of analysis is chosen, one of two outcomes may result: 1) If the unit chosen is too precise (i.e., at too much of a micro-level than what is actually needed), the researcher will set in motion an analysis that may miss important contextual information and may require more time and cost than if a broader unit of analysis had been chosen. An example of a too-precise unit of analysis might be small elements of content such as individual words. 2) If the unit chosen is too imprecise (i.e., at a very high macro-level), important connections and contextual meanings in the content at smaller (individual) units may be missed, leading to erroneous categorization and interpretation of the data. An example of a too-imprecise unit of analysis might be the entire set of diaries written by 25 participants in an IDI research study, or all the comments made by teenagers on an online support forum. Keep in mind, however, that what is deemed too precise or imprecise will vary across qualitative studies, making it difficult to prescribe the “right” solution for all situations.

Although there is no perfect prescription for every study, it is generally understood that researchers should strive for a unit of analysis that retains the context necessary to derive meaning from the data. For this reason, and if all other things are equal, the qualitative researcher should probably err on the side of using a broader, more contextually based unit of analysis rather than a narrowly focused level of analysis (e.g., sentences). This does not mean that supra-macro-level units, such as the entire set of transcripts from an IDI study, are appropriate; and, to the contrary, these very imprecise units, which will obscure meanings and nuances at the individual level, should be avoided. It does mean, however, that units of analysis defined as the entirety of a research interview or focus group discussion are more likely to provide the researcher with contextual entities by which reasonable and valid meanings can be obtained and analyzed across all cases.

In the end, the researcher needs to consider the particular circumstances of the study and define the unit of analysis keeping in mind that broad, contextually rich units of analysis — maintained throughout coding, category and theme development, and interpretation — are crucial to deriving meaning in qualitative data and ensuring the integrity of research outcomes.

Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , 12 (2), 237–256.

Image captured from: http://www.picklejarcommunications.com

How To Write A Research Proposal – Step-by-Step [Template]

Table of Contents

How To Write a Research Proposal

Writing a Research proposal involves several steps to ensure a well-structured and comprehensive document. Here is an explanation of each step:

1. Title and Abstract

Choose a concise and descriptive title that reflects the essence of your research.
Write an abstract summarizing your research question, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes. It should provide a brief overview of your proposal.

2. Introduction:

Provide an introduction to your research topic, highlighting its significance and relevance.
Clearly state the research problem or question you aim to address.
Discuss the background and context of the study, including previous research in the field.

3. Research Objectives

Outline the specific objectives or aims of your research. These objectives should be clear, achievable, and aligned with the research problem.

4. Literature Review:

Conduct a comprehensive review of relevant literature and studies related to your research topic.
Summarize key findings, identify gaps, and highlight how your research will contribute to the existing knowledge.

5. Methodology:

Describe the research design and methodology you plan to employ to address your research objectives.
Explain the data collection methods, instruments, and analysis techniques you will use.
Justify why the chosen methods are appropriate and suitable for your research.

6. Timeline:

Create a timeline or schedule that outlines the major milestones and activities of your research project.
Break down the research process into smaller tasks and estimate the time required for each task.

7. Resources:

Identify the resources needed for your research, such as access to specific databases, equipment, or funding.
Explain how you will acquire or utilize these resources to carry out your research effectively.

8. Ethical Considerations:

Discuss any ethical issues that may arise during your research and explain how you plan to address them.
If your research involves human subjects, explain how you will ensure their informed consent and privacy.

9. Expected Outcomes and Significance:

Clearly state the expected outcomes or results of your research.
Highlight the potential impact and significance of your research in advancing knowledge or addressing practical issues.

10. References:

Provide a list of all the references cited in your proposal, following a consistent citation style (e.g., APA, MLA).

11. Appendices:

Include any additional supporting materials, such as survey questionnaires, interview guides, or data analysis plans.

Research Proposal Format

The format of a research proposal may vary depending on the specific requirements of the institution or funding agency. However, the following is a commonly used format for a research proposal:

1. Title Page:

Include the title of your research proposal, your name, your affiliation or institution, and the date.

2. Abstract:

Provide a brief summary of your research proposal, highlighting the research problem, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes.

3. Introduction:

Introduce the research topic and provide background information.
State the research problem or question you aim to address.
Explain the significance and relevance of the research.
Review relevant literature and studies related to your research topic.
Summarize key findings and identify gaps in the existing knowledge.
Explain how your research will contribute to filling those gaps.

5. Research Objectives:

Clearly state the specific objectives or aims of your research.
Ensure that the objectives are clear, focused, and aligned with the research problem.

6. Methodology:

Describe the research design and methodology you plan to use.
Explain the data collection methods, instruments, and analysis techniques.
Justify why the chosen methods are appropriate for your research.

7. Timeline:

8. Resources:

Explain how you will acquire or utilize these resources effectively.

9. Ethical Considerations:

If applicable, explain how you will ensure informed consent and protect the privacy of research participants.

10. Expected Outcomes and Significance:

11. References:

12. Appendices:

Research Proposal Template

Here’s a template for a research proposal:

1. Introduction:

2. Literature Review:

3. Research Objectives:

4. Methodology:

5. Timeline:

6. Resources:

7. Ethical Considerations:

8. Expected Outcomes and Significance:

9. References:

10. Appendices:

Research Proposal Sample

Title: The Impact of Online Education on Student Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study

1. Introduction

Online education has gained significant prominence in recent years, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This research proposal aims to investigate the impact of online education on student learning outcomes by comparing them with traditional face-to-face instruction. The study will explore various aspects of online education, such as instructional methods, student engagement, and academic performance, to provide insights into the effectiveness of online learning.

2. Objectives

The main objectives of this research are as follows:

To compare student learning outcomes between online and traditional face-to-face education.
To examine the factors influencing student engagement in online learning environments.
To assess the effectiveness of different instructional methods employed in online education.
To identify challenges and opportunities associated with online education and suggest recommendations for improvement.

3. Methodology

3.1 Study Design

This research will utilize a mixed-methods approach to gather both quantitative and qualitative data. The study will include the following components:

3.2 Participants

The research will involve undergraduate students from two universities, one offering online education and the other providing face-to-face instruction. A total of 500 students (250 from each university) will be selected randomly to participate in the study.

3.3 Data Collection

The research will employ the following data collection methods:

Quantitative: Pre- and post-assessments will be conducted to measure students’ learning outcomes. Data on student demographics and academic performance will also be collected from university records.
Qualitative: Focus group discussions and individual interviews will be conducted with students to gather their perceptions and experiences regarding online education.

3.4 Data Analysis

Quantitative data will be analyzed using statistical software, employing descriptive statistics, t-tests, and regression analysis. Qualitative data will be transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns and themes.

4. Ethical Considerations

The study will adhere to ethical guidelines, ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Informed consent will be obtained, and participants will have the right to withdraw from the study at any time.

5. Significance and Expected Outcomes

This research will contribute to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence on the impact of online education on student learning outcomes. The findings will help educational institutions and policymakers make informed decisions about incorporating online learning methods and improving the quality of online education. Moreover, the study will identify potential challenges and opportunities related to online education and offer recommendations for enhancing student engagement and overall learning outcomes.

6. Timeline

The proposed research will be conducted over a period of 12 months, including data collection, analysis, and report writing.

The estimated budget for this research includes expenses related to data collection, software licenses, participant compensation, and research assistance. A detailed budget breakdown will be provided in the final research plan.

8. Conclusion

This research proposal aims to investigate the impact of online education on student learning outcomes through a comparative study with traditional face-to-face instruction. By exploring various dimensions of online education, this research will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and challenges associated with online learning. The findings will contribute to the ongoing discourse on educational practices and help shape future strategies for maximizing student learning outcomes in online education settings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

How To Write A Proposal – Step By Step Guide...

Grant Proposal – Example, Template and Guide

How To Write A Business Proposal – Step-by-Step...

Business Proposal – Templates, Examples and Guide

Proposal – Types, Examples, and Writing Guide

How to choose an Appropriate Method for Research?

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 4: Measurement and Units of Analysis

Learning Objectives

Differentiate between validity and reliability.
Explain the difference between internal and external validity.
Examine the difference between a variable and an attribute.
Define and provide examples for each of the four level of measurement: nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio.
Explain the difference between the independent and dependent variable.
Describe an extraneous variable and explain how it can threaten research findings.
Discuss what is meant by a rival plausible explanation.
Explain what a hypothesis is and in what situations creating a hypothesis is a suitable approach.

How do we know that our measures are good? Without some assurance of the quality of our measures, we cannot be certain that our findings have any meaning or, at the least, that our findings mean what we think they mean. When social scientists measure concepts, they aim to achieve reliability and validity in their measures. These two aspects of measurement quality are the focus of the first section in this chapter. We will consider reliability first and then take a look at validity. For this section, imagine we are interested in measuring the concepts of alcoholism and alcohol intake. What are some potential problems that could arise when attempting to measure this concept, and how might we work to overcome those problems?

Research Methods for the Social Sciences: An Introduction Copyright © 2020 by Valerie Sheppard is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Enroll & Pay

Proposal writing

Research Design and Analysis scientists are well-equipped and ready to support investigators with their research proposals. We can:

Advise on rigorous research design
Consult on randomized clinical trial methodology
Develop testable research questions
Create alignment between measures and aims
Conduct power analyses and provide information about sample size
Address attrition and baseline equivalence between groups
Write data analysis plans with modern statistical approaches to address aims
Assist in writing of data management plan
Assist in writing of data sharing plan

To ensure that we can give your grant our maximum attention in order to create the most persuasive grant possible, we suggest the following timeline for our help in preparing your application. We note that the targets below are not set in stone, because our capacity to assist you will always depend on the size of our queue at any given time. For example, we may be able to accommodate shorter timelines for grants to be submitted during off-peak months, whereas we will need longer timelines for grants to be submitted during peak times (e.g., IES submission in August).

10 weeks from submission

Ideally, initial conversations with the RDA about a proposal should occur at least 10 weeks prior to submission for regular grants (12 or more weeks during peak times). At this point we can help shape the design of the proposed research prior to generating an analysis plan.

5 weeks from submission

The next step, to be completed at least 5 weeks prior to submission, is for the investigator(s) to assemble ALL of the information requested in the section Necessary Input for Writing an Analysis Plan. Please keep in mind this very important step may require multiple back-and-forth conversations with the RDA and other collaborators in order to make and describe all of these decisions, and thus may take longer than initially anticipated.

Once complete analysis plan input has been provided, it will take a minimum of 1–2 weeks for the RDA to write the first draft of the analysis plan. At this point we can also help create a reasonable, well-informed budget for our involvement (see Creating a Budget below). Upon receipt, the investigator should try to incorporate the analysis plan content into the proposal, monitoring for consistency in ideas and in wording (e.g., what constructs and measures are called).

1-2 weeks from submission

A near-complete draft of the entire research plan should then be submitted to the RDA for review at least 1–2 weeks prior to submission. We will provide feedback on the readability and consistency of the entire document, which can be helpful given our non-expert point of view for the non-analysis content. Time permitting, we can also provide preliminary feedback on the rest of the proposal prior to this final stage.

After reviewing the near-complete version of the entire research plan and our portion of the budget, we can then provide biosketches and a letter of support to reiterate our commitment to your project as needed to complete our portion of the application.

785-864-0742
[email protected]

COMMENTS

Unit of Analysis: Definition, Types & Examples
A unit of analysis is the thing you want to discuss after your research, probably what you would regard to be the primary emphasis of your research. The researcher plans to comment on the primary topic or object in the research as a unit of analysis. The research question plays a significant role in determining it.
What is a Unit of Analysis? Overview & Examples
A unit of analysis is an object of study within a research project. It is the smallest unit a researcher can use to identify and describe a phenomenon—the 'what' or 'who' the researcher wants to study. For example, suppose a consultancy firm is hired to train the sales team in a solar company that is struggling to meet its targets.
The Unit of Analysis Explained
The unit of analysis is named as such because the unit type is determined based on the actual data analysis that you perform in your project or study. For example, if your research is based around data on exam grades for students at two different universities, then the unit of analysis is the data for the individual student due to each student ...
Unit of Analysis: Definition, Types & Examples
The unit of analysis is a way to understand and study a phenomenon. There are four main types of unit of analysis: individuals, groups, artifacts (books, photos, newspapers), and geographical units (towns, census tracts, states). Individuals are the smallest level of analysis. For example, an individual may be a person or an animal.
Units of Analysis and Methodologies for Qualitative Studies
Units of Analysis and Methodologies for Qualitative Studies. Identifying & Planning Research. Jan 29, 2024. By Janet Salmons, PhD Manager, Sage Research Methods Community. Selecting the methodology is an essential piece of research design. This post is excerpted and adapted from Chapter 2 of Doing Qualitative Research Online (2022).
4.4 Units of Analysis and Units of Observation
In sum, there are many potential units of analysis that a sociologist might examine, but some of the most common units include the following: Individuals; Groups; Organizations; Social phenomena. Policies and principles. Table 4.1 Units of analysis and units of observation: A hypothetical study of students' addictions to cell phones.
Choosing the Right Unit of Analysis for Your Research Project
The unit of analysis in research refers to the level at which data is collected and analyzed. It is essential for researchers to understand the different types of units of analysis, as well as their significance in shaping the research process and outcomes. Definition and Importance. With resonio, the unit of analysis you choose lays the ...
Unit of Analysis
The unit of analysis is the major entity that you are analyzing in your study. For instance, any of the following could be a unit of analysis in a study: individuals. groups. artifacts (books, photos, newspapers) geographical units (town, census tract, state) social interactions (dyadic relations, divorces, arrests)
Units of Analysis and Units of Observation
A unit of analysis is the entity that you wish to be able to say something about at the end of your study, probably what you would consider to be the main focus of your study. A unit of observation is the item (or items) that you actually observe, measure, or collect in the course of trying to learn something about your unit of analysis.
Unit of analysis
The unit of analysis is the entity that frames what is being looked at in a study, or is the entity being studied as a whole. In social science research, at the macro level, the most commonly referenced unit of analysis, considered to be a society is the state (polity) (i.e. country). At meso level, common units of observation include groups, organizations, and institutions, and at micro level ...
Chapter 4: Measurement and Units of Analysis
Chapter 4: Measurement and Units of Analysis. 28. 4.1 Reliability. 29. 4.2 Validity. 30. 4.3 Complexities in Measurement. 31. 4.4 Units of Analysis and Units of Observation. ... 14.1 What are the Goals of a Research Proposal? 113. 14.2 Writing the Research Proposal. 114. 14.3 Components of a Research Proposal. 115. Summary. 116. Key Takeaways ...
Measurement and Units of Analysis
Units of Analysis and Units of Observation. 25. Independent and Dependent Variables. 26. Rival Plausible Explanations. 27. Summary. V. The Literature Review. 28. ... Fifteen-Step Approach to Writing a Research Proposal. 82. Writing the Research Proposal. 83. Components of the Literature Review. 84. Summary. XV. Sharing your Research.
What is the Unit of Analysis in a Review?
The rationale for using studies as the unit of analysis is two-fold: First, we can only include the same study sample once in a review. Including more than one article from the same study in a review, treating each article as a separate study, introduces bias into the review. That particular sample would be given undue weight in the synthesis ...
What is the Unit of Analysis in a Review?
The rationale for using studies as the unit of analysis is two-fold: First, we can only include the same study sample once in a review. Including more than one article from the same study in a review, treating each article as a separate study, introduces bias into the review. That particular sample would be given undue weight in the synthesis ...
6.1. Units of Analysis
The unit of analysis refers to the person, collective, or object that you are focusing on and want to learn about through your research. As depicted in Figure 6.1, your unit of analysis would be the type of entity (say, an individual) you're interested in. Your sample would be a group of such entities (say, a group of individuals you survey ...
7.3 Unit of analysis and unit of observation
A unit of analysis is the entity that you wish to say something about at the end of your study, and it is considered the focus of your study. A unit of observation is the item (or items) that you observe, measure, or collect while trying to learn something about your unit of analysis. In some studies, the unit of observation may be the same as ...
4.4 Units of Analysis and Units of Observation
A unit of observation is the item (or items) that you actually observe, measure, or collect in the course of trying to learn something about your unit of analysis. In a given study, the unit of observation might be the same as the unit of analysis, but that is not always the case. Further, units of analysis are not required to be the same as ...
The unit of analysis in learning research: Approaches for imagining a
This involves that the unit(s) of analysis is(/are) defined 'in part by the study's object, in part by the researcher's focus, in part by the audience of the research and in part by the research participants (as distinct from the research object)' (Matusov, 2007, p. 325). This opens an array of possibilities for analyses that take into ...
Qualitative Data Analysis: The Unit of Analysis
The following is a modified excerpt from Applied Qualitative Research Design: A Total Quality Framework Approach (Roller & Lavrakas, 2015, pp. 262-263).. As discussed in two earlier articles in Research Design Review (see "The Important Role of 'Buckets' in Qualitative Data Analysis" and "Finding Connections & Making Sense of Qualitative Data"), the selection of the unit of ...
How to prepare a Research Proposal
It puts the proposal in context. 3. The introduction typically begins with a statement of the research problem in precise and clear terms. 1. The importance of the statement of the research problem 5: The statement of the problem is the essential basis for the construction of a research proposal (research objectives, hypotheses, methodology ...
How to Write a Research Proposal
Research proposal examples. Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We've included a few for you below. Example research proposal #1: "A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management" Example research proposal #2: "Medical Students as Mediators of ...
How To Write A Research Proposal
Here is an explanation of each step: 1. Title and Abstract. Choose a concise and descriptive title that reflects the essence of your research. Write an abstract summarizing your research question, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes. It should provide a brief overview of your proposal. 2.
Chapter 4: Measurement and Units of Analysis
15- Step Approach to Writing a Research Proposal. Chapter 15: Sharing Your Research. 15.1 Deciding What to Share and With Whom to Share it. 15.2 Writing up Research Results. 15.3 Disseminating Findings. ... Chapter 4: Measurement and Units of Analysis Learning Objectives. Differentiate between validity and reliability.
Research Design and Analysis
Ideally, initial conversations with the RDA about a proposal should occur at least 10 weeks prior to submission for regular grants (12 or more weeks during peak times). At this point we can help shape the design of the proposed research prior to generating an analysis plan. 5 weeks from submission
PDF UD Research AdministrationRoles and Res nsibili
Assist principal investigator with proposal preparation Coordinate the proposal process to ensure timely, compliant and accurate submission Assists the principal investigator in the preparation of large, interdisciplinary, and/or multi- institutional proposals by providing guidance and unobtrusive project management

Unit of Analysis: Definition, Types & Examples

What is a unit of analysis?

Types of “unit of analysis”

1. Individual Level

2. Aggregates Level

Organizations

3. Social Level

Social Artifacts Level

Social Interaction Level

MORE LIKE THIS

The Best Email Survey Tool to Boost Your Feedback Game

Top 10 Employee Engagement Survey Tools

Top 20 Employee Engagement Software Solutions

15 Best Customer Experience Software of 2024

Other categories

Unit of analysis: definition, types, examples, and more

Make research less tedious

Research questions and hypotheses

Data availability and quality

Feasibility and practicality

Theoretical framework and research design

Reductionism

Ecological fallacy

What is the most common unit of analysis?

Can the unit of analysis and the unit of observation be one?

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Editor’s picks

Latest articles

Log in or sign up

Community Blog

The Unit of Analysis Explained

Browse PhDs Now

Join Thousands of Students

Introduction

What Is a Unit of Analysis?

Why is Choosing the Right Unit of Analysis Important?

Unit of Analysis vs Unit of Observation

Types of “Unit of Analysis”

Examples of Each Type of Unit of Analysis

How Does a Social Scientist Choose a Unit of Analysis?

Factors to Consider When Choosing a Unit of Analysis

Projective Techniques In Surveys: Definition, Types & Pros & Cons

Research Summary: What Is It & How To Write One

What is Field Research: Meaning, Examples, Pros & Cons

The McNamara Fallacy: How Researchers Can Detect and to Avoid it.

Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection

Choosing the Right Unit of Analysis for Your Research Project

Definition and Importance

Difference between Unit of Analysis and Unit of Observation

Types of Units of Analysis: Individual, Aggregates, and Social

Research Questions and Hypotheses

Data Availability and Quality

Feasibility and Practicality

Theoretical Framework and Research Design

Reductionism

Ecological Fallacy

Robert Koch

Popular searches

Request consultation

Looking for an online survey platform?

Research Methods Knowledge Base

Unit of Analysis

Cookie Consent

Which one are you?

6.1. Units of Analysis

Deeper Dive: Ecological Fallacies

Share This Book

Unit of Analysis

Unit of Observation

Share This Book

Research Design Review

Share this:

Leave a comment Cancel reply

How To Write A Research Proposal – Step-by-Step [Template]

How To Write a Research Proposal

1. Title and Abstract

2. Introduction:

3. Research Objectives

5. Methodology:

6. Timeline: