Our websites may use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, you agree to this collection. For more information, please see our University Websites Privacy Notice .
The Graduate School
Template for annual reviews for doctoral students.
As part of an ongoing effort to foster good graduate student mentoring and facilitate communication between graduate advisors and advisees, The Graduate School has developed a template for annual reviews for doctoral (and potentially other) students . The purpose is to provide a tool that programs can use to: (1) allow students to report and reflect on their progress and accomplishments during the previous year and plan their activities and efforts for the coming year, and (2) aid major advisors in providing their graduate students with feedback on their progress to date and plans. The template is attached, along with examples of similar forms currently being used by some departments (English, Marine Sciences, and Psychology). The template draws from examples such as these, and incorporates feedback received from the Graduate Faculty Council and the Executive Committee.
Importantly, the template is designed to be customizable . We anticipate that programs will modify it — adding, changing, or deleting items – to suit the specific needs of their programs. Although use of this or any form is purely voluntary (i.e., there is no Graduate School requirement that annual reviews of this sort be conducted), we strongly urge programs to institute a process based on some version of a tool like this.
We are distributing this template now so that programs that want to do so can use it this academic year. However, we view this as a “living document” that we will be revising as we receive feedback on it. In addition, we will be developing guidance/tips on implementations suggestions and strategies that we will be posting on the TGS website, along with the template itself, over the coming months.
Download Template
If you have any questions or suggestions regarding the template itself or its use, please reach out to us at [email protected] or [email protected] .
Kent E. Holsinger Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor Vice Provost for Graduate Education and Dean of The Graduate School
Kathleen Segerson Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor Associate Dean of The Graduate School
Contact Information
860-486-3617
The Whetten Graduate Center, Second Floor University of Connecticut 438 Whitney Road Extension, Unit-1152 Storrs, CT 06269-1152
8:30am to 4:30pm Monday through Friday
UConn Today
- UConn Health Marks Clinical Trials Day
- ‘Doctors Academy’ at UConn Health Graduates High School Seniors
- Buzz, Chirp, Wee-Oo: The Sounds of Cicadas Are Back
- Generous Gift Provides Superior Quality Steinway Pianos for UConn’s Music Students
- Revived Give and Go Program Helps People and Planet
Upcoming Defenses
Doctoral dissertation oral defense of seth shuster.
Monday, May 20th, 2024
12:00 PM - 02:00 PM
Virtual, online
Degree: Ph.D. Chemistry Advisor: Dr. Steven L. Suib Title: High Temperature Coatings, Composites, and Inorganic Materials for Aerospace & Refractory Applications
Name: Seth Shuster ([email protected]) Advisor: Dr. Steven L. Suib ([email protected])
Doctoral Dissertation Oral Defense of Ye Chen
Arjona Building
Ye Chen, [email protected]
Doctoral Dissertation Oral Defense of (Saki Rezwana)
Castleman Building
Title: Adapting to Automation: Changes in Pedestrian Behavior in Response to Autonomous Vehicles. Field of Study: Transportation Engineering. Brief Description: This research analyzes pedestrian psychology while crossing the road in the presence of autonomous vehicles. The experiment was conducted in a virtual reality-based environment.
Saki Rezwana’s Ph.D. dissertation defense. Email: [email protected]
Doctoral Dissertation Oral Defense of Gino Villarreal
Music Building
Silvestre Revueltas: Shaping Mexican Cultural Identity through Music Doctor of Musical Arts
This paper thoroughtly analyzes Silvestre Revueltas’ chamber works, Ocho por Radio and Homenaje a Federico García Lorca, to demonstrate his portrayal of nationalism through music. It presents how Silvestre Revueltas’ musical style, motivated by political, philosophical, and social events of the early twentieth century, mirrors the rich complexity of an emerging Mexican culture, as it tried to claim a place in the modern world.
Gino Villarreal 860 405 4340
Doctoral Dissertation Oral Defense of Sruthi Mantri
Tuesday, May 21st, 2024
Prioritizing People – Mixed Equilibrium Assignment for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Occupancy
Sruthi Mantri - Email: [email protected]
- Undergraduate
- Master’s
- Areas of Focus
- Centers + Institutes
- Labs + Facilities
- Featured Research
- Undergraduate Research
- Graduate Group
- Open Faculty Positions
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Outreach Mission
- Local Programs
- Global Programs
- Why Penn Bioengineering?
- Bioengineering Blog
- Penn Engineering Blog
- Seminars + Events
- Visiting BE
- Make a Gift
- Current Students
- Annual PhD Progress Report
Ph.D. Student Handbook
Annual ph.d. progress report.
Starting in their second year, students will meet with a mentoring committee annually. Prior to candidacy, the mentoring committee will be composed of their Qualifying committee. After candidacy, the mentoring committee will be composed of their Dissertation committee, which depending on the nature of a student’s thesis may include members of the Qualifying committee. At least one week prior to the annual meeting (which also includes the candidacy exam), the student will provide a brief progress report (3-page max, excluding non-mandatory figures), an updated CV, and a copy of their IDP. At the beginning of the meeting, the student will meet alone with the committee, followed by a meeting of the advisor(s) with the committee. The committee chair will fill out the PhD Committee Meeting Report.
Access the Progress Report Submission form her e.
The purpose of the Dissertation Committee is to provide objective advice and fresh points of view to the student and Advisor. A lively discussion may be expected at these meetings, which is sure to benefit the student and the student’s research. Committee meetings are also important for ensuring that the student is: i) on schedule to complete the Thesis in an appropriate time frame, including maintaining the appropriate balance of experiments, analysis, writing, and dissemination; ii) thinking about and effectively pursuing post-graduation career plans; and iii) at the appropriate time is given permission to defend.
Doctoral Program:
- Student Directory
- Fellowships + Support
- New Students
- Transfer Credits
- Degree Requirements
- M.D. + Ph.D.
- V.M.D. + Ph.D.
- Certificate Programs
- Diversity Advisors
- Academic Forms, Advising Resources and Feedback Forms
Your BE Contact:
Kathleen Venit Associate Director, Graduate Programs 240 Skirkanich Hall
Graduate Student Groups:
Graduate Association of Bioengineers
Graduate Student Engineering Group
Skip to Content
- Prospective Students
- Current Students
- Creative Writing
- News & Events
Other ways to search:
- Events Calendar
The Department of English has moved from Hellems and Denison to Muenzinger . The main office is in Muenzinger D110.
Annual Report for PhD Students
PhD students in their second year and beyond are required to submit an annual report on the progress of their PhD work by October 31 of each year. These reports are used to assist the Associate Chair for Graduate Studies and (for more advanced students) the student’s Dissertation Director in advising about progress in the program.
Students without current reports on file may not be considered eligible by the department for fellowships or teaching positions. Reports should be no more than one page in length and can be submitted in person to the Graduate Program Coordinator via e-mail to [email protected] .
For a template of the report, click here .
Instructions
If you are completing coursework (second year).
- Outline your plans to complete your coursework in the current academic year, listing the courses you plan to take.
- List the members of your Advisory Committee and identify the Chair.
- If you have grades of Incomplete outstanding, outline your plans to complete the course(s). Grades of Incomplete may disqualify you from holding a teaching appointment.
- Outline how you have completed or plan to complete the foreign language requirement for the PhD.
If you have completed coursework (including grades of Incomplete) but have not yet passed the Qualifying Examination (Third year):
- Indicate when you will be taking your Qualifying Examination.
- Provide the title of your prospectus and a description of your field and method.
- List the five Advisory Committee members who will administer your exam, including the outside member.
If you have passed the Qualifying Examination (Third Year first semester and beyond)
- List the names of your Dissertation Director and the other four members of your dissertation committee, including the outside member.
- Describe your progress on the dissertation. Indicate chapters finished and expected date of completion.
- If applicable, indicate date of dissertation defense.
If you are currently a GPTI
List the name of a faculty member who will be visiting your classroom and providing a written evaluation of your teaching for your file.
All Students
If you are engaged in extracurricular or leadership activities outside of the English Department or CU Boulder (e.g. serving as an officer in a student organization or club, participating in off campus programs or organizations that benefit your community, participation in national or regional professional organizations) and would like to disclose these, please do so. This can help our department identify candidates for campus-wise funding and recognition opportunities.
University of St Andrews
Mms documentation.
- MMS Staff guides
Student Annual Progress Report
Introduction.
Each PGR student is to be reviewed at least once per year, in accordance with the Progress Review Policy. The forms are completed in MMS (https://mms.st-andrews.ac.uk/mms/)
There three key forms in the review process;
- a report from the Supervisor
- a self-assessment from the Student
- a report compiled by the Review Team
The student and supervisor reports will be read by the Review Team and will inform the Reviewers' report. The Reviewer report will make a recommendation based on the progress of the research degree, which will be one of four categories of possible outcomes: green, yellow, amber or red. Depending on the outcome subsequent reviews may be held at different frequencies.
This Student self-assessment is a crucial part of your annual progress review and must be submitted alongside any other material requested by your School (e.g. draft introduction, or sample chapter). It will be used by your reviewers to inform your progress review interview, and will be seen by your supervisor.
To complete the form, you will need:
- a brief description of your project,
- how often you have met with your supervisor and what form this takes,
- wither or not you have discussed and/or carried out any ethical or risk assessments,
- information on academic work not related to your research,
- a detailed completion plan,
- information on any issues associated with your project,
- information on any additional support you think would help your project,
- a description of how your progress to date has been, including an assessment of wither or not you expect to complete on time.
Creating and submitting a new form
The Postgraduate administration forms are completed in MMS (you can access MMS either from the links on the ‘Current Students’ tab or via the links on the ‘My Courses’ tab in MySaint. Each current student studying a research degree will have access to a ‘RESEARCH’ module in MMS. This module will be related to the subject of your degree and will have the subject code as a prefix (for example, the RESEARCH module associated with Biology is entitled ‘BIOL-RESEARCH’).
Figure 1 : Link to Postgraduate Administration tool and Reviewer Report overview
Each RESEARCH module will have a ‘Postgraduate Administration’ tool. This tool is used to handle a number of postgraduate related administration forms, such as annual progress reports, examining committee nominations and leave of Absence/Extension requests. To access the tool, click the ‘Postgraduate Administration’ tool link, an example of which is given in Figure 1 .
Annual Progress Reports are handled on the ‘Progress Reports’ tab in the Postgraduate Administration tool. Any existing self-assessment forms, any submitted supervisor reports and any submitted reviewers’ reports will appear in the corresponding sections of the page (see Figure 1 for an example). To create a new self-assessment form, click the ‘ Create new ’ link in the ‘Your self-assessment forms’ section. This will create, and direct you to, a new student annual progress review.
An example if the student annual progress review is given in Figure 2 . The review comprises 8 questions, all of which need completed before the form can be submitted. At any time, you can save the form using the ‘ Save’ button at the bottom of the form to be completed at a later time. When you save the review, if a question has been answered then a green border will appear around the question (see Figure 2 ). If the question has no answer then the red border will remain.
Once you have completed the review, you can submit the form to your school by clicking the ‘ Submit Review ’ button at the bottom of the form.
Note : You must answer all 8 questions before the review can be submitted.
Figure 2 : Example Student Progress Review
Help and Assistance
If you wish to raise concerns that you do not feel comfortable with your supervisor seeing, you should share them with the Director of Postgraduate Studies (DoPG) in the first instance. You should also, however, feel free to approach the Registry Student Support Officer or the Pro Dean Research Postgraduate .
For technical help and assistance please email IT Service Desk: [email protected] .
- Show search form Hide search form
- Quick links
- Staff search
- Search Search --> Websites Staff search Start search
Annual Progress Reports
Doctoral candidates have to submit a progress report every year once they have passed the public presentation. The annual progress reports serve two purposes:
First, they take stock of the progress made during each year of the doctoral studies. This may sound trivial, yet it helps both doctoral candidates and their supervisors to keep track of their doctoral projects and to avoid pitfalls that could have been easily avoided in retrospect (e.g. unrealistic timetable, procrastination, etc.).
Second, in the annual reports changes can be documented that become necessary or even desirable during the doctoral studies which could not have been anticipated when the dissertation agreement was signed. For instance, it might occur that the initially intended data collection becomes impossible because access to special archives or datasets was denied. Alternatively, it might be that new opportunities turn up, such as a new conference or workshop on the topic of the doctoral project. These changes to the dissertation agreement need to be documented in the annual reports. However, it is important to emphasize that ultimately it is up to the Director of the Doctoral Study Programme to accept these changes.
Submission of Annual Progress Reports
The annual progress report has to be sent to the respective SSC. Please check the website of your SSC for submission deadlines and for documents which have to be submitted in addition to the annual progress report.
Please note that for many funding schemes (e.g. dissertation completion fellowship) studying according to the university regulations is required. This includes the subsmission of annual progress reports.
Downloads
Annual Progress Report
DZ.V2 Annual Report.doc
File size: 191 kB
- Make a Gift
- Request More Info
- Faculty & Staff
- Current Students
- Coronavirus Info
Search form
Term performance report by academic plan.
Return to report selection page →
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Progress Report Guidance (2/2) Focus your work - combining two large pieces of work in a thesis statement is hard; better to focus on one aspect of the work, and clearly note the research direction and contribution. It is not generally necessary to link the report to the research proposal that was submitted as part of your PhD application.
Annual Progress Report for Ph.D. Students Name _____ Student PID Number _____ Portion Completed by the Major Professor Academic Performance 1. Has the student made acceptable progress during the evaluation period? Please comment below. 2. Please comment on the overall academic performance of the student, including coursework,
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (SAMPLE) School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences . CSD Doctor of Philosophy Program Annual Progress Report for AY 20xx-20xx Submit to CSD Administrator (who will submit to SHRS Student Services) ... PhD Student Academic Advisor . REMINDERS
Skim them to identify which of the elements in the Introduction model on page 9 are present in each one. Label the main parts B (Background to the Research), RES (the Research), and REP (the Report). Then see which of the more detailed labels (e.g. identifying a research 'gap' or aims) you can apply.
2. Progress to Date. Present the research work you have undertaken since your last progress report, describe the results obtained (including publications) as well as the relevance of these undertakings for your project. Link your work and results to the feedback and steps you had agreed on in your last annual conversation.
As part of an ongoing effort to foster good graduate student mentoring and facilitate communication between graduate advisors and advisees, The Graduate School has developed a template for annual reviews for doctoral (and potentially other) students.. The purpose is to provide a tool that programs can use to: (1) allow students to report and reflect on their progress and accomplishments during ...
Systems and Industrial Engineering PhD Annual Report Note to student: 1. Please complete this progress report, send it to your faculty advisor for their input and signature, and request them to send it back to you. 2. Once you have a complete report, you can submit via the link provided to you. Name Date Academic Year Student ID . Research
2021 - 2022 Annual Progress Report - PhD To the student: The purpose of this report is to make sure we have current contact information on file and to document and encourage your progress through your graduate program. This report requires that you communicate directly with your supervisor to complete this document.
progress report. o Annual progress report must be completed in winter term, starting in the second year onwards. o Academic progress must be demonstrated in each term until degree completion. o This form and attachments must be provided to the supervisory committee (SC) at least two weeks before the meeting date. o Deadline dates: Fall ...
Progress evident; student is on track. Progress not evident, but anticipated (acceptable remedial plan in place). Completion of this form is required in each year of enrolment beginning in PhD 3. The student should complete Part A before June 1 of each year, and should submit the form to the Program Coordinator at the Centre.
Student name: Academic supervisor* (main/co): Mentor: Reader 1*: Reader 2*: Date (final submission to grad adv.): Annual PhD Progress Report . Department of Physics, The George Washington University. For PhD students in 2nd year and later. DUE: 5/29 Start . semester: Number of credits accumulated at end of this spring semester:
Annual Progress Report and Nominations Form - Basic and Clinical PhD programmes 2 Annual update The annual update relates to the last calendar year. Outgoing students/fellows Ensure before you submit this form that the student/fellows listed are aware that you have provided their name, ORCiD ID and PhD details to Wellcome and
Annual committee meetings should take place no later than the end of May of each year. Submit this report to your committee members before the meeting. Following the meeting, the committee will provide a written report to the student, who is then given the opportunity to provide a written response. All three reports: from the student, from the ...
Annual Review Report for PhD Students. 408 Capen Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260-1608. Tel: 716-645-2939 Fax: 716-645-6142. Annual Review Report for PhD Students. To Be Completed by Academic Advisor/Director of Graduate Study. Student Name UB Person Number.
At least one week prior to the annual meeting (which also includes the candidacy exam), the student will provide a brief progress report (3-page max, excluding non-mandatory figures), an updated CV, and a copy of their IDP. At the beginning of the meeting, the student will meet alone with the committee, followed by a meeting of the advisor (s ...
annual evaluation have been completed. The advisor must attach a short summary of the evaluation to this document to be submitted to the Graduate Program Director. If the student's progress is Unsatisfactory, additional details on expected remedies and their appropriate timeline should be included in the attached Unsatisfactory Progress form.
Following the preparation of the first progress report, the supervisor and the PhD student set up a supervisory committee. The supervisory committee consists of the supervisor, any co-supervisors and at least two other members. The supervisory committee monitors the progress of the doctoral research by evaluating the annual progress reports.
Graduate Student Annual Progress Report Environmental Studies Program Provide responses to each question. Annual progress reports should be submitted by ENVS MS and PhD students in their second year or above by midnight on Sept. 30 (or the following Monday if 9/30 falls on a weekend). The objectives of annual progress reports are to:
Annual Report for PhD Students. PhD students in their second year and beyond are required to submit an annual report on the progress of their PhD work by October 31 of each year. These reports are used to assist the Associate Chair for Graduate Studies and (for more advanced students) the student's Dissertation Director in advising about ...
This Student self-assessment is a crucial part of your annual progress review and must be submitted alongside any other material requested by your School (e.g. draft introduction, or sample chapter). It will be used by your reviewers to inform your progress review interview, and will be seen by your supervisor. To complete the form, you will need:
Annual Progress report for PhD students 1. Name of the candidate: 2. Enrolment/Registration number: 3. Discipline: 4. Name of the Supervisor: 5. Title of Thesis: 6. Progress report for the session: ... Note: The Annual Progress reports will be placed before the RDC of concern discipline for approval. The report and further recommendation will ...
Annual Progress Reports. Doctoral candidates have to submit a progress report every year once they have passed the public presentation. The annual progress reports serve two purposes: First, they take stock of the progress made during each year of the doctoral studies. This may sound trivial, yet it helps both doctoral candidates and their ...
Return to report selection page →. 119 W. 31 st Street. New York, NY 10001 (212) 652-CUNY. Contact Us