qualitative research title related to stem strand

161+ Exciting Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Are you doing Qualitative research? Looking for the best qualitative research topics for stem students? It is a most interesting and good field for research. Qualitative research allows STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) students to delve deeper into complex issues, explore human behavior, and understand the intricacies of the world around them.

In this article, we’ll provide you with an extensive list of 161+ qualitative research topics tailored to STEM students. We’ll also explore how to find and choose good qualitative research topics, and why these topics are particularly beneficial for students, including those in high school.

Also Like To Read: 171+ Brilliant Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Table of Contents

What Are Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Qualitative research topics for stem students are questions or issues that necessitate an in-depth exploration of people’s experiences, beliefs, and behaviors. STEM students can use this approach to investigate societal impacts, ethical dilemmas, and user experiences related to scientific advancements and innovations.

Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, qualitative research delves into the ‘whys’ and ‘hows’ of a particular phenomenon.

How to Find and Choose Good Qualitative Research Topics

Selecting qualitative research topics for stem students is a crucial step in the research process. Here are some tips to help you find and choose a suitable topic:

Passion and Interest: Start by considering your personal interests and passions. What topics within STEM excite you? Research becomes more engaging when you’re genuinely interested in the subject.
Relevance: Choose qualitative research topics for stem students. Look for gaps in the existing knowledge or unanswered questions.
Literature Review: Conduct a thorough literature review to identify the latest trends and areas where qualitative research is lacking. This can guide you in selecting a topic that contributes to the field.
Feasibility: Ensure that your chosen topic is feasible within the resources and time constraints available to you. Some research topics may require extensive resources and funding.
Ethical Considerations: Be aware of ethical concerns related to your qualitative research topics for stem students, especially when dealing with human subjects or sensitive issues.

Here are the most exciting and very interesting Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students, high school students, nursing students, college students, etc.

Biology Qualitative Research Topics

Impact of Ecosystem Restoration on Biodiversity
Ethical Considerations in Human Gene Editing
Public Perceptions of Biotechnology in Agriculture
Coping Mechanisms and Stress Responses in Marine Biologists
Cultural Perspectives on Traditional Herbal Medicine
Community Attitudes Toward Wildlife Conservation Efforts
Ethical Issues in Animal Testing and Research
Indigenous Knowledge and Ethnobotany
Psychological Well-being of Conservation Biologists
Attitudes Toward Endangered Species Protection

Chemistry Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Adoption of Green Chemistry Practices in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Public Perception of Chemical Safety in Household Products
Strategies for Improving Chemistry Education
Art Conservation and Chemical Analysis
Consumer Attitudes Toward Organic Chemistry in Everyday Life
Ethical Considerations in Chemical Waste Disposal
The Role of Chemistry in Sustainable Agriculture
Perceptions of Nanomaterials and Their Applications
Chemistry-Related Career Aspirations in High School Students
Cultural Beliefs and Traditional Chemical Practices

Physics Qualitative Research Topics

Gender Bias in Physics Education and Career Progression
Philosophical Implications of Quantum Mechanics
Public Understanding of Renewable Energy Technologies
Influence of Science Fiction on Scientific Research
Perceptions of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe
Student Experiences in High School Physics Classes
Physics Outreach Programs and Their Impact on Communities
Cultural Variations in the Perception of Time and Space
Role of Physics in Environmental Conservation
Public Engagement with Science Through Astronomy Events

Engineering Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Ethics in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Human-Centered Design in Engineering
Innovation and Sustainability in Civil Engineering
Public Perception of Self-Driving Cars
Engineering Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation
Experiences of Women in Male-Dominated Engineering Fields
Role of Engineers in Disaster Response and Recovery
Ethical Considerations in Technology Patents
Perceptions of Engineering Education and Career Prospects
Students Views on the Role of Engineers in Society

Computer Science Qualitative Research Topics

Gender Diversity in Tech Companies
Ethical Implications of AI-Powered Decision-Making
User Experience and Interface Design
Cybersecurity Awareness and Behaviors
Digital Privacy Concerns and Practices
Social Media Use and Mental Health in College Students
Gaming Culture and its Impact on Social Interactions
Student Attitudes Toward Coding and Programming
Online Learning Platforms and Student Satisfaction
Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Life

Mathematics Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Gender Stereotypes in Mathematics Education
Cultural Variations in Problem-Solving Approaches
Perception of Math in Everyday Life
Math Anxiety and Coping Mechanisms
Historical Development of Mathematical Concepts
Attitudes Toward Mathematics Among Elementary School Students
Role of Mathematics in Solving Real-World Problems
Homeschooling Approaches to Teaching Mathematics
Effectiveness of Math Tutoring Programs
Math-Related Stereotypes in Society

Environmental Science Qualitative Research Topics

Local Communities’ Responses to Climate Change
Public Understanding of Conservation Practices
Sustainable Agriculture and Farmer Perspectives
Environmental Education and Behavior Change
Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Biodiversity Conservation
Conservation Awareness and Behavior of Tourists
Climate Change Perceptions Among Youth
Perceptions of Water Scarcity and Resource Management
Environmental Activism and Youth Engagement
Community Responses to Environmental Disasters

Geology and Earth Sciences Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Geologists’ Risk Perception and Decision-Making
Volcano Hazard Preparedness in At-Risk Communities
Public Attitudes Toward Geological Hazards
Environmental Consequences of Extractive Industries
Perceptions of Geological Time and Deep Earth Processes
Use of Geospatial Technology in Environmental Research
Role of Geology in Disaster Preparedness and Response
Geological Factors Influencing Urban Planning
Community Engagement in Geoscience Education
Climate Change Communication and Public Understanding

Astronomy and Space Science Qualitative Research Topics

The Role of Science Communication in Astronomy Education
Perceptions of Space Exploration and Colonization
UFO and Extraterrestrial Life Beliefs
Public Understanding of Black Holes and Neutron Stars
Space Tourism and Future Space Travel
Impact of Space Science Outreach Programs on Student Interest
Cultural Beliefs and Rituals Related to Celestial Events
Space Science in Indigenous Knowledge Systems
Public Engagement with Astronomical Phenomena
Space Exploration in Science Fiction and Popular Culture

Medicine and Health Sciences Qualitative Research Topics

Patient-Physician Communication and Trust
Ethical Considerations in Human Cloning and Genetic Modification
Public Attitudes Toward Vaccination
Coping Strategies for Healthcare Workers in Pandemics
Cultural Beliefs and Health Practices
Health Disparities Among Underserved Communities
Medical Decision-Making and Informed Consent
Mental Health Stigma and Help-Seeking Behavior
Wellness Practices and Health-Related Beliefs
Perceptions of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Psychology Qualitative Research Topics

Perceptions of Body Image in Different Cultures
Workplace Stress and Coping Mechanisms
LGBTQ+ Youth Experiences and Well-Being
Cross-Cultural Differences in Parenting Styles and Outcomes
Perceptions of Psychotherapy and Counseling
Attitudes Toward Medication for Mental Health Conditions
Psychological Well-being of Older Adults
Role of Cultural and Social Factors in Psychological Well-being
Technology Use and Its Impact on Mental Health

Social Sciences Qualitative Research Topics

Political Polarization and Online Echo Chambers
Immigration and Acculturation Experiences
Educational Inequality and School Policy
Youth Engagement in Environmental Activism
Identity and Social Media in the Digital Age
Social Media and Its Influence on Political Beliefs
Family Dynamics and Conflict Resolution
Social Support and Coping Strategies in College Students
Perceptions of Cyberbullying Among Adolescents
Impact of Social Movements on Societal Change

Interesting Sociology Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Perceptions of Racial Inequality and Discrimination
Aging and Quality of Life in Elderly Populations
Gender Roles and Expectations in Relationships
Online Communities and Social Support
Cultural Practices and Beliefs Related to Marriage
Family Dynamics and Coping Mechanisms
Perceptions of Community Safety and Policing
Attitudes Toward Social Welfare Programs
Influence of Media on Perceptions of Social Issues
Youth Perspectives on Education and Career Aspirations

Anthropology Qualitative Research Topics

Traditional Knowledge and Biodiversity Conservation
Cultural Variation in Parenting Practices
Indigenous Language Revitalization Efforts
Social Impacts of Tourism on Indigenous Communities
Rituals and Ceremonies in Different Cultural Contexts
Food and Identity in Cultural Practices
Traditional Healing and Healthcare Practices
Indigenous Rights and Land Conservation
Ethnographic Studies of Marginalized Communities
Cultural Practices Surrounding Death and Mourning

Economics and Business Qualitative Research Topics

Small Business Resilience in Times of Crisis
Workplace Diversity and Inclusion
Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions
International Trade and Cultural Perceptions
Consumer Behavior and Decision-Making in E-Commerce
Business Ethics and Ethical Decision-Making
Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Startups
Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Wealth Distribution
Impact of Economic Policies on Communities
Role of Economic Education in Financial Literacy

Good Education Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Homeschooling Experiences and Outcomes
Teacher Burnout and Coping Strategies
Inclusive Education and Special Needs Integration
Student Perspectives on Online Learning
High-Stakes Testing and Its Impact on Students
Multilingual Education and Bilingualism
Perceptions of Educational Technology in Classrooms
School Climate and Student Well-being
Teacher-Student Relationships and Their Effects on Learning
Cultural Diversity in Education and Inclusion

Environmental Engineering Qualitative Research Topics

Sustainable Transportation and Community Preferences
Ethical Considerations in Waste Reduction and Recycling
Public Attitudes Toward Renewable Energy Projects
Environmental Impact Assessment and Community Engagement
Sustainable Urban Planning and Neighborhood Perceptions
Water Quality and Conservation Practices in Residential Areas
Green Building Practices and User Experiences
Community Resilience in the Face of Climate Change
Role of Environmental Engineers in Disaster Preparedness

Why Qualitative Research Topics Are Good for STEM Students

Deeper Understanding: Qualitative research encourages STEM students to explore complex issues from a human perspective. This deepens their understanding of the broader impact of scientific discoveries and technological advancements.
Critical Thinking: Qualitative research fosters critical thinking skills by requiring students to analyze and interpret data, consider diverse viewpoints, and draw nuanced conclusions.
Real-World Relevance: Many qualitative research topics have real-world applications. Students can address problems, inform policy, and contribute to society by investigating issues that matter.
Interdisciplinary Learning: Qualitative research often transcends traditional STEM boundaries, allowing students to draw on insights from psychology, sociology, anthropology, and other fields.
Preparation for Future Careers: Qualitative research skills are valuable in various STEM careers, as they enable students to communicate complex ideas and understand the human and social aspects of their work.

Qualitative Research Topics for High School STEM Students

High school STEM students can benefit from qualitative research by honing their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Here are some qualitative research topics suitable for high school students:

Perceptions of STEM Education: Investigate students’ and teachers’ perceptions of STEM education and its effectiveness.
Environmental Awareness: Examine the factors influencing high school students’ environmental awareness and eco-friendly behaviors.
Digital Learning in the Classroom: Explore the impact of technology on learning experiences and student engagement.
STEM Gender Gap: Analyze the reasons behind the gender gap in STEM fields and potential strategies for closing it.
Science Communication: Study how high school students perceive and engage with popular science communication channels, like YouTube and podcasts.
Impact of Extracurricular STEM Activities: Investigate how participation in STEM clubs and competitions influences students’ interest and performance in science and technology.

In essence, these are the best qualitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines and are usable for other countries students too. Qualitative research topics offer STEM students a unique opportunity to explore the multifaceted aspects of their fields, develop essential skills, and contribute to meaningful discoveries. With the right topic selection, a strong research design, and ethical considerations, STEM students can easily get the best knowledge on exciting qualitative research that benefits both their career growth. So, choose a topic that resonates with your interests and get best job in your interest field.

299+ Brilliant Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Unlock the doors to captivating qualitative research topics for STEM students. Delve into authentic narratives and firsthand encounters, illuminating perspectives beyond mere statistics.

Embark on this journey where numbers take a backseat, and human experiences steer the course. Imagine excavating undiscovered gems of wisdom, waiting to be unearthed.

Let’s kickstart this odyssey! Qualitative research beckons, offering a novel lens for STEM enthusiasts to navigate.

Table of Contents

How Do I Find Good Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students?

STEM students, want to explore the human side of science, tech, engineering, and math? Here’s how:

Connect Science with People

See what folks think about cool tech like gene editing.
Look into tough choices scientists face, like testing on animals.
Explore how tech changes our daily lives.

Peek into STEM Pros’ Lives

Find out what motivates scientists and engineers.
Check out what challenges STEM students face.
See how teamwork works in STEM fields.

Get Friendly with Tech’s Human Side

Study how people use new gadgets.
See how tech affects our behavior, like on social media.
Look into who gets access to tech and why.

Where STEM Meets Society

Figure out how scientists can explain their work better.
Explore the rules that shape tech and science.
Think about how STEM ideas can help with big issues like climate change.

Tips for Awesome Research

Pick a part of STEM you love.
Make sure you’ve got what you need for your research.
Keep an eye on the news and new tech.

Ready to dive into the fascinating world where STEM meets humanity? Let’s go!

List of Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Check out qualitative research topics for STEM:-

Public attitudes towards climate change policies.
Women’s experiences in STEM careers.
Cultural views on vaccination.
Citizen science impact on environmental efforts.
Interdisciplinary research team dynamics.
Public perceptions of genetic engineering.
Scientist experiences in extreme environments.
Alternative medicine acceptance.
Effectiveness of science outreach programs.
Cultural conservation practices and sustainability.
User experience with health monitoring devices.
Adoption of smart home tech across generations.
Challenges in using assistive technologies.
Social media’s impact on privacy.
Effects of digital gaming on cognition.
Attitudes towards autonomous vehicles.
Online learning user experiences.
Community dynamics in online platforms.
Access disparities in technology.
Technology’s role in environmental solutions.

Engineering

Public perception of renewable energy projects.
Engineers in humanitarian efforts.
Diversity challenges in engineering.
Traditional vs. modern construction attitudes.
Smart city initiatives’ stakeholder views.
Engineering roles in disaster response.
Usability in product design.
Diversity in engineering education.
Public opinion on nuclear energy.
Future of space exploration.

Mathematics

Math education for students with disabilities.
Cultural attitudes towards math.
Gender gap in math achievement.
Experiences in math competitions.
Math’s role in financial decision-making.
AI in mathematical modeling.
Teaching abstract math concepts.
Cultural approaches to math.
Math’s impact on job performance.
Math tutoring effectiveness.

Interdisciplinary

Bioethics in biomedical research.
Team collaboration in interdisciplinary research.
Cultural views on food science.
Challenges in interdisciplinary education.
STEM’s role in global challenges.
Science communication experiences.
STEM education reform effectiveness.
Indigenous knowledge and Western science.
STEM career development by culture.
AI and robotics in healthcare.

Health and Medicine

Patient experience with telemedicine.
Attitudes towards mental health treatment.
Socioeconomic factors in healthcare access.
Personalized medicine acceptance.
Healthcare workers during COVID-19.
Public opinion on vaccination.
End-of-life care cultural beliefs.
Alternative therapy in healthcare.
Medical decision-making experiences.
Chronic illness psychosocial impacts.

Environment and Sustainability

Community views on conservation efforts.
Environmental activism experiences.
Cultural adaptation to climate change.
Green infrastructure acceptance.
Renewable energy stakeholder perspectives.
Indigenous community environmental struggles.
Sustainable agriculture cultural practices.
Citizen science in environmental monitoring.
Water conservation attitudes.
Environmental sustainability and social justice.
Inquiry-based learning impact.
Girls’ STEM education views.
Teacher training effectiveness.
Tech use in early childhood education.
Homeschooling in STEM.
Project-based learning outcomes.
Parental involvement in STEM.
Inclusive STEM education challenges.
Informal STEM learning impacts.
Socio-economic status in STEM education.

Social Sciences and Psychology

Gender roles in STEM.
Stereotype threat effects in STEM.
Diversity initiatives effectiveness.
First-generation student experiences.
Public science skepticism.
Cultural attitudes towards authority in science.
Psychological factors in STEM career choice.
Mentorship impact in STEM.
Career change to STEM experiences.
Lifelong learning in STEM.

Economics and Business

Tech innovation’s economic impact.
Entrepreneurship views across cultures.
Diversity in STEM entrepreneurship.
STEM’s role in economic growth.
Small business sustainability efforts.
Government policies for STEM.
Intellectual property views.
Globalization’s impact on STEM.
Corporate social responsibility in STEM.
Workplace diversity challenges.

Policy and Governance

Science diplomacy effectiveness.
Tech regulation across cultures.
Evidence-based policymaking in crises.
Government surveillance ethics.
Scientist involvement in policy.
Science funding prioritization.
Environmental regulation approaches.
STEM education policy impacts.
Government science literacy efforts.
Equity in STEM resources.

Ethics and Philosophy

Gene editing ethics.
Animal testing ethics.
AI ethics considerations.
STEM’s role in climate ethics.
Whistleblower experiences.
Research integrity in STEM.
Informed consent cultural differences.
Professional ethics in STEM.
Global health ethics.
Ethical dilemmas in STEM careers.

Communication and Media

Public engagement strategies.
Science portrayal in media.
Social media’s science impact.
Narrative storytelling in science.
Online science engagement.
Science documentary impacts.
Cultural science education approaches.
Visual communication in science.
Humor in science communication.
Misinformation combat strategies.

Arts and Humanities

Art-science collaborations.
Cultural representation in science.
Storytelling’s impact on science.
Visual arts in science outreach.
Artist-in-residence programs.
STEAM education effectiveness.
Artistic interpretations of science.
Indigenous science storytelling.
Women and minority contributions in STEM.
Creativity in scientific inquiry.

Global Issues and Development

Development aid effectiveness.
Climate change adaptation views.
Indigenous knowledge in sustainability.
Grassroots STEM efforts.
International health collaboration.
Water resource management approaches.
Globalization’s impact on culture.
STEM entrepreneurship in developing regions.
Refugee access to STEM.

History and Heritage

Underrepresented groups in STEM history.
Science throughout history.
Science preservation in museums.
Colonialism’s impact on science.
Scientific exploration experiences.
Science portrayal in historical narratives.
Cultural STEM education history.
Oral traditions in science.
Women and minority contributions in history.
Science in political upheavals.

Future Trends and Emerging Technologies

Human enhancement tech ethics.
AI’s impact on employment.
Space exploration future.
Blockchain’s industry potential.
Early adopter experiences.
Biometric surveillance ethics.
Emerging tech regulation views.
Quantum tech’s potential.
Renewable energy future.
Technological disruptions preparation.

Urbanization and Infrastructure

Sustainable urban development views.
Transportation infrastructure acceptance.
Urbanization’s biodiversity impact.
Green infrastructure benefits.
Urban access disparities.
Affordable housing attitudes.
Urban planning cultural variations.
Community engagement in development.
Tech integration in urban infrastructure.
Circular economy adoption.

Healthcare and Biomedicine

Gene editing ethics considerations.
Personalized medicine views.
Social determinants of health impact.
Telemedicine expansion acceptance.
Clinical trial participant experiences.
Organ transplantation ethics.
End-of-life care cultural practices.
Global health governance challenges.
Traditional medicine cultural roles.
Healthcare worker pandemic experiences.

Education and Learning

STEM education innovation impact.
Tech in education acceptance.
Socioeconomic impacts on education.
Informal STEM learning effects.
Inclusive STEM education experiences.
Lifelong learning cultural views.
Cultural STEM education approaches.
Online learning challenges.
Hands-on research experiences.

These condensed topics offer clear starting points for STEM students looking to dive into qualitative research across various fields.

Interesting and Informative Research Topics For Senior High School STEM Students

Survey research topics for stem students, best quantitative research topics for stem high school students, research topics for grade 11 stem students, research topics for grade 12 stem students, experimental research topics for stem students about plants, top 10 research topics for stem students, simple research topics for stem students, scientific research topics for stem students, correlational research topics for stem students, capstone research topics for stem students, non-experimental research topics for stem students, best qualitative research topics for stem students pdf.

Here are the Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

What Is An Example of Qualitative Research In Science?

Let’s embark on a scientific adventure that goes beyond charts and graphs, diving into the human side of climate change. Picture this: a qualitative research expedition that’s more about stories and emotions than cold, hard numbers.

The Climate Chronicles: Unveiling the Human Tale of Change

Our intrepid scientists set out not just to measure rising temperatures but to capture the heartbeat of a coastal community experiencing the frontline impacts of climate change.

Mission Objectives

Discover the personal stories of locals as they navigate the ebb and flow of changing tides. How has the rising sea level rewritten the chapters of their lives?
Explore the emotional landscape. What fears, hopes, and coping mechanisms emerge when faced with the unpredictable forces of climate change?
Weave through the cultural fabric of the community’s relationship with the environment. How do these changes resonate culturally and emotionally?
Highlight the community’s resilience. What communal efforts or practices have sprung up as a response to the environmental challenges?

Tools of Exploration

Researchers delved into personal narratives through one-on-one interviews, giving the community a platform to share their unique experiences.
Immerse yourself in the community’s daily life. Researchers became temporary residents, observing rituals, dynamics, and the heartbeat of the community.
Gather ’round for focus group discussions where shared experiences, challenges, and collective brainstorming took center stage.

Reading Between the Lines

Forget statistical jargon. Researchers uncovered recurring themes that resonated in the community’s stories, revealing the emotional and cultural layers of climate change.
Instead of drowning findings in numerical data, the researchers opted for a storytelling approach. Imagine presenting scientific findings as a captivating narrative.

What is the best research topic for stem students qualitative?

There isn’t a single “best” qualitative research topic for STEM students.

Choose what interests you

Explore human experiences in STEM.

Women in STEM careers.
Students’ views on teaching methods.
Ethical issues in scientific research.

Connect to a STEM area

Focus on a specific field like science, technology, engineering, or math.

Team communication in engineering.
Ethics in animal research.
Problem-solving in mathematics.

Be fresh and doable

Find a new angle and make sure you can research it.

Keep up with STEM news.
Ask professors for ideas.
Think about ethics and resources.

Choose a topic that excites you and lets you learn more about the human side of STEM.

What are the 10 examples of qualitative research?

Here are 10 simple and engaging qualitative research projects:

Student Loans: Talking with grads about their loan struggles.
Teacher Motivation: Chatting with teachers in low-income schools to understand why they stay.
Social Media and Body Image: Checking how athletes feel about their bodies online.
Street Art and Culture: Hanging with street artists to learn what art means to them.
Work and Retirement: Chatting with retirees about life after work.
New Medical Treatments: Hearing from patients about their treatment experiences.
Storytelling and Tradition: Listening to stories to understand culture.
Family Business Dynamics: Chatting with family members who work together.
Music Fan Communities: Exploring online music fan groups.
Women Entrepreneurs: Talking with female business owners about their challenges.

These projects give a peek into people’s lives and thoughts, making research interesting and relatable.

How do you choose a research topic in stem?

Navigating the vast landscape of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) for a research topic involves aligning your interests with project viability. Here’s a roadmap to guide you:

Discover Your Passion

Personal Connection: Explore what aspect of STEM ignites your curiosity—be it the wonders of nature, technological innovations, or mathematical elegance.
Real-World Relevance: Consider everyday challenges or global issues where STEM solutions could make a difference.

Ensure Feasibility and Focus

Scope: Keep your topic specific enough for thorough exploration within your available time and resources.
Data Accessibility: Assess if you can access the necessary information through surveys , existing data, experiments, or interviews.

Seek Originality and Significance

Fresh Perspective: Aim for a unique angle or approach to an existing topic, offering deeper insights or alternative methods.
Contribution to Knowledge: Evaluate how your research can fill a gap, propose solutions, or provide new interpretations in your field.

To spark ideas, explore these resources

Recent Scientific Discoveries: Scan news articles and scientific journals for recent breakthroughs that inspire further investigation.
Government Websites: Government agencies often highlight STEM challenges in areas like health, energy, or the environment, offering fertile ground for research.
Professor Consultations: Engage with professors in your field to learn about their ongoing research and seek guidance on potential topics.

Let’s dissect it: Qualitative research topics tailored for STEM students serve as gateways to the human dimension of science and technology. It’s about delving into real narratives, deciphering the essence of STEM, and grasping its intricacies.

Whether engaging in conversations with educators, examining the societal impact of technology, or grappling with profound ethical dilemmas, it all contributes to the journey. So, prepare to immerse yourself and uncover the human aspect within STEM!

100+ Most Qualitative Research Topics For High School Students In 2024

100+ Most Interesting Google Scholar Research Topics For Students [Updated 2024]

55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students

Primarily, STEM is an acronym for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. It’s a study program that weaves all four disciplines for cross-disciplinary knowledge to solve scientific problems. STEM touches across a broad array of subjects as STEM students are required to gain mastery of four disciplines.

As a project-based discipline, STEM has different stages of learning. The program operates like other disciplines, and as such, STEM students embrace knowledge depending on their level. Since it’s a discipline centered around innovation, students undertake projects regularly. As a STEM student, your project could either be to build or write on a subject. Your first plan of action is choosing a topic if it’s written. After selecting a topic, you’ll need to determine how long a thesis statement should be .

Given that topic is essential to writing any project, this article focuses on research topics for STEM students. So, if you’re writing a STEM research paper or write my research paper , below are some of the best research topics for STEM students.

List of Research Topics For STEM Students

Quantitative research topics for stem students, qualitative research topics for stem students, what are the best experimental research topics for stem students, non-experimental research topics for stem students, capstone research topics for stem students, correlational research topics for stem students, scientific research topics for stem students, simple research topics for stem students, top 10 research topics for stem students, experimental research topics for stem students about plants, research topics for grade 11 stem students, research topics for grade 12 stem students, quantitative research topics for stem high school students, survey research topics for stem students, interesting and informative research topics for senior high school stem students.

Several research topics can be formulated in this field. They cut across STEM science, engineering, technology, and math. Here is a list of good research topics for STEM students.

The effectiveness of online learning over physical learning
The rise of metabolic diseases and their relationship to increased consumption
How immunotherapy can improve prognosis in Covid-19 progression

For your quantitative research in STEM, you’ll need to learn how to cite a thesis MLA for the topic you’re choosing. Below are some of the best quantitative research topics for STEM students.

A study of the effect of digital technology on millennials
A futuristic study of a world ruled by robotics
A critical evaluation of the future demand in artificial intelligence

There are several practical research topics for STEM students. However, if you’re looking for qualitative research topics for STEM students, here are topics to explore.

An exploration into how microbial factories result in the cause shortage in raw metals
An experimental study on the possibility of older-aged men passing genetic abnormalities to children
A critical evaluation of how genetics could be used to help humans live healthier and longer.

Experimental research in STEM is a scientific research methodology that uses two sets of variables. They are dependent and independent variables that are studied under experimental research. Experimental research topics in STEM look into areas of science that use data to derive results.

Below are easy experimental research topics for STEM students.

A study of nuclear fusion and fission
An evaluation of the major drawbacks of Biotechnology in the pharmaceutical industry
A study of single-cell organisms and how they’re capable of becoming an intermediary host for diseases causing bacteria

Unlike experimental research, non-experimental research lacks the interference of an independent variable. Non-experimental research instead measures variables as they naturally occur. Below are some non-experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students.

Impacts of alcohol addiction on the psychological life of humans
The popularity of depression and schizophrenia amongst the pediatric population
The impact of breastfeeding on the child’s health and development

STEM learning and knowledge grow in stages. The older students get, the more stringent requirements are for their STEM research topic. There are several capstone topics for research for STEM students .

Below are some simple quantitative research topics for stem students.

How population impacts energy-saving strategies
The application of an Excel table processor capabilities for cost calculation
A study of the essence of science as a sphere of human activity

Correlations research is research where the researcher measures two continuous variables. This is done with little or no attempt to control extraneous variables but to assess the relationship. Here are some sample research topics for STEM students to look into bearing in mind how to cite a thesis APA style for your project.

Can pancreatic gland transplantation cure diabetes?
A study of improved living conditions and obesity
An evaluation of the digital currency as a valid form of payment and its impact on banking and economy

There are several science research topics for STEM students. Below are some possible quantitative research topics for STEM students.

A study of protease inhibitor and how it operates
A study of how men’s exercise impacts DNA traits passed to children
A study of the future of commercial space flight

If you’re looking for a simple research topic, below are easy research topics for STEM students.

How can the problem of Space junk be solved?
Can meteorites change our view of the universe?
Can private space flight companies change the future of space exploration?

For your top 10 research topics for STEM students, here are interesting topics for STEM students to consider.

A comparative study of social media addiction and adverse depression
The human effect of the illegal use of formalin in milk and food preservation
An evaluation of the human impact on the biosphere and its results
A study of how fungus affects plant growth
A comparative study of antiviral drugs and vaccine
A study of the ways technology has improved medicine and life science
The effectiveness of Vitamin D among older adults for disease prevention
What is the possibility of life on other planets?
Effects of Hubble Space Telescope on the universe
A study of important trends in medicinal chemistry research

Below are possible research topics for STEM students about plants:

How do magnetic fields impact plant growth?
Do the different colors of light impact the rate of photosynthesis?
How can fertilizer extend plant life during a drought?

Below are some examples of quantitative research topics for STEM students in grade 11.

A study of how plants conduct electricity
How does water salinity affect plant growth?
A study of soil pH levels on plants

Here are some of the best qualitative research topics for STEM students in grade 12.

An evaluation of artificial gravity and how it impacts seed germination
An exploration of the steps taken to develop the Covid-19 vaccine
Personalized medicine and the wave of the future

Here are topics to consider for your STEM-related research topics for high school students.

A study of stem cell treatment
How can molecular biological research of rare genetic disorders help understand cancer?
How Covid-19 affects people with digestive problems

Below are some survey topics for qualitative research for stem students.

How does Covid-19 impact immune-compromised people?
Soil temperature and how it affects root growth
Burned soil and how it affects seed germination

Here are some descriptive research topics for STEM students in senior high.

The scientific information concept and its role in conducting scientific research
The role of mathematical statistics in scientific research
A study of the natural resources contained in oceans

Final Words About Research Topics For STEM Students

STEM topics cover areas in various scientific fields, mathematics, engineering, and technology. While it can be tasking, reducing the task starts with choosing a favorable topic. If you require external assistance in writing your STEM research, you can seek professional help from our experts.

Qualitative research in STEM : studies of equity, access, and innovation

Available online, at the library.

Education Library (Cubberley)

The Education Library is closed for construction. Request items for pickup at another library.

More options

Find it at other libraries via WorldCat
Contributors

Description

Creators/contributors, contents/summary.

Contents Introduction Sherry Marx
*"I am an innovator:" Quahn's Counter-narrative of Becoming in STEM
Angela Calabrese Barton, Myunghwan Shin, and LaQuahn Johnson
*"I come because I make toy.": Examining Nodes of Criticality in an Afterschool Science & Engineering (SE) Club with Refugee Youth
Edna Tan and Beverly Faircloth
* Sociocultural Analysis of Engineering Design: Latino High School Students' Funds of Knowledge and Implications for Culturally Responsive Engineering Education
Joel Alejandro Mejia
* Bruised But Not Broken: African American Women Persistence in Engineering Degree Programs in Spite of Stereotype Threat
Sherry Marx
* Examining Academic Integrity in the Postmodern: Undergraduates' Use of Solutions to Complete Textbook-based Engineering Coursework
Angela Minichiello
* Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering
Matthew Meyer and Sherry Marx
* nitacimowinis: A research story in Indigenous Science Education
* From Ambivalences toward Self-Efficacy: Bilingual Teacher Candidates' Shifting Sense of Knowing as Conocimiento with STEM
Anita Bright and G. Sue Kasun
* Examining the Non-Rational in Science Classrooms: Girls, Sustainability, and Science Education
Kim Haverkos
* Seven Types of Subitizing Activity Characterizing Young Children's Mental Activity
Beth L. MacDonald and Jesse L. M. Wilkins
* Orienting Students to One Another and to the Mathematics During Discussions
Elham Kazemi and Adrian Cunard List of Contributors Index.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

Bibliographic information

Acquired with support from.

The Dr. Frank Y. Chuck and Dr. Bernadine Chuck Fong Family Book Fund

Browse related items

Stanford Home
Maps & Directions
Search Stanford
Emergency Info
Terms of Use
Non-Discrimination
Accessibility

Open access
Published: 22 April 2020

Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic analysis of publicly funded projects

Yeping Li 1 ,
Ke Wang 2 ,
Yu Xiao 1 ,
Jeffrey E. Froyd 3 &
Sandra B. Nite 1

International Journal of STEM Education volume 7 , Article number: 17 ( 2020 ) Cite this article

17k Accesses

28 Citations

7 Altmetric

Metrics details

Taking publicly funded projects in STEM education as a special lens, we aimed to learn about research and trends in STEM education. We identified a total of 127 projects funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the US Department of Education from 2003 to 2019. Both the number of funded projects in STEM education and their funding amounts were high, although there were considerable fluctuations over the years. The number of projects with multiple principal investigators increased over time. The project duration was typically in the range of 3–4 years, and the goals of these projects were mostly categorized as “development and innovation” or “efficacy and replication.” The majority of the 127 projects focused on individual STEM disciplines, especially mathematics. The findings, based on IES-funded projects, provided a glimpse of the research input and trends in STEM education in the USA, with possible implications for developing STEM education research in other education systems around the world.

Introduction

The rapid development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and research since the beginning of this century has benefited from strong, ongoing support from many different entities, including government agencies, professional organizations, industries, and education institutions (Li, 2014 ). Typically, studies that summarized the status of research in STEM education have used publications as the unit of their analyses (e.g., Li et al., 2019 ; Li et al., 2020 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Minichiello et al., 2018 ; Otten, Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & Veldhuis, 2019 ; Schreffler et al., 2019 ). Another approach, which has been used less frequently, is to study research funding. Although not all research publications were generated from funded projects and not all funded projects have been equally productive, as measured by publications, research funding and publications present two different, but related perspectives on the state of research in STEM education. Our review focuses on research funding.

Types of funding support to education research

There are different types of sources and mechanisms in place to allocate, administer, distribute, and manage funding support to education. In general, there are two sources of funding: public and private.

Public funding sources are commonly government agencies that support education program development and training, project evaluation, and research. For example, multiple state and federal agencies in the USA provide and manage funding support to education research, programs and training, including the US Department of Education (ED), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the National Endowment for the Humanities—Division of Education Programs. Researchers seeking support from public funding sources often submit proposals that are vetted through a well-structured peer-review process. The process is competitive, and the decision to fund a project validates both its importance and alignment with the funding agency’s development agenda. Changes in the agencies’ agendas and funding priorities can reflect governmental intentions and priorities for education and research.

Private funding sources have played a very important role in supporting education programs and research with a long history. Some private funding sources in the USA can be sizeable, such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ( https://www.gatesfoundation.org ), while many also have specific foci, such as the Howard Hughes Medical Institute ( https://www.hhmi.org ) that is dedicated to advancing science through research and science education. At the same time, private funding sources often have their own development agendas, flexibility in deciding funding priorities, and specific mechanisms in making funding decisions, including how funds can be used, distributed, and managed. Indeed, private funding sources differ from public funding sources in many ways. Given many special features associated with private funding sources, including the lack of transparency, we chose to examine projects that were supported by public funding sources in this review.

Approaches to examining public research funding support

One approach to studying public research funding support to STEM education would be to examine requests-for-proposals (RFPs) issued by different government agencies. However, those RFPs tend to provide guidelines, which are not sufficiently concrete to learn about specific research that is funded. In contrast, reviewing those projects selected for funding can provide more detailed information on research activity. Figure 1 shows a flowchart of research activity and distinguishes how funded projects and publications might provide different perspectives on research. In this review, we focus on the bolded portion of the flowchart, i.e., projects funded to promote STEM education.

A general flowchart of RFPs to publications

Current review

Why focus on research funding in the usa.

Recent reviews of journal publications in STEM education have consistently revealed that scholars in the USA played a leading role in producing and promoting scholarship in STEM education, with about 75% of authorship credits for all publications in STEM education either in the International Journal of STEM Education alone from 2014 to 2018 (Li et al., 2019 ) or in 36 selected journals published from 2000 to 2018 (Li et al., 2020 ). The strong scholarship development in the USA is likely due to a research environment that is well supported and conducive to high research output. Studying public funding support for STEM education research in the USA will provide information on trends and patterns, which will be valuable both in the USA and in other countries.

The context of policy and public funding support to STEM education in the USA

The tremendous development of STEM education in the USA over the past decades has benefited greatly from both national policies and strong funding support from the US governmental agencies as well as private funding sources. Federal funding for research and development in science, mathematics, technology, and engineering-related education in the USA was restarted in the late 1980s, in the latter years of the Reagan administration, which had earlier halted funding. In recent years, the federal government has strongly supported STEM education research and development. For example, the Obama administration in the USA (The White House, 2009 ) launched the “Educate to Innovate” campaign in November 2009 for excellence in STEM education as a national priority, with over 260 million USD in financial and in-kind support commitment. The Trump administration has continued to emphasize STEM education. For example, President Trump signed a memorandum in 2017 to direct ED to spend 200 million USD per year on competitive grants promoting STEM (The White House, 2017 ). In response, ED awarded 279 million USD in STEM discretionary grants in Fiscal Year 2018 (US Department of Education, 2018 ). The Trump administration took a step further to release a report in December 2018 detailing its five-year strategic plan of boosting STEM education in the USA (The White House, 2018 ). The strategic plan envisions that “All Americans will have lifelong access to high-quality STEM education and the USA will be the global leader in STEM literacy, innovation, and employment.” (Committee on STEM Education, 2018 , p. 1). Consistently, current Secretory of Education DeVos in the Trump administration has taken STEM as a centerpiece of her comprehensive education agenda (see https://www.ed.gov/stem ). The consistency in national policies and public funding support shows that STEM education continues to be a strategic priority in the USA.

Among many federal agencies that funded STEM education programs, the ED and NSF have functioned as two primary agencies. For ED, the Institute of Education Sciences (Institute of Education Sciences (IES), n.d. , see https://ies.ed.gov/aboutus/ ) was created by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 as its statistics, research, and evaluation arm. ED’s support to STEM education research has been mainly administered and managed by IES since 2003. In contrast to the focus of ED on education, NSF (see https://www.nsf.gov/about/ ) was created by Congress in 1950 to support basic research in many fields such as mathematics, computer sciences, and social sciences. Education and Human Resources is one of its seven directorates that provides important funding support to STEM education programs and research. In addition to these two federal agencies, some other federal agencies also provide funding support to STEM education programs and research from time to time.

Any study of public funding support to STEM education research in the USA would need to limit its scope, given the complexity of various public funding sources available in the system, the ambiguity associated with the meaning of STEM education across different federal agencies (Li et al., 2020 ), and the number of programs that have funded STEM education research over the years. For the purpose of this review, we have chosen to focus on the projects in STEM education funded by IES.

Research questions

Given the preceding research approach decision to focus on research projects funded by IES, we generated the following questions:

What were the number of projects, total project funding, and the average funding per project from 2003 to 2019 in STEM education research?

What were the trends of having single versus multiple principal investigator(s) in STEM education?

What were the types of awardees of the projects?

What were the participant populations in the projects?

What were the types of projects in terms of goals for program development and research in STEM education?

What were the disciplinary foci of the projects?

What research methods did projects tend to use in conducting STEM education research?

Based on the above discussion to focus on funding support from IES, we first specified the time period, and then searched the IES website to identify STEM education research projects funded by IES within the specified time period.

Time period

As discussed above, IES was established in 2002 and it did not start to administer and manage research funding support for ED until 2003. Therefore, we considered IES funded projects from 2003 to the end of 2019.

Searching and identifying IES funded projects in STEM education

Given the diverse perspectives about STEM education across different agencies and researchers (Li et al., 2020 ), we did not discuss and define the meaning of STEM education. Instead, we used the process described in the following paragraph to identify STEM education research projects funded by IES.

On the publicly accessible IES website ( https://ies.ed.gov ), one menu item is “FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES”, and there is a list of choices within this menu item. One choice is “SEARCH FUNDED RESEARCH GRANTS AND CONTRACTS.” On this web search page, we can choose “Program” under “ADDITIONAL SEARCH OPTIONS.” There are two program categories related to STEM under the option of “Program.” One is “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education” under one large category of “Education Research” and the other is “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics” under another large category of “Special Education Research.” We searched for funded projects under these two program categories, and the process returned 98 funded projects in “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education” under “Education Research” and 29 funded projects in “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics” under “Special Education Research,” for a total of 127 funded projects in these two programs designated for STEM education by IES Footnote 1 .

Data analysis

To address questions 1, 2, 3, and 4, we collected the following information about these projects identified using above procedure: amount of funding, years of duration, information about the PI, types of awardees that received and administered the funding (i.e., university versus those non-university including non-profit organization such as WestEd, Educational Testing Service), and projects’ foci on school level and participants. When a project’s coverage went beyond one category, the project was then coded in terms of its actual number of categories being covered. For example, we used the five categories to classify project’s participants: Pre–K, grades 1–4, grades 5–8, grades 9–12, and adult. If a funded project involved participants from Pre-school to grade 8, then we coded the project as having participants in three categories: Pre-K, grades 1–4, and grades 5–8.

To address question 5, we analyzed projects based on goal classifications from IES. IES followed the classification of research types that was produced through a joint effort between IES and NSF in 2013 (Institute of Education Sciences (IES) and National Science Foundation (NSF), 2013 ). The effort specified six types of research that provide guidance on the goals and level of funding support: foundational research, early-stage or exploratory research, design and development research, efficacy research, effectiveness research, and scale-up research. Related to these types, IES classified goals for funded projects: development and innovation, efficacy and replication, exploration, measurement, and scale-up evaluation, as described on the IES website.

To address question 6, we coded the disciplinary focus using the following five categories: mathematics, science, technology, engineering, and integrated (meaning an integration of any two or more of STEM disciplines). In some cases, we coded a project with multiple disciplinary foci into more than one category. The following are two project examples and how we coded them in terms of disciplinary foci:

The project of “A Randomized Controlled Study of the Effects of Intelligent Online Chemistry Tutors in Urban California School Districts” (2008, https://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=601 ) was to test the efficacy of the Quantum Chemistry Tutors, a suite of computer-based cognitive tutors that are designed to give individual tutoring to high school students on 12 chemistry topics. Therefore, we coded this project as having three categories of disciplinary foci: science because it was chemistry, technology because it applied instructional technology, and integrated because it integrated two or more of STEM disciplines.

The project of “Applications of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) to Improve the Skill Levels of Students with Deficiencies in Mathematics” (2009, https://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=827 ) was coded as having three categories of disciplinary foci: mathematics, technology because it used intelligent tutoring systems, and integrated because it integrated two or more of STEM disciplines.

To address question 7, all 127 projects were coded using a classification category system developed and used in a previous study (Wang et al., 2019 ). Specifically, each funded project was coded in terms of research type (experimental, interventional, longitudinal, single case, correlational) Footnote 2 , data collection method (interview, survey, observation, researcher designed tests, standardized tests, computer data Footnote 3 ), and data analysis method (descriptive statistics, ANOVA*, general regression, HLM, IRT, SEM, others) Footnote 4 . Based on a project description, specific method(s) were identified and coded following a procedure similar to what we used in a previous study (Wang et al., 2019 ). Two researchers coded each project’s description, and the agreement between them for all 127 projects was 88.2%. When method and disciplinary focus-coding discrepancies occurred, a final decision was reached after discussion.

Results and discussion

In the following sections, we report findings as corresponding to each of the seven research questions.

Question 1: the number of projects, total funding, and the average funding per project from 2003 to 2019

Figure 2 shows the distribution of funded projects over the years in each of the two program categories, “Education Research” and “Special Education Research,” as well as combined (i.e., “STEM” for projects funded under “Education Research,” “Special STEM” for projects funded under “Special Education Research,” and “Combined” for projects funded under both “Education Research” and “Special Education Research”). As Fig. 2 shows, the number of projects increased each year up to 2007, with STEM education projects started in 2003 under “Education Research” and in 2006 under “Special Education Research.” The number of projects in STEM under “Special Education Research” was generally less than those funded under the program category of “Education Research,” especially before 2011. There are noticeable decreases in combined project counts from 2009 to 2011 and from 2012 to 2014, before the number count increased again in 2015. We did not find a consistent pattern across the years from 2003 to 2019.

The distribution of STEM education projects over the years. (Note: STEM refers to projects funded under “Education Research,” Special STEM refers to projects funded under “Special Education Research,” and “Combined” refers to projects funded under both “Education Research” and “Special Education Research.” The same annotations are used in the rest of the figures.)

A similar trend can be observed in the total funding amount for STEM education research (see Fig. 3 ). The figure shows noticeably big year-to-year swings from 2003 to 2019, with the highest funding amount of more than 33 million USD in 2007 and the lowest amount of 2,698,900 USD in 2013 from these two program categories. Although it is possible that insufficient high-quality grant proposals were available in one particular year to receive funding, the funded amount and the number of projects (Fig. 2 ) provide insights about funding trends over the time period of the review.

Annual funding totals

As there are diverse perspectives and foci about STEM education, we also wondered if STEM education research projects might be funded by IES but in program options other than those designated options of “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education.” We found a total of 54 funded projects from 2007 to 2019, using the acronym “STEM” as a search term under the option of “SEARCH FUNDED RESEARCH GRANTS AND CONTRACTS” without any program category restriction. Only 2 (3.7%) out of these 54 projects were in the IES designated program options of STEM education in the category of “Education Research.” Further information about these 54 projects and related discussion can be found as additional notes at the end of this review.

Results from two different approaches to searching for IES-funded projects will likely raise questions about what kinds of projects were funded in the designated program option of “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education,” if only two funded projects under this option contained the acronym “STEM” in a project’s title and/or description. We shall provide further information in the following sub-sections, especially when answering question 6 related to projects’ disciplinary focus.

Figure 4 illustrates the trend of average funding amount per project each year in STEM education research from 2003 to 2019. The average funding per project varied considerably in the program category “Special Education Research,” and no STEM projects were funded in 2014 and 2017 in this category. In contrast, average funding per project was generally within the range of 1,132,738 USD in 2019 to 3,475,975 USD in 2014 for the projects in the category of “Education Research” and also for project funding in the combined category.

The trend of average funding amount per project funded each year in STEM education research

Figure 5 shows the number of projects in different funding amount categories (i.e., less than 1 million USD, 1–2 million USD, 2–3 million USD, 3 million USD or more). The majority of the 127 projects obtained funding of 1–2 million USD (77 projects, 60.6%), with 60 out of 98 projects (61.2%) under “Education Research” program and 17 out of 29 projects (58.6%) in the program category “Special Education Research.” The category with second most projects is funding of 3 million USD or more (21 projects, 16.5%), with 15 projects (15.3% of 98 projects) under “Education Research” and 6 projects (20.7% of 29 projects) under “Special Education Research.”

The number of projects in terms of total funding amount categories

Figure 6 shows the average amount of funding per project funded across these different funding amount and program categories. In general, the projects funded under “Education Research” tended to have a higher average amount than those funded under “Special Education Research,” except for those projects in the total funding amount category of “less than 1 million USD.” Considering all 127 funded projects, the average amount of funding was 1,960,826.3 USD per project.

The average amount of funding per project across different total funding amount and program categories

Figure 7 shows that the vast majority of these 127 projects were 3- or 4-year projects. In particular, 59 (46.5%) projects were funded as 4-year projects, with 46 projects (46.9%) under “Education Research” and 13 projects (44.8%) under “Special Education Research.” This category is followed closely by 3-year projects (54 projects, 42.5%), with 41 projects (41.8%) under “Education Research” and 13 projects (44.8%) under “Special Education Research.”

The number of projects in terms of years of project duration. (Note, 2: 2-year projects; 3: 3-year projects; 4: 4-year projects; 5: 5-year projects)

Question 2: trends of single versus multiple principal investigator(s) in STEM education

Figure 8 shows the distribution of projects over the years grouped by a single PI or multiple PIs where the program categories of “Education Research” and “Special Education Research” have been combined. The majority of projects before 2009 had a single PI, and the trend has been to have multiple PIs for STEM education research projects since 2009. The trend illustrates the increased emphases on collaboration in STEM education research, which is consistent with what we learned from a recent study of journal publications in STEM education (Li et al., 2020 ).

The distribution of projects with single versus multiple PIs over the years (combined)

Separating projects by program categories, Fig. 9 shows projects funded in the program category “Education Research.” The trends of single versus multiple PIs in Fig. 9 are similar to the trends shown in Fig. 8 for the combined programs. In addition, almost all projects in STEM education funded under this regular research program had multiple PIs since 2010.

The distribution of projects with single versus multiple PIs over the years (in “Education Research” program)

Figure 10 shows projects funded in the category “Special Education Research.” The pattern in Fig. 10 , where very few projects funded under this category had multiple PIs before 2014, is quite different from the patterns in Figs. 8 and 9 . We did not learn if single PIs were appropriate for the nature of these projects. The trend started to change in 2015 as the number of projects with multiple PIs increased and the number of projects with single PIs declined.

The distribution of projects with single versus multiple PIs over the years (in “Special Education Research” program)

Question 3: types of awardees of these projects

Besides the information about the project’s PI, the nature of the awardees can help illustrate what types of entity or organization were interested in developing and carrying out STEM education research. Figure 11 shows that the university was the main type of awardee before 2012, with 80 (63.0%) projects awarded to universities from 2003 to 2019. At the same time, non-university entities received funding support for 47 (37.0%) projects and they seem to have become even more active and successful in obtaining research funding in STEM education over the past several years. The result suggests that diverse organizations develop and conduct STEM education research, another indicator of the importance of STEM education research.

The distribution of projects funded to university versus non-university awardees over the years

Question 4: participant populations in the projects

Figure 12 indicates that the vast majority of projects were focused on student populations in preschool to grade 12. This is understandable as IES is the research funding arm of ED. Among those projects, middle school students were the participants in the most projects (70 projects), followed by student populations in elementary school (48 projects), and high school (38 projects). The adult population (including post-secondary students and teachers) was the participant group in 36 projects in a combined program count.

The number of projects in STEM education for different groups of participants (Note: Pre-K: preschool-kindergarten; G1–4: grades 1–4; G5–8: grades 5–8; G9–12: grades 9–12; adult: post-secondary students and teachers)

If we separate “Education Research” and “Special Education Research” programs, projects in the category “Special Education Research” focused on student populations in elementary and middle school most frequently, and then adult population. In contrast, projects in the category “Education Research” focused most frequently on middle school student population, followed by student populations in high school and elementary school.

Given the importance of funded research in special education Footnote 5 at IES, we considered projects focused on participants with disabilities. Figure 13 shows there were 28 projects in the category “Special Education Research” for participants with disabilities. There were also three such projects funded in the category “Education Research,” which together accounted for a total of 31 (24.4%) projects. In addition, some projects in the category “Education Research” focused on other participants, including 11 projects focused on ELL students (8.7%) projects and 37 projects focused on low SES students (29.1%).

The number of funded projects in STEM education for three special participant populations (Note: ELL: English language learners, Low SES: low social-economic status)

Figure 14 shows the trend of projects in STEM education for special participant populations. Participant populations with ELL and/or Low SES gained much attention before 2011 among these projects. Participant populations with disabilities received relatively consistent attention in projects on STEM education over the years. Research on STEM education with special participant populations is important and much needed. However, related scholarship is still in an early development stage. Interested readers can find related publications in this journal (e.g., Schreffler et al., 2019 ) and other journals (e.g., Lee, 2014 ).

The distribution of projects in STEM education for special participant populations over the years

Question 5: types of projects in terms of goals for program development and research

Figure 15 shows that “development and innovation” was the most frequently funded type of project (58 projects, 45.7%), followed by “efficacy and replication” (34 projects, 26.8%), and “measurement” (21 projects, 16.5%). The pattern is consistent across “Education Research,” “Special Education Research,” and combined. However, it should be noted that all five projects with the goal of “scale-up evaluation” were in the category “Education Research” Footnote 6 and funding for these projects were large.

The number of projects in terms of the types of goals

Examining the types of projects longitudinally, Fig. 16 shows that while “development and innovation” and “efficacy and replication” types of projects were most frequently funded in the “Education Research” program, the types of projects being funded changed longitudinally. The number of “development and innovation” projects was noticeably fewer over the past several years. In contrast, the number of “measurement” projects and “efficacy and replication” projects became more dominant. The change might reflect a shift in research development and needs.

The distribution of projects in terms of the type of goals over the years (in “Education Research” program)

Figure 17 shows the distribution of project types in the category “Special Education Research.” The pattern is different from the pattern shown in Fig. 16 . The types of “development and innovation” and “efficacy and replication” projects were also the dominant types of projects under “Special Education Research” program category in most of these years from 2007 to 2019. Projects in the type “measurement” were only observed in 2010 when that was the only type of project funded.

The distribution of projects in terms of goals over the years (in “Special Education Research” program)

Question 6: disciplinary foci of projects in developing and conducting STEM education research

Figure 18 shows that the majority of the 127 projects under such specific programs included disciplinary foci on individual STEM disciplines: mathematics in 88 projects, science in 51 projects, technology in 43 projects, and engineering in 2 projects. The tremendous attention to mathematics in these projects is a bit surprising, as mathematics was noted as being out of balance in STEM education (English, 2016 ) and also in STEM education publications (Li, 2018b , 2019 ). As noted above, each project can be classified in multiple disciplinary foci. However, of the 88 projects with a disciplinary focus on mathematics, 54 projects had mathematics as the only disciplinary focus (38 under “Education Research” program and 16 under “Special Education Research” program). We certainly hope that there will be more projects that further scholarship where mathematics is included as part of (integrated) STEM education (see Li & Schoenfeld, 2019 ).

The number of projects in terms of disciplinary focus

There were also projects with specific focus on integrated STEM education (i.e., combining any two or more disciplines of STEM), with a total of 55 (43.3%) projects in a combined program count. The limited number of projects on integrated STEM in the designated STEM funding programs further confirms the common perception that the development of integrated STEM education and research is still in its initial stage (Honey et al., 2014 ; Li, 2018a ).

In examining possible funding trends, Fig. 19 shows that mathematics projects were more frequently funded before 2012. Engineering was a rare disciplinary focus. Integrated STEM was a disciplinary focus from time to time among these projects. No other trends were observed.

The distribution of projects in terms of disciplinary focus over the years

Question 7: research types and methods that projects used

Figure 20 indicates that “interventional” (in 104 projects, 81.9%) and “experimental research” (in 89 projects, 70.1%) were the most frequently funded types of research. The percentages of projects funded under the regular education research program were similar to those funded under “Special Education Research” program, except that projects funded under “Special Education Research” tended to utilize correlational research more often.

The number of projects in terms of the type of research conducted

Research in STEM education uses diverse data collection and analysis methods; therefore, we wanted to study types of methods (Figs. 21 and 22 , respectively). Among the six types of methods used for data collection, Fig. 21 indicates that “standardized tests” and “designed tests” were the most commonly used methods for data collection, followed by “survey,” “observation,” and “interview.” The majority of projects used three quantitative methods (“standardized tests,” “researcher designed tests,” and “survey”). The finding is consistent with the finding from analysis of journal publications in STEM education (Li et al., 2020 ). Data collected through “interview” and “observation” were more likely to be analyzed using qualitative methods as part of a project’s research methodology.

The number of projects categorized by the type of data collection methods

The number of projects categorized by the type of data analysis methods

Figure 22 shows the use of seven (including others) data analysis methods among these projects. The first six methods (i.e., descriptive, ANOVA*, general regression, HLM, IRT, and SEM) as well as some methods in “others” are quantitative data analysis methods. The number of projects that used these quantitative methods is considerably larger than the number of projects that used qualitative methods (i.e., included in “others” category).

Concluding remarks

The systematic analysis of IES-funded research projects in STEM education presented an informative picture about research support for STEM education development in the USA, albeit based on only one public funding agency from 2003 to 2019. Over this 17-year span, IES funded 127 STEM education research projects (an average of over seven projects per year) in two designated STEM program categories. Although we found no discernable longitudinal funding patterns in these two program categories, both the number of funded projects in STEM education and their funding amounts were high. If we included an additional 52 projects with the acronym “STEM” funded by many other programs from 2007 to 2019 (see “ Notes ” section below), the total number of projects in STEM education research would be even higher, and the number of projects with the acronym “STEM” would also be larger. The results suggested the involvement of many researchers with diverse expertise in STEM education research was supported by a broad array of program areas in IES.

Addressing the seven questions showed several findings. Funding support for STEM education research was strong, with an average of about 2 million USD per project for a typical 3–4 year duration. Also, our analysis showed that the number of projects with multiple PIs over the years increased over the study time period, which we speculate was because STEM education research increasingly requires collaboration. STEM education research is still in early development stage, evidenced by the predominance of project goals in either “development and innovation” or “efficacy and replication” categories. We found very few projects (5 out of 127 projects, 4.0%) that were funded for “scale-up evaluation.” Finally, as shown by our analysis of project participants, IES had focused on funding projects for students in grades 1–12. Various quantitative research methods were frequently used by these projects for data collection and analyses.

These results illustrated how well STEM education research was supported through both the designated STEM education and many other programs during the study time period, which helps to explain why researchers in the USA have been so productive in producing and promoting scholarship in STEM education (Li et al., 2019 ; Li et al., 2020 ). We connected several findings from this study to findings from recent reviews of journal publications in STEM education. For example, publications in STEM education appeared in many different journals as many researchers with diverse expertise were supported to study various issues related to STEM education, STEM education publications often have co-authorship, and there is heavy use of quantitative research methods. The link between public funding and significant numbers of publications in STEM education research from US scholars offers a strong argument for the importance of providing strong funding support to research and development in STEM education in the USA and also in many other countries around the world.

The systematic analysis also revealed that STEM education, as used by IES in naming the designated programs, did not convey a clear definition or scope. In fact, we found diverse disciplinary foci in these projects. Integrated STEM was not a main focus of these designated programs in funding STEM education. Instead, many projects in these programs had clear subject content focus in individual disciplines, which is very similar to discipline-based education research (DBER, National Research Council, 2012 ). Interestingly enough, STEM education research had also been supported in many other programs of IES with diverse foci Footnote 7 , such as “Small Business Innovation Research,” “Cognition and Student Learning,” and “Postsecondary and Adult Education.” This funding reality further suggested the broad scope of issues associated with STEM education, as well as the growing need of building STEM education research as a distinct field (Li, 2018a ).

Inspired by our recent review of journal publications as research output in STEM education, this review started with an ambitious goal to study funding support as research input for STEM education. However, we had to limit the scope of the study for feasibility. We limited funding sources to one federal agency in the USA. Therefore, we did not analyze funding support from private funding sources including many private foundations and corporations. Although public funding sources have been one of the most important funding supports available for researchers to develop and expand their research work, the results of this systematic analysis suggest the importance future studies to learn more about research support and input to STEM education from other sources including other major public funding agencies, private foundations, and non-profit professional organizations.

Among these 54 funded projects containing the acronym “STEM” from 2007 to 2019, Table 1 shows that only 2 (3.7%) were in the IES designated program option of STEM education in the category of “Education Research.” Forty-nine projects were in 13 other program options in the category of “Education Research,” with surprisingly large numbers of projects under the “Small Business Innovation Research” option (17, 31.5%) and “Cognition and Student Learning” (11, 20.4%). Three of the 54 funded projects were in the program category of “Special Education Research.” To be specific, two of the three were in the program of “Small Business Innovation Research in Special Education,” and one was in the program of “Special Topic: Career and Technical Education for Students with Disabilities.”

The results suggest that many projects, focusing on various issues and questions directly associated with STEM education, were funded even when researchers applied for funding support in program options not designated as “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education.” It implies that issues associated with STEM education had been generally acknowledged as important across many different program areas in education research and special education research. The funding support available in diverse program areas likely allowed numerous scholars with diverse expertise to study many different questions and publish their research in diverse journals, as we noted in the recent review of journal publications in STEM education (Li et al., 2020 ).

A previous study identified and analyzed a total of 46 IES funded projects from 2007 to 2018 (with an average of fewer than 4 projects per year) that contain the acronym “STEM” in a project’s title and/or description (Wang et al., 2019 ). Finding eight newly funded projects in 2019 suggested a growing interest in research on issues directly associated with STEM education in diverse program areas. In fact, five out of these eight newly funded projects specifically included the acronym “STEM” in the project’s title to explicitly indicate the project’s association with STEM education.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials used and analyzed for the review are publicly available at the IES website, White House website, and other government agency websites.

In a previous study (Wang, Li, & Xiao, 2019), we used the acronym “STEM” as a search term under the option of “SEARCH FUNDED RESEARCH GRANTS AND CONTRACTS” without any program category restriction, and identified and analyzed 46 funded projects from 2007 to 2018 that contain “STEM” in a project’s title and/or description after screening out unrelated key words containing “stem” such as “system”. To make comparisons when needed, we did the same search using the acronym “STEM” and found 8 more funded projects in 2019 for a total of 54 funded projects across many different program categories from 2007 to 2019.

The project of “A Randomized Controlled Study of the Effects of Intelligent Online Chemistry Tutors in Urban California School Districts” (2008). In the project description, its subtitle shows intervention information. We coded this project as “interventional.” Then, the project also included the treatment group and the control group. We coded this project as “experimental.” Finally, this project was to test the efficacy of computer-based cognitive tutors. This was a correlational study. We thus coded it as “correlational.”

Computer data means that the project description indicated this kind of information, such as log data on students.

Descriptive means “descriptive statistics.” General regression means multiple regression, linear regression, logistical regression, except hierarchical linear regression model. ANOVA* is used here as a broad term to include analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, multivariate analysis of variance, and/or multivariate analysis of variance. Others include factor analysis, t tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and binomial tests, log data analysis, meta-analysis, constant comparative data analysis, and qualitative analysis.

Special education originally was about students with disabilities. It has broadened in scope over the years.

The number of students under Special Education was 14% of students in public schools in the USA in 2017–2018. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp

For example, “Design Environment for Educator-Student Collaboration Allowing Real-Time Engineering-centric, STEM (DESCARTES) Exploration in Middle Grades” (2017) was funded as a 2-year project to Parametric Studios, Inc. (awardee) under the program option of “Small Business Innovation Research” (here is the link: https://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1922 ). “Exploring the Spatial Alignment Hypothesis in STEM Learning Environments” (2017) was funded as a 4-year project to WestEd (awardee) under the program option of “Cognition and Student Learning” (link: https://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=2059 ). “Enhancing Undergraduate STEM Education by Integrating Mobile Learning Technologies with Natural Language Processing” (2018) was funded as a 4-year project to Purdue University (awardee) under the program option of “Postsecondary and Adult Education” (link: https://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=2130 ).

Abbreviations

Analysis of variance

Discipline-based education research

Department of Education

Hierarchical linear modeling

Institute of Education Sciences

Item response theory

National Science Foundation

Pre-school–grade 12

Requests-for-proposal

Structural equation modeling

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Committee on STEM Education, National Science & Technology Council, the White House (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education . Washington, DC. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf Accessed on 18 Jan 2019.

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 , 3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 .

Article Google Scholar

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research . Washington DC: National Academies Press.

Google Scholar

Institute of Education Sciences (IES) (n.d.). About IES: connecting research, policy and practice. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/aboutus/ Accessed on 2 Feb 2020.

Institute of Education Sciences (IES) & National Science Foundation (NSF). (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development. Washington, DC: The authors. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13126/nsf13126.pdf Accessed on 2 Feb 2020.

Lee, A. (2014). Students with disabilities choosing science technology engineering and math (STEM) majors in postsecondary institutions. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27 (3), 261–272.

Li, Y. (2014). International journal of STEM education – a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1 , 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-1 .

Li, Y. (2018a). Journal for STEM Education Research – promoting the development of interdisciplinary research in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1 (1-2), 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0009-z .

Li, Y. (2018b). Four years of development as a gathering place for international researchers and readers in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 5 , 54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0153-0 .

Li, Y. (2019). Five years of development in pursuing excellence in quality and global impact to become the first journal in STEM education covered in SSCI. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 42 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0198-8 .

Li, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: a systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1 .

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as ‘given’ in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 44 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9 .

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7 , 11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6 .

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2 .

Minichiello, A., Hood, J. R., & Harkness, D. S. (2018). Bring user experience design to bear on STEM education: a narrative literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1 (1-2), 7–33.

National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering . Washington DC: National Academies Press.

Otten, M., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Veldhuis, M. (2019). The balance model for teaching linear equations: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0183-2 .

Schreffler, J., Vasquez III, E., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019). Universal design for learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8 .

The White House (2009). President Obama launches “Educate to Innovate” campaign for excellence in science, technology, engineering & math (Stem) education. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-launches-educate-innovate-campaign-excellence-science-technology-en Accessed on 2 Feb 2020.

The White House (2017). Presidential memorandum for the secretary of Education. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-secretary-education/ Accessed on 2 Feb 2020.

The White House (2018). President Donald J. Trump is working to ensure all Americans have access to STEM education. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-is-working-to-ensure-all-americans-have-access-to-stem-education/ Accessed on 2 Feb 2020.

U.S. Department of Education (2018). U.S. Department of Education fulfills administration promise to invest $200 million in STEM education. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-fulfills-administration-promise-invest-200-million-stem-education Accessed on 2 Feb 2020.

Wang, K., Li, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2019). Exploring the status and development trends of STEM education research: the case of IES funded projects on STEM education in the U.S. 数学教育学报 . Journal of Mathematics Education, 28 (3), 53–61.

Download references

This review was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DUE-1852942). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4232, USA

Yeping Li, Yu Xiao & Sandra B. Nite

Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA, 70310, USA

Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

Jeffrey E. Froyd

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL conceptualized the study and drafted the manuscript. KW contributed with data collection, coding, analyses, and manuscript reviews. YX contributed to data collection, coding, and manuscript reviews. JEF and SBN contributed to manuscript improvement through manuscript reviews and revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeping Li .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y. et al. Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic analysis of publicly funded projects. IJ STEM Ed 7 , 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00213-8

Download citation

Received : 18 March 2020

Accepted : 20 March 2020

Published : 22 April 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00213-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Scholarship
STEM education research
STEM funding

qualitative research title related to stem strand

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

STEM as the most preferred strand of Senior High School Student's

2020, STEM as the most preferred strand of Senior High School Student's

Related Papers

Kieran Bentley

Participatory Educational Research

Danilo V . Rogayan Jr. , Clarisse Yimyr De Guzman

This qualitative descriptive research explored the perspectives of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) senior high school students in a public secondary school in Zambales, Philippines on their reasons why they enrolled in STEM and their intent to pursue relevant career. A total of 20 Grade 12 students were purposively selected as participants of the research. The participants were interviewed using a validated structured interview guide. The recorded interviews were individually transcribed to arrive at an extended text. The extended texts were reviewed to generate themes and significant statements. The paper found out that senior high school students are generally interested in the field related to biology. The alignment to the preferred course in college is the primary reason of the participants for enrolling in STEM. Almost all the students wanted to pursue STEM-related careers after their university graduation. Further, personal aspiration is the main reason for the participants to pursue STEM-related professions. The study recommends that senior high schools may design various activities during the career week. These activities may include possible career paths in STEM-related courses, students' career and motivation, and their career aptitude. Teachers may also infuse innovative pedagogies for better STEM instruction. For the students to have more interest in science, it is recommended that STEM teachers undergo retooling or pursue advanced studies. Senior high schools may conduct career guidance seminars for the students to guide them on what strands they should take. The Department of Education (DepEd) may support the implementation of different programs regarding students’ career preparation. This program will help the students to be more aware on what career path they wanted to pursue, and to avoid pressures from peers. Schools may advocate a collaborative, authentic and goal-oriented learning environment with respect to the demand of Industrial Revolution 4.0.

Clifford Anderson

This study uses data collected at two National Summer Transportation Institute (NSTI) programs in Connecticut and Mississippi to investigate high school students’ perceptions and preferences about education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Family background has a significant impact on a high school student's interest in STEM, as shown during the student recruitment stage and by the analysis of the students' college education plans prepared upon graduation from the two NSTI programs. The building exercise and competition instrument is the most effective among the few examined, while passive learning is not what young people prefer when briefly introduced in the two NSTI programs.

STEM is a curriculum which is based on the idea of education the students in four specific disciplines -science, technology, engineering and mathematics, in an approach which it is based on real-life applications.

Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education

Hersh C. Waxman

This study was grounded in the social cognitive career theoretical framework (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994). The purpose of this four-year longitudinal study was to examine the factors that may have contributed to students’ motivation to develop STEM interest during secondary school years. The participants in our study were 9th- 11th grade high school students from a large K-12 college preparatory charter school system, Harmony Public Schools (HPS) in Texas. We utilized descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses to carry out the study. The results revealed that three-year survey takers’ STEM major interest seemed to decrease steadily each year. Although there was a significant gender gap between males and females in STEM selection in 9th and 10th grade, this difference was not significant at the end of 11th grade. White and Asian students were significantly more likely to be interested in STEM careers. We also found that students who were most likely to choose a STEM ma...

Steve Alsop

Paul Canlas

Canadian Public Policy

Mitchell Steffler

Zahra Hazari

Alana Unfried , Latricia Townsend

The national economy is in need of more engineers and skilled workers in science, technology, and mathematics (STEM) fields who also possess competencies in critical-thinking, communication, and collaboration – also known as 21st century skills. In response to this need, educational organizations across the country are implementing innovative STEM education programs designed in part to increase student attitudes toward STEM subjects and careers. This paper describes how a team of researchers at The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University developed the Upper Elementary School and Middle/High School Student Attitudes toward STEM (S-STEM) Surveys to measure those attitudes. The surveys each consist of four, validated constructs which use Likert-scale items to measure student attitudes toward science, mathematics, engineering and technology, 21st century skills. The surveys also contain a comprehensive section measuring student interest in STEM car...

RELATED PAPERS

lia mustafa

Roberto Agreda Maldonado

Hafiz ullah

SSRN Electronic Journal

Johanne Døhlie Saltnes

Erika Donald

Corne Coetzee

Slavistična Revija

Maria Wtorkowska

Jeffrey Zheng

Genij Ortopedii

AHMAD SANUSI

Xenobiotica

denny septyanto

Crisis económica y nueva …

José Antonio Alonso

Journal of the Endocrine Society

Shaminie Athinarayanan

Jurnal Lokabmas Kreatif : Loyalitas Kreatifitas Abdi Masyarakat Kreatif

MASRAN MUSTAKIM

Journal for Quality in Women's Health

Shanty Natalia

Social Movement Studies

Emin Poljarevic

Human brain mapping

Audrey Thurm

Environmental Science & Technology

Sohan Shrestha

Pharmaceutical Biology

Yogesh Yadav

Revista da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisador s Negr s - ABPN

Maria Helena Leite Hunziker

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

eduardo Galante

Gazeta Médica

Joao Beckert

Jurnal Kebijakan Publik

nur ikawati

Current Clinical Pharmacology

Holger Siemann

Obesity Facts

Louise Arvidsson

We're Hiring!
Help Center
Find new research papers in:
Health Sciences
Earth Sciences
Cognitive Science
Mathematics
Computer Science
Academia ©2024

IMAGES

100 Qualitative Research Titles For High School Students
55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students
Proposed Research Titles of Grade 12 Stem Students
INTRODUCTION TO STEM STRAND
Advantages of STEM student
Qualitative Research in STEM by Sherry Marx · OverDrive: ebooks

VIDEO

Sample Qualitative and Quantitative Research Titles
PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1: STUDENTS REPORTING ON WRITING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TITLE
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TITLE IDEAS RELATED TO SLOW LEARNER #genius_ai #fyp #study #researchtips
Science Quiz 62 YT
STEM strand television advertisement

COMMENTS

169+ Exciting Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students
Engineering Qualitative Research Topics For STEM Students. Ethics in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Human-Centered Design in Engineering. Innovation and Sustainability in Civil Engineering. Public Perception of Self-Driving Cars. Engineering Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation.
151+ Brilliant Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students
Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students. 1. Studying how different types of dirt affect plant growth. 2. Checking how different plant foods impact how much crops grow. 3. Looking at how exercising affects your heart rate. 4. Testing which materials keep things warm the best.
55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students
There are several science research topics for STEM students. Below are some possible quantitative research topics for STEM students. A study of protease inhibitor and how it operates. A study of how men's exercise impacts DNA traits passed to children. A study of the future of commercial space flight.
Pursuing STEM Careers: Perspectives of Senior High School Students
Abstract and Figures. This qualitative descriptive research explored the perspectives of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) senior high school students in a public secondary ...
Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal
With the rapid increase in the number of scholarly publications on STEM education in recent years, reviews of the status and trends in STEM education research internationally support the development of the field. For this review, we conducted a systematic analysis of 798 articles in STEM education published between 2000 and the end of 2018 in 36 journals to get an overview about developments ...
Embracing a Culture of STEM Education: A Qualitative Research Study
The Qualitative Report Volume 26 Number 12 Article 15 12-19-2021 Embracing a Culture of STEM Education: A Qualitative Research Study Katie L. Laux Hillsborough County Public Schools, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr Part of the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended APA Citation
(PDF) Challenges in STEM Learning: A Case of Filipino ...
This qualitative study employed a case research design which sought to investigate nature of the challenges in STEM learning among senior high school students in the Philippines. Semi-structured ...
A Meta-Summary of Qualitative Findings about STEM Education
The purpose of this meta-summary study is to determine the preponderance findings about the contribution of STEM education to the dimensions of the science curriculum and the learning-teaching ...
Qualitative research in STEM : studies of equity, access, and
Publisher's summary. Qualitative Research in STEM examines the groundbreaking potential of qualitative research methods to address issues of social justice, equity, and sustainability in STEM. A collection of empirical studies conducted by prominent STEM researchers, this book examines the experiences and challenges faced by traditionally ...
Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic analysis of
Taking publicly funded projects in STEM education as a special lens, we aimed to learn about research and trends in STEM education. We identified a total of 127 projects funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the US Department of Education from 2003 to 2019. Both the number of funded projects in STEM education and their funding amounts were high, although there were ...
Peer learning in STEM: a qualitative study of a student-oriented active
For this study, a qualitative method approach was applied, specifically a case study using the PLA model in a research-oriented university in the Southern region of the United States. Specifically, four STEM classes were observed, and 6 PLA students and 11 students who were served by the PLAs were interviewed.
A Qualitative Exploration of the STEM Career-Related Outcome
With national, state, and local initiatives advocating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) knowledge and career goals, there is a need to understand youth's outcome expectations regarding these fields. We present a qualitative study examining the outcome expectations of 95 youth aged 10-14, using focus group data.
PDF STEM as Minority: A Phenomenological Case Study of How Students of ...
Other research, however, indicates that college environments do impact success for STEM students. Ost (2010), in his study at a large research university, found that positive peer influences can increase the probability of persistence. Although Ost found a large persistence gap between European American students and students of color,
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN STEM EDUCATION: Studies of Equity, Access and
Qualitative Research in STEM Education examines the ground-breaking potential of qualitative research methods to address issues of social justice, equity, and sustainability in STEM. A collection of empirical studies conducted by prominent STEM researchers, this book examines the experiences and challenges faced by traditionally marginalized ...
Qualitative Research in STEM
Qualitative Research in STEM examines the groundbreaking potential of qualitative research methods to address issues of social justice, equity, and sustainability in STEM.A collection of empirical studies conducted by prominent STEM researchers, this book examines the experiences and challenges faced by traditionally marginalized groups in STEM, most notably culturally and linguistically ...
Qualitative Research in STEM: Studies of Equity, Access ...
Qualitative Research in STEM examines the groundbreaking potential of qualitative research methods to address issues of social justice, equity, and sustainability in STEM.A collection of empirical studies conducted by prominent STEM researchers, this book examines the experiences and challenges faced by traditionally marginalized groups in STEM, most notably culturally and linguistically ...
PDF A Qualitative Exploration of the STEM Career-Related Outcome
pursue possible STEM careers can guide our intervention efforts. In addition, this knowledge would fill a critical gap in the literature related to early career development, namely that of the perceived STEM outcome expectations of preadolescent and early adolescent youth, as articulated by them.
Q: Can you give a research title for the STEM strand?
3 Basic tips on writing a good research paper title. How to write an effective title and abstract and choose appropriate keywords. One tip we can give right away is that you should first have a working (rough) title when you start the paper and then refine/finalize it once you've completed the paper (or the first draft). Hope that helps.
PDF Challenges in STEM Learning: A Case of Filipino High School Students
This qualitative study employed a case research design which sought to investigate nature of the challenges in STEM learning among senior high school students in the Philippines. Semi-structured interview guide was used in gathering the qualitative data from the 20 STEM learners in a government-run secondary school in Zambales, Philippines.
A Qualitative Exploration of the STEM Career-Related Outcome
Results supported the outcome expectations identified by Bandura (i.e., physical, social, and self), and two additional types of outcome expectations (generativity and. relational). These two ...
Successful with STEM? A Qualitative Case Study of Pre-Service Teacher
Abstract. This research is a qualitative case study of pre-service teachers' experiences with a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) module during a middle level interdisciplinary course in the teaching of mathematics and science. Data were collected through document analysis of participant reflection journals (during six ...
STEM as the most preferred strand of Senior High School Student's
Further, personal aspiration is the main reason for the participants to pursue STEM-related professions. The study recommends that senior high schools may design various activities during the career week. These activities may include possible career paths in STEM-related courses, students' career and motivation, and their career aptitude.
Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Choose STEM as Their
Moreover, based on the literature review, it was established that a student's Career Aim is the primary factor that prompts them to choose the STEM strand. Skills taught in the STEM strand, such as critical thinking and problem-solving, apply to practically all jobs and are in high demand for the majority.