school inventory of problem solving skills

The Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Problem-Solving Inventory for Elementary School Students

• Original Paper
• Published: 13 August 2022
• Volume 31 , pages 3359–3371, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Thao Thi Do 1 ,
• Cong Khanh Nguyen   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-9483 1 ,
• My Linh Thi Nguyen 2 ,
• Hong Gam Thi Luong 3 ,
• Quang Vinh Nguyen 1 &
• Ha Thi Tran 1  

332 Accesses

Explore all metrics

The study develops and evaluates the interpersonal problem-solving inventory for elementary school students (IPSI). In particular, the study employs a multidimensional interpersonal problem-solving model that is based on the cognitive-affective-behavioral approach to construct a process measure of interpersonal problem-solving inventory for 4 th and 5 th grade students, especially for elementary school settings in Vietnam. The inventory is a 4-point Likert-type scale consisting of 44 items and five dimensions. The IPSI was administered to a total elementary student sample that consisted of 786 Vietnamese elementary students in fourth and fifth grades (ages: 9–12, M = 10.11, SD = 0.75). The reliability of the IPSI was reported (Cronbach’s α  = 0.90; McDonald’s ω = 0.82). EFA was conducted on the first dataset to explore the emerging factor structure of the IPSI. The EFA results suggested an exclusive five-factor solution. CFA was examined on the second dataset to define the theory-driven five-factor structure of the IPSI. The CFA findings indicated that the IPSI consented to the five-factor structure as similar as the EFA results. The assessment of the five-factor model endorsed that five of the six global fit indices (χ 2 /df = 1.406 < 2, P  < 0.001; CFI = 0.928; TLI = 0.924; GFI = 0.875; RMSEA = 0.032 < 0.05; and SRMR = 0.049 < 0.05) are statistically acceptable, suggesting a good fitting model. The results suggest that the scale has acceptable internal reliability and construct validity. Applicability and limitations of the IPSI are discussed. Subsequent studies and possible improvements are proposed.

The IPSI scale was developed to assess individual problem-solving skills of elementary-age school students to real-life interpersonal issues.

The construct validity of the IPSI scale for Vietnamese fourth and fifth grade student samples were analysed using EFA and CFA techniques.

The results of examining Cronbach’s coefficient alpha levels indicated that the subscale scores on the IPSI verify good internal consistencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

The Interpersonal Problem-Solving Measure for Elementary School Students: Development and Preliminary Evaluation in a Third Grade Student Sample

Cong Khanh Nguyen, Ha Thi Tran & My Linh Thi Nguyen

Development and Psychometric Properties of a Social Problem Solving Test for Adolescents

Khanh Nguyen Cong & Linh Nguyen Thi My

Development of the teacher rating scale of interpersonal problem solving in adolescents

Nguyen Cong Khanh

Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Developing multidimensional likert scales using item factor analysis: the case of four-point items. Sociological Methods & Research , 45 (1), 109–133.

Article   Google Scholar  

Çam, S., & Tümkaya, S. (2008). Development of interpersonal problem solving inventory for high school students: The validity and reliability process. International Journal of Human Sciences , 5 (2), 1–17.

Google Scholar  

Dereli-İman, E. (2013). The social problem-solving questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish primary school students. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research , 52 , 97–116.

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology , 105 (3), 399–412.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

D’Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (2001). Problem-solving therapies. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (pp. 211-245). New York, London: The Guildford Press.

D’Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy , 26 , 409–432.

D’Zurilla, T. J. (1986). Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention . New York: Springer.

D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1996). Manual for the social problem solving inventory-revised (SPSI-R). In press, North Tonawanda, N.Y: Multi-Health Systems, INC.

D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI–R): Technical manual . North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.

D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2004). What is social problem-solving?: Meaning, models, and measures. In E. C. Chang, T. J. D. , Zurilla, & L. Sanna (Eds.), Social problem-solving: Theory, research, and training (pp. 11−27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

D’Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (1990). Development and preliminary evaluation of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 2 , 156–163.

Frauenknecht, M., & Black, D. A. (1995). Social Problem Solving Inventory for Adolescents (SPSI-A): Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Journal of Personality Assessment , 64 , 522–539.

Goss-Sampson, M. A. (2020). Statistical Analysis in JASP 0.14: A Guide for Students. Available online : https://jasp-stats.org/jasp-materials/ (accessed March 15 2019) .

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hartup, W. W., & Sancilio, M. F. (1986). Children’s friendships. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Soci a l behaviour in autism (pp. 61–80). New York: Plenum.

Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counselling Psychology , 29 (1), 66–75.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods , 6 (1), 53–60.

James, S., Hunsley, J., & Hemsworth, D. (2002). Factor structure of the relationship belief inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research , 26 (6), 729–744.

Kasik, L. (2014). Development of social problem solving—A longitudinal study (2009–2011) in a Hungarian context. European Journal of Developmental Psychology , 12 (2), 142–158.

Kathryn, S. W. (2011). Understanding how social and emotional skill deficits contribute to school failure. Preventing School Failure , 55 (1), 10–16.

Maydeu-Olivares, A., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1996). A factor-analytic study of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory: An integration of the theory and data. Cognitive Therapy and Research , 20 (6), 115–133.

McMurran, M., & McGuire, J. (2011). Social problem solving and offending evidence, evaluation and evolution . New York: Wiley.

Nguyen, C. K. (2019). Development of the teacher rating scale of interpersonal problem solving in adolescents. Current Psychology , 40 , 5175–5184.

Nguyen, C. K., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2017). Development of the social problem solving measure of adolescents’ competences in dealing with interpersonal problems. HNUE Journal of Science, Educational Sciences , 62 (12), 12–24.

Nguyen, C. K., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2020). Development and psychometric properties of a social problem solving test for adolescents. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy , 38 (1), 76–95.

Nguyen, C. K., Tran, T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2020b). The interpersonal problem-solving measure for elementary school students: development and preliminary evaluation in a third grade student sample. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy , 39 , 14–34.

Nguyen, C. K., Tran, T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2020a). The development of a social problem-solving test for elementary school students. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy , 39 , 35–57.

Nguyen, C. K., Tran, T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2018). The problem-solving ability of 4th and 5th grade elementary school students: the situation and factors affecting. Paper presented in the Proceedings the sixth international conference on school psychology: the role of school psychology in promoting well-being of students and families, Hanoi: Vietnam.

Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2007). Social competence in children . New York: Springer.

Shujja, S., Malik, F., & Khan, N. (2015). Social competence scale for adolescents (SCSA): Development and validation within cultural perspective. Journal of Behavioural . Sciences , 25 (1), 59–77.

Spence, S. H. (1991). Developments in the assessment of social skills and social competence in children. Behavior Change , 8 (4), 148–166.

Tepeli, K., & Yılmaz, E. (2013). Social problem solving skills of children in terms of maternal acceptance-rejection levels. US-China Education Review , 3 (8), 581–592.

Wakeling, H. (2007). The psychometric validation of the social problem-solving inventory -revised with UK incarcerated sexual offenders. Sex Abuse , 19 (3), 217–236.

Wentzel, R. R. (1991). Relation between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development , 62 (5), 1066–1078.

Werner, C., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2010). Deciding Between Competing Models: Chi-Square Difference Tests. Available online : https://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-b371-2797-0000-00000fda8f29/chisquare_diff_en.pdf (accessed April 10, 2019) .

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology , 9 (2), 79–94.

Zsolnai, A., Kasik, L., & Braunitzer, G. (2014). Coping strategies at the ages 8, 10 and 12. Educational Psychology , 35 (1), 73–92.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by the Research Group on Assessment and Education for Children with Developmental Disorders, Hanoi National University of Education. The authors would like to thanks Hanoi National University of Education.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam

Thao Thi Do, Cong Khanh Nguyen, Quang Vinh Nguyen & Ha Thi Tran

Graduate Academy of Social Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam

My Linh Thi Nguyen

Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Hong Gam Thi Luong

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Khanh Nguyen .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. We also confirm that the submission protocol of the study has been approved by the institutional ethics committee at Hanoi National University of Education (HNUE) and the Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Do, T.T., Nguyen, C.K., Nguyen, M.L.T. et al. The Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Problem-Solving Inventory for Elementary School Students. J Child Fam Stud 31 , 3359–3371 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02407-w

Download citation

Accepted : 01 August 2022

Published : 13 August 2022

Issue Date : December 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02407-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Social problem-solving
• Interpersonal problem-solving
• Elementary school student
• Interpersonal problem-solving inventory
• Interpersonal problem-solving competence
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Interview Questions

Comprehensive Interview Guide: 60+ Professions Explored in Detail

26 Good Examples of Problem Solving (Interview Answers)

By Biron Clark

Published: November 15, 2023

Employers like to hire people who can solve problems and work well under pressure. A job rarely goes 100% according to plan, so hiring managers will be more likely to hire you if you seem like you can handle unexpected challenges while staying calm and logical in your approach.

But how do they measure this?

They’re going to ask you interview questions about these problem solving skills, and they might also look for examples of problem solving on your resume and cover letter. So coming up, I’m going to share a list of examples of problem solving, whether you’re an experienced job seeker or recent graduate.

Then I’ll share sample interview answers to, “Give an example of a time you used logic to solve a problem?”

Problem-Solving Defined

It is the ability to identify the problem, prioritize based on gravity and urgency, analyze the root cause, gather relevant information, develop and evaluate viable solutions, decide on the most effective and logical solution, and plan and execute implementation. 

Problem-solving also involves critical thinking, communication, listening, creativity, research, data gathering, risk assessment, continuous learning, decision-making, and other soft and technical skills.

Solving problems not only prevent losses or damages but also boosts self-confidence and reputation when you successfully execute it. The spotlight shines on you when people see you handle issues with ease and savvy despite the challenges. Your ability and potential to be a future leader that can take on more significant roles and tackle bigger setbacks shine through. Problem-solving is a skill you can master by learning from others and acquiring wisdom from their and your own experiences. 

It takes a village to come up with solutions, but a good problem solver can steer the team towards the best choice and implement it to achieve the desired result.

Watch: 26 Good Examples of Problem Solving

Examples of problem solving scenarios in the workplace.

• Correcting a mistake at work, whether it was made by you or someone else
• Overcoming a delay at work through problem solving and communication
• Resolving an issue with a difficult or upset customer
• Overcoming issues related to a limited budget, and still delivering good work through the use of creative problem solving
• Overcoming a scheduling/staffing shortage in the department to still deliver excellent work
• Troubleshooting and resolving technical issues
• Handling and resolving a conflict with a coworker
• Solving any problems related to money, customer billing, accounting and bookkeeping, etc.
• Taking initiative when another team member overlooked or missed something important
• Taking initiative to meet with your superior to discuss a problem before it became potentially worse
• Solving a safety issue at work or reporting the issue to those who could solve it
• Using problem solving abilities to reduce/eliminate a company expense
• Finding a way to make the company more profitable through new service or product offerings, new pricing ideas, promotion and sale ideas, etc.
• Changing how a process, team, or task is organized to make it more efficient
• Using creative thinking to come up with a solution that the company hasn’t used before
• Performing research to collect data and information to find a new solution to a problem
• Boosting a company or team’s performance by improving some aspect of communication among employees
• Finding a new piece of data that can guide a company’s decisions or strategy better in a certain area

Problem Solving Examples for Recent Grads/Entry Level Job Seekers

• Coordinating work between team members in a class project
• Reassigning a missing team member’s work to other group members in a class project
• Adjusting your workflow on a project to accommodate a tight deadline
• Speaking to your professor to get help when you were struggling or unsure about a project
• Asking classmates, peers, or professors for help in an area of struggle
• Talking to your academic advisor to brainstorm solutions to a problem you were facing
• Researching solutions to an academic problem online, via Google or other methods
• Using problem solving and creative thinking to obtain an internship or other work opportunity during school after struggling at first

You can share all of the examples above when you’re asked questions about problem solving in your interview. As you can see, even if you have no professional work experience, it’s possible to think back to problems and unexpected challenges that you faced in your studies and discuss how you solved them.

Interview Answers to “Give an Example of an Occasion When You Used Logic to Solve a Problem”

Now, let’s look at some sample interview answers to, “Give me an example of a time you used logic to solve a problem,” since you’re likely to hear this interview question in all sorts of industries.

Example Answer 1:

At my current job, I recently solved a problem where a client was upset about our software pricing. They had misunderstood the sales representative who explained pricing originally, and when their package renewed for its second month, they called to complain about the invoice. I apologized for the confusion and then spoke to our billing team to see what type of solution we could come up with. We decided that the best course of action was to offer a long-term pricing package that would provide a discount. This not only solved the problem but got the customer to agree to a longer-term contract, which means we’ll keep their business for at least one year now, and they’re happy with the pricing. I feel I got the best possible outcome and the way I chose to solve the problem was effective.

Example Answer 2:

In my last job, I had to do quite a bit of problem solving related to our shift scheduling. We had four people quit within a week and the department was severely understaffed. I coordinated a ramp-up of our hiring efforts, I got approval from the department head to offer bonuses for overtime work, and then I found eight employees who were willing to do overtime this month. I think the key problem solving skills here were taking initiative, communicating clearly, and reacting quickly to solve this problem before it became an even bigger issue.

Example Answer 3:

In my current marketing role, my manager asked me to come up with a solution to our declining social media engagement. I assessed our current strategy and recent results, analyzed what some of our top competitors were doing, and then came up with an exact blueprint we could follow this year to emulate our best competitors but also stand out and develop a unique voice as a brand. I feel this is a good example of using logic to solve a problem because it was based on analysis and observation of competitors, rather than guessing or quickly reacting to the situation without reliable data. I always use logic and data to solve problems when possible. The project turned out to be a success and we increased our social media engagement by an average of 82% by the end of the year.

Answering Questions About Problem Solving with the STAR Method

When you answer interview questions about problem solving scenarios, or if you decide to demonstrate your problem solving skills in a cover letter (which is a good idea any time the job description mention problem solving as a necessary skill), I recommend using the STAR method to tell your story.

STAR stands for:

It’s a simple way of walking the listener or reader through the story in a way that will make sense to them. So before jumping in and talking about the problem that needed solving, make sure to describe the general situation. What job/company were you working at? When was this? Then, you can describe the task at hand and the problem that needed solving. After this, describe the course of action you chose and why. Ideally, show that you evaluated all the information you could given the time you had, and made a decision based on logic and fact.

Finally, describe a positive result you got.

Whether you’re answering interview questions about problem solving or writing a cover letter, you should only choose examples where you got a positive result and successfully solved the issue.

Example answer:

Situation : We had an irate client who was a social media influencer and had impossible delivery time demands we could not meet. She spoke negatively about us in her vlog and asked her followers to boycott our products. (Task : To develop an official statement to explain our company’s side, clarify the issue, and prevent it from getting out of hand). Action : I drafted a statement that balanced empathy, understanding, and utmost customer service with facts, logic, and fairness. It was direct, simple, succinct, and phrased to highlight our brand values while addressing the issue in a logical yet sensitive way.   We also tapped our influencer partners to subtly and indirectly share their positive experiences with our brand so we could counter the negative content being shared online.  Result : We got the results we worked for through proper communication and a positive and strategic campaign. The irate client agreed to have a dialogue with us. She apologized to us, and we reaffirmed our commitment to delivering quality service to all. We assured her that she can reach out to us anytime regarding her purchases and that we’d gladly accommodate her requests whenever possible. She also retracted her negative statements in her vlog and urged her followers to keep supporting our brand.

What Are Good Outcomes of Problem Solving?

Whenever you answer interview questions about problem solving or share examples of problem solving in a cover letter, you want to be sure you’re sharing a positive outcome.

Below are good outcomes of problem solving:

• Saving the company time or money
• Making the company money
• Pleasing/keeping a customer
• Obtaining new customers
• Solving a safety issue
• Solving a staffing/scheduling issue
• Solving a logistical issue
• Solving a company hiring issue
• Solving a technical/software issue
• Making a process more efficient and faster for the company
• Creating a new business process to make the company more profitable
• Improving the company’s brand/image/reputation
• Getting the company positive reviews from customers/clients

Every employer wants to make more money, save money, and save time. If you can assess your problem solving experience and think about how you’ve helped past employers in those three areas, then that’s a great start. That’s where I recommend you begin looking for stories of times you had to solve problems.

Tips to Improve Your Problem Solving Skills

Throughout your career, you’re going to get hired for better jobs and earn more money if you can show employers that you’re a problem solver. So to improve your problem solving skills, I recommend always analyzing a problem and situation before acting. When discussing problem solving with employers, you never want to sound like you rush or make impulsive decisions. They want to see fact-based or data-based decisions when you solve problems.

Next, to get better at solving problems, analyze the outcomes of past solutions you came up with. You can recognize what works and what doesn’t. Think about how you can get better at researching and analyzing a situation, but also how you can get better at communicating, deciding the right people in the organization to talk to and “pull in” to help you if needed, etc.

Finally, practice staying calm even in stressful situations. Take a few minutes to walk outside if needed. Step away from your phone and computer to clear your head. A work problem is rarely so urgent that you cannot take five minutes to think (with the possible exception of safety problems), and you’ll get better outcomes if you solve problems by acting logically instead of rushing to react in a panic.

You can use all of the ideas above to describe your problem solving skills when asked interview questions about the topic. If you say that you do the things above, employers will be impressed when they assess your problem solving ability.

If you practice the tips above, you’ll be ready to share detailed, impressive stories and problem solving examples that will make hiring managers want to offer you the job. Every employer appreciates a problem solver, whether solving problems is a requirement listed on the job description or not. And you never know which hiring manager or interviewer will ask you about a time you solved a problem, so you should always be ready to discuss this when applying for a job.

Related interview questions & answers:

• How do you handle stress?
• How do you handle conflict?
• Tell me about a time when you failed

About the Author

Read more articles by Biron Clark

Continue Reading

15 Most Common Pharmacist Interview Questions and Answers

15 most common paralegal interview questions and answers, top 30+ funny interview questions and answers, 60 hardest interview questions and answers, 100+ best ice breaker questions to ask candidates, top 20 situational interview questions (& sample answers), 15 most common physical therapist interview questions and answers, 15 most common project manager interview questions and answers.