animal testing rogerian essay

Essay Papers Writing Online

Master the art of writing a rogerian essay with these step-by-step guidelines.

Are you struggling to find common ground in an argumentative essay? A Rogerian essay might just be the solution you need. A Rogerian essay focuses on finding a middle ground and establishing rapport with the opposing viewpoint, rather than outright conflicting. This approach can lead to more constructive dialogue and understanding, making it a valuable tool in persuasive writing.

In this guide, we will explore the key elements of a Rogerian essay and provide you with tips on how to effectively structure and write one. Additionally, we will offer examples to illustrate the Rogerian approach in action, helping you to grasp the concept and apply it to your own writing.

Understanding the Rogerian Essay Approach

The Rogerian essay approach is a unique method of argumentation that aims to find common ground between conflicting viewpoints. Unlike traditional argumentative essays that focus on proving one side as the “right” side, Rogerian essays seek to understand and respect opposing perspectives. This approach emphasizes listening, empathy, and open-mindedness in order to foster constructive dialogue and resolution.

In a Rogerian essay, the writer acknowledges the validity of the opposing viewpoint before presenting their own position. This helps establish trust and credibility with the audience, creating a more receptive environment for discussion. By recognizing the merits of each perspective and finding areas of agreement, the Rogerian approach encourages cooperation and compromise rather than confrontation and conflict.

Overall, the Rogerian essay approach is effective in promoting understanding and collaboration between individuals with differing opinions. By approaching arguments with empathy and a willingness to engage in respectful dialogue, writers can create a more inclusive and productive discourse that promotes mutual understanding and consensus.

Overview of the Rogerian Essay Structure

A Rogerian essay is a form of argumentative essay that aims to find a middle ground between two conflicting perspectives. This type of essay is structured differently from traditional argumentative essays, focusing on finding common ground and understanding the opposing viewpoints. Below is an overview of the typical structure of a Rogerian essay:

• Introduction: Begin by introducing the topic and providing background information on the issue. Clearly state the problem or controversy at hand.
• Contextualization: Provide an overview of both sides of the argument, acknowledging the validity of each perspective without taking a definitive stance.
• Thesis Statement: Present your thesis, which should express a willingness to understand and compromise with the opposing viewpoint.
• Body Paragraphs: Develop your argument by exploring common ground and areas of agreement between the opposing perspectives. Use evidence and examples to support your points.
• Counterarguments: Acknowledge the strengths of the opposing viewpoint and address potential objections or concerns. Refrain from using confrontational language.
• Conclusion: Summarize the key points of your argument and reiterate the importance of finding common ground. End on a positive note, emphasizing the potential for cooperation and mutual understanding.

By following this structure, you can create a Rogerian essay that fosters constructive dialogue and promotes empathy and understanding between conflicting viewpoints.

Key Elements to Include in a Rogerian Essay

When writing a Rogerian essay, it is essential to include the following key elements:

How to Start Writing a Rogerian Essay

When starting a Rogerian essay, it is important to first choose a topic that is controversial yet has multiple viewpoints that can be explored. Consider issues that are debated in society but have no clear right or wrong answer.

Next, conduct thorough research on the chosen topic to understand different perspectives and arguments. This will help you present a well-rounded analysis in your essay.

Once you have gathered enough information, outline the main points of contention and areas of agreement between different viewpoints. This will serve as the basis for your argument and help you structure your essay effectively.

Remember that the goal of a Rogerian essay is to find common ground and establish mutual understanding. Approach the topic with an open mind and be willing to consider opposing viewpoints.

Lastly, start writing your essay by introducing the topic, presenting the different perspectives, and highlighting areas of agreement. Focus on building rapport with your audience and creating a respectful dialogue throughout the essay.

Examples of Rogerian Essays

Here are a few examples of Rogerian essays that showcase the principles of finding common ground and understanding different perspectives:

Tips for Writing a Successful Rogerian Essay

Writing a successful Rogerian essay involves careful planning and thoughtful consideration of your audience and argument. Here are some tips to help you craft a compelling and effective Rogerian essay:

Related Post

How to master the art of writing expository essays and captivate your audience, convenient and reliable source to purchase college essays online, step-by-step guide to crafting a powerful literary analysis essay, tips and techniques for crafting compelling narrative essays.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

6 The Rogerian Argument Model

The rogerian argument.

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue.  If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, academic or rhetorical argument is not merely a two-sided debate that seeks a winner and a loser, the Rogerian argument model provides a structured way to move beyond the win-lose mindset.  Indeed, the Rogerian model can be employed to deal effectively with controversial arguments that have been reduced to two opposing points of view by forcing the writer to confront opposing ideas and then work towards a common understanding with those who might disagree.

Figure 6.1 “Carl Ransom Rogers”

The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument:

1.  Introduction : Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way.  Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate.  Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Crucially, be sure to indicate the overall purpose of the essay: to come to a  compromise  about the issue at hand.  If this intent is not stated up front, the reader may be confused or even suspect manipulation on the part of the writer, i.e., that the writer is massaging the audience just to win a fight.  Be advised that the Rogerian essay uses an inductive reasoning structure, so  do not  include your thesis in your introduction.  You will build toward the thesis and then include it in your conclusion.  Once again, state the  intent  to compromise, but do not yet state what the compromise is.

2.  Side A :  Carefully map out the main claim and reasoning for the  opposing side  of the argument first.  The writer’s view should never really come first because that would defeat the purpose of what Rogers called  empathetic listening , which guides the overall approach to this type of argument.  By allowing the opposing argument to come first, you communicate to the reader that you are willing to respectfully consider another’s view on the issue.  Furthermore, you invite the reader to then give you the same respect and consideration when presenting your own view.  Finally, presenting the opposition first can help those readers who would side against you to ease into the essay, keeping them invested in the project.  If you present your own ideas first, you risk polarizing those readers from the start, which would then make them less amenable to considering a compromise by the end of the essay.   You can listen to Carl Rogers himself discuss the importance of empathy on  YouTube   (https://youtu.be/2dLsgpHw5x0, transcript  here ).

3.  Side B : Carefully go over  your side  of the argument.  When mapping out this side’s claim and support, be sure that it parallels that of Side A.  In other words, make sure not to raise entirely new categories of support, or there can be no way to come to a compromise.  Make sure to maintain a non-confrontational tone; for example, avoid appearing arrogant, sarcastic, or smug.

4.  The Bridge : A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side and tries to accommodate both. In this part, point out the ways in which you agree or can find  common ground  between the two sides.  There should be at least one point of agreement.  This can be an acknowledgement of the one part of the opposition’s agreement that you also support or an admittance to a shared set of values even if the two sides come to different ideas when employing those values.  This phase of the essay is crucial for two reasons: finding common ground (1) shows the audience the two views are not necessarily at complete odds, that they share more than they seem, and (2) sets up the compromise to come, making it easier to digest for all parties. Thus, this section  builds a bridge  from the two initial isolated and opposite views to a compromise that both sides can reasonably support.

5.  The Compromise :  Now is the time to finally announce your compromise, which is your thesis.  The compromise is what the essay has been building towards all along, so explain it carefully and demonstrate the logic of it. For example, if debating about whether to use racial profiling, a compromise might be based on both sides’ desire for a safer society.  That shared value can then lead to a new claim, one that disarms the original dispute or set of disputes.  For the racial profiling example, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race that would then promote safety in a less problematic way.

Figure 6.2 “Rogerian Argument”

Sample Writing Assignment

Find a controversial topic, and begin building a Rogerian argument.  Write up your responses to the following:

• The topic or dilemma I will write about is…
• My opposing audience is…
• My audience’s view on the topic is…
• My view on the topic is…
• Our common ground–shared values or something that we both already agree on about the topic–is…
• My compromise (the main claim or potential thesis) is…

Reading Strategies for a Rogerian Argument

To create a Rogerian Argument, you need to understand your opponent’s ideas deeply, and it also helps to understand your own side of the issue in depth. You already learned important skills for reading an argument, understanding an argument, and summarizing an argument. In addition to those skills, here are two new strategies: reading as a Believer and reading as a Doubter. As you can imagine, the first strategy is most relevant for a Rogerian Argument.

Believing and Doubting Games in Reading

When one thinks of reading the first thing that pops into mind is a person holding a book sitting in an easy chair in front of a fire lost in the author’s world, sailing the sea with captain Ahab, roaming the south with Faulkner, floating down the Mississippi with Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer, reading as a kind of vacation from the real world.  Reading is an escape into our imagination and the words and sentences of the writer. We are not tested on this reading or expected to argue about its literary merits. It is not work or pragmatic, it is pleasure, entertainment.

We read now from phones, computers, Nooks, wide screen color televisions, and movie screens as well as books and journals, and much of our reading in school is for a pragmatic purpose. For the purpose of this composition course we will use reading for inquiry (truth seeking) and persuasion (rhetoric).

Methods of Reading

Skimming is valuable when you are choosing your sources. It involves reading the abstract, the first paragraph, the last paragraph, and gliding or passing quickly through the body paragraphs.

Reading to find the truth about an issue

A good way of reading to explore and find the truth about an issue (inquiry) is by playing the believing and doubting game developed by Peter Elbow.

Believing Game

Close reading and summary writing as a way to play the believing game, doubting game.

The doubting game seeks truth by indirection – by seeking error. Doubting an assertion is the best way to find error in it. You must assume it is untrue if you want to find its weakness. The truer it seems, the harder you have to doubt it. Non credo ut intelligam: in order to understand what’s wrong, I must doubt. To doubt well, it helps if you make a special effort to extricate yourself from the assertions in question – especially those which you find self-evident. You must hold off to one side the self, its wishes, preconceptions, experiences, and commitments. (The machinery of symbolic logic helps people do this.) Also, it helps to run the assertion through logical transformations so as to reveal premises and necessary consequences and thereby flush out into the open any hidden errors. You can also doubt better by getting the assertions to battle each other and thus do some of the work: They are in a relationship of conflict, and getting them to wrestle each other, you can utilize some of their energy and cleverness for ferreting out weakness. Peter Elbow

Dialectic Thinking

Dialectic or dialectics (Greek: διαλεκτική, dialektikḗ), also known as the dialectical method, is a discourse between two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments.

Because it’s so hard to let go of an idea we are holding (or more to the point, an idea that’s holding us), our best hope for leverage in learning to doubt such ideas is to take on different ideas. Peter Elbow

Key Takeaways

Questions to Ask

•  How do the two arguers disagree about the facts and interpretation of facts?
• How are their beliefs, values, and assumptions different?
• Do they have shared beliefs, values and assumptions?
• How have my own beliefs, values, and assumptions changed? Have I been exposed to new ideas? How have my views changed?

Chapter Attribution

The material in this chapter is slightly modified (derivative) and includes material from the following sources:

“The Rogerian Argument” in Let’s Get Writing! by Kirsten DeVries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

“Believing and Doubting Games in Reading” from Writing and Rhetoric by Heather Hopkins Bowers; Anthony Ruggiero; and Jason Saphara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

Image Attributions from Let’s Get Writing!

Figure 6.1 “ Carl Ransom Rogers ,” by Didius, Wikimedia, CC-BY 2.5.

Figure 6.2 “Rogerian Argument,” by Kalyca Schultz, Virginia Western Community College, CC-0.

Upping Your Argument and Research Game Copyright © 2022 by Liona Burnham is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

29 The Rogerian Argument

Kirsten DeVries and Christina Frasier

Learning Objectives

• Understand the Rogerian structure of an argument.
• Identify argumentation that emphasizes finding common ground among thinkers.

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue.  If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, academic or rhetorical argument is not merely a two-sided debate that seeks a winner and a loser, the Rogerian argument model provides a structured way to move beyond the win-lose mindset.  Indeed, the Rogerian model can be employed to deal effectively with controversial arguments that have been reduced to two opposing points of view by forcing the writer to confront opposing ideas and then work towards a common understanding with those who might disagree.

The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument:

1.  Introduction : Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way.  Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate.  Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Crucially, be sure to indicate the overall purpose of the essay: to come to a  compromise  about the issue at hand.  If this intent is not stated up front, the reader may be confused or even suspect manipulation on the part of the writer, i.e., that the writer is massaging the audience just to win a fight.  Be advised that the Rogerian essay uses an inductive reasoning structure, so  do not  include your thesis in your introduction.  You will build toward the thesis and then include it in your conclusion.  Once again, state the  intent  to compromise, but do not yet state what the compromise is.

2.  Side A :  Carefully map out the main claim and reasoning for the  opposing side  of the argument first.  The writer’s view should never really come first because that would defeat the purpose of what Rogers called  empathetic listening , which guides the overall approach to this type of argument.  By allowing the opposing argument to come first, you communicate to the reader that you are willing to respectfully consider another’s view on the issue.  Furthermore, you invite the reader to then give you the same respect and consideration when presenting your own view.  Finally, presenting the opposition first can help those readers who would side against you to ease into the essay, keeping them invested in the project.  If you present your own ideas first, you risk polarizing those readers from the start, which would then make them less amenable to considering a compromise by the end of the essay.

3.  Side B : Carefully go over  your side  of the argument.  When mapping out this side’s claim and support, be sure that it parallels that of Side A.  In other words, make sure not to raise entirely new categories of support, or there can be no way to come to a compromise.  Make sure to maintain a non-confrontational tone; for example, avoid appearing arrogant, sarcastic, or smug.

4.  The Bridge : A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side and tries to accommodate both. In this part, point out the ways in which you agree or can find  common ground  between the two sides.  There should be at least one point of agreement.  This can be an acknowledgement of the one part of the opposition’s agreement that you also support or an admittance to a shared set of values even if the two sides come to different ideas when employing those values.  This phase of the essay is crucial for two reasons: finding common ground (1) shows the audience the two views are not necessarily at complete odds, that they share more than they seem, and (2) sets up the compromise to come, making it easier to digest for all parties. Thus, this section  builds a bridge  from the two initial isolated and opposite views to a compromise that both sides can reasonably support.

5.  The Compromise :  Now is the time to finally announce your compromise, which is your thesis.  The compromise is what the essay has been building towards all along, so explain it carefully and demonstrate the logic of it. For example, if debating about whether to use racial profiling, a compromise might be based on both sides’ desire for a safer society.  That shared value can then lead to a new claim, one that disarms the original dispute or set of disputes.  For the racial profiling example, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race that would then promote safety in a less problematic way.

• The Issue: You are pro-homeschooling
• The Introduction: Indicate your intent to find a compromise. Outline both sides of the argument–what opponents argue and proponents argue
• Side A: You show a deep understanding of the positions of those who are opposed to homeschooling
• Side B: Present your side of the issue–the benefits of homeschooling
• The Bridge: Build a bridge to compromise between both sides–what can both sides agree on? In this case, both sides want the best education possible for all students.
• The Compromise: The states can ensure that parents who want to home-school can do so, while it also ensures that home-schooled students receive a high-quality education in a safe environment with information and access to standardized testing.

Adapted from Let’s Get Writing!  by Elizabeth Browning; Kirsten DeVries; Kathy Boylan; Jenifer Kurtz; and Katelyn Burton,  CC BY-SA 4.0  

The Rogerian Argument Copyright © by Kirsten DeVries and Christina Frasier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

26 The Rogerian Argument

Kirsten DeVries

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue.  If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, academic or rhetorical argument is not merely a two-sided debate that seeks a winner and a loser, the Rogerian argument model provides a structured way to move beyond the win-lose mindset.  Indeed, the Rogerian model can be employed to deal effectively with controversial arguments that have been reduced to two opposing points of view by forcing the writer to confront opposing ideas and then work towards a common understanding with those who might disagree.

Figure 3.9 “Carl Ransom Rogers”

The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument:

1.  Introduction : Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way.  Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate.  Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Crucially, be sure to indicate the overall purpose of the essay: to come to a  compromise  about the issue at hand.  If this intent is not stated up front, the reader may be confused or even suspect manipulation on the part of the writer, i.e., that the writer is massaging the audience just to win a fight.  Be advised that the Rogerian essay uses an inductive reasoning structure, so  do not  include your thesis in your introduction.  You will build toward the thesis and then include it in your conclusion.  Once again, state the  intent  to compromise, but do not yet state what the compromise is.

2.  Side A :  Carefully map out the main claim and reasoning for the  opposing side  of the argument first.  The writer’s view should never really come first because that would defeat the purpose of what Rogers called  empathetic listening , which guides the overall approach to this type of argument.  By allowing the opposing argument to come first, you communicate to the reader that you are willing to respectfully consider another’s view on the issue.  Furthermore, you invite the reader to then give you the same respect and consideration when presenting your own view.  Finally, presenting the opposition first can help those readers who would side against you to ease into the essay, keeping them invested in the project.  If you present your own ideas first, you risk polarizing those readers from the start, which would then make them less amenable to considering a compromise by the end of the essay.   You can listen to Carl Rogers himself discuss the importance of empathy on  YouTube   (https://youtu.be/2dLsgpHw5x0, transcript  here ).

3.  Side B : Carefully go over  your side  of the argument.  When mapping out this side’s claim and support, be sure that it parallels that of Side A.  In other words, make sure not to raise entirely new categories of support, or there can be no way to come to a compromise.  Make sure to maintain a non-confrontational tone; for example, avoid appearing arrogant, sarcastic, or smug.

4.  The Bridge : A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side and tries to accommodate both. In this part, point out the ways in which you agree or can find  common ground  between the two sides.  There should be at least one point of agreement.  This can be an acknowledgement of the one part of the opposition’s agreement that you also support or an admittance to a shared set of values even if the two sides come to different ideas when employing those values.  This phase of the essay is crucial for two reasons: finding common ground (1) shows the audience the two views are not necessarily at complete odds, that they share more than they seem, and (2) sets up the compromise to come, making it easier to digest for all parties. Thus, this section  builds a bridge  from the two initial isolated and opposite views to a compromise that both sides can reasonably support.

5.  The Compromise :  Now is the time to finally announce your compromise, which is your thesis.  The compromise is what the essay has been building towards all along, so explain it carefully and demonstrate the logic of it. For example, if debating about whether to use racial profiling, a compromise might be based on both sides’ desire for a safer society.  That shared value can then lead to a new claim, one that disarms the original dispute or set of disputes.  For the racial profiling example, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race that would then promote safety in a less problematic way.

Figure 3.10 “Rogerian Argument”

Sample Writing Assignment 5

Find a controversial topic, and begin building a Rogerian argument.  Write up your responses to the following:

• The topic or dilemma I will write about is…
• My opposing audience is…
• My audience’s view on the topic is…
• My view on the topic is…
• Our common ground–shared values or something that we both already agree on about the topic–is…
• My compromise (the main claim or potential thesis) is…

Let's Get Writing! Copyright © 2018 by Kirsten DeVries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

415 Rogerian Essay Topics & Good Ideas

18 January 2024

last updated

Rogerian essay topics often delve into contentious issues, encouraging a balanced exploration of divergent perspectives. They may explore hot-button issues, like climate change, gun control, or immigration, always prioritizing empathetic understanding over rigid debate. Other topics can touch on social phenomena, like the impact of digital devices on mental health or the influence of video games on youth behavior. Cultural topics, examining norms, biases, and the effects of globalization, are also prevalent. The main purpose of these topics is not only to assert one’s viewpoint as the absolute truth but also to engage in a respectful, enlightening exchange of ideas. In turn, a good Rogerian essay topic can also discuss the complexities of educational reforms, healthcare systems, or artificial intelligence ethics, always encouraging nuanced discussion that illuminates common ground and cultivates mutual respect amidst differing viewpoints.

Best Rogerian Essay Topics

• Influence of Technology on Modern Education
• Adoption of Vegan Diets for Healthier Living
• Expanding Renewable Energy Use to Combat Climate Change
• Growth of Cryptocurrency in the Global Economy
• Comparing Traditional and Digital Art Mediums
• Examining Pros and Cons of Distance Learning
• Prospects of Space Exploration for Human Civilization
• Analyzing Therapeutic Use of Psychedelics
• Scrutinizing Surveillance: Privacy vs. Security
• Proliferation of Artificial Intelligence: A Blessing or a Curse
• Resolving Cultural Conflicts Through Mutual Understanding
• Evaluating the Influence of Social Media on Mental Health
• Evolving Gender Roles in Contemporary Society
• Debating Efficacy of Vaccines vs. Natural Immunity
• Envisioning Universal Basic Income’s Effect on Society
• Deliberating Genetic Modification in Agriculture
• Integration of Virtual Reality in Everyday Life
• Advancing Stem Cell Research for Medical Treatment
• Revisiting Historical Facts and Interpretations
• Deciphering Complexities of Quantum Computing
• Contemplating the Existence of Extraterrestrial Life
• Transitioning Toward Circular Economy: A Sustainable Choice
• Revolutionizing Healthcare With Telemedicine
• Improving Public Transport for Carbon-Neutral Cities

Easy Rogerian Topics

• Assessing Ethical Dimensions of Animal Testing
• Exploring Opportunities and Risks of Gene Editing
• Emphasizing Holistic Development in Education System
• Regulating Online Censorship: Freedom vs. Security
• Mitigating Challenges of the Aging Population
• Pursuing Sustainability in Fashion Industry
• Confronting Implications of Overpopulation
• Navigating Through Mental Health Stigmas
• Enhancing Sports Performance With Technology
• Addressing Disparities in Global Wealth Distribution
• Transforming Societies With Women’s Empowerment
• Understanding Neuromarketing: Manipulation or Effective Strategy
• Adapting to the Impact of Automation on the Workforce
• Exploring Intersectionality in Social Justice Movements
• Analyzing the Effects of Tourism on Local Cultures
• Demystifying Myths of Nuclear Energy
• Negotiating Ethical Boundaries of Cloning
• Outlining the Role of Play in Child Development
• Reforming Prison Systems for Better Rehabilitation
• Reimagining Urban Planning for Climate Resilience
• Deconstructing Stereotypes in Mass Media
• Illuminating the Role of Meditation in Stress Management
• Weighing Pros and Cons of Monarchy and Democracy
• Probing Influence of Music on Cognitive Development
• Balancing Nationalism and Globalization in Modern World
• Overcoming Biases in Artificial Intelligence
• Effects of Multilingualism on Cognitive Abilities
• Evaluating the Impacts of Single-Use Plastics on the Environment
• Necessity of Mental Health Awareness in Schools
• Augmenting Reality: Pros and Cons of AR in Education

Interesting Rogerian Topics

• Decoding the Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Behavior
• Benefits and Risks of Genetically Modified Foods
• Roles of Community Gardens in Urban Environments
• Impact of Microplastics on Aquatic Ecosystems
• Accessibility and Importance of Clean Water in Developing Nations
• Enhancing Accessibility in Public Spaces for Disabled Individuals
• Significance of Indigenous Knowledge in Conservation Efforts
• Assessing the Influence of Celebrity Culture on Youth
• Potential of Vertical Farming in Urban Landscapes
• Understanding the Phenomenon of Fast Fashion
• Roles of Art Therapy in Mental Health Treatment
• Influence of Binge-Watching on Social Behavior
• Importance of Cybersecurity in the Digital Age
• Roles of Music Therapy in Rehabilitation Programs
• Impacts of Deforestation on Climate Change
• Consequences of Child Labor on Society and Economy
• Roles of Microfinance in Alleviating Poverty
• Impacts of Gamification on Learning Outcomes
• Importance of Data Privacy in the Internet Age
• Influence of Classical Literature on Modern Society
• Roles of Green Architecture in Sustainable Development
• Decoding the Impact of Westernization on Non-Western Cultures
• Evaluating the Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Business Success
• Importance of Biodiversity Conservation for Human Survival
• Roles of E-sports in Modern Entertainment Culture

Rogerian Argument Topics

• Roles of Automation in Job Market Stability
• Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: Pros and Cons
• Adoption of Renewable Energy: A Solution to Climate Change
• Universal Healthcare: Economic Burden or Moral Obligation?
• Animal Rights in Industrialized Farming
• Impacts of Video Games on Adolescent Behavior
• GMO Foods: Threat or Solution to Global Hunger
• Parental Involvement in Child’s Educational Success
• Remote Work’s Effects on Employee Productivity
• Zero-Waste Lifestyle: Sustainable or Unrealistic?
• Homeschooling Versus Traditional Schooling
• Death Penalty: A Necessary Deterrent or Inhumane Practice?
• Influence of Violent Films on Society’s Aggression
• Veganism as a Solution to Health and Environmental Concerns
• Implications of Genetically Modified Organisms on Ecosystems
• Capitalism Versus Socialism: Economic and Social Impacts
• Gun Control: Safety Measures or Infringement on Rights?
• Immigration Policies: National Security or Humanitarian Crisis?
• Digital Privacy: Personal Protection or Hinderance to Law Enforcement?
• Abortion Rights: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?
• Euthanasia: Compassionate Option or Ethical Dilemma?
• Body Cameras on Police: Accountability or Invasion of Privacy?
• Technological Dependency: Progress or Problem?

Rogerian Persuasive Topics

• Exploring the Balance Between Privacy and National Security
• The Role of Technology in Enhancing Education Quality
• Advantages and Drawbacks of Autonomous Vehicles
• Influence of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health
• Potential Consequences of Extensive Genetically Modified Food Consumption
• Considerations Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide
• Climate Change: Evaluating Its Anthropogenic Causes
• Implications of Universal Basic Income Implementation
• Potential Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence
• Digital Surveillance: Protection or Intrusion?
• Animal Testing: Necessity vs. Cruelty
• Impacts of Vegetarianism on Health and Environment
• Fossil Fuels vs. Renewable Energy: An Economic Perspective
• Stem Cell Research: Balancing Ethics and Progress
• Mandatory Vaccinations: Public Health vs. Personal Liberty
• Space Exploration: Is It Worth the Investment?
• Regulation of Cryptocurrency: Necessity or Hindrance?
• Unregulated Internet: Freedom or Chaos?
• Responsible Tourism: Balancing Local Culture and Economic Growth
• Immigration Policies: Humanitarian Concerns and National Security
• Human Cloning: Ethical Implications and Potential Benefits
• Gun Control: Balancing Public Safety and Constitutional Rights

Rogerian Essay Topics on Social Issues

• The Impact of Global Warming on Coastal Regions
• Achieving Gender Parity in the Workplace
• Overcoming Poverty: Empowering Individuals for Social Transformation
• Enhancing Mental Health Support Systems Within Educational Institutions
• Promoting Renewable Energy Adoption for a Sustainable Future
• Nurturing Inclusive Learning Environments for Students With Disabilities
• Combating Food Insecurity: Establishing Accessible Nutritional Programs
• Fostering Cross-Cultural Understanding in a Pluralistic Society
• Promoting Ethical Practices in the Fashion and Apparel Industry
• Resolving the Water Crisis: Sustainable Solutions for All Communities
• Reducing Income Inequality Through Equitable Taxation Policies
• Bridging the Digital Divide: Ensuring Universal Internet Connectivity
• Combating Human Trafficking: Safeguarding Vulnerable Populations
• Addressing Affordable Housing for Every Citizen
• Supporting LGBTQ+ Rights: Cultivating an Inclusive Society
• Ensuring Access to Quality Healthcare in Underserved Areas
• Preventing Cyberbullying: Fostering Safer Online Environments
• Encouraging Responsible Consumption to Mitigate Climate Change
• Improving Prison Rehabilitation Programs for Successful Reintegration
• Combating Substance Abuse: Adopting Holistic Recovery Approaches
• Focusing on Civic Education to Foster Active Citizenship
• Understanding Small Enterprises for Economic Growth
• Solving Gun Violence Through Comprehensive Firearms Regulation

Education Rogerian Essay Topics

• Nurturing Creativity and Critical Thinking Skills in Education
• Promoting Inclusivity and Diversity Within Educational Institutions
• Cultivating Effective Teacher-Student Relationships for Academic Success
• The Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Education
• Empowering Students Through Student-Centered Learning Approaches
• Enhancing Early Childhood Education for Lifelong Success
• Addressing the Achievement Gap: Strategies for Equal Opportunities
• Implementing Project-Based Learning for Real-World Applications
• The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Educational Attainment
• Rethinking Standardized Testing: Alternative Assessment Methods
• Supporting Special Education Students: Individualized Approaches
• The Influence of Arts Education on Overall Academic Performance
• Integrating Multiculturalism in the Curriculum
• Parental Involvement: A Key to Student Achievement
• Promoting Environmental Awareness in Education for a Sustainable Future
• Benefits of Physical Education in Holistic Development
• Fostering Digital Literacy Skills for the 21st-Century Learner
• Effects of Assignments on Student Learning and Well-Being
• Early Intervention Programs: A Path to Educational Success
• Addressing Learning Disabilities: Strategies for Support and Achievement
• The Impact of Teacher Training and Professional Development
• Building Resilience and Perseverance in Students for Academic Success
• Promoting Global Citizenship in Education for a Connected World
• The Role of Education in Cultivating Responsible Citizenship

Technology Rogerian Essay Topics

• Enhancing Communication Through Social Media Platforms
• The Future of Autonomous Vehicles
• Harnessing Renewable Energy Sources for Sustainable Development
• Analyzing the Role of Big Data in Healthcare
• Implications of 3D Printing in Manufacturing
• The Evolution of E-Commerce and Its Economic Effects
• Psychological Effects of Video Games
• Unleashing the Potential of Blockchain Technology
• Robotics’ Roles in Enhancing Healthcare Services
• Cybersecurity: Protecting Data in a Digitized World
• Influence of Smart Devices on Human Behavior
• Augmented Reality’s Use in Marketing and Advertising
• Cloud Computing’s Impact on Business Operations
• Ethical Considerations in Genetic Engineering
• Artificial Intelligence’s Roles in Enhancing Education
• Social Impacts of Online Streaming Platforms
• Advancements in Nanotechnology and Their Applications
• Effects of Social Media on Mental Health
• Integrating Wearable Technology in Healthcare
• Future of Space Exploration and Colonization
• Algorithms’ Role in Decision-Making Processes
• Rise of Voice Assistants and Virtual Personalities
• The Intersection of Technology and Sustainability
• Exploring the Potential of Quantum Computing

Rogerian Essay Topics on Health Care

• Promoting Healthy Aging and Longevity in the Elderly Population
• Implementing Effective Strategies for Obesity Prevention and Management
• The Importance of Patient-Centered Care in Healthcare Systems
• Advancements in Precision Medicine and Personalized Healthcare
• Strategies for Promoting Health Literacy among Patients
• Ethical Considerations in Organ Transplantation and Allocation
• Fostering Cultural Competence in Healthcare Delivery
• The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making
• Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections Through Effective Measures
• The Role of Nursing in Enhancing Quality Healthcare Delivery
• Improving Palliative Care Services for Terminally Ill Patients
• Addressing the Opioid Crisis: Strategies for Pain Management
• Social Determinants of Health: Implications for Healthcare Outcomes
• Ensuring Health Equity in Access to Healthcare Services
• Innovations in Remote Patient Monitoring Technology
• Healthcare Policy: Ensuring Affordable and Accessible Care
• Integrating Complementary and Alternative Approaches Into Healthcare
• Ethical Considerations of Genetic Testing and Counseling in Healthcare
• Public Health Initiatives: Promoting Disease Prevention and Well-Being
• Promoting Health Literacy among Adolescent Populations
• Enhancing Healthcare Workforce Diversity and Cultural Competence
• Exploring the Global Impact of Medical Tourism on Healthcare Systems
• Benefits and Challenges of Universal Healthcare Coverage

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family & Relationship

• Building Trust and Trustworthiness in Intimate Relationships
• Nurturing Emotional Intelligence for Healthier Family Dynamics
• Fostering Mutual Respect in Parent-Child Relationships
• Balancing Independence and Interdependence in Sibling Relationships
• Promoting Equality and Gender Equity in Family Structures
• Cultivating Empathy in Intergenerational Relationships
• Embracing Diversity and Cultural Differences Within Family Units
• Enhancing Emotional Intimacy Through Active Listening in Romantic Relationships
• Addressing Addiction and Its Impact on Family Dynamics
• Understanding the Role of Boundaries in Healthy Family Relationships
• Exploring the Impact of Divorce on Parent-Child Relationships
• Promoting Mental Health and Well-Being in Family Settings
• Navigating Blended Families: Challenges and Solutions
• Examining the Influence of Technology on Family Relationships
• Exploring the Significance of Rituals and Traditions in Family Life
• Supporting Aging Parents and Elderly Relatives With Empathy and Care
• Nurturing Resilience in Children for Healthy Development
• Examining the Effects of Domestic Violence on Family Dynamics
• Supporting LGBTQ+ Family Members: Acceptance and Understanding
• Promoting Positive Co-Parenting Strategies After Separation or Divorce
• Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Relationships With Family
• Fostering Emotional Safety in Parenting Styles
• Understanding the Role of Extended Family in Child Rearing
• Embracing Work-Life Balance for Stronger Family Connections
• Promoting Healthy Attachment in Parent-Child Relationships

Rogerian Essay Topics on Education Reforms

• Fostering Creativity and Innovation in the Classroom
• Addressing the Achievement Gap in Underprivileged Schools
• Rethinking Standardized Testing in Educational Assessment
• Supporting Teachers’ Professional Development and Well-Being
• Integrating Technology for Effective Learning in Schools
• Reducing Class Sizes for Improved Student Engagement
• Strengthening Early Childhood Education Programs
• Empowering Students’ Voices and Agency in Decision-Making
• Enhancing Cultural Competence in the Curriculum
• Promoting Environmental Education and Sustainability
• Addressing Bullying and Promoting Safe School Environments
• Reducing Homework Load for Student Well-Being
• Improving School Infrastructure and Facilities
• Implementing Comprehensive Sex Education in Schools
• Encouraging Parental Involvement in Education
• Bridging the Digital Divide in Underserved Communities
• Promoting Multilingual Education for Language Diversity
• Integrating Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
• Supporting Gifted and Talented Education Programs
• Strengthening Career Counseling and Guidance Services
• Focusing on Teacher-Student Relationships for Academic Success
• Promoting Financial Literacy Education in Schools
• Fostering Global Citizenship Education for a Connected World
• Addressing Mental Health in Schools Through Comprehensive Programs
• Understanding Experiential Learning Opportunities for Students
• Using Ethical Education for Responsible Citizenship

Globalization Rogerian Essay Topics

• Ethical Dilemmas in a Globalized World
• Effects of Global Economic Integration on Traditional Industries
• Power Dynamics in the Era of Globalization
• Globalization and the Spread of Western Ideals
• Influence of Globalization on Education Systems
• Rise of Multinational Corporations in a Globalized Economy
• Sovereignty Challenges in the Context of Global Economic Integration
• Government’s Roles in Regulating Global Trade
• Addressing the Digital Divide in a Globalized Society
• Cultural Homogenization and Global Economic Integration
• Consumerism in the Age of Globalization
• Globalization’s Impacts on Healthcare Systems
• Language Shifts in a Globalized World
• Globalization and Income Inequality
• Transformation of Food Systems in a Globalized Economy
• Globalization’s Influence on Entertainment and Media
• Decline of Traditional Crafts in the Globalized Era
• Globalization’s Contribution to Climate Change
• Displacement of Indigenous Communities in a Globalized World
• Development Challenges in the Era of Globalization
• Gender Equality in the Globalized Society
• Protecting Cultural Heritage in the Face of Globalization
• Political Instability in the Context of Global Economic Integration

Rogerian Essay Topics About Gender & Sexuality

• Evaluating the Effects of Gender-Based Violence on Society
• Rethinking Traditional Gender Roles in the Workplace
• Examining the Intersectionality of Gender and Race
• Addressing the Challenges Faced by Transgender Individuals in Healthcare
• The Importance of Inclusive Language in Promoting Gender Equality
• Challenging Heteronormativity in Society
• Examining the Influence of Religion on LGBTQ+ Acceptance
• Understanding the Gender Pay Gap: Causes and Solutions
• Effects of Gender Socialization on Children’s Development
• Analyzing the Relationship Between Gender and Mental Health
• The Role of Masculinity in Shaping Men’s Health Issues
• Exploring Non-Binary Gender Identities and Experiences
• Examining the Representation of LGBTQ+ Characters in Media
• Promoting Supportive Environments for LGBTQ+ Youth
• Rethinking Consent Education: A Gender-Inclusive Approach
• Understanding the Stigma and Discrimination Faced by LGBTQ+ Seniors
• Exploring Gendered Expectations in Romantic Relationships
• Promoting Comprehensive Sexual Education for All Genders
• The Impact of Gender-Based Expectations on Career Choices
• Examining the History and Evolution of LGBTQ+ Rights Movements
• The Intersection of Gender and Disability: Challenges and Advocacy
• Analyzing the Role of Gender in Political Representation
• Rethinking Gender Equality in Sports: Breaking Barriers
• The Importance of Intersectional Approaches to Gender and Sexuality

Rogerian Essay Topics About Animal Rights

• Animal Welfare in Scientific Research and Experimentation
• The Moral Dilemma of Animal Agriculture
• Animal Rights and the Ethics of Hunting
• Animal-Assisted Therapy: Enhancing Human Well-Being With Animal Companions
• Animal Genetic Engineering: Implications and Ethical Concerns
• Ethical Fashion: Animal Rights and the Fur and Leather Industry
• Cruelty-Free Cosmetics: Ensuring Ethical Standards in the Beauty Industry
• Marine Parks and Animal Rights: Examining Captivity and Conservation
• Indigenous Cultures and the Ethical Treatment of Animals
• Animal Rights Activism: Strategies for Effective Advocacy
• Responsible Pet Ownership: Promoting Animal Welfare and Rights
• Responsible Wildlife Tourism: Respecting Animals in Their Natural Habitat
• Endangered Species Conservation: Protecting Animals on the Brink
• Animal Rights Laws: Challenges and the Need for Enforcement
• Animal Rehabilitation: Providing Refuge and Care for Injured Animals
• Ethics in Sports and Entertainment: The Use of Animals for Human Amusement
• Advancements in Biomedical Research: Ethical Implications for Animal Subjects
• Animal-Assisted Therapy: Harnessing the Healing Power of Animals
• Traditional Entertainment vs. Animal Welfare: The Circus Industry Debate
• Whaling Industry: Conservation Efforts and Ethical Dilemmas
• Animal Sanctuaries: Rescuing and Protecting Vulnerable Animals
• Animal Rights Organizations: Achievements and Ongoing Challenges
• Ethical Considerations in Pharmaceutical Testing: The Welfare of Animal Subjects

Gun Control Rogerian Essay Topics

• Exploring Alternative Approaches to Firearms Control
• Ensuring Second Amendment Rights and Public Safety
• Achieving a Balance: Individual Freedom and Gun Ownership
• Psychological Factors and Firearm Ownership Regulations
• Media’s Impacts on Public Perception of Guns
• Education’s Roles in Preventing Gun Violence
• Developing Comprehensive Background Check Systems
• Community-Based Solutions for Firearms Control
• Addressing Mental Health in Gun Violence Prevention
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Assault Weapons Bans
• Firearms Ownership and Self-Defense in a Changing Society
• Ethical Considerations in Policies on Firearms Control
• Combating Illegal Firearms Trafficking
• Enhancing Firearm Safety Measures and Responsible Storage
• Cultural Perspectives on Firearms Control and Ownership
• Gun Control and Its Implications for Civil Liberties
• Firearms Control as a Public Health Issue
• Technological Advancements in Enhancing Gun Safety
• Assessing the Influence of Lobbying Groups on Firearms Policies
• International Perspectives on Firearms Control
• Exploring the Link Between Gun Control and Domestic Violence
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gun-Free Zones
• Balancing State and Federal Authority in Firearm Regulations
• Law Enforcement’s Roles in Preventing Gun Violence
• Historical Contexts and Legislation on Firearms Control
• Youth Access to Firearms and Preventive Measures

Business Rogerian Essay Topics

• Analyzing the Role of Leadership in Promoting Organizational Innovation
• Exploring Sustainable Business Models for Environmental Conservation
• Evaluating the Effects of Ethical Consumerism on Business Operations
• Addressing the Gender Pay Gap in the Corporate Sector
• Fostering Effective Communication Strategies in Virtual Work Environments
• Examining the Benefits of Workplace Diversity for Business Performance
• Enhancing Employee Engagement Through Empowerment and Inclusion
• Implementing Green Initiatives for Sustainable Supply Chain Management
• Assessing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Business Efficiency
• Promoting Work-Life Balance for Employee Well-Being and Productivity
• Embracing Change Management for Successful Business Transformation
• Explaining the Influence of E-Commerce on Traditional Retail Industries
• The Role of Corporate Governance in Preventing Financial Fraud
• Addressing the Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership
• Developing Effective Marketing Strategies for Small Businesses
• Evaluating the Implications of Data Privacy Regulations on Business Practices
• Enhancing Customer Experience Through Personalization and Customization
• Assessing the Benefits and Challenges of Remote Work Arrangements
• The Impact of Globalization on Local Business Communities
• Promoting Entrepreneurship as a Driver of Economic Growth
• Understanding the Role of Corporate Culture in Organizational Success
• Expanding on the Benefits of Cross-Functional Collaboration in Business
• Focusing on the Mental Health Challenges in the Workplace
• Addressing the Role of Corporate Ethics in Building Trust With Stakeholders
• Implementing Cybersecurity Measures to Protect Business Data

Rogerian Essay Topics About Culture & Society

• Balancing Immigration Policies: Security and Compassion
• Exploring Cultural Appropriation: Boundaries and Respect
• Education’s Roles in Shaping Cultural Identity
• Coexistence and Religious Freedom in Diverse Societies
• Global Responsibility: Environmental Sustainability
• Pop Culture’s Impacts on Societal Values
• Combating Mental Health Stigma: Raising Awareness and Acceptance
• Technological Advancements: Shaping Society’s Future
• Multiculturalism and Integration: Challenges and Opportunities
• Empowering Individuals Through Political Activism
• Modern Society’s Evolving Family Structures
• Art’s Roles in Reflecting and Shaping Culture
• Navigating Media Bias in the Era of Misinformation
• Cultural Identity in a Globalized World
• LGBTQ+ Rights: Progress, Challenges, and Aspirations
• Consumerism’s Societal and Environmental Impacts
• Traditional Rituals: Significance in Contemporary Culture
• Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology Access and Social Equality
• Embracing Workplace Diversity for Inclusive Progress
• Fashion’s Influence on Cultural Expression
• Social Justice Movements: Catalysts for Change
• Sports’ Roles in Cultivating Cultural Identity
• Civic Engagement: Strengthening Democracy and Society
• Addressing the Needs of an Aging Society
• Cultural Relativism vs. Universal Human Rights

To Learn More, Read Relevant Articles

277 feminism topics & women’s rights essay topics, 447 position paper topics & essay ideas.

Home — Essay Samples — Environment — Animal Welfare — Argumentative Essay The Ethics Of Animal Testing

Argumentative Essay The Ethics of Animal Testing

• Categories: Animal Welfare Ethics

About this sample

Words: 1061 |

Published: Mar 5, 2024

Words: 1061 | Pages: 2 | 6 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Environment Philosophy

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 531 words

3 pages / 1670 words

3 pages / 1387 words

2 pages / 745 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Animal Welfare

This topic is to create awareness among the people about the care, management and nutrition of pets as well as stray animals (street animals). I believe that animals have feelings like humans too so, caring about animal welfare [...]

Pit bulls, also known as American Pit Bull Terriers, are a breed of dog that has been the subject of much controversy and debate for many years. The breed is often associated with negative stereotypes and misconceptions, leading [...]

From a young age, I have always had a deep love and respect for animals. Whether it was caring for my family's pets or volunteering at local animal shelters, my passion for animals has always been a significant part of my life. [...]

For centuries, zoos have been a popular way for people to observe and learn about exotic animals from all over the world. However, the debate over the ethics and morality of keeping animals in captivity has been a contentious [...]

The majestic tiger, once revered and admired, now finds itself on the brink of extinction, facing numerous threats to its survival. As one of the most iconic and endangered animals in the world, the tiger's plight serves as a [...]

Animals kept in zoos, aquariums, and circuses are treated poorly by humans and inevitably suffer of disease, pain, starvation, and fear so they will perform seamlessly for the public. Animals are forced by their owners to carry [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

How to Write an Animal Testing Essay: Tips for Argumentative & Persuasive Papers

• 🦮 Things to Know About Animal Rights Essay

📜 Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

🗣️ animal testing persuasive essay.

• ⚖️ Animal Testing For & Against Arguments
• 🦥 Animal testing Essay Sample
• 🐾 15 Awesome Titles for Animal Testing Essay

🦮 Animal Rights Essay Writing Guide

Here’s an introduction to animal testing essay writing. This topic is full of controversies and nuances that you need to know.

1. Animal Testing Essay Challenges

It might seem complicated to stay professional while writing about a sensitive topic. What should you consider before you start to write an animal testing essay?

Be ready to:

• Provide trustworthy facts and numbers. As this topic is debatable, you need to choose scientific data sources. All the evidence that supports your thesis should be credible and accurate.
• Keep your writing ethical. Avoid using biased information, overly emotional language, and stereotypes . Instead, use inclusive language without ambiguous interpretations.
• Regard an opposite opinion. It is essential to understand the issue from different perspectives. Include an opposing point of view to show your competence and the depth of your research.
• Overcome a moral dilemma. There is a lot to debate about animal testing, and you might not find a perfect solution. Therefore, be prepared to find the middle ground.
• Keep up with the scientific progress. As so much research constantly updates, you need to be aware of the last changes. It will help you to include only relevant data in your paper.

2. Animal Testing Essay Tips

Here are some tips to make your writing experience easier:

• Use academic research databases to look for evidence.
• Study the background and the development of the issue.
• Don’t hesitate to verify your data using other publications.
• Be objective when providing your arguments and evidence.
• Create an outline before writing your first draft.
• Create several versions of your essay to select the best one.
• Read papers that cover the same topic.
• Study the opposite point of view.
• Spend some extra time on proofreading and editing.

3. Animal Testing Essay Strategies: Argumentative Vs. Persuasive

Argumentative and persuasive essays on animal testing might seem somewhat similar. Here, we will describe the differences between these two types.

Argumentative Essay

An argumentative essay’s primary purpose is to convince the audience that your position is valid and worth attention.

• It requires profound research. You need to study the terminology and updates while exploring the issue.
• Its main bases are logic and evidence. Avoid emotional appeals even if they make your arguments sound stronger.
• It implies research of both sides. You will need to include an opposing argument and show its relevance.

Persuasive Essay

A persuasive essay convinces its audience using both facts and emotional response of the readers to prove one’s opinion.

• It is less formal. The tone is more relaxed. Choose facts that instantly appeal to your audience.
• Its primary basis is opinion. You will rely on the choice of words and strong arguments rather than on evidence.
• It focuses on one perspective. You have to convince readers that your way of thinking is the only option. Reviewing other positions is optional.

Now that you know the differences, we will look at each type. Here, we will explain how to prepare for writing and create an animal-testing argumentative essay outline.

What Is Animal Testing Argumentative Essay About?

An animal testing argumentative essay discusses the pros and cons of animal testing giving preference to one of the sides. You should state whether animal testing is necessary in your thesis and provide at least two arguments to support your claim. Then you will need to include at least one counterargument to show another perspective.

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay Outline

There are several types of organization for an argumentative essay: classical, Rogerian, and Toulmin. Rogerian is the most suitable one for this topic. This type of organization requires drawing attention to different opinions while promoting your arguments.

3 Tips for Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

Follow these tips to make your essay better:

• Choose an arguable topic. Something that is not obvious. It should puzzle your readers and make them interested in what you say.
• Stick to your thesis. It is the basis of your paper. You need to support every word of your thesis in body paragraphs.
• Think about your audience. Knowing who your readers are will help you choose the writing tone. It also determines the need for more or fewer explanations and background information.

Here is another pattern for developing your animal rights essay . Read the paragraph below to figure out how to write an excellent animal testing persuasive essay.

What Is Animal Testing Persuasive Essay About?

An animal testing persuasive essay is focused on one side of the issue. Here, you choose if you are for or against animal testing and prove your opinion. Appealing to conscience, sense of intelligence, or your readers’ emotions is your best instrument. You need to sound convincing to make your audience accept your perspective.

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay Outline

In this case, you need to focus on solid arguments supporting your viewpoint. It will determine the way your audience reacts to your writing.

3 Tips for Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

What do you need to do to write a better persuasive essay?

• Show your empathy. It will affect your readers’ experiences and create an emotional bond between you.
• Repeat yourself. Work with paraphrasing and figures of speech. Strategic repetition is an effective tool to remind your readers about the message you are trying to convey.
• Use rhetorical questions. Puzzle your audience by asking them something controversial. At the same time, your argumentation should promote your position as an answer.

⚖️ Animal Testing Essay: For & Against

Here, you will find the pros and cons of animal testing . You can use these arguments in argumentative and persuasive essays.

I. Arguments FOR Animal Testing

Here is why animal testing should be allowed:

• Many life-saving medicines rely on animal testing . According to the California Biomedical Association, animal research helped almost every medical breakthrough in the last century . Millions of human lives depend on animal testing. It helps treat breast cancer, tuberculosis, leukemia, and many others.
• There is no alternative to testing vaccines . Scientists needed animal testing to ensure that a vaccine doesn’t make a virus more dangerous. During the global pandemic of 2020, researchers used genetically modified mice to develop vaccines. There was no other way to ensure people’s safety.
• Animal testing prevents risking lives of human volunteers . If we test medicine or cosmetical products on toxicity, we can’t use people. Human trials also possess risks of side effects, but it could be worse without animal testing.
• It ensures the safety of the products we use . China does not even allow to put cosmetical products on the market before animal testing. We use more and more cosmetical products every day. There are more and more of them on the market. That is why we need to ensure that every product we use is safe for us.
• We need animal testing to make drugs for animals as well . Scientists use animal testing to develop medicines, vaccines, and medical devices.

II. Arguments AGAINST Animal Testing

The reasons why animal testing should be stopped:

• Not all of the testing results apply to people . Many anatomic, cellular, and metabolic differences make animals poor models for us. So some drugs that pass animal testing can eventually fail on people.
• There are alternative testing methods . Skin-producing technologies such as tissue bioprinting and human skin cells growth can replace animal testing. Of course, it is not possible for all the products, but these technologies can significantly reduce the use of animals.
• It does not guarantee 100% safety . Human bodies might react differently to the same ingredients. When drugs do not show any side effects or harmful consequences on animals, they still might be dangerous for humans.
• The demand for cruelty-free products increases . People know about the inhumanity of animal testing and choose to buy cruelty-free products. Politicians are also concerned and take measures against animal testing. European Union, Australia, and South Korea banned cosmetics tested on animals. That is why cosmetical brands give up animal testing and switch to other options.
• Inhumane treatment and bad conditions . Animals suffer from food and water deprivation, inflicted burns and other wounds, and CO2 asphyxiation. Also, many of them have their eyes open for hours to test cosmetic products. Animals deserve ethical treatment as they cannot protect themselves from humans.

🦥 Animal Testing Essay Sample

Read an animal testing argumentative essay example below. You can use it as a reference to your writing.

Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

As technological progress moves on, we need to move on too. Some practices that were considered normal should be reviewed in the 21st century. We need to choose animal welfare and moral standards over inhumanity. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, expensive, and inefficient.

Animals suffer when scientists use them as test models. Some live in small cages and do not have enough space for motion. Others are forced to eat or drink something unnatural for them. It is common for animals to experience pain because of skin and eye burns, itching, or other side effects in the worst cases. For example, during the Draize test, researchers put chemicals into rabbits' eyes to see the reaction.

Keeping and breeding animals need money. It implies costs for space, food, and other maintenance expenses. As animal tests are not always reliable and need several attempts, the price for developing a successful drug can exceed one billion dollars. Every time you buy a pill or a cosmetic product tested on animals, you pay for animal testing.

Animal testing does not guarantee identical results for humans in most cases. The failure rate for animal testing is higher than 95%. There are also many controversies because the reactions of animals and people to certain ingredients can be opposite. For example, penicillin can kill guinea pigs but helps people. Aspirin is dangerous for pets but relieves human headaches.

To put it all together, animal testing is immoral in the 21st century. It is inhuman, not accurate, and pricey to the companies. It would be better if they invested the money in new technologies to replace animal experimentation. All in all, we pay for these products as customers. We have a right to choose whether or not we want them to be tested on animals.

🐾 Titles for Animal Testing Essay

Last but not least. Below we’ve collected some of our best animal testing essay examples. Use them for inspiration, or try our free research title generator .

• Is Animal Testing Really Needed?
• Animals in Research, Education, and Teaching.
• Animal Experiments: Benefits, Ethics, and Defenders.
• Animal Experimentation: Justification Arguments.
• Animal Testing Ban: Counterargument and Rebuttal.
• Genetically Modified Animals and Implications.
• Animal Research, Its Ineffectiveness, and Amorality.
• Equal Consideration of Interests to Animals.
• The Ethics of Animal Use in Scientific Research.
• Debates of Using Animals in Scientific Analysis.
• Animal Testing in Scientific Experiments.
• Cosmetic and Medical Animal Testing.
• Pavlov’s Dog Experiment.
• Animal Testing for Medical Purposes .
• Duties to Non-Human Animals .
• Animal Testing in Biomedical Research .
• Animal-Based Therapy Overview and Analysis .
• Psychologist Perspective on Research Involving Animal and Human Subjects .
• Qualities That Humans and Animals Share .
• Effects of Animal Companions in Psychotherapy .
• Red Fluorescent Protein Transgenic Dogs Experiment .
• The Use of Animals for Research .
• Human and Animal Experiments in Psychology Studies: Implications for Society .
• “The Kingdom of Dogs” Article by Adams: A Different Perspective on Pavlov’s Dog Experiment .
• Animal Studies: The Role in Behaviorism Development .

🔗 References

• Suggestions for Developing Argumentative Essays
• 8 Persuasive Writing Tips and Techniques
• Animal Testing – Pros & Cons – ProCon.org
• The Debate on Animal Experimentation – Sather Health
• Importance of Animals in Human Lives | Sciencing
• Are There Any Benefits to Animal Testing? Get the Facts | PETA

Research Paper Analysis: How to Analyze a Research Article + Example

Film analysis: example, format, and outline + topics & prompts.

50 Rogerian Essay Topics

Not all essay writing is designed to press the point of an argument with no regard for the other side. In fact, when it comes to writing a Rogerian essay, the goal is to find a way to bring both sides of an issue together. This essay writing style is named for American psychologist Carl Rogers, who developed a non-confrontational approach to counseling and psychotherapy. Unfortunately, this type of essay can be challenging to write for many reasons, including:

• You have to be able to see both sides of the issue, even if you don’t agree with either.
• You’re not trying to score points or win an argument; you’re looking for common ground.
• It can be difficult to stay impartial.

For students struggling with this type of assignment, we’ve created a detailed guide breaking down the fundamentals of Rogerian essay writing and included 50 Rogerian essay topics to help get the creative juices flowing.

Fundamentals of Rogerian Essay Writing

A Rogerian essay’s tone and writing style will differ from the more aggressive style of an argumentative essay. In a Rogerian essay, the writer starts by acknowledging that there is another side to the issue at hand and that valid points can be made for it. They then build on this common ground to further explore the issue. This means that students will need to do more research and pay closer attention to the other side of the problem.

The fundamental structure of a Rogerian essay is:

• Introduce the issue at hand, making sure to mention that there are two sides to it.
• Acknowledge the validity of the other side’s argument while also stating your own position.
• Present your solution to the issue, making sure that it considers both sides of the debate.
• Discuss any potential objections to your solution and how you would address them.
• Summarize your argument and reiterate that common ground has been found.

The Introduction: Start by Stating the Issue

Your Rogerian essay will begin with an introduction in which you state the issue at hand. It’s essential to make sure that you mention that there are two sides to this issue so that your audience knows what they’re getting into. For example, if you’re writing about whether or not the government should fund Planned Parenthood, you might start your essay with something like this:

“There has been much debate surrounding the government’s role in funding Planned Parenthood. Some argue that the government has a responsibility to provide this kind of health care to its citizens, while others believe that doing so would be an endorsement of abortion. In this essay, I will attempt to find common ground between these two sides and explore a potential solution to the issue.”

Presenting Both Sides of the Argument: The Body paragraphs

Now that you’ve stated the issue at hand and acknowledged that there are two sides, it’s time to start exploring these sides in more detail. In the body paragraphs of your Rogerian essay, you will want to:

• Present each side of the issue fairly and impartially.
• Discuss the points that each side is trying to make.
• Point out any areas where the two sides agree with each other.
• Explore the implications of each side’s position.

For example, if you’re writing about the government funding Planned Parenthood, your body paragraphs might look something like this:

“Those who argue in favor of government funding for Planned Parenthood typically do so because it is a health care provider and that all citizens have a right to health care. They also point out that Planned Parenthood offers a variety of services beyond abortion, including cancer screenings and STD testing. Those who oppose government funding for Planned Parenthood typically do so on the grounds that they believe it should not be an endorsement of abortion. They also argue that other health care providers can offer the same services as Planned Parenthood.”

“It is important to note that both sides of this debate agree that all citizens have a right to health care. They also both agree that Planned Parenthood offers valuable services. Where they disagree is on the question of whether or not the government should be involved in funding this organization.”

Finding a Solution: The Conclusion

In the conclusion of your Rogerian essay, you will want to:

• Present your solution to the issue.
• Discuss any possible objections to your solution and how you would address them.

For example, if you’re writing about government funding for Planned Parenthood, your conclusion might look something like this:

“I believe that the government should provide funding for Planned Parenthood. I think that this is the best solution because it would allow all citizens to have access to the health care services that they need. It would also be an endorsement of the important work that Planned Parenthood does. However, I recognize that some object to this solution because it would be an endorsement of abortion. To address this concern, I would point out that the government already funds various organizations that provide abortions, such as hospitals. I believe that funding Planned Parenthood would simply be an extension of this policy.”

With the wiring guide above, you should be feeling a little more confident in your ability to write a Rogerian essay. However, if you are struggling to come up with a topic, here are 50 potential Rogerian essay topics to get you started:

Rogerian Essay Topics About Social Issues

• Should the government do more to combat climate change?
• Should the death penalty be abolished?
• Do gun laws need to be stricter?
• Is police brutality a problem in the United States?
• What can be done to reduce the number of mass shootings in the United States?
• Do we need to reform our immigration system?
• Does the welfare state do more harm than good?
• Should the government do more to protect the environment?
• Do zoos do more harm than good?
• Is animal testing ethical?
• Should the drinking age be lowered?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Education

• Is homeschooling a viable form of education?
• How can we improve the education system in the United States?
• Is college worth the cost?
• Should the government do more to make college affordable?
• Should students be required to take physical education classes?
• Are standardized tests an effective measure of student achievement?
• Should the use of computers in classrooms be limited?
• How can we ensure all students have access to quality education?
• Should schools do more to teach students about different cultures?
• Should creationism be taught in schools?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Technology

• Is too much reliance on technology a bad thing?
• Should we be concerned about the amount of time we spend on our phones?
• How can we balance our use of technology and our need for face-to-face interaction?
• Is social media making us more lonely?
• Should there be limits on the use of social media?
• Is the internet making us less intelligent?
• How can we make sure our kids are using technology responsibly?
• Should there be more regulation of the internet?
• Is technology changing the way we think?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Health Care

• Do we need to reform our healthcare system?
• How can we ensure everyone has access to quality health care?
• Should the government do more to combat the obesity epidemic?
• What can be done to reduce the number of cases of heart disease?
• How can we make sure our aging population is healthy and happy?
• What can be done to reduce the number of suicides in the United States?
• Should the government do more to combat mental health issues?
• Is our current approach to treating addiction effective?
• What can be done to reduce the number of cancer cases?
• How can we improve the quality of care in nursing homes?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family and Relationships

• Is divorce a problem in the United States?
• How can we make sure all families have access to quality child care?
• What can be done to reduce the number of teenage pregnancies?
• Should parents be more involved in their children’s education?
• How can we make sure all children are raised in a loving home?
• What can be done to reduce the number of divorces?
• Should single parents receive more support from the government?
• How can we ensure all families have access to quality health care?
• What role does religion play in family life?
• Are families getting stronger or weaker in the United States?

These 50 Rogerian essay topics should help you get started on your next essay. Whichever one you pick, be sure to argue both sides of the issue in a way that is fair, balanced, and respectful of your opponent’s point of view.

Related Posts

• 110 Personal Essay Topics
• 45 Photo Essay Topics
• 120 Exemplification Essay Topics
• 160 Climate Change Essay Topics
• 145 Classification Essay Topics

Categories:

• Essay Samples
• Essay Topics
• Essay Writing Guides

Recent posts:

• 170 Ethics Essay Topics
• 160 Satire Essay Topics
• 160 Rhetorical Essay Topics
• 155 Criminal Justice Essay Topics
• 150 Political Essay Topics
• 140 Sociology Essay Topics
• 140 Opinion Essay Topics
• 140 Environmental Essay Topics
• 135 Controversial Essay Topics
• 125 Classification and Division Essay Topics
• 120 Literary Essay Topics
• 100 Profile Essay Topics
• 90 Heart of Darkness Essay Topics
• 80 Holocaust Essay Topics

Testimonials

Table of Contents

Ai, ethics & human agency, collaboration, information literacy, writing process, rogerian argument.

• © 2023 by Joseph M. Moxley - University of South Florida

Solving Problems by Negotiating Differences 

How many times have you been in an argument that you knew you couldn’t win? Are you reluctant to change your mind about certain social, political, or personal issues? Do you have an unshakable faith in a particular religion or philosophy? For example, are you absolutely certain that abortion is immoral under all circumstances? Are you categorically against animal experimentation for advancements in medicine? Do you believe that criminals who have tortured and killed people should receive the death penalty? Do you believe that parents should have no more than two children because of the world population problem? Do you believe it is your patriotic duty to buy solely American products?

Some of our beliefs and arguments are based on faith, some on emotion, and some on logic alone. We all hold different religious, p olitical, and personal beliefs that largely define who we are and how we think. Within the past fifty years, as the size of our global village has appeared to shrink with the use of television, fax, and jets, we have become increasingly more sophisticated and knowledgable. As a result, most educated people now realize that few significant issues have simple solutions. Thanks to modern scholarship and research, we have come to realize that our personalities and thoughts are shaped to some degree by cultural expectations. Philosophers have challenged us to recognize that our worlviews – our assumptions about reality, what is good, what is possible – are influenced by our day-to-day experiences. We have realized that truth is nt a fixed, static entity that can be carried into a battle like a banner.

One wonderful aspect of your college career is meeting different worldviews through books and through discussions with people whom you otherwise would not encounter. Indeed, many college campuses offer a wonderful glimpse of the diversity of modern-day life. A wide-eyed glance at students at the university center on my campus, for instance, will show you Chinese students working alongside students from Africa and South America. Young women dressed in their power suits mix freely with returning older adult students. Fraternity brothers rush from place to place, dressed in their blue blazers and short haircuts, while male musicians, dressed in the tie-dyed fashions of the 1960s and shoulder-length hair, play guitars and sing protest songs.

One result of our increasingly sophisticated world is that you cannot assume that your readers will believe or even understand everythinhg you say. On the contrary, you need to assume that your readers will doubt you. They will question the validity of your evidence and test the logic of your conclusions. Modern readers tend to be particularly contentious when you insist on assertions that they find objectionable. Because of this shift in audience attitude, writers need to develop compelling ways of organizing and presenting arguments.

When  you wish to address an emotional and controversial issue and when  your audience is likely to be threatened by  your ideas, you will probably not be successful if you make your claim in the introduction of your essay (or verbal argument). No matter how thoroughly you go on to support your ideas with careful reasoning and to refute other claims (such as those held by your audience) respectfully, your readers have already decided to ignore you. For example, can you imagine how your roomate would respond if you remark that he or she is a terrible slob? Even if you follow up your comment with photographs of the dirty dishes, cluttered rooms, and soild carpet left in his or her wake, can you imagine that the final outcome of your detailed presentation might be resolution? More likely you will face anger, bitterness, and denial. Watch your introductory prepositions!

Most of us tend to resist change and are threatened by ideas that challenge what we believe. Also, most of us dislike being told what to do and how to think, so even if our brains tell us to agree, our emotions (and egos) tell us to shut down and ignore what we are hearing. A male chauvinist who believes that women are intellectually inferior to men will be unlikely to listen to your argument that women are as intelligent as men. Your quotes from world-renowned educators and philosophers and your statistics from the Stanford-Blinet or SAT, GRE, and MCAT scores would probably be dismissed as inaccurate because they threaten his assumptions. Of course, you could hope that the chauvinist would change his mind over time when he wasn’t being pressed, yet you couldn’t bet on this outcome.

Because conflict is inevitable, we need to seek creative ways to solve complicated problems and to negotiate differences between opposing parties. Although there are no simple formulas for bringing opposing factions together, we do have a relatively new form of communication founded on Carl Rogers’s client-centered therapeutic approach to one-on-one and group counseling. Essentially, the Rogerian problem-solving approach reconceptualizes our goals when we argue. Instead of assuming that an author or speaker shoudl hope to overcome an antagonistic audience with shrewd reasoning, the Rogerian approach would have the author or speaker attempt to reach some common ground with the audience. Thus, in a very real way, Rogerian “persuasion” is not a form of persuasion so much as it is a way of opening communication for negotiating common ground between divergent points of view. In terms of writing, we coud say that the Rogerian approach melds the techniques of informative analyses with those of persuasive reports. Your goal when you employ the tactics of Rogerian problem-solving is not for you to win and for your opponent to lose, a scenario that more often results in both parties losing. Instead, you explore ways that will allow both you and your audience to win.

On Rogerian Argument

adapted from Rhetoric Matters: Language and Argument in Context by Megan McIntyre and Curtis Le Van

Rogerian argument is often difficult for students to understand because it asks them to think about controversial topics in a different way: from the perspective of someone they disagree with. The discussions that follow are meant to help  you understand the reason for and the components of an argument in Rogerian style.

On Finding Common Ground 

“On Finding Common Ground” is written by Jeffrey Spicer, University of South Florida

“ It is only through the clash of adverse opinions that the remainder of the truth has any chance of being supplied.”

– John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859

“The major barrier to mutual interpersonal communication is our very natural tendency to judge, to evaluate, to approve or disapprove, the statement of the other person or the other group.”

– Carl Rogers, “Communication: Its Blocking and Its Facilitation,” 1951

argue (v.) – from the Greek argos, lit. “white,” or arguron, lit. “silver,” and meaning “to shine forth”: in contemporary usage, to present reasons for or against.

In 1951, the psychologist Carl Rogers gave a talk at the Centennial Conference on Communications at Northwestern University that changed the way we think about argument. Psychology at that time was dominated by psychologists like B.F. Skinner, who were learning to scientifically condition thoughts and feelings in the same way that Pavlov had conditioned his dogs to salivate at the sound of their dinner bell a half-century before.

Rogers, on the other hand, was a humanist. He believed that human speech and human cognition were interrelated and that the success or failure of one was related to the success or failure of the other. In “Communication: Its Blocking and Its Facilitation,” he put forward as the cornerstone of his practice the belief that “the whole task of psychotherapy is the task of dealing with a failure in communication” (330).

According to Rogers, the principle difficulty preventing people from settling their differences, indeed from communicating effectively in an everyday sense, was that people couldn’t stop evaluating one another. The more important a topic was to them, the more emotional the participants in a discussion became, and the more they were apt to judge what the other person was saying rather than giving it the best hearing they could. In short, Rogers noticed that when people argue, they tend to make judgments about their opponents’ positions before they really understand them.

Rogers’s goal, then, was to avoid this tendency to constantly evaluate and instead to “listen with understanding.” By this, he meant that people should not only try to  understand that someone holds a particular viewpoint but also try to get a sense of what it’s like to believe that. “What does that mean? It means to see the expressed idea and attitude from the other person’s point of view, to sense how it feels to him, to achieve his frame of reference in regard to the thing he is talking about” (Rogers 331-32). Rogers himself acknowledged barriers to this kind of understanding. First and foremost, you have to be willing to try it, and not many people are. Rogers’s approach seems like you’re giving ground to your opponents and, what’s worse, sometimes you actually are. “In the first place, it takes courage […] you run the risk of being changed yourself” (Rogers 333).

It is important to note, though, that this sort of Rogerian understanding is also itself an argumentative tactic. First, people will almost always refuse to consider something if they feel threatened by it, and Rogerian understanding reduces the threat to the opposition. Second, people reciprocate; they tend to treat others as they are treated by them.

Despite the initial difficulties, then, each new understanding of the opponent’s view makes the next easier, while at the same time inviting, even obligating, the opponent to strive for a like understanding. “This procedure can dela with the insincerities, the defensive exaggerations, the lies, the ‘false fronts’ which characterize almost every failure in communication. These defensive distortions drop away with astonishing speed as people find that the only intent is to understand, not judge” (Rogers 336).

This Rogerian process started to make its way into textbooks in 1970. Richard E. Young, Alton L. Becker, and Kenneth L. Pike’s introduction of Rogerian psychology in their book Rhetoric: Discovery and Change seeks to simplify some of Rogers’s terminology and begin to present the process as a set of rhetorical objectives: “The writer who uses the Rogerian strategy attempts to do three things:

• to convey to the reader that he is understood
• to delineate the area within which he believes the reader’s position to be valid
• to induce him to believe that he and the writer share certain moral qualities (275)

Put like this, in such a simple and reductive way, the process of attaining and expressing Rogerian understanding seems almost easy.

It is important to note that these are not developmental steps intended as heuristics, that indeed there are no sequential stages to a Rogerian argument. They are instead objectives to be pursued independently and recursively with the probably effect of facilitating communication. As Young, Becker, and Pike write, “Rogerian argument has no conventional structure; in fact, users of the strategy deliberately avoid conventional persuasive structures and techniques because these devices tend to produce a sense of threat.” This is not to say the argument has no structure, but rather that “the structure is more directly the product of a particular writer, a particular topic, and a particular audience” (275). The danger of argumentative form becoming an exclusionary force, silencing rather than evoking discussion, is therefore greatly reduced.

At this point, then, you may be wondering what Rogerian argument might actually look like in terms of an essay for a composition class. An essay modeled on Rogers’s approach should include a few particular parts:

• a discussion of the problem from both points of view that uses value-neutral language
• a discussion of the writer’s opponent’s point of view and a selection of facts or assertions the writer might be willing to concede to his opponent
• a discussion of the writer’s point of view and a selection of facts or assertions the writer’s opponent might be able to accept about his point of view
• a thesis that establishes a compromise between these two points of view and represents concessions from both the writer and his opponent

Analyzing Pertinent Conventions

Below are some of the strategies that you can use to negotiate consensus between opposing parties. As usual, you should not consider the following to be a rigid formula. Instead, pick and choose from these strategies in light of your audience, purpose, and intended voice.

Present the Problem

In the introduction, identify the issue and clarify its significance. Because you need to adopt a nonthreatening persona throughout your essay, however, avoid dogmatically presenting your view as the best or only way to solve the problem. Unlike your strategy for shaping a conventional persuasive text, at this point in your discussion you will not want to lay your cards on the table and summarize your presentation. Instead, explain the scope and complexity of the issue. You might want to mention the various approaches that people have taken to solve the problemandf perhaps even suggest that the issue is so complicated that the best you and your readers can hope for is consensus – or agreement on some aspect of the matter.

In your introduction and throughout your essay, you will want to explain the problem in ways that will make your audience say, “Yes, this author understands my position.” Because the people whom you are writing for may feel stress when you confront them with an emotionally charged issue and may already have made up their minds firmly on the subject, you should try to interest such reluctant readers by suggesting that you have an innovative way of viewing the problem. Of course, this tactic is effective only when you can indeed follow through and be as original as possible in your treatment of the subject. Otherwise, your readers may reject your ideas because they recognize that you have misrepresented yourself.

Challenge Yourself to Risk Change

Rather than masking your thoughts behind an “objective persona,” the Rogerian approach allows you to express your true feelings. However, if you are to meet the ideals of Rogerian communication, you need to challenge your own beliefs; you must be so open-minded that you truly entertain the possibility that your ideas are wrong, or at least not absolutely right. According to Rogers, you must “run the risk of being changed yourself. You … might find yourself influenced in your attitudes or your personality.”

Elaborate on the Value of Opposing Positions

In this part of your argument you will want to elaborate on which of your opponent’s claims about the problem are correct. For example, if your roommate’s messiness is driving you crazy but you still want to live with him or her, stress that cleanliness is not the be-all-and-end-all of human life. Commend your roommate for helping you focus on your studies and express appreciation for all of the times that he or she has pitched in to clean up. And, of course, you would also want to admit to a few annoying habits of your own, such as taking thirty-minute showers or talking on your cell phone late at night while your roommate is trying to sleep! After viewing the problem from your roommate’s perspective, you might even be willing to explore how your problem with compulsive neatness is itself a problem.

Show Instances When Your Assertions Are Valid

Once you have identified the problem in as nonthreatening a way as possible, established a fair-minded persona, and called for some level of consensus based on a “higher” interest, you have reached the most important stage in Rogerian negotiation: you can now present your position. At this point in your argument, you do not want to slap down a “But!” or “However!” and then come out of your corner punching. Remember the spirit of Rogerian problem solving: your ultimate goal is not to beat your audience, but to communicate with them and to promote a workable compromise. For example, in the sample argument with your roommate, rather than issuing an ultimatum such as “Unless you start picking up after yourself and doing your fair share of the housework, I’m moving out,” you could say, “I realize that you view housekeeping as a less important activity than I do, but I need to let you know that I find your messiness to be highly stressful, and I’m wondering what kind of compromise we can make so we can continue living together.” Yes, this statement carries an implied threat, but note how this sentence is framed positively and minimalizes the emotional intensity inherent in the situation.

To achieve the nonthreatening tone needed to diffuse emotional situations, avoid exaggerating your claims or using biased, emotional language. Also, avoid attacking your audience’s claims as exaggerated. Whenever you feel angry or defensive, take a deep breath and look for points in which you can agree with or understand your opponents. When you are really emotional about an issue, try to cool off enough to recognize where your language is loaded with explosive terms. To embrace the Rogerian approach, remember that you need to defuse your temper and set your pride and ego aside.

Present Your Claim in a Nonthreatening Way

Admittedly, it is difficult to substantiate an argument while acknowledging the value of competing positions. Yet if you have done an effective job in the early part of your essay, then your audience perceives you to be a reasonable person – someone worth listening to. Consequently, you should not sell yourself short when presenting your position.

Because of the emotionally charged context of your communication situation, you still need to maintain the same open-minded persona that you established in the introductory paragraphs. Although your main focus in this section is to develop the validity of your claim, you can maintain your fair-minded persona by recalling significant counterarguments and by elaborating on a few limitations of your claim. You can also remind your readers that you are not expecting them to accept your claim completely. Instead, you are merely attempting to show that under certain circumstances your position is valid.

Search for a Compromise and Call for a Higher Interest

Near the conclusion of your essay, you may find it useful to encourage your audience to seek a compromise with  you under a call for a “higher interest.”

Writing Assignments

The Rogerian method of problem solving is designed for exploring controversial interpersonal, social, and political problems. You can use these techniques to help  you begin or end a personal relationship or to help you effectively communicate with your professors, etc. Knowledge of the Rogerian method can help you deal with instances of sexual discrimination in the workplace or help you encourage insecure authorities to take the action that you want. You could use Rogerian approaches to encourage your classmates and other students at your school to be more sympatheticabout social problems such as poverty and ecological issues. To select a subject for a Rogerian analysis, try reviewing your journal and freewrite about significant interpersonal problems you have dealt with in  your life. Below are a few questions that may help you identify a subject:

• Do I want to write about an interpersonal issue? For example, am I having trouble communicating with someone? Could the breakdown be linked to my failure to employ Rogerian strategies? Are there any major differences in belief that I could bridge by communicating with him or her in a Rogerian way?
• Do I want to write about a social or political problem? Are there any on-campus or work-related problems that I wish to explore? For example, am I worried about an important national issue such as the federal deficit? Or could I promote harmony in a local or campus conflict?
• Are there any sports-related topics that I could tackle? For example, do I want to convince skiers that short skis have carved up the mountain in an ugly way? Do I want to persuade tennis players that we need to throw away the wide-body power rackets and go back to the days of wooden rackets because power tennis is killing finesse tennis?
• Consider playing the role of a marketing executive. Find a new product that you believe is superior to an established product and then write some advertising copy that explains why people should shirt their loyalty to the new product.

Prewriting and Drafting Strategies

Analyze Your Communication Situation

To help you get a handle on which claims you are willing to relinquish and which you wish to negotiate, write a profile of your anticipated audience. Because awareness of the opinions and fears of your audience is so crucial to successfully negotiating differences among competing positions, you need to try to “become” your audience. As usual, this process involves asking, “What do my readers believe and know about the subject? Why do they think and feel my position is wrong?” Ideally, this process extends beyond merely considering your audience’s needs to seting aside your thoughts and feelings and embracing the opposition’s notions about the subject.

After you have gotten “under the skin” of your audience, freewrite an essay about your subject from their perspective. Doing this in a Rogerian way means that you truly challenge your own beliefs and present your opponent’s viewpoints as strongly as you would your own. If you find yourself unwilling to explore the strengths of your opponent’s position, then you should select a new subject.

Write an Outline

After freewriting about your opponent’s positions as if they were your own, you will probably have excellent ideas about  how best to shape your essay. Youmay find it useful to jot down your objectives as suggested in the following outline. Remember, though, don’t let the outline control your thoughts. If insights occur while you are writing, experiment with them.

• Explain the issue’s significance and scope
• In what ways are the major assumptions of the opposing position valid?
• In what ways are your assumptions invalid and valid?
• What consensus can your establish?

Revising and Editing Strategies

By analyzing the strengths and weaknesses that your classmates and instructor have identified in past papers, you can know what special problems you shoud look for when evaluating your persuasive essay. As always, give yourself as much time as possible between drafts. Below I have listed some questions that highlight special concerns you will need to address when writing your Rogerian essay.

Is the Subject Appropriate for a Rogerian Approach?

A day or so after you have completed the first draft of your essay, reread it from the perspective of your intended audience. To conduct an honest self-evaluation, try to answer the following questions:

• In the introduction, have I truly been open-minded? Have I thoroughly reviewed the strengths of my opponent’s counterarguments? Have I honestly challenged the weaknesses of my own position?
• How could I change the essay to make it less emotionally charged?
• Are the transitions from the opposing position to my position as smooth as possible?
• When I present my claims, do I sound informed, intelligent, compassionate? What additional data would help my readers better understand my position? Do I need more facts and figures? Can I incorporate more outside quotations to substantiate my argument?
• Have I successfully limited my analysis and elaborated on one specific, significant claim? Have I presented my position clearly and accurately?
• Is the compromise I have suggested reasonable? Can I be more original in my call for a higher interest?

Read Your Work Aloud

Before submitting your essay to your peers or teacher, read it aloud to yourself several times. As you read, make a note of passages that seem difficult to read or sound awkward. Question whether the tone in the paragraphs is appropriate, given your audience and purpose. For example, can you find any passages that sound insincere or condescending?

Share Your Work with People Who Disagree with You

Ask people with different viewpoints from yours to critique your work. Let them know that you are attempting to seek a compromise between your position and theirs and that you welcome their suggestions.

Do a Criteria-Based Evaluation

In addition to making notes on criticisms of your text and ideas for improving it, you may find the following criteria-based format a useful way of identifying and correcting any weaknesses in your peers’ drafts or your own.

• Rogerian Appeals
• Author establishes an emphatic persona and avoid threatening challenges
• Author clarifies instances in which opposing assertions are valid
• Author show instances when assertions are valid
• Author develops claim in as nonthreatening way as possible
• Author seeks compromise and calls for an higher interest

(Low)          (Middle)          (High)

1 2 3             4 5 6             7 8 9 10

II. Substantive Revision

• The document is reader-based
• The tone is appropriate given the audience and purpose
• The document is organized and formatted effectively
• The paragraphs are coherent and cohesive

III. Edited Document

• Unnecessary jargon and awkward abstractions have been edited
• To be verbs have been eliminiated
• A high verb-to-noun ration has been established
• Strings of prepositions have been avoided
• The document has been edited for economy
• The document has been copyedited for grammatical, mechanical, and formatting errors

Evaluating Criticism

When your professor returns your Rogerian report to you, take a few moments to reflect on your growth as a writer. To help put your role as “apprentice” in perspective, you may find it useful to consider the following questions in your Writing and Research Notebook:

• What have you learned about yourself as a writer as a result of writing your Rogerian essay?
• In what ways has your knowledge of Rogerian negotiation and problem solving influenced how you will make oral and written arguments in the future? When writing this report, did you find your original point of view softening?
• Based on your peers’ and teacher’s responses to your work, what goals will you set for your next writing assignment?

Brevity - Say More with Less

Clarity (in Speech and Writing)

Coherence - How to Achieve Coherence in Writing

Flow - How to Create Flow in Writing

Inclusivity - Inclusive Language

The Elements of Style - The DNA of Powerful Writing

Suggested Edits

• Please select the purpose of your message. * - Corrections, Typos, or Edits Technical Support/Problems using the site Advertising with Writing Commons Copyright Issues I am contacting you about something else
• Your full name
• Your email address *
• Page URL needing edits *
• Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Other Topics:

Citation - Definition - Introduction to Citation in Academic & Professional Writing

• Joseph M. Moxley

Explore the different ways to cite sources in academic and professional writing, including in-text (Parenthetical), numerical, and note citations.

Collaboration - What is the Role of Collaboration in Academic & Professional Writing?

Collaboration refers to the act of working with others or AI to solve problems, coauthor texts, and develop products and services. Collaboration is a highly prized workplace competency in academic...

Genre may reference a type of writing, art, or musical composition; socially-agreed upon expectations about how writers and speakers should respond to particular rhetorical situations; the cultural values; the epistemological assumptions...

Grammar refers to the rules that inform how people and discourse communities use language (e.g., written or spoken English, body language, or visual language) to communicate. Learn about the rhetorical...

Information Literacy - Discerning Quality Information from Noise

Information Literacy refers to the competencies associated with locating, evaluating, using, and archiving information. In order to thrive, much less survive in a global information economy — an economy where information functions as a...

Mindset refers to a person or community’s way of feeling, thinking, and acting about a topic. The mindsets you hold, consciously or subconsciously, shape how you feel, think, and act–and...

Rhetoric: Exploring Its Definition and Impact on Modern Communication

Learn about rhetoric and rhetorical practices (e.g., rhetorical analysis, rhetorical reasoning,  rhetorical situation, and rhetorical stance) so that you can strategically manage how you compose and subsequently produce a text...

Style, most simply, refers to how you say something as opposed to what you say. The style of your writing matters because audiences are unlikely to read your work or...

The Writing Process - Research on Composing

The writing process refers to everything you do in order to complete a writing project. Over the last six decades, researchers have studied and theorized about how writers go about...

Writing Studies

Writing studies refers to an interdisciplinary community of scholars and researchers who study writing. Writing studies also refers to an academic, interdisciplinary discipline – a subject of study. Students in...

Featured Articles

Academic Writing – How to Write for the Academic Community

Professional Writing – How to Write for the Professional World

Credibility & Authority – How to Be Credible & Authoritative in Speech & Writing

essaypages.com

louren standcollar short jacket

• 購入数 1 2 3 4 5

ハワイアンジュエリー ネックレス シルバー 3.8mm 60cm ロープチェーン

【最高のグランジ】【ビッグサイズ】carhartt☆トラディショナルコート

ステラマッカートニー★ファラベラミニトート グレー

✩ジャスグリッティー✩JUSGLITTY ブークレジャコット

ブライダリウムミュー　新郎　革靴　ブラウン

ティランハート(レッド)ネックレス

namの人気コーディネート

ENFOLD アウター

【タグ付未使用】マムート エクセロン　ダウンジャケット レディースL

【廃盤】ティファニー バンブー リング シルバー 925 ヴィンテージ 竹 人気

ヴァンドーム青山　あこや真珠　ダイヤモンドネックレス　18金チェーン

珍品！ 鯨の歯 金蒔絵 竹に雀 アンティーク 櫛

新品 ギフト包装 ティファニー アトラスキューブネックレス

• このコーディネートを通報する

通報理由を選択してください

• コーディネートと無関係なタグ付け

このユーザーをブロックしますか？

ユーザーをブロックすると、そのユーザーからの コメントやフォロー等を受け付けなくなります。 ブロックをした場合、ユーザーへの通知はありません。

ブロックを解除しますか？

• Facebookで共有
• Pinterestで共有

Rogerian essay on animal testing

Finding the middle ground

(100 points)

Purpose:  To develop a well-organized middle ground essay.  To be capable of acknowledging and understanding an opposing group.  To establish a fair agreement between two different forces.

Choose one issue that interests you and begin your essay focusing on this specific one:

Remember, both sides are winning for a Rogerian essay.  Be fair and acknowledgeable to the other side of your argument.

There are four goals you should strive to meet in this essay; these goals are the main criteria I will use to arrive at your final grade.

1) Meet the length requirement: 4.5-5 pages (double-spaced, typed).

2) Introduction: presents both the pros and cons of the issue

3) Develop a clear thesis statement that addresses a middle ground argument for the topic.   

4) Cite two sources that support your argument and two that opposes it.  Show me with clear details how you acknowledge and state the opposing force fairly.  Conclusion: do you present a compromise between the two positions.

EXAMPLE: Torture is the practice of deliberately harming a person physically or psychologically for specific gains which includes: to punish, to obtain information about something, or to force someone to confess a crime. Some people argue that it should be prohibited because it is cruel, inhuman, and it goes against our civil rights. In other words, it should be banned at all times, and places. Others encourage torture because it may save many lives that are in danger which means that the suspect is a threat to them.  Furthermore, some authorities abuse people to make them admit their crime, or to punish them to spread fear in a society.  Write an essay that seeks a middle ground between the opposing sides. Use evidence from peer-reviewed sources to back your argument.