Project-based learning in bioethics education

  • Published: 15 May 2024

Cite this article

assignment 4 ethics

  • Joseph Tham   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-4107 1  

Higher education has become more student-centered as the Bologna process assigns students more time to study and research. Online teaching has been needed during the pandemic, which can be challenging regarding didactic and assessment. This paper analyzes project-based learning (PBL) as a form of teaching and assessing students in a bioethics course on reproductive ethics. The team project was the final assessment of the Faculty of Bioethics core curriculum course, "Bioethics, Technology and Procreation,” offered to two student groups in the 2019–2020 school year. The analysis of the results of PBL is descriptive qualitative with semi-quantitative data from student feedback. Forty students were presented with a detailed methodology of team projects and were encouraged to form teams of 3 to 5. They need to develop a team project with creativity and pastoral sensibility that will communicate the content assimilated in class to a selected target audience, with adequate means to measure the impact of their project on their target. Thirty-eight students formed ten teams and presented ten projects. Each team had 2–4 encounters with the professor and 6–10 encounters among team members. Six of the ten projects were categorized as didactic, three mediatic, one didactic-mediatic and 0 artistic. The grades of this final assignment ranged from 7 to 10, with an average of 8.7 out of 10. The survey feedback demonstrated high satisfaction, as students discovered new values in teamwork and pastoral applications. However, this innovation can be more time-consuming for the professor and the students, requiring more significant time management, teamwork and communication competency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

assignment 4 ethics

Similar content being viewed by others

assignment 4 ethics

Problem-based projects in medical education: extending PBL practices and broadening learning perspectives

assignment 4 ethics

Authentic learning in the undergraduate social research methods classroom: students’ perspectives on project-based pedagogy

assignment 4 ethics

Teaching Beyond the Classroom: A Project-Based Innovation in a Language Education Course

Título de Experto en Docencia Universitaria, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Escuela de Posgrado y Formación Permanente, www.postgrado.ufv.es

AAC&U. (n.d.). VALUE Rubrics—Teamwork . AAC&U. Retrieved February 27, 2024, from https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-teamwork

Al Moush, S. and A. Farhat. 2023. The power of authentic assessment in the age of AI. Faculty Focus | Higher Ed Teaching & Learning .  https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/educational-assessment/the-power-of-authentic-assessment-in-the-age-of-ai/ . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Bender, W.N. 2012. Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century . Thousand Oaks: Corwin / SAGE Publications.

Google Scholar  

Buck Institute for Education. n.d. What is PBL? PBLWorks. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1987. Donum Vitae, instruction on respect for human life . http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 2008. Instruction Dignitas Personae on certain bioethical questions . http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Czarnecki, D. 2015. Moral women, immoral technologies: How devout women negotiate gender, religion, and assisted reproductive technologies. Gender and Society 29 (5): 716–742.

Article   Google Scholar  

Edutopia. (n.d.). Project-based learning (PBL) . Edutopia. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning

Graduate Management Admission Council. 2020. The bologna accord: A European revolution with global implications . https://web.archive.org/web/20200324105130/https://www.gmac.com/why-gmac/gmac-news/gmnews/2005/january-february/the-bologna-accord-a-european-revolution-with-global-implications . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Kovácsné Pusztai, K. 2021. Evaluation of project-based learning. Acta Didactica Napocensia 14 (1):64–75. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.14.1.5

Learning Leap Consultants. n.d. The role of Bloom’s taxonomy in project based learning – Learning leap consultants . Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://learningleapconsultants.com/role-blooms-taxonomy-projectbased-learning/

PBLWorks (Director). 2010. Project based learning: Explained. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMCZvGesRz8 . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Ramos-Ramos, P. and A. M. B. Nicolás. 2022. Teaching dilemmas and student motivation in project-based learning in secondary education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning  16(1):Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v16i1.33056

Sgreccia, E. 2012. Personalist bioethics: Foundations and applications . J. A. D. Camillo & M. J. Miller, Trans. 1 edition. National Catholic Bioethics Center.

The Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area | European Education Area . (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2024, from https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/inclusive-and-connected-higher-education/bologna-process . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Vial Correa, J. D. D. and E. Sgreccia. 2005. The dignity of human procreation and reproductive technologies: Anthropological and ethical aspects . Libreria Editrice Vaticana. http://www.academiavita.org/_pdf/assemblies/10/the_dignity_of_human_procreation_and_reproductive_technologies.pdf . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Vogler, J.S., P. Thompson, D.W. Davis, B.E. Mayfield, P.M. Finley, and D. Yasseri. 2018. The hard work of soft skills: Augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science 46 (3): 457–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9438-9 .

YourEduAction. 2014. Cos’è L’Apprendimento Basato sul Progetto (Project Based Learning). Your Edu Action . https://www.youreduaction.it/project-based-learning/ . Accessed 28 Feb 2024

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Bioethics, Regina Apostolorum Pontifical Ateneo, Rome, Italy

Joseph Tham

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Tham .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests, additional information, publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Course syllabus (abridged for this publication)

Description: This course seeks to help the students understand the issues and debates surrounding infertility and ART. The student should assimilate the scientific data, the ethical positions, and the challenges of a secular mindset on these issues. Learning is attained through lessons, team and individual assignments, forums, debates and presentations to demonstrate the capacity to translate the acquired knowledge into pastoral projects.

Objective: This course seeks to help the students understand the issues and debates surrounding infertility and ART. The student should be able to assimilate the personalist bioethics position that coincides with the Catholic magisterium and should be able to defend this position in the current secular mindset, translating this knowledge into pastoral projects that could help propagate this understanding.

Competence: Students graduating from this course should have acquired knowledge about infertility problems, treatment options, and ethical positions. They should have assimilated the personalist bioethics vision and be able to explain and defend this position and apply it with pastoral creativity and sensibility.

Course content:

The human meaning of procreation : a) Today's vision of procreation; b) Personalist view of sexuality and procreation; c) Procreate and produce: two different human acts.

Scientific data : a) Infertility: causes, diagnosis, and treatment; b) natural methods; c) NaProTechnology; Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).

Ethics of ART : a) Judgment according to DP; b) Judgment according to the Magisterium; c) Surrogate motherhood; d) Laws and policy on procreation; e) Destiny for frozen embryos; f) Pastoral aspects.

Methodology

The course will consist of lectures with activities, forums and student presentations. Outside the classroom, the students will need to prepare weekly assignments that are individual or in teams. The final assessment can be a team or individual project demonstrating the content's assimilation and the ability to apply it to a particular audience pastorally.

Credits and distribution of work time

Twelve hours of classes and 18 h of four assignments, including essays, comparison charts, case studies, film forums, and personal readings. 20 h of a final team project (PBL).

Learning outcome

Summarize scientific data on infertility's causes, investigation and treatments. (NFP, NaProTechnology, ART)

Analyze, evaluate and contrast the modern secular mentality on fertility problems (sexuality, procreation, family) with those of the Catholic and personalist vision.

Offer a personal critique of the arguments for and against using ART in infertility treatments.

Analyze and offer ethical judgment on cases related to fertility treatments.

Designate pastoral projects on infertility that may influence society in favor of the culture of life.

Appendix 2: Instructions for PBL final team project

Please follow these steps.

Forming a team.

The number of the team should be at most six students. A smaller team of three to four might work better.

If you decide to work alone or have a team with more than six students, you need special approval from the professor.

The size of the team has a bearing on the final grade—since the larger the team, the more time and energy the project will require to carry out. The project should be proportionate to the time expected on the average of 20 h per student in the team.

Inform the professor of the formation of the team by ____________________.

Proposal of the target and the deliverable or project.

The team should ideally have a leader, a secretary and a spokesperson. The secretary should help with the minutes and final report describing the team project process. The spokesperson could be the one to present the project at the end.

Discuss which target audience is best suited for this project among the team members. Remember, the idea is to devise a project covering the course content's three areas (mentality, scientific data, and ethics) for a specific target. This stage is crucial. You can choose from different possibilities. It might be necessary to do some research in order to decide on the best target.

Discuss also among the team members the project that would be most effective in helping to convince or enlighten the target you have chosen based on the content material of the course. Preliminary research might also be necessary.

Consider the method of measuring the impact. That is, how do you know if the deliverable has been or will be effective in communicating the objective content?

A 1–2 page proposal could be drafted and sent to the professor at this stage. He can give you feedback, either written or by Zoom meeting, to discuss the merits and defects of the proposal. The proposal could take several encounters and exchanges. Once the professor gives you the okay, the team can start to work on the project.

The deliverable

The team should now divide the work among its members reasonably and fairly.

Refer to the rubrics that will give an idea about what is requested in formulating this deliverable. Some suggested research is offered below.

What is the target audience like? What are their background characteristics? How do you reach them? How do you learn more about them and their attitudes toward the subject matter (surveys, literature searches, interviews, etc.)?

How is the deliverable going to reach out to the target audience? How will they learn about it? What kind of recruitment or promotion would be needed? Would the deliverable address their real needs, pastorally speaking (how to verify that)? Are similar resources or activities available as alternatives, and what can I learn from these alternatives?

Does the content of the deliverable correspond to the three areas of content seen in the course? Does the deliverable express an understanding of the mentality of the target audience and address their concerns in a sensitive and pastoral manner? Does the deliverable cover the basic scientific knowledge proportionate to the target's level of education? Are the ethical principles and messages given in a way suitable to the target audience's needs and concerns?

How is the impact factor measured? Is the means of measurement specific to the target audience's background and needs? Is the means of measurement objective and quantifiable?

While finalizing the deliverable, the team should send a progress report to the professor about the advances and difficulties. There should be at least one Zoom encounter with the professor so that he can give his feedback and observations.

Ideally, the project should be delivered to the target audience, and the report should record or describe the process. The impact should also be recorded and reported. This can be part of the final presentation.

The deliverable and the report should be handed to the professor before the final presentation.

A report should describe the entire process of the team project. This report allows the professor to evaluate the competence of teamwork among the members.

It should describe the responsibilities and tasks of the different members.

It should describe the different encounters and decisions of the team.

It should describe how the team arrives at the target, deliverable, and impact measurement decisions.

It should describe the different investigations, the debates, the obstacles, and the team's agreements.

The presentation

Each team has 20 min to present on the final evaluation day.

The presentation is focused on the deliverable, the target and the impact.

The presenter should explain the nature of this deliverable, its goal and objective, and why the team believes it will effectively communicate the course content to the target audience.

If the project has been delivered, what are the results and impact? If not, how will the impact be measured?

It is followed by 10 min of questions and answers by the other teams and the professor.

Appendix 3: Assessment rubrics

Appendix 4: questionnaire.

figure a

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Tham, J. Project-based learning in bioethics education. International Journal of Ethics Education (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-024-00191-3

Download citation

Accepted : 17 April 2024

Published : 15 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-024-00191-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Project-based learning
  • Reproductive ethics
  • Medical ethics
  • Catholic theology
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research
  • Free Tools for Students
  • Harvard Referencing Generator

Free Harvard Referencing Generator

Generate accurate Harvard reference lists quickly and for FREE, with MyBib!

🤔 What is a Harvard Referencing Generator?

A Harvard Referencing Generator is a tool that automatically generates formatted academic references in the Harvard style.

It takes in relevant details about a source -- usually critical information like author names, article titles, publish dates, and URLs -- and adds the correct punctuation and formatting required by the Harvard referencing style.

The generated references can be copied into a reference list or bibliography, and then collectively appended to the end of an academic assignment. This is the standard way to give credit to sources used in the main body of an assignment.

👩‍🎓 Who uses a Harvard Referencing Generator?

Harvard is the main referencing style at colleges and universities in the United Kingdom and Australia. It is also very popular in other English-speaking countries such as South Africa, Hong Kong, and New Zealand. University-level students in these countries are most likely to use a Harvard generator to aid them with their undergraduate assignments (and often post-graduate too).

🙌 Why should I use a Harvard Referencing Generator?

A Harvard Referencing Generator solves two problems:

  • It provides a way to organise and keep track of the sources referenced in the content of an academic paper.
  • It ensures that references are formatted correctly -- inline with the Harvard referencing style -- and it does so considerably faster than writing them out manually.

A well-formatted and broad bibliography can account for up to 20% of the total grade for an undergraduate-level project, and using a generator tool can contribute significantly towards earning them.

⚙️ How do I use MyBib's Harvard Referencing Generator?

Here's how to use our reference generator:

  • If citing a book, website, journal, or video: enter the URL or title into the search bar at the top of the page and press the search button.
  • Choose the most relevant results from the list of search results.
  • Our generator will automatically locate the source details and format them in the correct Harvard format. You can make further changes if required.
  • Then either copy the formatted reference directly into your reference list by clicking the 'copy' button, or save it to your MyBib account for later.

MyBib supports the following for Harvard style:

🍏 What other versions of Harvard referencing exist?

There isn't "one true way" to do Harvard referencing, and many universities have their own slightly different guidelines for the style. Our generator can adapt to handle the following list of different Harvard styles:

  • Cite Them Right
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU)
  • University of the West of England (UWE)

Image of daniel-elias

Daniel is a qualified librarian, former teacher, and citation expert. He has been contributing to MyBib since 2018.

IMAGES

  1. SOLUTION: Assignment 4 ethics

    assignment 4 ethics

  2. Assignment #4 1 .pdf

    assignment 4 ethics

  3. Assignment 4 -Ethics and laws.docx

    assignment 4 ethics

  4. Assignment N1 Ethics 4

    assignment 4 ethics

  5. SOLUTION: Assignment 4 ethics docx

    assignment 4 ethics

  6. Assignment 4.docx

    assignment 4 ethics

VIDEO

  1. Week 6 Individual Assignment “Leading With Ethics & Integrity

  2. Business Responsibility & Sustainability Report Principle 2

  3. The CELTA 4 Written Assignments

  4. Individual Assignment DTT3023 Ethics and Professional Issues

  5. Business Ethics

  6. ETHICS IN ENGINEERING NPTEL ASSIGNMENT-6

COMMENTS

  1. Shadow Health Assignment 4: Ethics Flashcards

    call department head. Why should the department head be contacted. C. What should you say to dr. Tremblay. B. Why is this the appropriate level of information to include in your conversation with dr tremblay. A. What will you suggest for mrs. O'Connors treatment plan going forward.

  2. Shadow Health Assignment 4: Ethics Flashcards

    Ultimately, you have authority over your healthcare decisions. While my job is to champion your health, I will not tell you what to do. My responsibilities are to provide you options and information, respect your wishes, and continue to provide the best care possible. Samuel: I understand.

  3. Shadow Health Leadership

    The pump we gave you is under your control, and when you only use it when you are feeling increased pain, the medication is safe. Going off pain medication altogether could actually cause shallow breathing, which could lead to complications like pneumonia. It's ultimately your call. Shadow Health Leadership - Assignment 4: Ethics.

  4. Assignment 4 Ethics (Part 1 of 2)

    Assignment 4: Ethics (Part 1 of 2) Prioitization of care -Omar Haddad -Arun Patel -Samuel Liu -Debbie O'Connor - Anita Douglas. Select the Priority Patient: Deebie O'Connor because her O2 stat is below 90. Safety Check, Greet Patient. Subjective Findings - Interview Guide.

  5. Assignment 4 Ethics

    Assignment 4: Ethics Digital Clinical Experience Score 83% Debrief. Time: 1535. You have just completed the assignment about ethics. We're going to take some time to debrief you on what you've done so far. To begin, you'll have the opportunity to identify and discuss thoughts and feelings about the assignment. Next, we will consider how

  6. Shadow Health 2

    Assignment 4: Ethics Results | Completed. BSN335 Concepts of Nursing IV - Leadership - May 2023, 20232bsn. Return to Assignment (/assignments/823613/) Shadow Health will be performing planned maintenance this Friday, from 7:00am until 7:30am Eastern. During this time assignment attempts will be disable.

  7. Shadow Health Leadership Assignment 4 Ethics.(A+ Guide)

    Assignment 4 Ethics Assignment 4: Ethics Digital Clinical Experience Score 83.5% Debrief Time: 1535 You have just completed the assignment about ethics. We're going to take some time to debrief you on what you've done so far. To begin, you'll have the opportunity to identify and discuss thoughts and feelings about the assignment.

  8. Shadow Health Leadership Assignment 4 Ethics.(A+ Guide ...

    Shadow Health Leadership Assignment 4 Ethics.(A+ Guide) Download to Score an A! - You have just completed the assignment about ethics. We're going to take some time to debrief you on what you've done so far. To begin, you'll have the opportunity to identify and discuss thoughts and feelings about t... [Show more]

  9. Shadow Health Leadership Assignment 4 Ethics (A+ Guide).

    ortunity to identify and discuss thoughts and feelings about the assignment. Next, we will consider how Downloaded by Nels Terrell () lOMoARcPSD| Shadow Health Leadership Assignment 4 Ethics (A+ Guide). the models and processes you've read about in the Leadership Toolkit apply to the events of the assignment. We'll finish the debrief by working through ways you can integrate what you've ...

  10. Assignment 4

    View Assignment 4 - Prioritizing Delivery of Care.pdf from NRSG 4996 at Northeastern University. Assignment 4: Ethics | Completed | Shadow Health 3/18/21, 5:54 PM If you are are experiencing audio

  11. Assignment 4 Ethics prioritizing delivery of care.pdf

    Assignment 4: Ethics Results | Completed BSN335 Concepts of Nursing IV - Leadership - September 2020, 20203bsn33502 Return to Assignment (/assignments/407020/) (/site_notice_dismissals?from_flash=true&site_noti We want your feedback about our new dashboards!

  12. SHADOW HEALTH ASSIGNMENT 4 ETHICS COMPLETE QUESTIONS AND ...

    e You can administer oxygen if the patient is critical without orders How should you explain the situation to angela A Debbie O'Connor's breathing and oxygen levels are deteriorating; I couldn't reach her provider after two tries. Could you try contacting Dr. Tremblay yourself and requesting orders for a venturi mask? Why is it important to give charge nurse Angela the appropriate amount of ...

  13. Assignment 4 Ethics interprofessional communication Shadow ...

    Assignment 4 Ethics interprofessional communication Shadow Health Questions And Answers Correctly Verified Assignment 4: Ethics Results | Turned In Complex Care Clinical - March 2020, NUR 4505 Return to Assignment (/assignments/312155/) Your Results Lab Pass (/assignment_attempts/6439930/l ab_pass.p Interprofessional Communication Score: 37.5 ...

  14. Assignment 4- Ethics in Technology.docx

    View Assignment 4- Ethics in Technology.docx from PY 360V at Ashworth College. Student Name: Monelle Alexis Student Identification Number: AC1503654 Course Number and Title: PY360V Ethics in

  15. HU245 Unit 4 Assignment

    Assignment 4 1. Unit 4 Asiignment. Lucretia Davis Purdue Global University Hu245 Ethics Professor Russel Fail May 3, 2021. 2 Giving birth is such an amazing thing, but there are numerous things associated with the prevention of conception that are unethical and should be a crime.

  16. Shadow Health Assignment 4: Ethics Flashcards

    Shadow Health Assignment 4: Ethics. Teacher 46 terms. maggie_sheung. Preview. Health Care Ethics . 36 terms. PrestonTanner. Preview. Health care ethics exam 2 study guide. 10 terms. MatthewGaskill. Preview. Shadow Health Leadership - Assignment 6 Discharge and Conclusion. 25 terms. ayeringto. Preview. Shadow Health Leadership - Assignment 4 ...

  17. Shadow Health Assignment 4: Ethics with correct answers

    Shadow Health Assignment 4: Ethics with correct answers. Course. Shadow health. Institution. Shadow Health. Select priority patient Debbie oconnor Task prioritization Venturi mask Choose the best option Notify Charge Nurse Angela about the situation and ask her to contact the admitting provider about a venturi mask for Mrs. O'Connor.

  18. Project-based learning in bioethics education

    The PBL assignment comprised 50% of the final grade of the bioethics course on reproductive ethics. The students were assessed through a set of rubrics on the Deliverable (40%), the Final presentation (5%), and Teamwork (5%) (See Appendix Tables 4 , 5 , and 6 ).

  19. Ethics, Chapter 4 Flashcards

    Proposed a feminist model for ethical decision making where the client is engaged as fully as possible in the decision making process; includes a rational-evaluative procedure with corresponding emotional and intuitive queries to assist the counselor. Betan. Proposed a hermeneutic perspective of ethical decision making. Ethics, Chapter 4.

  20. W04 Assignment Personal Code of Ethics (docx)

    My Personal Code of Ethics Persistence: I need to be patient and keep working towards my goals. Success takes time. Faith: I will hold onto my faith and live by the gospel's teachings. Forgiveness: I'll forgive and move forward because good things are waiting for me. Avoid Procrastination: Putting things off is not good.

  21. Assignment 4.docx

    Assignment 4: Ethics Practicing sound ethical principles in research is imperative. Chapter 9 in our text covers historical events that led to the global regulation of human subjects research. Many egregious acts carried out under the guise of research were performed in the past and still, we have scientific misconduct continuing to this day despite these regulations.

  22. Psychiatry Online

    DSM-5-TR Chairs and Review Groups. DSM-5 Task Force and Work Groups. Preface to DSM-5-TR. Preface to DSM-5. DSM-5-TR Classification. Section I: DSM-5 Basics. Section II: Diagnostic Criteria and Codes. Section III: Emerging Measures and Models. Appendix.

  23. Full article: Effects and mechanisms of computerized cognitive training

    Ethics & dissemination. This protocol, along with other study materials (e.g., explanatory statements), has been reviewed and approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC; approval number: 16420). Any subsequent modifications to the protocol or study materials will also be reviewed by MUHREC.

  24. Assignment Week 4- Ethics

    BUS 5115 Business Law , Ethics Writeen Assignment unit 5 4; Preview text. University of the People. BUS 5115 Business Law, Ethics, and Social Responsibility. Written Assignment Week 4 Case Study: The Good Credit Reference Insider Information/Trading 23, February 2022.

  25. The Deloitte Global 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey

    Download the 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Report. 5 MB PDF. To learn more about the mental health findings, read the Mental Health Deep Dive. The 13th edition of Deloitte's Gen Z and Millennial Survey connected with nearly 23,000 respondents across 44 countries to track their experiences and expectations at work and in the world more broadly.

  26. Free Harvard Referencing Generator [Updated for 2024]

    A Harvard Referencing Generator is a tool that automatically generates formatted academic references in the Harvard style. It takes in relevant details about a source -- usually critical information like author names, article titles, publish dates, and URLs -- and adds the correct punctuation and formatting required by the Harvard referencing ...

  27. Plagiarism

    The action or practice of taking someone else's work, idea, etc., and passing it off as one's own; literary theft. ^ The American Heritage Dictionary (5th ed.), defines plagiarize thus: "To reproduce or otherwise use the words, ideas, or other work of another as one's own, or without attribution.".

  28. 6 takeaways for appraisers from the 2024 USPAP update

    Real property appraisers will have a new edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) to follow beginning January 1, 2024.. The adopted 2024 USPAP draft includes multiple updates. The largest involves an expansion of the USPAP's ETHICS RULE - meant to clarify the working appraiser's law-abiding obligation to unbiased and non-discriminatory practices.

  29. Flashcards week 4, ethics

    Responsible and morally right code. Quizlet has study tools to help you learn anything. Improve your grades and reach your goals with flashcards, practice tests and expert-written solutions today.

  30. Assignment #4 Ethics &+ Morals

    Assignment #4 Ethics &+ Morals. Course. Ethics And Moral Issues (HUP 104) 20 Documents. Students shared 20 documents in this course. University LaGuardia Community College. Info More info. Academic year: 2015/2016. Uploaded by: Anonymous Student. This document has been uploaded by a student, just like you, who decided to remain anonymous.