how to use chatgpt for research paper

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther
• v.28(6); 2023
• PMC10731938

ChatGPT for Research and Publication: A Step-by-Step Guide

Som s. biswas.

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.

Introduction

This commentary provides a concise step-by-step guide on using ChatGPT, an advanced natural language processing (NLP) model, for research and publication purposes. The guide assesses crucial aspects, including data preprocessing, fine-tuning techniques, prompt engineering, and ethical considerations. By addressing challenges related to biases, interpretability, and plagiarism, this commentary offers insights and recommendations for the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT. The guide empowers researchers to ethically integrate ChatGPT effectively into their workflows, enhancing productivity and improving the quality of their scientific publications. Through clear instructions and guidelines, researchers can tap into the transformative potential of ChatGPT, driving scientific progress in a language-driven world.

In recent years, the field of NLP has witnessed remarkable advancements, bringing us closer to the realm of humanlike language generation. Among these advancements, ChatGPT, based on the groundbreaking GPT-3.5 architecture developed by OpenAI, stands as an impressive language model capable of generating coherent and contextually relevant text responses. With its ability to understand and respond to user inputs, ChatGPT has opened up new possibilities for various applications, including research and publication. 1 – 3

The traditional process of conducting research and publishing scientific papers has been significantly transformed by the emergence of ChatGPT. Researchers and authors can now leverage the power of this sophisticated language model to streamline and enhance their workflow, leading to improved efficiency and higher-quality publications. However, using ChatGPT effectively in the research and publication domain requires a comprehensive understanding of its capabilities, limitations, and best practices.

In this commentary I offer my thoughts for a step-by-step guide for researchers and authors who seek to harness the potential of ChatGPT in their research endeavors and publication efforts. By exploring various aspects, such as data preprocessing, fine-tuning techniques, prompt engineering, and ethical considerations, this guide will equip researchers with the necessary knowledge to harness the full potential of ChatGPT in their scientific pursuits. Moreover, this commentary will delve into the challenges associated with using ChatGPT for research and publication, including biases, interpretability, and concerns regarding plagiarism. By addressing these challenges directly, I aim to provide researchers with valuable insights and recommendations to navigate these important issues and ensure the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT as a research tool. 4

The significance of my guide lies in its potential to bridge the gap between the rapid progress of language models like ChatGPT and the research and publication process. By elucidating the intricacies of integrating ChatGPT into scientific workflows, researchers will be empowered to leverage this advanced technology effectively, thereby enhancing the overall quality and impact of their research output. 5 In the following sections, I present a comprehensive overview of the steps involved in using ChatGPT for research and publication.

Step 1: Title and Title Page Creation by ChatGPT

ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in generating titles for research papers. Its ability to understand and generate humanlike text allows it to analyze and synthesize information provided by researchers to craft concise and impactful titles. By leveraging its vast knowledge base and language capabilities, ChatGPT can assist in capturing the essence of a research paper, conveying the main focus and contributions succinctly. Researchers can collaborate with ChatGPT by providing relevant information, such as the subject, objectives, methodology, and key findings of their study. ChatGPT can then generate multiple title options, offering different perspectives and angles that researchers can consider. This collaboration with ChatGPT can save time and stimulate creativity, helping researchers refine their titles to accurately represent their work and engage potential readers. ChatGPT can then be used to create the entire title page and then can also customize based on each journal’s recommendations.

For example:

Thus, we see that ChatGPT can write an entire title page based on just the title and author details. We notice that ChatGPT has created an email address that is incorrect and needs manual rectification. However, the rest of the title page, including keywords and the running title, is appropriate.

Step 2: Abstract/Summary Creation by chatGPT

ChatGPT can assist in condensing complex information into a clear and engaging abstract/summary, helping researchers communicate the significance and novelty of their research to a wider audience. By leveraging the language proficiency of ChatGPT, researchers can save time and effort in crafting abstracts while ensuring that the key aspects of their study are accurately represented.

In this example, we demonstrate that ChatGPT can create an entire abstract just by using the title alone. However, the more information researchers provide (preferably the entire body of the paper should be entered into chatGPT), the more accurate the abstract becomes.

Step 3: Introduction Creation by ChatGPT

By collaborating with ChatGPT, researchers can provide key information, such as the background, significance, and objectives of their study. ChatGPT can then generate a well-structured introduction that sets the context, highlights the relevance of the research, and outlines the paper’s objectives. Also, ChatGPT can be used to generate keywords and generate an abbreviations list from the article by using prompts. However, it is important to note that the generated introduction should be reviewed, customized, and refined by the researchers to align with their specific study and writing style.

In the example below, we note that ChatGPT has not only created an introduction but also the objectives of the study, which can then be edited by the human author.

Step 4: Can ChatGPT Create a Literature Review?

Yes, ChatGPT can help generate a literature review, but it is important to note that it may not have access to the most up-to-date research articles and studies due to copyrights and limited access to some journals. Additionally, a literature review typically requires a comprehensive analysis of multiple sources, so the generated response may not cover all relevant studies. Nonetheless, it can assist in providing a basic literature review on a given topic, which will need human authors to add to and edit it.

As we can see, ChatGPT is not as good at giving a detailed review of the literature as it is at summarizing contents or creating an introduction. Thus, its use is limited, if there is any at all, in this section of the paper.

Step 5: Can ChatGPT Assist in Brainstorming the Methodology of Studies?

ChatGPT can be a helpful tool in conceptualizing the methodology for research papers. By engaging in a conversation with ChatGPT, researchers can discuss their research objectives, study design, data collection methods, and data analysis techniques. ChatGPT’s natural language understanding allows it to provide suggestions and insights based on its knowledge base and understanding of research methodologies. Although ChatGPT can assist in generating ideas and providing guidance, it is important for researchers to critically evaluate and adapt the suggestions to align with their specific research goals and requirements.

Although the methodology is something that is unique to each paper and needs a human researcher to conceptualize it, we see in this example that ChatGPT can assist by giving ideas and examples based on the input of the title by the human researcher. Thus, ChatGPT can be part of brainstorming sessions when conceptualizing a study, although this section needs significant editing by a human, unlike the introduction or summary.

Step 6: Do Not Use ChatGPT for Fabricating Patient Data or Results!

This section of the paper must be authentic, and ChatGPT has a limited role, if any, because patient data have to be original. ChatGPT also currently cannot analyze clinical data compared with statistical software, like SPSS Statistics and Base SAS. However, Microsoft appears to be developing an Excel copilot that uses AI to create graphs and plots, and its use needs to be evaluated once it is released to the public. 6

Step 7: Discussion and Conclusions

This section of the paper can be generated by ChatGPT if all results are pasted as input; however, this section also needs manual editing because inaccuracies are common. By discussing their research with ChatGPT, researchers can also identify potential limitations, discuss the broader implications of their findings, and propose future research directions. Although ChatGPT can generate suggestions and facilitate the thought process, it is important for researchers to critically evaluate the information provided and ensure that the Discussion and Conclusion sections align with the specific research objectives and findings of their study. Ultimately, ChatGPT can serve as a supportive tool in developing a comprehensive and well-rounded discussion and conclusion for research papers.

Step 8: References

As per the author's experience, although ChatGPT is capable of creating references for an article, most of them are incorrect. So, using ChatGPT for creating references is not recommended. However, ChatGPT can convert references into any journaling style if the references are entered into ChatGPT and it is asked to convert them into a specific style.

Disadvantages of Using ChatGPT in Research

Although ChatGPT offers numerous advantages for assisting in the writing of research papers, there are also some important potential disadvantages to consider:

• Lack of domain expertise: ChatGPT is a general-purpose language model trained on a diverse range of Internet text, which means it may lack the specific domain expertise required for certain research topics. It may generate responses that are not accurate or well informed in specialized fields, potentially leading to incorrect or misleading information in research papers.
• Inconsistency and variability: ChatGPT’s responses can be inconsistent and vary depending on the input phrasing or prompt formulation. This can lead to unpredictability in generating reliable and coherent content, requiring additional effort to refine and ensure accuracy in research papers.
• Limited control over output: Although researchers can guide the model’s responses through prompts, ChatGPT’s generation process is still primarily autonomous. Researchers have limited control over the precise content and structure of the generated text, which may require careful editing and review to align with specific research goals, standards, and above all, accuracy.
• Biases and ethical considerations: Language models like ChatGPT can inadvertently reflect biases present in the training data. These biases may perpetuate existing societal or cultural biases in research papers, potentially leading to unfair or discriminatory content. The careful examination and mitigation of biases are crucial to ensure ethical and unbiased research output. 7
• Lack of interpretability: ChatGPT’s decision-making process is complex and not easily interpretable. Researchers may struggle to understand the reasoning behind the model’s generated responses, making it challenging to assess the reliability and credibility of the information provided. Ensuring transparency and interpretability in research papers becomes more challenging with such models. ChatGPT should cite the sources for its data, like Google Bard does.
• Plagiarism concerns: Because of its vast training data from the Internet, ChatGPT may inadvertently generate text that resembles or replicates existing content without proper citation or attribution. Researchers must be cautious about unintentional plagiarism and ensure that generated content is appropriately referenced and original. So, all ChatGPt-generated articles need to be double checked using antiplagiarism software.

In this commentary I have provided a comprehensive step-by-step guide for researchers and authors on harnessing the power of ChatGPT in the realm of research and publication. By exploring crucial aspects, such as data preprocessing, fine-tuning techniques, prompt engineering, and ethical considerations, the guide equips researchers with the necessary knowledge and tools to effectively integrate ChatGPT into their scientific workflows. 8

Through clear instructions, examples, and guidelines, researchers can navigate the complexities of using ChatGPT, leading to enhanced productivity and improved quality in their research output. Moreover, I address the challenges associated with biases, interpretability, and plagiarism concerns, ensuring the responsible and ethical usage of ChatGPT as a research tool.

The significance of this research lies in its ability to bridge the gap between the rapid advancements in language models like ChatGPT and the research and publication process. By empowering researchers with the skills to leverage ChatGPT effectively, this guide fosters innovation, drives scientific progress, and opens up new possibilities for transformative contributions to various fields. 9

As language-driven technologies continue to evolve, researchers must stay abreast of the latest advancements and best practices. The step-by-step guide presented in this commentary serves as a valuable resource, providing researchers with the knowledge and guidance necessary to maximize the potential of ChatGPT in their research endeavors. By embracing the capabilities of ChatGPT and ensuring its responsible and ethical use, researchers can revolutionize the way research and publications are conducted. With ChatGPT as a powerful tool in their arsenal, researchers are poised to make significant strides in their respective fields, pushing the boundaries of scientific knowledge and ushering in a new era of language-driven innovation. 10

However, and to reiterate, I cannot overemphasize that ChatGPT has, at present, many disadvantages, including inconsistencies, bias, and plagiarism concerns, that must be addressed by the human author before the article is submitted for publication to a journal, as well as prior to publication, because the human author(s) is solely responsible for their research integrity and accurate reporting.

In conclusion, I have attempted to provide researchers with a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively leverage ChatGPT for research and publication purposes. It has also highlighted the problems and precautions that the human author(s) must take before publishing ChatGPT-generated content. By embracing this step-by-step guide, researchers can unlock the full potential of ChatGPT, driving scientific progress and shaping the future of research and publications.

• Please use ChatGPT only if allowed by your institution, research lab, and the journal in question.
• Please acknowledge ChatGPT within your manuscript/published paper wherever you are using it.
• Please do not fabricate or plagiarize data. ChatGPT can be used only for summarizing texts, improving English writeups, and brainstorming ideas, and not for creating fabricated research raw data.

Acknowledgment.

The author acknowledges that this article was partially generated by ChatGPT (powered by OpenAI’s language model, GPT-3; http://openai.com ). The editing was performed by the human author.

Disclosures. The author declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria.

'ZDNET Recommends': What exactly does it mean?

ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.

When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers.

ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form .

How to use ChatGPT to summarize a book, article, or research paper

AI chatbots like ChatGPT can be used to make summarizing long articles, research papers, and books an easier job. If you're tasked with writing a summary for school or work about a body of written text, and you're pinched for time, ChatGPT can help you understand the necessary components.

You should remember that ChatGPT is a tool that can help you further understand a topic, and it may not be in your best interest to have it write your work for you.

Also:   How to make ChatGPT provide sources and citations

If you're a student writing a research paper, someone who is keen to discover more about a lengthy article, or someone who wants to dive into a complicated subject, you can use ChatGPT to simplify the process.

How ChatGPT can create summaries for you

Materials needed : You'll need a device that can connect to the internet, an OpenAI account , and a basic understanding of the article, research paper, or book you want to summarize. 

Also:  This AI chatbot can sum up any PDF and answer any question you have about it

The process should take about one to three minutes.

1. Find your article, paper, or book to summarize

If you need ChatGPT to help summarize an article or research paper, find the body of text online and keep it open in a separate tab.

2. Open your web browser and log in to OpenAI

Open your web browser of choice and type in chat.openai.com/chat . 

Also: How to use ChatGPT to write Excel formulas

Log in or sign up for an account. 

3. Type your request

In the chat box, type in TLDR: followed by the title of the book you want summarized. TLDR stands for too long, didn't read. 

Also: How to use ChatGPT: Everything you need to know

You can also ask ChatGPT: "Summarize [book title]." 

You cannot paste a URL into ChatGPT. If you do so, you'll get a response explaining that the chatbot cannot access websites. If you want ChatGPT to summarize research, you'll need a basic understanding of the topic to ensure you aren't including inaccurate information in your report.

For example, if you're writing a paper about how twin sibling dynamics affect their marriages, you can ask ChatGPT: "Explain how twin relationships affect their marriages."

Also:   The best AI chatbots: ChatGPT and other noteworthy alternatives 

ChatGPT will offer you a few bullet points of both positive and negative effects a twin bond can have on the twins' marriages. You'll still need to read key points of the research, as ChatGPT won't provide you with specific statistics or scientific conclusions. But ChatGPT can help you understand the context surrounding the research you're interested in.

If you're having trouble comprehending specific passages in an article, book, or research paper, you can copy parts of the text and paste them into ChatGPT.

Think of this method as reshuffling the words you're currently reading to help you make more sense of the text in front of you.

This is an accurate summary of 'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay'.

What are ChatGPT's limitations?

If you're using ChatGPT to summarize an article, book, or piece of research, keep in mind that ChatGPT isn't aware of events that occurred after September 2021. 

Also:   4 things Claude AI can do that ChatGPT can't

ChatGPT is a large language model that uses queues and millions of data points to mimic human responses. This form of mimicry is why ChatGPT will answer questions even when it doesn't output the correct answer. So, make sure you're not using any information from ChatGPT without fact-checking it.

If you try to get around this obstacle and provide ChatGPT with an article that contains information post-2021, it might hallucinate. Here, I asked the chatbot to summarize an article about a new app I wrote about , and it made up a few details. 

Lemon8 is a new app from TikTok's parent company, ByteDance. Although the TikTok trend may exist, that's not what the article is about.

Can ChatGPT summarize a PDF?

Copying and pasting a URL into ChatGPT won't yield you the best results. If there is a specific paragraph or sentence you're struggling with, you can copy and paste it into ChatGPT and ask it to explain it to you. Still, it's best to read the PDF and use the chatbot as a summary tool and not as an educator. 

Also:  How to use ChatGPT to write code

If you're looking for an AI chatbot that you can regularly rely on to give you an accurate summary of a PDF, consider using ChatPDF . You can summarize up to three PDFs of up to 120 pages per day, and an upgraded plan is available for $5 per month.

Can ChatGPT summarize an email thread?

Sort of. If you want to copy and paste every single email, ChatGPT can summarize the thread's contents for you. It would be more helpful to scan an email thread yourself and ask ChatGPT to help you write a response based on the key points you know about the conversation. 

Editor's note: We've added additional context to the step concerning ChatGPT summarizing articles by URL. 

More on AI tools

What is chatgpt and why does it matter here's what you need to know, chatgpt vs. chatgpt plus: is it worth the subscription fee, my top 5 tools to beat distractions and get more writing done - or any work, really.

Navigation Menu

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests..., provide feedback.

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly.

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation .

• Notifications

50 use cases of ChatGPT for research work

hollobit/ResearchChatGPT

Folders and files, repository files navigation, how can i use chatgpt in my research work.

There are many ways you can use ChatGPT in your research work. In this repository, I've collected a list of 50 ways and examples of how you can use ChatGPT in your research work.

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence language model that uses machine learning algorithms to generate human-like text. ChatGPT can be used to generate text in a variety of contexts, including answering questions, summarizing text, and generating new ideas.

What are ChatGPT Prompts?

ChatGPT is an AI language model that can generate human-like responses to prompts given to it. It is trained on a massive corpus of text data and can understand the context of a given prompt to generate relevant responses. By using ChatGPT prompts, you can generate topic ideas for your research paper based on keywords or subject areas.

Here are 50 examples of how ChatGPT can help your research.

• Generate topic ideas based on keywords or subject areas
• Provide guidance on conducting comprehensive literature reviews
• Suggest appropriate research methodologies and data collection techniques
• Help refine and narrow research questions and hypotheses
• Provide feedback on the clarity, coherence, and organization of writing
• Offer suggestions for improving writing style and tone
• Help with developing introductions, conclusions, and thesis statements
• Generate topic sentences and main points for paragraphs
• Assist with formatting and citation style
• Provide feedback on the validity and reliability of research findings
• Suggest strategies for addressing research limitations and gaps
• Provide guidance on analyzing and interpreting research data
• Help with identifying and addressing potential ethical issues in research
• Offer strategies for presenting research findings in a clear and concise manner
• Assist with developing tables, graphs, and other visual aids
• Provide feedback on the structure and clarity of arguments
• Suggest strategies for improving the coherence and flow of writing
• Help with proofreading and editing for grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors
• Provide recommendations for organizing and structuring the paper
• Assist with integrating primary and secondary sources
• Help with identifying and avoiding bias in research
• Provide guidance on selecting appropriate research participants or samples
• Assist with developing and refining research instruments (e.g. surveys, questionnaires)
• Suggest effective strategies for analyzing qualitative and quantitative data
• Provide guidance on data cleaning and preparation
• Offer feedback on the relevance and significance of research findings
• Suggest strategies for identifying and addressing potential confounding variables in research
• Help with crafting compelling and engaging titles for research papers
• Provide feedback on the appropriateness of research questions and hypotheses
• Offer suggestions for developing effective and relevant research questions
• Provide guidance on selecting appropriate research designs
• Assist with developing and implementing research studies
• Suggest effective strategies for collecting and analyzing data
• Assist with identifying and avoiding common research pitfalls
• Provide recommendations for writing and submitting research papers for publication
• Help with navigating the peer review process
• Offer feedback on the appropriateness of research results
• Provide guidance on the process of interpreting research findings
• Assist with developing and refining research theories and models
• Suggest effective strategies for testing and refining research theories and models
• Provide recommendations for presenting and disseminating research findings
• Help with developing compelling and persuasive arguments in research papers
• Offer suggestions for writing effective abstracts for research papers
• Provide guidance on identifying and avoiding plagiarism in research papers
• Suggest strategies for effectively communicating research findings to different audiences
• Assist with identifying appropriate journals for publication
• Provide feedback on the significance and contribution of research findings to the field
• Help with addressing peer review feedback and revising research papers
• Offer guidance on developing and refining research proposals
• Provide recommendations for conducting ethical and rigorous research.

As always, if you have any suggestions or things you'd like to add, please let us know.

1. Generating Topic Ideas through ChatGPT Prompt

When it comes to writing a research paper, the first and foremost task is to find a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. But sometimes, it can be challenging to come up with a research topic, especially if you're not sure where to start. That's where ChatGPT prompts come in handy. In this article, we'll explore how to use ChatGPT prompts to generate topic ideas based on keywords or subject areas.

How to Generate Topic Ideas using ChatGPT Prompts?

To generate topic ideas using ChatGPT prompts, follow these steps:

Identify the keywords or subject areas related to your research field.

Go to the ChatGPT website or use any other platform that offers similar features.

Enter your keywords or subject areas in the prompt box.

Click on the ""Generate"" button to get topic ideas related to your keywords or subject areas.

Review the generated responses and choose the ones that interest you the most.

Refine your topic ideas by adding or removing keywords and subject areas as needed.

Let's say you're a student studying psychology, and you're interested in researching the effects of social media on mental health. Here's how you can use ChatGPT prompts to generate topic ideas:

Keywords: social media, mental health, psychology.

Go to the ChatGPT website.

Enter the following prompt: ""Can you suggest research topics related to social media and mental health?""

Click on the ""Generate"" button.

ChatGPT generates several responses, such as:

• The impact of social media on adolescent mental health
• The role of social media in depression and anxiety
• Social media addiction and its effects on mental health
• The relationship between social media use and self-esteem
• How social media can be used to improve mental health outcomes

Review the generated responses and choose the one that interests you the most.

Refine your topic idea by adding or removing keywords and subject areas as needed.

In conclusion, using ChatGPT prompts can be an effective way to generate research topic ideas based on keywords or subject areas. By following the steps outlined in this article, you can use ChatGPT prompts to find a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study.

2. Guidance on Conducting Comprehensive Literature Reviews

Conducting a comprehensive literature review is an essential part of any research paper writing process. It helps researchers to understand the current state of knowledge, identify research gaps, and develop a theoretical framework for their study. The following ChatGPT prompts can be used to achieve this task:

Prompt 1: Identify Relevant Keywords

The first step in conducting a comprehensive literature review is to identify relevant keywords that are related to your research topic. This prompt can be used to generate a list of potential keywords:

• What are the main concepts or themes that relate to your research topic?
• What synonyms or related terms can be used to describe these concepts or themes?
• What are the common abbreviations or acronyms used in the field?

Example: If you are researching the impact of social media on mental health, the keywords could be social media, mental health, social networking sites, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, depression, anxiety, etc.

Prompt 2: Search for Relevant Literature

Once you have identified the keywords, the next step is to search for relevant literature using various databases such as Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, etc. This prompt can be used to refine your search strategy:

• What are the most relevant databases for your research topic?
• What search operators can be used to refine your search?
• What are the inclusion and exclusion criteria for selecting the literature?

Example: If you want to search for literature on the impact of social media on mental health, you can use the following search strategy: ""social media AND mental health"" OR ""social networking sites AND depression"" OR ""Facebook AND anxiety.""

Prompt 3: Evaluate the Quality of Literature

It is essential to evaluate the quality of the literature before including it in your review. This prompt can be used to develop a systematic approach to evaluate the literature:

• What are the criteria for evaluating the quality of literature?
• What are the potential biases or limitations of the studies?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the studies?

Example: When evaluating the quality of literature on the impact of social media on mental health, you can use the following criteria: sample size, research design, measurement tools, statistical analysis, etc.

Prompt 4: Synthesize and Summarize the Literature

The final step in conducting a comprehensive literature review is to synthesize and summarize the literature. This prompt can be used to develop a framework for synthesizing and summarizing the literature:

• What are the main findings of the studies?
• What are the similarities and differences between the studies?
• What are the research gaps and future directions?

Example: After synthesizing and summarizing the literature on the impact of social media on mental health, you can conclude that social media has both positive and negative effects on mental health, and more research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and moderators.

In conclusion, conducting a comprehensive literature review requires a systematic and structured approach. The ChatGPT prompts can be used to guide researchers in identifying relevant keywords, searching for relevant literature, evaluating the quality of literature, and synthesizing and summarizing the literature.

3. Suggesting Appropriate Research Methodologies and Data Collection Techniques

When it comes to writing a research paper, selecting the right research methodology and data collection techniques is crucial. The following ChatGPT prompts can help you in achieving this task:

ChatGPT Prompt 1: ""What are the best research methodologies for different types of research questions?""

Research methodologies are the procedures and techniques used to conduct research. Depending on the research question, different methodologies can be applied. Here are some examples:

• Qualitative research: This methodology is used to explore and understand complex phenomena through in-depth analysis of data. Qualitative research is best suited for research questions that seek to understand the meaning, context, and experiences of individuals or groups. Examples of qualitative methods include interviews, focus groups, and case studies.
• Quantitative research: This methodology is used to measure and quantify variables through statistical analysis. Quantitative research is best suited for research questions that seek to establish cause-and-effect relationships, test hypotheses, or generalize findings to a larger population. Examples of quantitative methods include surveys, experiments, and observational studies.
• Mixed-methods research: This methodology combines both qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a research question. Mixed-methods research is best suited for research questions that require both in-depth exploration and empirical validation. Examples of mixed-methods research include sequential explanatory design, concurrent triangulation design, and convergent design.

ChatGPT Prompt 2: ""What are the best data collection techniques for different types of data?""

Data collection techniques are the methods used to collect and record data. Depending on the type of data, different techniques can be applied. Here are some examples:

• Survey: This technique involves collecting data from a sample of individuals through questionnaires or interviews. Surveys are best suited for collecting quantitative data on attitudes, opinions, and behaviors. Examples of surveys include online surveys, phone surveys, and in-person surveys.
• Observation: This technique involves observing and recording data on behavior or phenomena in their natural settings. Observation is best suited for collecting qualitative data on behavior, social interactions, and environmental factors. Examples of observation include participant observation, non-participant observation, and structured observation.
• Interview: This technique involves collecting data through face-to-face or phone conversations with individuals or groups. Interviews are best suited for collecting qualitative data on experiences, attitudes, and opinions. Examples of interviews include structured interviews, semi-structured interviews, and unstructured interviews.
• Document analysis: This technique involves collecting data from written or electronic documents such as reports, articles, and social media posts. Document analysis is best suited for collecting qualitative data on policies, laws, and public opinion. Examples of document analysis include content analysis, discourse analysis, and narrative analysis.

In conclusion, selecting the appropriate research methodology and data collection techniques is crucial for conducting effective research. By using the above ChatGPT prompts, you can identify the best methodologies and techniques for your research question and data type.

4. Using ChatGPT to Refine and Narrow Research Questions and Hypotheses

Introduction.

Research papers require a clear and concise research question or hypothesis that guides the study. However, formulating a research question or hypothesis can be challenging, especially when the researcher is not sure where to start. In this paper, we will discuss how ChatGPT can be used to help refine and narrow research questions and hypotheses.

How to Use ChatGPT to Refine and Narrow Research Questions and Hypotheses

Start with a broad research question or hypothesis. Before using ChatGPT, it is important to have a general idea of the research question or hypothesis. This can be a broad question or hypothesis that needs to be refined and narrowed down.

Enter the research question or hypothesis into ChatGPT. Once you have a general idea of the research question or hypothesis, enter it into ChatGPT. ChatGPT will generate text that is related to the research question or hypothesis.

Read the generated text and identify key concepts. After ChatGPT generates text related to the research question or hypothesis, read the text and identify key concepts. These concepts can be used to refine and narrow down the research question or hypothesis.

Refine and narrow down the research question or hypothesis. Use the key concepts identified in the generated text to refine and narrow down the research question or hypothesis. This can be done by eliminating irrelevant information and focusing on the most important concepts.

Example of Using ChatGPT to Refine and Narrow Research Questions and Hypotheses

Suppose a researcher is interested in studying the impact of social media on mental health. The researcher has a general idea of the research question but is unsure how to refine and narrow it down. The researcher enters the following question into ChatGPT: ""How does social media impact mental health?""

ChatGPT generates the following text:

• Social media can have both positive and negative effects on mental health.
• Some studies have shown that social media use is associated with increased rates of depression and anxiety.
• Other studies have found that social media use can have positive effects on mental health, such as increased social support and reduced feelings of loneliness.

The researcher reads the generated text and identifies the key concepts: positive and negative effects, depression and anxiety, increased social support, and reduced loneliness. The researcher uses these concepts to refine and narrow down the research question to: ""What are the positive and negative effects of social media on mental health, specifically in relation to depression, anxiety, social support, and loneliness?""

By using ChatGPT, the researcher was able to refine and narrow down the research question, making it more focused and specific.

5. Using ChatGPT Prompts for Providing Feedback on Writing Clarity, Coherence, and Organization

When it comes to writing research papers, clarity, coherence, and organization are crucial elements that can make or break the quality of the paper. As a reviewer, providing feedback on these aspects can help improve the overall quality of the paper. ChatGPT can be used to generate prompts that can help achieve this task.

For example, the following ChatGPT prompts can be used for providing feedback on writing clarity, coherence, and organization:

""Can you simplify the language used in the paper? Is there any jargon or technical terms that are not explained clearly?""

This prompt can help identify areas where the language used in the paper may be too complex or difficult to understand. It can also highlight instances where jargon or technical terms are not explained adequately, leading to confusion among readers.

""Is there a clear thesis statement in the paper? Does the rest of the paper support this statement?""

This prompt can help assess the overall coherence of the paper. It can help identify whether the thesis statement is clear and whether the rest of the paper supports this statement. If the thesis statement is unclear or unsupported, it can be challenging for readers to understand the main argument of the paper.

""Is there a logical flow of ideas in the paper? Are the paragraphs and sections well-organized?""

This prompt can help evaluate the organization of the paper. It can help identify areas where the ideas in the paper may not flow logically or where the paragraphs and sections may not be well-organized. This can make it challenging for readers to follow the argument and can lead to confusion.

""Are there any inconsistencies or contradictions in the paper? Are all the sources cited appropriately?""

This prompt can help identify any inconsistencies or contradictions in the paper. It can also help ensure that all the sources used in the paper are cited appropriately. Inconsistencies or contradictions can undermine the credibility of the paper, while incorrect or insufficient citations can lead to accusations of plagiarism.

Using ChatGPT prompts for providing feedback on writing clarity, coherence, and organization can help reviewers evaluate the quality of a research paper more objectively. It can also help authors identify areas for improvement and produce a more polished final product.

6. Suggestions for Improving Writing Style and Tone

Writing style and tone are crucial aspects that determine the overall quality of a research paper. It is important to ensure that the language used in the paper is clear, concise, and engaging to the readers. Here are some ChatGPT prompts that can be used to offer suggestions for improving writing style and tone in a research paper.

ChatGPT Prompts:

• What are some common writing mistakes that can be avoided in a research paper?
• How can the language used in the paper be made more engaging to the readers?
• What are some effective ways to vary sentence structure and avoid repetition in the paper?
• How can the tone of the paper be adjusted to suit the intended audience?
• What are some ways to ensure that the language used in the paper is accessible to all readers?

Prompt: What are some common writing mistakes that can be avoided in a research paper?

There are several common writing mistakes that can be avoided in a research paper. These include:

• Using passive voice: Using passive voice can make the language of the paper sound dull and unengaging. It is better to use active voice to make the writing more dynamic.
• Overusing jargon: Using too much jargon can make the paper difficult to understand for readers who are not familiar with the field. It is important to strike a balance between using technical terms and making the language accessible to all readers.
• Lack of clarity: Writing should be clear and concise to avoid confusion. Sentences should be well-structured and free from unnecessary words or phrases.
• Repetition: Repetition can make the paper sound monotonous. It is important to vary sentence structure and use synonyms to avoid repetition.
• Inconsistent tone: The tone of the paper should be consistent throughout. It is important to decide on the appropriate tone for the intended audience and maintain it throughout the paper.

By avoiding these common writing mistakes, the language of the research paper can be made more engaging and accessible to all readers.

7. Using ChatGPT Prompts to Develop Introductions, Conclusions, and Thesis Statements

When writing a research paper, it is essential to have a strong introduction, a clear thesis statement, and a convincing conclusion. These elements are what set the tone for your paper and convey the main idea of your research. ChatGPT prompts can help you develop these elements by providing you with ideas and guiding questions to include in your writing.

Introductions

Introductions are meant to grab the reader's attention, provide background information, and present the thesis statement. Here are some ChatGPT prompts that can help you develop a strong introduction:

• What is the significance of your research topic?
• What inspired you to research this topic?
• What is the current state of research on your topic?
• What is the problem or gap in knowledge that your research aims to address?

Topic: The Effect of Social Media on Mental Health

Introduction:

Social media has become a ubiquitous part of modern life. It is a tool that is used for communication, socialization, and entertainment. However, the impact of social media on mental health has been a subject of debate in recent years. This research aims to explore the relationship between social media use and mental health and to identify the factors that contribute to this relationship. By understanding the impact of social media on mental health, we can develop strategies to mitigate the negative effects and promote positive mental health outcomes.

Thesis Statements

The thesis statement is the core of your research paper. It presents the main idea of your research and guides the reader through your argument. Here are some ChatGPT prompts that can help you develop a clear and concise thesis statement:

• What is the main argument of your research?
• What is the significance of your research?
• What is the scope of your research?
• What is the problem that your research aims to solve?

Thesis statement:

This research aims to explore the relationship between social media use and mental health and to identify the factors that contribute to this relationship. By examining the impact of social media on mental health, we can develop effective strategies to promote positive mental health outcomes.

Conclusions

Conclusions are meant to summarize the main points of your research and restate the thesis statement. They also provide a space for reflection and discussion of future research directions. Here are some ChatGPT prompts that can help you develop a strong conclusion:

• What are the main findings of your research?
• What are the implications of your research?
• What are the limitations of your research?
• What are the future research directions?

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this research has shown that social media use has a significant impact on mental health. The findings suggest that social media use is associated with increased risk of depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems. However, the relationship between social media use and mental health is complex, and there are many factors that contribute to this relationship. Future research should focus on identifying these factors and developing strategies to mitigate the negative effects of social media on mental health.

8. Using ChatGPT prompts to generate topic sentences and main points for paragraphs

In research paper writing, generating topic sentences and main points for paragraphs is crucial for creating a clear and organized structure. One way to achieve this is by using ChatGPT prompts, which are pre-trained language models that can generate text based on a given prompt. Here's an example of how to use ChatGPT prompts for this task:

Step 1: Choose a prompt

Choose a prompt that is relevant to your research topic and can help you generate ideas for your paragraphs. For example:

• ""What are the main causes of climate change?""
• ""How has social media influenced political discourse in the 21st century?""
• ""What are the benefits and drawbacks of online learning?""

Step 2: Generate text using ChatGPT

Use a ChatGPT tool, such as OpenAI's GPT-3 or Hugging Face's GPT-2, to generate text based on the prompt. For example, using the prompt ""What are the main causes of climate change?"", you could get the following text:

• ""Climate change is caused by a variety of factors, including the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes. These activities release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which trap heat and contribute to global warming. Other factors that contribute to climate change include agriculture, transportation, and waste management.""

Step 3: Extract topic sentences and main points

From the generated text, extract the topic sentences and main points that can be used for your paragraphs. For example:

• Topic sentence: Climate change is caused by a variety of factors.
• Burning of fossil fuels
• Deforestation
• Industrial processes
• Greenhouse gases trap heat and contribute to global warming
• Agriculture, transportation, and waste management also contribute to climate change.

Step 4: Use the topic sentences and main points in your paragraphs

Use the extracted topic sentences and main points to create clear and organized paragraphs in your research paper. For example:

Paragraph 1: Introduction to climate change

Paragraph 2: Greenhouse gases and global warming

• Topic sentence: Greenhouse gases trap heat and contribute to global warming.
• Explanation of greenhouse effect
• Examples of greenhouse gases
• Evidence of global warming

Paragraph 3: Other factors contributing to climate change

• Topic sentence: Agriculture, transportation, and waste management also contribute to climate change.
• Explanation of each factor
• Examples of how they contribute to climate change
• Possible solutions

Using ChatGPT prompts can be a useful tool for generating topic sentences and main points for your research paper paragraphs. By following the steps outlined above, you can create a clear and organized structure that effectively communicates your ideas to your readers.

9. Types of ChatGPT prompts for formatting and citation style

In academic writing, proper formatting and citation style are crucial aspects that help in ensuring the paper's clarity and credibility. Proper formatting and citation style help readers to locate and identify the sources used in the research paper. With the increasing number of citation styles and formatting requirements, it can be challenging for writers to keep up with the latest trends. Fortunately, ChatGPT prompts are a useful tool that can assist with formatting and citation style in research paper writing.

There are several types of ChatGPT prompts that can assist with formatting and citation style in research paper writing. These include:

1. Citation style prompts

Citation style prompts help writers format their citations according to the required citation style. For instance, if a writer is required to use the MLA citation style, they can use a ChatGPT prompt to generate a correct citation for a specific source.

Prompt: Generate a correct MLA citation for a book with the following details: Title: The Great Gatsby, Author: F. Scott Fitzgerald, Publisher: Scribner, Year of Publication: 1925.

Response: Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby . Scribner, 1925.

2. Formatting prompts

Formatting prompts help writers format their research papers according to specific guidelines. For instance, if a writer is required to use a specific font or margin size, they can use a ChatGPT prompt to generate the correct format.

Prompt: Generate a formatting prompt for a research paper that requires Times New Roman font, 12-point size, and one-inch margins.

Response: Set the font to Times New Roman, 12-point size. Set the margins to one inch on all sides.

3. Reference management prompts

Reference management prompts help writers manage their references by organizing them in a specific order, such as alphabetical or chronological order.

Prompt: Organize the references in the research paper in alphabetical order.

Response: Alphabetize the references in the research paper according to the author's last name.

In conclusion, ChatGPT prompts are a useful tool that can assist with formatting and citation style in research paper writing. Citation style prompts, formatting prompts, and reference management prompts are some of the prompts that can be used for this purpose. By using ChatGPT prompts, writers can save time and ensure that their research papers are formatted and cited correctly.

10. Using ChatGPT prompts to provide feedback on the validity and reliability of research findings

In academic research, it is essential to ensure that the findings presented are both valid and reliable. Validity refers to the accuracy of the research results and whether they measure what they claim to measure. Reliability, on the other hand, refers to the consistency of the research results when they are repeated or tested.

To provide feedback on the validity and reliability of research findings, ChatGPT prompts can be used. ChatGPT is an AI language model that can generate responses to various prompts. Here are some examples of ChatGPT prompts that can be used:

Prompt 1: Can you explain how the study’s design and methodology contribute to the validity of the results?

• The study design and methodology should align with the research question and objectives.
• The sample size should be representative of the population being studied.
• The data collection methods should be reliable and valid.
• The data analysis methods should be appropriate and rigorous.

Example response: The study design and methodology appear to be appropriate for the research question and objectives. The sample size is sufficient and representative of the population being studied. Both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods were used, which increases the validity of the results. The data analysis methods were rigorous, and the statistical tests used were appropriate for the data.

Prompt 2: How do you assess the reliability of the findings presented in the study?

• The study should be replicable.
• The data should be consistent across different measures and time points.
• The research methods should be standardized.
• The results should be consistent with previous research on the topic.

Example response: The study appears to be reliable based on the consistency of the data across different measures and time points. The research methods were standardized, and the results are consistent with previous research on the topic. However, the study could be improved by providing more detail on the replicability of the study, such as providing information on the inter-rater reliability of the data collection methods.

Prompt 3: Can you identify any potential threats to the validity or reliability of the study?

• Threats to internal validity include confounding variables and selection bias.
• Threats to external validity include the generalizability of the results to other populations or situations.
• Threats to reliability include measurement error and inter-rater reliability.

Example response: One potential threat to the validity of the study is selection bias, as the sample was recruited through convenience sampling. There is also a risk of measurement error, as some of the data was self-reported. However, the study attempted to mitigate these threats by using standardized data collection methods and statistical analysis. The external validity of the study is limited due to the specific population being studied, which may limit the generalizability of the results to other situations or populations.

11. Strategies for Addressing Research Limitations and Gaps

Research limitations and gaps are a common issue in research studies. It is essential to identify and address these limitations and gaps to ensure the validity and reliability of the results. The following strategies can be used to address research limitations and gaps:

1. Acknowledge the limitations and gaps

It is essential to acknowledge the limitations and gaps in the research study. This will help to establish the scope of the study and the potential impact of the limitations and gaps on the results.

In a study on the effectiveness of a new teaching method, the researchers found that the sample size was small, which limited the generalizability of the results. The researchers acknowledged this limitation and highlighted the need for further research with larger sample sizes to validate the findings.

2. Provide alternative explanations

Another strategy for addressing research limitations and gaps is to provide alternative explanations for the results. This can help to mitigate the impact of the limitations and gaps on the validity of the results.

In a study on the impact of social media on mental health, the researchers found a correlation between social media use and depression. However, the researchers acknowledged that other factors, such as pre-existing mental health conditions, could also contribute to the results.

3. Conduct further research

Conducting further research is perhaps the most effective strategy for addressing research limitations and gaps. This can help to validate the findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

In a study on the effectiveness of a new medication, the researchers found that the sample size was small, which limited the generalizability of the results. The researchers suggested conducting further research with a larger sample size to validate the findings.

4. Use multiple methods

Using multiple methods can help to address research limitations and gaps by providing a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic. This can help to mitigate the impact of the limitations and gaps on the validity of the results.

In a study on the impact of a new technology on productivity, the researchers used both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather data. This helped to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the technology on productivity.

5. Collaborate with other researchers

Collaborating with other researchers can help to address research limitations and gaps by providing access to additional resources and expertise. This can help to validate the findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

In a study on the impact of a new treatment on patient outcomes, the researchers collaborated with other researchers to gather data from multiple sites. This helped to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the treatment on patient outcomes.

In conclusion, addressing research limitations and gaps is essential for ensuring the validity and reliability of the results. By acknowledging the limitations and gaps, providing alternative explanations, conducting further research, using multiple methods, and collaborating with other researchers, researchers can mitigate the impact of limitations and gaps on their research studies.

12. Guidance on Analyzing and Interpreting Research Data

Analyzing and interpreting research data is a crucial part of any research paper. It allows researchers to draw conclusions from their findings and communicate their results effectively. Here are some ChatGPT prompts that can help achieve this task:

Prompt 1: Exploring Data

This prompt can be used to analyze and explore data, which is the first step in data analysis. It helps researchers to identify patterns, trends, and relationships in their data. Here is an example:

Prompt: Use exploratory data analysis to identify patterns in the data.

Description:

• Identify the variables in the data set.
• Plot the data using different graphical techniques, such as histograms, scatter plots, and box plots.
• Look for patterns, trends, and relationships in the data.
• Use summary statistics, such as mean, median, and standard deviation, to describe the data.

Prompt 2: Hypothesis Testing

This prompt can be used to test hypotheses and draw conclusions from the data. It helps researchers to determine whether their findings are statistically significant and generalize to the population. Here is an example:

Prompt: Test the hypothesis that there is a significant difference in the mean scores of two groups.

• Define the null and alternative hypotheses.
• Select an appropriate test statistic, such as t-test or ANOVA.
• Calculate the p-value and compare it to the significance level.
• Interpret the results and draw conclusions.

Prompt 3: Regression Analysis

This prompt can be used to analyze the relationship between two or more variables. It helps researchers to determine the strength and direction of the relationship and make predictions based on the data. Here is an example:

Prompt: Conduct a regression analysis to determine the relationship between income and education level.

• Identify the dependent and independent variables.
• Select an appropriate regression model, such as linear regression or logistic regression.
• Calculate the regression coefficients and interpret their meaning.
• Evaluate the goodness of fit of the model, using measures such as R-squared and residual plots.
• Use the model to make predictions and draw conclusions.

In conclusion, using ChatGPT prompts can help researchers to analyze and interpret their data effectively. By following these guidelines, researchers can ensure that their findings are accurate, reliable, and meaningful.

13. Using ChatGPT to Identify and Address Potential Ethical Issues in Research

Research is critical in gaining knowledge and driving progress in various fields. However, ethical issues can arise during the research process that may compromise the integrity of the study or harm the participants. Therefore, it is crucial to identify and address potential ethical issues in research to ensure that the study is conducted ethically.

Using ChatGPT to Identify Ethical Issues

ChatGPT is an AI language model that can be used to generate prompts to identify potential ethical issues in research. The following are some examples of ChatGPT prompts that can be used to identify ethical issues in research:

• What are the potential consequences of the study on the participants?
• How can the study be conducted in a way that respects the autonomy of the participants?
• What are the potential conflicts of interest that may arise during the study?
• How can the study be conducted in a way that protects the privacy and confidentiality of the participants?
• What are the potential risks and benefits of the study, and how can they be addressed?

Using ChatGPT to Address Ethical Issues

Once potential ethical issues have been identified, ChatGPT can be used to generate prompts on how to address these issues. The following are some examples of ChatGPT prompts that can be used to address ethical issues in research:

• How can the researchers obtain informed consent from the participants?
• How can the researchers ensure that the study is conducted in a way that respects the cultural and social norms of the participants?
• How can the researchers minimize the potential harm to the participants?
• How can the researchers ensure that the study is conducted in a way that is transparent and accountable?
• How can the researchers ensure that the data collected is accurate and reliable?

Suppose a researcher wants to conduct a study on the effects of a new drug on cancer patients. The following are some potential ethical issues that may arise:

• The potential harm to the participants due to the side effects of the drug.
• The potential conflict of interest due to the researcher's affiliation with the drug company that produces the drug.
• The potential breach of confidentiality and privacy of the participants' medical records.
• The potential bias in the data collected due to the researcher's preconceived notions about the drug's effectiveness.

To address these issues, the researcher can use ChatGPT to generate prompts on how to obtain informed consent from the participants, how to minimize harm, how to ensure transparency and accountability, and how to minimize bias in the data collected.

In conclusion, ChatGPT can be a useful tool in identifying and addressing potential ethical issues in research. By generating prompts, researchers can ensure that their studies are conducted ethically and with the utmost respect for the participants' autonomy and well-being.

14. Strategies for Presenting Research Findings in a Clear and Concise Manner

When it comes to presenting research findings, it is essential to present them in a way that is easy to understand and engaging for your audience. Here are some strategies to help you present your research findings in a clear and concise manner:

Use Visuals

Visuals can help you communicate complex information in a clear and concise manner. Consider using graphs, charts, and images to help illustrate your findings. Here are some tips for using visuals effectively:

• Use simple and easy-to-understand graphics
• Choose the right type of graphic for the data you want to present
• Use color and contrast to highlight important points
• Use labels and captions to provide context and clarity

Use Plain Language

Using plain language can help you communicate your research findings in a way that is easy for your audience to understand. Here are some tips for using plain language:

• Avoid using jargon or technical terms that your audience may not be familiar with
• Use short and simple sentences
• Use active voice instead of passive voice
• Break up long paragraphs into shorter ones

Focus on the Key Findings

When presenting your research findings, it is important to focus on the key findings. Here are some tips for focusing on the key findings:

• Start with a clear and concise summary of your key findings
• Highlight the most important findings using visuals or other tools
• Avoid overwhelming your audience with too much information
• Focus on what is most relevant to your audience

Tell a Story

Telling a story can help you engage your audience and make your research findings more memorable. Here are some tips for telling a story:

• Start with a clear and compelling introduction that sets the stage for your research
• Use examples or case studies to illustrate your key findings
• Use anecdotes or personal stories to help your audience connect with your research
• End with a clear and concise conclusion that summarizes your key findings

Suppose you are conducting research on the impact of social media on mental health. You have collected a significant amount of data and now need to present your findings to a group of mental health professionals.

To present your findings in a clear and concise manner, you could use the following strategies:

• Use visuals such as graphs and charts to illustrate the data you have collected.
• Use plain language to explain the findings in a way that is easy to understand.
• Focus on the key findings, such as the correlation between social media use and depression.
• Tell a story that highlights the impact of social media on mental health, using anecdotes or case studies to make your findings more memorable.

By using these strategies, you can present your research findings in a way that is clear, concise, and engaging for your audience.

15. ChatGPT Prompt for Developing Tables, Graphs, and Other Visual Aids in Research Paper Writing

Research papers often require the inclusion of tables, graphs, and other visual aids to present data and findings in a clear and concise manner. ChatGPT offers several prompts that can assist with the development of these visual aids, including:

Prompt 1: ""Can you provide examples of tables and graphs that are commonly used in research papers?""

This prompt can be used to help writers identify the types of tables and graphs that are most commonly used in research papers. Examples of tables and graphs that may be discussed include:

• Bar graphs: used to compare data across categories
• Line graphs: used to show trends over time
• Scatter plots: used to show the relationship between two variables
• Pie charts: used to show proportions of a whole
• Tables: used to present data in an organized manner

Example response:

""Bar graphs are commonly used in research papers to compare data across categories. For example, if we were conducting a study on the effectiveness of different types of exercise on weight loss, we might use a bar graph to compare the average weight loss of participants who engaged in aerobic exercise, strength training, or a combination of both. Line graphs are often used to show trends over time, such as changes in a population's average income over a number of years. Scatter plots can be used to show the relationship between two variables, such as the relationship between a person's age and their level of education. Pie charts are commonly used to show proportions of a whole, such as the percentage of a company's revenue that comes from different product lines. Tables can be used to present data in an organized manner, such as a table that lists the demographic information of participants in a study.""

Prompt 2: ""Can you help me create a table/graph to present my data/findings?""

This prompt can be used to get assistance with creating a specific table or graph to present data or findings. The writer can provide the necessary information, such as the data to be included, the type of graph or table they need, and any formatting requirements.

""Sure, I can help you create a graph to present your findings. Can you tell me what type of data you have and what kind of graph you want to use? If you have data on the percentage of students who passed a test at different schools, a bar graph might be a good choice. You can have the schools listed on the x-axis and the percentage of students who passed the test listed on the y-axis. Alternatively, if you have data on the changes in temperature in different cities over time, a line graph might be a better choice. You can have the cities listed on the x-axis and the temperature listed on the y-axis, with different lines representing each city.""

Prompt 3: ""Can you provide feedback on my current table/graph and suggest improvements?""

This prompt can be used to get feedback on a table or graph that the writer has already created. The writer can provide the table or graph, and the ChatGPT can provide suggestions for improvements, such as changing the formatting or adding labels to make the data easier to understand.

""Thanks for sharing your graph with me. One suggestion I have is to add labels to the x- and y-axes to make it clear what the graph is showing. You might also want to change the color scheme to make it easier to read. Another suggestion is to add a title that summarizes the main point of the graph. For example, if your graph shows the relationship between age and income, your title could be 'Income by Age Group'.

16. Using ChatGPT to Achieve Better Research Paper Writing: Providing Feedback on Structure and Clarity of Arguments

One of the most essential aspects of writing a research paper is ensuring that the structure and arguments are clear and concise. To achieve this, feedback from peers and instructors is critical. However, getting feedback can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex topics and ideas. Fortunately, artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT can improve the writing process by providing useful feedback on the structure and clarity of arguments.

How can ChatGPT be used for providing feedback on the structure and clarity of arguments in research papers?

ChatGPT can provide feedback on the structure and clarity of arguments in research papers by analyzing the language used in the paper and evaluating its coherence, clarity, and logical flow. This can be done by inputting the paper into ChatGPT and analyzing the generated response. Here are some ways ChatGPT can be used to provide feedback on research paper structure and clarity:

1. Identifying unclear language

ChatGPT can identify unclear language by analyzing the text and suggesting alternative wordings, phrasings, or sentence structures. This can help improve the clarity of arguments in research papers.

2. Evaluating coherence and logical flow

ChatGPT can evaluate coherence and logical flow by analyzing the order of arguments, the use of transitional phrases, and the overall structure of the paper. It can suggest changes to improve the flow and ensure that the arguments are presented in a logical and coherent manner.

3. Checking for consistency

ChatGPT can check for consistency by analyzing the language used throughout the paper and identifying areas where the language is inconsistent or contradictory. It can suggest changes to ensure that the language used is consistent throughout the paper.

Let's say you are writing a research paper on the impact of social media on mental health. You have written the first draft of the paper, but you are not sure if the arguments are clear and well-structured. You can use ChatGPT to provide feedback on the structure and clarity of your arguments. Here is how:

• Input the paper into ChatGPT.
• Ask ChatGPT to evaluate the coherence and logical flow of the paper.
• ChatGPT suggests reordering some of the arguments to improve the flow.
• ChatGPT also suggests adding transitional phrases to improve the coherence of the paper.
• Finally, ChatGPT suggests rewording some of the sentences to improve the clarity of the arguments.

With these suggestions from ChatGPT, you can go back and revise your paper to improve the structure and clarity of your arguments.

In conclusion, ChatGPT is a valuable tool for providing feedback on the structure and clarity of arguments in research papers. It can help writers improve the coherence, clarity, and logical flow of their writing, making their arguments more persuasive and effective.

17. Strategies for Improving Coherence and Flow in Writing

When writing a research paper, it's important to ensure that the writing is easy to follow and understand. One way to achieve this is by improving coherence and flow. Coherence refers to the logical connections between ideas, while flow refers to the smooth transition from one idea to the next. Here are some strategies for improving coherence and flow in writing:

1. Use Transitional Words and Phrases

Transitional words and phrases can help to connect ideas and improve the flow of writing. Examples include:

• Furthermore
• In addition
• Nevertheless
• Consequently
• As a result

By using these transitions, the reader can follow the writer's train of thought and understand how different ideas relate to each other.

2. Use Topic Sentences

Topic sentences are a way to introduce the main idea of a paragraph. By including a clear and concise topic sentence, the reader can easily understand what the paragraph is about and how it relates to the overall argument.

""The prevalence of social media has led to a shift in the way that people communicate with each other. Specifically, social media has enabled people to connect with others who share similar interests, regardless of geographic location.""

3. Use Consistent Verb Tenses

Using consistent verb tenses can help to improve coherence in writing. When the verb tenses change unexpectedly, it can be confusing for the reader.

""The researchers conducted a survey and found that the majority of participants prefer coffee over tea. However, some participants reported that they drink tea more frequently than coffee.""

4. Use Parallel Structure

Parallel structure refers to using the same grammatical structure for similar ideas. This can help to improve coherence and make the writing easier to follow.

""The study found that participants who completed the intervention had lower levels of stress, were more physically active, and reported higher levels of life satisfaction than those who did not complete the intervention.""

5. Use Clear Pronoun References

Pronoun references can be confusing if it's not clear which noun they are referring to. To improve coherence, make sure that pronoun references are clear and unambiguous.

""The researchers conducted a study on the effects of caffeine on cognitive performance. They found that participants who consumed caffeine performed better on cognitive tasks than those who did not.""

By implementing these strategies, writers can improve the coherence and flow of their writing, making it easier for readers to follow their thought process and understand their argument.

18. Using ChatGPT for Proofreading and Editing Research Papers

As research paper writing is a complex and time-consuming process, it is common for writers to make grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. One way to overcome these challenges is by using ChatGPT to help proofread and edit research papers.

How can ChatGPT help with proofreading and editing?

ChatGPT can help in several ways with proofreading and editing research papers, including:

• Providing suggestions for grammar and syntax errors, such as incorrect verb tense or sentence structure.
• Offering alternatives for repetitive words or phrases.
• Identifying and correcting spelling errors.
• Providing recommendations for improving the readability and flow of the text.

Example of using ChatGPT for proofreading and editing

Here is an example of how ChatGPT can be used for proofreading and editing a research paper:

• Copy and paste the text of the research paper into the ChatGPT platform.
• Ask ChatGPT to proofread and edit the text.
• Review the suggestions and edits provided by ChatGPT.
• Make necessary changes to the research paper based on ChatGPT's recommendations.
• Review the paper again to ensure that all errors have been corrected.

By using ChatGPT for proofreading and editing, researchers can improve the quality of their writing and save time in the editing process. However, it is important to note that ChatGPT is not perfect and may not catch all errors, so it is still essential to review the text manually.

19. Provide recommendations for organizing and structuring the paper

When writing a research paper, it is important to structure your content in a logical and clear manner. This helps to ensure that your readers can easily understand your message and follow your argument. Here are some ChatGPT prompts that can be used to check whether your paper is well-organized and structured:

1. Does the introduction clearly state the purpose of the paper?

• The introduction should provide a clear and concise statement of the purpose of the paper.
• It should explain why the research was conducted and what questions the paper aims to answer.

Example: ""The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of social media on mental health. Specifically, we aim to explore whether social media use is associated with increased levels of depression and anxiety.""

2. Are the main points of the paper presented in a logical order?

• The main points of the paper should be presented in a logical order that makes sense to the reader.
• You may want to use headings and subheadings to help you organize your content.

Example: ""The paper is organized as follows. First, we provide a review of the literature on social media use and mental health. Next, we describe the methods used in our study. Then, we present our findings and discuss their implications. Finally, we offer some recommendations for future research.""

3. Are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented in the paper?

• The conclusions of the paper should be supported by the evidence presented in the paper.
• You should provide a clear and concise summary of your findings, and explain how they relate to your research question.

Example: ""In conclusion, our study found that social media use is positively associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. These findings support the need for further research into the potential negative effects of social media on mental health. We suggest that future studies should explore the mechanisms through which social media use may affect mental health, and consider interventions that may help to mitigate these effects.""

In summary, organizing and structuring a research paper is essential for ensuring that your message is clear and coherent. Using ChatGPT prompts can help you to check whether your paper is well-organized and structured, and provide recommendations for improvement.

20. Using ChatGPT Prompts to Assist with Integrating Primary and Secondary Sources in Research Paper Writing

Research paper writing is a complex process that involves the use of both primary and secondary sources to support claims and arguments. Integrating these sources can be challenging, especially for students who are still learning how to conduct research and write academic papers. One way to overcome this challenge is to use ChatGPT prompts, which are designed to help writers generate ideas and organize their thoughts. In this paper, we will explore how ChatGPT prompts can be used to assist with integrating primary and secondary sources in research paper writing.

How can ChatGPT prompts assist with integrating primary and secondary sources?

ChatGPT prompts can assist with integrating primary and secondary sources by helping the writer identify relevant sources, extract key information from those sources, and integrate that information into their own writing. For example, here are some ChatGPT prompts that could be used to assist with integrating primary and secondary sources:

Prompt 1: ""What are the main arguments or claims made by the primary source?""

• This prompt can be used to help the writer identify the key arguments or claims made by a primary source. By focusing on the main arguments, the writer can more easily integrate the source into their own writing.

Prompt 2: ""What evidence does the secondary source provide to support the argument made by the primary source?""

• This prompt can be used to help the writer identify the evidence provided by a secondary source that supports the argument made by a primary source. By connecting the evidence from the secondary source to the argument from the primary source, the writer can strengthen their own argument.

Prompt 3: ""How does the primary source relate to the broader topic or research question?""

• This prompt can be used to help the writer contextualize the primary source within the broader topic or research question. By understanding how the primary source fits into the larger picture, the writer can more effectively integrate the source into their own writing.

Prompt 4: ""What are the limitations or weaknesses of the secondary source?""

• This prompt can be used to help the writer identify the limitations or weaknesses of a secondary source. By being aware of the limitations, the writer can more effectively evaluate the source and integrate it into their own writing.

In conclusion, using ChatGPT prompts can be an effective way to assist with integrating primary and secondary sources in research paper writing. By using prompts to identify relevant sources, extract key information, and integrate that information into their own writing, writers can strengthen their arguments and produce more effective research papers. As AI technology continues to advance, we can expect to see more tools like ChatGPT that can assist with various aspects of the research and writing process.

21. Using ChatGPT to Help with Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research

Research papers are essential in the field of academics and research. It is necessary to ensure that research is conducted fairly and objectively. Bias in research can lead to inaccurate findings and conclusions. In this paper, we will explore how ChatGPT can be used to help identify and avoid bias in research.

How Can ChatGPT Help Identify and Avoid Bias in Research?

Prompt 1: ""what are some common biases in research"".

ChatGPT can provide a list of common biases in research. This can help researchers to identify and avoid these biases in their own research. Some common biases in research include:

• Confirmation bias: This is when a researcher only looks for evidence that confirms their hypothesis and ignores evidence that contradicts it.
• Sampling bias: This is when a sample is not representative of the population being studied.
• Publication bias: This is when studies with positive results are more likely to be published than studies with negative results.
• Selection bias: This is when participants are not randomly selected and are instead handpicked by the researcher.
• Reporting bias: This is when results are selectively reported, leaving out important information that could affect the conclusions drawn from the study.

Prompt 2: ""How can researchers avoid bias in their research?""

ChatGPT can provide a list of strategies that researchers can use to avoid bias in their research. Some strategies include:

• Use random sampling techniques to select participants.
• Use blind or double-blind study designs to reduce the impact of researcher bias.
• Be aware of your own biases and work to mitigate them.
• Use a control group to compare results.
• Use multiple measures to assess the same construct.
• Be transparent in reporting results, including negative results.

Suppose a researcher is conducting a study on the effectiveness of a new teaching method. They want to ensure that their research is not biased. The researcher can use ChatGPT to generate prompts such as ""What are some common biases in education research?"" and ""How can I avoid bias in my education research?"" to identify and avoid bias in their study. They may learn that confirmation bias is a common issue in education research and that they can mitigate it by being open-minded to all potential outcomes. They may also learn that using a blind study design can reduce the impact of their own biases.

Bias in research can have serious consequences, leading to inaccurate findings and conclusions. ChatGPT can be a useful tool for researchers to identify and avoid bias in their research. By generating prompts related to common biases and strategies to avoid them, researchers can conduct fair and objective research.

22. Selecting Appropriate Research Participants or Samples

Research design is the backbone of any research study. It is crucial to select the right participants or sample for research to gain valid and reliable results. The following ChatGPT prompts can be used to check whether the research study has selected appropriate research participants or samples:

ChatGPT Prompt 1: What is the sample size of the research study, and how was it determined?

The sample size of the research study should be appropriate to achieve the research objectives. The size of the sample depends on the following factors:

• The research design
• The level of significance (alpha)
• The desired power of the test
• The effect size
• The sampling method

The sample size should be large enough to achieve the desired power of the test and small enough to reduce the cost and time of the research. The sample size can be determined by using statistical formulas, power analysis, or sampling tables.

Example: The research study aims to investigate the effect of a new teaching method on the academic performance of high school students. The sample size of the study is determined by using power analysis. The level of significance is set at 0.05, the power of the test is set at 0.8, and the effect size is set at 0.5. The sample size is calculated to be 64 students.

ChatGPT Prompt 2: Are the research participants representative of the population under study?

The research participants should be representative of the population under study to generalize the research findings. The representativeness of the sample depends on the sampling method and the sampling frame. The sampling method should be unbiased and random to avoid selection bias. The sampling frame should include all the elements of the population under study.

Example: The research study aims to investigate the attitudes of university students towards online learning. The sample is selected by using stratified random sampling. The sampling frame includes all the students enrolled in the university. The sample is stratified based on the faculty, and the participants are selected randomly from each stratum. The research participants are representative of the university population.

ChatGPT Prompt 3: Are the research participants willing and able to participate in the research study?

The research participants should be willing and able to participate in the research study to avoid non-response bias. The willingness of the participants can be ensured by obtaining informed consent and providing incentives. The ability of the participants to participate can be ensured by selecting participants who meet the eligibility criteria.

Example: The research study aims to investigate the health-related quality of life of cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy. The sample is selected from the cancer registry of a hospital. The eligibility criteria include age, cancer type, and chemotherapy regimen. The participants are contacted by phone, and informed consent is obtained from them. The participants who are willing and able to participate are included in the study.

Selecting appropriate research participants or samples is crucial to achieving valid and reliable research results. The above ChatGPT prompts can be used to check whether the research study has selected appropriate research participants or samples. By considering these prompts, researchers can ensure that their research is rigorous and meaningful.

23. Using ChatGPT Prompts to Assist with Developing and Refining Research Instruments

When it comes to research paper writing, developing and refining research instruments such as surveys and questionnaires can be a challenging task. Fortunately, ChatGPT prompts can be a useful tool to help with this process. By using prompts from ChatGPT, researchers can get ideas and insights on how to create effective research instruments that will yield accurate and valuable data.

Example of ChatGPT Prompt for Developing a Survey

Let's say you are conducting research on customer satisfaction with a particular product or service. You want to create a survey that will help you gather data on what customers like and dislike about the product or service. To get ideas for questions to include in the survey, you can use ChatGPT prompts. Here's an example of a prompt you could use:

Prompt: ""What are some effective questions to include in a customer satisfaction survey?""

Based on this prompt, ChatGPT might generate the following responses:

• ""How satisfied are you with the product/service overall?""
• ""What aspects of the product/service do you find most appealing?""
• ""What aspects of the product/service do you find least appealing?""
• ""How likely are you to recommend the product/service to others?""
• ""What improvements would you suggest for the product/service?""

Using these prompts, you can create a survey that is tailored to your research question and will yield valuable data.

Example of ChatGPT Prompt for Refining a Questionnaire

Let's say you are conducting research on the relationship between social media use and mental health. You have created a questionnaire that asks participants about their social media use and their mental health, but you're not sure if the questions are clear and effective. To get ideas for how to refine the questionnaire, you can use ChatGPT prompts. Here's an example of a prompt you could use:

Prompt: ""What are some effective ways to ask about social media use in a questionnaire?""

• ""How many hours per day do you spend on social media?""
• ""What social media platforms do you use most frequently?""
• ""How often do you post on social media?""
• ""Have you ever felt pressure to present a certain image on social media?""
• ""Have you ever experienced cyberbullying on social media?""

Using these prompts, you can refine your questionnaire to ensure that it is clear and effective in gathering data on social media use and mental health.

Overall, ChatGPT prompts can be a valuable tool for researchers who are developing and refining research instruments. By using prompts to generate ideas and suggestions, researchers can create instruments that will yield accurate and valuable data.

24. Suggest effective strategies for analyzing qualitative and quantitative data

Analyzing qualitative and quantitative data is an essential step in research paper writing. Both types of data require different analytical strategies to extract meaningful insights. In this paper, we will discuss effective strategies for analyzing qualitative and quantitative data.

Analyzing Qualitative Data

Qualitative data is descriptive data that cannot be measured numerically. Analyzing qualitative data involves the following strategies:

• Coding: This involves categorizing data into themes or patterns. The researcher identifies key concepts and assigns codes to them. This makes it easier to identify patterns and themes within the data.
• Content Analysis: This involves analyzing the content of the data to identify themes, patterns, and meanings. The researcher reads and re-reads the data to identify the main ideas and themes.
• Triangulation: This involves using multiple data sources to verify the findings. The researcher can use a combination of interviews, focus groups, and observations to gather data. This helps to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.

Analyzing Quantitative Data

Quantitative data is numerical data that can be measured and analyzed statistically. Analyzing quantitative data involves the following strategies:

• Descriptive Statistics: This involves summarizing and describing the data using measures such as mean, mode, and median. This helps to identify patterns and trends in the data.
• Inferential Statistics: This involves using statistical tests to make inferences about the data. The researcher can use tests such as t-tests and ANOVA to test hypotheses and identify significant differences between groups.
• Data Visualization: This involves using graphs and charts to present the data visually. This makes it easier to identify patterns and trends in the data.

ChatGPT Prompt Examples

Here are some examples of ChatGPT prompts that can be used to achieve the mission of suggesting effective strategies for analyzing qualitative and quantitative data:

• What are some effective strategies for coding qualitative data?
• How can content analysis be used to analyze qualitative data?
• What is triangulation and how can it be used to ensure the validity and reliability of qualitative data?
• What is descriptive statistics and how can it be used to analyze quantitative data?
• How can inferential statistics be used to test hypotheses and identify significant differences between groups?
• What are some effective ways to visualize quantitative data?"

25. Guidance on Data Cleaning and Preparation

Data cleaning and preparation is a crucial step in the research paper writing process. It involves transforming raw data into a format that is suitable for analysis. The goal of this process is to ensure that the data is accurate, complete, and consistent. In this paper, we will discuss the different types of ChatGPT prompts that can be used to achieve this mission.

Types of ChatGPT Prompts

1. prompt for identifying missing values.

One of the most common issues in data cleaning is missing values. These values can be identified using the following prompt:

List all the missing values in the dataset.

2. Prompt for handling missing values

Once missing values have been identified, they need to be handled appropriately. The following prompt can be used to guide this process:

What method should be used to handle missing values?

3. Prompt for identifying outliers

Outliers are data points that are significantly different from other data points in the dataset. They can be identified using the following prompt:

Identify all the outliers in the dataset.

4. Prompt for handling outliers

Outliers can be handled in different ways depending on the nature of the data. The following prompt can be used to guide this process:

What method should be used to handle outliers?

5. Prompt for identifying duplicates

Duplicates can occur when the same data is recorded multiple times in the dataset. They can be identified using the following prompt:

Identify all the duplicate data in the dataset.

6. Prompt for handling duplicates

Duplicate data can be handled in different ways depending on the nature of the data. The following prompt can be used to guide this process:

What method should be used to handle duplicate data?

Consider a research paper that analyzes the relationship between a student's GPA and their attendance. The dataset used in this study contains the following variables: student ID, GPA, attendance, gender, and age.

To clean and prepare this data, the following prompts can be used:

• Prompt for identifying missing values: List all the missing values in the dataset.
• Prompt for handling missing values: What method should be used to handle missing values?
• Prompt for identifying outliers: Identify all the outliers in the dataset.
• Prompt for handling outliers: What method should be used to handle outliers?
• Prompt for identifying duplicates: Identify all the duplicate data in the dataset.
• Prompt for handling duplicates: What method should be used to handle duplicate data?

By using these prompts, the researcher can ensure that the data is accurate, complete, and consistent, which will improve the quality of their analysis.

26. Using ChatGPT Prompts to Check Feedback on the Relevance and Significance of Research Findings

When conducting research, it is important to gather feedback on the relevance and significance of the findings. One effective way to do this is by using ChatGPT prompts. In this article, we will explore the types of prompts that can be used to accomplish this task.

Example of Research Summary Text

The research findings suggest that there is a significant correlation between regular exercise and improved mental health. The study involved 500 participants, all of whom engaged in some form of physical activity at least three times a week. The results showed that those who exercised regularly reported lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression compared to those who did not exercise.

ChatGPT Prompts

Here are some examples of prompts that can be used to check feedback from given summary text on the relevance and significance of the research findings:

• What are your thoughts on the correlation between regular exercise and improved mental health from the given summary text?
• Do you think the sample size of 500 participants is sufficient to draw valid conclusions from the given summary text?
• How do you think these findings could impact public health policies related to physical activity from the given summary text?
• Can you suggest any other factors that may influence the relationship between exercise and mental health from the given summary text?
• Do you think these findings could be applicable to other populations, such as older adults or individuals with disabilities from the given summary text?
• What implications do you think these findings have for mental health treatment and prevention from the given summary text?

Using ChatGPT prompts can be a useful way to gather feedback on the relevance and significance of research findings. By asking targeted questions, researchers can gain valuable insights into how their findings are perceived and how they can be applied to real-world situations.

27. Strategies for Identifying and Addressing Potential Confounding Variables in Research

Confounding variables are variables that can affect the outcome of a research study, but are not the variables of interest. They can lead to false conclusions and hinder the accuracy and validity of research findings. To identify and address potential confounding variables in research, the following strategies can be used:

1. Define the research question and hypothesis

• Clearly define the research question and hypothesis to ensure that the variables of interest are identified and focused on in the study.
• Identify potential confounding variables that may affect the outcome of the study.

2. Conduct a literature review

• Review relevant literature to identify potential confounding variables that have been previously identified in similar studies.
• Consider the methods used in these studies to address confounding variables.

3. Collect data on potential confounding variables

• Collect data on potential confounding variables to determine their relationship with the variables of interest.
• Use standardized measures and methods to ensure consistency and accuracy in data collection.

4. Analyze data for confounding variables

• Use statistical methods to analyze the data and identify potential confounding variables.
• Control for confounding variables by including them as covariates in the analysis or by stratifying the analysis to address their effects.

5. Address confounding variables in study design

• Design the study to minimize the effects of potential confounding variables.
• Use randomization, matching, or blocking to ensure that confounding variables are equally distributed among groups.
• Use blinding and placebo controls to reduce bias.

By using these strategies, researchers can identify and address potential confounding variables in their studies, leading to more accurate and valid research findings.

Example ChatGPT prompts for identifying and addressing confounding variables in research:

• What are some potential confounding variables that may affect the outcome of the study from the given summary text?
• How can the study design be modified to control for potential confounding variables from the given summary text?
• What statistical methods can be used to analyze the data for potential confounding variables from the given summary text?
• Can the effects of confounding variables be controlled for by including them as covariates in the analysis or by stratifying the analysis from the given summary text?
• How can blinding and placebo controls be used to reduce bias in the study from the given summary text?

28. How ChatGPT Prompts can Help with Crafting Compelling and Engaging Titles for Research Papers

The title of a research paper is the first thing that readers see, and it can have a significant impact on whether they decide to read the paper or not. Crafting a compelling and engaging title is essential for getting your research noticed and read by others. ChatGPT prompts can help researchers achieve this goal by providing a variety of prompts that can be used to generate creative and effective titles.

Example of ChatGPT Prompts for Title Generation

Here are some examples of ChatGPT prompts that can be used for crafting compelling and engaging titles for research papers:

• Please rewrite the given candidate title with consideration "What is the most surprising finding from your research, and how can it change the way we think about the topic"?
• Please rewrite the given candidate title with consideration "How can your research help solve a real-world problem, and what are the implications of your findings"?
• Please rewrite the given candidate title with consideration "What are the most interesting or controversial aspects of your research, and how can you highlight these in your title"?
• Please rewrite the given candidate title with consideration "What are the key takeaways from your research, and how can you turn these into a catchy and memorable title"?
• Please rewrite the given candidate title with consideration "What are the most important unanswered questions in your field, and how can your research contribute to answering these questions"?

Benefits of Using ChatGPT Prompts for Title Generation

There are several benefits to using ChatGPT prompts for crafting compelling and engaging titles for research papers, including:

• Increased creativity: ChatGPT prompts can help researchers think outside of the box and come up with new and innovative ideas for titles.
• Improved clarity: ChatGPT prompts can help researchers clarify the key findings and implications of their research, which can be reflected in the title.
• Enhanced memorability: ChatGPT prompts can help researchers come up with titles that are catchy and memorable, making their research more likely to be shared and cited by others.

Crafting compelling and engaging titles for research papers is essential for getting your research noticed and read by others. ChatGPT prompts can help researchers achieve this goal by providing a variety of prompts that can be used to generate creative and effective titles. By using ChatGPT prompts, researchers can increase their creativity, improve clarity, and enhance memorability, ultimately leading to greater impact and visibility for their research.

29. Using ChatGPT for Feedback on Research Questions and Hypotheses

In research paper writing, it is crucial to have appropriate research questions and hypotheses. These questions guide the research process and help researchers to achieve their objectives. However, it can be challenging to determine whether research questions and hypotheses are appropriate or not. In this use case, we will explore how ChatGPT can be used to provide feedback on the appropriateness of research questions and hypotheses.

Preparing to get feedback

To use ChatGPT for providing feedback on the appropriateness of research questions and hypotheses, follow these steps:

• Prepare the research material: Collect the research abstract, research questions, and hypotheses you want to evaluate. Make sure the material is clearly presented and accessible for input.
• Formulate a clear prompt: Create a concise and explicit prompt that instructs ChatGPT to provide feedback on the research questions and hypotheses. For example:
"Please evaluate the following research questions and hypotheses for their appropriateness, relevance, clarity, and alignment with the study's objectives. Offer suggestions for improvement, if necessary. Here are the research abstract, questions, and hypotheses: ..."
Then, insert the research abstract, questions, and hypotheses into the prompt.
• Input the prompt into ChatGPT: Copy and paste your prompt into ChatGPT, and submit it for processing.
• Review the response: Carefully review the generated response to ensure it addresses the appropriateness, relevance, clarity, and alignment of the research questions and hypotheses. Check whether the feedback is constructive and provides useful suggestions for improvement.
• Refine the prompt, if necessary: If the initial response does not fully address your needs or requires more specific feedback, refine the prompt to better direct ChatGPT toward the desired outcome. You may need to do this iteratively to get the most helpful feedback.

Example 1: Review Research Questions and Hypotheses

Example 2: generate research question and hypotheses and request feedback, types of chatgpt prompts:.

Clarification Prompt: This type of prompt is used to seek clarification on unclear or ambiguous research questions and hypotheses. It is especially useful when the research questions and hypotheses are too broad or vague. For example, "Could you please clarify what you mean by 'effective communication' in your research question?"

Specificity Prompt: This type of prompt is used to encourage researchers to make their research questions and hypotheses more specific and focused. It is particularly useful when the research questions and hypotheses are too general or broad. For example, "Could you please provide more specific details on the age range of the participants in your study?"

Relevance Prompt: This type of prompt is used to assess the relevance of research questions and hypotheses to the research topic. It is especially useful when the research questions and hypotheses are not directly related to the research topic. For example, "How does your research question relate to the main research topic?"

Testability Prompt: This type of prompt is used to check the testability of research questions and hypotheses. It is particularly useful when the research questions and hypotheses are too vague or general. For example, "Can you provide a testable hypothesis for your research question?"

Significance Prompt: This type of prompt is used to assess the significance of research questions and hypotheses. It is especially useful when the research questions and hypotheses do not contribute significantly to the existing body of knowledge. For example, "How does your research question contribute to the existing body of knowledge?"

Get Additional Feedbacks

Researchers can additionally input their questions and comments into ChatGPT and receive feedback on the appropriateness of their questions and hypotheses. Here are some examples of prompts that can be used for feedback on research questions and hypotheses:

Prompts 1: Check the hypotheses' relevance to the research question

• Can you explain what you mean by research question using research abstract?
• How would you define key concept in the research question from research abstract?
• Is the research question clear and concise from research abstract?

Prompts 2: Check the hypotheses' relevance to the research question

• Do the hypotheses address the research question?
• Are the hypotheses relevant to the study's aims and objectives?
• Do the hypotheses align with the research gap?

Prompts 3: Evaluate the hypotheses' testability

• Can the hypotheses be tested with the available data and research methods?
• Are there any limitations to testing the hypotheses?
• Can the hypotheses be modified to make them more testable?

Prompts 4: Evaluate weakness and potential

• "What are the weaknesses of my research question/hypothesis?"
• "What are the potential biases in my research question/hypothesis?"
• "How can I improve my research question/hypothesis?"
• "What are the gaps in my research question/hypothesis?"

30. Suggestions for Developing Effective and Relevant Research Questions

Research questions are the foundation of any research paper. They guide the research process, and the quality of the research questions directly affects the quality of the research. Therefore, it is essential to develop effective and relevant research questions to ensure that your research is meaningful and valuable. In this article, we will provide you with some suggestions for developing effective and relevant research questions.

Suggestions

1. choose a topic of interest.

The first step in developing effective and relevant research questions is to choose a topic that you are interested in. It is easier to develop research questions about a topic that you are passionate about. Also, choosing a topic that you are familiar with will help you to develop better research questions.

For example, if you are interested in the effects of social media on mental health, you can develop research questions such as:

• What is the relationship between social media use and anxiety?
• How does social media use affect depression among teenagers?

2. Define the Research Problem

Once you have chosen a topic, the next step is to define the research problem. The research problem is the gap or the knowledge that you want to explore in your research. Defining the research problem will help you to develop research questions that are relevant and meaningful.

For example, if your research problem is the lack of understanding of the impact of social media on mental health, you can develop research questions such as:

• What are the positive and negative effects of social media on mental health?
• How can social media be used to promote mental health?

3. Use a Question Stem

Using a question stem can help you to develop effective and relevant research questions. A question stem is a phrase or a sentence that starts with words such as "what," "how," "why," or "when." Using a question stem will help you to focus on a specific aspect of your research problem.

For example, if your research problem is the impact of social media on mental health, you can use the following question stems to develop research questions:

• What are the effects of social media on mental health?
• How does social media use affect mental health?
• Why do people use social media, and what are the effects on mental health?

4. Consider the Research Design

The research design is the plan or the strategy that you will use to conduct your research. The research design will affect the research questions that you can develop. Therefore, it is essential to consider the research design when developing research questions.

For example, if you are planning to conduct a survey to explore the impact of social media on mental health, you can develop research questions such as:

• What is the prevalence of social media use among teenagers, and how does it affect their mental health?
• How do different social media platforms affect mental health differently?

Example of prompt use

31. guidance on selecting appropriate research designs.

Research is an essential aspect of research life, and it requires a proper plan to conduct it successfully. One of the critical components of research planning is selecting an appropriate research design. The research design is the blueprint for conducting the research, and it outlines the procedures, methods, and techniques that will be used to gather and analyze data. This guidance will provide the necessary information required to select appropriate research designs.

Understanding the Research Question

Before selecting a research design, you need to understand the research question. The research question will determine the type of research design you will use. Ask yourself the following questions:

• What is the research question?
• What is the purpose of the research?
• What are the expected outcomes of the research?

Types of Research Designs

There are different types of research designs, and each design has its advantages and disadvantages. Consider the following research designs:

Experimental Research Design

Experimental research design is used to investigate the cause and effect relationship between variables. It involves manipulating the independent variable and observing the effect on the dependent variable.

Quasi-Experimental Research Design

Quasi-experimental research design is similar to experimental research design, but it lacks randomization. It is used when it is not possible to randomize participants.

Correlational Research Design

Correlational research design is used to investigate the relationship between two or more variables. It does not involve manipulation of variables.

Survey Research Design

Survey research design is used to collect data from a large sample of people. It involves using questionnaires or interviews to gather data.

Case Study Research Design

Case study research design is used to investigate a particular case or phenomenon. It involves in-depth analysis of a particular case.

Example of Prompt

Example and result.

Copyright (C) 2023, Prompted by Jonghong Jeon, Text Drafted by ChatGPT

11 Ways To Use ChatGPT To Write A Research Paper

All these tasks that would have taken you hours, maybe even days, and sometimes longer, can now take just a few minutes or even shorter when you use ChatGPT.

Today I want to talk about the top things that ChatGPT can help you with when it comes to research papers so that you can write your paper much faster.

Before we dive into the specific tips and show you how to use ChatGPT when writing research papers, let me preface by saying that it is just a tool and is limited in many ways. It’s not good enough yet to replace you and replace the researcher in writing the research paper.

You’ve got to understand that you can’t just tell ChatGPT to write a couple of paragraphs for you and then use it as ChatGPT writes it and then submit it. It’s just not going to work like that. Plus, it would kind of be plagiarism although AI isn’t human.

So what you’ve got to do is remember about the limitations of the technology:

• One main limitation is that it was trained on data up to January 2022, which means that more recent papers and more recent data are not going to be there.
• Another crucial limitation is that it doesn’t pull the references for most things. So when you’re writing the literature review, ChatGPT can write paragraphs for you real quick, but there are no references for them, and you can’t really pull the references for it.
• And remember: what ChatGPT writes isn’t necessarily perfect or good enough to be published in a top journal. You will most likely have to take ChatGPT text, improve upon it, revise it before you finally submit it.

So, let’s dive in and let’s see exactly how you can accelerate your progress with your research papers using ChatGPT.

1. How to Write Research Paper Title with ChatGPT

The first thing that we’re gonna do is get ChatGPT to give us some good research paper titles using ChatGPT.

I’m going to copy and paste the abstract that I’ve already got, and then I’m going to tell ChatGPT to suggest a title for a research paper based on this abstract .

Here is the title of the research paper that ChatGPT generated: “ Unmasking the Academic Impersonator: A Multifaceted Investigation into Detecting LLM-Generated Writing ”.

I think ChatGPT’s title is very good.

Now let’s see if ChatGPT can maybe give us some alternative so that we can choose.

ChatGPT message : Can you suggest two additional titles for the research paper based on that same abstract?

Title 2: “ Guardians of Academic Integrity: Unveiling LLM-Generated Content through Dataset, User Study, and Detection Algorithms “.

Title 3: “ Deciphering the Enigma: Insights into Detecting LLM-Generated Academic Writing via Dataset, User Perception, and Advanced Algorithms “.

ChatGPT message : Can you suggest two more titles which will be phrased as questions based on that same abstract?

Title 4: “ Can Humans Spot the Imposter? Exploring the Challenge of Detecting LLM-Generated Academic Writing “.

Title 5: “ Is AI Outsmarting Academia? Investigating the Detection of LLM-Generated Content in Research Papers “.

So ChatGPT can clearly give you titles. The way to do it is just to paste the abstract and ask ChatGPT to give you titles. An alternative, if you’ve got the whole introduction written, you can also give ChatGPT the introduction, and it will give you good titles as well.

2. How to Use ChatGPT to Write an Abstract

Now let’s see if ChatGPT can do the reverse.

Can ChatGPT write an abstract based on the title of your paper?

ChatGPT message : Write an abstract for a research paper based on this title.

The result is really good. It follows the exact structure of an abstract.

3. How to Write Research Outline with ChatGPT

Now, you can ask ChatGPT to write an outline that includes as many details of your task as possible. For example, I used the title suggested by ChatGPT in the first step.

ChatGPT prompt : Write an outline for a research paper that is [NUMBER] pages long and needs to use [NUMBER] primary sources on this topic: [TITLE]

ChatGPT generated a 33-point outline that details the areas I should cover in my research paper.

4. How to Write an Introduction Using ChatGPT

Let’s ask ChatGPT to write an introduction to a research paper and see what comes out of it.

ChatGPT prompt : Write a [NUMBER] paragraph introduction to a research paper entitled: [TITLE]

ChatGPT wrote a 4 paragraph introduction and it looks very good again.

5. How to Write a Thesis Statement Using ChatGPT

Writing a strong thesis statement is essential for any research paper, as it serves as the backbone of your argument or analysis. With ChatGPT you can simplify the writing process.

ChatGPT message : Write a thesis statement for a research paper based on this title.

ChatGPT generates a thesis statement based on the information provided. Review the response carefully, considering its clarity, relevance, and alignment with your research goals. If necessary, refine the statement by providing additional guidance or asking follow-up questions.

6. Find The Research Gap Using ChatGPT

Now we can get ChatGPT to do is to work on a research gap. This is what many PhD students and researchers do.

Let’s see if ChatGPT can suggest us any good research gaps.

ChatGPT message : Suggest a research gap on the topic of detecting ChatGPT-generated academic writing.

This is really well presented.

7. Writing a Research Question Using ChatGPT

If you have a research gap, you can just give ChatGPT the research gap, and from that, you can get research questions.

ChatGPT message : Suggest two different research questions based on the following research gap.

Both of these research questions are fantastic. And both of them should be investigated.

8. Making a Research Question More Specific with ChatGPT

A big problem that a lot of people have with research questions or aims is that they are too vague or too general.

What ChatGPT suggests here is pretty good already, but let’s see if it’s capable of making a research question more specific.

ChatGPT message : Make the following research question more specific and precise.

Question #1

Question #2

Right, this is pretty good. This is definitely more specific.

I think ChatGPT can help you to specify your research questions.

If you’re struggling with your aim or research question is too vague, then you can use ChatGPT to make it more specific.

9. How To Use ChatGPT To Write A Literature Review

You’re just kind of starting out with a topic, and you want to see what are some of the key publications that you should read on that topic just to get yourself started.

Let’s see how ChatGPT can help us accelerate the literature review process.

ChatGPT prompt : I am investigating [TOPIC]. What are the key research papers on this topic I should read?

I have to say that I’m not very impressed. I think the result was affected by the limitations of the data on which the algorithm was trained until 2022.

Nevertheless, you can definitely use ChatGPT to get you the literature that you should start reading.

10. Writing a Methodology For a Research Paper Using ChatGPT

After reviewing the literature, I ask ChatGPT to suggest the methodology section for the topic. This section will include research approaches and sampling techniques for data collection.

ChatGPT message : Write a research methodology for a research paper based on this title.

As you can see, ChatGPT can help generate the overall structure of the research methodology.

11. How to use ChatGPT to summarize a research paper

The last thing which I feel ChatGPT could be very useful in research is asking for summarization.

We can ask ChatGPT to summarize a particular paper or the key takeaways that could be important for us from that paper.

In that way, you can just note it down in a proper way with proper citations, which you could use as a literature review in your research writing or academic writing.

ChatGPT prompt: Can you provide a summary of [PAPER NAME]

Can ChatGPT write research papers?

To answer this question, I turned to ChatGPT, here is its answer:

“I can indeed assist in generating content for research papers, including providing structured information, drafting paragraphs, and even offering suggestions for methodology and analysis.However, it’s crucial to note that while I can generate text based on the input and parameters provided, I lack true understanding, creativity, or original thought. Therefore, while I can help with the mechanical aspects of writing a research paper, the conceptualization, critical analysis, and interpretation of research findings are best left to human researchers who possess domain expertise and critical thinking skills. Ultimately, the quality and validity of a research paper rely on the expertise and integrity of its human authors.”

Using the power of ChatGPT can be transformative for those grappling with the daunting task of writing research papers.

ChatGPT won’t write your research paper for you from scratch, but it can make the writing process much easier.

It gives you some content to work with. And then you can rewrite it in your own words.

You’ve got a starting point now.

Related articles

• 7 Reasons Why Copywriters Must Be Shameless
• 5 Factors that Distinguish Great Copywriters
• 10 Things Epic Copywriters Do
• Career Advice for Writers: How to Become a Copywriter
• 5 Things You Need to Know About Copywriting

A professional freelance web copywriter with several years’ experience in web marketing and SEO copywriting.

Other posts by Christina Walker

Comments (0)

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• 10 April 2024

Is ChatGPT corrupting peer review? Telltale words hint at AI use

• Dalmeet Singh Chawla

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

You have full access to this article via your institution.

A study suggests that researchers are using chatbots to assist with peer review. Credit: Rmedia7/Shutterstock

A study that identified buzzword adjectives that could be hallmarks of AI-written text in peer-review reports suggests that researchers are turning to ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) tools to evaluate others’ work.

The authors of the study 1 , posted on the arXiv preprint server on 11 March, examined the extent to which AI chatbots could have modified the peer reviews of conference proceedings submitted to four major computer-science meetings since the release of ChatGPT.

Their analysis suggests that up to 17% of the peer-review reports have been substantially modified by chatbots — although it’s unclear whether researchers used the tools to construct reviews from scratch or just to edit and improve written drafts.

How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing

The idea of chatbots writing referee reports for unpublished work is “very shocking” given that the tools often generate misleading or fabricated information, says Debora Weber-Wulff, a computer scientist at the HTW Berlin–University of Applied Sciences in Germany. “It’s the expectation that a human researcher looks at it,” she adds. “AI systems ‘hallucinate’, and we can’t know when they’re hallucinating and when they’re not.”

The meetings included in the study are the Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, due to be held in Vienna next month, 2023’s Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, held in New Orleans, Louisiana, the 2023 Conference on Robot Learning in Atlanta, Georgia, and the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing in Singapore.

Nature reached out to the organizers of all four conferences for comment, but none responded.

Buzzword search

Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has been used to write a number of scientific papers , in some cases even being listed as an author . Out of more than 1,600 scientists who responded to a 2023 Nature survey , nearly 30% said they had used generative AI to write papers and around 15% said they had used it for their own literature reviews and to write grant applications.

In the arXiv study, a team led by Weixin Liang, a computer scientist at Stanford University in California, developed a technique to search for AI-written text by identifying adjectives that are used more often by AI than by humans.

By comparing the use of adjectives in a total of more than 146,000 peer reviews submitted to the same conferences before and after the release of ChatGPT, the analysis found that the frequency of certain positive adjectives, such as ‘commendable’, ‘innovative’, ‘meticulous’, ‘intricate’, ‘notable’ and ‘versatile’, had increased significantly since the chatbot’s use became mainstream. The study flagged the 100 most disproportionately used adjectives.

Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers

Reviews that gave a lower rating to conference proceedings or were submitted close to the deadline, and those whose authors were least likely to respond to rebuttals from authors, were most likely to contain these adjectives, and therefore most likely to have been written by chatbots at least to some extent, the study found.

“It seems like when people have a lack of time, they tend to use ChatGPT,” says Liang.

The study also examined more than 25,000 peer reviews associated with around 10,000 manuscripts that had been accepted for publication across 15 Nature Portfolio journals between 2019 and 2023, but didn’t find a spike in usage of the same adjectives since the release of ChatGPT.

A spokesperson for Springer Nature said the publisher asks peer reviewers not to upload manuscripts into generative AI tools , noting that these still have “considerable limitations” and that reviews might include sensitive or proprietary information. ( Nature’s news team is independent of its publisher.)

Springer Nature is exploring the idea of providing peer reviewers with safe AI tools to guide their evaluation, the spokesperson said.

Transparency issue

The increased prevalence of the buzzwords Liang’s study identified in post-ChatGPT reviews is “really striking”, says Andrew Gray, a bibliometrics support officer at University College London. The work inspired him to analyse the extent to which some of the same adjectives, as well as a selection of adverbs, crop up in peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2023. His findings, described in an arXiv preprint published on 25 March, show a significant increase in the use of certain terms, including ‘commendable’, ‘meticulous’ and ‘intricate’, since ChatGPT surfaced 2 . The study estimates that the authors of at least 60,000 papers published in 2023 — just over 1% of all scholarly studies published that year — used chatbots to some extent.

Gray says it’s possible peer reviewers are using chatbots only for copyediting or translation, but that a lack of transparency from authors makes it difficult to tell. “We have the signs that these things are being used,” he says, “but we don’t really understand how they’re being used.”

‘Obviously ChatGPT’ — how reviewers accused me of scientific fraud

“We do not wish to pass a value judgement or claim that the use of AI tools for reviewing papers is necessarily bad or good,” Liang says. “But we do think that for transparency and accountability, it’s important to estimate how much of that final text might be generated or modified by AI.”

Weber-Wulff doesn’t think tools such as ChatGPT should be used to any extent during peer review, and worries that the use of chatbots might be even higher in cases in which referee reports are not published. (The reviews of papers published by Nature Portfolio journals used in Liang’s study were available online as part of a transparent peer-review scheme .) “Peer review has been corrupted by AI systems,” she says.

Using chatbots for peer review could also have copyright implications, Weber-Wulff adds, because it could involve giving the tools access to confidential, unpublished material. She notes that the approach of using telltale adjectives to detect potential AI activity might work well in English, but could be less effective for other languages.

Nature 628 , 483-484 (2024)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01051-2

Liang, W. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07183 (2024).

Gray, A. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16887 (2024).

Download references

Reprints and permissions

Related Articles

ChatGPT can write a paper in an hour — but there are downsides

• Machine learning
• Peer review

Lethal AI weapons are here: how can we control them?

News Feature 23 APR 24

Will AI accelerate or delay the race to net-zero emissions?

Comment 22 APR 24

AI’s keen diagnostic eye

Outlook 18 APR 24

Londoners see what a scientist looks like up close in 50 photographs

Career News 18 APR 24

Researchers want a ‘nutrition label’ for academic-paper facts

Nature Index 17 APR 24

Structure peer review to make it more robust

World View 16 APR 24

Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing

Career Column 08 APR 24

Is AI ready to mass-produce lay summaries of research articles?

Nature Index 20 MAR 24

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Description Applications are invited for a postdoctoral fellow position at the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, to participate...

Toronto (City), Ontario (CA)

Sinai Health

Postdoctoral Research Associate - Surgery

Memphis, Tennessee

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (St. Jude)

Open Rank Faculty Position in Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics

The Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics (www.virginia.edu/bmg) and the University of Virginia Cancer Center

Charlottesville, Virginia

Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics

Postdoctoral Position - Synthetic Cell/Living Cell Spheroids for Interactive Biomaterials

Co-assembly of artificial cells and living cells to make co-spheroid structures and study their interactive behavior for biomaterials applications.

Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz (DE)

University of Mainz

2024 Recruitment notice Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology: Shenzhen, China

The wide-ranging expertise drawing from technical, engineering or science professions...

Shenzhen,China

Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

• Interesting
• Scholarships
• UGC-CARE Journals

How to Use ChatGpt to Write a Scientific Research Paper?

• Tips for using ChatGpt to write a scientific research paper

Table of contents

Chatgpt to write a scientific research paper, find this article with the following keywords.

ChatGPT is an AI language model, it can generate text based on the input provided by user. However, It should be used as a tool to assist in the writing process rather than being relied on entirely to write a scientific research paper. Writing a scientific research paper requires not only knowledge of the subject matter but also critical thinking, analysis, and interpretation of data. Therefore, it is essential to use ChatGPT in conjunction with your own expertise and knowledge.

In this article, ilovephd provided tips to use ChatGPT for Scientific research paper writing.

Here are some steps you can take to use ChatGPT to write a scientific research paper :

• Begin by identifying the research question or hypothesis that you want to address in your paper.
• Use ChatGPT to search for relevant scientific literature related to your research question or hypothesis. ChatGPT can provide you with a summary of existing research on the topic, as well as any gaps in the literature.
• Collect data through experiments, surveys, or other means. Then, use ChatGPT to help analyze and interpret your data, as well as generate visualizations to support your findings.
• Use ChatGPT to help organize your paper by creating an outline, structuring your arguments, and ensuring that your paper is well-organized and flows logically.
• Use ChatGPT to generate draft sections of your paper, such as the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. However, ensure that you review and edit the content generated by ChatGPT to ensure it aligns with your research and is written in your own voice.
• Use ChatGPT to help edit and proofread your paper for grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. However, ensure that you carefully review and make any necessary revisions to the content generated by ChatGPT to ensure accuracy and clarity.

Remember that while ChatGPT can be a helpful tool in the scientific research paper writing process, it is not a substitute for your own expertise, critical thinking, and analysis. Therefore, it is important to use ChatGPT in conjunction with your own knowledge and skills to ensure a high-quality scientific research paper.

10 Myths about ChatGPT in scientific research paper writing

Here are 10 myths about ChatGpt in scientific research paper writing:

• Fact: While ChatGpt can assist in generating content for a scientific research paper, it cannot write a paper entirely on its own. Human expertise, critical thinking, and analysis are still essential in the writing process.
• Fact: ChatGpt is a tool that can assist in the research and writing process, but it cannot replace human researchers. The expertise and skills of human researchers are still necessary in scientific research.
• Fact: ChatGpt can assist in analyzing and interpreting data, but human input is still essential in ensuring accuracy and drawing meaningful conclusions.
• Fact: While ChatGpt can generate original content, it is still possible for the content to be similar or identical to existing material. It is important to review and edit any content generated by ChatGpt to ensure it is original and appropriately cited.
• Fact: ChatGpt’s ability to write effectively may vary depending on the scientific field. It is essential to provide ChatGpt with specific information and context to ensure accurate and effective writing.
• Fact: ChatGpt’s content may still contain errors or mistakes, and it is important to review and edit any content generated by ChatGpt for accuracy and clarity.
• Fact: ChatGpt’s content is based on machine learning and natural language processing, and while it can produce high-quality content, it is not necessarily better than human-written content.
• Myth: ChatGpt can write content that is more persuasive than human-written content. Fact: Persuasion requires human communication skills and emotional intelligence, and ChatGpt’s content may not be as persuasive as human-written content.
• Fact: ChatGpt’s content is based on data and input provided by humans, and therefore may contain subjective bias. It is important to review and edit any content generated by ChatGpt to ensure it is objective.
• Fact: ChatGpt’s content is only as good as the research and knowledge that is provided to it. Therefore, it is still essential for researchers to have expertise and knowledge in their field and to provide accurate information to ChatGpt to generate effective content.

I hope, this article would help you to know how to use ChatGPT 4 to your scientific research paper writing.

• AI language model for scientific research paper writing
• Writing scientific research papers with ChatGpt
• ChatGpt for scientific paper writing
• How to use ChatGpt for scientific research paper writing
• Scientific paper writing with the help of ChatGpt
• ChatGpt for scientific research and writing
• How ChatGpt can assist with scientific research paper writing
• Writing high-quality scientific research papers using ChatGpt
• ChatGpt as a tool for scientific paper writing
• artificial intelligence
• Research Paper
• Research Paper Writing
• research paper writing tips
• Scientific Research Paper Writing

What is Research Design? and How to Frame it?

42 digital signal processing project ideas to explore, what is a research design importance and types, email subscription.

iLovePhD is a research education website to know updated research-related information. It helps researchers to find top journals for publishing research articles and get an easy manual for research tools. The main aim of this website is to help Ph.D. scholars who are working in various domains to get more valuable ideas to carry out their research. Learn the current groundbreaking research activities around the world, love the process of getting a Ph.D.

WhatsApp Channel

Join iLovePhD WhatsApp Channel Now!

Contact us: [email protected]

Copyright © 2019-2024 - iLovePhD

• Artificial intelligence

Secure Your Spot in Our PCA Online Course Starting on April 02 (Click for More Info)

Research Paper Summary Using ChatGPT (Example)

Hi! In this tutorial, I will show you how to use ChatGPT to summarize a research paper .

Since ChatGPT cannot access an external URL, we cannot give it the link to a research paper along with a summary instruction prompt.

Therefore, we will need to make use of ChatGPT Summary for Chrome extension . The installation and usage of the extension are straightforward, but if you need assistance, then take a look at this tutorial article .

Here is an overview:

Let’s jump into the discussion!

Get Research Paper URL

In order to be able to use ChatGPT Summary for Chrome extension to summarize a research paper, the paper has to be hosted online and be in the form of a web article because, from my experience, it cannot summarize a hosted PDF document .

However, if you would like to know how to use ChatGPT to summarize a PDF document, then you can read this tutorial article .

The research paper we will summarize in this tutorial is from ScienceDirect . It is a paper about artificial intelligence and unemployment in high-tech developed countries. You can access the paper here .

  Now that we have accessed the research paper, we can ask ChatGPT to summarize it for us. First, though, we will need to make a slight modification to the prompt.  

Modify Summary Prompt

The default prompt that comes with the ChatGPT Summary for Chrome extension instructs ChatGPT to summarize an article into 5 main points.

In our case, we want it to summarize the research paper as one short paragraph. Therefore, we will adjust the prompt setting to reflect that.

So, go to the extension icon on your Google Chrome browser menu bar, right-click on it, and select “Options”. In the prompt area, enter the following prompt: Summarize the main points of the paper as one short paragraph and click “Save Prompt”.

  With that, ChatGPT should summarize the research paper in a short paragraph as instructed.  

Summarize Research Paper

Now that we have adjusted our prompt instruction, it is time to run the extension on the research paper.

Simply go back to the research paper and click the ChatGPT Summary for Chrome extension icon, and it will automatically summarize the paper in a popup widget like so.

  It certainly did a good job summarizing the entire paper in one paragraph. You can experiment with the prompt and see in what other ways the research paper can be summarized using ChatGPT.  

Video, Further Resources & Summary

Do you need more explanations on how to summarize a research paper using ChatGPT? Then you should have a look at the following YouTube video of the Statistics Globe YouTube channel.

In the video, we explain in some more detail how to summarize a research paper using ChatGPT.

The YouTube video will be added soon.

Furthermore, you could have a look at some of the other interesting ChatGPT-based tutorials on Statistics Globe:

• Best ChatGPT Prompts for Writing a Cover Letter (5 Examples)
• Best ChatGPT Prompts (7 Examples)
• How to Use ChatGPT for Story Writing (Example)
• How to Write Better ChatGPT Prompts (Examples)
• How to Use ChatGPT for Coding (Examples)
• Introduction to Python Programming

This post has shown how to summarize a research paper using ChatGPT . I hope you found this post helpful! In case you have further questions, you may leave a comment below.

This page was created in collaboration with Ifeanyi Idiaye. You might check out Ifeanyi’s personal author page to read more about his academic background and the other articles he has written for the Statistics Globe website.

Subscribe to the Statistics Globe Newsletter

Get regular updates on the latest tutorials, offers & news at Statistics Globe. I hate spam & you may opt out anytime: Privacy Policy .

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Comment

I’m Joachim Schork. On this website, I provide statistics tutorials as well as code in Python and R programming.

Statistics Globe Newsletter

Get regular updates on the latest tutorials, offers & news at Statistics Globe. I hate spam & you may opt out anytime: Privacy Policy .

Related Tutorials

Draw 3D Plot of PCA in Python (Example)

Confirmatory Factor Analysis in R (Example)

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Published on 22.4.2024 in Vol 26 (2024)

Using ChatGPT-4 to Create Structured Medical Notes From Audio Recordings of Physician-Patient Encounters: Comparative Study

Authors of this article:

Original Paper

• Annessa Kernberg, MD   ; 
• Jeffrey A Gold, MD   ; 
• Vishnu Mohan, MD  

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, United States

Corresponding Author:

Vishnu Mohan, MD

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology

Oregon Health and Sciences University

3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road

Portland, OR, 97239

United States

Phone: 1 5034944469

Email: [email protected]

Background: Medical documentation plays a crucial role in clinical practice, facilitating accurate patient management and communication among health care professionals. However, inaccuracies in medical notes can lead to miscommunication and diagnostic errors. Additionally, the demands of documentation contribute to physician burnout. Although intermediaries like medical scribes and speech recognition software have been used to ease this burden, they have limitations in terms of accuracy and addressing provider-specific metrics. The integration of ambient artificial intelligence (AI)–powered solutions offers a promising way to improve documentation while fitting seamlessly into existing workflows.

Objective: This study aims to assess the accuracy and quality of Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (SOAP) notes generated by ChatGPT-4, an AI model, using established transcripts of History and Physical Examination as the gold standard. We seek to identify potential errors and evaluate the model’s performance across different categories.

Methods: We conducted simulated patient-provider encounters representing various ambulatory specialties and transcribed the audio files. Key reportable elements were identified, and ChatGPT-4 was used to generate SOAP notes based on these transcripts. Three versions of each note were created and compared to the gold standard via chart review; errors generated from the comparison were categorized as omissions, incorrect information, or additions. We compared the accuracy of data elements across versions, transcript length, and data categories. Additionally, we assessed note quality using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI) scoring system.

Results: Although ChatGPT-4 consistently generated SOAP-style notes, there were, on average, 23.6 errors per clinical case, with errors of omission (86%) being the most common, followed by addition errors (10.5%) and inclusion of incorrect facts (3.2%). There was significant variance between replicates of the same case, with only 52.9% of data elements reported correctly across all 3 replicates. The accuracy of data elements varied across cases, with the highest accuracy observed in the “Objective” section. Consequently, the measure of note quality, assessed by PDQI, demonstrated intra- and intercase variance. Finally, the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 was inversely correlated to both the transcript length ( P =.05) and the number of scorable data elements ( P =.05).

Conclusions: Our study reveals substantial variability in errors, accuracy, and note quality generated by ChatGPT-4. Errors were not limited to specific sections, and the inconsistency in error types across replicates complicated predictability. Transcript length and data complexity were inversely correlated with note accuracy, raising concerns about the model’s effectiveness in handling complex medical cases. The quality and reliability of clinical notes produced by ChatGPT-4 do not meet the standards required for clinical use. Although AI holds promise in health care, caution should be exercised before widespread adoption. Further research is needed to address accuracy, variability, and potential errors. ChatGPT-4, while valuable in various applications, should not be considered a safe alternative to human-generated clinical documentation at this time.

Introduction

Medical documentation is an integral aspect of clinical practice, ensuring accuracy and comprehensive patient management and serving as a communication tool among health care professionals. In recent years, it has become increasingly evident that inaccuracies in medical notes lead to miscommunication, diagnostic discrepancies, and patients’ perceptions of subpar medical care [ 1 ]. Beyond the immediate implications of documentation errors, documentation demands have been identified as a significant contributor to physician burnout [ 2 ]. With health care professionals spending an increasing amount of their working hours on paperwork, there is less time and energy left for direct patient care.

To counter this, many institutions have adopted the use of intermediaries, such as medical scribes or speech recognition software, to shoulder the documentation load and allow clinicians to focus on patient interactions. However, both of these solutions have significant limitations and concerns regarding documentation accuracy and lack of impact on many provider-specific metrics surrounding after-hours charting and burnout [ 3 , 4 ]. In addition, the financial implications of employing medical scribes render them inaccessible to numerous health care practices [ 5 ]. Consequently, there is a continued search for innovative solutions to create effective and accurate documentation while seamlessly integrating into existing workflows.

With the rapid and exponential growth in computing capacity, artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used in health care, holding the promise of revolutionizing medical documentation, thus potentially alleviating the burden on physicians [ 6 ]. AI-powered systems can analyze vast amounts of data quickly, identify patterns, and suggest diagnostic options. Although the allure of AI is undeniable, questions regarding its accuracy, reliability, and suitability in the clinical setting remain. The maturation of speech recognition technology has led to large-scale adoption by health care organizations, allowing for real-time transcription services. This, combined with software using large language models (LLMs), now enables the creation of structured medical notes in close temporal relation to the clinical encounter, thereby decreasing the clinician documentation burden [ 7 , 8 ]. Multiple software vendors are developing and deploying documentation assistance software powered by ambient AI, referred to as ambient digital scribes. There is already significant interest on the part of clinicians and health care organizations to adopt them. However, little data exist on the safety and quality of the documentation, with analysis made more difficult by the proprietary AI engine used by each vendor.

One such AI system is OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4, a state-of-the-art LLM known for its ability to engage in text-based communication with users (as a chatbot), which is used in some commercial ambient digital scribe solutions. Released in November 2022, ChatGPT-4 is trained on a vast amount of text data from the internet and uses an LLM to answer the users’ prompts. Health care providers envision numerous applications for ChatGPT-4, such as answering patient questions, automated insurance prior authorizations, and creating differential diagnoses [ 9 , 10 ]. It is important to note that open AI platforms, such as ChatGPT-4, are not recommended for clinical use due to the many regulatory and privacy issues. Despite this, there is a continued interest in whether ChatGPT-4 could serve as a freely available tool to assist as a documentation intermediary, bridging the gap between health care professionals and the tedious task of recordkeeping.

However, it is imperative that prior to the widespread adoption of these tools, their safety and efficacy need to be evaluated in a structured and clinically contextually relevant manner. Therefore, the goal of this study was to use transcripts from simulated patient-provider encounters to determine the accuracy, readability, and reproducibility of ChatGPT-4–generated Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (SOAP) notes.

As part of a project designed to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of human scribe–generated notes, we created 14 simulated patient-provider encounters. All encounters used professional standardized patients and represented a wide range of ambulatory specialties. A standardized patient is an individual trained to simulate a medical scenario for health care education, assessment, and research. Briefly, for each case, a storyboard was created by subject matter experts and used for training the standardized patient to ensure standard content delivery according to best practices [ 11 ]. After an initial dry-run, each scenario was conducted in a simulated ambulatory patient exam room equipped with audio-video capture. At the end of the scenario, audio-video files were exported for use. These cases represented a variety of diagnoses ( Table 1 ).

Audio files for each case were professionally transcribed. For each encounter, a list of key reportable elements was created for each case using the transcripts and informed by the initial storyboard, by 2 clinical experts of the study team. This is being used as the scoring rubric for subsequent analysis. These encounter transcripts were then fed into ChatGPT-4 using a standard prompt (“generate a clinical note in SOAP format for the following”). The SOAP format is a widely used clinical documentation format that concatenates data elements of the clinical interview into headers representing SOAP-related components. The SOAP format is a standard model for medical documentation, providing a clear, concise framework for health care professionals to record and share patient information. Each transcript was run through the model three times to assess output fidelity associated with replicability, thus generating three documentation versions for each case for a total of 42 ChatGPT-4 generated SOAP notes (the prompt and full output are present in Multimedia Appendix 1 ). A new discussion space was created for each case to prevent the various transcripts from conflating each other. Each prompt request was conducted consecutively within the same discussion space.

After acquiring the generated notes, various comparisons were made to assess the output’s accuracy and quality. Within a single case, the 3 versions were analyzed based on errors generated. A list of errors was defined as follows: (1) omissions—where expected documentation elements or data were missing; (2) incorrect—where the data element was referred to but incorrect; and (3) additions—information added that was not in the transcript. The framework for defining quality in clinical documentation based on omissions, incorrect information, and additions is a structured approach to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of medical records. These characteristics (omissions, incorrect information, and additions), if present, help define the quality of documentation given their implications. For example, omissions can lead to gaps in patient care, misdiagnosis, or delays in treatment. Incorrect information can compromise patient safety and lead to negative health consequences. Additions, while not always harmful, can be inaccurate and reduce the efficiency of care delivery. This framework is particularly useful in assessing the performance of health care documentation processes, such as those generated by medical scribes, and in quantifying appropriate information retrieval [ 4 , 12 ]. A correct data element was defined as one without the previously outlined errors.

To ensure and assess note quality, we outlined critical data elements for each clinical case. Members of the study team independently selected these crucial data elements and subsequently compiled them to guarantee comprehensiveness. They used these elements to generate a gold standard checklist and an associated gold standard History and Physical Examination note. Then, 2 raters graded the 3 ChatGPT-4 versions of each encounter based on whether they correctly included, missed, or wrongly presented the corresponding data element. We enumerated the number of errors and correct data elements for each version. Afterward, we compared the correct data elements across the 3 ChatGPT-4 versions for presence and consistency, as follows: (1) across all three versions, (2) across two versions, (3) only in a single version, or (4) not present at all. Finally, we compared the percentages of appropriate data elements across the versions to the transcript’s length and the number of data elements.

The data elements were divided into three documentation-related sections: (1) Subjective , further subdivided into the history of present illness and other patient-reported information, including medications, allergies, family history, social history, and past medical history; (2) Objective , which includes vital signs, physical exam, and any reported test results; and (3) Assessment and Plan , which includes the provider reported differential, plan, and follow-up instructions. The percentages of correct data elements were then compared based on these categories.

Lastly, the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI) scoring system, which is a validated tool to assess note quality, was used to evaluate the quality of the generated notes [ 13 ]. Using a set of predefined criteria, the PDQI facilitates the objective analysis of documentation practices. Within the PDQI, 9 criteria assess if the document is (1) up to date, (2) accurate, (3) thorough, (4) useful, (5) organized, (6) comprehensible, (7) succinct, (8) synthesized, and (9) consistent. The items are then scored based on a 5-point Likert scale, with the highest value representing the ideal characteristic. A maximum score of 45 represents the document that extremely shows the associated attribute, and a minimum score of 9 points indicates that the attribute is not at all present. The PDQI score was calculated for the 3 versions of the generated note, averaged, and compared across the 14 cases by a member of the study team (AK).

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 10; GraphPad Software Inc). For between-group comparisons, we used the Friedman test for overall and between-group comparisons given the nonnormal distribution of the data as determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Pearson r test was used for univariate correlations. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Considerations

The study was deemed exempt from an institutional review board approval as it did not include human subjects and therefore did not pose any risks.

We first looked at the overall structure of the notes. Consistently, ChatGPT-4 was able to generate a SOAP-style note. Overall, there was a significant variance in note length between the 3 replicates, with the transcripts of some cases being very similar in length, while others showed nearly a 50% variance between replicates ( Figure 1 ).

We classified errors into 3 types: errors of omission, those related to incorrect facts, and errors associated with information addition. Overall, the total number of errors ranged from 5.7 to 64.7 errors per case, with significant differences between the replicates ( Figure 2 A). When we subdivided errors into the 3 basic types, errors of omission were by far the most common, comprising, on average, 86.3% of all errors, followed by addition errors (10.5%) and incorrect facts (3.2%). Examples of these types of errors are illustrated in Table 2 . There was significant variance both in the total number and distribution of errors between cases and between replicates of the same case ( Figure 2 B).

For accuracy, we assessed the overall congruence between replicates. The frequency of correct reporting across the 3 replicates was compared against the gold standard History and Physical Examination. Overall, the mean percentage of elements reported correctly across all 3 replicates for the 14 cases was 53% (range 22%-79%). Interestingly, nearly 30% of data elements were reported correctly in only 1 or 2 of the replicates, suggesting issues with both accuracy and congruency ( Figure 3 ).

Breaking down ChatGPT-4’s performance based on individual categories, there was a significant variance in the accuracy in each section of the note. Specifically, the highest accuracy was observed in the Objective section of the note (median 86.9, IQR 75.4%-96.9%) and was significantly higher compared to the History and Physical examination (median 63.8%, IQR 54.2%-76.8%; P =–.02), Other (median 75.2%, IQR 68.5%-82.4%), and Assessment and Plan (median 66.9%, IQR 36.4%-83.5%; Figure 4 ).

The combination of variance in note structure as well as the number and type of errors resulted in similar variance in overall note quality as determined by PDQI-9. Overall, the mean PDQI-9 score was 29.7 (range 23.7-39.7), with significant variance between replicates within a case ( Figure 5 ).

Finally, we wished to determine whether characteristics in the parent transcript were associated with note quality. Overall, transcript length and the total number of scorable elements (as a measure of information density or complexity) both correlated inversely with the total percentage of elements reported correctly across the 3 replicates for each case ( Figure 6 ). We observed similar findings for PDQI-9 (details are not shown).

Principal Results

Our study highlights the significant variations in errors, accuracy, and quality of SOAP notes generated by ChatGPT-4. With regard to errors, they are not limited to specific sections of the note and include errors of omission as well as commission. Although the number of errors is consistent with regard to the number of data elements, another important finding is that the error rate is not consistent across replicates of the same case. This means that the model is not making the same errors repeatedly, making it difficult for health care providers to predict where errors may occur. This variability introduces a level of unpredictability, which can impact clinical oversight.

Comparison With Prior Work

In the context of medical research, our investigation has shed light on the critical issue of documentation accuracy, which has been a recurring concern in prior studies. Our findings align with the existing body of research on digital scribes, revealing noteworthy variations in accuracy, particularly in the context of nonobjective data [ 4 , 14 ]. In the realm of ChatGPT-4, the study conducted by Johnson et al [ 15 ] delved into its performance in giving precise and comprehensive medical information. This inquiry enlisted the expertise of 33 physicians, spanning 17 different specialties, who formulated questions that were subsequently posed to ChatGPT. Approximately 57.8% of the generated responses were assessed as accurate or nearly correct. This outcome underscores the imperative for exercising caution when solely relying on AI-generated medical information and the need for continuous evaluation, as others have noted [ 16 ]. However, in another study by Walker et al [ 17 ] aimed at evaluating the reliability of medical information provided by ChatGPT-4, multiple iterations of their queries executed through the model yielded a remarkable 100% internal consistency among the generated outputs [ 17 ]. Although promising, it should be noted that the queries used in their experiment consisted of direct single-sentence questions pertaining to specific hepatobiliary diagnoses. This mode of input differs significantly from the transcription of patient encounters. Our research, in contrast, stands out by probing the reproducibility of note generation—a relatively less explored topic in existing literature.

The PDQI-9 scores also highlight the overall variance in quality. In previous research, the PDQI-9 score of 26.2 was rated “terrible or bad,” versus a PDQI-9 score of 36.6, which was rated “good or excellent” [ 13 ]. In our study, the mean PDQI-9 score of 29.7 is closer to the “terrible or bad” range. These observations suggest that although ChatGPT-4 can consistently generate a SOAP-style note, it introduces errors and struggles with maintaining uniformity and accuracy. These issues could pose potential challenges if implemented in a clinical setting.

An essential aspect of our research was to identify the factors contributing to inaccuracies in AI-generated notes. Notably, we found an inverse correlation between note accuracy and transcript length as well as the amount of reportable data. This observation has profound implications for large language models like ChatGPT-4, indicating their challenges with longer and denser information. This raises questions about their effectiveness in handling complex medical cases.

These findings have significant clinical implications. The high variability in PDQI-9 scores, coupled with a high error rate, indicates low-quality notes. Recently, there have been concerns regarding ChatGPT-4’s capacity to generate what can be classified as “hallucinations”—synthesized data that may be misinterpreted as factual information. These data are often incomplete and sometimes misleading [ 18 ]. This has implications for the quality of patient care, potentially leading to diagnostic errors and eroding trust in AI, both among health care providers and patients. Acknowledging the increasing documentation burden contributing to physician burnout, generative AI technology for clinical note documentation may save time [ 2 , 19 ]. However, if our data are representative of similar accuracy rates with other AI-powered systems, any time savings could be negated by the need for corrections. This mirrors previous studies with human scribes, where widespread adoption had little impact on after-hours charting or chart completion time [ 20 - 22 ].

Limitations

Our research is not without limitations. Primarily, the generated SOAP notes underwent processing through an open AI model, in contrast to the proprietary closed models commonly used in the generative AI domain of health care. It is pertinent to note that proprietary technologies, such as DAX Copilot (a collaborative venture of Microsoft and Nuance), have restricted accessibility, available only to entities holding contractual agreements with the parent company. Furthermore, these models evolve iteratively. Consequently, the errors as well as the correct elements in our current data set might not manifest in subsequent versions. However, it is important to note that the methodology reported here establishes a means by which these systems can be evaluated systematically. It should be acknowledged that this study only used transcripts, eliminating the confounder of any potential errors introduced by the speech recognition aspect [ 23 , 24 ]. Integrating this aspect will be critical for a more complete evaluation of fully integrated generative AI–powered documentation assistants. Another limitation is the inability to draw conclusions regarding the correlation between types of cases and associated errors. A substantially larger volume of encounters would be required to delineate this relationship. Additionally, despite its standardized criteria, using the PDQI can still be influenced by the subjective judgment of the reviewer and can be a time-consuming process, particularly for longer documents. Conversely, the instrument does cover a broad range of quality dimensions, facilitating a more holistic evaluation. Furthermore, it can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify strengths and weaknesses, guiding targeted quality improvement initiatives. Finally, in large language models, such as ChatGPT-4, the temperature of the model is a parameter that controls the randomness or predictability of the model’s output. It is a component that tunes the model to generate responses that are either more varied and creative or more deterministic and conservative. With this in mind, ChatGPT-4’s temperature allows for variability, but this setting is not accessible to the end user [ 25 , 26 ]. Further, even setting the temperature to zero does not appear to ensure uniformity of response [ 27 ]. Along these lines, the absence of real-time feedback within the application also limits the model’s ability to adjust its responses based on user input, and therefore, hinders the model’s opportunity to learn from real-world interactions and refine its output.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study used standardized simulated patient-provider interactions to evaluate the quality and reliability of AI-generated clinical notes. The generated notes do not meet the acceptable quality standards for clinical use. Our methodology provides a foundation for future assessments of AI technology in terms of quality and safety. At this time, AI should not be considered a safe alternative to digital scribes.

Data Availability

The data sets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

ChatGPT-4 responses.

• Bell SK, Delbanco T, Elmore JG, Fitzgerald PS, Fossa A, Harcourt K, et al. Frequency and types of patient-reported errors in electronic health record ambulatory care notes. JAMA Netw Open. Jun 01, 2020;3(6):e205867. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Gaffney A, Woolhandler S, Cai C, Bor D, Himmelstein J, McCormick D, et al. Medical documentation burden among US office-based physicians in 2019: a national study. JAMA Intern Med. May 01, 2022;182(5):564-566. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Florig ST, Corby S, Rosson NT, Devara T, Weiskopf NG, Gold JA, et al. Chart completion time of attending physicians while using medical scribes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021;2021:457-465. [ FREE Full text ] [ Medline ]
• Pranaat R, Mohan V, O'Reilly M, Hirsh M, McGrath K, Scholl G, et al. Use of simulation based on an electronic health records environment to evaluate the structure and accuracy of notes generated by medical scribes: proof-of-concept study. JMIR Med Inform. Sep 20, 2017;5(3):e30. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Corby S, Whittaker K, Ash JS, Mohan V, Becton J, Solberg N, et al. The future of medical scribes documenting in the electronic health record: results of an expert consensus conference. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Jun 29, 2021;21(1):204. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Ahuja AS. The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7702. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Hickenlooper J, Boyter M, Sycamore T. Clinical documentation strategies 2023. Klasresearch. URL: https:/​/klasresearch.​com/​report/​clinical-documentation-strategies-2023-examining-which-options-best-fit-your-needs/​2763 [accessed 2024-04-11]
• Goss FR, Blackley SV, Ortega CA, Kowalski LT, Landman AB, Lin C, et al. A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform. Oct 2019;130:103938. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Hirosawa T, Harada Y, Yokose M, Sakamoto T, Kawamura R, Shimizu T. diagnostic accuracy of differential-diagnosis lists generated by generative pretrained transformer 3 chatbot for clinical vignettes with common chief complaints: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Feb 15, 2023;20(4):3378. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Dahmen J, Kayaalp ME, Ollivier M, Pareek A, Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J, et al. Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Apr 2023;31(4):1187-1189. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Lewis K, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, et al. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP). Adv Simul (Lond). 2017;2:10. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Artis KA, Bordley J, Mohan V, Gold JA. Data omission by physician trainees on ICU rounds*. Critical Care Medicine. 2019;47(3):403-409. [ CrossRef ]
• Stetson PD, Bakken S, Wrenn JO, Siegler EL. Assessing electronic note quality using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform. 2012;3(2):164-174. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Rule A, Florig ST, Bedrick S, Mohan V, Gold JA, Hribar MR. Comparing scribed and non-scribed outpatient progress notes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021;2021:1059-1068. [ FREE Full text ] [ Medline ]
• Johnson D, Goodman R, Patrinely J, Stone C, Zimmerman E, Donald R, et al. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated medical responses: an evaluation of the Chat-GPT model. Res Sq. Feb 28, 2023;43(6):622-626. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Preiksaitis C, Sinsky CA, Rose C. ChatGPT is not the solution to physicians' documentation burden. Nat Med. Jun 2023;29(6):1296-1297. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Walker HL, Ghani S, Kuemmerli C, Nebiker CA, Müller BP, Raptis DA, et al. Reliability of medical information provided by ChatGPT: assessment against clinical guidelines and patient information quality instrument. J Med Internet Res. Jun 30, 2023;25:e47479. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Van Bulck L, Moons P. What if your patient switches from Dr. Google to Dr ChatGPT? A vignette-based survey of the trustworthiness, value and danger of ChatGPT-generated responses to health questions. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. Apr 24, 2023.:95-98. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Kroth PJ, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S, Babbott S, Poplau S, Qeadan F, et al. Association of electronic health record design and use factors with clinician stress and burnout. JAMA Netw Open. Aug 02, 2019;2(8):e199609. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Florig ST, Corby S, Devara T, Weiskopf NG, Mohan V, Gold JA. Medical record closure practices of physicians before and after the use of medical scribes. JAMA. Oct 04, 2022;328(13):1350. [ CrossRef ]
• Gidwani R, Nguyen C, Kofoed A, Carragee C, Rydel T, Nelligan I, et al. Impact of Scribes on Physician Satisfaction, Patient Satisfaction, and Charting Efficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2017;15(5):427-433. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Jhaveri P, Abdulahad D, Fogel B, Chuang C, Lehman E, Chawla L, et al. Impact of scribe intervention on documentation in an outpatient pediatric primary care practice. Acad Pediatr. Mar 2022;22(2):289-295. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Hodgson T, Magrabi F, Coiera E. Efficiency and safety of speech recognition for documentation in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Nov 01, 2017;24(6):1127-1133. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Mohr DN, Turner DW, Pond GR, Kamath JS, De Vos CB, Carpenter PC. Speech recognition as a transcription aid: a randomized comparison with standard transcription. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):85-93. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Peng K, Ding L, Zhong Q, Shen L, Liu X, Zhang M, et al. Towards making the most of ChatGPT for machine translation. SSRN Journal. 2023.:1-9. [ CrossRef ]
• Guo Q, Cao J, Xie X. Exploring the potential of chatgpt in automated code refinement: an empirical study. 2024. Presented at: ICSE '24: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering; April 14 - 20; Lisbon, Portugal. [ CrossRef ]
• Ouyang S, Zhang J, Harman M. LLM is like a box of chocolates: the non-determinism of ChatGPT in code generation. arXiv. Preprint posted online on Aug 5, 2023. [ CrossRef ]

Abbreviations

Edited by T de Azevedo Cardoso, G Eysenbach; submitted 09.11.23; peer-reviewed by A Almansour, C Chuang; comments to author 31.01.24; revised version received 20.02.24; accepted 10.03.24; published 22.04.24.

©Annessa Kernberg, Jeffrey A Gold, Vishnu Mohan. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 22.04.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

Colorado State University

Tuesday, April 23

• University Source
• Agricultural Sciences
• Health and Human Sciences
• Liberal Arts
• Natural Sciences
• Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
• Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering
• Warner College of Natural Resources
• Office of Engagement and Extension

Five key insights into ChatGPT students need to know

by Brendan Henry published April 16, 2024

ChatGPT has taken the world by storm in a relatively short time. The creators of the trending chatbot, OpenAI, released a demo for ChatGPT in 2022. Since then, educators have been forced to discuss the artificially intelligent elephant in the room.

Discussions have been rooted in finding a balance between fear of compromising academic integrity and using artificial intelligence as an instructional tool. 

Editor’s note

This story was produced in partnership with the Department of Journalism and Media Communication as part of a special class in which students get hands-on experiences developing and producing content with the Division of Marketing and Communications for SOURCE, the news website of CSU.

In February 2023, the Provost’s Ethics Colloquium held a public discussion at the Lory Student Center at Colorado State University regarding the impact of ChatGPT on academics. Matthew Hickey , the associate dean for research and graduate studies in the College of Health and Human Sciences, moderated the discussion and provided his own insights and advice for the ever-evolving chatbot.

1. Understanding the potency of ChatGPT and AI

Hickey notes that it did not take long for ChatGPT to ascend to the level of proficiency that it has. From the early days of the beta at the end of 2022, the chatbot can now crank out an entire essay in less than a minute, carry out a comprehensive and intelligent-sounding conversation with the user, and even write code. With how quickly the program has developed, Hickey cites the uncertainty that both he and his colleagues faced, especially in terms of academic accountability mechanisms.

Not only is ChatGPT a concern academically, but it has already resulted in job loss – specifically in writing-centric industries. ChatGPT and other programs have become so concerning that OpenAI and other AI experts have signed a statement for mitigating the risk of human extinction as a result of AI. The statement equates the human extinction resulting from AI to that of pandemics and nuclear war.

 2. ChatGPT should be a tool, not a ghostwriter

While using ChatGPT to write an essay for a class is not exactly comparable to nuclear war, it still takes a toll on the student. Hickey says that copying and pasting from ChatGPT can cause intellectual harm.

“We’ve got to create a climate on campus where the students themselves can realize that, ‘I’m actually doing myself harm because I’m not learning, and that’s gonna hurt me when I’m going out looking for a job, etc.,’” Hickey said. “Because we’re not going to be able to rely on these large language models and in every setting we find ourselves in for the rest of our lives.”

 3. Transparent and mindful use of ChatGPT

Hickey does not feel the need to ban ChatGPT from his classroom but instead expects transparency from his students if they use it as a tool. He wants to be sure that his students are turning in their own writing and not dragging and dropping entire sentences or sections from the program, something he considers a violation of academic integrity. Hickey says it can be beneficial to probe the chatbot as if it were another conversational partner in a classroom setting.

While Hickey allows the use of ChatGPT in his classes so long as his students communicate their use to him, he knows that some educators on campus may not have the same policy and disallow the chatbot altogether. In this case, he feels that students should respect the rule and refrain from using it.

 4. ChatGPT runs on an illusion of intelligence

A glaring issue brought up by Hickey and many other users of ChatGPT is how good it is at making things up and sounding confident about it.

“ChatGPT and other large language models are trained to generate plausible texts,” Hickey said. “It’s not trained to deliver truthful text. It’s just plausible.”

Hickey cited a physician’s use of ChatGPT to model the pulmonary blood flow responses to particular stressors. What the chatbot generated was completely implausible for humans, but for medical students who may not know any better, the results could be misleading and problematic. This is why Hickey stresses the importance of knowing that ChatGPT can be used as a tool, but also that it is still full of flaws and requires fact-checking.

5. Artificial intelligence is here to stay

Technology continues to grow and develop, and with that AI. There is no avoiding it, and ignoring the reality, as Hickey suggests, will not be beneficial. Educators will likely be implementing AI like ChatGPT into courses as a tool, similar to how Hickey and other instructors have.

This goes beyond CSU. Abram Anders, the associate director of the Student Innovation Center at Iowa State University, also has been working on AI tools to use in the classroom. Anders was a keynote speaker at the Provost’s Ethics Colloquium last November.

“You don’t have to be a technical optimist or an AI optimist to engage these tools,” Anders said at the Provost’s Ethics Colloquium. Anders referred to a student of his who is pursuing a career in creative writing, and the student initially held a pessimistic view of AI, fearing it would hinder career prospects. However, through the course, the student realized that AI still requires human guidance, alleviating concerns about the impact on their career potential.

Regardless of the future steps universities and educators take, ChatGPT and AI programs are here to stay.

• google+ -->

• Talent Collective
• Reading List
• Popular Articles
• Ethics statement
• The Tech Resume Book
• Mobile Apps at Scale Book
• Interview Preparation

How does ChatGPT work? As explained by the ChatGPT team.

See a longer version of this article here: Scaling ChatGPT: Five Real-World Engineering Challenges.

Sometimes the best explanations of how a technology solution works come from the software engineers who built it. To explain how ChatGPT (and other large language models) operate, I turned to the ChatGPT engineering team.

"How does ChatGPT work, under the hood?"

I asked this from Evan Morikawa at OpenAI. Evan joined OpenAI in 2020 – two years before ChatGPT launched – and has led the Applied engineering team as ChatGPT launched and scaled. His team was the one that created ChatGPT, and Evan has been there from the very beginning.

With this, it’s over to Evan. My questions are in italic.

A refresher on OpenAI, and on Evan

Evan: how did you join OpenAI, and end up heading the Applied engineering group – which also builds ChatGPT?

OpenAI is the creator of ChatGPT, which is just one of the business’ products. Other shipped things include  DALL·E 3  (image generation,)  GPT-4  (an advanced model,) and the  OpenAI API  which developers and companies use to integrate AI into their processes. ChatGPT and the API each expose several classes of model: GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4.

The engineering, product, and design organization that makes and scales these products is called "Applied," and was founded in 2020 when GPT-3 was released. It’s broadly chartered with safely bringing OpenAI's research to the world. OpenAI itself was founded in 2015 and at the company’s core today is still a research lab with the  goal  of creating a safe and aligned artificial general intelligence (AGI.)

I joined OpenAI in October 2020 when Applied was brand new. I do  not  have a PhD in Machine Learning, and was excited by the idea of building APIs and engineering teams. I managed our entire Applied Engineering org from its earliest days through the launch and scaling of ChatGPT.  We cover more on Evan’s story in  Inside OpenAI: how does ChatGPT ship so quickly?  

How does ChatGPT work?

For those of us who have not spent the past few years building ChatGPT from the ground up, how does it work?

When you ask ChatGPT a question, several steps happen:

• Input.  We take your text from the text input.
• Tokenization.  We chunk it into tokens. A token roughly maps to a couple of unicode characters. You can think of it as a word. 
• Create embeddings.  We turn each token into a vector of numbers. These are called embeddings. 
• Multiply embeddings by model weights.  We then multiply these embeddings by hundreds of billions of model weights.
• Sample a prediction.  At the end of this multiplication, the vector of numbers represents the probability of the next most likely token. That next most likely token are the next few characters that spit out of ChatGPT.

Let’s visualize these steps. The first two are straightforward:

Note that tokenization doesn’t necessarily mean splitting text into words; tokens can be subsets of words as well. 

Embeddings  are at the heart of large language models (LLM), and we create them from tokens in the next step:

An embedding is a multi-dimensional representation of a token. We explicitly train  some of our models  to explicitly allow the capture of semantic meanings and relationships between words or phrases. For example, the embedding for “dog” and “puppy” are closer together in several dimensions than “dog” and “computer” are. These multi-dimensional embeddings help machines understand human language more efficiently.

Model weights  are used to calculate a weighted embedding matrix, which is used to predict the next likely token. For this step, we need to use OpenAI’s weight matrix, which consists of hundreds of billions of weights, and multiply it by a matrix we construct from the embeddings. This is a compute-intensive multiplication.

Sampling a prediction  is done after we do billions of multiplications. The final vector represents the probability of the next most likely token. Sampling is when we choose the next most likely token and send it back to the user. Each word that spits out of ChatGPT is this same process repeated over and over again many times per second.

Pretraining and inference

How do we generate this complex set of model weights, whose values encode most of human knowledge? We do it through a process called  pretraining . The goal is to build a model that can predict the next token (which you can think of as a word), for all words on the internet. 

During pretraining, the weights are gradually updated via  gradient descent , which is is a mathematical optimization method. An analogy of gradient descent is a hiker stuck up a mountain, who’s trying to get down. However, they don’t have a full view of the mountain due to heavy fog which limits their view to a small area around them. Gradient descent would mean to look at the steepness of the incline from the hiker’s current position, and proceed in the direction of the steepest descent. We can assume steepness is not obvious from simple observation, but luckily, this hiker has an instrument to measure steepness. However, it takes time to do a single measurement and they want to get down before sunset. So, this hiker needs to decide how frequently to stop and measure the steepness, so they still can get down before sunset.

Once we have our model we can run  inference  on it, which is when we prompt the model with text. For example, the prompt could be: “write a guest post for the Pragmatic Engineer.” This prompt then asks the model to  predict the next most likely token (word) . It makes this prediction based on past input, and it happens repeatedly, token by token, word by word, until it spits out your post! 

This is Gergely again.

How ChatGPT works isn’t magic, and is worth understanding.  Like most people, my first reaction to trying out ChatGPT was that it felt  magical . I typed in questions and got answers that felt like they could have come from a human! ChatGPT works impressively well with human language, and has access to more information than any one human could handle. It’s also good at programming-related questions, and there was a point when I questioned if ChatGPT could be  more capable  than humans, even in areas like programming, where humans have done better, until now?

For a sense of ChatGPT’s limitations, you need to understand how it works. ChatGPT and other LLMs do not “think” and “understand” like humans. ChatGPT does, however, generate words based on what the next most likely word should be, looking at the input, and everything generated so far.

In an excellent  deepdive about how ChatGPT works , Stephen Wolfram – creator of the expert search engine  WolframAlph a – summarizes ChatGPT:

“The basic concept of ChatGPT is at some level rather simple. Start from a huge sample of human-created text from the web, books, etc. Then train a neural net to generate text that’s “like this”. And in particular, make it able to start from a “prompt” and then continue with text that’s “like what it’s been trained with”. As we’ve seen, the actual neural net in ChatGPT is made up of very simple elements—though billions of them. And the basic operation of the neural net is also very simple, consisting essentially of passing input derived from the text it’s generated so far “once through its elements” (without any loops, etc.) for every new word (or part of a word) that it generates. But the remarkable—and unexpected—thing is that this process can produce text that’s successfully “like” what’s out there on the web, in books, etc. (...) The specific engineering of ChatGPT has made it quite compelling. But ultimately (at least until it can use outside tools) ChatGPT is “merely” pulling out some “coherent thread of text” from the “statistics of conventional wisdom” that it’s accumulated. But it’s amazing how human-like the results are.”

This was an expert from the article Scaling ChatGPT: Five Real-World Engineering Challenges . Read that article for more details on the engineering challenges behind building (and scaling) ChatGPT, as explained by Evan.

Other explanations on how ChatGPT and LLMs work:

• What Is ChatGPT Doing … and Why Does It Work? by Stephen Wolfram. Probably the best easy-to-follow, and yet in-depth article.
• Via spreadsheets / Excel (really! It's easy to follow)

Featured Pragmatic Engineer Jobs

• Director of Engineering at Synthesia. £180-250K . Remote (EU or UK).
• Senior Product Engineer (Backend) at Plain. £75-110K + equity. Remote (Europe).
• Founding Engineer (Full-Stack) at Ethos. New York City.
• Senior Platform Infrastructure Engineer at Jack Henry. $130-280K . Remote (US).
• Senior Software Engineer at Tint. $140-250K . Remote (US or EU).
• Senior Software Engineer at Tally Health. $140-180K + equity. New York City or Remote (US).
• Senior Frontend Engineer at WellTheory. $130-150K + equity. Remote (Global).
• Senior Frontend Developer at ePilot. €70-100K . Köln (Germany) or Remote (Germany).
• Senior Full Stack Engineer at ePilot. €70-100K . Remote (Germany).
• Senior Product Engineer, Frontend at Attio. £90-125K + equity. Remote (Europe).
• Engineering Manager at Safi. Remote (UK).
• Staff Full Stack Engineer at POSH. $170-220K + equity. New York (US).
• Software Engineer at Air Space Intelligence. Boston, MA (US).
• Senior Backend Developer (Python) at Octopus Kraken. Berlin or Munich (Germany).
• Senior Python Developer at Octopus Kraken. Paris (France).
• Manager, Web Engineering at HashiCorp. $136-173K + equity. Remote (US).
• Manager, Web Engineering at HashiCorp. $123-180K + equity. Remote (US).
• Lead Frontend Engineer at Rooser. £100-120K London (UK).
• Software Engineer at Rooser. London (UK).
• Director, AI/ML at Sixfold AI. $195-225K + equity. New York or Remote (US).
• Founding Engineer (Full-Stack) at Strada. $140-190K + 0.5-1% equity. Remote (Global).
• Senior Full Stack Engineer - Developer Experience at Synthesia. €100K+ . Remote (Europe).
• Senior Full Stack Engineer - Growth/Collaboration at Synthesia. €100K+ . Remote (Europe).
• Principal Data Engineer at Bobsled. $160-200K + equity. Remote (US, Europe).
• Technical Studio Lead at Sanctuary Computer. $154-167K . New York or Remote (US).
• Senior Software Engineer at Onaroll. $135-165K . Remote (US).
• Senior Backend Engineer - C#/.NET at Straddle. £90-125K + founding team equity. Remote (UK).
• Founding Engineer at Mentava. $100-250K + equity. Remote (Global).

The above jobs score at least 9/12 on The Pragmatic Engineer Test . Browse more senior engineer and engineering leadership roles with great engineering cultures, or add your own on The Pragmatic Engineer Job board and apply to join The Pragmatic Engineer Talent Collective .

ChatGPT: A GPT-4 Turbo Upgrade and Everything Else to Know

It started as a research project. But ChatGPT has swept us away with its mind-blowing skills. Now, GPT-4 Turbo has improved in writing, math, logical reasoning and coding.

• Shankland covered the tech industry for more than 25 years and was a science writer for five years before that. He has deep expertise in microprocessors, digital photography, computer hardware and software, internet standards, web technology, and more.

In 2022, OpenAI wowed the world when it introduced ChatGPT and showed us a chatbot with an entirely new level of power, breadth and usefulness, thanks to the generative AI technology behind it. Since then, ChatGPT has continued to evolve, including its most recent development: access to its latest GPT-4 Turbo model for paid users.

ChatGPT and generative AI aren't a novelty anymore, but keeping track of what they can do can be a challenge as new abilities arrive. Most notably, OpenAI now provides easier access to anyone who wants to use it. It also lets anyone write custom AI apps called GPTs and share them on its own app store, while on a smaller scale ChatGPT can now speak its responses to you. OpenAI has been leading the generative AI charge , but it's hotly pursued by Microsoft, Google and startups far and wide.

Generative AI still hasn't shaken a core problem -- it makes up information that sounds plausible but isn't necessarily correct. But there's no denying AI has fired the imaginations of computer scientists, loosened the purse strings of venture capitalists and caught the attention of everyone from teachers to doctors to artists and more, all wondering how AI will change their work and their lives. 

If you're trying to get a handle on ChatGPT, this FAQ is for you. Here's a look at what's up.

Read more :  ChatGPT 3.5 Review: First Doesn't Mean Best

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is an online chatbot that responds to "prompts" -- text requests that you type. ChatGPT has countless uses . You can request relationship advice, a summarized history of punk rock or an explanation of the ocean's tides. It's particularly good at writing software, and it can also handle some other technical tasks, like creating 3D models .

ChatGPT is called a generative AI because it generates these responses on its own. But it can also display more overtly creative output like screenplays, poetry, jokes and student essays. That's one of the abilities that really caught people's attention.

Much of AI has been focused on specific tasks, but ChatGPT is a general-purpose tool. This puts it more into a category like a search engine.

That breadth makes it powerful but also hard to fully control. OpenAI has many mechanisms in place to try to screen out abuse and other problems, but there's an active cat-and-mouse game afoot by researchers and others who try to get ChatGPT to do things like offer bomb-making recipes.

ChatGPT really blew people's minds when it began passing tests. For example, AnsibleHealth researchers reported in 2023 that " ChatGPT performed at or near the passing threshold " for the United States Medical Licensing Exam, suggesting that AI chatbots "may have the potential to assist with medical education, and potentially, clinical decision-making."

We're a long way from fully fledged doctor-bots you can trust, but the computing industry is investing billions of dollars to solve the problems and expand AI into new domains like visual data too. OpenAI is among those at the vanguard. So strap in, because the AI journey is going to be a sometimes terrifying, sometimes exciting thrill.

What's ChatGPT's origin?

Artificial intelligence algorithms had been ticking away for years before ChatGPT arrived. These systems were a big departure from traditional programming, which follows a rigid if-this-then-that approach. AI, in contrast, is trained to spot patterns in complex real-world data. AI has been busy for more than a decade screening out spam, identifying our friends in photos, recommending videos and translating our Alexa voice commands into computerese.

A Google technology called transformers helped propel AI to a new level, leading to a type of AI called a large language model, or LLM. These AIs are trained on enormous quantities of text, including material like books, blog posts, forum comments and news articles. The training process internalizes the relationships between words, letting chatbots process input text and then generate what it believes to be appropriate output text. 

A second phase of building an LLM is called reinforcement learning through human feedback, or RLHF. That's when people review the chatbot's responses and steer it toward good answers or away from bad ones. That significantly alters the tool's behavior and is one important mechanism for trying to stop abuse.

OpenAI's LLM is called GPT, which stands for "generative pretrained transformer." Training a new model is expensive and time consuming, typically taking weeks and requiring a data center packed with thousands of expensive AI acceleration processors. OpenAI's latest LLM is called GPT-4 Turbo . Other LLMs include Google's Gemini (formerly called Bard), Anthropic's Claude and Meta's Llama .

ChatGPT is an interface that lets you easily prompt GPT for responses. When it arrived as a free tool in November 2022, its use exploded far beyond what OpenAI expected.

When OpenAI launched ChatGPT, the company didn't even see it as a product. It was supposed to be a mere "research preview," a test that could draw some feedback from a broader audience, said ChatGPT product leader Nick Turley. Instead, it went viral, and OpenAI scrambled to just keep the service up and running under the demand.

"It was surreal," Turley said. "There was something about that release that just struck a nerve with folks in a way that we certainly did not expect. I remember distinctly coming back the day after we launched and looking at dashboards and thinking, something's broken, this couldn't be real, because we really didn't make a very big deal out of this launch."

ChatGPT, a name only engineers could love, was launched as a research project in November 2022, but quickly caught on as a consumer product.

How do I use ChatGPT?

The ChatGPT website is the most obvious method. Open it up, select the LLM version you want from the drop-down menu in the upper left corner, and type in a query.

As of April 1, OpenAI is allowing consumers to use ChatGPT without first signing up for an account. According to a blog post , the move was meant to make the tool more accessible. OpenAI also said in the post that as part of the move, it's introducing added content safeguards, blocking prompts in a wider range of categories.

However, users with accounts will be able to do more with the tool, such as save and review their history, share conversations and tap into features like voice conversations and custom instructions.

OpenAI in 2023 released a ChatGPT app for iPhones and for Android phones . In February, ChatGPT for Apple Vision Pro arrived , too, adding the chatbot's abilities to the "spatial computing" headset. Be careful to look for the genuine article, because other developers can create their own chatbot apps that link to OpenAI's GPT.

In January, OpenAI opened its GPT Store , a collection of custom AI apps that focus ChatGPT's all-purpose design to specific jobs. A lot more on that later, but in addition to finding them through the store you can invoke them with the @ symbol in a prompt, the way you might tag a friend on Instagram.

Microsoft uses GPT for its Bing search engine, which means you can also try out ChatGPT there.

ChatGPT is sprouting up in various hardware devices, including Volkswagen EVs , Humane's voice-controlled AI pin and the squarish Rabbit R1 device .

How much does ChatGPT cost?

It's free, though you have to set up an account to take advantage of all of its features.

For more capability, there's also a subscription called ChatGPT Plus that costs $20 per month that offers a variety of advantages: It responds faster, particularly during busy times when the free version is slow or sometimes tells you to try again later. It also offers access to newer AI models, including GPT-4 Turbo . OpenAI said it has improved capabilities in writing, math, logical reasoning and coding in this model.

The free ChatGPT uses the older GPT-3.5, which doesn't do as well on OpenAI's benchmark tests but which is faster to respond. The newest variation, GPT-4 Turbo, arrived in late 2023 with more up-to-date responses and an ability to ingest and output larger blocks of text.

ChatGPT is growing beyond its language roots. With ChatGPT Plus, you can upload images, for example, to ask what type of mushroom is in a photo.

Perhaps most importantly, ChatGPT Plus lets you use GPTs.

What are these GPTs?

GPTs are custom versions of ChatGPT from OpenAI, its business partners and thousands of third-party developers who created their own GPTs.

Sometimes when people encounter ChatGPT, they don't know where to start. OpenAI calls it the "empty box problem." Discovering that led the company to find a way to narrow down the choices, Turley said.

"People really benefit from the packaging of a use case -- here's a very specific thing that I can do with ChatGPT," like travel planning, cooking help or an interactive, step-by-step tool to build a website, Turley said.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announces custom AI apps called GPTs at a developer event in November 2023.

Think of GPTs as OpenAI trying to make the general-purpose power of ChatGPT more refined the same way smartphones have a wealth of specific tools. (And think of GPTs as OpenAI's attempt to take control over how we find, use and pay for these apps, much like Apple has a commanding role over iPhones through its App Store.)

What GPTs are available now?

OpenAI's GPT store now offers millions of GPTs , though as with smartphone apps, you'll probably not be interested in most of them. A range of GPT custom apps are available, including AllTrails personal trail recommendations , a Khan Academy programming tutor , a Canva design tool , a book recommender , a fitness trainer , the laundry buddy clothes washing label decoder, a music theory instructor , a haiku writer and the Pearl for Pets for vet advice bot .

One person excited by GPTs is Daniel Kivatinos, co-founder of financial services company JustPaid . His team is building a GPT designed to take a spreadsheet of financial data as input and then let executives ask questions. How fast is a startup going through the money investors gave it? Why did that employee just file a $6,000 travel expense?

JustPaid hopes that GPTs will eventually be powerful enough to accept connections to bank accounts and financial software, which would mean a more powerful tool. For now, the developers are focusing on guardrails to avoid problems like hallucinations -- those answers that sound plausible but are actually wrong -- or making sure the GPT is answering based on the users' data, not on some general information in its AI model, Kivatinos said.

Anyone can create a GPT, at least in principle. OpenAI's GPT editor walks you through the process with a series of prompts. Just like the regular ChatGPT, your ability to craft the right prompt will generate better results.

Another notable difference from regular ChatGPT: GPTs let you upload extra data that's relevant to your particular GPT, like a collection of essays or a writing style guide.

Some of the GPTs draw on OpenAI's Dall-E tool for turning text into images, which can be useful and entertaining. For example, there is a coloring book picture creator , a logo generator and a tool that turns text prompts into diagrams like company org charts. OpenAI calls Dall-E a GPT.

How up to date is ChatGPT?

Not very, and that can be a problem. For example, a Bing search using ChatGPT to process results said OpenAI hadn't yet released its ChatGPT Android app. Search results from traditional search engines can help to "ground" AI results, and indeed that's part of the Microsoft-OpenAI partnership that can tweak ChatGPT Plus results.

GPT-4 Turbo, announced in November, is trained on data up through April 2023. But it's nothing like a search engine whose bots crawl news sites many times a day for the latest information.

Can you trust ChatGPT responses?

No. Well, sometimes, but you need to be wary.

Large language models work by stringing words together, one after another, based on what's probable each step of the way. But it turns out that LLM's generative AI works better and sounds more natural with a little spice of randomness added to the word selection recipe. That's the basic statistical nature that underlies the criticism that LLMs are mere "stochastic parrots" rather than sophisticated systems that in some way understand the world's complexity.

The result of this system, combined with the steering influence of the human training, is an AI that produces results that sound plausible but that aren't necessarily true. ChatGPT does better with information that's well represented in training data and undisputed -- for instance, red traffic signals mean stop, Plato was a philosopher who wrote the Allegory of the Cave , an Alaskan earthquake in 1964 was the largest in US history at magnitude 9.2.

We humans interact with AI chatbots by writing prompts -- questions or statements that seek an answer from the information stored in the chatbot's underlying large language model. 

When facts are more sparsely documented, controversial or off the beaten track of human knowledge, LLMs don't work as well. Unfortunately, they sometimes produce incorrect answers with a convincing, authoritative voice. That's what tripped up a lawyer who used ChatGPT to bolster his legal case only to be reprimanded when it emerged he used ChatGPT fabricated some cases that appeared to support his arguments. "I did not comprehend that ChatGPT could fabricate cases ," he said, according to The New York Times.

Such fabrications are called hallucinations in the AI business.

That means when you're using ChatGPT, it's best to double check facts elsewhere.

But there are plenty of creative uses for ChatGPT that don't require strictly factual results.

Want to use ChatGPT to draft a cover letter for a job hunt or give you ideas for a themed birthday party? No problem. Looking for hotel suggestions in Bangladesh? ChatGPT can give useful travel itineraries , but confirm the results before booking anything.

Is the hallucination problem getting better?

Yes, but we haven't seen a breakthrough.

"Hallucinations are a fundamental limitation of the way that these models work today," Turley said. LLMs just predict the next word in a response, over and over, "which means that they return things that are likely to be true, which is not always the same as things that are true," Turley said.

But OpenAI has been making gradual progress. "With nearly every model update, we've gotten a little bit better on making the model both more factual and more self aware about what it does and doesn't know," Turley said. "If you compare ChatGPT now to the original ChatGPT, it's much better at saying, 'I don't know that' or 'I can't help you with that' versus making something up."

Hallucinations are so much a part of the zeitgeist that Dictionary.com touted it as a new word it added to its dictionary in 2023.

Can you use ChatGPT for wicked purposes?

You can try, but lots of it will violate OpenAI's terms of use , and the company tries to block it too. The company prohibits use that involves sexual or violent material, racist caricatures, and personal information like Social Security numbers or addresses.

OpenAI works hard to prevent harmful uses. Indeed, its basic sales pitch is trying to bring the benefits of AI to the world without the drawbacks. But it acknowledges the difficulties, for example in its GPT-4 "system card" that documents its safety work.

"GPT-4 can generate potentially harmful content, such as advice on planning attacks or hate speech. It can represent various societal biases and worldviews that may not be representative of the user's intent, or of widely shared values. It can also generate code that is compromised or vulnerable," the system card says. It also can be used to try to identify individuals and could help lower the cost of cyberattacks.

Through a process called red teaming, in which experts try to find unsafe uses of its AI and bypass protections, OpenAI identified lots of problems and tried to nip them in the bud before GPT-4 launched. For example, a prompt to generate jokes mocking a Muslim boyfriend in a wheelchair was diverted so its response said, "I cannot provide jokes that may offend someone based on their religion, disability or any other personal factors. However, I'd be happy to help you come up with some light-hearted and friendly jokes that can bring laughter to the event without hurting anyone's feelings."

Researchers are still probing LLM limits. For example, Italian researchers discovered they could use ChatGPT to fabricate fake but convincing medical research data . And Google DeepMind researchers found that telling ChatGPT to repeat the same word forever eventually caused a glitch that made the chatbot blurt out training data verbatim. That's a big no-no, and OpenAI barred the approach .

LLMs are still new. Expect more problems and more patches.

And there are plenty of uses for ChatGPT that might be allowed but ill-advised. The website of Philadelphia's sheriff published more than 30 bogus news stories generated with ChatGPT .

What about ChatGPT and cheating in school?

ChatGPT is well suited to short essays on just about anything you might encounter in high school or college, to the chagrin of many educators who fear students will type in prompts instead of thinking for themselves.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touted his company's partnership with OpenAI at a November 2023 event for OpenAI developers. Microsoft uses OpenAI's GPT large language model for its Bing search engine, Office productivity tools and GitHub Copilot programming assistant.

ChatGPT also can solve some math problems, explain physics phenomena, write chemistry lab reports and handle all kinds of other work students are supposed to handle on their own. Companies that sell anti-plagiarism software have pivoted to flagging text they believe an AI generated.

But not everyone is opposed, seeing it more like a tool akin to Google search and Wikipedia articles that can help students.

"There was a time when using calculators on exams was a huge no-no," said Alexis Abramson, dean of Dartmouth's Thayer School of Engineering. "It's really important that our students learn how to use these tools, because 90% of them are going into jobs where they're going to be expected to use these tools. They're going to walk in the office and people will expect them, being age 22 and technologically savvy, to be able to use these tools."

ChatGPT also can help kids get past writer's block and can help kids who aren't as good at writing, perhaps because English isn't their first language, she said.

So for Abramson, using ChatGPT to write a first draft or polish their grammar is fine. But she asks her students to disclose that fact.

"Anytime you use it, I would like you to include what you did when you turn in your assignment," she said. "It's unavoidable that students will use ChatGPT, so why don't we figure out a way to help them use it responsibly?"

Is ChatGPT coming for my job?

The threat to employment is real as managers seek to replace expensive humans with cheaper automated processes. We've seen this movie before: elevator operators were replaced by buttons, bookkeepers were replaced by accounting software, welders were replaced by robots. 

ChatGPT has all sorts of potential to blitz white-collar jobs. Paralegals summarizing documents, marketers writing promotional materials, tax advisers interpreting IRS rules, even therapists offering relationship advice.

But so far, in part because of problems with things like hallucinations, AI companies present their bots as assistants and "copilots," not replacements.

And so far, sentiment is more positive than negative about chatbots, according to a survey by consulting firm PwC. Of 53,912 people surveyed around the world, 52% expressed at least one good expectation about the arrival of AI, for example that AI would increase their productivity. That compares with 35% who had at least one negative thing to say, for example that AI will replace them or require skills they're not confident they can learn.

How will ChatGPT affect programmers?

Software development is a particular area where people have found ChatGPT and its rivals useful. Trained on millions of lines of code, it internalized enough information to build websites and mobile apps. It can help programmers frame up bigger projects or fill in details.

One of the biggest fans is Microsoft's GitHub , a site where developers can host projects and invite collaboration. Nearly a third of people maintaining GitHub projects use its GPT-based assistant, called Copilot, and 92% of US developers say they're using AI tools .

"We call it the industrial revolution of software development," said Github Chief Product Officer Inbal Shani. "We see it lowering the barrier for entry. People who are not developers today can write software and develop applications using Copilot."

It's the next step in making programming more accessible, she said. Programmers used to have to understand bits and bytes, then higher-level languages gradually eased the difficulties. "Now you can write coding the way you talk to people," she said.

And AI programming aids still have a lot to prove. Researchers from Stanford and the University of California-San Diego found in a  study of 47 programmers  that those with access to an OpenAI programming help " wrote significantly less secure code  than those without access."

And they raise a variation of the cheating problem that some teachers are worried about: copying software that shouldn't be copied, which can lead to copyright problems. That's why Copyleaks, a maker of plagiarism detection software, offers a tool called the  Codeleaks Source Code AI Detector  designed to spot AI-generated code from ChatGPT, Google Gemini and GitHub Copilot. AIs could inadvertently copy code from other sources, and the latest version is designed to spot copied code based on its semantic structures, not just verbatim software.

At least in the next five years, Shani doesn't see AI tools like Copilot as taking humans out of programming.

"I don't think that it will replace the human in the loop. There's some capabilities that we as humanity have -- the creative thinking, the innovation, the ability to think beyond how a machine thinks in terms of putting things together in a creative way. That's something that the machine can still not do."

Editors' note: CNET used an AI engine to help create several dozen stories, which are labeled accordingly. For more, see our  AI policy .

Computing Guides

• Best Laptop
• Best Chromebook
• Best Budget Laptop
• Best Cheap Gaming Laptop
• Best 2-in-1 Laptop
• Best Windows Laptop
• Best Macbook
• Best Gaming Laptop
• Best Macbook Deals
• Best Desktop PC
• Best Gaming PC
• Best Monitor Under 200
• Best Desktop Deals
• Best Monitors
• M2 Mac Mini Review
• Best PC Speakers
• Best Printer
• Best External Hard Drive SSD
• Best USB C Hub Docking Station
• Best Keyboard
• Best Webcams
• Best Laptop Backpack
• Best Camera to Buy
• Best Vlogging Camera
• Best Tripod
• Best Waterproof Camera
• Best Action Camera
• Best Camera Bag and Backpack
• Best E-Ink Tablets
• Best iPad Deals
• Best E-Reader
• Best Tablet
• Best Android Tablet
• Best 3D Printer
• Best Budget 3D Printer
• Best 3D Printing Filament
• Best 3D Printer Deals
• Dell Coupon Codes
• Newegg Promo Codes
• HP Coupon Codes
• Microsoft Coupons
• Anker Coupons
• Logitech Promo Codes
• Western Digital Coupons
• Monoprice Promo Codes
• A4C Coupons

10 Custom GPTs That Actually Make ChatGPT Better

ChatGPT is a great all-rounder, but what if you could improve its output in specific areas?

Quick Links

• Diagrams: Show Me
• Presentation Slides
• Math Solver
• Travel Guide
• Scholar GPT
• Prompt Professor
• Gym, Fitness, & Training Assistant by Rogan Keel
• Resume by jobbright.ai

Key Takeaways

• ChatGPT offers custom GPTs to help you perform several actions.
• Use custom GPTs to design better prompts, get gym routines, tweak your resume, and more.
• Access these custom GPTs by going to the Explore GPTs tab in ChatGPT.

ChatGPT on its own is great, but did you know that you can use custom GPTs to streamline its functionality? Custom GPTs can teach you how to code, plan trips, transcribe videos, and much, much more, and there are heaps for you to choose from.

So, here are the best custom GPTs that actually make ChatGPT a better tool for any situation.

1 Diagrams: Show Me

The Diagrams: Show Me GPT plugin quickly visualizes all kinds of information in diagrams. You can use this add-on to view promotion paths at companies you want to work for, and it’s also handy if you need general flow charts (for example, we asked Diagrams: Show Me to outline the process from freelancing to running an agency).

Once you’ve created an initial prototype, you can make adjustments by giving the GPT new instructions. Alternatively, you can edit the image with code instead if you know how to. You can use Diagrams: Show Me to optimize productivity with workflow diagrams for your personal and work projects.

Canva is one of the most popular platforms for designing graphics online, and several Canva apps are worth checking out to create better designs . The Canva GPT plugin helps you create all kinds of content, such as Instagram posts and logos.

When you use the Canva custom GPT, you may notice that some of the text in your visuals overlay other boxes. Fortunately, when you click on a design prototype, the GPT will redirect you to the Canva app. Here, you can make any edits you feel are necessary—such as resizing text and adding new images.

If you want to level up your Canva projects, consider reading how to use Canva’s Magic Studio for your designs .

3 Presentation Slides

Creating slides that are informative and engaging is crucial in workspaces and when studying. However, deciding how to lay out your slides can be challenging. The Presentation Slides GPT plugin is designed to help minimize the manual work.

You can ask Presentation Slides to outline your presentation, meaning that you can take what you like and adapt everything in your preferred presentation creator later. Besides organizing information, presentation slides can guide you in designing a layout that fits your project theme.

The Presentation Slides GPT offers advice on keeping your audiences engaged during your presentation. When you’re ready to compile everything, consider using the best tools that use AI to make presentations for you .

4 Math Solver

While some people have no problems working out mathematical equations, it’s not simple for everyone. If you struggle with numbers but want to improve your math skills, consider using the Math Solver custom GPT.

You can ask Math Solver for help with simple and complex equations. The GPT walks you through how to solve each one and explains the concept. You also get useful related questions to help you continue enhancing your skills.

Although Math Solver is good for understanding how to solve mathematical problems, you shouldn’t use it to cheat on your homework or exams. In fact, there are many ways that you should not use ChatGPT as a student —such as relying on the program to write essays for you.

5 Travel Guide

Do you have a big upcoming trip, or are you simply researching potential adventures? Consider using the Travel Guide GPT plugin to help you gather essential information and plan your itinerary.

Travel Guide is pretty good at providing an itinerary outline for you to build upon later. For example, you can use the days it gives you and then do extra research elsewhere for places to eat, where to stay, etc.

Besides planning itineraries, Travel Guide can offer budget travel tips for specific destinations. For example, we asked the Travel Guide GPT to help us visit Switzerland on a budget of 80 Swiss Francs (c. $88 per day), excluding hotels.

If you’re interested in a unique adventure, consider reading these inspiring travel blogs of adventurers who trek the world on foot .

6 Scholar GPT

Academic research is a strenuous process regardless of your experience, but AI tools can help you streamline the process and provide more context. Scholar GPT is one of those. With this GPT, you can upload research paper PDFs and links to receive analysis.

Scholar GPT can analyze text from reputable websites, including Google Scholar and PubMed. Besides analyzing research papers, you can also ask the tool to give you the latest news in your industry. If you’d prefer to use research websites directly, start by checking out these expert Google Scholar search tips .

7 Prompt Professor

If you’re new to ChatGPT or other AI tools, getting your prompts right will take some time and experimentation. But thanks to custom GPTs like Prompt Professor, you can get helpful feedback to reduce the learning curve.

Prompt Professor can review every prompt you’re planning to send and outline what you did well. For example, we received feedback that our prompt was direct and offered contextual information.

You also get tips on how to improve your prompt, which you can then make a note of in the future.

Prompt Professor can also provide tips on the golden rules of prompting. Moreover, if you’re new, you can get general advice on how to write a good prompt. If you want a headstart, there are several AI prompt generators you can also try .

8 Code Tutor

Are you new to the world of coding? If so, consider trying the Code Tutor GPT plugin. Code Tutor helps users understand different coding concepts and jargon, and it can also help you become more effective with implementation and planning processes.

Code Tutor can also help users with topics they may have for homework. The GPT often asks you to provide further context for every prompt you send, which helps it give you a more accurate answer.

9 Gym, Fitness, & Training Assistant by Rogan Keel

Walking into the gym for the first time can be incredibly daunting, especially if you know little or nothing about fitness. Creating a program is also difficult; I still vividly remember spending hours on bodybuilding forums when I first began training in 2014. Fortunately, getting the information you need is much easier these days—and Rogan Keel’s Gym, Fitness, & Training Assistant is a helpful custom GPT for new gym-goers.

To use this GPT more effectively, make sure you give it as much information as possible. For example, I gave it my story of what my health condition was like when I first wanted to go to the gym and mentioned dietary requirements. You should also mention how many days you’d like to exercise per week. After giving the assistant all the required information, you’ll get an overview of your diet and exercise regimen.

Below the overview, you’ll find further details of your training plan. If you want to keep everything handy, you can also request a PDF. There are plenty of other online sources for workout programs where you can also get further help with your fitness journey.

10 Resume by jobbright.ai

Are you looking for a new job or to change your career? If so, you’ll find several custom GPTs to help you on your search—including jobbright.ai’s version. When you upload your resume, the GPT will first extract the information from what you send. Then, after confirming that everything is accurate, you’ll get a feedback table with scores and comments on what you did well and could improve. Moreover, you get bulleted tips for enhancing your resume.

Besides analyzing your resume, you can also ask the GPT for jobs related to your skills. If you’re planning a career change, consider checking out these tools to help you successfully pivot .

Regardless of whether you want a new job or need to plan a big trip, ChatGPT has several custom GPTs that’ll help you achieve your desired results. The quality of your answers depends on how good your prompts are, but you can also find custom GPTs to help you in that respect. Go to Explore GPTs in ChatGPT to find these and several others.

Have a thesis expert improve your writing

Check your thesis for plagiarism in 10 minutes, generate your apa citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Using AI tools

• How to Write a Paper with ChatGPT | Tips & Examples

How to Write a Paper with ChatGPT | Tips & Examples

Published on 17 August 2023 by Koen Driessen .

A good research paper demonstrates your academic writing skills and knowledge of your chosen topic.

Your research paper should be based on in-depth independent research. However, generative AI tools like ChatGPT can be effectively used throughout the research process to:

• Brainstorm research questions
• Develop a methodology
• Create an outline
• Find sources
• Summarise and paraphrase text
• Provide feedback

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Table of contents

Brainstorming research questions, developing a methodology, creating an outline, finding sources, summarising or paraphrasing text, receiving feedback, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions.

You can use ChatGPT to help formulate research questions , brainstorm potential thesis statements , or narrow down a broad subject area to a specific topic that interests you.

However, make sure that the outputs make sense and meet the requirements of your assignment. You can adapt these outputs manually, or use further prompts to ensure they meet your needs. For more information, see our tips for creating effective ChatGPT prompts .

• Generate three possible research questions for a research paper on the following topic: “The role of virtual reality in enhancing training and skill development in various industries.”
• “What are the cognitive and skill development benefits of virtual reality-based training compared to traditional training methods across different industries?”
• “How does the level of immersion in virtual reality training impact knowledge retention and skill transfer in fields such as medicine, aviation, and manufacturing?”
• “What are the key factors that influence the successful integration and adoption of virtual reality technology for training purposes in diverse industries, and what challenges hinder its widespread implementation?”

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Correct my document today

Your paper should clearly indicate the data collection and analysis methods you used in your research.

You can use ChatGPT to help decide what kind of research you will conduct (e.g., qualitative or quantitative ), how you will analyse the data, and how you will mitigate potential research bias .

Bear in mind that you should be able to rationalize your chosen methodology . For example, you should ensure that it is either a standard methodology in the field or can be justified.

• Suggest three quantitative research methods appropriate to the following question: “What are the cognitive and skill development benefits of virtual reality-based training compared to traditional training methods in the field of healthcare?”
• Experimental Study: Conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where healthcare professionals are randomly assigned to either a virtual reality-based training group or a traditional training group. Both groups would receive training in specific healthcare tasks, and their cognitive and skill development outcomes would be measured and compared. Performance metrics, such as accuracy, speed, and efficiency, could be quantitatively assessed to determine the benefits of virtual reality-based training over traditional methods.
• Survey Research: Design a comprehensive survey targeting healthcare professionals who have undergone both virtual reality-based training and traditional training. The survey could include Likert-scale questions and structured response options to gauge their perceived cognitive and skill development benefits from each training method. Additionally, open-ended questions could be included to gather qualitative insights on specific strengths and weaknesses of each training approach.
• Task Performance Analysis: Implement a task-based assessment that simulates real-life healthcare scenarios, where participants are evaluated on their ability to handle critical situations. Participants would go through both virtual reality-based training and traditional training before being assessed in the simulated scenarios. Their performance in the assessment could be objectively measured using predefined criteria, allowing for a quantitative comparison of skill development between the two training methods.

A clear outline can help structure your paper, organise your arguments effectively, and make your research more efficient.

You can use generative AI tools like ChatGPT to formulate a potential outline to help guide your research. You can be as specific as you like, giving an overview of your research objectives , main arguments, and any evidence you intend to include in your paper.

However, ChatGPT outputs sometimes contain factual inaccuracies. It’s important to check the headings and subheadings suggested in the output and adapt them to meet your needs.

• Create an outline for an academic research paper with the following research question:“What are the cognitive and skill development benefits of virtual reality-based training compared to traditional training methods in the field of healthcare?” The paper will be about 10 pages long.

B. Existing studies on cognitive and skill development benefits of virtual reality training

C. Comparison of virtual reality-based training with traditional training methods

D. Gaps in the literature and research limitations

III. Theoretical Framework

A. Theoretical basis for cognitive and skill development in training

B. Application of cognitive theories to virtual reality-based training

C. The role of immersive learning environments in skill acquisition

D. Conceptual framework for the study

IV. Research Methodology

A. Research design and approach (e.g., quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention)

B. Selection of participants and sample size calculation

C. Description of the virtual reality-based training and traditional training programs

D. Instruments and measures for assessing cognitive and skill development

E. Data collection procedures and ethical considerations

V. Data Analysis

A. Overview of statistical methods used for data analysis

B. Treatment of data and data cleaning

C. Quantitative analysis of cognitive and skill development outcomes

D. Presentation of findings with charts and tables

VI. Results

A. Presentation of the results of the cognitive and skill development assessments

B. Comparison of outcomes between virtual reality-based training and traditional training

C. Statistical significance and effect size analysis

D. Interpretation of the results and implications

VII. Discussion

A. Interpretation of findings in the context of the research question

B. Comparison of results with existing literature

C. Explanation of how virtual reality-based training impacts cognitive processes and skill development

D. Limitations of the study and areas for future research

VIII. Practical Implications

A. Practical applications of virtual reality-based training in healthcare settings

B. Recommendations for integrating virtual reality training in healthcare education

C. Benefits of virtual reality for continuous professional development in healthcare

IX. Conclusion

A. Summary of key findings

B. Reiteration of the research question and hypothesis

C. Contributions of the study to the field of healthcare training

D. Concluding remarks

X. References

You can use ChatGPT to help find sources relevant to your research. However, it’s important to be aware of the limitations of ChatGPT (for example, it occasionally cites nonexistent sources).

Instead of asking ChatGPT for specific source recommendations, try asking it for recommendations on the types of sources relevant to your research topic. You can also use it to generate a list of relevant keywords to use in your literature search.

• What types of sources could I use to write a research paper on the following research question? “What are the cognitive and skill development benefits of virtual reality-based training compared to traditional training methods in the field of healthcare?”
• Academic Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are valuable sources of scholarly research. Look for articles in medical education, cognitive psychology, virtual reality applications in healthcare, and technology-enhanced learning.
• Research Studies: Seek out published research studies that specifically investigate the impact of virtual reality-based training on cognitive and skill development in healthcare professionals.
• Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: These studies provide comprehensive overviews of existing research on a specific topic, making them a valuable source for summarizing and analyzing the overall evidence.
• Books and Book Chapters: Academic books and book chapters authored by experts in the fields of medical education, virtual reality, cognitive science, or instructional design can provide in-depth insights and theoretical foundations.
• Conference Proceedings: Proceedings from relevant conferences and symposiums may present the latest findings and advancements in virtual reality-based training and healthcare education.
• Educational Institution Websites: Universities and medical schools often publish research papers, case studies, and whitepapers related to medical education and virtual reality training.
• Industry Reports: Reports and whitepapers from healthcare organizations or technology companies exploring the benefits of virtual reality-based training in the healthcare sector.
• Government and Non-profit Organisations: Look for reports and publications from government agencies and non-profit organisations that focus on medical education and healthcare training.
• Online Databases: Utilize academic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect to search for peer-reviewed research articles and conference papers.
• Expert Interviews: If possible, conduct interviews with experts in medical education, cognitive science, and virtual reality to gain valuable insights and perspectives.
• Surveys and Polls: Refer to reputable surveys and polls related to virtual reality-based training in the healthcare industry for additional statistical data.

You can use ChatGPT to paraphrase or summarise text. This can help you to condense sources to their most important points and explore new ways of expressing your ideas.

Alternatively you can use the more specialised tools featured on Scribbr’s AI writing resources page, which are designed specifically for these purposes and will give a smoother user experience.

• Provide a short summary of the following text:“One of the most profound applications of VR in healthcare is its use in surgical training. Traditionally, surgical training has relied on a combination of didactic lectures, observation of procedures, and hands-on experience in the operating room. However, these methods may not provide the ideal environment for novices to develop the necessary dexterity and spatial understanding essential for complex surgeries. VR overcomes these limitations by offering immersive, true-to-life simulations that allow surgeons to navigate through intricate anatomical structures, practice incisions, and learn to manage unexpected challenges that may arise during surgeries. This hands-on experience in a risk-free environment not only enhances technical skills but also builds confidence and reduces the learning curve for new surgical techniques.”
• Virtual Reality (VR) has a profound impact on healthcare, particularly in surgical training, as it provides immersive simulations that help surgeons develop dexterity, spatial understanding, and confidence for complex surgeries in a risk-free environment, ultimately enhancing their technical skills and reducing the learning curve.

When you’ve finished writing your research paper, you can use ChatGPT to receive feedback. You can be as specific as you like, selecting particular aspects the output should focus on (e.g., tone, clarity of structure, appropriateness of evidence to support your arguments).

You can also use ChatGPT to check grammar, spelling, and punctuation. However, it’s not designed for this purpose and occasionally misses errors. We recommend using a more specialised tool like Scribbr’s free grammar checker . Or, for more comprehensive feedback, Scribbr’s proofreading and editing service .

• Feedback the above text with regard to appropriateness of evidence and coherence of structure.
• The research paper demonstrates a well-structured and coherent presentation of the cognitive and skill development benefits of VR-based surgical training. The introduction effectively sets the context and rationale, while the literature review incorporates relevant historical and empirical evidence. The theoretical framework strengthens the foundation for the analysis.The methodology section could provide more details on the research design and study selection criteria. However, the sections on cognitive and skill development benefits present compelling evidence, supported by appropriate sub-sections.The exploration of improved patient outcomes lacks concrete examples but effectively outlines potential benefits. The section on challenges and future directions raises relevant points, but suggestions for solutions could enhance practicality.Overall, the paper combines theoretical, empirical, and practical evidence, offering a well-rounded approach. It establishes the significance of VR-based surgical training and concludes with a concise summary of key findings.

If you want more tips on using AI tools , understanding plagiarism , and citing sources , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations, examples, and formats.

• Citing ChatGPT
• Best grammar checker
• Best paraphrasing tool
• ChatGPT in your studies
• Is ChatGPT trustworthy?
• Types of plagiarism
• Self-plagiarism
• Avoiding plagiarism
• Academic integrity
• Best plagiarism checker

Citing sources

• Citation styles
• In-text citation
• Citation examples
• Annotated bibliography

Yes, you can use ChatGPT to summarise text . This can help you understand complex information more easily, summarise the central argument of your own paper, or clarify your research question.

You can also use Scribbr’s free text summariser , which is designed specifically for this purpose.

Yes, you can use ChatGPT to paraphrase text to help you express your ideas more clearly, explore different ways of phrasing your arguments, and avoid repetition.

However, it’s not specifically designed for this purpose. We recommend using a specialised tool like Scribbr’s free paraphrasing tool , which will provide a smoother user experience.

No, having ChatGPT write your college essay can negatively impact your application in numerous ways. ChatGPT outputs are unoriginal and lack personal insight.

Furthermore, Passing off AI-generated text as your own work is considered academically dishonest . AI detectors may be used to detect this offense, and it’s highly unlikely that any university will accept you if you are caught submitting an AI-generated admission essay.

However, you can use ChatGPT to help write your college essay during the preparation and revision stages (e.g., for brainstorming ideas and generating feedback).

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Driessen, K. (2023, August 17). How to Write a Paper with ChatGPT | Tips & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 22 April 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/using-ai-tools/chatgpt-paper/

Is this article helpful?

Koen Driessen

Other students also liked, how to write good chatgpt prompts, chatgpt citations | formats & examples, ethical implications of chatgpt, still have questions.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

About 1 in 5 U.S. teens who’ve heard of ChatGPT have used it for schoolwork

Roughly one-in-five teenagers who have heard of ChatGPT say they have used it to help them do their schoolwork, according to a new Pew Research Center survey of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17. With a majority of teens having heard of ChatGPT, that amounts to 13% of all U.S. teens who have used the generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot in their schoolwork.

Teens in higher grade levels are particularly likely to have used the chatbot to help them with schoolwork. About one-quarter of 11th and 12th graders who have heard of ChatGPT say they have done this. This share drops to 17% among 9th and 10th graders and 12% among 7th and 8th graders.

There is no significant difference between teen boys and girls who have used ChatGPT in this way.

The introduction of ChatGPT last year has led to much discussion about its role in schools , especially whether schools should integrate the new technology into the classroom or ban it .

Pew Research Center conducted this analysis to understand American teens’ use and understanding of ChatGPT in the school setting.

The Center conducted an online survey of 1,453 U.S. teens from Sept. 26 to Oct. 23, 2023, via Ipsos. Ipsos recruited the teens via their parents, who were part of its KnowledgePanel . The KnowledgePanel is a probability-based web panel recruited primarily through national, random sampling of residential addresses. The survey was weighted to be representative of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 who live with their parents by age, gender, race and ethnicity, household income, and other categories.

This research was reviewed and approved by an external institutional review board (IRB), Advarra, an independent committee of experts specializing in helping to protect the rights of research participants.

Here are the  questions used for this analysis , along with responses, and its  methodology .

Teens’ awareness of ChatGPT

Overall, two-thirds of U.S. teens say they have heard of ChatGPT, including 23% who have heard a lot about it. But awareness varies by race and ethnicity, as well as by household income:

• 72% of White teens say they’ve heard at least a little about ChatGPT, compared with 63% of Hispanic teens and 56% of Black teens.
• 75% of teens living in households that make $75,000 or more annually have heard of ChatGPT. Much smaller shares in households with incomes between $30,000 and $74,999 (58%) and less than $30,000 (41%) say the same.

Teens who are more aware of ChatGPT are more likely to use it for schoolwork. Roughly a third of teens who have heard a lot about ChatGPT (36%) have used it for schoolwork, far higher than the 10% among those who have heard a little about it.

When do teens think it’s OK for students to use ChatGPT?

For teens, whether it is – or is not – acceptable for students to use ChatGPT depends on what it is being used for.

There is a fair amount of support for using the chatbot to explore a topic. Roughly seven-in-ten teens who have heard of ChatGPT say it’s acceptable to use when they are researching something new, while 13% say it is not acceptable.

However, there is much less support for using ChatGPT to do the work itself. Just one-in-five teens who have heard of ChatGPT say it’s acceptable to use it to write essays, while 57% say it is not acceptable. And 39% say it’s acceptable to use ChatGPT to solve math problems, while a similar share of teens (36%) say it’s not acceptable.

Some teens are uncertain about whether it’s acceptable to use ChatGPT for these tasks. Between 18% and 24% say they aren’t sure whether these are acceptable use cases for ChatGPT.

Those who have heard a lot about ChatGPT are more likely than those who have only heard a little about it to say it’s acceptable to use the chatbot to research topics, solve math problems and write essays. For instance, 54% of teens who have heard a lot about ChatGPT say it’s acceptable to use it to solve math problems, compared with 32% among those who have heard a little about it.

Note: Here are the  questions used for this analysis , along with responses, and its  methodology .

• Artificial Intelligence
• Technology Adoption
• Teens & Tech

Many Americans think generative AI programs should credit the sources they rely on

Americans’ use of chatgpt is ticking up, but few trust its election information, q&a: how we used large language models to identify guests on popular podcasts, striking findings from 2023, what the data says about americans’ views of artificial intelligence, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Age & Generations
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Economy & Work
• Family & Relationships
• Gender & LGBTQ
• Immigration & Migration
• International Affairs
• Internet & Technology
• Methodological Research
• News Habits & Media
• Non-U.S. Governments
• Other Topics
• Politics & Policy
• Race & Ethnicity
• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy