research on human resource management practices

Innovation and human resource management: a systematic literature review

European Journal of Innovation Management

ISSN : 1460-1060

Article publication date: 18 January 2022

Issue publication date: 19 December 2022

This study aims to map scientific publications, intellectual structure and research trends in the development of human resource management (HRM) by adopting innovative practices. Specifically, it aims to (1) identify the fundamental contributions of research and to (2) determine the lines of research that constitute the most prominent intellectual structure to contribute to defining a future research agenda.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employs bibliometric, bibliographic coupling and cluster analysis techniques. To evaluate any potential patterns among the articles, it is analyzed how those were jointly cited. Hierarchical cluster analysis was also applied to those subject to bibliographic coupling analysis within the scope of grouping the interrelated articles into distinct sets.

The results enabled the identification and classification of various theoretical perspectives on human resources development through the adoption of innovative practices into four main approaches: (1) organizational factors of success, (2) strategic HRM, (3) human behavior and (4) learning management.

Originality/value

This study identifies, explores, analyzes and summarizes the main themes contributing to deepening the literature by identifying the priority areas concerning HRM through the adoption of innovative practices that can guarantee international standards of excellence.

• Systematic literature review

Jotabá, M.N. , Fernandes, C.I. , Gunkel, M. and Kraus, S. (2022), "Innovation and human resource management: a systematic literature review", European Journal of Innovation Management , Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0330

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Mariana Namen Jotabá, Cristina I. Fernandes, Marjaana Gunkel and Sascha Kraus

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

1. Introduction

Potgieter and Mokomane (2020) argue that the strategic emphasis of a human resource management (HRM) department can be summarized as the effective management of teams and individuals in an organization aimed at competitive advantage and performance success. Thus, there is growing interest in investigating the role of HRM departments and practices in supporting companies' capacity for innovation ( Engelsberger et al. , 2021 ). Due to the recent transformation (such as digitization) of most organizations, HRM's role in strategic management has become more important ( Zhou et al. , 2020 ), as these practices can provide tools for change and innovation and support strategic decision-making in organizations ( Sheehan et al. , 2016 ).

The HR strategy is increasingly related to the prevailing organizational strategy, experiencing the direct impact of ongoing changes while supporting the organization's development in the emerging digital environment. Thus, HRM practices have increasingly considered the needs of Industrial Revolution 4.0, which inevitably points to huge changes in the established system and its contexts. Within this scope of change, high-performing organizations adopt radically different forms and become more digital and innovative ( Deloitte, 2017 ).

HRM plays a significant role in supporting changes. Thus, several studies have begun to examine the relationship between HRM and innovation, specifically, practices that contribute to innovation in organizations. Looise and van Riemsdijk (2004) suggest that four aspects of HR are important for innovation in an organization, namely, work design, people, performance management and rewards, as well as communication and participation. De Leede and Looise (2005) present a model relating the HRM strategy to organizational results, such as innovation and success, noting that HRM practices, resulting from the strategy, can lead to results such as creativity, commitment and competencies, resulting in the organizational results of innovation and success.

Although HR practices and employees seem essential for innovation, empirical research linking the areas of HRM and innovation is quite scarce ( De Leeds and Looise, 2005 ; Laursen and Foss, 2014 ; Seeck and Diehl, 2017 ). Given the strong and growing focus on innovation, the HRM of organizations also needs to review their employees' skills. According to Meskó et al. (2018) , 50% of all current jobs will be outdated in the next two decades. This leads to the imperative challenges faced by HRM in advancing at a faster pace, adapting practices and routines as well as facilitating organizational learning ( Muñoz-Pascual et al. , 2019 ). HR practices are innovative and support innovation within organizations ( Kossek, 1987 ; Looise and van Riemsdijk, 2004 ).

Innovation in HR is related to changes in the social systems of organizations and the adoption and diffusion of these innovations, due to environmental forces and social processes ( Koosek, 1987 ). As noted by Looise and van Riemsdijk (2004) , these HR innovations are fundamental to innovation within organizations. Supporting employees' careers and establishing a goal and objective systems with rewards for successfully undertaking and conducting innovation ( Cano and Cano, 2006 ) are important for innovation. Thus, reflecting on the impacts that innovation can enhance regarding the future of work and employment is important. Furthermore, the HRM's role in supporting these changes should be carefully analyzed. Hence, a more in-depth analysis of HRM structures, rethinking routine activities, reviewing policies, developing new knowledge and skills and enabling teams to work in work environments that are completely different from previous ones.

Seeck and Diehl (2017) were the first and so far only scholars to systematize the theme of innovation in HRM, identifying 35 empirical studies linking HRM and innovation over 25 years (1990–2015). The results indicate the importance of the relationship: HRM practices implemented by organizations have a positive effect on innovation. Given the growing importance, and the speed of innovation, examining the development of this strand of literature is of utmost importance. This is also observed by Natalicchio et al. (2018) who conclude that the direct effect of HRM is of interest to research and the moderating role of HR practices requires a broader debate in the literature.

Thus, inspired by the work of Seeck and Diehl (2017) and building upon as well as updating it, we aimed to stimulate academic improvement and provide a better sense of direction and offer a thorough and systematic review of this expanding literature. We focus on addressing the following questions: What constitutes innovation in HRM? What theories support research on innovation in HRM? Our study makes several important contributions to the literature. First, we present a systematic review of the literature on innovation in HRM using bibliometric techniques (e.g. Donthu et al. , 2021 ). This helps identify the previous literature's findings and sets the stage for new research, summarizing the main knowledge gaps and directions. Second, our review challenges several theoretical/conceptual assumptions prevalent in HRM innovation research and offers new perspectives that can shape future research. Third, we define a road map for an informed research agenda that proposes multiple improved directions.

Overall, our study aimed to conduct a mapping of scientific publications, intellectual structure and research trends in the area of innovation in human resources management. Specifically, we intend to (1) identify the fundamental contributions of research in this area and (2) determine the lines of research that constitute the most prominent intellectual structure to contribute to the definition of a future research agenda.

2. Methodology

This study aimed to critically analyze studies that examine HRM's role in innovative companies through a systematic literature review (SLR), bibliographic coupling and cluster analysis techniques. The SLR process starts with the definition, objectives and conceptual limitations ( Kraus et al. , 2020 ). This study concentrates on the macro-context of strategic HRM associated with innovation to broaden the conceptual understanding of the adoption of such practices. For this, the following goals were established: (1) identifying studies published in scientific journals on HRM practices related to adopting and conducting innovation in organizations; (2) proposing an integrated evaluation of the problems and discoveries of the leading individual studies to understand the scenario surrounding human resources and innovation; and (3) presenting implications for HRM practices ( Denyer and Tranfield, 2009 ).

Next, the software package VOSviewer was used to generate bibliometric maps and identify bibliographic coupling in the article references. Bibliographic coupling classifies two articles when they make recourse to the same reference item ( Kessler, 1963 ). Each cluster was determined by analyzing the content and keywords, and thus, the most pertinent information of the articles in the sample. The resulting clusters serve as a starting point for organizing the scientific outputs.

2.1 Selecting the review method

This work aimed to overcome the challenges associated with the increasing volume of scientific production (e.g. subjectivity), as evaluating and comprehending a topic's literature requires scientific analytical tools ( Kraus et al. , 2021 ). Therefore, it engages in a systematic process of identifying, analyzing and synthesizing discrete streams ( Snyder, 2019 ; Kraus et al. , 2020 ; Vrontis and Christofi, 2021 ) to establish the theoretical underpinnings of in–home service consumption. For this, we adopted a hybrid review methodology by combining a bibliometric and framework-based review ( Figure 1 ) ( Snyder, 2019 ). The bibliometric review enabled us to quantify the productivity of scientific research, identify thematic clusters and establish the foundations of in–home service consumption ( Mas-Tur et al. , 2020 ). The framework-based review set the foundations for the proposed innovation and HRM framework and a comprehensive understanding of innovation and HRM. A review based on bibliometric analysis provides a powerful set of methods and measures for studying the structure and process of scholarly communication. To study the available literature, we relied on three widely used techniques of bibliometric analysis: evaluative, relational and review techniques ( Echchakoui, 2020 ). The evaluation technique focuses on the academic impact and includes three types of measures: influence (e.g. number of citations per year and per author), productivity (e.g. number of publications per year and per author) and hybrid (a combination of influence and productivity) (e.g. the average number of citations per paper). The relational technique explores the relationship between units of analysis on a specific topic or research field, identifying patterns and networks among journals, publications and/or authors. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, co-authorship analysis and co-word analysis are examples of relational techniques (e.g. Kraus et al. , 2012 ). The review techniques refer to systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses or qualitative studies ( Echchakoui, 2020 ). The present study encompasses all three bibliometric techniques.

2.2 Data collection and processing methods

A literature search was conducted using the Web of Science database. The search terms used were “innovation” and “human resource management” (and possible abbreviations). A total of 532 articles were obtained.

To obtain the primary objective and specific goals, the search focused on articles from academic journals, narrowing them to 446 articles; followed by the filters “topic,” in the categories of “management” and “business,” in English language and in December 2020. In summary, 241 articles indexed in the database were identified in the Web of Science , which can be considered “the most prestigious database and leading academic institutions and the research world” ( Gasparyan et al. , 2013 , p. 1271). Figure 1 provides the details of the research protocol.

The data were processed using VOSviewer software (version 1.6.15), which sets the parameters for bibliographic coupling at a minimum cluster size of six articles. This procedure resulted in a final sample of 237 articles, which were grouped into four clusters. Among them, four articles excluded by the software were disregarded. Furthermore, based on the exclusion criteria, after reading the publications, 201 articles were excluded because they were not related to HR and innovation and the adoption of innovative practices in HRM, including theoretical/conceptual and empirical publications. Descriptive statistics were produced using SPSS Statistics software version 27.0.

Each scientific publication included in the sample was analyzed regarding (1) the performance, thus, the descriptive statistical data and (2) trends in clusters along with the cluster descriptions.

3.1 Performance

As demonstrated by the previous overview study of Seeck and Diehl (2017) , the number of publications relating HRM to innovation is relatively low. However, our study shows that there has been a rising interest in the topic, as presented in Figure 2 . From 2015, in which the overview study of Seeck and Diehl ended its analysis, there has been a sharp increase in the number of publications. There were only 18 studies on the topic from 1987 (the date of the first publication) to 2015, but another 18 from 2016 to 2020.

When examining the research methods of the publications, we found that the majority, namely 20 studies (55.6%), were quantitative by nature, followed by 11 (30.6%) qualitative studies. Among them, four (11%) were conceptual, and one (2.8%) was a mixed-method study that applied qualitative and quantitative methods.

A broad range of methods were employed across the articles. Regarding the quantitative articles, five publications utilized structural equation modeling, and four used regression analyses as methods, making them the most common methods. Case studies were the most popular method for qualitative studies with seven publications, followed by two studies using document analysis, and two using mixed methods design. Regarding conceptual studies, three were theory publications, and only one was a literature review. The only mixed-method study utilized linear regressions and telephone interviews as the quantitative qualitative methods, respectively.

3.2 Cluster trend s

To portray the trends in the literature regarding innovation and HRM, we approached the bibliographic confluences among the 36 studies in the sample. This resulted in the definition of the four clusters. This organization of the clusters and respective publications contained in each was designated by the software tool for the construction and visualization of bibliometric networks ( VOSviewer, 2021 ). Figure 3 presents a visual model of the cluster network.

Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine patterns in journals, groups of authors and publications related to the group and topic, as well as the number of citations related to the authors. Table 1 presents the journals in which the studies were published and the number of citations in the publications during data collection.

The identified articles can be grouped into four clusters ( Figure 4 ):

The following table provides an overview of the articles in the four clusters:

Although the overall number of publications in the area was low, a broad range of journals served as an outlet for the studies. Human Resources Management and the International Journal of Manpower published the largest number of publications (three publications each). In the former, two publications belong to Cluster 2, in 2020 and 2019, and one article to Cluster 1, which was published in 1987 and is the first publication in our study sample. In the latter, one article belongs to Cluster 3 (year of publication 2020), another to Cluster 1 (year of publication 2011) and one to Cluster 2 (year of publication 2005). International Journal of Project Management, Journal of Management, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Organization Science and Technovation have served as an outlet for two studies, whereas the remaining journals have published only one study in the area.

An examination of the citations revealed five author teams with over 100 citations: Seibert et al. (2001) with 637 citations under the auspices of Cluster 1, Lopez-Cabrales et al. (2009) with 175 citations belong to Cluster 2, Akgun et al. (2007) received 137 citations for their articles in Cluster 3, Chou (2014) with 108 citations in Cluster 2 and Kwak and Anbari (2009) gained 103 citations for an article in Cluster 4. Of the 36 published articles, four were not cited during data collection, which may be because they were all published in 2020.

4. Cluster descriptions

In the next step, all articles in each respective cluster were read and analyzed to determine whether they responded to the research objective of providing implications for HRM. The analysis enabled the identification of shared characteristics and points of divergence, which led to the establishment of the research categories for each cluster. The four research clusters are discussed below:

4.1 Cluster 1: Organizational factors of success

The cluster “organizational success factors” comprising 11 articles, focuses on understanding the relationship between proactivity and innovation and the appropriate role of the HR manager.

Proactiveness is a personality trait that is positively related to career growth and innovation ( Seibert et al. , 2001 ). HRM systems are mediators that influence the development of work and increase proactive behaviors and motivation, vital for the development of organizations ( Tummers et al. , 2015 ). According to Shaw et al. (2005) , the adoption of human resources compensation models is crucial for organizational innovation, regardless of the adopted compensation models.

Baruk (2017) clarifies that employer branding is important, and necessary for companies, such as employer brands, to establish strategies that allow them to achieve organizational innovation. From the viewpoint of Bayo-Moriones et al. (2020) , HR and their performance evaluation must be aligned with the company's innovation strategy.

In this cluster, a group of three authors who focused their publications on knowledge management as a success factor for innovation can be identified.

The creation, transformation and use of different types of knowledge must be considered fundamental assets in innovative performance ( Nielsen and Rasmussen, 2011 ). For these authors, knowledge management is strictly related to learning, organization and innovation, which have a direct impact on the performance of companies. According to Feldman et al. (2019) , regarding innovation, companies must adopt five practices: promote human resources based on their characteristics related to taking initiative and ability to lead, perform job rotation, pay attention to the remuneration system, provide job security and hire workers based on knowledge and experience. Ganz (2020) argues that companies with clear innovation goals should experiment with the best strategies to adopt, according to their human resources. For this, they must experiment in low-risk environments and then apply the definitive strategy in a real context.

Kossek (1987) clarified that business innovation is directly linked to the ability to form networks and HRM alliances with professors and consultants. Moreover, it clarifies that senior management's role is to present the HR department and its respective executives as crucial elements in strategic decisions, in the construction of a work environment in which workers believe that executives care about their welfare. According to Ottenbacher and Harrington (2010) , there are two global success factors for innovation: market attractiveness and strategic HRM. Thus, service advantage, empowerment, employee training and behavior-based assessment all influence the intended outcomes of innovation.

4.2 Cluster 2: Strategic HRM

This cluster consists of 10 articles that contribute to understanding the impact of strategic HRM on innovation.

For Natalicchio et al. (2018) , the success of innovation practices is not in the recruitment of highly qualified employees but in the ability to implement employee training activities. In other words, innovation occurs through teams, with a focus on learning and developing innovative minds. Thus, it is important to adopt collaborative and competitive mechanisms to manage innovative ideas that arise within a company ( Cano and Cano, 2006 ; Bergendahl and Magnusson, 2014 ). According to Wang et al. (2005) , HRM has a direct and positive impact on the entrepreneurship process and, consequently, on the success of innovation activities. Omta et al. (1994) add the importance of management control and human resource practices to innovation's success.

Companies should also adopt advanced technological systems in HRM to create a collaborative culture that establishes alliances and partnerships; they should promote relationship networks for the exchange of experiences and technological support. This stimulus to organizational learning, through the development of human capital and its absorption capacity, is a predictor of organizational innovation ( Perez et al. , 2002 ; Muñoz-Pascual et al. , 2019 ; Pradana et al. , 2020 ). Hence, Lopez-Cabrales et al. (2009) argue that the impact of innovation and organizational performance depends on the systematization of HR knowledge. They argue that knowledge-based HRM practices have a positive influence on innovation and profit. However, it is important to realize that these practices become more difficult in small-and medium-sized companies ( Muñoz-Pascual et al. , 2019 ). Della Torre et al. (2020) remind us that, despite the importance of technological systems for innovation activities to be successful, it is essential to implement motivational systems dedicated to raising workers' motivation.

4.3 Cluster 3: Human behavior

This cluster consists of nine articles that help us understand how human behavior contributes to innovation activities.

Along with physical and financial capital, human capital drives companies toward innovation activities. Several authors argue that organizational development is achieved through human capital, as it enables companies to obtain an innovative capacity that allows them the necessary resilience to face the obstacles and challenges arising from globalization, competitiveness and the knowledge-based economy ( Menéndez Blanco and Montes-Botella, 2017 ; Marjanski et al. , 2019 ). For Yazici et al. (2016) , innovation and proactivity are key factors for organizational growth. The organizational climate also promotes the well-being of employees and, therefore, if companies have more satisfied employees, they can implement innovative activities to achieve better results ( Chou, 2014 ; Kao et al. , 2020 ).

In innovation activities, the leader's behavior has a direct impact. In organizational environments, marked by high competitiveness and uncertainty, innovation is vital for survival and long-term success. In these circumstances, leaders with altruistic behavior can create business environments that facilitate innovation, through appropriate learning atmospheres ( Escrig et al. , 2016 ; Kiesnere and Baumgartner, 2019 ).

Another promoter of innovation and its success is the emotional capacity of companies and its impact on organizational learning. This learning ability is directly linked to product innovation and company performance ( Akgün et al. , 2007 ; Soomro and Shah, 2015 ).

4.4 Cluster 4: Learning management

This cluster is composed of six articles that relate learning management to innovation.

HR practices (recruiting and selecting activities, as well as training programs) must be effective and aligned with the knowledge management strategy and the business, regarding organizational strategy, for innovation activities ( GOPE, Elia and Passiante, 2018 ). Companies that adopt knowledge management practices can generate a competitive advantage as a result of the innovative process ( Gonzalez and de Melo, 2018 ). Gonzalez and de Melo (2018) show that the knowledge management process is impacted by five contextual factors: HRM, supportive leadership, learning culture, autonomy and information technology systems. Olander et al. (2015) argue that human capital and knowledge are the Allies of innovation. There are several practices related to commitment, trust, motivation and a sense of responsibility, which strengthen loyalty and improve the preservation of the company's intellectual capital.

For Calamel et al. (2012) , the solution of sustainable models lies in innovation practices and identifying increasing levels of cooperation as well as creating collaborative projects in HRM; through collective learning different skills can be developed. In sustainable models focused on industrial ecology, the optimization and better efficiency of resources are achieved through the integration and coordination of skills, innovations and new routines in functional areas, innovation and development of all technologies, waste control, human resource adjustments, management of environmental constraints and networking and marketing ( Kwak and Anbari, 2009 ; Kabongo and Boiral, 2017 ).

5. Discussion

To support future research on HRM practices on innovation, we established the conclusions from a review of the evidence derived from the peer-reviewed literature using the Web of Science database. This was aimed at developing a structure that illustrates the core considerations around this theme, enabling the identification of behaviors for the adoption of innovative practices in HRM, evaluating the problems and discoveries and providing indications for human resource strategic management and policy practices ( Aguinis et al. , 2021 ). For this, we used a framework that categorizes the clusters, specifically, organizational factors of success, strategic HRM, human behavior and learning management.

This duly highlights that this conceptual structure was developed by ascertaining the facts supporting the development of the knowledge base. This study identified, along with the four direct clusters around the core areas in strategic HRM, 15 themes/subareas of interest: proactivity, innovation in services, factors of influence in HRM, HR subsystems, knowledge management in HRM, organizational performance, HRM practices, learning capacity, impact on the organizational climate, impact on entrepreneurship, leadership, factors of organizational growth, impact on the organizational climate, project management and sustainable business models.

The subareas arise from the content analysis of the articles in each cluster. In Cluster 1, organizations with greater chances of obtaining superior organizational results present elements such as proactivity, the practice of innovation in services offered, knowledge management practices, the adoption of HR systems and innovation in HRM subsystems in their routines. These success factors are interconnected with Cluster 2, which complements the strategic management of the area and its practices as key elements for performance and competitiveness gains. In Cluster 3, the relevance of behavior and human capital emerges to capture and enjoy the benefits of innovation, contributing to the growth and learning capacity of the organization through people, promoting impact on the organizational climate and developing the entrepreneurial spirit within the company itself. Moreover, the importance of leadership was analyzed to stimulate the construction of environments that allow their employees to be open to radical and incremental innovations. Finally, in Cluster 4, high-performance HRM practices as well as their effective ability in the relationship with knowledge management convey reiterate the existence of HR practices aimed at enabling individual learning, motivation and staff retention. This may prove favorable for HR managers to encourage employees to engage in learning processes and, consequently, improve organizational results and innovation.

Hence, we detailed the main trends in the literature on the motivations and obstacles to the adoption of innovation in HRM, as shown in Figure 5 .

Based on the reviewed articles, we identified various limitations of the research and, consequently, representing some potential contributions for consideration by future research projects, as outlined in Table 2 .

6. Conclusion

This study sought to critically analyze the literature to drive the development of HR through the adoption of innovative practices. We may affirm that this research field has been ongoing since 1987. Despite the 33 years of research, the field remains in the construction phase, and a significant proportion of the studies only adopt exploratory qualitative approaches. The trends regarding the number of articles published in this timeframe, despite the relatively low total number (only 36 publications), reflect an increasing level of academic interest in studying innovation in association with HRM, whether at the conceptual understanding level or through empirical studies enabling the development of new policies and more modern HRM practices, bringing better results that can benefit the company–HR sector–teams triad. The results obtained demonstrate that 2019 may turn out to be a landmark in this scientific field regarding associating innovation in HR given the surge in publications.

There was also the scope for identifying how the authors' main interests focus on understanding and developing mathematical models that can assist in identifying the organizational success factors in knowledge management, proactivity and HR subsystems. This objective arises from providing greater recognition of the factors that favor innovation-friendly management, as well as helping HR managers plan where they can prioritize efforts for organizational growth.

Furthermore, the research, to a certain extent, advances conclusions on the debate about knowledge management in the majority of these studies and that permeates throughout the clusters. These emphasize the relevance of learning and stimulating the development of teams and, as such, standing out on the list of priority tasks for HRM. This also pointed out how, paradoxically, this interlinkage between knowledge management and the clusters in the current research – the “learning management” cluster registered the lowest number of publications regarding the other groups. The justification may reflect how this theme underlies all approaches and is, therefore, not an individual theme of lesser interest.

This also advanced with the need to reflect on the importance of the HRM role within the organizations deemed innovative as well as those seeking to develop their innovative environments and as a mediator in this process to assist companies facing competitive markets.

This also verified only a low level of research on approaches to the deployment of technologies, specifically, the adoption of systems versus innovation in the HR department. This raises questions about how HR might better accompany technological practices and means. Would it be a good innovation practice for HR to adopt systems that facilitate routine tasks and management? What image should HR convey in support of other sectors and the organization without bolstering its position, thus, without adopting innovative practices by deploying software and “tech practices” that facilitate and enable their tasks?

The research also corroborates an understanding of the future of work in approaching research that presents sustainable business models, acclaimed for applying more modern and longer-lasting organizational practices.

As every study, also ours has a number of limitations. First, our keywords, process and use of specific databases (Web of Science) may have resulted in the omission of potentially relevant other studies. Second, because we concentrated on analyzing and integrating existing research, we did not provide research propositions connecting the themes and elements of innovation and HRM. Third, this review only included studies published in peer-reviewed academic journals written in English; it excludes books, conference proceedings and other literature, as well as articles written in other languages that might have be relevant. Although we are aware of and confident in our results, we believe they are representative of the research conducted in this field. Hence, we believe that we provided a perspective of the intellectual structure of this field of study, along with the contribution of our conceptual model, for future investigation.

Research protocol

Number of publications per year

Cluster network

Clusters of innovative practice adoption

Framework for adopting innovation in HRM

Key journals with the most cited publications and authors

Future directions

Aguinis , H. , Jensen , S.H. and Kraus , S. ( 2021 ), “ Policy implications of organizational behavior and human resource management research ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. ahead-of-print , doi: 10.5465/amp.2020.0093 .

Akgün , A.E. , Keskin , H. , Byrne , J.C. and Aren , S. ( 2007 ), “ Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance ”, Technovation , Vol.  27 No.  9 , pp.  501 - 513 , doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.03.001 .

Baruk , A.I. ( 2017 ), “ Contentment of employees vs their prosumeric activity in the scope of recommending an employer ”, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing , Vol. 32 No. 5 , pp. 742 - 751 , doi: 10.1108/JBIM-10-2016-0240 .

Bayo-Moriones , A. , Galdon-Sanchez , J.E. and Martinez-de-Morentin , S. ( 2020 ), “ Business strategy, performance appraisal, and organizational results ”, Personnel Review , Vol. 50 No. 2 , pp. 515 - 534 , doi: 10.1108/PR-09-2019-0498 .

Bergendahl , M. and Magnusson , M. ( 2014 ), “ Combining collaboration and competition: a key to improved idea management? ”, European Journal of International Management , Vol.  8 No.  5 , pp.  528 - 547 , doi: 10.1504/EJIM.2014.064603 .

Calamel , L. , Defélix , C. , Picq , T. and Retour , D. ( 2012 ), “ Inter-organisational projects in French innovation clusters: the construction of collaboration ”, International Journal of Project Management , Vol.  30 No.  1 , pp.  48 - 59 , doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.001 .

Cano , C.P. and Cano , P.Q. ( 2006 ), “ Human resources management and its impact on innovation performance in companies ”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol.  35 Nos 1-4 , pp.  11 - 28 , doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009227 .

Chou , C.J. ( 2014 ), “ Hotels' environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: interactions and outcomes ”, Tourism Management , Vol.  40 , pp.  436 - 446 , doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.001 .

De Leede , J. and Looise , J.K. ( 2005 ), “ Innovation and HRM: towards an integrated framework ”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol.  14 No.  2 , pp.  108 - 117 .

Della Torre , E. , Salimi , M. and Giangreco , A. ( 2020 ), “ Crowding‐out or crowding‐in? Direct voice, performance‐related pay, and organizational innovation in European firms ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol.  59 No.  2 , pp.  185 - 199 , doi: 10.1002/hrm.21987 .

Delloite ( 2017 ), Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends - Rewriting the Rules for the Digital Age , Deloitte Univerity Press , available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/central-europe/ce-global-human-capital-trends.pdf ( accessed January 2020 ).

Denyer , D. and Tranfield , D ( 2009 ), “ Producing a systematic review ”, in Buchanan , D.A. and Bryman , A. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods , Sage Publications , pp. 671 - 689 .

Dominguez , E.E. , Mallen , B.F.F. , Chiva , G.R. and Lapiedra , A.R. ( 2016 ), “ How does altruistic leader behavior foster radical innovation? The mediating effect of organizational learning capability ”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal , Vol. 37 No. 8 , pp. 1056 - 1082 .

Donthu , N. , Kumar , S. , Mukherjee , D. , Pandey , N. and Lim , W.M. ( 2021 ), “ How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol.  133 , pp.  285 - 296 .

Echchakoui , S. ( 2020 ), “ Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019 ”, Journal of Marketing Analytics , Vol.  8 No.  3 , pp.  165 - 184 .

Engelsberger , A. , Halvorsen , B. , Cavanagh , J. and Bartram , T. ( 2021 ), “ Human resources management and open innovation: the role of open innovation mindset ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources , Vol. ahead-of-print , doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12281 .

Escrig , E.D. , Broch , F.F.M. , Gómez , R.C. and Alcamí , R.L. ( 2016 ), “ How does altruistic leader behavior foster radical innovation? The mediating effect of organizational learning capability ”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal , Vol.  37 No.  8 , pp.  1056 - 1082 , doi: 10.1108/LODJ-03-2015-0050 .

Feldman , M.P. , Ozcan , S. and Reichstein , T. ( 2019 ), “ Falling not far from the tree: entrepreneurs and organizational heritage ”, Organization Science , Vol.  30 No.  2 , pp.  337 - 360 , doi: 10.1287/orsc.2018.1222 .

Ganz , S.C. ( 2020 ), “ Hyperopic search: organizations learning about managers learning about strategies ”, Organization Science , Vol. 31 No. 4 , doi: 10.1287/orsc.2019.1330 .

Gasparyan , A.Y. , Ayvazyan , L. and Kitas , G.D. ( 2013 ), “ Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases ”, Journal of Korean Medical Science , Vol.  28 No.  9 , pp.  1270 - 1275 , doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1270 .

Gonzalez , R.V.D. and de Melo , T.M. ( 2018 ), “ The effects of organization context on knowledge exploration and exploitation ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol.  90 , pp.  215 - 225 , doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.025 .

Gope , S. , Elia , G. and Passiante , G. ( 2018 ), “ The effect of HRM practices on knowledge management capacity: a comparative study in Indian IT industry ”, Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol.  22 No.  3 , pp.  649 - 677 , doi: 10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0453 .

Kabongo , J.D. and Boiral , O. ( 2017 ), “ Doing more with less: building dynamic capabilities for eco‐efficiency ”, Business Strategy and the Environment , Vol.  26 No.  7 , pp.  956 - 971 , doi: 10.1002/bse.1958 .

Kao , C.Y. , Tsaur , S.H. and Huang , C.C. ( 2020 ), “ The scale development of organizational culture on customer delight ”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , Vol.  32 No.  10 , pp.  3067 - 3090 , doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-02-2019-0128 .

Kessler , M.M. ( 1963 ), “ Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers ”, American Documentation , Vol. 14 No. 1 , pp. 10 - 25 , doi: 10.1002/asi.5090140103 .

Kiesnere , A.L. and Baumgartner , R.J. ( 2019 ), “ Sustainability management emergence and integration on different management levels in smaller large‐sized companies in Austria ”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , Vol.  26 No.  6 , pp.  1607 - 1626 , doi: 10.1002/csr.1854 .

Kossek , E.E. ( 1987 ), “ Human resources management innovation ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol.  26 No.  1 , pp.  71 - 92 , doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930260105 .

Kraus , S. , Filser , M. , Eggers , F. , Hills , G.E. and Hultman , C.M. ( 2012 ), “ The entrepreneurial marketing domain: a citation and co‐citation analysis ”, Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship , Vol.  14 No.  1 , pp.  6 - 26 , doi: 10.1108/14715201211246698 .

Kraus , S. , Breier , M. and Dasí-Rodríguez , S. ( 2020 ), “ The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research ”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , Vol.  16 No.  3 , pp.  1023 - 1042 .

Kraus , S. , Mahto , R.V. and Walsh , S.T. ( 2021 ), “ The importance of literature reviews in small business and entrepreneurship research ”, Journal of Small Business Management , Vol. ahead-of-print , doi: 10.1080/00472778.2021.1955128 .

Kwak , Y.H. and Anbari , F.T. ( 2009 ), “ Analyzing project management research: perspectives from top management journals ”, International Journal of Project Management , Vol.  27 No.  5 , pp.  435 - 446 , doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.004 .

Laursen , K. and Foss , N.J. ( 2014 ), Human Resource Management Practices and Innovation , Oxford Handbooks Online , doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/978019969 .

Lee , H.W. , Pak , J. , Kim , S. and Li , L.Z. ( 2019 ), “ Effects of HRM systems on employee proactivity and group innovation ”, Journal of Management , Vol.  45 No.  2 , pp.  819 - 846 , doi: 10.1177/0149206316680029 .

Looise , J.K. and van Riemsdijk , M. ( 2004 ), “ Innovating organisations and HRM: a conceptual framework ”, Management Revue , Vol. 15 No. 3 , pp. 277 - 287 .

Lopez‐Cabrales , A. , Pérez‐Luño , A. and Cabrera , R.V. ( 2009 ), “ Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activityin cooperation with the school of business administration ”, HRM: Published The University of Michigan and in Alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management , Vol.  48 No.  4 , pp.  485 - 503 , doi: 10.1002/hrm.20295 .

Marjański , A. , Sułkowski , Ł. , Marjańska-Potakowska , J. and Staniszewska , K. ( 2019 ), “ Social capital drives SME growth: a study of family firms in Poland ”, German Journal of HRM , Vol.  33 No.  3 , pp.  280 - 304 , doi: 10.1177/2397002219847668 .

Mas-Tur , A. , Kraus , S. , Brandtner , M. , Ewert , R. and Kürsten , W. ( 2020 ), “ Advances in management research: a bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science ”, Review of Managerial Science , Vol.  14 No.  5 , pp.  933 - 958 .

Menéndez Blanco , J.M. and Montes-Botella , J.-L. ( 2017 ), “ Exploring nurtured company resilience through human capital and human resource development ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 38 No. 5 , pp. 661 - 674 , doi: 10.1108/ijm-11-2015-0196 .

Meskó , B. , Hetényi , G. and Győrffy , Z. ( 2018 ), “ Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare? ”, BMC Health Services Research , Vol.  18 No.  1 , p. 545 .

Muñoz-Pascual , L. , Curado , C. and Galende , J. ( 2019 ), “ How does the use of information technologies affect the adoption of environmental practices in SMEs? A mixed-methods approach ”, Review of Managerial Science , Vol. 15 , pp. 75 - 102 , doi: 10.1007/s11846-019-00371-2 .

Natalicchio , A. , Petruzzelli , A.M. , Cardinali , S. and Savino , T. ( 2018 ), “ Open innovation and the human resource dimension ”, Management Decision , Vol. 56 No. 6 , pp. 1271 - 1284 , doi: 10.1108/MD-03-2017-0268 .

Nielsen , P. and Rasmussen , P. ( 2011 ), “ Knowledge management in the firm: concepts and issues ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol.  5 No.  6 , pp.  479 - 493 , doi: 10.1108/01437721111158161 .

Olander , H. , Hurmelinna-Laukkanen , P. and Heilmann , P. ( 2015 ), “ Human resources–strength and weakness in protection of intellectual capital ”, Journal of Intellectual Capital , Vol.  16 No.  4 , pp.  742 - 762 , doi: 10.1108/JIC-03-2015-0027 .

Omta , S.W.F. , Bouter , L.M. and Vanengelen , J.M.L. ( 1994 ), “ Managing industrial pharmaceutical research-and-development - a comparative-study of management control and innovative effectiveness in european and anglo-american companies ”, R&D Management , Vol.  4 , pp.  303 - 315 , doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00886.x .

Ottenbacher , M.C. and Harrington , R.J. ( 2010 ), “ Strategies for achieving success for innovative versus incremental new services ”, Journal of Services Marketing , Vol.  24 , pp.  3 - 15 , doi: 10.1108/08876041011017853 .

Perez , C.C. and Quevado , C.P. ( 2006 ), “ Human resources management and its impact on innovation performance in companies ”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol. 35 Nos 1-4 , p. 11 , doi: 10.1504/ijtm.2006.009227 .

Pérez , M.P. , Sánchez , A.M. and de Luis Carnicer , M.P. ( 2002 ), “ Benefits and barriers of telework: perception differences of human resources managers according to company's operations strategy ”, Technovation , Vol.  22 No.  12 , pp.  775 - 783 , doi: 10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00069-4 .

Potgieter , I.L. and Mokomane , S.E. ( 2020 ), “ Implementation of HRM functions in selected small manufacturing companies in Ga-Rankuwa industrial area, Gauteng, South Africa ”, SA Journal of HRM , Vol.  18 No.  1 , pp.  1 - 11 , doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1282 .

Pradana , M. , Pérez-Luño , A. and Fuentes-Blasco , M. ( 2020 ), “ Innovation as the key to gain performance from absorptive capacity and human capital ”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management , Vol. 32 No. 7 , pp. 822 - 834 , doi: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1714578 .

Seeck , H. and Diehl , M.R. ( 2017 ), “ A literature review on HRM and innovation–taking stock and future directions ”, The International Journal of HRM , Vol.  28 No.  6 , pp.  913 - 944 .

Seibert , S.E. , Kraimer , M.L. and Crant , J.M. ( 2001 ), “ What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success ”, Personnel Psychology , Vol.  54 No.  4 , pp.  845 - 874 , doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x .

Shaw , J.D. , Gupta , N. , Mitra , A. and Ledford , G.E. Jr ( 2005 ), “ Success and survival of skill-based pay plans ”, Journal of Management , Vol.  31 No.  1 , pp.  28 - 49 , doi: 10.1177/0149206304271376 .

Sheehan , C. , De Cieri , H. , Cooper , B. and Shea , T. ( 2016 ), “ Strategic implications of HR role management in a dynamic environment ”, Personnel Review , Vol.  45 No.  2 , pp.  353 - 373 , doi: 10.1108/PR-04-2014-0071 .

Snyder , H. ( 2019 ), “ Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol.  104 , pp.  333 - 339 .

Soomro , B.A. and Shah , N. ( 2015 ), “ Developing attitudes and intentions among potential entrepreneurs ”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management , Vol.  28 No.  2 , pp.  304 - 322 , doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0070 .

Tummers , L. , Kruyen , P.M. , Vijverberg , D.M. and Voesenek , T.J. ( 2015 ), “ Connecting HRM and change management: the importance of proactivity and vitality ”, Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol. 28 No. 4 , pp. 627 - 640 , doi: 10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0220 .

VOSviewer ( 2021 ), “ Visualing scientifing landscapes ”, available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/ ( accessed May 2021 ).

Vrontis , D. and Christofi , M. ( 2021 ), “ R&D internationalization and innovation: a systematic review, integrative framework and future research directions ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol.  128 , pp.  812 - 823 .

Wang , Z. , Chen , J. and Zang , Z. ( 2005 ), “ Strategic human resources, innovation and entrepreneurship fit ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 26 No. 6 , pp. 544 - 559 , doi: 10.1108/01437720510625458 .

Yazici , S. , Köseoglu , M.A. and Okumus , F. ( 2016 ), “ Identification of growth factors for small firms: evidence from hotel companies on an island ”, Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol.  29 No.  6 , pp.  994 - 1029 , doi: 10.1108/JOCM-12-2015-0231 .

Zhou , Y. , Liu , G. , Chang , X. and Wang , L. ( 2020 ), “ The impact of HRM digitalization on firm performance: investigating three-way interactions ”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources , Vol.  59 No.  1 , pp.  20 - 43 , doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12258 .

Corresponding author

Related articles, we’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

The Innovation Shift in Higher Education pp 11–40 Cite as

Insights About Human Resource Practices, Knowledge Management Practices, and Innovation

• Aftab Ara   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-5897 3 &
• Kishore Kumar Das 4  
• First Online: 18 September 2021

236 Accesses

A detailed discussion on the research constructs Human Resource Practices (HRP), Knowledge Management Processes (KMP), and Innovation (INN) is discussed in this chapter, and contemporary research is analyzed to define the dimensions and relevant variables. To perform empirical studies on the three research constructs, this chapter provides the necessary theoretical framework for the analysis. The identification of the research gap that has culminated in this chapter is also narrated.

• Human Resource Practices
• Knowledge Management Practices

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211.

Google Scholar  

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 , 107–136.

Article   Google Scholar  

Alderfer, C. P. (1981). Intergroup relations and organisational behavior. In J. R. Hackman et al. (Eds.), Readings in organisational psychology (pp. 408–416). McGraw-\Hill.

Altbach, P. G. (2006, January 2–8). The private higher education revolution: An introduction. University News, 44 No.01.

Anandakrishnan, M. (2006). Privatization of higher education: Opportunities and anomalies . Privatization and commercialization of higher education, organized by NIEPA, New Delhi.

Anantatmula, V. S., & Shrivastav, B. (2012). Evolution of project teams for Generation Y workforce. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5 (1), 9–26.

Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance management: Key strategies and practical guidelines . Kogan Page.

Ashok, M., Narula, R., & Martinez, N. A. (2014). End‐user collaboration for process innovation in services: The role of internal resources (UNU‐MERIT Working Paper Series). United Nations University.

Assudani, R. H. (2005). Catching the chameleon: Understanding the elusive term knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (2), 31–44.

Badaracco, J. L. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances . Harvard Business School Press.

Bandler, R., Grinder, J., & O‘Stevens, J. (1981). Frogs into princes: Neurolinguistic programming Real People Press.

Bergfors, M. E., & Larsson, A. (2009). Product and process innovation in process industry: A new perspective on development. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2 (3), 261–276.

Bird, H., (2015). Appraising clever people: lessons from introducing performance reviews for academics in a UK University. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47 (2), 81–85.

Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2002). Separating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Business & Psychology, 16 (3), 391–412.

Brachos, D., Kostopoulos, K., Soderquist, K. E., & Prastacos, G. (2007). Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 , 31–44.

Broadbridge, A. M., Maxwell, G. A., & Ogden, S. M. (2007). Experiences, perceptions and expectations of retail employment for generation Y. Career Development International, 12 (6), 523–544.

Cantù, C., Corsaro, D., & Snehota, I. (2012). Roles of actors in combining resources into complex solutions. Journal of Business Research, 65 (2), 139–150.

Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3), 35–41.

Coenen, L. (2007). The role of universities in the regional innovation systems of the North East of England and Scania, Sweden: Providing missing links? Environment and Planning c: Government and Policy, 25 (6), 803–821.

Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice . Butterworth-Heinemann.

de Zubielqui, G. C., Pi-Shen, J. J., & Lindsay, S. N. (2015). Knowledge transfer between actors in the innovation system: A study of higher education institutions (HEIS) and SMES. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30 (3 & 4), 436–458.

Decter, M., Bennett, D., & Leseure, M. (2007). University to business technology transfer—UK and USA comparisons. Technovation, 27 (3), 145–155.

Delong, D. W. (2004). Lost knowledge: Confronting the threat of an aging workforce . Oxford University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

DeNisia, A., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 8 (1), 127–179.

Donofrio, N. M. (2006). An engine for innovation. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 23 (2), 45–54.

Drabenstott, M. (2008). Universities, innovation and regional development: A view from the United States. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20 (2), 1–13.

Falola H. O., Ibidunni A. S, & Olokundun A. M., (2014). Incentives packages and employees‘ attitudes to work: A study of selected government parastatals in Ogun State, South-West, Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science IJRBS, 3, (1), 2147–4478.

Fang, E., Palmatier, R., & Grewal, R. (2011). Effects of customer and innovation asset configuration strategies on firm performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 587–602.

Fay, D., Shipton, H., West, M. A., & Patterson, M. (2014). Teamwork and organizational innovation: The moderating role of the HRM context. Journal of Management, 24 (2), 261–282.

Fisher, S. G., Hunter, T. A., & Macrosson, W. D. K. (1997). Team or group? Managers’ perceptions of the differences. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12 (4), 232–242.

Freeman, C. (Ed.). (2010). The long wave debate, in: T. Vasko . Technical Innovations, Diffusion and long Cycles of Economic Development. Berlin: Springer.

Frishammar, J., Kurkkio, M., Abrahamsson, L., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: A literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59 , 519–529.

Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50 , 851–834.

Griese, I., Pick, D., & Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2012). Antecedents of knowledge generation competence and its impact on innovativeness. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27 (6), 468–485.

Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15 (2), 103–120.

Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (11), 1133–1153.

Hamel, G. (2009). Moon shots for management . Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

Hartman, D. (2011). Types of finance-rewards and incentives, Retrieved on August 15, 2015 from: www.eHowmoney.com .

Hedgebeth, D. (2007). Making use of knowledge sharing technologies. VINE, the Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 37 (1), 49–49.

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20 (2), 196–210.

Hesselbein, F., Goldsmith, M., & Somerville, I. (Eds.). (2002). Leading for innovation and organizing for results . Jossey-Bass.

Hitchcock, D. E., & Willard, M. (1995). Why teams can fail and what to do about it: Essential tools for anyone implementing self-directed work teams . Irwin.

Hoarau, H. (2014). Knowledge acquisition and assimilation in tourism-innovation processes. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 1 (1), 1–17.

Hsu, T., Ke, H., & Yang, W. (2006). Unified knowledge-based content management for digital archives in museums. The Electronic Library, 24 (1), 38–50.

Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (5), 1128–1134.

Ivancevich, J. M. (2004). Human resource management (p. 83). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

JISC. (2012). Enhancing curriculum design with technology . Retrieved on August 24 from: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/enhancing-curriculum-design.pdf .

Kim, Y. J., Chun, J. U., & Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 29 (1), 67–77.

Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise and other bribes . Houghton Mifflin.

Kozlenkova, I., Samaha, S., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014). Resource-based theory in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42 (1), 1–21.

KPMG. (2013). HR as a driver for organizational innovation, KPMG HR transformations. Retrieved on 26th August, 2015 from: https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/hr-driver-organizational-innovation-v3.pdf .

Krogh, G. V., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation . Oxford University Press.

Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21 (3), 25–36.

Lane, P. L., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 833–863.

Lawler, E. E. (1996). Organizational climate: Relationship to organizational structure, process, and performance. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 11 , 139–155.

Lawson, G. (2005). Development and innovation in curriculum design in landscape planning: Students as agents of change. In X. Wang (Ed.). Proceedings 1st International Landscape Studies Education Symposium (pp. 447–452).

Leković, B., & Susnjar, G. (2010). Learning, education and development in comparative Human Resource Management . Strategic Management, 15 (4), 53–74.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation . Harvard Business School Press.

Longenecker, C. O., Fink, L. S., & Caldwell, S. (2014). Current US trends in formal performance appraisal: Practices and opportunities—Part II. Industrial and Commercial Training, 46 (7), 393–399.

Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62 (4), 1–12.

Magnier-Watanabe, R. and Senoo, D. (2008). Organizational characteristics as prescriptive factors of knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12 (1), 21–36.

Maley, J. (2013). Hybrid purposes of performance appraisal in a crisis. Journal of Management Development, 32 (10), 1093–1112.

Martin, C. A. (2005). From high maintenance to high productivity. Industry and Commercial Training, 37 (1), 39–44.

McDermott, R., & Archibald, D. (2010). Harnessing your staff’s informal networks. Harvard Business Review, 88 (3), 82–89.

Miles, I. (2000). Services innovation: Coming of age in the knowledge based economy. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4 (4), 371–389.

Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. (2004). Compensation . McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Modi, S. (2014). Higher education in India: Issues and challenges. Academe, 17 (1), 15–20.

Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62 , 1269–1280.

Moses, O. S., & Ifeoma, E. J. (2014). Overcoming cultural barriers to innovation and knowledge sharing: An organization perspective. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 2 (9), 22–36.

Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10 (3), 313–351.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change . Belknap Press.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company . Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69 (6), 96–104.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5 , 14–37.

O‟Dell, C. S., Grayson, C. J., & Essaides, N. (1998). If only we knew what we know: The transfer of internal knowledge and best practice . Free Press.

OECD (2007). Innovation strategy for education and training innovation: The OECD definition. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1 (1), 124–136. http://www.oecd.org .

Osibinjo, O. A., Adeniji, A. A., Falola, H. O., & Heirsmac, P. T. (2014). Compensation packages: A strategic tool for employees’ performance and retention. Leonardo Journal of Sciences, 25 (1), 65–84.

Palethorpe, R. (2011). Learning and development. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43 (6), 394–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197851111160531 .

Pattinson, S., & Preece, D. (2014). Communities of practice, knowledge acquisition and innovation: A case study of science-based SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18 (1), 1–29.

Pérez, M. P., Sánchez, A. M., de Luis Carnicer, M. P., & Jiménez, M. J. V. (2002). Knowledge tasks and teleworking: A taxonomy model of feasibility adoption. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (3), 272–284.

Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63 (4), 149–160.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3), 79–93.

Rah, J. A., Gul, S., & Wani, Z. A. (2010). University libraries: Step towards a web based knowledge management system. Vine, 40 (1), 24–38.

Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations . Free Press.

Roknuzzaman, M., Kanai, H., & Umemoto, K. (2009). Integration of knowledge management process into digital library system: A theoretical perspective. Library Review, 58 (5), 372–386.

Rönnblom, M., & Keisu, B. (2013). Constructions of innovation and gender (equality) in Swedish Universities. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5 (3), 342–356.

Rowland, C. A., & Hall, R. D. (2013). Perceived unfairness in appraisal: Engagement and sustainable organizational performance. EuroMed Journal of Business, 8 (3), 195–208.

Sarwar, S., Aslam, H. D., & Muhammad I. R. (2012). Hindering factors of beginning teachers’ high performance in higher education Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management, 26 (1), 27–38.

Scarnati, J. T. (2001). On becoming a team player. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 7 (1/2), 5–10.

Seely-Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organisation Science, 12 (1), 198–213.

Shaw, S., & Fairhurst, D. (2008). Engaging a new generation of graduates. Education and Training, 50 (5), 366–378.

Slavić, A. & Berber, N. (2014). The impact of training on organizational outcomes in the CEE region—Focus on hungary, Serbia, Slovenia and Slovakia . In Conference proceedings, Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking—In the 21st Century Budapest, Hungary.

Sukula, S. K. (2006). Developing Indigenous knowledge databases in India. The Electronic Library, 24 (1), 83–93.

Suorsa, A., & Huotari, M. (2014). Knowledge creation and the concept of a human being: A phenomenological approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1 (5), 1042–1057.

Szulanski .G(2003) Sticky knowledge barriers to knowing in the firm . Sage.

Teece, D. (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33 (2), 22–34.

Tharenou, P., Saks, A. M., & Moore, C. (2007). A review and critique of research on training and organizational-level outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 17 , 251–273.

Tohidinia, Z., & Mosakhani, M. (2010). Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110 (4), 611–631.

Tregaskis, O., & Heraty, N. (2012). Human resource development: National embeddedness. In C. Brewster & W. Mayrhofer (Eds.), Handbook of research on comparative human resource management (pp. 164–184). Edward Elgar.

Tuytens, M. & Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41 (6), 756–776.

Valencia, J. C. N., Valle, R. S., & Jiménez, D. J. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (4), 466–480.

Valentine, D. B., & Powers, T. L. (2013). Generation Y values and lifestyle segments. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30 (7), 597–606.

Villadsen, B. (1995). Communication and delegation in collusive agencies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19 (2–3), 315–344.

Vivas-López, S. (2014). Talent management and teamwork interaction: Evidence in large Spanish companies. International Journal of Business, 19 (1), 31–43.

Vroom V.H., (1964). Work and motivation . Wiley. In Osibinjo, O.A., Adeniji, A.A., Falola, H.O., Heirsmac, P.T. (2014). Compensation packages: a strategic tool for employees‘ performance and retention. Leonardo Journal of Sciences, 25 (1), 65–84.

Westerlund, M., & Rajala, R. (2010). Learning and innovation in inter-organizational network collaboration. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25 (6), 435–442.

White, S. C., & Glickman, T. S. (2007). Innovation in higher education: Implications for the future (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 137). New York, NY: Wiley InterScience.

Yulong, Li., MonideepaTarafdar, S., & Rao, S. (2012). Collaborative knowledge management practices: Theoretical development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32 (4), 398–422.

Zhao, H. (2006). Expectations of recruiters and applicants in large cities of China. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (5), 459–475.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Excellence, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

School of Management, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, India

Kishore Kumar Das

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aftab Ara .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Ara, A., Das, K.K. (2021). Insights About Human Resource Practices, Knowledge Management Practices, and Innovation. In: The Innovation Shift in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2055-3_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2055-3_2

Published : 18 September 2021

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-16-2054-6

Online ISBN : 978-981-16-2055-3

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

HumanResourcesManagement

Week 1 – HR Research

Cultivating Excellence: Lessons from Fortune’s Best Companies to Work For

Introduction: In the dynamic landscape of business, fostering a workplace culture where employees thrive is paramount. Fortune’s Best Companies to Work For list serves as a beacon, illuminating organizations that excel in this aspect. In this blog post, we delve into the practices of three standout companies from the 2020 list—Hilton, Ultimate Software, and Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. We’ll explore how their Human Resources (HR) strategies align with managerial aspirations and the challenges faced in maintaining such environments.

Employee Testimonials: What stands out in the testimonials from Hilton, Ultimate Software, and Wegmans Food Markets, Inc., is the profound sense of belonging and appreciation expressed by employees. They emphasize feeling valued, supported, and integral to the organization’s success. This underscores the importance of prioritizing employee well-being and engagement in organizational culture.

HR Practices: Each of these companies demonstrates a commitment to their employees through various HR practices. Hilton’s emphasis on personalized care reflects their belief in treating employees like family. Ultimate Software’s dedication to prioritizing people aligns with their mission of fostering a supportive work environment. Wegmans’ focus on actions, not just words, highlights the authenticity of their commitment to employee welfare. These practices echo concepts from HR management literature, such as employee-centric approaches, organizational support theory, and the role of leadership in shaping culture.

Managerial Aspirations: As a manager, I aspire to embody the values exemplified by these companies—empathy, support, and genuine care for my team. I envision fostering a culture where employees feel valued, empowered, and motivated to contribute their best. Aligning HR functions with managerial goals will be crucial in realizing this vision, from recruitment and onboarding to performance management and employee development.

Challenges: While striving to emulate the practices of exemplary companies, I anticipate challenges in navigating diverse personalities, resolving conflicts, and adapting to evolving workplace dynamics. Balancing the needs of individuals with organizational goals, maintaining open communication channels, and fostering inclusivity will require continuous learning and proactive HR support.

Conclusion: Fortune’s Best Companies to Work For serve as inspirations for cultivating exceptional workplaces where employees thrive. By integrating insights from their HR practices into managerial approaches, we can foster cultures of excellence and drive organizational success. As we navigate the complexities of leadership, let us remember the profound impact of prioritizing people—the heart and soul of every organization.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Psychol Res Behav Manag

How Human Resource Management Practices Translate Into Sustainable Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role Of Product, Process And Knowledge Innovation

Samma faiz rasool.

1 Postdoctoral Station of Statistical, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, People’s Republic of China

2 School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Institute, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, People’s Republic of China

3 School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, People’s Republic of China

Madeeha Samma

4 School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, People’s Republic of China

Yanping Zhang

This study examined how human resource management (HRM) can directly and indirectly influence sustainable organizational performance (SOP), with organizational innovation (OI) as a mediator.

Research methods

For this quantitative study, a 31-item questionnaire was used to collect data on HRM and SOP from 20 Shanghai branches of five Chinese banks. HRM was defined as multidimensional, consisting of employee staffing, staff development, performance management, and compensation and benefits. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM 3.2) was used to estimate the effects.

The HRM practices of performance management and compensation and benefits showed a direct and positive influence on SOP. Looking at indirect relationships, all four dimensions of HRM practices were positively related to OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation), which, in turn, was positively related to SOP. Organizational innovation was thus shown to play a mediating role between HRM and SOP.

The study emphasizes that the banking sector of China consists of many employees who maintain old styles of working, alongside some who attempt to take on the new innovative working mechanisms and engage with staff development programs. This latter group of personnel make a valuable contribution to SOP. Moreover, the effect on organizational dynamics of implementing HRM practices aids in bringing about innovations in processes, products, and knowledge.

Introduction

Human resource development is a central part of restructuring organizations, whether the aim is to develop organizational infrastructure, improve business processes, or increase knowledge, innovativeness or other organizational parameters. In dynamic organizational environments, the rewards stemming from investments in human resources are recognized by academics and practitioners. This is especially true in the current era with its emphasis on innovative, knowledge-based organizations. In this context, human resource development plays an especially important role in achieving sustainable organizational performance (SOP). 1 While there have been many attempts to determine the intervening constructs for this relationship, this study uses a more synthesized framework to uncover new insights.

Since the inception of organizational human resources, HRM practices have aimed at the acquisition, development, and motivation of employees as a key to attaining SOP. Barney (1991) argued that human resource practices are the key to attaining SOP and that HRM practices should, therefore, be treated as a central part of organizational strategy. Many theories in the extant literature support this notion that staff are to be treated as an integral resource of any organization; most importantly, the resource-based (RBV) and knowledge-based (KBV) theories have both presented this argument, and weighted human resources equal with other organizational resources in generating SOP. 2  Organizational managers have responded over recent decades by adopting a range of human resource practices to support their business performance, including in the areas of employee staffing, performance management, staff development, and compensation and benefits. 3 Analysis of these highlighted HRM practices has provided many insights for the field of strategic management, and led to developments in the economics of organizations, firm competitiveness, and the working dynamics of employees.

Organizational innovation (OI) is thought to be another important contributor to SOP. Many researchers have formed the view that encapsulating the attribute of innovation, definitive of the current era of business, is critical to SOP. As organizations are now strongly encouraged to incorporate innovative processes into their business models, much research emphasis is being placed on identifying the contributing factors of innovativeness. In particular, the relationship between HRM practices, OI, and SOP has recently received significant attention in management studies. 4 – 6 According to the literature, certain HRM practices have a positive relationship with sustained organizational innovations, 7 , 8 which also enhance SOP. 9 On the basis of these previous research findings, this study takes innovation (in the realms of product, process, and knowledge) as an intervening construct in attaining SOP. 10

Despite the strong interest among researchers and practitioners, some gaps remain in establishing the interrelationship of HRM practices, innovativeness and SOP. First, most of the research focuses on the exercise of innovation in developed countries, with studies undertaken in Europe, the USA, Japan, Singapore, Korea, New Zealand, and Russia. 11 – 20 Meaningful research results and insights are in their infancy for emerging economies. Second, firms in the banking sector, including financial institutions and other related organizations, are showing an inclination toward innovation, but are not a major focus of the literature. Third, a few studies have examined the direct relationship between HRM practices and OI or between HRM practices and SOP, 21 , 22 but the three-way relationship between HRM practices, OI, and SOP is unexplored. Especially, studies have not considered OI as an intervening construct between HRM practices and SOP.

Based on the above-mentioned research impetus, the purpose of this study is to address these gaps in the framework of the RBV and KBV theories. This study emphasizes the intervening constructs of innovation to provide new dimensions for subscribing to sustainable organizational performance. Within the developed research framework the study addresses the following research questions:

RQ1. How do HRM practices (employee staffing, staff development, performance management, and compensation and benefits) bring about sustainable organizational performance (SOP)?

RQ2. How does organizational innovation (product, process, and knowledge innovation) intervene in the relationship between HRM practices and sustainable organizational performance (SOP)?

The remainder of paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is devoted to the conceptual background. Section 3 frames the hypotheses and outlines the theoretical framework. Section 4 addresses the methodology. Section 5 presents the results of the data analysis. Sections 6 and 7 conclude the study and provide a discussion of the results and their implications, and suggestions for future research directions.

Literature Review

Background of hrm practices in china.

Organizations in emerging countries are becoming aware of HRM practices and their importance. In China, a number of scholars have discussed the practical and theoretical issues with the implementation of HRM practices in modern Chinese firms. Wang 23 addressed the concept of HRM in Chinese culture, borrowing the concept of HRM from theories of organizational psychology, and presented his insights to Chinese firms. 24 Many HRM practices were also brought about in the mid-1990s by national changes, such as greater concern with the welfare of employees and changes in labor laws and regulations. Performance-based compensation, fixed-term employment contracts, employee relations and succession planning were introduced in this period. In the late-1990s, Chinese firms came to realize that their HRM practices required several changes to promote innovation. 25 Since then, HRM practices have been extensively applied in Chinese firms from the perspective of innovativeness. However, the traditional economic systems did not necessarily provide support to changes in the labor market in China. Additionally, multinational organizations started investing in Chinese organizations toward the end of the 1990s, and these investments brought Western capital, corporate cultures, and management styles to Chinese firms. The organizational dynamism brought to China by organizations from developed countries opened the door for researchers to examine HRM in the Chinese context. 26 At the beginning of the 21st century, dynamic reforms in HRM-practices were launched in the international market that affected the Chinese labor market. China became a member of the WTO (World Trade Organization) in December 2001, 27 which brought many reforms into the Chinese economy and created a complex market and operational environment. These reforms further brought modern HRM practices into Chinese firms. 28

Concept Of Human Resource Management (HRM)

HRM can be defined as the policies and practices required to perform the routines of human resources in an organization, such as employee staffing, staff development, performance management, compensation management, and encouraging employee involvement in decision making. 29 Foss and Lyngsie (2011) give the following reasons for engaging in HRM practices: first, to assign duties to employees and teams; second, to develop and publicize incentives for knowledge sharing, individual achievements, and benefit sharing; third, as a medium for intra-organization information sharing about practices like job rotation and knowledge sharing; fourth, to generate internal and external training opportunities for employees; and last, to carry out retention, recruitment, and promotion policies to fulfill the organization’s HR needs. The last two of these tasks are considered part of conventional HRM practice, whereas the first three are more modern HRM roles. 30

HRM practices are considered significant to attaining an organization’s goals and gaining a competitive advantage. 31 The success of any organization depends upon many factors, but RBV considers employees to be the most important resource. Organizations can achieve SOP by encapsulating the benefits of good HRM practices and innovation in routine business processes. 32 Past research has discussed these practices in the perspective of VRIN (“valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable and non-substitutable”) resources, arguing that these qualities of human resources contribute to SOP. 4 , 33 This means that HRM implementations are becoming critical to organizations. Management personnel are taking a keen interest in their organization’s ability to exercise HRM practices to positively shape the working conduct of employees and fully utilize their capacity to deliver innovative business processes, help to meet organizational objectives, and ultimately realize SOP. 34

Therefore, the authors believe that HRM practices play a dual role in SOP. On the one hand, HRM practices and policies are used to manage and to organize the work, incorporating the organization’s basic structure. HRM practices and policies serve to manage and employ people by incorporating individual administration tasks and the development of new procedures, either in consultation with or communicated to individuals and teams within the organization. 35 On the other hand, diverse HRM implementations can also be viewed as significant to support and stimulate creativity, primarily by empowering the sovereignty of workers and consequently giving rise to novel procedures. 36 With this dual role of HRM practices in mind, it is not just a question of managing work and representing business structures, there is also the potential for HRM to unlock the imagination of personnel. Therefore, it is conceivable that HRM practices and policies could be utilized to bring about innovativeness and thus create an innovation-driven path toward SOP. 37

Organizational Innovation (OI)

Since the inception of the Industrial Revolution, innovation has been considered an advantageous attribute for many organizations. OI provides a point of difference for those organizations that can viably use innovative systems to attain benefits and increase market share. 38 OI has been defined as “the acceptance of behavior or an idea to create value for the organization”. 39 This entails that organizational advancement involves the appropriation of ideas from outside the organization and the generation of ideas within. Moreover, the literature suggests that organizations not only create ideas but also develop, and ultimately implements these ideas. 40 Ideas need to be followed up with implementation, which spans commencement, execution, and determination. 41 Damanpour (1996) therefore argues that innovation in an organization means the successful implementation of unique ideas for product development, processes development and knowledge development. 42 Innovation also improves existing corporate practices through structural changes, improving organizational methods, and re-engineering management strategies. 43 OI applied to organizational design and structure can leads to improved intra-organizational coordination and cooperation instruments. 44

In this study, we adopt the classification of OI by Bruton & White 45 into product, process, and knowledge innovation. Product innovation introduces goods and related tangible or intangible services that have significantly new and improved characteristics or projected usage. 46 Process innovation is the implementation of significantly new and improved means of delivering production. 47 Knowledge innovation draws on the facts, information, and skills acquired by employees through their experiences and available resources. 34 Without creative ideas arising from employees, there is unlikely to be any innovation in an organization.

Sustainable Organizational Performance (SOP)

Sustainability, an ongoing concern for several developing economies, enterprises and organizations, is an approach to attaining organizational performance. 48 The United Nations characterizes sustainable development as that which “meets present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. 49 The SOP of an organization is mainly based on the execution of the firm’s plans of action, and involves the ideal positioning of its services and products amongst its competitors. Sustainability is seen as productive to the organization, such that sustainability is not just an idea but an ideology that posits a congruity of ecological, societal, and economic concerns. 50 Emphasizing sustainability throughout an organization will have an influence on elements of HRM. 50 , 51 Firms accomplish sustainability partly by encouraging OI (in terms of product, process, and knowledge innovation) and pursuing human development-based business models. Organizations can make sustainable plans of action by acquiring information about their markets, customers, competitors, and future advances. Given that OI involves the acceptance of new ideas to create value, it therefore serves as a pivotal factor for SOP.

Organizational performance (OP) is one of the most highly researched outcome variables in the management literature. 52 , 53 Some researchers exclusively focus on the narrow financial performance of the organization while some focus on the larger economic performance of the organization. 54 However, in this study, we select SOP as an outcome variable. Increasingly, sustainability in organizations is being defined more broadly, and incorporates the economic, social and environmental effects of the organization’s production processes. SOP involves consistent financial success, maintaining the organization’s image, and sustainability-related outcomes. 55 Furthermore, Wiggins and Ruefli (2002) argue that SOP represents an organization’s capacity to achieve and sustain competitive advantages over time.

Hypotheses Framing And Theoretical Framework

In this study, the proposed model highlights that HRM practices can bring about an advancement in SOP through OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation). HRM practices and OI have long been major concerns among researchers and practitioners for their role in producing OP. HRM practices are being treated as an agent of competitive advantage, 56 and diverse effects on OP have been claimed by researchers in the field of HRM. 57 , 58 The RBV contends that the execution of HRM-practices may make a significant difference to OP. 59 In dynamic business environments, HRM practices have an impact on the innovativeness of firms and constitute essential tools for firms to improve their SOP. Therefore, the authors of the present study contend that OI mediates the connection between HRM practices and SOP, and seek to explore the mediated effect of OI on the relationship between several HRM practices and SOP. The current study analyzes these relationships empirically and highlights the impact of HRM practices on SOP through OI in an emerging nation. This study also complements previous work by clarifying the role of HRM practices in shaping the OI that lead to SOP.

It is well established that firms can attain SOP by expanding their financial status when contrasted with their competitors. In fact, SOP has been defined as “the ability of a firm to generate a higher amount of economic worth than the economic worth of their competitors.” 60 However, SOP might also be evaluated in relation to the human resources of a firms’ competitors. It is now common practice for organizations to painstakingly analyze their HRM-practices against their competitors due to help them to achieve SOP. 61 It is a challenging task for organizations to sustain their performance through human resources, but an inclusive strategy can enable organizations to face this challenge. 62 SOP needs to be considered with the end goal of making it one of a kind for a particular firm; otherwise, opponents can duplicate the business processes, thus opening the door for a loss of SOP. As Barney 2 argues, SOP requires VRIN resources, and the persistence of these traits ought to be confirmed to make SOP feasible.

Existing literature explains that HRM practices have a significant relationship with OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation) and sustainable outcomes for an organization. 57 , 63 The key purpose of HRM practices is to achieve organizational goals through personnel and generating competitiveness within the organization. 64 However, firms are also in dire need of inventive employees who are flexible, risk taking, quick to make decisions and tolerant of different kinds of uncertainty. 65 Based on RBV and KBV theory, some scholars claim that workers’ observations of a firm’s high commitment to HRM practices have deep-rooted influences on employees’ productivity in working toward organizational performance. 66 Furthermore, employee creativity enhances OI, which can then help the organization to improve SOP. 67 Based on these ideas, the proposed research model of the study is shown in Figure 1 , which demonstrates all of the hypotheses.

Proposed research model.

Note: Arrows indicate hypothesized positive relationship. Solid arrows suggest a direct relationship and dashed arrows suggest an indirect relationship in the model.

HRM Practices And SOP

A large number of HRM researchers have highlighted the positive relationship between HRM practices (employee staffing, staff development, performance management, and compensation and benefits) and SOP. 61 , 68 , 69 Multiple studies have also been designed and published on the specific topic of effective HRM practices and their effects on SOP; these also support the existence of a positive relationship. 70 RBV theory also supports the notion that organizational resources are very important for sustainable success, and HRM is key among all resources of an organization. 71 Furthermore, RBV states that different capabilities and organizational resources positively affect the sustainability of organizational outcomes. 72 Some scholars with a universalistic approach have argued that HRM practices collectively improve SOP, 73 and recommend the use of HRM practices to enhance financial, operational, and organizational performance. 14 Others suggest that particular forms of HRM practices promote SOP, such as profit sharing and result-oriented performance appraisals, 74 or selective recruitment and the practices of staff development and compensation and benefits. 14 These findings have greatly helped in understanding the relationships between various HRM practices and SOP. Thus, the positive relationship between HRM practices with SOP is predicted with the following hypothesis:

H1a. Employee staffing positively influences sustainable organizational performance

H1b. Staff development positively influences sustainable organizational performance

H1c. Performance management positively influences sustainable organizational performance

H1d. Compensation and benefits positively influences sustainable organizational performance

HRM Practices And Organizational Innovation

Human resources are a set of knowledge, skills, and expertise that people have, and are an important source of competitive advantage and organizational performance. 75 Chen and Huang (2009) suggest that HRM practices are effective in changing the attitudes, capacities, and behaviors of employees to attain the organizational goals in more efficient and effective ways. However, they argue that when companies are involved in innovative activities, they encounter relatively more uncertainty in the practice of innovation. According to the contemporary view of theory in management studies, different approaches are taken to innovation in human resources through managerial skills, attitudes, and abilities. 76 These skills include attitude, education, and interpersonal attributes, such as social behavior and assertiveness. Further, it is ultimately the ability to innovate that gives the HRM framework the capacity to generate value for the organization. 59 Organizational outcomes emerge from HRM practices that push people towards creativity and sustainable organizational development. 58 This literature indicates that HRM practices and OI both have a positive and significant relationship to SOP.

Employee staffing and retention policies assure the flow of valuable high-standard employees into advanced organizations. 74 Human capital is the backbone of any organization that seeks to add creativity through employee staffing. OI and organizational knowledge also have a close relation. It is evident that OI is reliant upon the firm’s knowledge, which starts by recruiting talented employees. 77 If the firm recruits the right people for the right jobs, they will play key roles in innovation. Thus, successful organizations establish a pool of innovative teams that carefully recruit employees and make the competitive recruiting network environment work for sustainably developing the organization. 78 Past literature shows that employee staffing has a positive and significant relationship with OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation). 34 In this spirit, we hypothesize the following in relation to employee staffing practices:

H2a. Employee staffing positively influences product innovation

H2b. Employee staffing positively influences process innovation

H2c. Employee staffing positively influences knowledge innovation

According to RBV, OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation) is central to achieving SOP. 79 Organizations that offer advanced products to their target markets, capture new customers and enhance employee performance generate sustainable competitive advantages. 80 If HRM practices support OI and innovation supports SOP, then OI has a direct connection or nexus with employee performance management. 81 Studies have repeatedly shown that performance management as positively associated with OI. 71 , 82 Hence, a positive association of performance management with OI is predicted in the following hypotheses:

H3a. Performance management positively influences product innovation

H3b. Performance management positively influences process innovation

H3c. Performance management positively influences knowledge innovation

Employees with extensive expertise, skills, and knowledge bring innovation to organizations. 83 OI therefore requires the broad application of staff development techniques. 84 Laursen and Foss (2003)found that OI had a positive relationship with internal and external staff development practices. A number of researchers have shown that staff development practices are positively connected with OI, but that characteristics of the employees moderate this association. For example, it has been suggested that not all employees will respond to staff development initiatives in the same way: employees who plan to remain for longer in the organization will participate more positively than those who are temporary. 85 Thus, the positive relationship between staff development practices and OI is predicted in the following hypotheses:

H4a. Staff development positively influences product innovation

H4b. Staff development positively influences process innovation

H4c. Staff development positively influences knowledge innovation

Compensation and benefits practices affect the behavior of employees and OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation). According to abilities, motivation, and opportunities theory (AMO), compensation and benefits form a part of the motivation goal of HR practices, affecting attitudes at work and bringing creativity to organizations. 86 Firms attract skilled workers through attractive compensation and benefits packages and innovative rewards systems. 1 The compensation and benefits system affects innovation in three ways: first, by attracting innovative employees to the organization and retaining them; second, by giving employees a general sense of motivation that then makes them more likely to engage in creative behavior; and third, by offering specific motivators, such as recognition, special incentives, and merits for creative ideas. 36 In line with these three ways that compensation and benefits practices can have a positive and significant association with OI, the following hypotheses are proposed:

H5a. Compensation and benefit positively influence product innovation

H5b. Compensation and benefit positively influences process innovation

H5c. Compensation and benefit positively influence knowledge innovation

Organizational Innovation And Sustainable Organizational Performance

A large number of scholars have developed theoretical models and concepts to bring out the relationship between OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation) and SOP. There is clear evidence that OI has a positive relationship with SOP. 79 , 84 , 87 – 91 The literature consistently argues that innovation in firms affects financial and administrative performance. 92 Also, new product development and new services deployment can increase profitability and SOP. 46 OI is strong in organizations that strive to break through, change the status quo, and develop new products, processes, and knowledge. 93 These arguments suggest that each of the three forms of OI (product, process, and knowledge) are positively related to SOP, which leads to the following hypotheses:

H6a. Product innovation positively influences sustainable organizational performance

H6b. Process innovation positively influences sustainable organizational performance

H6c. Knowledge innovation positively influences sustainable organizational performance

Mediating Effect Of Organizational Innovation

Most of the studies reviewed above indicate that OI has a direct effect on OP. However, Volberda, Van Den Bosch, and Heij 94 suggest in their study that OI plays a mediating role between HRM practices and SOP. Similarly, Tsang and Zahra (2008) confirm that organizational innovations are influenced by HRM practices, and then in turn enhance SOP. 95 Extant literature demonstrates that OI serves as a key mediator between HRM practices and SOP. 96 Hence, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H7 . Organizational innovation (product, process, and knowledge innovation) mediates between the relationship of HRM practices (employee performance, staff development, employee staffing, and compensation and benefits) and sustainable organizational performance

Research Methods

The banking sector in the emerging country of China is selected as the site of this study for the following reasons. Most studies related to this subject have been conducted in advanced countries, with relatively very few studies conducted in emerging countries with different OP perspectives. Recently, China has undergone much development in HRM practices, which creates an impetus for this research. While there is extensive utilization of modern HRM practices across Chinese companies, the banking sector is a major domain for innovation and constitutes a good site for this research, as well as being readily accessible to the authors.

Questionnaire Design

A questionnaire survey was used for this study, which is a common methodology to collect a wide range of responses in empirical research. Thirty-one items were included in the questionnaire, each offering respondents choices from a 5-point Likert scale. The items used in this research were adapted from related literature. With the exception of process innovation, each of the HRM practices (employee staffing, staff development, performance management, compensation and benefits) and fields of innovation(product innovation and knowledge innovation) were measured with four items, in line with the literature. 25 , 34 , 60 , 64 , 98 , 99 SOP was measured with three items. 60 A pilot test of 20 participants with similar demographics as the final sample was performed to test the usability of the questionnaire. After making some minor corrections, it was confirmed that all of the items were well understood and the respondents had filled out the questionnaires successfully. The detail of the questionnaire (research instrument) and factor loading of each item is showing in the Appendix .

Data Collocation

The data were collected from 20 Shanghai branches of five Chinese banks that exercise modern HRM practices and have incorporated modern innovation mechanisms into their businesses. Due to data confidentiality, we report the selected banks as Bank A, B, C, D, and E. The author distributed 365 questionnaires among banking employees, 15 of which were rejected because the banks were not proven to be appropriate for the survey. The final sample consists of 350 responses.

The items for employee staffing (ES) were adopted from Ngo, Lau, and Foley (2008). 25 Four items were used marked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “Our organization staff selection process is rigorous,” and “Our organizational selection is based on the expertise and skills set of potential candidates.” Cronbach’s alpha for employee staffing was 0.805 (see Table 2 ).

Construct Reliability And Validity

Abbreviations: Alpha, Cronbach’s alpha; CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted.

Staff development (SD) items were adopted from Lu et al 98 and Chen and Huang (2009). 34 Four items were used marked on a 5-point Likert Scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “In our organization, on-the-job training is more important than formal,” and “Our organization has formal training activities.” Cronbach’s alpha for staff development was 0.717 (see Table 2 ).

Performance management (PM) also used four items, adapted from Ali et al, Molleman and Timmerman, 100 and Ngo et al. 25 All items were marked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “Employees behavior is an important factor for performance appraisal,” and “Employees who perform insufficiently carry less salary.” Cronbach’s alpha for performance management was 0.783 (see Table 2 ).

Compensation and benefits (CB) used four items developed by Molleman and Timmerman. 100 All items were marked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “Our compensation package is more competitive than other organizations in the same industry,” and “Our remuneration package is intended to promote employee retention.” Cronbach’s alpha for compensation and benefits was 0.810 (see Table 2 ).

Product innovation (PDIn) used four items developed by Chen and Huang 34 and Prifti and Alimehmeti (2017). 99 All items were marked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “In comparison with competitors, our organization has introduced more innovative products and services during the past three years,” and “We manage to cope with market demands and develop new products and services quickly through innovativeness.” Cronbach’s alpha for product innovation was 0.766 (see Table 2 ).

Process innovation (PCIn) was measured by three items adapted from Chen and Huang (2009). 34 However, the measurement of work productivity was modified according to the needs of this research. Work productivity was calculated by averaging the items to ensure higher scale values represent higher levels of productivity. Sample items included, “New or significantly innovative processes improve of organizational services,” and “Our organization facilities new innovative processes to improve quality and cost reduction.” Cronbach’s alpha for process innovation was 0.843 (see Table 2 ).

Knowledge innovation (KIn) used four items developed by Akram, Goraya, Malik, and Aljarallah (2018). 60 All items were marked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “Our organization has knowledge-based processes,” and “There exist formal processes in our organization to share the best practice among the different fields of activities.” Cronbach’s alpha for knowledge innovation was 0.917 (see Table 2 ).

Sustainable organizational performance (SOP) is the dependent variable, for which we used three items developed by Akram et al (2018). 60 All items were marked on a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Sample items included “Our creative products/services incorporate the concepts of environmental sustainability and organizational knowledge,” and “During production and service supply, our operational cost is low compared to our competitors.” Cronbach’s alpha for SOP was 0.791 (see Table 2 ).

Demographics

The selected banks were already exercising modern HRM-practices and aware of the innovation mechanisms that these practices bring about in achieving SOP. The majority of the respondents were male (54.6% males and 45.4% females); 30% of respondents had less than five years of work experience, 31.9% had 5–10 years, and 31.1% more than ten years; 16% of respondents were senior managers, 44.3% were middle managers, and 38.9% were administrative staff; 30.6% were under the age of 35 years, 28.3% were 35–44 years old, and 9.7% were aged more than 44 years; 41.7% had completed undergraduate studies, 45.7% graduate, and 12.6% post-graduate. Five major Chinese banks were considered for this study, with the distribution of the sample being as follows: Bank A, 21.7%, Bank B, 18.9%, Bank C, 20%, Bank D, 19.1%, and Bank E, 20.3%. The data are sufficient to run a path analysis in SmartPLS. Previous studies have had comparable sample characteristics. 95 , 101 Table 1 displays the demographic statistics of respondents. A comprehensive research methodology flowchart is shown as Figure 2 .

Research methodology flowchart.

Analysis And Results

A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM 3.2) approach was used to analyze the relationships drawn from the theoretical framework. 102 The reason for selecting a variance-based structural equation modeling (SmartPLS) approach is that it is comparatively less sensitive to sample size when compared to covariance-based SEM approaches like AMOS. 103 We first examined the reliability and validity of the scales. 104 Table 2 presents the results of testing for the reliability and validity of all constructs. The reliability measures (i.e., Cronbach’s alpha, rho_A, and composite reliability) for all constructs were found to be greater than the threshold of 0.7, 105 and the AVE of each construct was greater than the threshold of 0.5. 106

To further test the reliability of constructs used and their specified convergent validity, discriminant validity was checked. 106 For this purpose, the square root of the AVE for each construct should be higher than the shared variance among constructs. Table 3 shows the diagonal values in bold to be higher than the inter-construct correlation values. The discriminant validity was therefore recognized.

Discriminant Validity Of Contructs

Notes: Diagonal elements are the square root of AVE, whereas off-diagonal values are inter-construct correlations. The values appearing in bold indicate significance at 0.05 level.

Abbreviations: ES, employee staffing; SD, staff development; PM, performance management; CB, compensation and benefits; PDIn, product innovation; PCIn, process innovation; KIn, knowledge innovation; SOP, sustainable organizational performance.

Hypotheses Testing

Hypothesis testing was done through the bootstrapping mechanism in SmartPLS. 102 Table 4 demonstrates the direct effects in the theoretical framework along with t-values and p-values. The results indicated that PM and CB positively influences SOP (β=0.278, p<0.000; β=0.098, p<0.016), but ES and SD does not positively influence SOP (β=0.057, p<0.253; β=0.000, p<0.994), therefore H1c and H1d were accepted, and H1a and H1b were rejected. The direct effects of ES, SD, PM, and CB on PDIn were all shown to be positively significant (β=0.256, p<0.000; β=0.244, p<0.000; β=0.235, p<0.000; β=0.119, p<0.030), thus H2a, H3a, H4a, and H5a were all accepted. Similarly, the direct effects of ES, SD, PM, and CB on PCIn were all shown to be positively significant (β=0.201, p<0.001; β=0.119, p<0.036; β=0.241, p<0.001; β=0.196, p<0.000), thus H2b, H3b, H4b, and H5b were all accepted. Moreover, the direct effects of ES, SD, PM, and CB on KIn were also shown to be positively significant (β=0.183, p<0.003; β=0.169, p<0.06; β=0.222, p<0.005; β=0.165, p<0.005), thus H2c, H3c, H4c, and H5c were all accepted. Furthermore, the direct effects of PDIn, PCIn, and Kin on SOP were also found to be significant (β=0.179, p<0.002; β=0.148, p<0.005; β=0.190, p<0.000), thus H6a, H6b, and H6c were accepted. Two control variables, namely experience and gender, were also tested. Of these, only gender showed a significant impact on SOP (β=0.062, p<0.094) (see Table 4 ).

Path Model Results (direct Effect)

Mediated Effects

In order to test the mediating effects of PDIn, PCIn, and KIn we first checked the indirect effects of ES, SD, PM, and CB on SOP, with the results shown in Table 5 . Indirect effects were found for ES on SOP (β= 0.110, p<0.000), SD on SOP (β= 0.093, p<0.000), PM on SOP (β= 0.120, p<0.000), and CB on SOP (β= 0.082, p<0.000). Thus, PDIn, PCIn, and KIn mediate the relationship between ES, SD, PM, CB and the dependent variable (SOP). To identify the type of partial or full mediation, we observed the change in the effect size of ES, SD, and PM, CB on SOP through direct and indirect effects. In all cases, the total effects of ES, SD, PM, and CB on SOP (β=0.057, p<0.253; β=0.000, p<0.994; β=0.278, p<0.000; β=0.098, p<0.016) provided variated significance effects ( Table 4 ). ES and SD were found to be not directly significant which translates to fully mediated effects of ES and SD on SOP through PDIn, PCIn, and KIn. However, the direct effects of PM and CB were found to be significant through both direct and indirect effects, which translates to partially mediated effects of the said constructs on SOP through PDIn, PCIn, and KIn. Hence, Hypothesis 7 was accepted. Figure 3 demonstrates the theoretical constructs with R 2 values.

Theoretical constructs with R 2 values.

Indirect Effects

Abbreviations: ES, employee staffing; SD, staff development; PM, performance management; CB, compensation and benefits; SOP, sustainable organizational performance.

With its analyses of the interactions between HRM and innovation in affecting SOP, this research effort has ascertained meaningful results based on a synthesized model framework. Prior to this study, most similar work has focused on cases in developed countries; 14 , 16 , 17 , 20 only a limited amount of findings have been presented on emerging countries like China. 13 , 15 Additionally, the limited studies that have been made in emerging countries reveal a scarcity of attention to the banking sector, belying its significant role in the socio-economic development of a country. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is among the first to investigate the impact of HRM practices on SOP in the Chinese organizational context, particularly in considering OI as a mediating construct.

We first focused on the direct relationship between HRM practices and SOP, with the results showing that two HRM practices (performance management and compensation and benefits) significantly influence SOP, partially supporting our intuitions in hypotheses H1a–H1d. Prior studies have shown that HRM practices, including performance management and compensation and benefits, have a positive and significant relationship with SOP. 69 , 107 , 108 In the Chinese context, (Law, Tse, and Zhou (2003)) conducted a large-scale survey of HR managers in China and found that HRM practices have a significant relationship with sustainable firm performance. However, in this study, the relationships of employee staffing and staff development to SOP are insignificant. A plausible reason for this result could be the ideology persisting among older employees in the Chinese banking sector, who often prefer to maintain traditional workplace practices and are reluctant to embrace modern work practices. These employees may also be unaware of, or uncomfortable with, technological devices and their use in today’s organizations; an ambivalence toward such technologies might deter participation in technology-based staff development programs.

Second, this study found positive and direct effects of OI on SOP. Terziovski 109 showed in his study that OI has a positive and significant direct relationship with SOP. Moreover, Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle 84 drew on a sample of 173 Spanish firms in finding that product and process innovations lead to SOP. They concluded that product and process innovation are resource building mechanisms in modern organizations and must be carefully treated in uplifting organizational performance. Additionally, in our study, the impact of knowledge innovation was ascertained. Based on the concept of knowledge-based economies, with the insights provided by the KBV, the findings of our study verify the impact of knowledge innovation on SOP. This points to the value of firms working to create by-products of their knowledge capabilities for the benefit of long-term organizational stability, competitive advantage, employee satisfaction, research and development, and other organizational goals.

Third, the mediated effect also shows significant results, which constitutes an original contribution in the context of an emerging or developing country like China. OI mediates in the relationship between HRM practices and SOP. The results showing the mediating role of OI support the findings of past literature. Chowhan (2016) 5 argued that new and improved product and process innovation management strengthens the desire for innovativeness in an organization. Similarly, Zehir, Üzmez, and Yıldız (2016) indicate that OI is a significant element for gaining SOP. 110 The specific conceptualization of innovation used in this study maintains a distinction between new and old organizational or administrative practices in emerging countries; as a result, the multidimensionality of innovation is not neglected. In this light, knowledge-based innovation was also found to have an intervening effect on the relationship between HRM practices and SOP. The RBV suggests that knowledge innovation (inclusive of employee knowledge, skills, and abilities) mediates as a key resource for product and services development, which brings about sustainable competitive advantage. 111 Lopez-Cabrales, Pérez-Luño, and Cabrera (2009) 112 examined 86 Spanish organizations and their findings indicated that HRM practices were not directly connected with sustainable outcomes for the organization unless they took knowledge-based innovation as a mediator. 113

Conclusions, Implications And Future Research Directions

Conclusions.

The research model of this study was developed by drawing on insights provided by the previous literature and the RBV and KBV theoretical approaches. Our results support the link between HRM practices, OI, and SOP in emerging nations. The outcomes of this study indicate that two HRM practices (performance management and compensation and benefits) have a direct, positive, and significant influence on SOP. Two other HRM practices (employee staffing and staff development) are not significant influences on SOP when measured as a direct relationship. Moreover, our results indicate that all HRM practices (employee staffing, performance management, staff development, and compensation and benefits) have an indirect, positive, and significant influence on OI (product, process, and knowledge innovation). The outcomes of this study also testify that OI (product, process, knowledge innovation) positively influences SOP, and that OI (product, process, and knowledge) mediates in the relationship between HRM practices and SOP.

Our findings could be interpreted as follows. 1) In the banking sector, some employees prefer to hold on to traditional styles of working, whereas others try to encapsulate the new innovative working mechanisms and engages with staff development programs. Those employees who keep working with the traditional working ethos may not make the contribution to SOP that is made by those who are more open to change and likely to engage with staff development. 2) Implementing improved HRM practices is associated with the likelihood of bringing more innovation to organizational dynamics, in the forms of process innovation, product innovation, and knowledge innovation. However, the magnitude of the impact of HRM practices on innovation varies. Some practices create more product innovation while some serve to enhance the process and knowledge innovation but, as a collateral benefit, all HRM practices contribute to the desire for innovativeness in various spheres of the firm among management personnel. 3) Innovation is an essential resource to any organization in achieving measures of long-term performance such as SOP.

Implications

Since the aptness of HRM practices and an OI approach are significant factors of SOP, the market conditions in which Chinese organizations operate should be considered. China has made major efforts to promote innovation, which is an important factor in SOP in a knowledge-based economy. These efforts are favorable to the development of the Chinese economy and can also be effective in other developing countries. For example, the Chinese government has developed National Innovation Systems (NIS) and enhanced the research and development (R&D) mechanisms for the banking sector. 3 In an environment encouraging innovation, Chinese organizations are required to enhance and maintain their competitiveness by effectively fitting their HRM practices to OI needs. Therefore, the role of HRM should shift from traditional HRM practices into modern HRM practices.

The results of this study have numerous implications for practitioners. HR managers are encouraged to recruit knowledge-based employees to enhance knowledge-based innovation. Many organizations have opted to adopt new HRM practices (in, for example, employee staffing) in their various competitive business domains. HR managers may be encouraged to switch their HR practices from traditional performance evaluation practices to new performance evaluation practices (e.g., HR performance matrices and 360-degree performance evaluation). Effective performance management would construct a roadmap of employee motivations that will maximize their effort towards achieving sustainable organizational goals. Moreover, at the time of the performance appraisal process, providing opportunities for feedback to employees will improve the gaps between actual performance and desired organizational goals. This study also finds that staff development had a positive effect on organizational innovation. Hence, employees ought to have access to extensive training opportunities, continuously or periodically, based on the requirement to meet global challenges. The knowledge, skills, and abilities acquired via staff development will enhance the product, process, and knowledge-based innovation, which in turn will help to improve SOP. Correspondingly, organizational managers should place more emphasis on the development of direct and indirect compensation methods for employees, because these act as motivating agents among employees and bring about improved performance.

Our results show that OI intervenes in the relationship between HRM practices and SOP. This result highlights the significance of OI. Thus, HR managers ought to manage their organization’s employees through a variety of HRM practices to encourage their competencies in handling OI and its applications. Additionally, a higher level of OI can rouse innovative thoughts and knowledge that may eventually lead to an increase in SOP. As previous research has noted, to facilitate the link between HRM practices and favorable SOP, HR managers first need to identify the importance of OI. Then they should apply HRM practices to promote a sound level of OI, which in turn will result in favorable and sustainable outcomes. 34

Limitations And Future Research

The findings of this study are limited by its focus on the banking industry of China. Further research could be done in other sectors, such as manufacturing and IT, to generalize the results or indicate a need to modify the concepts. A further limitation of our study is the low response rate of the survey respondents, a future study with a higher response rate may provide more reliable insights. Last, a future study could seek to enlarge the present framework by merging RBV and KBV with other performance-based theories. RBV and KBV both point out that, alongside human resources, many other factors, such as IT capabilities, organizational culture, and work-place environment, also play a key role in SOP. Therefore, future research may explore the relationship between these factors and SOP. In this study, the authors have considered OI as a mediating variable. Other mediating constructs, such as motivating agents, learning capabilities, or technological innovation could also be usefully explored. We believe that future studies which address these issues would provide further insights to gain a better understanding of human resource management practices and their effects on sustainable organizational performance.

Acknowledgments

• This study is supported by Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province in China (Grant No. 2017A040403072) and the Innovation Team Project of Guangzhou University in China (Grant No. 201831799).
• This study is also supported by the National Social Science Foundation Project (Grant No. 16BGL094) Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Program of Ministry of Education (Grant No.15YJCZH225), Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science “twelfth five-year plan” Fund Project (Grant No. GD14XGL53).
• Moreover, this article is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673179): Empirical Research of China on the Coupling of Clique and Knowledge Flow in Alliance Innovation Network Based on the Self-Organization.

Ethics Statement

The research ethics committee of Guangzhou University and Shanghai University approved this study, and it was survey-based research. The research participants (senior managers, middle managers and administrative staff) of the Chinese banking sector gave consent over the telephone for conducting the questionnaire survey. Participants were identified through their supervisors, and they filled in the questionnaires willingly.

Author Contributions

All authors have equally contributed to drafting the manuscript, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, reading, and approving the final manuscript. Moreover, all authors are confirming that the agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.