book reviews of

Why Write? Yiyun Li’s New Novel Explores Our Urge to Invent.

In “The Book of Goose,” a literary hoax devised by two teenagers closes the distance between fiction and reality.

Credit... Lily Snowden-Fine

Supported by

• Share full article

By Megan O’Grady

• Sept. 18, 2022
• Apple Books
• Barnes and Noble
• Books-A-Million
• Bookshop.org

When you purchase an independently reviewed book through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.

THE BOOK OF GOOSE, by Yiyun Li

“Isn’t it enough just to know a story? Why take the time to write it out?” wonders 13-year-old Agnès, one of two adolescent girls at the center of Yiyun Li’s new novel, “The Book of Goose.” The question drives not only the tale Agnès proceeds to tell us, but the entire course of literary history. What moves us to share our inner lives in this way? By inscribing them on the world, can we ever capture something enduring in our speck-of-dust-in-the-universe existence?

Literature has always been a safe house for people who don’t make official histories, who don’t pretend to be the heroes of their own destiny. That’s certainly true of Li’s wide-ranging body of work: two virtuosic story collections, a memoir-in-essays and four previous novels, which include what might be the bleakest work of fiction I’ve ever read — “ The Vagrants ,” a granular portrait of a small community amid the political oppression of late-1970s China — and the most heart-rending: “ Where Reasons End ,” a dialogue between a mother and her deceased son, written after the suicide of one of the author’s own children. Often, there’s a tension between the reticence of the people on Li’s pages — a stoicism that shouldn’t be mistaken for passivity — and the eerie, supersaturated grandeur of Li’s storytelling, with its insistence that life matters enough to recount it with such precision and tenderness.

“The Book of Goose” is, on its face, about a literary hoax devised between two French teenagers in the 1950s, Agnès and Fabienne, who grow up in a desolate village in which privation is as spiritual as it is material. “Well-proportioned we were not,” recalls Agnès, who narrates in retrospect. Ravaged by World War II, their village, St. Rémy, is the kind of place in which even moments of joy seem to precipitate doom: After falling in love with an American G.I., Fabienne’s older sister dies in childbirth along with her infant; Agnès’s brother, Jean, returns home from a German labor camp only to become a prisoner of his bed, vacant-eyed and coughing up blood.

While Agnès attends school, the scrappier, nearly feral Fabienne spends her days tending farm animals, waiting on her drunken father and brothers (her mother’s absence is unexplained), and cooking up games involving ghosts and graveyards. A “whetstone to Fabienne’s blade,” the more biddable Agnès realizes that she would have been like other girls had it not been for her bolder and more brilliant friend, writing down the lyrics to love songs in her notebook, wanting nothing more from life than stockings and boys. “What a tragedy that would have been,” she decides, “living an interchangeable life, looking for interchangeable excitements.”

The desire to make people “know how it feels to be us” prompts Fabienne to come up with a new diversion: She will tell Agnès stories; Agnès, who has better penmanship and a “more pleasant look,” will transcribe them and take credit for their authorship. Together, they enlist the town’s postmaster, M. Devaux, who is educated and worldly by St. Rémy standards, to help them revise the manuscript and submit it to a publisher. Against all odds, the book, a series of macabre stories involving the death of a child, becomes a hit, praised for its “ferocious honesty.” Agnès is invited to Paris to promote the book, where she’s hailed as “a savage young chronicler of the postwar life.”

While Fabienne is the engine behind the scheme, it is Agnès — her sense of possibility ignited by her Paris adventures — who turns out to be more skilled at telling the world what it wants to hear, answering questions from the press about her book’s verisimilitude enigmatically. (Here I was reminded of the reception of Jerzy Kosinski’s “The Painted Bird,” his lurid account of peasant depravity in occupied Poland, which was eagerly embraced as at least semi-autobiographical when it was first published in the United States in 1965 — though one may also detect echoes of the publicity machine Li herself has been subjected to over the years.) “The journalists and critics, mindless people, refused to see that the distance between life and death was always shorter than people are willing to understand,” Agnès reflects.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

Advertisement