background of the study practical research 2

• Privacy Policy

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Background of The Study – Examples and Writing Guide

Background of The Study – Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Background of The Study

Definition:

Background of the study refers to the context, circumstances, and history that led to the research problem or topic being studied. It provides the reader with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and the significance of the study.

The background of the study usually includes a discussion of the relevant literature, the gap in knowledge or understanding, and the research questions or hypotheses to be addressed. It also highlights the importance of the research topic and its potential contributions to the field. A well-written background of the study sets the stage for the research and helps the reader to appreciate the need for the study and its potential significance.

How to Write Background of The Study

Here are some steps to help you write the background of the study:

Identify the Research Problem

Start by identifying the research problem you are trying to address. This problem should be significant and relevant to your field of study.

Provide Context

Once you have identified the research problem, provide some context. This could include the historical, social, or political context of the problem.

Review Literature

Conduct a thorough review of the existing literature on the topic. This will help you understand what has been studied and what gaps exist in the current research.

Identify Research Gap

Based on your literature review, identify the gap in knowledge or understanding that your research aims to address. This gap will be the focus of your research question or hypothesis.

State Objectives

Clearly state the objectives of your research . These should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

Discuss Significance

Explain the significance of your research. This could include its potential impact on theory , practice, policy, or society.

Finally, summarize the key points of the background of the study. This will help the reader understand the research problem, its context, and its significance.

How to Write Background of The Study in Proposal

The background of the study is an essential part of any proposal as it sets the stage for the research project and provides the context and justification for why the research is needed. Here are the steps to write a compelling background of the study in your proposal:

• Identify the problem: Clearly state the research problem or gap in the current knowledge that you intend to address through your research.
• Provide context: Provide a brief overview of the research area and highlight its significance in the field.
• Review literature: Summarize the relevant literature related to the research problem and provide a critical evaluation of the current state of knowledge.
• Identify gaps : Identify the gaps or limitations in the existing literature and explain how your research will contribute to filling these gaps.
• Justify the study : Explain why your research is important and what practical or theoretical contributions it can make to the field.
• Highlight objectives: Clearly state the objectives of the study and how they relate to the research problem.
• Discuss methodology: Provide an overview of the methodology you will use to collect and analyze data, and explain why it is appropriate for the research problem.
• Conclude : Summarize the key points of the background of the study and explain how they support your research proposal.

How to Write Background of The Study In Thesis

The background of the study is a critical component of a thesis as it provides context for the research problem, rationale for conducting the study, and the significance of the research. Here are some steps to help you write a strong background of the study:

• Identify the research problem : Start by identifying the research problem that your thesis is addressing. What is the issue that you are trying to solve or explore? Be specific and concise in your problem statement.
• Review the literature: Conduct a thorough review of the relevant literature on the topic. This should include scholarly articles, books, and other sources that are directly related to your research question.
• I dentify gaps in the literature: After reviewing the literature, identify any gaps in the existing research. What questions remain unanswered? What areas have not been explored? This will help you to establish the need for your research.
• Establish the significance of the research: Clearly state the significance of your research. Why is it important to address this research problem? What are the potential implications of your research? How will it contribute to the field?
• Provide an overview of the research design: Provide an overview of the research design and methodology that you will be using in your study. This should include a brief explanation of the research approach, data collection methods, and data analysis techniques.
• State the research objectives and research questions: Clearly state the research objectives and research questions that your study aims to answer. These should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound.
• Summarize the chapter: Summarize the chapter by highlighting the key points and linking them back to the research problem, significance of the study, and research questions.

How to Write Background of The Study in Research Paper

Here are the steps to write the background of the study in a research paper:

• Identify the research problem: Start by identifying the research problem that your study aims to address. This can be a particular issue, a gap in the literature, or a need for further investigation.
• Conduct a literature review: Conduct a thorough literature review to gather information on the topic, identify existing studies, and understand the current state of research. This will help you identify the gap in the literature that your study aims to fill.
• Explain the significance of the study: Explain why your study is important and why it is necessary. This can include the potential impact on the field, the importance to society, or the need to address a particular issue.
• Provide context: Provide context for the research problem by discussing the broader social, economic, or political context that the study is situated in. This can help the reader understand the relevance of the study and its potential implications.
• State the research questions and objectives: State the research questions and objectives that your study aims to address. This will help the reader understand the scope of the study and its purpose.
• Summarize the methodology : Briefly summarize the methodology you used to conduct the study, including the data collection and analysis methods. This can help the reader understand how the study was conducted and its reliability.

Examples of Background of The Study

Here are some examples of the background of the study:

Problem : The prevalence of obesity among children in the United States has reached alarming levels, with nearly one in five children classified as obese.

Significance : Obesity in childhood is associated with numerous negative health outcomes, including increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers.

Gap in knowledge : Despite efforts to address the obesity epidemic, rates continue to rise. There is a need for effective interventions that target the unique needs of children and their families.

Problem : The use of antibiotics in agriculture has contributed to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which poses a significant threat to human health.

Significance : Antibiotic-resistant infections are responsible for thousands of deaths each year and are a major public health concern.

Gap in knowledge: While there is a growing body of research on the use of antibiotics in agriculture, there is still much to be learned about the mechanisms of resistance and the most effective strategies for reducing antibiotic use.

Edxample 3:

Problem : Many low-income communities lack access to healthy food options, leading to high rates of food insecurity and diet-related diseases.

Significance : Poor nutrition is a major contributor to chronic diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

Gap in knowledge : While there have been efforts to address food insecurity, there is a need for more research on the barriers to accessing healthy food in low-income communities and effective strategies for increasing access.

Examples of Background of The Study In Research

Here are some real-life examples of how the background of the study can be written in different fields of study:

Example 1 : “There has been a significant increase in the incidence of diabetes in recent years. This has led to an increased demand for effective diabetes management strategies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new diabetes management program in improving patient outcomes.”

Example 2 : “The use of social media has become increasingly prevalent in modern society. Despite its popularity, little is known about the effects of social media use on mental health. This study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health in young adults.”

Example 3: “Despite significant advancements in cancer treatment, the survival rate for patients with pancreatic cancer remains low. The purpose of this study is to identify potential biomarkers that can be used to improve early detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer.”

Examples of Background of The Study in Proposal

Here are some real-time examples of the background of the study in a proposal:

Example 1 : The prevalence of mental health issues among university students has been increasing over the past decade. This study aims to investigate the causes and impacts of mental health issues on academic performance and wellbeing.

Example 2 : Climate change is a global issue that has significant implications for agriculture in developing countries. This study aims to examine the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers to climate change and identify effective strategies to enhance their resilience.

Example 3 : The use of social media in political campaigns has become increasingly common in recent years. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of social media campaigns in mobilizing young voters and influencing their voting behavior.

Example 4 : Employee turnover is a major challenge for organizations, especially in the service sector. This study aims to identify the key factors that influence employee turnover in the hospitality industry and explore effective strategies for reducing turnover rates.

Examples of Background of The Study in Thesis

Here are some real-time examples of the background of the study in the thesis:

Example 1 : “Women’s participation in the workforce has increased significantly over the past few decades. However, women continue to be underrepresented in leadership positions, particularly in male-dominated industries such as technology. This study aims to examine the factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in leadership roles in the technology industry, with a focus on organizational culture and gender bias.”

Example 2 : “Mental health is a critical component of overall health and well-being. Despite increased awareness of the importance of mental health, there are still significant gaps in access to mental health services, particularly in low-income and rural communities. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based mental health intervention in improving mental health outcomes in underserved populations.”

Example 3: “The use of technology in education has become increasingly widespread, with many schools adopting online learning platforms and digital resources. However, there is limited research on the impact of technology on student learning outcomes and engagement. This study aims to explore the relationship between technology use and academic achievement among middle school students, as well as the factors that mediate this relationship.”

Examples of Background of The Study in Research Paper

Here are some examples of how the background of the study can be written in various fields:

Example 1: The prevalence of obesity has been on the rise globally, with the World Health Organization reporting that approximately 650 million adults were obese in 2016. Obesity is a major risk factor for several chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. In recent years, several interventions have been proposed to address this issue, including lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery. However, there is a lack of consensus on the most effective intervention for obesity management. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of different interventions for obesity management and identify the most effective one.

Example 2: Antibiotic resistance has become a major public health threat worldwide. Infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with longer hospital stays, higher healthcare costs, and increased mortality. The inappropriate use of antibiotics is one of the main factors contributing to the development of antibiotic resistance. Despite numerous efforts to promote the rational use of antibiotics, studies have shown that many healthcare providers continue to prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This study aims to explore the factors influencing healthcare providers’ prescribing behavior and identify strategies to improve antibiotic prescribing practices.

Example 3: Social media has become an integral part of modern communication, with millions of people worldwide using platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Social media has several advantages, including facilitating communication, connecting people, and disseminating information. However, social media use has also been associated with several negative outcomes, including cyberbullying, addiction, and mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on mental health and identify the factors that mediate this relationship.

Purpose of Background of The Study

The primary purpose of the background of the study is to help the reader understand the rationale for the research by presenting the historical, theoretical, and empirical background of the problem.

More specifically, the background of the study aims to:

• Provide a clear understanding of the research problem and its context.
• Identify the gap in knowledge that the study intends to fill.
• Establish the significance of the research problem and its potential contribution to the field.
• Highlight the key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the problem.
• Provide a rationale for the research questions or hypotheses and the research design.
• Identify the limitations and scope of the study.

When to Write Background of The Study

The background of the study should be written early on in the research process, ideally before the research design is finalized and data collection begins. This allows the researcher to clearly articulate the rationale for the study and establish a strong foundation for the research.

The background of the study typically comes after the introduction but before the literature review section. It should provide an overview of the research problem and its context, and also introduce the key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the problem.

Writing the background of the study early on in the research process also helps to identify potential gaps in knowledge and areas for further investigation, which can guide the development of the research questions or hypotheses and the research design. By establishing the significance of the research problem and its potential contribution to the field, the background of the study can also help to justify the research and secure funding or support from stakeholders.

Advantage of Background of The Study

The background of the study has several advantages, including:

• Provides context: The background of the study provides context for the research problem by highlighting the historical, theoretical, and empirical background of the problem. This allows the reader to understand the research problem in its broader context and appreciate its significance.
• Identifies gaps in knowledge: By reviewing the existing literature related to the research problem, the background of the study can identify gaps in knowledge that the study intends to fill. This helps to establish the novelty and originality of the research and its potential contribution to the field.
• Justifies the research : The background of the study helps to justify the research by demonstrating its significance and potential impact. This can be useful in securing funding or support for the research.
• Guides the research design: The background of the study can guide the development of the research questions or hypotheses and the research design by identifying key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the problem. This ensures that the research is grounded in existing knowledge and is designed to address the research problem effectively.
• Establishes credibility: By demonstrating the researcher’s knowledge of the field and the research problem, the background of the study can establish the researcher’s credibility and expertise, which can enhance the trustworthiness and validity of the research.

Disadvantages of Background of The Study

Some Disadvantages of Background of The Study are as follows:

• Time-consuming : Writing a comprehensive background of the study can be time-consuming, especially if the research problem is complex and multifaceted. This can delay the research process and impact the timeline for completing the study.
• Repetitive: The background of the study can sometimes be repetitive, as it often involves summarizing existing research and theories related to the research problem. This can be tedious for the reader and may make the section less engaging.
• Limitations of existing research: The background of the study can reveal the limitations of existing research related to the problem. This can create challenges for the researcher in developing research questions or hypotheses that address the gaps in knowledge identified in the background of the study.
• Bias : The researcher’s biases and perspectives can influence the content and tone of the background of the study. This can impact the reader’s perception of the research problem and may influence the validity of the research.
• Accessibility: Accessing and reviewing the literature related to the research problem can be challenging, especially if the researcher does not have access to a comprehensive database or if the literature is not available in the researcher’s language. This can limit the depth and scope of the background of the study.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

Institutional Review Board – Application Sample...

Evaluating Research – Process, Examples and...

Practical Research 2 Module: Identifying the Inquiry and Stating the Problem

This Self-Learning Module (SLM) is prepared so that you, our dear learners, can continue your studies and learn while at home. Activities, questions, directions, exercises, and discussions are carefully stated for you to understand each lesson.

At the end of this module, you should be able to:

1. design a research useful in daily life (CS_RS12-Id-e-1);

2. write research title (CS_RS12-Id-e-2) ;

3. describe background of research (CS_RS12-Id-e-3) ;

4. state research questions (CS_RS12-Id-e-4) ;

5. indicate scope and delimitation of study (CS_RS12-Id-e-5);

6. present written statement of the problem (CS_RS12-Id-e-7) .

Senior High School Quarter 1 Self-Learning Module Practical Research 2 – Identifying the Inquiry and Stating the Problem

Can't find what you're looking for.

We are here to help - please use the search box below.

1 thought on “Practical Research 2 Module: Identifying the Inquiry and Stating the Problem”

How can I download this PDF?

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

You are using an outdated browser. Upgrade your browser today or install Google Chrome Frame to better experience this site.

Related Resources

• —Identifying the Inquiry and Stating the Problem

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 – Choosing Research Topic View Download

Activity Sheets  |  DOC

Curriculum Information

Copyright information, technical information.

The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: A systematic review

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• ORCID record for Jessica L. Griffiths
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• ORCID record for Katherine R. K. Saunders
• ORCID record for Una Foye
• ORCID record for Anna Greenburgh
• ORCID record for Antonio Rojas-Garcia
• ORCID record for Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
• ORCID record for Sonia Johnson
• ORCID record for Alan Simpson
• Info/History
• Supplementary material
• Preview PDF

Background: The use of surveillance technologies is becoming increasingly common in inpatient mental health settings, commonly justified as efforts to improve safety and cost-effectiveness. However, the use of these technologies has been questioned in light of limited research conducted and the sensitivities, ethical concerns and potential harms of surveillance. This systematic review aims to: 1) map how surveillance technologies have been employed in inpatient mental health settings, 2) identify any best practice guidance, 3) explore how they are experienced by patients, staff and carers, and 4) examine evidence regarding their impact. Methods: We searched five academic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, PubMed and Scopus), one grey literature database (HMIC) and two pre-print servers (medRxiv and PsyArXiv) to identify relevant papers published up to 18/09/2023. We also conducted backwards and forwards citation tracking and contacted experts to identify relevant literature. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach. Results: A total of 27 studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Included studies reported on CCTV/video monitoring (n = 13), Vision-Based Patient Monitoring and Management (VBPMM) (n = 6), Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) (n = 4), GPS electronic monitoring (n = 2) and wearable sensors (n = 2). Twelve papers (44.4%) were rated as low quality, five (18.5%) medium quality, and ten (37.0%) high quality. Five studies (18.5%) declared a conflict of interest. We identified minimal best practice guidance. Qualitative findings indicate that patient, staff and carer perceptions and experiences of surveillance technologies are mixed and complex. Quantitative findings regarding the impact of surveillance on outcomes such as self-harm, violence, aggression, care quality and cost-effectiveness were inconsistent or weak. Discussion: There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that surveillance technologies in inpatient mental health settings are achieving the outcomes they are employed to achieve, such as improving safety and reducing costs. The studies were generally of low methodological quality, lacked lived experience involvement, and a substantial proportion (18.5%) declared conflicts of interest. Further independent coproduced research is needed to more comprehensively evaluate the impact of surveillance technologies in inpatient settings, including harms and benefits. If surveillance technologies are to be implemented, it will be important to engage all key stakeholders in the development of policies, procedures and best practice guidance to regulate their use, with a particular emphasis on prioritising the perspectives of patients.

Competing Interest Statement

AS and UF have undertaken and published research on BWCs. We have received no financial support from BWC or any other surveillance technology companies. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical Protocols

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=463993

Funding Statement

This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (grant no. PR-PRU-0916-22003). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ARG was supported by the Ramon y Cajal programme (RYC2022-038556-I), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Data Availability

The template data extraction form is available in Supplementary 1. MMAT quality appraisal ratings for each included study are available in Supplementary 2. All data used is publicly available in the published papers included in this review.

View the discussion thread.

Supplementary Material

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager
• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One
• Addiction Medicine (316)
• Allergy and Immunology (617)
• Anesthesia (159)
• Cardiovascular Medicine (2276)
• Dentistry and Oral Medicine (279)
• Dermatology (201)
• Emergency Medicine (370)
• Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (798)
• Epidemiology (11575)
• Forensic Medicine (10)
• Gastroenterology (678)
• Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3577)
• Geriatric Medicine (336)
• Health Economics (616)
• Health Informatics (2305)
• Health Policy (913)
• Health Systems and Quality Improvement (863)
• Hematology (335)
• HIV/AIDS (752)
• Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13149)
• Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (755)
• Medical Education (359)
• Medical Ethics (100)
• Nephrology (388)
• Neurology (3346)
• Nursing (191)
• Nutrition (506)
• Obstetrics and Gynecology (651)
• Occupational and Environmental Health (645)
• Oncology (1756)
• Ophthalmology (524)
• Orthopedics (209)
• Otolaryngology (284)
• Pain Medicine (223)
• Palliative Medicine (66)
• Pathology (437)
• Pediatrics (1001)
• Pharmacology and Therapeutics (422)
• Primary Care Research (406)
• Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3059)
• Public and Global Health (5984)
• Radiology and Imaging (1221)
• Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (714)
• Respiratory Medicine (811)
• Rheumatology (367)
• Sexual and Reproductive Health (350)
• Sports Medicine (316)
• Surgery (386)
• Toxicology (50)
• Transplantation (170)
• Urology (142)

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Is Intermittent Fasting Bad for Your Heart? Here’s What We Know.

By Alice Callahan

You may have seen the headlines: “Intermittent fasting linked to 91 percent increase in risk of death from heart disease”; “The intermittent fasting trend may pose risks to your heart.”

The news came from an abstract presented Monday at an American Heart Association conference in Chicago. The study has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and experts cautioned that it had many limitations. Here’s what we know.

The Background

Intermittent fasting involves cycling between eating and fasting for specific periods of time. A common approach, for example, is to eat only within an eight-hour window each day, said Krista Varady, a professor of nutrition at the University of Illinois Chicago.

Several short-term trials have suggested that this eating style can lead to some weight loss and may lower blood pressure and improve blood sugar control in certain people, she said.

But the longest intermittent fasting trial lasted only one year , said Victor Wenze Zhong, lead author of the new study and an epidemiologist at Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine in China. His aim, he said, was to look at longer term health.

The Research

The new study included more than 20,000 adults from the United States. The participants completed two interviews, less than two weeks apart, about what time they ate on the previous day. The researchers then calculated the participants’ average eating windows and assumed it was their typical schedule for the rest of the study, Dr. Zhong said. The participants were followed for an average of eight years.

During that time, the participants who limited their eating to eight hours in a day had a 91 percent greater chance of dying from cardiovascular disease than those who ate over a 12- to 16-hour time frame, the researchers reported.

But there were just 414 people in the eight-hour eating group, Dr. Zhong said. And they tended to be younger and less educated; have lower income and less access to food; and be more likely to smoke than the other participants.

The researchers accounted for these factors in their analysis, Dr. Zhong said. But the study did not show that this style of eating caused deaths from cardiovascular disease, only that the two were linked.

The Limitations

Since the study has not been published or peer-reviewed, it’s challenging to fully evaluate it, Dr. Varady said.

A “major limitation” is that they used just two reports to accurately represent people’s typical eating pattern, Dr. Varady said; and the study did not seem to evaluate what kinds of foods people ate.

Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, a cardiologist and professor of medicine at Tufts University, called the study “very problematic.” The eight-hour eating group may have included many people who were very busy, or faced other challenges that forced them to miss meals or eat erratically, he said.

The group also could have included people who were already in poor health — those with eating disorders or illness that reduced their appetite, for instance, which may have resulted in them eating during a shorter window, said Satchidananda Panda, a professor at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in San Diego.

And if intermittent fasting is really harmful, it’s not clear why that might be. Dr. Zhong said that his study was not designed to answer that question.

What’s Next

More research is needed to evaluate the long term health effects of intermittent fasting, Dr. Zhong said.

Intermittent fasting isn’t a good fit for everyone, said Dr. Pam Taub, a cardiologist at the University of California, San Diego. But many of her patients have enjoyed its benefits, like reduced cholesterol levels.

Now, her patients are “confused and scared” by the headlines they’re reading, Dr. Taub said. But she won’t recommend that they change anything based on this study, she said, adding that people should always talk with their doctor before shifting their diet or lifestyle.

An earlier version of this story misrepresented the way researchers collected diet information with the study participants. It was via two interviews, not two questionnaires.

How we handle corrections

Alice Callahan is a Times reporter covering nutrition and health. She has a Ph.D. in nutrition from the University of California, Davis. More about Alice Callahan

A Guide to Better Nutrition

How much salt is too much? Should I cut back? We asked experts these and other questions about sodium .

Patients were told for years that cutting calories would ease the symptoms of polycystic ovary syndrome. But research suggests dieting may not help at all .

We asked a nutrition expert how she keeps up healthy habits without stressing about food. Here are seven tips  she shared for maintaining that balance.

There are many people who want to lose a few pounds for whom weight loss drugs are not the right choice. Is old-fashioned dieting a good option ?

Salmon is good for you, but choosing the right type to eat isn’t so easy. Here are answers to all your questions about this nutritional powerhouse .

Read these books to shift into a healthier way of thinking about food .

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Published on 4.4.2024 in Vol 26 (2024)

Moving Biosurveillance Beyond Coded Data Using AI for Symptom Detection From Physician Notes: Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Original Paper

• Andrew J McMurry 1, 2 , PhD   ; 
• Amy R Zipursky 1, 3 , MD, MBI   ; 
• Alon Geva 1, 4, 5 , MD, MPH   ; 
• Karen L Olson 1, 2 , PhD   ; 
• James R Jones 1 , MPhil   ; 
• Vladimir Ignatov 1 , MFA   ; 
• Timothy A Miller 1, 2 , PhD   ; 
• Kenneth D Mandl 1, 2, 6 , MD, MPH  

1 Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

2 Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

3 Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

4 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

5 Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

Corresponding Author:

Kenneth D Mandl, MD, MPH

Computational Health Informatics Program

Boston Children's Hospital

Landmark 5506 Mail Stop BCH3187, 401 Park Drive

Boston, MA, 02215

United States

Phone: 1 6173554145

Email: [email protected]

Background: Real-time surveillance of emerging infectious diseases necessitates a dynamically evolving, computable case definition, which frequently incorporates symptom-related criteria. For symptom detection, both population health monitoring platforms and research initiatives primarily depend on structured data extracted from electronic health records.

Objective: This study sought to validate and test an artificial intelligence (AI)–based natural language processing (NLP) pipeline for detecting COVID-19 symptoms from physician notes in pediatric patients. We specifically study patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) who can be sentinel cases in an outbreak.

Methods: Subjects in this retrospective cohort study are patients who are 21 years of age and younger, who presented to a pediatric ED at a large academic children’s hospital between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2022. The ED notes for all patients were processed with an NLP pipeline tuned to detect the mention of 11 COVID-19 symptoms based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. For a gold standard, 3 subject matter experts labeled 226 ED notes and had strong agreement ( F 1 -score=0.986; positive predictive value [PPV]=0.972; and sensitivity=1.0). F 1 -score, PPV, and sensitivity were used to compare the performance of both NLP and the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) coding to the gold standard chart review. As a formative use case, variations in symptom patterns were measured across SARS-CoV-2 variant eras.

Results: There were 85,678 ED encounters during the study period, including 4% (n=3420) with patients with COVID-19. NLP was more accurate at identifying encounters with patients that had any of the COVID-19 symptoms ( F 1 -score=0.796) than ICD-10 codes ( F 1 -score =0.451). NLP accuracy was higher for positive symptoms (sensitivity=0.930) than ICD-10 (sensitivity=0.300). However, ICD-10 accuracy was higher for negative symptoms (specificity=0.994) than NLP (specificity=0.917). Congestion or runny nose showed the highest accuracy difference (NLP: F 1 -score=0.828 and ICD-10: F 1 -score=0.042). For encounters with patients with COVID-19, prevalence estimates of each NLP symptom differed across variant eras. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have each NLP symptom detected than patients without this disease. Effect sizes (odds ratios) varied across pandemic eras.

Conclusions: This study establishes the value of AI-based NLP as a highly effective tool for real-time COVID-19 symptom detection in pediatric patients, outperforming traditional ICD-10 methods. It also reveals the evolving nature of symptom prevalence across different virus variants, underscoring the need for dynamic, technology-driven approaches in infectious disease surveillance.

Introduction

Real-time emerging infection surveillance requires a case definition that often involves symptomatology. To detect symptoms, population health monitoring systems and research studies tend to largely rely on structured data from electronic health records, including the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes [ 1 ]. However, symptoms are not diagnoses and, therefore, may not be consistently coded, leading to incorrect estimates of the prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms [ 2 ]. Natural language processing (NLP) of unstructured data from electronic health records has proven useful in recognizing COVID-19 symptoms and identifying additional signs and symptoms compared to structured data alone [ 3 , 4 ]. However, surveillance of COVID-19 symptoms is nuanced as symptoms have been shown to differ by variant eras [ 5 , 6 ] and by age, with pediatric patients generally experiencing milder symptoms [ 7 ]. For example, while loss of taste or smell was reported with early COVID-19 variants, it was less commonly reported during the Omicron wave and in younger patients who more frequently experience fever and cough [ 8 - 11 ]. Understanding symptom patterns in children during different COVID-19 variant eras is important. Early in the pandemic, the availability of molecular testing was extremely limited. The less severe course of infection and varying presentations may lead to under testing due to mild symptoms [ 12 ], potentially underestimating pediatric COVID-19 cases. Additionally, relatively asymptomatic children can still transmit the virus. Tailoring interventions based on age-specific manifestations contribute to effective control of virus transmission within communities.

We sought to validate and test an open-source artificial intelligence (AI)–based NLP pipeline that includes a large language model (LLM) to detect COVID-19 symptoms from physician notes. As a formative use case, we sought to illustrate how this pipeline could detect COVID-19 symptoms and differentiate symptom patterns across SARS-CoV-2 variant eras in pediatric patients. We specifically study patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) who can be sentinel cases in an outbreak.

Study Design and Setting

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients up to 21 years of age presenting to the ED of a large, free-standing, university-affiliated, pediatric hospital between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2022.

Ethical Considerations

The Boston Children’s Hospital Committee on Clinical Investigation performed ethical, privacy, and confidentiality reviews of the study and found it to be exempt from human subjects oversight. A waiver of consent was obtained to cover the targeted extraction and secure review of clinical notes by approved study personnel in protected environments within the hospital firewall.

Study Variables

The main dependent variables were a set of 11 COVID-19 symptoms based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria [ 13 ]—fever or chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea or vomiting, and diarrhea. We identified these symptoms by both NLP and ICD-10 codes. For the formative use case, the study period was divided into 3 variant eras defined using Massachusetts COVID-19 data from Covariant [ 14 ]. The pre-Delta era was from March 1, 2020, to June 20, 2021; the Delta era was from June 21, 2021, to December 19, 2021; and the Omicron era was from December 20, 2021, onward. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test or the presence of ICD-10 code U07.1 for COVID-19 during the same ED encounter in which symptoms were evaluated.

AI/NLP Pipeline Development

A total of 3 reviewers reached a consensus on a symptom concept dictionary [ 15 ] to capture each of the 11 COVID-19 symptoms. They relied on the Unified Medical Language System [ 16 ], which has a nearly comprehensive list of symptom descriptors [ 17 ], including SNOMED (SNOMED International) coded clinical terms [ 18 ], ICD-10 codes for administrative billing, abbreviations, and common language for patients [ 19 ]. The open-source and free Apache cTAKES (Apache Software Foundation) NLP pipeline was tuned to recognize and extract coded concepts for positive symptom mentions (based on the dictionary) from physician notes [ 20 ]. Apache cTAKES uses a NegEx algorithm which can help address negation [ 20 - 23 ]. To further address negation, we incorporated an LLM, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, that was fine-tuned for negation classification on clinical text [ 24 , 25 ].

Gold Standard

A total of 2 reviewers established a gold standard by manually reviewing physician ED notes. After all notes were labeled by the cTAKES pipeline, a test set of 226 ED notes was loaded into Label Studio [ 26 ], an open-source application for ground truth labeling. These notes were from patients both with and without COVID-19 and were selected to ensure that each of the 11 symptoms was mentioned in at least 30 ED notes. Some notes mentioned more than 1 symptom. Using an annotation guide ( Multimedia Appendix 1 ), 2 reviewers, who were masked from the terms identified by the NLP pipeline for note selection, each labeled 113 notes for mention of the 11 COVID-19 symptoms. As per the guide, only symptoms relevant to the present illness were considered positive mentions. Symptoms were not considered positive mentions if stated as past medical history, family history, social history, or an indication for a medication unrelated to the encounter.

Interrater Reliability

The F 1 -score was used to assess consistency in manual chart review. The F 1 -score is the balance of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) [ 27 ]. It was computed by comparing the annotations of each of the 2 initial reviewers to those of a third reviewer, who independently labeled a subset (56/226, 25%) of notes annotated by the other reviewers. The choice of F 1 -score as the metric for agreement was informed by the observed high frequency of true negative annotations when they were assigned by chance [ 20 , 27 , 28 ]. Reliability analyses used Python (version 3.10; Python Software Foundation).

AI/NLP and ICD-10 Accuracy

Accuracy measures of the true symptom percentages in the test set for each symptom included F 1 -score, PPV, sensitivity, and specificity [ 29 , 30 ].

Formative Use Case

The impact of pandemic variant era on COVID-19 symptomatology was examined. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patients presenting to the ED during each pandemic era. The percentage of patients in the ED with symptoms of COVID-19 was assessed in separate analyses for each symptom using chi-square analyses of 3×2 tables (pandemic era × symptom presence or absence) with α set at .05. Post hoc chi-square tests were used to compare each pandemic era with all others using a Bonferroni adjusted α of .017. To assess the effect of pandemic era, COVID-19 status, and the interaction of these variables on whether or not a patient had each symptom, logistic regression was used in separate analyses for each symptom. Bonferroni adjusted confidence limits were used for post hoc analyses. If the interaction term was not significant, the main effects of COVID-19 and variant era were reported. Data were analyzed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc).

Study Population

There were 59,173 unique patients with 85,678 ED encounters during the study period. For each ED encounter, there was 1 final physician ED note that aggregated all ED physician documentation. Characteristics of the entire study cohort and variant-specific cohorts are summarized in Table 1 . A patient could appear in the cohort more than once if they had multiple ED encounters.

a PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

b ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

High consistency was demonstrated between reviewer 3, who labeled a subset of notes, and both reviewers 1 and 2, who each labeled half of the notes chosen to establish the gold standard. The F 1 -scores for the 2 reviewers were 0.988 and 0.984, respectively. The PPV was 0.976 and 0.968 and sensitivity was 1.0 for both.

AI or NLP ICD-10 Accuracy

As shown in Table 2 , the F 1 -score for NLP was higher and thus more accurate at identifying encounters in the test set with patients that had any of the COVID-19 symptoms than ICD-10. NLP also had higher F 1 -score for each individual symptom. In addition, NLP sensitivity of true positive symptoms was higher than ICD-10. However, NLP accuracy of true negative symptoms (specificity) was somewhat lower compared to ICD-10.

a NLP: natural language processing.

c F 1 -score: accuracy measure balancing PPV and sensitivity.

d PPV: positive predictive value.

The 2 most prevalent symptoms, cough and fever, had sensitivity scores for NLP that were among the highest of the symptoms, and much higher than those for ICD-10 codes. The greatest discrepancy between NLP and ICD-10 F 1 -scores was for congestion or runny nose. The smallest difference was for diarrhea.

Prevalence of Symptoms Over Time

The percentage of ED encounters with patients with COVID-19 who had symptoms was estimated using the NLP pipeline and ICD-10 codes. As shown in Figure 1 , during each month of the study, the percentage of encounters with no symptoms detected was much lower using NLP compared to ICD-10. Using NLP, the range was from 0% to 19% of encounters (mean 6%, SD 4%), while with ICD-10, the range was 22% to 52% (mean 38%, SD 7%).

The percentage of encounters with patients with COVID-19 who presented with each symptom by month was higher using NLP than ICD-10 ( Multimedia Appendix 2 ). The 2 most common symptoms, cough and fever, are shown in Figures 2 and 3 . On average, cough was identified during 52% (SD 13%) of the encounters each month using NLP, but only 15% (SD 5%) using ICD-10. On average, fever characterized 70% (SD 11%) of encounters using NLP, but 41% (SD 9%) using ICD-10.

Using ICD-10, there were many months where individual symptoms were not detected. Of the 27 study months, loss of taste or smell was not detected using ICD-10 during 24 months, nor were muscle or body aches during 13 months. A total of 3 more symptoms had at least 3 consecutive months where each was not detected using ICD-10. These were congestion or runny nose (9 total months, not all consecutive), sore throat (8 months), and fatigue (7 months). Sporadic months without detection using ICD-10 were observed for headache (5 months), diarrhea (2 months), cough (1 month), and nausea or vomiting (1 month). Using NLP, sporadic months without detection were observed for just 2 symptoms, loss of taste or smell (6 months) and sore throat (2 months).

Prevalence of Symptoms Across Variant Eras

The prevalence estimates of symptoms across variant eras for encounters with patients with COVID-19 differed for each symptom identified by NLP, except for nausea or vomiting and sore throat ( Table 3 ). Post hoc analyses revealed several patterns. New loss of taste or smell was the only symptom that varied across all 3 eras. It was most common in the pre-Delta era, followed by the Delta era, and then the Omicron era. Congestion or runny nose, cough, and fever or chills were more common during the Delta and Omicron era than during the pre-Delta era, but the Delta era did not differ from the Omicron era. Muscle or body aches were more common during the pre-Delta era than both the Delta and Omicron eras, but the Delta era did not differ from the Omicron era. Diarrhea, fatigue, headache, and shortness of breath were more common during the pre-Delta era than the Omicron era but were not different than the Delta era, and the Delta era did not differ from the Omicron era. Nausea or vomiting and sore throat did not differ by variant era. The chi-square results are in Multimedia Appendix 3 .

a,b,c Variant eras with the same superscript across a row did not differ in post hoc analyses.

Symptoms by COVID-19 Status and Variant Era

The interaction of COVID-19 status and variant era on the presence of each symptom is shown in Table 4 . However, because the interaction was not significant for 2 symptoms, fever and chills, and sore throat, the main effects for COVID-19 status are shown for both ( P <.001). The odds ratios (ORs) indicate that patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have each of these 2 symptoms than patients without this disease. These symptoms were also more likely to occur during the Delta and Omicron era than during the pre-Delta era. For the remaining symptoms, the interaction term was significant and the ORs in each variant era are shown in the table. The ORs comparing patients with COVID-19 to those without the disease differed among the variant eras. Several patterns were observed. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to exhibit each of the symptoms of congestion or runny nose, cough, fatigue, headache, muscle or body aches, new loss of taste or smell, or shortness of breath or difficulty breathing. However, effect sizes (ORs) differed among pandemic eras. For diarrhea, this symptom was more likely for patients with COVID-19 in the pre-Delta and Delta eras, but not during the Omicron era. And nausea was more likely only in the pre-Delta era. Significant ORs ranged in size from 1.3 to 26.7 (mean 4.6, SD 5.3). The logistic regression results are in Multimedia Appendix 4 .

a Odds ratios compare patients with COVID-19 at an ED encounter to patients without the disease.

b CL: Bonferroni adjusted confidence limits in post hoc analyses.

c If the interaction term was significant, the effect of COVID-19 during each variant era is shown. Otherwise, the effect for COVID-19 is shown.

d Type 3 test of the interaction term (variant era × COVID-19) in a logistic regression analysis.

Principal Findings

We find evidence that AI-based NLP of physician notes is a superior method for capturing patient symptoms for real-time biosurveillance than reliance on traditional approaches using ICD-10. NLP was more sensitive than ICD-10 codes in identifying symptoms and some symptoms could only be detected using NLP. As a form of internal validation, the symptoms identified by the CDC as associated with COVID-19 were more common in patients with than without this disease.

Comparison With Prior Work

The study was also able to capture a nuanced picture of symptom prevalence and odds across different SARS-CoV-2 variant eras. Consistent with previous literature, symptom patterns changed over time as new variants emerged. Variants may present with differences in symptomatology as a result of a number of factors including differences in mutations in spike proteins, receptor binding, and ability to escape host antibodies [ 31 ]. As has been previously reported [ 11 , 32 - 35 ], we found that fever or chills were the most common COVID-19 symptom across the variants. In our cohort, shortness of breath was less common during the Omicron era than during the pre-Delta era. The Omicron variant has less of an ability to replicate in the lungs compared to the bronchi, which may explain why this symptom became less common [ 36 ]. Studies have reported sore throat as a common symptom in the Omicron era, but we did not observe a significant difference across eras [ 8 , 9 ]. It is possible that we did not see a higher percentage of sore throats in the Omicron era because it may be more challenging for pediatric patients to describe this symptom. One study found that sore throat was observed more often in those of 5-20 years of age compared to those of 0-4 years of age [ 8 ]. Similarly, a study reported that sore throat was more common in those greater than or equal to 13 years of age in the Omicron era compared to the Delta era [ 37 ]. In our study cohort, approximately half of the patients were younger than 5 years of age. As children this age may not be able to describe their symptoms well, symptoms that are also signs, such as fever or cough, might be more commonly documented in physician notes than symptoms such as sore throat. New loss of taste or smell was most common in the pre-Delta era, followed by the Delta era and then the Omicron era in this study. This symptom has been reported less commonly in the Omicron era [ 8 , 9 ]. Studies have postulated that patients with the Omicron variant are less likely to present with loss of taste or smell as this variant has less penetration of the mucus layer and therefore, may be less likely to infect the olfactory epithelium [ 38 ].

Limitations

There were important limitations in our use of NLP. The NLP pipeline was tested with a set of notes where some symptoms were more frequent in the test set (eg, loss of taste or smell) than in the formative use case. This was done to have sufficient data to evaluate the symptom pipeline. The NLP pipeline does not account for vital signs and so fever may not have been detected with the pipeline if it was documented in a patient’s vital signs rather than the clinical text. The cTAKES tool in the pipeline lacks the temporal context to ascertain if the mention of a symptom in a note is a new symptom or a prior symptom. We modified our technique because of this but nevertheless may have overestimated the prevalence of symptoms in our study. Future work will involve filtering by note section so that certain components of a note like past medical history are not included. We used 2 techniques to recognize negation, but some negated symptoms (eg, “patient had no cough”) were still captured as positive symptom mentions leading to a possible overestimation of symptom prevalence. Finally, this NLP pipeline did involve substantial preprocessing. We plan to evaluate the implementation of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) for this task. GPT-4 was able to extract COVID-19 symptoms in a recent study [ 39 ] and it may limit the need for preprocessing.

Our formative study had some limitations. First, we examined COVID-19 symptoms in patients presenting to a single urban pediatric ED. Patients presenting to outpatient settings, who likely had milder symptoms, were not included and our results may reflect patients with more severe symptoms. And because the setting was a single site, results may not generalize to other EDs. Second, we defined COVID-19 status as positive if a patient had a PCR positive test for COVID-19 or an appropriate ICD-10 code at the ED encounter. Patients who were COVID-19 positive on a test at home or at an outside center may not have been captured by this definition even if they presented to the ED with COVID-19 [ 40 ]. Additionally, symptoms may have differed across variant eras as a result of COVID-19 vaccinations or previous infections rather than variant differences. Literature in adults shows that vaccination is associated with a decrease in systemic symptoms [ 41 ]. The United States Food and Drug Administration authorized the use of the COVID-19 vaccine in October 2021, during the Delta era and prior to the Omicron era, for children 5-11 years of age [ 42 ]. Vaccination rates for pediatric patients vary by age group in Massachusetts, as of April 3, 2023, of those 0-19 years of age, 3% to 57% have received a primary series but have not been boosted, and 3% to 18% have been boosted since September 1, 2022 [ 43 ]. As such, some patients in the Delta and Omicron eras may have been vaccinated or had previous COVID-19 infections [ 44 ].

Conclusions

In an era where rapid and accurate infectious disease surveillance is crucial, this study underscores the transformative potential of AI-based NLP for real-time symptom detection, significantly outperforming traditional methods such as ICD-10 coding. The dynamic adaptability of NLP technology allows for the nuanced capture of evolving symptomatology across different virus variants, offering a more responsive and precise tool kit for biosurveillance efforts. Its integration into existing health care infrastructure could be a game changer, elevating our capabilities to monitor, understand, and ultimately control the spread of emerging infectious diseases.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award. The contents are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement by CDC, HHS, or the US Government. Support was also obtained from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Cooperative Agreement (U01TR002623). ARZ was supported by a training grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD040128). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) was not used to design or conduct this study.

Data Availability

All data analyzed during this study for the formative use case are in Multimedia Appendix 5 of this published article.

Authors' Contributions

KDM, AJM, and TAM contributed to the conceptualization. KDM contributed to the funding. AJM, ARZ, AG, and KLO performed the formal analysis. AJM, JRJ, and VI contributed to the software. AJM, ARZ, and KDM contributed to writing original drafts. KLO and AG contributed to writing review and edits.

Conflicts of Interest

TAM is a member of the advisory council for Lavita AI. Others declare no conflicts of interest.

COVID-19 symptoms annotation guide.

Detection of COVID-19 symptoms using NLP and ICD-10 by month for emergency department encounters with patients with COVID-19. ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; NLP: natural language processing.

The chi-square analysis of COVID-19 symptom prevalence by pandemic variant era for emergency department encounters with patients with COVID-19, symptoms were detected using NLP. NLP: natural language processing.

Logistic regression analysis of the effect of COVID-19 status, pandemic variant era, and their interaction on symptom status for ED encounters, symptoms were detected using NLP. ED: emergency department; NLP: natural language processing.

Data files for the time series figures, the chi-square analysis of symptom prevalence, and the logistic regression analysis of the effects of COVID-19 status and pandemic variant era on symptom status.

• Subramanian A, Nirantharakumar K, Hughes S, Myles P, Williams T, Gokhale KM, et al. Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in non-hospitalized adults. Nat Med. 2022;28(8):1706-1714. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Crabb BT, Lyons A, Bale M, Martin V, Berger B, Mann S, et al. Comparison of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes with electronic medical records among patients with symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2017703. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Wang J, Abu-El-Rub N, Gray J, Pham HA, Zhou Y, Manion FJ, et al. COVID-19 SignSym: a fast adaptation of a general clinical NLP tool to identify and normalize COVID-19 signs and symptoms to OMOP common data model. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(6):1275-1283. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Malden DE, Tartof SY, Ackerson BK, Hong V, Skarbinski J, Yau V, et al. Natural language processing for improved characterization of COVID-19 symptoms: observational study of 350,000 patients in a large integrated health care system. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(12):e41529. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Di Chiara C, Boracchini R, Sturniolo G, Barbieri A, Costenaro P, Cozzani S, et al. Clinical features of COVID-19 in Italian outpatient children and adolescents during parental, Delta, and Omicron waves: a prospective, observational, cohort study. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1193857. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Sumner MW, Xie J, Zemek R, Winston K, Freire G, Burstein B, et al. Comparison of symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 variants among children in Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3):e232328. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Liguoro I, Pilotto C, Bonanni M, Ferrari ME, Pusiol A, Nocerino A, et al. SARS-COV-2 infection in children and newborns: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(7):1029-1046. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Menni C, Valdes AM, Polidori L, Antonelli M, Penamakuri S, Nogal A, et al. Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of Omicron and Delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1618-1624. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Akaishi T, Kushimoto S, Katori Y, Sugawara N, Egusa H, Igarashi K, et al. COVID-19-related symptoms during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant surge in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2022;258(2):103-110. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• García-Vera C, Castejón-Ramírez S, Miranda EL, Abadía RH, Ventura MG, Navarro EB, et al. COVID-19 in children: clinical and epidemiological spectrum in the community. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181(3):1235-1242. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Viner RM, Ward JL, Hudson LD, Ashe M, Patel SV, Hargreaves D, et al. Systematic review of reviews of symptoms and signs of COVID-19 in children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child. 2021;106:802-807. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• COVID-19 disease in children and adolescents: scientific brief, 29 September 2021. World Health Organization. 2021. URL: https:/​/www.​who.int/​publications/​i/​item/​WHO-2019-nCoV-Sci_Brief-Children_and_adolescents-2021.​1?ssp=1&setlang=en&cc=US [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Symptoms of COVID-19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Hodcroft E. CoVariants. CoVariants. 2021. URL: https://covariants.org/ [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Machine-learning-for-medical-language / ctakes-client-py. Github. URL: https:/​/github.​com/​Machine-Learning-for-Medical-Language/​ctakes-client-py/​blob/​main/​ctakesclient/​resources/​covid_symptoms.​bsv [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Bodenreider O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D267-D270. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Köhler S, Gargano M, Matentzoglu N, Carmody LC, Lewis-Smith D, Vasilevsky NA, et al. The human phenotype ontology in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D1207-D1217. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• SNOMEDCT_US (SNOMED CT, US edition)—synopsis, UMLS vocabularies. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). URL: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/sourcereleasedocs/current/SNOMEDCT_US/index.html [accessed 2024-02-28]
• CHV (Consumer Health Vocabulary)—synopsis, UMLS vocabularies. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). URL: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/sourcereleasedocs/current/CHV/index.html [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, Zheng J, Sohn S, Kipper-Schuler KC, et al. Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(5):507-513. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chapman WW, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, Cooper GF, Buchanan BG. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform. 2001;34(5):301-310. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Harkema H, Dowling JN, Thornblade T, Chapman WW. ConText: an algorithm for determining negation, experiencer, and temporal status from clinical reports. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(5):839-851. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chapman WW, Hillert D, Velupillai S, Kvist M, Skeppstedt M, Chapman BE, et al. Extending the NegEx lexicon for multiple languages. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:677-681. [ FREE Full text ] [ Medline ]
• Machine-learning-for-medical-language. GitHub. URL: https://github.com/Machine-Learning-for-Medical-Language [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Miller T, Bethard S, Amiri H, Savova G. Unsupervised domain adaptation for clinical negation detection. 2017. Presented at: BioNLP; August 4, 2017;165-170; Vancouver, Canada. URL: https://aclanthology.org/W17-2320/ [ CrossRef ]
• Tkachenko M, Malyuk M, Holmanyuk A, Liubimov N. Label studio: data labeling software. GitHub. 2020. URL: https://github.com/heartexlabs/label-studio [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Hripcsak G, Rothschild AS. Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(3):296-298. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-282. [ FREE Full text ] [ Medline ]
• Habibzadeh F, Habibzadeh P, Yadollahie M. The apparent prevalence, the true prevalence. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022;32(2):020101. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Monaghan TF, Rahman SN, Agudelo CW, Wein AJ, Lazar JM, Everaert K, et al. Foundational statistical principles in medical research: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(5):503. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Lauring AS, Hodcroft EB. Genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2-what do they mean? JAMA. 2021;325(6):529-531. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Götzinger F, Santiago-García B, Noguera-Julián A, Lanaspa M, Lancella L, Carducci FIC, et al. COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Europe: a multinational, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(9):653-661. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• King JA, Whitten TA, Bakal JA, McAlister FA. Symptoms associated with a positive result for a swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in Alberta. CMAJ. 2021;193(1):E1-E9. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Takács AT, Bukva M, Gavallér G, Kapus K, Rózsa M, Bán-Gagyi B, et al. Epidemiology and clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized children across four waves in Hungary: a retrospective, comparative study from march 2020 to december 2021. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(6):e937. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Kenney PO, Chang AJ, Krabill L, Hicar MD. Decreased clinical severity of pediatric acute COVID-19 and MIS-C and increase of incidental cases during the Omicron wave in comparison to the Delta wave. Viruses. 2023;15(1):180. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Hui KPY, Ho JCW, Cheung MC, Ng KC, Ching RHH, Lai KL, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human bronchus and lung ex vivo. Nature. 2022;603(7902):715-720. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Shoji K, Akiyama T, Tsuzuki S, Matsunaga N, Asai Y, Suzuki S, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in hospitalized children during the Omicron variant predominant period. J Infect Chemother. 2022;28(11):1531-1535. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Butowt R, Bilińska K, von Bartheld C. Why does the Omicron variant largely spare olfactory function? implications for the pathogenesis of anosmia in coronavirus disease 2019. J Infect Dis. 2022;226(8):1304-1308. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Wei WI, Leung CLK, Tang A, McNeil EB, Wong SYS, Kwok KO. Extracting symptoms from free-text responses using ChatGPT among COVID-19 cases in Hong Kong. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;30(1):142.e1-142.e3. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Wang L, Zipursky AR, Geva A, McMurry AJ, Mandl KD, Miller TA. A computable case definition for patients with SARS-CoV2 testing that occurred outside the hospital. JAMIA Open. 2023;6(3):ooad047. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Bramante CT, Proper JL, Boulware DR, Karger AB, Murray T, Rao V, et al. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a lower viral load and likelihood of systemic symptoms. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(5):ofac066. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• FDA authorizes Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in children 5 through 11 years of age. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2021. URL: https:/​/www.​fda.gov/​news-events/​press-announcements/​fda-authorizes-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-emergency-use-children-5-through-11-years-age [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Weekly COVID-19 vaccination report (as of April 3, 2023). Massachusetts Department of Public Health. URL: https://www.mass.gov/doc/weekly-covid-19-vaccination-report-april-5-2023/download [accessed 2024-02-28]
• Bhattacharyya RP, Hanage WP. Challenges in inferring intrinsic severity of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(7):e14. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]

Abbreviations

Edited by T de Azevedo Cardoso; submitted 06.10.23; peer-reviewed by D Liebovitz; comments to author 09.11.23; revised version received 30.11.23; accepted 27.02.24; published 04.04.24.

©Andrew J McMurry, Amy R Zipursky, Alon Geva, Karen L Olson, James R Jones, Vladimir Ignatov, Timothy A Miller, Kenneth D Mandl. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 04.04.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

We couldn’t find any results matching your search.

Please try using other words for your search or explore other sections of the website for relevant information.

We’re sorry, we are currently experiencing some issues, please try again later.

Our team is working diligently to resolve the issue. Thank you for your patience and understanding.

News & Insights

Goldman Sachs Predicts Over 120% Rally for These 2 ‘Strong Buy’ Stocks

April 04, 2024 — 09:16 pm EDT

Written by Michael Marcus for TipRanks  ->

Even with a brief drop this week, the markets are showing strength this year, with the S&P 500  climbing 8%. However, there’s a big question on investors’ minds: Can this momentum keep up?

David Kostin, Goldman’s chief US equity strategist, has given four scenarios for investor consideration: “(1) in a ‘catch up,’ the S&P 500 would end the year at 5800 (+12% from today), (2) in a ‘catch-down,’ the S&P 500 would fall to 4500 (-14%), (3) continued mega-cap exceptionalism would lift the index to 6000 (+15%), and (4) recession fears would push the index down to 4500 (-14%).”

It remains to be seen which scenario will play out. Nonetheless, Goldman Sachs analyst Richard Law has made two specific stock recommendations, foreseeing substantial upside potential of over 120%. Law’s bullish outlook is shared by others in the market; according to the TipRanks database , both stocks carry a Strong Buy consensus rating from analysts. Let’s take a closer look.

Olema Pharmaceuticals ( OLMA )

The first Goldman pick we’ll look at is Olema Pharma, a medical research firm working at the clinical stage with a focus on the discovery, development, and commercialization of new therapies specifically targeted at women’s cancers. Olema has a research pipeline built around a leading drug candidate, OP-1250 (also called palazestrant), which is under investigation in six separate research tracks. Of these, five are at the clinical trial stage.

Those five clinical tracks involve testing OP-1250 as a monotherapy and as a combo therapy in conjunction with several other anti-cancer drugs in the treatment of ER+/HER2 metastatic breast cancer. The most advanced track, studying the drug as a monotherapy, is entirely under Olema’s direction; several of the other tracks involve partnership programs with larger drug companies.

The company’s most advanced is the Phase 3 pivotal monotherapy trial of OP-1250. This study was initiated during 4Q23, and top-line results are expected during 2026.

In the meantime, there are several milestones expected for this year. In May, the company will present interim results from the Phase 2 clinical trial of OP-1250 in combo with ribociclib at the ESMO Breast Cancer Annual Congress in Berlin. Next, during Q3, the company is expected to initiate a Phase 1b/2 study of its leading candidate in combo with everolimus. And finally, late this year, Olema expects to file the Investigational New Drug application for its candidate OP-3136 with the FDA

In all, this biopharma has a full plate, and that has caught the attention of Goldman Sachs’ Richard Law.

“OLMA’s Ph. 2 late line mono data showed impressive efficacy even in the elusive ESR1-WT population. While the mESR1 data look in-line with competitors, the ESR1-WT data are arguably the best-in-class. Applying statistical adjustments on Ph. 2 results using EMERALD learnings for Ph. 3 OPERA-1 in 2-3L showed palazestrant could achieve approval in both mESR1 and ESR1-WT, although we are less confident on why it is able to succeed in ESR1-WT while others with similar MOA could not. Our Buy rating is driven by pala’s best-in-class potential in a large ER+/HER2- breast cancer market and the possibility of OLMA securing a biopharma partnership deal (OLMA announced as priority in 2024) that could bring additional value to the stock,” Law opined.

Law’s Buy rating on OLMA comes with a $24 price target, implying the stock will gain 128% on the one-year horizon. (To watch Law’s track record, click here )

Overall, it’s clear, from the unanimous Strong Buy consensus rating, that Wall Street agrees with the bullish take; this stock has 7 recent positive recommendations. The shares are priced at $10.51 and their $25 average price target suggest a one-year upside potential of ~138%. (See OLMA stock forecast )

Mineralys Therapeutics ( MLYS )

The second Goldman pick is Mineralys, another clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. Mineralys is laser-focused on addressing the consequences of elevated levels of aldosterone, a hormone that, at elevated levels, can cause serious hypertension. Aldosterone is part of the natural control for potassium and salt levels in the bloodstream; when these get out of whack, high blood pressure, or hypertension, is the usual result. Approximately 25% of patients with high blood pressure also have elevated aldosterone.

This points toward a large potential market for Mineralys to address. Among Americans age 20 and up, there are some 122 million who have high blood pressure, with or without treatment. The prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension, and its effect on the organs such as the heart and kidney, has a huge dollar impact on the economy, in the form of preventable health care spending and time missed from work. Mineralys has developed a new drug candidate, lorundrostat, to address this medical need, and has advanced the drug well into clinical trials.

The company recently launched a pivotal Phase 3 trial of lorundrostat, the Launch-HTN study. This is the second ongoing pivotal of the drug, on patients with uHTN or rHTN. The study, which was initiated during 4Q23, looks at the drug when added to the patients’ existing blood pressure treatment regimen.

The first of the two pivotal trials, Advance-HTN, also continues apace. Mineralys is using this trial to examine the safety and efficacy of lorundrostat used as an add-on therapy ‘to an AHA guidelines-based standardized background treatment regimen of either two or three antihypertensive medications.’

Mineralys expects to have topline data from the Advance-HTN trial ready for release during 4Q24, as well as to have topline data from Launch-HTN during 2H25.

Checking in again with analyst Richard Law, we find him upbeat on this company, based on the previous successes in its Phase 2 trials and the dollar potential of the addressable market in hypertension treatments.

“Despite spironolactone becoming the SOC in resistant HTN, there is still an unmet need due to its gynecomastia and hyperkalemia effects. Lorundrostat’s Ph. 2 already showed ~10 mmHg placebo-adjusted SBP reduction. Patients with obesity showed an even greater ~17 mmHg reduction. We believe this level of efficacy can achieve best-in-class and MLYS’s targeted approach for obesity-related HTN in the 3/4L settings could still treat 7-8M targetable patients in the US alone. We model lorundrostat achieving ~$2.8B WW non-risk-adjusted, or ~$1.1B risk-adjusted, peak sales in 2040. Our Buy rating is driven by MLYS potentially showing best-in-class efficacy in a large obesity-related HTN market,” Law opined.

Law’s Buy rating on MLYS is backed by a $30 price target, indicating a 138% upside over the one-year horizon.

All in all, there are 3 recent analyst reviews of this stock, and they are all positive, for a unanimous Strong Buy consensus rating. Mineralys shares are trading for $12.61 and their average price target of $32 is somewhat more bullish than the Goldman view, suggesting a robust 154% gain in the coming year. (See MLYS stock forecast )

To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’  Best Stocks to Buy , a tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analyst. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Stocks mentioned

More related articles.

This data feed is not available at this time.

Sign up for the TradeTalks newsletter to receive your weekly dose of trading news, trends and education. Delivered Wednesdays.

To add symbols:

• Type a symbol or company name. When the symbol you want to add appears, add it to My Quotes by selecting it and pressing Enter/Return.
• Copy and paste multiple symbols separated by spaces.

These symbols will be available throughout the site during your session.

Your symbols have been updated

Edit watchlist.

• Type a symbol or company name. When the symbol you want to add appears, add it to Watchlist by selecting it and pressing Enter/Return.

Opt in to Smart Portfolio

Smart Portfolio is supported by our partner TipRanks. By connecting my portfolio to TipRanks Smart Portfolio I agree to their Terms of Use .

• Open access
• Published: 02 April 2022

A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access

• Nicholas C. Coombs 1 ,
• Duncan G. Campbell 2 &
• James Caringi 1  

BMC Health Services Research volume  22 , Article number:  438 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

22k Accesses

19 Citations

10 Altmetric

Metrics details

Ensuring access to healthcare is a complex, multi-dimensional health challenge. Since the inception of the coronavirus pandemic, this challenge is more pressing. Some dimensions of access are difficult to quantify, namely characteristics that influence healthcare services to be both acceptable and appropriate. These link to a patient’s acceptance of services that they are to receive and ensuring appropriate fit between services and a patient’s specific healthcare needs. These dimensions of access are particularly evident in rural health systems where additional structural barriers make accessing healthcare more difficult. Thus, it is important to examine healthcare access barriers in rural-specific areas to understand their origin and implications for resolution.

We used qualitative methods and a convenience sample of healthcare providers who currently practice in the rural US state of Montana. Our sample included 12 healthcare providers from diverse training backgrounds and specialties. All were decision-makers in the development or revision of patients’ treatment plans. Semi-structured interviews and content analysis were used to explore barriers–appropriateness and acceptability–to healthcare access in their patient populations. Our analysis was both deductive and inductive and focused on three analytic domains: cultural considerations, patient-provider communication, and provider-provider communication. Member checks ensured credibility and trustworthiness of our findings.

Five key themes emerged from analysis: 1) a friction exists between aspects of patients’ rural identities and healthcare systems; 2) facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences; 3) communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented; 4) time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems; and 5) profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US.

Conclusions

Inadequate access to healthcare is an issue in the US, particularly in rural areas. Rural healthcare consumers compose a hard-to-reach patient population. Too few providers exist to meet population health needs, and fragmented communication impairs rural health systems’ ability to function. These issues exacerbate the difficulty of ensuring acceptable and appropriate delivery of healthcare services, which compound all other barriers to healthcare access for rural residents. Each dimension of access must be monitored to improve patient experiences and outcomes for rural Americans.

Peer Review reports

Unequal access to healthcare services is an important element of health disparities in the United States [ 1 ], and there remains much about access that is not fully understood. The lack of understanding is attributable, in part, to the lack of uniformity in how access is defined and evaluated, and the extent to which access is often oversimplified in research [ 2 ]. Subsequently, attempts to address population-level barriers to healthcare access are insufficient, and access remains an unresolved, complex health challenge [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. This paper presents a study that aims to explore some of the less well studied barriers to healthcare access, particularly those that influence healthcare acceptability and appropriateness.

In truth, healthcare access entails a complicated calculus that combines characteristics of individuals, their households, and their social and physical environments with characteristics of healthcare delivery systems, organizations, and healthcare providers. For one to fully ‘access’ healthcare, they must have the means to identify their healthcare needs and have available to them care providers and the facilities where they work. Further, patients must then reach, obtain, and use the healthcare services in order to have their healthcare needs fulfilled. Levesque and colleagues critically examined access conceptualizations in 2013 and synthesized all ways in which access to healthcare was previously characterized; Levesque et al. proposed five dimensions of access: approachability, acceptability, availability, affordability and appropriateness [ 2 ]. These refer to the ability to perceive, seek, reach, pay for, and engage in services, respectively.

According to Levesque et al.’s framework, the five dimensions combine to facilitate access to care or serve as barriers. Approachability indicates that people facing health needs understand that healthcare services exist and might be helpful. Acceptability represents whether patients see healthcare services as consistent or inconsistent with their own social and cultural values and worldviews. Availability indicates that healthcare services are reached both physically and in a timely manner. Affordability simplifies one’s capacity to pay for healthcare services without compromising basic necessities, and finally, appropriateness represents the fit between healthcare services and a patient’s specific healthcare needs [ 2 ]. This study focused on the acceptability and appropriateness dimensions of access.

Before the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19) pandemic, approximately 13.3% of adults in the US did not have a usual source of healthcare [ 6 ]. Millions more did not utilize services regularly, and close to two-thirds reported that they would be debilitated by an unexpected medical bill [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Findings like these emphasized a fragility in the financial security of the American population [ 10 ]. These concerns were exacerbated by the pandemic when a sudden surge in unemployment increased un- and under-insurance rates [ 11 ]. Indeed, employer-sponsored insurance covers close to half of Americans’ total cost of illness [ 12 ]. Unemployment linked to COVID-19 cut off the lone outlet to healthcare access for many. Health-related financial concerns expanded beyond individuals, as healthcare organizations were unequipped to manage a simultaneous increase in demand for specialized healthcare services and a steep drop off for routine revenue-generating healthcare services [ 13 ]. These consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic all put additional, unexpected pressure on an already fragmented US healthcare system.

Other structural barriers to healthcare access exist in relation to the rural–urban divide. Less than 10% of US healthcare resources are located in rural areas where approximately 20% of the American population resides [ 14 ]. In a country with substantially fewer providers per capita compared to many other developed countries, persons in rural areas experience uniquely pressing healthcare provider shortages [ 15 , 16 ]. Rural inhabitants also tend to have lower household income, higher rates of un- or under-insurance, and more difficulty with travel to healthcare clinics than urban dwellers [ 17 ]. Subsequently, persons in rural communities use healthcare services at lower rates, and potentially preventable hospitalizations are more prevalent [ 18 ]. This disparity often leads rural residents to use services primarily for more urgent needs and less so for routine care [ 19 , 20 , 21 ].

The differences in how rural and urban healthcare systems function warranted a federal initiative to focus exclusively on rural health priorities and serve as counterpart to Healthy People objectives [ 22 ]. The rural determinants of health, a more specific expression of general social determinants, add issues of geography and topography to the well-documented social, economic and political factors that influence all Americans’ access to healthcare [ 23 ]. As a result, access is consistently regarded as a top priority in rural areas, and many research efforts have explored the intersection between access and rurality, namely within its less understood dimensions (acceptability and appropriateness) [ 22 ].

Acceptability-related barriers to care

Acceptability represents the dimension of healthcare access that affects a patient’s ability to seek healthcare, particularly linked to one’s professional values, norms and culture [ 2 ]. Access to health information is an influential factor for acceptable healthcare and is essential to promote and maintain a healthy population [ 24 ]. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, health literacy or a high ‘health IQ’ is the degree to which individuals have the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to inform health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others, which impacts healthcare use and system navigation [ 25 ]. The literature indicates that lower levels of health literacy contribute to health disparities among rural populations [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Evidence points to a need for effective health communication between healthcare organizations and patients to improve health literacy [ 24 ]. However, little research has been done in this area, particularly as it relates to technologically-based interventions to disseminate health information [ 29 ].

Stigma, an undesirable position of perceived diminished status in an individual’s social position, is another challenge that influences healthcare acceptability [ 30 ]. Those who may experience stigma fear negative social consequences in relation to care seeking. They are more likely to delay seeking care, especially among ethnic minority populations [ 31 , 32 ]. Social media presents opportunities for the dissemination of misleading medical information; this runs further risk for stigma [ 33 ]. Stigma is difficult to undo, but research has shown that developing a positive relationship with a healthcare provider or organization can work to reduce stigma among patients, thus promoting healthcare acceptability [ 34 ].

A provider’s attempts to engage patients and empower them to be active decision-makers regarding their treatment has also been shown to improve healthcare acceptability. One study found that patients with heart disease who completed a daily diary of weight and self-assessment of symptoms, per correspondence with their provider, had better care outcomes than those who did not [ 35 ]. Engaging with household family members and involved community healers also mitigates barriers to care, emphasizing the importance of a team-based approach that extends beyond those who typically provide healthcare services [ 36 , 37 ]. One study, for instance, explored how individuals closest to a pregnant woman affect the woman’s decision to seek maternity care; partners, female relatives, and community health-workers were among the most influential in promoting negative views, all of which reduced a woman’s likelihood to access care [ 38 ].

Appropriateness-related barriers to care

Appropriateness marks the dimension of healthcare access that affects a patient’s ability to engage, and according to Levesque et al., is of relevance once all other dimensions (the ability to perceive, seek, reach and pay for) are achieved [ 2 ]. The ability to engage in healthcare is influenced by a patient’s level of empowerment, adherence to information, and support received by their healthcare provider. Thus, barriers to healthcare access that relate to appropriateness are often those that indicate a breakdown in communication between a patient with their healthcare provider. Such breakdown can involve a patient experiencing miscommunication, confrontation, and/or a discrepancy between their provider’s goals and their own goals for healthcare. Appropriateness represents a dimension of healthcare access that is widely acknowledged as an area in need of improvement, which indicates a need to rethink how healthcare providers and organizations can adapt to serve the healthcare needs of their communities [ 39 ]. This is especially true for rural, ethnic minority populations, which disproportionately experience an abundance of other barriers to healthcare access. Culturally appropriate care is especially important for members of minority populations [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Ultimately, patients value a patient-provider relationship characterized by a welcoming, non-judgmental atmosphere [ 43 , 44 ]. In rural settings especially, level of trust and familiarity are common factors that affect service utilization [ 45 ]. Evidence suggests that kind treatment by a healthcare provider who promotes patient-centered care can have a greater overall effect on a patient’s experience than a provider’s degree of medical knowledge or use of modern equipment [ 46 ]. Of course, investing the time needed to nurture close and caring interpersonal connections is particularly difficult in under-resourced, time-pressured rural health systems [ 47 , 48 ].

The most effective way to evaluate access to healthcare largely depends on which dimensions are explored. For instance, a population-based survey can be used to measure the barrier of healthcare affordability. Survey questions can inquire directly about health insurance coverage, care-related financial burden, concern about healthcare costs, and the feared financial impacts of illness and/or disability. Many national organizations have employed such surveys to measure affordability-related barriers to healthcare. For example, a question may ask explicitly about financial concerns: ‘If you get sick or have an accident, how worried are you that you will not be able to pay your medical bills?’ [ 49 ]. Approachability and availability dimensions of access are also studied using quantitative analysis of survey questions, such as ‘Is there a place that you usually go to when you are sick or need advice about your health?’ or ‘Have you ever delayed getting medical care because you couldn’t get through on the telephone?’ In contrast, the remaining two dimensions–acceptability and appropriateness–require a qualitative approach, as the social and cultural factors that determine a patient’s likelihood of accepting aspects of the services that are to be received (acceptability) and the fit between those services and the patient’s specific healthcare needs (appropriateness) can be more abstract [ 50 , 51 ]. In social science, qualitative methods are appropriate to generate knowledge of what social events mean to individuals and how those individuals interact within them; these methods allow for an exploration of depth rather than breadth [ 52 , 53 ]. Qualitative methods, therefore, are appropriate tools for understanding the depth of healthcare providers’ experiences in the inherently social context of seeking and engaging in healthcare.

In sum, acceptability- and appropriateness-related barriers to healthcare access are multi-layered, complex and abundant. Ensuring access becomes even more challenging if structural barriers to access are factored in. In this study, we aimed to explore barriers to healthcare access among persons in Montana, a historically underserved, under-resourced, rural region of the US. Montana is the fourth largest and third least densely populated state in the country; more than 80% of Montana counties are classified as non-core (the lowest level of urban/rural classification), and over 90% are designated as health professional shortage areas [ 54 , 55 ]. Qualitative methods supported our inquiry to explore barriers to healthcare access related to acceptability and appropriateness.

Participants

Qualitative methods were utilized for this interpretive, exploratory study because knowledge regarding barriers to healthcare access within Montana’s rural health systems is limited. We chose Montana healthcare providers, rather than patients, as the population of interest so we may explore barriers to healthcare access from the perspective of those who serve many persons in rural settings. Inclusion criteria required study participants to provide direct healthcare to patients at least one-half of their time. We defined ‘provider’ as a healthcare organization employee with clinical decision-making power and the qualifications to develop or revise patients’ treatment plans. In an attempt to capture a group of providers with diverse experience, we included providers across several types and specialties. These included advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), physicians (MDs and DOs), and physician assistants (PAs) who worked in critical care medicine, emergency medicine, family medicine, hospital medicine, internal medicine, pain medicine, palliative medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, and urgent care medicine. We also included licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs) and clinical psychologists who specialize in behavioral healthcare provision.

Recruitment and Data Collection

We recruited participants via email using a snowball sampling approach [ 56 ]. We opted for this approach because of its effectiveness in time-pressured contexts, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which has made healthcare provider populations hard to reach [ 57 ]. Considering additional constraints with the pandemic and the rural nature of Montana, interviews were administered virtually via Zoom video or telephone conferencing with Zoom’s audio recording function enabled. All interviews were conducted by the first author between January and September 2021. The average length of interviews was 50 min, ranging from 35 to 70 min. There were occasional challenges experienced during interviews (poor cell phone reception from participants, dropped calls), in which case the interviewer remained on the line until adequate communication was resumed. All interviews were included for analysis and transcribed verbatim into NVivo Version 12 software. All qualitative data were saved and stored on a password-protected University of Montana server. Hard-copy field notes were securely stored in a locked office on the university’s main campus.

Data analysis included a deductive followed by an inductive approach. This dual analysis adheres to Levesque’s framework for qualitative methods, which is discussed in the Definition of Analytic Domains sub-section below. Original synthesis of the literature informed the development of our initial deductive codebook. The deductive approach was derived from a theory-driven hypothesis, which consisted of synthesizing previous research findings regarding acceptability- and appropriateness-related barriers to care. Although the locations, patient populations and specific type of healthcare services varied by study in the existing literature, several recurring barriers to healthcare access were identified. We then operationalized three analytic domains based on these findings: cultural considerations, patient-provider communication, and provider-provider communication. These domains were chosen for two reasons: 1) the terms ‘culture’ and ‘communication’ were the most frequently documented characteristics across the studies examined, and 2) they each align closely with the acceptability and appropriateness dimensions of access to healthcare, respectively. In addition, ‘culture’ is included in the definition of acceptability and ‘communication’ is a quintessential aspect of appropriateness. These domains guided the deductive portion of our analysis, which facilitated the development of an interview guide used for this study.

Interviews were semi-structured to allow broad interpretations from participants and expand the open-ended characterization of study findings. Data were analyzed through a flexible coding approach proposed by Deterding and Waters [ 58 ]. Qualitative content analysis was used, a method particularly beneficial for analyzing large amounts of qualitative data collected through interviews that offers possibility of quantifying categories to identify emerging themes [ 52 , 59 ]. After fifty percent of data were analyzed, we used an inductive approach as a formative check and repeated until data saturation, or the point at which no new information was gathered in interviews [ 60 ]. At each point of inductive analysis, interview questions were added, removed, or revised in consideration of findings gathered [ 61 ]. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) was used for reporting all qualitative data for this study [ 62 ]. The first and third authors served as primary and secondary analysts of the qualitative data and collaborated to triangulate these findings. An audit approach was employed, which consisted of coding completed by the first author and then reviewed by the third author. After analyses were complete, member checks ensured credibility and trustworthiness of findings [ 63 ]. Member checks consisted of contacting each study participant to explain the study’s findings; one-third of participants responded and confirmed all findings. All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the authors’ institution’s Institutional Review Board.

Definitions of Analytic Domains

Cultural considerations.

Western health systems often fail to consider aspects of patients’ cultural perspectives and histories. This can manifest in the form of a providers’ lack of cultural humility. Cultural humility is a process of preventing imposition of one’s worldview and cultural beliefs on others and recognizing that everyone’s conception of the world is valid. Humility cultivates sensitive approaches in treating patients [ 64 ]. A lack of cultural humility impedes the delivery of acceptable and appropriate healthcare [ 65 ], which can involve low empathy or respect for patients, or dismissal of culture and traditions as superstitions that interfere with standard treatments [ 66 , 67 ]. Ensuring cultural humility among all healthcare employees is a step toward optimal healthcare delivery. Cultural humility is often accomplished through training that can be tailored to particular cultural- or gender-specific populations [ 68 , 69 ]. Since cultural identities and humility have been marked as factors that can heavily influence patients’ access to care, cultural considerations composed our first analytic domain. To assess this domain, we asked participants how they address the unique needs of their patients, how they react when they observe a cultural behavior or attitude from a patient that may not directly align with their treatment plan, and if they have received any multicultural training or training on cultural considerations in their current role.

Patient-provider communication

Other barriers to healthcare access can be linked to ineffective patient-provider communication. Patients who do not feel involved in healthcare decisions are less likely to adhere to treatment recommendations [ 70 ]. Patients who experience communication difficulties with providers may feel coerced, which generates disempowerment and leads patients to employ more covert ways of engagement [ 71 , 72 ]. Language barriers can further compromise communication and hinder outcomes or patient progress [ 73 , 74 ]. Any miscommunication between a patient and provider can affect one’s access to healthcare, namely affecting appropriateness-related barriers. For these reasons, patient-provider communication composed our second analytic domain. We asked participants to highlight the challenges they experience when communicating with their patients, how those complications are addressed, and how communication strategies inform confidentiality in their practice. Confidentiality is a core ethical principle in healthcare, especially in rural areas that have smaller, interconnected patient populations [ 75 ].

Provider-Provider Communication

A patient’s journey through the healthcare system necessitates sufficient correspondence between patients, primary, and secondary providers after discharge and care encounters [ 76 ]. Inter-provider and patient-provider communication are areas of healthcare that are acknowledged to have some gaps. Inconsistent mechanisms for follow up communication with patients in primary care have been documented and emphasized as a concern among those with chronic illness who require close monitoring [ 68 , 77 ]. Similar inconsistencies exist between providers, which can lead to unclear care goals, extended hospital stays, and increased medical costs [ 78 ]. For these reasons, provider-provider communication composed our third analytic domain. We asked participants to describe the approaches they take to streamline communication after a patient’s hospital visit, the methods they use to ensure collaborative communication between primary or secondary providers, and where communication challenges exist.

Healthcare provider characteristics

Our sample included 12 providers: four in family medicine (1 MD, 1 DO, 1 PA & 1 APRN), three in pediatrics (2 MD with specialty in hospital medicine & 1 DO), three in palliative medicine (2 MDs & 1 APRN with specialty in wound care), one in critical care medicine (DO with specialty in pediatric pulmonology) and one in behavioral health (1 LCSW with specialty in trauma). Our participants averaged 9 years (range 2–15) as a healthcare provider; most reported more than 5 years in their current professional role. The diversity of participants extended to their patient populations as well, with each participant reporting a unique distribution of age, race and level of medical complexity among their patients. Most participants reported that a portion of their patients travel up to five hours, sometimes across county- or state-lines, to receive care.

Theme 1: A friction exists between aspects of patients’ rural identities and healthcare systems

Our participants comprised a collection of medical professions and reported variability among health-related reasons their patients seek care. However, most participants acknowledged similar characteristics that influence their patients’ challenges to healthcare access. These identified factors formed categories from which the first theme emerged. There exists a great deal of ‘rugged individualism’ among Montanans, which reflects a self-sufficient and self-reliant way of life. Stoicism marked a primary factor to characterize this quality. One participant explained:

True Montanans are difficult to treat medically because they tend to be a tough group. They don’t see doctors. They don’t want to go, and they don’t want to be sick. That’s an aspect of Montana that makes health culture a little bit difficult.

Another participant echoed this finding by stating:

The backwoods Montana range guy who has an identity of being strong and independent probably doesn’t seek out a lot of medical care or take a lot of medications. Their sense of vitality, independence and identity really come from being able to take care and rely on themselves. When that is threatened, that’s going to create a unique experience of illness.

Similar responses were shared by all twelve participants; stoicism seemed to be heavily embedded in many patient populations in Montana and serves as a key determinant of healthcare acceptability. There are additional factors, however, that may interact with stoicism but are multiply determined. Stigma is an example of this, presented in this context as one’s concern about judgement by the healthcare system. Respondents were openly critical of this perception of the healthcare system as it was widely discussed in interviews. One participant stated:

There is a real perception of a punitive nature in the medical community, particularly if I observe a health issue other than the primary reason for one’s hospital visit, whether that may be predicated on medical neglect, delay of care, or something that may warrant a report to social services. For many of the patients and families I see, it’s not a positive experience and one that is sometimes an uphill barrier that I work hard to circumnavigate.

Analysis of these factors suggest that low use of healthcare services may link to several characteristics, including access problems. Separately, a patient’s perceived stigma from healthcare providers may also impact a patient’s willingness to receive services. One participant put it best by stating

Sometimes, families assume that I didn’t want to see them because they will come in for follow up to meet with me but end up meeting with another provider, which is frustrating because I want to maintain patients on my panel but available time and resource occasionally limits me from doing so. It could be really hard adapting to those needs on the fly, but it’s an honest miss.

When a patient arrives for a healthcare visit and experiences this frustration, it may elicit a patient’s perceptions of neglect or disorganization. This ‘honest miss’ may, in turn, exacerbate other acceptable-related barriers to care.

Theme 2: Facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences

The biomedical model is the standard of care utilized in Western medicine [ 79 , 80 ]. However, the US comprises people with diverse social and cultural identities that may not directly align with Western conceptions of health and wellness. Approximately 11.5% of the Montana population falls within an ethnic minority group. 6.4% are of American Indian or Alaska Native origin, 0.5% are of Black or African American origin, 0.8% are of Asian origin and 3.8% are of multiple or other origins. [ 81 ]. Cultural insensitivity is acknowledged in health services research as an active deterrent for appropriate healthcare delivery [ 65 ]. Participants for this study were asked how they react when a patient brings up a cultural attitude or behavior that may impact the proposed treatment plan. Eight participants noted a necessity for humility when this occurs. One participant conceptualized this by stating:

When this happens, I learn about individuals and a way of life that is different to the way I grew up. There is a lot of beauty and health in a non-patriarchal, non-dominating, non-sexist framework, and when we can engage in such, it is really expansive for my own learning process.

The participants who expressed humility emphasized that it is best to work in tandem with their patient, congruently. Especially for those with contrasting worldviews, a provider and a patient working as a team poses an opportunity to develop trust. Without it, a patient can easily fall out of the system, further hindering their ability to access healthcare services in the future. One participant stated:

The approach that ends up being successful for a lot of patients is when we understand their modalities, and they have a sense we understand those things. We have to show understanding and they have to trust. From there, we can make recommendations to help get them there, not decisions for them to obey, rather views based on our experiences and understanding of medicine.

Curiosity was another reaction noted by a handful of participants. One participant said:

I believe patients and their caregivers can be engaged and loving in different ways that don’t always follow the prescribed approach in the ways I’ve been trained, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are detrimental. I love what I do, and I love learning new things or new approaches, but I also love being surprised. My style of medicine is not to predict peoples’ lives, rather to empower and support what makes life meaningful for them.

Participants mentioned several other characteristics that they use in practice to prevent cultural insensitivity and support a collaborative approach to healthcare. Table 1 lists these facilitating characteristics and quotes to explain the substance of their benefit.

Consensus among participants indicated that the use of these protective factors to promote cultural sensitivity and apply them in practice is not standardized. When asked, all but two participants said they had not received any culturally-based training since beginning their practice. Instead, they referred to developing skills through “on the job training” or “off the cuff learning.” The general way of medicine, one participant remarked, was to “throw you to the fire.” This suggested that use of standardized cultural humility training modules for healthcare providers was not common practice. Many attributed this to time constraints.

Individual efforts to gain culturally appropriate skills or enhance cultural humility were mentioned, however. For example, three participants reported that they attended medical conferences to discuss cultural challenges within medicine, one participant sought out cultural education within their organization, and another was invited by Native American community members to engage in traditional peace ceremonies. Participants described these additional efforts as uncommon and outside the parameters of a provider’s job responsibilities, as they require time commitments without compensation.

Additionally, eight participants said they share their personal contact information with patients so they may call them directly for medical needs. The conditions and frequency with which this is done was variable and more common among providers in specialized areas of medicine or those who described having a manageable patient panel. All who reported that they shared their personal contact information described it as an aspect of rural health service delivery that is atypical in other, non-rural healthcare systems.

Theme 3: Communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented

Healthcare is complex and multi-disciplinary, and patients’ treatment is rarely overseen by a single provider [ 82 ]. The array of provider types and specialties is vast, as is the range of responsibilities ascribed to providers. Thus, open communication among providers both within and between healthcare systems is vital for the success of collaborative healthcare [ 83 ]. Without effective communication achieved between healthcare providers, the appropriate delivery of healthcare services may be become compromised. Our participants noted that they face multiple challenges that complicate communication with other providers. Miscommunication between departments, often implicating the Emergency Department (ED), was a recurring point noted among participants. One participant who is a primary care physician said:

If one of my patients goes to the ER, I don’t always get the notes. They’re supposed to send them to the patient’s primary care doc. The same thing happens with general admissions, but again, I often find out from somebody else that my patient was admitted to the hospital.

This failure to communicate can negatively impact the patient, particularly if time sensitivity or medical complexity is essential to treatment. A patient’s primary care physician is the most accurate source of their medical history; without an effective way to obtain and synthesize a patient’s health information, there may be increased risk of medical error. One participant in a specialty field stated:

One of the biggest barriers I see is obtaining a concise description of a patient’s history and needs. You can imagine if you’re a mom and you’ve got a complicated kid. You head to the ER. The ER doc looks at you with really wide eyes, not knowing how to get information about your child that’s really important.

This concern was highlighted with a specific example from a different participant:

I have been unable to troubleshoot instances when I send people to the ER with a pretty clear indication for admission, and then they’re sent home. For instance, I had an older fellow with pretty severe chronic kidney disease. He presented to another practitioner in my office with shortness of breath and swelling and appeared to have newly onset decompensated heart failure. When I figured this out, I sent him to the ER, called and gave my report. The patient later came back for follow up to find out not only that they had not been admitted but they lost no weight with outpatient dialysis . I feel like a real opportunity was missed to try to optimize the care of the patient simply because there was poor communication between myself and the ER. This poor guy… He ended up going to the ER four times before he got admitted for COVID-19.

In some cases, communication breakdown was reported as the sole cause of a poor outcome. When communication is effective, each essential member of the healthcare team is engaged and collaborating with the same information. Some participants called this process ‘rounds’ when a regularly scheduled meeting is staged between a group of providers to ensure access to accurate patient information. Accurate communication may also help build trust and improve a patient’s experience. In contrast, ineffective communication can result in poor clarity regarding providers’ responsibilities or lost information. Appropriate delivery of healthcare considers the fit between providers and a patient’s specific healthcare needs; the factors noted here suggest that provider-provider miscommunication can adversely affect this dimension of healthcare access.

Another important mechanism of communication is the sharing of electronic medical records (EMRs), a process that continues to shift with technological advances. Innovation is still recent enough, however, for several of our study participants to be able to recall a time when paper charts were standard. Widespread adoption and embrace of the improvements inherent in electronic medical records expanded in the late 2000’s [ 84 ]. EMRs vastly improved the ability to retain, organize, safeguard, and transfer health information. Every participant highlighted EMRs at one point or another and often did so with an underlying sense of anger or frustration. Systematic issues and problems with EMRs were discussed. One participant provided historical context to such records:

Years back, the government aimed to buy an electronic medical record system, whichever was the best, and a number of companies created their own. Each were a reasonable system, so they all got their checks and now we have four completely separate operating systems that do not talk to each other. The idea was to make a router or some type of relay that can share information back and forth. There was no money in that though, so of course, no one did anything about it. Depending on what hospital, clinic or agency you work for, you will most likely work within one of these systems. It was a great idea; it just didn’t get finished.

Seven participants confirmed these points and their impacts on making coordination more difficult, relying on outdated communication strategies more often than not. Many noted this even occurs between facilities within the same city and in separate small metropolitan areas across the state. One participant said:

If my hospital decides to contract with one EMR and the hospital across town contracts with another, correspondence between these hospitals goes back to traditional faxing. As a provider, you’re just taking a ‘fingered crossed’ approach hoping that the fax worked, is picked up, was put in the appropriate inbox and was actually looked at. Information acquisition and making sure it’s timely are unforeseen between EMRs.

Participants reported an “astronomic” number of daily faxes and telephone calls to complete the communication EMRs were initially designed to handle. These challenges are even more burdensome if a patient moves from out of town or out of state; obtaining their medical records was repeatedly referred to as a “chore” so onerous that it often remains undone. Another recurring concern brought up by participants regarded accuracy within EMRs to lend a false sense of security. They are not frequently updated, not designed to be family-centered and not set up to do anything automatically. One participant highlighted these limitations by stating:

I was very proud of a change I made in our EMR system [EPIC], even though it was one I never should have had to make. I was getting very upset because I would find out from my nursing assistant who read the obituary that one of my patients had died. There was a real problem with the way the EMR was notifying PCP’s, so I got an EPIC-level automated notification built into our EMR so that any time a patient died, their status would be changed to deceased and a notification would be sent to their PCP. It’s just really awful to find out a week later that your patient died, especially when you know these people and their families really well. It’s not good care to have blind follow up.

Whether it be a physical or electronic miscommunication between healthcare providers, the appropriate delivery of healthcare can be called to question

Theme 4: Time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems

Several measures of system capacity suggest the healthcare system in the US is under-resourced. There are fewer physicians and hospital beds per capita compared to most comparable countries, and the growth of healthcare provider populations has stagnated over time [ 15 ]. Rural areas, in particular, are subject to resource limitations [ 16 ]. All participants discussed provider shortages in detail. They described how shortages impact time allocation in their day-to-day operations. Tasks like patient intakes, critical assessments, and recovering information from EMRs take time, of which most participants claimed to not have enough of. There was also a consensus in having inadequate time to spend on medically complex cases. Time pressures were reported to subsequently influence quality of care. One participant stated:

With the constant pace of medicine, time is not on your side. A provider cannot always participate in an enriching dialogue with their patients, so rather than listen and learn, we are often coerced into the mindset of ‘getting through’ this patient so we can move on. This echoes for patient education during discharge, making the whole process more arduous than it otherwise could be if time and resources were not as sparse.

Depending on provider type, specialty, and the size of patient panels, four participants said they have the luxury of extending patient visits to 40 + minutes. Any flexibility with patient visits was regarded as just that: a luxury. Very few providers described the ability to coordinate their schedules as such. This led some study participants to limit the number of patients they serve. One participant said:

We simply don’t have enough clinicians, which is a shame because these people are really skilled, exceptional, brilliant providers but are performing way below their capacity. Because of this, I have a smaller case load so I can engage in a level of care that I feel is in the best interest of my patients. Everything is a tradeoff. Time has to be sacrificed at one point or another. This compromise sets our system up to do ‘ok’ work, not great work.

Of course, managing an overly large number of patients with high complexity is challenging. Especially while enduring the burden of a persisting global pandemic, participants reflected that the general outlook of administering healthcare in the US is to “do more with less.” This often forces providers to delegate responsibilities, which participants noted has potential downsides. One participant described how delegating patient care can cause problems.

Very often will a patient schedule a follow up that needs to happen within a certain time frame, but I am unable to see them myself. So, they are then placed with one of my mid-level providers. However, if additional health issues are introduced, which often happens, there is a high-risk of bounce-back or need to return once again to the hospital. It’s an inefficient vetting process that falls to people who may not have specific training in the labs and imaging that are often included in follow up visits. Unfortunately, it’s a forlorn hope to have a primary care physician be able to attend all levels of a patient’s care.

Several participants described how time constraints stretch all healthcare staff thin and complicate patient care. This was particularly important among participants who reported having a patient panel exceeding 1000. There were some participants, however, who praised the relationships they have with their nurse practitioners and physician’s assistants and mark transparency as the most effective way to coordinate care. Collectively, these clinical relationships were built over long standing periods of time, a disadvantage to providers at the start of their medical career. All but one participant with over a decade of clinical experience mentioned the usefulness of these relationships. The factors discussed in Theme 4 are directly linked to the Availability dimension of access to healthcare. A patient’s ability to reach care is subject to the capacity of their healthcare provider(s). Additionally, further analysis suggests these factors also link to the Appropriateness dimension because the quality of patient-provider relationships may be negatively impacted if a provider’s time is compromised.

Theme 5: Profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US.

The US healthcare system functions partially for-profit in the public and private sectors. The federal government provides funding for national programs such as Medicare, but a majority of Americans access healthcare through private employer plans [ 85 ]. As a result, uninsurance rates influence healthcare access. Though the rate of the uninsured has dropped over the last decade through expansion of the Affordable Care Act, it remains above 8 percent [ 86 ]. Historically, there has been ethical criticism in the literature of a for-profit system as it is said to exacerbate healthcare disparities and constitute unfair competition against nonprofit institutions. Specifically, the US healthcare system treats healthcare as a commodity instead of a right, enables organizational controls that adversely affect patient-provider relationships, undermines medical education, and constitutes a medical-industrial complex that threatens influence on healthcare-related public policy [ 87 ]. Though unprompted by the interviewer, participants raised many of these concerns. One participant shared their views on how priorities stand in their practice:

A lot of the higher-ups in the healthcare system where I work see each patient visit as a number. It’s not that they don’t have the capacity to think beyond that, but that’s what their role is, making sure we’re profitable. That’s part of why our healthcare system in the US is as broken as it is. It’s accentuated focus on financially and capitalistically driven factors versus understanding all these other barriers to care.

Eight participants echoed a similar concept, that addressing barriers to healthcare access in their organizations is largely complicated because so much attention is directed on matters that have nothing to do with patients. A few other participants supported this by alluding to a “cherry-picking” process by which those at the top of the hierarchy devote their attention to the easiest tasks. One participant shared an experience where contrasting work demands between administrators and front-line clinical providers produces adverse effects:

We had a new administrator in our hospital. I had been really frustrated with the lack of cultural awareness and curiosity from our other leaders in the past, so I offered to meet and take them on a tour of the reservation. This was meant to introduce them to kids, families and Tribal leaders who live in the area and their interface with healthcare. They declined, which I thought was disappointing and eye-opening.

Analysis of these factors suggest that those who work directly with patients understand patient needs better than those who serve in management roles. This same participant went on to suggest an ulterior motive for a push towards telemedicine, as administrators primarily highlight the benefit of billing for virtual visits instead of the nature of the visits themselves.

This study explored barriers and facilitators to healthcare access from the perspective of rural healthcare providers in Montana. Our qualitative analysis uncovered five key themes: 1) a friction exists between aspects of patients’ rural identities and healthcare systems; 2) facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences; 3) communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented; 4) time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems; and 5) profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US. Themes 2 and 3 were directly supported by earlier qualitative studies that applied Levesque’s framework, specifically regarding healthcare providers’ poor interpersonal quality and lack of collaboration with other providers that are suspected to result from a lack of provider training [ 67 , 70 ]. This ties back to the importance of cultural humility, which many previous culture-based trainings have referred to as cultural competence. Cultural competence is achieved through a plethora of trainings designed to expose providers to different cultures’ beliefs and values but induces risk of stereotyping and stigmatizing a patient’s views. Therefore, cultural humility is the preferred idea, by which providers reflect and gain open-ended appreciation for a patient’s culture [ 88 ].

Implications for Practice

Perhaps the most substantial takeaway is how embedded rugged individualism is within rural patient populations and how difficult that makes the delivery of care in rural health systems. We heard from participants that stoicism and perceptions of stigma within the system contribute to this, but other resulting factors may be influential at the provider- and organizational-levels. Stoicism and perceived stigma both appear to arise, in part, from an understandable knowledge gap regarding the care system. For instance, healthcare providers understand the relations between primary and secondary care, but many patients may perceive both concepts as elements of a single healthcare system [ 89 ]. Any issue experienced by a patient when tasked to see both a primary and secondary provider may result in a patient becoming confused [ 90 ]. This may also overlap with our third theme, as a disjointed means of communication between healthcare providers can exacerbate patients’ negative experiences. One consideration to improve this is to incorporate telehealth programs into an existing referral framework to reduce unnecessary interfacility transfers; telehealth programs have proven effective in rural and remote settings [ 91 ].

In fact, telehealth has been rolled out in a variety of virtual platforms throughout its evolution, its innovation matched with continued technological advancement. Simply put, telehealth allows health service delivery from a distance; it allows knowledge and practice of clinical care to be in a different space than a patient. Because of this, a primary benefit of telehealth is its impact on improving patient-centered outcomes among those living in rural areas. For instance, text messaging technology improves early infant diagnosis, adherence to recommended diagnostic testing, and participant engagement in lifestyle change interventions [ 92 , 93 , 94 ]. More sophisticated interventions have found their way into smartphone-based technology, some of which are accessible even without an internet connection [ 95 , 96 ]. Internet accessibility is important because a number of study participants noted internet connectivity as a barrier for patients who live in low resource communities. Videoconferencing is another function of telehealth that has delivered a variety of health services, including those which are mental health-specific [ 97 ], and mobile health clinics have been used in rural, hard-to-reach settings to show the delivery of quality healthcare is both feasible and acceptable [ 98 , 99 , 100 ]. While telehealth has potential to reduce a number of healthcare access barriers, it may not always address the most pressing healthcare needs [ 101 ]. However, telehealth does serve as a viable, cost-effective alternative for rural populations with limited physical access to specialized services [ 102 ]. With time and resource limitations acknowledged as a key theme in our study, an emphasis on expanding telehealth services is encouraged as it will likely have significant involvement on advancing healthcare in the future, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic persists [ 103 ].

Implications for Policy

One could argue that most of the areas of fragmentation in the US healthcare system can be linked to the very philosophy on which it is based: an emphasis on profits as highest priority. Americans are, therefore, forced to navigate a health service system that does not work solely in their best interests. It is not surprising to observe lower rates of healthcare usage in rural areas, which may be a result from rural persons’ negative views of the US healthcare system or a perception that the system does not exist to support wellness. These perceptions may interact with ‘rugged individualism’ to squelch rural residents’ engagement in healthcare. Many of the providers we interviewed for this study appeared to understand this and strived to improve their patients’ experiences and outcomes. Though these efforts are admirable, they may not characterize all providers who serve in rural areas of the US. From a policy standpoint, it is important to recognize these expansive efforts from providers. If incentives were offered to encourage maximum efforts be made, it may lessen burden due to physician burnout and fatigue. Of course, there is no easy fix to the persisting limit of time and resources for providers, problems that require workforce expansion. Ultimately, though, the current structure of the US healthcare system is failing rural America and doing little to help the practice of rural healthcare providers.

Implications for Future Research

It is important for future health systems research efforts to consider issues that arise from both individual- and system-level access barriers and where the two intersect. Oftentimes, challenges that appear linked to a patient or provider may actually stem from an overarching system failure. If failures are critically and properly addressed, we may refine our understanding of what we can do in our professional spaces to improve care as practitioners, workforce developers, researchers and advocates. This qualitative study was exploratory in nature. It represents a step forward in knowledge generation regarding challenges in access to healthcare for rural Americans. Although mental health did not come up by design in this study, future efforts exploring barriers to healthcare access in rural systems should focus on access to mental healthcare. In many rural areas, Montana included, rates of suicide, substance use and other mental health disorders are highly prevalent. These characteristics should be part of the overall discussion of access to healthcare in rural areas. Optimally, barriers to healthcare access should continue to be explored through qualitative and mixed study designs to honor its multi-dimensional stature.

Strengths and Limitations

It is important to note first that this study interviewed healthcare providers instead of patients, which served as both a strength and limitation. Healthcare providers were able to draw on numerous patient-provider experiences, enabling an account of the aggregate which would have been impossible for a patient population. However, accounts of healthcare providers’ perceptions of barriers to healthcare access for their patients may differ from patients’ specific views. Future research should examine acceptability- and appropriateness-related barriers to healthcare access in patient populations. Second, study participants were recruited through convenience sampling methods, so results may be biased towards healthcare providers who are more invested in addressing barriers to healthcare access. Particularly, the providers interviewed for this study represented a subset who go beyond expectations of their job descriptions by engaging with their communities and spending additional uncompensated time with their patients. It is likely that a provider who exhibits these behavioral traits is more likely to participate in research aimed at addressing barriers to healthcare access. Third, the inability to conduct face-to-face interviews for our qualitative study may have posed an additional limitation. It is possible, for example, that in-person interviews might have resulted in increased rapport with study participants. Notwithstanding this possibility, the remote interview format was necessary to accommodate health risks to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, given our qualitative approach, results from our study cannot be generalizable to all rural providers’ views or other rural health systems. In addition, no causality can be inferred regarding the influence of aspects of rurality on access. The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study was to probe research questions for future efforts. We also acknowledge the authors’ roles in the research, also known as reflexivity. The first author was the only author who administered interviews and had no prior relationships with all but one study participant. Assumptions and pre-dispositions to interview content by the first author were regularly addressed throughout data analysis to maintain study integrity. This was achieved by conducting analysis by unique interview question, rather than by unique participant, and recoding the numerical order of participants for each question. Our commitment to rigorous qualitative methods was a strength for the study for multiple reasons. Conducting member checks with participants ensured trustworthiness of findings. Continuing data collection to data saturation ensured dependability of findings, which was achieved after 10 interviews and confirmed after 2 additional interviews. We further recognize the heterogeneity in our sample of participants, which helped generate variability in responses. To remain consistent with appropriate means of presenting results in qualitative research however, we shared minimal demographic information about our study participants to ensure confidentiality.

The divide between urban and rural health stretches beyond a disproportionate allocation of resources. Rural health systems serve a more complicated and hard-to-reach patient population. They lack sufficient numbers of providers to meet population health needs. These disparities impact collaboration between patients and providers as well as the delivery of acceptable and appropriate healthcare. The marker of rurality complicates the already cumbersome challenge of administering acceptable and appropriate healthcare and impediments stemming from rurality require continued monitoring to improve patient experiences and outcomes. Our qualitative study explored rural healthcare providers’ views on some of the social, cultural, and programmatic factors that influence access to healthcare among their patient populations. We identified five key themes: 1) a friction exists between aspects of patients’ rural identities and healthcare systems; 2) facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences; 3) communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented; 4) time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems; and 5) profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US. This study provides implications that may shift the landscape of a healthcare provider’s approach to delivering healthcare. Further exploration is required to understand the effects these characteristics have on measurable patient-centered outcomes in rural areas.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to individual privacy could be compromised but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

All study procedures and methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations from the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was given by exempt review from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Montana (IRB Protocol No.: 186–20). Participants received oral and written information about the study prior to interview, which allowed them to provide informed consent for the interviews to be recorded and used for qualitative research purposes. No ethical concerns were experienced in this study pertaining to human subjects.

Consent for publication.

The participants consented to the publication of de-identified material from the interviews.

Riley WJ. Health Disparities: Gaps in Access, Quality and Affordability of Medical Care. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2012;123:167–74.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Levesque J, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Serban N. A Multidimensional Framework for Measuring Access. In: Serban N. Healthcare System Access: Measurement, Inference, and Intervention. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. p. 13–59.

Google Scholar  

Roncarolo F, Boivin A, Denis JL, et al. What do we know about the needs and challenges of health systems? A scoping review of the international literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:636. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2585-5 .

Cabrera-Barona P, Blaschke T. Kienberger S. Explaining Accessibility and Satisfaction Related to Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Soc Indic Res. 2017;133,719–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1371-9 .

Coombs NC, Meriwether WE, Caringi J, Newcomer SR. Barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with mental health challenges: A population-based study. SSM Popul Health. 2021;15:100847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100847 .

Farietta TP, Lu B, Tumin R. Ohio’s Medicaid Expansion and Unmet Health Needs Among Low-Income Women of Reproductive Age. Matern Child Health. 2018;22(12):1771–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2575-1 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Sommers BD, Blendon RJ, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Changes in Utilization and Health Among Low-Income Adults After Medicaid Expansion or Expanded Private Insurance. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;1;176(10):1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4419 .

National Alliance on Mental Illness: The Doctor is Out. Continuing Disparities in Access to Mental and Physical Health Care. 2017. https://www.nami.org/Support-Education/Publications-Reports/Public-Policy-Reports/The-Doctor-is-Out . Accessed 29 Aug 2021.

Pollitz K, Lopes L, Kearney A, Rae M, Cox C, Fehr F, Rousseau D, Kaiser Family Foundation. US Statistics on Surprise Medical Billing. JAMA. 2020;323(6):498. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0065 .

Kahraman C, Orobello C, Cirella GT. hanging Dynamics with COVID-19: Future Outlook. In: XX Cirella GT, editor. Human Settlements: Urbanization, Smart Sector Development, and Future Outlook. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 235–52.

Book   Google Scholar  

Blumenthal D, Fowler EJ, Abrams M, Collins SR. Covid-19 — Implications for the Health Care System. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1483–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2021088 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Defêche J, Azarzar S, Mesdagh A, Dellot P, Tytgat A, Bureau F, Gillet L, Belhadj Y, Bontems S, Hayette M-P, Schils R, Rahmouni S, Ernst M, Moutschen M, Darcis G. In-Depth Longitudinal Comparison of Clinical Specimens to Detect SARS-CoV-2. Pathogens. 2021;10(11):1362. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111362 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rosenblatt RA, Hart LG. Physicians and rural America. West J Med. 2000;173(5):348–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/ewjm.173.5.348 .

Kaiser Family Foundation Analysis of OECD Data. 2020. https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/u-s-health-care-resources-compare-countries/#item-physicians-density-per-1000-population-2000-2018 . Accessed 31 Oct 2021.

Government Accounting Office. Physician Workforce: Locations and Types of Graduate Training Were Largely Unchanged, and Federal Efforts May Not Be Sufficient to Meet Needs. 2017. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-411.pdf . Accessed 31 Oct 2021.

The Kaiser Family Foundation: The Uninsured in Rural America. 2003. https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/the-uninsured-in-rural-america-update-pdf.pdf . Accessed 15 Sept 2021.

Wright B, Potter AJ, Trivedi AN, Mueller KJ. The Relationship Between Rural Health Clinic Use and Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 2018;34(4):423–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12253 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Weichelt B, Bendixsen C, Patrick T. A Model for Assessing Necessary Conditions for Rural Health Care’s Mobile Health Readiness: Qualitative Assessment of Clinician-Perceived Barriers. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(11): e11915. https://doi.org/10.2196/11915 .

Mangundu M, Roets L, Janse van Rensberg E. Accessibility of healthcare in rural Zimbabwe: The perspective of nurses and healthcare users. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2245 .

Rahayu YYS, Araki T, Rosleine D. Factors affecting the use of herbal medicines in the universal health coverage system in Indonesia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;260: 112974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.112974 .

Bolin JN, Bellamy GR, Ferdinand AO, et al. Rural Healthy People 2020: New Decade, Same Challenges. Journal of Rural Health. 2015;31(3):326–33.

Reid S. The rural determinants of health: using critical realism as a theoretical framework. Rural Remote Health. 2019;19(3):5184. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5184 .

Wynia MK, Osborn CY. Health literacy and communication quality in health care organizations. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):102–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.499981 .

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What is Health Literacy? 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html . Accessed 25 Feb 2022.

Davis TC, Arnold CL, Rademaker A, et al. Differences in barriers to mammography between rural and urban women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(7):748–55. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2011.3397 .

Halverson J, Martinez-Donate A, Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Health literacy and urbanicity among cancer patients. J Rural Health. 2013;29(4):392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12018 .

Zahnd WE, Scaife SL, Francis ML. Health literacy skills in rural and urban populations. Am J Health Behav. 2009;33(5):550–7. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.33.5.8 .

Dogba MJ, Dossa AR, Breton E, Gandonou-Migan R. Using information and communication technologies to involve patients and the public in health education in rural and remote areas: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3906-7 .

Committee on the Science of Changing Behavioral Health Social Norms, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. In: Ending Discrimination Against People with Mental and Substance Use Disorders: The Evidence for Stigma Change. Washington: National Academics Press; 2016. p. 33–52.

Wu Y, Zhou H, Wang Q, Cao M, Medina A, Rozelle S. Use of maternal health services among women in the ethnic rural areas of western China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3996-2 .

Meyer E, Hennink M, Rochat R, et al. Working Towards Safe Motherhood: Delays and Barriers to Prenatal Care for Women in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Georgia. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(7):1358–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1997-x .

Heinrich S. Medical science faces the post-truth era: a plea for the grassroot values of science. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33(2):198–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000833 .

Esquivel MM, Chen JC, Woo RK, et al. Why do patients receive care from a short-term medical mission? Survey study from rural Guatemala. J Surg Res. 2017;215:160–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.056 .

Park LG, Dracup K, Whooley MA, et al. Symptom Diary Use and Improved Survival for Patients With Heart Failure [published correction appears in Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;10(12):]. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(11):e003874. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003874 .

Taleb F, Perkins J, Ali NA, et al. Transforming maternal and newborn health social norms and practices to increase utilization of health services in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0501-8 .

Billah SM, Hoque DE, Rahman M, et al. Feasibility of engaging “Village Doctors” in the Community-based Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (C-IMCI): experience from rural Bangladesh. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2): 020413. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.020413 .

Kaiser JL, Fong RM, Hamer DH, et al. How a woman’s interpersonal relationships can delay care-seeking and access during the maternity period in rural Zambia: An intersection of the Social Ecological Model with the Three Delays Framework. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:312–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.011 .

Rao KD, Sheffel A. Quality of clinical care and bypassing of primary health centers in India. Soc Sci Med. 2018;207:80–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.040 .

Lee YT, Lee YH, Kaplan WA. Is Taiwan’s National Health Insurance a perfect system? Problems related to health care utilization of the aboriginal population in rural townships. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34(1):e6–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2653 .

Lyford M, Haigh MM, Baxi S, Cheetham S, Shahid S, Thompson SC. An Exploration of Underrepresentation of Aboriginal Cancer Patients Attending a Regional Radiotherapy Service in Western Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020337 .

Article   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rohr JM, Spears KL, Geske J, Khandalavala B, Lacey MJ. Utilization of Health Care Resources by the Amish of a Rural County in Nebraska. J Community Health. 2019;44(6):1090–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00696-9 .

Johnston K, Harvey C, Matich P, et al. Increasing access to sexual health care for rural and regional young people: Similarities and differences in the views of young people and service providers. Aust J Rural Health. 2015;23(5):257–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12186 .

Legido-Quigley H, Naheed A, de Silva HA, et al. Patients’ experiences on accessing health care services for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1): e0211100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211100 .

Shaw B, Amouzou A, Miller NP, Bryce J, Surkan PJ. A qualitative exploration of care-seeking pathways for sick children in the rural Oromia region of Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2123-5 .

Larson E, Vail D, Mbaruku GM, Kimweri A, Freedman LP, Kruk ME. Moving Toward Patient-Centered Care in Africa: A Discrete Choice Experiment of Preferences for Delivery Care among 3,003 Tanzanian Women. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8): e0135621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135621 .

Spleen AM, Lengerich EJ, Camacho FT, Vanderpool RC. Health care avoidance among rural populations: results from a nationally representative survey. J Rural Health. 2014;30(1):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12032 .

Weisgrau S. Issues in rural health: access, hospitals, and reform. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995;17(1):1–14.

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/surveys.htm . Accessed 29 Aug 2021.

Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 .

Dyer TA, Owens J, Robinson PG. The acceptability of healthcare: from satisfaction to trust. Community Dent Health. 2016;33(4):242–51. https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_3902Dyer10 .

Padgett DK. Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Health. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2012.

Tolley EE, Ulin PR, Mack N, Robinson ET, Succop SM. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. San Francisco, California: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016.

Ingram DD, Franco SJ. 2013 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. In: National Center for Health Statistics: Vital Health Statistics. 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_166.pdf . Accessed 31 Oct 2021.

Health Resources & Services Administration. Health Professional Shortage Area Find. 2021. https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/shortage-area/hpsa-find . Accessed 31 Oct 2021.

Shaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A. Approaches to Recruiting “Hard-To-Reach” Populations into Re-search: A Review of the Literature. Health Promot Perspect. 2011;1(2):86–94. https://doi.org/10.5681/hpp.2011.009 .

Sadler GR, Lee HC, Lim RS, Fullerton J. Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nurs Health Sci. 2010;12(3):369–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x .

Deterding NM, Waters MC. Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews: A Twenty-first-century Approach. Sociological Methods & Research. 2021;50(2):708–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377 .

Schreier M, Stamann C, Janssen M, Dahl T, Whittal A. Qualitative Content Analysis: Conceptualizations and Challenges in Research Practice-Introduction to the FQS Special Issue" Qualitative Content Analysis I". InForum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2019;20:26 DEU.

Guest G, Namey E, Chen M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5): e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076 .

Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2000;1(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089 .

O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, Vol. 89, No. 9 / Sept 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 .

Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545–7. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 .

Miller S. Cultural humility is the first step to becoming global care providers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38(1):92–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00311.x .

Prasad SJ, Nair P, Gadhvi K, Barai I, Danish HS, Philip AB. Cultural humility: treating the patient, not the illness. Med Educ Online. 2016;21:30908. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.30908 .

George MS, Davey R, Mohanty I, Upton P. “Everything is provided free, but they are still hesitant to access healthcare services”: why does the indigenous community in Attapadi, Kerala continue to experience poor access to healthcare? Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01216-1 .

Romanelli M, Hudson KD. Individual and systemic barriers to health care: Perspectives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(6):714–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000306 .

Bailie J, Schierhout G, Laycock A, et al. Determinants of access to chronic illness care: a mixed-methods evaluation of a national multifaceted chronic disease package for Indigenous Australians. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11): e008103. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008103 .

Reeve C, Humphreys J, Wakerman J, Carter M, Carroll V, Reeve D. Strengthening primary health care: achieving health gains in a remote region of Australia. Med J Aust. 2015;202(9):483–7. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja14.00894 .

Swan LET, Auerbach SL, Ely GE, Agbemenu K, Mencia J, Araf NR. Family Planning Practices in Appalachia: Focus Group Perspectives on Service Needs in the Context of Regional Substance Abuse. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041198 .

Kabia E, Mbau R, Oyando R, et al. “We are called the et cetera”: experiences of the poor with health financing reforms that target them in Kenya. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1006-2 .

Ho JW, Kuluski K, Im J. “It’s a fight to get anything you need” - Accessing care in the community from the perspectives of people with multimorbidity. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1311–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12571 .

Latif A, Mandane B, Ali A, Ghumra S, Gulzar N. A Qualitative Exploration to Understand Access to Pharmacy Medication Reviews: Views from Marginalized Patient Groups. Pharmacy (Basel). 2020;8(2):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020073 .

Tschirhart N, Diaz E, Ottersen T. Accessing public healthcare in Oslo, Norway: the experiences of Thai immigrant masseuses. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):722. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4560-9 .

Ireland S, Belton S, Doran F. “I didn’t feel judged”: exploring women’s access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia. J Prim Health Care. 2020;12(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1071/HC19050 .

Stokes T, Tumilty E, Latu ATF, et al. Improving access to health care for people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Southern New Zealand: qualitative study of the views of health professional stakeholders and patients. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11): e033524. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033524 .

Jafar TH, Ramakrishnan C, John O, et al. Access to CKD Care in Rural Communities of India: a qualitative study exploring the barriers and potential facilitators. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-1702-6 .

Doetsch J, Pilot E, Santana P, Krafft T. Potential barriers in healthcare access of the elderly population influenced by the economic crisis and the troika agreement: a qualitative case study in Lisbon, Portugal. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0679-7 .

Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460 .

Risberg G, Hamberg K, Johansson E.E. Gender perspective in medicine: a vital part of medical scientific rationality. A useful model for comprehending structures and hierarchies within medical science. BMC Med. 2006;4(1):1.

Montana Census & Economic Information Center. 2021. https://ceic.mt.gov/ . Accessed 18 Sept 2021.

Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America, Institute of Medicine. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington: National Academies Press; 2013.

O’Daniel M, Rosenstein AH, Professional Communication and Team Collaboration. In: Hughes RG, editor. Chapter 33: Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville; 2008.

Evans RS. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearb Med Inform. 2016;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S48-S61. https://doi.org/10.15265/IYS-2016-s006 .

Tikkanen R, Osborn R, Mossialos E, Djordjevic A, Wharton GA. International Health Care System Profiles: United States. The Commonwealth Fund. 2020. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/united-states . Accessed 19 Sept 2021.

Berchick ER, Barnett JC, Upton RD. Health Insurance Coverage in the United States. Washington: United States Census Bureau; 2018.

Brock DW, Buchanan A. Ethical Issues in For-Profit Health Care. In: Gray BH, editor. For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care. Washington: National Academics Press; 1986.

Lekas HM, Pahl K, Fuller Lewis C. Rethinking Cultural Competence: Shifting to Cultural Humility. Health Serv Insights. 2020;13:1178632920970580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632920970580 .

Beaulieu MD. Primary and secondary care: Breaking down barriers for our patients with chronic diseases. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59(2):221.

Crafford L, Jenkins LS. Why seek a second consultation at an emergency centre? A qualitative study. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017;9(1):e1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1397 .

Sorensen MJ, von Recklinghausen FM, Fulton G, et al. Secondary overtriage: The burden of unnecessary interfacility transfers in a rural trauma system. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:763–8.

Sutcliffe CG, Thuma PE, van Dijk JH, et al. Use of mobile phones and text messaging to decrease the turnaround time for early infant HIV diagnosis and notification in rural Zambia: an observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0822-z .

Baldwin LM, Morrison C, Griffin J, et al. Bidirectional Text Messaging to Improve Adherence to Recommended Lipid Testing. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(5):608–14. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.05.170088 .

Albright K, Krantz MJ, Backlund Jarquín P, DeAlleaume L, Coronel-Mockler S, Estacio RO. Health Promotion Text Messaging Preferences and Acceptability Among the Medically Underserved. Health Promot Pract. 2015;16(4):523–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839914566850 .

Cramer ME, Mollard EK, Ford AL, Kupzyk KA, Wilson FA. The feasibility and promise of mobile technology with community health worker reinforcement to reduce rural preterm birth. Public Health Nurs. 2018;35(6):508–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12543 .

Gbadamosi SO, Eze C, Olawepo JO, et al. A Patient-Held Smartcard With a Unique Identifier and an mHealth Platform to Improve the Availability of Prenatal Test Results in Rural Nigeria: Demonstration Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(1): e18. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8716 .

Trondsen MV, Tjora A, Broom A, Scambler G. The symbolic affordances of a video-mediated gaze in emergency psychiatry. Soc Sci Med. 2018;197:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.056 .

Schwitters A, Lederer P, Zilversmit L, et al. Barriers to health care in rural Mozambique: a rapid ethnographic assessment of planned mobile health clinics for ART. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3(1):109–16. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00145 .

Kojima N, Krupp K, Ravi K, et al. Implementing and sustaining a mobile medical clinic for prenatal care and sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Mysore, India. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2282-3 .

Gorman SE, Martinez JM, Olson J. An assessment of HIV treatment outcomes among utilizers of semi-mobile clinics in rural Kenya. AIDS Care. 2015;27(5):665–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2014.986053 .

Lee S, Black D, Held ML. Factors Associated with Telehealth Service Utilization among Rural Populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(4):1259–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2019.0104 .

Agha Z, Schapira RM, Maker AH. Cost effectiveness of telemedicine for the delivery of outpatient pulmonary care to a rural population. Telemed J E Health. 2002;8(3):281–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/15305620260353171 .

Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12): e24087. https://doi.org/10.2196/24087 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Center for Biomedical Research Excellence award (P20GM130418) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institute of Health. The first author was also supported by the University of Montana Burnham Population Health Fellowship. We would like to thank Dr. Christopher Dietrich, Dr. Jennifer Robohm and Dr. Eric Arzubi for their contributions on determining inclusion criteria for the healthcare provider population used for this study.

 This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, and not-for-profit sectors. 

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Public & Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA

Nicholas C. Coombs & James Caringi

Department of Psychology, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA

Duncan G. Campbell

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: NC and JC; data collection: NC; analysis and interpretation of results: NC and JC; draft manuscript preparation: NC, DC and JC; and manuscript editing: NC, DC and JC. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas C. Coombs .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Coombs, N.C., Campbell, D.G. & Caringi, J. A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access. BMC Health Serv Res 22 , 438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2

Download citation

Received : 11 January 2022

Accepted : 21 March 2022

Published : 02 April 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Access to healthcare
• Rural health
• Qualitative methods

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

• General enquiries: [email protected]

• Open access
• Published: 03 April 2024

Women’s experiences of attempted suicide in the perinatal period (ASPEN-study) – a qualitative study

• Kaat De Backer   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5202-2808 1 ,
• Alexandra Pali   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-5817-156X 1 , 2 ,
• Fiona L. Challacombe   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3316-8155 3 ,
• Rosanna Hildersley   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-6101 3 ,
• Mary Newburn   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9471-0908 4 ,
• Sergio A. Silverio   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471 5 , 6 ,
• Jane Sandall   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-743X 1 ,
• Louise M. Howard   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9942-744X 3 &
• Abigail Easter   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6537 1  

BMC Psychiatry volume  24 , Article number:  255 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

122 Accesses

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

Suicide is a leading cause of maternal death during pregnancy and the year after birth (the perinatal period). While maternal suicide is a relatively rare event with a prevalence of 3.84 per 100,000 live births in the UK [ 1 ], the impact of maternal suicide is profound and long-lasting. Many more women will attempt suicide during the perinatal period, with a worldwide estimated prevalence of 680 per 100,000 in pregnancy and 210 per 100,000 in the year after birth [ 2 ]. Qualitative research into perinatal suicide attempts is crucial to understand the experiences, motives and the circumstances surrounding these events, but this has largely been unexplored.

Our study aimed to explore the experiences of women and birthing people who had a perinatal suicide attempt and to understand the context and contributing factors surrounding their perinatal suicide attempt.

Through iterative feedback from a group of women with lived experience of perinatal mental illness and relevant stakeholders, a qualitative study design was developed. We recruited women and birthing people ( N  = 11) in the UK who self-reported as having undertaken a suicide attempt. Interviews were conducted virtually, recorded and transcribed. Using NVivo software, a critical realist approach to Thematic Analysis was followed, and themes were developed.

Three key themes were identified that contributed to the perinatal suicide attempt. The first theme ‘Trauma and Adversities’ captures the traumatic events and life adversities with which participants started their pregnancy journeys. The second theme, ‘Disillusionment with Motherhood’ brings together a range of sub-themes highlighting various challenges related to pregnancy, birth and motherhood resulting in a decline in women’s mental health. The third theme, ‘Entrapment and Despair’, presents a range of factors that leads to a significant deterioration of women’s mental health, marked by feelings of failure, hopelessness and losing control.

Conclusions

Feelings of entrapment and despair in women who are struggling with motherhood, alongside a background of traumatic events and life adversities may indicate warning signs of a perinatal suicide. Meaningful enquiry around these factors could lead to timely detection, thus improving care and potentially prevent future maternal suicides.

Peer Review reports

Pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period are a positive and empowering experience for many women and birthing people Footnote 1 . Yet it is widely accepted that the perinatal period is also a time of significant stress, with one in four women experiencing mental health difficulties during this time [ 3 ]. Evidence on the impact of perinatal mental ill-health on the mother [ 4 ], her children [ 5 ], the wider family [ 6 ] and society [ 7 ] has grown in the last decade and worldwide, maternal suicide has been identified as a global public health issue [ 8 ]. In European countries with enhanced surveillance systems for maternal mortality maternal suicide has been identified as one of the leading causes of maternal death [ 9 ]. In the UK, the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths (MBRRACE-UK) have repeatedly highlighted similar findings, leading to the development and expansion of specialist perinatal mental health services in the UK [ 10 ]. Despite this, there has been no sign of a reduction in suicide rates [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. The UK Government has therefore identified pregnant women and new mothers for the first time as a priority group in the recent Suicide Prevention Strategy [ 15 ].

While maternal suicide is a relatively rare event with a prevalence of 3.84 per 100,000 live births (95% CI 2.55–5.55) in the UK [ 1 ], many more women will attempt suicide during pregnancy and the year after birth. Worldwide, the pooled prevalence of perinatal suicide attempts has been estimated to be 680 per 100,000 (95% CI 0.10–4.69%) during pregnancy and 210 per 100,000 (95% CI 0.01–3.21%) during the first-year postpartum [ 2 ]. As well as distressing in their own right, perinatal suicide attempts are known to increase the risk of future fatal acts [ 16 ]. Antenatal [ 17 ] and postnatal suicide attempts [ 18 ] are also associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity, adverse birth outcomes, and further suicide attempts.

It is important to note that terminology in suicide research has been a contentious issue and a wide range of definitions have been used in various contexts. The US National Center for Injury and Control issued guidance on uniform definitions in the context of self-directed violence’ [ 19 ], which has informed our study definition of ‘suicide attempt’: “a non-fatal, self-directed, potentially injurious behaviour with intent to die as a result of the behaviour. A suicide attempt might not result in injury”. This definition contains three components worth highlighting, i.e. (1) suicidal ideation, (2) suicidal intent and (3) suicidal behaviour. ‘Suicidal ideation’, also known as ‘suicidality’ (i.e. thoughts of engaging in suicide-related behaviour) [ 19 ] is a known risk factor for suicide [ 20 ] but does not necessarily lead to suicidal behaviours (e.g., behaviour that is self-directed and deliberately results in injury or the potential for injury to oneself, with implicit or explicit evidence of suicidal intent’) [ 19 ]. ‘Suicide attempt’ must also be distinguished from ‘near-fatal deliberate self-harm’, which was defined by Douglas et al (2004) as ‘an act of self-harm using a method that would usually lead to death, or self-injury to a “vital” body area, or self-poisoning that requires admission to an intensive care unit or is judged to be potentially lethal [ 21 ]’. This definition does not contain an element of ‘suicidal intent’, ie. explicit or implicit evidence that at the time of injury the individual intended to kill self or wished to die, and that the individual understood the probable consequences of his or her actions [ 19 ].

To date, perinatal suicide research has predominately been based on case note reviews [ 1 ], retrospective cohort studies [ 22 ], or qualitative studies focussing on suicidal ideation [ 23 ]. Research into suicide attempts in the perinatal period is therefore acutely needed, to gain a better understanding of the circumstances surrounding maternal suicide, the support available to perinatal women and how future deaths can be avoided. To our knowledge, no studies in the UK have used qualitative methods to explore the experiences of women who undertook a suicide attempt in pregnancy or during the postnatal period, yet survived. A better understanding of these events could help refine support and early interventions for women and birthing people at risk.

Aim of the study

The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of women and birthing people who had undertaken one or more suicide attempts during the perinatal period.

Study design

The ASPEN-study (Attempted Suicide during the PEriNatal period) utilised a qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews, to allow for an in-depth understanding of the contextual factors of perinatal suicide attempts, and to demystify the taboos and misunderstanding that are enshrouding this phenomenon [ 24 ]. Qualitative methods are particularly helpful to study sensitive topics [ 25 ] and can facilitate a deeper understanding of suicide attempts, beyond merely explaining [ 26 ]. We adopted a critical realist ontology, meaning participants’ accounts were seen as ‘truths’, even when their reported recall might have been impacted by serious mental illness and/or distress at the time of events [ 27 ]. We also adopted an objectivist epistemological stance meaning our belief system of how we acquire knowledge is one of reality existing and not being constructed, thus enabling an approach to participants’ narratives with no preconceived notions of how the participants may experience the phenomenon of interest [ 28 ]. Drawing on our epistemological and ontological positions, a critical realist approach to Thematic Analysis was best aligned with our philosophical underpinnings. Critical realist TA is an alternative approach to Thematic Analysis, that differs from codebook TA with its positivistic assumptions [ 29 ], or reflexive TA that is grounded in philosophical constructivism [ 30 , 31 ]. Critical realist TA is an explanatory approach that aims to produce causal knowledge through qualitative research on phenomena in the world around us [ 32 , 33 ]. We wanted to go beyond merely ‘exploring’ the phenomenon of perinatal suicide attempt, but aimed to understand what women had experienced during this time, such as any significant life course events they identified as relevant to their perinatal suicide attempt, the specific circumstances in the lead-up to the suicide attempt, their views of motherhood and how this impacted their mental health and any key elements or milestones that made a substantial difference on their journey to recovery. As such, this approach informed our development and structure of the interview schedule and analysis of the data to ensure that this was captured.

Participants and recruitment

The study was advertised through social media and third sector organisations in the field of perinatal mental health and suicide prevention (see Acknowledgements). Interested participants were included if they: (1) were 18 years of age or older; (2) had one or more suicide attempts during the perinatal period (i.e. from pregnancy up to the first year after giving birth), including when the attempt was prevented by self, a loved one or a member of the public; (3) and this happened less than 10 years ago; (4) were residing in the UK; and (5) were not receiving inpatient psychiatric care or experiencing an acute episode of a psychiatric disorder at the time of recruitment. The latter exclusion criterium was adopted in line with our safety protocol, to prevent delays in recovery by addressing such a difficult event outside a therapeutic environment. We used both convenience sampling and purposive sampling techniques: we interviewed anyone who responded to our recruitment materials, met the inclusion criteria and wanted to participate in the study after reading the participant information sheet (convenience sampling). Simultaneously, we also made concerted efforts through intense collaboration with community leaders and third sector organisations to recruit a diverse sample of women and birthing people from different ethnic, cultural, socio-economic and religious backgrounds (purposive sampling). A total of twelve women and birthing people contacted the research team with an interest in the study. Eligibility for the study was explored in a sensitive way, against the overall inclusion criteria and the three components of the study’s definition of ‘suicide attempt’ (suicidal ideation, intent and behaviour). Where in doubt, eligibility was discussed with the wider supervision team. In total, eleven interviews were conducted. A twelfth interested participant did not attend the (online) interview and did not respond to any follow-up emails. Recruitment was finalised when no new themes were being generated from data analysis of the last two interviews [ 34 ]. Participants received reimbursement of £50 for their time to complete the interview and a short demographic survey.

Data collection and analysis

Semi-structured interviews lasted between 38 and 115 min ( MTime  = 65 min) and were conducted via video-conference software (Microsoft Teams) by one researcher (KDB) between October 2022 and April 2023. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and de-identified by a professional transcription company. Field notes were taken during the interview. Transcriptions were checked for accuracy by two researchers (KDB, AP). The interview schedule, which was co-designed with a panel of women with lived experience of perinatal mental illness, aimed to explore experiences of mental health difficulties prior to and during the perinatal period, the circumstances in the lead-up to the suicide attempt, and those following the suicide attempt. The interview schedule was used flexibly and did not prevent participants from sharing their story in the order they preferred, but instead, was used as an aid to prompt where required. Interview data was so rich that a secondary analysis focusing on social support prior and after women’s suicide attempts was undertaken, to be published separately.

Thematic Analysis (TA) [ 30 , 31 , 33 ] of the interview data was conducted using NVivo software while adopting a critical realist approach to Thematic Analysis [ 30 , 31 , 33 ]. The process of data analysis is rarely a linear event, and guided by Fryer’s previous work on critical realist TA [ 33 ], our approach to data analysis is presented in Fig.  1 and can best be described as follows:

Display of critical realist approach to thematic analysis

Public and patient involvement and engagement (PPIE)

An established advisory panel of women with lived experience of perinatal mental illness was consulted during different phases of the study with additional feedback sought from key stakeholders in the field of perinatal mental illness (see Acknowledgements). The process of PPIE during the study design and data collection phase of this study has been documented elsewhere [ 35 ]. A draft manuscript was shared with research participants to sense-check findings and comment on the manuscript. Participants were also given the opportunity to select a pseudonym of their choice. A total of 8 participants reviewed the draft manuscript and their feedback was incorporated in the final version of this paper.

The study team and reflexivity

The research team are a multidisciplinary team of researchers and clinical academics, with backgrounds in psychology (FLC, AE, RH, SAS, AP), psychiatry (LMH), and midwifery (KDB, JS), and several had clinical experience of supporting women who attempted suicide during the perinatal period (KDB, FLC, LMH). Within the research team, there was a balance between those who were parents and those who did not have children and researchers were at different stages of their life, spanning nearly three generations. The phenomenon of suicidality in the perinatal period was familiar to most of the research team, through extensive clinical experience and/or previous research in the field of perinatal mental health. Our positionality is therefore best described as ‘hybrid’, concordant with our critical realist ontology, as we aimed to align our existing knowledge and understanding (i.e. being embedded in the data) with the uniqueness and unfamiliarity of each individual story that was shared with us as a ‘truth’ (i.e. being an objective onlooker), in order to analyse the data in a coherent and sensitive matter [ 36 ]. Data were collected by one researcher (KDB) who was trained in advanced qualitative research techniques as well as having clinical experience as a perinatal mental health midwife. Analysis was conducted by the same researcher and a MSc Student with a background in clinical psychology (AP). Regular team meetings were held throughout the data collection and analysis phase to discuss and sense-check the developing themes and sub-themes.

Participant safety and researcher wellbeing

The safety and emotional wellbeing of all participants was key throughout the study. Thus, we adopted key elements of trauma-informed care into our study design [ 37 ]. A robust safety protocol, with clear pathways for escalation if required, was developed with the input of the PPIE advisory panel [ 38 ]. The study team undertook bespoke training in trauma-informed interviewing and the interview schedule was developed with this in mind. A safety check prior and after the interview was carried out by the same researcher (KDB), either via email or by phone and all participants were offered a confidential de-brief session with an independent clinical psychologist. The psychological safety of the researchers was also considered [ 25 ] and supported by access to regular reflective supervision sessions provided by a clinical psychologist and regular debrief sessions with supervisors to process any difficult emotions arising from conducting the interviews [ 39 ]. We were acutely aware of the potentially triggering content of the audio files and raised this with the transcription company [ 40 ]. When sending audio recordings for transcription, a summary of triggering content was provided to ensure the transcription would be appropriately allocated.

The majority of our sample ( N  = 11) were White British women ( n  = 10), with one woman from a mixed ethnic background. Participants were predominantly married ( n  = 8) and had higher education qualifications ( n  = 7). All but one participant had received a mental health diagnosis by a doctor or other healthcare professional in the past although the demographic survey did not allow to ascertain when this diagnosis had been given. More than half of the participants in our sample were given multiple diagnoses, indicating a high level of complexity in mental health presentation. In most cases, pregnancies had been planned ( n  = 9). All but two women were multiparous, with half of the sample having two children ( n  = 6), and three participants having three or more children. Two women were first-time mothers at the time of the attempt. Four women undertook their suicide attempt during pregnancy, with a fifth woman being pregnant whilst her older child was still under the age of one. The remaining six women undertook a suicide attempt within the year after giving birth. Four participants had a stay in an inpatient psychiatric Mother and Baby Unit (MBU), and for three of them the admission was preceded by their suicide attempt. For one participant, the admission in the Mother and Baby Unit was subsequently followed by an admission in a general psychiatric hospital, where she undertook the actual suicide attempt. A full table of demographic and clinical information can be found in Table  1 .

Qualitative analysis resulted in the identification of three key themes that played a significant role in the deterioration of women’s mental health during the perinatal period, ultimately culminating into a suicide attempt. Saturation for all themes and sub-themes was achieved after nine interviews when no new themes or subthemes were generated. Data from the remaining two interviews confirmed our analysis and provided additional depth and detail [ 34 ]. The three overarching themes are presented in Fig.  2 : Theme 1 ‘Trauma and Adversities’ , consisting of family history of perinatal mental illness and psycho-social adversities, including grief and trauma; Theme 2 ‘Disillusionment with Motherhood’ , marked by a variety of challenges that arose during pregnancy or the postnatal period; and Theme 3 ‘Entrapment and Despair’ , where multiple stressors piled up with no respite or support available, leading to a severe deterioration of mental ill-health, and ultimately, the suicide attempt.

Display of themes and sub-themes

Qualitative data is presented below, with the most representative quotations in text and an additional table of supplementary of quotations included in Supplementary Material 1 .

Theme 1: trauma and adversities

All respondents in our sample started their pregnancy journeys with a range of vulnerabilities, such as previous mental health difficulties, loss, trauma, or social risk factors including domestic abuse and substance misuse. Nevertheless, participants were not always aware of the profound impact these would have on their mental health later in pregnancy and in the postnatal period. Subthemes contributing to this were:

Psycho-social adversities

Many women had experienced mental health difficulties at some point in their life, and most were fully aware of their potentially devastating impact. Some had experienced poor mental health during adolescence and young adulthood and anticipated mental health problems during the perinatal period.

“I’ve had some terrible things happen in my life about failed marriage and fertility problems. Big, big things that I’ve sort of managed with a strength of mine that I perhaps didn’t have in my late teens or early 20s to overcome. So I guess it was always on my radar knowing the stats around you are more likely to have perinatal mental health problems if you’ve had bouts of depression in the past.” – Rosy .

In contrast, others had dealt with traumatic experiences in their life, but could not see how this would be relevant to their mental health during pregnancy and the postnatal period. They started their pregnancy unaware of any potential risks to their mental health.

“I lost my brother when he was 18. […] And I didn’t get a lot of time off work, I was kind of straight back into work. I’m a [professional role in mental health], so I was working in acute psychiatry. Back to work, dealing with other people’s trauma and I don’t think I really dealt with my own particularly well. And it was kind of I think eight months later I had an episode of depression, just very low mood, apathy, poor motivation, poor concentration, was treated briefly with antidepressants and then just kind of did okay after that. So there had been nothing.” – Simone .

Previous trauma was reported by almost all respondents, whether it being through a bereavement, or traumatic life experiences, such as miscarriage and infertility, domestic abuse, fractured relationships, or suicide of a loved one. Two women reported having experienced domestic abuse. One of them reported the abuse, which she described as a ‘punishment’, only started after informing her partner of the pregnancy.

“It was a punishment actually that I dared to be pregnant even though he knew I wasn’t on any contraception or anything. And it really shocked me because he had never ever been like that before.” – Lauren .

For the other respondent, the domestic abuse had been long-lasting and led her to seek coping strategies to deal with the trauma and pain. Being in an abusive relationship created the worst possible start for pregnancy, with no support available.

“Well, it was my first pregnancy. I was 24 so I still hadn’t grown up properly, and I was in a really bad domestic violence relationship so there was a lot going on around that. I was getting no support [for] my pregnancy. I was also using as well which I regret profoundly, but I was drinking, like I drank occasionally because of my mental health, and my mental health was just all over the place; I was really, really unwell.” – Selina .

For some, their previous mental health difficulties were related to an earlier pregnancy or birth experience:

“I had huge amounts of birth trauma from my first, which I had a debrief for from the hospital, which was incredibly unhelpful. And it ended in emergency caesarean [section], after nine days of labour, and being in hospital, as a very naïve 19-year-old, having her first baby; looking back on it, feeling quite coerced by doctors, but not realising at the time that that’s what was happening. And that has impacted me for the rest of my life.” – Sam .

The severity of previous perinatal mental health problems was varied, with one woman having experienced postpartum psychosis after the birth of her first child. Going into the second pregnancy, the risk of relapse was hanging over her like a dark cloud:

“I remember sort of going to the 12-week scan with [second pregnancy] and getting the picture and thinking like shit, it’s really real now and it could all happen again. So I was really scared about that. Because the reccurrence rates are quite high for psychosis, so it’s quite likely that I was going to become unwell. So I was worried, yes, I was really concerned.” – Marie .

This feeling of worry was also reported by women with mild to moderate mental health difficulties and was compounded by a fear of being dismissed and not being able to access support if they would require it.

“I think there was something about the anxiousness of doing it all again, because I think I had some prenatal depression with my first, that wasn’t picked up, and then postnatal anxiety through the roof, that was also never picked up, and was told that was normal.” – Sam .

Family history of perinatal mental illness

Several respondents had a family history of perinatal mental illness and were vigilant that they might experience something similar. To mitigate this risk, they actively sought perinatal mental health support at the earliest opportunity.

“My mum had severe perinatal mental illness, she was hospitalised after my older brother for a year without him […]. At the time they didn’t really have Mother and Baby Units. Then I came [a few] years later and she was hospitalised again but with me for six months, and she passed away […] So my dad said she was saying the same things as each time she’d been sectioned; she would present with very religious ideation and stuff like this, so it was exactly the same stuff, and she died by suicide. So because of that collective history, when we were trying to get pregnant we thought “We need to let someone know we’re trying to get pregnant,” and so I was referred then to a Perinatal Psychiatrist before we got pregnant” - Sarah .

For others, this family history was not something which was spoken about prior to their own experiences of perinatal mental illness. One respondent mentioned she had never been aware of her mother’s history of postnatal depression until she herself started to experience postnatal depression.

“I didn’t know that my mum had postnatal depression. That’s not anything that she’d shared until… I knew that my brother cried a lot and I think he had a cows’ milk protein intolerance, but I didn’t know that my mum…” – Rosy .

Theme 2: disillusionment with motherhood

While previous mental health challenges or trauma were present in the background, all women were profoundly disillusioned with motherhood which contributed to a deterioration in their mental health. This theme of ‘Disillusionment with Motherhood’ captures three sub-themes that reflect a discrepancy between what women thought or hoped motherhood would be like, and the crushing reality they found themselves in. Together, these sub-themes compounded each other and became a catalyst for worsening mental health. The following sub-themes address the various areas of disillusionment that women in our sample reported: in their bodies, in their identity and in the bond with their baby.

The physical and mental struggle of pregnancy and birth

All participants held hopes and expectations of what their pregnancy, birth or the postnatal period would be like. For some first-time mothers, it soon became clear that the societal rosy-hued image of pregnancy was very far removed from their own experience of pregnancy. As they came to grips with how pregnancy was unfolding, the harsh contrast between expectation and reality was so high that many struggled to adjust to this:

“There’s all this thing about pregnancy you’re supposed to be glowing and it’s all marvellous and you’ve got these wonderful hormones, but I was just beached on the sofa feeling hot and sweaty thinking when is this baby going to come out, when’s it going to come out?” – Simone .

For those who had been pregnant before, the reality of another pregnancy, knowing full well what was in store, started to dawn on them:

“I don’t know, it hit me like a ton of bricks. Like oh shit, I’m doing this again. I’m pregnant again.” – Liv .

In addition to these psychological adjustments to reality, respondents mentioned how the physical toll of pregnancy and childbirth played a significant role in the deterioration of their mental health. This close correlation between physical issues and mental health decline was abundantly clear across the sample.

“I was horribly, horribly sick [hyperemesis]; that got worse each pregnancy. I don’t know if that’s normal; I’d heard it is. But horribly sick, which makes you absolutely miserable anyway.” – Sam . “I just sort of couldn’t wait for it [the pregnancy] to end. Yes, I just wanted to give birth. So when they said that they were going to induce me at 40 weeks I thought thank goodness, because my sickness started again quite late on. Again, I don’t know if it was because of the pre-eclampsia. But yes, I was just very ready, very ready to have little one.” – Hannah .

In the most extreme cases, pregnancy was not viewed as something to be enjoyed, but something that left women feeling repulsive.

“So since the pregnancy, just my life fell apart really, I was unemployed, and I just felt the whole way through not just sick and ill, absolutely physically repulsive, like I just felt like an absolute filthy animal. I can’t describe the disgust I felt for myself and the bigger my bump grew, the more disgusting I felt. And I don’t know, it’s just everything was awful, every day was awful.” – Lauren .

For other women physical injuries as a result of childbirth left them unable to function and to enjoy the things they were looking forward to as a new mother.

“I had some tearing and I’d had an episiotomy and they hadn’t healed, so my episiotomy had opened up and there were lots of A&E [Accidents and Emergency] visits and an operation eventually, but I think that really didn’t help my mental health because obviously if you’re in pain all the time then, it just drags you down, doesn’t it? So I wasn’t able to do my normal stuff, I wasn’t able to just carry on with life because I was in pain, I couldn’t sit and I felt like I couldn’t do mummy things.” – Mel .

Apart from the physical repercussions of pregnancy and childbirth, it was the trauma of giving birth and its psychological sequalae which triggered a marked deterioration in the mental health of several women in our sample.

“It was just sort of like you couldn’t expect it to happen, it was like a poor pregnancy and sort of felt like, you know, the birth went wrong as well.” – Hannah . “I had a premature baby. And I went on, I don’t know, like trauma response. Like totally numb. I suppose the adrenalin, the shock, everything…” – Liv .

Invalidation of identity and self-sacrifice

Almost all respondents encountered negative experiences with healthcare professionals at some point during pregnancy or the postnatal period and felt invalidated and dismissed by these. Women reported they were not seen as a person, with a complete identity, but reduced to a vessel for their baby, with little consideration given to their own feelings. This led to a profound loss of identity, exacerbating feelings of being invisible, inadequate and unimportant.

“It was never about me. And I know it’s not all about me, but when I’m wanting to commit suicide, it is very much about me and not one person asked me if I was alright, they were more concerned if the baby was alright, which I was as well, but they just completely bypassed that there was any reason I would do it.“ – Selina .

There seemed to be a lack of professional inquisitiveness to understand why a mother(-to-be) would consider suicide. Instead, all attention was directed towards the well-being of the baby, leading to multiple missed opportunities for timely care and support. In some cases, women reached out but their calls for help were simply ignored while their mood was rapidly deteriorating. These experiences would have devastating consequences on their further help-seeking behaviour.

“What really killed me, what was like the punch in the face that I needed was when I had my midwife appointment at, I don’t know, eight, ten weeks, something like that, and I told her ‘you know what, I’m not feeling right. There’s something bubbling inside me that is not alright, is not correct. I feel more anxious than normal, I can’t sleep, it’s all very weird’. And she just said ‘okay, I’m going to pin that down here to talk about in your next appointment. But we’re not going to do anything right now’. I never saw her again, by the way.” – Liv .

Invalidating encounters like the one described above would have a profound impact on how women viewed healthcare professionals as a source of support and whether they would reach out to them and share the extent of their mental health problems.

“I just felt like nobody was listening at all, just not heard one bit.” – Anna .

For some, the invalidating experience would almost become a motivator to succeed in their suicide plans, as they felt the severity of their mental health problems was brushed under the carpet. One participant sought help after a first suicide attempt through a medication overdose and shared the following:

“So then I think a few more weeks went by and I went back to the doctor’s. I said to the doctor, ’I want to kill myself’. My medication and stuff, I was honest with him, I said the medications and stuff that he was put… I think he tried me on Zopiclone as well with not sleeping and he said, ‘Well if you wanted to kill yourself, you would have done it by now’. I was just… I sort of felt then I’ve got something to prove.” – Hannah .

The loss of identity made respondents feel invisible to healthcare professionals and went hand in hand with exhausting themselves to be the best possible mother for their baby. Women described feelings of total self-sacrifice to meet this perceived standard of ‘the perfect mother’.

“I think I sort of went into supermum mode when I came home, like I had something to prove, and again, it’s that background of failure. I think I’m quite hard on myself anyway and I’m quite… If something goes wrong, I’m probably harder on myself in my head than somebody else would be and I maybe got a bit of a perfectionist trait, so I really didn’t want to rely on anybody, I didn’t ask for help with anything regarding my little boy, and I had a really, really strong bond with him which was really positive, but I think I was sort of going like overkill with not asking for help.” – Hannah .

However, as women started to experience the hard reality of caring for a newborn, they felt unable to meet this impossible standard. The perceived pressure to achieve (unrealistic) goals as well as their feelings of failure to do so started to take a significant strain on their mental health.

“No one had ever told me that before. No one had ever said that you don’t just have to drop everything and run to your child. Because I thought that that was what a secure bond was; and obviously now I’ve learnt about attachment theory and things. I thought that, for her to be securely bonded with me, I had to give every last drop of myself to be her mum.” – Sam .

‘It wasn’t like starry-eyed love’

Closely linked with the previous sub-theme, was the realisation for many women that they did not feel an instant rush of love for their baby. Several women reported feeling unsettled and flawed as a mother when they felt distant and detached from their baby. Women tried their very best to ‘act as a mother’ and do whatever their baby required, but this did not mean they also ‘felt like a mother’.

“So, at the beginning it was very strange. It, because like I said, I was determined to do anything in my power to get that baby out of NICU [Neonatal Intensive Care Unit]. Like whatever it takes, whatever the cost. So it never felt like oh, it’s my baby. I would have jumped in front of a train for him but it was not like a starry-eyed love. And that kept going.” – Liv . “In terms of motherhood, yes, I don’t know whether I just felt I was failing at it or… [pause] I don’t know, I felt very not connected to the baby. I had felt very, very bonded and very connected, and then I wasn’t at all.” – Sarah .

Sadly, for some, this lack of bonding with their baby persisted for a long time, with enduring consequences on their mental health and family happiness, leading to feelings of guilt and shame with which they still are coming to terms with.

“I had no attachment to him probably for about five years, nothing at all, just this ongoing sense of regret and I remember thinking daily I’ve made such a massive mistake in my life and almost this like realisation you are never going to get back what you had before, so just this real hopelessness actually at life.” – Lauren . “I just couldn’t, I couldn’t bond with, I couldn’t. Even still now I love her to pieces but we’re not like mother and daughter, we’re not.” – Anna .

Theme 3: entrapment and despair

In the final phase leading up to the suicide attempt, women experienced an accumulation of stressors, unleashing an overwhelming feeling of hopelessness and entrapment, with seemingly no way out of the situation they found themselves in. The sub-themes identified under this theme of ‘Entrapment and Despair’ left women no breathing space or respite. A perfect storm was brewing, for which women only started to see one way out, and that was by taking their own life.

Feeling like a failure

All respondents expressed a pervasive feeling of utter failure, intersecting their different identifies as a woman, mother and partner. Their perceived inability to meet expectations, whether this related to giving birth, feeding their baby, or functioning as a mother and partner stood in sharp contrast with how they viewed other mothers, who seemed to be effortlessly successful in doing so.

“You sort of just blame yourself. So I can just remember looking at him when he was asleep thinking like, ’Oh you’ve failed, I can’t do this, I’ve already failed at being a mum, but I can’t do this’, and I can just remember just thinking that, looking at him. So I think even though I know it wasn’t my fault, you really felt like a failure and I felt like it was me, like there was something wrong with me, because a lot of women around me, like even family, they never really had experiences like that, they would have like a good pregnancy, like a vaginal birth, a normal birth, so I really felt like I had failed and I really blamed myself for that.” – Hannah .

This feeling of being a total failure created a sense of dread, leaving them fearful every day that their inability and incompetence as a mother would be further exposed.

“I remember seeing the light coming in through the curtains in the morning and just thinking “Oh my god, no, I can’t, I can’t do another day,” like my heart would go, and it was that dread, that whole dread would come over me and I’d think “I can’t do another day today, I just can’t do it. I can’t do it.” It was like a… Yes, it was really hard. I just felt like I don’t know, it felt like I just wasn’t good enough for her, I wasn’t good enough. […] It just felt like I wasn’t good enough to be her mum.” – Mel .

This overwhelming sense of incompetence erased feelings of love, enjoyment or hope and instilled a feeling that their baby and loved ones would be better off without them.

“So it just escalated. This what was going on in my head about, you know, me not being good enough, a failure, just escalated even more, that now I was thinking they are going to take him away, everyone will know how rubbish I am. So it was later that week where I still wasn’t sleeping and I just thought, do you know what, the both of them would be better off without me, because I’ve just failed, I’m just a failure. They will be better off without me.” – Simone . “…That just made me feel so, so low that I think that spiral of internalised feelings and negativity compounded with this sort of isolation and lack of sleep just led me to think they’d be better off without me around, they’d have a parent maybe or a family that would be able to meet their needs.” – Rosy .

Intense intrusive thoughts and abnormal experiences

More than half of the women in our sample reported intrusive ideas or unsettling experiences in the period preceding their suicide attempt. For many, this came as a total surprise as they were unaware this could happen and they felt unable to express the extent of their intrusive thoughts to anyone.

“I remember getting up and going to the bathroom to brush my teeth and then started hearing voices. So this voice, I didn’t recognise it, was just chanting, ‘stinky [name of baby], stinky [name of baby]’, which is my baby’s name and I was like why’s that happening? I don’t understand. Where’s that coming from? And then later that day I remember looking at my husband and thinking you’re the father of this baby, but I’m not its mother. It was a really odd thought, because I was like I know I’ve been pregnant and I know I’ve just been through all that labour, but I look at this baby and it’s not mine, but I know you are the dad. It was really odd.”- Simone . “They [the intrusive thoughts] were really, really scary. And totally uncontrollable as well. They were so vivid and they used to make me feel really upset because they happened quite early on, probably when she was only a few weeks old and I remembering googling them and reading loads of things about it didn’t mean that you were not coping, it didn’t meant that you were going to hurt your baby, it didn’t mean that you were depressed, but I think maybe I should have perhaps seen that as a bit of a sign that I needed to get some help because it was weeks and weeks later that I finally did. But yes, they did upset me and I only told my mum, I didn’t tell anybody else because I just felt as though are people going to think that I’m going to hurt her? Am I going to hurt her if I talk about it more? Yes, they were really scary.” – Rosy .

For some, these ideas were extremely horrific and a symptom of their psychotic illness at the time. Unfortunately, this was left undiagnosed and untreated, leaving them totally desperate and isolated while these unsettling thoughts became their lived reality.

“[…] I started to think ‘oh I’ve committed all these awful crimes in my life’ and I was kind of struggling to process what they were and I was thinking have I killed people and maybe buried them and I don’t know where they are or have I kind of done a big theft or something but not been able to quite work out where I’d stolen the money from. But I was kind of panicking that I’d either buried these bodies or hidden this money and I couldn’t remember where they were, so I was panicking someone else is going to find them and then I’m going to be put in prison. So I had this kind of I want to die because I’m scared I’m going to go to prison because I’ve done all these awful things. And I just felt absolutely desperate.” – Lauren .

Alone in this world

While these distressing experiences of failure and intrusive thoughts invaded women’s mindset, women felt profoundly alone and isolated. Social isolation was reported as a catalyst for their suicide attempt by every woman in the sample. For some, it was a continuation of the situation they had already been in, but during this stage everything felt more desperate, more alone.

“I think by that point I wasn’t talking to anybody at all, not family, certainly not the kids’ dad. The kids’ dad… […] I just totally blocked his number and I wasn’t seeing anybody else. And actually, in some ways, I don’t think anybody wanted to see me because they were just like, “Why have you had another kid?” So the only people that I saw were my own kids, maybe the odd school teacher at pickup but that was it. No one from work. No friends really.” – Lauren .

For others, it was the absence of their partner, who had to return to work after paternity leave, that served as a lever for an acute deterioration of their mental health.

“Everything was fine until about three weeks after the birth and we were back at home, and my husband went back to work; it was him going back to work and I just, yes, fell apart.” – Sarah .

Some respondents had their baby during one of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, when social restrictions meant they were unable to meet with friends or family or seek peer support from other mothers. Instead, they felt cooped up inside their house, alone and isolated, with their suicidal thoughts.

“Completely isolated. Not being able to, like I could have been going to, I don’t know, prenatal yoga. Or breastfeeding groups or toddler groups. Anything else that would take me out of that loop. So I think obviously that made it a lot worse. I don’t think that it would have been… – I don’t know.” – Liv . “So she was three or four months old when Covid hit and it was the whole lockdown and yes, everything just got ten times worse because I couldn’t do anything then; I couldn’t go and talk to my mum, I couldn’t go out, I couldn’t even have doctor’s appointments, I couldn’t have hospital appointments which made me worry even more, and my husband’s a key worker so I was just on my own all the time. Yes, and I think that’s when it got to the point where I just felt like I couldn’t cope anymore.” – Mel .

Several respondents recalled how this feeling of loneliness instilled a determination in them to retreat into isolation further. This meant they no longer wanted to speak to or be around others, even when they had a supportive network in place. An unstoppable cycle of isolation and socially avoidant behaviour was set in motion.

“I just stopped talking to people. That’s when I stopped talking to anybody and I got really ill with my mental health because of it, but I thought “Well, why am I going to talk to people when they don’t listen to me anyway?”- Selina . “I knew exactly what I was doing. I knew how I was going to do it. I just wanted it done. So I thought I have to tell him. I have to tell him. But I couldn’t tell him that I was off to kill myself.” – Simone .

‘Tired’ and ‘wired’

All but two respondents mentioned sleep deprivation as a major contributing factor to the accumulation of despair in the days or weeks before the suicide attempt. The sheer exhaustion they felt prevented them from thinking clearly or having the energy to face their circumstances and get better.

“My little boy slept really well from, gosh, about three weeks, maybe less than that, he would sleep through the night which was really, really lucky, but I couldn’t sleep and I think, yes, the problems of not sleeping had a snowball effect.” – Hannah .

This level of hypervigilance and restlessness was for many women the reason why they were unable to sleep. While women reported to feel exhausted on one hand, they also reported to experience an unhealthy level of drive, anger or arousal, leaving them ‘tired and wired’.

“I stopped sleeping entirely; I was so angry all the time – it’s all the textbook depression symptoms, but I was so angry all the time. I was so tired all the time, but just wired, couldn’t sleep.”- Sam . “I remember thinking I’m just so tired, I just want to go to sleep. I just want to be asleep and not be disturbed. But my mind was just so busy.” – Simone .

Some displayed agitated and manic behaviour to such an extent that they struggled to understand how this went unnoticed.

“I live three miles from the hospital and after they sent me home the next day, I walked back to the hospital with [the] kids and I was mowing the lawn five days after he was born and cleaning the house from top to bottom and driving all over the city after a [caesarean] section and you kind of just think like why did nobody notice? How can you think that that’s normal behaviour? Because I just felt this constant need, like I’ve got to be constantly doing things, constantly cleaning things, constantly walking places or doing things, alongside this absolute anger.” – Lauren .

The irreversibility of motherhood

A majority of respondents described they came to a very agonising realisation that they were unable to get out of being a mother and that they found themselves in an irreversible situation, with no going back. The feeling of being ‘stuck’ was so pervasive, that many expressed they wanted either the pregnancy to end, or to not wake up. The irreversibility of motherhood was surrounded by feelings of deep regret and an admission that this had been their own fault and responsibility.

“I remember actually hoping he would be stillborn towards the end, I think after the bridge. I just really wanted for him to be stillborn because if he was then it would all be over but it wouldn’t be my fault, and then I couldn’t go back. I think there was this constant sense of wanting to go back before any of it had happened and I just have my [older] children and I was working and I was happy and I kept seeking these ways just to go back and there weren’t any and I just got more and more desperate as time went on.” – Lauren .

Many respondents shared their conflicting emotions towards their baby, who they viewed as the cause of their distress on the one hand, and as the reason to stay alive on the other.

“[…] I simply could not do it anymore. Help, or don’t help. Whatever. I’m just not going to be around. And it’s almost like this feeling of, you want someone to take the baby off you, so that the baby’s not around, or that’s how I felt. The baby is your reason to stay alive, but the baby’s also the thing that’s causing you so much anguish. And that conflict is just so hard.” – Sam .

Women were desperate to get a grip on the situation, yet it all felt in vain, with no improvement in sight. An overwhelming feeling of hopelessness took over, leaving women with no light at the end of the tunnel and only one option: taking their own life.

“I don’t know how to explain it. I was feeling like all the things that I had to do were like water in my hands. I could see it. I could feel it. I could hold it. But it was coming through my fingers and I couldn’t do anything about it.” – Liv .

Our study identified three overarching themes, marking different phases during which women’s mental health gradually deteriorated. Whilst not all sub-themes under these themes were necessarily reported by every respondent, they paint a comprehensive picture of the distressing feelings and contributing factors that women experienced in the days and weeks prior to their suicide attempt. Nearly half of our sample undertook a suicide attempt during pregnancy. This is in line with evidence suggesting antepartum suicide attempts are an important complication of pregnancy [ 2 ] and act as a strong predictor for postnatal suicidal behaviour, including completed suicide [ 41 ]. In addition, participants in our sample whose suicide attempt occurred during the postnatal period reported suicidal ideation had started during pregnancy, making the antenatal period a critical period for both antenatal and postnatal suicide prevention.

Our first theme, ‘Trauma and adversities’, captures vulnerabilities prior to conception and during pregnancy and has two key elements: (1) psycho-social adversities, including grief and trauma and (2) having a family history of perinatal mental health difficulties. Women with previous mental health difficulties, in particular those with a history of depression and mood disorders, are known to have an increased risk of fatal and non-fatal perinatal suicide attempts [ 3 , 42 , 43 ]. In addition, previous adverse life events and abuse, especially when these occurred during childhood, [ 44 , 45 ], perinatal bereavement and infertility [ 46 ], comorbid substance use disorders and intimate partner violence [ 47 ], have also been associated with an increased risk of perinatal suicidal thoughts and suicidal behaviour. While the need for trauma-informed maternity services has become a public health priority [ 37 ], it is not always matched by a general awareness of the importance to raise these issues during pregnancy or the postnatal period [ 48 ]. This is reflected in our findings, where several of the respondents had experienced significant trauma and adverse life events prior to becoming pregnant but did not feel this was particularly relevant. Similarly, for some respondents a significant family history of perinatal mental health problems was unbeknown to them until their own mental health deteriorated. In contrast, those respondents who started pregnancy with an alertness of the risk of perinatal mental health problems in light of their own previous mental health difficulties or those of close relatives, reported to have prophylactic support measures in place, for instance by accessing a community perinatal mental health service during pregnancy. While this did not prevent their mental health from deteriorating, it did shorten the referral and escalation times when they reached a point of crisis. Having meaningful conversations about the prevalence of perinatal mental ill-health early on in pregnancy and undertaking a thorough assessment of mental health-related risk factors, such as previous mental health history, domestic abuse, substance misuse, previous trauma, among others, at every contact with maternity services is therefore essential to mitigate these pre-existing vulnerabilities [ 49 ].

In our second theme, ‘Disillusionment with Motherhood’, we identified a range of triggering factors that caused women’s mental health to decline. A first and often overlooked sub-theme that we identified was the impact of a physically and mentally challenging pregnancy and birth and their role in a subsequent mental health deterioration. This was often exacerbated when women received unkind, disrespectful care, which made them feel invisible. Whilst there are no studies to our knowledge that directly associate birth trauma with an increased risk of perinatal suicide, the association between birth trauma and postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is well established [ 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. Postpartum PTSD in turn is associated with poor coping and stress and highly co-morbid with depression [ 50 ]. Less evidence is available on the association between pregnancy and birth complications and perinatal suicide risk. One study found no association between maternal complications in pregnancy and during birth with hospitalisation for a suicide attempt [ 54 ]. Yet, as illustrated by our study sample, not all suicide attempts will result in an admission to a general hospital for medical treatment. Thus, further evidence is needed to understand the role of physical health complications, both during pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period, and their role in mood deterioration.

The subsequent sub-themes of ‘Invalidation of identify and self-sacrifice’ and ‘It wasn’t like starry-eyed love’ are closely intertwined and bring the complexity of women’s conflicting emotions towards motherhood to light [ 55 ]. The desire to be a good mother as a newly found identify often came to the detriment of their own personal self, with many women reporting situations of total self-sacrifice [ 56 ]. These daily struggles, of trying to be the perfect mother on the one hand, while trying to bond with their baby on the other hand, was in many cases fertile soil to start feeling obsolete as a person and feeling disillusioned in motherhood. Our findings build on previous work from Reid et al. (2022), who identified key factors in the context of a perinatal suicide attempt, such as a strained mother-infant bond, lack of social support, loneliness and hopelessness [ 44 ]. This resonates with our sub-themes of “Feeling like a failure”, “Alone in this world” and “Irreversibility of motherhood”. Our final theme “Entrapment and Despair” is in line with Reid et al. (2022)’s final phase, called ‘Darkness Descends’ [ 23 ] and is marked by pervasive feelings of hopelessness and failed motherhood. Under this theme, a turbulent accumulation of negative factors resulting in a fast deterioration of their mental health was reported by all respondents. These feelings of hopelessness and being totally entrapped were so all-encompassing, that participants felt no other way out than by attempting to take their own life. However, in this third stage, women did not just feel disillusioned, they felt totally incompetent as a mother, to a point they believed their baby and family would be better off without them. The finality of motherhood, with no way to turn back time or to escape their fate (‘Irreversibility of Motherhood’), drove them further to despair [ 55 ]. The MBRRACE-UK reports have repeatedly raised such feelings of incompetence as a mother and estrangement of the infant as a ‘red flag’ which should be taken seriously to prevent future maternal deaths by suicide [ 1 , 13 , 57 ].

Another factor we identified in this phase was the occurrence of intrusive thoughts and unsettling (psychotic) experiences, brought together in the subtheme ‘Intense intrusive thoughts and abnormal experiences’. The majority of our respondents reported abnormal experiences that were very unsettling to them. For some, these could be described as intrusive thoughts in the context of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Although intrusive thoughts are common among new parents, such experiences are often misunderstood, surrounded by stigma, and sometimes being misdiagnosed or over-normalised and dismissed, preventing timely and effective intervention [ 58 ]. For others in our sample, these experiences may have been delusions or hallucinations as part of a psychotic presentation. For all respondents who had them, the experiences were intense, frightening and difficult to understand at the time. Practitioner knowledge, sensitive risk assessment and careful diagnostic consideration about the nature and type of internal experiences is fundamental to appropriately treat women experiencing these upsetting experiences [ 59 ]. Yet equally important is increased public awareness on the occurrence and impact of such experiences, so women can seek timely support when they experience these frightening thoughts or delusions.

A third common factor we identified was sleep deprivation during pregnancy and the postnatal period and its profound impact on women’s mental health. Sleep disturbance is very common in relation to mental illness, and was highlighted in the most recent MBRRACE-UK report as marked and persistent in those women who died by suicide, even when treated with hypnotic medication [ 1 ]. A recent systematic review by Palagini et al. (2023) showed insomnia and poor sleep quality increased the odds of suicidal risk in pregnant and postpartum women by more than threefold, independently from psychiatric comorbidity [ 60 ]. Especially in a context of onset of psychotic illness, such as bipolar disorder, insomnia often precipitates other psychotic symptoms such as restlessness, irritability and rapid mood changes [ 61 ]. Unfortunately, as sleep loss is generally accepted as a common ‘side effect’ of pregnancy and having a newborn baby, its severity and potential devastating consequences are poorly understood and often minimised. Overall, the theme of ‘Entrapment and Despair’ captures the sheer hopelessness and inability to gain control over a rapidly escalating situation, in line with Klonsky and May’s Three-Step-Theory of suicide [ 62 ]. This theoretical model of suicide considers three steps to suicide. Being in pain and hopelessness leads to suicidal ideation (Step 1), which can be exacerbated by isolation or countered by connectedness (Step 2). The final step is marked by one’s capability of attempting suicide (Step 3). The pervasive feeling of hopelessness and lack of control gradually paved the way for a solid belief it would be better to no longer be here. Participants in our sample shared how they accepted this belief and waited for an opportunity to carry out their suicide plan. This combination of hopelessness and rejection of motherhood, a belief that death would be preferred and an opportunity to act on these thoughts has been previously theorised as a culmination of factors for perinatal suicide [ 23 ]. In line with findings from previous MBRRACE-UK reports, the vast majority of respondents in our sample turned to violent methods for suicide, such as jumping, hanging, suffocation, using sharp objects or stepping in front of traffic, reflecting the high level of distress women found themselves in and the determination with which they wanted to carry out their plan.

Strengths and limitation

Our study is the first to our knowledge to focus on suicide attempts during the perinatal period and offers a rich understanding of women’s experiences surrounding these highly distressing events. A strength of this study is the recruitment of participants across the UK, rather than one geographical area, with diversity in the sample regarding age, parity, psychiatric morbidity, social support, educational attainment and socio-economic status. Significant efforts were made to recruit women from diverse ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, through invitations and meetings with community leaders and designated support groups. Despite our efforts, we did not achieve diversity regarding ethnic and cultural background, one of the limitations of this study. Ethnicity data from the latest MBRRCACE-UK report showed that women who died by suicide were predominately white (86%), with no further ethnicity details on the remaining 14% [ 1 ]. As a result, although this was never our intention, we are aware our study findings are focusing on the experiences of White women in the UK and not transferrable to an ethnically and culturally more diverse sample, or to other countries across the globe. In addition, our sample consisted predominantly of participants with higher educational qualification, in positions of employment. Therefore, our analysis was unable to explore the impact of poverty on women’s suicidality, which is known to be an important driver of poor (perinatal) mental health [ 63 , 64 ]. We are aware a more ethnically, culturally, religiously and socio-economically heterogenous sample is likely to represent a diversity of perspectives, highlighting these issues. Another limitation was the design of the demographic survey, which did not specifically differentiate between mental health diagnosis given during the life course or specifically at the time of the suicide attempt. Suicide research, especially in a perinatal context, is notorious for its recruitment challenges. Saturation for all themes and sub-themes was achieved well within the available sample and is one of the strengths of this study. Another strength of our study is the sensitivity and rigour of patient and public involvement throughout the various phases of the study. This was crucial to do justice to the courage which participants had shown by sharing their stories and to keep respondents safe throughout their research participation.

Implications for clinical practice and care and future research

Our study highlights the importance of routine inquiry of previous mental health difficulties and family history of perinatal mental health problems at the first encounter during pregnancy. Yet, such an assessment needs to be more comprehensive than a tick-box exercise and should be accompanied by a personalised conversation about prevalence of perinatal mental health problems and potential triggers, including trauma and grief. Professionals should be given adequate time during antenatal encounters to explore this in depth and, where required, receive additional training in perinatal mental health to build confidence in doing so. The perinatal period is often described as a ‘window of opportunity’, but this goes both ways: While every encounter creates opportunity for screening, detection and support, it also has the potential for invoking or deepening trauma. Our study revealed the devastating and long-lasting impact of unkind, careless and dismissive remarks by healthcare professionals on women’s mental health, thus instilling a feeling of failure by throw-away comments that would ripple on weeks and months after they were uttered. Perinatal healthcare professionals need to understand the weight of their words, how they can provide hope when women are struggling, but equally how they can push women further into isolation and despair. Culturally aware and trauma-informed clinical practice is essential to achieve this, whilst also recognising the impact of burn-out and carer’s fatigue in an overstretched and under-resourced healthcare service. Healthcare professionals need to be cautious about the difference between normalising and dismissing distressing feelings. In addition, professionals need to fully understand the profound impact of physical, social and psychological risk factors as identified by our study. The physical and mental challenge of pregnancy and childbirth, often in combination with a traumatic birth experience should not be underestimated. An impaired mother-infant dyad, feelings of resentment of motherhood, and the discrepancy between women’s expectations and their lived reality are all key triggers that should be discussed, identified and addressed at the earliest opportunity, in a non-judgemental and sensitive way to avoid further escalation. Women need to be validated and reassured by professionals when disclosing these feelings, and be informed that support is available to help them transition into motherhood. Continuity of care throughout the perinatal period, if done with sensitivity and person-centredness, can foster trusting relationship so women feel safe and supported to disclose distressing feelings. Similarly, insomnia and sleep disturbance, albeit in combination with restlessness and irritability, intrusive thoughts and feelings of lack of control and failure are red flags for severe and rapid mental health deterioration that required prompt and effective action. More than anything, women need to feel safe and listened to, so they can share their feelings with healthcare professionals without fear of judgement, shame and stigma. Our study showed that women will often retreat into silence prior to a suicide attempt and in that moment more than ever rely on attentive, educated and compassionate support networks to avoid a suicide attempt.

Future research into perinatal suicide attempt should focus on developing effective preventative interventions and public health strategies, both in an antenatal and postnatal context, with their distinct healthcare professionals’ involvement and resource challenges. By using implementation science methods, these interventions should be tested and evaluated on their efficacy and effectiveness, in order to reduce future maternal suicides.

This study is the first UK-based qualitative study looking at suicide attempts during the perinatal period. Our findings identified three themes with several contributing factors which led women to undertake a suicide attempt. It is important to understand the impact of previous trauma and life adversity when going through pregnancy and the postnatal period. Feelings of disillusionment with motherhood and feeling entrapped in a hopeless situation were key phases women experienced in the lead-up to their suicide attempt. Our study findings have important implications for clinical practice and healthcare professionals should be aware of warning signs, to improve timely detection and facilitate meaningful inquiry, in order to improve care and prevent future maternal suicide deaths.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the privacy of the participants in the study and the sensitive nature of the data. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author ([email protected]).

We acknowledge not all people who give birth and go through the perinatal period identity as women, female or mothers. While this paper utilises predominantly the terms women and mothers, we aim to include also those who identify as transgender, non-binary or any other gender identity.

Knight M, Bunch K, Patel R, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk J. Saving lives, improving mothers’ Care Core Report - lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2018-20. In. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2022.

Google Scholar  

Rao WW, Yang Y, Ma TJ, Zhang Q, Ungvari GS, Hall BJ, Xiang YT. Worldwide prevalence of suicide attempt in pregnant and postpartum women: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(5):711–20.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Howard LM, Khalifeh H. Perinatal mental health: a review of progress and challenges. In: World Psychiatry vol. 19; 2020: 313–327.

Gold KJ, Singh V, Marcus SM, Palladino CL. Mental health, substance use and intimate partner problems among pregnant and postpartum suicide victims in the National Violent Death Reporting System. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34(2):139–45.

Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, Howard LM, Pariante CM. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–19.

Letourneau NL, Dennis C-L, Benzies K, Duffett-Leger L, Stewart M, Tryphonopoulos PD, Este D, Watson W. Postpartum Depression is a Family Affair: addressing the impact on mothers, fathers, and children. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012;33(7):445–57.

Bauer A, Parsonage M, Knapp M, Iemmi V, Adelaja B. The costs of perinatal mental health problems. Lond School Econ 2014.

Chin K, Wendt A, Bennett IM, Bhat A. Suicide and maternal mortality. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022;24(4):239–75.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Diguisto C, Saucedo M, Kallianidis A, Bloemenkamp K, Bodker B, Buoncristiano M, Donati S, Gissler M, Johansen M, Knight M, et al. Maternal mortality in eight European countries with enhanced surveillance systems: descriptive population based study. BMJ. 2022;379:e070621.

Cantwell R. Perinatal mental health service development across the UK – many achievements, growing challenges. Ir J Psychol Med 2022:1–4.

Knight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Patel R, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2017-19. In. Oxford; 2021.

Knight M, Nair M, Tuffnell D, Shakespeare J, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013-15 Maternal, Newborn and Infant. Clinical Outcome Review Programme; 2017.

Knight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Jayakody H, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme; 2018.

Knight M, Bunch K, Cairns A, Cantwell R, Cox P, Kenyon S, Kotnis R, Lucas N, Lucas S, Marshall L, et al. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Rapid report: Learning from SARS-CoV-2-related and associated maternal deaths in the UK Maternal. Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme; 2020.

Department of Health and Social Care. Suicide prevention in England: 5 year cross-sector strategy. In.; 2023.

Orsolini L, Valchera A, Vecchiotti R, Tomasetti C, Iasevoli F, Fornaro M, De Berardis D, Perna G, Pompili M, Bellantuono C. Suicide during Perinatal Period: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical correlates. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:138.

Gandhi SG, Gilbert WM, McElvy SS, El Kady D, Danielson B, Xing G, Smith LH. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after attempted suicide. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):984–90.

Schiff MA, Grossman DC. Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk for postpartum suicide attempt in Washington state, 1987–2001. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):e669–675.

Crosby A, Ortega L, Melanson C. Self-directed violence surveillance; uniform definitions and recommended data elements. In.: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (U.S.). Division of Violence Prevention; 2011.

Brown GK, Beck AT, Steer RA, Grisham JR. Risk factors for suicide in psychiatric outpatients: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(3):371–7.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Douglas J, Cooper J, Amos T, Webb R, Guthrie E, Appleby L. Near-fatal deliberate self-harm: characteristics, prevention and implications for the prevention of suicide. J Affect Disord. 2004;79(1):263–8.

Johannsen BM, Larsen JT, Laursen TM, Ayre K, Howard LM, Meltzer-Brody S, Bech BH, Munk-Olsen T. Self-harm in women with postpartum mental disorders. Psychol Med. 2020;50(9):1563–9.

Reid H, Pratt D, Edge D, Wittkowski A. What makes a perinatal woman suicidal? A grounded theory study. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):386.

Al-Halabi S, Garcia-Haro J, de la Fe Rodriguez-Munoz M, Fonseca-Pedrero E. Suicidal behavior and the perinatal period: taboo and misunderstanding. Psychol Papers. 2021;42(3):161–9.

Silverio SA, Sheen KS, Bramante A, Knighting K, Koops TU, Montgomery E, November L, Soulsby LK, Stevenson JH, Watkins M, et al. Sensitive, challenging, and difficult topics: experiences and practical considerations for qualitative researchers. Int J Qualitative Methods. 2022;21:16094069221124739.

Article   Google Scholar  

Hjelmeland H, Knizek BL. Why we need qualitative research in Suicidology. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 2010;40(1):74–80.

O’Mahoney J. Critical realism and qualitative research: an introductory overview. In, edn.; 2016.

Williams R. The epistemology of knowledge and the knowledge process cycle: beyond the objectivist vs interpretivist. J Knowl Manage. 2008;12(4):72–85.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–97.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

Wiltshire G, Ronkainen N. A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes. J Crit Realism. 2021;20(2):159–80.

Fryer T. A critical realist approach to thematic analysis: producing causal explanations. J Crit Realism. 2022;21(4):365–84.

Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148.

De Backer K, Newburn M, Hildersley R, Easter A. Conducting a sensitive research study on perinatal suicide attempts — the power of patient and public involvement and Engagement (PPIE). MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2023;33(2):115–8.

Martinez Dy A, Martin L, Marlow S. Developing a critical Realist positional Approach to Intersectionality. J Crit Realism. 2014;13(5):447–66.

Law C, Wolfenden L, Sperlich M, Taylor J. A good practice guide to support implementation of trauma-informed care in the perinatal period. In.; 2021.

Gibson S, Benson O, Brand SL. Talking about suicide: confidentiality and anonymity in qualitative research. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(1):0969733012452684.

Johnson B, Clarke JM. Collecting Sensitive Data: the impact on researchers. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(3):421–34.

Kiyimba N, O’Reilly M. An exploration of the possibility for secondary traumatic stress among transcriptionists: a grounded theory approach. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2016;13(1):92–108.

Lindahl V, Pearson JL, Colpe L. Prevalence of suicidality during pregnancy and the postpartum. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8(2):77–87.

Gressier F, Guillard V, Cazas O, Falissard B, Glangeaud-Freudenthal NMC, Sutter-Dallay A-L. Risk factors for suicide attempt in pregnancy and the post-partum period in women with serious mental illnesses. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:284–91.

Taylor CL, Broadbent M, Khondoker M, Stewart RJ, Howard LM. Predictors of severe relapse in pregnant women with psychotic or bipolar disorders. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;104:100–7.

Reid H, Pratt D, Edge D, Wittkowski A. Maternal suicide ideation and Behaviour during pregnancy and the First Postpartum Year: a systematic review of psychological and psychosocial risk factors. Front Psychiatry 2022, 13.

Bright AM, Doody O, Tuohy T. Women with perinatal suicidal ideation-A scoping review of the biopsychosocial risk factors to inform health service provision and research. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(9):e0274862.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Weng S-C, Chang J-C, Yeh M-K, Wang S-M, Lee C-S, Chen Y-H. Do stillbirth, miscarriage, and termination of pregnancy increase risks of attempted and completed suicide within a year? A population-based nested case–control study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;125(8):983–90.

Forray A, Yonkers KA. The Collision of Mental Health, Substance Use Disorder, and suicide. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):1083–90.

Cull J, Thomson G, Downe S, Fine M, Topalidou A. Views from women and maternity care professionals on routine discussion of previous trauma in the perinatal period: a qualitative evidence synthesis. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(5):e0284119.

National Institute for Health Care Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service clinical management and service guidance guidance clinical guideline. In.; 2014.

Ayers S, Bond R, Bertullies S, Wijma K. The aetiology of post-traumatic stress following childbirth: a meta-analysis and theoretical framework. Psychol Med. 2016;46(6):1121–34.

Sheen K, Slade P. The efficacy of ‘debriefing’ after childbirth: is there a case for targeted intervention? J Reproductive Infant Psychol. 2015;33:308–20.

Sheen K, Slade P. Examining the content and moderators of women’s fears for giving birth: a meta-synthesis. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(13–14):2523–35.

Jomeen J, Martin CR, Jones C, Marshall C, Ayers S, Burt K, Frodsham L, Horsch A, Midwinter D, O’Connell M, et al. Tokophobia and fear of birth: a workshop consensus statement on current issues and recommendations for future research. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(1):2–15.

Schiff M, Grossman D. Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk for postpartum suicide attempt in Washington State, 1987–2001. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):e669–75.

Nicolson P. Loss, happiness and postpartum depression: the ultimate paradox. Can Psychol. 1999;40:162–78.

Staneva AA, Bogossian F, Wittkowski A. The experience of psychological distress, depression, and anxiety during pregnancy: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Midwifery. 2015;31(6):563–73.

Knight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme. In. Oxford; 2020.

Fairbrother N, Woody SR. New mothers’ thoughts of harm related to the newborn. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2008;11(3):221–9.

Challacombe FL, Bavetta M, DeGiorgio S. Intrusive thoughts in perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder. BMJ. 2019;367:l6574.

Palagini L, Cipriani E, Miniati M, Bramante A, Gemignani A, Geoffroy PA, Riemann D. Insomnia, poor sleep quality and perinatal suicidal risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sleep Res 2023:e14000.

Sharma V, Mazmanian D. Sleep loss and postpartum psychosis. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5(2):98–105.

Klonsky ED, May AM, 3ST). The Three-Step Theory (: A New Theory of Suicide Rooted in the Ideation-to-Action Framework. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy 2015, 8(2):114–129.

Mathieu S, Treloar A, Hawgood J, Ross V, Kõlves K. The role of unemployment, Financial Hardship, and economic recession on suicidal behaviors and interventions to mitigate their impact: a review. Front Public Health. 2022;10:907052.

Parra-Saavedra M, Miranda J. Maternal mental health is being affected by poverty and COVID-19. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(8):e1031–2.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the women and birthing people who took part in this study, for their time, their bravery and the honesty with which they shared their story. Their commitment to improve care for others who find themselves in a similar position was a privilege to witness. We thank Dr Clare Dolman, the Patient Advisory Group at the Section for Women’s Mental Health at King’s College London, the South London Applied Research Collaboration Maternity and Perinatal Mental Health theme Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group for their suggestions and feedback throughout the different stages of this study. We also like to thank the third sector partners that were closely involved in the study journey, such as Maternal Mental Health Alliance, Mothers for Mothers, the Institute of Health Visiting, the Motherhood Group, REFORM, National Childbirth Trust (NCT), and Maternity Action.

This work was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) South London Applied Research Collaboration (NIHR200152). Patient and public involvement engagement activities undertaken for this study were funded through a King’s Engaged Research Network (KERN) Public Engagement Small Grant Award. Kaat De Backer, Sergio A. Silverio, Professor Jane Sandall and Dr Abigail Easter are supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Kaat De Backer (King’s College London) is also in receipt of an NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship (NIHR302565). Sergio A. Silverio (King’s College London) is currently in receipt of a Personal Doctoral Fellowship from the NIHR ARC South London Capacity Building Theme [NIHR-INF-2170]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, Lambeth, London, SE1 7EH, UK

Kaat De Backer, Alexandra Pali, Jane Sandall & Abigail Easter

Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Alexandra Pali

Section of Women’s Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Denmark Hill, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, England

Fiona L. Challacombe, Rosanna Hildersley & Louise M. Howard

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Lead for ARC South London, Maternity and Perinatal Mental health theme, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, 10th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, Lambeth, London, SE1 7EH, UK

Mary Newburn

Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, 6th Floor Addison House, Great Maze Pond, Southwark, London, SE1 1UK, UK

Sergio A. Silverio

School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, L3 3AF, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

AE, LMH, JS, RH, KDB conceived the work and designed the study. SAS and MN contributed to the development of the design. MN led the Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement. KDB, AP, AE, FLC contributed to data acquisition. KDB, AP, AE, FLC interpreted the data. KDB drafted the manuscript and incorporated revisions from all other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail Easter .

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate.

Ethical approvals were sought and granted by the King’s College London Health Faculties Research Ethics Committee, in January 2021 (reference HR-20/21-20092), with a further amendment in June 2022, after further feedback from the advisory panel and stakeholder meeting (reference MOD-21/22-20092). The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. Participants were also invited to proof-read the manuscript to ensure they were satisfied with selection of quotations.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

De Backer, K., Pali, A., Challacombe, F.L. et al. Women’s experiences of attempted suicide in the perinatal period (ASPEN-study) – a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 24 , 255 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05686-3

Download citation

Received : 22 December 2023

Accepted : 14 March 2024

Published : 03 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05686-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Qualitative research
• Women’s mental health

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]
• General enquiries: [email protected]