research proposal 2023

17 Research Proposal Examples

A research proposal systematically and transparently outlines a proposed research project.

The purpose of a research proposal is to demonstrate a project’s viability and the researcher’s preparedness to conduct an academic study. It serves as a roadmap for the researcher.

The process holds value both externally (for accountability purposes and often as a requirement for a grant application) and intrinsic value (for helping the researcher to clarify the mechanics, purpose, and potential signficance of the study).

Key sections of a research proposal include: the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, research design and methods, timeline, budget, outcomes and implications, references, and appendix. Each is briefly explained below.

Watch my Guide: How to Write a Research Proposal

Get your Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)

Research Proposal Sample Structure

Title: The title should present a concise and descriptive statement that clearly conveys the core idea of the research projects. Make it as specific as possible. The reader should immediately be able to grasp the core idea of the intended research project. Often, the title is left too vague and does not help give an understanding of what exactly the study looks at.

Abstract: Abstracts are usually around 250-300 words and provide an overview of what is to follow – including the research problem , objectives, methods, expected outcomes, and significance of the study. Use it as a roadmap and ensure that, if the abstract is the only thing someone reads, they’ll get a good fly-by of what will be discussed in the peice.

Introduction: Introductions are all about contextualization. They often set the background information with a statement of the problem. At the end of the introduction, the reader should understand what the rationale for the study truly is. I like to see the research questions or hypotheses included in the introduction and I like to get a good understanding of what the significance of the research will be. It’s often easiest to write the introduction last

Literature Review: The literature review dives deep into the existing literature on the topic, demosntrating your thorough understanding of the existing literature including themes, strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the literature. It serves both to demonstrate your knowledge of the field and, to demonstrate how the proposed study will fit alongside the literature on the topic. A good literature review concludes by clearly demonstrating how your research will contribute something new and innovative to the conversation in the literature.

Research Design and Methods: This section needs to clearly demonstrate how the data will be gathered and analyzed in a systematic and academically sound manner. Here, you need to demonstrate that the conclusions of your research will be both valid and reliable. Common points discussed in the research design and methods section include highlighting the research paradigm, methodologies, intended population or sample to be studied, data collection techniques, and data analysis procedures . Toward the end of this section, you are encouraged to also address ethical considerations and limitations of the research process , but also to explain why you chose your research design and how you are mitigating the identified risks and limitations.

Timeline: Provide an outline of the anticipated timeline for the study. Break it down into its various stages (including data collection, data analysis, and report writing). The goal of this section is firstly to establish a reasonable breakdown of steps for you to follow and secondly to demonstrate to the assessors that your project is practicable and feasible.

Budget: Estimate the costs associated with the research project and include evidence for your estimations. Typical costs include staffing costs, equipment, travel, and data collection tools. When applying for a scholarship, the budget should demonstrate that you are being responsible with your expensive and that your funding application is reasonable.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: A discussion of the anticipated findings or results of the research, as well as the potential contributions to the existing knowledge, theory, or practice in the field. This section should also address the potential impact of the research on relevant stakeholders and any broader implications for policy or practice.

References: A complete list of all the sources cited in the research proposal, formatted according to the required citation style. This demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the relevant literature and ensures proper attribution of ideas and information.

Appendices (if applicable): Any additional materials, such as questionnaires, interview guides, or consent forms, that provide further information or support for the research proposal. These materials should be included as appendices at the end of the document.

Research Proposal Examples

Research proposals often extend anywhere between 2,000 and 15,000 words in length. The following snippets are samples designed to briefly demonstrate what might be discussed in each section.

1. Education Studies Research Proposals

See some real sample pieces:

• Assessment of the perceptions of teachers towards a new grading system
• Does ICT use in secondary classrooms help or hinder student learning?
• Digital technologies in focus project
• Urban Middle School Teachers’ Experiences of the Implementation of
• Restorative Justice Practices
• Experiences of students of color in service learning

Consider this hypothetical education research proposal:

The Impact of Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Middle School Mathematics

Abstract: The proposed study will explore multiplayer game-based learning techniques in middle school mathematics curricula and their effects on student engagement. The study aims to contribute to the current literature on game-based learning by examining the effects of multiplayer gaming in learning.

Introduction: Digital game-based learning has long been shunned within mathematics education for fears that it may distract students or lower the academic integrity of the classrooms. However, there is emerging evidence that digital games in math have emerging benefits not only for engagement but also academic skill development. Contributing to this discourse, this study seeks to explore the potential benefits of multiplayer digital game-based learning by examining its impact on middle school students’ engagement and academic performance in a mathematics class.

Literature Review: The literature review has identified gaps in the current knowledge, namely, while game-based learning has been extensively explored, the role of multiplayer games in supporting learning has not been studied.

Research Design and Methods: This study will employ a mixed-methods research design based upon action research in the classroom. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design will first be used to compare the academic performance and engagement of middle school students exposed to game-based learning techniques with those in a control group receiving instruction without the aid of technology. Students will also be observed and interviewed in regard to the effect of communication and collaboration during gameplay on their learning.

Timeline: The study will take place across the second term of the school year with a pre-test taking place on the first day of the term and the post-test taking place on Wednesday in Week 10.

Budget: The key budgetary requirements will be the technologies required, including the subscription cost for the identified games and computers.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: It is expected that the findings will contribute to the current literature on game-based learning and inform educational practices, providing educators and policymakers with insights into how to better support student achievement in mathematics.

2. Psychology Research Proposals

See some real examples:

• A situational analysis of shared leadership in a self-managing team
• The effect of musical preference on running performance
• Relationship between self-esteem and disordered eating amongst adolescent females

Consider this hypothetical psychology research proposal:

The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress Reduction in College Students

Abstract: This research proposal examines the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on stress reduction among college students, using a pre-test/post-test experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods .

Introduction: College students face heightened stress levels during exam weeks. This can affect both mental health and test performance. This study explores the potential benefits of mindfulness-based interventions such as meditation as a way to mediate stress levels in the weeks leading up to exam time.

Literature Review: Existing research on mindfulness-based meditation has shown the ability for mindfulness to increase metacognition, decrease anxiety levels, and decrease stress. Existing literature has looked at workplace, high school and general college-level applications. This study will contribute to the corpus of literature by exploring the effects of mindfulness directly in the context of exam weeks.

Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n= 234 ) will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group, receiving 5 days per week of 10-minute mindfulness-based interventions, or a control group, receiving no intervention. Data will be collected through self-report questionnaires, measuring stress levels, semi-structured interviews exploring participants’ experiences, and students’ test scores.

Timeline: The study will begin three weeks before the students’ exam week and conclude after each student’s final exam. Data collection will occur at the beginning (pre-test of self-reported stress levels) and end (post-test) of the three weeks.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: The study aims to provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in reducing stress among college students in the lead up to exams, with potential implications for mental health support and stress management programs on college campuses.

3. Sociology Research Proposals

• Understanding emerging social movements: A case study of ‘Jersey in Transition’
• The interaction of health, education and employment in Western China
• Can we preserve lower-income affordable neighbourhoods in the face of rising costs?

Consider this hypothetical sociology research proposal:

The Impact of Social Media Usage on Interpersonal Relationships among Young Adults

Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effects of social media usage on interpersonal relationships among young adults, using a longitudinal mixed-methods approach with ongoing semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data.

Introduction: Social media platforms have become a key medium for the development of interpersonal relationships, particularly for young adults. This study examines the potential positive and negative effects of social media usage on young adults’ relationships and development over time.

Literature Review: A preliminary review of relevant literature has demonstrated that social media usage is central to development of a personal identity and relationships with others with similar subcultural interests. However, it has also been accompanied by data on mental health deline and deteriorating off-screen relationships. The literature is to-date lacking important longitudinal data on these topics.

Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n = 454 ) will be young adults aged 18-24. Ongoing self-report surveys will assess participants’ social media usage, relationship satisfaction, and communication patterns. A subset of participants will be selected for longitudinal in-depth interviews starting at age 18 and continuing for 5 years.

Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of five years, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide insights into the complex relationship between social media usage and interpersonal relationships among young adults, potentially informing social policies and mental health support related to social media use.

4. Nursing Research Proposals

• Does Orthopaedic Pre-assessment clinic prepare the patient for admission to hospital?
• Nurses’ perceptions and experiences of providing psychological care to burns patients
• Registered psychiatric nurse’s practice with mentally ill parents and their children

Consider this hypothetical nursing research proposal:

The Influence of Nurse-Patient Communication on Patient Satisfaction and Health Outcomes following Emergency Cesarians

Abstract: This research will examines the impact of effective nurse-patient communication on patient satisfaction and health outcomes for women following c-sections, utilizing a mixed-methods approach with patient surveys and semi-structured interviews.

Introduction: It has long been known that effective communication between nurses and patients is crucial for quality care. However, additional complications arise following emergency c-sections due to the interaction between new mother’s changing roles and recovery from surgery.

Literature Review: A review of the literature demonstrates the importance of nurse-patient communication, its impact on patient satisfaction, and potential links to health outcomes. However, communication between nurses and new mothers is less examined, and the specific experiences of those who have given birth via emergency c-section are to date unexamined.

Research Design and Methods: Participants will be patients in a hospital setting who have recently had an emergency c-section. A self-report survey will assess their satisfaction with nurse-patient communication and perceived health outcomes. A subset of participants will be selected for in-depth interviews to explore their experiences and perceptions of the communication with their nurses.

Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including rolling recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing within the hospital.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the significance of nurse-patient communication in supporting new mothers who have had an emergency c-section. Recommendations will be presented for supporting nurses and midwives in improving outcomes for new mothers who had complications during birth.

5. Social Work Research Proposals

• Experiences of negotiating employment and caring responsibilities of fathers post-divorce
• Exploring kinship care in the north region of British Columbia

Consider this hypothetical social work research proposal:

The Role of a Family-Centered Intervention in Preventing Homelessness Among At-Risk Youthin a working-class town in Northern England

Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effectiveness of a family-centered intervention provided by a local council area in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth. This case study will use a mixed-methods approach with program evaluation data and semi-structured interviews to collect quantitative and qualitative data .

Introduction: Homelessness among youth remains a significant social issue. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in addressing this problem and identify factors that contribute to successful prevention strategies.

Literature Review: A review of the literature has demonstrated several key factors contributing to youth homelessness including lack of parental support, lack of social support, and low levels of family involvement. It also demonstrates the important role of family-centered interventions in addressing this issue. Drawing on current evidence, this study explores the effectiveness of one such intervention in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth in a working-class town in Northern England.

Research Design and Methods: The study will evaluate a new family-centered intervention program targeting at-risk youth and their families. Quantitative data on program outcomes, including housing stability and family functioning, will be collected through program records and evaluation reports. Semi-structured interviews with program staff, participants, and relevant stakeholders will provide qualitative insights into the factors contributing to program success or failure.

Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.

Budget: Expenses include access to program evaluation data, interview materials, data analysis software, and any related travel costs for in-person interviews.

Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in preventing youth homelessness, potentially informing the expansion of or necessary changes to social work practices in Northern England.

Research Proposal Template

Get your Detailed Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)

This is a template for a 2500-word research proposal. You may find it difficult to squeeze everything into this wordcount, but it’s a common wordcount for Honors and MA-level dissertations.

Your research proposal is where you really get going with your study. I’d strongly recommend working closely with your teacher in developing a research proposal that’s consistent with the requirements and culture of your institution, as in my experience it varies considerably. The above template is from my own courses that walk students through research proposals in a British School of Education.

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 5 Top Tips for Succeeding at University
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 50 Durable Goods Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 100 Consumer Goods Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 30 Globalization Pros and Cons

8 thoughts on “17 Research Proposal Examples”

Very excellent research proposals

very helpful

Very helpful

Dear Sir, I need some help to write an educational research proposal. Thank you.

Hi Levi, use the site search bar to ask a question and I’ll likely have a guide already written for your specific question. Thanks for reading!

very good research proposal

Thank you so much sir! ❤️

Very helpful 👌

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Starting the research process
• How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

Published on October 12, 2022 by Shona McCombes and Tegan George. Revised on November 21, 2023.

A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s important, and how you will conduct your research.

The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most proposals will contain at least these elements:

Introduction

Literature review.

• Research design

Reference list

While the sections may vary, the overall objective is always the same. A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research plan, helping you get organized and feel confident in the path forward you choose to take.

Table of contents

Research proposal purpose, research proposal examples, research design and methods, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research proposals.

Academics often have to write research proposals to get funding for their projects. As a student, you might have to write a research proposal as part of a grad school application , or prior to starting your thesis or dissertation .

In addition to helping you figure out what your research can look like, a proposal can also serve to demonstrate why your project is worth pursuing to a funder, educational institution, or supervisor.

Research proposal length

The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.

One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.

Download our research proposal template

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.

• Example research proposal #1: “A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management”
• Example research proposal #2: “Medical Students as Mediators of Change in Tobacco Use”

Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:

• The proposed title of your project
• Your supervisor’s name
• Your institution and department

The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.

Your introduction should:

• Introduce your topic
• Give necessary background and context
• Outline your  problem statement  and research questions

To guide your introduction , include information about:

• Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
• How much is already known about the topic
• What is missing from this current knowledge
• What new insights your research will contribute
• Why you believe this research is worth doing

As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review  shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.

In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:

• Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
• Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
• Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesize prior scholarship

Following the literature review, restate your main  objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.

To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.

For example, your results might have implications for:

• Improving best practices
• Informing policymaking decisions
• Strengthening a theory or model
• Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
• Creating a basis for future research

Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .

Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.

Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.

Download our research schedule template

If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.

Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:

• Cost : exactly how much money do you need?
• Justification : why is this cost necessary to complete the research?
• Source : how did you calculate the amount?

To determine your budget, think about:

• Travel costs : do you need to go somewhere to collect your data? How will you get there, and how much time will you need? What will you do there (e.g., interviews, archival research)?
• Materials : do you need access to any tools or technologies?
• Help : do you need to hire any research assistants for the project? What will they do, and how much will you pay them?

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Methodology

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.

A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.

A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.

All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved March 27, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, unlimited academic ai-proofreading.

✔ Document error-free in 5minutes ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Research Proposal Example/Sample

Detailed Walkthrough + Free Proposal Template

If you’re getting started crafting your research proposal and are looking for a few examples of research proposals , you’ve come to the right place.

In this video, we walk you through two successful (approved) research proposals , one for a Master’s-level project, and one for a PhD-level dissertation. We also start off by unpacking our free research proposal template and discussing the four core sections of a research proposal, so that you have a clear understanding of the basics before diving into the actual proposals.

• Research proposal example/sample – Master’s-level (PDF/Word)
• Research proposal example/sample – PhD-level (PDF/Word)
• Proposal template (Fully editable) 

If you’re working on a research proposal for a dissertation or thesis, you may also find the following useful:

• Research Proposal Bootcamp : Learn how to write a research proposal as efficiently and effectively as possible
• 1:1 Proposal Coaching : Get hands-on help with your research proposal

FAQ: Research Proposal Example

Research proposal example: frequently asked questions, are the sample proposals real.

Yes. The proposals are real and were approved by the respective universities.

Can I copy one of these proposals for my own research?

As we discuss in the video, every research proposal will be slightly different, depending on the university’s unique requirements, as well as the nature of the research itself. Therefore, you’ll need to tailor your research proposal to suit your specific context.

You can learn more about the basics of writing a research proposal here .

How do I get the research proposal template?

You can access our free proposal template here .

Is the proposal template really free?

Yes. There is no cost for the proposal template and you are free to use it as a foundation for your research proposal.

Where can I learn more about proposal writing?

For self-directed learners, our Research Proposal Bootcamp is a great starting point.

For students that want hands-on guidance, our private coaching service is recommended.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling Udemy Course, Research Proposal Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

I am at the stage of writing my thesis proposal for a PhD in Management at Altantic International University. I checked on the coaching services, but it indicates that it’s not available in my area. I am in South Sudan. My proposed topic is: “Leadership Behavior in Local Government Governance Ecosystem and Service Delivery Effectiveness in Post Conflict Districts of Northern Uganda”. I will appreciate your guidance and support

GRADCOCH is very grateful motivated and helpful for all students etc. it is very accorporated and provide easy access way strongly agree from GRADCOCH.

Proposal research departemet management

I am at the stage of writing my thesis proposal for a masters in Analysis of w heat commercialisation by small holders householdrs at Hawassa International University. I will appreciate your guidance and support

please provide a attractive proposal about foreign universities .It would be your highness.

comparative constitutional law

Kindly guide me through writing a good proposal on the thesis topic; Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Inclusion in Nigeria. Thank you

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Unpublishing this opportunity has collateral effects. If you unpublish this opportunity, 95 active application(s) will be archived. Archived applications cannot be managed by Program Officers, and they cannot be viewed or managed by applicants.

2023 Stanford Global Health Seed Grants - Call for Proposals

The Stanford Global Health Seed Grant program encourages the development of innovative solutions to global health and planetary health challenges. It supports scientific and clinical research, implementation science, and development of new innovations in health care implementation or delivery. The program seeks to enable Stanford’s vibrant global health community, support global health training opportunities for Stanford trainees and students, and build capacity with international partners.  Research projects that have strong potential to generate solutions and impact, and/or scale up into larger initiatives are encouraged to apply.

The Center for Innovation in Global Health believes that local is global; we are committed to improving health equity among all populations, including in the United States.

Program Priority Areas

Preference will be given to research teams that include more than one discipline and reflect the Center for Innovation in Global Health’s major initiatives and funders’ priorities:

• Global Health :  Interdisciplinary, solutions-oriented research that seeks to improve health in low-resourced settings
• Research that addresses the health implications of climate change or other forms of environmental degradation
• Projects that explore the ways in which conservation efforts can impact human health
• Global Maternal and Child Health :  Solutions-oriented research that seeks to improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings
• Global Emergency Medicine :  Projects that support innovative research in emergency medicine in low-resource settings
• Global Surgery :  Projects to develop or support educational programs, research, or innovations that improve global surgical care
• Global Ophthalmology :  Projects that support research to improve global eye health
• Global Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences :  Projects that support research to improve global mental health
• Local Health Equity :  Solutions-oriented research that seeks to improve health equity in the San Francisco Bay Area
• Refugees and Displaced Populations in the United States :  Projects that strengthen relationships with existing community partners, build capacity for health outcomes, and/or deliver clinical or other health, wellness or educational services

Eligibility

• All Stanford Faculty with PI eligibility may apply.  This call is open to Faculty from all seven schools.  Post-doctoral fellows, clinical trainees, instructors, and research scientists/scholars must identify a faculty mentor and then may be included as co-PIs.
• Projects that create new interdisciplinary collaborations are encouraged. Teams may include investigators in off-campus partner institutions, including in Low- or Middle-Income Countries. Teams may also partner with nonprofit organizations, industry or government officials.

  * At this stage, you do not have to prepare a PIF, a PDRF form or work with your institutional representative (RPM or OSR)

Selection Criteria

The Stanford Center for Innovation in Global Health and funders will review proposals based on:

• Scientific merit of the proposal, with quality, innovation and creativity balanced by likelihood of success
• Interdisciplinary nature of the project and research team, including international collaborations where appropriate
• Likelihood that results or solutions will lead to improved health among vulnerable populations
• A persuasive case that results would lead to scale-up, and/or catalyze further funding from external sources
• Involvement of Stanford trainees and/or students; global health career development
• Alignment between the proposal’s goals and the program priority areas (outlined above)

Submission Guidelines

All documents should be in pdf format, single-spaced, Arial 11-point font, with one-inch margins.

Submissions must not exceed 3 pages , exclusive of cover page, citations, budget, and biographical information.

To be considered, all elements of the proposal must be collated into one PDF file and uploaded.

Each proposal must include:

• Project title
• One-paragraph summary
• Priority Area(s)
• Each team member’s name, email, professional title, and department and school affiliation(s)
• Introduction
• Specific aims
• Preliminary data (if available)
• Proposed project design and methods
• how the multi-disciplinary team will work together
• the history of your relationship with any external/community partners
• Description of potential for impact and follow-on funding
• Literature cited
• Itemized budget with brief budget justification
• Short (150 words max) bio-sketches for team members

Key Dates :

• March 30, 2023:  Proposals due via online application  (11:59 PM Pacific)
• May 16, 2023:      Award letters are sent out
• June 15, 2023:    Grants begin.  Awards will be for 18 months or less.  All grantees are eligible for one no-cost extension if necessary.

Research Administration and Reporting Requirements:

• Once grants are awarded, the project team must submit a PDRF form via SeRA to set up their seed grant PTA.
• If research includes Human subjects, projects will need to obtain IRB approval prior to incurring any costs related to the human subjects phase of research.
• All grantees must submit annual progress reports by December 1, 2023, and a final report 45 days after the work has been completed. 
• All seed grantees must also apply to present their funded research at the annual Stanford Global Health Research Convening, typically held every January.

Amount of funding

$10,000 - $50,000 for 18 months.

We encourage investigators to consider submitting requests for less than the maximum, as this will enable us to award more grants.

Funders include:

• the Stanford Center for Innovation in Global Health
• the Woods Institute for the Environment
• the Maternal and Child Health Research Institute
• the Stanford Health Care Office of Research & Health Equity
• the Stanford Office of Community Engagement
• the Stanford School of Medicine (SOM) Departments of Surgery, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Ophthalmology, and Emergency Medicine

Budget Guidelines

Award amounts are based on analysis of a detailed budget request. 

• Funds may be used for salary support of faculty, graduate students, post-docs, and other research staff.
• Eligible budget items include:  operating supplies, equipment items, communications expenses, meeting costs, prototyping expenses, imaging time, and travel directly associated with the research activity.
• The grants will not support general (non-research-related) staff, administrative support, or tuition.
• No indirect charges need be included in your budget.

Questions?  Contact:  S. Jill Mueller:    [email protected]

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

• Competition
• Inequality & Mobility
• Tax & Macroeconomics
• Value Added
• Elevating Research
• Connect with an Expert
• In the Media
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy

Connect with us

• Washington Center for Equitable Growth
• 740 15th St. NW 8th Floor
• Washington, D.C. 20005
• Phone: 202.545.6002

RESEARCH November 9, 2022

The Washington Center for Equitable Growth seeks to deepen our understanding of how inequality affects economic growth and stability. To do so, we support research investigating the various channels through which economic inequality, in all its forms, may or may not impact economic growth and stability.

Equitable Growth promotes efforts to increase diversity in the economics profession and across the social sciences. We recognize the importance of diverse perspectives in broadening and deepening research on the topics in this request for proposals.

FUNDING PRIORITIES

Equitable Growth is interested in inequality in all of its forms and its relationship to growth. We also recognize that various forms of inequality interact with each other in ways that deserve more attention.

We support research inquiry using many different types of evidence, relying on a variety of methodological approaches and cutting across academic disciplines.

Preference is given to projects creating new data that can be made publicly available and to studies that engage with relevant literature across disciplines.

MACROECONOMICS AND INEQUALITY

How is inequality structurally reshaping the economy and the models research uses? What are the effects of the historic levels of inequality on economic growth and business cycles, and what policies could lead to more equitable, sustainable, and broadly shared growth? How can macroeconomic research more fully take into account the economic, social, and environmental benefits and costs of addressing the consequences and risks of climate change? Equitable Growth is particularly interested in how racial disparities and discrimination in the economy affect economic growth and well-being overall and the well-being of historically marginalized groups.

Areas of interest include but are not limited to:

MONETARY POLICY

What are the distributional effects of monetary policy, both expansionary and contractionary? How does the financial market response to changes in monetary policy affect wealth inequality?

How do the costs of inflation vary across household characteristics, such as income or race? How do a household’s asset and debt positions affect its experience of inflation?  

INVESTMENT, GROWTH, AND SUPPLY-SIDE MACROECONOMICS

How can macroeconomic policy best support the supply-side of the economy to generate equitable growth? What role does government investment have in crowding-in or crowding-out private investment and growth in general and in areas such as the move toward a cleaner economy? What instrument choice or mechanism design best aligns the incentives of the private sector and the government in these public investments? Why may large, private firms be hesitant to make long-term investments even when they have ample cash and financing available?

FISCAL POLICY

What are the distributional effects of fiscal policy, and do they differ across different demographic groups? Did the more aggressive fiscal policy response during the recent recession limit scarring and mitigate the severity of the recession, compared to previous recessions? What are the implications of increased income and wealth inequality for public policy, and how do public policies affect these relationships? Would more automatic stabilizers improve the toolkit of policies to fight recessions?

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IN GOVERNMENT PROCESSES

How can inequality and growth be reflected in a nuanced way in government economic indicators or government economic analyses, such as legislative scoring or regulatory cost benefit analysis? How can economic analysis or key economic indicators better take into account long-term threats to growth, such as climate change, or the potential returns of long-term investments, such as investments in children? How can they better model distributional impacts and racial disparities?

HUMAN CAPITAL AND WELL-BEING

How does economic inequality, particularly wealth inequality, affect the development of human capital, and what are the impacts on the health and stability of the macroeconomy? To what extent can the institutions that support the development of human capital mitigate inequality’s potential effects and enhance well-being and current and future economic productivity? Through what channels do these effects occur?

INVESTMENTS IN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

What short-term indicators, other than education and health indicators, are impacted by investments in children and families that lead to long-term economic gains for children? Are there important complementarities in these investments in children and families that might limit the effectiveness of one investment if not accompanied by other investments, especially for those impacted by structural racism?

What are the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of child care and early education programs on children’s human capital development? How do they relate to long-term labor market outcomes, productivity, and economic growth, and what mechanisms underpin those human capital outcomes?

HUMAN CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT

What role do public policies—such as labor market regulations, work support policies, and income support policies—play in individual and family well-being, labor force participation, and consumption? What policies may be effective in combating discrimination and other structural impediments to the deployment of human capital?

How does the current U.S. child care market facilitate or impede labor force participation and economic growth? Where are the biggest inequities in the U.S. child care system, and how do those affect labor force participation and macroeconomic stability? How does the health and functioning of the U.S. child care sector impact the macroeconomy and business cycle, and vice versa?

INTRA- AND INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY

What policies, especially at scale, may be effective in making upward mobility more attainable and equitable? What structural factors and institutions, including structural racism, determine who has the opportunity to achieve upward mobility? What mechanisms explain the strong correlations we see in who achieves upward mobility? Which place-based programs or interventions are most effective in promoting economic mobility, and for whom? What policies are effective at strengthening household balance sheets, building wealth, improving economic stability, and shifting the trajectory of lifetime earnings, and what are the macroeconomic effects of such policies? How are climate change and other environmental factors affecting intergenerational mobility? While Equitable Growth is interested in both contemporary and historical approaches to these questions, we are particularly interested in research that will clarify indicators and critical interventions that will guide policymaking today.

THE LABOR MARKET

How does inequality affect the labor market? How does the labor market and workplace organization affect whether growth is broadly shared? What are the labor market impacts on intra- and intergenerational mobility, and have changes in employer-employee relationships and new types of work arrangements affected the opportunity for job advancement and mobility? How prevalent is discrimination in the labor market, and what are its effects? How is climate change affecting wages and job quality?

POWER IN LABOR MARKETS

What is the relative bargaining power of workers versus employers, what influences that balance, and how does it affect pay levels, job quality, and economic growth? Do structural barriers, including structural racism and gender discrimination, or social norms affect labor market dynamics? What role do public policies, unions, and other forms of workplace organization play in determining labor market power? What effect do new technologies and new types of work arrangements have on who has power and how that power is exerted?

TECHNOLOGY IN THE WORKPLACE

How is the use of technology affecting work and workers, including hiring, wages, working conditions, scheduling/schedule stability, job quality, on-the-job training, management, surveillance, and outsourcing? How are labor market institutions succeeding or failing in the face of new forms of workplace organization, including those enabled by the adoption of new technologies? How are different forms of automation, algorithmic management, and other technologies measured and defined, now and over time, and what are the implications for understanding their effects on workers, wages, and labor markets? Do those effects differ for different demographic groups or protected classes? Equitable Growth is interested in both contemporary and historical approaches to these questions.

RETURNS TO WORK

How are returns to work affected by inflation? What are the firm effects of policies intended to improve worker well-being? Where is monopsony power prevalent, what are its causes, what impacts employer ability to exercise monopsony power, and what policies are most effective at addressing it? What role do structural racism and gender discrimination play, and what policies may be effective in decreasing the racial and gender wage gaps? How does enforcement of existing labor laws affect outcomes for workers?

MARKET STRUCTURE

What is the role of market structure in determining economic growth and its distribution? What is the relationship between inequality, market power, and economic growth? How competitive are markets in the U.S. economy, and is that changing? What conduct is likely or unlikely to harm competition, and how? Equitable Growth is interested in research from an aggregate perspective, which has been common in the macroeconomic and labor literatures, as well as industry- or market-specific analysis that has been the focus of industrial organization literatures.

EXISTENCE AND CAUSES OF MARKET POWER

Is there increased market power in the economy, and if so, what are its causes? Areas of interest include studies of mergers, potential competition, and specific conduct. Is anticompetitive activity more common in some industries than others?

CONSEQUENCES OF MARKET POWER

What are the effects of market power on product markets, labor markets, and small business, including new business formation, firm growth, business investment, productivity, and inequality? Has increased market power made firms less resilient to shocks, such as supply-chain interruptions and severe weather? How have technological developments affected competition? How does market concentration affect the development or deployment of new technologies to mitigate climate change and support sustainable economic growth? Does market power disproportionately affect historically marginalized groups? How do racial and other inequalities affect competition?

EFFECTIVENESS OF POLICY TOOLS

Equitable Growth is particularly interested in empirical work that examines the effectiveness of policies to promote competition, including, but not limited to, the state of antitrust enforcement, regulatory approaches, new foundations for antitrust actions that do not necessarily rely on prices, and comparisons of the U.S. antitrust enforcement regime with other models. Equitable Growth also is interested in the differential effect of policies on different sized firms, particularly small business and minority-owned business, and the ways in which policies are shaping markets.

WHAT WE FUND

Academic grants.

Academic grants are open to researchers affiliated with a U.S. university. The affiliated university must administer the grant.

Academic grants are typically in the $25,000 to $100,000 range over 1 to 3 years. We frequently partner with other foundations to support projects jointly or to share proposals that are not a fit for our grant program, but which may be of interest to other funders.

Equitable Growth is willing to fund a wide range of activities, including researcher salary and benefits, research assistance, data purchase, and costs associated with conducting experiments or participating in professional conferences. Our grants cannot cover indirect overhead.

Visit the academic grants section of our website to learn more about academic grants, including eligibility, allowable costs, and evaluation criteria.

DOCTORAL/POSTDOCTORAL GRANTS

Doctoral/postdoctoral grants are open to graduate students currently enrolled in a doctoral program at a U.S. university and to recent Ph.D. graduates currently in a postdoctoral position at a U.S. university. If you are currently a graduate student or in a postdoctoral position, you may choose to apply for either an academic or doctoral/postdoctoral grant, depending on the pool in which you’d like to compete.

International students at U.S. universities are eligible to apply, though if awarded, the grant would likely need to be administered through the university. International students are advised to communicate their intention to apply with their institution to ensure adherence to institutional protocol if funded.

Doctoral/postdoctoral grants are funded at $15,000 over 1 year.

Funding can be used to cover the costs associated with conducting research, such as research assistance, data purchase, or participating in professional conferences. Funding can also be used as stipend support. Our grants cannot cover indirect overhead.

Visit the doctoral/postdoctoral grants section of our website to learn more about doctoral/postdoctoral grants, including eligibility, allowable costs, and evaluation criteria.

DISSERTATION SCHOLARS PROGRAM

Equitable Growth is building a network of scholars doing cutting-edge research on inequality and growth. The Dissertation Scholars program provides Ph.D. candidates with financial and professional support to pursue their own research and to gain familiarity with current policy discussions and the policy process. The program is currently operating virtually.

The position is open to graduate students who are currently enrolled in a Ph.D. program at a U.S. university and whose research aligns with Equitable Growth’s funding priorities. Dissertation Scholars are given an annualized $50,000 stipend and professional support, and are expected to support Equitable Growth’s grant program.

Scheduling is flexible to permit for travel to home institutions, as well as academic conferences. Tenure is for one academic year.

Applicants not selected for the Dissertation Scholar program will automatically be considered for a doctoral/postdoctoral grant.

Visit the Dissertation Scholars program section of our website to learn more about the program, including eligibility, the selection process, and evaluation criteria.

HOW TO APPLY

Academic grants .

To apply for an academic grant, submit a letter of inquiry and abbreviated curriculum vitae (max. five pages) using the online application portal .

Letters of inquiry are short descriptions of a research project. They should be approximately two pages in length. Letters of inquiry that are more than 1,500 words will not be considered. The word limit is designed to encourage concision and clarity. 

Letters of inquiry must include: 

• Problem or question your research seeks to address and how it relates to Equitable Growth’s funding priorities
• Engagement with and expected contribution to the literature
• Methodological approach, including data sources and research design
• Status of data access
• Timeline for completion

We encourage applicants to consider policy implications. Development of new data sources is also of interest.  

If tables, graphs, or other images are helpful in explaining your project, they can be included. While they will not count against the word limit, we encourage you to limit the use of images to one or two. Citations should be included in a references section and do not count against the word/page limit.

A preliminary budget is also required and should be submitted as a brief narrative (approximately 150 words). Budget narratives are submitted as part of the application form and do not have to be included in the letter of inquiry. At this stage, we are interested in the total expected cost of the project and a general breakdown of those costs (such as salary, research assistance, costs associated with data collection, travel, or conference fees). If applicable, please include a brief description of other secured or anticipated funding sources for the proposed work. A detailed project budget will be required for applicants who are invited to submit a full proposal. 

The deadline to apply is 11:59 p.m. EST on January 23, 2023.  

Visit the academic grants section of our website to learn more about academic grants, including eligibility, allowable costs, and evaluation criteria.  

DOCTORAL/POSTDOCTORAL GRANTS 

To apply for a doctoral/postdoctoral grant, submit a proposal and curriculum vitae using the online application portal .

Doctoral/postdoctoral proposals should be approximately six single-spaced pages with standard font and margins. Proposals longer than seven pages will not be considered. While we do not want to be overly prescriptive, the page limit is designed to encourage concision and clarity. 

Proposals should address the following: 

• Detailed methodological approach, including data sources and research design

Budget information is requested within the application form and should not be included in your six-page proposal. This section should briefly describe direct costs, such as data purchase or research assistance. If funding will be used for support only, simply state that. 

If tables, graphs, or other images are helpful in explaining your project, they can be included either in the body of the proposal or as an appendix. While they will not count against the page limit, we encourage you to limit the use of images to one or two. Citations should be included in a references section and do not count against the page limit.

Doctoral/postdoctoral applicants do not need to submit a letter of inquiry. Professional references are also not required.  

Doctoral/postdoctoral proposals are due by 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 20, 2023. 

Visit the doctoral/postdoctoral grants section of our website to learn more about doctoral/postdoctoral grants, including eligibility, allowable costs, and evaluation criteria.  

DISSERTATION SCHOLARS PROGRAM 

To apply to the Dissertation Scholars program, submit a proposal, statement of purpose, and curriculum vitae using the online application portal .

Application to the program also requires two academic letters of recommendation, preferably from your chair and an advisor. 

Letters of recommendation should be submitted through the online application portal. Prior to submitting your application, you will have the opportunity to request letters of recommendation through the online application portal. Letters must be submitted by the application deadline, so please reach out to your letter-writers well in advance of the deadline. 

The proposal should follow the requirements and guidelines for doctoral/postdoctoral proposals.  

The statement of purpose should be approximately two pages and should describe: 

• Your motivating research questions 
• The direction you anticipate your research agenda taking and how that relates to Equitable Growth’s mission 
• How you hope to spend your time with Equitable Growth and how that will help further your career/research 

Applicants selected to move forward in the Dissertation Scholar review process will be asked to interview with Equitable Growth in April 2023. Interviews consist of a research presentation and about three small group interviews with select staff. They are typically conducted over one day. Presentations and interviews will be done virtually. Selection decisions will be announced in early May 2023. 

The deadline to apply is 11:59 p.m. EST on January 23, 2023.

Academic letters of inquiry are due by 11:59 p.m. EST on January 23, 2023.

If invited, full proposals will be due by 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 8, 2023. 

Dissertation Scholar applications are due by 11:59 p.m. EST on January 23, 2023. 

Funding decisions will be announced by mid-July 2023. We anticipate that funds will be distributed in early fall 2023, though the timing of disbursement depends in part on the particulars of the project and the researcher’s home institution.

THE REVIEW PROCESS

Letters of inquiry and full proposals for academic grants are reviewed by staff, external peer reviewers, and members of Equitable Growth’s Steering Committee.  

Proposals for doctoral/postdoctoral grants and the Dissertation Scholars program are reviewed by our staff and members of our Steering Committee.  

All funding is approved by our Steering Committee .

For more information on evaluation criteria, visit the academic grants , doctoral/postdoctoral grants , or Dissertation Scholars program sections of our website.

FEEDBACK PRIOR TO SUBMISSION

Equitable Growth cannot provide feedback on a written proposal or Letter of Inquiry prior to the application deadline, but staff are available to meet with applicants to discuss questions they may have. Questions may include, but are not limited to, how to apply, budget guidelines, proposal structure, eligibility, and a project’s relevance to Equitable Growth’s mission and funding priorities.  

Watch these recordings of recent informational webinars to learn more about our funding opportunities, how to apply, and tips for a successful application.

The slide decks for each webinar can be viewed using these links: Academic webinar and Doctoral/postdoctoral/Dissertation Scholars webinar.

Equitable Growth staff are also available to meet with interested applicants. Please complete this form if you would like to schedule a time with our staff regarding any questions you may have about submitting an application. You will receive an email from [email protected] to schedule a 15–30 minute Zoom call with Equitable Growth staff best positioned to answer your question(s).

SUBMIT YOUR PROPOSAL

Submit your proposal by creating an account and completing the submission form using our online application portal .

If you have questions or are having trouble with the application portal, please email [email protected] or call 202-276-3368.

2022 Request for Proposals

November 10, 2021

Equitable Growth’s 2022 grantees will study the drivers and effects of U.S. economic inequality

August 30, 2022

Equitable Growth announces two Dissertation Scholars for 2022–23 academic year

October 6, 2022

Explore the Equitable Growth network of experts around the country and get answers to today's most pressing questions!

• Knowledge for Change

Knowledge for Change: 2023 Call for Proposals and Application Procedures

• Eligibility
• Selection Criteria
• Submission and Selection Process

The 2023 Call for Proposals (CFP) for the Knowledge for Change Umbrella Program (KCP) Phase IV is now open. Housed in the Development Economics Vice Presidency (DEC), the KCP is a multi-donor trust fund with a successful track record in delivering high-impact, policy-relevant research, and knowledge products. The KCP aims at promoting evidence-based policy development in support of poverty reduction and shared prosperity in developing countries. The following are the main goals of the program:

• Original Research : produce rigorous and relevant fundamental research in support of evidence-based policy making in international development, anticipating future needs and knowledge gaps as well as responding to current policy challenges.
• Operational Relevance : support World Bank Group country operations in the design, implementation, evaluation, and modification of development interventions in an effective and efficient manner.
• Open Knowledge : maximize the impact of research and data by making knowledge accessible and actionable, particularly through partnerships and capacity-building activities.

The KCP launched its fourth phase in early 2021, with an objective to carry out activities related to research, data, and analytics around the following IDA’s special themes: 

• Jobs and economic transformation
• Fragility, conflict, and violence
• Climate change
• Gender and development
• Governance and institutions
• Debt and financial fragility
• Human capital
• Disability 
• Main activities of the proposed projects should concern fundamental original knowledge generation and dissemination, support at least one of the KCP goals, and contribute to the achievement of at least one of the IDA thematic priorities outlined in the KCP IV Concept Note . Projects may include components of data collection, empirical analysis, or theoretical modelling.
• Thematic priorities: For this round of CPF, priorities will be given to proposals addressing the following thematic areas: a) fragility, conflict, and violence (including migration); b) climate change; c) gender and development; d) governance and institutions; e) debt and financial fragility, f) human capital (especially girl education); and g) technology.
• Geographic scope : Projects covering all countries are eligible, and a portion of the funds will be prioritized for those focused on countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.
• Project duration must be ≤ 24 months, and extensions will only be granted on an exceptional basis.
• Collaboration among staff across the WBG is strongly encouraged. The CFP invites proposals submitted by DEC staff, and joint proposals submitted by DEC staff in conjunction with colleagues working in other parts of the WBG. In the case of joint proposals, the ADM TTL must be a DEC staff.
• Grants from this CFP are for Bank Executed Disbursing/Activity Level Account (BEDA). The funds may be used to finance the variable costs of research, such as data collection, research assistance, fieldwork-related travel expenses, and dissemination. Funds can also be used to fund World Bank regular staff time, consultant fees (when engaging external contributors), and local capacity building efforts.  All purchases of goods and services (including when engaging external vendors) must follow applicable Bank procedures.
• For this round of CFP, the range of award amount will be between $50,000 to $300,000 per project. 

KCP emphasizes research and analytical rigor (the “Knowledge” part of KCP) as well as policy impact inside the World Bank and beyond (the “Change” part of KCP). In particular, four criteria are applied in the assessment process:

• Quality. Successful research proposals need to be assessed as being of high quality, meaning that the proposed activity will use a rigorous analytical approach to yield valid results and reliable evidence that represent the creation of new knowledge, including primary data, for development that advances the knowledge frontier.
• Relevance and policy impact. Successful proposals need to demonstrate policy relevance and value added, relative to existing academic literature as well as other work being done in the World Bank, and alignment with priority themes. This includes research on current policy priorities as well as forward-looking research on emerging policy issues that arise in a rapidly changing economic environment. 
• Communication. To ensure continued impact, proposals should include plans for communication and internal and external knowledge dissemination activities, including plans for proper documentation, archiving, and sharing of relevant data and code produced during the project for replicability purposes.
• Country participation and partnerships. Where relevant, proposals should document plans for country participation, involvement of local researchers or institutions from developing countries, and steps to ensure that the program strengthens local capacity. 
• Deadline: Proposals are due on June 15, 2023.
• Proposal template
• Prior to the proposal submission, TTLs must obtain clearance from i) reporting Unit Manager, and ii) respective DEC Department Director. The clearance email from the relevant DEC Department Director should be included in the proposal package.
• For country projects, TTLs are strongly encouraged to inform and consult relevant colleagues in the Country Management Units (CMUs) prior to proposal submission.
• Proposal submission: TTLs submit the proposal, together with respective DEC Department Director’s clearance email, and evidence of CMU consultation (for proposals covering country level activities) to the KCP Program Management Unit (PMU) at [email protected]
• External Reviews : All proposals will go through a round of review by independent subject matter experts from outside DEC, who will rate the proposals based on the selection criteria outlined above.
• Decision Meeting of the Internal Management Committee (IMC): The IMC will hold a decision meeting in early fall to review, discuss and select the proposals that will be awarded KCP grants, based on the ratings, comments, and recommendations from the reviewers, operational relevance, as well as the World Bank and DEC’s strategic priorities. Decisions will be made on an “up-or-down” basis, i.e., the entire proposal will or will not be approved – the IMC will not adjust the amount of the grant.
• Notification of Awardees: The KCP PMU will notify all TTLs regarding the selection result in early fall. TTLs should plan for projects to start in FY2024. 

♦  Full Proposal Template

♦ KCP IV Concept Note

♦  KCP Website

♦ List of approved projects from previous CFPs ( 2021 CFP , 2022 CFP )

♦ Questions? Email KCP Program Manager Kerina Wang  and  KCP PMU .

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

How to Write a Research Proposal: The Complete Guide (2023)

by  Antony W

January 16, 2023

When you have to write a research proposal for a project or as part of your course assessment, you may wonder why you have to spend so much time and effort toward preliminaries for the actual project. However, writing a research proposal is a solid way of ensuring that your project succeeds, and we are going to show you how to do it.

Academia is notorious for its love of defining and delimiting everything. When it comes to your project, it helps to have a concrete plan and approach for what you intend to do. Thus, a research proposal acts as the blueprint of your project.

Writing an excellent research proposal requires a combination of subject knowledge, planning, research skills, and communication skills.

However, if you feel that you would rather spend your time and effort elsewhere, we will write your project proposal for guaranteed quality and top-level expertise. All you need to do is reach out to us , and you can even get 25% off your first order.

If you do have the time and skills needed to write a successful proposal, let's go on. Let us show you how we do it so that you, too, can write research proposals like a pro.

What is a Research Proposal

A research proposal is a concise summary of a proposed research project. It is a document that defines what your project is, what it will entail, what it will need, how it will be carried out, and what you expect to achieve.

Like a good blueprint, a good research proposal acts like a plan that you can follow systematically toward the successful completion of your project. For students, it is the introduction to an actual project which you may or may never carry out.

Why Do You Need a Research Proposal?

Every big project started with a well-crafted research proposal that passed a review process and won a grant.

Even if you are not going to be applying for a grant, a research proposal will help you plan your project ahead of time and foresee any future challenges. It forces you to clearly define what you expect to do and achieve with your project and thus gives it a solid form you can pitch to others.

Are you about to carry out major research? Do you have a series of science or social experiments you want to perform? Are you pursuing a Ph.D.? If your answer to any of these questions is 'yes,' you need a research proposal.

Of course, students too will be writing tons of research proposals before they graduate. That is a good thing because it equips them with the skills they will need to succeed in the future. Some professors also prefer to assign research proposals instead of actual research projects.

That is a great mercy for the students because it saves them the exhausting and mind-numbing work involved in an actual project.

Whenever you write a research proposal, there is a lot at stake, so you better make it good.

What Makes a Good Research Proposal

A good research proposal is you pitching your research project to the world. You will be trying to convince everyone why your project is valuable, that you have the expertise to carry it out successfully, and that what you hope to achieve will benefit them. It also outlines how you will be using the resources assigned, if any.

Part of the audience will be your professor awarding a grade, a committee awarding a grant, peers reviewing your project, and many other essential readers. If you convince them to go ahead with your project, the proposal is successful. So, what will help to make it a success?

• Make it simple:  The aim is to simplify your project as much as possible without leaving out any important details. Make it concise, use simple and clear language, and structure it for optimal simplicity and ease of flipping through.
• It has to be feasible:  This falls in the purview of selecting the right topic and the actual planning stages. No one will give a hoot about your project unless it can be done with the usual application of effort, time, and resources. Anything eccentric and out of place will need something more than a proposal to carry through.
• Useful : Ultimately, you need to be able to base an entire project on it successfully. Thus, every step and stage involved should be a part of making the research project successful.
• Innovative: When you are competing for a grant, the competition will likely be very stiff. Unless your proposal stands out, it will never pass initial scrutiny.
• It should have specific and measurable objectives: Ultimately, your project is what matters. What you intend to achieve must be very specific, and its success can be quantified in some way.

Having now established that you need to write a research proposal and what you need to make it good, here is how you should go about it.

How to Write a Research Proposal, Step-by-Step 

Writing a research proposal is easy if you know how to do it. You will be marrying all the stated objectives into one document.

Besides, there are specific formats, structures, and templates you can follow to give your research proposal a head start. The process involved can be broken down into several sequential steps.

Choose Your Topic

Sometimes, the topic of your research is clear-cut and needs no refinement. Other times, it is already provided by an instructor, faculty, or organization. Most of the time, however, you have to come up with the subject matter.

Choosing a single topic out of tens or hundreds of possibilities is daunting, but you can make it easier by doing the following.

• Choose something you feel strongly about. It may be a subject that impressed you deeply during class, one you have heard about elsewhere, or even entirely new. If it is something that you are passionate about, it will be easier and more enjoyable for you.
• A research project needs to be very specific in its objectives, so be as specific as possible without drawing prior conclusions or bias. However, it should be one for which existing research material is sufficient for an in-depth study.
• Of course, the topic should be one in which you are well versed. If you are a student, it has to be pertinent to your course material.
• Think about what impact it will have on your career in the future. It is always prudent to look far beyond the current, and choosing the right topic for a research project can give you a firm basis for your career.

how unlikely they may seem. Don't confine yourself at this stage, but rather be flexible and open-minded.

Then, take time to think about each topic, its impact on you and the society, and what value would be added by looking into it. You should have narrowed it down to a few items by now, so research lightly online to see which will be more manageable until you find the ideal match

To start with, brainstorm for ideas and write down everything that comes to mind, no matter how unlikely they may seem. Don't confine yourself at this stage, but rather be flexible and open-minded. 

Then, take time to think about each topic, its impact on you and the society, and what value would be added by looking into it. You should have narrowed it down to a few items by now, so research lightly online to see which will be more manageable until you find the ideal match.

Craft an Abstract

The abstract is a succinct and comprehensive summary of the entire research condensed into one paragraph of about 300 words. It sets the bounds of what the project aims to accomplish.

The purpose of an abstract is simply to describe. While your goal is to convince the reader that your project is worth a shot, you will not be trying to sell it to him. Make the abstract simple, clear, and as short as possible without leaving out anything important.

To do this, start by writing a short paragraph describing the entire project. You can also give a brief context to help readers get a bigger picture of the project. Next, describe and give brief arguments about the major questions your project is aiming to tackle.

It is also a good idea to update the reader of previous research into the subject matter. That will help give them a smooth transition into the rationale or goals of your project. Finally, describe your research method and findings.

The abstract sounds very much like a brief outline of the entire project, which is what it is. You want to give a clear picture for the reader who does not have time to go through the whole project. It also has the take-away points of your research. As such, it is usually a good idea to write the abstract once your project is done to make sure nothing is left out.

Plan Your Research 

You have your goals; now you know what you need to accomplish in the project. How do you go about it? Unless you are a student writing a proposal for an imaginary project, this stage is even more fun.

Some projects involve lots of reading, while others need you to go even further and get original data from primary methods. Sometimes you can get material online, while many projects require countless hours in the library perusing books.

Now is an excellent time to come up with a strategy for your research. How are you going to obtain credible and relevant sources?

Who are you giant to work with to achieve this? Planning your research takes time and effort, but you also need to be flexible in this part. Once you have it figured out, your research proposal is almost done.

What A Research Proposal Looks Like: Format and Sample Outline

By now, you intuitively know what should go into your research proposal. We will give it a concrete form with a sample outline to help you structure it accordingly. However, keep in mind that not every research proposal looks the same, and different entities create their own formats. If you don't have a suggested format, here is a sample you can use.

Introduction

The introduction of your research proposal and that of an essay are not much different in that they are both meant to entice and hook the reader. The only difference is that this time, the goal is to prove how important your research project is to your audience.

Literature review/Background information

This is the part where you review what other research and material are available onto which you aim to build. It provides context for your research and helps your readers understand why you are carrying out your project. You can  read this post to learn how to write a literature review The main aim of this point is to supply missing links in the available information, prove what is suspected, or underscore something already known. You will need a lot of background information on a professional proposal as opposed to one done in class. Always be sure to use only the most recent and up-to-date information available.

Methodology

How will you find out the information and data you need for your research? For a class project, you are better off using the research methods you have been learning over the semester to prove to your instructor that you understood the techniques taught.

If the research project is your own, you can choose the methods best for your project that lend the most credence to it. You will also need to state what your primary and secondary sources will be. You don't have to go in detail, such as name specific books. Just list the qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods you intend to use.

Here, you will give the exact names of books, journals, articles, and publications that you used in your research. List them in APA, MLA, or other acceptable formats. APA is used in social sciences, while humanities use MLA. Check this guide to learn more about sources and citations . 

A research proposal can vary in length but is usually 4-8 pages or up to 8000 words. You might also like to know that the humanities use the past tense, while social sciences use the present tense in writing. Sciences also use the past tense to describe what happened.

Need Help With Writing Your Research Proposal?

That is all you need to write a fantastic research proposal, but as they say, the proof is in the pudding. When you get down to it, you might find that some things still need the attention of experienced research proposal writers. If you need help with your research proposal, reach out to the team at Help for Assessments .

We are also expert writers of research projects and documentation, theses, dissertations, essays, and all forms of academic writing. Let our experts help you get there faster and more conveniently. Apart from getting an instant quote, we will give you 25% off your first order, so claim it now !

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

The Mercury Project The Mercury Project: 2023 Call for Proposals

In Fall 2021, the Social Science Research Council launched the Mercury Project , mobilizing social and behavioral scientists in a search for cost-effective and scalable solutions to build vaccination demand and healthier information environments.

With $25M in funding from The Rockefeller Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, and the National Science Foundation, the teams in the Mercury Project consortium are evaluating a portfolio of interventions in 17 countries that vary in settings, target populations, and risk/reward ratios, with the goal of identifying those interventions that most cost-effectively and scalably increase science-based health decision making.  

We are excited to announce a new call for proposals with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The Mercury Project now invites proposals to evaluate the causal impacts of online or offline interventions designed to increase demand for vaccinations consistent with national priorities, including childhood vaccines, HPV, polio, measles, and Covid-19 vaccinations, in low- and lower-middle income countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean.

Applicants are encouraged to consider the Mercury Project’s Research Framework in developing proposals. Preference will be given to projects that:

• evaluate the effects of interventions on behavioral outcomes, including vaccination uptake;
• evaluate interventions that are designed and delivered in collaboration with governmental, NGO, and/or corporate partners;
• have demonstrated potential to be cost-effective at scale;
• include researchers and research institutions located in the countries in which the study is being conducted.

Proposed projects may have a duration of up to 30 months. Primary applicant organizations must be tax-exempt organizations or the equivalent in the local context (e.g., nonprofit organizations, universities, governmental units). Proposed budgets should be appropriate to cover project costs, with indirect costs not exceeding 15% of direct costs. 

Proposals will undergo confidential peer review by a panel of scientific experts. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of scientific merit, potential to cost-effectively increase vaccination demand at scale, and research team inclusivity. Proposals will be reviewed on a rolling basis; we encourage applicants to submit proposals earlier rather than later. Applications will not be accepted after May 1, 2023.

Proposal Requirements

Applicants will be asked to provide the following information through the Mercury Project application portal.

• Identities of primary applicant organization and any proposed subaward organizations, including organizations’ tax-exempt (or equivalent) status;
• Identities of principal and co-investigators, including disciplinary and institutional affiliations, links to investigator websites or CVs, and contact information for principal investigator;
• Project description, including intervention design, proposed strategy to make causal inferences (e.g., randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental design), potential causal mechanisms, sample size and power analysis, outcomes of interest, evidence for likely cost-effectiveness at scale, project duration and timeline, discussion of ethical considerations (6 pages maximum);
• Letters of collaboration from implementing partners;
• Project budget and budget narrative, with indirect costs not exceeding 15%.

Mercury Project Research Consortium

Grantees will be expected to participate in the Mercury Project research consortium, including regular monthly virtual research team meetings, at least one in-person convening of grantees and other invited parties, and the development of research and policy briefs written for policy impact. Additional funding for these activities will be provided by the Mercury Project.

If you have questions, please review the FAQ page . Please note that we cannot review materials in advance of submissions. For further questions not addressed in the FAQs, please contact [email protected] . 

Privacy Overview

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Call for Exploratory Research Proposals, FY2023

• July 6, 2022 Letters of Intent due at 5 p.m. PDT
• August 1, 2022 Invitation for full proposals sent
• August 31, 2022 Invitation only: Full proposals due at 5 p.m. PDT
• November 30, 2022 Decision notices sent
• December 1, 2022 Projects begin

Updated January 2023: Meet the awardees of the EMSL Call for FY2023 Exploratory Research . 

EMSL’s Call for FY2023 Exploratory Research Proposals is seeking leading-edge research activities that employ certain highlighted capabilities, detailed below, to advance scientific understanding in EMSL’s science areas. A letter of intent is required prior to submitting a proposal, and full proposals may only be submitted by invitation. Successful proposals will include well-described research plans that can be completed within the ten-month project period. A template is available for full proposals and is not required for letters of intent. EMSL is piloting a dual anonymous peer review process for the FY2023 call.  Letters of intent will not be anonymized.

Focus topic areas

Proposals should be clearly aligned with one or more of the three EMSL science areas.  Proposals must also employ one or more of the highlighted capabilities listed below as an integral enabling capability. As guide, approximately 30% or more of the research effort should focus on the highlighted capabilities, in terms of requested hours or samples analyzed.  

Highlighted Capabilities  

EMSL’s new single-cell transcriptomic workflows elucidate intercellular signaling, communication and ensuing heterogeneity that underpin the behavior of complex multicellular/multispecies assemblages including microbial communities and host-microbe systems. (Contact: Alex Beliaev ).   

Chemical biology – EMSL is developing capabilities in chemical biology to probe enzyme function and characterize biochemical pathways. For example, EMSL recently developed a probe library to broadly profile amidase activity, which targets both canonical (peptide-like) and non-canonical amide hydrolase activity. EMSL is seeking users to utilize this library or work with us to develop probes for other activities. (Contact: Sankar Krishnamoorthy , Kris Brandvold )  

Synthetic soil habitats – EMSL has developed a suite of synthetic soil habitats to measure the impact of target soil parameters on ecological interactions. This suite includes pore scale micromodels, mineral-amended microfluidic habitats, RhizoChip, Bioprinted Synthetic Soil Aggregates, and EcoFAB platforms. These synthetic habitats are ideal for multiomics characterization and multimodal imaging of the spatial organization of soil communities (plant, bacteria, and fungi) and mapping molecular exchanges between organisms. (Contact: Arunima Bhattacharjee , Jayde Aufrecht, Kirsten Hofmockel ) 

EMSL has integrated new capabilities for studying root-system architecture. These are: optical coherence tomography (OCT) , a gel root imaging system, and  x-ray computed tomography . These approaches are ideal for non-destructive studies of root development in plants. A new 3D root cartographic platform can be used to index and prepare samples for these 3D imaging methods. (Contact:  Amir Akhami ,  Tamas Varga )    

Three-dimensional BGC characterization of soils: EMSL has developed a workflow for high-resolution characterization of intact/undisturbed soil aggregates or cores for morphology (texture, porosity), chemistry (mineralogy, organic matter, organo-mineral associations), and hydrology (pore network connectivity, flow properties) in three dimensions (3D) using multimodal probes.  (Contact: Emily Graham , Odeta Qafoku ) 

We encourage proposals that focus on developing artificial intelligence/machine learning aided methods to mine information from 2D chemical maps, process multimodal data, help co-register spatial data from different instruments, or to expand 2D chemical info to 3D space. (Contact: Jay Bardhan , Tamas Varga ) 

Get Started

Develop a Research Plan

Submit a Letter of Intent

Submit a Full Proposal to the Anonymized Call

Review criteria

User proposals are peer reviewed against the four criteria listed below. For each criterion, the reviewer rates the proposal as Outstanding, Excellent, Good, Fundamentally Sound, or Questionable Impact as well as provides detailed comments on the quality of the proposal to support each rating, noting specifically the proposal's strengths and weaknesses. The reviewer also provides overall comments and recommendations to support the ratings given. These scores and comments serve as the starting point for Proposal Review Panel (PRP) discussions. The PRP is responsible for the final score and recommendation to EMSL management.

Criterion 1: Scientific merit and quality of the proposed research (50%)

Potential Considerations: How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity?   If successful, would the proposed research deliver high-impact products (for example, be publishable in high-impact journals)?

Criterion 2: Relevance of the proposed research to EMSL's mission (20%)

EMSL’s mission is to accelerate scientific discovery and pioneer new capabilities to understand biological and environmental processes across temporal and spatial scales. EMSL leads the scientific community toward a predictive understanding of complex biological and environmental systems to enable sustainable solutions to the nation’s energy and environmental challenges.

EMSL supports the mission of the BER program in the DOE to achieve a predictive understanding of complex biological, Earth, and environmental systems for energy and infrastructure security, independence, and prosperity. BER seeks to understand the biological, biogeochemical, and physical processes that span from molecular and genomics-controlled scales to the regional and global scales that govern changes in watershed dynamics, climate, and the Earth system.

Starting with the genetic information encoded in organisms’ genomes, BER research seeks to discover the principles that guide the translation of the genetic code into the functional proteins and the metabolic and regulatory networks underlying the systems biology of plants and microbes as they respond to and modify their environments. This predictive understanding will enable design and reengineering of microbes and plants underpinning energy independence and a broad clean energy portfolio, including improved biofuels and bioproducts, improved carbon storage capabilities, and controlled biological transformation of materials such as nutrients and contaminants in the environment.

BER research further advances the fundamental understanding of the dynamic, physical, and biogeochemical processes required to systematically develop Earth system models that integrate across the atmosphere, land masses, oceans, sea ice, and subsurface. These predictive tools and approaches are needed to inform policies and plans for ensuring the security and resilience of the Nation’s critical infrastructure and natural resources.

Note: Projects with direct relevance in these areas will have the best chance for selection. Other projects of scientific significance are also welcomed, but the applicant should clearly outline how the project will further a DOE mission or other areas with economic or societal impact .

Potential Considerations:  What is the relationship of the proposed research to EMSL's mission? Does the research project significantly advance the mission goals? How well does the project plan represent a unique or innovative application or development of EMSL capabilities?

Criterion 3: Impact of the proposed research on one or more EMSL Science Areas (20%)

Potential Considerations:  Will the proposed research advance scientific and/or technological understanding of issues pertaining to one or more EMSL Science Areas? To what extent does the proposed research suggest and explore creative and original concepts related to one or more EMSL Science Areas? How strongly does it relate to the Science Area's focused topics as outlined in the most recent Call for Proposals? How well will it advance EMSL along the directions specifically outlined in the focused topics?

Criterion 4: Appropriateness and reasonableness of the request for EMSL resources for the proposed research (10%)

Potential Considerations:  Are EMSL capabilities and resources essential to performing this research? Are the proposed methods/approaches optimal for achieving the scientific objectives of the proposal? Are the requested resources reasonable and appropriate for the proposed research? Does the complexity and/or scope of effort justify the duration of the proposed project—including any modifications to EMSL equipment to carry out research? Is the specified work plan practical and achievable for the proposed research project? Is the amount of time requested for each piece of equipment clearly justified and appropriate?

The 2030 Project Fast Grants - Call for Proposals

Call for Research-to-Impact Fast Grant Proposals 2023

In order to mobilize Cornell to support ambitious climate action in this decisive decade, Cornell Atkinson and The 2030 Project: A Cornell Climate Initiative are issuing a special request for proposals for fast grant research-to-impact funding . We seek to enable faculty to seize urgent and unique opportunities to provide support for impact-oriented climate research, expected to be in the $10,000-$25,000 range. In select cases, the amount awarded could be higher for proposals that make a compelling case for greater funding.

We are interested in supporting projects that will use seed funding to:

• Better position research teams to submit new research proposals to external public agencies, foundations, or private-sector partners to inform long-term, large-scale efforts in the areas of emission reductions/decarbonization, carbon removal, natural, engineered and hybrid climate solutions, or climate preparedness and adaptation.
• Develop cross-disciplinary collaborations across various colleges or schools within Cornell.
• Eliminate or substantially reduce a major source of greenhouse gas emissions;
• Remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and/or ocean; and
• Prepare for a climate-change-impacted world. Note projects with quantifiable, scalable potential are especially welcome : i.e. .5 billion tons or more of annual emission reductions or removal; projects that impact >50,000 people, globally scalable to billions of tons and millions of people.
• Accelerate efforts to develop the food & farms of the future; the energy systems of the future; the materials of the future; and/or the societies of the future – systems that support human flourishing while minimizing harmful climate impacts. Including, but not limited to, zero-emission agriculture; renewable and zero-carbon energy production; decarbonized industrial processes and sustainable material extraction; climate finance and climate policy development.
• Support an equitable transition – improving quality of life, equity, legitimacy, or justice as part of a transition to prevent or prepare for climate change.
• Launch immediate efforts to inform and support the urgent response to climate change and help advance progress towards publicly articulated public or private climate goals.      Examples: United States emission nationally defined commitment goal under the Paris Agreement; the Global Methane pledge; NYS CLCPA goals; or a corporate Net-Zero pledge.
• Build new or deepen existing partnerships with key non-academic partners, such as a government, company, or organization to turn research into impact (e.g. EDF; Nature Conservancy; Clean Air Task Force; Rocky Mountain Institute).
• Advance a new entrepreneurial endeavor or enable technology commercialization

NOTE : 2030 Project funds are subject to the same restrictions as any other university research funding. Applications are open to any Cornell University-eligible Principal Investigator, however Cornell PIs who were previously awarded 2030 Project Fast Grants are not eligible . (Please click here for more details about PI eligibility.)

There will be three distinct 2030 Fast Grant proposal calls in 2023:

• July 24, 2023: Info Session ( RSVP )
• Aug. 7, 2023: Proposal Due Date
• Aug. 25, 2023: Applicants Notified
• Sept. 1, 2023: Info Session ( RSVP )
• Sept. 11, 2023: Proposal Due Date
• Sept. 29, 2023: Applicants Notified
• Oct 6, 2023: Info Session ( RSVP )
• Oct. 23, 2023: Proposal Due Date
• Nov. 10, 2023: Applicants Notified

All Info Sessions will convene virtually (You are welcome to attend more than one session)

Proposal Instructions

Please submit your short proposal via this online form when each Request for Proposals is launched. Succinct feedback will be offered for unselected proposals.

Revisions and resubmissions are welcomed across all 3 cycles, but please note that previous feedback must be addressed prior to resubmitting your proposal during a subsequent cycle.

Selection Process

Selection will be based on the consistency of proposals with the ambitions of the project described above. Evaluation will be made by a combined group of internal and external stakeholders, with a final decision made by 2030 Project leadership.

Responsibilities

Fast Grant PIs will:

• Meet with the Center leadership to discuss the progress of efforts in research, intended applications, desired impacts, development of Cornell and external partnerships, follow-on funding, and milestones met and/or
• Submit periodic reports describing results and progress relating to each specific metric of success presented in the proposal
• Respond to surveys or other requests for information about the longer-term impacts of the AVF project after the funding ends
• Acknowledge The 2030 Project: A Cornell Climate Initiative and Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability in all presentations, reports, and publications stemming at least in part from this funding.  Guidance for acknowledging your affiliation with Cornell Atkinson can be found on our website .

E-mail [email protected] with any questions.

The Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability is the hub of collaborative sustainability research at Cornell University, forging vital connections among researchers, students, staff, and external partners. The center’s funding and programming accelerate groundbreaking research within and across all of Cornell’s colleges and schools. In turn, the center is the university’s home to bold ideas and powerful new models that ensure people and the planet not only survive but thrive.

Sign up for our newsletter:

Through calls for research proposals, we fund projects that aim to foster climate-resilient food systems, global health, education and science, democratic and inclusive governance, and sustainable and inclusive economies in developing countries. Gender equality and inclusion are also central to our strategy and the research we support.

Browse our open calls and learn about the experiences of some of our past  Research Awardees , or browse our rich portfolio of active and completed  research projects  to learn more about the work we do.

Sign up for funding alerts

Please review our  privacy notice

Closed Calls

Archived calls, which offer a sense of the types of calls IDRC manages, are kept on the site for one year. 

We use cookies on this website to give you a better user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more

ERIA invites the submission of research proposals to join its research projects across sectors. All calls for proposals will be posted in our website and announced through our social media accounts. 

Publications

Recent Articles

Search eria.org, latest multimedia.

Latest News

27 March 2024

25 March 2024

Research scholar program

The Research Scholar Program aims to support early-career professors who are pursuing research in fields relevant to Google.

The Research Scholar Program provides unrestricted gifts to support research at institutions around the world, and is focused on funding world-class research conducted by early-career professors.

Program status

Applications are currently closed..

Decisions for the November 2023 application will be announced via email by April 2024. Please check back in Fall 2024 for details on future application cycles.

Award information

We encourage submissions from professors globally who are teaching at universities and meet the eligibility requirements. It is our hope that this program will help develop collaborations with new professors and encourage the formation of long-term relationships.

Awards are disbursed as unrestricted gifts to the university and are not intended for overhead or indirect costs. They are intended for use during the academic year in which the award is provided to support the professor’s research efforts.

Eligibility criteria

• Post doctoral staff can only serve as a co-PI, not a primary PI.
• We consider exceptions for applicants who have been teaching seven years or fewer and had delays, such as working in industry, parental leave, leave of absence, etc. This exception request can be documented on the application.
• Faculty can only serve as a PI or Co-PI per round. Applicants cannot serve on two separate proposals.
• Applicants can apply a maximum of 3 times within the 7 years post-PhD.

Funding amounts

The funds granted will be up to $60,000 USD and are intended to support the advancement of the professor’s research.

Supporting cutting-edge research

Algorithms and optimization.

Our team conducts research in graph mining, optimization, operations research, and market algorithms to improve Google's infrastructure, machine learning, and marketplaces. We collaborate with teams across Google and perform research in related areas, such as algorithmic foundations of machine learning, distributed optimization, economics, and data mining.

Health research

Google Health research aims to advance AI and technology to help people live healthier lives through collaborative research with public officials, clinicians, and consumers. We are developing tools to understand population health, novel algorithms to better understand and use complex medical data, and technology to help people find high-quality health information and understand their health status.

We invite proposals that will generate and understand large datasets to improve population health, develop novel algorithms for better understanding of complex medical data, and develop novel methods to extract health insights cheaper, faster, or better.

Machine learning and data mining

Machine learning is the foundation of Google's research, with a broad scope that includes foundational and algorithmic work, critical real-world applications, and topics, such as federated learning, information retrieval, learning theory, optimization, reinforcement learning, robotics, and recommender systems.

Natural language processing

Our team comprises multiple research groups working on a wide range of natural language understanding and generation projects. Our researchers are focused on advancing the state of the art in natural language technologies and accelerating adoption everywhere for the benefit of the user. Natural language processing and understanding plays a major role in driving Google’s company-wide OKRs as language understanding is the key to unlocking Google’s approach: “Build a more helpful Google for everyone that increases the world’s knowledge, success, health, and happiness.”

Quantum computing

The Quantum AI team is developing an error-corrected quantum computer and discovering valuable applications by offering a quantum computing service. We collaborate with academic partners to advance both goals, so if you have a quantum algorithm you would like to run on our service, please submit a proposal.

Software engineering and programming languages

Research on all aspects of software development, including the engineers and the programming languages, libraries, development tools, and processes that they use.

Fundamental and applied science

Large language, visual, and multimodal models have made significant advances in recent years, opening up new possibilities for scientific research. We invite proposals in these four areas:

• Applications : Proposals that demonstrate how large language models can be used to advance scientific discovery in a specific field.
• Foundations : Proposals that explore broad advances in building, tuning, or deploying large models for scientific research, such as integrating language models with specialized scientific tools, developing multimodal models for understanding scientific data, and accelerating scientific analysis, experimentation, and summarization.
• Evaluation : Proposals that develop datasets or methods for benchmarking and evaluating large models for science, including evaluating domain-specific knowledge, assessing factuality and grounding, evaluating multimodal capabilities, and developing tasks that require multi-step scientific reasoning.
• HCI : Proposals that enhance scientific workflows, such as automating complex simulation pipelines, with large language models and human-in-the-loop interaction.

Human-computer interation

HCI researchers at Google design and build large-scale interactive systems that aim to be humane, simple-to-understand, and delightful to use. We work across a variety of HCI disciplines, including predictive and intelligent user interfaces, mobile and ubiquitous computing, social and collaborative computing, and interactive visualization.

Machine perception

Machine perception researchers at Google develop algorithms and systems to tackle a wide range of tasks, including action recognition, object recognition and detection, hand-writing recognition, audio understanding, perceptual similarity measures, and image and video compression.

Google's privacy research reaches across multiple teams, focusing on different aspects of privacy to advance the state of the art and develop tools to protect users and give them control over their data. This includes work on privacy-preserving technologies using cryptography and differential privacy, machine learning for privacy, user interface design and human-computer interactions to make communication clear and empower users, privacy policy to define Google's guiding principles for user protection, and system analysis and measurement to develop techniques to evaluate the privacy health of Google's systems.

Google's security and anti-abuse research team brings together experts from multiple disciplines to defend users from a wide range of threats. This includes work on access control, information security, networking, operating systems, language design, cryptography, fraud detection, machine learning for abuse detection, denial of service, emerging threats, user interfaces, and other human-centered aspects of security.

Systems and networking systems

Google's systems and networking systems research is focused on building and deploying novel systems at unprecedented scale. Our work spans the entire spectrum of computing, from large-scale distributed systems to individual machines to accelerator technologies.

We address fundamental questions around data center architecture, cloud virtual networking, wide-area network interconnects, software-defined networking, machine learning for networking, large-scale management infrastructure, congestion control, bandwidth management, capacity planning, and designing networks to meet traffic demands.

Frequently asked questions

Learn more about our programs and outreach efforts on our FAQ page.

2023 Microplastic Research Program: Request for Proposals

**UPDATED MAR 6, 2023 AWARD INFORMATION TO REFLECT FINAL AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR CALL 2**

IMPORTANT DATES

March 7, 2023 – 3:30 pm - 4:30 pm PT: RFP Informational Webinar (Optional)

March 24, 2023 – 5:00 pm PT: Letter of Intent due to eSeaGrant

May 15, 2023 – 5:00 pm PT: Full proposals due to eSeaGrant 

*Only applicants who have submitted a letter of intent are eligible to submit a full proposal

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Microplastic particles (1 nm to 5 mm in size) are pervasive and persistent in our communities and environment with estimates of plastic entering the global ocean anticipated to increase exponentially each year. Microplastic exposures can cause adverse effects on marine life, including tissue inflammation, impaired growth, developmental anomalies, reproductive difficulties, and mortality. Meanwhile, severely disadvantaged and disadvantaged communities in California may have disproportionate exposure to microplastics through environmental contamination, inhalation and drinking water due to proximity to plastic manufacturing facilities, dense highways, among other causes of plastic particle emissions.

California Sea Grant and the California Ocean Protection Council (OPC) have an existing partnership to address marine debris and plastic pollution through the 2018-2024 California Ocean Litter Prevention Strategy. Public Resources Code section 35635 (added by Senate Bill No. 1263, Reg. Session 2017-2018) further required the Ocean Protection Council to develop the Statewide Microplastics Strategy (adopted by OPC on February 23, 2022). The Statewide Microplastics Strategy is a comprehensive, prioritized research plan to better understand the sources and pathways of microplastics to the environment, identify solutions to prevent microplastic pollution, and support the development of risk assessments for microplastics in California marine habitats. 

California Sea Grant and OPC are now soliciting proposals for two research calls to advance microplastics understanding and management in California, consistent with the priorities outlined in the California Ocean Litter Strategy and Statewide Microplastics Strategy. These requests for proposals seek to increase understanding and management of environmental microplastic contamination by informing improved management of specific microplastic sources, refining and improving understanding of microplastic effects in the environment, and informing the use of structural low impact development (LID) stormwater management approaches to intervene and prevent microplastics from reaching California aquatic environments.

CALIFORNIA SEA GRANT

The mission of California Sea Grant is to provide the information, tools, training and relationships needed to help California conserve and sustainably prosper from our coastal and marine environments. California Sea Grant accomplishes this by collaborating with a range of local, state, regional, national, and international partners to further the co-production and application of relevant evidence-based knowledge.

California Sea Grant’s Strategic Plan prioritizes opportunities that benefit society through building and maintaining 1) Healthy Coastal Ecosystems (HCE), 2) Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture (SFA), and 3) Resilient Coastal Communities and Economies (RCE). Specifically, the planned solicitations will meet California Sea Grant’s 2024-2027 Strategic Plan HCE Goal 1: California’s coastal and marine ecosystems, including the biodiversity, functioning and services they provide, are better understood, protected, enhanced and restored through the facilitation of partnerships and the (co-) production of knowledge ; and address HCE priority topics within pollution in water, sediment and organisms (e.g., marine debris, land-based sources of trash, microplastics, and chemical contaminants). The planned solicitations also address RCE Goal 2: California’s coastal communities have the information, partnerships and tools needed to support planning, policy and actions for emerging marine and coastal industries and resource management that ensure an equitable and resilient path forward ; and address RCE priority topics to understand coastal hazards and risks (e.g., water quality hazards, compound risks to coastal habitats, communities and economies).  

CALIFORNIA OCEAN PROTECTION COUNCIL

The  California Ocean Protection Council  (OPC) was established to improve the management and protection of ocean and coastal resources and ecosystems. One of the many ways the OPC achieves this purpose is by supporting innovative research that directly informs and improves the stewardship of ocean and coastal resources. OPC has a long-standing commitment to protecting ocean health through addressing ocean litter and plastic pollution. The intent of this solicitation is to meet OPC’s Strategic Plan Objective 3.4.4 and advance the research priorities of the Statewide Microplastics Strategy to better understand the sources and pathways of microplastics to the environment, identify solutions to prevent microplastic pollution, and support the development of risk assessments for microplastics in California marine habitats. The solicitation is also aligned with the 2018-2024 California Ocean Litter Prevention Strategy to increase understanding of the scale and impact of microplastics and microfibers on the marine environment and develop solutions. 

Proposed research should be in line with the following strategic goals and guiding efforts: 

• 2022 California Ocean Protection Council Statewide Microplastics Strategy
• 2021 Microplastics Health Effects Workshop
• 2021 Microplastic Pollution in California: A Precautionary Framework and Scientific Guidance to Assess and Address Risk to the Marine Environment
• 2018 – 2024 California Ocean Litter Prevention Strategy
• 2024 – 2027 California Sea Grant Strategic Plan
• 2020 – 2025 California Ocean Protection Council Strategic Plan
• 2022 California Ocean Protection Council Equity Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Award information, matching funds  , research priorities, eligibility, submission instructions, letters of intent, full proposals, review process, evaluation criteria, selection criteria, conditions of award, award information.

California Sea Grant and OPC are soliciting proposals for projects that are up to 2 years in duration through two research calls. There is a total of $1,450,000 available for this combined research solicitation. California Sea Grant will contribute $375,000 of NOAA Sea Grant funds to Research Call 1 and OPC will contribute an additional $1,075,000 for projects under Research Calls 1 and 2. The anticipated start date for all projects is approximately October 1, 2023. California Sea Grant will lead grant administration for both solicitations on behalf of OPC. 

MATCHING FUNDS

No matching funds will be required for this funding opportunity. However, PIs are encouraged to point out related research and collaborations that would complement the submitted proposal.

RESEARCH PRIORITIES

CALL 1: IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF AQUATIC MICROPLASTIC CONTAMINATION SOURCES AND ECOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY ($375,000 per project maximum) This competitive call for projects relates to the fate, transport, source attribution, and/or assessment of environmental effects caused by microplastics that enter state surface waters and the marine environment. Projects should be capable of informing management action to address and prevent microplastic pollution in the aquatic environment and/or assessing microplastic effects. 

Priority projects related to this call include, but are not limited to, one of the following:

Investigations of microplastic contamination from specific sources quantified in the environment and/or ambient waters. Sources may include agricultural microplastic contamination, specific and identifiable aerial sources such as clothing dryers, wildfires that occur in the wildland urban interface, or industrial discharges, including plastic production, recycling, composting, and bioplastic production facilities. Proposed research questions may address, but are not limited to:

• Improved understanding of to what extent, and from what specific sources or practices (e.g., composted or degraded plastics), the agricultural sector may contribute to microplastics in California ambient waters or marine environment.
• Improved understanding of to what extent wastewater treatment byproducts (e.g., biosolids) introduce microplastics into agricultural soils, compared to soils without application of wastewater treatment byproducts.
• Improved understanding of specific and identifiable sources and pathways by which microplastics enter California ambient waters to inform management actions that may reduce microplastic loading.

Environmentally relevant microplastic exposure effects and thresholds , including the bioavailability of microplastic morphologies (e.g., size, shape, eco-corona, etc.) and associated chemicals to evaluate hazards and dose-response relationships on marine organisms, endangered/threatened species, and associated human health impacts to inform and refine microplastic risk assessments. Studies incorporating the following are preferred: using organisms most representative of species occurring in California’s aquatic ecosystems, organisms highly sensitive to microplastics, and/or experimental designs utilizing meso- or macrocosm, in situ observations, and/or continuous environmental monitoring. Proposed research questions may address, but are not limited to:

• Dose-response relationships of environmentally relevant (e.g., polydisperse, realistic weathering and biofouling, etc.) microplastics with an emphasis on data-poor microplastic polymers and morphologies (e.g., microfiber and/or tire wear particles) to inform management recommendations. Studies designed to meet minimum quality criteria (de Ruijter et al. 2020) are strongly preferred.
• Improved understanding of effect mechanisms, including demonstration of ecologically and/or toxicologically relevant metrics (e.g., volume, surface area) and adverse outcome pathways.

A total of $950,000 is available for Research Call 1. Three to six projects are anticipated to be selected for funding and range from a minimum of $80,000 to a maximum of $375,000 (to include indirect costs, if any). The anticipated start date of these projects is approximately October 1, 2023. The duration of a project request is typically two years, although requests for a one-year award will also be considered.  

CALL 2: MICROPLASTIC REMOVAL EFFICACY OF LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID): STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) ($500,000 per project maximum) This competitive call for projects relates to microplastic removal efficacy of low impact development (LID): structural best management practices (BMPs). The research call seeks to inform the design, location, and use of structural LID BMPs in urban watersheds with high trash generation rates that are co-located in severely disadvantaged community or disadvantaged communities (SDAC/DAC) as defined by California Water Code section 79505.5, subdivision (a). Projects must provide tangible recommendations for effective LID design, operations, and management strategies. 

This research call seeks to address the following: 

• Determine specific locations and factors (e.g., environmental, hydrogeologic conditions, land use characteristics) within California urban watersheds that have the highest potential to reduce macro- and microplastic loading into the environment with structural LID BMPs.
• Evaluate structural LID BMPs, including an evaluation of site-specific soil conditions, effects of bioretention soil media composition, effects on biota (e.g. vegetation, at what concentrations will structural LID BMPs no longer function due to degradation of biota caused by microplastics or relevant stormwater contaminants), and design factors (including but not limited to structural BMP dimensions, pre-treatment, soil compaction level), to inform LID design, operations, and management strategies that are most effective in intercepting and reducing microplastic loading in the aquatic and marine environment. 
• Evaluate the effects of microplastic polymer, size, and shape on the efficacy of stormwater BMPs for microplastic interception.
• Investigate retention of microplastics in (and any subsequent release from) infiltration BMPs and identify possible maintenance steps to maximize performance of an infiltration BMP during its design life.
• Identify recommendations and best practices to inform the application of structural LID as a stormwater management approach to intercept macro- and microplastic, including operations and maintenance recommendations for specific LID approaches. 

A total of $500,000 is available for Research Call 2. It is anticipated one to two projects will be selected for funding and range from a minimum of $200,000 to $500,000 (to include indirect costs, if any). The anticipated start date of these projects is approximately October 1, 2023. The duration of a project request is typically two years, although requests for a one-year award will also be considered. 

ELIGIBILITY

Eligible applicants for this competitive grant program include public agencies, tribes and Tribal governments, public or private universities, nonprofit corporations, or private entities subject to Public Resources Code Section 35650. Projects must benefit the state of California , relatedly, California applicants will be highly prioritized. California Sea Grant is the final arbiter of decisions regarding eligibility.

Applicants may submit more than one Letter of Intent/Full Proposal, but if more than one proposal is selected for funding, funds will be distributed through a single subaward to the Principal Investigator’s institution. In addition, PIs may be listed as co-PIs on other projects, even if they are lead PI on their own project.

OPC values diversity and equity at all levels of its workforce, in community engagement, and funded research. California Sea Grant is committed to increasing the diversity of the workforce we fund and of the communities we serve . We embrace individuals of all ages, races, ethnicities, national origins, gender identities, sexual orientations, disabilities, cultures, religions, marital statuses, job classifications, veteran status types, as well as income and socioeconomic status types. California Sea Grant is committed to building inclusive research, extension, communication, and education programs that serve people with unique knowledge, backgrounds, life experiences, needs, perspectives, and ways of thinking.

If you have questions about your institution’s eligibility to apply to this call, please contact Kaitlyn Kalua ( [email protected] ) or [email protected] . 

The following timetable lists key dates that will lead to the establishment of research awards under this call: March 7, 2023 – 3:30 pm - 4:30 pm PT : RFP Informational Webinar (Optional) March 24, 2023 – 5:00 pm PT : Letter of Intent due to eSeaGrant April 7, 2023 (approximate): Letter of Intent responses sent to applicants April 13, 2023 – 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm PT : Application Webinar (Optional; full details will be sent to those who submit an LOI) May 15, 2023 – 5:00 pm PT : Full proposals due to eSeaGrant [Note: only applicants who submitted a letter of intent are eligible to submit a full proposal]   July 2023 (approximate): Proposal applicants notified of recommendations August 15, 2023 : Recommended projects brought to August Council meeting for consideration of funding October 1, 2023 : Awards begin October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 : Project year 1 October 1, 2024 – September 30, 2025 : Project year 2

California Sea Grant and OPC hosted an informational webinar to provide an overview of the request for proposals and application logistics on Tuesday, March 7, 2023 from 3:30 – 4:30 PM PT.

A recording of the webinar is below:

California Sea Grant and OPC hosted an application webinar to provide insight in the review/selection process, walk through full proposal components on eSeaGrant, and address common questions, mistakes, and tips on Thursday, April 13, 2023 from 1:00 – 2:00 PM PT.

The supplementary material shared during the webinar is accessible here . 

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Applicants are required to use the eSeaGrant online system for proposal submission. eSeaGrant walks applicants through each step of the application process. All documents will be submitted through eSeaGrant. If you have not registered in eSeaGrant, you will need to register via the online submission “portal” ( http://eseagrant2.ucsd.edu ). Once you have registered and login, you can change your password by clicking on your name in the upper-right corner of the screen, and select “My Profile”. 

To start a proposal, or revisit/edit an existing proposal, click on “RFP (Request for Proposals)” on the banner head. Then click on “Add Proposal” under “2023 Microplastic Research Program (Letter of Intent)”. Only applicants who have submitted a letter of intent may submit a full proposal and may receive an invitation to eSeaGrant for their full proposals. 

In order to submit a proposal, you must work down the sequence of sections listed on the left side of the proposal window. eSeaGrant provides sections to input or upload all application components. Files to upload must be converted to PDFs before uploading to eSeaGrant. You may add collaborators (e.g., co-PIs, sponsored project office staff, etc.) as appropriate to assist in completing the proposal using the “Manage Collaborators” button in the upper right corner of your screen. Collaborators must also have accounts on eSeaGrant in order to be added to your proposal.

It is recommended that applicants access the system, review submission requirements within it, and start to upload necessary documents well in advance of the submission deadline. This will give users the opportunity to obtain any necessary clarification or assistance before the deadline. The submission deadline will not be extended. 

For questions regarding use of eSeaGrant, please contact [email protected] . 

LETTERS OF INTENT (LOI)

Letters of intent (LOI) are due by 5:00 pm PT on March 24, 2023 submitted through the eSeaGrant online portal . Letters of intent (2-page limit, 12 pt font, PDF file) will be evaluated by California Sea Grant and OPC to determine consistency with the priorities of this competitive solicitation. Principal investigators will be notified in mid-March 2023 whether the project is encouraged or discouraged to submit a full proposal. ( Any who submit a letter of intent, including those LOIs that are discouraged, are eligible to submit a full proposal ).  

In the letter of intent, please provide the following information: 

• Name of applicant, affiliation, and contact information 
• Statement of which Research Call (1 or 2) the project addresses
• Title of project
• Approximate funding to be requested
• Permits/CEQA - If permits are required, we ask that this be stated. Ensuring that all permits are properly obtained before research commences is the responsibility of the applicant. 
• After the review of your LOI, do you give permission to share your contact information with the PIs of other project(s) that California Sea Grant and/or OPC believe might mutually benefit from collaboration? Substantive proposal content will not be shared. (Y/N) 
• the focal topic
• the specific research questions to be addressed
• how the proposed work advances the research priorities of the solicitation
• the proposed study design and approach (including study location if applicable)
• impacts and/or engagement with impacted communities (if applicable)
• proposed data analysis
• anticipated management application 

Proposed Reviewers - Sea Grant uses external reviewers to review research proposals. Please enter information into eSeaGrant of at least three potential reviewers who you believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. 

• Applicants may also designate persons they would prefer not review the proposal, indicating why. These suggestions are optional.

Program managers will review each LOI to determine whether it is responsive to the goals and priorities of this funding opportunity, as advertised in this notice. Applicants that accomplish the following elements in their LOI will be more likely to be encouraged to submit a full proposal of the proposed work:

• Demonstrates relevance to the research priorities of this solicitation (stated above)
• Clearly articulates the problem(s) being addressed and how the project advances existing microplastic research and understanding
• Sufficiently informs microplastic management recommendations 

Applicants that have the following issues in their LOI will be more likely to be discouraged from submitting a full proposal of the proposed work:

• Does not clearly demonstrate how the proposed work fulfills the research priorities (stated above) 
• Lacks a clear connection to management/policy (project is not “decision-maker relevant”) 
• Is redundant or duplicative of past work

FULL PROPOSALS 

Only applicants who have submitted a letter of intent are eligible to submit a full proposal.

Full proposals are due by 5:00 pm PT on May 15, 2023 through the eSeaGrant online portal . All required proposal documents will be submitted through eSeaGrant (submission instructions above). We encourage applicants to review eSeaGrant well in advance of the submission deadline to ensure an understanding of all requirements. A fillable template Excel Workbook is provided for guidance on select proposal requirements (Cover page, Budget & Budget Justification, Current and Pending Support, and Project Timeline/Milestones chart). 

Adherence to the format requirements is mandatory and ensures fairness across all applications. Applications not meeting the format requirements may be rejected without review. Several application elements have specific page limits and excess pages will not be reviewed. Only the requested materials should be submitted; additional documents (e.g. appendices, unless specified in these instructions) will not be reviewed.

Proposal Format: 

• Type Fonts: 12 point Arial or Helvetica preferred. 
• Margins: Side, top and bottom margins should be approximately 1 inch each. 
• Line Spacing: The narrative of the proposal should be single-spaced. Please do not use 1½ line spacing. 
• Graphics: Any tables, figures and illustrations must be submitted in final form and embedded within or appended to the narrative. All graphics and tables count toward the 12-page limit of the project narrative. 
• References: The list of references does not count toward the 12-page limit. 

Proposal requirements and size limits for a complete application package are listed below. Please use this as an inventory checklist to aid you in preparing the application.

Signed Institutional Cover Page - This cover page provides basic summary information regarding the project. Applicants should download and use the fillable Excel Spreadsheet (found in the fillable template Excel Workbook and also linked at the bottom of this page), enter this information, and upload this document as a PDF back into eSeaGrant. *Please provide all requested information and obtain the required signatures. If you are applying from an academic institution, send your original proposal to your campus research office for local campus approval.

Project Summary - The Project Summary (not to exceed 1000 characters) is a fillable on-line form in eSeaGrant. Applicants will need to prepare separate sections for objectives, methodology, rationale, and identify the OPC Strategic Plan , Statewide Microplastics Strategy , and California Sea Grant Strategic Plan Focus Area(s) the project addresses to complete the project summary form. The project summary provides a concise description of the proposed research in a form useful to a variety of readers not requiring detailed information. Instructions are available in eSeaGrant to help applicants accurately complete the form. Please follow these instructions carefully - the project summary is the most widely consulted description of your project.

Project Narrative - The project narrative is a single PDF file that includes multiple components. The format and contents may vary; however, proposals should include the information listed below. The project narrative MUST not exceed 12 pages (INCLUDING: Illustrations, Charts, Tables, and Figures). Excess pages will not be included in the review. Applicants do not need to use the entire 12-page maximum. Depending on the proposed activities, a shorter description may suffice. Any works cited, CVs, letters of support, and current and pending support sections included do not contribute to the suggested page limit.

Introduction and Background – Provide the rationale for your project (a well-defined problem or important opportunity). Demonstrate a clear relationship between the problem statement and the project objectives. Merit, rationale, innovativeness, and utilization for the research proposed are criteria by which proposals are evaluated. Thus, a clear, concise statement of the “real world” need for your research (rationale), a description of who might use the results and how these results might be used (utilization) should be addressed. 

Project Objectives – In number or “bullet” format, provide a list of clearly defined objectives. For each objective, provide a concise statement explaining how the objective is aligned with the goals and priorities of this funding opportunity.

Approach (Plan of Work) – Provide an explanation of the methods you will use to address your project objectives. Present the scientific/technical approach, experiments, procedures, etc. Identify and discuss any new approaches (innovativeness) to solving problems and exploiting opportunities in resource management or development, including public outreach. Please make clear what other sources of support (fiscal, personnel or logistical), if any, will be used to help support the work proposed.

Outcomes and Deliverables – Project outcomes should be clearly related to the project objectives and should be briefly described. Any planned interactions with relevant management personnel should be described. Within the design of the project, applicants should identify which group(s) of stakeholders will benefit from the work performed. Each proposal should clearly describe how users of information will be engaged before work begins, during the project, and how results will be disseminated to the targeted stakeholder.

Project Timeline – Please provide a timeline for accomplishing the proposed work, which covers the entire duration of the project. Include approximate dates for key milestones related to the proposed work, including the accomplishment of anticipated outcomes and release of deliverables.

Community Engagement and DEIJA Statement (suggested 1-2 pages) – California Sea Grant and OPC encourage applicants to integrate diversity and inclusion in the scientific project and/or research design. In this section, describe how well the proposed activity broadens the participation of underrepresented groups and how they benefit from the outcomes of the proposed activity. Guided research experiences and mentorship to students, with the goal of increasing retention in STEM and launching careers in coastal science, and supporting research programs within or building research relationships with Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) are highly encouraged. Partnerships with local community-based organizations, tribes, and impacted communities are also highly encouraged, where applicable, to inform the proposed research design and/or location(s).

Applicants are encouraged to review the OPC Equity Plan (e.g. Goal 1, Strategy 1.4.2; Goal 4, Strategies 4.2.3 and 4.2.4) and resources and best practices compiled by Sea Grant’s Community of Practice related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

References – List all included references alphabetically. The list of References does NOT count toward the 12-page limit of the narrative but must be included in the narrative pdf file. 

CVs and Additional Personnel – CVs (max 2 pages for each person) of all key personnel (PIs, co-PIs) must be included in the narrative pdf file but will not count toward the 12-page limit. Each investigator (PI or co-PI) record created in eSeaGrant should have a CV associated with it. If a CV longer than 2 pages is submitted, Sea Grant will provide reviewers only with the first 2 pages of the CV for each PI and co-PI. 

Listing “Additional Personnel” in eSeaGrant is optional, and this section is to be used at your discretion. You may include all additional personnel who are NOT listed as investigators (e.g., Associate PIs, post-doctoral scholars, key graduate students). If there are additional personnel who are not the PI or co-PI’s listed in this section, their CVs should also be attached to the submission.

Support Letters - Support letters are optional. If they are to be included, please consolidate all letters into the narrative pdf file. Letters of support will not count toward the 12-page limit.

Budget Narrative – The Budget Narrative must include both the eSeaGrant Budget Forms and a Budget Justification document. In addition to the specific guidance below, general guidance on preparing budgets and budget justification can be found here . The fillable template Excel Workbook can be used to prepare your budget, but all final budgets must be submitted using the eSeaGrant budget forms.  

eSeaGrant Budget Forms are required to provide budget breakdowns and budget justifications by year and object class for the proposal. A completed eSeaGrant Budget worksheet should be completed for each project year (i.e., Year 1 and Year 2). Be prepared to enter any salaries, wages, and fringe benefits for all personnel associated with the project. Also, if applicable, indicate expected costs for equipment, expendable supplies, publication costs, and travel. 

The Budget Justification is required for each year of the project (or each individual project within an application). Each budget justification should explain the budget items in sufficient detail to enable review of the appropriateness of the funding requested.

Travel. Applicants are requested to include expenses to travel to an in-person PI workshop in Q1 of 2024, to be located in San Diego, CA.

Indirect Costs (IDC), if applicable. Both federal and state funds will be used to support projects approved for funding. When completing your budget, please use the state IDC rate of 15% (unless your institution has a previously negotiated IDC rate of 25% with OPC) (MTDC). If your project is approved for funding using federal funds, you will be asked to revise your budget to your institution’s federally negotiated rate. If recommended for funding, California Sea Grant may ask you to work with staff to revise your budget to ensure that the project budget, indirect costs, match, etc. are correct. 

Current and Pending Support - Describe any current or pending sources of support if applicable for each investigator (PI and Co-PIs) and other key personnel. An example template is included in the RFP Excel Workbook downloadable here .

Data Management Plan - All applications should include a Data Management Plan. Describe how data and other information generated by the project will be handled, stored, and shared, i.e., disseminated to the public, participants, stakeholders, and the State.

The California Natural Resource Agency (CNRA) open data platform serves as the formal vehicle for delivery of all data associated with OPC funded projects. Applicants should also be aware that a wide variety of aquatic environmental data and microplastic toxicity data are collected by and made available by two data collection systems (respectively): the California Environmental Data Exchange Network (CEDEN) and Toxicity of Microplastics Explorer (ToMEx) . These two programs also are potential recipients and managers of environmental monitoring and toxicity data collected by researchers, and may aid researchers in fulfilling data accessibility requirements (see NOAA Data Sharing Requirements, below). Applicants are encouraged to contact staff at CEDEN or ToMEx , as appropriate, to discuss availability and access to data, and data management or data quality requirements that might bear on the proposed research program. Applicants are encouraged to address data harmonization and reporting in the Data Management Plan (see e.g., Win et al. , 2020 for guidance).

NOAA Data Sharing Requirements - Data and information collected and/or created under NOAA grants and cooperative agreements must be made visible, accessible, and independently understandable to general users, free of charge or at minimal cost, in a timely manner (typically no later than two years after the data are collected or created), except where limited by law, regulation, policy or by security requirements. The requirement has two basic parts: (1) environmental data generated by a grant project must be made available after a reasonable period of exclusive use, and (2) the grant application must describe the plan to make the data available (Principal Investigators are expected to execute the plan).

If your project produces environmental data, it must conform to NOAA’s Data Sharing Directive for Grants, Cooperative Agreements, and Contracts. For detailed guidance, you can view the current version of the policy, including a definition of environmental data (which can include socioeconomic and model data), download any updates and access additional implementation resources at the following permanent URL (Appendix B outlines requirements): https://nosc.noaa.gov/EDMC/documents/Data_Sharing_Directive_v3.0.pdf . 

If a proposal responding to this competition will not generate environmental data, the data management plan should say, “This project will not generate environmental data, therefore a data management plan is not required.”

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire: An Environmental Questionnaire is required with each application. Applicants can download a fillable questionnaire form here: https://seagrant.noaa.gov/insideseagrant/Implementation . All applicants must ensure that the Questionnaire is completed in full and includes detailed information regarding project location, methodology, and permits. If a question is not applicable to your project write “N/A” as your response; blank responses are considered incomplete responses.  Copies of all permits required for project activities should be included with application materials. If a permit is pending or planned, please provide this information. Guidance on how to complete the Questionnaire and example Questionnaires for different types of projects can be found here: https://seagrant.noaa.gov/insideseagrant/Implementation .

The NEPA Questionnaire is required for ALL research projects even if the project is fully lab-based or relies on social science. The NEPA Questionnaire is also required for any project that meets the following criteria:

• Environmental permits, authorizations or waivers
• Biological take and/or release
• Environmental sampling
• Hazardous or toxic substances and waste
• Permanent or temporary environmental effects
• Endangered or threatened species and/or protected areas
• Known or unknown risks to human health or the environment
• Controversial environmental subject matter

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance: The CEQA summary is a fillable online form in eSeaGrant. Please include information on the project’s CEQA compliance. The Ocean Protection Council must determine whether the project is in compliance with CEQA prior to the issuance of funding awards. Please note that OPC cannot serve as a lead agency for CEQA. It is the responsibility of the applicant to identify a lead agency and ensure compliance under CEQA. If you believe the project to be exempt from CEQA, please identify which exemption the project falls under. The definition of activities that are “projects” under CEQA is available here , and the list of activities that are categorically exempt from CEQA is available here . If the project requires environmental review under CEQA, please provide the following information: 

• Lead Agency Name
• Lead Agency Representative, Title
• Contact Information (phone, email)
• What type of CEQA document has been, or is being prepared: Mitigated Negative Declaration/Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report? Please upload the CEQA document (draft is acceptable if the final is not available).
• If CEQA is in progress, please provide an estimated date by which the lead agency will approve the CEQA document.

Accessibility Plan – Please provide information regarding how accessibility requirements will be addressed (suggested ½ - 1 page uploaded as a PDF). All reports, deliverables, and communication materials produced for online posting and distribution associated with research funded by this RFP must be accessible, including but not limited to, blindness and low vision, deafness, and hearing loss, in compliance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Level AA and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. For more information regarding accessibility requirements, please visit: https://dor.ca.gov/Home/WebAccessibilityToolkithttps://dor.ca.gov/Home/WebAccessibilityToolkit . Please indicate whether this required portion of the project will be addressed in-house or if this is a service that must be contracted out. If the applicant will require financial support to address accessibility requirements, this service can be included in the budget of the project.

Demographics Questionnaire (Optional) – This questionnaire can be filled out online in eSeaGrant. It is voluntary and answers will be anonymous. Any data provided assists California Sea Grant in its commitment to equal opportunities. This questionnaire will be separated from the application and will not be used in any review decisions. This data will be used internally for statistical data gathering and reporting purposes in evaluating the extent to which California Sea Grant is achieving its equal opportunity goals.

REVIEW PROCESS

Proposals will undergo a structured review process led by California Sea Grant and OPC. Each proposal will be subjected to at least three external written reviews. Reviewers/panelists will all be external to California Sea Grant and all reviewers will be asked to complete a Conflict of Interest (COI) form prior to conducting their review. Review panels will include subject matter experts, scientists, and agency representatives. At their discretion, CA Sea Grant and OPC may request additional review by likely user groups of the research findings or suggest coordination of complementary proposals. 

EVALUATION CRITERIA 

To be funded, research must be consistent with the missions of California Sea Grant and OPC, be consistent with this request for proposals, and be a microplastic-based project likely to yield results capable of informing management action to address microplastic contamination in California.

Evaluation of proposals will be based on the following criteria: 

• Project Rationale, Relevance, and Utilization (30%): The degree to which the proposed project addresses an important issue, scientific problem, information gap, or opportunity in the health, development, use or management of marine or coastal resources and ecosystems, consistent with the priority research areas of the solicitation. The degree to which the proposed project will help inform future management action to address microplastic pollution and demonstrates who might use the results and how these results might be used.
• Scientific Merit and Innovativeness (30%): The degree to which the proposed project will provide possible solutions, explore, and develop new approaches to evaluate, quantify, and/or manage microplastic pollution through use of state-of-the-art and robust methods. Demonstrates that the project builds from and advances the state of the science without duplicating or being redundant with previous work.
• Community Engagement and DEIJA (20%): The degree to which diversity and inclusion is integrated in the project and/or research design, including how the proposed activity broadens the participation of underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), and/or impacted communities in the research design, location(s), and/or mentorship opportunities.
• Qualifications of Investigators (15%): The degree to which investigators are qualified by education, training and/or experience to execute the proposed project. Evidence of any record of achievement with previous funding. 
• Project Costs and Justification (5%)   

SELECTION CRITERIA

California Sea Grant and OPC shall award in the rank order based on the evaluation criteria above unless the proposal is justified to be selected out of rank order based on one or more of the following factors:

• Availability of funding.
• Geographically
• By type of institution 
• By type of partners 
• By research priority 
• By project types
• Duplication of other projects funded or considered for funding by California Sea Grant and OPC.
• Program priorities and policy factors.
• Applicant’s prior award performance.
• Partnerships with/participation of diverse groups, mentors and underrepresented communities.

It is expected that PIs will be notified in July 2023 whether CA Sea Grant and OPC intend to fund their project, pending concurrence from NOAA Sea Grant and OPC. Projects recommended for funding through this review process will be presented at an Ocean Protection Council meeting on August 15, 2023 for consideration of final approval of awards. After OPC and NOAA Sea Grant concurrence, applicants will be notified of the final award selection and can begin projects on or after October 1, 2023.

CONDITIONS OF AWARD

A full description of the Conditions of Award will be provided to project PIs if funded. Briefly, throughout the award period PIs will be required to:

Progress Reports

Provide project Progress Reports to California Sea Grant on an annual basis, including a final report, and a copy of any thesis or dissertation from students supported by this award, even if it is completed after the award period. Progress Reports and Final Reports are extremely important for describing the impacts, accomplishments, products, and outreach that were accomplished during the life of a project.

Work with California Sea Grant’s Communication Team and assist California Sea Grant's efforts to publicize your research activities.

Acknowledge Support

Acknowledge OPC and California Sea Grant support in all relevant presentations and publications. Attributions to OPC and California Sea Grant-funded (or supported) projects require attribution and funding acknowledgment. 

Proposal Content Questions:  

Kaitlyn Kalua, Ocean Protection Council - Water Quality Program Manager

[email protected]  

eSeaGrant Questions:  [email protected]

Tanya Torres, California Sea Grant - Marine Debris Research Associate

Lian Guo, California Sea Grant - Research Coordinator

Budget Questions:  [email protected]

Carol Bailey-Sumber, California Sea Grant - Grants Analyst

Rose Madson, California Sea Grant - Assistant Director

Application Resources

Subscribe to california sea grant emails, subscribe to california sea grant emails.

• Funding, fellowship, and job announcements
• Russian River Salmon & Steelhead Program
• Delta Stewardship Council Funding/Fellowships

View previous campaigns.

Research and Development Facility

R&D Facility

Call for Research Proposals 2022-2023

• introduction

ESA EO AFRICA R&D Facility, in collaboration with the African Union Commission (AUC), announces:

Related to the themes eo for managing water scarcity and safeguarding food security in africa, introduction, call for research proposals, research topics.

Water scarcity and food security are the main themes of the EO AFRICA R&D Facility’s Research Calls. The present call aims at addressing research topics related to the modelling and monitoring of environmental processes . Proposals in the following topics are encouraged to apply:

• EO contribution to hydrological forecast
• Runoff and river discharge
• Regional evapotranspiration and hydrological stresses
• Irrigation demand
• Crop development and yield forecast
• EO support of precision farming
• Forest and rangeland processes
• Ocean/coastal processes related to food resources

Application Criteria

Project proposals shall meet the following criteria:

• The project must be proposed by two scientists representing a collaborative partnership of one African and one European research entity (e.g., institute, laboratory, university). The co-principal investigators should possess a PhD degree relevant to the topics of the call or should be in the process of obtaining it as a PhD candidate.
• Project teams may include more researchers.
• Projects should be completed within 12 months .
• Project proposals should focus on one or more of the research topics of the call.
• Each proposal is expected to have a research plan for the scientific cooperation of the African and European partners to develop an innovative EO algorithm or workflow, preferably as an open-source interactive notebook (e.g., Jupyter Notebook).
• The proposal should explain how the work will be shared among the partners, including the roles of project team members and their expected contributions.
• The proposed research can be linked to an ongoing (collaborative) project of the partners. Therefore, the proposal can present activities that would aim to expand further ongoing research work.
• Research plan should be accompanied by a detailed budget, including anticipated cost items related to the research project.
• Proposed budget cannot include ICT resources for computing purposes (e.g., servers), as such resources will be provided by the Network of Resources of the ESA separately.
• Both partners have equal rights on the budget, so its allocation must be decided in a full agreement. Nevertheless, due to the governing regulations, the European partner should administer the budget.
• The Innovation Lab of the EO AFRICA R&D Facility should be used for the development of the algorithm/workflow, as well as other analyses and computations. Commercial use of the resources is not allowed.
• The developed algorithm/workflow should utilise EO data from ESA missions , such as Sentinel. Third-party data can also be utilised. The use of analysis-ready data and EO data services is encouraged.
• The developed algorithm/workflow and its application in the thematic context of the call shall be published at least in one international conference proceeding or in a peer-reviewed journal. Open-access publications are encouraged and will be supported by the Facility from an additional fund. Thus open-access publication costs should not be included in the budget.

Funding and Benefits

The EO AFRICA R&D Facility will provide the selected projects with:

• A budget of up to 25,000 EUR to cover research activities during the project period (max. 12 months), such as personnel costs, field work, data collection, bilateral visits, scientific meetings, training activities, etc.
• Free access to cloud-based Virtual Research Environments (VREs) through the Innovation Lab of the Facility, an interactive geospatial computing platform with ready-to-use EO software and facilitated access to EO data (e.g., Sentinel and other ESA missions) through the host DIAS infrastructure . See Appendix for more information on VREs.
• Dedicated user and technical support for using VREs and developing geospatial computing workflows.
• Scientific support and advice by senior researchers and experts of the EO AFRICA R&D Facility consortium .
• Access to the EO AFRICA Space Academy and its Digital Campus for capacity and knowledge development activities, such as online courses, webinars and face-to-face training events on topics related to EO, cloud computing, food security and water scarcity.
• Integration into the EO AFRICA Network for international scientific networking, collaboration and visibility.

Proposal Submission

The call is announced on 20 September 2022 and will be open for submission for 8 (eight) weeks . The deadline for submitting a full proposal is 15 November 2022, 18:00 CET .

The proposal submission shall include:

• Research proposal fully completed in all parts according to the provided template ( English or French ), duly signed by the African and the European Co-PIs and authorized representatives of the African and European research institutions,
• Detailed CV of the African co-principal investigator,
• Detailed CV of the European co-principal investigator,
• Short resumes of other researchers of the team.

The following items are optional and will be considered as assets:

• Support letter(s) from the beneficiaries,
• Any other relevant document.

Proposals shall be submitted as a single PDF document together with all supportive documents (e.g., CVs, support letters) to ESA through EO AFRICA R&D Facility via e-mail to: [email protected] .

Expected Deliverables

An expert committee will evaluate proposals with members delegated by ESA, AUC and EO AFRICA R&D Facility. The following criteria will be considered:

• Level of innovation of the EO application with relevance to the topics of the call
• Addressing the specific needs in Africa
• Scientific soundness and maturity
• Making innovative use of digital tools
• Impact for fostering the use of EO data and services in Africa
• Balanced cooperation of the partners
• Background of the African and European co-principal investigators
• Geographic representation of Africa

The applicants of the selected projects will be informed by e-mail in January 2023 .

The scientific content and the budget distribution for each selected project will be finalised in agreement with the EO AFRICA R&D Facility. After authorisation by ESA, a tri-lateral collaboration agreement will be signed between the EO AFRICA R&D Facility and the African and European institutions of each selected project. The applicants are encouraged to review the example collaboration agreement before submission of their proposals to prevent any potential conflict at a later stage.

The list of awarded projects will be published on the EO AFRICA R&D website in February 2023 .

Relevant Links

EO AFRICA website: https://eo4society.esa.int/eo-africa/ EO AFRICA R&D website: https://www.eoafrica-rd.org/ EO AFRICA R&D research projects: https://www.eoafrica-rd.org/research/eo-africa-rd-research-projects/

Important Dates

Any questions relating to the call should be sent by e-mail to [email protected] , no later than 2 (two) working days before the submission deadline.

Virtual Research Environments (VREs)

Each research team will have access to one or more VREs with the following features:

• 4 vCPU with Intel x86-64 architecture
• 100 GB SSD local storage for temporary storage
• SSD network storage for permanent storage (min. 1 TB)
• Direct network access to EO Data available on the host DIAS platform .
• JupyterLab interface with terminal and remote desktop access
• Pre-installed scientific computing, EO data analysis, and machine learning packages for accessing EO data services, developing EO algorithms and workflows, and visualising results in interactive notebooks (e.g., Python and R packages)
• Pre-installed scientific and EO desktop software for pre-processing and other needs (e.g., SNAP, QGIS, Visual Code, RStudio, etc.)

GPU-enabled VREs with the following features will be available for specific needs, which are explicitly indicated in the proposal and quantified in terms of hours necessary:

• 12 vCPU with Intel x86-64 architecture
• 128 GB SSD local storage for temporary storage
• Pre-installed scientific computing, EO data analysis, and machine learning packages for accessing EO data services, developing GPU-accelerated EO algorithms and workflows, and visualising results in interactive notebooks (e.g., Python and R packages)

Frequently Asked Questions

9239 Research Proposal Form - guidance (2023)

Topic outline.

The aim of this video is to provide information and guidance for the Research Proposal Form for examination from 2023.

The Research Proposal Form should be completed by learners with support from their teacher as part of the initial programme of learning for the Research Report. It should be completed before learners start to work on their independent research and writing.

The Research Proposal Form is reviewed internally by the teacher only, and not by Cambridge International.

You can download the Research Proposal Form from the samples database at www.cambridgeinternational.org/samples .

It should be distributed to learners and completed electronically.

The Research Proposal Form to be used for examination from 2023, has some small differences to the 2022 version.

These differences reflect the changes to the requirements for the Cambridge Research Report.

This video will explain how the Research Proposal Form should be completed by the teacher and learners.

Each candidate needs to provide their centre number, centre name, candidate number, their name and the exam series (the month, either June or November) and the year for which they are entering.

The next section asks learners to state their research question.

They should keep this short and focused — the size of the box reflects this.

Although the boxes on the electronic document can be expanded, it is not advisable to do this here as the question should be as clear and direct as possible.

All questions for the Research Report should refer to a debate so that learners can evaluate contrasting perspectives and come to a conclusion that judges these perspectives.

This box prompts learners to explain this debate by identifying each of these perspectives and relating them to the question they have stated in the first box.

The next box asks learners to 'outline and explain the key concepts which are relevant to the question'.

This section is new from 2023, and reflects the assessment now being made of how learners use these, in their research report.

The key concepts are best defined as the main terms or ideas which are used in the report.

Learners need to summarise what these are and explain their significance for their project.

In this section learners need to list the main sources they have identified so far, and to explain how they will be using them.

These should be sources that support each of the perspectives they have identified in their debate.

Learners would normally be expected to list the sources as a short bibliography, although this does not need to match a specific system of referencing at this stage.

In this section learners also need to explain how they will be using these sources.

We recommend one or more paragraphs to explain how the sources relate to the debate and how they will be used.

The box will expand as your learners type into the box and you should encourage them to take as much space as they need.

The remainder of the form is for teacher feedback. After the form has been first submitted, you should review it and complete the ‘Stage 1 comment’ box.

These evaluative comments should identify strengths and weaknesses in the way the question has been formulated, the appropriateness of the debate and the clarity with which it has been explained. The range, quality and relevance of the sources which are being proposed should also be commented on.

After making these comments, you should then record your judgement on the learner’s proposal.

You will need to tick one of these boxes:

this means you are confident that the proposal serves as a suitable basis for a report. It meets the requirements of the syllabus by having a question which focuses on the debate between different perspectives and is supported by sources.

Approved (with proviso): this means that, in principle, the proposal can produce a report which meets the requirements of the syllabus, but in order to do this some specific actions or changes are required.

You should set these out in the feedback and follow up on them in subsequent supervision meetings.

Not approved (resubmission required): this means that one or more elements of the proposal do not meet the requirements of the syllabus.

It could be that the question is unsuitable, there is not a clear debate between perspectives or sources are not listed or unsuitable.

This means that the learner will have to produce an updated version of the form for you to consider again.

More information needed: this means that the proposal does not contain enough information to make a judgement on whether it will meet the requirements of the syllabus.

The feedback should state this and set out what further information is required, in order to make a judgement.

The learner will have to produce an updated version of the form for you to consider again.

If the proposal is not approved or more information is required, the learner will need to consider your advice and produce an updated version of the form.

You should then give further feedback in the ‘Stage 2 comment’ box.

Copy your stage 1 comments into the stage 1 comment box in order to track each part of the process.

The only options at this stage are ‘approved’ or ‘approved (with proviso)’.

OPEN CALL FOR THEMATIC RESEARCH PROPOSALS 2023

1.0 Introduction

African  Economic   Research Consortium  is a premier capacity building institution  in Africa  established  in 1988.  The  main areas  of  capacity building  include  research, training, and  policy outreach. The  research component  has two tracks:  thematic and  collaborative research programmes.  Thematic  research has to date had  over 4,500 researchers  participating  from 41  countries  in Africa. The  pinnacle  of  thematic  research is  the  Biannual Research Workshop held  in June and  December  annually. Many of its researchers benefited from the research grant and unique mentoring by internationally renowned Resource Persons. With renewed emphasis on publication in top tier economics journals, generous mentoring opportunities as well as rigorous selection process. The Biannual  Research Workshop brings  together  brings  together  about 200 AERC-Supported  researchers  and  policy makers  across the continent  and  university professors(resource persons) from Africa and  the  rest of  the  world.

The AERC thematic research programme has evolved over time as the primary focus for capacity building in policy-oriented economic research for early career African researchers. It involves conceptualization, framing, design, and analysis of key economic research questions of relevance to policy making in Africa. The thematic research programme uses a unique framework combining learning-by-doing by researchers, peer review, mentoring and networking through the biannual research workshop, with skills improvement through technical workshops and visiting scholars’ programmes.

AERC hereby calls for research proposals to undertake research in the following five thematic areas:

Group A: Poverty, labor markets and income distribution.

Group B: Macroeconomic policy and growth.

Group C: Finance and resource mobilization.

Group D:  Production, trade, and economic integration.

Group E: Agriculture, climate change and natural resource management.

The thematic Research modality provides for grants to individuals/teams from both academia and policy institutions to conduct research related to the designated themes.

Applicants should meet the following requirements:

• Applicants are nationals of Africa, and their research needs to focus on sub-Saharan Africa; and
• Those sending applications should be holders of Master’s or PhD.

iii. Proposals that exceed 3,500 words count will be rejected automatically.

• All submitted proposal should meet AERC proposal submission guideline Proposal Writing – AERC (aercafrica.org) (to see the details).

THIS IS AN OPEN CALL, SO THERE IS NO DEADLINE.

‘Women are  encouraged  to participate.’

  Login – AERC RMS (aercafrica.org) to login/register on the AERC Research Management System (RMS) to submit your proposal.

• Report Vulnerbility
• Whistleblowing
• Privacy Terms

© 2024 All Rights Reserved

• Skip to main content
• Screen Reader Access

• Vision & Mission
• Organisational Structure
• Network Map
• CSIR Leader
• CSIR Directory
• Mandate of CPD
• Activities of CPD
• Officials and Staff details
• Mandate of IMD
• Details of Staff of the Directorate
• Information
• NMITLI Advertisement 2022
• NMITLI Proforma
• Innovation Protection Unit (IPU)
• Technology Management Directorate
• CSIR Unit for Research and Development of Information Products (URDIP)
• Vision & Mission ISTAD
• ISTAD Mandate
• ISTAD Activities
• Bilateral and Multilateral Cooperation
• Global S&T Partners
• Human Resource Development through training/fellowship opportunities for CSIR Scientists at centres of excellence abroad (RRF)
• Capacity Building through education and research training for the developing countries’ scholars/researchers(The World Academy of Sciences(TWAS) Fellowship)
• CSIR ISTAD Forms
• Information ISTAD
• International R and D Updates

News/Call for proposals/Announcements

• Contact Us ISTAD
• CSIR Outreach
• Science Communication and Dissemination Directorate (SCDD)
• DG’s Executive Directorate
• CSIR Annual Accounts
• Annual Report
• CSIR Annual Grants/Budget
• Former Director Generals
• Rules & Regulations & Bye Laws
• CSIR theme directorates
• Research Publication
• R&D Projects of CSIR
• Technology Transfer
• Compendium of Technologies
• Outcome Review of CSIR Schemes
• Appreciation Letters
• Latest Achievements
• CSIR Success Stories
• CSIR Milestones
• MOUs Signed
• About NMITLI
• Approved Projects under Covid-19
• News Bulletin
• Press Release
• CSIR Samachar
• CSIR India YouTube
• Photo Gallery
• New India Samachar
• CSIR Events
• CSIR Science Stories
• CSIR SciArt
• About SEC-CSIR
• Declaration Form
• External Resources
• Conflict of Interest Statement Formats
• C-DIS Template
• CSIR Ethics Guidelines
• List of CSIR Ethics and Safety Officers

Website Content Owned and Managed by Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Copyright© 2023 All Rights Reserved: Designed by CSIR and Hosted by National Informatics Centre

Last Updated : 28/Mar/2024

• Total Visitors: 21470376

2023 Stanford environmental research: A year in review

A new report looks back at the most impactful environment and sustainability research from Stanford scholars in 2023.

Each year, researchers at Stanford produce hundreds of studies that advance our knowledge of environmental systems and generate innovative solutions to some of the most pressing energy, ecology, and sustainability challenges.

The  Stanford Environmental Research Year in Review , produced by the  Woods Institute for the Environment , provides a snapshot of key studies from scholars across Stanford’s seven schools. These publications demonstrate how Stanford faculty, students, postdoctoral scholars, and research staff are building connections between knowledge generation and scalable impact.

Download the Stanford Environmental Research 2023 Year in Review

This year’s review spans a wide range of topics that can inform environmental policies, technology, conservation, business, and decision-making, including:

• Incorporating justice and equity frameworks into conservation and urban access to nature
• Wildfire management, public health impacts, and policy recommendations to support the firefighting workforce
• Climate-resilient approaches for designing marine protected areas and adapting to coastal flooding
• Water security and new technology for wastewater treatment and disinfection
• Interconnectedness of biodiversity and food security
• Pathways to upcycle materials for sustainable infrastructure

The examples highlighted in the Stanford Environmental Research Year in Review are far from exhaustive, but they illustrate the breadth and depth of expertise brought to collaborative partnerships at the university and beyond. In total, Stanford scholars produced more than 700 peer-reviewed publications related to the environment and sustainability in 2023.

View the 2023 publications collection

To learn more:

Madison Pobis Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment [email protected]

Explore More

A roadmap to climate resilience

The Woods Institute joins an effort to inform implementation of federal climate policies.

• Woods Highlights

Warming climate threatens rodent population that feeds Arctic foxes

Liz Hadley, an expert in biodiversity, says climate change-induced extinction threatens not only the Arctic fox but also many more species.

• In the Media

People&Planet | March 2024

• People&Planet

November 2023 Selected Grants

Below is a brief snapshot of some of the research grants awarded to Boston University faculty in November 2023. View grant highlights from previous months or view detailed information on research funding on the Sponsored Research Reporting page .

Simulation of Semiconductor Devices and Material ARL/BU Initiative

Total anticipated, principal investigator.

Enrico Bellotti, Photonics Center

Department of Defense/ARL

General Support for the Global Economic Governance Initiative

Kevin Gallagher, Global Development Policy Center

Open Society Foundations

Youth Centered Social Capital Research Cohort

Jonathan Zaff, Wheelock College of Education & Human Development

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Investigating How Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Inhibitors Are Changing Obesity Care in the U.S. and the Impact on Diverse Populations

Andrew Stokes, School of Public Health

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Harmonizing Industry Reporting on Access

Peter Rockers, School of Public Health

Deciphering the Immune Evasion Mechanisms of Arboviruses in Mosquitoes

Mohsan Saeed, National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories

The Smith Family Foundation

Expanding the Work of the Riser Network in Creating a Research Network to Inform Policy and Practice Focused on Racial Justice in Health and Education

Stephanie Curenton, Wheelock College of Education & Human Development

Strengthen Understanding of the School Leadership Pipeline in Massachusetts

Olivia Chi, Wheelock College of Education & Human Development

Barr Foundation, Inc.

Defining the Replication Stress Response in the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Pathway

Rachel Flynn, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine

American Cancer Society, Inc.

Exploring Roles for PAX3 in Regulating Gene Expression on a Post-Transcriptional Level

Deborah Lang, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine

Building Systems of Services for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs

Margaret Comeau, School of Social Work

American Academy of Pediatrics

Please note, anticipated amount is for the entire project period. For more information on a specific award please contact rosamail.bu.edu .

View past grant listings

Information For...

• भारत सरकार GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
• विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
• Screen Reader Access

Search form

विज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग

• Home   >>  
• What's New   >>  
• Call for Proposals  >>  
• Acts & Orders
• Announcement
• Awards/Prize/Result
• Call For Proposals
• Geospatial Policy/ Services
• International Cooperation Calls/Announcements/Results
• Monthly Achievements
• OMs and Guidelines

Call for Proposals

Archive Call For Proposals

Related Organization

Miscellaneous.

• Vision & Mission
• VIT Milestones
• Administrative Offices
• Infrastructure
• Sustainability
• True Green project
• Community Outreach
• Community Radio
• Archieved News
• MHRD/UGC/AICTE
• Careers@VIT
• Academic Regulations
• Academic Council
• Programmes Offered
• Undergraduate
• Postgraduate
• International
• Placement Highlights
• Placement Tracker
• International Transfer Programs (ITP)
• Semester Abroad Program (SAP)
• Partner Universities
• International Admissions
• Inbound Exchange Programs
• Academic Research
• Sponsored Research
• Research Centers
• Research Facilities
• Student Clubs
• Student Chapters
• Campus Events
• Counselling Division
• General Grievance Redressal Committee
• Programme Representatives
• Student Council
• Disability Support
• PROJECTS LAB
• Health Services
• Other Amenities
• Green Campus
• Policies on Core values
• Institution’s Innovation Council
• Innovation and StartUp Policy
• Online Institute (VITOL)
• Controller of Examinations
• Transcripts for Alumni
• WES attestation
• WES Application Process
• WES Advisory Blog
• Certificate Verification for Registered Agencies
• Email Contacts
• Teaching Learning Centre of Excellence
• Parent Login
• Guest House
• Grievance Redressal
• Hotels in Vellore
• Student Login
• VIT Intranet
• SBST Freshers App
• Anti Ragging Committee
• Capability Enhancement Schemes
• Industrial Visit
• Transcripts
• Medium of Instruction / Migration Certificate
• Lateral Hiring
• Other services to Alumni
• Alumni - Events
• Distinguished Alumni Awards
• Alumni - Photo Gallery
• VITAA Website
• Alumni contact
• Campus Tour

Call for Proposal

Specific Call for Proposals

International Bilateral/ International Call for Proposals

Fellowship/ Workshop Opportunities

• About SpoRIC
• Sponsored Projects
• Latest Project
• Funding Agency
• Call for Proposals
• Industrial Consultancy
• VIT-SEED Grant
• Global Skill Development Centre
• Project Submission Guidelines
• SPORIC Contact

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Search Awards
• Recent Awards
• Presidential and Honorary Awards
• About Awards
• How to Manage Your Award
• Grant General Conditions
• Cooperative Agreement Conditions
• Special Conditions
• Federal Demonstration Partnership
• Policy Office Website

Please report errors in award information by writing to: [email protected] .

News & Events

View the contact page for more contact and location information

• Top Stories
• Trinity success in 2023 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowships results

Trinity success in 2023 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowships awards

Posted on: 25 March 2024

Eight Trinity research proposals secured funding under the recently announced 2023 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Postdoctoral Fellowships results.

 The   Postdoctoral Fellowship   funding programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) supports researchers’ careers and fosters excellence in research. The awards are the European Union’s flagship programme for doctoral education and postdoctoral training.

The eight awardees are drawn from right across the Trinity research community — School of Chemistry, CONNECT (Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre), School of Physics, School of Histories and Humanities, Centre for Language and Communication Studies (CLCS), and School of Languages, Literatures & Cultural Studies. The total amount awarded to Trinity was €1,629,235.

There were a total of 193 proposals from Ireland evaluated by the programme, of which were 34 proposals selected for funding. This represents a success rate of 17.6% for Ireland in comparison to an overall success rate for the call of 15.8%. The projects awarded funding in Trinity include:

• Joanna Bialek, supervised by Professor Nathan Hill from the Centre for Language and Communication Studies (CLCS). Tibetan Obsolete Mortuary practices and afterlife Beliefs. Language conservatism of religious writings in the service of Proto-Bodish reconstruction (TOMB)
• Christine Collins, supervised by Professor Kate Maguire from the School of Physics. Understanding kilonova diversity using radiative transfer simulations with realistic binary neutron star ( KN-TRANSFER)
• Carlos Grigsby, supervised by Professor Omar Garcia from the school of Languages, Literatures & Cultural Studies. Worlding Central American Literature (WOCAL)
• Rishu Raj, supervised by Professor Dan Kilper from CONNECT.  Design and development of energy-efficient next-generation communication networks ( ENGCoN)
• Fabio Santanni, supervised by Professor Mathias Senge from the School of Chemistry. Control exchange-coupling Interactions in poRphyrin-based Quantum logIc gaTes ( CIRQuIT).
• Arup Sarkar, supervised by Professor Alessandro Lunghi from the School of Physics. Quantum Sensing with Metal-Organic Frameworks: DFT, Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning Exploration (SEQUOIA)
• Asmita Sen, supervised by Professor Alessandro Lunghi from the School of Physics. Machine Learning-Assisted simulation of Metalloenzyme’s Reactivity, Machine Learning-Assisted simulation of Metalloenzyme’s Reactivity (MALAMER)
• Tess Wingard, supervised by Professor Ruth Karras from the School of Histories and Humanities. Sexuality in Crisis: The Black Death and Social Control in Fourteenth-Century England (SiC)
• Awards and Funding

Media Contact:

Fiona Tyrrell | Media Relations | [email protected] | +353 1 896 3551

• Public Lectures
• Faculty & Staff Site >>

2024 UW Three Minute Thesis (3MT)

Eligibility Criteria | Event | Theme | Prizes | Timeline | Proposal Submission Form | Proposal Guidelines & Selection Criteria | Preliminary Round | Past Winners | FAQs | Contact

UW 3MT® is a professional development competition that celebrates the exciting capstone and research experiences of master’s and doctoral students at the University of Washington from all three campuses. The competition supports graduate students’ capacity to effectively explain their research or capstone project in three minutes, in a language appropriate to a public audience. This event is a partnership between Graduate Student Affairs in The Graduate School and the UW Libraries Research Commons .

Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) is an academic research communication competition originally developed by the University of Queensland, Australia.

The online preliminary round will be held in early May, and the competition will be held in person on May 23, 2024, 3:00-4:30 p.m. , Seattle campus. First Place, Runner Up, and People’s Choice will be awarded.

Send questions to [email protected].

Watch past competitions: 2022 | 2023

The theme for this year’s competition is Impact. Impact can be defined as the positive outcome of a critical intervention, social policy, service provision model, legal framework, or technological innovation. How does your graduate research demonstrate impact for the public good? We’re excited to celebrate the influence our graduate students have on the world.

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible to submit a proposal for UW 3MT, you must meet the following criteria:

• You are a University of Washington master’s or doctoral student from any UW campus.
• You have a draft of your final project (e.g. capstone, thesis, or dissertation), including findings and conclusions.
• Only one member of a capstone project team may submit a proposal. If the proposal is selected, the same student who submitted the proposal must be the presenter.
• Your degree will be granted during AY 2023-2024.

3MT competitions are intended for graduate students who are ready to present their capstone, thesis, or dissertation work, rather than for works-in-progress. If you are at an earlier stage with your research, we encourage you to submit a proposal to Scholars’ Studio to present your work.

At the 3MT Competition on May 23, a panel of external judges will select winners for First Place and a Runner Up. A People’s Choice winner will be voted on by the audience.

Go To Top ↑

Proposal Guidelines for Online Preliminary Round

The proposal must address the following components:

Capstone or Research Project Summary

In 300 words or less, please describe your capstone or research project for a general reader (without a lot of discipline-specific jargon or technical language).

Your summary:

– Must be concise and coherent – Does not include a lot of disciplinary jargon – Is understandable to a general, public audience

Theme: Impact

Impact is the theme for this year’s UW Three Minute Thesis. Briefly (300 words) describe how your capstone or research project demonstrates impact.

Proposal Selection Criteria

Successful proposals for preliminary rounds are based on the following two components:

1. Capstone or Research Project Summary

– Is the capstone or research project summary concise and 300 words or less? – Does the summary include a lot of disciplinary jargon? – Is the summary understandable to a general, public audience?

2. Theme: Impact

Does the proposal include how the capstone or research project demonstrate impact in 300 words or less?

Submit Your Proposal

Access the proposal submission form. The deadline is April 23, 2024 by 11:59 p.m. (PDT).

Preliminary Round

If your proposal is selected, you will then have an opportunity to present your capstone or research project in a virtual preliminary round to be held in early May. Successful presenters will be selected to present at the in person 3MT Competition, scheduled for May 23.

Guidance on Preparing Your 3MT Presentation

Review the following tips and resources:

• Preparing for Your 3MT Presentation , University of Queensland
• Tips for Effective Design and Use of the 3MT Slide , Indiana University
• Time to Perfect Your Elevator Pitch , University of Pennsylvania
• How to Write a PhD Elevator Pitch , Academic Positions
• Communication: Two Minutes to Impress , Nature Jobs

Successful presenters will be selected to compete as finalists on competition day, based on the following guidelines:

3MT Competition Day

UW 3MT Competition May 23, 2024, 3:00–4:30 p.m. Seattle campus

In front of a general audience and an esteemed panel of judges, up to 15 graduate student presenters will each compete by doing three-minute presentations about their capstone or research projects.

Past Winners

• First Place – Mayuree Binjolkar , doctoral student in Civil & Environmental Engineering
• Runner Up – Ekta Samani , doctoral student in Mechanical Engineering
• People’s Choice – Megan Maerz, doctoral student in Molecular Medicine & Mechanisms of Disease
• First Place – Enrique Saldarriaga , doctoral student in Health Economics and Outcomes Research
• Runner Up – Julia Dreifus , doctoral student in Microbiology
• People’s Choice – Douglas Wagoner, master’s student in Public Administration
• First Place – Beth Halsne , doctoral student in Rehabilitation Science & master’s student in Mechanical Engineering
• Runner Up – Jackie Otting , master’s student in Education (Learning Science & Human Development)
• People’s Choice – Arianne Caudal , doctoral student in Biochemistry
• Event canceled due to COVID-19
• First Place – Barbara Rodriguez Droguett , doctoral student in Built Environment
• Runner Up – Junyue Cao , doctoral student in Molecular & Cellular Biology
• People’s Choice – Junyue Cao , doctoral student in Molecular & Cellular Biology
• First Place – Amey Khanolka r, doctoral student in Mechanical Engineering
• Runner Up – Evan Schuster , master’s student in Mechanical Engineering
• People’s Choice – Amey Khanolkar , doctoral student in Mechanical Engineering
• First Place – Molly Grear , doctoral student in Civil & Environmental Engineering
• Runner Up – Gabby Barsh , doctoral student in Molecular & Cellular Biology
• People’s Choice – Zheng Li , doctoral student in Bioengineering

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens on 3MT Competition Day?

UW 3MT Competition May 23, 2024, 3:00-4:30 p.m. Seattle campus

In front of a general audience and a panel of judges, up to 15 graduate student presenters will each compete by doing three-minute presentations about their capstone or research projects.

Presenters will be competing for First Place, Runner Up, and People’s Choice Awards.

Who is eligible to submit a proposal for UW 3MT?

To be eligible to submit a proposal, you must meet the following criteria:

3MT competitions are intended for graduate students who are ready to present their capstone, thesis, or dissertation work, rather than for works-in-progress. If you are at an earlier stage with your research, we encourage you to submit proposals to Scholars’ Studio to present your work.

What is allowed on my 3MT slide?

One single static PowerPoint slide is permitted.

In preparing the slide, remember that ‘less is more.’ It does not have to include text. Visual cues are very effective in assisting the presenter’s explanation of their research. (No slide transitions, video, or animations are permitted).

Can I use sound or video files?

No additional electronic media (e.g. sound, music, animation, and video files) is permitted during the competition.

Can I have props (a 3D printed model, a soccer ball, a microscope, etc.)?

No. Is there a dress code?

Business formal or casual is suggested. Costumes are not allowed. Can I win in more than one category during the competition?

Yes, it is possible to win a place (First or Runner Up) and also win the People’s Choice Award.

Who will be in the audience during the competition?

The audience is often a mix of graduate students, faculty, staff, and University leadership. There will also be supporters of graduate education in attendance, as well as presenters’ family and community members.

[email protected]

• Study Guides
• Homework Questions

Research Study Proposal- Drug Use Among Teens-PART 2

Announcement of NRF One Call for Proposals: 2024/2025

The National Research Foundation (NRF) has the pleasure of announcing the opening of the NRF One Call for Proposals.

The Calls opening in 2024 includes the following funding categories:

• Concept Notes
• Global Knowledge Partnerships
• Infrastructure grants
• Institutional Grants
• Non-Funding Opportunities
• NRF Postgraduate Scholarships
• Postdoctoral Grants
• Research Grants
• SARAO Diploma and Undergraduate Scholarships
• Targeted Grants
• Travel, Training and Conference Grants
• Travel, Training, and Conference Grants for Scholarship and Fellowship-holders

Applications must be submitted electronically on the NRF Connect System at NRF Connect unless otherwise stated in the General Application Guide.

All Framework and Funding and Application Guide documents as well as the General Application Guide 2025, are available on the NRF website at:

NRF Call for Proposals for Funding in 2024 and 2025 – National Research Foundation

The Call documents should be consulted for the relevant contact person/s for each Funding Instrument.

Institutional Cut-off Dates

Applications must reach the NRF by the cut-off dates as indicated in Appendix 1 of the General Application Guide 2025.

Institutions should set their own earlier internal closing dates for applications to be submitted to the Research Office or equivalent.

NRF Postgraduate Scholarships applications will be available from April 2024 and SARAO Undergraduate and Diploma Scholarships from June 2024.  Call details and deadline dates will be announced when the calls are opened.

NB: The following Calls will open sometime this week:                                                                                                

• The NRF Postdoctoral Grants
• Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme (FBIP) – Concept Notes (for Large Call)

Applicants are encouraged to first engage their institutional authorities, i.e. Research/Postgraduate Office (or equivalent) for information and advice on application submissions.

For Funding Instrument-related Queries:

• Please contact the relevant contact person/s as indicated in the Framework and Funding and Application Guides.
• For technical support, the NRF Support Desk can be contacted at the following e-mail address: [email protected] .

Related Posts

2024 NRF Awards: Call for Nominations

Call for Proposal: Ecological Connectivity to maximize bio-diversity conservation 2023

IIASA Job Opportunity: Research Assistant in Data Science (Part-time, Temporary)

IIASA Job Opportunity: Research Scholar (Postdoc) – Water Program

Hit enter to search or ESC to close