undergraduate research project guidelines

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• CAREER COLUMN
• 15 March 2019

A student’s guide to undergraduate research

• Shiwei Wang 0

Shiwei Wang is a junior undergraduate student studying Integrated Science and Chemistry at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. Twitter: @W_Shiwei

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

I have thoroughly enjoyed my experience working in a materials-chemistry laboratory at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, for the past two years. Being able to mix an undergraduate education with original research in a proper laboratory has been a fantastic opportunity.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00871-x

This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. Guest posts are encouraged. You can get in touch with the editor at [email protected].

Wang, S. et al. Preprint at ChemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.7824707.v2 (2019).

Download references

Related Articles

Bring training forward for undergraduate researchers

Want to make a difference? Try working at an environmental non-profit organization

Career Feature 26 APR 24

Scientists urged to collect royalties from the ‘magic money tree’

Career Feature 25 APR 24

NIH pay rise for postdocs and PhD students could have US ripple effect

News 25 APR 24

Ecologists: don’t lose touch with the joy of fieldwork

World View 24 APR 24

Chemistry lab destroyed by Taiwan earthquake has physical and mental impacts

Correspondence 23 APR 24

Faculty Positions in Westlake University

Founded in 2018, Westlake University is a new type of non-profit research-oriented university in Hangzhou, China, supported by public a...

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Westlake University

Global Faculty Recruitment of School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University

The School of Life Sciences at Tsinghua University invites applications for tenure-track or tenured faculty positions at all ranks (Assistant/Ass...

Beijing, China

Tsinghua University (The School of Life Sciences)

Professor/Associate Professor/Assistant Professor/Senior Lecturer/Lecturer

The School of Science and Engineering (SSE) at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK-Shenzhen) sincerely invites applications for mul...

Shenzhen, China

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK Shenzhen)

Open Faculty Positions at the State Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition & Brain-inspired Intelligence

The laboratory focuses on understanding the mechanisms of brain intelligence and developing the theory and techniques of brain-inspired intelligence.

Shanghai, China

CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology (CEBSIT)

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

• The Student Experience
• Financial Aid
• Degree Finder
• Undergraduate Arts & Sciences
• Departments and Programs
• Research, Scholarship & Creativity
• Centers & Institutes
• Geisel School of Medicine
• Guarini School of Graduate & Advanced Studies
• Thayer School of Engineering
• Tuck School of Business

Campus Life

• Diversity & Inclusion
• Athletics & Recreation
• Student Groups & Activities
• Residential Life

Undergraduate Advising and Research (UGAR)

• [email protected] Contact & Department Info Mail
• Affiliated Programs
• Racial injustice statement
• About Research
• Eligibility
• Finding a Faculty Mentor
• UGAR deadlines
• Dartmouth research funding
• External research funding
• Presidential Scholars
• Leave Term Grants
• Honors Thesis Grants
• Conference Funding
• Senior Fellowships
• Shoals Marine Lab Summer Research
• Application do's and don'ts
• Budget Guidelines
• Copyright and Patent Information
• Council on Undergraduate Research
• Final Reports
• Research Organizations
• Research Proposal Guidelines
• Resolving Difficulties
• Stipend Information
• Switching Mentors or Projects
• Thank you to funders
• Tax Information
• Travel Information
• UGAR updates
• Faculty project database
• Faculty eligibility
• Information and resources
• Mentoring students
• Permissions and training
• UGAR Programs
• Scholar Programs
• Hanlon Scholars
• Coulter Scholars
• Gerstner Scholars
• Program information
• How to apply
• List of Stamps Scholars
• New Stamps Scholars
• Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellowships
• Research Events
• General Information
• 2024 Symposium
• Poster guidelines
• Award for Library Research in the Sciences
• Christopher G. Reed Science Competition
• MAD research video competition
• Spring at Dartmouth: Research and Dialogues
• Undergraduate research conferences
• Academic Advising
• Advising at Dartmouth
• Meal Reimbursement Policy
• Advising resources for students
• How to get pre-major advice

Search form

• Getting Started
• For faculty

Research proposal guidelines

General guidelines.

• Proposal should be 4-6 pages in length (double-spaced). This page limit does not include references, additional figures, timeline, etc.  Do not include a cover page or your abstract in the proposal document.
• Name your documents with your last name, your first name, dash, and what the document is (e.g. smithjoan-proposal.doc, smithjoan-budget.pdf)
• Submit your proposal via the online application form as a Word document or as a PDF.  Be sure your file has the appropriate extension (.doc or .pdf).
• If you use the track changes feature to get feedback on your proposal, be sure to accept or reject the changes and turn off reviewing and turn off comments (and re-save the document) before submitting. Close the document and reopen it to be sure that all tracking and comments have actually been removed.
• Your application will not be considered for funding unless your research mentor confirms that he/she has seen the final version of your proposal.  It is your responsibility to consult with your research mentor about your proposal and to ensure that he/she has seen the final version before the application deadline.

Your proposal must be divided into sections as described below (be sure to clearly label the sections):

1.  Project information

• state what the project is
• explain why the project is important
• discuss relevant literature and/or previous work in the area
• describe the project: what exactly are you planning to do
• describe how your background in academics and/or other areas has prepared you to do this project
• describe any language and/or cultural barriers as well as potential safety concerns you may encounter in the course of your project

2.  Timeline for the project

• include a timeline for your research (for example, list what you expect to be doing each week during your project)
• if you plan to travel off campus for your research, provide an itinerary for where you plan to be and when you will be there  

3.  Additional information

• Confirm that you will be working on this research full time throughout the funded term.
• If you will be doing anything else during the term of your proposed research (e.g. employment, personal travel, extracurricular activities) explain what these are and specify number of hours per week that you will be devoting to them.
• If the research is related to your senior honors thesis, explain the relationship of the research to your honors thesis (proposed or in progress) and also specify whether your research advisor is also your thesis advisor
• Describe your understanding of the Shoals Marine Lab facility and how you will adapt to the island's relative isolation

• Get Curious
• Talk to People
• Take Action
• Inspire Others
• Events and Outcomes
• JHU At-A-Glance
• Students and Schools
• Ready to Hire?
• Mentor Students
• Hire Students
• “When U Grow Up” Podcast

A student’s guide to undergraduate research

• Share This: Share A student’s guide to undergraduate research on Facebook Share A student’s guide to undergraduate research on LinkedIn Share A student’s guide to undergraduate research on X

Originally written by Shiwei Wang for Nature journal in March 2019.

Participating in original research during your undergraduate studies can greatly expand your learning experience. However, finding the project can be a challenging task, so here’s a short but comprehensive guide that can help you get the most out of an undergraduate research opportunity.

Choose the right lab

Learn to think like a scientist. A lot of people start their undergraduate research by glancing at the faculty list and e-mailing multiple professors whose work seems interesting. Although this might get you a position somewhere, it is not the most effective approach. Before looking at labs, dive into the science to find out which areas fascinate you. Read a lot, go to talks, and talk to your professors not just about their classes, but about science in general as well.

Subscribe to e-mail newsletters from journals such as Nature and Science. Try to read research highlights and science news regularly. Podcasts and articles by, for example, Nature, Science, Scientific American or Quanta can also be interesting sources of information. Follow academics, journals and universities on Twitter. Start your undergraduate research by learning more about science, thinking like a scientist and working out what you love.

Look for questions, not subjects. You might have chosen a major to study, but don’t let this limit your search for research labs. Modern labs are interdisciplinary and very different from what you do in undergrad labs. Instead of limiting your search to your department, try to look at labs in all related departments. Choose labs on the basis of the questions they’re trying to answer.

Mentoring is as important as research. Contact group members to learn about your prospective laboratory’s environment. Are the group members close? Is the lab friendly or competitive and condescending? Is the lab head hands-off or hands-on? The size of the group is also important. If you join a small group, you’ll have a higher chance of being mentored directly by your principal investigator, whereas in a big group, you are more likely to be mentored by a postdoctoral researcher or graduate student.

Reach out with confidence. Once you’ve determined that the research programme interests you and the group dynamic is healthy, send the principal investigator an e-mail. Make sure to explain why you’re interested in working in the lab and that you have spoken to other lab members. Be patient if they don’t reply. If you don’t receive a response after a week or so, send a second e-mail or reach out in other ways, such as by asking group members to enquire for you.

Get the most out of the experience

Start your research with reading, and keep on reading. Usually, the principal investigator will assign you a mentor and a project. Ask for literature to read: learning about the state of the field and why the work is important will help you to push the project forward. Read about your field as well as other, totally unrelated fields. As an undergraduate, you have the freedom to change your major and your future plans. Make sure to strike a balance between reading and conducting experiments. It’s hard to do both at the same time, but it will make you a better scientist.

Set specific goals for yourself and let your mentors know. Think about what you want from your research and how much time you are willing to put in. Besides learning the techniques, do you want to learn how to analyse results and design experiments? Do you want to learn how to write proposals by applying for undergraduate research grants? Do you want to improve your presentation skills by going to conferences? Do you want to potentially finish a project for publication? Working out what you want to achieve will help you to direct your time effectively.

Research takes time. Don’t blame yourself if experiments don’t work or the project is not moving forward as fast as you expected. Science is about failing and trying again. Getting used to and coping with frustration is part of the learning curve of research.

Find a healthy balance. University is already a lot of work, and research will only take up more time. When planning your schedule, try to allocate large blocks of time (whole afternoons or individual days) to research. Rushing through a procedure could be unsafe and will often produce useless results. Always plan extra time for experiments. Consider working less in the lab during exam weeks so you don’t get overwhelmed. Talk to your mentor about your schedule and feelings regularly, so that you can arrange experiments at times that suit you, and you can keep on top of your mental health.

Find financial support. If you wish to do research at your own institution over the summer, your institution might offer funding to cover your expenses. If you want to go to another university, you can apply for funding from that institution’s undergraduate research programme, or from foundations, companies or academic societies. For example, the US National Science Foundation offers a Research Experiences for Undergraduates programme. Universities, foundations and academic societies might also offer grants to cover your travel expense to various conferences. Don’t let money limit what you want to do. Talk to senior students or professors, or search online to find all the opportunities!

Always think about the big picture. Your undergraduate research doesn’t define what you’re going to do after your degree. Keep reading and taking classes outside your comfort zone. Explore and learn as much as possible. Working out what you love is the best preparation you can get for the rest of your career.

Read the full article on the Nature website.

To find a research opportunity at Johns Hopkins University, visit the Hopkins Office of Undergraduate Research website .

• Getting Started
• Hearst URCC Faculty Research Assistant Program
• URCC Peer Research Mentors
• Find Brandeis Research Opportunities and Faculty Mentors
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Research By Class Year
• Guidelines for Undergraduate Research Participation
• Research Advice from Brandeis Undergraduates
• Undergraduate Research Spotlights
• Faculty-Undergraduate Research Partnership Spotlight
• Graduate Research Mentor Spotlight
• Alumni Spotlights
• Past Spotlights
• Brandeis Funding Opportunities
• Dr. John R. Hose P’97, P’00 Research Fellowship
• Provost's Undergraduate Research Fund
• Jerome A. Schiff Undergraduate Fellows Program
• Ariel Weissmann Undergraduate Research Fund
• David & Lola Swede P'89 Research Fellowship for Jewish Studies
• Phoebe Rothman Giddon Brandeis Alumna Undergraduate Research Fellowship
• Fisher Explorer Grants
• Lurie Undergraduate Fellowship in Disability Policy
• Science Research
• External Funding Opportunities
• Recent Awards
• Research Support
• Spring 2023 Undergraduate Research Symposium
• Symposium Key Dates and Deadlines
• Oral Presentation Tips
• Presentation Templates
• URCC Abstract writing guidelines
• Tips for Faculty
• Suggestions for Faculty on Getting Started
• Connect with Undergraduate and Faculty Research Collaborators
• Hearst URCC Undergraduate Faculty Research Assistant Program
• Faculty Resources for Undergraduate Research
• Faculty-Staff URCC Advisory Group
• Graduate Researcher and Mentor Spotlight
• Undergraduate Research News
• URCC Newsletters
• Degree Programs
• Majors and Minors
• Graduate Programs
• The Brandeis Core
• School of Arts and Sciences
• Brandeis Online
• Brandeis International Business School
• Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
• Heller School for Social Policy and Management
• Rabb School of Continuing Studies
• Precollege Programs
• Faculty and Researcher Directory
• Brandeis Library
• Academic Calendar
• Undergraduate Admissions
• Summer School
• Financial Aid
• Research that Matters
• Resources for Researchers
• Brandeis Researchers in the News
• Provost Research Grants
• Faculty Research
• Student Research
• Centers and Institutes
• Office of the Vice Provost for Research
• Office of the Provost
• Housing/Community Living
• Campus Calendar
• Student Engagement
• Clubs and Organizations
• Community Service
• Dean of Students Office
• Orientation
• Hiatt Career Center
• Spiritual Life
• Graduate Student Affairs
• Directory of Campus Contacts
• Division of Creative Arts
• Brandeis Arts Engagement
• Rose Art Museum
• Bernstein Festival of the Creative Arts
• Theater Arts Productions
• Brandeis Concert Series
• Public Sculpture at Brandeis
• Women's Studies Research Center
• Creative Arts Award
• Our Jewish Roots
• The Framework for the Future
• Mission and Diversity Statements
• Distinguished Faculty
• Nobel Prize 2017
• Notable Alumni
• Administration
• Working at Brandeis
• Commencement
• Offices Directory
• Faculty & Staff
• Alumni & Friends
• Parents & Families
• 75th Anniversary
• New Students
• Shuttle Schedules
• Support at Brandeis

Undergraduate Research and Creative Collaborations

Guidelines for undergraduate participation in faculty research projects, including independent laboratory research and research volunteers.

Approved Oct 27, 2021

Participating in independent research as an undergraduate within laboratories and other research and creative project opportunities directed by Brandeis faculty is a valuable educational experience encouraged across the academic disciplines. The following guidelines are based on historical practices at Brandeis and provide a basic outline for the process.

Students must have permission from the faculty mentor (principal investigator [PI] responsible for operation of the group or leading the research project) to participate in the research or lab project.

A member of the research team should be designated to act as a direct supervisor (grad student, post-doc, research staff member and/or the faculty mentor/PI themselves).

Student researchers must comply with all applicable safety, confidentiality and compliance rules, documented through completing mandatory online or in-person training, including human subjects policies (IRB) or animal research rules (IACUC). The faculty PI is responsible for ensuring that all students have completed all required training before commencing research, and that they comply with all relevant rules and protocols.

In normal circumstances, students either should be paid or receive academic credit for independent research.

Students will normally register for a course during the academic year. The one-credit courses numbered 91g (“Introduction to Research Practice”) will cover most students starting on a research project.

In exceptional circumstances, students may petition to volunteer outside of the employment and course structures for a period of up to four months. Petitions should originate with the faculty mentor and be approved first by the department chair or their designate, and then by the Undergraduate Research and Creative Collaborations Office ( URCC). Volunteers are not allowed to participate until the petition is approved.

Situations for which a volunteer position may be appropriate might include:

Starting research during the middle of a semester.

Working during the summer if fellowship or grant funding is unavailable.

Volunteering in a lab for more than one summer or semester should be avoided.

Only projects with a research or learning component are governed by these rules. Students whose only task is support (e.g., making media, flipping flies, copying documents, etc.) should always be paid as hourly student employees. Faculty can review the defining characteristics of an unpaid volunteer position as described in the U.S. Department of Labor Fact Sheet on unpaid internships .

All students are strongly encouraged to contact the URCC which can assist in finding appropriate research opportunities or fellowships to fund their research participation.

• Research Spotlights
• Funding Opportunities
• Undergraduate Research Symposium
• For Faculty
• News and Events

Contact For More Information

Margaret Lynch, PhD Director of Undergraduate-Faculty Research Partnerships [email protected]

Secondary Menu

• Events & Workshops
• Join our Listserv!
• Guide to Undergraduate Research at Duke

Duke is among the top universities for research, but when you think of research, do you think of undergraduates?

If you answered no, think again. Research isn’t only for faculty or graduate students; undergrads can begin participating in research in a multitude of ways from as early as their first year at Duke.

The  Directors of Academic Engagement , faculty, and students from across Duke took time this year to explain the value of research experiences for undergraduates and break down the elusive process of finding a research project.

From Dance and English, Political Science and Psychology, to Biology and Neuroscience, these Duke researchers demonstrate the various types of opportunities available to students in all areas of Duke while breaking down myths that research is out of reach.

 Welcome to Undergraduate Research at Duke 

Start with a passion

If students feel overwhelmed by the options available to them, they aren’t alone, says  Bridgette Hard , professor of the practice of  Psychology & Neuroscience . There are many options for students at Duke to pursue research, whether through independent study or work with individual faculty mentors,  summer research programs  or through established, interdisciplinary programs like  Bass Connections .

The first step in research is taking a step — any step — especially if it is still the first year.

What is successful research?

Sometimes research fails. You uncover information or results that you didn’t expect. Plans fall apart, or new hurdles appear along the way. What’s next? Duke researchers discuss why this isn’t necessarily a bad thing and how “failing” research might actually be successful in the long run. 

“Nothing is unproductive in research…and nothing is unproductive in the way you get involved in research at Duke. Everything is a learning process,” says Director of Academic Engagement Jules Odendahl-James.

Finding partners in research

At Duke, there are many avenues to connect to others doing research and lots of people who are interested in helping. The key is finding the right people.

“The institution is resource rich,” says  Iyun Ashani Harrison , associate professor of the practice in  Dance . “Access to intellectuals, to ideas, it influences your processes, your research, how you imagine yourself in the world and what you might be able to do.”

The unexpected gifts of research

The benefits of engaging in research aren’t limited merely to research outcomes.

“Meeting people that you didn’t know you should know,” is one of the most important outcomes of participating in research according to  Candis Watts Smith , associate professor of  Political Science . Listen as other faculty and students share the benefits they have found from participating in research at Duke.

To take the next step — or the first step — in exploring research opportunities at Duke, students can visit this  page for   many resources on identifying mentors conducting research of interest and ideas for contacting potential mentors. 

• Getting Started in Research
• Undergrad Research Calendar
• Honors Theses
• Explore Research by Department
• Compensation for International Students
• Research Abroad: Safety Considerations
• Human Subjects: Institutional Review Board
• Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Tutorials
• Frequently Asked Questions
• URS Academic Term Grants
• Program II Research Funds
• Duke Opportunities
• Opportunities Database
• Non-Duke Opportunities
• Resources for Presentations
• Undergraduate Research Journals
• Student Team Grants
• Eligibility & Requirements
• Application Instructions
• Background & Facts
• Duke ASP Faculty Mentors
• Duke ASP Scholars
• Financial Support
• Contact the Amgen Scholars Program
• PRIME-Cancer Research Program Mentors
• Student Stories
• Student Advisory Council
• Annual Undergraduate Research Symposium
• 2024 Symposium Abstract Booklets
• Previous Abstract Books

• Enroll & Pay
• Getting Started in Research
• Undergraduate Research Awards
• Fall Research Showcase
• Student Workshops

UGRA Proposal Guidelines

NOTICE: The proposal format requirements have changed slightly since last semester.

Your UGRA proposal will be evaluated using one of the following rubrics provided to faculty reviewers: Research Project Rubric (.docx) or Creative Project Rubric (.docx) We recommend that you read over the appropriate rubric and use it while revising your proposal.

Your proposal should:

• be no more than 5 total pages, including your text content (~2000 words), figures, images, image captions, references, footnotes, appendices, etc.
• be single-spaced and typed using Times New Roman 12 point font for main content. Additional text can be used as needed to support figures, images, captions, footnotes, etc.
• have 1 inch margins top, bottom, right, and left.
• have a title at the top of the first page. Please do not include your name.
• include the following sections: abstract/summary, background and introduction, methods and approach, applicant's preparation, conclusion, and references. Optional content may include figures, charts, and images.
• be saved as a PDF with file name LastnameProposal.PDF. For example, SmithProposal.PDF

***Proposals not meeting the criteria outlined above may not be considered for review.

Guidelines for:

• Students working in groups: Students applying as part of a group need to each submit their own proposal. Proposals should not be written together and, therefore, should not share written content (ie, identical sentences or paragraphs). Reviewers must be able to see that each student has a full understanding of the project since each student will receive an individual scholarship.
• Students who have previously received a UGRA:  If applying for a second award, students should submit a full proposal even when continuing on the same project. This proposal needs to include a brief update on their progress either in the Background and Introduction section or the Methods and Approach section. The Methods and Approach should then describe the next steps of the project. Much of your proposal may stay the same, but be sure to include any newly relevant background information if the project has shifted directions or new information was published.

Your UGRA proposal is required to include the following sections:

1. Abstract/Summary 

Purpose : In one paragraph, summarize your proposal. Give the reader a general sense of the field, the problem or idea your work will address, and how you will accomplish this project.

Guiding Questions

• Why will you do this work?
• What will you do (think broadly for this section)?
• And how will you do it?
• This is your chance to make a good first impression on your readers; it should clearly convey what your project is and why it is important enough to fund.
• Connect your project to the big picture.
• This section is a summary of your entire proposal, so write it last.
• For tips on writing research proposals, see The Professor Is In blog's " Foolproof Research Grant Template ," as well as posts on how to talk about the big issue in your project and the contribution to the literature .
• Visit the KU Writing Center’s webpage .

2. Background and Introduction 

Purpose: This section has two goals: 1) summarize the work that’s been done in your area and 2) explain how your work will contribute to this field of study. In many fields, this section is referred to as the literature review. It must include citations of previous research or creative work related to your topic.

• What is already known or has been done in this area?
• For creative projects: Which artists have done similar work or explored similar themes? 
• How will this project add to what is already known or has been done?
• For creative projects: What is your creative vision for the project? What is the inspiration for your project?
• This section is commonly referred to as a literature review.  The purpose is to position your project within the academic conversation about your topic.
• You must cite the published work that you review in this section and list it in the References section. Proposals that do not cite other works in this section and include them in the References section will not be funded.
• Focus on the key publications needed to outline the current state of the field; typical UGRA proposals include 5-10 sources.
• Be sure to synthesize your sources; this section should read more like a story than a list. Avoid direct quotes; they make it harder for you to synthesize multiple works into a story. Show how your project continues the story by explaining your contribution.
• Watch this video about the B.E.A.M. system for organizing sources for some tips.

3. Methods and Approach

Purpose: Describe what you will actually do for your project and why you will take this approach. You need to include a timeline that clearly details the work that you will complete during the semester of the award.

• What will you actually do? What data will you be using?  How will you collect it?  How will you analyze it? What materials or resources will you need? 
• What are the major steps to complete this project?
• How will the results of these methods allow you to address your original question?
• Is the project that you’ve outlined feasible in one semester?
• Will you work with human subjects? If so, how will you meet the requirements of the KU Human Subjects Committee (HSCL)? Consult your mentor for help with this process.
• For creative projects: How will you approach and get feedback on your work?
• Why did you select the particular methods/techniques you’ve described?
• Be specific to show the reviewer that you have thought through the process and are prepared to begin your project.
• Relevant details you might mention (depending on project type) include: descriptions of methods and rationale for choosing them, any software or equipment you’ll use and why, a description of your creative process, and/or controls for proposed experiments.
• Explain the choices you have made in designing your project.  Why are you choosing this method over another?  Are there other studies that have used a similar approach?  Show the reviewer that you understand not just what you are doing for your project, but why you are doing it.
• Use the timeline to help you and the reviewers ensure that you are proposing a feasible project for one semester. A chart or table is an easy way to provide the timeline.
• If the project is part of a larger research program or a long-term interest, make clear what part of the larger project will be completed during the one semester term of the grant.
• Cite your method's origin paper or other work using this technique to show that your approach is standard in the field.
• Use a first person narrative here, especially when you are working as part of a research group. Reviewers will have a better idea of what you are doing versus what others will do.
• Don't forget to describe your data analysis plan, especially any statistical methods you plan to use, and how this analysis will tie back to the original question you set out to address. This is a common mistake that reviewers catch.
• If you are working on a multi-semester project, be sure to provide the most details about the award period that you are applying for.  The reviewer will want to see what work would be funded if you had the award.

4. Applicant's Preparation

Purpose : Describe your preparation and qualifications to complete this project.

• What experiences, coursework, or training have you done that will give you the needed background knowledge and skills to undertake the project?
• Did you complete coursework that is relevant? What specific skills or background information did you learn in these classes that prepared you for your project?
• Did you learn a language, technique, or laboratory skill that you’ll use?
• Or have you already been doing faculty mentored research or independent study on this topic?
• Do not skimp on this section; be sure to write at least one paragraph here to make the case that you can complete this project.  The reviewer needs to be able to see whether you have the skills and background knowledge needed to complete the project.
• Rather than telling the reviewer that you are qualified, show them.  Saying "I am prepared to do this research project" is not as convincing as saying "I used X technique in my BIOL 123 class, earned an A in my BIOL 456 course, and have already begun preparations to do Y procedure in my work in Prof. Z's lab this semester."
• Keep in mind that UGRA reviewers will not be viewing your transcripts as part of your UGRA application, so if you have taken relevant courses you should mention them, what grade you received in those classes, and how they will help you complete the proposed project.
• If you do not already have a skill that you will need to complete the project, be sure to address how you will get that knowledge or training. 

5. Conclusion

Purpose: Show a clear connection between the different parts of your proposal.  Summarize key points of your proposal for one final reminder of what you’re doing, how you’ll do it, and why. This is your final sales pitch to the reviewer and a good time to return to how your project relates to the big picture.

• How will the results and outcomes of your proposed work tie back to your original intent?   In other words, explain how and why your proposed approach will help you achieve your goal. 
• How will you disseminate your work? 
• What criteria will you use to evaluate your success?
• Clearly show the reviewer the connections between your initial intent, proposed work, and anticipated outcomes.  You want to convince your reviewer that the overall goals of your project are important, and that the plan you’ve outlined will move you toward those goals.

6. References

Purpose: List the materials you are citing in your proposal. 

• Did you list every source you cited in the text?
• Did you include the most important and relevant sources for your project?
• Use the citation style most commonly used in your discipline for both the in-text citations and the reference list.
• Your references do not count towards your 2,000 word limit.
• You should not include any references that are not cited in the text of the proposal.

7. (Optional) Figures, Charts, and Images

Purpose: You may include any figures, charts, images, etc. that are helpful in explaining your work, either as an appendix or within the body of your work. 

• Is there an idea you’re trying to communicate in words that would be easier to understand in picture form?
• Do you have portfolio pieces that will demonstrate the type of artwork or product you are proposing to create?
• Do you have a survey or interview tool you’d like to reference as an appendix?
• Do you have preliminary data showing that a new technique works?
• Keep it simple. Only include information that is needed to understand the proposal. Don’t include a figure or image just to have one.
• Any figures, charts, images, and examples of artwork need to be referred to within the text of the proposal. Without explanation, the reader does not know why you are including them.
• Label any figures, charts, and images with a descriptive title, caption, and/or legend for easy reference.
• Prepare to Apply
• Proposal Guidelines
• Courtwright Award

Student Links

• Get Started
• Fund your Research
• Share your Research
• Instructional Videos
• Volunteer Opportunities

Connect With Us

Quick links.

• Getting Started

College of Arts and Sciences

• Dean’s Office
• CAS Academic Leadership
• Alumni Advisory Board
• Academic Departments
• Academic Centers
• Bachelor of Liberal Studies
• Debate Program
• Honors Program
• Pre-Healthcare Programs
• Special Majors
• Special Programs
• Women’s and Gender Studies
• Academic Regulations for President’s and Dean’s Lists
• Beyond the Classroom
• CAS Student Advisory Board
• UMW Graduate Programs
• Partnership Graduate and Professional Programs
• Study Away Programs
• Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Summer Institute
• Summer Science Institute
• Undergraduate Research Grant Awards
• Signing up for URES 197 Projects
• URES 197 FAQ’s
• Approved URES 197 Projects
• Student Research and Creativity Symposium
• Faculty Development Supplemental Grants
• Eligibility and Restrictions – Faculty Research Grants
• Proposal Format and Guidelines – Faculty Research Grant Applications
• Review Process for Faculty Research Grants
• Final Report – Faculty Research Grants
• Summer Pedagogy Program
• CAS Faculty Governance
• Faculty Resources
• Newly Appointed Full-Time Faculty 2023-2024
• Resources for New Faculty
• Academic Department Chair Directory
• Chairs’ Meetings Information
• Resources for Department Chairs
• CAS Newsletter Spring 2024
• CAS Newsletter Fall 2023
• CAS Newsletter Spring 2023
• CAS Newsletter Fall 2022
• CAS Newsletter Spring 2022
• CAS Newsletter Fall 2021
• Spring 2021
• CLEAR – CLimate, Environment, And Resiliency

Guidelines for Undergraduate Research Applications

Undergraduate Research Grant applications provide faculty of University of Mary Washington with an opportunity to guide degree-seeking,  undergraduate  students in the skills of conducting a specialized research project or experience and should be treated in that pre-professional learning context.  Students are expected to participate significantly in writing the application and the project report.

While grant projects are usually completed within one semester, it is possible to make a request in the Fall semester application period for a project that will be completed by the end of the Spring semester.  An interim progress report is required for all approved two-semester projects and is due by the deadline for final reports for fall semester projects (see below under “Required Report”).

Required Application Materials:

Applications must address all points stated on the undergraduate undergraduate research grant application . Grant applications lacking the necessary signatures on the cover sheet will not be considered.

The application MUST include a  description of the proposed activity.   This description must outline the goals of the project, present a brief case for the project’s significance, and explain the activity’s relevance to the applicant’s scholarly and professional development.    This description should be written clearly and in non-technical, jargon-free language appropriate for a general audience. The application  must  also indicate the frequency and nature of the interaction during the project between the student and the sponsoring faculty member.

As part of the application, the proposal  must include a budget  on which all requested funds are listed with costs provided.

NOTE : If you are planning to request funds to travel out of the country, you will be  required  to enroll in Medical Insurance with Center for International Education (CIE), for the time you are abroad. ALL students who travel internationally for their research will work with UMW’s CIE and follow the steps for  Research Abroad . Please contact CIE at  [email protected]  or (540) 654-1434 for assistance.

Finally, the faculty sponsor  must   provide a short “rationale statement” explaining why the student and the proposed project merit consideration for funding.

Role of the Student:

• Complete Grant Proposal Cover Sheet
• Participate significantly in writing the application and the project report
• Explain activities relevance to scholarly development
• Indicate the frequency and nature of the interaction during the project between the student and the sponsoring faculty member
• A project report is due in the College of Arts and Sciences Dean’s Office by the first day of classes in the semester following the grant period
• Interim progress report is required for all approved two-semester projects and is due by the deadline for final reports for fall semester projects

Role of the Faculty Sponsor:

• Work with the student on the supported research project
• Serve as the student’s main point of contact regarding the procedures required for spending the awarded grant funds.
• For research supplies  – help the student understand required purchasing procedures or may instruct the student on who to see in the department (e.g. the department office manager) for assistance.
• For travel  –will create a travel pre-approval ( request for travel ) and/or an expense report ( reimbursement ) in Chrome River for their student(s). However, if the faculty member may delegate out to a designee, that faculty member will need to approve the request before it will route to the next approver in line. If you cannot find the student in Chrome River, the student will need to complete a  COVW-9  (NOT the Vendor Registration Form) and submit the completed form to Accounts Payable (the State will not accept electronic signatures, it must be hand-written).
• Provide a short “rationale statement” explaining why the student and the proposed project merit consideration for funding.

Required Report:

A brief end-of-semester project report is due in the College of Arts and Sciences Dean’s Office by the first day of classes in the semester following the grant period.  The report should describe the project’s achieved objectives, summarize the budget expenditures made, and provide brief overall commentary about the outcome of the undergraduate research project. Dr. Elizabeth Lewis will email you a link to a form for this report near the end of your funding period.

General guidelines for decisions on grant proposals:

• Applicants for Undergraduate Research Grants must be enrolled as degree-seeking, undergraduate students at UMW during the period in which the grant project is to be initiated and conducted.
• All purchases of goods and services must follow Commonwealth and University regulations, such as using mandatory sources and observing bidding requirements. Direct questions before purchasing any items to Faculty sponsor and / or Department Office Manager. For more information, the Procurement Services web pages  and contact information is available.
• All purchases of non-consumable items made with UMW grant funds (such as equipment, software, books, DVDs, and the like) are the property of the UMW because they have been purchased with Commonwealth of Virginia funds.
• Proposal requests for travel funds must either be for the student(s) presenting at a conference, actively engaging in a guided, experiential project, or conducting field and/or specialized library research that is integral to completion of a final, tangible research project the student is preparing. Undergraduate Research funds are not provided for students to attend meetings as attendees/listeners/observers or for students who wish to attend such meetings for “networking” purposes.
• The student(s) must be centrally involved in framing the problem, developing a research strategy, and conducting the project. Undergraduate Research Grants do not support a student’s passive involvement in a faculty member’s project.
• Undergraduate Research Grants may not be requested to cover the costs for a student to take credit-earning courses at UMW or at another college or university.

In this section

Program guidelines.

• Why Participate in SURE?
• Past Projects

The Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE) program aims to grow and enhance the undergraduate research experience for UM-Dearborn students. The SURE program accomplishes this through faculty mentorship and training while students participate in a faculty member’s research or scholarly project. As part of their training, students are required to attend a series of professional development sessions covering topics such as responsible conduct in research, using library research resources, creating an elevator pitch, translating experiences in your resume, and successful presentation techniques.

• Faculty application submission deadline: March 11, 2024.   

If you are a current UM-Dearborn undergraduate student who will graduate December 2024 or after and are interested in participating, please contact a faculty member in your discipline who is conducting research or contact [email protected] with your research interests and we will see if we can help match you.

Expectations

The primary role of the faculty members is mentoring undergraduate students. Although the program aims to support the research agenda of the individual faculty members, the program primarily focuses on student experience and training future researchers. Faculty members are expected to design a research experience for students that address the following points.

• Design and oversee a research project that is compatible with the student's background and interests.
• Exposure to the general research area and methods of the discipline.
• Introduction to various venues to present and publish.

Faculty mentors are expected to participate in the following:

• Attend at least one professional development session for all SURE students.
• Attend the SURE faculty mentor orientation in May.
• Attend (with the student researcher) the SURE kickoff meeting in May.
• Provide feedback on the design and expectations of the program.
• Attend the SURE Showcase in September.
• Complete a reflection survey at the end of the program.
• Work with the students to complete student expectations.

Student Participant Requirements:

• Current UM-Dearborn undergraduate student who will graduate December 2024 or after.
• Attend the SURE kickoff meeting in May.
• Participate in 4 of several student professional development sessions on various topics offered throughout the summer
• Present at the SURE Showcase in September.
• Complete two surveys (one in May and one in September).
• Applications were due by 11:59 pm on March 11, 2023 .
• Incomplete applications will be returned during the administrative review; they can be corrected if time allows but must be resubmitted by the stated deadline.

Eligibility

• The applicant must be a member of the faculty of UM-Dearborn.
• The selected student must be a registered UM-Dearborn undergraduate student who will graduate December 2024 or after.
• Application Limit - one application (with a single undergraduate researcher) per eligible faculty member will be accepted.
• All reports from the applicant’s previous Dearborn Campus Grants must be current.

Project Period

• The faculty mentor and student researcher will design a schedule to work on the project between May and August 2024.

Budget Guidelines & Award Administration

• Experience Plus will manage the administration of the students' stipends.
• Funds provide a stipend to an undergraduate student as a summer research fellow. The student will be paid $3,200 in four installments.
• Additional project expenses are the responsibility of the faculty member. For funding for supplies, please see the campus Faculty Research Mini Grant .

Application Requirements

The following sections are required:

• Lay abstract - A brief summary of your research project written for members of the public rather than researchers or professionals. It should be written in plain English, avoid the use of jargon or acronyms and include an explanation of any technical terms.
• Expected contribution/role the student will have on the proposed project.
• An outline of how you will mentor this student, including engagement, training on the research project, and career planning. 
• The impact the learning and overall professional growth of your student mentee (e.g., educational value, bridge to graduate or career goals, etc.).
• Brief description of the student candidate or potential student profile.

Human Subjects or Animal Research (if applicable)

• Projects including work with human subjects (e.g., surveys, interviews, data collection, etc.) require approval from the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB) before work can begin. For more information see the Human Subjects Compliance page.
• Projects including work with vertebrate animals will need approval from the University of Michigan's Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) before work can begin. For more information see the Animal Care & Use Program (ACUP) page.
• Proof of IRB/IACUC approval is required prior to release of funds.

Evaluation Criteria

Applications will be evaluated based upon the following:

• What are the merit and quality of the proposed work and expected outcomes or products?
• Does the proposed work fit the intended purpose, guidelines, and program requirements?
• How essential is the student to furthering the project?
• Is the student contribution made clear in the application?
• Does the faculty researcher have a mentoring plan or clear and specific goals for the mentoring?

Reporting Requirements at Project Completion

• Participation in the professional development series as well as the Summer Undergraduate Research Program Fall Showcase are required
• Faculty and student participants will be required to complete assessment surveys in the process of the program.
• Future funding by the UM-Dearborn Campus Grants program is contingent upon fulfilling the program reporting requirements.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

PROJECT GUIDELINES FOR UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Related Papers

Pleasery Myman

Jacqueline Ho

Moon Remysa

Faith Gatune

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Explore Student Grants

Song Wu, '24 composed a graphic novel about a first-generation Chinese-American teenager's struggle to define his identity in punk music, sexuality, and America with the assistance of a VPUE Student Grant.  

Inquiry, investigation, and discovery

are at the heart of Stanford’s mission. Every faculty member is engaged in groundbreaking original scholarship, and as an undergraduate, you can join faculty in their work in laboratories, libraries, studios, and beyond. Imagine how you can connect your classroom learning and intellectual interests as you work on an independent project under faculty mentorship.

• Get Inspired
• Develop a Mentor Relationship
• Assemble Your Research Toolbox
• Explore Departmental Funding
• Fellowships

Photo: Matt Mettias '23 was awarded a Chappell Lougee Scholarship to support the development of his original music album Keanu . The conscious hip-hop/Hawaiian fusion album centers Pacific Islander issues.

Upcoming Events and Deadlines

May conference grant deadline.

Left image: Major Grant recipient and Art Practice student Sabrina Bedford created an acrylic paint series to accompany her own short novel about a girl surviving in a post-climate change disaster world who comes across a time machine. Right image: Major Grant recipients Gunner Dongieux and Sean O’Bannon navigate the intersection of tech and art by working to seamlessly incorporate AI into Gunner’s painting using a Generative Adversarial Network.

Explore #MyStanfordResearch on Instagram

Cookie Acknowledgement

This website uses cookies to collect information to improve your browsing experience. Please review our Privacy Statement for more information.

• College of Engineering
• News Center

Students’ awesome research ideas celebrated at college’s second AUSome Science in 60 Seconds

Published: Apr 25, 2024 4:25 PM

By Joe McAdory

Can waste materials be used to produce sustainable 3D-printed housing? Can sustainable fuel trim aircraft emissions in the fight against climate change and end our dependence on aviation petroleum? Can Auburn engineering students examine such research projects, then explain them on video in just 60 seconds?

Of course they can.

AUSome Science in 60 Seconds, a research-based competition in its second year presented by the  Council of Engineering Graduate Students  (CEGS), tasked students to create videos and explain their respective projects in a minute or less. Winners were announced during an awards ceremony on Thursday, April 25.

Since registration opened in January, students recorded video presentations using animation, simulation, diagrams, pictures, or demonstrations explaining overviews of their respective studies — but at a level where general audiences can follow. Judging was based on engagement, illumination, creativity and understanding of the subject matter.

Lucila Carias, a second-year graduate student in  polymer and fiber engineering in the Department of Chemical Engineering , and Ayden Kemp, a senior double-majoring in aerospace engineering and biosystems engineering , earned highest marks among faculty judges — winning top honors in graduate student and undergraduate student categories.

Carias, a member of the polymer and fiber research laboratory and recipient of the 2024 100+ Women Strong Outstanding Graduate Award (chemical engineering), noted that an estimated 14% of the state of Alabama’s population is house insecure. Her solution: sustainable 3D-printed housing.

“We aim to engineer bio-resins that target the advanced manufacturing industry of the future,” said Carias, a member of the college’s Center for Polymers and Advanced Composites . “We envision alleviating these challenges by using waste material for low-cost, environmental benefits to produce sustainable resins for 3D printed houses. Furthermore, another problem for which we found a solution is to decrease the number of accidents in the current process of building homes; that is also one of the main goals of this project. We are going to take that out of the equation and use machines so that we can print houses.”

Carias added that the research is a collaboration between Auburn University and the University of Idaho.

Kemp, who will graduate in May and plans to follow that by pursuing a graduate degree in biosystems engineering, developed a plan to not only end our dependence on petroleum for aviation and replace them with sustainable fuels made from converted waste and/or renewable sources.

How? By pyrolysis.

“Pyrolysis is heating the material at high temperatures, but under an inert atmosphere,” he said. “There's no oxygen. The material is not burning. The energy that's being supplied by the heat splits the molecules that make each of those compounds. Biomass and polystyrene both have a lot of cyclic aromatic benzene ring structures that when heated, will separate from the other ones, and then that can be used as an additive to make sustainable aviation fuels.”

Kemp, who is also working toward a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering, was drawn to biofuels production research as a sophomore.

“I took that knowledge and added my own twist,” said Kemp, who credited Sushil Adhikari, professor in biosystems engineering, and Hossein Jahromi, assistant professor in biosystems engineering. “Most of the research in our lab is with pine pyrolysis, which is used for biodiesel fuel. I added in a plastic component so I could make more of the aerospace fuels.”

Other selected winners included:

• Samuel Ginn College of Engineering Dean’s Office Video: Katie Wolfe, electrical and computer engineering .
• CEGS Most Creative Video: Shireen Singh, graduate student in chemical engineering.
• Undergraduate finalists: Sam Yount, mechanical engineering , and Ethan Wavra, chemical engineering. Wavra also won the People’s Choice Award.
• Graduate finalists: Tori Phillips, chemical engineering, and Jacob Faulkner, chemical engineering.

“Experiential learning opportunities such as AUSome Science in 60 Seconds provides student researchers with the opportunity to sharpen their skills for future endeavors,” said Maria Auad, associate dean for graduate studies and faculty development. “With today’s available technology, scientists can share their research – in a nutshell – to viewers on-demand. Projects like this allow students to polish their presentation and technology skills before they enter the workforce.

“I’m thrilled with not only the research our students undertake, but also the scope and diversity of projects from departments throughout the college.”

Matthew Garnett, CEGS president and PhD candidate in chemical engineering, said the purpose of the competition was to give graduate and undergraduate students a platform to be creative and showcase their research to a general audience.

“These videos will be used as recruitment tools to help attract prospective students to Auburn and show off the cool work being done on our campus,” he said. “I was very impressed with the content and quality of the videos. The judging panel had a hard time determining our overall winners, as many of the videos were exceptional. We look forward to hosting this competition in the future.” 

AUSome Science in 60 Seconds overall graduate winner Lucila Carias, left, and undergraduate winner Ayden Kemp.

Featured Faculty

Chemical Engineering

Recent Headlines