unfolding case study nursing

• NLN Certification
• Assessment Services
• CNEA Accreditation
• NLN Foundation
• Mission & Core Values
• History & Archives
• Board of Governors
• Senior Management
• NLN Nominations
• Career Center

Henry and Ertha Williams

Julia morales and lucy grey, millie larsen.

• Developing Interprofessional Education and Practice in Oral Health
• Importance of Oral-Systemic Health in Older Adults
• Performing Oral Health Assessments on Aging Patients
• Oral Health for the Older Adult Living in the Community
• Elder Abuse in the United States
• Geriatric Syndromes
• Mental Health Needs of Older Adults
• Student-Led Geriatric Nursing Conference: Evidence in Practice
• Teaching Oral Health Care for Older Adults
• Using Case Study Betsy to Understand Down's Syndrome & Dementia
• Using Cinema to Enhance Teaching Issues Related to Older Adults
• Using the Monologue of Doris Smith to Understand Situational Decision-Making
• Caring for the Caregiver
• Caring for the Older Adult at Risk for Falling
• Coordinating and Managing Care During Transitions Among Care Settings
• End-of-Life Decision Making for Older Adults: Competent and Compassionate Care
• Myths of Aging
• Using Continuing Care Retirement Communities to Enhance a Better Understanding of Older Adults
• ACE.S Knowledge Domains
• ACE.S Essential Nursing Actions
• ACE.S Framework
• ACE.S Development & History
• ACE.S Additional Resources
• ACE.S Video Library

ACE.S Unfolding Cases

An unfolding case is one that evolves over time in a manner that is unpredictable to the learner. New situations develop and are revealed with each encounter. Every ACE unfolding case uses the highly regarded unfolding case model developed for Advancing Care Excellence for Seniors (ACE.S) . Each case includes the following:

• A first-person monologue that introduces the family and the complex problems they are facing.
• Simulation scenarios designed to help students practice assessing function and expectations of their patient(s), with links to appropriate evidence-based assessment tools. Suggestions for debriefing are included.
• An innovative final assignment that asks students to finish the story .
• Instructor toolkits with suggestions on how to use the various components of the unfolding cases and incorporate them into the curriculum.

These unfolding cases combine the power of storytelling with the experiential nature of simulation scenarios. They are intended to create a robust, meaningful experience for students, one that provides a simulated experience of continuity of care and that will help them integrate the Essential Knowledge Domains and Nursing Actions into their practice of nursing. We hope you will give them a try! Standardized/Simulated patients are recommended for all ACE simulations. If you are not already familiar with the Association for Standardized Patient Educators Standards of Best Practice, we encourage you to review them.

Learn more about unfolding cases by visiting the  How to Use an Unfolding Case  page.

Sherman "Red" Yoder

Nln leadership development program for simulation educators project mapping the ace.s unfolding cases to the aacn essentials.

Project Disclaimer: Simulation leadership projects are a requirement for the Leadership Development Program for Simulation Educators. All projects are then placed within SIRC for the benefit of the nursing education community. Inclusion of this specific project does not constitute an endorsement by the NLN of the AACN Essentials.

Unfolding Cases with Older Adults from Other ACE Programs

Butch sampson (ace.v), eugene shaw (ace.v), ertha williams (ace.z), george palo (ace.z), judy and karen jones (ace.z), mike walker (ace+).

Why KeithRN Unfolding Case Studies Can Transform the Virtual (and Traditional) Clinical (1/2)

Keith Rischer – Ph.D., RN, CCRN, CEN

As a nurse with over 35 years of experience who remained in practice as an educator, I’ve witnessed the gap between how nursing is taught and how it is practiced, and I decided to do something about it! Read more…

The Ultimate Solution to Develop Clinical Judgment Skills

KeithRN’s Think Like a Nurse Membership

Access exclusive active learning resources for faculty and students, including KeithRN Case Studies, making it your go-to resource.

Sign up to receive a free KeithRN NextGen Case Study!

Develop clinical judgment skills with this innovative new case study on asthma to prepare your students for nextgen nclex and practice.

" * " indicates required fields

Keith Rischer

Helping graduate nurses transition to practice, recommended for you.

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses

Strategy submission, using unfolding case studies to develop clinical forethought in novice nursing students.

Brenda Moench

RN, MS, CNE

Nursing Instructor

Institution:

University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

[email protected]

Competency Categories:

Patient-Centered Care, Safety

Learner Level(s):

Pre-Licensure ADN/Diploma, Pre-Licensure BSN

Learner Setting(s):

Strategy Type:

Case Studies

Learning Objectives:

Strategy Overview:

Submitted Materials:

Teaching-Strategy-QSEN-TS-241-1.docx - https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AECA5dGZdE6YPXxF0DmMMC8M9maipFe5&usp=drive_copy

Additional Materials:

Benner, P., Hughes, R.G., & Sutphen, M., (2008). Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Tanner, C.A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204-211.

Evaluation Description:

Unfolding Case Studies for Nursing Leadership

Affiliations.

• 1 Oakland University School of Nursing, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
• 2 Oakland University School of Nursing, Rochester, Michigan, USA [email protected].
• PMID: 36918280
• DOI: 10.1891/JDNP-2021-0018

Background: The education of nursing students has changed radically during the COVID-19 pandemic, with more content being delivered virtually. With less face-to-face (F2F) contact with educators, content translation to real-world scenarios is diminished. Objective: To determine if an educational seminar using unfolding case studies will improve students' understanding of concepts. Method: A pilot study of senior-level nursing students of an intensive unfolding case study application was conducted to focus on concept application. Results: Pre- and post-tests were compared with the increase in understanding of the focused topics, delegation, advanced directives, and safety, which was statistically significant (t[55] = 6.92, p < .001). Conclusion: Using real-world clinical problems through case studies facilitates understanding concepts and developing critical thinking skills/problem-solving abilities. The results of this study provide an impetus for the use of unfolding case studies to help nursing students understand leadership concepts.

Keywords: advanced directives; delegation; leadership; safety.

© Copyright 2023 Springer Publishing Company, LLC.

• COVID-19* / epidemiology
• Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate* / methods
• Pilot Projects
• Students, Nursing*

• Medical Books

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Unfolding Case Studies: Experiencing the Realities of Clinical Nursing Practice 1st Edition

This comprehensive workbook contains a compilation of unfolding cases across the discipline of nursing, and includes unique aspects of nursing regarding spirituality, family issues, community as client, and gerontology concerns. It integrates concepts of age, setting, role development, and ethical/legal issues. Users gain a simulated experience in prioritizing nursing problems, identifying appropriate teaching strategies, documenting nursing care, and critically analyzing the totality of common situations encountered in professional nursing practice. Unfolding case models deal with obstetrics, pediatrics, mental health, medical surgery, and assorted cases regarding such issues as: falls in the elderly, urinary incontinence, aging, sleep-rest changes, managing staff conflict, public health nursing, vital signs, confidentiality, and spirituality. For educating student and staff nurses in various nursing programs.

• ISBN-10 0130892793
• ISBN-13 978-0130892799
• Edition 1st
• Publisher Prentice Hall
• Publication date November 6, 2000
• Language English
• Dimensions 8.31 x 0.52 x 10.9 inches
• Print length 262 pages
• See all details

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly

Editorial Reviews

From the inside flap.

Sincerely, Kellie Glendon and Debbie Ulrich

From the Back Cover

• Kellie J. Glendon MSN, RNC
• Deborah L. Ulrich Ph.D, RN
• Includes over 60 case studies covering all core nursing areas.
• Emphasizes critical thinking and problem solving by encouraging readers to analyze given situations, prioritize, and formulate interventions.
• Presents a case that typifies a common disorder or disease and follows the client as the situation "unfolds" across time, settings, and/or disease progression, enabling readers to experience the realities of nursing practice as clients' conditions change.
• Integrates concepts such as age, setting, role development, and ethical/legal issues.
• Writing prompts at the end of each case encourage readers to reflect on the experience, think about different perspectives, or plan future learning needs.

About the Author

DEBORAH. L. ULRICH, PhD, RN is an experienced nurse educator who has influenced nurse educators through journal articles, national presentations, and a recent book on interactive group learning. Her strategies have challenged educators to experiment with new ways of teaching and learning. Debbie has been a nurse educator for the past 30 years in diverse educational settings.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

To the student.

The purpose of this workbook is to help you practice the critical skills of problem solving and applying information to common situations you encounter in your practice of professional nursing. The role of the professional nurse has become exceedingly more complex, as nurses must care for clients in shorter time periods and in a variety of settings such as home, hospital, outpatient clinics, and rehabilitation facilities. No longer do nurses have extended periods of time to process information and plan care. As insurance plans dictate shorter stays and/or fewer visits, nurses must be able to analyze situations, plan interventions, and respond quickly to ever-changing situations.

The "Unfolding Cases Model" (Glendon and Ulrich, 1997) will give you practice in the skills you will need in the workplace. You will be asked to analyze realistic cases that unfold sequentially and follow the typical progression of common conditions or disorders. All cases are interspersed with focused questions to be answered by groups of students using common cooperative learning strategies (see Table 1). By using the case as a study guide prior to class, you will have some time to explore these focused questions individually, prior to your group involvement. This prior preparation will increase the effectiveness of the group strategy. Your instructor will brief you about the strategy she or he wishes you to use, as well as the process of how to report your group's findings to the entire class. An important aspect of learning and using critical thinking is being able to examine the varied perspectives of others. This cooperative learning group strategy exposes you to the alternative ideas and ways of thinking of your peers, thus multiplying the learning potential of the case. At the end of each case you will be asked to complete a reflective writing assignment that will allow you to investigate your individual thoughts, feelings, and ideas related to nursing practice issues or situations (see Table 2). In nursing practice we are frequently exposed to situations that oppose our personal values and beliefs. These cases will give you an opportunity to explore these issues and help you identify the nursing role. Your instructor may collect the cases prior to class discussion to determine your level of preparation for discussion of the case. In any instance, prior individual preparation will benefit both you and your group as you process the case in class.

This book is designed to help you adapt to the new ways your instructors will be teaching in the new millennium. Research has shown that students learn best when they are actively involved in the process of learning and are not passive recipients of the teacher's expertise. You will notice that your instructors are using the lecture method less often and are relying on newer interactive group strategies. This can be very disturbing to you as a student who is used to previous methods that required you to merely take notes on what the instructor presented and regurgitate the same information back to them on a test. Now, in this model, the instructor poses a case and asks you and your peers to process it. They won't be just giving you the right answers. Your first impulse might be to think your instructor is not doing anything and that you are teaching yourself. This is a common feeling, but it is far from the truth. The instructor is merely changing his or her role in the teaching and learning process from being the center of knowledge to being one of manipulating the environment so that students can be involved in and discover the connections of things in an active fashion. Being actively involved will increase your learning. In the traditional lecture method, students quickly learn that it is not really necessary to read or prepare much prior to class because the teacher will tell them in the lecture everything that is really important. This way of thinking is erroneous in that today's world is filled with volumes of ever-changing information and no one could possibly know everything. Therefore, the most important job of the teacher is to create focus and teach you how to think. Information will change, but the skill of problem solving and critical thinking will benefit you forever. That is the purpose of this "Unfolding Case Model." (Glendon and Ulrich, 1997)

In traditional methods, the majority of time you spend with the teacher is when she or he is presenting you with new information in a lecture. Until you have had the time to process that information, you are unaware of what you do not understand or what questions you have. It is when you are alone reviewing your notes and trying to process and apply information that you really need the teacher's help. In the new learning paradigm, students need to prepare individually by doing the reading assignments and/or looking at the case prior to class. Class time should be the time when the instructor helps students process information that they have already been exposed to through their own reading. The "Unfolding Case" method actualizes this line of thinking. In using this book, you need to read through the case before doing your reading assignment to help you emphasize the important content in the reading. As you read, jot down possible solutions to each of the focused questions. This~will help you as you interact with your peers to process the case in class. Your instructor will tell you which cooperative learning strategies to use and how to report your findings as a group. He or she may also use this same model at the end of a clinical for a post conference or as a clinical make-up assignment. As you complete the cases, it is our hope that you will work with your instructor and expand your ability to learn and grow as a professional.

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Prentice Hall; 1st edition (November 6, 2000)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 262 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0130892793
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0130892799
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 8.8 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 8.31 x 0.52 x 10.9 inches
• #259 in Nursing LPN & LVN
• #657 in Nursing Fundamentals & Skills (Books)
• #725 in General (Books)

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Become an Amazon Hub Partner
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Scaffolding as active learning in nursing education

Recent changes, such as COVID-19 restrictions and advances in technology, have led to unique effects on nursing education, requiring new pedagogical thinking and strategies. Studies have shown that a more active approach to learning leads to positive gains for students. In this conceptual paper, we argue that scaffolding specifically allows instructors to break down assignments into meaningful chunks with instructional support that fall within reach of a student's ability, making the assignment both more manageable and actively engaging. This paper outlines six principles (Van Lier, 1996) to the scaffolding approach and discusses two example assignments that utilize scaffolding in nursing education to increase active engagement and improve learning outcomes. Examples include a research critique paper and an unfolding case study.

Scaffolding as Active Learning in Nursing Education

The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted higher education, causing sudden shifts between online and in-person learning. Nursing programs are uniquely affected, as clinical, lab, simulation, and didactic learning experiences are modified to meet new public safely restrictions. These modifications challenge faculty's knowledge of pedagogy and require new thinking, as well as detachment from the past. Creativity in designing innovative learning strategies is required. Weberg et al. (2021) argue that faculty must challenge assumptions of what educating students means and formulate new evidence-based practices in nursing education.

While education is experiencing shifts internally, new data suggests a continuing decline in the preparedness of new graduate nurses ( Kavanagh et al., 2021 ). Rapid changes in practice, technological innovation, and increased professional stressors threaten to widen the gap between education and practice. All nurses are challenged by the exposure of new moral dilemmas and unexpected risk situations, and support is needed to help them care for patients. This may leave experienced staff little time to mentor a new generation of nurses.

Riegel et al. (2021) notes that many nursing students are overwhelmed both personally and academically. They are easily distracted by a variety of social, emotional, financial, and time management problems. However, the challenges of the profession require that students be prepared in critical thinking and clinical judgment skills to face the demands of practice ( Riegel et al., 2021 ). Faculty must challenge students to apply cognitive skills, including analysis, inference, evaluation, and explanation.

Active Learning

To meet these challenges in higher education broadly, and nursing education specifically, a more active and hands-on approach is needed. In 2014, Freeman et al. suggested that learning is more effective when students are actively engaged in their learning, rather than passively receiving information through strategies such as lecture alone. This active form of instruction is colloquially referred to as active learning ( Freeman et al., 2014 ). In general, active learning refers to methods that include students in meaningful activities and reflection on what they are doing ( Bonwell & Eison, 1991 ). Active learning has been shown to lead to higher test scores and lower failure rates compared to traditional lecture ( Freeman et al., 2014 ). Additionally, active learning has been shown to double conceptual understanding ( Hake, 1998 ).

The value of active learning has been tested in nursing education. Research has shown that case-based learning can increase academic achievement, critical thinking, and self confidence in nursing courses ( Englund, 2020 ; Ma & Zhou, 2022 ), although this finding is not consistent across settings ( Carter & Welch, 2016 ; Kantar & Sailian, 2018 ). Researchers who studied a flipped classroom, characterized by situational and collaborative learning, found that students in the experimental (flipped classroom) group had higher academic performance than students in the control group ( Dong et al., 2021 ). Students participating in team-based learning in a pathophysiology class reported higher accountability (93%) and satisfaction (92%) with their learning, although their grades were not affected ( Branney & Priego-Hernandez, 2017 ). Other active learning teaching strategies described in the literature include escape rooms ( Stringfellow, 2021 ), concept maps ( Bressington et al., 2017 ), role-playing ( Nemec et al., 2021 ), and scaffolding written papers ( Sakraida, 2020 ).

Scaffolding as Active Learning

We suggest one method of active learning is scaffolding assignments. Scaffolding is an instructional method by which course material is broken down into smaller content and skills that fall within a learner's zone of proximal development (ZPD; Donato, 1988 ; Vygotsky, 1978 ; Wood et al., 1976 ). The ZPD refers to skills or content which is just out of reach of what a novice learner could complete on their own (potential development level), but that which the learner has potential to successfully complete with planned instructional supports. These instructional supports at each step are known as the scaffold and allow the learner to practice the skills and content until they have independently mastered the step at which time the supports are gradually removed ( Weissberg, 2006 ). Instructional supports can include strategies in the forms of learner-content, learner-instructor, and learner-learner interaction such as interaction with peers through activities, instructor feedback and encouragement, and use of additional relevant resources ( Cho & Cho, 2016 ).

This strategy for learning is rooted in sociocultural theory which views learning as taking place in a social context rather than as an independent endeavor. Therefore, learning is not merely seen as passed on from one individual to another but rather co-constructed between an expert and novice learner through dialogue with the influence of physical, psychological, and cultural tools ( Barnard & Campbell, 2005 ).

As a form of active learning, scaffolding requires learners to actively engage in each step of the learning process rather than only passively taking in information. This allows students to practice skills, retrieve information, and receive feedback at each step of the scaffolded process. Repeated practice helps learners build the neural networks and habits needed to master learning and move information to long-term memory rather than maintaining it in short-term working memory ( Ambrose et al., 2010 ).

Leo Van Lier (1996) has formulated six principles of scaffolding:

• • Contextual support—a safe but challenging environment, errors are expected and accepted as part of the learning process
• • Continuity—repeated occurrences over time of a complex of actions, keeping a balance between routine and variation
• • Intersubjectivity—mutual engagement and support, two minds thinking as one
• • Flow—communication between participants is not forced, but flow in a natural way
• • Contingency—the scaffolded assistance depends on learners’ reactions, elements can be added, changed, deleted, repeated, etc.
• • Handover—the ZPD closes when learner is ready to undertake similar tasks without help ( Van Lier, 1996 , p. 196).

Scaffolding Assignment Examples

The principles of scaffolding can be utilized for a variety of types of assignments. These can happen both inside and outside the classroom. Below we outline two examples that highlight some of the diversity of assignments and learning environments in which scaffolding can take place.

Assignment Example 1: The Research Critique Paper

Writing a research critique paper is an example of a scaffolded assignment that comes from a course on Scholarly Inquiry. This 3-credit course meets face-to-face for three hours each week over 14 weeks. Students learn about the research process as well as evidence-based practice. The research component of the course emphasizes analysis and evaluation of nursing research, as well as writing skills.

The Quantitative Research Critique paper challenges students to read and analyze one quantitative study, and to describe their findings in a 6-page APA paper. Students choose an article from three posted options. The outline for the paper is based on pre-set criteria, which serve as the basis for the analysis. Additionally, students use their textbook and lecture materials to appraise the article.

The class content on quantitative research is spread over three weeks and is supported as weekly modules in the learning management system (LMS). Students have four weeks to complete the paper. The scaffolded assignment is not only divided into the required content chunks but also broken into recommended process steps. These steps include appraising and writing to be completed each week as smaller active learning activities. By scaffolding the paper, students are actively involved with peers and the instructor each step of the writing process, getting feedback along the way, rather than working in a silo. Table 1 outlines the content, resources, and recommended activities that are presented to students each week.

Quantitative Critique Paper Assignment: Content, Resources, and Activities

In week 1, students are introduced to the assignment with a tour of the resources in the LMS. Recommendations are given to use this first week to select one research article from the three posted based on their own interests. The Writing Center meets with the class to present tips on initiating an APA paper. The quantitative critique worksheet is introduced as a way to begin writing the paper in small sections.

In weeks 1 through 3, classroom activities are planned to cover the quantitative research process. Students interact with this information by working through class worksheets in small groups, recalling information in class games, and comparing class PowerPoint presentations with textbook information. Activities are planned to engage students. A bingo game in week 2 reinforces concepts on sampling and data collection. During “Tea Test Time” in week 3, students learn the meaning of the t-test statistic by collecting data from two types of chocolate chip cookies and calculating a t-test using an online calculator.

In week 3, the final lecture content is presented. This gives students an adequate understanding of quantitative research to practice the critique process in online groups of 15–16 students. These online discussions are held during week 3, in which each student submits the answer to one of the paper criteria and receives instructor feedback. Most students are asked to rewrite and repost, to improve their writing, APA citations, and the accuracy of the information. This group critique is described as a “dry run” of the individual critique paper, and students are held to the same standard. Concepts which give students difficulty are reviewed in the LMS Q & A Discussion.

Students are encouraged to work with peers, the instructor, and the Writing Center to understand the content for the paper and to write effectively. At the end of class on week 3, students are divided into three face-to-face groups corresponding to the research article they have chosen to critique. Each group discusses how the information in the study meets critique criteria. Over the following week, individual students reach out to the instructor with questions and work with the Writing Center on drafts of the paper. While TurnItIn (a plagiarism detector) is required, students are encouraged to use TurnItIn as a learning tool by submitting their final draft early enough to rewrite and improve it if their plagiarism score indicates that their work is not sufficiently unique.

Since this approach has been initiated, feedback from students has been positive. In an anonymous midterm survey, students made the following comments: (a) “I think the worksheet and sample paper for the essays help me a lot” and (b) “Deadlines and clear instructions help me stay focused.” Although not all students take advantage of time management recommendations, they all use the quantitative critique worksheet to help them break down content into chunks. The worksheet also serves as a tool to share when reviewing their ideas with the instructor and other students. We emphasize that “writing follows thinking” and by putting down their thoughts in the worksheet, students have an easier time with the writing process.

Assignment Example 2: Unfolding Case Study

This unfolding case study example comes from a course on Complex Care with Adults and Aging Populations. This 6-credit course meets face-to-face for three hours of theory and 10 hours of intermediate and intensive care clinical each week for 14 weeks. The unfolding case study activity example outlined below in Table 2 closely follows a case study published by Kirwan (2015) and takes thirty to forty-five minutes to complete. The instructor stands in front of the class and begins writing on the whiteboard while verbalizing the report. Students are free to work individually or in small, informal groups to answer questions posed by the instructor designed to stimulate critical thinking. Students must recognize pertinent data, interpret these data based upon the patient's unique situation and history, and then respond with appropriate solutions based on a rapid, holistic evaluation of the situation ( Tanner, 2006 ). Throughout the activity the instructor creates a sense of urgency, clarifies points of disagreement, prompts as needed, and asks “what if” questions to further enhance learning. By scaffolding the case study and unfolding it over time, the instructor is able to build layers of understanding and skills that require inquiry and critical thinking from students.

Unfolding Case Study Activity: Opioid Induced Respiratory Insufficiency

An ideal learning scenario in a complex medical-surgical course would involve a patient who presents with a common chief complaint yet possesses multiple underlying health conditions, takes multiple medications and is at risk for a wide range of complications. This allows complexity to the case that students can uncover and analyze, similar to what they would encounter in a real-life scenario as they obtain additional, potentially contradictory information. The case study exemplar outlined in Table 2 is conducted following a short lecture on rapid responses yet requires students to recall and apply learning from the previous week related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They must also recall and apply knowledge from previous semesters related to opioids and myocardial infarctions as they treat an individual in a unique situation. Students become quite engaged as they critically think through Mrs. J's situation, request interventions, receive results, and call the rapid response team. They are also asked to think about how they will delegate care for their other patients while engaged with Mrs. J. and are reminded to include her husband in the plan of care.

The exemplar is based on a well-developed case study, but other brief cases on seizure emergences ( Purviance, 2019 ) and esophageal varices ( Purviance, 2021 ) have also been utilized following related lectures. Many of these brief cases are available online and in nursing journals, are easily tailored to course objectives, and can help identify areas of student confusion while engaging students in activities to reinforce learning.

These two assignments provide examples of how to actively engage students in the learning process through scaffolding. Each assignment uniquely breaks up the content and process of learning through scaffolding and demonstrate Van Lier's (1996) six principles, which are discussed below:

Contextual Support

Students are offered a safe but challenging environment where errors are accepted as part of the learning process. In example 1, the research critique paper, the online written group discussion provides a way to support students in learning the critique process before they write their individual papers. Groups of 15 students all critique the same research study and each student writes about one of the fifteen criteria for the critique. Students are informed that they will have to repost if their answer is not accurate. The instructor coaches these students, and most students are able to repost correctly. Seeing peer responses also help the students reflect on their answer. In example 2, the unfolding case study, contextual support during these highly social, interactive case study activities hinges largely on positive role modeling by the instructor. The first case study activity occurs in the third week of the semester to allow time for students to settle into the course, build foundational knowledge, and gain an understanding of the instructor's way of being. During the activity all answers are acknowledged with constructive feedback and discussed as a full class. If students spontaneously laugh at a peer's response the instructor will note reasons why that response might be valid for consideration or will briefly discuss their own experiences as a nurse, noting that all nurses have times when they may not know what to do and need to look something up or seek out assistance from peers in the moment. This helps build a supportive and safe learning environment where students recognize all answer attempts are welcome.

Students are provided the opportunity to practice complex actions multiple times through repeated occurrences. In example 1, the research critique paper, the multiple components of the course such as textbook readings, knowledge check quizzes, lecture, class activities, online group discussions, peer feedback inside and outside of class, and individual or group consultations with the instructor and Writing Center, all contribute to students’ knowledge of the final quantitative research critique process. The course provides many ways for students to learn and to receive formal and informal feedback on their writing. In example 2, the unfolding case study, continuity is accomplished by following the cycle of noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting-on-action ( Tanner, 2006 ). Students receive, report, request additional information, and interpret relevant data prior to responding with their planned actions. Reflecting-on-action occurs as the instructor provides feedback and uses prompts to redirect in the moment. After the activity, further reflection occurs as the class identifies what went well and what they would do differently in the future.

Intersubjectivity

There is mutual engagement and support between student (the novice) and peers and/or the instructor. This allows for knowledge to be co-constructed to develop a mutual understanding of a concept and “two minds to think as one” such as between a student and instructor or between a student and other students. The time it takes to reach this understanding varies greatly for different students. In example 1, for the research critique paper, if a student has taken a research course in another field, such as psychology, the zone of proximal development (ZPD) may be close enough that a student can ask questions in class or the online discussion, read assignment instructions, and then write the critique paper on their own. Other students with less background may require individual meetings with the instructor (expert) as well as peer discussions to determine answers to the criteria, followed by further review of their writing by the instructor, in order to have a successful paper. In example 2, the unfolding case study, intersubjectivity occurs naturally as students become engaged in the activity. At first, they will consult with peers before offering an answer. As the case moves forward, a response from one student with intermittent feedback from the instructor will seem to prompt a thought by another student and answers will be offered more rapidly as students understand the situation. Sometimes the instructor will prompt with “what did we talk about earlier?” to direct them toward a previously shared thought.

Communication between peers and with the instructor is not forced. In example 1, for the research critique paper, the instructor communicates to students the recommended steps to follow when developing the paper. This includes both the “process” of writing, by which a student develops an assignment over time, and the “content” or chunks of information, which are included within the criteria or outline of the paper. While the chunks of content are evaluated in the grading rubric, the process or timeline for completing the work varies by student. One limitation is students who procrastinate, despite instructor advice, tend to have poorer achievement. In example 2, the unfolding case study, flow is enhanced through question prompts from the instructor designed to engage and direct students towards solutions. Students are encouraged to call out answers to create the sense that the situation is moving forward. If no one offers a solution the instructor will state “you are the nurse, your patient needs help, what will you do?” to create a sense of urgency and motivate student responses. When it's flowing well, the instructor cannot keep up with writing the answers on the white board as students think of interventions to implement.

Contingency

Elements of the scaffolded process depend on the learners’ reactions and are adjusted throughout the process as needed. In example 1, the research critique paper has been altered over time, as students’ needs and learning preferences change. Modifications were made when the course went online during the pandemic. In the online environment, more structured group sessions were planned for peer discussion and for consultation with the instructor. In example 2, the unfolding case study, student responses drive the case forward in the moment. Sometimes students call a rapid response sooner than expected, or sometimes they implement interventions that prevent the need for a rapid response. If they respond rapidly to rescue the patient, the case study can shift towards system issues that may have impacted the patient's care or the nurses’ decisions in the moment. The use of “what if” questions aid in directing the case and contribute to the flexibility of the activity.

When the students are ready to complete similar tasks without assistance, the ZPD closes and students complete assignments on their own. In example 1, for the research critique paper, there is a natural handover when students submit their paper to the LMS drop box and receive a TurnItIn Similarity (plagiarism) score. Students are encouraged to submit early, allowing time to modify their papers if the Similarity score is high. In example 2, for the unfolding case study, students also attend clinical each week with clinical instructors who are aware of class topics for the week and attempt to provide students with related activities. Students often report subsequent clinical experiences to the instructor and discuss how these experiences were similar (or dissimilar) to the cases utilized in class.

Scaffolding allows assignments to be broken down into smaller, more manageable chunks that fall within students’ ZPD. These assignments represent two examples of how scaffolding can be applied in nursing education through a research paper and an in-class unfolding case study. However, the instructional method of scaffolding can be applied to many different types of assignments, and even across multiple assignments in a class, to ensure students are building skills at strategic learning levels and with appropriate instructional supports. Instructors are encouraged to apply the principles of scaffolding and these examples to their own classes in ways that are the most effective to meet their needs.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors do not have any funding or any conflict of interest when writing this manuscript. It is purely their own work.

• Ambrose S.A., Bridges M.W., DiPietro M., Lovett M.C., Norman M.K. John Wiley & Sons; 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barnard R., Campbell L. Sociocultural theory and the teaching of process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context. The TESOLANZ Journal. 2005; 13 :76–88. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/433 [ Google Scholar ]
• Bonwell C.C., Eisen J.A. George Washington University; 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. (A.-EHERN Washington, Trans.) [ Google Scholar ]
• Branney J., Priego-Hernandez J. A mixed methods evaluation of team-based learning for applied pathophysiology in undergraduate nursing education. Nursing Education Today. 2017; 61 :127–133. 10.1016/j.nedr.2017.11.014 [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bressington D.T., Wong W., Lam K.K.C., Chien W.T. Concept mapping to promote meaningful learning, help relate theory to practice and improve learning self-efficacy in Asian mental health nursing students: A mixed-methods pilot study. Nursing Education Today. 2017; 60 :47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.019. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carter, J. T., & Welch, S. (2016). The effectiveness of unfolding case studies on ADN nursing students’ level of knowledge and critical thinking skills. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 11, 143–146. 10.1016.j.tein.2016.05.004
• Cho M.H., Cho Y. Online instructors’ use of scaffolding strategies to promote interactions: A scale development study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2016; 17 (6):108–120. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2816. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second language learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Newark: University of Delaware.
• Dong Y., Yin H., Du S., Wang A. The effects of flipped classroom characterized by situational and collaborative learning in a community nursing course: A quasi-experimental design. Nursing Education Today. 2021; 105 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105037. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Englund H. Using unfolding case studies to develop critical thinking skills in baccalaureate nursing students: A pilot study. Nursing Education Today. 2020; 93 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104542. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M., Smith M.K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M.P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111 (23):8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics. 1998; 66 (1):64–74. doi: 10.1119/1.18809. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kantar L.D., Sailian S. The effect of instruction on learning: Case based versus lecture based. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2018; 13 :207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2018.05.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kavanagh J.M., Sharpnack P.A. Crisis in competency: A defining moment in nursing education. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2021; 26 (1) doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol26No01Man02. N.PAG-N.PAG. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kirwan M.M. The three R's of patient deterioration. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy. 2015; 13 (3):16–18. http://doi:oRg/10.1097/01.NME.0000462653.43279.de [ Google Scholar ]
• Ma C., Zhou W. Effects of unfolding case-based learning on academic achievement, critical thinking, and self-confidence in undergraduate nursing students learning health assessment skills. Nursing Education in Practice. 2022; 60 doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103321. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nemec R., Brower E., Allert J. A Guide to implementing role-play in the nursing classroom. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2021; 42 (6):E163–E164. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000678. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Purviance D.J. Seizure emergencies. American Nurse Today. 2019; 14 (10):3. https://www.myamericannurse.com/seizure-emergencies/ No doi available. [ Google Scholar ]
• Purviance D.J. Esophageal varices. American Nurse Today. 2021; 16 (9):6. https://www.myamericannurse.com/esophageal-varices /No doi available. [ Google Scholar ]
• Riegel F., Martini J.G., Bresolin P., Mohallem A.G., Nes A.A.G. Developing critical thinking in the teaching of nursing: A challenge in times of Covid-19 pandemic. Escola Anna Nery. 2021; 25 doi: 10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2020-0476. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sakraida T.J. Writing-in-the-discipline with instructional scaffolding in an RN-to-BSN nursing research course. Journal of Nursing Education. 2020; 59 (3):179–180. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200220-15. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stringfellow E.J. Escaping the classroom: Replacing traditional lecture with interactive learning stations in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2021; 42 (6):E152–E153. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000813. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tanner C.A. Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. The Journal of Nursing Education. 2006; 45 (6):204–211. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060601-04. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Lier L. Addison Wesley Longman; 1996. Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy & authenticity. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vygotsky L.S. Harvard University Press; 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. [ Google Scholar ]
• Weberg D., Chan G.K., Dickow M. Disrupting nursing education in light of Covid-19. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2021; 26 (1) doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol26No01Man04. N.PAG-N.PAG. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Weissberg R. In: Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Hyland K., Hyland F., editors. Cambridge University Press; 2006. Scaffolded feedback: Theoretical conversations with advanced L2 writers; pp. 81–104. Eds. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wood D., Bruner J.S., Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1976; 17 :89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]