What is the Critical Thinking Test?
Critical thinking practice test, take a free practice critical thinking test, practice critical thinking test.
Updated November 16, 2023
The Critical Thinking Test is a comprehensive evaluation designed to assess individuals' cognitive capacities and analytical prowess.
This formal examination, often referred to as the critical thinking assessment, is a benchmark for those aiming to demonstrate their proficiency in discernment and problem-solving.
In addition, this evaluative tool meticulously gauges a range of skills, including logical reasoning, analytical thinking, and the ability to evaluate and synthesize information.
This article will embark on an exploration of the Critical Thinking Test, elucidating its intricacies and elucidating its paramount importance. We will dissect the essential skills it measures and clarify its significance in gauging one's intellectual aptitude.
We will examine examples of critical thinking questions, illuminating the challenging scenarios that candidates encounter prompting them to navigate the complexities of thought with finesse.
Before going ahead to take the critical thinking test, let's delve into the realm of preparation. This segment serves as a crucible for honing the skills assessed in the actual examination, offering candidates a chance to refine their analytical blades before facing the real challenge. Here are some skills that will help you with the critical thinking assessment: Logical Reasoning: The practice test meticulously evaluates your ability to deduce conclusions from given information, assess the validity of arguments, and recognize patterns in logic. Analytical Thinking: Prepare to dissect complex scenarios, identify key components, and synthesize information to draw insightful conclusions—a fundamental aspect of the critical thinking assessment. Problem-Solving Proficiency: Navigate through intricate problems that mirror real-world challenges, honing your capacity to approach issues systematically and derive effective solutions. What to Expect: The Critical Thinking Practice Test is crafted to mirror the format and complexity of the actual examination. Expect a series of scenarios, each accompanied by a set of questions that demand thoughtful analysis and logical deduction. These scenarios span diverse fields, from business and science to everyday scenarios, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of your critical thinking skills. Examples of Critical Thinking Questions Scenario: In a business context, analyze the potential impacts of a proposed strategy on both short-term profitability and long-term sustainability. Question: What factors would you consider in determining the viability of the proposed strategy, and how might it affect the company's overall success? Scenario: Evaluate conflicting scientific studies on a pressing environmental issue.
Question: Identify the key methodologies and data points in each study. How would you reconcile the disparities to form an informed, unbiased conclusion?
Why Practice Matters
Engaging in the Critical Thinking Practice Test familiarizes you with the test format and cultivates a mindset geared towards agile and astute reasoning. This preparatory phase allows you to refine your cognitive toolkit, ensuring you approach the assessment with confidence and finesse.
We'll navigate through specific examples as we proceed, offering insights into effective strategies for tackling critical thinking questions. Prepare to embark on a journey of intellectual sharpening, where each practice question refines your analytical prowess for the challenges ahead.
This is a practice critical thinking test.
The test consists of three questions .
After you have answered all the questions, you will be shown the correct answers and given full explanations.
Make sure you read and fully understand each question before answering. Work quickly, but don't rush. You cannot afford to make mistakes on a real test .
If you get a question wrong, make sure you find out why and learn how to answer this type of question in the future.
Six friends are seated in a restaurant across a rectangular table. There are three chairs on each side. Adam and Dorky do not have anyone sitting to their right and Clyde and Benjamin do not have anyone sitting to their left. Adam and Benjamin are not sitting on the same side of the table.
If Ethan is not sitting next to Dorky, who is seated immediately to the left of Felix?
You might also be interested in these other PRT articles:
Critical Thinking test
By 123test team . Updated May 12, 2023
Critical Thinking test reviews
This Critical Thinking test measures your ability to think critically and draw logical conclusions based on written information. Critical Thinking tests are often used in job assessments in the legal sector to assess a candidate's analytical critical thinking skills. A well known example of a critical thinking test is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal .
Need more practice?
Score higher on your critical thinking test.
The test comprises of the following five sections with a total of 10 questions:
- Analysing Arguments
- Assumptions
- Interpreting Information
Instructions Critical Thinking test
Each question presents one or more paragraphs of text and a question about the information in the text. It's your job to figure out which of the options is the correct answer.
Below is a statement that is followed by an argument. You should consider this argument to be true. It is then up to you to determine whether the argument is strong or weak. Do not let your personal opinion about the statement play a role in your evaluation of the argument.
Statement: It would be good if people would eat vegetarian more often. Argument: No, because dairy also requires animals to be kept that will have to be eaten again later.
Is this a strong or weak argument?
Strong argument Weak argument
Statement: Germany should no longer use the euro as its currency Argument: No, because that means that the 10 billion Deutschmark that the introduction of the euro has cost is money thrown away.
Overfishing is the phenomenon that too much fish is caught in a certain area, which leads to the disappearance of the fish species in that area. This trend can only be reversed by means of catch reduction measures. These must therefore be introduced and enforced.
Assumption: The disappearance of fish species in areas of the oceans is undesirable.
Is the assumption made from the text?
Assumption is made Assumption is not made
As a company, we strive for satisfied customers. That's why from now on we're going to keep track of how quickly our help desk employees pick up the phone. Our goal is for that phone to ring for a maximum of 20 seconds.
Assumption: The company has tools or ways to measure how quickly help desk employees pick up the phone.
- All reptiles lay eggs
- All reptiles are vertebrates
- All snakes are reptiles
- All vertebrates have brains
- Some reptiles hatch their eggs themselves
- Most reptiles have two lungs
- Many snakes only have one lung
- Cobras are poisonous snakes
- All reptiles are animals
Conclusion: Some snakes hatch their eggs themselves.
Does the conclusion follow the statements?
Conclusion follows Conclusion does not follow
(Continue with the statements from question 5.)
Conclusion: Some animals that lay eggs only have one lung.
In the famous 1971 Stanford experiment, 24 normal, healthy male students were randomly assigned as 'guards' (12) or 'prisoners' (12). The guards were given a uniform and instructed to keep order, but not to use force. The prisoners were given prison uniforms. Soon after the start of the experiment, the guards made up all kinds of sentences for the prisoners. Insurgents were shot down with a fire extinguisher and public undressing or solitary confinement was also a punishment. The aggression of the guards became stronger as the experiment progressed. At one point, the abuses took place at night, because the guards thought that the researchers were not watching. It turned out that some guards also had fun treating the prisoners very cruelly. For example, prisoners got a bag over their heads and were chained to their ankles. Originally, the experiment would last 14 days. However, after six days the experiment was stopped.
The students who took part in the research did not expect to react the way they did in such a situation.
To what extent is this conclusion true, based on the given text?
True Probably true More information required Probably false False
(Continue with the text from 'Stanford experiment' in question 7.)
The results of the experiment support the claim that every young man (or at least some young men) is capable of turning into a sadist fairly quickly.
- A flag is a tribute to the nation and should therefore not be hung outside at night. Hoisting the flag therefore happens at sunrise, bringing it down at sunset. Only when a country flag is illuminated by spotlights on both sides, it may remain hanging after sunset. There is a simple rule of thumb for the time of bringing down the flag. This is the moment when there is no longer any visible difference between the individual colors of the flag.
- A flag may not touch the ground.
- On the Dutch flag, unless entitled to do so, no decorations or other additions should be made. Also the use of a flag purely for decoration should be avoided. However, flag cloth may be used for decoration - for example in the form of drapes.
- The orange pennant is only used on birthdays of members of the Royal House and on King's Day. The orange pennant should be as long or slightly longer than the diagonal of the flag.
Conclusion: One can assume that no Dutch flag will fly at government buildings at night, unless it is illuminated by spotlights on both sides.
Does the conclusion follow, based on the given text?
(Continue with the text from 'Dutch flag protocol' in question 9.)
Conclusion: If the protocol is followed, the orange pennant will always be longer than the horizontal bands/stripes of the flag.
Please answer the questions below. Not all questions are required but it will help us improve this test.
My educational level is
-- please select -- primary school high school college university PhD other
- AON Hewitt G.A.T.E.
- PI Cognitive Assessment (PLI Test)
- Korn Ferry Leadership Assessment
- Berke Assessment
- Ergometrics
- Thomas International
- Predictive Index (PI)
- NEO Personality Inventory
- Leadership Assessment
- Gallup’s CliftonStrengths
- Sales Personality Tests
- Personality Management Tests
- Saville Wave
- McQuaig Word Survey
- Bell Personality Test
- Myers Briggs Personality Test
- DISC Personality Test
- Management SJT
- Supervisory SJT
- Administrative SJT
- Call Center SJT
- Customer Service SJT
- Firefighter SJT
- Numerical Reasoning Tests
- Verbal Reasoning Tests
- Logical Reasoning Tests
- Cognitive Ability Tests
- Technical Aptitude Tests
- Spatial Reasoning Tests
- Abstract Reasoning Test
- Deductive Reasoning Tests
- Inductive Reasoning Tests
- Mechanical Reasoning Tests
- Diagrammatic Reasoning Tests
- Fault Finding Aptitude Tests
- Mathematical Reasoning Tests
- Critical Thinking Tests
- Analytical Reasoning Tests
- Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test
- Criteria’s CCAT
- Matrigma Test
- Air Traffic Controller Test
- Administrative Assistant Exam
- Clerical Ability Exam
- School Secretary Tests
- State Trooper Exam
- Probation Officer Exam
- FBI Entrance Exam
- Office Assistant Exam
- Clerk Typist Test
- Police Records Clerk Exam
- Canada’s Public Service Exams
- Firefighter Exams
- Police Exams
- Army Aptitude Tests
- USPS Postal Exams
- Hiring Process by Professions
- Recruiting Companies
Select Page
Critical Thinking Test: Online Preparation & Free Practice Questions – 2024
- Information
- Free Example Questions
What Is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking is a form of decision making and reasoning using data and observations. Someone who is a strong critical thinker can find quality solutions efficiently and can evaluate issues objectively.
What Is a Critical Thinking Test?
Critical thinking tests provide companies valuable insight into the leadership, reasoning, and overall capabilities of candidates. Because strong critical thinking skills are highly sought after, the critical thinking test can be applicable to any field and discipline across multiple levels of expertise from recent graduate to executive. However, it is commonly administered to those applying for criminal justice and business-related occupations.
Job seekers with upcoming critical thinking tests will be evaluated on more than their ability to rationalize, critical thinking tests also measure the following subsets:
- Organizing & Planning
- Strategizing
- Decision Making
- Problem Solving
The format of the critical thinking uses hypothetical scenarios to assess candidates. The scenarios are typically relevant to the field you are interested in to assess your knowledge of the role. There will also be general questions concerning more basic issues or problems that commonly occur in a workplace environment.
The critical thinking test is multiple-choice with thirty minutes to complete the assessment. Candidates will receive a notification stating whether or not they passed within a week of completion.
How Is the Critical Thinking Test Scored?
The critical reasoning test is scored based on your raw score and your percentile in comparison with your norm group. It’s important to note that these will not be the same number.
A norm group is a collection of scores from individuals in your field at your level of experience. The percentile score is used to alert employers if you exceed, meet or miss the benchmark for the average expectations of candidates. You will be rated on a scale of one to one hundred with fifty consisting of the mean and median scores.
A raw score is simply the number of correct answers. The critical thinking test comprises your raw score based on the performance in the following areas:
- Recognizing Assumptions The candidate must be able to understand when a statement is made with no supporting evidence and how this can affect a decision. Further, candidates are asked to identify these discrepancies, whether they are stated explicitly or implicitly, and assess its relevance to the given scenario.
- Evaluating Arguments Candidates must evaluate arguments without considering inferences or being subjective. Beyond that, candidates must assess the supporting evidence, the structure of the argument and the degree of its influence. It is very important to dismiss emotions for this portion of the critical thinking test.
- Drawing Conclusions Drawing conclusions puts a large emphasis on reasoning. In this section, it’s important to assess all of the available evidence and data to form a plausible conclusion that accurately applies to all the given information. Employers also want to see candidates that will consider all possible solutions rather than making the evidence fit a desired narrative.
Employers will receive all of this information in a performance report construed by the assessment company. Employers will also be given insight into your overall potential, job knowledge, creativity and job performance per the report.
Where Will I Take a Critical Thinking Test?
Critical thinking tests are non-proctored online assessments that are typically sent via email after an initial screening. For some occupations, the company may ask that the candidate take the critical thinking test again on-site either before their final interview or during an assessment day. The most common test candidates are asked to take is the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) created by the popular assessment company, Pearson . This assessment company is on their third edition with new scoring and subsets described above. The WGCTA gained popularity because of its ability to assess a candidate’s potential alongside their aptitude. Another established assessment is the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery that contains sixty questions with a thirty-minute time limit. Both of the aforementioned critical thinking tests are multiple choice.
How to Prepare for the Critical Thinking Test?
The critical thinking test is difficult to study for because the test is designed to assess your bare knowledge and raw skills. In order to prepare successfully, it is important to focus on the areas of the test that you can equip yourself for. One aspect of the test that demands preparation is the time limit. Many candidates’ scores are negatively impacted because they skip or guess too many of the questions in an attempt to beat the clock. If you want to optimize your chances of achieving a good score, use online practice tests to acquaint yourself with the time constraint and the general theme of the questions. By utilizing the online practice tests, you can find the pace that works best for you. Another helpful way to prepare is running through sample questions. This way, you can warm-up your brain and gain an understanding of the expectations that both the test and the company have of you.
Free Sample Questions to Practice
- Look over her past quizzes to see what she missed.
- Set aside more time during the week to review the material for the quiz.
- Get to class on early Wednesday and briefly look over the chapters.
- Get a good night’s sleep.
- Parents should find an alternative way to get their kids to school next week.
- The premiums must be over-priced.
- Collective bargaining is no longer a feasible solution.
- Their employers are being unreasonable.
- People in Hawaii dislike living on an island.
- Colder climates induce more happiness than warmer climates.
- The high scores on the Alaska survey were produced by people who enjoy snow.
- People in Hawaii should move to Alaska.
- Jenny’s credit card was declined at the mall.
- Jenny’s bank keeps charging her $30 overdraft fees.
- Jenny’s check bounced when she attempted to purchase a new TV.
- Jenny spends more money than she makes.
- Lori has thirty cans of soda in a refrigerator in her garage and another fourteen sitting on the counter. Lori does not have anymore cans of soda. Therefore, Lori has 44 cans of soda.
- The accounting department loves math. My friend works in the accounting department. My friend loves math.
- Everyone southbound on the freeway yesterday was late to work. Jackie was southbound on the freeway. Jackie was late to work.
- Adrian lives in either Springfield, California, or Springfield, Illinois. If he lives in Illinois, then he is an American.
Aptitude Tests
- Aptitude Tests Guide
- Numerical Reasoning Test
- Verbal Reasoning Test
- Cognitive Ability Test
- Critical Thinking Test
- Logical Reasoning Test
- Spatial Reasoning Test
- Technical Aptitude Test
- Inductive Reasoning Test
- Analytical Reasoning Test
- Deductive Reasoning Test
- Mechanical Reasoning Test
- Non-Verbal Reasoning Tests
- Diagrammatic Reasoning Test
- Concentration Assessment Test
- Finance Reasoning Aptitude Test
- Fault Finding (Fault Diagnosis) Test
- Senior Management Aptitude Tests
- Error Checking Tests
- In-Basket Exercise
- Practice Tests
- Predictive Index
- Firefighter
- Hogan Assessments
- Leadership Assessment
- Ramsay Technician Assessments
- Watson-Glaser
- Raven's Progressive Matrix
- NEO Personality Inventory
- Texas Success Initiative
- Birkman Personality Test
- TSA Prep Booster™ Course
- TSA Practice Test
- TSA Written Skills Assessment
- TSA CBT X-Ray Object Recognition Test
- TSA Connect the Dots
- SHL Assessment Prep Course
- Practice Test & Answers
- SHL Practice Tests
- SHL Test Answers
- SHL Inductive Reasoning Test
- SHL Numerical Reasoning Test
- SHL Verbal Reasoning Test
- SHL Verify G+ Test
- SHL Mechanical Comprehension Test
- SHL Situational Judgment Test
- SHL OPQ Personality Test
- Predictive Index Master (Cognitive & Behavioral)
- Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment
- Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
- Predictive Index Practice Test
- Predictive Index Results
- Caliper Course
- Caliper Test Prep With Real Practice Test
- USPS Postal Exam
- Postal Exam 474
- Postal Exam 475
- Postal Exam 476
- Postal Exam 477
- USPS Postal Exam Prep
- Pass the 2024 Postal Exam With Practice Tests
- Virtual Entry Assessment (VEA)
- General Police Prep Course
- Police Situational Judgement Test
- Police Psychological Exam Course
- Massachusetts State Police Exam
- Pennsylvania Police Exam
- Philadelphia Police Exam
- Nassau County Police Exam Course
- Suffolk County Police Exam
- Correctional Officer Exam
- MTA Police Exam
- New York State Police Exam Prep Course
- School Safety Agent Course
- Police Officer NYPD Exam
- Police Fitness Prep Course
- Exam Formats
- EB Jacobs Law Enforcement Aptitude Battery
- CJBAT Study Guide
- DELPOE Police Exam
- Texas LEVEL Test With Expert Guides
- PELLETB Course
- FBI Test Phase 1 (Special Agent Exam): Guide with Practice Test [2024]
- Police Test Preparation Suite
- Pass a Polygraph Test (Lie Detector): Expert Tips & Questions – 2024
- Firefighter Test
- FDNY Firefighter Prep Course
- Firefighter Psych Test
- NFSI Firefighter Prep Course
- FCTC Firefighter Prep Course
- Firefighter Aptitude and Character Test
- FireTeam Prep Course
- Master Course
- Hogan Assessments Master Course
- Personality Courses
- Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)
- Hogan Development Survey (HDS)
- Hogan Motives, Values & Preferences Inventory (MVPI)
- Busines Reasoning Course
- Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory (HBRI)
- Leadership Assessment Test
- GardaWorld Pre Board Primer
- Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test II (BMCT-II) Success Prep Course
- Beat the 2024 BMCT With Industry Expert Guides & Realistic Practice Tests
- 911 Dispatcher
- CHP Dispatcher
- Exam Format
- Criticall Dispatcher
- Criticall Dispatcher Test
- Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test - CCAT Course
- Universal Cognitive Aptitude Test - UCAT Course
- CCAT Practice Test
- Criteria Pre-employment Testing: Personality, Aptitude & Skill Tests
- Korn Ferry Course
- Ace the 2024 Korn Ferry Assessment With Practice Test & Expert Guides
- Ramsay Electrical Assessment
- Ramsay Maintenance Assessment
- Ramsay Mechanical Assessment
- Ramsay Multicraft Assessment
- Ramsay Electrical Practice Test
- Ramsay Maintenance Practice Test
- Ramsay Mechanical Practice Test
- Ramsay Multicraft Practice Test
- Ramsay Test Prep
- AFOQT Study Guide
- ASTB Study Guide
- SIFT Study Guide
- Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Course
- Beat the Watson Glaser and Upgrade Your Career
- Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices
- Texas Success Initiative Course
- TSI Practice Test 2024: Math, Reading & Writing
- TSI Reading Practice Test: 15 Q&A with Explanations
- Pass our Free TSI Math Practice Test (2024 Update)
- Take our Free TSI Writing Practice Test (2024)
- Birkman Personality Course
- How it Works
Critical Thinking Test: Sample Questions with Explanations (2024)
Employers value and seek candidates who demonstrate advanced critical thinking skills. They often administer critical thinking tests as part of their hiring process. Critical thinking tests can be very difficult for those who don’t prepare. A great way to start practicing is by taking our critical thinking free practice test.
What Does The Critical Thinking Test Include?
The Critical Thinking Test assesses your capacity to think critically and form logical conclusions when given written information. Critical thinking tests are generally used in job recruitment processes, in the legal sector. These tests measure the analytical critical thinking abilities of a candidate.
Why Is Critical Thinking Useful?
Critical thinking is put into action in various stages of decision-making and problem-solving tasks:
- Identify the problem
- Choose suitable information to find the solution
- Identify the assumptions that are implied and written in the text
- Form hypotheses and choose the most suitable and credible answers
- Form well-founded conclusions and determine the soundness of inferences
What is Watson Glaser Test and what Critical Thinking Skills it Measures?
The most common type of critical thinking test is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (W-GCTA). Typically used by legal and financial organizations, as well as management businesses, a Watson Glaser test is created to assess candidates’ critical thinking skills.
The test consists of 10 questions to be answered in 10 minutes approx (although there is no timer on the test itself). Our test is slightly harder than the real thing, to make it sufficiently challenging practice.
You need to get 70% correct to pass the test. Don’t forget to first check out the test techniques section further down this page beforehand.
Questions 25
Pass percentage 70%.
The test is broken down into five central areas:
- Assumptions
- Interpretation
Critical Thinking Course
- 1 BONUS Interview Prep Video Guide Buy this Course: Get full access to all lessons, practice tests and guides.
The Five Critical Thinking Skills Explained
1. recognition of assumption.
You’ll be presented with a statement. The statement is then followed by several proposed assumptions. When answering, you must work out if an assumption was made or if an assumption was not made in the statement. An assumption is a proclamation that an individual takes for granted. This section of the tests measures your ability to withhold from forming assumptions about things that are not necessarily correct.
- 1: Assumption Made
- 2: Assumption Not Made
Although the passage does state that Charlie’s fundraising team is doing its best so that the charity event can meet its goal, nowhere did it state that their team is leading the event.
2. Evaluation of Arguments
You will be presented with an argument. You will then be asked to decide whether the argument is strong or weak. An argument is considered strong if it directly connects to the statement provided, and is believed to be significant.
No, participation awards should not be given in every competition because studies have shown that this would cause the participants to put in less effort because they will get a prize no matter what the outcome is.
- 1: Strong Argument
- 2: Weak Argument
This is a strong argument as it provides evidence as to why participation awards should not be given in every competition
3. Deductions
In deduction questions, you will need to form conclusions based solely on the information provided in the question and not based on your knowledge. You will be given a small passage of information and you will need to evaluate a list of deductions made based on that passage. If the conclusion cannot be formed for the information provided, then the conclusion does not follow. The answer must be entirely founded on the statements made and not on conclusions drawn from your knowledge.
In a surprise party for Donna, Edna arrived after Felix and Gary did. Kelly arrived before Felix and Gary did.
- 1: Conclusion Follows
- 2: Conclusion Does not Follow
For questions like this, jot down the clues to help you out. Use initials as a quick reference.
K | F&G | E
Looking at the simple diagram, “K”, which stands for “Kelly,” arrived before Edna “E” did. The answer is A.
4. Interpretation
In these questions, you are given a passage of information followed by a list of possible conclusions. You will need to interpret the information in the paragraph and determine whether or not each conclusion follows, based solely on the information given.
A number of students were given the following advice:
“The use of powerful words is a technique, which makes you a better writer. Your choice of words is very important in molding the way people interaction with the article. You should use powerful words to spice up your article. Power words should be used liberally to enhance the flavor of what you write! ”
In the fourth sentence, it is stated, “Power words should be used liberally to enhance the flavor of what you write!”
Thus, if you were to write an essay, using powerful words can give more flavor to it.
5. Inferences
An inference is a conclusion made from observed or supposed facts and details. It is information that is not apparent in the information provided but rather is extracted from it. In this section, you will be provided with a passage of information about a specific scene or event. A list of possible inferences will then be given, and you will need to decide if they are ‘true’, ‘false’, ‘possibly true’, ‘possibly false’, or whether it is not possible to say based on the information provided.
With the advancement of technology, the need for more infrastructure has never been higher. According to the plan of the current U.S. Administration, it aims to put a $1 trillion investment on improving infrastructure, a portion of which will include priority projects and technologies that can strengthen its economic competitiveness such as transportation, 5G wireless communication technology, rural broadband technologies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and even artificial intelligence.
It stated that it expects to work with Congress to develop a comprehensive infrastructure package, which is expected to have a budget of $200 billion for certain priorities.
- 2: Probably True
- 3: Not Enough Information
- 4: Probably False
Although it was mentioned in the passage that the U.S. government is to allocate $200 billion on certain priorities, it did not specify if these certain priorities were for ‘transportation, 5G wireless communication technology, rural broadband technologies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and artificial intelligence’ or if the aforementioned priorities will have a different allocation.
What we can be sure of, however, is that at least a portion of the $1 trillion infrastructure budget will be used on the mentioned priorities regardless, meaning that there is a chance that $200 billion will be used on those aforementioned areas.
Improve Your Score with Prepterminal’s Critical Thinking Course
The Critical Thinking test is difficult, but not impossible to overcome with practice. At PrepTerminal our psychometric test experts have developed a critical thinking preparatory test to provide you with the material you need to practice for your critical thinking test. Prepare with us to increase your chance of successfully overcoming this hurdle in the recruitment process.
Prepterminal’s preparatory critical thinking course features a structured study course along with critical thinking practice tests to help you improve your exam score. Our course includes video and text-based information presented in a clear and easy-to-understand manner so you can follow along at your own pace with ease.
Created by: Matt
Psychometric tutor, prepterminal test expert, 414 students, 4.7 , 73 reviews.
How to Prepare for a Critical Thinking Test: Effective Strategies and Tips
Preparing for a critical thinking test can be challenging, as it requires you to use your intellectual skills to critically analyze evidence and reach logical conclusions. Critical thinking tests, sometimes known as critical reasoning tests, are often used by employers to evaluate how a candidate makes logical deductions after scrutinizing the evidence provided, while avoiding fallacies or non-factual opinions.
Key Takeaways
Understanding critical thinking, critical thinking skills, strategies to enhance critical thinking ability, fundamentals of critical thinking test, evaluation of arguments, types of critical thinking tests.
There are different types of critical thinking tests available online, covering a range of question formats and testing methods. Some tests focus on analyzing written passages, while others present the information in diagrams or charts. Most tests evaluate an individual’s ability to:
Importance of Critical Thinking Tests for Employers
For employers, critical thinking tests play a vital role in the application process. Employers use these tests to assess a candidate’s ability to scrutinize evidence, make logical deductions, and avoid fallacies or non-factual opinions. This evaluation is essential in deciding whether an individual is suitable for a role that requires complex decision-making, troubleshooting, or problem-solving skills.
Guidelines to Prepare for the Test
Assessing and recognizing assumptions, drawing logical conclusions.
A critical component of critical thinking is drawing logical conclusions based on the information provided. To master this skill, begin with analyzing different scenarios and identifying the relevant details. This process involves making inferences and connecting multiple pieces of information to arrive at a sound conclusion. Engage in activities that challenge your interpretation and decision-making abilities, as these skills will be beneficial on assessment day.
Implementing Problem Solving Techniques
Sharpening deduction skills.
In conclusion, enhancing your critical thinking skills requires diligent practice and an understanding of key principles. By following the guidelines above, you can confidently prepare for the test and emerge with a strong foundation in critical thinking.
Critical Thinking Tests in Different Sectors
Critical thinking in the legal sector, critical thinking in the banking sector.
The banking sector similarly places great importance on critical thinking abilities. SHL Critical Reasoning Battery is commonly utilized in the banking industry to assess candidates’ logical reasoning and decision-making skills. You can practice critical thinking tests here .
Relevant Psychometric Assessments
When preparing for a critical thinking test, it is important to familiarize yourself with relevant psychometric assessments that employers might use to evaluate your cognitive abilities. Two widely known assessments are the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery .
Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal
Shl critical reasoning battery.
Another important test to be aware of is the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery . This assessment evaluates a candidate’s aptitude for logical reasoning and analysis, focusing on their ability to identify alternative interpretations and make well-informed decisions.
In conclusion, preparing for a critical thinking test requires understanding the relevant psychometric assessments, such as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery. By focusing on the specific categories and cognitive abilities assessed in these tests, you can improve your critical thinking skills and increase your chances of success in the recruitment process.
Approach to Sample Questions
Interpreting information, evaluating arguments, recognizing assumptions.
Recognizing assumptions is a crucial aspect of critical thinking, as it involves identifying biases, values, and beliefs underlying the presented information. Make a habit of questioning assumptions and considering alternative viewpoints. As you practice recognizing assumptions, challenge yourself to consider counterarguments and explore different perspectives. Developing this skill will enable you to approach sample questions with a more open mind and balanced judgment.
Practice Tests
Preparing for a critical thinking test involves a combination of honing your intellectual and reflective skills. One key aspect is to practice regularly with different test assessments to familiarize yourself with the format and question types.
Lastly, persistence and dedication are crucial in refining your critical thinking skills. Be prepared to invest time and effort into this process, and do not become disheartened if you face difficulties along the way. Remember to learn from your mistakes, adapt your strategies, and you will undoubtedly see progress in your critical thinking capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key elements to focus on while practicing, how can one improve problem-solving skills, what are the best sources for critical thinking test samples.
The best sources for critical thinking test samples are reputable websites and platforms that offer practice tests and resources tailored to the specific critical thinking test format. Some examples include Psychometric Success , Practice Aptitude Tests , and Practice4Me . These platforms offer sample questions, tips, and techniques to help candidates familiarize themselves with the test format and content.
How essential is time management in critical thinking tests?
What strategies can be employed to enhance logical reasoning, how can one effectively analyze arguments during the test.
Analyzing arguments effectively during a critical thinking test involves evaluating the evidence presented, understanding the structure of the argument, determining the validity of the argument, and identifying potential fallacies or biased reasoning. To achieve this, test-takers should practice critically analyzing various types of arguments, focusing on the logical and evidentiary components, and maintaining a neutral and objective viewpoint throughout the process.
You may also like
How to evaluate sources using critical thinking: a concise guide to informed research, critical thinking questions for your boyfriend, critical thinking and goal setting, 11 effective and fun exercises to learn critical thinking, download this free ebook.
Critical Thinking test
Summary of the critical thinking test.
This online Critical Thinking skills assessment evaluates candidates’ skills in critical thinking through inductive and deductive reasoning problems . This pre-employment aptitude test helps you identify candidates who can evaluate information and make sound judgments using logic and analytical skills.
Covered skills
Analyzing syllogisms
Making inferences
Recognizing assumptions and fallacies
Weighing arguments
Use the Critical Thinking test to hire
Any role that involves a high degree of critical and independent thinking to solve complex problems, such as analysts, engineers, executives, lawyers, marketers, and data scientists, among many others.
About the Critical Thinking test
Effective critical thinking requires skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, and evaluating information to make a sound, logical judgment or formulate an innovative solution.
In practice, this means that candidates can identify what information is important to solving a problem, gather it where possible, and draw conclusions to reach a solution. It requires using a range of soft skills and cognitive abilities, including:
Logical reasoning
Open-mindedness
Strategizing
These skills are difficult, or even impossible, to glean from a resume; employers should use critical thinking skills tests instead to assess them quickly and easily without bias.
Our Critical Thinking test evaluates candidates’ abilities to:
Solve syllogisms through deductive reasoning skills and logical thinking
Interpret sequences and arrangements, evaluate arguments to find a weak argument, and draw sound conclusions
Ask deduction questions and assess cause-and-effect relationships
Practice reading comprehension to recognize assumptions
These types of questions ( see our practice test for sample questions ) measure critical thinking by presenting candidates with single or multiple-choice statements, asking them to analyze the information and use logic to identify the correct answer.
By using a critical thinking assessment test to screen candidates with a time limit, you can ensure that everyone you invite to interviews meets a baseline requirement for critical thinking skills. Besides, you reach this conclusion through a data-driven, unbiased method that takes a fraction of the time of traditional resume screening.
The test is made by a subject-matter expert
Testgorilla assessment team.
TestGorilla's Assessment Team is responsible for the delivery of leading edge, science-based measurement, assessment content, insights and innovation. The team is comprised of organizational psychologists, data scientists, psychometricians, academics, researchers, writers, and editors.
Collectively, the Assessment Team boasts more than 15 advanced degrees, more than 100 scientific publications and presentations, and almost 100 years of assessment and talent acquisition industry experience.
Crafted with expert knowledge
TestGorilla’s tests are created by subject matter experts. We assess potential subject-matter experts based on their knowledge, ability, and reputation. Before being published, each test is peer-reviewed by another expert, then calibrated using hundreds of test takers with relevant experience in the subject.
Our feedback mechanisms and unique algorithms allow our subject-matter experts to constantly improve their tests.
What our customers are saying
TestGorilla helps me to assess engineers rapidly. Creating assessments for different positions is easy due to pre-existing templates. You can create an assessment in less than 2 minutes. The interface is intuitive and it’s easy to visualize results per assessment.
VP of engineering, mid-market (51-1000 FTE)
Any tool can have functions—bells and whistles. Not every tool comes armed with staff passionate about making the user experience positive.
The TestGorilla team only offers useful insights to user challenges, they engage in conversation.
For instance, I recently asked a question about a Python test I intended to implement. Instead of receiving “oh, that test would work perfectly for your solution,” or, “at this time we’re thinking about implementing a solution that may or may not…” I received a direct and straightforward answer with additional thoughts to help shape the solution.
I hope that TestGorilla realizes the value proposition in their work is not only the platform but the type of support that’s provided.
For a bit of context—I am a diversity recruiter trying to create a platform that removes bias from the hiring process and encourages the discovery of new and unseen talent.
Chief Talent Connector, small business (50 or fewer FTE)
Use TestGorilla to hire the best faster, easier and bias-free
Our screening tests identify the best candidates and make your hiring decisions faster, easier, and bias-free.
Learn how each candidate performs on the job using our library of 400+ scientifically validated tests.
Test candidates for job-specific skills like coding or digital marketing, as well as general skills like critical thinking. Our unique personality and culture tests allow you to get to know your applicants as real people – not just pieces of paper.
Give all applicants an equal, unbiased opportunity to showcase their skills with our data-driven and performance-based ranking system.
With TestGorilla, you’ll get the best talent from all walks of life, allowing for a stronger, more diverse workplace.
Our short, customizable assessments and easy-to-use interface can be accessed from any device, with no login required.
Add your company logo, color theme, and more to leave a lasting impression that candidates will appreciate.
Watch what TestGorilla can do for you
Create high-quality assessments, fast.
Building assessments is a breeze with TestGorilla. Get started with these simple steps.
Building assessments is quick and easy with TestGorilla. Just pick a name, select the tests you need, then add your own custom questions.
You can customize your assessments further by adding your company logo, color theme, and more. Build the assessment that works for you.
Send email invites directly from TestGorilla, straight from your ATS, or connect with candidates by sharing a direct link.
Have a long list of candidates? Easily send multiple invites with a single click. You can also customize your email invites.
Discover your strongest candidates with TestGorilla’s easy-to-read output reports, rankings, and analytics.
Easily switch from a comprehensive overview to a detailed analysis of your candidates. Then, go beyond the data by watching personalized candidate videos.
View a sample report
The Critical Thinking test will be included in a PDF report along with the other tests from your assessment. You can easily download and share this report with colleagues and candidates.
Why are critical thinking skills important to employers?
The importance of critical thinking abilities in the workplace comes from its ability to improve performance in almost any role. If a candidate can think critically about problems, they are likely to solve them faster and with less need for intervention from superiors .
Critical thinking practice is essential for managers, who regularly need to make decisions that affect multiple people and involve many variables. Other benefits of fostering critical thinking in the workplace include:
Encouraging creative problem-solving and organizational agility
Improving conflict resolution
Promoting ethical decision-making
Creating a culture of continuous learning
Asking all applicants to answer critical reasoning test questions can help you hire competent employees and effective managers on a global scale in a fraction of the time. Nexus HR, an HR services provider, did precisely this with our tests – reducing their “time-to-fill” metrics for open positions and improving the quality of hire, particularly in India and the Philippines.
Critical-thinking competencies to hire for
Candidates with critical-thinking skills have several competencies:
Observation skills: They constantly seek new information by asking others or observing their environment and the people around them.
Analysis: They can use fast thinking to analyze new situations, but they can also slow down and analyze situations by asking questions and conducting research.
Decision-making: After observing and analyzing the data available, candidates can critically evaluate the information at their disposal to make a data-driven decision .
Communication: A great critical thinker also knows the importance of communicating their decisions to those around them and understands how best to organize this information for others.
Problem-solving: The candidate can apply their skills in observing and analyzing data to decision-making and finding solutions to complex problems.
What job roles can you hire with our Critical Thinking test?
This Critical Thinking assessment test is not role-specific, which means you can use the Critical Thinking test for employment across any number of roles.
Here are a few examples:
Analysts must know how to interpret data, identify patterns, and provide actionable, feasible insights
Engineers use their critical thinking skills to tackle complex problems and devise effective solutions that meet or exceed safety standards
Chief executive officers must be able to shape organizational strategy, adapt to change, and inspire their workers to perform at their best
Lawyers analyze case law, construct arguments, and navigate legal complexities with sharp critical thinking
Marketers craft compelling brand messages and develop successful go-to-market strategies thanks to a mixture of research and strategic thinking
Data scientists rely on critical thinking skills to examine data sets, spot trends, and make informed business decisions
Teachers design tutorials, create practice questions, evaluate student performance, and adapt their teaching methods based on careful analysis and reflective judgment
Healthcare professionals use critical thinking skills to assess patient symptoms and devise appropriate care plans
Create a multi-measure assessment: 4 tests to pair with the Critical Thinking test
With TestGorilla, you can combine up to five psychometric tests into a multi-measure assessment to find well-rounded candidates.
Here are the tests you should consider including alongside our critical thinking evaluation in your recruitment process.
Communication test : Assess candidates’ ability to communicate clearly and professionally through written, verbal, or non-verbal communication.
Time Management test : Present candidates with typical workplace scenarios to assess how effectively they can prioritize, plan, and execute tasks.
Problem Solving test : Hire candidates with the ability to analyze and interpret textual information to make correct decisions.
Big Five (OCEAN) test : Evaluate candidates on five key factors of personality: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional stability.
Note: We haven’t included any role-specific skills tests here because they depend on the position you’re hiring for. However, we highly recommend you add at least one in your five-test assessment to ensure your candidates possess the right skills for the job.
An assessment is the total package of tests and custom questions that you put together to evaluate your candidates. Each individual test within an assessment is designed to test something specific, such as a job skill or language. An assessment can consist of up to 5 tests and 20 custom questions. You can have candidates respond to your custom questions in several ways, such as with a personalized video.
Yes! Custom questions are great for testing candidates in your own unique way. We support the following question types: video, multiple-choice, coding, file upload, and essay. Besides adding your own custom questions, you can also create your own tests.
A video question is a specific type of custom question you can add to your assessment. Video questions let you create a question and have your candidates use their webcam to record a video response. This is an excellent way to see how a candidate would conduct themselves in a live interview, and is especially useful for sales and hospitality roles. Some good examples of things to ask for video questions would be "Why do you want to work for our company?" or "Try to sell me an item you have on your desk right now."
Besides video questions, you can also add the following types of custom questions: multiple-choice, coding, file upload, and essay. Multiple-choice lets your candidates choose from a list of answers that you provide, coding lets you create a coding problem for them to solve, file upload allows your candidates to upload a file that you request (such as a resume or portfolio), and essay allows an open-ended text response to your question. You can learn more about different custom question types here .
Yes! You can add your own logo and company color theme to your assessments. This is a great way to leave a positive and lasting brand impression on your candidates.
Our team is always here to help. After you sign up, we’ll reach out to guide you through the first steps of setting up your TestGorilla account. If you have any further questions, you can contact our support team via email, chat or call. We also offer detailed guides in our extensive help center .
It depends! We offer five free tests, or unlimited access to our library of 400+ tests with the price based on your company size. Find more information on our pricing plans here , calculate the cost-benefit of using TestGorilla assessments, or speak to one of our sales team for your personalized demo and learn how we can help you revolutionize hiring today.
Yes. You can add up to five tests to each assessment.
We recommend using our assessment software as a pre-screening tool at the beginning of your recruitment process. You can add a link to the assessment in your job post or directly invite candidates by email.
TestGorilla replaces traditional resume screening with a much more reliable and efficient process, designed to find the most skilled candidates earlier and faster.
We offer the following cognitive ability tests : Numerical Reasoning, Problem Solving, Attention to Detail, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Thinking.
Our cognitive ability tests allow you to test for skills that are difficult to evaluate in an interview. Check out our blog on why these tests are so useful and how to choose the best one for your assessment.
Related tests
Intermediate math, mechanical reasoning, attention to detail (textual), verbal reasoning, problem solving, numerical reasoning, computational thinking, basic math calculations, understanding instructions, attention to detail (visual).
Get 25% off all test packages.
Get 25% off all test packages!
Click below to get 25% off all test packages.
Watson Glaser Assessments
- 228 questions
Watson Glaser tests are a form of psychometric assessment that fall under the category of critical thinking tests. They are designed to determine how well an individual can process information from a logical perspective, and then evaluate, analyse and make sound judgements. As such, they are commonly used in the recruitment process for professions that rely on these skills.
What is a Watson Glaser test?
Watson Glaser test is a comprehensive psychometric assessment that falls under the category of critical thinking tests. It is designed to determine how well an individual can process information from a logical perspective, and then evaluate, analyze and make sound judgments. Watson Glaser test is commonly used in the recruitment process for professions that rely on these skills.
Watson Glaser tests have been around since 1925 when they were first developed by American psychologists Goodwin Watson and Edwin Glaser. Subject to many revisions and improvements over the years, they are now produced by test publisher TalentLens and are considered one of the most trusted methods of evaluating critical reasoning.
Critical thinking is a complex skill that requires the ability to interpret information, differentiate fact from fallacy, draw evidence-based conclusions and identify sound arguments, all while remaining objective.
Like many critical thinking tests , the Watson Glaser test measures these skills through verbal information: that is, statements or passages of text from which an individual is required to make deductions and inferences, pinpoint assumptions needed to validate a proposition, and weigh up the strength of an argument.
These are inherent skills, more prominent in some than others. The Watson Glaser test, therefore, requires no prior knowledge. Success relies on existing knowledge being put to one side, the sole focus being the evidence laid out in each question.
You may be asked to sit a Watson Glaser test by the potential employer if applying for a graduate, professional or managerial level position in a sector where critical thinking is a prerequisite. Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is most commonly used in the legal sector, but also the selection process of organizations like the Bank of England.
The test may be used for screening purposes in the initial stages of the hiring process, or at a later date as part of an assessment day .
What is the format of a Watson Glaser test?
The Watson Glaser test is a timed, multiple-choice assessment, the most recent version of which consists of 40 critical reasoning questions with a 30-minute time constraint.
Questions are split across five areas of logical reasoning ability:
Drawing inferences
To draw inferences is essential to make an educated guess based on the evidence in front of you, without being swayed by any pre-existing knowledge or subconscious bias.
You’ll be presented with a short paragraph, followed by a set of inferred statements. Potential employees need to critically analyse the information in the given paragraph to determine if these statements are true, probably true, false, probably false, or if there is insufficient proof to determine either way.
Recognising assumptions
Assumptions relating to what we understand to be true without needing solid proof. They are the underlying facts that give an argument its validity.
In this section of the test, you’ll be presented with a statement and a set of assumptions. If the statement relies on the assumption being true, you would mark it as ‘assumption made’.
If the assumption is irrelevant to the statement or bears no weight on its validity, you would mark it as ‘assumption not made.
Deductive reasoning is the act of arriving at a fact-based conclusion through a logical thought process. A deduction differs from an assumption in that it is what we take away from an argument, as opposed to the facts on which an argument needs to stand.
Based solely on the evidence presented in a statement or short paragraph, you’ll need to determine if a list of conclusions does or does not logically follow the information in front of you.
Interpreting
The interpretation section of the Watson Glaser test is similar to the deduction section, in that you’ll be asked to determine whether a given conclusion can logically be drawn from an argument.
However, with these questions, you’ll need to be able to identify significant pieces of information and decide if a logical interpretation can be applied in support of the conclusion in question.
Evaluating arguments
This last section looks at your ability to separate a weak argument from a strong one. It is designed to test your impartial evaluation of arguments, not your personal opinion.
A question will be posted, followed by a set of arguments on either side of the debate. You’ll need to decide if an argument is relevant and challenging, and therefore strong, or vague and unrealistic, and therefore weak.
What skills does it look to measure?
The five sections combined to give an overall picture of your performance in key areas, and measure your ability to:
Define a problem
Select key points of information to formulate a solution
Understand when an assumption has been made, and when it has not
Hypothesise, or select an applicable hypothesis based on limited evidence
Draw fact-based conclusions
Determine the probability of an inference
What is a passing score on the Watson Glaser tests?
The results of your Watson Glaser test will be assessed against a norm group: individuals of a comparative educational background or professional standing – within a relevant field – that have previously sat the exam.
It is therefore difficult to state an exact pass score on the test since it depends entirely on the performance of your peers. Ideally, you’d look to reach 75% and above to give yourself a competitive edge.
Which professions use Watson Glaser tests, and why?
Watson Glaser tests are used to assess suitability for several occupations including those in the medical profession, marketing, and education. Those critical reasoning tests are most common in law firms and professional services sectors.
Many positions in law, banking, and finance, for example, require that an individual make informed decisions that can be justified, are rooted in fact, and are free from bias. Since critical thinking is an essential skill here, employers use Watson Glaser tests to determine how well-suited a candidate is for these professions.
How to prepare for a Watson Glaser test
Practice is the first port of call when preparing for your Watson Glaser test. Although critical thinking is an inherent skill, it can be nurtured and improved upon.
Watson Glaser tests are built around a model known as RED . Try to keep this in mind as you approach both practice tests and daily tasks.
The components associated with the RED model are:
Recognising assumptions . Instead of simply taking things at face value, such as the news or a part of a conversation with a friend or co-worker, ask yourself if what you’re hearing can be classified as true, and what the facts are that back it up. Are they evidential, or based on assumptions?
Evaluating arguments . We’re all guilty of seeking out information that confirms our perspective. Instead, actively look for opinions that contradict your own and assess them from an objective point of view. The better you become at seeing both sides of a story, the more prepared you’ll be to critically evaluate arguments in your Watson Glaser test.
Drawing conclusions . Try to get used to drawing fact-based conclusions, rather than those based on emotional reactions or subconscious bias. These conclusions may not align with your perspective, but a Watson Glaser test requires that you conclude impartially – and as with most things in life, practice makes perfect here.
Prepare yourself for leading employers
Tips for Watson Glaser tests
Study the practice questions.
In the official test, you’ll have the opportunity to complete practice questions. These are there for a reason, so use them wisely. Each section of the test differs slightly in its approach, and the more comfortable you are with what is being asked of you, the more clearly you’ll be able to approach the problem.
Leave instinct and intuition at the door
To succeed on a Watson Glaser test, you need to go against human nature and ignore everything you think you know. Each question will contain all the relevant information you need. Whether you believe it to be true, agree with it, or not, is irrelevant. For the sake of the test, evaluate only the information given. Any outside knowledge should temporarily be forgotten.
Examine each question carefully
The key to strategic critical thinking is to fully understand what is being presented. You cannot draw a valid conclusion, or understand what assumptions support an argument, if you do not fully comprehend what is put forward. You may feel the need to rush under the time pressure, but attention to detail is vital.
Look for keywords and phrases
The statement, proposition or paragraph of text at the start of each question will inevitably include keywords or phrases that relate directly to the assumptions, inferences or conclusions given. These are your clues. Identify them, and you’ll find it much easier to analyse each scenario objectively.
Split your time evenly
Remember, you have a set amount of time to work through all five sections of the test. Split this evenly across the board before you start, and keep track of how much time you spend on each question. It may seem counterintuitive to add to the pressure, but in setting yourself a time frame, you eliminate the risk of dedicated excessive attention to any one part of the test.
For further advice, check out our full set of tips for Watson Glaser tests .
Practice Aptitude Tests is not associated with Watson Glaser. We provide preparation services for Watson Glaser psychometric tests. Our tests are not designed to be identical to any style, employer or industry. Visit https://www.talentlens.co.uk/product/watson-glaser/ to find out more.
Sample Watson Glaser Tests question Test your knowledge!
What can be inferred from the following statement? 'Despite increased competition, sales figures for Company Y have improved.'
- Increased competition has had a direct negative effect on sales figures.
- Company Y has possibly employed successful strategies to overcome competitive challenges.
- The overall market has been declining.
- Company Y's products are unaffected by competition.
Which of the following conclusions can logically be drawn from the information given? Despite its small size, Company X is the market leader in its segment.
- Company X's market segment prefers quality over size.
- Company X has a larger market share in its segment than its bigger competitors.
- The size of a company is not related to its market leadership.
- Company X is the smallest company in its market segment.
After reading the passage, what is the author's main argument?
- Traditional education systems are adequate to meet current workforce needs.
- Workplaces need to ensure their employees are consistently learning to keep up with technological changes.
- Technological innovation has little impact on the skills required by the workforce.
- Education systems are evolving faster than workplaces can keep up.
Which assumption is implicit in the following statement? 'We expect our customer base to double when we expand our services internationally.'
- International markets are eager for the company's services.
- The company has conducted ample market research on international markets.
- The company's services are currently not available internationally.
- Customers are dissatisfied with the current services.
Evaluate the strength of the given argument: 'Since implementing the new safety protocol, our factory has seen a 30% reduction in workplace injuries.'
- The new safety protocol is ineffective and should be reviewed.
- The 30% reduction in workplace injuries can be solely attributed to the new safety protocol.
- The factory should promote the person responsible for the new safety protocol.
- The new safety protocol may have contributed to the reduction in workplace injuries.
Start your success journey
Access one of our Watson Glaser tests for FREE.
After using the platform for two weeks, I’ve never felt more prepared for an Aptitude test.
Ethan used Practice Aptitude Tests to improve his situational judgement scores.
Hire better talent
At Neuroworx we help companies build perfect teams
Watson Glaser Tests Tips
1 understand the test structure.
Before you dive into practicing for the Watson Glaser tests, it’s crucial to familiarize yourself with their structure. These tests aim to assess critical thinking skills across a range of areas, which TalentLens categorizes as ‘select’, ‘develop’, and ‘engage’. By understanding the types of questions and sections you will encounter, you can tailor your test preparation strategy effectively.
2 Focus on Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is at the heart of Watson Glaser tests. It’s not just about what you know but how you apply your knowledge to analyze, evaluate, and make decisions. Spend time honing your reasoning skills—practice breaking down complex information into manageable parts and consider arguments from multiple perspectives.
3 Manage Your Time Wisely
Like many aptitude tests, the Watson Glaser tests require you to balance accuracy with speed. Practice managing your time efficiently so you can give each question the attention it deserves while ensuring you complete the test within the allotted time frame. Use timers in your practice sessions at Practice Aptitude Tests to simulate real test conditions.
4 Sharpen Your Reading Skills
Reading comprehension is essential for Watson Glaser tests, as you’ll need to interpret written material quickly and accurately. Practice reading dense and challenging texts to improve your absorption and analysis capabilities. The key here is to not only understand the passages but also to critically evaluate them.
5 Stay Calm and Confident
Test anxiety can affect your performance. Remember to stay calm, take deep breaths, and approach each question with confidence. Regular practice at Practice Aptitude Tests will help build your familiarity with the question types and format, which in turn will boost your test-taking confidence.
Prepare for your Watson Glaser Assessments
Immediate access. Cancel anytime.
- 20 Aptitude packages
- 59 Language packages
- 110 Programming packages
- 39 Admissions packages
- 48 Personality packages
- 315 Employer packages
- 34 Publisher packages
- 35 Industry packages
- Dashboard performance tracking
- Full solutions and explanations
- Tips, tricks, guides and resources
- Access to free tests
- Basic performance tracking
- Solutions & explanations
- Tips and resources
Watson Glaser Tests FAQs
How does watson glaser define critical thinking.
According to the methodology behind Watson Glaser tests, critical thinking is the ability to observe a scenario and consider it from various perspectives, whilst identifying what is fact, what is assumed and what is mere opinion. In doing so, you should be able to draw logical conclusions and use these for informed decision making.
How can I improve my critical thinking skills?
Critical thinking is a part of our daily lives; we’re just not always aware that we’re doing it. To improve your skills, tune in to the world around you, ask questions, read actively and look for evidence in every statement or argument you come across. Take practice tests regularly to assess your progress.
Is the Watson Glaser test hard?
Watson Glaser tests are considered among the most challenging of all critical thinking assessments, since they test five separate aspects of logical reasoning ability . Time constraints also add to the pressure. That said, they are typically no harder than the careers for which they test your suitability, and with dedicated practice, you can hone your skills and make critical thinking second nature.
Where can I practice Watson Glaser tests?
There are multiple online resources available to help you prepare for your Watson Glaser test, including our own free practice tests . We recommended you work through these questions to familiarise yourself with the format and improve your critical thinking skills.
Reviews of our Watson Glaser tests
What our customers say about our Watson Glaser tests
Jozef Bailey
United Kingdom
April 05, 2022
Doesn't cover all aspects of Watson-Glaser tests but useful
The WGCTA uses more categories to assess critical thinking, but this was useful for the inference section.
April 01, 2022
Just practicing for an interview
Good information and liked that it had a countdown clock, to give you that real feel in the test situation.
Jerico Kadhir
March 31, 2022
Aptitude test
It was OK, I didn't understand personally whether or not the "cannot say" option was acceptable or not in a lot of the questions, as it may have been a trick option.
Salvarina Viknesuari
March 15, 2022
I like the test because the platform is simple and engaging while the test itself is different than most of the Watson Glaser tests I've taken.
Alexis Sheridan
March 02, 2022
Some of the ratios were harder than I thought!
I like how clear the design and layout is - makes things very easy (even if the content itself is not!)
Cyril Lekgetho
February 17, 2022
Mental arithmetic
I enjoyed the fact that there were multiple questions pertaining to one passage of information, rather than multiple passages. However I would've appreciated a more varied question type.
Madupoju Manish
February 16, 2022
Analytics are the best questions
I like the test because of its time schedule. The way the questions are prepared makes it easy to crack the original test.
Chelsea Franklin
February 02, 2022
Interesting
I haven't done something like this for ages. Very good for the brain - although I certainly experienced some fog whilst doing it.
January 04, 2022
Population/exchange rates were the hardest
Great test as it felt a bit time pressured. Very different types of questions in terms of difficulty.
faezeh tavakoli
January 02, 2022
More attention to detail + be more time conscious
It was asking about daily stuff we all deal with, but as an assessment it's scrutinising how we approach these problems.
By using our website you agree with our Cookie Policy.
Free Critical Thinking Practice Test with Questions, Answers, and Explanations
The questions on this free Critical Thinking practice test are a true representation of the questions you'll face on the actual Critical Thinking Aptitude Test.
These Critical Thinking sample questions were specifically chosen from our full Critical Thinking test practice pack to help improve your score and ace your pre-employment process.
Good Luck !
Free Critical Thinking Practice Questions
1. United Bank is concerned about the increasing media coverage of suspicions of corruption among its top management staff. The VP of finance was accused of embezzling ten million dollars, for which the maximum penalty is eight years in prison. The bank's attorneys advised management to offer him a plea bargain according to which he will admit to the crime, return the money plus compensation, and serve one year of community service. The VP of finance is reluctant to accept, pleading his innocence. If the VP of finance is found guilty of the charge and the judge gives him the maximum sentence, the VP of finance can be sentenced to a jail term of eight years.
A. True B. Probably True C. Insufficient Data D. Probably False E. False
Answer: The correct answer is 'True'.
The passage says: 'for which the maximum penalty is eight years in prison'. If there is a possible penalty of eight years in prison for the felony the VP is charged with, and he is found guilty, then it is possible that he would be sentenced for this period. As the statement uses the word 'can' it recognizes this is only one possibility of many. Therefore, the statement is true.
2. A new study proves that scores on cognitive ability tests, which include critical thinking tests, are strongly related to success in both civilian and military jobs, and predict outcomes in all jobs. The added value of these tests, the authors conclude, is that they predict both what an individual can do right now, as well the extent to which an individual is likely to learn and develop. Nowadays, occupational psychologists use cognitive ability tests more often than in the past.
Answer: The correct answer is 'Insufficient Data'.
The passage presents information about a new possible utility for cognitive ability tests in the occupational consultancy area. Yet, we lack information about the extent of past and present use of these tests; hence, it is impossible to determine and even to assume whether the statement is correct or not. Therefore, the correct answer is 'Insufficient Data'.
3. Following a reduction in the number of applicants, the college has been asking students to evaluate faculty teaching performance for the last two years. The college's management announced that the purpose of these evaluations is to provide information to faculty about teachers' strengths and weaknesses, and to help higher management make decisions about pay raises and promotions to reward the better teachers. Last week, Professor Burke, a recently retired senior lecturer at the college, wrote a letter in which he objected to these evaluations, claiming they compromise academic standards.
The college management does not care about academic excellence at all.
Answer: The correct answer is 'Probably False'.
This is a very definitive assertion that cannot be derived from the text. Even if the purpose of the evaluation is student satisfaction rather than trying to promote academic standards, it is very unlikely that the management does not care about academic level at all. Remember, you can use common sense and world knowledge when deciding between 'Probably' and 'Insufficient Data'.
We offer full preparation for the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal .
If you are slated to take the Watson Glaser, make sure you come prepared with one of the best practice courses available!
Read Our Reviews
Really Really Good! It was a great investment and a really good way to practice for the actual assessment. I would highly recommend for anyone looking to get some good practice before taking the test.
(Mariam S. on Watson Glaser Practice Test)
Worth the money ! Thank you for the excellent product -- I had only about a week to prepare for the test but was able to get my dream job. It's a very hard test for sure, but there were a large number of relevant test questions with clear explanations that helped a lot.
(Kyoto T. On Watson Glaser Practice Test)
If you have to do this If you have to do this test and have no knowledge of how you tackle it I thoroughly recommend this course. It puts you in the correct mindset to tackle each of the sections. Money well invested for your future.
(Ray J. on Watson Glaser + RARNA Bundle)
Evaluation of Arguments - This section asks you to evaluate arguments. There is a question followed by an argument. The argument appears to be valid, however, you have to decide whether it is a strong argument or a weak argument, meaning that it should be both important and relevant to the question. You can find more Evaluation of Arguments sample questions in the following guide or purchase JobTestPrep's full Watson Glaser preparation .
4. Retailer groups opposed to Visa and MasterCard’s $7.25 billion settlement of a lawsuit over merchant credit card fees said they have garnered support from about 1,200 businesses covered by the deal. These groups urged U.S. District Judge in Brooklyn not to grant initial approval to the settlement, however, the ruling will probably be in its favour. That could end seven years of litigation over an alleged conspiracy by the card companies and banks to fix the fees that retailers are charged when customers pay with cards.
The judge thinks that a conspiracy between the credit card companies has not occurred.
There are possible reasons for the judge to rule in favour of a settlement that have nothing to do with the judge’s own opinion on the case, like wanting to avoid further costs for both sides in an already long and expensive process. The text simply does not provide any information regarding the judge’s beliefs. Therefore, the answer is 'Insufficient Data'.
5. Virtual employees, or employees who work from home via computer, are an increasing trend. In the US, the number of virtual employees has increased 39% in the last two years and 74% in the last five years. Employing virtual workers reduces costs and makes it possible to use talented workers no matter where they are located globally. Yet, running a workplace with virtual employees might entail miscommunication and less camaraderie, and can be more time-consuming than face-to-face interaction. Today, a majority of the employees in the US are virtual employees.
The passage describes an increasing trend of virtual employment hiring. Yet, it is not specified how prevalent has this trend become in comparison to the entire work force. There is no confirmation or contradiction of the statement, and the first tendency may be to choose 'insufficient data'. However, in this section of the test, you are allowed to use common sense to choose the right answer. By applying logic to the answer choices, you can surmise that there are many jobs which cannot be done virtually, and that despite the increasing popularity of this trend, it is unlikely that a majority of employees in the US are virtual.
Therefore, the correct answer is 'Probably False'.
6. We forecast that completion of the development of supercomputers will be followed by a shortage of people who know how to make use of all this computing power. Proposed Assumption: It's only a matter of time until the development of supercomputers will be completed.
A. Assumption Made B. Assumption Not Made
Answer: Assumption not made.
The forecast does not relate to more than a hypothetical scenario (the completion of supercomputers development). It is neither certain that such a scenario will occur, nor that it is only a matter of time until it will. For example, 'we forecast that an alien invasion will force the nations of this world to work together' does not assume an alien invasion is bound to happen at some point.
Recognising Assumptions - In these types of exercises, you must recognize whether an assumption is justifiable or not. The exercises usually consist of a statement followed by an assumption about it. Your job is to identify whether this assumption is supported by the statement. Check out these Recognising Assumptions questions . Other Critical Thinking practice preps include Hogan , Watson Glaser , and RANRA .
7. Wife to husband: Our joint income is lower than it could be. But soon I will begin to work at an additional part-time job, and I will earn extra income. Proposed Assumption: The couple's expenses have increased significantly lately.
Answer: Assumption is not made.
There may be many reasons for the wife's wish to increase her household's incomes.
8. A career at DX Electronics is the best choice—it is the most stable workplace.
Proposed Assumption:
Most of DX Electronics' employees are satisfied with their current company management.
The above text does not relate to employee satisfaction in any way. It might make sense that a workplace’s employees must be satisfied for it to be stable, but one does not have to make this assumption to make this statement.
9. Ethics committee member: 'This person was the proctor at the exam during which the two students were caught allegedly cheating. Yet she claims to recognize the student who was giving the answers but not the student who was getting the answers. Therefore, the proctor's testimony should be excluded.' Proposed Assumption: If a proctor claims to recognize both parties involved in cheating, then the proctor's testimony should be included.
Answer: Assumption not made. The passage gives a reason to disqualify a proctor’s testimony, but it does not say the absence of that reason should automatically qualify the testimony. For example: If you are not an American citizen, you cannot run for president. However, if you are an American citizen, it does not necessarily mean you can run for president. There are other conditions, such as your age and the amount of time you have been an American resident.
10. About 330 marketing professionals attended this year’s Media Innovations Forum. This indicates that social media engagement is a substantial feature of brand marketing plans. Proposed Assumption: The extent of attendance in professional media forums is not negligible.
Answer: The assumption is made. Premise 1: Spotting attendance in professional forums allows one to recognise a trend or behaviour in a certain industry. Premise 2: The Media Innovations Forum is important enough to indicate trends in the marketing industry. Conclusion: Social media engagement is a substantial feature of brand marketing plans In other words: According to the above, attendance in professional forums must be significant, or else how can one use it to justify or recognise a noticeable trend in the marketing world? Remember, you are not asked to judge whether the assumption is justified, only whether the speaker had made it.
When dealing with an inference question , you must draw conclusions from observed or assumed facts. You are presented with a short text containing a set of facts with an inferred statement. On the basis of what you've read, you need to make an assessment of this statement's validity.
11. You are nervous if you are stuck in traffic. Everyone stuck in traffic is anxious.
If you are stuck in traffic, you are both anxious and nervous.
A. Conclusion follows B. Conclusion does not follows
Answer: Conclusion follows.
Stuck in traffic = A, nervous = B, anxious = C. According to the premises, if A -> B, and every A -> C, which also means A -> B + C.
The conclusion states A -> B + C.
The conclusion is the combination of the two premises; therefore, it follows.
12. In a certain recycling company that generously rewarded workers for each new client they brought in, it was found that 15 percent of the workers brought in three or more new clients last year. Among workers who had bribed clients to get their business, 25 percent brought in three or more new clients last year.
The workers that had not used bribes earned more money than the ones who did, because the bribers also lost money in the process of bringing in clients.
Answer: Conclusion does not follow. Though it makes sense, that conclusion does not follow beyond a reasonable doubt. Altogether, the workers who had used bribes may have brought more clients than those who had not, so their reward was greater even after subtracting the cost of the bribes. In addition, neither the reward nor the bribe discussed are necessarily cash-related incentives. One might bribe someone by offering free tickets to the theatre owned by his family, or give away something that is not material in nature.
13. When I go to work in the morning, I usually leave my house at 7:00 am and take the bus into the city. On rare occasions, however, I stay overnight at my aunt’s house and take the underground to work.
My workplace is in the city.
Answer: Conclusion does not follow. Although it is stated that the narrator takes the bus into the city when he goes to work, we cannot deduce, beyond a reasonable doubt, that his workplace is actually in the city. The city could just be a stop on the way to the workplace.
14. Studies conducted over the last 60 years show adult obesity and the direct medical cost thereof have increased steadily worldwide. The last decade has the highest rates of both these trends.
Adult obesity and the direct medical cost thereof have increased because fast food has become more prevalent worldwide.
Answer: Conclusion does not follow. From our general knowledge, one may infer that this statement is correct. However, it does not follow from the passage since the passage contains no indication whatsoever concerning fast food. Although fast food could be a good reason for the above-mentioned problems, there may be other reasons as well, so the conclusion does not follow.
Deduction - In this section, you must evaluate information and decide whether the conclusions drawn are justified. Based on the information you have read, a statement of facts is presented followed by a conclusion. Analyse whether the conclusions follow or contradict the statement. Improve your skills with more Deduction questions or purchase the full Watson Glaser preparation . Other Critical Thinking practice preps include Hogan , Watson Glaser , and RANRA .
15. I have a nine-month-old baby at home, and she usually agrees to be put to bed, where she falls asleep promptly. But every time her grandparents visit in the evening, she cries when I put her to bed, and she continues to cry for an hour.
My baby reacts to some changes in routine by refusing to go to sleep quietly.
Answer: Conclusion does not follow. This is a generalization which the passage does not imply. It may be the case, but there could also be many other reasons why the baby will not fall asleep easily. For example, whenever the grandparents visit, the house is noisier, so the baby cannot sleep. It is not possible to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt what the reason for the baby’s problem is.
Interpretation - Here, you evaluate the strength of different arguments in support of a particular topic. Presented to you is a short paragraph, which should be taken as fact. There is a suggested conclusion following this paragraph, which must be verified beyond a reasonable doubt. There are two options: Conclusion follows, and conclusion does not follow. Challenge yourself with more Watson Glaser Interpretation questions . Other Critical Thinking practice preps include Hogan , Watson Glaser , and RANRA .
16. Should the US government welfare program exchange the current system of food stamps, which act like cash, for a list of approved foods?
Argument: No. While fraudulent schemes using food stamps are well known and can therefore be prevented, the fraudulent schemes that undoubtedly will be used with a list of approved foods are unknown and therefore cannot be prevented.
A. Strong argument B. Weak argument
Answer: Strong argument. This argument is both important and related to the issue. If fraudulent schemes related to food stamps are currently being successfully prevented, it would not promote the general welfare of the people to change the system to one with unknown dangerous of fraud.
17. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation?
Argument: No. Labour laws such as this one that protect employers discourage employees, making them less efficient in the workplace.
Answer: Strong argument. If you consider this argument as true, as you are required to, then this argument is strong. It is relevant to the question of whether there should be a law forcing employees to give two months’ notice before they can resign, and it is important, stating that such laws would only render employees less motivated and productive. Therefore, the argument is strong.
18. When grading tests, should teachers consider that some of their students have native-born parents and other students have immigrant parents?
Argument: No. Although some teachers may be sympathetic to students from immigrant families with financial difficulties, their grading should reflect the students’ work and abilities, regardless of ethnic or financial background.
Answer: Strong argument. Whether you agree with this argument or not, you must regard it as true. As such, it is strong. It both relates to the question directly, and raises an important claim, that grades should reflect someone’s merits, and not take into account factors such as ethnicity or socioeconomic background.
19. Should the government close ageing and polluting power stations even if the result is more energy imports?
Argument: No; importing is highly expensive, and the world-wide financial crisis has had a major impact on the government's ability to pay for such expensive schemes.
Answer: Strong argument. Like the argument in the previous question, the argument addresses one of the main issues presented in the statement—importing energy. More specifically, it addresses the reduced financial ability of the government to execute energy imports due to a world crisis. Therefore, it offers a reliable reason as to why it is probably not desirable to close local power plants.
20. Should the government allow rehabilitated convicted criminals the right to expunge their criminal record after a waiting period of five years?
Argument: Yes; expunging criminal records reduces social stigma and helps rehabilitated criminals assimilate better in society.
Answer: Strong argument. This argument is both directly related to the question and is important. It gives a substantiated reason for why expunging criminal records would have a positive effect. Therefore, it is a strong argument.
In the Critical Thinking Watson Glaser PrepPack , you will find the largest selection of practice tests, study guides and tutorials. We offer straightforward expert explanations as well as predictive score reports that show your skill level and progress. With our materials, you will be able to significantly boost your potential within a short period of time, thereby improving your chances of being hired.
Answer Index
Continue Practicing for the Critical Thinking Exam
Access more Critical Thinking Test practice tests and other valuable critical thinking test prep materials so that you take the test while being as prepared as possible:
- The Watson Glaser Practice Course - 2 full-length Watson Glaser practice test simulations and 23 extra practice drills to sharpen your abilities.
- The Complete Clifford Chance Assessment Preparation - Prepare with 3 RANRA-style practice tests, 2 Watson Glaser-style full practice assessments and 300 practice questions and drills.
- Linklaters Watson Glaser Test - 1 Diagnostic Test, 6 Full-length Watson Glaser Simulations, 23 Specialized Practice Tests for All Five Watson Glaser Sections.
- Hogan Lovells Watson Glaser Assessment - Full-Length Watson Glaser Simulations, Inference Drills, Deduction Drills, Arguments Drills, Interpretation Drills, Assumptions Drills.
- Combination of RANRA Watson Glaser Tests - 3 RANRA-style, 29 Watson Glaser-style, and 12 Numerical Exercises practice tests.
Since 1992, JobTestPrep has stood for true-to-original online test and assessment centre preparation. Our decades of experience make us a leading international provider of test training. Over one million customers have already used our products to prepare professionally for their recruitment tests.
- Arabic Site
- United States
- TestPrep-Online
- Terms & Conditions
- Refund Policy
- Affiliate Programme
- Higher Education
- Student Beans
This is a free sample version of our critical thinking tests.
- Upgrade to see more
What Is the Watson Glaser Test?
Who uses the watson glaser test and why, why is it so important to be a critical thinker, what is the watson glaser red model, how to pass a watson glaser test in 2024, how to prepare for a watson glaser critical appraisal in 2024, frequently asked questions, the watson glaser critical thinking appraisal.
Updated May 10, 2024
Modern employers have changed the way that they recruit new candidates. They are no longer looking for people who have the technical skills on paper that match the job description.
Instead, they are looking for candidates who can demonstrably prove that they have a wider range of transferrable skills.
One of those key skills is the ability to think critically .
Firms (particularly those in sectors such as law, finance, HR and marketing ) need to know that their employees can look beyond the surface of the information presented to them.
They want confidence that their staff members can understand, analyze and evaluate situations or work-related tasks. There is more on the importance of critical thinking later in this article.
This is where the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking test comes into play.
The Watson Glaser critical thinking test is a unique assessment that provides a detailed analysis of a participant’s ability to think critically.
The test lasts 30 minutes and applicants can expect to be tested on around 40 questions in five distinct areas :
Assumptions
Interpretation.
The questions are multiple-choice and may be phrased as true/false statements in a bid to see how well the participant has understood and interpreted the information provided.
Employers around the world use it during recruitment campaigns to help hiring managers effectively filter their prospective candidates .
The Watson Glaser test has been used for more than 85 years; employers trust the insights that the test can provide.
In today’s competitive jobs market where every candidate has brought the best of themselves, it can be increasingly difficult for employers to decide between applicants.
On paper, two candidates may appear identical, with a similar level of education, work experience, and even interests and skills.
But that does not necessarily mean both or either of them is right for the job.
There is much information available on creating an effective cover letter and resume, not to mention advice on making a good impression during an interview.
As a result, employers are increasingly turning to psychometric testing to look beyond the information that they have.
They want to find the right fit: someone who has the skills that they need now and in the future. And with recruitment costs rising each year, making the wrong hiring decision can be catastrophic.
This is where the Watson Glaser test can help.
It can provide hiring managers with the additional support and guidance they need to help them make an informed decision.
The Watson Glaser test is popular among firms working in professional services (such as law, banking and insurance) . It is used for recruitment for junior and senior positions and some of the world’s most recognized establishments are known for their use of the test.
The Bank of England, Deloitte, Hiscox, Linklaters and Hogan Lovells are just a few employers who enhance their recruitment processes through Watson Glaser testing.
Critical thinking is all about logic and rational thought. Finding out someone’s critical thinking skill level is about knowing whether they can assess whether they are being told the truth and how they can use inferences and assumptions to aid their decision-making.
If you are working in a high-pressure environment, having an instinctive ability to look beyond the information provided to the underlying patterns of cause-and-effect can be crucial to do your job well.
Although it is often thought of concerning law firms and finance teams, it is easy to see how critical thinking skills could be applied to a wide range of professions.
For example, HR professionals dealing with internal disputes may need to think critically. Or social workers and other health professionals may need to use critical thinking to assess whether someone is vulnerable and in need of help and support when that person does not or cannot say openly.
Practice Watson Glaser Test with TestHQ
Critical thinking is about questioning what you already know . It is about understanding how to find the facts and the truth about a situation or argument without being influenced by other people’s opinions .
It is also about looking at the bigger picture and seeing how decisions made now may have short-term benefits but long-term consequences.
For those working in senior managerial roles, this ability to think objectively can make a big difference to business success.
As part of the critical thinking assessment, the Watson Glaser Test focuses on the acronym, 'RED':
- R ecognize assumptions
- E valuate arguments
- D raw conclusions
Put simply, the RED model ensures you can understand how to move beyond subconscious bias in your thinking. It ensures that you can identify the truth and understand the differences between fact and opinion.
To recognize assumptions , you must understand yourself and others: what your thought patterns and past experiences have led you to conclude about the world.
Evaluating arguments requires you to genuinely consider the merits of all options in a situation, and not just choose the one you feel that you ‘ought’ to.
Finally, to draw an accurate and beneficial conclusion you must trust your decision-making and understanding of the situation.
Watson Glaser Practice Test Questions & Answers
As mentioned earlier, the Watson Glaser Test assesses five core elements. Here, they will be examined in more depth:
This part of the test is about your ability to draw conclusions based on facts . These facts may be directly provided or may be assumptions that you have previously made.
Within the assessment, you can expect to be provided with a selection of text. Along with the text will be a statement.
You may need to decide whether that statement is true, probably true, insufficient data (neither true nor false), probably false or false.
The test looks to see if your answer was based on a conclusion that could be inferred from the text provided or if it is based on an assumption you previously made.
Take a Watson Glaser Practice Test
Example Statement:
500 students recently attended a voluntary conference in New York. During the conference, two of the main topics discussed were issues relating to diversity and climate change. This is because these are the two issues that the students selected that are important to them.
Many people make decisions based on assumptions. But you need to be able to identify when assumptions are being made.
Within the Watson Glaser test , you will be provided with a written statement as well as an assumption.
You will be asked to declare whether that assumption was made in the text provided or not .
This is an important part of the test; it allows employers to understand if you have any expectations about whether things are true or not . For roles in law or finance, this is a vital skill.
We need to save money, so we’ll visit the local shops in the nearest town rather than the local supermarket
As a core part of critical thinking, 'deduction' is the ability to use logic and reasoning to come to an informed decision .
You will be presented with several facts, along with a variety of conclusions. You will be tasked with confirming whether those conclusions can be made from the information provided in that statement.
The answers are commonly in a ‘Yes, it follows/No, it does not follow’ form.
It is sometimes sunny on Wednesdays. All sunny days are fun. Therefore…
If you need to prepare for a number of different employment tests and want to outsmart the competition, choose a Premium Membership from TestHQ . You will get access to three PrepPacks of your choice, from a database that covers all the major test providers and employers and tailored profession packs.
Get a Premium Package Now
Critical thinking is also about interpreting the information correctly. It is about using the information provided to come to a valuable, informed decision .
Like the deduction questions, you will be provided with a written statement, which you must assume to be true.
You will also be provided with a suggested interpretation of that written statement. You must decide if that interpretation is correct based on the information provided, using a yes/no format.
A study of toddlers shows that their speech can change significantly between the ages of 10 months and three years old. At 1 year old, a child may learn their first word whereas at three years old they may know 200 words
Evaluation of Arguments
This final part requires you to identify whether an argument is strong or weak . You will be presented with a written statement and several arguments that can be used for or against it. You need to identify which is the strongest argument and which is the weakest based on the information provided.
Should all 18-year-olds go to college to study for a degree after they have graduated from high school?
There are no confirmed pass/fail scores for Watson Glaser tests; different sectors have different interpretations of what is a good score .
Law firms, for example, will require a pass mark of at least 75–80% because the ability to think critically is an essential aspect of working as a lawyer.
As a comparative test, you need to consider what the comparative ‘norm’ is for your chosen profession. Your score will be compared to other candidates taking the test and you need to score better than them.
It is important to try and score as highly as you possibly can. Your Watson Glaser test score can set you apart from other candidates; you need to impress the recruiters as much as possible.
Your best chance of achieving a high score is to practice as much as possible in advance.
Everyone will have their own preferred study methods, and what works for one person may not necessarily work for another.
However, there are some basic techniques everyone can use, which will enhance your study preparation ahead of the test:
Step 1 . Pay Attention to Online Practice Tests
There are numerous free online training aids available; these can be beneficial as a starting point to your preparation.
However, it should be noted that they are often not as detailed as the actual exam questions.
When researching for online test questions, make sure that any questions are specific to the Watson Glaser Test , not just critical thinking.
General critical thinking questions can help you improve your skills but will not familiarize you with this test. Therefore, make sure you practice any questions which follow the ‘rules’ and structure of a Watson Glaser Test .
Step 2 . Paid-for Preparation Packs Can Be Effective
If you are looking for something that mimics the complexity of a Watson Glaser test , you may wish to look at investing in a preparation pack.
There are plenty of options available from sites such as TestHQ . These are often far more comprehensive than free practice tests.
They may also include specific drills (which take you through each of the five stages of the test) as well as study guides, practice tests and suggestions of how to improve your score.
Psychologically, if you have purchased a preparation pack, you may be more inclined to increase your pre-test practice/study when compared to using free tools, due to having invested money.
Step 3 . Apply Critical Thinking to All Aspects of Your Daily Routine
The best way to improve your critical thinking score is to practice it every day.
It is not just about using your skills to pass an exam question; it is about being able to think critically in everyday scenarios.
Therefore, when you are reading the news or online articles, try to think whether you are being given facts or you are making deductions and assumptions from the information provided.
The more you practice your critical thinking in these scenarios, the more it will become second nature to you.
You could revert to the RED model: recognize the assumptions being made, by you and the author; evaluate the arguments and decide which, if any, are strong; and draw conclusions from the information provided and perhaps see if they differ from conclusions drawn using your external knowledge.
Prepare for Watson Glaser Test with TestHQ
Nine Top Tips for Ensuring Success in Your Watson Glaser Test
If you are getting ready to participate in a Watson Glaser test, you must be clear about what you are being asked to do.
Here are a few tips that can help you to improve your Watson Glaser test score.
1. Practice, Practice, Practice
Critical thinking is a skill that should become second nature to you. You should practice as much as possible, not just so that you can pass the test, but also to feel confident in using your skills in reality.
2. The Best Success Is Based on the Long-Term Study
To succeed in your Watson Glaser test , you need to spend time preparing.
Those who begin studying in the weeks and months beforehand will be far more successful than those who leave their study to the last minute.
3. Acquaint Yourself With the Test Format
The Watson Glaser test has a different type of question to other critical thinking tests.
Make sure that you are aware of what to expect from the test questions. The last thing you want is to be surprised on test day.
4. Read the Instructions Carefully
This is one of the simplest but most effective tips. Your critical thinking skills start with understanding what you are being asked to do. Take your time over the question.
Although you may only have 30 minutes to complete the test, it is still important that you do not rush through and submit the wrong answers. You do not get a higher score if you finish early, so use your time wisely.
5. Only Use the Information Provided in the Question
Remember, the purpose of the test is to see if you can come to a decision based on the provided written statement.
This means that you must ignore anything that you think you already know and focus only on the information given in the question.
6. Widen Your Non-Fictional Reading
Reading a variety of journals, newspapers and reports, and watching examples of debates and arguments will help you to improve your skills.
You will start to understand how the same basic facts can be presented in different ways and cause people to draw different conclusions.
From there, you can start to enhance your critical thinking skills to go beyond the perspective provided in any given situation.
7. Be Self-Aware
We all have our own biases and prejudices whether we know them or not. It is important to think about how your own opinions and life experiences may impact how you perceive and understand situations.
For example, someone who has grown up with a lot of money may have a different interpretation of what it is like to go without, compared to someone who has grown up in extreme poverty.
It is important to have this self-awareness as it is important for understanding other people; this is useful if you are working in sectors such as law.
8. Read the Explanations During Your Preparation
To make the most of practice tests, make sure you read the analysis explaining the answers, regardless of if you got the question right or wrong.
This is the crux of your study; it will explain the reasoning why a certain answer is correct, and this will help you understand how to choose the correct answers.
9. Practice Your Timings
You know that you will have five sections to complete in the test. You also know that you have 30 minutes to complete the test.
Therefore, make sure that your timings are in sync within your practice, so you can work your way through the test in its entirety.
Time yourself on how long each section takes you and put in extra work on your slowest.
What score do you need to pass the Watson Glaser test?
There is no standard benchmark score to pass the Watson Glaser test . Each business sector has its own perception of what constitutes a good score and every employer will set its own requirements.
It is wise to aim for a Watson Glaser test score of at least 75%. To score 75% or higher, you will need to correctly answer at least 30 of the 40 questions.
The employing organization will use your test results to compare your performance with other candidates within the selection pool. The higher you score in the Watson Glaser test , the better your chances of being hired.
Can you fail a Watson Glaser test?
It is not possible to fail a Watson Glaser test . However, your score may not be high enough to meet the benchmark set by the employing organization.
By aiming for a score of at least 75%, you stand a good chance of progressing to the next stage of the recruitment process.
Are Watson Glaser tests hard?
Many candidates find the Watson Glaser test hard. The test is designed to assess five different aspects of logical reasoning skills. Candidates must work under pressure, which adds another dimension of difficulty.
By practicing your critical thinking skills, you can improve your chances of achieving a high score on the Watson Glaser test .
How do I prepare for Watson Glaser?
To prepare for Watson Glaser , you will need to practice your critical thinking abilities. This can be achieved through a range of activities; for example, reading a variety of newspapers, journals and other literature.
Try applying the RED model to your reading – recognize the assumptions being made (both by you and the writer), evaluate the arguments and decide which of these (if any) are strong.
You should also practice drawing conclusions from the information available to you.
Online Watson Glaser practice assessments are a useful way to prepare for Watson Glaser. These practice tests will give you an idea of what to expect on the day, although the questions are not usually as detailed as those in the actual test.
You might also consider using a paid-for Watson Glaser preparation pack, such as the one available from TestHQ . Preparation packs provide a comprehensive test guide, including practice tests and recommendations on how to improve your test score.
How long does the Watson Glaser test take?
Candidates are allowed 30 minutes to complete the Watson Glaser test . The multiple-choice test questions are grouped into five distinct areas – assumptions, deduction, evaluation, inference and interpretation.
Which firms use the Watson Glaser test?
Companies all over the world use the Watson Glaser test as part of their recruitment campaigns.
It is a popular choice for professional service firms, including banking, law, and insurance. Firms using the Watson Glaser test include the Bank of England, Hiscox, Deloitte and Clifford Chance.
How many times can you take the Watson Glaser test?
Most employers will only allow you to take the Watson Glaser test once per application. However, you may take the Watson Glaser test more than once throughout your career.
What is the next step after passing the Watson Glaser test?
The next step after passing the Watson Glaser test will vary between employers. Some firms will ask you to attend a face-to-face interview after passing the Watson Glaser test, others will ask you to attend an assessment center. Speak to the hiring manager to find out the process for the firm you are applying for.
Start preparing in advance for the Watson Glaser test
The Watson Glaser test differs from other critical thinking tests. It has its own rules and formations, and the exam is incredibly competitive. If you are asked to participate in a Watson Glaser test it is because your prospective employer is looking for the ‘best of the best’. Your aim is not to simply pass the test; it is to achieve a higher score than anyone else taking that test .
Therefore, taking the time to prepare for the Watson Glaser test is vital for your chances of success. You need to be confident that you know what you are being asked to do, and that you can use your critical thinking skills to make informed decisions.
Your study is about more than helping you to pass a test; it is about providing you with the skills and capability to think critically about information in the ‘real world’ .
You might also be interested in these other Psychometric Success articles:
Or explore the Aptitude Tests / Test Types sections.
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Working with sources
- What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples
What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples
Published on May 30, 2022 by Eoghan Ryan . Revised on May 31, 2023.
Critical thinking is the ability to effectively analyze information and form a judgment .
To think critically, you must be aware of your own biases and assumptions when encountering information, and apply consistent standards when evaluating sources .
Critical thinking skills help you to:
- Identify credible sources
- Evaluate and respond to arguments
- Assess alternative viewpoints
- Test hypotheses against relevant criteria
Table of contents
Why is critical thinking important, critical thinking examples, how to think critically, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about critical thinking.
Critical thinking is important for making judgments about sources of information and forming your own arguments. It emphasizes a rational, objective, and self-aware approach that can help you to identify credible sources and strengthen your conclusions.
Critical thinking is important in all disciplines and throughout all stages of the research process . The types of evidence used in the sciences and in the humanities may differ, but critical thinking skills are relevant to both.
In academic writing , critical thinking can help you to determine whether a source:
- Is free from research bias
- Provides evidence to support its research findings
- Considers alternative viewpoints
Outside of academia, critical thinking goes hand in hand with information literacy to help you form opinions rationally and engage independently and critically with popular media.
Don't submit your assignments before you do this
The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.
Try for free
Critical thinking can help you to identify reliable sources of information that you can cite in your research paper . It can also guide your own research methods and inform your own arguments.
Outside of academia, critical thinking can help you to be aware of both your own and others’ biases and assumptions.
Academic examples
However, when you compare the findings of the study with other current research, you determine that the results seem improbable. You analyze the paper again, consulting the sources it cites.
You notice that the research was funded by the pharmaceutical company that created the treatment. Because of this, you view its results skeptically and determine that more independent research is necessary to confirm or refute them. Example: Poor critical thinking in an academic context You’re researching a paper on the impact wireless technology has had on developing countries that previously did not have large-scale communications infrastructure. You read an article that seems to confirm your hypothesis: the impact is mainly positive. Rather than evaluating the research methodology, you accept the findings uncritically.
Nonacademic examples
However, you decide to compare this review article with consumer reviews on a different site. You find that these reviews are not as positive. Some customers have had problems installing the alarm, and some have noted that it activates for no apparent reason.
You revisit the original review article. You notice that the words “sponsored content” appear in small print under the article title. Based on this, you conclude that the review is advertising and is therefore not an unbiased source. Example: Poor critical thinking in a nonacademic context You support a candidate in an upcoming election. You visit an online news site affiliated with their political party and read an article that criticizes their opponent. The article claims that the opponent is inexperienced in politics. You accept this without evidence, because it fits your preconceptions about the opponent.
There is no single way to think critically. How you engage with information will depend on the type of source you’re using and the information you need.
However, you can engage with sources in a systematic and critical way by asking certain questions when you encounter information. Like the CRAAP test , these questions focus on the currency , relevance , authority , accuracy , and purpose of a source of information.
When encountering information, ask:
- Who is the author? Are they an expert in their field?
- What do they say? Is their argument clear? Can you summarize it?
- When did they say this? Is the source current?
- Where is the information published? Is it an academic article? Is it peer-reviewed ?
- Why did the author publish it? What is their motivation?
- How do they make their argument? Is it backed up by evidence? Does it rely on opinion, speculation, or appeals to emotion ? Do they address alternative arguments?
Critical thinking also involves being aware of your own biases, not only those of others. When you make an argument or draw your own conclusions, you can ask similar questions about your own writing:
- Am I only considering evidence that supports my preconceptions?
- Is my argument expressed clearly and backed up with credible sources?
- Would I be convinced by this argument coming from someone else?
If you want to know more about ChatGPT, AI tools , citation , and plagiarism , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- ChatGPT vs human editor
- ChatGPT citations
- Is ChatGPT trustworthy?
- Using ChatGPT for your studies
- What is ChatGPT?
- Chicago style
- Paraphrasing
Plagiarism
- Types of plagiarism
- Self-plagiarism
- Avoiding plagiarism
- Academic integrity
- Consequences of plagiarism
- Common knowledge
Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.
Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.
Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.
Critical thinking skills include the ability to:
You can assess information and arguments critically by asking certain questions about the source. You can use the CRAAP test , focusing on the currency , relevance , authority , accuracy , and purpose of a source of information.
Ask questions such as:
- Who is the author? Are they an expert?
- How do they make their argument? Is it backed up by evidence?
A credible source should pass the CRAAP test and follow these guidelines:
- The information should be up to date and current.
- The author and publication should be a trusted authority on the subject you are researching.
- The sources the author cited should be easy to find, clear, and unbiased.
- For a web source, the URL and layout should signify that it is trustworthy.
Information literacy refers to a broad range of skills, including the ability to find, evaluate, and use sources of information effectively.
Being information literate means that you:
- Know how to find credible sources
- Use relevant sources to inform your research
- Understand what constitutes plagiarism
- Know how to cite your sources correctly
Confirmation bias is the tendency to search, interpret, and recall information in a way that aligns with our pre-existing values, opinions, or beliefs. It refers to the ability to recollect information best when it amplifies what we already believe. Relatedly, we tend to forget information that contradicts our opinions.
Although selective recall is a component of confirmation bias, it should not be confused with recall bias.
On the other hand, recall bias refers to the differences in the ability between study participants to recall past events when self-reporting is used. This difference in accuracy or completeness of recollection is not related to beliefs or opinions. Rather, recall bias relates to other factors, such as the length of the recall period, age, and the characteristics of the disease under investigation.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Ryan, E. (2023, May 31). What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 27, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/critical-thinking/
Is this article helpful?
Eoghan Ryan
Other students also liked, student guide: information literacy | meaning & examples, what are credible sources & how to spot them | examples, applying the craap test & evaluating sources, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
Introduction
- Call for Volunteers!
- Our Team of Presenters
- Fellows of the Foundation
- Dr. Richard Paul
- Dr. Linda Elder
- Dr. Gerald Nosich
- Contact Us - Office Information
- Permission to Use Our Work
- Create a CriticalThinking.Org Account
- Contributions to the Foundation for Critical Thinking
- Testimonials
- Center for Critical Thinking
- The National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking
- International Center for the Assessment of Higher Order Thinking
- Library of Critical Thinking Resources
- Professional Development
- Inservice Information Request Form
- Certification Online Course
- The State of Critical Thinking Today
- Higher Education
- K-12 Instruction
- Customized Webinars and Online Courses for Faculty
- Business & Professional Groups
- The Center for Critical Thinking Community Online
- Certification in the Paul-Elder Approach to Critical Thinking
- Professional Development Model - College and University
- Professional Development Model for K-12
- Workshop Descriptions
- Online Courses in Critical Thinking
- Critical Thinking Training for Law Enforcement
- Consulting for Leaders and Key Personnel at Your Organization
- Critical Thinking Therapy
- Conferences & Events
- Upcoming Learning Opportunities
- 2024 Fall Academy on Critical Thinking
- Daily Schedule
- Transportation, Lodging, and Social Functions
- Critical Thinking Therapy Release & Book Signing
- Academy Presuppositions
- Save the Date: 45th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Presuppositions of the Conference
- Call for Proposals
- Conference Archives
- 44th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Focal Session Descriptions
- Guest Presentation Program
- Presuppositions of the 44th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Recommended Reading
- 43rd Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Register as an Ambassador
- Testimonials from Past Attendees
- Thank You to Our Donors
- 42nd Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Overview of Sessions (Flyer)
- Presuppositions of the Annual International Conference
- Testimonials from Past Conferences
- 41st Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Recommended Publications
- Dedication to Our Donors
- 40th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Session Descriptions
- Testimonials from Prior Conferences
- International Critical Thinking Manifesto
- Scholarships Available
- 39th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Travel and Lodging Info
- FAQ & General Announcements
- Focal and Plenary Session Descriptions
- Program and Proceedings of the 39th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- The Venue: KU Leuven
- Call for Critical Thinking Ambassadors
- Conference Background Information
- 38th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Call for Ambassadors for Critical Thinking
- Conference Focal Session Descriptions
- Conference Concurrent Session Descriptions
- Conference Roundtable Discussions
- Conference Announcements and FAQ
- Conference Program and Proceedings
- Conference Daily Schedule
- Conference Hotel Information
- Conference Academic Credit
- Conference Presuppositions
- What Participants Have Said About the Conference
- 37th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking
- Registration & Fees
- FAQ and Announcements
- Conference Presenters
- 37th Conference Flyer
- Program and Proceedings of the 37th Conference
- 36th International Conference
- Conference Sessions
- Conference Flyer
- Program and Proceedings
- Academic Credit
- 35th International Conference
- Conference Session Descriptions
- Available Online Sessions
- Bertrand Russell Distinguished Scholar - Daniel Ellsberg
- 35th International Conference Program
- Concurrent Sessions
- Posthumous Bertrand Russell Scholar
- Hotel Information
- Conference FAQs
- Visiting UC Berkeley
- 34th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
- Bertrand Russell Distinguished Scholar - Ralph Nader
- Conference Concurrent Presenters
- Conference Program
- Conference Theme
- Roundtable Discussions
- Flyer for Bulletin Boards
- 33rd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
- 33rd International Conference Program
- 33rd International Conference Sessions
- 33rd International Conference Presenters
- The Bertrand Russell Distinguished Scholars Critical Thinking Conversations
- 33rd International Conference - Fees & Registration
- 33rd International Conference Concurrent Presenters
- 33rd International Conference - Hotel Information
- 33rd International Conference Flyer
- 32nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
- 32nd Annual Conference Sessions
- 32nd Annual Conference Presenter Information
- 32nd Conference Program
- The Bertrand Russell Distinguished Scholars Critical Thinking Lecture Series
- 32nd Annual Conference Concurrent Presenters
- 32nd Annual Conference Academic Credit
- 31st INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
- 31st Conference Sessions
- Comments about previous conferences
- Conference Hotel (2011)
- 31st Concurrent Presenters
- Registration Fees
- 31st International Conference
- 30th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CRITICAL THINKING
- 30th International Conference Theme
- 30th Conference Sessions
- PreConference Sessions
- 30th Concurrent Presenters
- 30th Conference Presuppositions
- Hilton Garden Inn
- 29th International Conference
- 29th Conference Theme
- 29th Conference Sessions
- 29th Preconference Sessions
- 29th Conference Concurrent Sessions
- 2008 International Conference on Critical Thinking
- 2008 Preconference Sessions (28th Intl. Conference)
- 2007 Conference on Critical Thinking (Main Page)
- 2007 Conference Theme and sessions
- 2007 Pre-Conference Workshops
- 2006 Annual International Conference (archived)
- 2006 International Conference Theme
- 2005 International Conference (archived)
- Prior Conference Programs (Pre 2000)
- Workshop Archives
- Spring 2022 Online Workshops
- 2021 Online Workshops for Winter & Spring
- 2019 Seminar for Military and Intelligence Trainers and Instructors
- Transportation, Lodging, and Recreation
- Seminar Flyer
- 2013 Spring Workshops
- Our Presenters
- 2013 Spring Workshops - Hotel Information
- 2013 Spring Workshops Flyer
- 2013 Spring Workshops - Schedule
- Spring Workshop 2012
- 2012 Spring Workshop Strands
- 2012 Spring Workshop Flier
- 2011 Spring Workshop
- Spring 2010 Workshop Strands
- 2009 Spring Workshops on Critical Thinking
- 2008 SPRING Workshops and Seminars on Critical Thinking
- 2008 Ethical Reasoning Workshop
- 2008 - On Richard Paul's Teaching Design
- 2008 Engineering Reasoning Workshop
- 2008 Academia sobre Formulando Preguntas Esenciales
- Fellows Academy Archives
- 2017 Fall International Fellows Academy
- 4th International Fellows Academy - 2016
- 3rd International Fellows Academy
- 2nd International Fellows Academy
- 1st International Fellows Academy
- Academy Archives
- October 2019 Critical Thinking Academy for Educators and Administrators
- Transportation, Lodging, and Leisure
- Advanced Seminar: Oxford Tutorial
- Recreational Group Activities
- Limited Scholarships Available
- September 2019 Critical Thinking Educators and Administrators Academy
- 2019 Critical Thinking Training for Trainers and Advanced Academy
- Academy Flyer
- Seattle, WA 2017 Spring Academy
- San Diego, CA 2017 Spring Academy
- 2016 Spring Academy -- Washington D.C.
- 2016 Spring Academy -- Houston, TX
- The 2nd International Academy on Critical Thinking (Oxford 2008)
- 2007 National Academy on Critical Thinking Testing and Assessment
- 2006 Cambridge Academy (archived)
- 2006 Cambridge Academy Theme
- 2006 Cambridge Academy Sessions
- Accommodations at St. John's College
- Assessment & Testing
- A Model for the National Assessment of Higher Order Thinking
- International Critical Thinking Essay Test
- Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Test
- Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Sample Test
- Consequential Validity: Using Assessment to Drive Instruction
- News & Announcements
- Newest Pages Added to CriticalThinking.Org
- Online Learning
- Critical Thinking Online Courses
- Critical Thinking Blog
- 2019 Blog Entries
- 2020 Blog Entries
- 2021 Blog Entries
- 2022 Blog Entries
- 2023 Blog Entries
- Online Courses for Your Students
- 2023 Webinar Archives
- 2022 Webinar Archives
- 2021 Webinar Archive
- 2020 Webinar Archive
- Guided Study Groups
- Critical Thinking Channel on YouTube
- CT800: Fall 2024
Translate this page from English...
*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy. Click Here for our professional translations.
Critical Thinking: Where to Begin
- For College and University Faculty
- For College and University Students
- For High School Teachers
- For Jr. High School Teachers
- For Elementary Teachers (Grades 4-6)
- For Elementary Teachers (Kindergarten - 3rd Grade)
- For Science and Engineering Instruction
- For Business and Professional Development
- For Nursing and Health Care
- For Home Schooling and Home Study
If you are new to critical thinking or wish to deepen your conception of it, we recommend you review the content below and bookmark this page for future reference.
Our Conception of Critical Thinking...
"Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness..."
"Critical thinking is self-guided, self-disciplined thinking which attempts to reason at the highest level of quality in a fairminded way. People who think critically attempt, with consistent and conscious effort, to live rationally, reasonably, and empathically. They are keenly aware of the inherently flawed nature of human thinking when left unchecked. They strive to diminish the power of their egocentric and sociocentric tendencies. They use the intellectual tools that critical thinking offers – concepts and principles that enable them to analyze, assess, and improve thinking. They work diligently to develop the intellectual virtues of intellectual integrity, intellectual humility, intellectual civility, intellectual empathy, intellectual sense of justice and confidence in reason. They realize that no matter how skilled they are as thinkers, they can always improve their reasoning abilities and they will at times fall prey to mistakes in reasoning, human irrationality, prejudices, biases, distortions, uncritically accepted social rules and taboos, self-interest, and vested interest.
They strive to improve the world in whatever ways they can and contribute to a more rational, civilized society. At the same time, they recognize the complexities often inherent in doing so. They strive never to think simplistically about complicated issues and always to consider the rights and needs of relevant others. They recognize the complexities in developing as thinkers, and commit themselves to life-long practice toward self-improvement. They embody the Socratic principle: The unexamined life is not worth living , because they realize that many unexamined lives together result in an uncritical, unjust, dangerous world."
Why Critical Thinking?
The Problem:
Everyone thinks; it is our nature to do so. But much of our thinking, left to itself, is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed, or down-right prejudiced. Yet the quality of our lives and that of what we produce, make, or build depends precisely on the quality of our thought. Shoddy thinking is costly, both in money and in quality of life. Excellence in thought, however, must be systematically cultivated.
A Brief Definition:
Critical thinking is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it. The Result:
A well-cultivated critical thinker:
- raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely;
- gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively;
- comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards;
- thinks openmindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and
- communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems.
Critical thinking is, in short, self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking. It requires rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities, and a commitment to overcoming our native egocentrism and sociocentrism. Read more about our concept of critical thinking .
The Essential Dimensions of Critical Thinking
Our conception of critical thinking is based on the substantive approach developed by Dr. Richard Paul and his colleagues at the Center and Foundation for Critical Thinking over multiple decades. It is relevant to every subject, discipline, and profession, and to reasoning through the problems of everyday life. It entails five essential dimensions of critical thinking:
At the left is an overview of the first three dimensions. In sum, the elements or structures of thought enable us to "take our thinking apart" and analyze it. The intellectual standards are used to assess and evaluate the elements. The intellectual traits are dispositions of mind embodied by the fairminded critical thinker. To cultivate the mind, we need command of these essential dimensions, and we need to consistently apply them as we think through the many problems and issues in our lives.
The Elements of Reasoning and Intellectual Standards
To learn more about the elements of thought and how to apply the intellectual standards, check out our interactive model. Simply click on the link below, scroll to the bottom of the page, and explore the model with your mouse.
Why the Analysis of Thinking Is Important If you want to think well, you must understand at least the rudiments of thought, the most basic structures out of which all thinking is made. You must learn how to take thinking apart. Analyzing the Logic of a Subject When we understand the elements of reasoning, we realize that all subjects, all disciplines, have a fundamental logic defined by the structures of thought embedded within them. Therefore, to lay bare a subject’s most fundamental logic, we should begin with these questions:
Going Deeper...
The Critical Thinking Bookstore
Our online bookstore houses numerous books and teacher's manuals , Thinker's Guides , videos , and other educational materials .
Learn From Our Fellows and Scholars
Watch our Event Calendar , which provides an overview of all upcoming conferences and academies hosted by the Foundation for Critical Thinking. Clicking an entry on the Event Calendar will bring up that event's details, and the option to register. For those interested in online learning, the Foundation offers accredited online courses in critical thinking for both educators and the general public, as well as an online test for evaluating basic comprehension of critical thinking concepts . We are in the process of developing more online learning tools and tests to offer the community.
Utilizing this Website
This website contains large amounts research and an online library of articles , both of which are freely available to the public. We also invite you to become a member of the Critical Thinking Community , where you will gain access to more tools and materials. If you cannot locate a resource on a specific topic or concept, try searching for it using our Search Tool . The Search Tool is at the upper-right of every page on the website.
- Numerical Reasoning
- Verbal Reasoning
- Inductive Reasoning
- Diagrammatic Reasoning
- Logical Reasoning
- Mechanical Reasoning
- Situational Judgement
- Deductive reasoning
- Critical thinking
- Spatial reasoning
- Error checking
- Verbal comprehension
- Reading comprehension
- Psychometric tests
- Personality test
- In-Tray exercise
- E-Tray exercise
- Group exercise
- Roleplay exercise
- Presentation exercise
- Analysis exercise
- Case study exercise
- Game based assessments
- Competency based assessment
- Strengths based assessment
- Strengths based interview
- Video interview
- Saville Assessment
- Talent Q / Korn Ferry
- Watson Glaser
- Test Partnership
- Clevry (Criterion)
- Criteria Corp
- Aon / Cut-e
- Sova Assessment
Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Tests
Complex and challenging critical thinking tests, including the Watson-Glaser, are used mostly by law firms.
Page contents:
About critical thinking tests and how they work, free practice critical thinking test, the watson glaser critical thinking appraisal, what is measured by a watson glaser critical thinking test, what should i know before taking a watson glaser critical thinking test, major publishers' critical thinking tests, advice for all critical thinking tests, assessmentday's practice tests can help you to prepare for a critical thinking test, one final point, other test publishers.
Updated: 08 September 2022
Critical thinking tests, or critical reasoning tests, are psychometric tests used in recruitment at all levels, graduate, professional and managerial, but predominantly in the legal sector. However, it is not uncommon to find companies in other sectors using critical thinking tests as part of their selection process. This is an intense test, focusing primarily on your analytical, or critical thinking, skills. Some tests are still conducted by paper and pen, but, just like other psychometric tests, critical thinking tests are mostly administered online at home or on a computer at a testing center.
The questions are multiple choice, and these choices and the style of questions are explained in more detail further down the page. The tests will often follow these two common timings:
- 30 questions with a 40 minute time limit
- 80 questions with a 60 minute time limit
Critical Thinking can be defined in many ways and an exact description is disputed, however, most agree on a broad definition of critical thinking, that 'critical thinking involves rational, purposeful, and goal-directed thinking...by using certain cognitive skills and strategies.' An absence or lack of critical thinking skills at times may lead us to believe things which aren't true, because we haven't sufficiently analysed and criticized the information we've received or used this to formulate and independently test our own theories, arguments and ideas. These are all examples of critical thinking skills put into practice. Glaser (An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking, 1941) stated that to think critically involved three key parts:
- An attitude of being disposed to consider in a thoughtful way the problems and subjects that come within the range of one's experiences
- Knowledge of the methods of logical inquiry and reasoning
- Some skill in applying those methods
Note: AssessmentDay and its products are not affiliated with Pearson or TalentLens. Our practice tests are for candidates to prepare for the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal; we do not sell tests for employers to select candidates.
Free Critical Thinking Test
Here, we have a full critical thinking test for you to practice for free. You can dive straight in and practice the full test (in blue at the bottom), or tackle each individual section one at a time.
All answers and explanations are included at the end of the test, or alternatively you can download the Solutions PDF. Each test has been given a generous time limit.
Critical Thinking Test 1
- 40 questions
Critical Thinking Test 2
Critical thinking test 3, critical thinking test 4.
TalentLens' Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) is the most common critical thinking test. You can visit their official site here: Watson Glaser . Most other critical thinking tests are based on the Watson Glaser format. More than 90 years' of experience have led to many modifications and improvements in the test.
The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is widely regarded as a good predictor of work productivity and at identifying candidates with a good potential to become managers and occupy other positions as a senior member of staff. The latest edition of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test has improved its validity, appealed more to businesses by focusing on business-relevant topics, switched to the Item Response Theory (IRT) for its scoring, updated norm groups, and integrated anti-cheat measures by having an online retest, which can be used to validate results.
Developed by Goodwin Watson and Edward Glaser, the Watson Glaser test is favored by law firms , keen to measure people's abilities to reason, reach conclusions and know when leaps in logic have been made. Skills which are required in the legal sector. The questions in each of the 5 sections aims to evaluate the candidate's ability to:
- 1. Arrive at correct inferences
- 2. Identify when an assumption has been made
- 3. Use deductive reasoning
- 4. Reach logical conclusions
- 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of arguments
Did You Know
The most recent revision of the W-GCTA was published in 2011 with notable improvements being better face validity and business-relevant items, scoring based on Item Response Theory (IRT), updated norm groups, and an online retest which can be used to validate a paper and pencil test result.
A Critical thinking tests assesses your ability in 5 key areas mentioned above; assumptions, arguments, deductions, inferences and interpreting information. Often in this order. A short paragraph of text a few sentences long or a single sentence is used as a starting point. This passage will contain information which you will base your answer to the question on. Another sentence is then presented to you and you will be asked to judge something about this sentence based on the information in the short paragraph. The five sections are explained in more detail here:
- Assumptions - You are being asked to state whether the information in the second set of text you are presented is an assumption made in the first paragraph. Quite a tricky concept to get your head around at first. In a nutshell, when people speak or make arguments, there are underlying assumptions in those arguments. Here you are presented with some assumptions and are asked to judge if that is being made in the original statement. For example in the statement "only people earning a high salary can afford a fast car," what's being assumed is that fast cars are expensive because only people who are earning a lot of money can buy one, however, what's not being assumed is that people without high salaries aren't legally allowed to buy a fast car. You are asked to choose whether an assumption has been made or has not been made.
- Arguments - You are presented with an argument, such as "Should college fees be abolished?" Regardless of your own opinions and thoughts on the argument, you are then presented with statements related to this original argument. You are asked to say whether the responses to the original argument of "Should college fees be abolished?" make for strong or weak arguments. Arguments are considered strong if they are related to the topic such as, "Yes, many people who would benefit from a college education do not because they cannot afford it. This hurts the country's economic growth." The argument presented is sound, related to the original question. Compare this with a weak argument, "No, I do not trust people who read a lot of books." It is clear that the second argument bears very little relation to the subject of the abolition of college tuition fees. This is not to say that an argument against the original argument will always be a weak one, or that an argument in favor will always be a strong one. For example, "Yes, I like people that read books," is in favor of the abolition as indicated by "yes," but that person's like or dislike of others that read books isn't related, or hasn't been explained how it's related to removing the fees. Carefully considering what is being said, remove it from your own personal opinions and political views to objectively analyse what someone else has put forward.
- Deductions - A few sentences of information are presented to you. Another separate short statement will also be shown to you, which is supposed to represent a conclusion that someone has reached. You will have to determine whether this conclusion logically follows from the information given to you. Can the statement be deduced from the information available>? If so, and without a doubt, then the conclusion follows, if not, then the conclusion does not follow. Your decision must be based on the information given and not from your own knowledge.
- Inferences - A short scenario is described to you, followed by possible inferences. The inferences are short statements. Imagine that these are what people have said is inferred from the scenario. Use your judgement and the short scenario to assess whether what's being said has actually been inferred from the passage and the likelihood of this inference. You are asked to rank each inference as either 'true,' 'false,' 'possibly true,' 'possibly false.' For some proposed inferences there isn't enough information to say either 'true' or 'false' so a fifth option is included; 'more information required.' You can only select one option from the five.
- Interpreting Information - Following a similar format to the previous four sections, a short passage of information and then a series of statements are shown to you. You are asked to judge whether the information in the passage can be interpreted as the statements suggest. The answer options are straightforward here; you either select 'conclusion follows,' or 'conclusion does not follow,' depending on whether or not you believe that the statement can be logically reached from the information given. Again, for this section and all others, you are to base your choice of answer on what you're given, not on any specialized knowledge you might have.
If a watson glaser critical thinking test is used in the early stages of the application process it's likely to be used as a screening tool. This puts some pressure on candidates to meet a minimum pass mark, which will allow them to be selected to go on to the next stage of the selection process. If it's used at a later stage in the process, the results from this will be combined with performance in other assessments, tests, exercises and interviews. All the information you need to answer the questions will be in the test. Below the details of a few companies' critical thinking tests are pointed out.
Here is a list of critical reasoning tests on the market at present, which candidates may be likely to encounter for recruitment, selection or development.
- W-GCTA - The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal as it is formally called is the most ubiquitous critical thinking test out there. This is the one that you are most likely to encounter.
- GMAT - The general management aptitude test, used by business schools and colleges test students' critical thinking ability. The critical thinking questions are written in a business or finance context.
- SHL - SHL have produced the Critical Reasoning Test Battery composed of 60 critical reasoning questions with a strict time limit of 30 minutes.
- Cornell - Cornell have developed a critical thinking test to be used in educational environments. The two levels, X and Z, are aimed at children and adults, respectively.
- Area-specific - There are tests which focus on either numerical critical reasoning skills and verbal critical reasoning skills. These tests will ask only numerical or only verbal questions to assess your skills in a specific area.
Here is some general advice to help you perform to the best of your ability for your critical reasoning test.
- No prior knowledge - The key point here is that critical reasoning tests are measuring your ability to think, or the method that you use to reach a conclusion. You should therefore not rely on prior knowledge to answer the question. Questions will be written so that you do not need to know any specialist knowledge to answer the question. For example, you will not be expected to know mathematical formulas or laws of nature and to answer questions with that information. If you are given the formula and its description in the questions, you are expected to use that information to reach the answer.
- Carefully read the instructions - There are 5 sections to most critical thinking tests and each will assess a slightly different skill. Make sure you have read the instructions and understand what it is you are expected to do to answer the questions for this section. There is quite a difference between the Assumptions section and the Deductions section for example. Applying the rules of one to the other would lead to just guessing the answers and making many mistakes.
- Keep your eye on the timer - These tests are complex. You might find yourself fixated on answering one question and taking up a lot of the time you are allowed. Checking how much time you have every so often can help you to more evenly distribute your time between the questions. This is done to avoid spending too much time on one question when that time would be better spent answering more or checking your answers. This time management applies to all tests, but is particularly important with Critical Thinking tests, as many people believe they have such a large amount of time, but underestimate the number of questions they have to answer.
- Logical fallacies - Identifying logical fallacies is key to many parts of this test, and researching the difference between sound and fallacious logic will prove helpful in a critical reasoning test. A fallacy is an error in reasoning due to a misconception or a presumption, and an argument which employs a formal fallacy, logical fallacy or a deductive fallacy in its reasoning becomes an invalid argument. Researching the different types of fallacy (i.e. red herring argument, straw man argument, confusing correlation and causation etc.) can help you spot these in the test and correctly answer the question.
The practice tests that we have cover all of the sections of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking test and these overlap with many of the variations in Critical Thinking tests produced by major publishers. practice helps to increase your confidence, gives you a chance to learn from your mistakes in a risk-free environment, and can reduce stress before an exam.
The best place to get advice on taking a critical thinking tests is the test publisher's website, for example this one for the Watson Glaser .
If you have already successfully passed a few initial stages of the application process, it's unlikely that companies will focus solely on your results in the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking test when deciding whether or not to hire you. This type of selection by results on one test is more likely if it is part of the early stages of the process. However, towards the later stages the company will look at your results across interviews, group exercises, other aptitude tests and your résumé and will collate all of this information before reaching a decision. If you have been invited to undertake a critical reasoning test then the organisation clearly has an interest in hiring you, let that fact inspire confidence and perform to the best of your ability on your test, good luck!
You may also be interested in these popular tests sections.
COMMENTS
Take a Free Practice Critical Thinking Test. PRT Critical Thinking Test: question 1 of 3. Six friends are seated in a restaurant across a rectangular table. There are three chairs on each side. Adam and Dorky do not have anyone sitting to their right and Clyde and Benjamin do not have anyone sitting to their left.
This Critical Thinking test measures your ability to think critically and draw logical conclusions based on written information. Critical Thinking tests are often used in job assessments in the legal sector to assess a candidate's analytical critical thinking skills. A well known example of a critical thinking test is the Watson-Glaser Critical ...
The scenarios are typically relevant to the field you are interested in to assess your knowledge of the role. There will also be general questions concerning more basic issues or problems that commonly occur in a workplace environment. The critical thinking test is multiple-choice with thirty minutes to complete the assessment.
Practice Critical Thinking Test. Try a free critical thinking test. This free practice test contains 10 test questions and has a time limit of 6 minutes. Improve your performance with our test preparation platform. Access 24/7 from all your devices. More than 1000 verbal practice questions.
Critical thinking is put into action in various stages of decision-making and problem-solving tasks: Identify the problem. Choose suitable information to find the solution. Identify the assumptions that are implied and written in the text. Form hypotheses and choose the most suitable and credible answers.
To prepare for a critical thinking test effectively, it's important to focus on a few key elements while practicing. These include evaluating arguments, assessing evidence, understanding the structure and logic of an argument, and ensuring that emotions or personal opinions do not influence conclusions.
Critical thinking, also known as critical reasoning, is the ability to assess a situation and consider/understand various perspectives, all while acknowledging, extracting and deciphering facts, opinions and assumptions. Critical thinking tests are a sub-type of aptitude exams or psychometric tests used in pre-employment assessment for jobs ...
Our Critical Thinking test evaluates candidates' abilities to: Solve syllogisms through deductive reasoning skills and logical thinking. Interpret sequences and arrangements, evaluate arguments to find a weak argument, and draw sound conclusions. Ask deduction questions and assess cause-and-effect relationships.
228 questions. Critical thinking tests, sometimes known as critical reasoning tests, are often used by employers. They evaluate how a candidate makes logical deductions after scrutinising the evidence provided, while avoiding fallacies or non-factual opinions. Critical thinking tests can form part of an assessment day, or be used as a screening ...
The Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Sample Test is freely available to the public. The sample test is intended for use as a demonstration of both the content and grading tools which are available in the full version of this test. The sample test has a limited number of questions compared to the full version, and therefore should not be ...
It is the only critical thinking test that approaches critical thinking as a trans-disciplinary system of interconnected concepts, principles, and understandings. It focuses on the five essential dimensions of critical thinking: 1. The analysis of thought. 2. The assessment of thought. 3. The dispositions of thought. 4. The skills and abilities ...
Sample Test Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts SAMPLE Test. Part One: On the Nature of Critical Thinking Q: Critical thinking is essential to reasoning well through complicated issues. ... If a statement is irrelevant, we benefit by asking how it helps us answer the question at issue. True; False; Q: Inferences are implications embedded in ...
228 questions. Watson Glaser tests are a form of psychometric assessment that fall under the category of critical thinking tests. They are designed to determine how well an individual can process information from a logical perspective, and then evaluate, analyse and make sound judgements. As such, they are commonly used in the recruitment ...
Free Critical Thinking Practice Questions. 1. United Bank is concerned about the increasing media coverage of suspicions of corruption among its top management staff. The VP of finance was accused of embezzling ten million dollars, for which the maximum penalty is eight years in prison.
Questions Booklet. This practice critical thinking test will assess your ability to make inferences and assumptions and to reason logically with arguments. The test comprises the following five sections: Read the instructions preceding each section and answer the questions. There are a total of.
Use sample questions and practice tests to hone your skills. This will not only improve your critical thinking abilities but also help you become familiar with the test format. 3. Review Your Answers: After completing a practice test, review your answers. Understand why you got a question right or wrong.
This practice critical thinking test will assess your ability to make inferences and assumptions and to reason logically with arguments. The test comprises of the following five sections: Read the instructions preceding each section and answer the questions. There are a total of 86 questions in this test and you should aim to correctly answer ...
The Watson Glaser critical thinking test is a unique assessment that provides a detailed analysis of a participant's ability to think critically. The test lasts 30 minutes and applicants can expect to be tested on around 40 questions in five distinct areas: Inference. Assumptions. Deduction.
Critical thinking is the ability to effectively analyze information and form a judgment. To think critically, you must be aware of your own biases and assumptions when encountering information, and apply consistent standards when evaluating sources. Critical thinking skills help you to: Identify credible sources. Evaluate and respond to arguments.
Introduction. About: This is a short critical thinking assessment test. This critical thinking test consists of 10 questions. The test has a time limit of 6 minutes. Instructions: The time limit is 3 minutes for each test, do not take too long to answer a question or it may run out. You are always able to skip a question and return to it later ...
A Brief Definition: Critical thinking is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it. A well-cultivated critical thinker: communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems. Critical thinking is, in short, self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking.
The critical thinking quiz will help you understand when someone is right and acknowledged. Check out our online critical thinking MCQ quiz and see if you ace the art of actively and skillfully analyzing and evaluating information gathered through observation. We have a collection of critical thinking quizzes to help you analyze the facts and ...
The critical thinking questions are written in a business or finance context. ... The practice tests that we have cover all of the sections of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking test and these overlap with many of the variations in Critical Thinking tests produced by major publishers. practice helps to increase your confidence, gives you a ...
Critical thinking is the analysis of available facts, evidence, observations, and arguments in order to form a judgement by the application of rational, skeptical, and unbiased analyses and evaluation. [1] In modern times, the use of the phrase critical thinking can be traced to John Dewey, who used the phrase reflective thinking. [2] The application of critical thinking includes self-directed ...