doctoral dissertation po polsku

Tymoteusz Doligalski

Blog o e-biznesie i marketingu internetowym, jak napisać doktorat.

Wpis w wersji roboczej. Zawiera transkrypcję prelekcji dla doktorantów z października 2022 r.

Zacznijmy od próby uchwycenia istoty doktoratu. Podam trzy podejścia. Pierwsze podejście, to jest ustawa Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym. Zgodnie z ustawą, doktorat prezentuje ogólną wiedzę teoretyczną, zaświadcza o umiejętności samodzielnego prowadzenia badań naukowych. Dostarcza pewne oryginalne rozwiązanie problemu naukowego, a także może być napisane w formie rozprawy, co oczywiste, jak i w formie artykułów powiązanych tematycznie. Drugie ujęcie pochodzi od profesora Kazimierza Kucińskiego z SGH. Ono było kiedyś zawarte w takim artykule „Prawie wszystko o doktoratach”. To opracowanie było przedstawione na starej stronie SGH, być może na tej nowej jeszcze wróci. Tam było dużo ciekawych i wartościowych treści, ale chciałbym zwrócić uwagę właśnie na tę esencję, czyli próbę uchwycenia czym jest doktorat. Sprawozdanie prof. Kucińskiego jest to dzieło naukowe cechujące się krytycyzmem, innowacyjnością, podejmuje nowe metody, problemy badawcze, proponuje nowe metody badawcze i to, co ważne jest to owoc uczenia się przez prowadzenie badania naukowego i charakteryzuje się pewnym formalizmem, czyli wszystko, każde twierdzenie musi być udokumentowane, uzasadnione, udowodnione. Na koniec chciałbym przedstawić zasłyszaną opinię. Tę opinię zasłyszałem, jako doktorant, od pewnego profesora,który ma dość wypracowaną pozycję w swojej kategorii, w swojej dyscyplinie. On sprowadził doktorat do następujących stwierdzeń. Doktorant identyfikuje problem badawczy, a następnie dobiera i stosuje metodę badawczą. Moim zdaniem te trzy ujęcia korelują ze sobą,gdyż zwracają uwagę, na przykład na problem badawczy, na metodę badawczą. To może jest oczywiste, ale jak później pokażę, bardzo często doktoranci popełniają pewne błędy, ignorując właśnie te wymienione tutaj aspekty. 

Teraz chciałbym przedstawić najważniejsze ujęcie w tej prezentacji. Najważniejszy model w tej prezentacji może jedyny model w tej prezentacji, ale najważniejszy slajd, mianowicie PhD canvas. PhD canvas jest takim klonem biznes model canvas,czyli szablonu modelu biznesowego, który został stworzony przez Osterwaldera i Pigneura. Historia tego biznes model canvas, jest następująca, Alex Osterwalder był doktorantem na jednej ze szwajcarskich politechnik. I chyba doradzał innym doktorantom, jak założyć startup. Był zmęczony tym doradzaniem i stworzył właśnie ten model, który tak naprawdę jest listą rzeczy, o których należy pamiętać zakładając startup, przedstawionych w pewnej formule graficznej. To jest proste ujęcie, być może zbyt proste, ale ono jest bardzo przydatne dla osób, które nie mają odpowiedniej wiedzy. Dla tych, które mają już tę wiedzę, ono może być oczywiste, czy niezbyt wystarczające.  

Podobnie jest właśnie z tym PhD canvas. Ono zwraca uwagę na ważne aspekty. Moim zdaniem ważne aspekty. Jeżeli ktoś jest już zaawansowany w pisaniu doktoratu, te aspekty będą dla tej osoby w miarę oczywiste. A więc co się znajduje? Jakie bloki się znajdują w tym modelu? Mianowicie jest teoria. Teoria, czyli dotychczas opublikowane prace naukowe, przede wszystkim artykuły z renomowanych czasopism, które powinny być aktualne, ale pamiętajmy, że tutaj często doktoranci popełniają taki błąd, mówią: „będę analizować artykuły z ostatnich 5 lat”. Ja pracując w obszarze e-biznesu korzystam często z artykułów sprzed 20 lat. Oczywiście nie jest ich specjalnie wiele, ale też do takich sięgam, czyli takie założenie, że stawiamy pewną cezurę czasową, jest dość ryzykowne. Raczej bym tutaj akcent stawiał na właśnie renomowane czasopisma, czyli te czasopisma, które należą do światowej czołówki typu Journal of Marketing, Journal of Finance. Te czasopisma, które znajdują sięna tak zwanej liście filadelfijskiej, ale pamiętajmy również, że mamy w Polsce sensowne czasopisma oraz mamy w tych czasopismach i być może w innych czasopismach, nie tylko tych renomowanych wartościowe artykuły. Akcent jest tutaj, żeby tkwić w tym nurcie światowej nauki, w taki świadomy sposób i z tego nurtu czerpać.  

Następnym obszarem jest problem badawczy. Ja tutaj w tej kategorii problem badawczy umieściłem zarówno lukę badawczą, cel i hipotezy. Luka badawcza, a więc pewna niewiedza występująca w pewnym obszarze, którą musicie udokumentować i następnie cel. Celem jest pewna próba, czy też wypełnienie tej luki. Celem jest odpowiedzenie na pewne pytania, ale pamiętajmy to jest często taki błąd doktorantów, celem nie powinna być analiza, bo analiza jest pewną metodą, a nie celem.  

Następnie doktoraty zawierają tezę albo hipotezę główną, one się różnie nazywa. Czasami jest nazywana hipotezą, czasami tezą. Czyli to jest takie główne przypuszczenie, które chcecie zweryfikować. Ta hipoteza główna jest weryfikowana z wykorzystaniem hipotez pomocniczych, a więc takich stwierdzeń, przypuszczeń bardziej cząstkowych, być może, niekoniecznie roboczych, ale o mniejszym zasięgu, o mniejszej wadze, które łącznie powinny się składać na tę hipotezę główną, czyli weryfikacja hipotez pomocniczych powinna służyć weryfikacji tezy bądź hipotezy głównej.  

No i teraz kwestie kontrowersyjne. Jeden profesor, powiedzmy z generacji poprzedzającej moją powiedział, że za jego czasów doktoraty były bez hipotez. Rozmawiałem z jednym doktorantem, ale z fizyki on mówi, że u nich nie ma hipotez w doktoratach. Jest cel pracy, w którym jest identyfikacja pewnej wartości. I ostatnio również właśnie, recenzowałem jeden doktorat z ekonomii. Ten doktorat był napisany na bazie artykułów powiązanych tematycznie, a więc to nie była jedna zwarta rozprawa. I tam był jasno postawiony cel ale również hipotezy nie było, ale ogólnie przyjmuje się, że doktorat powinien mieć hipotezę. Czyli sygnalizuję, że jest pewien margines doktoratów, w których, tej hipotezy głównej nie ma.  

Następnie mamy metodę badawczą, czyli metodę dojścia do celu pracy. Metodę na zweryfikowanie hipotezy głównej i pomocniczych. I ta moja prezentacja nie jest metodologiczna, ale chciałbym zwrócić uwagę na takie podejście praktyczne. Mianowicie, z pewnością macie w swoim komputerze albo na dysku sieciowym katalog, gdzie znajdują się artykuły z Waszej dziedziny, artykuły związane tematycznie z Waszym doktoratem. Ale również zachęcam Was do założenia katalogu, gdzie będą artykuły, które będą zawierały metodę badawczą, taką, która będzie benchmarkiem dla Was.  

Taką częstą metodą badawczą w naukach o zarządzaniu  jest przeprowadzanie wywiadów pogłębionych, czyli jako badań jakościowych na początku, oczywiście po przeglądzie literatury, czyli przegląd literatury, badania jakościowe, na przykład wywiady pogłębione z przedstawicielami powiedzmy 20 firm. Takie wywiady jeszcze nieustrukturyzowane, być może mamy scenariusz, ale nie do końca się go trzymamy. Chcemy raczej zdiagnozować, to uniwersum tego problemu badawczego i następnie, po tych załóżmy dwudziestu wywiadach pogłębionych, przeprowadzamy badania ilościowe, badanie często kwestionariuszowe. Na przykład takie, które da sto albo dwieście kwestionariuszy, wypełnionych ankiet, ale często ta liczba jest dużo mniejsza. No i teraz zobaczmy, tego typu metodę badawczą, stosujemy zarówno w marketingu, możemy zastosować w finansach, możemy zastosować w HR. Dlatego warto się orientować, gdzie tego typu metoda badawcza, na którą się orientujecie, w jakich artykułach, nawet spoza Waszej wąskiej dziedziny jest stosowana i mieć ten folder właśnie z tymi na przykład pięcioma artykułami, w których metodę badawczą, traktujecie jako benchmark. 

Następny aspekt to są badane podmioty. To jest taki aspekt, na którym rozmawiając często z kandydatami na doktorantów, w którym Ci kandydaci na doktorantów napotykają na problem. Podam taki przykład. Rozmawiam z moim znajomym, który ma pewne już dość spore doświadczenie w branży interaktywnej i opowiada mi o koncepcji swojego doktoratu. Pytam go w końcu, ok ale jakie firmy chcesz badać? On mówi, że chce przebadać 10 agencji full service, ale już teraz wie, że pięć z tych agencji nie wypełni kwestionariusza. To mówimy ok, ale zapomnij o tego typu badaniu, o tego typu metodzie, bo z pięcioma wypełnionymi kwestionariuszami to nic nie zrobisz. Być może pięć podmiotów może być wystarczające, jeżeli zastosujemy analizę przypadków case study, ale to naprawdę muszą być takie przypadki typu na przykład fuzje albo jakieś duże organizacje typu banki, albo ważne instytucje, a i tak to jest dość ryzykowne,choć moim zdaniem nadal do wykonania. Czyli zastanówcie się na początku, czy macie odpowiednio dużo podmiotów. Oczywiście, tymi podmiotami zazwyczaj są firmy. W marketingu bardzo często są również konsumenci, wtedy ta liczebność musi być odpowiednio wyższa, ale pamiętajmy o tym, czy one są porównywalne.  

Pewien doktorant raz chciał zbadać telekomy ilościowo, czyli tych firm mamy kilka, mniej niż 10 załóżmy oraz operatorów telefonii komórkowej, w szczególności tych lokalnych, ale moim zdaniem to są nieprzystające podmioty, one są słabo porównywalne, czyli te podmioty, które badamy powinny być z jednej kategorii, a przynajmniej powinny być w dużym stopniu podobne. 

I to są te cztery najważniejsze elementy. 

Z tego wszystkiego powinna wynikać odpowiedź na pytanie: “So what?”. To pytanie: “So what?” jest stosowane często w anglosaskim świecie. Dobrze, masz ciekawe badania, ale co z tego wynika?W naszym polskim podejściu do doktoratów liczy się tak zwany wkład do nauki, czyli w jaki sposób ten doktorat rozwija naukę,  i jak pamiętacie z poprzedniego slajdu, tam było wspomniane o oryginalnym rozwiązaniu, ale teraz, to być może mój trochę kontrowersyjny pogląd, ale tam nie ma, przynajmniej w ustawie, jak i w tych innych ujęciach, nie ma wymogów jakiegoś przełomowego odkrycia. Nie ma wymogów takiego odkrycia naukowego przez duże O, przez duże N, jest mowa o wkładzie do nauki. I mój kontrowersyjny pogląd być może wynika on z moich ograniczeń, zbyt wąskiego spojrzenia, ale nie spotkamy się z doktoratem, w którym dobrze byłaby opisana teoria, dobrze zdiagnozowany problem badawczy, dobrze zastosowana metoda badawcza, a który byłby odrzucony, zrecenzowany negatywnie z tego względu, że wkład do nauki jest zbyt trywialny, to znaczy w tym sensie, że doktorat jest akademicki, ale wyniki nie są przełomowe. 

Znam takie dwa doktoraty, te doktoraty badały wpływ pewnej funkcji w przedsiębiorstwie, na funkcjonowanie przedsiębiorstwa i ci doktoranci byli przekonani, że to udowodnią, a współczynnik korelacji im wyszedł bliski zeru. Absolutnie, nie było to powodem do odrzucenia tych doktoratów. Warto zadbać o te powyższe elementy, warto mieć na uwadze pytanie “So what?”, warto mieć na uwadze ten wkład do nauki, ale jeżeli ten wkład do nauki nie będzie przełomowy, to najwyżej nie uda Wam się opublikować tego doktoratu w renomowanym czasopiśmie,czy artykułu na bazie tego doktoratu, ale raczej nie będzie to podstawa do negatywnej recenzji. Ale to jest tak, jak mówię, moja kontrowersyjna, moja subiektywna opinia. 

No i następnie mamy prototypowanie. Na konferencji, na której spotkałem Pigneura, czyli współautora Buisness Model Canvas, on powiedział następującą rzecz, że przy projektowaniu modelu biznesowego, przy projektowaniu startupu należy tworzyć kilka wersji tego startupu. Czyli na kilka różnych wersji uzupełnić ten szablon i następnie jak nabierzemy pewnego dystansu wybrać ten, który nam najbardziej odpowiada i nad nim pracować.  To co powiedział, dokładnie jest zawarte na tym slajdzie. Mianowicie nie zakochujemy się w swoim pierwszym pomyśle i myślę, że to też jest słuszna uwaga, do właśnie koncepcji doktoratu.  

Teraz przedstawię najczęstsze błędy, które popełniają albo doktoranci albo kandydaci na doktorantów. Odbyłem kilka spotkań z kandydatami na doktorantów i wiem, jak te koncepcje są tworzone na początku. Czyli bardzo często doktoranci przychodzą z góry ustalonym problemem badawczym i to jest błąd. Może to nie jest błąd, bo można oczywiście to zmienić, można ten problem zwalczyć, ale pamiętajmy że to nie jest tak, że my mamy pewien problem badawczy i zaczynamy go badać i w ten sposób zaczynamy tworzyć. Właściwym podejściem jest to, że analizujemy literaturę i doszukujemy się tej luki wiedzy w pewnym obszarze i ją dokumentujemy.  

Być może to nie jest luka wiedzy, to być może jest jakiś błąd, Być może to jest sprzeczność, ale początkiem pracy powinna być analiza literatury, a nie problem badawczy. Oczywiście pewien problem badawczy może ukierunkuje nas na analizę literatury, ale pamiętajmy, że nie trzymajmy się zbyt kurczowo tej wstępnej naszej wizji. 

Następnie już na etapie autoreferatów, ja to zauważyłem na seminariach doktoranckich jeszcze w czasach przedpandemicznych. Często w nich uczestniczyłem, najłatwiejszy sposób na skrytykowanie doktoratu, i to takie twórcze, to jest popatrzenie na tytuł pracy, na spis treści, na cel i na hipotezę i na sprawdzenie, czy występują w tych miejscach, te same terminy. I bardzo często było tak, że na przykład w celu było zupełnie co innego niż w hipotezach albo w hipotezie głównej były inne pojęcia niż w hipotezach cząstkowych. Czyli zadbanie o spójności siatki pojęć w tych miejscach jest niezwykle ważne. Kolejny taki błąd, to są barokowe tezy. Teza to jest stwierdzenie, to jest przypuszczenie, które powinniśmy zweryfikować, tak lub nie. Oczywiście czasami są od tego pewne wyjątki, częściowo może być teza potwierdzona bądź sfalsyfikowana. Natomiast te sformułowania powinny być jednoznaczne, one powinny być bliżej minimalizmu niż baroku. Czyli nie wrzucajmy do tych tez, do tego naszego przypuszczenia, wszystkich możliwych przymiotników, wszystkich możliwych rzeczowników, bo nam to utrudni działanie. Podobnie w definicjach nie powinno być wartościowania. I spotkałem się z taką definicją mianowicie, że system to logicznie uporządkowana całość. To trochę było bardziej rozbudowane, ale teraz, co to znaczy logicznie rozbudowana całość? Systemem na pewno jest organizacja, firma. Systemem jest rodzina, ale pytanie czy wszystkie rodziny, organizacje, firmy są logicznie uporządkowane? No to jest właśnie przykład nie do końca trafnej definicji. 

I tak jak wspominałem często doktoranci piszą, celem pracy jest analiza. Celem pracy jest identyfikacja, stwierdzenie czegoś, ale nie analiza. Często pewnym problemem, błędem doktorantów jest nieumiejętność klarownego odpowiedzenia na pytanie, co chce zbadać? Z tym spotykamy się na wielu etapach. To znaczy pisze do mnie kandydat na doktoranta, mówi, że chce pisać na taki temat doktorat, i ten temat naprawdę jest powiedzmy, trzyzdaniowy. Jest tam cała złożoność danej dyscypliny.  

Byłem na jednym seminarium doktorskim i doktorant nie potrafił wyjść z tej teorii i w końcu pewna doświadczona pani profesor, przerwała mu i zadała pytanie, co dokładnie chce pan zbadać? On się na początku skonfudował, ale później jakoś na to w miarę klarowny sposób odpowiedział. Wy też musicie odpowiedzieć na to pytanie i to pytanie jest dużo ważniejsze niż temat doktoratu, który i tak zostanie na koniec sformułowany czy zmodyfikowany. 

Pewnym takim błędem, ale to już chyba błąd, który już w coraz mniejszym stopniu występuje, to niepowoływanie się na artykuły z renomowanych czasopism zagranicznych. Takim błędem częstszym jest ćwiczenie, że doktorat przypomina ćwiczenie zastosowania metody badawczej. Podam Wam dwa przykłady, jeden doktoranta i drugi mój. Pewien doktorant rozmawia z pewnym doktorantem i on mówi, że chce wrzucić dane, które są dostępne ogólnie do modelu równań strukturalnych, no i zobaczymy, co z tego mu wyjdzie i to będzie taki doktorat. Ja powiedziałem dobrze, ale to nie na tym polega, bo jaki to będzie wkład do nauki to musisz bardziej do tego podejść, i podałem mu taki mój przykład, w którym zostaliśmy skrytykowani za podobne podejście. Wysłaliśmy referat na konferencje, referat ze względu na ilość znaków był ograniczony, głównie tam były metody badawcze. No i co napisał recenzent? Recenzent napisał, że ok, ale ten referat przypomina ćwiczenie z regresji, a nie referat naukowy. Słabo opisany jest przegląd literatury, słabo jest opisany problem naukowy, słabo są opisane wnioski, ograniczenia, natomiast większość narracji sprowadza się do opisania metody ilościowej. Pamiętajmy, że ta metoda ilościowa jest pewnym elementem w całości, a nie powinna dominować w całej rozprawie. 

Kolejnym takim strategicznym błędem, zapewne na etapie bycia kandydatem na doktoranta, to jest następujące, mam spore na przykład 15-letnie doświadczenie zawodowe i chcę to opisać w doktoracie. Wtedy mówię dobrze, ale być może największym problemem jest właśnie doświadczenie zawodowe. To znaczy doświadczenie zawodowe ma dużo zalet, bo ono pozwala na zrozumienie tego, co się dzieje w danej branży. Pozwala na pewne wartościowanie, pozwala na identyfikację tego, co może jest niedostępne dla takich badaczy stricte naukowych, ale ono może być dużym balastem, w szczególności wtedy, kiedy doktorant chce podzielić się swoją wiedzą zawodową w doktoracie. 

Teraz chciałbym przedstawić dwa doktoraty, dwa różne doktoraty, one zostały napisane w Katedrze Marketingu, ewentualnie w Zakładzie Wartości Klienta, to jest mniej więcej ta sama jednostka, tylko na różnych etapach. Ten po prawej to był mój doktorat. Ja napisałem taki doktorat szeroki, czyli próbowałem stworzyć ogólną teorię wszystkiego w zakresie zarządzania wartością klienta, czyli zawarłem dużo wątków. Ten doktorat był rozległy, ale ani nie napisałem super dobrego doktoratu,  ani nie napisałem go szybko. Później udało mi się opublikować książkę, do której jest tu link, na bazie tego doktoratu, ale ponownie musiałem włożyć pewien nakład pracy w dostosowanie tego doktoratu do publikacji. Teraz bym już tak na pewno doktoratu nie pisał w szczególności, że nie powinno się zaczynać od większych wyzwań. 

Kilka lat po tym, jak obroniłem swój doktorat, do naszej jednostki przyszedł Przemek Tomczyk i on również napisał doktorat pod przewodnictwem profesor Barbary Dobiegały-Korony, ale ta koncepcja była już na innym etapie i Przemek do tego inaczej podszedł. On nie chciał tworzyć teorii, ani jej powtarzać. Chciał przeprowadzić badania empiryczne i napisał taki wąski doktorat, który był doktoratem akademickim, ale szybko przeszedł przez teorie i główny środek ciężkości tego doktoratu to było badanie empiryczne. Tutaj jest autoreferat, link do autoreferatu tego doktoratu jeżeli macie dostęp do tej prezentacji. Przemek zrobił następującą ciekawą rzecz. Dużo czasu przeznaczył na wybór branży, następnie wybrał branżę ubezpieczeń i skontaktował się z organizacją branżową. To chyba była Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń i tam zaproponował im barter. Barter polegał na tym, Izba przekazała swoim agentom, których miała kilka tysięcy, link do ankiety i oczywiście odpowiednią motywację, natomiast Przemek podzielił się wynikami badań na szkoleniach z agentami.  I w sumie to był dość ciekawy sposób, właśnie taki trochę autostopowiczowy z tego względu, że udało mu się wykorzystać zasoby innych organizacji, a jednocześnie nie potrzebował grantu na przeprowadzenie tych badań ilościowych, bo odbyło się to w sposób bezkosztowy.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Strona główna

Doctoral studies

Dear Graduate of MA Studies,

The Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, offers you full-time doctoral studies in English. The PhD programme is addressed to graduates of second-cycle studies (full Masters programme or equivalent) – with no restrictions concerning the field. The aim of the studies is for the graduates to be educated specialists with the academic degree of doctor of social science in the field of political science, doctor of social science in the field of security studies, doctor of social science in the field of  public policy.

It is noteworthy that the University of Warsaw ranks in the third hundred (places 201-300) of the Shanghai Ranking’s Global Ranking of Academic Subjects 2018 in the field of social sciences – political sciences. The Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, is reported as the best in Poland in the fields of political science and international relations (2018).

Our PhD programme is conducted in a two-way system. On the one hand, the students conduct their own research projects under the care of the supervisor or the support supervisor, and on the other hand, they participate in classes (obligatory or to choose) and didactic practices. The learning cycle includes a group of general subjects, and related to the chosen specialization (discipline), elective courses (optional), preparing a doctoral student to do research activities and developing teaching skills, as well as didactic practices. The programme of the research, performed under the care of the supervisor or the support supervisor, covers three learning paths of political science, public policy, and security studies. The PhD student can also pursue an interdisciplinary path.

The doctoral studies programme is intended for active and creative people who wish to develop their research interests. You can pursue further studies and comprehensively develop your skills by broadening academic knowledge and conducting research. You will have the opportunity to spend one semester at one of 90 universities in Europe under the Erasmus scholarship, as well as  the opportunity to spend one semester at one of the most reputable universities anywhere in the world. You will also get the chance to participate in many international seminars and conferences. Last but not least: you will gain an experience in working in multinational environment.

Our competences and openness will help you fulfil your ambitions. We will be pleased to welcome you to our group of PhD students!

Prof. dr hab. Stanisław Sulowski Dean of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies

WARNING! Due to RESOLUTION NO. 412 OF THE SENATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW of 17 April 2019 on the terms and conditions, and procedure of enrolment for Doctoral Schools at the University of Warsaw in the academic year 2019/2020 the admission process for PhD studies has changed.

The document

In order to complete Year 1 the student should[2]:

• Obtain at least 14 ECTS credits .
• Complete all courses according to the program of the 1 st year of study (confirmed in  the student’s book or exam card).
• Complete teaching practices (at least 10, but not more than 90 teaching hours) and obtain written confirmation of the placement.
• (* as a part of individual research activity connected with the PhD thesis) present the concept of the doctoral thesis accepted by the supervisor and confirm participation in at least 1 scientific conference.
• Submit the report on the research and scientific activity in a given academic year approved by the supervisor.
• The deadline for submission of all required documents is outlined by the detailed rules of the doctoral studies and organization of an academic year schedule set by the Rector of the University of Warsaw.

In order to complete Year 2 the student should[4]:

• Obtain at least 29 ECTS credits till the end of the 2 nd academic year.
• Complete all courses according to the program of the 2 nd year of study (confirmed in  the student’s book or exam card).
• (* as a part of individual research activity connected with the PhD thesis) present the developed concept of the doctoral thesis accepted by the supervisor, as well as present:

– fragments of the PhD dissertation with the approval of the supervisor;

– at least 1 research note, or elaboration of thematic bibliography (approved by the supervisor), or at least 1 review article, or publication of the       research note or the review article should be evidenced by the copy of the publication (for inspection), or (in case of adoption for printing) by the       confirmation signed by the scientific journal’s chief editor or assistant editor

[1] Teaching classes in the university or participation in their conducting, including the preparation or participation in the preparation of e-learning courses,

under the supervision of a tutor, a supervisor or other experienced academic teacher

[1] Achievements of the doctoral studies are taken into account to pass the subsequent year of studies, only

In order to complete Year 3 the student should[6]:

• Obtain at least 38 ECTS credits till the end of the 3 rd academic year.
• Complete all courses according to the program of the 3 rd year of study (confirmed in the student’s book or the exam card).
• (* as a part of individual research activity connected with the PhD thesis) present fragments of the PhD dissertation with the approval of the supervisor, as well as present at least 1 paper or communiqué at a scientific conference, confirmed by the conference’s organizer.
• The deadline for submission of all required documents is outlined by the detailed rules of the doctoral studies and organization of an academic year             schedule set by the Rector of the University of Warsaw.

PhD students who manage to realize the full program of study and prepare a doctoral thesis can graduate in 3 years (it demands to complete at least 45 ECTS credits till the end of the 3rd academic year).

In order to complete Year 4 the student should[8]:

• Obtain at least 45 ECTS credits till the end of the 4 th academic year.
• Complete all courses according to the program of the 3 4th year of study (confirmed in the exam card).
• (* as a part of individual research activity connected with the PhD thesis) present fragments of the PhD dissertation with the approval of the supervisor, as well as at least 1 scientific article published in a peer reviewed journal or book, evidenced by the journal’s/book’s table of contents, or (in case of adoption for printing) by the confirmation signed by the scientific journal’s chief editor/assistant editor or the publishing house’s editor (in case of a book).
•  Submit the report on the research and scientific activity in a given academic year approved by the supervisor.

[2] Achievements of the doctoral studies are taken into account to pass the subsequent year of studies, only

[5] Teaching classes in the university or participation in their conducting, including the preparation or participation in the preparation of e-learning courses,

   under the supervision of a tutor, a supervisor or other experienced academic teacher

[6] Achievements of the doctoral studies are taken into account to pass the subsequent year of studies, only

[7] Teaching classes in the university or participation in their conducting, including the preparation or participation in the preparation of e-learning courses,  under the supervision of a tutor, a supervisor or other experienced academic teacher

[8] Achievements of the doctoral studies are taken into account to pass the subsequent year of studies, only, also from the previous years if not obtained

Credit of earlier stages of studies based on them.

–> !!! List of academic tutors !!! <–

RESOLUTION NO. 3/2017

OF THE BOARD OF THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

of 25 January 2017

on appointing an academic tutor to a doctoral student

and a supporting supervisor of a doctoral thesis

In order to ensure academic supervision of doctoral students and to support them in their independent research work, the Board of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies resolves as follows:

• Pursuant to the Ordinance of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 13 April 2016 on doctoral degree programmes and doctoral scholarships, an academic tutor to a doctoral student at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies must be an academic teacher employed at the Faculty and holding at least the degree of doktor habilitowany in the disciplines of science in which the Board of the WNPiSM Faculty is authorised to award the degree of doktor or in related disciplines, and with academic research published within the previous 5 years.
• In exceptional circumstances, the Dean of WNPiSM may consent to the role of an academic tutor to a doctoral student studying at the Faculty being performed by an academic teacher or a research employee employed at another unit, if he or she meets the conditions specified above.
• A doctoral student is required to initiate cooperation with an academic tutor by the end of the first year of studies and to deliver to the head of the doctoral programme the academic teacher’s written consent to such supervision immediately. The written consent must also include a statement of the academic teacher on the number of persons who prepare their doctoral theses under his/her supervision at the given time, including the doctoral student to whom the submitted consent pertains, as well as including any persons who are not students of the doctoral programme at WNPiSM but who plan to defend their theses before the Board of the WNPiSM Faculty.
• If a doctoral student has difficulty finding an academic tutor, he/she is required to report this problem to the head of the doctoral programme by the end of the first year of studies in order to obtain assistance.
• An academic tutor is approved by the Dean. The Dean may authorise the head of the doctoral programme to perform this role.
• A doctoral student or the head of the doctoral programme may apply to the Dean for a change of the academic tutor. Such an application should be submitted together with a justification, in writing and signed.
• Out of concern for the quality of cooperation with doctoral students, it is hereby established that one academic teacher may provide supervision for no more than 6 doctoral students at the same time, including any persons who are not students of the doctoral programme at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies.
• The limit of persons under the supervision of an academic teacher includes also any persons for whom the academic teacher acts as the supervisor of a doctoral thesis which has not been defended yet.
• If at the time when the resolution comes into force, the limit specified in point 1 above is exceeded, the academic teacher may not become tutor to any additional doctoral students until the number of doctoral students under his/her supervision is lower than 6 persons.
• The Board of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies may appoint a supporting supervisor in relation to a specific doctoral assessment procedure, at the written request of the candidate for the position of a supporting supervisor and of the doctoral student.
• Appointment of a supporting supervisor takes place – in a vote by secret ballot – at the time when the doctoral assessment procedure is initiated and the thesis supervisor is appointed.
• The role of a supporting supervisor may be performed by an employee of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, or of another unit, holding the degree of doktor and whose academic and research achievements and qualifications are compliant with Article 20(7) of the Act of 14 March 2003 on academic degrees and titles and on degrees and titles in art s, and they are related to the subject of the supervised doctoral assessment procedure.
• A person may perform the function of a supporting supervisor in relation to only 2 doctoral assessment procedures at the same time.
• If at the time when the resolution comes into force the limit specified in point 2 above is exceeded, the employee may not be appointed as supporting supervisor until the number of doctoral students under his/her supervision is lower than the limit set above.
• A supporting supervisor works under the guidance of the thesis supervisor who sets the principles of cooperation between the supporting supervisor and the doctoral student.
• Appointing a supporting supervisor may be preceded with an agreement concluded between the thesis supervisor, the supporting supervisor and the doctoral student, specifying the duties (tasks) of the supporting supervisor and the manner of their performance during the preparation of the thesis by the doctoral student
• By submitting a thesis for assessment, the thesis supervisor confirms in writing that the supporting supervisor has fulfilled his/her tasks and thus the information on the supporting supervisor’s participation in the work is to be included on the thesis’ title page.
• The Dean of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies confirms that the supporting supervisor has fulfilled his/her tasks with an appropriate certificate. The specimen certificate is provided as an appendix to this resolution.
• A supporting supervisor may be dismissed from his/her role at any stage of the doctoral assessment procedure in relation to which he has been appointed if the thesis supervisor submits a request to this effect to the Faculty Board.
• The role of a supporting supervisor expires automatically upon the change of the thesis supervisor.
• In the case of circumstances described in point 1 and 2 above, the employee may not include the information on his/her role of a supporting supervisor in his/her academic record.

The Faculty Board may appoint the supporting supervisor – without the right to vote – to sit on the commission for the doctoral assessment procedure in relation to which he/she performs the role of a supporting supervisor.

Participation of a supporting supervisor in the doctoral assessment procedure is not subject to any form of contract which would result in payment of a salary

The following resolutions of the Board of the Faculty of Journalism and Political Science of the University of Warsaw hereby expire:

–    on the rules of appointing a supporting supervisor in the doctoral assessment procedures of 29 May 2013,

–    on the maximum number of doctoral students mentored by a supervisor or a supporting supervisor of 26 February 2014.

The resolution comes into force on the day of its adoption.

Dean of the Faculty

of Political Science and International Studies of the University of Warsaw

Prof. UW dr hab. Stanisław Sulowski

Head of doctoral studies

Head of programmes in international relations.

Professor Barbara Szatur – Jaworska

[email protected]

Office hours and venue:

— Room 210 (2st floor) Auditorium Building Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28

ORDINANCE NO. 4/2017  

OF THE DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW

of 2 October 2017

on the rules of conducting a doctoral assessment procedure

at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies

of the University of Warsaw

The Faculty of Political Science and International Studies of the University of Warsaw is authorised to confer the degree of doktor nauk społecznych [doctoral degree in social sciences] in the discipline of:

• political science,
• security science,
• public policy.
• Examination of the application for the doctoral assessment procedure
• A doctoral assessment procedure is initiated at the request of the person applying for the degree of doktor in the discipline of: political science, security science, public policy.
• For the doctoral assessment procedure to be initiated, the candidate for the degree must be an author of a scientific book published or accepted for publishing, or of at least one scientific article published in a peer-reviewed journal from the list of scientific journals announced by the minister competent for science based on the regulations on financing science, or of a publication being a part of peer-reviewed materials published following an international scientific conference.
• An application for the doctoral assessment procedure, including a detailed synopsis of the doctoral thesis, should be first discussed and approved at a meeting of an appropriate unit or chair. An approved application is then submitted to the Office for Academic Degrees and Doctoral Programmes [Sekcja ds. stopni i studiów doktoranckich]. The Office for Academic Degrees and Doctoral Programmes submits the documents related to the doctoral assessment procedure to the teams for doctoral assessment procedures appointed by the Faculty Board in the discipline of: political science, security science and public policy.
• The teams for doctoral assessment procedures determine whether the subject of the thesis falls within the scope of the Faculty Board’s authorisation to confer the degree of doktor , whether the submitted documents, and in particular the synopsis of the doctoral thesis, demonstrate appropriate scientific quality and indicate that the works on the thesis are highly advanced, which is the basis for initiating the doctoral assessment procedure, and whether the title of the thesis has been properly formulated. If the thesis synopsis and/or title require supplementation or amendments, the application is returned to the candidate.
• The academic staff member who has consented to be the thesis supervisor may be present at the team’s meeting (without the right to vote). Such an academic staff member may, with the consent of the candidate, make changes in the submitted application during the team’s meeting.
• If the candidate has met the requirements, the relevant team submits to the Faculty Board its recommendation to initiate the doctoral assessment procedure, appoint the thesis supervisor (and a co-supervisor, if applicable) and (if a relevant request has been submitted) a supporting supervisor.
• A specimen application and the list of other documents required for initiating a doctoral assessment procedure have been provided as Appendix 1 to these Rules .
• The application for the doctoral assessment procedure is examined at the meeting of the Faculty Board. The candidate’s academic tutor applying for the position of the thesis supervisor is also present at the meeting. The Faculty Board, by secret ballot and with an absolute majority of the votes cast with at least half of the members entitled to vote present, adopts the resolutions on:

– initiation of a doctoral assessment procedure

– appointing a thesis supervisor

– appointing a supporting supervisor

• The Faculty Board may terminate a doctoral assessment procedure if a doctoral student fails to submit his/her doctoral thesis within four years from the initiation of a doctoral assessment procedure.
• If a resolution on rejection of the application for the doctoral assessment procedure is adopted, the Chairperson of the Faculty Board notifies the candidate of this decision in writing and with a justification.
• In justified circumstances, a candidate may request a change of supervisor, supporting supervisor or the subject of the doctoral thesis. Such changes are approved with a resolution of the Faculty Board, upon consulting the relevant team for doctoral assessment procedures.
• Doctoral thesis
• A doctoral thesis should present an original solution to a scientific problem and demonstrate the candidate’s general theoretical knowledge in the given discipline of science as well as the ability to conduct independent research. A doctoral thesis must be its author’s individual achievement; it may also constitute an independent and distinct part of a collective work if it demonstrates the candidate’s individual contribution to the development of the work’s concept, performance of the experimental part, preparation and interpretation of the results.
• A doctoral thesis should be submitted in four copies together with a summary in English and in Polish and an opinion from the thesis supervisor presenting the description and assessment of the thesis.
• A doctoral thesis prepared in a language other than Polish should include a summary in English and in Polish.

III. Doctoral degree exams

• The Faculty Board appoints members to the examination committees for conducting doctoral degree exams. The examination committee is composed of persons holding the academic title of profesor or the academic degree of doktor habilitowany . This requirement does not concern examiners conducting exams in a modern foreign language.
• Doctoral degree exams are conducted within the following scopes:
• a) the primary discipline compliant with the subject of the doctoral thesis – with the examination committee composed of at least four persons holding the title of profesor in the field of science or art to which the given discipline of science belongs, or the degree of doktor habilitowany in the given discipline of science, or persons who have acquired qualifications equivalent to those resulting from holding the degree of doktor habilitowany under Article 21a of the Act and who conduct research or teaching activity in relation to this discipline of science, including the thesis supervisor, the second supervisor or a co-supervisor;
• a) an additional discipline – with the examination committee composed of at least three persons among whom at least one holds the title of profesor in the field of science or art to which the given discipline of science belongs, or the degree of doktor habilitowany in the given discipline of science, or who has acquired qualifications equivalent to those resulting from holding the degree of doktor habilitowany under Article 21a of the Act and who conduct research or teaching activity in relation to this discipline of science;
• c) a modern foreign language – with the examination committee composed of at least three persons among whom at least one teaches this language in a higher education institution and the remaining persons hold the degree of at least doktor .
• If the candidate fails to pass one of the doctoral degree exams, the candidate may apply to the Faculty Board for re-taking the exam. Such an exam may be held no sooner than after the lapse of three months from the date of the first exam and no more than once.
• Appointing reviewers
• The teams for doctoral assessment procedures in the discipline of: political science; security science; public policy submit to the Faculty Board their recommendations on two reviewers for the submitted doctoral thesis. A reviewer must hold the title of profesor or the degree of doktor habilitowany . The role of reviewer may not be performed by a person in relation to whom there are justified doubts as to his/her impartiality.
• Upon receiving the last review, all reviews and the thesis summary are immediately sent in an electronic form to the Central Commission for Degrees and Titles.
• Accepting the doctoral thesis and its approval for a public defence
• The Faculty Board, at the request of the relevant team, appoints the Doctoral Commission responsible for: accepting the doctoral thesis, approving it for a public defence and accepting the defence. The Commission is composed of the members of the Faculty Board holding the title of profesor or the degree of doktor habilitowany in the field of science to which the primary discipline relevant for the thesis subject belongs, and the members of the Faculty Board holding the title of profesor or the degree of doktor habilitowany in a related discipline of science, the thesis supervisor and the reviewers. The supporting supervisor may be present at the meetings of the commission conducting doctoral degree exams and of the Doctoral Commission, upon the invitation of the chairperson of the Faculty Board and without the right to vote.
• The Doctoral Commission, having read the doctoral thesis and the opinions of the supervisor and the reviewers, adopts by secret ballot a resolution on acceptance of the doctoral thesis and its approval for a public defence and sets the date of the defence. In the event a doctoral thesis is not accepted and not approved for a defence, the Doctoral Commission presents this matter to the Faculty Board together with a justification and the Faculty Board adopts a resolution on this matter.

A summary of the doctoral thesis is posted on the Faculty’s website directly after the Doctoral Commission adopts the resolution on acceptance of the doctoral thesis, while the reviews are posted on the day on which they are submitted by the reviewers. The summary and the reviews are available on the website at least until the day on which the degree of doktor is awarded.

• Defence of the doctoral thesis
• Information on the date of the public defence is sent to organisational units authorised to award the degree of doktor nauk społecznych [doctoral degree in social sciences] in the discipline of: political science, public policy, security science. No later than ten days before the date of the defence an announcement on the defence of the doctoral thesis is posted on the noticeboard for doctoral students and on the Faculty’s website.
• The doctoral thesis defence takes places at an open meeting of the Doctoral Commission with the thesis supervisor, supporting supervisor and reviewers present.
• The course of the doctoral thesis defence is minuted.
• During a doctoral thesis defence:
• a) The Chairperson of the Commission announces that the candidate has met the conditions specified by regulations on the doctoral assessment procedure, has passed the doctoral degree exams, has submitted a doctoral thesis which has received positive opinions from the reviewers and the thesis supervisor, has been accepted and approved for a defence.
• b) The thesis supervisor presents the candidate and his/her academic achievements.
• c) The candidate presents the main aims of the doctoral thesis – a summary of his/her academic achievements, which has been also submitted in a written form, and the reviewers present their opinions on the doctoral thesis.
• d) If a reviewer is absent, the chairperson of the Doctoral Commission decides that a review is read out by one of the Commission members.
• e) The Candidate expresses his/her opinion on the reviews.
• f) The Chairperson opens a discussion during which all those present at the meeting may voice their opinions and the candidate answers any questions asked.
• After the doctoral thesis defence, the Doctoral Commission holds a closed meeting at which it adopts a resolution on accepting (or rejecting) the public defence of the doctoral thesis.
• The Doctoral Commission prepares a draft resolution on the award of the degree of doktor and submits it to the Faculty Board.
• A doctoral thesis may be awarded distinctions according to the rules specified in a relevant resolution of the Faculty Board.
• The Faculty Board, by secret ballot and with an absolute majority of the votes cast with at least half of the members entitled to vote present, adopts the resolutions on the award of the degree of doktor .
• The resolution of the Faculty Board on the award of the degree of doktor becomes valid upon its adoption.

VII. Terminating a doctoral assessment procedure

• A doctoral assessment procedure is terminated at the Dean’s request if:
• a) the candidate has not taken the doctoral degree exams or has failed to pass them,
• b) the Doctoral Commission has not accepted the doctoral thesis and has not approved it for a public defence.
• A doctoral assessment procedure may be terminated at the request of the Dean or the thesis supervisor if the candidate has not submitted his/her doctoral thesis within four years from the date of initiating the procedure.
• The Faculty Board may terminate a doctoral assessment procedure at the request of the candidate.

This ordinance enters into force on the day of its signing. Ordinance no. 3/2017 of 15 May 2017 becomes ineffective.

The above Rules have been specified pursuant to the following acts: Act of 14 March 2005 ‘Law on Higher Education’, as amended

Act of 14 March 2003 on academic degrees and titles and on degrees and titles in arts, as amended

Ordinance of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 26 September 2016 on a detailed course of actions in the doctoral assessment procedure, the procedure for award of the degree of doktor habilitowany and the procedure for award of the title of profesor

Appendix 1  

Documents required for initiating a doctoral assessment procedure

Doctoral programme students and graduates

• Application to the Board of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies of the University of Warsaw for initiation of a doctoral assessment procedure, together with the proposed subject of the thesis and indication of the thesis supervisor.

The application must include:

– information on the area of knowledge, field and discipline of science in relation to which the doctoral assessment procedure is to be initiated;

– application for a consent to submit a doctoral thesis in a language other than Polish;

– information on the chosen foreign language (doctoral degree exam);

– information on the chosen additional discipline for the doctoral degree exam (please choose from: political science, philosophy, public policy, security science).

• A scientific book published or accepted for publishing or at least one scientific publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal of at least national reach, as specified by the minister competent for science based on the regulations on financing science, or in a peer-reviewed report from an international scientific conference.
• Consent from the academic tutor to provide academic supervision and adopt the role of the thesis supervisor.
• Consent from the second academic tutor to provide academic supervision and adopt the role of the thesis co-supervisor, if applicable.
• The candidate’s recommendations regarding the thesis supervisor (and co-supervisor, if applicable).
• Application of the academic tutor for appointment of a supporting supervisor, if applicable.
• Consent of the supporting supervisor to provide academic supervision.
• Opinion of the academic tutor (with an indication of the percentage of the thesis already written and accepted).
• List of the candidate’s scientific publications.
• Synopsis of the doctoral thesis.
• Plan of the doctoral thesis.
• List of references collected for the purpose of the doctoral thesis.
• Résumé/CV.
• Declaration on the payment of costs of a doctoral thesis defence if the thesis is submitted more than two years after the date of graduation from the doctoral programme (applies to doctoral programme students and graduates).
• Information on the course of the doctoral assessment procedure if the candidate has already applied for the degree of doktor in the past.

Persons who apply for a doctoral assessment procedure as part of an individual procedure must submit also:

• higher education diploma,
• declaration on the payment of costs of the doctoral thesis defence,
• personal questionnaire form.

A candidate who is a beneficiary of the ‘Diamond Grant’ [Diamentowy Grant] programme established by the minister competent for science must submit an application for a doctoral assessment procedure together with:

1) copy of a document certifying his/her status of a beneficiary of the programme ‘Diamentowy Grant’;

2) opinion referred to in Article 11(3) of the Act.

RESOLUTION NO. 88/2017

of 26 April 2017

on the principles of awarding Distinctions to doctoral theses

A doctoral thesis may be awarded distinctions if all of the following criteria are met:

• a) the doctoral thesis defence has taken place no later than 4 years after the initiation of the doctoral assessment procedure;
• b) the doctoral degree exams have been passed by the candidate for a doctoral degree with the grade ‘very good’;
• c) the request for awarding distinctions to a doctoral thesis has been submitted by the thesis reviewer or reviewers;
• d) the request for awarding distinctions to a doctoral thesis has been approved by a qualified majority of two-thirds of the members of the Doctoral Commission, after the acceptance of the public doctoral thesis defence.

The request for awarding distinctions to a doctoral thesis should be submitted by the Chairperson of the Doctoral Commission during the meeting of the Faculty Board at which the matter of conferring the doctoral degree is considered.

A doctoral thesis has been awarded distinctions if the request of the Doctoral Commission has been approved with the absolute majority of votes of authorised members of the Faculty Board.

Head of the PhD Student Union: Rafał Więckiewicz M.A. [email protected]

Phone number & e-mail: + 48 22 55 20 187 [email protected]

Office hours:

Office Venue: Auditorium Building Krakowskie Przedmieście st. 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw Room no. 210, 2 floor

• Faculty Authorities
• About the Faculty
• History of the Faculty
• Dean’s Representative
• Important Acts
• SCIENCE & RESEARCH
• Announcements
• Office hours of our teaching staff
• Class schedules
• Study programmes
• BA & MA theses supervisors 2020/2021
• IT Support Office (USOS)
• COOPERATION
• FOR CANDIDATES
• Political Science Alumni Association, University of Warsaw
• International Office
• POLSKA WERSJA

• Skip to the main menu
• Skip to search
• Skip to content

Doctoral dissertation | Gdańsk University of Technology

Page content.

• Doctoral dissertation

Art. 187 - Act of 20 July 2018 The Law on Higher Education and Science 1. The doctoral dissertation demonstrates the candidate’s general theoretical knowledge in a discipline (or disciplines) and the ability to conduct research or artistic work independently. 2. The subject matter of the doctoral dissertation shall be an original solution to a scientific problem or in terms of the application of results of own scientific research in the economic or social sphere, or an original artistic achievement. 3. The doctoral dissertation may be a written dissertation, including a scientific monograph; a collection of published and thematically related scientific articles; design, construction, technological, implementation or artistic work; as well as an independent and separate part of a collective work. 4. The doctoral dissertation shall include an abstract in English, whereas a doctoral dissertation prepared in a foreign language – an abstract in Polish. In the case when the dissertation is not in written form, its description in Polish and English shall be attached.

Procedure for awarding the doctoral degree:

legal basis:

• Gdańsk Tech - information on Scientific Affairs Office website
• IBW PAN - information on The  Institute of Hydro-Engineering of Polish Academy of Sciences website
• IMP PAN - information on The Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery of Polish Academy of Sciences website (in Polish only)

Composition of the Scientific Councils for Disciplines:

• Gdańsk Tech: Scientifc Councils for the term 2020-2024 in polish only, we can provide you with an English by Google Translate
• The Institute of Hydro-Engineering of Polish Academy of Sciences - Scientific Council for the term 2023-2026
• The Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery of Polish Academy of Sciences - Scientific Council for the term 2023-2026

In case of questions, please contact directly the Councils of Scientific Areas and Disciplines (Gdańsk Tech), as well as the Scientific Boards (Institutes).

• economics and finance [EiF]   --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English
• management and quality studies [ZiJ]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English    
• chemical sciences [NCh]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English  
• physical sciences [NF]   --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English  
• mathematics [M]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English
• civil engineering, geodesy and transport [ILGiT]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English    
• architecture and urban planning [AiU]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English
• environmental engineering, mining and energy [IŚGiE]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English     
• materials engineering [IMa]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English
• mechanical engineering [IMe]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English
• automation, electronics, electrical engineering and space technologies [AEEiTK] -->  English language
• information and communication technology [ITiT]  --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English 
• biomedical engineering [IB] --> PhD students may choose the language of the dissertation - Polish or English

Navigation PhD Students

• Coordinators of disciplines
• Programme of study
• Changes in the implementation to the Programme of Study
• Individual research proposal
• Mid-term evaluation
• Teaching practice
• Completion of PhD training
• Extension of doctoral training
• Suspension of PhD training
• Formalities
• Scholarships for PhD Students
• Projects for PhD Students
• PhD Student's mobilities
• Other topics

• Doctoral School

• Program listing

About the programme

The goal of the studies.

We expect those completing the PhD programme to be able to: 

• analyse and formulate relevant research questions aimed to make a significant contribution to their respective fields of research.     
• conceptualise and implement research designs and methodologies that make it possible to push the boundaries of knowledge in their respective research fields 
• communicate orally and in writing effectively and clearly, participate actively in international conferences, collaborate in international research groups, and publish in top journals 
• hold positions in leading academic and research institutions, conduct research, development, and innovation projects in various organisations outside the academic environment 

Applicants must have an interest in research in addition to excellent academic transcripts. The programme is open to graduates of various disciplines (including e.g. management, finance, economics, law, engineering, psychology, and other related disciplines), who aspire to make significant theoretical and methodological contributions to the development of the field of social sciences through their scientific and research activity.

Target audience

We are looking for early-stage professionals who have a passion for research and an ambition to become leading researchers in the field of social and legal sciences.

• analyse and formulate relevant research questions aimed to make a significant contribution to their respective fields of science     
• hold positions in leading academic and research institutions or conduct research, development, and innovation projects in various organisations outside the academic environment 

The perfect applicant deciding to pursue doctoral studies at Kozminski University: 

• is ambitious;   
• aspires to pursue a career in research in the field of social sciences;  
• is able to analyse complex problems and issues;   
• is highly proficient in English;  
• has a documented record of excellent study results achieved in the past;   
• holds a master’s degree in the field of social sciences, legal sciences or in a related discipline; 

Learn more about the doctoral school, our students and supervisors

• Courses taught by internationally acclaimed faculty;
• An inspiring, creative, challenging, and supportive environment that stimulates its members to explore issues that matter to them;
• An atmosphere of collegiality and mutual support;
• An opportunity to engage at deep levels of research, a chance to create, question, and reflect on knowledge.

The standard duration of doctoral studies is four years. In the first two years, doctoral students are required to complete their scientific-methodical courses. Years 3 and 4 focus mainly on writing the doctoral dissertation. The course of study ends with a “defence” of the dissertation. In the course of study, doctoral students gain experience in the area of conducting research and disseminating its results as well as planning, implementing, and applying for funds for research projects - everything under the supervision of experienced researchers.

Those doctoral students who find the researching and teaching activities of KU’s faculty members highly relevant to their interests are given four years to conduct a personal research project from start to end. These four years are an opportunity for them to prepare for their future entry into the world of international academia by means of publishing activity and through participation in scientific conferences. 

KU doctoral school has two processes in place aimed to monitor students’ progress: 

• Research Seminars: each of the doctoral students presents their progress in their research at least once per year. The objective is not to evaluate the work performed but to help the student in their research orientation. This workshop-type meeting brings together doctoral students, dissertation supervisors, the programme director, and other faculty members from KU or from outside KU, selected in accordance with the subject of the dissertation. 
• Annual Assessment: each of the doctoral students presents and discusses the results of their activity (progress made in their independent research project, dissemination of research results, involvement in research projects, etc.) and their plans for the following year. The objective is to review the work performed in a given year and to prepare a plan for the year to follow. Participants include: the supervisor of the dissertation, the programme director, and - possibly - other faculty members from KU or from outside KU. It takes place in June. 

Class Schedule

The main goal of the PhD programme is to help its participants acquire and develop the skills required in the practice of a researcher and of an academic teacher. Doctoral students also work on their dissertations - research project of great significance and of the utmost quality. Apart from the dissertation element, doctoral studies include also a general and thorough research training, a chance to explore a chosen specialization, and a teaching training module.

Doctoral school programme

Doctoral School Director

Do you wish to become a researcher prepared to work at the world’s best universities? Are you looking for a rigorous PhD programme run by one of the best research institutions/business schools in Central Europe? If so, Kozminski University’s full-time PhD programme in social and legal sciences is the programme for you.  

Taking part in the doctoral programme at Kozminski University offers a chance for high-calibre researchers exploring disciplines such as management, economy, finance, or law to to work closely with academics at the forefront of their respective fields, to become part of a vibrant research community, and to benefit from the resources and reputation of the university. 

The doctoral programme at Kozminski University provides a rigorous framework of training modules and courses that cover a wide range of topics and research methods. The curriculum involves also working closely with dissertation supervisors. Kozminski University is a relatively young school but it is also a research centre whose list of achievements in different scientific disciplines is already very impressive. 

The PhD programme is an opportunity for doctoral students to get prepared to enter the world of international academia by taking part in scientific projects and industry-specific events as well as by means of their publishing activity. 

We attach great significance to three criteria: your prior academic background; the relevance of your proposed research problem; the fitness of your proposal for the overall research activity of our faculty.

Applicants to the Kozminski University PhD program must hold a master’s degree or equivalent and need to have documented proficiency in the English language.

1. Deadlines 

• Official call publishing – February 2024 
• Application opening date – 25 June 2024 
• Application closing date – 2 July 2024 
• PhD admission results (ranking for interviews) – 8-16 July 2024
• PhD admission results – 22 July 2024

2. Financial Conditions 

Doctoral school funded by the Ministry of Education and Science 

3. Requirements 

Applications can be submitted by candidates of any citizenship who: 

a) have completed or are completing their graduate (master) degree  (e.g. level 7 European Qualification Framework) recognized by the Admission Board, 

b) have at least a “proven” C1 (CEFR) level of competence in English - Date of the exam: not before  October 31, 2020, 

c) have a confirmation of support from a potential supervisor (among KU faculty), 

d) self-declare that the candidate if committed to a full time Ph.D. programme. 

e) have at least a “proven” B2 (CEFR) level of competence in English - Date of the exam: not before  October 31, 2020. The minimum score corresponding to the level B2: 

• International Certificate: FCE, CAE, CPE, BEC Vantage, BEC Higher – more then 173 points, 
• International Certificate: IELTS – average 6.5; no part lower than 5, 
• International Certificate: TOEFL iBT – 84 points. 

But if you don't have an internationally recognized certificate, you will have to self-declare: 

• you are a native speaker of English, 
• you have attended a university program in English. 

4. Selection Criteria 

We attach great significance to three criteria: your prior academic background; the relevance of your proposed research problem; the fitness of your proposal for the overall research activity of our faculty. 

The first step assessment is based on a candidate’s: 

• personal curriculum;  
• academic records;  
• research proposal; 
• statement of purpose;  
• up to three reference letters; 
• other relevant documents (maximum five). 

The qualifications assessment criteria are as follows: 

• a maximum of 40 points for the applicant’s curriculum vita, academic records and thesis' abstract; 
• a maximum of 30 points for statement of purpose, research proposal and reference letters; 
• a maximum of 10 points for other relevant elements. 

The second step assessment is based on the interview, whose maximum score is 20 points. 

The Admission Board will interview applicants who have obtained at least 60 points in the qualifications assessment. An applicant will be eligible for admission to the PhD program if he or she has obtained at least 60 points in the qualifications assessment and at least 15 points out of 20 in the interview. 

Interviews may be held by communications technology which does not require the physical presence of the applicant. 

The purpose of the interview is to better assess applicants’ qualifications; discuss their research proposal (relevance, international approach, issues involved) and their publications, if any; test their aptitude for the program; ascertain their proficiency in English and other foreign languages (when only self-certified), and ascertain their competence in a subject of their choice, which is part of the PhD curriculum. 

5. Documents for Selection 

A wide range of information is needed in order to assess the applicants' strengths and potential for academic success. In particular, the following elements are considered: 

• Application ( appendix 1 ), 
• Application form ( appendix 2 ), 
• A confirmation of support from a potential supervisor (among KU faculty) ( appendix 3 ), 
• Personal curriculum: full CV: education, work experience, language skills, study/work abroad, other relevant skills and experiences, 
• Academic records: transcript of exams and certification of undergraduate and graduate degrees awarded and final grade (if any); if the graduate program has not been completed , an enrollment document with the full study plan, the exams taken and the grades achieved, 
• Statement of purpose:  short description (max 1200 words) of your motivation for enrollment in Koźmiński University PhD program and of your professional goals, 
• Reference letters: up to three reference letters send directly to KU by referees. Referees can be academic (first best) or non-academic (second best) ( appendix 4 ), 
• Research proposal: detailed description of research proposal ( appendix 5 ), 
• Abstract of the thesis only if included in your graduate program (maximum length: one page); 
• Other relevant documents (maximum five): e.g. publications, other programs attended, etc. 
• Documentary evidence of English language competence, 
• Self-declare that the candidate if committed to a full time Ph.D. programme, 
• Copy of the national ID or a passport, 
• Proof of payment of the admission fee (non-refundable). 

6. Application Procedure  

Candidates submit their recruitment documents between 25 June and 2 July 2024. 

The documents can be sent by email to: [email protected] , traditional post or leave in A7a room. 

This deadline is not negotiable.

7. Results: Communication Procedure 

Applicants are ranked according to merit. 

Final ranking: 

• by 22 July 2024 you will be sent a personal e-mail to the address provided in which information about the final outcome of the application will be found. 

8. Financial Matters 

Admission fee: 200 pln/46,72EUR (Exchange rates according to NBP table of 2024-04-08)     

Scholarship per month – 3466,90 pln/809,93 EUR Exchange rates according to NBP table of 2024-04-08)

9. Full Official Call 

Please carefully read the Full Official Call in order to get detailed information about the set of rules and guidelines to apply for the PhD you are interested in. 

More information

This deadline is not negotiable. 

Admission fee: 200 pln/46,72EUR (Exchange rates according to NBP table of 2024-04-08)

Please carefully read the Full Official Call in order to get detailed information about the set of rules and guidelines to apply for the PhD you are interested in.

Enrolment fee: 200 pln/46,72EUR (Exchange rates according to NBP table of 2024-04-08)

Bank account to which you can pay the registration fee:   Kozminski University    03-301 Warsaw,  ul. Jagiellońska 57/59    BANK PEKAO SA in Warsaw 20 1240 1024 1111 0010 1646 0637 SWIFT: PKOPPLPW Title: Doctoral School + full name

Program is free of charge na Doctoral school funded by the Ministry of Education and Science

PhD studies in Poland

PhD studies (Third cycle studies, doctoral studies, doctoral studies [1] [2]) – in accordance with the repealed Act on Higher Education, studies enabling advanced knowledge in a given field or discipline, preparing for independent research and creative activity. Education at doctoral studies ended in obtaining a third degree qualification (in Poland the graduate receives a Certificate of completion of doctoral studies [3]). Completing third degree studies did not mean obtaining a doctoral degree, but it should be noted that doctoral studies created conditions for the preparation of a doctoral dissertation [4]. Doctoral studies could be conducted by authorized organizational units of the university, a scientific institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, a research institute or an international scientific institute operating on the territory of the Republic of Poland.

In Poland, doctoral studies lasted not less than 2 years and not more than 4 years, with the possibility of extension in justified cases by 2 years (eg conducting long-term scientific research) [5].

In Poland in the 2011/2012 academic year 40,263 people studied as part of doctoral studies, including 29,943 in full-time mode and 10,320 in extramural mode [6].

Education at doctoral studies required the completion of second-cycle studies or uniform master’s studies.

Constitution for science

The doctoral student education system has been thoroughly rebuilt thanks to the Constitution for Science. What are the most important changes?

• Current doctoral studies (third cycle studies) have been replaced by the education of doctoral students in doctoral schools. doctoral school will be run by the entire university, and not – as in the case of doctoral studies – an authorized university unit.
• Right to run a doctoral school has been associated with the scientific category – it can be run by an entity conducting scientific activity in at least two scientific disciplines with category A +, A or B +.
• Division into modes (full-time and part-time) of doctoral studies was eliminated, and doctoral school education is free for doctoral students.
• Each participant of the doctoral school will receive a scholarship .
• In place of environmental doctoral studies, entities which have at least one scientific category not lower than B + may conduct a joint doctoral school.
• Instead of university-wide and institutional doctoral study regulations, doctoral school regulations are introduced, adopted by senates or scientific councils for individual doctoral schools, respectively.

Frequently asked questions

Doctoral students who start their doctoral studies before the 2019/2020 academic year, continue their education on the current basis. [Resp. from 27.07.2018]

Until April 30, 2019, PhD students who started their third-cycle studies before the 2019/20 academic year can open their doctoral dissertation on the old principles. If they fail to do so, they will be able to institute proceedings for the award of a doctoral degree from October 1, 2019. In this case, however – the proceedings will proceed according to the new rules. The changes that have occurred in this matter thanks to the Constitution for Science are pro-quality and will not adversely affect future doctors. Most of the regulations regarding checking the learning outcomes are made by the university.

No. Doctoral scholarships received by doctoral students who started their doctoral studies before the 2019/2020 academic year will be exempt from personal income tax, and will not be reduced by social security contributions. Only those scholarships paid as part of doctoral schools – doctoral students who have been studying there since October 1, 2019 – are to be included. Currently conducted doctoral studies should be continued in this respect on the current basis. [Resp. from 18.10.2018]

The new rules, introducing a universal system of doctoral scholarships, will apply to doctoral students studying in doctoral schools – from October 1, 2019 [resp. from 27.07.2018]

The amount of doctoral scholarship is not less than 60% of the minimum basic salary of an assistant in accordance with the provisions in force before October 1, 2018, i.e. not less than PLN 1,470. The decision to award a doctoral scholarship, the period of its receipt and the amount is taken by the rector at the university. [Resp. from 10.01.2019]

Doctoral studies started before the academic year 2019/2020 are conducted on the current basis, but not longer than until December 31, 2023 (in accordance with Article 279 (1) of the Act introducing the Act – Law on Higher Education and Science). The closing date for the closure of the doctoral dissertation initiated under the old rules is December 31, 2021. On the other hand, persons who began their doctoral studies under the old principles and did not complete their doctoral dissertation by December 31, 2021, may apply for a doctoral degree also under the new principles (in accordance with from Article 179 of the Act – Regulations introducing the Act – Law on Higher Education and Science). The exact schedule for doctoral studies (resulting from transitional provisions): commencement of doctoral studies (under the old rules): before the academic year 2019/2020 Opening the doctoral dissertation (on the old principles): by April 30, 2019 at the latest. completion of doctoral studies (on the old principles): by 31 December 2023 at the latest. Completion of the doctoral dissertation (on the old principles): by December 31, 2021, at the latest. commencing education at the doctoral school (under the new rules): from October 1, 2019 [resp. from 22.08.2018]

It is not possible to extend the deadline. The cancellation or closure of a doctoral dissertation not completed by December 31, 2021 applies to all doctoral dissertations initiated under current (i.e. old) regulations. [Resp. from 22.08.2018]

The new rules apply to persons admitted to doctoral schools. From May 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019, proceedings regarding the award of a doctoral degree shall not be initiated. Legal basis: Article 179 para. 2 and paragraph 5 of the Act. Provisions introducing the Act – Law on Higher Education and Science [answer. from 27.07.2018]

The doctoral dissertation is closed by an appropriate resolution of the entity conducting this proceeding. Re-initiation of proceedings on the new principles, i.e. on the basis of the Law on Higher Education and Science, may take place as part of education at the doctoral school or in the extramural mode. The issue of financing the proceedings for granting a doctoral degree – conducted under new rules – has been regulated in art. 182 of the Law on higher education and science. A person who applies for a doctoral degree pays a fee for conducting proceedings in this case. The amount of the fee may not exceed the costs of the procedure, taking into account in particular the costs of remuneration of the promoter or promoters, ancillary promoter and reviewers. The fee is not collected at the university, PAS institute, research institute, international institute from an applicant for a doctoral degree who has completed doctoral education. In justified cases, the rector, director of the PAN institute, director of a research institute or director of an international institute may exempt from the fee in whole or in part. In the case of an academic teacher or researcher, the costs of proceedings are borne by the university employing him, the Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, a research institute or an international institute. [Resp. from 22.08.2018]

A doctoral student studying under the old rules should submit an application to the dean. At the same time, it should be pointed out that in the case of doctoral students who started their studies before the academic year 2019/2020 and who will apply for a doctoral degree under the new rules, the procedure initiates the submission of an application for the appointment of a promoter or promoters. More information in the article. [Resp. from 10.22.2018]Will the doctoral student who started his education in the 2018/2019 academic year be able to obtain doctoral status at the doctoral school in the 2019/2020 academic year?

Both the Act – Law on Higher Education and Science and the Act – Regulations introducing the Act – Law on Higher Education and Science do not provide for “going” to doctoral school. Persons who begin their doctoral studies before the academic year 2019/2020, continue them on the basis of the current rules and do not become participants in doctoral education. [Resp. from March 7, 2019]

Doctoral students who started their doctoral studies before the 2019/2020 academic year may take part in the recruitment to the doctoral school and, after successful completion, study at the doctoral and doctoral school and receive a doctoral scholarship. A limitation on receiving a doctoral scholarship at a doctoral school is having a doctoral degree. The total period of receiving doctoral scholarships at doctoral schools cannot exceed 4 years. The university has the right to expect that the doctoral dissertation carried out during doctoral school education will not be thematically and conceptually the same as the work previously prepared as part of doctoral studies. During the recruitment procedure, the entity running the doctoral school may require the candidate to submit a certificate of the doctoral studies or information about the doctoral dissertation – including the doctoral dissertation, if he / she applied (or simultaneously applies) to award a doctoral degree in a different formula (studies) doctoral, ‘free-foot’ mode). The university running the school has the right to request the above information and expect that the scientific problem, which would constitute the subject of the doctoral dissertation prepared at the doctoral school, was no longer solved as part of previously undertaken education. The Act does not explicitly provide for a prohibition on receiving a doctoral scholarship at doctoral studies by a person who, despite starting from the new academic year in doctoral school, has not resigned from doctoral studies. However, it should be remembered that the doctoral school system significantly increased the requirements for doctoral students. Therefore, there are concerns whether a person trying to combine education in both modes will be able to timely and with the highest standards to fulfill the obligations arising from both education at the doctoral school and as part of doctoral studies. [Resp. from July 22, 2019]

source: https://konstytucjadlanauki.gov.pl/ksztalcenie-doktorantow-najczesciej-zadawane-pytania

To support our work, we invite you to accept cookies or to subscribe.

You have chosen not to accept cookies when visiting our site.

The content available on our site is the result of the daily efforts of our editors. They all work towards a single goal: to provide you with rich, high-quality content. All this is possible thanks to the income generated by advertising and subscriptions.

By giving your consent or subscribing, you are supporting the work of our editorial team and ensuring the long-term future of our site.

If you already have purchased a subscription, please log in

What is the translation of "dissertation" in Polish?

"dissertation" in polish, dissertation {noun}.

• volume_up dysertacja
• praca dyplomowa
• praca pisemna

BA dissertation {noun}

• volume_up praca licencjacka

PhD dissertation {noun}

• volume_up rozprawa doktorska
• dysertacja doktorska

postdoctoral dissertation {noun}

• volume_up praca habilitacyjna

doctoral dissertation {noun}

• volume_up praca doktorska
• rozprawa doktorska

Polish translations powered by Oxford Languages

Dissertation noun, translations.

• British English
• open_in_new Link to source
• warning Request revision

Context sentences

English polish contextual examples of "dissertation" in polish.

These sentences come from external sources and may not be accurate. bab.la is not responsible for their content.

Monolingual examples

English how to use "dissertation" in a sentence, english how to use "ba dissertation" in a sentence, english how to use "phd dissertation" in a sentence, english how to use "postdoctoral dissertation" in a sentence, english how to use "doctoral dissertation" in a sentence, english how to use "dysertacja" in a sentence, english how to use "rozprawa doktorska" in a sentence, english how to use "dysertacja doktorska" in a sentence, english how to use "praca habilitacyjna" in a sentence, english how to use "praca doktorska" in a sentence, collocations, "dissertation focus" in polish.

• volume_up rozprawa ostrości
• volume_up rozprawa

"dissertation research" in Polish

• volume_up badania dysertacyjne
• volume_up badania nad rozprawą

"dissertation writing" in Polish

• volume_up pisanie rozprawy

Synonyms (English) for "dissertation":

Pronunciation.

• dissenting judge
• dissenting justice
• dissenting member
• dissenting opinion
• dissenting opinions
• dissenting view
• dissenting views
• dissenting voice
• dissenting voices
• dissenting vote
• dissertation
• dissertation advisor
• dissertation director
• dissertation focus
• dissertation research
• dissertation writing
• dissident activity
• dissident factions

Have a look at the Zulu-English dictionary by bab.la.

Social Login

• Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
• Wyloguj się

Tłumaczenie słowa dissertation - Słownik angielsko-polski

Dissertation.

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

(Tłumaczenie dissertation z Cambridge English–Polish Dictionary © Cambridge University Press)

Translation of dissertation | PASSWORD English-Polish Dictionary

(Tłumaczenie dissertation z PASSWORD English-Polish Dictionary © 2022 K Dictionaries Ltd)

Przykłady dissertation

Tłumaczenie dissertation.

Uzyskaj szybkie, bezpłatne tłumaczenie!

a group of four people who play musical instruments or sing as a group

Alike and analogous (Talking about similarities, Part 1)

Dowiedz się więcej dzięki +Plus

• Świeże i godne polecenia {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
• Definicje Jasne wyjaśnienia naturalnego, mówionego i pisanego języka angielskiego. angielski Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
• Gramatyka i tezaurus Objaśnienia naturalnego użycia języka angielskiego w piśmie i mowie gramatyka Tezaurus
• Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
• angielski–chiński (uproszczony) Chinese (Simplified)–English
• angielski–chiński (tradycyjny) Chinese (Traditional)–English
• angielski–holenderski holenderski–angielski
• angielski–francuski francuski–angielski
• angielski–niemiecki niemiecki–angielski
• angielski–indonezyjski indonezyjski–angielski
• angielski–włoski włoski–angielski
• angielski–japoński japoński–angielski
• angielski–norweski norweski–angielski
• angielski–polski polski–angielski
• angielski–portugalski portugalski–angielski
• angielski–hiszpański hiszpański–angielski
• English–Swedish Swedish–English
• Dictionary +Plus Listy słów
• English–Polish    Noun
• PASSWORD English–Polish    Noun
• Translations
• Wszystkie tłumaczenia

Dodaj dissertation do jednej z poniższych list lub utwórz nową.

{{message}}

Coś poszło nie tak.

Pojawił się problem z wysłaniem raportu.

Aby wesprzeć naszą pracę, zapraszamy do zaakceptowania plików cookie lub subskrypcji.

Użytkownik zdecydował się nie akceptować plików cookie podczas odwiedzania naszej witryny.

Treści dostępne na naszej stronie są wynikiem codziennych wysiłków naszych redaktorów. Wszyscy oni dążą do jednego celu: dostarczania bogatych treści wysokiej jakości. Wszystko to jest możliwe dzięki dochodom generowanym przez reklamy i subskrypcje.

Wyrażając zgodę lub subskrybując, wspierasz pracę naszego zespołu redakcyjnego i zapewniasz długoterminową przyszłość naszej witryny.

Jeśli masz już wykupioną subskrypcję, zaloguj się

Jakie jest tłumaczenie "postdoctoral" po polsku?

"postdoctoral" - polskie tłumaczenie, postdoctoral {przym.}.

• volume_up podoktorancki

postdoctoral dissertation {rzecz.}

• volume_up praca habilitacyjna

person who submits a postdoctoral/habilitation thesis

• volume_up habilitant

Tłumaczenia na język polski dostarczane przez Oxford Languages

Postdoctoral adjective, tłumaczenia, postdoctoral {przymiotnik}, postdoctoral dissertation {rzeczownik}, przykłady użycia, english polish przykłady kontekstowe "postdoctoral" po polsku.

Poniższe tłumaczenia pochodzą z zewnętrznych źródeł i mogą być niedokładne. bab.la nie jest odpowiedzialne za ich brzmienie.

• open_in_new Link do źródła
• warning Prośba o sprawdzenie

Przykłady jednojęzyczne

English jak użyć "postdoctoral" w zdaniu, english jak użyć "postdoctoral dissertation" w zdaniu, english jak użyć "praca habilitacyjna" w zdaniu, english jak użyć "habilitant" w zdaniu, "postdoctoral fellow" - polskie tłumaczenie.

• volume_up kolega podoktorski
• volume_up doktorant

"postdoctoral fellowship" - polskie tłumaczenie

• volume_up stypendium podoktorskie

"postdoctoral researchers" - polskie tłumaczenie

• volume_up badacze podoktorscy
• volume_up naukowcy podoktorscy

Synonimy (angielski) dla "postdoctoral":

• postcard feature
• postcard image
• postcard view
• postcardware
• postcognition
• postcolonial study
• postdoctoral
• postdoctoral dissertation
• postdoctoral fellow
• postdoctoral fellowship
• postdoctoral researchers
• postdoctoral scholars
• poste restante
• posted a return
• posted a statement
• posted anywhere
• posted everywhere

Więcej w słownik rosyjsko-polski .

Logowanie społecznościowe

Finished Papers

"doktorant" po angielsku — Słownik polsko-angielski | zobacz "doktorant" po polsku

• słuchacz studium podyplomowego , magistrant , student studiów magisterskich , doktorant , student studiów doktoranckich [policzalny] My son is a graduate, I'm so proud of him. (Mój syn jest studentem studiów magisterskich, jestem z niego taki dumny.) I'm so proud of my son - he's a graduate. (Jestem taki dumny z mojego syna - jest słuchaczem studium podyplomowego.) I'm a graduate at our local university. (Jestem magistrantem na naszym lokalnym uniwersytecie.) student, który uzyskał dyplom ukończenia studiów pierwszego stopnia i kontynuuje naukę
• PhD student , Ph.D. student  
• doctorand , doctorandus   [policzalny]

Powiązane zwroty — "doktorant"

"doktorant" — słownik kolokacji angielskich.

The university had 322 postgraduate students in the 2007-2008 academic year.

In 1964 the first 15 postgraduate students joined from nine countries.

The total student population is about 33,800 of which over 20,000 are undergraduate and the rest postgraduate students .

He returned to the Academy as a postgraduate student in 1934.

In addition several postgraduate students have made significant contributions to the project.

In 2005, the total number of registered postgraduate students was 959.

The School has a total of about 300 undergraduate and 60 postgraduate students .

"Of our 101 postgraduate students in piano, 20 or 30 have been here for 8 to 10 years," she said.

A recent 2003 addition provides for a handful of postgraduate students .

The student population includes 10,525 undergraduate and 3,050 postgraduate students .

• school student • college student • graduate student • Kolokacje: rzeczownik + student

At first she saw nothing in the short graduate student .

He's up with his graduate students , doing what he can.

As a former graduate student I will just say this.

Would a university have to check what data is being made available to foreign graduate students ?

Even then, the school would not have housing for its 600 graduate students .

During the summer of 1993, the first graduate students began classes.

He is a former graduate student , but that doesn't make you an academic.

Since 1989, the department has enrolled more than 473 graduate students from across the country and around the world.

So at that point, no graduate student was interested in working on this.

About 23 percent of its 10,493 graduate students are foreigners.

• school student • college student • minority student • Kolokacje: rzeczownik + student
• Graduate School • graduate program • Graduate Center • Kolokacje: graduate + rzeczownik

PhD students in the program work closely with the advisors on these projects, which have a wide range of topics.

Later, they are joined by the university's first 2 PhD students .

PhD student who murdered and dismembered three women will spend the rest of his life in prison.

It have a total of nearly 950 researchers and 715 PhD students .

With a total of around 200 employees the school has approximately 60 PhD students and 70 academic staff.

The university college also has several PhD students working in various disciplines.

Furthermore, PhD students are supported in the early years of their professional career.

He has been the advisor of more than 55 PhD students .

PhD students often have to take on debt to undertake their degree.

PhD students receive their doctoral degrees from a university partner, which can range in locations.

We finally found the right guy, a moonlighting Ph.D. student who did the job properly.

I'll never let anyone less talented than a Ph.D. student on our roof ever again.

Seven universities have recognized the institute for the guidance of Ph.D. students .

The program usually includes 25-30 Ph.D. students at one time.

Over the course of his career, he advised twenty Ph.D. students .

I took his economic history course for first-year Ph.D. students in 1959-60.

Among them are 1300 researchers, 1000 Ph.D. students and 500 postdoctorates.

Ph.D. students choose to complete two or three fields of study, in addition to writing a dissertation.

He was a recognized post graduate teacher and a guide for Ph.D. students .

Many Ph.D. students are doing research in the science.

Bardzo lubimy ciasteczka, ale jeszcze bardziej cenimy Twoją prywatność

Używamy plików cookie i podobnych technologii do analizy statystyk odwiedzalności i innych celów opisanych w Polityce prywatności . Jeśli wybierzesz „Akceptuj wszystko”, wszystkie ciasteczka opisane w naszej Polityce prywatności będą przechowywane w Twojej przeglądarce. Jeśli wybierzesz opcję „Odrzuć wszystko”, w Twojej przeglądarce będą przechowywane wyłącznie niezbędne do funkcjonowania witryny pliki cookie. W każdej chwili możesz dokonać zmiany w swoich ustawieniach .

• niemieckiego
• hiszpańskiego
• francuskiego
• Kurs angielskiego
• Prywatność i cookies
• Rozwiązywanie problemów