science investigatory project research paper

• Earth Science
• Physics & Engineering
• Science Kits
• Microscopes
• Science Curriculum and Kits
• About Home Science Tools

Teaching Resources & Guides > How to Teach Science Tips > Writing a Science Report  

Writing a Science Report

With science fair season coming up as well as many end of the year projects, students are often required to write a research paper or a report on their project. Use this guide to help you in the process from finding a topic to revising and editing your final paper.

Brainstorming Topics

Sometimes one of the largest barriers to writing a research paper is trying to figure out what to write about. Many times the topic is supplied by the teacher, or the curriculum tells what the student should research and write about. However, this is not always the case. Sometimes the student is given a very broad concept to write a research paper on, for example, water. Within the category of water, there are many topics and subtopics that would be appropriate. Topics about water can include anything from the three states of water, different water sources, minerals found in water, how water is used by living organisms, the water cycle, or how to find water in the desert. The point is that “water” is a very large topic and would be too broad to be adequately covered in a typical 3-5 page research paper.

When given a broad category to write about, it is important to narrow it down to a topic that is much more manageable. Sometimes research needs to be done in order to find the best topic to write about. (Look for searching tips in “Finding and Gathering Information.”) Listed below are some tips and guidelines for picking a suitable research topic:

• Pick a topic within the category that you find interesting. It makes it that much easier to research and write about a topic if it interests you.
• You may find while researching a topic that the details of the topic are very boring to you. If this is the case, and you have the option to do this, change your topic.
• Pick a topic that you are already familiar with and research further into that area to build on your current knowledge.
• When researching topics to do your paper on, look at how much information you are finding. If you are finding very little information on your topic or you are finding an overwhelming amount, you may need to rethink your topic.
• If permissible, always leave yourself open to changing your topic. While researching for topics, you may come across one that you find really interesting and can use just as well as the previous topics you were searching for.
• Most importantly, does your research topic fit the guidelines set forth by your teacher or curriculum?

Finding and Gathering Information

There are numerous resources out there to help you find information on the topic selected for your research paper. One of the first places to begin research is at your local library. Use the Dewey Decimal System or ask the librarian to help you find books related to your topic. There are also a variety of reference materials, such as encyclopedias, available at the library.

A relatively new reference resource has become available with the power of technology – the Internet. While the Internet allows the user to access a wealth of information that is often more up-to-date than printed materials such as books and encyclopedias, there are certainly drawbacks to using it. It can be hard to tell whether or not a site contains factual information or just someone’s opinion. A site can also be dangerous or inappropriate for students to use.

You may find that certain science concepts and science terminology are not easy to find in regular dictionaries and encyclopedias. A science dictionary or science encyclopedia can help you find more in-depth and relevant information for your science report. If your topic is very technical or specific, reference materials such as medical dictionaries and chemistry encyclopedias may also be good resources to use.

If you are writing a report for your science fair project, not only will you be finding information from published sources, you will also be generating your own data, results, and conclusions. Keep a journal that tracks and records your experiments and results. When writing your report, you can either write out your findings from your experiments or display them using graphs or charts .

*As you are gathering information, keep a working bibliography of where you found your sources. Look under “Citing Sources” for more information. This will save you a lot of time in the long run!

Organizing Information

Most people find it hard to just take all the information they have gathered from their research and write it out in paper form. It is hard to get a starting point and go from the beginning to the end. You probably have several ideas you know you want to put in your paper, but you may be having trouble deciding where these ideas should go. Organizing your information in a way where new thoughts can be added to a subtopic at any time is a great way to organize the information you have about your topic. Here are two of the more popular ways to organize information so it can be used in a research paper:

• Graphic organizers such as a web or mind map . Mind maps are basically stating the main topic of your paper, then branching off into as many subtopics as possible about the main topic. Enchanted Learning has a list of several different types of mind maps as well as information on how to use them and what topics fit best for each type of mind map and graphic organizer.
• Sub-Subtopic: Low temperatures and adequate amounts of snow are needed to form glaciers.
• Sub-Subtopic: Glaciers move large amounts of earth and debris.
• Sub-Subtopic: Two basic types of glaciers: valley and continental.
• Subtopic: Icebergs – large masses of ice floating on liquid water

Different Formats For Your Paper

Depending on your topic and your writing preference, the layout of your paper can greatly enhance how well the information on your topic is displayed.

1. Process . This method is used to explain how something is done or how it works by listing the steps of the process. For most science fair projects and science experiments, this is the best format. Reports for science fairs need the entire project written out from start to finish. Your report should include a title page, statement of purpose, hypothesis, materials and procedures, results and conclusions, discussion, and credits and bibliography. If applicable, graphs, tables, or charts should be included with the results portion of your report.

2. Cause and effect . This is another common science experiment research paper format. The basic premise is that because event X happened, event Y happened.

3. Specific to general . This method works best when trying to draw conclusions about how little topics and details are connected to support one main topic or idea.

4. Climatic order . Similar to the “specific to general” category, here details are listed in order from least important to most important.

5. General to specific . Works in a similar fashion as the method for organizing your information. The main topic or subtopic is stated first, followed by supporting details that give more information about the topic.

6. Compare and contrast . This method works best when you wish to show the similarities and/or differences between two or more topics. A block pattern is used when you first write about one topic and all its details and then write about the second topic and all its details. An alternating pattern can be used to describe a detail about the first topic and then compare that to the related detail of the second topic. The block pattern and alternating pattern can also be combined to make a format that better fits your research paper.

Citing Sources

When writing a research paper, you must cite your sources! Otherwise you are plagiarizing (claiming someone else’s ideas as your own) which can cause severe penalties from failing your research paper assignment in primary and secondary grades to failing the entire course (most colleges and universities have this policy). To help you avoid plagiarism, follow these simple steps:

• Find out what format for citing your paper your teacher or curriculum wishes you to use. One of the most widely used and widely accepted citation formats by scholars and schools is the Modern Language Association (MLA) format. We recommended that you do an Internet search for the most recent format of the citation style you will be using in your paper.
• Keep a working bibliography when researching your topic. Have a document in your computer files or a page in your notebook where you write down every source that you found and may use in your paper. (You probably will not use every resource you find, but it is much easier to delete unused sources later rather than try to find them four weeks down the road.) To make this process even easier, write the source down in the citation format that will be used in your paper. No matter what citation format you use, you should always write down title, author, publisher, published date, page numbers used, and if applicable, the volume and issue number.
• When collecting ideas and information from your sources, write the author’s last name at the end of the idea. When revising and formatting your paper, keep the author’s last name attached to the end of the idea, no matter where you move that idea. This way, you won’t have to go back and try to remember where the ideas in your paper came from.
• There are two ways to use the information in your paper: paraphrasing and quotes. The majority of your paper will be paraphrasing the information you found. Paraphrasing is basically restating the idea being used in your own words.   As a general rule of thumb, no more than two of the original words should be used in sequence when paraphrasing information, and similes should be used for as many of the words as possible in the original passage without changing the meaning of the main point. Sometimes, you may find something stated so well by the original author that it would be best to use the author’s original words in your paper. When using the author’s original words, use quotation marks only around the words being directly quoted and work the quote into the body of your paper so that it makes sense grammatically. Search the Internet for more rules on paraphrasing and quoting information.

Revising and Editing Your Paper

Revising your paper basically means you are fixing grammatical errors or changing the meaning of what you wrote. After you have written the rough draft of your paper, read through it again to make sure the ideas in your paper flow and are cohesive. You may need to add in information, delete extra information, use a thesaurus to find a better word to better express a concept, reword a sentence, or just make sure your ideas are stated in a logical and progressive order.

After revising your paper, go back and edit it, correcting the capitalization, punctuation, and spelling errors – the mechanics of writing. If you are not 100% positive a word is spelled correctly, look it up in a dictionary. Ask a parent or teacher for help on the proper usage of commas, hyphens, capitalization, and numbers. You may also be able to find the answers to these questions by doing an Internet search on writing mechanics or by checking you local library for a book on writing mechanics.

It is also always a good idea to have someone else read your paper. Because this person did not write the paper and is not familiar with the topic, he or she is more likely to catch mistakes or ideas that do not quite make sense. This person can also give you insights or suggestions on how to reword or format your paper to make it flow better or convey your ideas better.

More Information:

• Quick Science Fair Guide
• Science Fair Project Ideas

Teaching Homeschool

Welcome! After you finish this article, we invite you to read other articles to assist you in teaching science at home on the Resource Center, which consists of hundreds of free science articles!

Shop for Science Supplies!

Home Science Tools offers a wide variety of science products and kits. Find affordable beakers, dissection supplies, chemicals, microscopes, and everything else you need to teach science for all ages!

Related Articles

29 Creative Ways to Use a Home Science Tools Beaker Mug

Infuse a dash of experimentation into your daily routine with a Home Science Tools Beaker Mug! As we gear up for our 29th Anniversary, we've compiled a list of 29 exciting ways to use your beaker mug in everyday life. From brewing up creative concoctions to unleashing...

Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

What are the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)?  These guidelines summarize what students “should” know and be able to do in different learning levels of science. The NGSS is based on research showing that students who are well-prepared for the future need...

The Beginners Guide to Choosing a Homeschool Science Curriculum

Get Started: Researching Homeschool Science   Curriculums  Teaching homeschool science is a great way for families to personalize their child's education while giving you the flexibility to teach it your way. There are many wonderful science curriculums...

Synthetic Frog Dissection Guide Project

Frog dissections are a great way to learn about the human body, as frogs have many organs and tissues similar to those of humans. It is important to determine which type of dissection is best for your student or child. Some individuals do not enjoy performing...

Snowstorm in a Boiling Flask Density Project

You know the mesmerizing feeling of watching the snow fall during a snowstorm? With this project, you can make your own snowstorm in a flask using an adaptation from the lava lamp science experiment! It’s a perfect project for any winter day.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

Get project ideas and special offers delivered to your inbox.

Advertisement

Investigative Research Projects for Students in Science: The State of the Field and a Research Agenda

• Open access
• Published: 16 March 2023
• Volume 23 , pages 80–95, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Michael J. Reiss   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-4229 1 ,
• Richard Sheldrake   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-6478 1 &
• Wilton Lodge   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-8880 1  

3356 Accesses

2 Citations

6 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

One of the ways in which students can be taught science is by doing science, the intention being to help students understand the nature, processes, and methods of science. Investigative research projects may be used in an attempt to reflect some aspects of science more authentically than other teaching and learning approaches, such as confirmatory practical activities and teacher demonstrations. In this article, we are interested in the affordances of investigative research projects where students, either individually or collaboratively, undertake original research. We provide a critical rather than a systematic review of the field. We begin by examining the literature on the aims of science education, and how science is taught in schools, before specifically turning to investigative research projects. We examine how such projects are typically undertaken before reviewing their aims and, in more detail, the consequences for students of undertaking such projects. We conclude that we need social science research studies that make explicit the possible benefits of investigative research projects in science. Such studies should have adequate control groups that look at the long-term consequences of such projects not only by collecting delayed data from participants, but by following them longitudinally to see whether such projects make any difference to participants’ subsequent education and career destinations. We also conclude that there is too often a tendency for investigative research projects for students in science to ignore the reasons why scientists work in particular areas and to assume that once a written report of the research has been authored, the work is done. We therefore, while being positive about the potential for investigative research projects, make specific recommendations as to how greater authenticity might result from students undertaking such projects.

L’une des façons d’enseigner les sciences aux étudiants est de leur faire faire des activités scientifiques, l’objectif étant de les aider à comprendre la nature, les processus et les méthodes de la science. On peut avoir recours à des projets de recherche et d’enquête afin de refléter plus fidèlement certains éléments relevant de la science qu’en utilisant d’autres approches d’enseignement et d’apprentissage, telles que les activités pratiques de confirmation et les démonstrations faites par l’enseignant. Dans cet article, nous nous intéressons aux possibilités offertes par les projets de recherche dans lesquels les étudiants, individuellement ou en collaboration, entreprennent des recherches novatrices. Nous proposons un examen critique du domaine plutôt que d’y porter un regard systématique. Nous commençons par examiner la documentation portant sur les objectifs de l’enseignement des sciences et la manière dont les sciences sont enseignées dans les écoles, avant de nous intéresser plus particulièrement aux projets de recherche et d’enquête. Nous analysons la manière dont ces projets sont généralement menés avant d’examiner leurs buts et d’évaluer de façon plus approfondie quelles sont les conséquences pour les élèves de réaliser de tels projets. Nous constatons que nous avons besoin d’études de recherche en sciences sociales qui rendent explicites les avantages potentiels des projets de recherche et d’enquête scientifiques. Ces études devraient comporter des groupes de contrôle adéquats qui examinent les conséquences à long terme de ces projets, non seulement en recueillant des données différées auprès des participants, mais aussi en suivant ceux-ci de manière longitudinale de façon à voir si ces projets font une quelconque différence dans l’éducation subséquente et les destinations professionnelles ultérieures des participants. Nous concluons également que les projets de recherche et d’enquête des étudiants en sciences ont trop souvent tendance à ignorer les raisons pour lesquelles les scientifiques travaillent dans des domaines particuliers et à supposer qu’une fois que le rapport de recherche a été rédigé, le travail est terminé. Par conséquent, tout en demeurant optimistes quant au potentiel que représentent les projets de recherche et d’enquête, nous formulons des recommandations particulières en ce qui a trait à la manière dont une plus grande authenticité pourrait résulter de la réalisation de tels projets par les étudiants.

Similar content being viewed by others

Investigative School Research Projects in Biology: Effects on Students

Moving Research into the Classroom: Synergy in Collaboration

Reintroducing “the” Scientific Method to Introduce Scientific Inquiry in Schools?

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Many young people are interested in science but do not necessarily see themselves as able to become scientists (Archer & DeWitt, 2017 ; Archer et al., 2015 ). Others may not want to become scientists even though they may see themselves as succeeding in science (Gokpinar & Reiss, 2016 ). At the same time, in many countries, governments and industry want more young people to continue with science, primarily in the hope that they will go into science or science-related careers (including engineering and technology), but also because of the benefits to society that are presumed to flow from having a scientifically literate population. Making science more inclusive and accessible to everyone may need endeavours and support from across education, employers, and society (Royal Society, 2014 ; Institute of Physics, 2020 ).

However, getting more people to continue with science, once it is no longer compulsory, is only one purpose of school science (Mansfield & Reiss, 2020 ). Much of school science is focused on getting students to understand core content of science—things like the particulate theory of matter, and the causes of disease in humans and other organisms. Another strand in school science is on getting students to understand something of the practices of science, particularly through undertaking practical work. A further, recently emerging, position is that science education should help students to use their knowledge and critical understanding of the content and practices of science to strive for social and environmental justice (Sjöström & Eilks, 2018 ).

In this article, we are interested in the affordances of investigative research projects—discussed in more detail below but essentially pieces of work undertaken by students either individually or collaboratively in which they undertake original research. We provide a critical rather than a systematic review of the field and suggest how future research might be undertaken to explore in more detail the possible contribution of such projects. We begin by examining the literature on the aims of science education, and how science is taught in schools, before specifically turning to investigative research projects. We examine how such projects are typically undertaken before reviewing their aims and, in more detail, the consequences for students of undertaking such projects. We make recommendations as to how investigative research projects might more fruitfully be undertaken and conclude by proposing a research agenda.

Aims of Science Education

School science education typically aims to prepare some students to become scientists, while concurrently educating all students in science and about science (Claussen & Osborne, 2013 ; Hofstein & Lunetta, 2004 ; Osborne & Dillon, 2008 ). For example, in England, especially for older students, the current science National Curriculum for 5–16-year-olds is framed as providing a platform for future studies and careers in science for some students, and providing knowledge and skills so that all students can understand and engage with the natural world within their everyday lives (Department for Education, 2014 ). Accordingly, science education within the National Curriculum in England broadly aims to develop students’ scientific knowledge and conceptual understanding; develop students’ understanding of the nature, processes, and methods of science (aspects of ‘working scientifically’, including experimental, analytical, and other related skills); and ensure that students understand the relevance, uses, and implications of science within everyday life (Department for Education, 2014 ). Comparable aims are typically found in other countries (Coll & Taylor, 2012 ; Hollins & Reiss, 2016 ).

Science education often involves practical work, which is generally intended to help students gain conceptual understanding, practical and wider skills, and understanding of how science and scientists work (Abrahams & Reiss, 2017 ; Cukurova et al., 2015 ; Hodson, 1993 ; Millar, 1998 ). Essentially, the thinking behind much practical work is that students would learn about science by doing science. Practical work has often been orientated towards confirming and illustrating scientific knowledge, although it is increasingly orientated around reflecting the processes of investigation and inquiry used within the field of science, and providing understanding of the nature of science (Abrahams & Reiss, 2017 ; Hofstein & Lunetta, 2004 ).

In many countries, especially those with the resources to have school laboratories, practical work in science is undertaken at secondary level relatively frequently, although this is less the case with older students (Hamlyn et al., 2020 , 2017 ). Practical work is more frequent in schools within more advantaged regions (Hamlyn et al., 2020 ) and many students report that they would have preferred to do more practical work (Cerini et al., 2003 ; Hamlyn et al., 2020 ).

The impact of practical work remains less clear (Cukurova et al., 2015 ; Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ). Society broadly expects that students in any one country will experience practical work to similar extents, so it is unfeasible, for more than a handful of lessons (e.g. Shana & Abulibdeh, 2020 ), to apply experimental designs where some students undertake practical work while others do not. One study, where students were assigned to one of four different groups, concluded that while conventional practical work led to more student learning than did either watching videos or reading textbooks, it was no more effective than when students watched a teacher demonstration (Moore et al., 2020 ).

The study by Moore et al. ( 2020 ) illustrates an important point, namely, that students can acquire conceptual knowledge and theoretical understanding by ways other than engagement in practical work. Indeed, there are some countries where less practical work is undertaken than in others, yet students score well, on average, on international measures of attainment. Some, but relatively few, studies have focused on whether the extent of practical work, and/or whether practical work undertaken in particular ways, associates with any educational or other outcomes. There are some indications that more frequent practical work associates with benefits (Cukurova et al., 2015 ). For example, students in higher-performing secondary schools have reported that they undertake more frequent practical work than pupils in lower-performing schools, although this does not reflect the impact of practical work alone (Hamlyn et al., 2017 ). In a more recent study, Oliver et al. ( 2021a , b ), in their analysis of the science scores in the six Anglophone countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA) that participated in PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) 2015, found that “Of particular note is that the highest level of student achievement is associated with doing practical work in some lessons (rather than all or most) and this patterning is consistent across all six countries” (p. 35).

Students often appreciate and enjoy practical work in science (Hamlyn et al., 2020 ; National Foundation for Educational Research, 2011 ). Nevertheless, students do not necessarily understand the purposes of practical work, some feel that practical work may not necessarily be the best way to understand some aspects of science, and some highlight that practical work does not necessarily give them what they need for examinations (Abrahams & Reiss, 2012 ; Sharpe & Abrahams, 2020 ). Teachers have also spoken about the challenges of devising and delivering practical work, and often value practical work for being motivational for students rather than for helping them to understand science concepts (Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ; National Foundation for Educational Research, 2011 ).

Teaching Approaches

Educational research has examined how teaching and learning could best be undertaken. Many teaching and learning approaches have been found to associate with students’ learning outcomes, such as their achievement (Bennett et al., 2007 ; Furtak et al., 2012 ; Hattie et al., 2020 ; Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ) and interest (e.g. Chachashvili-Bolotin et al., 2016 ; Swarat et al., 2012 ), both in science and more generally. However, considering different teaching and learning approaches is complicated by terminology (where the definitions of terms can vary and/or terms can be applied in various ways) and wider aspects of generalisation (where it can be difficult to determine trends across studies undertaken in diverse ways across diverse contexts).

Inquiry-based approaches to teaching and learning generally involve students having more initiative to direct and undertake activities to develop their understanding (although not necessarily without guidance and support from teachers), such as working scientifically to devise and undertake investigations. However, it is important to emphasise that inquiry-based approaches do not necessitate practical work. Indeed, there are many subjects where no practical work takes place and yet students can undertake inquiries. In science, examples of non-practical-based inquiries that could fruitfully be undertaken collaboratively or individually and using the internet and/or libraries include the sort of research that students might undertake to investigate a socio-scientific issue. An example of such research includes what the effects of reintroducing an extinct or endangered species might be on an ecosystem, such as the reintroduction of the Eurasian beaver ( Castor fiber ) into the UK, or the barn owl ( Tyto alba ) into Canada. Inquiry-based learning in school science has often been found to associate with greater achievement (Furtak et al., 2012 ; Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ), though too much time spent on inquiry can result in reduced achievement (Oliver et al., 2021a ).

Allied to inquiry-based approaches is project-based learning. Here, students take initiative, manifest autonomy, and exercise responsibility for addressing an issue (often attempting to solve a problem) that usually results in an end product (such as a report or model), with teachers as facilitators and guides. The project occurs over a relatively long duration of time (Helle et al., 2006 ), to allow time for planning, revising, undertaking, and writing up the study. Project-based learning tends to associate positively with achievement (Chen & Yang, 2019 ).

Context-based approaches to teaching and learning use specific contexts and applications as starting points for the development of scientific ideas, rather than more traditional approaches that typically cover scientific ideas before moving on to consider their applications and contexts (Bennett et al., 2007 ). Context-based approaches have been found to be broadly equivalent to other teaching and learning approaches in developing students’ understanding, with some evidence for helping foster positive attitudes to science to a greater extent than traditional approaches (Bennett et al., 2007 ). Specifically relating learning to students’ experiences or context (referred to as ‘enhanced context strategies’) often associates positively with achievement (Schroeder et al., 2007 ). The literature on context-based approaches overlaps with that on the use of socio-scientific issues in science education, where students develop their scientific knowledge and understanding by considering complicated issues where science plays a role but on its own is not sufficient to produce solutions (e.g. Dawson, 2015 ; Zeidler & Sadler, 2008 ). To date, the literature on context-based approaches and/or socio-scientific issues has remained distinct from that on investigative research projects but, as we will argue below, there might be benefit in considering their intersection.

Various other teaching and learning approaches have been found to be beneficial in science, including collaborative work, computer-based work, and the provision of extra-curricular activities (Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ). Similarly, but specifically focusing on chemistry, various teaching and learning practices have been found to associate positively with academic outcomes, including (most strongly) collaborative learning and problem-based learning (Rahman & Lewis, 2019 ).

Most attention has focused on achievement-related outcomes. Nevertheless, inquiry-based learning, context-based learning, computer-based learning, collaborative learning, and extra-curricular activities have often also been found to associate positively with students’ interests and aspirations towards science (Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ). While many teaching and learning approaches associate with benefits, it remains difficult definitively to establish whether any particular approach is optimal and/or whether particular approaches are better than others. Teaching and learning time are limited, so applying a particular approach may mean not applying another approach.

Investigative Research Projects

Science education has often (implicitly or explicitly) been orientated around students learning science by doing science, intending to help students understand the nature, processes, and methods of science. An early critique of pedagogical approaches that saw students as scientists was provided by Driver ( 1983 ) who, while not dismissing the value of the approach, cautioned against over-enthusiastic adoption on the grounds that, unsurprisingly, school students, compared to actual scientists, manifest a range of misconceptions about how scientific research is undertaken. Contemporary recommendations for practical work include schools delivering frequent and varied practical activities (in at least half of all science lessons), and students also having the opportunity to undertake open-ended and extended investigative projects (Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ).

Investigative research projects may be intended to reflect some aspects of science more accurately or authentically than other teaching and learning approaches, such as confirmatory practical activities and teacher demonstrations. Nevertheless, authenticity in science and science education can be approached and/or defined in various ways (Braund & Reiss, 2006 ), and the issue raises wider questions such as whether only (adult) scientists can authentically experience science, and who determines what science is and what authentic experiences of science are (Kapon et al., 2018 ; Martin et al., 1990 ).

Although too tight a definition can be unhelpful, investigative research projects in science typically involve students determining a research question (where the outcome is unknown) and approaches to answer it, undertaking the investigation, analysing the data, and reporting the findings. The project may be undertaken alone or in groups, with support from teachers and/or others such as scientists and researchers (Bennett et al., 2018 ; Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ). Students may have varying degrees of autonomy—but then that is true of scientists too.

Independent research projects in science for students have often been framed around providing students with authentic experiences of scientific research and with the potential for wider benefits around scientific knowledge and skills, attitudes, and motivations around science, and ultimately helping science to become more inclusive and accessible to everyone (Bennett et al., 2018 ; Milner-Bolotin, 2012 ). Considered in review across numerous studies, independent research projects for secondary school students (aged 11–19) have often (but not necessarily always) resulted in benefits, including the following:

Acquisition of science-related knowledge (Burgin et al., 2012 ; Charney et al., 2007 ; Dijkstra & Goedhart, 2011 ; Houseal et al., 2014 ; Sousa-Silva et al., 2018 ; Ward et al., 2016 );

Enhancement of knowledge and/or skills around aspects of research and working scientifically (Bulte et al., 2006 ; Charney et al., 2007 ; Ebenezer et al., 2011 ; Etkina et al., 2003 ; Hsu & Espinoza, 2018 ; Ward et al., 2016 );

Greater confidence in undertaking various aspects of science, including applying knowledge and skills (Abraham, 2002 ; Carsten Conner et al., 2021 ; Hsu & Espinoza, 2018 ; Stake & Mares, 2001 , 2005 );

Aspirations towards science-related studies and/or careers (Abraham, 2002 ; Stake & Mares, 2001 ), although students in other studies have reported unchanged and already high aspirations towards science-related studies and/or careers (Burgin et al., 2015 , 2012 );

Subsequently entering science-related careers (Roberts & Wassersug, 2009 );

Development of science and/or research identities and/or identification as a scientist or researcher (Carsten Conner et al., 2021 ; Deemer et al., 2021 );

Feelings and experiences of real science and doing science (Barab & Hay, 2001 ; Burgin et al., 2015 ; Chapman & Feldman, 2017 );

Wider awareness and/or understanding of science, scientists, and/or positive attitudes towards science (Abraham, 2002 ; Houseal et al., 2014 ; Stake & Mares, 2005 );

Benefits akin to induction into scientific or research communities of practice (Carsten Conner et al., 2018 );

Development of wider personal, studying, and/or social skills, including working with others and independent work (Abraham, 2002 ; Moote, 2019 ; Moote et al., 2013 ; Sousa-Silva et al., 2018 ).

Positive experiences of projects and programmes are often conveyed by students (Dijkstra & Goedhart, 2011 ; Rushton et al., 2019 ; Williams et al., 2018 ). For example, students have reported appreciating the greater freedom and independence to discover things, and that they felt they were undertaking real experiments with a purpose, and a greater sense of meaning (Bulte et al., 2006 ).

Nevertheless, it remains difficult to determine the extent of generalisation from diverse research studies undertaken in various ways and across various contexts: benefits have been observed across studies involving different foci (determining what was measured and/or reported), projects for students, and contexts and countries. Essentially, each individual research study did not cover and/or evidence the whole range of benefits. Many benefits have been self-reported, and only some studies have considered changes over time (Moote, 2019 ; Moote et al., 2013 ).

Investigative science research projects for students are delivered in various ways. For example, some projects are undertaken through formal programmes that provide introductions and induction, learning modules, equipment, and the opportunity to present findings (Ward et al., 2016 ). Some programmes put a particular emphasis on the presentation and dissemination of findings (Bell et al., 2003 ; Ebenezer et al., 2011 ; Stake & Mares, 2005 ). Some projects are undertaken through schools (Ebenezer et al., 2011 ; Ward et al., 2016 ); others entail students working at universities, sometimes undertaking and/or assisting with existing projects (Bell et al., 2003 ; Burgin et al., 2015 , 2012 ; Charney et al., 2007 ; Stake & Mares, 2001 , 2005 ) or in competitions (e.g. Liao et al., 2017 ). While many projects are undertaken in laboratory settings, some are undertaken outdoors, in the field (Carsten Conner et al., 2018 ; Houseal et al., 2014 ; Young et al., 2020 ).

Primary School

While much of the school literature on investigative research projects in science concentrates on secondary or university students, some such projects are undertaken with students in primary school. These projects are often perceived as enjoyable and considered to benefit scientific skills and knowledge and/or confidence in doing science (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ; Liljeström et al., 2013 ; Maiorca et al., 2021 ; Tyler-Wood et al., 2012 ). Such projects often help students feel that they are scientists and doing science (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ; Reveles et al., 2004 ).

For example, one programme for primary school students in Australia intended students to develop and apply skills in thinking and working scientifically with support by scientist mentors over 10 weeks. It involved the students identifying areas of interest and testable questions within a wider scientific theme, collaboratively investigating their area of interest through collecting and analysing data, and then presenting their findings. Data on the programme’s outcomes were obtained through interviews with students and by studying the reports that they wrote (Forbes & Skamp, 2016 , 2019 ). Participating students said that they appreciated the autonomy and practical aspects, and enjoyed the experiences. The students showed developments in thinking scientifically and around the nature of science, where science often became seen as something that could be interesting, enjoyable, student-led, collaborative, creative, challenging, and a way to understand how things work within the world (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ). The experiences of thinking and working scientifically, and aspects such as collaborative working and learning from each other, were broadly considered to help develop students’ scientific identities and include them within a scientific community of practice. Some students felt that they were doing authentic (‘real’) science, in contrast to some of their earlier or other experiences of science at school, which had not involved an emphasis on working scientifically and/or specific activities within working scientifically, such as collecting and analysing data (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ).

CREST Awards

CREST Awards are intended to give young people (aged 5–19) in the UK the opportunity to explore real STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) projects, providing the experience of ‘being a scientist’ (British Science Association, 2018 ). The scheme has been running since the 1980s and some 30,000 Awards are given each year. They exist at three levels (Bronze, Silver, and Gold), reflecting the necessary time commitment and level of independence and originality expected. The Awards are presented as offering the potential for participants to experience the process of engaging in a project, and developing investigation, problem-solving, and communication skills. They are also presented as something that can contribute to further awards (such as Duke of Edinburgh Awards) and/or competition entries (such as The Big Bang Competition). CREST Gold Awards can be used to enhance applications to university and employment. At Gold level, arranging for a STEM professional in a field related to the student’s work to act as a mentor is recommended, though not formally required. CREST Awards are assessed by teachers and/or assessors from industry or academia, depending on the Award level.

Classes of secondary school students in Scotland undertaking CREST Awards projects appeared to show some benefits around motivational and studying strategies, but less clearly than would be ideal (Moote, 2019 ; Moote et al, 2013 ). Students undertaking CREST Silver Awards between 2010 and 2013 gained better qualifications at age 16 and were more likely to study science subjects for 16–19-year-olds than other comparable students (matched on prior attainment and certain personal characteristics), although the students may have differed on unmeasured aspects, such as attitudes and motivations towards science and studying (Stock Jones et al., 2016 ). A subsequent randomised controlled trial found that year 9 students (aged 13–14) undertaking CREST Silver Awards and other comparable students ultimately showed similar science test scores, attitudes towards school work, confidence in undertaking various aspects of life (not covering school work), attitudes towards science careers (inaccurately referred to as self-efficacy), and aspirations towards science careers (Husain et al., 2019 ). Nevertheless, teachers and students perceived benefits, including students acquiring transferable skills such as time management, problem-solving, and team working, and that science topics were made more interesting and relevant for students (Husain et al., 2019 ). Overall, it remains difficult to form any definitive conclusions about impacts, given the diverse scope of CREST Awards but limited research. For example, whether and/or how CREST Awards projects are independent of or integrated with curricula areas may determine the extent of (curricula-based) knowledge gains.

Nuffield Research Placements

Nuffield Research Placements involve students in the UK undertaking STEM research placements during the summer between years 12 and 13, and presenting their findings at a celebration event (Nuffield Foundation, 2020 ). The scheme has been running since 1996 and a little over 1000 students participate each year. The programme is variously framed as an opportunity for students to undertake real research and develop scientific and other skills, and an initiative to enhance access/inclusion and assist the progression of students into STEM studies at university (Cilauro & Paull, 2019 ; Nuffield Foundation, 2020 ).

The application process is competitive, and requires a personal statement where students explain their interest in completing the placement. Students need to be studying at least one STEM subject in year 12, be in full-time education at a state school (i.e. not a private school that requires fees), and have reached a certain academic level at year 11. The scheme historically aimed to support and prioritise students from disadvantaged backgrounds, and is now only available for students from disadvantaged backgrounds based on family income, living or having lived in care, and/or being the first person in their immediate family who will study in higher education (Nuffield Foundation, 2020 ).

There have been indications that students who undertake Nuffield Research Placements are, on average, more likely to enrol on STEM subjects at top (Russell Group) UK universities and complete a higher number of STEM qualifications for 16–19-year-olds than other students (Cilauro & Paull, 2019 ). Nevertheless, it remains difficult to isolate independent impacts of the placements, given that (for example) students commence their 16–19 education prior to the placements.

Following their Nuffield Research Placements, students have reported increased understanding of what STEM researchers do in their daily work and unchanging (already high) enjoyment of STEM and interest in STEM job opportunities (Bowes et al., 2017 ; Cilauro & Paull, 2019 ). Wider benefits have been attributed to the placement, including skills in writing reports, working independently, confidence in their own abilities in general, and team working (Bowes et al., 2017 ). Students also often report that they feel they have contributed to an authentic research study in an area of STEM in which they are interested (Bowes et al., 2021 ).

Institute for Research in Schools Projects

The Institute for Research in Schools (IRIS) started in 2016 and has about 1000 or more participating students in the UK annually. It facilitates students to undertake a range of investigative research projects from a varied portfolio of options. For example, these projects have included CERN@School (Whyntie, 2016 ; Whyntie et al., 2015 , 2016 ), where students have been found to have positive experiences, developing research and data analysis skills, and developing wider skills such as collaboration and communication (Hatfield et al., 2019 ; Parker et al., 2019 ). Teachers who have facilitated projects for their students (Rushton & Reiss, 2019 ) report that the experiences produced personal and wider benefits around:

Appreciating the freedom to teach and engage in the research projects;

Connecting or reconnecting with science and research, including interest and enthusiasm (in science as well as teaching it) and with a role as a scientist, including being able to share past experiences or work as a scientist with students;

Collaborating with students and scientists, researchers, and others in different and/or new ways via doing research (including facilitating students and providing support);

Professional and skills development (refreshing/revitalising teaching and interest), including recognition by colleagues/others (strengthening recognition as a teacher/scientist, as having skills, as someone who provides opportunities/support for students).

The teachers felt that their students developed a range of specific and transferable benefits, including around research, communication, teamwork, planning, leadership, interest and enthusiasm, confidence, and awareness of the realities of science and science careers. Some benefits could follow and/or be enhanced by the topics that the students were studying, such as interest and enthusiasm linking with personal and wider/real-life relevance, for example, for topics like biodiversity (Rushton & Reiss, 2019 ).

Students in England who completed IRIS projects and presented their findings at conferences reported that the experiences were beneficial through developing skills (including communication, confidence, and managing anxiety); gaining awareness, knowledge, and understanding of the processes of research and careers in research; collaboration and sharing with students and teachers; developing networks and contacts; and doing something that may benefit their university applications (Rushton et al., 2019 ). Presenting and disseminating findings at conferences were considered to be inspirational and validating (including experiencing the impressive scientific and historical context of the conference venue), although also challenging, given limited time, competing demands, anxiety and nervousness, and uncertainty about how to engage with others and undertake networking (Rushton et al., 2019 ).

Although our principal interest is in investigative research projects in science at school, it is worth briefly surveying the literature on such projects at university level. This is because while such projects are rare at school level, normally resulting from special initiatives, there is a long tradition in a number of countries of investigative research projects in science being undertaken at university level, alongside other types of practical work.

Unsurprisingly, university science students typically report having little to no prior experience with authentic research, although they may have had laboratory or fieldwork experience on their pre-university courses (Cartrette & Melroe-Lehrman, 2012 ; John & Creighton, 2011 ). University students still perceive non-investigative-based laboratory work as meaningful experiences of scientific laboratory work, even if these might be less authentic experiences of (some aspects of) scientific research (Goodwin et al., 2021 ; Rowland et al., 2016 ).

Research experiences for university science students are often framed around providing students with authentic experiences of scientific research, with more explicit foci towards developing research skills and practices, developing conceptual understanding, conveying the nature of science, and fostering science identities (Linn et al., 2015 ). Considered in review across numerous studies, research experiences for university science students have often (but not necessarily always) resulted in benefits, including to research skills and practices and confidence in applying them, enhanced understanding of the reality of scientific research and careers, and higher likelihood of persisting or progressing within science education and/or careers (Linn et al., 2015 ).

For example, in one study, university students of science in England reported having no experience of ‘real’ research before undertaking a summer research placement programme (John & Creighton, 2011 ). After the programme, the majority of students agreed that they had discovered that they liked research and that they had gained an understanding of the everyday realities of research. Most of the students reported that their placement confirmed or increased their intentions towards postgraduate study and research careers (John & Creighton, 2011 ).

Implications and Future Directions

Investigative research projects in science have the potential for various benefits, given the findings from wider research into inquiry-based learning (Furtak et al., 2012 ; Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ), context-based learning (Bennett et al., 2007 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ), and project-based learning (Chen & Yang, 2019 ). However, the potential for benefits involves broad generalisations, where inquiry-based learning (for example) covers a diverse range of approaches that may or may not be similar to those encountered within investigative research projects. Furthermore, we do not see investigative research projects as a universal panacea. It is, for example, unrealistic to expect that students can simultaneously learn scientific knowledge, learn about scientific practice, and engage skillfully and appropriately in aspects of scientific practice. Indeed, careful scaffolding from teachers is likely to be required for any, let alone all, of these benefits to result.

We are conscious that enabling students to undertake investigative research projects in science places particular burdens on teachers. Anecdotal evidence suggests that if teachers themselves have had a university education in which they undertook one or more such projects themselves (e.g. because they undertook a research masters or doctorate in science), they are more likely both to be enthused about the benefits of this way of working and to be able to help their students undertake research. It would be good to have this hypothesis investigated rigorously and, more importantly, to have data on effective professional development for teachers to help their students undertake investigative research projects in science. It is known that school teachers of science can benefit from undertaking small-scale research projects as professional development (e.g. Bevins et al., 2011 ; Koomen et al., 2014 ), but such studies do not seem rigorously to have followed individual teachers through into their subsequent day-to-day work with their students to determine the long-term consequences for the students.

Benefits accruing from investigative research projects are likely to be enhanced if there is an alignment between the form of the assessment and the intended outcomes of the investigative research project (cf. Molefe, 2011 ). The first author recalls how advanced level biology projects (for 16–18-year-olds) were assessed in England by one of the Examination Boards back in the 1980s. At the end of the course, each student who had submitted such a project had a 15-min viva with an external examiner. The mark scheme rewarded not only the sorts of things that any advanced level biology mark scheme would credit (use of literature, appropriate research design, care in data collection, thorough analysis, etc.) but originality too. There was therefore an emphasis on novel research. Indeed, occasionally students published sole- or co-authored accounts of their work in biology or biology education journals.

We mentioned above Driver’s ( 1983 ) caution about the extent to which it is realistic to envisage high school students undertaking investigative research projects that have more than superficial resemblance to those undertaken by actual scientists. Nevertheless, as the above review indicates, there is a strong strand within school science education of advocating the benefits of students designing and undertaking open-ended research projects (cf. Albone et al., 1995 ). Roth ( 1995 ) argued that for school science to be authentic, students need to:

(1) learn in contexts constituted in part by ill-defined problems; (2) experience uncertainties and ambiguities and the social nature of scientific work and knowledge; (3) learning is predicated on, and driven by, their current knowledge state; (4) experience themselves as parts of communities of inquiry in which knowledge, practices, resources and discourse are shared; (5) in these communities, members can draw on the expertise of more knowledgeable others whether they are peers, advisors or teachers. (p. 1)

Investigative research projects in science allow learners to learn about science by doing science, and therefore might help foster science identities. Science identities can involve someone recognising themselves and also being recognised by others as being a science person, and also with having various experiences, knowledge, and skills that are valued and recognised within the wider fields of science.

However, the evidence base, as indicated above and in the systematic review of practical independent research projects in high school science undertaken by Bennett et al. ( 2018 ), is still not robust. We need research studies that make explicit the putative benefits of investigative research projects in science, that have adequate control groups, and that look at the long-term consequences of such projects not only by collecting delayed data from participants (whether by surveys or interviews) but by following them longitudinally to see whether such projects make any difference to their subsequent education and career destinations. We also know very little about the significance of students’ home circumstances for their enthusiasm and capacity to undertake investigative research projects in science, though it seems likely that students with high science capital (DeWitt et al., 2016 ) are more likely to receive familial support in undertaking such projects (cf. Lissitsa & Chachashvili‐Bolotin, 2019 ).

We also need studies that consider more carefully what it is to engage in scientific practices. It is notable that the existing literature on investigative research projects for students in science makes no use of the literature on ethnographic studies of scientists at work—neither the foundational texts (e.g. Latour & Woolgar, 1979 ; Knorr-Cetina, 1983 ) nor more recent studies (e.g. Silvast et al., 2020 ). Too often there is a tendency for investigative research projects for students in science to ignore the reasons why scientists work in particular areas and to assume that once a written report of the research has been authored, the work is done. There can also be a somewhat simplistic belief that the sine qua non of an investigative research project is experimental science. Keen as we are on experimental science, there is more to being a scientist than undertaking experiments. For example, computer simulations (Winsberg, 2019 ) and other approaches that take advantage of advances in digital technologies are of increasing importance to the work of many scientists. It would be good to see such approaches reflected in more school student investigative projects (cf. Staacks et al., 2018 ).

More generally, greater authenticity would be likely to result if the following three issues were explicitly considered with students:

How should the particular focus of the research be identified? Students should be helped to realise that virtually all scientific research requires substantial funding. It may not be enough, therefore, for students to identify the focus for their work on the grounds of personal interest alone if they wish to understand how science is undertaken in reality. Here, such activities as participating in well-designed citizen science projects that still enable student autonomy (e.g. Curtis, 2018 ) can help.

Students should be encouraged, once their written report has been completed, to present it at a conference (as happens, for instance, with many IRIS projects) and to write it up for publication. Writing for publication is more feasible now that publication can be via blogs or on the internet, compared to the days when the only possible outlets were hard-copy journals or monographs.

What change in the world does the research wish to effect? Much student research in science seems implicitly to presume that science is neutral. The reality—back to funding again—is that most scientific research is undertaken with specific ends in mind (for instance, the development of medical treatments, the location of valuable mineral ores, the manufacture of new products for which desire can also be manufactured). It is not, of course, that we are calling for students unquestioningly to adopt the same values as those of professional scientists. Rather, we would encourage students to be enabled to reflect on such ends and values.

Abraham, L. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House, 75 (5), 229–232.

Article   Google Scholar  

Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. (2012). Practical work: its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49 (8), 1035–1055.

Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds) (2017). Enhancing learning with effective practical science 11-16 . London: Bloomsbury.

Google Scholar  

Albone, E., Collins, N., & Hill, T. (Eds) (1995). Scientific research in schools: a compendium of practical experience. Bristol: Clifton Scientific Trust.

Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: a conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52 (7), 922–948.

Archer, L., & DeWitt, J. (2017). Understanding young people’s science aspirations: How students form ideas about ‘becoming a scientist’. Abingdon: Routledge.

Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (1), 70–102.

Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (5), 487–509.

Bennett, J., Dunlop, L., Knox, K., Reiss, M. J., & Torrance Jenkins, R. (2018). Practical independent research projects in science: a synthesis and evaluation of the evidence of impact on high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 40 (14), 1755–1773.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: a synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91 (3), 347–370.

Bevins, S., Jordan, J., & Perry, E. (2011). Reflecting on professional development. Educational Action Research, 19 (3), 399–411.

Bowes, L., Birkin, G., & Tazzyman, S. (2017). Nuffield research placements evaluation: final report on waves 1 to 3 of the longitudinal survey of 2016 applicants. Leicester: CFE Research.

Bowes, L., Tazzyman, S., Stutz, A., & Birkin, G. (2021). Evaluation of Nuffield future researchers. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: the contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education , 28 , 1373–1388.

British Science Association. (2018). CREST Awards: getting started guide, primary. London: British Science Association.

Bulte, A., Westbroek, H., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (9), 1063–1086.

Burgin, S., McConnell, W., & Flowers, A. (2015). ‘I actually contributed to their research’: the influence of an abbreviated summer apprenticeship program in science and engineering for diverse high-school learners. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (3), 411–445.

Burgin, S., Sadler, T., & Koroly, M. J. (2012). High school student participation in scientific research apprenticeships: variation in and relationships among student experiences and outcomes. Research in Science Education, 42 , 439–467.

Carsten Conner, L., Oxtoby, L., & Perin, S. (2021). Power and positionality shape identity work during a science research apprenticeship for girls. International Journal of Science Education , 1–14.

Carsten Conner, L., Perin, S., & Pettit, E. (2018). Tacit knowledge and girls’ notions about a field science community of practice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8 (2), 164–177.

Cartrette, D., & Melroe-Lehrman, B. (2012). Describing changes in undergraduate students’ preconceptions of research activities. Research in Science Education, 42 , 1073–1100.

Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2003). Student review of the science curriculum: major findings . London: Planet Science.

Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., Milner-Bolotin, M., & Lissitsa, S. (2016). Examination of factors predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education , 38 (3), 366–390.

Chapman, A., & Feldman, A. (2017). Cultivation of science identity through authentic science in an urban high school classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12 , 469–491.

Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (2), 195–213.

Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26 , 71–81.

Cilauro, F., & Paull, G. (2019). Evaluation of Nuffield research placements: interim report. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Claussen, S., & Osborne, J. (2013). Bourdieu’s notion of cultural capital and its implications for the science curriculum. Science Education, 97 (1), 58–79.

Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2012). An international perspective on science curriculum development and implementation. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 771–782). Springer, Dordrecht.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Cukurova, M., Hanley, P., & Lewis, A. (2015). Rapid evidence review of good practical science. London: Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

Curtis, V. (2018). Online citizen science and the widening of academia: distributed engagement with research and knowledge production . Cham: Palgrave.

Dawson, V. (2015). Western Australian high school students’ understandings about the socioscientific issue of climate change. International Journal of Science Education , 37 (7), 1024–1043.

Deemer, E., Ogas, J., Barr, A., Bowdon, R., Hall, M., Paula, S., … Lim, S. (2021). Scientific research identity development need not wait until college: examining the motivational impact of a pre-college authentic research experience. Research in Science Education , 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09994-6

Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: framework document. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4 . Accessed 1 July 1 2017.

DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38 , 2431–2449.

Dijkstra, E., & Goedhart, M. (2011). Evaluation of authentic science projects on climate change in secondary schools: a focus on gender differences. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29 (2), 131–146.

Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (1), 94–116.

Etkina, E., Matilsky, T., & Lawrence, M. (2003). Pushing to the edge: Rutgers Astrophysics Institute motivates talented high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (10), 958–985.

Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2016). Secondary science teachers’ and students’ involvement in a primary school community of science practice: how it changed their practices and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 46 , 91–112.

Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2019). ‘You actually feel like you’re actually doing some science’: primary students’ perspectives of their involvement in the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education, 49 , 465–498.

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82 (3), 300–329.

Gatsby Charitable Foundation. (2017). Good practical science. London: Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

Gokpinar, T., & Reiss, M. (2016). The role of outside-school factors in science education: a two-stage theoretical model linking Bourdieu and Sen, with a case study. International Journal of Science Education , 38 , 1278–1303.

Goodwin, E., Anokhin, V., Gray, M., Zajic, D., Podrabsky, J., & Shortlidge, E. (2021). Is this science? Students’ experiences of failure make a research-based course feel authentic. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20 (1), 1–15.

Hamlyn, B., Hanson, T., Malam, S., Man, C., Smith, K., & Williams, L. (2020). Young people’s views on science education: science education tracker 2019: wave 2. London: Wellcome Trust.

Hamlyn, R., Matthews, P., & Shanahan, M. (2017). Young people’s views on science education: science education tracker research report February 2017. London: Wellcome Trust.

Hatfield, P., Furnell, W., Shenoy, A., Fox, E., Parker, B., Thomas, L., & Rushton, E. (2019). IRIS opens pupils’ eyes to real space research. Astronomy & Geophysics, 60 (1), 1.22–1.24.

Hattie, J., Bustamante, V., Almarode, J. T., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2020). Great teaching by design: from intention to implementation in the visible learning classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education – theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51 , 287–314.

Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22 (1), 85–142.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88 (1), 28–54.

Hollins, M. & Reiss, M. J. (2016) A review of the school science curricula in eleven high achieving jurisdictions. The Curriculum Journal , 27 , 80-94.

Houseal, A., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student-teacher-scientist partnership on students’ and teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51 (1), 84–115.

Hsu, P.-L., & Espinoza, P. (2018). Cultivating constructivist science internships for high school students through a community of practice with cogenerative dialogues. Learning Environments Research, 21 , 267–283.

Husain, F., Wishart, R., Attygalle, K., Averill, P., Ilic, N., & Mayer, M. (2019). CREST Silver evaluation report. London: Education Endowment Foundation.

Institute of Physics. (2020). Limit Less: Support young people to change the world. London: Institute of Physics.

John, J., & Creighton, J. (2011). Researcher development: the impact of undergraduate research opportunity programmes on students in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (7), 781–797.

Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102 (5), 1077–1106.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1983). New developments in science studies: the ethnographic challenge. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 8 (2), 153–177.

Koomen, M. H., Blair, R., Young-Isebrand, E., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2014). Science professional development with teachers: nurturing the scientist within. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education , 18 (6).

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts . Beverly Hills: Sage.

Liao, T., McKenna, J., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2017). Four decades of High School Physics Olympics Competitions at the University of British Columbia. Physics in Canada , 73 (3), 127–129.

Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2013). Making learning whole: an instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8 , 51–86.

Linn, M., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities. Science, 347 (6222), 1261757.

Lissitsa, S., & Chachashvili‐Bolotin, S. (2019). Enrolment in mathematics and physics at the advanced level in secondary school among two generations of highly skilled immigrants. International Migration , 57 (5), 216–234.

Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Bush, S., Delaney, A., Mohr-Schroeder, M., & Soledad, S. Y. (2021). Informal learning environments and impact on interest in STEM careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19 , 45–64.

Mansfield J., & Reiss M. J. (2020). The place of values in the aims of school science education. In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, A. Fitzgerald, & A. Jones (Eds), Values in science education (pp. 191–209), Cham: Springer.

Martin, B., Kass, H., & Brouwer, W. (1990). Authentic science: a diversity of meanings. Science Education, 74 (5), 541–554.

Millar, R. (1998). Rhetoric and reality: what practical work in science is really for. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science. Which way now? (pp. 16–31). London: Routledge.

Milner-Bolotin, M. (2012). Increasing interactivity and authenticity of chemistry instruction through data acquisition systems and other technologies. Journal of Chemical Education , 89 (4), 477–481.

Molefe, M. L. (2011). A study of life sciences projects in science talent quest competitions in the Western Cape, South Africa, with special reference to scientific skills and knowledge . Unpublished PhD thesis.

Moore, A. M., Fairhurst, P., Correia, C. F., Harrison, C., & Bennett, J. M. (2020). Science practical work in a COVID-19 world: are teacher demonstrations, videos and textbooks effective replacements for hands-on practical activities? School Science Review , 102 (378), 7–12.

Moote, J. (2019). Investigating the longer-term impact of the CREST inquiry-based learning programme on student self-regulated processes and related motivations: views of students and teachers. Research in Science Education, 49 (1), 265–294.

Moote, J., Williams, J., & Sproule, J. (2013). When students take control: investigating the impact of the CREST inquiry-based learning program on self-regulated processes and related motivations in young science students. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12 (2), 178–196.

National Foundation for Educational Research. (2011). Exploring young people’s views on science education. London: Wellcome Trust.

Nuffield Foundation. (2020). Nuffield research placements: guide for student applicants. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Oliver, M. C., Jerrim, J., & Adkins, M. J. (2021a). PISA: Engagement Attainment and interest in Science (PEAS) – Final Report. Available at https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/lsri/documents/peas-report.pdf .

Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021b). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: a comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education , 51 , 595–616.

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

Parker, B., Thomas, L., Rushton, E., & Hatfield, P. (2019). Transforming education with the Timepix detector – Ten years of CERN@school. Radiation Measurements, 127 (106090), 1–7.

Rahman, M. T., & Lewis, S. (2019). Evaluating the evidence base for evidence‐based instructional practices in chemistry through meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21610

Reveles, J., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 1111–1144.

Roberts, L., & Wassersug, R. (2009). Does doing scientific research in high school correlate with students staying in science? A half-century retrospective study. Research in Science Education, 39 , 251–256.

Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Rowland, S., Pedwell, R., Lawrie, G., Lovie-Toon, J., & Hung, Y. (2016). Do we need to design course-based undergraduate research experiences for authenticity? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15 (4), 1–16.

Royal Society. (2014). Vision for science and mathematics education. London: The Royal Society.

Rushton, E., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). From science teacher to ‘teacher scientist’: exploring the experiences of research-active science teachers in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 41 (11), 1541–1561.

Rushton, E., Charters, L., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). The experiences of active participation in academic conferences for high school science students. Research in Science & Technological Education , 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1657395

Savelsbergh, E., Prins, G., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B., Draijer, J., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: a meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19 , 158–172.

Schroeder, C., Scott, T., Tolson, H., Huang, T.-Y., & Lee, Y.-H. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (10), 1436–1460.

Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on high students’ academic achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education , 10 (2), 199–215.

Sharpe, R., & Abrahams, I. (2020). Secondary school students’ attitudes to practical work in biology, chemistry and physics in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38 (1), 84–104.

Silvast, A., Laes, E., Abram, S., & Bombaerts, G. (2020). What do energy modellers know? An ethnography of epistemic values and knowledge models. Energy Research & Social Science , 66 , 101495.

Sjöström, J. & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung . In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65–88). Cham: Springer.

Sousa-Silva, C., McKemmish, L., Chubb, K., Gorman, M., Baker, J., Barton, E., … Tennyson, J. (2018). Original Research by Young Twinkle Students (ORBYTS): when can students start performing original research? Physics Education, 53 (1), 1–12.

Staacks, S., Hütz, S., Heinke, H., & Stampfer, C. (2018). Advanced tools for smartphone-based experiments: phyphox. Physics Education , 53 (4), 045009.

Stake, J., & Mares, K. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (10), 1065–1088.

Stake, J., & Mares, K. (2005). Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: the splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (4), 359–375.

Stock Jones, R., Annable, T., Billingham, Z., & MacDonald, C. (2016). Quantifying CREST: what impact does the Silver CREST Award have on science scores and STEM subject selection? London: British Science Association.

Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 49 (4), 515–537.

Tyler-Wood, T., Ellison, A., Lim, O., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2012). Bringing up girls in science (BUGS): the effectiveness of an afterschool environmental science program for increasing female students’ interest in science careers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 , 46–55.

Ward, T., Delaloye, N., Adams, E. R., Ware, D., Vanek, D., Knuth, R., … Holian, A. (2016). Air toxics under the big sky: examining the effectiveness of authentic scientific research on high school students’ science skills and interest. International Journal of Science Education, 38 (6), 905–921.

Whyntie, T. (2016). CERN@School: forming nationwide collaborations for physics research in schools. Nuclear Physics News, 26 (1), 16–19.

Whyntie, T., Bithray, H., Cook, J., Coupe, A., Eddy, D., Fickling, R., … Shearer, N. (2015). CERN@school: demonstrating physics with the Timepix detector. Contemporary Physics, 56 (4), 451–467.

Whyntie, T., Cook, J., Coupe, A., Fickling, R., Parker, B., & Shearer, N. (2016). CERN@school: bringing CERN into the classroom. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, 273-275 , 1265–1270.

Williams, D., Brule, H., Kelley, S., & Skinner, E. (2018). Science in the learning gardens (SciLG): a study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5 (8), 1–14.

Winsberg, E. (2019). Computer simulations in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/simulations-science/ .

Young, J., Carsten Conner, L., & Pettit, E. (2020). ‘You really see it’: environmental identity shifts through interacting with a climate change-impacted glacier landscape. International Journal of Science Education, 42 (18), 3049–3070.

Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: a prelude to action. Science & Education , 17 , 799–803.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to The Institute of Research in Schools for funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK

Michael J. Reiss, Richard Sheldrake & Wilton Lodge

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Reiss .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Reiss, M.J., Sheldrake, R. & Lodge, W. Investigative Research Projects for Students in Science: The State of the Field and a Research Agenda. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 23 , 80–95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00263-4

Download citation

Accepted : 01 February 2023

Published : 16 March 2023

Issue Date : March 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00263-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Science investigative research projects
• Student autonomy
• Student engagement
• Authenticity
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications

How to Do a Science Investigatory Project

Last Updated: February 2, 2024 Fact Checked

This article was co-authored by Bess Ruff, MA . Bess Ruff is a Geography PhD student at Florida State University. She received her MA in Environmental Science and Management from the University of California, Santa Barbara in 2016. She has conducted survey work for marine spatial planning projects in the Caribbean and provided research support as a graduate fellow for the Sustainable Fisheries Group. There are 7 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 305,982 times.

A Science Investigatory Project (SIP) uses the scientific method to study and test an idea about how something works. It involves researching a topic, formulating a working theory (or hypothesis) that can be tested, conducting the experiment, and recording and reporting the results. You will probably need to follow this procedure if you are planning to enter a project in a school science fair, for instance. However, knowing how to do an SIP is useful for anyone interested in the sciences as well as anyone who wants to improve their problem-solving skills.

Employing the Scientific Method

• Think about something that interests, surprises, or confuses you, and consider whether it is something you can reasonably investigate for a project. Formulate a single question that sums up you would like to examine. [1] X Research source
• For instance, say you've heard that you can make a simple solar oven out of a pizza box. [2] X Research source You may, however, be skeptical as to whether this can be done, or done consistently at least. Therefore, your question might be: "Can a simple solar oven be made that works consistently in various conditions?"
• Make sure the topic you select is manageable within your time frame, budget, and skill level, and that it doesn't break any rules for the assignment/fair/competition (for example, no animal testing). You can search for ideas online if you need help, but don't just copy a project you find there; this will also be against the rules and is unethical.
• However, you can modify an existing project to test a different hypothesis or look into a question that was not answered by previous experiments. This isn't an ethical breach, and can often make for interesting results and discussions.

• Be aware of the requirements for your project. Many science fairs require that you have at least three reputable academic sources such as peer-reviewed journal publications to use as references. [4] X Research source
• Your sources will need to be unbiased (not tied to a product for sale, for instance), timely (not an encyclopedia from 1965), and credible (not some anonymous comment on a blog post). Web sources that are supported by a scientific organization or journal are a good bet. Ask your teacher or project director for guidance if you need it.
• For instance, the search query "how to make a solar oven out of a pizza box" will produce a bounty of sources, some more scientifically-grounded (and thus reliable) than others. The hit on an on-topic article in a recognized, reputable periodical should be considered a valid source. [5] X Research source
• On the other hand, blog posts, anonymous articles, and crowd-sourced materials probably won't make the cut. As valuable a resource as wikiHow is, it may not be considered a valid source for your SIP. It can, however, be helpful in introducing you to your chosen experiment and pointing you toward more academic sources. Choosing well-developed articles with numerous footnotes (that link to solid sources themselves) will improve the odds of acceptance, but discuss the issue with your instructor, fair organizer, etc.

• It is often helpful to turn your question into a hypothesis by thinking in "if / then" terms. You may want to frame your hypothesis (at least initially) as "If [I do this], then [this will happen]."
• For our example, the hypothesis might be: "A solar oven made from a pizza box can consistently heat foods any time there is abundant sunshine."

• Consideration of variables is key in setting up your experiment. Scientific experiments have three types of variables: independent (those changed by you); dependent (those that change in response to the independent variable); and controlled (those that remain the same). [8] X Trustworthy Source Science Buddies Expert-sourced database of science projects, explanations, and educational material Go to source
• When planning your experiment, consider the materials that you will need. Make sure they are readily available and affordable, or even better, use materials that are already in your house.
• For our pizza box solar oven, the materials are easy to acquire and assemble. The oven, item cooked (s'mores, for instance), and full sunshine will be controlled variables. Other environmental conditions (time or day or time of year, for instance) could be the independent variable; and "done-ness" of the item the dependent variable.

• Closely follow the steps that you have planned to test your experiment. However, if your test can not be conducted as planned, reconfigure your steps or try different materials. (If you really want to win the science fair, this will be a big step for you!)
• It is common practice for science fairs that you will need to conduct your test at least three times to ensure a scientifically-valid result. [10] X Trustworthy Source Science Buddies Expert-sourced database of science projects, explanations, and educational material Go to source
• For our pizza box oven, then, let's say you decide to test your solar oven by placing it in direct sun on three similar, 90-degree Fahrenheit days in July, at three times each day (10 am, 2 pm, 6 pm).

• Sometimes your data may be best recorded as a graph, chart, or just a journal entry. However you record the data, make sure it is easy to review and analyze. Keep accurate records of all your results, even if they don't turn out the way you hoped or planned. This is also part of science! [11] X Research source
• As per the solar oven tests at 10 am, 2 pm, and 6 pm on three sunny days, you will need to utilize your results. By recording the done-ness of your s'mores (by how melted the chocolate and marshmallow is, for instance), you may find that only the 2 pm placement was consistently successful. [12] X Research source

• If you started out with a simple, clear, straightforward question, and a similar hypothesis, it should be easier to craft your conclusion.
• Remember, concluding that your hypothesis was completely wrong does not make your SIP a failure. If you make clear, scientifically-grounded findings, and present them well, it can and will be a success.
• In the pizza box solar oven example, our hypothesis was "A solar oven made from a pizza box can consistently heat foods any time there is abundant sunshine." Our conclusion, however, might be: "A solar oven made from a pizza box can only be consistently successful in heating foods in mid-day sun on a hot day."

Explaining and Presenting Your Project

• For a science fair, for example, the judging could be based on the following criteria (adding up to 100%): research paper (50%); oral presentation (30%); display poster (20%).

• SIP abstracts are often limited to one page in length, and perhaps 250 words. In this short space, focus on the purpose of your experiment, procedures, results, and any possible applications. [14] X Research source

• Use the guidelines provide by your teacher or the science fair director for information on how to construct your research paper.
• As one example, your paper may need to be broken down into categories such as: 1) Title Page; 2) Introduction (where you identify your topic and hypothesis); 3) Materials & Methods (where you describe your experiment); 4) Results & Discoveries (where you identify your findings); 5) Conclusion & Recommendations (where you "answer" your hypothesis); 6) References (where you list your sources).

• Write up your research paper first, and use it as your guide in constructing your oral presentation. Follow a similar framework in outlining your hypothesis, experiments, results, and conclusions.
• Focus on clarity and concision. Make sure everyone understands what you did, why you did it, and what you discovered in doing it.

• Science fairs commonly use a standard size, three panel display board, approximately 36 inches high by 48 inches wide.
• You should lay out your poster like the front page of a newspaper, with your title at the top, hypothesis and conclusion front and center, and supporting materials (methods, sources, etc.) clearly placed under headings on either side.
• Use images, diagrams, and the like to spruce up the visual appeal of your poster, but don't sacrifice content for visual pizzazz.

Expert Q&A

You Might Also Like

• ↑ https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/intro-to-biology/science-of-biology/a/the-science-of-biology
• ↑ http://www.education.com/science-fair/article/design-solar-cooker/
• ↑ https://www.societyforscience.org/isef/international-rules/rules-for-all-projects/
• ↑ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sunny-science-build-a-pizza-box-solar-oven/
• ↑ http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_guide_index.shtml
• ↑ http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/science-fair/en/
• ↑ https://ctsciencefair.org/student-guide/abstract

About This Article

To do a science investigatory project, start by thinking about a question you'd like to answer. For example, you may be wondering “Does the same kind of mold grow on different types of bread?” Then, once you have a question that's specific, form a hypothesis about what you think the answer will be. For this experiment, a good hypothesis might be “While all bread will produce the same kind of mold, the type of bread will impact how fast the mold grows.” With this hypothesis in mind, grab a few different kinds of of bread, set up your work station, and do your experiment at least 3 times to make sure the results are right. To learn how to record and analyze your results, keep reading! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Did this article help you?

Rachelle Hart Matthews

Dec 3, 2016

DennisDayline Saga Nuñez

May 30, 2017

Lamberto Garcia

Nov 19, 2016

Roselyn Fadri

Dec 7, 2016

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Level up your tech skills and stay ahead of the curve

Community Blog

Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.

What is a Science Investigatory Project?

• By Dr Harry Hothi
• August 27, 2020

Many of the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) PhD students that we’ve interviewed on our site have also been active STEM ambassadors. This means that they engage with school children to help them learn more about scientific research and become enthused with STEM subjects. This can be in the form of giving talks at schools, producing online videos and also becoming involved as mentors in science investigatory projects. This page gives you more detail about the latter.

A science investigatory project (SIP) refers to a science-based research project or study that is performed by school children. An SIP is usually a science experiment performed in a classroom setting with the class separated into small groups, but can also form part of a scientific exhibition or fair project.

The main aim of a science investigatory project is for it to provide school aged children with an engaging way to learn more about science and the concept of performing scientific research. The approaches used are often broadly aligned with those used by PhD students carrying out a research project. The hope here is that it sparks an interest in the children about scientific concepts or STEM subjects in general and that this interest is carried forward to the university level.

These are intended to be a fun way to learn about the scientific process and research. If you as PhD student have the opportunity to become involved in an SIP, then definitely take it up! If you do, then approach the exercise with the aim of teaching the school children about the following 6 research concepts:

• Defining a Research Question . This could happen after a classroom lesson introducing the children to a new concept. Depending on their age, encourage them to spend time reading up about the subject independently (i.e. a first review of literature using Google searches). Guide them in coming up with a research question that they genuinely don’t know the answer to yet. Can they find out what a dependent variable is and an independent variable? Also help them understand what constitutes a controlled experiment. A popular investigatory project is one based around finding out if used cooking oil can be purified using a sedimentation method so that it can be recycled.
• Formulating a Null Hypothesis . Help the children understand the concept of the hypothesis and null hypothesis and refine the research question into this format. The null hypothesis for the above example could be ‘sedimentation is not able to purify used cooking oil’.
• Agreeing a Study Design . Come up with the scientific method needed to test the hypothesis and run the experiments to collect data.
• Collecting and Interpreting Results . Encourage the children to discuss the results they find and what they could mean. Using our example, can they see any differences between unused oil and oil that they tried to purify? Did the process work?
• Concluding the Study . Have them think about their results and what their original null hypothesis was. Do they think the null hypothesis is true – i.e. did they show that sedimentation was not able to purify used cooking oil?
• Presenting the Work . This should be a fun way to learn about the important skill of presenting your research. This might be in the form of a written page describing what they did and what they found and including a summary graph of results. Another good approach is to encourage them to give short presentations using photos of their experimental setup.

Getting involved in a science investigatory project can be a great outreach activity to promote STEM subjects and scientific research to children. Running a science experiment with them and teaching them to think about the scientific method used can be a lot of fun too. I definitely recommend trying it even just once during your time as a PhD student.

The term rationale of research means the reason for performing the research study in question.

A thesis and dissertation appendix contains additional information which supports your main arguments. Find out what they should include and how to format them.

Find out the differences between a Literature Review and an Annotated Bibliography, whey they should be used and how to write them.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Browse PhDs Now

This post gives you the best questions to ask at a PhD interview, to help you work out if your potential supervisor and lab is a good fit for you.

Choosing a good PhD supervisor will be paramount to your success as a PhD student, but what qualities should you be looking for? Read our post to find out.

Clara is in the first year of her PhD at the University of Castilla-La Mancha in Spain. Her research is based around understanding the reactivity of peroxynitrite with organic compounds such as commonly used drugs, food preservatives, or components of atmospheric aerosols.

Eleni is nearing the end of her PhD at the University of Sheffield on understanding Peroxidase immobilisation on Bioinspired Silicas and application of the biocatalyst for dye removal.

Join Thousands of Students

110+ Best Science Investigatory Project Topics: Dive into Science

• Post author By admin
• September 29, 2023

Explore a wide range of science investigatory project topics to engage in innovative research and make significant contributions to the field.

Get ready to dive headfirst into the thrilling world of Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topics! Imagine a journey where you become a scientist, an explorer of the unknown, and a solver of real-world puzzles.

This is what SIP offers – a chance to channel your inner curiosity and creativity into the fascinating realm of science.

From unlocking the secrets of life in biology to experimenting with the wonders of chemistry, from unraveling the mysteries of the universe in physics to addressing vital environmental issues – SIP topics are your keys to a world of exploration.

In this adventure, we’ll guide you through an array of captivating SIP ideas. These topics aren’t just assignments; they’re opportunities to uncover new knowledge, make a difference, and have a blast along the way.

So, gear up for an exciting journey, as we unveil the science topics that could spark your imagination and fuel your passion for discovery. Let’s begin!

Table of Contents

What is a Science Investigatory Project?

Imagine stepping into the shoes of a scientist – asking questions, running experiments, and discovering the secrets of the world around you. That’s exactly what a Science Investigatory Project, or SIP, is all about.

At its core, a SIP is a thrilling journey of scientific exploration. It’s a project that challenges you to pick a problem, make educated guesses (that’s your hypothesis), roll up your sleeves for experiments, collect data, and connect the dots to find answers.

Here’s how it works

Step 1: the mystery.

You start with a question – something that piques your curiosity. It could be anything from “Why do plants grow towards the light?” to “What makes the sky blue?” Your SIP is your ticket to unravel these mysteries.

Step 2: The Guess

Next comes your hypothesis – a fancy word for your best guess at the answer. It’s like saying, “I think this is what’s happening, and here’s why.”

Step 3: The Detective Work

Now, it’s time for the fun part – experimenting! You set up tests, tweak variables, and observe closely. Whether you’re mixing chemicals, observing insects, or measuring temperature, you’re the scientist in charge.

Step 4: Clues and Evidence

As you experiment, you collect clues in the form of data – numbers, measurements, observations. It’s like gathering puzzle pieces.

Step 5: The “Aha!” Moment

When you analyze your data, patterns start to emerge. You connect those puzzle pieces until you have a clear picture. Does your data support your guess (hypothesis), or do you need to rethink things?

Step 6: Sharing Your Discovery

Scientists don’t keep their findings to themselves. They share them with the world. Your SIP report or presentation is your chance to do just that. You explain what you did, what you found, and why it matters.

So, why do SIPs matter? They’re not just school projects. They’re your chance to think like a scientist, ask questions like a detective, and discover like an explorer. They’re where you become the expert, the innovator, the problem-solver.

From the mysteries of biology to the wonders of chemistry and the enigmas of physics, SIPs open doors to countless adventures in science. So, what question will you ask? What mystery will you solve? Your SIP journey awaits – embrace it, and you might just uncover something amazing.

Choosing the Right SIP Topic

Choosing the right Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topic is like selecting a path for your scientific adventure. It’s a critical decision, and here’s how to make it count:

Follow Your Passion

Your SIP topic should resonate with your interests. Pick something you’re genuinely curious about. When you’re passionate, the research becomes a thrilling quest, not a chore.

Real-World Relevance

Consider how your topic connects to the real world. Can your research shed light on a problem or offer solutions? SIPs are a chance to make a tangible impact.

Feasibility

Be realistic about the resources at your disposal. Choose a topic that you can explore within your time frame and access to equipment. Avoid overly ambitious projects that might overwhelm you.

Originality Matters

While it’s okay to explore well-trodden paths, strive for a unique angle. What can you add to the existing knowledge? Innovative ideas often lead to exciting discoveries.

Mentor Guidance

If you’re feeling uncertain, don’t hesitate to seek guidance from teachers or mentors. They can help you refine your ideas and offer valuable insights.

Remember, your SIP topic is the compass for your scientific journey. It should excite your curiosity, have real-world significance, and be feasible within your means. So, choose wisely, and let your scientific adventure begin!

Popular Science Investigatory Project Topics

Now that we’ve established the criteria for selecting a SIP topic, let’s explore some captivating ideas across various scientific domains.

• Investigating the Effects of Various Soil Types on Plant Growth
• The Impact of Different Water pH Levels on Aquatic Life
• Studying the Behavior of Insects in Response to Environmental Changes
• Analyzing the Effect of Different Light Intensities on Photosynthesis
• Exploring the Microbial Diversity in Different Soil Samples
• Investigating the Antioxidant Properties of Various Fruit Extracts
• Studying the Growth Patterns of Mold on Different Types of Food
• Analyzing the Effects of Temperature on Enzyme Activity
• Investigating the Impact of Pollution on the Health of Local Wildlife
• Exploring the Relationship Between Diet and Gut Microbiota Composition
• Developing Eco-Friendly Cleaning Products from Household Ingredients
• Investigating the Chemical Composition of Common Food Preservatives
• Analyzing the Effects of Different Chemical Reactions on Metal Corrosion
• Studying the Factors Affecting the Rate of Vitamin C Degradation in Fruit Juices
• Exploring the Chemistry Behind the Colors of Fireworks
• Investigating the Efficiency of Various Household Water Softeners
• Synthesizing Biodegradable Polymers from Natural Sources
• Studying the Chemical Reactions Involved in Baking Soda and Vinegar Reactions
• Analyzing the Impact of Acids and Bases on Tooth Enamel
• Investigating the Chemical Composition of Different Brands of Shampoos
• Designing and Testing a Solar-Powered Water Heater
• Investigating the Factors Affecting the Bounce Height of Balls
• Studying the Relationship Between Temperature and Electrical Conductivity in Materials
• Analyzing the Efficiency of Different Insulating Materials
• Exploring the Effects of Magnetism on Plant Growth
• Investigating the Behavior of Sound Waves in Different Environments
• Studying the Impact of Projectile Launch Angles on Distance
• Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Speed of Falling Objects
• Investigating the Reflection and Refraction of Light in Different Media
• Exploring the Relationship Between the Length of a Pendulum and Its Period

Environmental Science

• Analyzing the Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Air Quality
• Investigating the Impact of Microplastics on Marine Life
• Studying the Relationship Between Temperature and Ocean Acidification
• Exploring the Effects of Deforestation on Local Ecosystems
• Investigating the Factors Contributing to Soil Erosion in a Watershed
• Analyzing the Impact of Noise Pollution on Wildlife Behavior
• Studying the Relationship Between Temperature and Ice Melt Rates
• Investigating the Effect of Urbanization on Local Bird Populations
• Exploring the Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health in Urban Areas
• Analyzing the Biodiversity of Insects in Urban vs. Rural Environments

Social Sciences

• Analyzing the Impact of Social Media Use on Teenagers’ Mental Health
• Investigating the Factors Influencing Online Shopping Behavior
• Studying the Effects of Different Teaching Methods on Student Engagement
• Analyzing the Impact of Parenting Styles on Children’s Academic Performance
• Investigating the Relationship Between Music Preferences and Stress Levels
• Exploring the Factors Contributing to Workplace Stress and Burnout
• Studying the Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Access to Healthcare
• Analyzing the Factors Influencing Voting Behavior in Local Elections
• Investigating the Impact of Advertising on Consumer Purchasing Decisions
• Exploring the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Team Performance in the Workplace

These SIP topics offer a wide range of research opportunities for students in biology, chemistry, physics, and environmental science. Students can choose topics that align with their interests and contribute to their understanding of the natural world.

Conducting Your SIP

So, you’ve picked an exciting Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topic and you’re all set to dive into the world of scientific exploration. But how do you go from a brilliant idea to conducting your own experiments? Let’s break it down into easy steps:

Step 1: Dive into Research

Before you start mixing chemicals or setting up experiments, it’s time for some detective work. Dive into research! What’s already out there about your topic? Books, articles, websites – explore them all. This background study gives you the superpower of knowledge before you even start.

Step 2: Hypothesize Away!

With all that newfound wisdom, formulate a hypothesis. Don your scientist’s hat and make an educated guess about what you think will happen during your experiments. It’s like making a bet with science itself!

Step 3: Time for Action

Now comes the fun part. Design your experiments. What materials do you need? What steps should you follow? Imagine you’re a mad scientist with a plan! Then, go ahead and conduct your experiments. Be precise, follow your plan, and observe like Sherlock.

Step 4: Collect That Data

During your experiments, be a data ninja. Record everything. Measurements, observations, weird surprises – they’re all clues! The more detailed your notes, the better.

Step 5: Decode Your Findings

Time to put on your detective’s hat again. What do your data and observations tell you? Look for patterns, anomalies, and secrets your experiments are revealing. This is where the real magic happens.

Step 6: The Big Reveal

Now, reveal the grand finale – your conclusions! Did your experiments support your hypothesis, or did they throw you a curveball? Discuss what your findings mean and why they matter. It’s like solving the mystery in a thrilling novel.

Step 7: Your SIP Report

Finally, put it all together in your SIP report. Think of it as your scientific storybook. Share your journey with the world. Start with the introduction, add in your methodology, sprinkle your results and discussions, and wrap it up with a conclusion that leaves your readers in awe.

Remember, this isn’t just about science; it’s about your adventure in discovering the unknown. Have fun, be curious, and let your inner scientist shine!

What is a good topic for an investigatory project?

A good topic for an investigatory project depends on your interests and the resources available to you. Here are some broad categories and potential topics to consider:

• The Impact of Different Fertilizers on Plant Growth
• Investigating the Effect of Air Pollution on Local Plant Life
• Analyzing the Quality of Drinking Water from Various Sources
• Studying the Growth of Microorganisms in Different Water Types
• Creating Biodegradable Plastics from Natural Materials
• Investigating the Chemical Composition of Household Cleaning Products
• Analyzing the Effects of Different Cooking Oils on Food Nutrition
• Testing the pH Levels of Various Household Substances
• Studying the Behavior of Ants in Response to Different Food Types
• Investigating the Impact of Light Exposure on Seed Germination
• Analyzing the Effects of Different Music Types on Plant Growth
• Designing and Testing a Simple Wind Turbine
• Investigating the Relationship Between Temperature and Electrical Conductivity in Materials
• Studying the Behavior of Different Types of Pendulums
• Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Solar Panels
• Analyzing the Impact of Social Media Use on Teenagers’ Sleep Patterns
• Investigating the Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior in Online Shopping
• Studying the Effects of Different Teaching Methods on Student Learning
• Analyzing the Relationship Between Music Preferences and Mood

Computer Science and Technology

• Developing a Smartphone App for Personal Productivity
• Investigating the Factors Affecting Wi-Fi Signal Strength in Different Locations
• Analyzing the Impact of Screen Time on Productivity and Well-being
• Studying the Efficiency of Different Coding Languages in Software Development

When choosing a topic, consider your interests, available resources, and the potential impact of your project. It’s essential to select a topic that excites you and allows you to conduct meaningful research.

Additionally, check with your school or instructor for any specific guidelines or requirements for your investigatory project.

What should I do in a science investigatory project?

So, you’re all set to embark on a thrilling adventure known as a Science Investigatory Project (SIP). But where do you start, and what should you be doing? Here’s your guide to diving headfirst into the world of scientific exploration:

Choose a Topic That Sparks Your Interest

Begin by picking a topic that genuinely excites you. It should be something you’re curious about, like “Why do plants grow towards the light?” or “How does pollution affect local water quality?”

Unleash Your Inner Detective with Background Research

Dive into the world of books, articles, and online resources. Learn everything you can about your chosen topic. It’s like gathering clues to solve a mystery.

Craft Your Hypothesis – Your Educated Guess

Formulate a hypothesis. Think of it as your scientific prediction. What do you think will happen when you investigate your question? Make an educated guess and write it down.

Plan Your Scientific Experiments

Now, let’s get hands-on! Plan your experiments. What materials will you need? What steps will you follow? Imagine you’re a mad scientist with a plan to uncover the secrets of the universe!

Collect Data – Be a Data Ninja

During your experiments, be a data ninja! Record everything meticulously. Measurements, observations, quirky surprises – they’re all part of your data treasure trove.

Decode Your Findings – Be a Scientific Sleuth

Time to decode the clues! Analyze your data like a scientific sleuth. Look for patterns, unexpected twists, and, most importantly, what your experiments are trying to tell you.

Share Your Scientific Tale: The SIP Report

It’s time to tell your scientific tale. Create your SIP report – your storybook of science. Start with the introduction, add in your experiments, sprinkle with results, and wrap it up with a conclusion that leaves your readers in awe.

Share Your Discoveries with the World

If you can, share your SIP findings. Present your work to your classmates, at science fairs, or anywhere you can. Share your excitement about science with the world!

Remember, SIP isn’t just about following steps; it’s about your adventure in discovering the mysteries of the universe. So, stay curious, have fun, and let your inner scientist shine!

What are the best topics for investigatory project chemistry class 12?

Hey there, future chemists! It’s time to explore the fascinating world of Chemistry with some class 12 investigatory project ideas that will not only challenge your scientific skills but also pique your curiosity:

Water Wizardry

Dive into the world of H2O and analyze water samples from different sources – tap water, well water, and that bottled stuff. Let’s uncover the secrets of your hydration!

Biodiesel Bonanza

Ever wondered if you could turn cooking oil into fuel? Investigate the synthesis of biodiesel from everyday vegetable oils, and let’s see if we can power the future with French fries!

Vitamin C Showdown

Put on your lab coat and determine the vitamin C content in various fruit juices. Is your morning OJ really packed with vitamin C? Let’s find out!

Race Against Time – The Iodine Clock

Get ready to race time itself! Study the kinetics of the iodine clock reaction and see how factors like concentration and temperature affect this chemistry marvel.

Shampoo Chemistry

Let’s turn your shower into a science lab! Test the pH levels of different shampoos – are they gentle or are they acidic? Your hair deserves the best!

Heavy Metal Detectives

Investigate soils for heavy metals. Are there hidden dangers lurking beneath our feet? Let’s discover the truth and protect the environment.

Metal Makeover

Ever dreamed of turning ordinary objects into shimmering treasures? Electroplate items like coins or jewelry with various metals and unveil their magical transformations!

The Dye Chronicles

Explore the vibrant world of food dyes used in your favorite treats. What’s really behind those bright colors? Let’s uncover the secrets of our rainbow foods!

Solubility Sleuths

Unravel the mysteries of solubility! How does temperature impact the solubility of common salts? Let’s dissolve some science questions.

Perfume Alchemy

Dive into the world of fragrances! Analyze the chemical components in different perfumes and discover the magic behind your favorite scents.

Remember, the best project is one that not only challenges you but also stirs your scientific curiosity. Choose a topic that excites you, and let your chemistry adventure begin!

What are good science experiment ideas?

• Light Dance with Plants: Imagine plants swaying to the rhythm of light! Explore how different types of light affect plant growth – from disco-like colorful LEDs to the soothing glow of natural sunlight.
• Kitchen Warriors: Don your lab coat and investigate everyday kitchen items like garlic, honey, and vinegar as germ-fighting superheroes. Who knew your kitchen could be a battleground for bacteria?
• Animal Extravaganza: Dive into the world of critters! Observe and report on the curious behaviors of your chosen animal buddies. It’s like being a wildlife detective in your own backyard.
• Fizz, Pop, and Bang: Get ready for some explosive fun! Experiment with classic chemical reactions that sizzle and explode, like the volcanic eruption of baking soda and vinegar.
• Titration Showdown: Become a master of precision with acid-base titration. Unlock the secrets of unknown solutions, like a chemistry detective solving mysteries.
• Crystal Kingdom: Step into the magical world of crystals. Grow your own dazzling crystals and reveal how factors like temperature and concentration influence their growth.
• Swingin’ Pendulums: Swing into action with pendulums! Investigate how factors like pendulum length and mass affect the way they sway. It’s like dancing with physics.
• Machine Marvels: Enter the world of simple machines. Uncover the mechanical magic behind levers, pulleys, and inclined planes as you lift heavy objects with ease.
• Electromagnet Madness: Get electrified! Build your own electromagnet and experiment with coils and currents to see how they shape magnetic fields.
• Water Adventure: Dive into water quality testing. Collect samples from different sources and become a water detective, searching for clues about pollution and health.
• Air Expedition: Take to the skies with your own air quality station. Discover what’s floating in the air around you, from tiny particles to invisible gases.
• Climate Crusaders: Join the battle against climate change. Investigate how shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns impact your local ecosystem.

Earth Science

• Rock Detectives: Grab your magnifying glass and investigate rocks and fossils in your area. It’s like traveling through time to uncover Earth’s ancient secrets.
• Weather Watchers: Become a meteorologist with your own weather station. Predict the weather and marvel at how the atmosphere behaves around you.
• Volcano Eruption Spectacle: Get ready for volcanic eruptions without the lava! Create a stunning volcano model and watch it come to life with your own eruptions.
• Starry Nights: Explore the cosmos with a telescope and discover celestial wonders, from the rings of Saturn to the galaxies far, far away.
• Moon Phases Odyssey: Join the lunar calendar club! Track the Moon’s different faces over weeks and become an expert on lunar phases.
• Solar Eclipse Spectacle: Witness the sky’s ultimate blockbuster – a solar eclipse! Safely observe this cosmic dance with eclipse glasses and telescopes.

These science experiments are not just about learning; they’re about unleashing your inner scientist and having a blast along the way! So, pick your favorite, put on your lab coat, and let the science adventures begin!

In wrapping up our exploration of Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topics, it’s clear that we’ve uncovered a treasure trove of possibilities. These topics are more than just words on a page; they’re gateways to adventure, inquiry, and understanding.

We’ve ventured into diverse realms of science, from the secrets of plant life to the hidden chemistry of everyday items. We’ve danced with the laws of physics, delved into environmental enigmas, and probed the complexities of human behavior. These topics aren’t just ideas; they’re invitations to explore the wonders of our world.

So, as you consider your own SIP journey, let your curiosity be your compass. Pick a topic that truly intrigues you, one that keeps you awake at night with questions. Embrace the process – the experiments, the surprises, and the “Aha!” moments.

Remember, it’s not just about reaching a conclusion; it’s about the exhilarating path you take to get there. SIPs are your chance to be a scientist, an explorer, and a storyteller all at once. So, go ahead, choose your topic, embark on your adventure, and share your discoveries with the world. Science is waiting for your curiosity to light the way!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. how long does it typically take to complete a science investigatory project, the duration of an sip varies, but it generally spans a few months to a year, depending on the complexity of the topic and available resources., 2. can i work on an sip alone, or is it better to collaborate with classmates, you can choose to work on an sip individually or in a group. both approaches have their advantages, so it depends on your preference and the project’s requirements., 3. are there any age restrictions for participating in sips, sips are typically undertaken by students in middle school and high school, but there are no strict age restrictions. anyone with a passion for scientific inquiry can engage in an sip., 4. how can i find a mentor or advisor for my sip, you can seek guidance from science teachers, professors, or professionals in your chosen field. they can provide valuable insights and support throughout your sip journey., 5. where can i showcase my sip findings, you can present your sip findings at science fairs, school exhibitions, or even submit them to relevant scientific journals or conferences for broader recognition..

• australia (2)
• duolingo (13)
• Education (273)
• General (75)
• How To (16)
• IELTS (127)
• Latest Updates (162)
• Malta Visa (6)
• Permanent residency (1)
• Programming (31)
• Scholarship (1)
• Sponsored (4)
• Study Abroad (187)
• Technology (12)
• work permit (8)

Recent Posts

191+ Most Interesting Science Investigatory Project Topics 

Science Investigatory Project Topics (SIPs) are a good way for students to explore and use scientific principles in real-world problems. They promote critical thinking, invention, and a deeper knowledge of various scientific fields. 

In this article, we present a comprehensive list of over 191 best SIP topics categorized into different fields of science. Whether you are using science investigatory project ideas for high school, college, or advanced level, all these projects can serve the best opportunities.

Let’s know the SIP ideas for students, teachers, and anyone interested in science project ideas . It gives you lots of knowledge.

What Is The Best Science Investigatory Project

Table of Contents

A SIP (Science Investigatory Project) is a scientific study. It is based on research that is conducted by students typically in secondary school or higher education. The primary objective of a Science Investigatory Project is to apply the scientific method to gain a deeper understanding of a precise phenomenon, concept, or natural occurrence.

The procedure of choosing the Science Investigatory Project topics involves several key steps. These include selecting a research topic, formulating a hypothesis, designing experiments or investigations, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence, and presenting findings in a structured and coherent manner. Students undertaking SIPs are encouraged to demonstrate critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and the ability to communicate scientific information effectively.

How To Choose Award-Winning Science Investigatory Project Topics

Here are the steps for how to choose Science Investigatory Project topics.

1. Identify Your Interests

Start by considering your personal interests and passions within the field of science. A topic that genuinely fascinates you will keep you motivated throughout the project.

2. Define a Clear Goal

Clearly state the goal or objective of your SIP. What specific scientific question or problem do you want to address or investigate?

3. Conduct Background Research

Research existing scientific literature, articles, and research papers related to your area of interest. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge and identify gaps or areas where further research is needed.

4. Brainstorm Ideas

Brainstorm a list of potential SIP topics based on your interests and the gaps you’ve identified in existing research. Don’t worry about narrowing down your options at this stage; just generate ideas.

5. Narrow Down Your Options

Evaluate each potential topic based on criteria such as feasibility, relevance, novelty, and complexity. Eliminate topics that are too broad, too simple, or too difficult to pursue within your resources and timeframe.

6. Formulate a Hypothesis

For the remaining topics, develop a clear and testable hypothesis. A well-defined hypothesis will guide your experiments and investigations.

7. Consider Resources

Assess the availability of resources, materials, and equipment needed for your SIP. Ensure that you can access what you need to carry out your project effectively.

8. Seek Mentorship

Consult with teachers, mentors, or experts in your chosen field of science. They can provide valuable insights, offer guidance, and help you refine your topic.

9. Evaluate Potential Impact

Consider the potential impact or significance of your SIP. Will it contribute to existing knowledge, address a relevant issue, or have real-world applications? Projects with practical implications often stand out.

10. Plan Your Approach

Once you’ve chosen a topic, create a detailed research plan outlining the steps you’ll take, the experiments you’ll conduct, and the timeline for your SIP. Ensure that your project is well-structured and follows the scientific method.

The following are the best Science Investigatory Project Topics for students.

Good Science Investigatory Project Topics For Physics

• Investigating the efficiency of solar panels in different weather conditions.
• Studying the principles of magnetic levitation.
• Analyzing the factors affecting the speed of sound in different mediums.
• Building a homemade electromagnetic coil gun.
• Exploring the physics behind the double-slit experiment.

Chemistry Science Investigatory Project Topics & Ideas 

• Investigating the effects of different catalysts on chemical reactions.
• Analyzing the properties of superabsorbent polymers.
• Studying the process of fermentation in bread making.
• Testing the pH levels of various household substances.
• Synthesizing biodiesel from vegetable oil.

Best Science Investigatory Project Titles For Biology 

• Examining the impact of environmental factors on plant growth.
• Investigating the effects of different antibiotics on bacterial growth.
• Studying the biodiversity of microorganisms in local water sources.
• Analyzing the genetics of inherited traits in families.
• Exploring the behavior of ants in response to different stimuli.

SIP Project Ideas For Environmental Science

• Measuring air quality in different urban and rural areas.
• Investigating the impact of deforestation on local ecosystems.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of natural vs. synthetic pesticides.
• Studying the effects of oil spills on marine life.
• Assessing the water quality of local rivers and streams.

Fun Science Investigatory Project Topics For Astronomy

• Observing and recording celestial phenomena such as meteor showers.
• Constructing a homemade telescope to view distant galaxies.
• Analyzing the impact of light pollution on stargazing.
• Studying the phases of the moon and their effects on tides.
• Investigating the properties of exoplanets and their potential habitability.

Best Geology SIP Project Topics

• Examining the formation of different types of rocks and minerals.
• Investigating the impact of earthquakes on building structures.
• Studying the process of soil erosion and its prevention.
• Analyzing the composition of volcanic ash.
• Identifying and categorizing local fossils.

Computer Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Developing a facial recognition system using machine learning.
• Studying the efficiency of various sorting algorithms.
• Creating a computer simulation of population growth.
• Investigating the security of different password encryption methods.
• Analyzing the impact of coding languages on software development.

Top Science Investigatory Project Topics In Engineering 

• Designing and building a water purification system.
• Creating a model of a sustainable energy-efficient house.
• Investigating the aerodynamics of different wing shapes.
• Analyzing the structural integrity of various bridge designs.
• Studying the feasibility of using 3D printing in prosthetics.

Medicine and Health SIP Project Ideas For Students

• Investigating the effects of different diets on weight loss.
• Studying the impact of music on heart rate and stress levels.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of natural remedies for common ailments.
• Investigating the spread of diseases through handshakes.
• Studying the influence of exercise on mental health.

Curious Science Investigatory Project In Social Sciences

• Analyzing the factors influencing consumer buying behavior.
• Investigating the effects of social media on interpersonal relationships.
• Studying the impact of gender stereotypes on career choices.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of various teaching methods in education.
• Investigating the correlation between socioeconomic status and academic performance.

Easiest SIP Ideas For Energy and Sustainability

• Designing a wind turbine to harness renewable energy.
• Investigating the efficiency of different types of insulation materials.
• Studying the feasibility of solar-powered water heaters.
• Analyzing the environmental impact of electric vs. gas-powered vehicles.
• Investigating the potential for geothermal energy in a local area.

Science Investigatory Project Topics For Materials Science

• Analyzing the properties and uses of graphene.
• Investigating the effects of temperature on the conductivity of materials.
• Studying the potential applications of shape-memory alloys.
• Examining the properties of superconductors.
• Investigating the use of nanomaterials in water purification.

Psychology Award Winning Science Fair Projects For 10th Grade

• Studying the effects of color on human emotions and behavior.
• Investigating the impact of meditation on stress reduction.
• Analyzing the influence of peer pressure on decision-making.
• Studying the relationship between memory and sleep patterns.
• Investigating the psychology of decision-making in consumer choices.

Food Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Analyzing the nutritional content of different food items.
• Investigating the effects of food additives on human health.
• Studying the preservation techniques of various cultures.
• Analyzing the fermentation process in cheese-making.
• Investigating the effects of different cooking methods on food quality.

Mind-Blowing SIP Ideas For Robotics and Automation

• Designing and building a robotic arm for specific tasks.
• Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in autonomous vehicles.
• Studying the development of swarm robotics for collective tasks.
• Analyzing the use of robotics in medical surgery.
• Investigating the potential applications of drones in various industries.

Mathematics Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Exploring the properties of fractals and their visual representations.
• Investigating the applications of prime numbers in cryptography.
• Studying the geometry of tessellations and their artistic expressions.
• Analyzing the properties of different number sequences, such as Fibonacci.
• Investigating the mathematics behind the Rubik’s Cube and algorithms for solving it.

Electronics and Electrical Engineering Projects

• Designing a home automation system using IoT technology.
• Investigating the efficiency of different types of batteries.
• Studying the principles of wireless power transfer.
• Analyzing the effects of electromagnetic interference on electronic devices.
• Investigating the use of renewable energy sources for charging devices.

Great Science Investigatory Project Topics In Civil Engineering

• Designing and building a model earthquake-resistant structure.
• Investigating the properties of different building materials.
• Studying the effects of various road surfaces on vehicle efficiency.
• Analyzing the structural integrity of different bridge designs.
• Investigating sustainable urban planning and green infrastructure.

Chemical Engineering Science Investigatory Projects

• Designing and optimizing a water treatment plant.
• Investigating the production of biodegradable plastics from plant sources.
• Studying the process of distillation and its applications.
• Analyzing the effects of different catalysts on chemical reactions.
• Investigating the principles of fluid dynamics in chemical processes.

Space Exploration Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Designing a Mars rover prototype for planetary exploration.
• Investigating the feasibility of establishing a lunar colony.
• Studying the effects of microgravity on plant growth.
• Analyzing the potential for asteroid mining.
• Investigating the challenges of long-term space travel and colonization.

SIP Ideas For Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

• Developing a recommendation system based on user preferences.
• Investigating the use of neural networks in image recognition.
• Studying the principles of natural language processing for chatbots.
• Analyzing the ethical implications of AI in decision-making.
• Investigating the development of AI-driven healthcare diagnostics.

Science Investigatory Project Topics In Renewable Energy

• Designing and building a model wind farm for energy generation.
• Investigating the efficiency of different types of solar panels.
• Studying the potential of wave energy as a renewable resource.
• Analyzing the impact of biomass energy production on the environment.
• Investigating the feasibility of harnessing energy from ocean currents.

Social Issues and Policy

• Analyzing the impact of climate change policies on emissions reduction.
• Investigating the effects of universal basic income on poverty reduction.
• Studying the consequences of government interventions in healthcare.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of anti-bullying programs in schools.
• Investigating the impact of social media regulations on free speech.

Transportation and Mobility

• Designing a sustainable urban transportation system.
• Investigating the efficiency of electric vs. hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
• Studying the development of autonomous public transportation.
• Analyzing the impact of ride-sharing services on traffic congestion.
• Investigating the feasibility of hyperloop transportation systems.

Cryptography and Cybersecurity

• Investigating the security of different encryption algorithms.
• Studying the principles of blockchain technology and its applications.
• Analyzing the vulnerabilities of IoT devices to cyberattacks.
• Investigating the effectiveness of biometric authentication methods.
• Studying the ethical implications of cybersecurity practices.

Renewable Agriculture 

• Designing and building an automated hydroponics system.
• Investigating the use of vertical farming for efficient crop production.
• Studying the impact of organic farming practices on soil health.
• Analyzing the benefits of crop rotation and polyculture in agriculture.
• Investigating the use of precision agriculture techniques for resource optimization.

Chemical Analysis SIP Project Ideas

• Developing a method for detecting heavy metals in water sources.
• Investigating the composition of essential oils from different plants.
• Studying the chemical reactions involved in food preservation.
• Analyzing the nutritional content of various types of honey.
• Investigating the use of spectroscopy in chemical analysis.

Alternative Energy Sources

• Designing and building a model tidal energy generator.
• Investigating the potential of piezoelectric energy harvesting.
• Studying the principles of thermoelectric energy conversion.
• Analyzing the feasibility of harnessing geothermal energy.
• Investigating the use of algae for biofuel production.

Behavioral Economics Project Ideas For Students

• Analyzing the impact of behavioral nudges on consumer choices.
• Investigating the psychology of decision-making in financial investments.
• Studying the effects of default options on organ donation rates.
• Analyzing the behavioral economics of charitable giving.
• Investigating the factors influencing retirement savings behavior.

Medical Imaging Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Developing a low-cost medical imaging device for rural areas.
• Investigating the use of AI in medical image analysis.
• Studying the principles of MRI and its diagnostic applications.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of different imaging modalities in healthcare.
• Investigating the use of 3D printing for creating medical models.

Environmental Conservation SIP Ideas For Students

• Designing and implementing a waste recycling program.
• Investigating the impact of reforestation on wildlife habitats.
• Studying the conservation efforts for endangered species.
• Analyzing the effects of marine protected areas on biodiversity.
• Investigating sustainable fishing practices and their impact on ecosystems.

Human-Computer Interaction

• Developing a user-friendly interface for elderly individuals.
• Investigating the design principles of effective mobile apps.
• Studying the impact of virtual reality on user engagement.
• Analyzing the accessibility of websites for individuals with disabilities.
• Investigating the use of eye-tracking technology in human-computer interaction.

Renewable Building Materials

• Designing and testing sustainable building materials.
• Investigating the use of bamboo in construction.
• Studying the properties of recycled plastic as a building material.
• Analyzing the benefits of green roofs and walls in urban areas.
• Investigating the use of mycelium-based materials in architecture.

Political Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Analyzing the impact of political advertising on voter behavior.
• Investigating the effects of gerrymandering on election outcomes.
• Studying the role of social media in political activism.
• Analyzing the influence of campaign finance on political campaigns.
• Investigating the factors contributing to voter turnout.

Biotechnology Science Investigatory Project Topics

• Developing a genetically modified crop for enhanced nutrition.
• Investigating the use of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene editing.
• Studying the production of biopharmaceuticals in genetically modified organisms.
• Analyzing the potential of synthetic biology in creating novel organisms.
• Investigating the use of bioluminescent organisms in pollution monitoring.

Good Science Investigatory Ideas For Physics of Sports

• Analyzing the physics of projectile motion in sports.
• Investigating the effects of equipment design on athletic performance.
• Studying the aerodynamics of different types of sports balls.
• Analyzing the biomechanics of human movement in sports.
• Investigating the physics of friction and traction in sports.

Marine Biology Science Investigatory Projects

• Studying the biodiversity of coral reefs and their conservation.
• Investigating the migration patterns of marine species.
• Analyzing the effects of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems.
• Studying the behavior of deep-sea organisms in extreme conditions.
• Investigating the impact of plastic pollution on marine life.

Superb c In Nanotechnology

• Developing nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery.
• Studying the applications of nanotechnology in electronics.
• Analyzing the potential of nanosensors for medical diagnostics.
• Investigating the use of nanomaterials in renewable energy devices.
• Developing nanoscale materials for enhancing solar cell efficiency.

What are the top 10 science fair projects for 8th grade

These are the top 10 science fair project topics for 8th grade.

• Exploring the Effects of pH on Plant Growth.”
• “Testing Various Insulators’ Impact on Heat Retention.”
• “Investigating the Efficiency of Natural vs. Chemical Cleaners.”
• “Measuring the Impact of Exercise on Heart Rate.”
• “Studying the Relationship Between Magnet Strength and Distance.”
• “Analyzing the Factors Affecting Paper Bridge Strength.”
• “Investigating the Effects of Music on Memory.”
• “Determining the Efficiency of Solar Cookers.”
• “Testing Different Types of Soil for Plant Growth.”
• “Exploring the Impact of Surface Area on Chemical Reactions.”

7 Best Steps in Making an Investigatory Project

If you want to know how to make a Science Investigatory Project topics, just follow these steps. It helps you to make a good SIP project very easily.

Step 1:- Select a Research Topic

Choose a topic that interests you and is aligned with your field of study or the scientific area you want to explore. Ensure that your topic is specific and researchable.

Step 2:- Formulate a Research Question or Hypothesis

Clearly define the research question you want to answer or formulate a testable hypothesis that addresses your chosen topic. Your hypothesis should predict the outcome of your experiments.

Step 3:- Conduct Background Research

Gather information and background knowledge related to your topic by consulting books, scientific articles, online resources, and experts. This research will help you understand the context of your project and identify gaps in existing knowledge.

Step 4:- Design and Plan Your Experiments

Develop a detailed research plan outlining the steps, procedures, and materials you will use in your experiments. Ensure that your experiments are well-structured, controlled, and repeatable.

Step 5:- Perform Experiments and Collect Data

Conduct your experiments according to your research plan, making careful observations and recording data. Ensure that you collect enough data to draw meaningful conclusions.

Step 6: Analyze Data and Draw Conclusions

Analyze the data you’ve collected using appropriate statistical or analytical methods. Evaluate whether your results support or refute your hypothesis. Draw conclusions based on your analysis.

Step 7:- Prepare and Present Your Project

Create a formal report or presentation summarizing your investigatory project. Include sections on the introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Be sure to highlight the significance of your findings and any practical applications.

Conclusion – Science Investigatory Project Topics

Science Investigatory Projects topics provide students with an opportunity to delve into the fascinating world of science and technology. The topics listed above span a wide range of scientific disciplines and can serve as a starting point for students looking to tackle their own investigative journeys. 

Whether it’s exploring the mysteries of the cosmos or delving into the intricacies of cellular biology, there’s a wealth of knowledge waiting to be discovered through these ingenious SIP topics. 

So, pick a field that piques your interest, gather your resources, and embark on a scientific adventure that could lead to groundbreaking discoveries and a deeper appreciation of the world around us.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a winning science fair project.

A winning science fair project demonstrates originality, thorough research, clear methodology, and significant results that contribute to scientific knowledge or address a real-world problem.

What is a science project for students?

A science project for students is a hands-on, research-based exploration of a scientific question or topic, often involving experiments, data analysis, and presentation of findings.

What is the easiest science project?

The easiest science project varies by individual interests and familiarity with scientific concepts, but simple experiments like testing paper airplane designs or growing plants from seeds are often considered straightforward options.

Similar Articles

How To Do Homework Fast – 11 Tips To Do Homework Fast

Homework is one of the most important parts that have to be done by students. It has been around for…

How to Write an Assignment Introduction – 6 Best Tips

In essence, the writing tasks in academic tenure students are an integral part of any curriculum. Whether in high school,…

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Science Investigatory Project

Related Papers

Jang Sarvida

This study is a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of extracting ethanol from corn (Zea maize) stalks mostly left by the farmers in the field after harvest through mechanical extraction, filtration, fermentation and distillation.

Arridina Susan Silitonga , Masjuki Haji Hassan , A. H. Sebayang

The increasing consumption of fossil fuels has led to the development of alternative fuels for the future. Domestic biofuel production and the utilization of alternative fuels can decrease dependency on petroleum oil, reduce trade deficits, reduce air pollution and reduce carbon dioxide emission. Bioethanol is a renewable fuel produced by the fermentation of sugar which is derived from plants such as sugarcane or beet, maize, or cassava etc. However, bioethanol consumption in an engine is approximately 51% higher than gasoline since the energy per unit volume of ethanol is 34% lower than for gasoline. Bioethanol is an oxygenated fuel that contains 35% oxygen, which can reduce particulate matter and NO x emissions caused by combustion of the fuel. Therefore, bioethanol–gasoline blends can significantly reduce petroleum use and GHG emission. In addition, utilization of lignocellulosic materials in bioethanol production is the most viable pathway from an environmental point of view. This paper reviews the current status and technologies involved in bioethanol production and the properties and engine performance from various biomass feedstocks which are the recommended sustainable alternative fuel in the future.

Energy for Sustainable Development

Carlos Rolz , Rolando Cifuentes

Mhlengi Nqoba

Livestock Research for Rural Development

Cristina Chuck

ISBN 978-953-51-0008-9

Cesar M Moreira , Cesar Moreira

M Reza Hadi

Abas Almodares

Innovative Research Publications

present research is focus to synthesis water based silver nanofluids by chemical reduction which increase the thermal conductivity to enhance the rate of heat transfer also to characterize the thermal properties and heat transfer performance of nanofluids over heat exchangers to enhance the efficiency and overall heat transfer coefficient of heat exchanger with simultaneous reduction in the area of heat exchanger. As noted above the basic concept of dispersing solids in fluids to enhance thermal conductivity. Solid particles are added because they conduct heat much better than do liquids. Compared with micro particles, nanoparticles stay suspended much longer and possess a much higher surface area. The surface/volume

RELATED PAPERS

Biomass and Bioenergy

Caleb Dalley

Hazrat Ali , Fazal Haq

Bioresource Technology

Edgard Gnansounou

The Scientific World Journal

Mohd Sofian Azirun

Progress in Energy and Combustion Science

Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Thiruvengadam S

Abdullahi Mohammed

José Monteiro

Felix Takim

SHC120107 Student

Asmamaw Tesfaw

Jitendra Saini

Mohan Jain , Vivek Kumar

Honey Sweet

IJAERS Journal

Ratnavathi Chamarthy

Gheorghe M Stoian

Dr. Pinaki Dey

Justice Rono

Rani Ran Jeeva

Sachin Kumar

Yu-Chung Chiang

abebe alemu

Parvati Rijal

Bioresource technology

Nwabuebo Okem Romanus

Farhan Ramadhan

Dominik Rutz

Plant Breeding

Antonio Figueira

Applied Energy

Yanna Liang

Maria Joan Montemayor

Keith Chapman

Muhammad Nasidi , Yusuf Deeni

ignatius Nzom

Agronomy Journal

IAEME Publication

PROCEEDING OF INDONESIAN STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC MEETING, DELFT, THE NETHERLANDS, MAY 2008

Daniel Sondakh

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024