thesis on school health and safety

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Children (Basel)

Feeling Unsafe at School and Associated Mental Health Difficulties among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

1 Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, 20014 Turun Yliopisto, Finland; [email protected] (P.K.); [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (K.M.)

2 INVEST Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, 20014 Turun Yliopisto, Finland; [email protected] (E.T.); if.utu@uosdna (A.S.)

Elina Tiiri

3 Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20521 Turku, Finland

Prakash Khanal

Jayden khakurel, kaisa mishina.

4 Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 Turun Yliopisto, Finland

Andre Sourander

Associated data.

No new data were created in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

This study systematically reviewed the literature on perceived school safety. We investigated the prevalence, factors and associated mental health difficulties, as well as cross-cultural findings. Five databases were searched up to 9 February 2021 for peer-reviewed papers published in English. We included quantitative studies that explored the perception of school safety among children and adolescents. The reference lists of the selected papers were also searched. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the included studies. The review included 43 papers. The mean prevalence of the students who felt unsafe at school was 19.4% and ranged from 6.1% to 69.1%. Their perceived safety was associated with a wide range of personal, school, and social factors. Not feeling safe at school was related to being victimized and mental health difficulties, including depressive symptoms and suicidal behavior. Higher perceived school safety was associated with measures such as the presence of a security officer and fair school rule enforcement. The results showed the lack of cross-cultural studies on perceived school safety. Empirical studies are needed that examine the mechanisms of school safety, using valid measures. A clear definition of school safety should be considered a key aspect of future studies.

1. Introduction

Researchers have increasingly focused on school safety in the last 20 years and there has been a greater emphasis on physical threats such as gun-related school violence which has received extensive media coverage [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Another well-known global threat to students’ safety is bullying which takes different forms, namely physical, verbal, relational, and damage to property [ 6 ]. School safety is defined by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization as the process of establishing, and maintaining, a school that is a physically, cognitively, and emotionally safe space for students and staff to carry out learning activities [ 7 ]. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals also state that schools should provide safe, non-violent, inclusive, and effective learning environments for all [ 8 ].

School safety needs to be examined in terms of both physical and psychological safety. Just because a school is free from violence, it does not necessarily mean it provides a safe environment [ 2 ]. Students may worry about their safety even though they do not face any danger from violence or bullying [ 9 ]. Safe schools are those where students do not experience fear or anxiety of any danger that can weaken their cognitive ability and restrict the learning process [ 2 ]. Students need psychological safety to learn effectively [ 10 ].

School safety is often included in studies as one of the aspects of school climate. However, in previous literature, the operationalization of school climate is diverse [ 11 ] and many studies do not include school safety as a dimension of school climate [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Furthermore, school safety has been conceptualized as an independent outcome of a positive school climate in research [ 16 ]. School climate has been reported to be associated with mental health difficulties and bullying victimization [ 17 , 18 ]. However, it is not clear whether perceived school safety itself accounts for these associations or if they can be explained by other aspects of school climate. In this systematic literature review, we focus on perceived school safety.

Current literature on school safety is scattered, and it is necessary to get an overview on what the scholars have discussed on the topic and identify the knowledge gap. There have not been any systematic reviews of the literature on perceived school safety providing a comprehensive overview of studies on how safe children and adolescents felt at school. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the topic and describe the existing literature and fill that knowledge gap. To do that, we investigated the prevalence of students who felt unsafe at school and examined the factors that were associated with perceived school safety, with a particular focus on any association with mental health difficulties. Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory was used to organize the findings on factors associated with perceived school safety [ 19 , 20 ]. We also wanted to shed light on the findings of cross-cultural studies on school safety, as researchers have suggested that it is vital to use a cross-cultural perspective to explain cultural variances in perceived school safety [ 21 , 22 ]. The findings of this study will directly help educators, researchers, and policy makers to make decisions based on evidence-based knowledge to strengthen the safety of schools.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [ 23 , 24 , 25 ] and the Synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines [ 26 ]. Our systematic literature review protocol was developed and registered in PROSPERO on 1 March 2020 and was last updated on 17 August 2020 (registration number CRD42020171435).

2.1. Search Strategy

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PROSPERO to ensure there were no existing systematic literature reviews or on-going reviews of school safety among children and adolescents. The research questions for the review were developed based on the population, intervention, control and outcomes criteria approach [ 25 ]. The study population was children and adolescents enrolled at school, the intervention was the schools, and the outcome was the students’ perceived school safety. The focus of this study was to explore the perceptions of students’ safety at school, not to compare it with others who were not at school. Therefore, a comparison group was not applicable to this study.

The literature search was conducted from 30 January to 5 February 2020 and was last updated on 9 February 2021 to find recently published papers. Five electronic databases were chosen because of their relevance to the field of mental health and education: PubMed, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. The search strings used for each database are provided in Supplementary Table S1 . Additional literature was identified by assessing the reference lists of the selected papers to ensure that all the potentially eligible studies were included [ 27 ].

2.2. Study Selection

Two authors (YM and PK) independently scanned the titles and abstracts of the papers retrieved from the searches and the papers that did not have an abstract or a full text version were excluded. All searched records were inputted to RefWorks (Ex Libris Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel), and the decisions made during the selection process are reported in the PRISMA flow diagram ( Figure 1 ).

Flow chart used to select papers related to perceived school safety in the present review.

The search was limited to peer-reviewed papers published in English in scientific journals. Case reports, conference abstracts, book chapters, trial registers, Internet resources, and unpublished records were excluded. There were no restrictions on the country of origin. We included quantitative studies that examined the general population of children and adolescents who were enrolled at school. Children and adolescents in school settings, elementary school to high school, were included, and data from individuals only over 18 years old such as college/university students were excluded. Studies that included teachers and parents were only included if the results were reported separately for children and adolescents. Studies on safety outside schools, such as at home and in the community, were excluded.

The main outcome of this review was how safe students felt at school, and this meant that we needed to be clear about how we defined the word safe. The studies that we included used various questions to measure school safety, such as asking students whether they felt fearful or secure at school. Studies that used various synonyms for safe were included in this review. School safety is often included in studies that discuss it as one of the aspects of the school climate. These were only included if the results for school safety were reported separately.

2.3. Full Texts and Quality Assessment

The search identified 1129 papers and two authors (YM and PK) carried out screening on the papers based on their titles and abstracts. Any disagreements were resolved between the two authors (YM and PK), with advice from a third author if necessary (ET). Finally, the two authors (YM and PK) assessed the full texts of the 125 papers and identified 43 papers met the eligibility criteria. YM and PK evaluated the quality of the evidence, and any risk of bias in reporting the findings, by using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies [ 28 ]. The quality of each study was rated as good, fair, or poor. Studies that were rated poor were excluded from this review, to ensure the quality of evidence.

2.4. Data Extraction and Data Synthesis

The data extraction was conducted by YM. Excel version 2010 for Windows (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA, USA) was used to manage the data and PK checked and verified the accuracy and completeness of the data extraction. The extracted data included the name of the first author, publication year, country, participants, response rate, age range, measures, responses, the year the data was collected, research design, setting, the estimated prevalence of school safety, associated factors, and associated mental health difficulties. Any disagreements in the data extraction were resolved through discussion or consultation between the two reviewers (YM and PK), and a third author helped resolve any disagreements (ET).

The inter-rater reliability of the assessment process was assessed using Cohen’s kappa, and the scores were 0.90 (almost perfect agreement) for the study selection, 0.62 (substantial agreement) for the quality assessment, and 1.00 (perfect agreement) for the data extraction.

Our aim was to present a narrative synthesis of the findings from the included studies, not to conduct a meta-analysis [ 29 ]. To ensure consistency across the results, we decided beforehand how the results from each study would be reported [ 26 ]. When the prevalence has been reported using a four-point Likert scale, that is divided into feeling safe and feeling unsafe. For instance, feeling safe combines agree and strongly agree and feeling unsafe combines disagree and strongly disagree. Studies that used a five-point Likert scale had an inconsistent approach to presenting prevalence, and we divided the scale responses into feeling safe and feeling unsafe as presented in these studies. Associated factors were organized according to the environment: the child’s immediate environment, interrelations between the different environments that surround them, and environments that the child does not actively participate in [ 20 ]. It also includes cultural contexts, life transitions, and sociohistorical events.

3.1. Study Characteristics

We found that 43 papers met the inclusion criteria and these 40 cross-sectional studies, and three longitudinal study underwent data extraction. Of these, 17 papers addressed the prevalence of school safety, 42 papers presented factors associated with perceived school safety, and 10 discussed mental health difficulties related to school safety. Only one cross-cultural study met our criteria and was included.

We reviewed 34 studies from North America: 32 from the United States and two from Canada. One study was from South America, Chile. There were also four studies from Europe, two from the Netherlands, one from Italy and one from Finland. The final three were from Asia, two from Israel, and one from Japan. The response rates ranged from 50–100% in the 33 studies that reported the rates. The number of participants ranged from 542 to 159,630, and they were in the 3rd to the 12th grade. There was one study just from elementary school settings and 38 studies just from secondary school. Four studies covered both elementary and secondary schools. Although we did not set any time limits for the publications, the relevant studies started to appear around 2004, and 30 of the 43 papers were published between 2016–2020.

All the studies used self-report measures to assess how safe the children and adolescents felt at school. A single item was used to measure their feelings in 25 studies, for example, whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement “I feel safe at school”. The other 18 studies used multiple items, such as how safe they felt in the classrooms, corridors and toilets. Most studies used 4- or 5-point Likert scale. The major limitation was that the items that assessed perceived school safety did not define school safety or what it meant to feel safe at school. Table 1 summarizes the studies that were included, and Table S2 provides further details of the included studies.

Description of the 43 studies included in the review.

The quality assessment rated 23 studies as good and 20 as fair. The most common risk of bias was selection bias, followed by no clear description of the research questions and measurement bias. Another common limitation was inadequate adjustments for potential confounders ( Table S3 ).

3.2. Prevalence of Perceived School Safety

Table 2 provides a summary of findings from cross-sectional studies which provided the prevalence of school safety. The mean prevalence of students who felt unsafe at school was 19.4% (range 6.1–69.1%). Three studies presented separate data by sex [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The mean prevalence for boys was 31.5% (11.5–68.4%), and for girls, it was 30.7% (10.4–69.9%). Two studies reported the prevalence separately for sexual minority youths (28.8, 39.7%) and non-sexual minority youths (17.2, 20.1%) [ 22 , 33 ].

Summary of findings from cross-sectional studies which provided the prevalence of school safety.

Note: Schools: elementary (E), secondary (S), CS = Cross-sectional, LS = Longitudinal, NR = Not reported. The numbers have been rounded to one decimal point.

3.3. Factors Associated with Perceived School Safety

There were 18 studies that compared perceived school safety separately among sexes. Six studies found that boys were more likely to perceive their schools unsafe than girls [ 31 , 34 , 38 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], and five studies found that girls reported lower perceptions of school safety than boys [ 39 , 42 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Sexual minority youths were less likely to feel safe at school than non-sexual minority youths [ 22 , 33 , 34 , 51 ]. Most studies found that non-white respondents were less likely to report feeling safe at school compared to white respondents [ 34 , 35 , 39 , 43 , 45 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Four studies reported that older students were more likely to report feeling unsafe at school [ 38 , 49 , 52 , 53 ] while three studies reported the opposite [ 42 , 47 , 48 ]. Two studies reported that students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds were more likely to perceive their school as unsafe [ 38 , 49 ].

Ten studies reported a significant association between mental health difficulties and a sense of safety at school. Depression and suicidal behavior were the most frequently reported issues. Studies consistently reported that feeling unsafe at school was related to depressive symptoms [ 45 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Feeling safer at school tended to decrease the probability of suicide attempts and suicidal ideation [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. Self-harming behavior was also found to be associated with a sense of safety at school [ 32 , 59 ]. Yablon [ 60 ] found that feeling safe at school had significant associations with fewer post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and less post-traumatic growth, which means that positive changes resulted from traumatic life events. Nijs et al. [ 61 ] used the self-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to examine the association between mental health problems and perceived school safety. They found a strong association with the three subscales that measured emotional problems, peer problem, and conduct problems. However, there was no significant association with hyperactivity symptoms and prosocial skills.

3.3.1. Immediate Environment

Victimization was associated with negative perceived school safety in 20 studies. The most common type of victimization was bullying, followed by youth violence, emotional or psychological violence, and witnessing violence. Three studies showed that those who bullied others were more likely to feel unsafe at school than those who stood by and witnessed bullying [ 30 ]. Moreover, Bachman et al. [ 31 ] found that witnessing bullying was significantly associated with low perceived school safety for 5th-grade students and 8th-grade girls, but not 8th-grade boys. Esselmont [ 62 ] found that the direct effects of victimization on perceived school safety were stronger for boys than girls. Most of the studies that have investigated the association between bullying victimization and school safety have only focused on traditional bullying and only two studies covered cyberbullying [ 53 , 63 ].

Several school-related factors were associated with perceived school safety. Five studies found a consistent negative association between feeling unsafe at school and educational attainment [ 40 , 42 , 50 , 55 , 64 ]. A large scale longitudinal study [ 40 ] found that future reported perceived school safety does not affect educational attainment in the previous year, suggesting that changes in reported perceived school safety lead to decreases in educational attainment, not the other way around. This study also found that feeling unsafe at school had statistically significant effect on educational attainment as students are exposed to greater in-school violence and disruption [ 40 ]. In general, security measures, such as metal detectors digital surveillance technology, were related to lower perceptions of safety [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. An exception was having a security officer at the school, which was associated with higher perceptions of safety [ 43 , 48 ]. Fair, clear, and consistent school rule enforcement was associated with a greater feeling of safety [ 31 , 38 , 50 ]. Mooij and Fettelaar [ 42 ] reported that students who went to larger schools were more likely to report feeling safe. Perumean-Chaney and Sutton [ 50 ] found that students who were in larger classes were less likely to feel safe than those in smaller classes. Students with a higher perception of their school environment were more likely to report feeling safer at school [ 44 , 47 ]. Within school climate items, school connection was the largest single contribution to the overall prediction of a sense of safety at school [ 47 ].

Another factor that shaped how safe students felt about safety was their relationship with others. Students who felt that their teachers care about them [ 38 , 44 ] and had high levels of trust in them [ 65 ] were more likely to feel safe at school. When teachers were seen to be unfair, this was reflected in lower perceptions of safety [ 66 ]. Students who reported that family cohesion was important to them, and who came from intact families, were more likely to feel safe at school [ 39 , 42 ]. Students who talked to their families more about activities and events at school were more likely to report better perceptions of school safety [ 38 ]. Having close friends [ 39 ] and feeling that making friends was easy [ 38 ] were associated with a higher sense of school safety.

The use, and availability, of substances and weapons were also associated with how safe students felt. Five reported that significantly lower perceived school safety if substances were available and used at school [ 31 , 39 , 44 , 45 , 55 ]. The most common types of substances were drugs, followed by alcohol and cigarettes. Students who carried a weapon at school were more likely to feel that their school was unsafe [ 36 , 62 ], as did students who saw others carrying weapons at school [ 38 , 44 ].

3.3.2. Interrelations between Surrounding Environments

The interrelations of the different surrounding environments include interactions between family members and schoolteachers, which has rarely been studied. Hong and Eamon [ 38 ] found that parents getting involved by attending school meetings and events was not significantly associated with perceived school safety. Other variables, such as relationships with friends and family members and social workers being involved with the family, have not been explored.

3.3.3. Environments That Students Did Not Actively Participate in

The environments that school students did not actively participate in included social structures that influenced the child’s immediate settings, such as their local community [ 67 ]. This has not been widely studied in the included studies. Students who felt their neighborhood was safer were more likely to feel safe at school [ 38 , 47 , 50 ]. This result suggested that other factors that students were not involved in, such as racism and discrimination and employment opportunities could also have been associated with perceived school safety [ 19 , 20 ].

We did not find any cultural context and life transitions factors that were associated with school safety or sociohistorical events, such as economic recessions, anti-discrimination laws, changing schools and puberty.

Table 3 presents a summary of the factors that were associated with a sense of school safety, and Figure 2 illustrates an adapted ecological systems model of the multiple domains in relation to perceived school safety among children and adolescents.

Summary of factors and mental health difficulties associated with school safety.

Note: (−) = associated with feeling unsafe, (+) = associated with feeling safe.

An adapted ecological systems model of the multiple domains related to perceived school safety.

3.4. Cross-Cultural Studies

One cross-cultural study that compared China and the United States met our criteria and passed the quality assessment [ 52 ]. It found that Chinese students had significantly higher perceptions of school safety than American students in middle school and high school, but there were no significant differences in elementary school.

4. Discussion

This study had four key findings. First, a remarkable number of children and adolescents did not feel safe at school. Second, students’ perceptions of school safety were associated with factors such as being bullied. Third, not feeling safe at school was related to mental health difficulties, such as depressive symptoms and suicidal behavior. Fourth, there was only one cross-cultural study on perceived school safety met our criteria, and only four studies were carried out in non-western societies.

The mean prevalence of students who felt unsafe was 19.4%, and it was alarmingly high in some studies. This high prevalence highlights the need of strong political leadership, a robust legal and policy framework to promoting a safe learning environment, including the use of positive discipline [ 73 ]. There were wide variations between countries, from 6.1% in a study from the United States [ 37 ] to 69.1% in a study from Japan [ 32 ]. The large variation in the results was influenced by differences in the study methods, the lack of a definition for perceived school safety and how it was measured. The findings were mainly based on studies carried out in single western countries, which made it impossible to identify culture-specific differences in perceived school safety.

The analysis revealed that multiple factors affected how safe children and adolescents felt at school. The literature consistently reported strong associations between being bullied, youth violence and low levels of school safety, which is understandable, as victims may feel scared to go to school and avoid going [ 74 , 75 , 76 ]. Students expect teachers to keep them safe and actively address bullying [ 77 , 78 ]. However, teachers do not always successfully intervene, because they may be unaware of bullying [ 79 , 80 ] or may even feel it is unnecessary to intervene [ 81 ].

There were mixed results regarding sex. Some studies said that boys were more likely to feel unsafe at school than girls [ 31 , 34 , 38 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], due to their higher involvement in disruptive activities and bullying [ 82 , 83 ]. However, some studies said girls had greater fears than boys [ 39 , 42 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], and other studies found no significant differences between sexes [ 32 , 35 , 68 ]. These findings suggest that a sense of feeling unsafe at school is a shared issue for both boys and girls.

The studies reported relatively persistent results that sexual minority youths and non-white students felt unsafe at school. This might be because sexual minority youths [ 84 , 85 ] and students from ethnic minorities [ 86 , 87 ] faced a higher risk of being bullied. We were surprised that several studies reported that older students had lower perceived school safety, as there is generally a decrease in bullying as children grow older [ 88 , 89 ]. It is possible that other factors associated with lower perceived school safety could explain these findings, such as the emotional problems that are more prevalent among adolescents than younger children [ 90 ].

Feeling unsafe at school was associated with various mental health problems, including emotional problems and suicidal behavior. Previous research has shown that mental health problems were associated with being bullied [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ], and others have reported a bi-directional association in which mental health problems both preceded and followed being bullied [ 95 ]. Because being bullied was also associated with perceived school safety, the associations between mental health, victimization and perceived school safety appear complex. Understanding and addressing these associations could help to tackle absenteeism, because as many as 10–14% of students avoided school because they felt unsafe [ 96 , 97 ]. Mental health problems [ 98 , 99 ] and being bullied [ 74 , 89 ] have also been associated with absenteeism. The associations between feeling safe at school, mental health difficulties, and victimization and absenteeism emphasize the importance of comprehensive interventions for the whole school community, targeted sub-groups who are at high risk, and students who have already developed symptoms. These should be provided according to the nature and intensity of the students’ needs [ 10 ].

Strengthening school security measures has become a common preventive response to school violence [ 100 ]. However, using security measures, such as metal detectors and digital surveillance technology, had a negative impact on students’ perceptions of school safety. The only exception was a school security officer at school, which was associated with higher perceived school safety [ 43 , 48 ]. It is possible that metal detectors inconvenience students [ 101 ] and that they do not like feeling of being searched and monitored by security devices [ 48 , 102 ]. This could have a negative impact on their sense of safety by, for example, reminding them of a potential threat. On the one hand, risky behaviors, such as school violence and substance use, are more likely when there are no consistent, clear rules for students [ 103 ]. On the other hand, when fair, clear, and consistent school rules were enforced, this was associated with a higher sense of school safety. Trusting teachers and feeling that they cared for students were also associated with higher perceptions of school safety. Smaller classes enabled students to have more individual attention from, and active interaction with, teachers [ 104 ]. A longitudinal study showed a positive long-term impact of smaller classes on students, including higher academic achievements and completing education [ 105 ].

It appears that complex interactions of social, psychological, and biological factors shaped students’ emotional sense of safety and that these factors moderated the effects that each other had on how safe children and adolescents felt at school. Although perceived school safety was measured with a single question in most studies, it was a strong independent risk factor that was associated with being bullied and mental health difficulties. When students experience a combination of these factors associated with poor school safety, it may put them at greater risk for behaviors and mental and behavioral health concerns. This finding suggests that these most vulnerable students may need additional targeted actions by, for example, providing selective prevention interventions.

Only one cross-cultural study on perceived school safety fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Bear et al. [ 52 ] reported that Chinese students had significantly higher perceptions of school safety than American students. A Master’s degree thesis by Gong [ 106 ] was not included, as it did not pass the quality assessment, but that also showed that Chinese students’ perceptions of school safety were significantly higher than American students, across ages and sexes [ 106 ]. The differences in the prevalence of school safety among countries might be explained by different cultural values and norms, such as self-perfection, respecting teachers, and social harmony [ 52 , 106 ]. Given increasing international immigration [ 107 ] and the fact that ethnicity and feeling at home in the country is associated with feeling safe, future studies should examine how safe immigrant children feel at school compared to their native-born peers. This was the first review to provide a comprehensive overview of studies on how safe children and adolescents felt at school and associated mental health difficulties. Based on our findings, future studies should use valid measurements and provide clear information about the scoring and interpretation of scales. They also need to provide clear definitions of perceived school safety to improve the consistency of reporting. In future reviews, it would be important to include studies not published in English to gain a wider understanding of school safety. Most of the factors that were associated with perceived school safety were in the student’s immediate environment and attention to other settings was rather limited. It would be interesting for future studies to examine associations between perceived school safety and factors in other settings, such as the interrelations of different surrounding environments, environments that the child does not actively participate in, cultural contexts, life transitions, and sociohistorical events. Most of the studies we reviewed were published between 2016–2020, indicating an increasing research interest in school safety. This might have been influenced by the increased number of school shooting in the United States in recent years [ 108 ]. Cross-cultural perspectives should be considered a key aspect of future investigations into perceptions of school safety, including non-western countries. Ecological perspectives would also enhance our understanding of how different associated factors interact and moderate each other’s effects to recognize and support the most vulnerable students.

Our review had several limitations, including the fact that we only studied papers published in English. This may explain why there were significantly fewer studies from non-western countries. All of the studies, except one, had cross-sectional designs that were insufficient to establish causal relationships. Inconsistencies in the measurement tools used in the studies and the lack of a clear definition of school safety limited our ability to synthesize the results. A strength was that different guidelines were used to ensure a transparent and complete reporting process, as well as the quality of evidence in the review. Despite these limitations, this review provides unique findings on the overall prevalence of perceived school safety and the various factors and mental health difficulties associated with that.

5. Conclusions

Global educators and policymakers need to be aware that a high prevalence of students feel unsafe at school. The findings of our review highlight the importance of various social, psychological, and biological factors that contributed to low perceived school safety, especially being bullied. In addition, our findings suggest that teachers, family members, and friends play a key role in making students feel safe at school. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine the mechanisms of school safety. Possible adversities due to a low sense of safety should be a key focus of future investigations. Studies also need to focus on cross-cultural perspectives and include non-western countries.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the INVEST Research Flagship, and PSYCOHORTS consortium. (We would like to thank all the investigators and participants for their helpful comments.)

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/3/232/s1 . Table S1: Search strings used in databases. Table S2: Characteristics of the studies that were included in this review. Table S3: Results of quality assessment of the observational included studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.M., E.T., K.M., J.K. and A.S.; methodology, P.K.; software, Y.M.; validation, E.T. and P.K.; formal analysis, Y.M.; data curation, Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.M. and E.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.M., E.T., K.M., P.K., J.K. and A.S.; visualization, Y.M.; supervision, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research was conducted as a part of the INVEST Research Flagship, funded by the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme (decision number: 320162) and the Academy of Finland Health from Cohorts and Biobanks Programme (decision number: 308552). Yuko Mori received support for this work from the Scandinavia-Japan Sasakawa Foundation (project number GA20-JPN-0045). Elina Tiiri received support from the Finnish Brain Foundation. The funding organizations played no role in any aspect of the study or paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dancing with power: Aboriginal health, cultural safety and medical education

Principal supervisor, year of award, department, school or centre, campus location, degree type, usage metrics.

• Skip to main content
• Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

We, the voters

Where gun violence is common, some students say physical safety is a top concern.

Meg Anderson

The busy halls of North Community High School in Minneapolis in between classes. Caroline Yang for NPR hide caption

The busy halls of North Community High School in Minneapolis in between classes.

The students at North Community High School in Minneapolis have seen a lot. Some things, morbid curiosities: a bullet, freshly fired, spinning and melting the rubber on the track surrounding the school's football field.

Others, much more painful: the murder of Deshaun Hill Jr., shot and killed two years ago just blocks from the school. He was 15 years old, and the quarterback of the football team.

"That was my best friend, so we did everything with each other. I feel like that's the toughest thing, just knowing that he's not physically by my side anymore," senior Kahlil Brown says.

Last spring, another member of the football team was shot in both legs. He survived.

"It is not normal. It shouldn't be seen as normal. But we go through it so much that it is normal here," senior Jalen Beard says.

Kahlil Brown, 18, says teammate Deshaun Hill Jr., the student and quarterback who was shot and killed in 2022, was his best friend. Brown, shown posing for a portrait at the North Community High School football field in Minneapolis on April 9, will attend St. Olaf College in the fall. Caroline Yang for NPR hide caption

Kahlil Brown, 18, says teammate Deshaun Hill Jr., the student and quarterback who was shot and killed in 2022, was his best friend. Brown, shown posing for a portrait at the North Community High School football field in Minneapolis on April 9, will attend St. Olaf College in the fall.

Across the country, millions of young people are enduring this same reality: Firearm injuries are the leading cause of death for children and teens over age 1 nationwide.

The federal government is investing billions of dollars to combat this problem. But on the north side of Minneapolis, some students living under the threat of gun violence say there's a disconnect between what the government is offering and what they say they need.

"We needed that police officer at our school and they took it out"

Gun violence affects children and teenagers in devastating ways, says Sonali Rajan, an associate professor at Columbia University's Teachers College. That goes far beyond the physical harm guns can cause.

"Witnessing firearm violence, surviving a shooting, hearing gunshots," Rajan says. "There's a real range of experiences that we have to consider when we think about its impacts and the emotional trauma that goes hand-in-hand with that — nightmares, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, typical symptoms we might associate with post-traumatic stress disorder."

Students exposed to gun violence are less likely to do well in school and less likely to graduate . What's more, the rate of firearm deaths for Black children is six times higher than it is for white children. In Minneapolis, students at North High are well aware of those effects.

"If you're outside, you don't really feel comfortable, you don't really get to relax," Beard says. "Even if you're not the one doing it, even if you're not a part of no gang, nothing like that. But you could still end up being the one on the ground."

A portrait of Deshaun Hill Jr. hangs outside on the fence surrounding the North Community High School track and football field in Minneapolis. Caroline Yang for NPR hide caption

A portrait of Deshaun Hill Jr. hangs outside on the fence surrounding the North Community High School track and football field in Minneapolis.

In response, the Biden administration is awarding $1 billion across the next several years as part of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act . That money aims to increase the number of mental health professionals in schools.

As part of the same legislation, the administration distributed about another $1 billion in grants to create what it calls "safer and healthier learning environments," employing a wide range of strategies — including anti-bullying and violence prevention programs, staff training and metal detectors.

Minneapolis Public Schools will receive at least $500,000 of this federal aid, much of which is focused on drug and alcohol prevention. The district plans to apply for the mental health grants and has received other state and federal funding specifically for preventing gun violence.

When it comes to more mental health resources, Beard says he would welcome that extra support, as long as a counselor can truly relate.

"You don't want to talk to a stranger who has never been in this situation, who never had one of their best friends pass away at 15," Beard says. "They wouldn't understand. And it would feel like I'm talking to an alien, basically."

In 2020, George Floyd was murdered by a police officer in this same city. Shortly after, the school district ended its contract with the city's police — and pulled school resource officers from its buildings.

"So now the police is out of our schools," says Brown, the senior whose best friend was killed. "We needed that police officer at our school and they took it out."

The school still has a security monitor, but that person is not a sworn officer. The security monitor can't arrest people and doesn't carry a weapon. Students say they don't want to be overpoliced, much less by officers they don't know. But at North, the school resource officer was also the head coach of the football team — and still is.

"That's a trusted person," Beard says. "If I knew my coach was out there protecting me, I'm fine."

Jalen Beard, 18, a friend and teammate of Deshaun Hill Jr., stands by the football field at school. Beard plans to attend St. Olaf College. Caroline Yang for NPR hide caption

Jalen Beard, 18, a friend and teammate of Deshaun Hill Jr., stands by the football field at school. Beard plans to attend St. Olaf College.

Studies have shown the presence of police can criminalize the school space and serve as a pipeline into the criminal justice system, says Rajan, the Columbia researcher. Still, she says, the need for real physical safety is valid.

"We can't necessarily employ a cookie cutter approach to gun violence prevention," Rajan says. "There are 51 million children in our public school system right now. So there is a lot of nuance here we have to contend with."

"What are we doing to prevent that violence from happening at all?"

Every morning, Principal Friestleben stations herself in the hallway to greet students. She says that's intentional: Structure and consistency communicate to students that they're safe.

"My children are walking in with generational and personal experience of not being protected and not being valued and centered," she says.

North Community High School Principal Mauri Friestleben stands in a newly renovated classroom on April 9. Caroline Yang for NPR hide caption

North Community High School Principal Mauri Friestleben stands in a newly renovated classroom on April 9.

Educators need to understand that even though they can't control what happens in the neighborhood, schools can make a real difference in student well-being, says Dan Flannery, a professor who researches gun violence at Case Western Reserve University.

"If you have a positive school climate and culture, if kids feel attached to the school, they're going to have a much more positive experience," Flannery says. "You need to have a commitment to that perspective. The staff and teachers and principals have to understand that this is an important thing to do."

The all-hands-on-deck approach is part of a larger way of thinking: treating gun violence as a disease.

"Public health is predicated on the notion that we should invest as much as we can in what we call primary prevention," Rajan says. "Prevention is saying 'What are we doing years and years before an individual is posing a potential threat to a school community? What are we doing to make it harder? What are we doing to prevent that violence from happening at all?'"

She says alongside stricter gun laws, strengthening communities at large — investing not just in school culture, but also in things like affordable housing and neighborhood green space — can act as a sort of vaccine against violence.

Friestleben wants to see that investment. And though she welcomes the funds, she isn't sure the latest federal grants will get at the root problems that can lead to gun violence.

Jalen Beard holds a pendant he wears in remembrance of his friend. Caroline Yang for NPR hide caption

Jalen Beard holds a pendant he wears in remembrance of his friend.

"It's no different than one of my kids being hungry and going to the corner store and getting chips. It's satisfying a teeny, tiny little bit of hunger, but not in a healthy, sustainable, longstanding way," she says.

This year Jalen Beard and Kahlil Brown will graduate and go on to college.

They'll attend St. Olaf College, a small liberal arts school about 45 miles from home. They're going to be roommates, and they'll both be playing football, something they talked about doing with their friend who's no longer here.

"He wasn't getting in trouble. He went to class. He had good grades," Beard says. "To me, he was doing everything right. He was doing everything he was supposed to be. And he still didn't get his opportunity."

Note: Meg Anderson was a teacher for Minneapolis Public Schools several years ago. Her spouse works for the district.

• school resource officers
• children's mental health
• school safety
• school shootings
• gun violence
• mental health

• Election 2024
• Entertainment
• Newsletters
• Photography
• Personal Finance
• AP Investigations
• AP Buyline Personal Finance
• AP Buyline Shopping
• Press Releases
• Israel-Hamas War
• Russia-Ukraine War
• Global elections
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East
• Election Results
• Delegate Tracker
• AP & Elections
• Auto Racing
• 2024 Paris Olympic Games
• Movie reviews
• Book reviews
• Personal finance
• Financial Markets
• Business Highlights
• Financial wellness
• Artificial Intelligence
• Social Media

Two shootings, two different responses — Maine restricts guns while Iowa arms teachers

The Maine Legislature has approved sweeping gun safety legislation nearly six months after the deadliest shooting in state history (April 18)

FILE - Rain soaked memorials for those who died in a mass shooting sit along the roadside by Schemengees Bar & Grille, Oct. 30, 2023, in Lewiston, Maine. Maine’s Democratic-led Legislature gave final approval to legislation imposing new restrictions on guns before adjourning Thursday, April 18, 2024. (AP Photo/Matt York, File)

• Copy Link copied

FILE - Community members look at a memorial outside Schemengees Bar & Grille, Nov. 3, 2023, Lewiston, Maine. Maine’s Democratic-led Legislature gave final approval to legislation imposing new restrictions on guns before adjourning Thursday, April 18, 2024. (AP Photo/Matt York, File)

FILE - Police respond to Perry High School, Jan. 4, 2024, in Perry, Iowa. Iowa’s Republican-led Legislature passed a bill this week allowing teachers and staff who undergo training to get permits to carry guns on school property. That comes three months after a fatal shooting at the Iowa school. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

FILE - A rock is painted to memorialize Perry High School shooting victim Ahmir Jolliff at the school, Jan. 6, 2024, in Perry, Iowa. Iowa’s Republican-led Legislature passed a bill this week allowing teachers and staff who undergo training to get permits to carry guns on school property. That comes three months after a fatal shooting at the Iowa school. (Lily Smith/The Des Moines Register via AP, File)

Six months after a deadly mass shooting by an Army reservist, Maine lawmakers this week passed a wide-ranging package of new gun restrictions.

Three months after a fatal school shooting , Iowa lawmakers this week passed legislation allowing trained teachers and staff to carry guns on school property.

Two states. Two tragedies. Two different approaches to improving public safety.

“We live in two different Americas, in essence,” said Daniel Webster, a health policy professor affiliated with the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions.

“We see terrible acts of gun violence; no one wants them, of course,” Webster said. “But we see this through different lenses.”

Legislatures in about 20 states already have passed measures this year to expand gun rights or restrict access to firearms. Dozens more proposals are pending. The divide continues a trend seen last year, when more than half the states enacted firearms legislation , with Democrats generally favoring more limits and Republicans more freedoms for gun owners.

LIMITS ON GUNS IN MAINE

Maine has a tradition of hunting and gun ownership. But after an Army reservist killed 18 people and wounded 13 others in Lewiston, Democratic Gov. Janet Mills called for a variety of new laws aimed at preventing dangerous people from possessing guns and strengthening mental health services.

Before adjourning its 2024 session early Thursday, lawmakers approved measures imposing a 72-hour waiting period for gun purchases, expanding background checks on private gun sales and criminalizing sales to certain prohibited people. They also passed a ban on devices that convert semi-automatic firearms into rapid-firing weapons like machine guns, and enhanced an existing law that allows judges to temporarily remove guns from people during a mental health crisis.

A gun safety coalition praised it as a significant step forward in response to constituents’ concerns after the Lewiston shooting. But Republican state Sen. Lisa Keim criticized colleagues for “using the tragedy to advance legislation” that had been unable to pass previously.

GUNS IN IOWA SCHOOLS

In Perry, Iowa, a school principal and sixth-grade student died and several others were wounded when a 17-year-old student opened fire in January.

A 2021 state law already allowed schools to authorize individuals to carry firearms, though some districts have not done so because of concerns about insurance coverage.

The legislation given final approval Monday by the Republican-led Legislature builds upon the prior law by allowing teachers and staff who undergo gun safety training to get a professional permit to carry guns in schools. If they do, they would be protected from criminal or civil liability for use of reasonable force.

The legislation also requires large school districts to station a police officer or private security guard at each high school, unless the school board votes not to do so. Most of those school districts already have security staff.

DIVERGING STATE LAWS

Republican-led legislatures in Kentucky, Nebraska, South Dakota, Tennessee and Utah also passed measures this year that would expand the ability of some people to bring guns into schools. A bill passed in Wyoming allots $480,000 to reimburse schools for the cost of training employees to carry guns on school property.

Louisiana and South Carolina , led by Republican lawmakers and governors, each enacted laws allowing people to carry concealed guns without a permit. The National Rifle Association, which supported the measures, said similar laws now exist in 29 states.

By contrast, the Democrat-led Delaware Legislature passed legislation requiring people wanting to buy a handgun to first be fingerprinted, undergo training and obtain a state permit.

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, signed a pair of new laws imposing restrictions. One sets a seven-day waiting period to purchase firearms — more than double the three-day period required by the federal government for a background check.

Another new law in New Mexico prohibits carrying firearms within 100 feet (30 meters) of polling places, with an exemption for concealed-carry permit holders. Voting site restrictions on guns now exist in about one-third of the states and Washington, D.C., according to the gun-violence prevention group Giffords.

BUCKING PARTY TRENDS

Not all new gun policies diverge along partisan lines.

Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin this year vetoed 30 gun-related bills passed by the Democratic-led General Assembly that he said would have trampled on constitutional rights. Yet Youngkin also signed some gun restrictions: One bans devices that convert semi-automatic handguns into automatic weapons. Another allows felony charges against parents who let a child have access to a firearm after being notified the child poses a threat of violence.

While signing several gun rights measures, Republican Gov. Mark Gordon of Wyoming also vetoed legislation that would have allowed people to carry concealed guns in public schools and government meetings. Gordon cited concerns the bill could have exceeded the separation of powers provision in the state constitution.

And in some cases, high-profile shootings have prompted lawmakers to avoid taking action on proposals they might otherwise have considered.

Missouri’s Republican-led House had been prepared to debate bills exempting guns and ammunition from sales taxes and allowing people with concealed-carry permits to bring guns onto public transportation. But after the deadly shooting at the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl celebration , House Majority Leader Jon Patterson said those bills would not be brought up this year.

Associated Press writers David Sharp in Augusta, Maine, and Hannah Fingerhut in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this report.

• Bibliography
• More Referencing guides Blog Automated transliteration Relevant bibliographies by topics
• Automated transliteration
• Relevant bibliographies by topics
• Referencing guides

Study Abroad in Moscow, Russia

Diplomacy and International Relations at MGIMO

Russian as a Second Language

More Moscow Study Abroad

How much does it cost to study abroad in moscow.

• Program: Each program page gives its specific pricing information. SRAS offers a variety of program choices of varying length and cost.
• Cost of Living: Our Moscow Student Budget Guide can help you plan out how much you might need for food, entertainment, and other independent costs.
• Airfare: Our International Airfare Guide can give you some pointers on getting the best price for tickets to and from your study abroad in Moscow.

What's It Like to Study in Moscow?

Talk to an expert about study abroad in moscow, more from sras:.

• Language Study With SRAS
• Study Abroad or Online
• Featured Short Term Programs
• Family Of Sites
• Contact SRAS
• Join an Info Session

Just yesterday my student successfully defended her honors thesis on environmentalism around Lake Baikal, a project that would not have been possible without the fieldwork that she conducted on her SRAS study abroad program in Irkutsk. I hope to see more such projects in the future and will keep directing students to SRAS programs!

At Stetson, we’ve used SRAS to arrange all of our student study abroad trips for the past five or six years. During that time we’ve sent dozens of students on summer- and semester-long programs in Moscow, St Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod and Irkutsk. In every interaction I’ve had with them, SRAS has been prompt, reliable, knowledgable, courteous and quick to lend a hand when needed.

• All Programs
• Program Destinations
• Join An Info Session
• Online Research Internships
• SRAS Program Grants
• Learning Credits
• Health, Safety, and Etiquette
• SRAS Global Ambassador Program
• Guide to International Careers
• Meet Our Team
• SRAS on Tour
• Advising for SRAS
• Affiliation/Partnership
• Site Visits
• Develop Your Custom Program
• Sample Itineraries
• Peer Tutoring
• Chat with Russian Speakers
• Virtual Tours
• Continuing Education
• Research Support
• Individual Student Programs
• Resources for Students of Russian
• North American Survey of Enrollments
• Guide to Archives in Russia
• SRAS Family Of Sites

to submit an obituary

For information on submitting an obituary, please contact Reading Eagle by phone at 610-371-5018, or email at [email protected] or fax at 610-371-5193.

Most obituaries published in the Reading Eagle are submitted through funeral homes and cremation services, but we will accept submissions from families. Obituaries can be emailed to [email protected] .

In addition to the text of the obituary, any photographs that you wish to include can be attached to this email. Please put the text of the obituary in a Word document, a Google document or in the body of the email. The Reading Eagle also requires a way to verify the death, so please include either the phone number of the funeral home or cremation service that is in charge of the deceased's care or a photo of his/her death certificate. We also request that your full name, phone number and address are all included in this email.

All payments by families must be made with a credit card. We will send a proof of the completed obituary before we require payment. The obituary cannot run, however, until we receive payment in full.

Obituaries can be submitted for any future date, but they must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. the day prior to its running for it to be published.

Please call the obituary desk, at 610-371-5018, for information on pricing.

7 Berks school districts get a total of $2.4…

Share this:.

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
• Things to Do
• Classifieds
• Special Sections

Breaking News

Wyomissing police charge man in stabbing of woman that led to crash into store lot, latest headlines, 7 berks school districts get a total of $2.4 million in safety grants, the grants support improved security and mental health support..

Seven school districts in Berks County have been awarded a combined $2.4 million in competitive grants to improve security and mental health support for students and staff at those districts.

The grants were approved Wednesday by the School Safety and Security Committee under the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. The awards complete the $155 million school safety grants program package appropriated in the bipartisan 2023-24 state budget.

The grants were given to the following recipients:

Berks Career and Technical Center — $428,188

Boyertown School District — $297,768

Brandywine Heights School District — $434,388

Fleetwood School District — $450,000

Gov. Mifflin School District — $266,176

Hamburg School District — $400,000

Kutztown School District —  $135,000

More in News

US expected to provide $6 billion to fund long-term weapons contracts for Ukraine, officials say

Ukraine pulls US-provided Abrams tanks from the front lines over Russian drone threats

SUBSCRIBER ONLY

17 states challenge federal rules entitling workers to accommodations for abortion.

Trump downplays deadly Charlottesville rally by comparing it to campus protests over Gaza war

Status message

Moscow office.

1350 Troy Highway Moscow , ID 83843 United States