journal and research paper difference

SpringerLink shop

Types of journal articles

It is helpful to familiarise yourself with the different types of articles published by journals. Although it may appear there are a large number of types of articles published due to the wide variety of names they are published under, most articles published are one of the following types; Original Research, Review Articles, Short reports or Letters, Case Studies, Methodologies.

Original Research:

This is the most common type of journal manuscript used to publish full reports of data from research. It may be called an Original Article, Research Article, Research, or just Article, depending on the journal. The Original Research format is suitable for many different fields and different types of studies. It includes full Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections.

Short reports or Letters:

These papers communicate brief reports of data from original research that editors believe will be interesting to many researchers, and that will likely stimulate further research in the field. As they are relatively short the format is useful for scientists with results that are time sensitive (for example, those in highly competitive or quickly-changing disciplines). This format often has strict length limits, so some experimental details may not be published until the authors write a full Original Research manuscript. These papers are also sometimes called Brief communications .

Review Articles:

Review Articles provide a comprehensive summary of research on a certain topic, and a perspective on the state of the field and where it is heading. They are often written by leaders in a particular discipline after invitation from the editors of a journal. Reviews are often widely read (for example, by researchers looking for a full introduction to a field) and highly cited. Reviews commonly cite approximately 100 primary research articles.

TIP: If you would like to write a Review but have not been invited by a journal, be sure to check the journal website as some journals to not consider unsolicited Reviews. If the website does not mention whether Reviews are commissioned it is wise to send a pre-submission enquiry letter to the journal editor to propose your Review manuscript before you spend time writing it.

Case Studies:

These articles report specific instances of interesting phenomena. A goal of Case Studies is to make other researchers aware of the possibility that a specific phenomenon might occur. This type of study is often used in medicine to report the occurrence of previously unknown or emerging pathologies.

Methodologies or Methods

These articles present a new experimental method, test or procedure. The method described may either be completely new, or may offer a better version of an existing method. The article should describe a demonstrable advance on what is currently available.

Back │ Next

Journal Article vs Research Paper: Difference and Comparison

A journal article presents original research findings in a concise format, focusing on a specific topic within a broader field. It undergoes peer review before publication, ensuring quality and validity. On the other hand, a research paper is a comprehensive document that may include multiple experiments, analyses, and discussions, aimed at contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

Key Takeaways A journal article is a shorter scholarly writing published in a specific academic journal. A research paper is a more extended, comprehensive academic writing presenting original research. Journal articles are more focused and present specific findings, while research papers are broader and present a more comprehensive study.

Journal Article vs Research Paper

A journal article is a piece of published work that presents the research findings and may include analysis, remark, or discussion. A research paper is a detailed account of the research that may be published or unpublished and includes an introduction, literature review, methods, results, and conclusion.

Comparison Table

What is journal article.

A journal article is a scholarly publication that presents the findings of original research, analysis, or review within a particular academic field. These articles serve as fundamental units of scholarly communication, disseminating new knowledge, theories, and insights to the academic community and beyond. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Content and Structure

1 Abstract: A journal article begins with an abstract, a concise summary of the study’s objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. The abstract provides readers with a quick overview of the article’s content and findings.

2 Introduction: Following the abstract, the introduction sets the context for the study by reviewing relevant literature, identifying gaps or controversies in existing knowledge, and stating the research objectives or hypotheses.

Peer Review Process:

1 Submission: Authors submit their articles to scholarly journals for publication consideration, adhering to the journal’s guidelines and formatting requirements.

2 Peer Review: Upon submission, the journal’s editor assigns the manuscript to peer reviewers—experts in the field—who evaluate the article’s quality, originality, methodology, and significance. Peer review helps ensure the rigor and credibility of the research.

3 Revision: Based on the reviewers’ feedback, authors may revise their article to address any concerns or criticisms raised. This iterative process of revision and reevaluation continues until the article meets the journal’s standards for publication.

4 Acceptance and Publication: If the article meets the journal’s criteria, it is accepted for publication and undergoes final editing and formatting. Once published, the article becomes part of the journal’s archive and is accessible to readers worldwide.

What is Research Paper?

A research paper is a comprehensive document that presents the findings, analysis, and interpretations of original research conducted by the author(s) within a specific academic discipline. These papers serve as a means for scholars to contribute new knowledge, theories, and insights to their respective fields. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

1. Content and Structure

1 Introduction: The introduction of a research paper provides background information on the topic, reviews relevant literature, and outlines the research objectives or hypotheses. It establishes the context for the study and justifies its significance.

2 Methods: The methods section describes the procedures, materials, and techniques employed in the research. It should provide sufficient detail to enable other researchers to replicate the study and verify its results.

3 Results: This section presents the empirical findings of the research, using tables, figures, or graphs to illustrate data. Authors report their observations or measurements objectively, without interpretation or speculation.

4 Discussion: In the discussion section, authors interpret the results in light of the research questions or hypotheses, comparing them to previous studies and addressing their implications. They may also explore alternative explanations, limitations of the study, and avenues for future research.

5 Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the research and highlights their significance. It may reiterate the study’s contribution to the field, offer final reflections, and suggest directions for further inquiry.

Characteristics and Scope

1 Original Research: Unlike review papers or essays, research papers are based on original research conducted by the authors. They contribute new data, insights, or interpretations to the academic discourse.

2 Rigorous Methodology: Research papers adhere to rigorous scientific or scholarly methodologies, employing systematic approaches to data collection, analysis, and interpretation. They prioritize objectivity, validity, and reliability in their findings.

3 Length and Complexity: Research papers vary in length and complexity, depending on the scope of the study and the requirements of the target publication venue. They may range from concise reports of preliminary findings to comprehensive analyses of multi-year research projects.

4 Contribution to Knowledge: Research papers aim to advance knowledge within their respective fields by addressing research gaps, testing hypotheses, or generating new theories. They contribute to the cumulative growth of scholarship through the dissemination of original research findings.

Main Differences Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Journal articles focus on a specific aspect or finding within a broader topic.
Research papers provide a comprehensive analysis of a research project, including multiple experiments, analyses, and discussions.
Journal articles are concise, containing essential findings, methods, and interpretations in a limited space.
Research papers tend to be longer and more detailed, offering exhaustive exploration of the research topic, methodology, results, and implications.
Journal articles undergo peer review by experts in the field before publication, ensuring quality and validity.
Research papers may or may not undergo formal peer review, depending on the publication venue or academic requirements.
Journal articles present findings objectively, without extensive interpretation or speculation.
Research papers include in-depth interpretation of results, discussion of implications, and exploration of potential limitations or biases.
Journal articles contribute to the scholarly conversation by presenting new findings, analyses, or reviews within a specific topic area.
Research papers advance knowledge within a field by offering comprehensive analyses, testing hypotheses, or generating new theories through original research.

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

https://gssrr.org/index.php/gssrr/How-to-Publish-Research-Paper
https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/types-of-journal-manuscripts/1356
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/research_papers/index.html

Last Updated : 05 March, 2024

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

Emma Smith holds an MA degree in English from Irvine Valley College. She has been a Journalist since 2002, writing articles on the English language, Sports, and Law. Read more about me on her bio page .

Share this post!

21 thoughts on “journal article vs research paper: difference and comparison”.

The characteristics of a journal article outlined in the article shed light on the structured nature of these scholarly publications. It’s important to understand the components that make up a journal article to effectively communicate research findings.

Agreed, knowing the key components of a journal article is essential for researchers aiming to publish their work in reputable academic journals.

Absolutely, the detailed breakdown of the characteristics of a journal article provides valuable insights for aspiring authors.

This article provides a clear and concise comparison between journal articles and research papers. It’s informative and well-structured. I appreciate the detailed explanation of the characteristics of each type of publication.

I agree, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the differences between journal articles and research papers. It’s a valuable resource for researchers and academics.

The characteristics of a journal article and a research paper are clearly delineated in the article, providing an insightful comparison between the two types of scholarly publications.

Absolutely, the article offers a comprehensive comparison that highlights the unique features of journal articles and research papers.

The article effectively differentiates between journal articles and research papers, offering a comprehensive understanding of the distinct characteristics and purposes of each type of scholarly publication.

I concur, the article serves as an illuminating guide for researchers and scholars navigating the intricacies of academic writing and publication.

The article offers a thorough understanding of the significance of journal articles and research papers in the academic and professional spheres. It serves as a valuable resource for individuals engaged in scholarly writing and research.

I find the comparison table provided in the article particularly helpful. It offers a quick reference for distinguishing between journal articles and research papers based on publication outlet, content, target audience, peer review, length, structure, emphasis, and impact.

Yes, the comparison table is a useful tool for researchers to understand the key differences between journal articles and research papers at a glance.

The comparison table and detailed explanations in the article provide a nuanced understanding of the unique features of journal articles and research papers, making it a valuable resource for the academic community.

Absolutely, the article offers a comprehensive analysis that elucidates the differences and similarities between journal articles and research papers.

The distinction between journal articles and research papers is crucial for academic writing. This article does a great job of highlighting those differences and their respective characteristics.

Absolutely, understanding the nuances between these two types of publications is essential for academic and scholarly work. This article does an excellent job of breaking it down.

The structure of a research paper outlined in the article serves as a helpful guide for researchers looking to compose comprehensive and well-organized scholarly documents. It offers a clear framework for presenting original research findings.

I found the breakdown of the structure of a research paper to be particularly enlightening. It offers a roadmap for researchers to follow when crafting their academic work.

Yes, understanding the structure of a research paper is essential for effectively communicating the results of a study. This article provides a detailed overview of what to include in a research paper.

The detailed explanation of the structure and content of a journal article and a research paper is beneficial for researchers seeking to refine their academic writing skills and publish their work.

Indeed, the article provides valuable insights into the components and organization of journal articles and research papers, aiding researchers in producing high-quality scholarly publications.

Journal Article vs. Research Paper — What's the Difference?

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Table of contents, key differences, comparison chart, review process, length & scope, publication, compare with definitions, journal article, research paper, common curiosities, what's the main difference between a journal article and a research paper, are journal articles always peer-reviewed, who reads journal articles, can a research paper become a journal article, who typically writes journal articles, why are citations important in both journal articles and research papers, do journal articles have a word limit, are all journal articles based on experimental research, where can i find journal articles, is a thesis the same as a research paper, can i use a journal article as a reference for my research paper, do all research papers get published, why is it essential for a journal article to be peer-reviewed, do all academic journals charge to publish journal articles, how long can a research paper be, share your discovery.

Author Spotlight

Popular Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

New Comparisons

Trending Terms

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Criminal Justice
Environment
Politics & Government
Race & Gender

Expert Commentary

White papers, working papers, preprints, journal articles: What’s the difference?

In this updated piece, we explain the most common types of research papers journalists will encounter, noting their strengths and weaknesses.

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .

by Denise-Marie Ordway, The Journalist's Resource February 25, 2022

This <a target="_blank" href="https://journalistsresource.org/media/working-papers-research-articles/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://journalistsresource.org">The Journalist's Resource</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cropped-jr-favicon-150x150.png" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

This tip sheet, originally published in May 2018, has been updated to include preprint research, a type of research featured often in news coverage of the coronavirus pandemic.

Journalists rely most often on four types of research in their work. White papers, working papers, preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles.

How are they different? And which is best?

Below, we explain each, pointing out its strengths and weaknesses. As always, we urge journalists to use care in selecting any research to ground their coverage and fact-check claims.

Peer-reviewed article

Peer-reviewed research — the kind that appears in academic journals and that we highlight here at The Journalist’s Resource — has undergone a detailed critique by scholars with expertise in the field. While peer-reviewed research is generally the most reliable, journalists should keep in mind that publication in a prestigious journal is no guarantee of quality and that no single university or research organization always does the best research on a given topic.

It is safe to assume, however, that articles published in top-tier journals have been reviewed and given a stamp of approval by a number of accomplished scholars. For journalists who are uncertain, we’ve put together a list of 13 questions to ask to gauge the quality of a research article.

Keep in mind that not everything that appears in a scholarly journal has been peer reviewed. Journals publish various types of content, including book reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and, sometimes, even poetry.

Working paper

This broad category describes research papers that have not been peer reviewed or published in a journal. Working papers can be in various stages of completion. One might be ready for publication in a prestigious journal while another requires significant editing and other changes that could actually alter its main findings. Sometimes, working paper findings are so preliminary, authors will advise against citing their work .

Even so, working papers are a great way for journalists to gain access to new research quickly. The peer-review and publication process can take months to a year or longer, which means that by the time studies get published, their findings are sometimes not as useful or the data are old.

In choosing working papers, journalists should communicate with scholars about the progress of their research and how confident they are in their findings. It’s a good idea to seek corroboration from peer-reviewed research and to ask other researchers for help assessing a study.

A preprint is similar to a working paper in that it has not been vetted through a formal peer-review process. However, preprints tend to be more complete . Also, preprints submitted to public servers such as the Social Science Research Network and the health sciences server medRxiv get a cursory screening before they’re published online for public view.

Preprints, like academic journal articles, are assigned a Digital Object Identifier , or DOI, and become a permanent part of the scientific record.

White paper

A white paper is a report, often compiled by government agencies, businesses and nonprofit organizations, that outlines an issue and often explores possible solutions to a problem. For example, in November 2021, the federal Office of Community Oriented Policing Services released a white paper looking at factors that help or hinder law enforcement recruitment of Black Americans. Earlier in the year, the Advanced Technology Academic Research Center published a white paper on the American Rescue Plan ‘s widespread implications for government agencies.

In the business world, white papers also are used for marketing purposes — to describe a new product or approach, for instance, or diagnose a problem.

While a white paper can help journalists get up to speed quickly on an issue, it’s important to note some white papers advocate a specific position or policy change. Some rely on incomplete research or research that has not been peer reviewed.

Looking for more guidance on writing about research? Check out our tip sheets on covering biomedical research preprints amid the coronavirus and what journalists should know about peer review .

The Journalist’s Resource would like to thank Matthew Baum , the Marvin Kalb professor of global communications and professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School, for his help preparing this tip sheet.

About The Author

Denise-Marie Ordway

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Edited by Diffzy | Updated on: April 30, 2023

Why read @ Diffzy

Our articles are well-researched

We make unbiased comparisons

Our content is free to access

We are a one-stop platform for finding differences and comparisons

We compare similar terms in both tabular forms as well as in points

Introduction

Reading material that is directly related to one's field of study is a highly useful tool that may be used to improve one's knowledge. Reading books, papers, and articles that are pertinent to a topic holds a whole notion for elevating one's level of knowledge as well as aggregating one's grades. Some of the vehicles that are utilized in professional and academic learning include journals, articles published in journals, and research papers.

It is possible to refer to as a "journal article" any piece of writing that has been accepted for publication in a journal. However, journals publish a variety of papers, and while some of those pieces require original research to be submitted, others do not.

However, the term "research article" is reserved exclusively for those types of articles that call for their original research. This category comprises, most frequently, empirical studies as well as pieces based on original research. Review articles, articles presenting opinions and points of view, comments, letters, and other types of writing do not normally fit within the category of research papers.

Journal Article vs Research Paper

The main difference between a research paper and a journal article is that journal articles are intended for an academic audience and are comprehensive, well researched, and conceptual. On the other hand, research papers focus on and investigate a single viewpoint in-depth, substantiating their claims with relevant theories, scientific standpoints, and evaluations supported by the extensive study.

A compilation of articles on a variety of subjects is known as a journal. There are many different kinds of journals, including personal journals, academic journals, art journals, and so on. Regarding the academic side of things, however, we have a lot more to learn about scholarly journals. It is a collection of papers covering a wide range of subject areas in one volume. It is a compilation of several various work compilations into one volume. In contrast to a research paper, it is made up of articles on a variety of subjects.

When writing research papers, a reference to this source is frequently required. It is a magazine that comes out regularly and is based on the concept that many different subjects and situations are related or correlated to one another. When compared to the information presented in a paper, the depth of coverage supplied in a journal is shallower. As was just mentioned, a journal serves as a point of reference for a variety of people and organizations who are engaged in research.

A research paper can be thought of as essentially a sheet of information on a particular subject. According to the conventional definition, "it is a descriptive context in the form of words or text," which we may find if we search it up. It gives its readers knowledge that is both in-depth and pertinent regarding a particular subject matter. This is an investigation into a particular issue, and by the time it's finished, the authors hope to have proposed a workable solution to that issue.

The majority of the work is done by teams consisting of two or three people. It might be as long as twenty pages or even more, and it consists of a comprehensive study of a single distinct subject. Having said that, one thing that needs to be made clear is that the length of it is contingent on the setting of the study.

However, a research paper can be anywhere from 5,000 to 10,000 words long, whereas a journal can only be between 5,000 and 10,000 words long at most. This is the primary distinction between the two types of writing. Because it is a periodic publication, a magazine can supply you with a list of regional, national, and even international conferences.

Because it is a periodic publication, as was previously said, it also notifies you of upcoming conference events. Publication in a scholarly journal is a goal for many students and young researchers, particularly if the work being submitted is their very first research paper.

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper in Tabular Form
What is a Journal Article?

Articles published in journals are significantly shorter than novels and are focused on a narrow range of subjects.

A compilation of articles (much like a magazine) that is published consistently during the year is known as a journal. The most recent research is published in journals, and the articles published in journals are produced by specialists for other experts. They could be printed, published online, or published in both mediums simultaneously.

If you have a writing assignment and your instructor asks you to use "journal articles" in your research, you might find yourself wondering if she means articles from popular magazines and newspapers. If you do find yourself wondering this, the answer is yes, she does mean articles from popular magazines and newspapers. On the other hand, papers published in journals are substantially dissimilar to those published in periodicals. For one thing, the primary objective of journal articles is research. In most cases, these are scholarly publications that have been vetted by other experts in the field and were written by experts specifically for other professionals.

Journal articles are published regularly, and each article may have anywhere from one to several authors who contributed to its completion.

A journal article is an experiential piece that can take on a variety of forms. For instance, a journal article may have started as an analysis of a piece that was published in a newspaper, a review, a proposal, or any number of other academic and research-based contributions.

In a nutshell, an article published in a journal can either be scholarly or non-academic.

An article published in a journal can also serve as a research paper, which can then be presented in a variety of settings.

It is beneficial to become familiar with the various kinds of papers that are published in journals. Although there might be a large number of different types of articles published due to the wide variety of names that they are published under, the majority of the articles that are published fall into one of the following categories: original research, review articles, short reports or letters, case studies, and methodologies.

What is a Research Paper?

Writing assignments in academia frequently take the shape of research papers. Students and academics are required to locate knowledge on a topic (also known as conducting research), take a stance on the topic, and present support (or evidence) for that viewpoint within the context of a structured report to complete a research paper.

The word "research paper" can also be used to refer to an academic publication that presents the findings of one's original study or provides an analysis of the findings of research carried out by others. Before they can be approved for publishing in an academic journal, the vast majority of scholarly works are subjected to a procedure known as peer review.

A research paper can be defined as any type of document that requires the author to research a specific topic. Research papers, in contrast to essays, which are frequently and frequently based substantially on the author's viewpoint and are written from the author's point of view, are based on facts.

To write a research paper, you are required to first think of anything you have an opinion about, then do study and become an expert on that issue, and finally, support your thoughts and statements with facts discovered through your extensive research.

A research paper is the result of the author spending time collecting and analyzing data, as well as thinking for themselves. When academics are looking for solutions to questions, the first thing they do is begin searching for material that can be used to either expand, utilize, approve or refute the findings.

To put it another way, research papers are the end products of processes that involve taking into consideration written works and adhering to certain specifications. In addition, scientists do study to build and expand a variety of hypotheses, which might lead to the development of social or technological aspects of human science. To be able to create papers that are relevant to the research, however, they need to have a definition of the research, as well as its structure, characteristics, and types.

Quite frequently, students are tasked with writing research papers. Students, scholars, and scientists eventually find themselves in a scenario in which they are required to answer particular questions by referencing sources. In its most fundamental form, a research paper is one of the forms of papers that can be written by academics in which they investigate questions or subjects, search for secondary sources, and compose papers on predetermined topics.

For instance, if a person is given the task of writing a research paper on certain causes of global warming or any other subject, they are required to first compose a research proposal on the subject, during which they must evaluate significant aspects and reputable sources. Writing an essay tends to center on the author's own experiences and observations, but writing a research paper requires covering sources and adhering to academic norms.

In addition to this, researchers are obligated to follow the format of research papers. Therefore, those who write research papers need to conduct a study on their themes, cover important features of those issues, process reputable articles, and appropriately structure their final studies.

Main Differences Between Journal Article and Research Paper in Points
A research paper is an in-depth investigation into 'A' particular question, which may again have multiple other sub-questions that need to be re-found or revisited. On the other hand, journal articles are typically written to enhance one's knowledge in a particular field, domain of learning, or related to a professional approach that is helpful in field-specific understanding.
A research paper is an in-depth investigation of something that has already been presented, whereas journal articles are based on the author's perspective.
According to the prior notion, a journal or paper could be a research paper or a current trending news article based on any beliefs that involve personal experience and learnings. On the other hand, a research paper is an in-depth investigation into the readability of conceptual information through the presentation of data in the form of graphs, diagrams, case studies, and so on.
It takes some time to finish the research paper because it requires the study of a case, a sample of individuals, a demographic area, etc., all of which take some time.
whereas the effort involved in producing a journal paper can be completed in as little as a week or as much as a few months. However, it is not as in-depth as a research article.
If a research paper is written and extensively worked on by, for example, a department, domain, or organization, then the research paper will be patented. On the other hand, a journal article is open to the public and can be read, shared, reviewed, and presented without violating any copyright mandates or policies that are in place. A journal article cannot be protected by a patent.
The presentation of the content can be made to flow naturally and can be written in a short amount of time. On the other hand, a research paper needs to include considerable rough work, as well as a paper that is written methodically and includes appropriate citations in the appropriate locations.
A research paper is not driven through any type of ratings and is primarily concerned with its presentation and discoveries to be made known, however, a journal article does run after ratings because, in today's world, everything is moving to digitalization.

It is important to be aware that a journal article and a research paper each have their distinct audience, purpose, reach out, and most importantly – worth as a medium of knowledge. This can be shown by connecting the dot of the specifically demarcated six-pointers that have been presented above.

https://gssrr.org/index.php/gssrr/How-to-Publish-Research-Paper
https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/types-of-journal-manuscripts/1356

Cite this article.

Use the citation below to add this article to your bibliography:

MLA Style Citation

"Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper." Diffzy.com , 2024. Fri. 26 Apr. 2024. < https://www.diffzy.com/article/difference-between-journal-article-and-research-paper-318 >.

Chicago Style Citation

Diffzy.com , 2024. "Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper." Accessed April 26, 2024. https://www.diffzy.com/article/difference-between-journal-article-and-research-paper-318 .

APA Style Citation

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper. (n.d.). diffzy.com , Retrieved April 26, 2024, from https://www.diffzy.com/article/difference-between-journal-article-and-research-paper-318 .

Edited by Diffzy

Share this article

Difference between Journal Article and Research Paper

Specific education reading is an important tool that will enhance your academic excellence. To keep excelling, you will need to read relevant articles, papers, documents, and books. Journals, Journal articles, and research papers are important mechanisms for professional and academic learning.

Journal Article Vs. Research Paper

The difference between a journal article and a research paper is that the journal article is well researched and extensive. It is also conceptual and well-suited for the academic audience. Research papers on the other hand focus on a specific viewpoint and substantiate the viewpoint with relevant theories. Research papers require many extensive studies to ensure the viewpoint is fully supported.

Comparison between the Journal Article and the Research Paper

The journal article is an overall publication while a research paper can be cited.
Journal articles are written based on knowledge and experience while research papers require an in-depth study of the specific topic.
Journal articles are short while research papers are long and always ongoing.
You cannot patent a journal article but you can patent a research paper.
While a research paper does not have a specific domain, journal articles have a broader spectrum.
There is an impact rating needed for journal articles while no specific rating is needed for the research paper.

What is a Journal Article?

When publishing a journal article, more than one author can be used to give their specific conclusions. Journal articles are of different natures and they can be experiential. Journal articles can be academic or non-academic.

Journal articles can be presented differently as research papers and on different platforms.

What is a Research Paper?

Writing a research paper can take a lot of time. This is because it involves something that has already been published but needs to be reopened again. The first step to writing a research paper is sitting with the thought and why exactly you want to research it. The research will involve the timeframe, type of data collection method to use, and most importantly, in-depth research.

To write a research paper, you will need to do a literature review. This includes the reading of various case studies, findings, newspapers, all containing the topic of research or question to be answered.

Journal articles are written to show special or enhanced knowledge in a certain field. It is useful to bring understanding to a particular field. Journals cannot be written by just anyone. Instead, they are written by experts. A research paper on the other hand revolves around a particular topic or question. The question may contain other questions within it that need to be researched on, re-found, or re-visited. The research paperwork is done using a specific format and supports every point with tactical findings. In short, a research paper is written to answer a question or get findings of something that was already initially researched and written about.

Journals can be a paper written based on something that is currently trending or new ideologies that could be personal experiences and learnings. Research papers on the other hand are more extensive. They involve a particular topic and questions that can be presented using diagrams, graphs, and case studies.

Due to the level of research needed to write a research paper, a lot of time is needed. The findings need to be factual, totally supporting the topic or question in place. Journal papers on the other hand take a short time. That is, they can be completed within a week. A journal can go to a month but does not take as much time as a research paper.

When an organization, department, or domain writes a research paper, it needs to be patented. What this means is that it cannot be published without due permission. A journal paper on the other hand does not require rights or permissions. It is open for people and can be reviewed, shared, and presented without necessarily touching the copyrights. Journals do not need to be patented.

Writing a journal requires generality and broad visibility. While a journal paper can be a research paper, it does not always apply to be one. A journal’s content can be written within a short period and needs to flow to be understood. A research paper on the other hand needs to have extensive rough work on the side. It is a paper that is written systematically and with relevant citations. A literature review is an important aspect of the research paper. You need to have proof of the data collection method that includes raw data collection, interview transcripts and so much more.

While everything going digital in today’s world and rating is required for everything, a journal article will not require ratings. What journals need are views as the ones most viewed get the best footage. A research paper, being a component of the journal, can be limited as to who gets access to the same. It also does not require ratings but its presentations and findings are what make it known to the audience.

In conclusion, we can see that both the journal papers and research papers have different audiences. That makes them different in terms of research, language used, and the kind of presentation in the end.

It is also good to understand the purpose of both papers. While a journal is mainly open to the masses and does not have restrictions as to who gets access, research papers have their specific audience. This is because it entails answering certain questions that audiences would love to know and discussing certain topics in depth.

As such, it takes a longer time to research and write a research paper than it does to write a journal. A research paper is systematic and requires various citations that help to support your facts. A journal paper on the other hand is writing thoughts and explaining that particular thought in depth.

Research papers require skills in doing research. A journal mostly requires a creative mind.

SMU Libraries
Scholarship & Research
Teaching & Learning
Bridwell Library
Business Library
DeGolyer Library
Fondren Library
Hamon Arts Library
Underwood Law Library
Fort Burgwin Library
Exhibits & Digital Collections
SMU Scholar
Special Collections & Archives
Connect With Us
Research Guides by Subject
How Do I . . . ? Guides
Find Your Librarian
Writing Support

Types of Research Papers: Overview

Types of Research Questions

A research paper is simply a piece of writing that uses outside sources. There are different types of research papers with varying purposes and expectations for sourcing. While this guide explains those differences broadly, disciplines and assignments vary. Ask your professor for clarification on the purpose, types of appropriate research questions , and expectations of sources for your assignment.

Need More Help?

Related guides.

Literature Reviews
Annotated Bibliographies
Starting Your Research

Research and Writing Lab

Need last minute help but didn't book an appointment? Every week we offer online drop-in labs.

Tuesdays 3:00pm - 4:30pm via Zoom @ https://smu.zoom.us/j/92637892352 and in-person, Fondren Red 1st floor (near elevators)

Next: Types of Research Questions >>
Last Updated: Apr 24, 2024 12:40 PM
URL: https://guides.smu.edu/researchpapertypes

Journal vs conference papers: Key differences & advice

Journal and conference papers are not the same, and both formats have advantages and disadvantages. A good understanding of the key differences between journal and conference papers avoid s pitfalls, such as copyright issues when wanting to turn a conference into a journal paper at a later stage.

Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you make a purchase using the links below at no additional cost to you . I only recommend products or services that I truly believe can benefit my audience. As always, my opinions are my own.

What is a journal paper?

What is a conference paper, advantages of journal papers, disadvantages of journal papers, advantages of conference papers, disadvantages of conference papers, differences between journal and conference papers, questions to ask yourself before submitting a conference paper, is conference paper better than journal paper, can you use a conference paper in a journal, are all conference papers automatically published in conference proceedings, do conference papers count as publications.

A journal paper is a written piece of academic work – presenting empirical research, a theoretical discussion, or both – published in an academic journal. Most journal papers or articles are peer-reviewed , meaning they undergo a rigorous review process involving several stages and rounds of revisions before they are published.

Most academic journals have an impact factor, which is an index calculated based on the number of citations of articles published within a specific journal. The higher the impact factor of a journal, the wider the (potential) reach of journal papers that it publishes. And the better the reputation of the journal.

Therefore, authors of journal papers tend to target journals with a high impact factor to publish their work. There are other criteria that play a role when selecting a journal to publish research . However, the impact factor remains a crucial one, as publications in high-impact factor journals strongly influence academic promotions.

A conference paper is a piece of academic work that is specifically written for an academic conference, and mostly accompanies a conference presentation. While there are some exceptions, most conference papers are not peer-reviewed.

Conference papers are usually submitted several weeks before the actual conference, and circulated among conference participants in preparation for the actual presentations. However, not all conferences require conference papers. And some conferences make the submission of a conference paper optional.

Many conferences that require or allow the submission of a conference paper have ‘best conference paper’ awards, rewarding outstanding submissions. Furthermore, some conferences publish a collection of conference papers after the event, in the so-called conference proceedings. Many conference proceedings do not have an impact factor.

If you are looking to elevate your writing and editing skills, I highly recommend enrolling in the course “ Good with Words: Writing and Editing Specialization “, which is a 4 course series offered by the University of Michigan. This comprehensive program is conveniently available as an online course on Coursera, allowing you to learn at your own pace. Plus, upon successful completion, you’ll have the opportunity to earn a valuable certificate to showcase your newfound expertise!

Advantages and disadvantages of journal and conference papers

The choice between a journal or a conference paper should be a careful one. Both formats fulfill important but different roles in academia. Therefore, a good understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of both formats can help to make an informed decision.

Please notice that the following points are developed from a social sciences perspective. Other fields and specific disciplines may have different standards.

Journal papers are more prestigious in academia. Especially if you strive for an academic career , publishing peer-reviewed journal papers in high-impact journals should be your priority.
Journal papers are more frequently cited than conference papers. Journal impact factors are not the only metric that strongly influences academic promotions: The so-called h-index is a metric that measures your ‘impact’ in terms of how often your publications have been cited. And journal papers are cited more often than conference papers, as they are considered more reputable.
Journal papers undergo revisions, which often means they are of higher quality. Due to the rigorous peer-review process that most journal papers are subjected to, the quality of journal papers tends to be better than that of conference papers. During peer review, experts on a topic point out flaws in the draft paper, challenge your thinking and provide suggestions for improvement. While dealing with peer review comments can be a tedious process, the final result is often a much better paper compared to the initial manuscript.
Publishing a journal paper takes time. The whole process from manuscript to published paper can be lengthy, and take from anywhere between several months to several years.
Most journals do not publish preliminary results. Even if you make a groundbreaking discovery in your preliminary analysis, most journals will not consider it worthy of a publication before more final conclusions can be drawn.
There is a risk of outdated data in journal papers. For instance, if you want to publish your academic work to contribute to a current societal discussion, a journal paper may not be the best option. In the worst case, the publishing process takes more than a year and by the time of publication, your data may be outdated. Furthermore, your conclusions may be irrelevant for practice as a lot can change in a year.
Journal papers have to follow strict rules set by journals. Journals set, for example, rules in terms of length, structure, or reference style that have to be followed. Conference papers, on the other hand, are often more flexible.
Conference papers tend to have a lower threshold of acceptance than journal papers. It is much easier to publish a conference paper in conference proceedings than publish academic work in a high-impact journal. Therefore, conference papers can be a valuable option to learn about paper writing and publishing, and an easier way for early career researchers to get their name on a publication.
Conference papers are published relatively fast. Some conference papers undergo peer review before being published in conference proceedings, but many don’t. In general, conference proceedings are published relatively soon after the actual conference takes places. Thus, a conference paper can be a good way to publish fast.
Conference papers can discuss ongoing research and preliminary results. Contrary to journal papers, conference papers often address ongoing research and tentative conclusions. Furthermore, the format tends to be more open than in journal papers, providing authors of conference papers more freedom in terms of content and structure.
Conference papers can often compete for ‘best conference paper’ aw ards . And having such an award to your name certainly looks good on your academic CV !
Conference papers do not count as much as journal publications for career advancement. This is because many conference papers are not peer-reviewed and because many conference proceedings do not have an impact factor. Thus, in terms of career promotion or trajectories, conference papers are less relevant than journal papers.
Conference papers can create copyright issues. It is a very common scenario: an author writes a conference paper first, then makes some edits and submits it to an academic journal for publication. If the conference paper has been published in conference proceedings, it will likely be flagged as plagiarised by the journal. Journals do not like to publish articles which have been published elsewhere in a similar fashion, and some use any indication of plagiarism (even if it is self-plagiarism) as a reason to desk-reject a manuscript.
Sharing great ideas prematurely in a conference paper can make you vulnerable. Unfortunately, there is a lot of competition in academia, and not everyone plays by the rules. Therefore, you should always carefully consider how much of your work you share, without linking it to a publication of your own. Sharing an excellent idea that is sent around to hundreds of conference participants creates a risk that someone copies or steals your idea or approach, and tries to publish it faster in a journal article than you do.

Based on the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of journal and conference papers above, the following key differences come to light:

Content and requirements : Conference papers are more open to include preliminary results and are more flexible in terms of requirements than journal papers. The target audience of conference papers are conference participants, while journal papers target the wider academic community.
Submission and peer review process : Journal papers tend to be submitted via an online system and undergo a structured peer review process. Conference papers are often simply sent to the conference organisers by email and are not peer-reviewed.
Time to publication: Conference papers are often published more quickly in conference proceedings than journal papers are published in academic journals.
Career relevance: Journal papers are much more relevant for academic careers than conference papers. Most journals have impact factors, while most conference proceedings do not have impact factors.

Even though journal papers are more important for academic promotions, submitting a conference paper is not per se the wrong choice. A ‘best conference paper’ award, for instance, can make you stand out when applying for academic jobs.

When embarking on writing a conference paper, it is better to be safe than sorry: At times, it may require reaching out to conference organisers or target journals to make sure that you will not run into copyright or plagiarism issues at a later point.

Oftentimes, conferences still allow you to present even without submitting a conference paper. Or you can ask the conference organisers not to include your paper in the conference proceedings. Furthermore, some journals are okay with publishing a paper that has been published in a conference proceeding earlier. Just make sure to ask in advance to prevent bad surprises!

Thus, when considering a conference paper, first answer the following questions:

What are the benefits of submitting a conference paper to the specific conference, and do they outweigh the drawbacks?
How can I mitigate the drawbacks? (Would my conference paper be published in the conference proceedings and can I opt out? Can I participate in the conference without a conference paper?)
Do I share too many original ideas in my conference paper, which someone could copy without referring to my work as I haven’t published on the topic yet?
Could I face copyright issues if I want to turn my conference paper into a journal paper at a later point?

Frequently Asked Questions

In academia, journal papers are considered ‘better’ than conference papers because they have a stronger positive impact on academic careers. Reasons for this are the more rigorous peer-review process that journal papers tend to undergo before publication, the higher standards of journals compared to conference proceedings, and the impact factor of journals.

You should never simply submit a conference paper to a journal without making substantial edits beforehand. That said, it is okay to use similar data or arguments. If your conference paper has been published in conference proceedings, it is best to inform the journal about it in your letter to the editor , which accompanies your journal paper submission. Otherwise, it may be flagged as plagiarised and immediately desk-rejected by the journal editors before it even has the chance to enter the peer-review process.

Not all conference papers are automatically published in conference proceedings. Different conferences have different rules when it comes to publishing papers in conference proceedings. Therefore, you should check the rules and procedures of a specific conference in advance. If you cannot find the information online, you can send an email to the conference organisers. You can also always ask if it is possible to present without submitting a conference paper or to not have your conference paper published in the conference proceedings.

Conference papers often do not count as academic publications. Therefore, on academic CVs, conference papers tend to be listed under ‘Conferences’ instead of ‘Publications’. Alternatively, they are listed as a separate sub-category under ‘Publications’, but in a way that they are clearly differentiated from other (peer-reviewed) publications.

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox!

Subscribe and receive Master Academia's quarterly newsletter.

The best answers to "What are your plans after graduation?"

How many people have a phd data from oecd countries, related articles.

A guide to industry-funded research: Types, examples & getting started

How to harness theoretical and conceptual frameworks for groundbreaking research

10 powerful methodology courses for PhD students [online]

How to address data privacy and confidentiality concerns of AI in research

Research on Credit Regulation Mechanism of E-commerce Platform Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Published: 22 April 2024

Cite this article

Zeguo Qiu 1 ,
Yuchen Yin 2 ,
Yao Yuan 1 &
Yunhao Chen 1

In the growing e-commerce industry, the problem of malicious business operations has become increasingly prominent, exposing many problems such as weak supervision of e-commerce platforms and no way for consumers to complain. In order to solve the problems of counterfeit and shoddy products on e-commerce platforms and promote the sustainable development of the e-commerce industry in China, this paper constructs a three-party evolutionary game model of e-commerce platforms, merchants, and consumers, investigates the influence of each influencing factor on each party’s strategy choice, and provides targeted suggestions to e-commerce platforms based on relevant factors. Finally, the impact of several important parameters on the equilibrium solution is discussed through sensitivity analysis. The results show that: 1) the smaller the cost difference between active and negative regulation, the more the e-commerce platform tends to active regulation strategy, but increasing fines for dishonest merchants and consumer complaints have little impact on the e-commerce platform; 2) increasing consumer compensation, creating an honest business environment, and reducing the cost of honest business all help companies tend to operate in good faith; 3) the only factor that affects the tendency of consumer complaint strategies is the cost of complaints. The loss suffered by silence and the compensation given to consumers have little effect on consumers’ tendency to complain strategy. The results can provide theoretical guidance for participants to make useful strategic decisions in the e-commerce market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Barkatullah A H (2018). Does self-regulation provide legal protection and security to e-commerce consumers? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 30: 94–101.

Article Google Scholar

Bergh D D, Ketchen J D, Orlandi I, Heugens P P, Boyd B K (2019). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management 45(1): 122–158.

Bhargava H K, Sundaresan S (2003). Managing quality uncertainty through contingency pricing. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences .

Bai Q, Tan S, Zheng Y, Su J, Li T (2023). Credit supervision and trading strategy of rural e-commerce based on evolutionary game. Kybernetes 52(11): 5164–5185.

Chen P (2023). What lies about circular economy practices and performance? Fresh insights from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 416, 137893.

Chen P, Dagestani A A (2023). Greenwashing behavior and firm value - From the perspective of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30(5): 2330–2343.

Chen P, Dagestani AA, Kim S (2023). Corporate social responsibility and green exploratory innovation - The moderating role of three environmental regulations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management : 1–13.

Cheng S, Fan Q, Dagestani A A (2023). Opening the black box between strategic vision on digitalization and SMEs digital transformation: The mediating role of resource orchestration. Kybernetes 53(2): 580–599.

Chin S, Lu C, Ho P, Shiao Y, Wu T (2021). Commodity anti-counterfeiting decision in e-commerce trade based on machine learning and Internet of Things. Computer Standards & Interfaces 76: 103504.

Chen B, Wang L, Rasool H, Wang J (2022). Research on the impact of marketing strategy on consumers’ impulsive purchase behavior in livestreaming e-commerce. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 905531.

Cao Y, Yu Z, Wan G (2017). Evolutionary game study between government and enterprises in food adulteration under the new media environment. Chinese Journal of Management Science 25(6): 179–187.

Google Scholar

Du S (2023). An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of cooperation strategy between SMEs and cross-border e-commerce platforms considering the cross-network effect. Kybernetes 53(5): 1857–1887.

Dagestani A A, Qing L, Abou Houran M (2022). What remains unsolved in sub-african environmental exposure information disclosure: A review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15(10): 487.

Farrell H (2006). Regulating information flows: States, private actors, and E-commerce. Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 353–374.

Ferrante M (2015). China’s renewed attention to the fight against counterfeit products sold online: The impact of Taobao’s new policy and punishments. Journal of Internet Law 18: 3–9.

Friedman D (1991). Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 59(3): 637–666.

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Fan M, Ammah V, Dakhan S A, Liu R, Mingle M N A, Pu Z (2021). Critical factors of reacquainting consumer trust in e-commerce. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 8(3): 561–573.

Huston J H, Spencer R W (2002). Quality, uncertainty and the Internet: The market for cyber lemons. The American Economist 46(1): 50–60.

Hossin M A, Sarker M N I, Yin X, Frimpong A N K (2018). Development dimensions of e-commerce in Bangladesh: Scope, challenges and threats. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Management and Management Science : 42–47.

Hayne S C, Wang H, Wang L (2015). Modeling reputation as a time-series: Evaluating the risk of purchase decisions on eBay. Decision Sciences 46(6): 1077–1107.

Indu T R, Joseph A, Divya V, Mathew LS (2016). Fake product detection and reputation system for E-commerce. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 2: 300–304.

Ji S, Zhao D, Luo R (2019). Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers’ behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles. Energy 189: 116064.

Kennedy J P (2020). Counterfeit products online. The Palgrave Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance : 1001–1024.

Kwilinski A, Volynets R, Berdnik I, Holovko M, Berzin P (2019). E-Commerce: Concept and legal regulation in modern economic conditions. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22(2): 1–6.

Liu X, Lin K, Wang L (2021). Stochastic evolutionary game analysis of e-waste recycling in environmental regulation from the perspective of dual governance system. Journal of Cleaner Production 319: 128685.

Li C, Li H, Tao C (2023). Evolutionary game of platform enterprises, government and consumers in the context of digital economy. Journal of Business Research 167: 113858.

Long R, Yang J, Chen H, Li Q, Fang W, Wang L (2019). Co-evolutionary simulation study of multiple stakeholders in the take-out waste recycling industry chain. Journal of Environmental Management 231: 701–713.

Mohamad M B, Kanaan A G, Aseh K, Alawi N A, Amayreh K T, et al. (2021, June). Enterprise problems and proposed solutions using the concept of E-Commerce. IEEE In 2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE) : 186–192.

Miao Q, Xie D, Zhong W (2018). Platform externality, asymmetric information, and counterfeit deterrence in e-commerce. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 54(14): 3209–3234.

Qing L (2022). The impact of environmental information disclosure on Chinese firms’ environmental and economic performance in the 21st century: A systematic review. IEEE Engineering Management Review 50(4): 203–214.

Samak A C S (2013). An experimental study of reputation with heterogeneous goods. Decision Support Systems 54(2): 1134–1149.

Shukla P S, Nigam P V (2018). E-shopping using mobile apps and the emerging consumer in the digital age of retail hyper personalization: An insight. Pacific Business Review International 10(10): 131–139.

Shen B, Yang X, Xu Y, Ge W, Liu G, Su X, Zhao S, Dagestani A A, Ran Q (2023). Can carbon emission trading pilot policy drive industrial structure low-carbon restructuring: New evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(14): 41553–41569.

Sun M, Zhao J (2022). Behavioral patterns beyond posting negative reviews online: An empirical view. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 17(3): 949–983.

Tao M, Goh L T, Zheng Y, Le W (2023). Do China’s anti-corruption efforts improve corporate productivity? A difference-in-difference exploration of Chinese listed enterprises. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 87: 101594.

Vaidya U, Mehta P G (2008). Lyapunov measure for almost everywhere stability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 53(1): 307–323.

Wu B, Cheng J, Qi Y (2020). Tripartite evolutionary game analysis for “deceive acquaintances” behavior of ecommerce platforms in cooperative supervision. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 550: 123892.

Wadleigh J, Drew J, Moore T (2015, May). The e-commerce market for “lemons” identification and analysis of websites selling counterfeit goods. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web : 1188–1197.

Wang X, Ren X (2020). Research on credit supervision mechanism of e-commerce platform based on evolutionary game. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice 40(10): 2617–2630.

Wang Y, Wang D, Shi X (2021). Exploring the dilemma of overcapacity governance in China’s coal industry: A tripartite evolutionary game model. Resources Policy 71: 102000.

You G, Guo H, Dagestani A A, Deng S (2021). Evaluating reputation of internet financial platform: An improved fuzzy evaluation approach. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2021: 1–18.

Xiao M (2022). Supervision strategy analysis on price discrimination of e-commerce company in the context of big data based on four-party evolutionary game. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience : 2900286.

Xu X, Wang L, Wang X (2023). Evolutionary game analysis of information service quality control of e-commerce platforms under information ecology. Journal of Management Analytics 11(1): 135–159.

Xu Y, Zhang Y (2009). A online credit evaluation method based on AHP and SPA. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 14(7): 3031–3036.

You G, Guo H, Dagestani A A, Deng S (2021). Evolutionary game analysis of three players on behavioural strategy of P2P lending participants: A sustainable operations perspective. Complexity : 1–18.

Zhang J (2006). The roles of players and reputation: Evidence from eBay online auctions. Decision Support Systems 42(3): 1800–1818.

Zhou Y, Gao X, Luo S, Xiong Y, Ye N (2022). Anti-counterfeiting in a retail platform: A game-theoretic approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 165: 102839.

Zhang L, Long R, Huang Z, Li W, Wei J (2020). Evolutionary game analysis on the implementation of subsidy policy for sustainable transportation development. Journal of Cleaner Production 267: 122159.

Zhao S, Tian W (2022). How do R&D factors affect total factor productivity: Based on stochastic frontier analysis method. Economic Analysis Letters 1(2): 28–34.

Zhang L, Wang XX, Li JX (2020). Dynamic evolutionary game of credit mechanism among core populations in E-commerce ecosystem. Operations Research and Management Science 29(4): 93–101.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply grateful to the reviewers for their constructive comments, which greatly contributed to improving the quality of this paper. This research was supported in part by the Philosophy and Social Planning Project of Heilongjiang Province under Grant Nos. 20JYB031 and 23GLA011.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150028, China

Zeguo Qiu, Yao Yuan & Yunhao Chen

School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, 150028, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeguo Qiu .

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Zeguo Qiu is a professor of the School of Computer and Information Engineering at Harbin University of Commerce. He received his PhD degree in engineering management from Dongbei University of Finance and Economics. His research interests are in the areas of ecommerce, online public opinion, and information system management. His research papers have been published in journals including Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, etc.

Yuchen Yin holds master’s degree in management science and engineering from Harbin University of Commerce. Her research interests are in areas such as e-commerce, online public opinion and policy optimization.

Yao Yuan received a master’s degree in management science and engineering from Harbin University of Commerce. His research areas include rural e-commerce, trade economics, and corporate social responsibility.

Yunhao Chen holds master’s degree in management science and engineering from Harbin University of Commerce. His research interests are in areas such as big data analysis, e-commerce and online public opinion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Qiu, Z., Yin, Y., Yuan, Y. et al. Research on Credit Regulation Mechanism of E-commerce Platform Based on Evolutionary Game Theory. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-024-5603-2

Download citation

Published : 22 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-024-5603-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Evolutionary game
data simulation
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Published on 23.4.2024 in Vol 26 (2024)

Electronic Media Use and Sleep Quality: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors of this article:

Xiaoning Han * , PhD ;
Enze Zhou * , MA ;
Dong Liu * , PhD

School of Journalism and Communication, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

*all authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Dong Liu, PhD

School of Journalism and Communication

Renmin University of China

No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District

Beijing, 100872

Phone: 86 13693388506

Email: [email protected]

Background: This paper explores the widely discussed relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality, indicating negative effects due to various factors. However, existing meta-analyses on the topic have some limitations.

Objective: The study aims to analyze and compare the impacts of different digital media types, such as smartphones, online games, and social media, on sleep quality.

Methods: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the study performed a systematic meta-analysis of literature across multiple databases, including Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar, from January 2018 to October 2023. Two trained coders coded the study characteristics independently. The effect sizes were calculated using the correlation coefficient as a standardized measure of the relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality across studies. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3.0) was used to perform the meta-analysis. Statistical methods such as funnel plots were used to assess the presence of asymmetry and a p -curve test to test the p -hacking problem, which can indicate publication bias.

Results: Following a thorough screening process, the study involved 55 papers (56 items) with 41,716 participants from over 20 countries, classifying electronic media use into “general use” and “problematic use.” The meta-analysis revealed that electronic media use was significantly linked with decreased sleep quality and increased sleep problems with varying effect sizes across subgroups. A significant cultural difference was also observed in these effects. General use was associated with a significant decrease in sleep quality ( P <.001). The pooled effect size was 0.28 (95% CI 0.21-0.35; k =20). Problematic use was associated with a significant increase in sleep problems ( P ≤.001). The pooled effect size was 0.33 (95% CI 0.28-0.38; k =36). The subgroup analysis indicated that the effect of general smartphone use and sleep problems was r =0.33 (95% CI 0.27-0.40), which was the highest among the general group. The effect of problematic internet use and sleep problems was r =0.51 (95% CI 0.43-0.59), which was the highest among the problematic groups. There were significant differences among these subgroups (general: Q between =14.46, P =.001; problematic: Q between =27.37, P <.001). The results of the meta-regression analysis using age, gender, and culture as moderators indicated that only cultural difference in the relationship between Eastern and Western culture was significant ( Q between =6.69; P =.01). All funnel plots and p -curve analyses showed no evidence of publication and selection bias.

Conclusions: Despite some variability, the study overall confirms the correlation between increased electronic media use and poorer sleep outcomes, which is notably more significant in Eastern cultures.

Introduction

Sleep is vital to our health. Research has shown that high sleep quality can lead to improvements in a series of health outcomes, such as an improved immune system, better mood and mental health, enhanced physical performance, lower risk of chronic diseases, and a longer life span [ 1 - 5 ].

Electronic media refers to forms of media or communication that use electronic devices or technology to create, distribute, and display content. This can include various forms of digital media such as smartphones, tablets, instant messaging, phone calls, social media, online games, short video platforms, etc. Electronic media has permeated every aspect of our lives [ 6 ]. Many prefer to use smartphones or tablets before sleep, which can negatively affect sleep in many aspects, including delayed sleep onset, disrupted sleep patterns, shortened sleep duration, and poor sleep quality [ 7 - 10 ]. Furthermore, problematic use occurs when the behavior surpasses a certain limit. In this study, problematic use of electronic media is not solely determined by the amount of time spent on these platforms, but rather by behavioral indicators that suggest an unhealthy or harmful relationship with them.

Smartphones or tablet use can affect sleep quality in many ways. At first, the use of these devices may directly displace, delay, or interrupt sleep time, resulting in inadequate sleep quantity [ 11 ]. The sound of notifications and vibrations of these devices may interrupt sleep. Second, the screens of smartphones and tablets emit blue light, which can suppress the production of melatonin, the hormone responsible for regulating sleep-wake cycles [ 12 ]. Third, consuming emotionally charged content, such as news, suspenseful movies, or engaging in online arguments, can increase emotional arousal, making it harder to relax and fall asleep. This emotional arousal can also lead to disrupted sleep and nightmares [ 13 ]. Finally, the use of electronic devices before bedtime can lead to a delay in bedtime and a shortened sleep duration, as individuals may lose track of time while engaging with their devices. This can result in a disrupted sleep routine and decreased sleep quality [ 14 ].

Some studies have conducted meta-analyses on screen media use and sleep outcomes in 2016, 2019, and 2021 [ 15 - 17 ]. However, these studies had their own limitations. First, the sample size included in their meta-analyses was small (around 10). Second, these studies only focused on 1 aspect of the effect of digital media on sleep quality. For example, Carter et al [ 16 ] focused only on adolescents, and both Alimoradi et al [ 15 ] and Kristensen et al [ 17 ] only reviewed the relationship between problematic use of digital media or devices and sleep quality. Despite of the high heterogeneity found in the meta-analyses, none have compared the effects of different digital media or devices. This study aims to clarify and compare the effects of these different channels.

Literature Search

The research adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines ( Multimedia Appendix 1 ) and followed a predetermined protocol [ 18 , 19 ]. As the idea and scope of this study evolved over time, the meta-analysis was not preregistered. However, the methodology was defined a priori and strictly followed to reduce biases, and the possible influence of post hoc decisions was minimized. All relevant studies in English, published from January 1, 2018, to October 9, 2023, were searched. We searched the following databases: Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The abstracts were examined manually. The keywords used to search were the combination of the following words: “sleep” OR “sleep duration” OR “sleep quality” OR “sleep problems” AND “electronic media” OR “smartphone” OR “tablet” OR “social media” OR “Facebook” OR “Twitter” OR “online gaming” OR “internet” OR “addiction” OR “problematic” ( Multimedia Appendix 2 ). Additionally, the reference lists of relevant studies were examined.

Two trained coders independently screened the titles and abstracts of the identified papers for eligibility, followed by a full-text review of the selected studies. Discrepancies between the coders were resolved through discussion until a consensus was reached. The reference lists of the included studies were also manually screened to identify any additional relevant studies. Through this rigorous process, we ensured a comprehensive and replicable literature search that could contribute to the robustness of our meta-analysis findings.

Inclusion or Exclusion Criteria

Titles and abstracts from search results were scrutinized for relevance, with duplicates removed. Full texts of pertinent papers were obtained, and their eligibility for inclusion was evaluated. We mainly included correlational studies that used both continuous measures of time spent using electronic media use and sleep quality. Studies must have been available in English. Four criteria were used to screen studies: (1) only peer-reviewed empirical studies, published in English, were considered for inclusion in the meta-analysis; (2) the studies should report quantitative statistics on electronic media use and sleep quality, including sample size and essential information to calculate the effect size, and review papers, qualitative studies, case studies, and conference abstracts were excluded; (3) studies on both general use and problematic use of electronic media or devices should be included; and (4) only studies that used correlation, regression, or odds ratio were included to ensure consistency.

Study Coding

Two trained coders were used to code the characteristics of the studies independently. Discrepancies were discussed with the first author of the paper to resolve. Sample size and characteristics of participants were coded: country, female ratio, average age, publication year, and electronic types. Effect sizes were either extracted directly from the original publications or manually calculated. If a study reported multiple dependent effects, the effects were merged into one. If a study reported multiple independent effects from different samples, the effects were included separately. Additionally, to evaluate the study quality, the papers were classified into 3 tiers (high, middle, and low) according to Journal Citation Reports 2022 , a ranking of journals based on their impact factor as reported in the Web of Science. The few unindexed papers were rated based on their citation counts as reported in Google Scholar.

Meta-Analysis and Moderator Analyses

The effect sizes were calculated using the correlation coefficient ( r ) as a standardized measure of the relationship between electronic media or device use and sleep quality across studies. When studies reported multiple effect sizes, we selected the one that best represented the overall association between electronic media use and sleep quality. If studies did not provide correlation coefficients, we converted other reported statistics (eg, standardized regression coefficients) into correlation coefficients using established formulas. Once calculated, the correlation coefficients were transformed into Fisher z scores to stabilize the variance and normalize the distribution.

Previous meta-studies have shown high levels of heterogeneity. Hence, the random effects model was adopted for all analyses. To explore potential factors contributing to the heterogeneity and to further understand the relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality, we conducted moderator analyses. The following categorical and continuous moderators were examined: media types (online gaming, social media, smartphone, or intent), participants’ average age, culture, female ratio, and sleep quality assessment method. For categorical moderators, subgroup analyses were performed, while for continuous moderators, meta-regression analyses were conducted. All analyses were completed in the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3.0; Biostat, Inc).

Publication Bias

We used statistical methods such as funnel plots to assess the presence of asymmetry and a p -curve test to test the p -hacking problem, which may indicate publication bias. In case of detected asymmetry, we applied techniques such as the trim-and-fill method to adjust the effect size estimates.

By addressing publication bias, we aimed to provide a more accurate and reliable synthesis of the available evidence, enhancing the validity and generalizability of our meta-analytic findings. Nevertheless, it is essential for readers to interpret the results cautiously, considering the potential limitations imposed by publication bias and other methodological concerns.

Search Findings

A total of 98,806 studies were identified from databases, especially Scopus (n=49,643), Google Scholar (n=18,600), Science Direct (n=15,084), and Web of Science (n=11,689). Upon removing duplicate records and excluding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 754 studies remained for the screening phase. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 703 studies were excluded. A total of 4 additional studies were identified from the references of relevant reviews. Finally, 55 studies [ 20 - 74 ] were included in the meta-analysis. The flow diagram of the selection is shown in Figure 1 .

Characteristics of Included Studies

In 20 studies, 21,594 participants were included in the analysis of the general use of electronic media and sleep quality. The average age of the sample ranged from 9.9 to 44 years. The category of general online gaming and sleep quality included 4 studies, with 14,837 participants; the category of general smartphone use and sleep quality included 10 studies, with 5011 participants; and the category of general social media use and sleep quality included 6 studies, with 1746 participants.

These studies came from the following countries or areas: Germany, Serbia, Indonesia, India, China, Italy, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, Spain, Qatar, Egypt, Argentina, and Portugal. The most frequently used measure of electronic media use was the time spent on it. The most frequently used measure of sleep was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

In 35 studies, 20,122 participants were included in the analysis of the problematic use of electronic media and sleep quality. The average age of the sample ranged from 14.76 to 65.62 years. The category of problematic online gaming and sleep quality included 5 studies, with 1874 participants; the category of problematic internet use and sleep quality included 2 studies, with 774 participants; the category of problematic smartphone use and sleep quality included 18 studies, with 12,204 participants; and the category of problematic social media use and sleep quality included 11 studies, with 5270 participants. There was a study that focused on both social media and online gaming, which led to its inclusion in the analysis. These studies came from 14 countries or areas: Turkey, the United States, Indonesia, China, France, Taiwan, India, South Korea, Hong Kong, Iran, Poland, Israel, Hungary, and Saudi Arabia. The most frequently used measures of problematic electronic media use were the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form, Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Form, and Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale.

With respect to study quality, the 56 papers were published in 50 journals, 41 of which were indexed in Journal Citation Reports 2022 , while the remaining 9 journals were rated based on their citation counts as reported in Google Scholar. As a result, of the 56 papers included in the study, 22 papers were assigned a high rating, 18 papers were assigned a middle rating, and 16 papers were assigned a low rating. More information about the included studies is listed in Multimedia Appendix 3 [ 20 - 74 ].

Meta-Analysis

The results of the meta-analysis of the relationship between general electronic media use and sleep quality showed that electronic media use was associated with a significant decrease in sleep quality ( P <.001). The pooled effect size was 0.28 (95% CI 0.21-0.35; k =20), indicating that individuals who used electronic media more frequently were generally associated with more sleeping problems.

The second meta-analysis showed that problematic electronic media use was associated with a significant increase in sleep problems ( P ≤.001). The pooled effect size was 0.33 (95% CI 0.28-0.38; k =36), indicating that participants who used electronic media more frequently were more likely to have more sleep problems.

Moderator Analyses

At first, we conducted subgroup analyses for different media or devices. The results are shown in Tables 1 and 2 . The effect of the relationship between general online gaming and sleep problems was r =0.14 (95% CI 0.06-0.22); the effect of the relationship between general smartphone use and sleep problems was r =0.33 (95% CI 0.27-0.40); and the effect of the relationship between general social media use and sleep problems was r =0.28 (95% CI 0.21-0.34). There are significant differences among these groups ( Q between =14.46; P =.001).

The effect of the relationship between problematic gaming and sleep problems was r =0.49, 95% CI 0.23-0.69; the effect of the relationship between problematic internet use and sleep problems was r =0.51 (95% CI 0.43-0.59); the effect of the relationship between problematic smartphone use and sleep problems was r =0.25 (95% CI 0.20-0.30); and the effect of the relationship between problematic social media use and sleep problems was r =0.35 (95% CI 0.29-0.40). There are significant differences among these groups ( Q between =27.37; P <.001).

We also used age, gender, and culture as moderators to conduct meta-regression analyses. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4 . Only cultural difference in the relationship between Eastern and Western culture was significant ( Q between =6.694; P =.01). All other analyses were not significant.

a Not applicable.

All funnel plots of the analyses were symmetrical, showing no evidence of publication bias ( Figures 2 - 5 ). We also conducted p -curve analyses to see whether there were any selection biases. The results also showed that there were no biases.

Principal Findings

This study indicated that electronic media use was significantly linked with decreased sleep quality and increased sleep problems with varying effect sizes across subgroups. General use was associated with a significant decrease in sleep quality. Problematic use was associated with a significant increase in sleep problems. A significant cultural difference was also observed by the meta-regression analysis.

First, there is a distinction in the impact on sleep quality between problematic use and general use, with the former exhibiting a higher correlation strength. However, both have a positive correlation, suggesting that the deeper the level of use, the more sleep-related issues are observed. In addressing this research question, the way in which electronic media use is conceptualized and operationalized may have a bearing on the ultimate outcomes. Problematic use is measured through addiction scales, while general use is predominantly assessed by duration of use (time), leading to divergent results stemming from these distinct approaches. The key takeaway is that each measurement possesses unique strengths and weaknesses, and the pathways affecting sleep quality differ. Consequently, the selection of a measurement approach should be tailored to the specific research question at hand. The duration of general use reflects an individual’s comprehensive involvement with electronic media, and its impact on sleep quality is evident in factors such as an extended time to fall asleep and reduced sleep duration. The addiction scale for problematic use illuminates an individual’s preferences, dependencies, and other associations with electronic media. Its impact on sleep quality is evident through physiological and psychological responses, including anxiety, stress, and emotional reactions.

Second, notable variations exist in how different types of electronic media affect sleep quality. In general, the positive predictive effects of smartphone, social media, and online gaming use durations on sleep problems gradually decrease. In the problematic context, the intensity of addiction to the internet and online gaming has the most significant positive impact on sleep problems, followed by social media, while smartphones exert the least influence. On one hand, longitudinal comparisons within the same context reveal that the content and format of electronic media can have varying degrees of negative impact on sleep quality, irrespective of whether it involves general or problematic use. On the other hand, cross-context comparisons suggest that both general and problematic use play a role in moderating the impact of electronic media types on sleep quality. As an illustration, problematic use reinforces the positive impact of online gaming and social media on sleep problems, while mitigating the influence of smartphones. Considering smartphones as electronic media, an extended duration of general use is associated with lower sleep quality. However, during problematic use, smartphones serve as the platform for other electronic media such as games and social media, resulting in a weakened predictive effect on sleep quality. Put differently, in the context of problematic use, the specific type of electronic media an individual consumes on their smartphones becomes increasingly pivotal in shaping sleep quality.

Third, cultural differences were found to be significant moderators of the relationship between electronic media use and sleep problems in both our study and Carter et al [ 16 ]. Kristensen et al [ 17 ], however, did not specifically address the role of cultural differences but revealed that there was a strong and consistent association between bedtime media device use and sleep outcomes across the studies included. Our findings showed that the association between problematic social media use was significantly larger in Eastern culture. We speculate that the difference may be attributed to cultural differences in social media use patterns, perceptions of social norms and expectations, variations in bedtime routines and habits, and diverse coping mechanisms for stress. These speculations warrant further investigation to understand better the underlying factors contributing to the observed cultural differences in the relationship between social media use and sleep quality.

Fourth, it was observed that gender and age had no significant impact on sleep quality. The negative effects of electronic media use are not only confined to the sleep quality of adults, and the association with gender differences remains unclear. Recent studies point out that electronic media use among preschoolers may result in a “time-shifting” process, disrupting their sleep patterns [ 75 ]. Similarly, children and adolescent sleep patterns have been reported to be adversely affected by electronic media use [ 76 - 78 ]. These findings underscore the necessity of considering age group variations in future research, as electronic media use may differently impact sleep quality across age demographics.

In conclusion, our study, Carter et al [ 16 ], and Kristensen et al [ 17 ] collectively emphasize the importance of understanding and addressing the negative impact of electronic media use, particularly problematic online gaming and smartphone use, on sleep quality and related issues. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms and specific factors contributing to the relationship between electronic media use and sleep problems.

Strengths and Limitations

Our study, supplemented with research by Carter et al [ 16 ] and Kristensen et al [ 17 ], contributes to the growing evidence supporting a connection between electronic media use and sleep quality. We found that both general and problematic use of electronic media correlates with sleep issues, with the strength of the correlation varying based on the type of electronic media and cultural factors, with no significant relationship observed with age or gender.

Despite the vast amount of research on the relationship between electronic media use and sleep, several gaps and limitations still exist.

First, the inclusion criteria were restricted to English-language, peer-reviewed empirical studies published between January 2018 and October 2023. This may have led to the exclusion of relevant studies published in other languages or before 2018, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings. Furthermore, the exclusion of non–peer-reviewed studies and conference abstracts may have introduced publication bias, as significant results are more likely to be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Second, although we used a comprehensive search strategy, the possibility remains that some relevant studies may have been missed. Additionally, the search strategies were not linked with Medical Subject Headings headers and may not have captured all possible electronic media types, resulting in an incomplete representation of the effects of electronic media use on sleep quality.

Third, the studies included in our meta-analysis exhibited considerable heterogeneity in sample characteristics, electronic media types, and measures of sleep quality. This heterogeneity might have contributed to the variability in effect sizes observed across studies. Although we conducted moderator analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, other unexamined factors may still have influenced the relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality.

Fourth, our meta-analysis relied on the correlation coefficient ( r ) as the primary effect size measure, which may not fully capture the complex relationships between electronic media use and sleep quality. Moreover, the conversion of other reported statistics into correlation coefficients could introduce additional sources of error. The correlational nature of the included studies limited our ability to draw causal inferences between electronic media use and sleep quality. Experimental and longitudinal research designs would provide stronger evidence for the directionality of this relationship.

Given these limitations, future research should aim to include a more diverse range of studies, examine additional potential moderators, and use more robust research designs to better understand the complex relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our updated meta-analysis affirms the consistent negative impact of electronic media use on sleep outcomes, with problematic online gaming and smartphone use being particularly impactful. Notably, the negative effect of problematic social media use on sleep quality appears more pronounced in Eastern cultures. This research emphasizes the need for public health initiatives to increase awareness of these impacts, particularly for adolescents. Further research, including experimental and longitudinal studies, is necessary to delve deeper into the complex relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality, considering potential moderators like cultural differences.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Journalism and Marxism Research Center, Renmin University of China (MXG202215), and by funds for building world-class universities (disciplines) of Renmin University of China (23RXW195).

A statement on the use of ChatGPT in the process of writing this paper can be found in Multimedia Appendix 4.

Data Availability

The data sets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist.

Search strategies.

Characteristics of included studies.

Large language model statement.

Brink-Kjaer A, Leary EB, Sun H, Westover MB, Stone KL, Peppard PE, et al. Age estimation from sleep studies using deep learning predicts life expectancy. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):103. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Killgore WDS. Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition. Prog Brain Res. 2010;185:105-129. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Lee S, Mu CX, Wallace ML, Andel R, Almeida DM, Buxton OM, et al. Sleep health composites are associated with the risk of heart disease across sex and race. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2023. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Prather AA. Sleep, stress, and immunity. In: Grandner MA, editor. Sleep and Health, 1st Edition. Cambridge. Academic Press; 2019;319-330.
Scott AJ, Webb TL, Martyn-St James M, Rowse G, Weich S. Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. Dec 2021;60:101556. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Guttmann A. Statista. 2023. URL: https://www.statista.com/topics/1536/media-use/#topicOverview [accessed 2023-06-10]
Hysing M, Pallesen S, Stormark KM, Jakobsen R, Lundervold AJ, Sivertsen B. Sleep and use of electronic devices in adolescence: results from a large population-based study. BMJ Open. Feb 02, 2015;5(1):e006748. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Lavender RM. Electronic media use and sleep quality. Undergrad J Psychol. 2015;28(1):55-62. [ FREE Full text ]
Exelmans L, Van den Bulck J. Bedtime mobile phone use and sleep in adults. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:93-101. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Twenge JM, Krizan Z, Hisler G. Decreases in self-reported sleep duration among U.S. adolescents 2009-2015 and association with new media screen time. Sleep Med. 2017;39:47-53. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Exelmans L. Electronic media use and sleep: a self-control perspective. Curr Sleep Med Rep. 2019;5:135-140. [ CrossRef ]
Jniene A, Errguig L, El Hangouche AJ, Rkain H, Aboudrar S, El Ftouh M, et al. Perception of sleep disturbances due to bedtime use of blue light-emitting devices and its impact on habits and sleep quality among young medical students. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7012350. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Munezawa T, Kaneita Y, Osaki Y, Kanda H, Minowa M, Suzuki K, et al. The association between use of mobile phones after lights out and sleep disturbances among Japanese adolescents: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Sleep. 2011;34(8):1013-1020. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Smith LJ, Gradisar M, King DL, Short M. Intrinsic and extrinsic predictors of video-gaming behaviour and adolescent bedtimes: the relationship between flow states, self-perceived risk-taking, device accessibility, parental regulation of media and bedtime. Sleep Med. 2017;30:64-70. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Alimoradi Z, Lin CY, Broström A, Bülow PH, Bajalan Z, Griffiths MD, et al. Internet addiction and sleep problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2019;47:51-61. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Carter B, Rees P, Hale L, Bhattacharjee D, Paradkar MS. Association between portable screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(12):1202-1208. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Kristensen JH, Pallesen S, King DL, Hysing M, Erevik EK. Problematic gaming and sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:675237. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Akçay D, Akçay BD. The effect of computer game playing habits of university students on their sleep states. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020;56(4):820-826. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Alahdal WM, Alsaedi AA, Garrni AS, Alharbi FS. The impact of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among high school students in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e40759. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Alam A, Alshakhsi S, Al-Thani D, Ali R. The role of objectively recorded smartphone usage and personality traits in sleep quality. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023;9:e1261. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Almeida F, Marques DR, Gomes AA. A preliminary study on the association between social media at night and sleep quality: the relevance of FOMO, cognitive pre-sleep arousal, and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation. Scand J Psychol. 2023;64(2):123-132. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Alshobaili FA, AlYousefi NA. The effect of smartphone usage at bedtime on sleep quality among Saudi non-medical staff at King Saud University Medical City. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(6):1953-1957. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Alsulami A, Bakhsh D, Baik M, Merdad M, Aboalfaraj N. Assessment of sleep quality and its relationship to social media use among medical students. Med Sci Educ. 2019;29(1):157-161. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Altintas E, Karaca Y, Hullaert T, Tassi P. Sleep quality and video game playing: effect of intensity of video game playing and mental health. Psychiatry Res. 2019;273:487-492. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Asbee J, Slavish D, Taylor DJ, Dietch JR. Using a frequentist and Bayesian approach to examine video game usage, substance use, and sleep among college students. J Sleep Res. 2023;32(4):e13844. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Bae ES, Kang HS, Lee HN. The mediating effect of sleep quality in the relationship between academic stress and social network service addiction tendency among adolescents. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2020;31(3):290-299. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Chatterjee S, Kar SK. Smartphone addiction and quality of sleep among Indian medical students. Psychiatry. 2021;84(2):182-191. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Chung JE, Choi SA, Kim KT, Yee J, Kim JH, Seong JW, et al. Smartphone addiction risk and daytime sleepiness in Korean adolescents. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(7):800-806. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Demir YP, Sumer MM. Effects of smartphone overuse on headache, sleep and quality of life in migraine patients. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2019;24(2):115-121. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Dewi RK, Efendi F, Has EMM, Gunawan J. Adolescents' smartphone use at night, sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2018;33(2):20180095. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Eden A, Ellithorpe ME, Meshi D, Ulusoy E, Grady SM. All night long: problematic media use is differentially associated with sleep quality and depression by medium. Commun Res Rep. 2021;38(3):143-149. [ CrossRef ]
Ellithorpe ME, Meshi D, Tham SM. Problematic video gaming is associated with poor sleep quality, diet quality, and personal hygiene. Psychol Pop Media. 2023;12(2):248-253. [ CrossRef ]
Elsheikh AA, Elsharkawy SA, Ahmed DS. Impact of smartphone use at bedtime on sleep quality and academic activities among medical students at Al -Azhar University at Cairo. J Public Health (Berl.). Jun 15, 2023.:1-10. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Gaya AR, Brum R, Brites K, Gaya A, de Borba Schneiders L, Duarte Junior MA, et al. Electronic device and social network use and sleep outcomes among adolescents: the EHDLA study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):919. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Gezgin DM. Understanding patterns for smartphone addiction: age, sleep duration, social network use and fear of missing out. Cypriot J Educ Sci. 2018;13(2):166-177. [ CrossRef ]
Graham S, Mason A, Riordan B, Winter T, Scarf D. Taking a break from social media improves wellbeing through sleep quality. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(6):421-425. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Guerrero MD, Barnes JD, Chaput JP, Tremblay MS. Screen time and problem behaviors in children: exploring the mediating role of sleep duration. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):105. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Hamvai C, Kiss H, Vörös H, Fitzpatrick KM, Vargha A, Pikó BF. Association between impulsivity and cognitive capacity decrease is mediated by smartphone addiction, academic procrastination, bedtime procrastination, sleep insufficiency and daytime fatigue among medical students: a path analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):537. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Herlache AD, Lang KM, Krizan Z. Withdrawn and wired: problematic internet use accounts for the link of neurotic withdrawal to sleep disturbances. Sleep Sci. 2018;11(2):69-73. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Huang Q, Li Y, Huang S, Qi J, Shao T, Chen X, et al. Smartphone use and sleep quality in chinese college students: a preliminary study. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:352. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Hussain Z, Griffiths MD. The associations between problematic social networking site use and sleep quality, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, anxiety and stress. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19:686-700. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Imani V, Ahorsu DK, Taghizadeh N, Parsapour Z, Nejati B, Chen HP, et al. The mediating roles of anxiety, depression, sleepiness, insomnia, and sleep quality in the association between problematic social media use and quality of life among patients with cancer. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(9):1745. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Jeong CY, Seo YS, Cho EH. The effect of SNS addiction tendency on trait-anxiety and quality of sleep in university students'. J Korean Clin Health Sci. 2018;6(2):1147-1155. [ CrossRef ]
Karaş H, Küçükparlak İ, Özbek MG, Yılmaz T. Addictive smartphone use in the elderly: relationship with depression, anxiety and sleep quality. Psychogeriatrics. 2023;23(1):116-125. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Kater MJ, Schlarb AA. Smartphone usage in adolescents: motives and link to sleep disturbances, stress and sleep reactivity. Somnologie. 2020;24(4):245-252. [ CrossRef ]
Kharisma AC, Fitryasari R, Rahmawati PD. Online games addiction and the decline in sleep quality of college student gamers in the online game communities in Surabaya, Indonesia. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2020;24(7):8987-8993. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Kumar VA, Chandrasekaran V, Brahadeeswari H. Prevalence of smartphone addiction and its effects on sleep quality: a cross-sectional study among medical students. Ind Psychiatry J. 2019;28(1):82-85. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Lee Y, Blebea J, Janssen F, Domoff SE. The impact of smartphone and social media use on adolescent sleep quality and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2023;2023:3277040. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Li L, Griffiths MD, Mei S, Niu Z. Fear of missing out and smartphone addiction mediates the relationship between positive and negative affect and sleep quality among Chinese university students. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:877. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Li Y, Mu W, Sun C, Kwok SYCL. Surrounded by smartphones: relationship between peer phubbing, psychological distress, problematic smartphone use, daytime sleepiness, and subjective sleep quality. Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18:1099-1114. [ CrossRef ]
Luo X, Hu C. Loneliness and sleep disturbance among first-year college students: the sequential mediating effect of attachment anxiety and mobile social media dependence. Psychol Sch. 2022;59(9):1776-1789. [ CrossRef ]
Luqman A, Masood A, Shahzad F, Shahbaz M, Feng Y. Untangling the adverse effects of late-night usage of smartphone-based SNS among university students. Behav Inf Technol. 2021;40(15):1671-1687. [ CrossRef ]
Makhfudli, Aulia A, Pratiwi A. Relationship intensity of social media use with quality of sleep, social interaction, and self-esteem in urban adolescents in Surabaya. Sys Rev Pharm. 2020;11(5):783-788. [ CrossRef ]
Ozcan B, Acimis NM. Sleep quality in Pamukkale university students and its relationship with smartphone addiction. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):206-211. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Peltz JS, Bodenlos JS, Kingery JN, Abar C. Psychological processes linking problematic smartphone use to sleep disturbance in young adults. Sleep Health. 2023;9(4):524-531. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Pérez-Chada D, Bioch SA, Schönfeld D, Gozal D, Perez-Lloret S, Sleep in Adolescents Collaborative Study Group. Screen use, sleep duration, daytime somnolence, and academic failure in school-aged adolescents. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281379. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Przepiorka A, Blachnio A. The role of Facebook intrusion, depression, and future time perspective in sleep problems among adolescents. J Res Adolesc. 2020;30(2):559-569. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Rudolf K, Bickmann P, Froböse I, Tholl C, Wechsler K, Grieben C. Demographics and health behavior of video game and eSports players in Germany: the eSports study 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):1870. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Sami H, Danielle L, Lihi D, Elena S. The effect of sleep disturbances and internet addiction on suicidal ideation among adolescents in the presence of depressive symptoms. Psychiatry Res. 2018;267:327-332. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Scott H, Woods HC. Fear of missing out and sleep: cognitive behavioural factors in adolescents' nighttime social media use. J Adolesc. 2018;68:61-65. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Spagnoli P, Balducci C, Fabbri M, Molinaro D, Barbato G. Workaholism, intensive smartphone use, and the sleep-wake cycle: a multiple mediation analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3517. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Stanković M, Nešić M, Čičević S, Shi Z. Association of smartphone use with depression, anxiety, stress, sleep quality, and internet addiction. empirical evidence from a smartphone application. Pers Individ Differ. Jan 2021;168:110342. [ CrossRef ]
Tandon A, Kaur P, Dhir A, Mäntymäki M. Sleepless due to social media? investigating problematic sleep due to social media and social media sleep hygiene. Comput Hum Behav. Dec 2020;113:106487. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Wang PY, Chen KL, Yang SY, Lin PH. Relationship of sleep quality, smartphone dependence, and health-related behaviors in female junior college students. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214769. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Wang Q, Zhong Y, Zhao G, Song R, Zeng C. Relationship among content type of smartphone use, technostress, and sleep difficulty: a study of university students in China. Educ Inf Technol. Aug 02, 2022;28(2):1697-1714. [ CrossRef ]
Wong HY, Mo HY, Potenza MN, Chan MNM, Lau WM, Chui TK, et al. Relationships between severity of internet gaming disorder, severity of problematic social media use, sleep quality and psychological distress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):1879. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Xie X, Dong Y, Wang J. Sleep quality as a mediator of problematic smartphone use and clinical health symptoms. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(2):466-472. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Yang SY, Chen KL, Lin PH, Wang PY. Relationships among health-related behaviors, smartphone dependence, and sleep duration in female junior college students. Soc Health Behav. 2019;2(1):26-31. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Yıldırım M, Öztürk A, Solmaz F. Fear of COVID-19 and sleep problems in Turkish young adults: mediating roles of happiness and problematic social networking sites use. Psihologija. 2023;56(4):497-515. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]
Zhai X, Ye M, Wang C, Gu Q, Huang T, Wang K, et al. Associations among physical activity and smartphone use with perceived stress and sleep quality of Chinese college students. Mental Health and Physical Activity. Mar 2020;18:100323. [ CrossRef ]
Zhang MX, Wu AMS. Effects of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among Chinese university students: the mediating role of self-regulation and bedtime procrastination. Addict Behav. 2020;111:106552. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Zhang MX, Zhou H, Yang HM, Wu AMS. The prospective effect of problematic smartphone use and fear of missing out on sleep among Chinese adolescents. Curr Psychol. May 24, 2021;42(7):5297-5305. [ CrossRef ]
Beyens I, Nathanson AI. Electronic media use and sleep among preschoolers: evidence for time-shifted and less consolidated sleep. Health Commun. 2019;34(5):537-544. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
Mazurek MO, Engelhardt CR, Hilgard J, Sohl K. Bedtime electronic media use and sleep in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016;37(7):525-531. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
King DL, Delfabbro PH, Zwaans T, Kaptsis D. Sleep interference effects of pathological electronic media use during adolescence. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2014;12:21-35. [ CrossRef ]
Kubiszewski V, Fontaine R, Rusch E, Hazouard E. Association between electronic media use and sleep habits: an eight-day follow-up study. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2013;19(3):395-407. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ]

Abbreviations

Edited by G Eysenbach, T Leung; submitted 20.04.23; peer-reviewed by M Behzadifar, F Estévez-López, R Prieto-Moreno; comments to author 18.05.23; revised version received 15.06.23; accepted 26.03.24; published 23.04.24.

©Xiaoning Han, Enze Zhou, Dong Liu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 23.04.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

Master Your Homework
Do My Homework

Research Paper and Article: What’s the Difference?

Research Papers and Articles are distinct types of academic writing, but they share many of the same qualities. This article seeks to elucidate the differences between a research paper and an article while also highlighting some common elements shared by both. It will be argued that although there is some overlap between these two forms of scholarly communication, research papers tend to have a more substantial emphasis on data collection and analysis than articles do. In addition, it will be demonstrated how each type has its own unique purpose in terms of disseminating information about particular topics or fields of study. Finally, best practices for utilizing either form for optimal results will be discussed as well as how researchers should go about selecting which one suits their needs best.

1. Introduction to Research Papers and Articles

2. the definition of a research paper, 3. distinguishing characteristics of a research paper, 4. the definition of an article, 5. distinguishing characteristics of an article, 6. understanding the difference between a research paper and an article, 7. conclusion.

What is a Research Paper?

A research paper is an extended written work that presents and supports a thesis, or argument. It delves into the details of existing knowledge on the topic, including both primary sources (directly related to the subject) and secondary sources (related information used as evidence). Research papers often involve analysis from an academic perspective—one backed up with facts, figures, personal opinions, and other forms of supporting material.

What are Research Articles?

Research articles are typically shorter pieces of writing than full-length research papers. They may focus on one specific aspect of the topic or contain some preliminary findings based upon their own original research efforts in order to present new ideas for further study. Unlike lengthy research papers which require extensive background reading before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn from them; many short form articles do not need this level of depth in order to provide interesting insights into a given field.

A research paper is an in-depth academic writing that requires the author to have a thorough knowledge of the subject at hand. It often contains research conducted by a student or group, and it is used to demonstrate their understanding of said topic. In most cases, this type of work will be written with data from primary sources such as interviews or surveys.

Structural Specifications

A research paper has a distinct structure that needs to be respected in order for it to pass the test of scholarly review. This includes having an introduction, body and conclusion sections, all organized logically. Additionally, there should also be headings and subheadings throughout the text. It is crucial that each section clearly states its purpose while also building on any previous points made – ultimately leading up to answering the initial question posed at the beginning of the paper.

Article vs Paper

Understanding the Different Kinds of Written Pieces In order to craft a comprehensive and thoughtful piece of writing, it is essential that one understands the difference between various forms of written pieces. The two main types are research papers and articles, which have distinct features separating them from one another.

Research paper: A scholarly work typically required for completion of an undergraduate or graduate degree.
Research article: A document containing original findings in a given field.

The primary difference between these two formats lies in their purpose. Research papers often delve into historical contexts as well as theoretical concepts; they may also serve as repositories for acquired data sets pertaining to current topics or events in academia.

On the other hand, research articles focus primarily on exploring new ideas within disciplines such as science and medicine. They tend to be more concise than longer form works such as dissertations; however, both draw heavily upon factual evidence presented through detailed analysis or empirical experimentation. In this way, each type serves its own unique purpose while providing critical information towards better understanding relevant topics across many subject areas.

While reading any text, it is important to know the distinguishing characteristics of the article. A research paper and a research article are both valuable works that help inform readers about various topics or issues; however, they differ in terms of purpose, structure and audience.

Research Paper : The primary purpose of this type of work is to explain an issue through detailed analysis from a variety of perspectives. Research papers use long blocks of text which include arguments supported by evidence gathered from sources such as published books or journals. Additionally, they often have footnotes or citations embedded within them.
Research Article : This type written work usually takes less time than a research paper due its smaller size (e.g., 2000-3000 words). It has clear objectives for writing up results regarding new methods/techniques developed for solving problems related to science/technology etc.; hence uses technical language rather than storytelling style like narrative pieces do.

The research paper and the research article can seem like similar documents, however there are key differences to consider when examining them.

Research Paper:

Whereas a traditional research paper may explore multiple avenues regarding one particular field or area of study, an article will instead focus solely on one aspect at hand – which could range from discussing current trends surrounding technological advancements to summarizing literature review findings related to behavioral studies conducted over extended periods of time. As such, articles tend to have narrower scopes while papers allow authors greater leeway due to their lengthier formats and higher degree levels associated with them.

Final Reflection The research presented in this paper has revealed that technology can greatly improve the learning experience. Technology-enhanced instruction offers a range of advantages, including improved student engagement and an ability to tailor teaching to individual students’ needs. However, it is important for educators to recognize that there are challenges associated with introducing tech into the classroom. Properly assessing how best to incorporate new technologies requires time and resources from both instructors and institutions alike.

Technology-infused lessons have great potential for enhancing educational outcomes, but only when implemented thoughtfully and deliberately. Educators must take into account factors such as costs associated with implementing or maintaining technological solutions; technical support infrastructure; availability of professional development opportunities; contextual variables specific to their classrooms (e.g., access disparities); content knowledge related to using appropriate tools effectively in different subject areas; alignment between instruction objectives/assessments/technology use; sufficient instructional preparation strategies prior introduction of digital media components across multiple grade levels curriculum standards etc.. This will ensure greater success within the classroom environment via incorporating current technologies alongside traditional approaches found successful over many generations now past.

Overall, technology integration presents tremendous potential for improving teaching practices while also providing students better opportunities for reaching long term academic goals than ever before without utilizing advances available today–allowing them easier paths towards more diverse successes later on in life irrespective one’s location geographically speaking be they close by or further abroad . It remains up still though ultimately upon us all–educators at every level globally whether directly involved presently or seeking those who already working along these lines willing capable going above beyond expected norms from fellow colleagues–as well society entire–to help realize full capabilities modern age holds whenever possible each given chance arises come our way through innovation applied nowadays moving forward continually despite any odds imposed once beforehand against us never fully yielding nor wavering trying no matter what justifiably so deserves future we aim build far brighter much grander scale imaginable arguably could dream create surely intending construct sustaining legacy regardless anyone else’s opinion right wrong even if alone knows why worth taking doing ultimate efforts needed effectuating lasting impacts felt everyone concerned after gone leaving end impressions indelibly marked those remain serve testament integrity conviction carried out job done successfully accordance plan initially laid forth accurately faithfully followed adhere expectations set agreed assured kept fixed focus mind’s eye view foresight completing task moment arrives due date determined arrive consequently utmost importance placed assignments taken seriously ensuring relevant requirements meet met satisfactorily overall satisfactory rating received satisfaction ones entrusting project results depend deliverables supplied highly esteemed pleased finish thank you

In conclusion, it is clear that there are distinct differences between a research paper and an article. Research papers tend to be longer than articles and involve more in-depth analysis of the topic at hand. Articles typically focus on one specific aspect or point while research papers investigate several different perspectives within the given subject matter. Furthermore, both types of writing use evidence from sources to support their arguments but differ in terms of formatting requirements as well as content organization structure. It is important for authors to understand these distinctions when determining which type of written work best suits their needs.

IMAGES

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper
Journal Article vs. Research Paper
Difference Between Journal and Research Paper?
Research Paper vs. Review Paper: Differences Between Research Papers
What is the Difference Between Article and Journal
Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

VIDEO

Difference between Research paper and a review. Which one is more important?
How to Make Table of Contents for Review Paper ?
Online Workshop on Research Paper Writing & Publishing Day 1
How to search Elsevier Interdisciplinary journal with IMPACT FACTOR and publish for free #elsevier
Online Workshop on Research Paper Writing & Publishing Day 2
Common Types of Research Papers for Publication

COMMENTS

What's the Difference: Research Paper vs. Journal?
The differences between a research paper and journal are clear. In summary, the main difference is that research papers build upon existing knowledge with an original purpose in mind while journals record events from everyday life or provide commentary on current topics of interest.
Research Paper vs. Journal: What's the Difference?
Research papers and journals are both common tools in academic study, but they differ in purpose. While research papers provide an overview of a topic, journals delve deeper into specific topics or issues. ... The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the differences between a research paper and a journal. By understanding these ...
Understanding the Differences Between a Research Paper and a Journal
A research paper is an in-depth exploration of a specific topic; while journals are collections of articles on various topics relating to the same subject or field. Understanding these differences can help researchers ensure they're using the right tools for their particular project. This article will outline key differences between a ...
Difference Between Research Paper and Journal Article
The key difference is the use of each. One is for practice in writing, and the other is a certain practice for fellow practitioners. That said, one (research paper) is used more as a way to educate a student on how to write clearly and effectively about a topic, while the other (journal article) is written to educate the reader on a subject or ...
Types of journal articles
Original Research: This is the most common type of journal manuscript used to publish full reports of data from research. It may be called an Original Article, Research Article, Research, or just Article, depending on the journal. The Original Research format is suitable for many different fields and different types of studies.
Journal Article vs Research Paper: Difference and Comparison
A journal article is a shorter scholarly writing published in a specific academic journal. A research paper is a more extended, comprehensive academic writing presenting original research. Journal articles are more focused and present specific findings, while research papers are broader and present a more comprehensive study. Summary.
Q: Are 'journal article' and 'research article' the same?
Review articles, opinion and perspective pieces, commentaries, letters, etc. are typically do not fall under the bracket of research articles. However, the points discussed in the infographic 9 differences between thesis and journal article can be applied to research articles. This is because theses involve original research, and therefore, the ...
Journal Article vs. Research Paper
A Journal Article is a peer-reviewed piece published in an academic journal, while a Research Paper is a detailed study on a topic, not necessarily published. Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper
White papers, working papers, preprints: What's the difference?
Preprints, like academic journal articles, are assigned a Digital Object Identifier, or DOI, and become a permanent part of the scientific record. White paper. A white paper is a report, often compiled by government agencies, businesses and nonprofit organizations, that outlines an issue and often explores possible solutions to a problem.
Difference Between Journal and Research Paper?
Nevertheless, it should be understood that its length depends on the context of the study. However, the key difference between a journal and a research paper is that a journal is limited to 5,000 - 10,000 words unlike a research paper. A journal can provide you with a list of national and international conferences as it is a periodical ...
Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper
Having said that, one thing that needs to be made clear is that the length of it is contingent on the setting of the study. However, a research paper can be anywhere from 5,000 to 10,000 words long, whereas a journal can only be between 5,000 and 10,000 words long at most. This is the primary distinction between the two types of writing.
Understanding Research Paper vs. Journal Differences
Research Paper vs Journal Differences: Purpose - Research papers are typically written as an assignment for students while journals present original findings from research conducted by professionals. Length - Journals tend to be shorter than research papers, focusing on one area or aspect with just enough information provided. ...
Difference between Journal Article and Research Paper
The difference between a journal article and a research paper is that the journal article is well researched and extensive. It is also conceptual and well-suited for the academic audience. Research papers on the other hand focus on a specific viewpoint and substantiate the viewpoint with relevant theories. Research papers require many extensive ...
Overview
There are different types of research papers with varying purposes and expectations for sourcing. While this guide explains those differences broadly, disciplines and assignments vary. Ask your professor for clarification on the purpose, types of appropriate research questions, and expectations of sources for your assignment.
Difference between Paper and Article for scientific writings
The following extract helps understand the difference between a research article and a research paper: Research paper and research articles are pieces of writing that require critical analysis, inquiry, insight, and demonstration of some special skills from students and scientists. It is really overwhelming for students when their teachers ask ...
Journal vs conference papers: Key differences & advice
A journal paper is a written piece of academic work - presenting empirical research, a theoretical discussion, or both - published in an academic journal. Most journal papers or articles are peer-reviewed , meaning they undergo a rigorous review process involving several stages and rounds of revisions before they are published.
Difference between conference paper and journal paper
Journal papers tend to have generous page-limits (or none at all), but typically require the work to be more comprehensive and self-contained in return. In general, in most fields, papers in well-recognized journals tend to have more prestige than papers in well-recognized conferences (esp. in terms of metrics).
5 Differences between a research paper and a review paper
Dec 11, 2017. There are different types of scholarly literature. Some of these require researchers to conduct an original study, whereas others can be based on previously published research. Understanding each of these types and also how they differ from one another can be rather confusing for researchers, especially early career researchers.
What is the difference between letter, communication and journal paper?
Often "paper" has no limit. Typically the shorter the length limit, the more prestigious it is and the tougher the acceptance criteria. The subject matter covered by the journal is the same for all categories. Some journals also have a "review" category which includes papers which are not original research. Often a review is by invitation only.
Understanding the Difference Between Research Papers and Journals
The typeface used for Research Papers is typically 12 point Times New Roman while the font size for Journals can vary. Another difference is that different citation methods are used; MLA format might be expected to be used with Research Paper whereas AMA or APA may be preferred by Journals.
What Is the Difference Between Conference Papers, Journal Papers, Term
Almost all scholars who perform research come across this basic question. And if you are in this field, you should know the basic differences among the various manuscript of research work. Things are readily available at one click today and that is why, it is more important to know the difference between conferences, journal, patents, proceedings, etc. so that you refer the right piece of work ...
What is the difference between a research paper and a review paper
The research paper will be based on the analysis and interpretation of this data. A review article or review paper is based on other published articles. It does not report original research. Review articles generally summarize the existing literature on a topic in an attempt to explain the current state of understanding on the topic.
Examining the Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in ...
This paper systematically analyzes 54 research articles, published in the past decade within major peer-reviewed English-language scholarly publications in the form of a systematic research review. In doing so, it aims to identify and classify the challenges that prevent improved CDW management by assimilating previous research results in ...
The Difference Between Research Papers and Journals
Research papers can draw attention to important topics or issues with wider relevance whereas journal articles bring existing information together in one place so it's easier to understand how different concepts relate. In conclusion, it is clear that there are distinct differences between research papers and journals.
Research on Credit Regulation Mechanism of E-commerce ...
His research interests are in the areas of ecommerce, online public opinion, and information system management. His research papers have been published in journals including Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, etc.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Background: This paper explores the widely discussed relationship between electronic media use and sleep quality, indicating negative effects due to various factors. However, existing meta-analyses on the topic have some limitations. Objective: The study aims to analyze and compare the impacts of different digital media types, such as smartphones, online games, and social media, on sleep quality.
Research Paper and Article: What's the Difference?
The two main types are research papers and articles, which have distinct features separating them from one another. Research paper: A scholarly work typically required for completion of an undergraduate or graduate degree. Research article: A document containing original findings in a given field. The primary difference between these two ...

Types of journal articles

Journal Article vs Research Paper: Difference and Comparison

Journal Article vs Research Paper

Comparison Table

Content and Structure

Similar Reads

Peer Review Process:

What is Research Paper?

1. Content and Structure

Characteristics and Scope

Main Differences Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Share this post!

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Journal Article vs. Research Paper — What's the Difference?

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Author Spotlight

Popular Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

New Comparisons

Trending Terms

White papers, working papers, preprints, journal articles: What’s the difference?

Republish this article

About The Author

Denise-Marie Ordway

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Table of Contents

MLA Style Citation

Chicago Style Citation

APA Style Citation

Share this article

Difference between Journal Article and Research Paper

Journal Article Vs. Research Paper

What is a Journal Article?

What is a Research Paper?

Types of Research Papers: Overview

Need More Help?

Research and Writing Lab

Journal vs conference papers: Key differences & advice

What is a journal paper?

Advantages and disadvantages of journal and conference papers

Frequently Asked Questions

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox!

The best answers to "What are your plans after graduation?"

A guide to industry-funded research: Types, examples & getting started

How to harness theoretical and conceptual frameworks for groundbreaking research

10 powerful methodology courses for PhD students [online]

How to address data privacy and confidentiality concerns of AI in research

Research on Credit Regulation Mechanism of E-commerce Platform Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Cite this article

Access this article

Data Availability

Acknowledgments

Author information

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic Media Use and Sleep Quality: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Corresponding Author:

Introduction

Literature Search

Inclusion or Exclusion Criteria

Study Coding

Meta-Analysis and Moderator Analyses

Publication Bias

Search Findings

Characteristics of Included Studies

Meta-Analysis

Moderator Analyses

Principal Findings

Strengths and Limitations

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Abbreviations

Research Paper and Article: What’s the Difference?