social research jobs charity

Skip to main content

• Skip to main menu
• Skip to user menu

Find your career and your calling.

• Job Function
• Focus Areas

Browse jobs by Job Function

• Accounting / Finance   30
• Administrative / Clerical   35
• Advocacy / Lobbying   29
• Child Care / After school / Counselor   10
• Development / Fundraising   84
• Direct Service / Social Service   33
• Education / Teaching   38
• Event Planning   15
• Executive / Senior Management   53
• Legal   18
• Marketing / Communications   35
• Program / Project Management   63
• Public Policy / Administration   12
• Social Work / Counseling   27
• Volunteer Services   24

Browse jobs by Focus Areas

• Agriculture / Food / Nutrition   10
• Arts / Culture / Humanities   17
• Capacity Building / Volunteerism   19
• Civil Rights / Advocacy   52
• Education   82
• Environment   40
• Government   25
• Healthcare   31
• Housing / Shelter   27
• Human Services   66
• Mental Health / Crisis Intervention   28
• Philanthropy / Social Responsibility   38
• Religion / Faith-based   11
• Science / Technology   11
• Youth Development   34

Career insight

Jobseeker resources: Guides, services, and pros we trust

Not everyone faces the same challenges – and the volume of advice online can be a challenge of its own. To help, we’ve curated a list of reliable sources for advice and services, including job-search guides for members of specific demographics: persons with disabilities, working moms, veterans, new graduates, and more.

What your remote-work resume needs

The self-care career advantage: Planning your “Spa Day of Self-Assessment”

Negotiating your return to the office

Jobs of the week

View all articles

Featured jobs

Education Coordinator

Savannah, Georgia

Director, Development

Atlanta, Georgia / Hybrid • Salary Range - $70K -$80K based on ex...

Charlottesville, Virginia • $100,000-$120,000, commensurate with ...

View all jobs

Be inspired

SIGN UP FOR EMAILS

Get discovered

POST YOUR RESUME

Featured employers

View all employers

At Work for Good  our mission is to help purpose-driven organizations and talented professionals connect, so together you can do the best work possible. Click to learn more .

Find opportunities

Set up job alert

Quick search

• DC Nonprofit Jobs
• Tri-state Nonprofit Jobs
• Los Angeles Nonprofit Jobs
• Bay Area Nonprofit Jobs

More Jobs This will open in a new window

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Working at Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a great place to work, learn and grow. Our culture is open, collegial, collaborative, supportive and down-to-earth. Our staff is made up of smart, talented, mission-driven people who care deeply about the work they do.

We are led by political scientist  Michael Dimock  and have a  staff  of more than 180 people. Our  experts  combine the observational and storytelling skills of journalists with the analytical rigor of social scientists. We hire people from a wide variety of backgrounds, including social science researchers, data scientists, survey methodologists, journalists, graphic artists, web developers, communications professionals, and administrative support and operations staff.

In our work we value independence, objectivity, accuracy, rigor, humility, transparency, and innovation.  An extension of these values is our vision of a positive, welcoming workplace built on respect, collaboration, openness, accountability, and community building – one where everyone can thrive and contribute to the mission.

View our current job openings

As a preeminent research organization with national and global reach, the Center provides a wide range of opportunities for personal and professional growth. Supporting our staff’s continuous learning and development is critical to maintaining the excellence of our research and advancing the mission of the Center, and we strive to create an environment where people can contribute their best work.

Because Pew Research Center aims to inform policymakers and the public by holding a mirror to society, it is important to us to reflect our society’s many voices, backgrounds and perspectives. Being inclusive, diverse and equitable is foundational to the Center’s mission and is integral to how we, at the Center, achieve excellence. View  staff demographics .

Total Rewards

In addition to competitive pay, Pew Research Center’s employees enjoy a robust total rewards packagethat includes:

• Affordable, comprehensive health care and employer-paid disability and life insurance.
• Generous paid annual leave plan.
• Up to a 12% employer 401(k) contribution, with vesting at the end of the first year.
• A 37.5-hour workweek.
• All staff are eligible to telework up to 60% of each week. 

This link  leads to the machine readable files that are made available in response to the federal Transparency in Coverage Rule and includes negotiated service rates and out-of-network allowed amounts between health plans and healthcare providers. The machine-readable files are formatted to allow researchers, regulators, and application developers to more easily access and analyze data.

How to apply

All open positions are posted on our careers site.  To search for job openings, you can search by department, position type, or just hit “Search” which will show you all current openings. If you are interested in more than one opportunity, apply to each position separately and include a separate cover letter for each opening.

Cover letters are required for a complete application.  In your cover letter, please tell us about why this particular job is interesting to you.  Highlight your skills and describe in detail your experience that is most relevant to the position.

If you are chosen to move forward, a member of our HR team will reach out to you to schedule a phone interview.  There are typically 2-3 rounds of interviews and they can include video calls, in-person meetings, and skills assessments.

All jobs are all based in our office in Washington, DC.  We are unable to accommodate full-time remote work.  Relocation assistance is available for some positions.  Due to the high volume of applicants, if you are not selected you will not be notified until the position has been closed.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Age & Generations
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Economy & Work
• Family & Relationships
• Gender & LGBTQ
• Immigration & Migration
• International Affairs
• Internet & Technology
• Methodological Research
• News Habits & Media
• Non-U.S. Governments
• Other Topics
• Politics & Policy
• Race & Ethnicity
• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy

• Jobseeker Login
• Employer Login
•   Twitter
•   Facebook
•   LinkedIn
•   YouTube

Find a job in the nonprofit sector

Get started.

• Nonprofit Organizations (32)
• Fundraising (22)
• Executive (18)
• Administrative (6)
• Public Policy/Advocacy (6)
• Education (6)
• Finance (6)
• Communications and Public Relations (4)
• Arts and Culture (3)
• Accounting (2)
• Membership (2)
• Environmental (2)
• Anywhere (6)
• Moccasin, California (4)
• Seattle, Washington (4)
• Bostwick, Florida (3)
• Navarre, Florida (3)
• New York City, New York (3)
• Warner, New Hampshire (3)
• Mc Afee, New Jersey (3)
• Ojo Feliz, New Mexico (3)
• Dryden, Washington (3)
• Minneapolis, Minnesota (3)
• Lebanon Junction, Kentucky (3)
• Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C. (3)
• El Portal, California (3)
• Dawson Springs, Kentucky (3)
• Saint Paul, Minnesota (3)
• Coulterville, California (3)
• Fair Haven, New York (3)
• Milesville, South Dakota (3)
• Longmont, Colorado (2)
• Newfield, New Jersey (2)
• San Francisco, California (2)
• Northport, Michigan (2)
• Fish Camp, California (2)
• Johannesburg, California (2)
• Range, Alabama (2)
• Tuscola, Texas (2)
• Shelly, Minnesota (2)
• Chicago, Illinois (2)
• Grantsburg, Indiana (2)
• Hope, Kentucky (2)
• Damascus, Virginia (2)
• Boston, Massachusetts (2)
• Framingham, Massachusetts (2)
• Egg Harbor, Wisconsin (2)
• Leeds, Maine (2)
• Bradley Beach, New Jersey (2)
• Southampton Township, New Jersey (2)
• Pleasant Plains, Illinois (2)
• Bodega Bay, California (2)
• Edwards, Mississippi (2)
• Alpine, New York (2)
• Mount Angel, Oregon (1)
• Garden City, Idaho (1)
• Spring Lake, New Jersey (1)
• Birnamwood, Wisconsin (1)
• Los Angeles County, California (1)
• Holland, Texas (1)
• Alpine, New Jersey (1)
• Placida, Florida (1)
• Maben, Mississippi (1)
• Merrill, Oregon (1)
• Hardy, Arkansas (1)
• Midpines, California (1)
• Meyers Chuck, Alaska (1)
• Menlo Park, California (1)
• Ramsay, Montana (1)
• Martin, Michigan (1)
• Madison, New Hampshire (1)
• Manhattan, New York (1)
• Monson, Massachusetts (1)
• Washington, D.C., US (1)
• Findley Lake, New York (1)
• San Bernardino, California (1)
• Brooks, Maine (1)
• Arlington, Virginia (1)
• Minnesota, US (1)
• El Monte, California (1)
• Miami, Florida (1)
• Massachusetts, US (1)
• Baltimore, Maryland (1)
• Fairview Heights, Illinois (1)
• Atlanta, Georgia (1)
• Soulsbyville, California (1)
• Pennsauken, New Jersey (1)
• Norfolk, Virginia (1)
• Sacramento, California (1)
• Windsor, South Carolina (1)
• Harvard, Massachusetts (1)
• Northford, Connecticut (1)
• Long Branch, Texas (1)
• Cuervo, New Mexico (1)
• Port Chester, New York (1)
• Garden Plain, Kansas (1)
• Topeka, Kansas (1)
• Palmer, Massachusetts (1)
• Rye, Colorado (1)
• Poston, Arizona (1)
• Goldsboro, Texas (1)
• Albuquerque, New Mexico (1)
• Cairo, West Virginia (1)
• Waco, Nebraska (1)
• Doe Hill, Virginia (1)
• Pearl, Mississippi (1)
• Maynard, Massachusetts (1)
• Overland Park, Kansas (1)
• Rockland, Idaho (1)
• Burlington Flats, New York (1)
• Wise River, Montana (1)
• Los Angeles, California (1)

Featured Jobs

Executive Director, Foundation

SAC Health Foundation is seeking a highly accomplished and experienced executive to fillthe role of ...

Chief Executive Officer

Friends of the underline.

The FUL Board of Directors is seeking a CEO to build on the organization’s extraordinary success s...

Northeast Regional Manager, Community Engagement

National ovarian cancer coalition.

As the Northeast Regional Manager specializing in community outreach, events, and philanthropy, you ...

Executive Director (Remote Location)

Reaching out mba.

Aspen Leadership Group is proud to partner with Reaching Out MBA in the search for an Executive Dire...

Office Manager

Trinity youth services.

Perform clerical duties including typing, managing petty cash, updating forms, and tracking reports....

Director of Grant Administration

Golden leaf foundation.

The Director of Grant Administration serves as the primary administrator for Golden LEAF’s grant m...

Chief Lending Officer, Oweesta Corporation

The Chief Lending Officer (CLO) at Oweesta plays a pivotal role in strategic planning and lending op...

Development Director

Mission creek camp & retreat center.

Responsible for raising funds for Mission Creek Camp & Retreat Center to accomplish goals and in...

Chief Development Officer (Hybrid - Metropolitan NYC)

Coop careers.

Aspen Leadership Group is proud to partner with COOP Careers in the search for a Chief Development O...

Administrative Assistant

Target als foundation, inc..

The Administrative Assistant will support the Foundation’s administrative efforts, working with op...

Advocate Supervisor

Nancy mccullar.

Advocate Supervisor supports twenty volunteer child advocates who represent abused, neglected, or ab...

Chief Program Officer, Oweesta Corporation

The CPO oversees programmatic staff and is responsible for developing policies, workplans, and budge...

Development Specialist

Support department administration, the volunteer program, and general marketing efforts. Develop and...

Director of Philanthropy

Santa fe animal shelter.

Support the programs of the Santa Fe Animal Shelter (the Shelter) by raising gifts from individuals,...

Recent News

Vaccine mandates and your nonprofit, how to build a culture of security at your nonprofit, can your brand be more accessible, stay updated.

Stay up-to-date with the latest nonprofit resources and trends by subscribing to our e-newsletters

Find Your State Association

Connect with local resources and expertise

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Contact Us & Support

• Log in
• Site search

Social researcher

Social researchers plan, design, conduct, analyse and manage social research projects, reporting on findings in order to shape policy or to examine the effectiveness of existing policy

As a social researcher you'll use a range of methods such as interviews, survey questionnaires, focus groups and desk research to investigate the attitudes, behaviour and experiences of individuals and population samples on specific issues.

Your research could focus on a range of topics, including:

• the benefits system
• children and families
• crime and justice
• the environment
• equalities/human rights
• health and social care
• population structure and migration
• social services
• tax and pensions
• unemployment
• work and income.

You'll collect, analyse and evaluate data and information and present your findings to clients and key stakeholders in order to inform policy decisions.

You could work in a client-side role, which has slightly more focus on the users of the research, (e.g. policymakers), or on the agency-side, which focuses more on the design and delivery of the research.

For information on working in social research for the government, see government social research officer .

Responsibilities

As a social researcher, you'll be involved in a range of activities (usually in a team). You’ll typically need to:

• understand the needs of the project, i.e. the research questions it needs to answer
• design an appropriate methodology to deliver the project
• design and write survey questionnaires
• apply a range of research techniques to gather relevant information, including document analysis, surveys, case studies and interviews (face-to-face, telephone and online)
• liaise with and direct social research field interviewers to gather information
• gather information by directing or carrying out qualitative fieldwork
• conduct reviews of relevant literature and evidence
• analyse and evaluate research and interpret data using a range of analysis packages
• prepare, present and disseminate results in the form of reports, briefings, research papers and presentations
• offer research-based briefings and advice, which may involve writing action plans
• advise external bodies on social policy
• prepare and present tenders for new research projects, or respond to research tenders prepared by others.
• Starting salaries at researcher level typically range from £20,000 to £29,000.
• You're likely to earn between £30,000 and £50,000 as a senior social researcher with significant experience.
• Salaries at manager/director level can rise to £70,000+, depending on the sector.

Salaries vary depending on your experience, the sector you work in and your location. Salaries in local and national government and academia are likely to follow a grading structure.

Income figures are intended as a guide only.

Working hours

Working hours are typically 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday.

What to expect

• Jobs are available throughout the UK, particularly in towns and cities. Some sectors of employment are more concentrated in London and the South East.
• In some sectors, short-term contracts are common and you may need to be flexible to find a constant flow of work.
• There are opportunities for freelance or consultancy work once you've got substantial practical experience, which will suit you if you're outgoing and enjoy bidding for work, networking and making contacts.
• Working to regular project deadlines can be challenging, especially if you're working on policy issues in a changing and quick response environment or working on more than one project.
• The work is largely office based, although you may need to travel for meetings and to undertake research.

Qualifications

You'll usually need a degree to get into social research. Although any subject is acceptable, employers often prefer those with a strong analytical and/or research focus. The following subjects may be particularly useful:

• anthropology
• business studies
• mathematics
• social policy
• statistics.

It's possible to move into a career in social research straight after your degree, particularly if your course included social research methods and statistics.

Although not essential, taking a taught Masters course in social research methods or a research degree (MPhil, PhD) may be advantageous. Search for postgraduate courses in social research .

Some of the large research agencies run graduate training schemes and you may need a 2:1 or above to be considered for a place.

You'll need to have:

• basic experience or understanding of quantitative and/or qualitative methods
• strong analytical and problem-solving skills
• the ability to think logically and creatively (both are important)
• good communication skills, both written and verbal
• interpersonal skills to develop and maintain relationships
• report planning and writing skills
• teamworking skills and the ability to work well on your own
• confidence in using Microsoft Office software
• project management skills to oversee all aspects of a research project right through from initial plans to the final report
• accuracy and attention to detail for handling data and reporting research findings
• a flexible approach to work, with the ability to work on several different research projects at once
• organisation skills, good time management and the ability to work under pressure and meet deadlines.

Work experience

Experience of research methods, from modules on your degree or Masters course for example, is important.

You could also get some practical experience in research or market research interviewing. Visit Market Research Society (MRS) - Work Placement & Intern Opportunities for details of companies that welcome approaches from students and graduates looking for a work placement in social or market research.

Opportunities for freelance and temporary survey interviewers are also available with NatCen (National Centre for Social Research) and ScotCen . Alternatively, you could get experience in a managerial or administrative role in which research is used to evaluate service delivery.

Although the larger research agencies are likely to have graduate traineeships, small businesses specialising in social research may not have formal schemes, but nonetheless may be able to provide a good grounding in social research methods. Use your networking skills at social research or training events to find out about possible openings.

Find out more about the different kinds of  work experience and internships  that are available.

There are opportunities available in many types of organisation, including:

• central government - social researchers work in the main government departments (see government social research officer ), as well as for the Scottish and Welsh governments
• local government - particularly social services, housing, education and chief executive departments
• independent research institutes such as NatCen Social Research (based in London and Edinburgh)
• large and small research agencies
• higher education institutions (academia)
• the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
• trade unions
• pressure and lobby groups.

Many of the larger research agencies, such as Ipsos UK and Kantar Public, have specialist social research departments and some offer graduate traineeships. There are also many small businesses that specialise in social and market research.

Social researchers in higher education (academia) are based in:

• large research centres
• attachments to university teaching departments.

Research centre clients range from government to charities and may also include undertaking consultancy work as well as their own research. Jobs are available on both a permanent and fixed-term contract (often two to three years). If your work is attached to a university teaching department, you'll usually be employed on a fixed-term contract for the length of the project.

Some market research consultancies in the private sector also conduct social research for clients such as government agencies, consumer goods producers and retailers, and media agencies.

Look for job vacancies at:

• Charity Job
• Jobs.ac.uk and THEunijobs - for social research jobs in higher education.
• Research Job Finder
• Social Research Association - Career opportunities in social research

The Research Buyers Guide provides information on companies and consultants offering market research services, which may be useful for speculative applications.

Professional development

Graduate training programmes are available with some of the larger research agencies and government departments. These usually last two years and include initial induction, on-the-job training, a range of short courses and mentor support.

With many smaller organisations you'll be trained on the job, learning from colleagues. You'll also take short training courses on specific areas, such as:

• evaluation techniques
• statistical methods
• qualitative methods
• survey design and sampling
• presentation skills
• the use of software packages.

The SRA provides both foundation and advanced training in a broad range of areas, (including courses from NatCen Learning):

• report writing
• conducting focus groups
• qualitative interviewing
• questionnaire design and testing
• qualitative approaches
• creative methods
• consultancy skills.

For more information, see SRA Training .

SRA membership is also useful for networking and career development opportunities.

You could also study for an MSc in social research part time while working.

Career prospects

In central and local government, higher education and most of the independent research institutes, there's a recognisable career structure with different grades reflecting levels of experience, responsibility and seniority.

As a typical new entrant in the Civil Service you might expect to be a research officer for two years before promotion to senior research officer. Promotion to principal research officer generally takes four years, depending on your skills and experience. If you're employed at a university specialist research centre, your career and salary structures are usually linked to those of lecturing staff.

If you're working for a major research agency, you're likely to start as a researcher before moving on to the role of senior researcher. At director level, you may be in charge of a group of researchers focused on a policy area, and will need strong leadership and management skills.

Promotion from entry level generally leads to involvement in larger projects, project management, tendering for new business, and staff and financial management. Senior researchers are also expected to win new business.

How would you rate this page?

On a scale where 1 is dislike and 5 is like

• Dislike 1 unhappy-very
• Like 5 happy-very

Thank you for rating the page

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

•  We're Hiring!
•  Help Center

• Presentations 3
• Russian Federation

Polina Vrublevskaya

• Other Affiliations: add
• Research Interests: Social Research Methods and Methodology , Sociology , Religion Studies , Emile Durkheim , Discourse Analysis , Paul Ricoeur , and 2 more Inclusive Education and Michael Foucault ( Inclusive Education and Michael Foucault ) edit
• About: Research fellow at laboratory for "Sociology of Religion" at Institut of Teology at Saint Tikhon's Orthodox University in Moscow (Russia). edit
• Advisors: Ivan Zabaev edit

Research Interests: Social Work , NGOs (Anthropology) , and Religious Studies ()

Research interests: gift exchange , emile durkheim , and anthropology of religion (), research interests: community engagement & participation , emile durkheim , religious studies , and ritual practices ().

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• Academia.edu Publishing
•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Search All Jobs
• Featured Employers
• Create Free Account
• Writing Effective Job Postings Checklist
• Job Posting Options
• Become a Featured Employer
• Course Bundles
• Salary Report
• Criminal Record Checks
• Video Screening & Interviewing
• CharityVillage Annual Conference & Awards
• Crowdfunding
• Web Accessibility Solution
• Free tools for more inclusive hiring
• Advertise with Us
• All Services and Pricing
• Search Volunteer Opportunities
• Post a Volunteer Listing
• Writing Effective Volunteer Postings Checklist
• Diversity in Canada’s Not-For-Profit Sector
• Canadian Nonprofit Sector Salary & Benefits Report
• Purchase the Salary Report
• Search Learning Centre
• Annual Conference & Awards
• About CharityVillage®
• Sector Directory
• Post & View Events
• Free Downloadable Guides
• Employer Login
• Job Seeker Login
• My Fundraising Campaigns
• English Français

FIND YOUR NEXT JOB ON CHARITYVILLAGE.COM

Bilingual Program Manager

Care canada.

CARE Canada is looking for a Bilingual Program Manager! (1 year contract). CARE Canada est à la re...

Grant Writer (Volunteer)

Stand up for student well-being.

We’re looking for an organized, passionate and talented Grant Writer with 6 months to 1 year of ...

Overnight Intensive Services (Awake)

Lumenus community services.

Toronto, Ontario, CA

We are currently hiring for part-time and full-time Overnight Intensive Therapist roles for our Live...

Development Associate: Corporate Partnership (Major Gifts)

Save the water.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

The Corporate Partnership (Major Gifts) Associate will under direct supervision of the Project Leade...

Volunteer, Respite & Renew: Caregiver Support (Toronto, Peel Region)

Vha home healthcare.

Peel, Ontario, CA

Promote the physical, emotional, and cognitive well-being of vulnerable seniors with dementia living...

CharityVillage Connects: The State of Canadian Generosity: Trends You Need to Know for 2024

What’s the most recent research revealing about the state of Canadian fundraising? Join us in this episode of CharityVillage Connects, where we dig into new reports that reveal the impact of inflation on giving, demographic changes that require new fundraising strategies, and larger sociological shifts that may account for the current downward trend in donations. Listen now, as experts and researchers from across the sector share their findings, concerns, and potential solutions.  

To download the full podcast episode transcript,   click here .

How to subscribe.

Subscribe today with your favourite podcast player including   iTunes ,   Spotify ,   Amazon , and more.

Meet Our Guests

• Dr. Paloma Raggo, Director and Principal Investigator, Charity Insights Project Canada (CICP) at Carleton University  
• John Hallward, President, Sector3Insights  
• Wen-Chih O’Connell, Executive Director and President, PayPal Giving Fund Canada  
• Charlotte Field, Partner, Good Works  

Meet Our Guests (in order of appearance)

Dr. Paloma Raggo 

CICP-PCPOB Director & Principal Investigator, Charity Insight Canada Project at Carleton University

Dr. Paloma Raggo is a faculty in the Graduate Programs of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership at the School of Public Policy and Administration at Carleton University. Her research focuses on leadership and nonprofit governance, global philanthropy, and research methods.

John A. Hallward

Founder, Sector3Insights 

John is a graduate of Queen’s University (Kingston, Ontario), BComm, 1983. He started his career at Procter & Gamble (Toronto) in market research, and then Johnson & Johnson (in Montreal) as the Market Research Manager. In 1986, John co-created Tandemar Research, with his partner. This was a very successful market research enterprise, hiring hundreds of people, and doing business in both Canada and the USA, with a few global projects.

In 2000, Tandemar was acquired by Ipsos, merged with the Angus Reid company (also acquired the same date by Ipsos), and became Ipsos Canada, the largest research firm in Canada. John took on a global role supporting the expansion of Advertising + Brand Equity Tracking expertise within Ipsos around the world.

John retired from Ipsos in February, 2020, to concentrate more time on volunteering for the health of the Non-Profit Sector in Canada, and supporting his social enterprise research firm for the benefit of non-profits; Sector3Insights.

In 2007, John had his first book published by Wiley & Sons, New York; “Gimme! The Human Nature of Successful Marketing”.

In New York, April 2008, John won the Advertising Research Foundation “Great Minds” Innovation Award for his contribution to innovative thinking in the advertising research industry. John is one of the few Canadians to win such an award in the USA.

In 2008, John returned to his entrepreneurial spirit, but in a unique way. After learning that Canadian charity behaviour was waning, and that Canadian giving rates were half of Americans, John created GIV3 (a registered Canadian charity) with the mission to encourage more Canadians to be more giving. John and his family have been the main funders.

John published his second book in 2011; “The Happiness Equation. The Human Nature of Happy People”.

In 2016, John was honored with the highest recognition, in Canada, as “Fellow” of the Market Research and Intelligence Association (now the “Canadian Research Insights Council”).

Wen-Chih O’Connell

Executive Director and President, PayPal Giving Fund Canada Wen-Chih O’Connell is passionate about bridging the gap between the charity and corporate worlds to leverage the strengths of each toward positive community impact. As the Executive Director and President of PayPal Giving Fund Canada, she is working to increase funds raised online for Canadian charities by partnering with tech companies to integrate giving opportunities into their platforms and make giving part of everyday life.

She recently joined the rest of her family in becoming a Canadian citizen, and loves to eat yummy food and spend time with her partner and two sons.

Charlotte Field

Partner, Good Works

Charlotte is a fundraiser and digital native with more than a decade of experience in communications and fundraising. She’s a strategic thinker with a mind for integrating offline and online tactics to create cohesive donor journeys that generate exceptional results. As a partner at Good Works, she’s worked with charities of all sizes and causes to raise funds from annual and legacy donors.

Charlotte is a co-author of ‘You Can’t Take It With You: The Art & Science of Legacy Fundraising’ (2019), a regular on the conference circuit, and pronounces ‘GIF’ with a hard ‘G’.

About your Host

Mary Barroll

President of   CharityVillage

Mary Barroll , president of CharityVillage , is an online business executive and lawyer with a background in media, technology and IP law. A former CBC journalist and independent TV producer, in 2013 she was appointed General Counsel & VP Media Affairs at CharityVillage.com, Canada’s largest job portal for charities and not for profits in Canada, and then President in 2021. Mary is also President of sister company, TalentEgg.ca, Canada’s No.1, award-winning job board and online career resource that connects top employers with top students and grads .  

CharityVillage Resources from this Episode 

• CharityVillage eLearning: Digital Transformation  

Additional Resources from this Episode 

We’ve gathered the resources from this episode into one helpful list:  

• Generosity in Canada: The 2023 Generosity Index (Fraser Institute)  
• The Status of Canadian Fundraising Report 2023 (Blackbaud)  
• State of the Canadian Charitable Sector: Mid-Year Report 2023 (Charity Insights Canada Project)  
• Charity Insights Canada Project Survey on Donor Behaviour (June 2023)  
• Generosity in Canada: Summary Report 2023 (Sector3Insights)  
• The Future of Giving: Looking Beyond the Selfie (PayPal Giving Fund and AGENTSC)   
• Record high charitable giving in 2021 by the fewest donors ever (Statistics Canada)    
• State of the Legacy Nation 2023 (Good Works)  

Watch the full interviews with our guests

Catch up on past episodes

Missed one of our monthly podcast episodes? All of our past episodes are available   here .

Never miss another episode – subscribe today with your favourite podcast player including   iTunes ,   Spotify ,   Amazon , and more.

• Careers & Job Search
• Volunteer Engagement
• Management & Governance
• Human Resources
• Marketing & Communications
• Fundraising
• Capital Campaigns
• Corporate Giving
• Direct Mail
• Fundraising Q & A
• Grant Writing
• Individual Giving
• Major Gifts
• Online Giving
• Philanthropy
• Planned Giving
• Social Enterprise
• Stewardship
• Sector News

Popular Cities

• Yellowknife
• Charlottetown
• Fredericton
• Quebec City
• Greater Montreal Area
• Greater Toronto Area

Popular Searches

• Executive Director
• Communications
• Social Work
• Board of Director
• Remote Jobs

Roles by Province

• British Columbia
• New Brunswick
• Nova Scotia
• Prince Edward Island
• Newfoundland and Labrador
• Northwest Territories
• Saskatchewan

•   facebook
•   twitter
•   linkedin
•   instagram
•   Pinterest
• Privacy Policy
• Terms and Conditions

Oxford University Press's Academic Insights for the Thinking World

“Unparalleled research quality”: An interview with Tanya Laplante, Head of Product Platforms

Oxford Academic

• By Tanya Laplante
• April 24 th 2024

As part of our Publishing 101 blog series, we are interviewing “hidden” figures at Oxford University Press: colleagues who our authors would not typically work with but who make a crucial contribution to the success of their books.

Tanya explains how, as research behaviours have changed, we use digital platforms to ensure that our authors’ books reach readers worldwide.

What is your role at OUP?

I am Head of Product Platforms in the Academic Division of Oxford University Press. I oversee the strategic development for the platforms, such as Oxford Academic, that host our book and journal products and services.

What is the difference between the product and editorial departments at OUP?

While editorial focuses on individual works like books and journals, product is responsible for the overall success and health of OUP’s digital portfolio. Many departments contribute to our digital products and oversee various aspects of product creation and maintenance that are central to success: editorial, sales, marketing, data strategy, content operations, royalties, etc. Product’s role is to ensure that all of those aspects are working together in as seamless a way as possible to deliver high-quality, author-driven products to the people that read our content, namely researchers.

How did Oxford Academic become our home for academic books?

Research behaviours have changed over the past two decades, as we have steadily seen sales shift away from print towards online. Oxford Academic allows us to better connect the online version of our books into a wider aggregated library of content that is easily found on search engines like Google, which can dramatically enhance the reach and impact of our authors’ work. Digital dissemination allows us to put scholarship into the hands of researchers and learners worldwide who might never have access to a library print copy. 

Oxford Academic came out of a desire within the Press to create a single gateway into Academic’s content to streamline the research journeys of those searching for content in our books and journals. It launched with journals in 2017, with research books following in 2022. Digital-first publishing is a priority for OUP as it increases the discoverability and accessibility of our research, thereby magnifying its reach and impact for our authors.

What opportunities does Oxford Academic offer our authors?

Oxford Academic offers authors a modern, mobile-friendly, accessible, search engine optimized platform upon which to publish research. In practice, this means that it’s easier for researchers to find our authors’ work online. With journals and books on the same platform, reader journeys across the two formats are not only possible but can be informed by AI-driven recommendation widgets, so readers are recommended other relevant research.

Some of the key benefits for readers include being able to:

• Quickly find books, journals, and images by building powerful searches, or using our robust links to related content  
• Access content from their preferred device, and experience a modern platform with updated features and functionality  
• Understand research quickly with our graphical or video abstracts, non-textual outputs such as images, multimedia, data, and code, and text shown with tables or images side-by-side

Our Insight Working Group is constantly reviewing reader behaviors to recommend development that will drive the use of our books and journals content and, consequently, the impact of authors’ research.

What do you enjoy most about your job?

I enjoy working across departments with various stakeholders to find innovative platform solutions for customers, readers, and authors. It can be a challenge to narrow down the areas of the platform that we should invest in. But I, and the stakeholders I work with, have developed a great deal of expertise that informs where investment is best placed. We want to invest in areas that will have the greatest impact for the greatest number of people that use platforms such as Oxford Academic, including authors, customers, and society partners.

How do you see the digital publishing landscape evolving over the next few years?

New publishing models (Open Access) and technological changes (AI) are both impacting scholarly publishing. With the expansion of Open Access and a changing funder landscape, OUP needs to demonstrate the value of what we, as a non-profit publisher, bring to the research ecosystem. We need to better educate funders, authors, and customers about the critical role we play in the publishing process: overseeing peer review, managing distribution, application of metadata, maximizing discoverability on digital platforms, and more.

In terms of AI and other technological changes, we need to optimize the benefits while minimizing the risks. We are entering a period of great change in digital publication, from review to submission to publication and discoverability. The quality of the research we publish on behalf of authors is unparalleled. We need to harness that quality and use AI as a way to enrich the user experience and increase discoverability of the content, while ensuring we are still driving users to a trusted version of record on OUP’s platforms.

In both of these spaces, we will also need to consider unique services and capabilities we can provide for key stakeholders in this space, including authors, customers, and society partners. What can OUP bring to the table to make their role in the publication process a more seamless one?

Feature image by Marius Masalar , via Unsplash .

Tanya Laplante , Head of Product Platforms, Oxford University Press.

• Publishing 101
• Series & Columns

Our Privacy Policy sets out how Oxford University Press handles your personal information, and your rights to object to your personal information being used for marketing to you or being processed as part of our business activities.

We will only use your personal information to register you for OUPblog articles.

Or subscribe to articles in the subject area by email or RSS

Related posts:

Recent Comments

There are currently no comments.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Career Motivation and Job Satisfaction in Türkiye: Mediating Role of Teacher İnnovativeness and İnstructional Practice

• Regular Article
• Open access
• Published: 24 April 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-1914 1 &
• Fulya Barış Pekmezci   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-512X 2  

Scholarly research on teachers’ job satisfaction has recently attracted the attention of researchers. However, only few studies have focused on the factors that address teachers’ job satisfaction, as to reveal whether and to what extent teachers’ career motivations, especially social utility motivation, affect job satisfaction. Existing literature suggests that social utility motivation is likely to affect the factors such as teachers’ commitment, teaching practices, self-efficacy, and professionalism, which can be considered necessary for job satisfaction. In this context, this study aims to reveal the effect of teachers’ social utility motivation on job satisfaction and the mediating effect performed by instructional practice and teacher innovation, using data from the TALIS 2018 dataset. Based on our research questions, we used data teacher questionnaires gathered in Türkiye. After accounting for missing values, the structural equation modeling analysis 2539 teachers from Türkiye. In the study, the researchers applied a mediation analysis of structural equation modeling to test the proposed model. The results of the analysis confirm that instructional practice and teacher innovation mediate between social utility motivation and job satisfaction. This research is expected to contribute to the studies that focus on the effects of social utility motivation on job satisfaction.

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Educational administration and research have increasingly focused on teachers’ job satisfaction in recent years. One of the critical factors driving this trend is the recognition that teachers’ job satisfaction plays a vital role in determining the effectiveness and development of schools (Lopes & Oliveira, 2020 ). Teacher Job Satisfaction (JS) is essential to ensure successful education as it affects the quality of teaching, the effectiveness of school management, and the overall school environment (Dreer, 2021 ; Pepe et al., 2017 ).

Subsequently, teachers’ job satisfaction is prominently on the agenda of policymakers worldwide (Chen et al., 2023 ; OECD, 2019 ; Pepe et al., 2017 ). In recent years, educational researchers have discovered that social utilization motivation (SOCUT) is a variable that can influence teachers’ job satisfaction (JS) (Fokkens-Bruinsma & Canrinus, 2014 ). In a study, Pepe et al. ( 2017 ) found that the variable that best predicts teachers’ job satisfaction is their relationships and bonds with students. However, research examining the impact of Social benefit motivation (SOCUT) on teachers’ job satisfaction (JS) has yet to reach a comprehensive level (Turner et al., 2011 ). Moreover, a recent study by Chang and Sung ( 2024 ) examined the impact of SOCUT on teachers’ JS using a sample from Taiwan. Consequently, further research is needed to elucidate the complex dynamics between SOCUT and teachers’ JS.

Previous research indicates that SOCUT is linked to both student and teacher output, with a particular emphasis on its association with student output (Kılınç et al., 2012 ; Lopes &Oliveira, 2020 ; Richardson &Watt, 2014 ; Turner et al., 2011 ). Educational administration researchers have examined that teachers with high SOCUT levels have positive attitudes towards their profession. (Kılınç et al., 2012 ). Despite growing attention to SOCUT and its effects on various teacher attitudes, it is surprising that less empirical research has been done on its relevance to JS (Kılınç et al., 2012 ; Liu et al., 2023 ). Reports suggest that the relationships between SOCUT and teacher attitudes are influenced by a number of individual and organizational variables acting as mediators (McLean et al., 2019 ), such as teaching adaptations of teachers (Klassen et al., 2009 ) and team innovation (TEAMIN) (Blömeke et al., 2021 ) mediate teacher attitudes.

However, studies focusing on the role of mediating variables in this relationship are limited, even though there is accumulated knowledge on the direct and indirect mechanisms linking SOCUT and teachers’ job satisfaction (Liu et al., 2023 ). However, there is also a gap in the literature on whether instructional practice (IP) and TEAMIN mediate the relationship between SOCUT and teachers’ JS. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between teachers’ SOCUT and teachers’ JS, focusing on the mediating role of teachers’ IP and TEAMIN in the Turkish school context. In this sense, the research questions guiding this study are as follows:

What is the extent of the relationship between SOCUT and JS?

Do TEAMIN and IP mediate the relationship between SOCUT and JS?

The unique contribution of this research is to explore the extent to which the mediating factors of teachers’ IP and TEAMIN influence the relationship between teachers’ SOCUT and JS. In addition to contributing to the body of knowledge on teacher JS, the findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners.

Literature Review and Conceptual Framework

Social utility motivation.

OECD ( 2018 ) categorizes teachers’ motivation to teach into personal benefit motivation, social utility motivation, and perceptions of value and policy impact. In this study, we focused on social utility motivation (SOCUT). This construct refers to an individual’s motivation to make a positive social impact and contribute to shaping the younger generation’s future. Thomson and Palermo ( 2018 ) assert that SOCUT comprises social benefit values that underpin the decision to teach, such as the aspiration to contribute to society and improve the lives of children. One factor that drives individuals to pursue a career in teaching is their perception of its usefulness for themselves or others. Manuel and Hughes’ ( 2006 ) study identified the desire to positively impact children’s lives as one of the reasons why prospective teachers choose the teaching profession. These findings underscore the importance of intrinsic motivation in the teaching profession. Individuals driven by purpose and passion may be well-suited for this work. McKenzie and Santiago ( 2005 ) reported that individuals commonly choose the teaching profession as the desire to contribute to society. Torsney et al. ( 2019 ) highlight that SOCUT encompasses various aspects that teachers may appreciate concerning the teaching profession, including its impact on the immediate environment and society.

SOCUT has organizational behavior implications for teachers. For instance, according to Torsney et al. ( 2019 ), SOCUT is a reliable and positive predictor of professional commitment and job satisfaction. Conversely, McLean et al. ( 2019 ) discovered that low personal and social benefit values are linked to teacher burnout, which can harm teacher JS. Additionally, Liu et al. ( 2023 ) found that SOCUT significantly predicts teacher job satisfaction. In addition, SOCUT is significantly related to teachers’ self-efficacy in each position (An et al., 2021 ). In their study on preservice teachers in Singapore, Lam et al. ( 1995 ) provide evidence that the higher the preservice teachers’ SOCUT, the lower their intention to leave. Therefore, the relationship of SOCUT with teachers’ organizational outcomes is essential, and its relationship with organizational behaviors needs to be investigated further. However, few studies explain the relationship between career motivation and job satisfaction. Precisely for this reason, this study tries to examine the relationship between SOCUT and teachers’ JS, TEAMIN, and IP.

Instructional Practice

Recent years have seen an increase in research that Instructional Practice (IP) is among the key determinants of student learning outcomes (Darling-Hammond, 2000 ; Rincón-Gallardo & Fleisch, 2016 ; Schleicher, 2016 ; Zumwalt & Craig, 2005 ). In a Brophy ( 1986 ) study, specific teacher behaviors were consistently linked to student achievement. Effective teaching encompasses-specific behaviors such as defining well-defined academic objectives to establish learning outcomes, utilizing efficient classroom management techniques, and customizing teaching approaches to cater to the unique needs of both students and subject matter. Specific behaviors such as defining well-defined academic objectives to establish learning outcomes, utilizing efficient classroom management techniques, and customizing teaching approaches to cater to the unique needs of both students and subject matter. TALIS’s multidimensional framework defines effective teaching practices based on years of research. According to a study by Ainley and Carstens ( 2018 ) and the OECD ( 2018 ), effective teaching is characterized by four dimensions: clarity of instruction, cognitive activation, classroom management, and enhanced activities.

Rincón-Gallardo and Fleisch ( 2016 ) have discovered evidence that various IP strategies that achieve successful improvements, transformations, and student rediscovery across multiple schools positively support student learning. Van de Grift ( 2007 ) highlights the importance of clear teaching objectives, well-structured lessons, mobilizing students, and, if necessary, direct teaching about practical IP. Effective teaching practices include specific actions such as structuring information, providing redundant information, delivering clear presentations, demonstrating enthusiasm, and maintaining an appropriate pace and cool-down during information processing. Teachers must also offer instructional tips and appropriate feedback, as Weinert et al. ( 1989 ) noted. Ainley and Carstens ( 2018 ) assert that Instructional Practice (IP) comprises several elements that foster student motivation and achievement. First, teachers’ IP refers to what happens in the classroom. In the classroom, IP focuses teachers’ attention on students’ learning goals, provides students with a variety of learning models, and at the same time incorporates contemporary practices that motivate them to think (Rosenshine, 1995 ).

Collective Teacher Innovation

The success of the organizations in a competitive environment and in the changing world conditions depends on their correct perception and implementation of innovation (Mumford & Licuanan, 2004 ). Innovation refers to introducing and implementing a new product, idea, method, or anything new (Utterback, 1971 ). The process consists of three steps: coming up with an idea, getting the idea ready for implementation, and creating changes by implementing the innovation (Serdyukov, 2017 ). Educational organizations, like all organizations, are affected by environmental changes and innovations.

Unlike other organizations, educational organizations are also responsible for initiating change and innovation, that’s why education is essential to support students’ creative and innovative thinking (Andiliou & Murphy, 2010 ). Another important aspect of education is the importance given to innovative teaching practices (OECD, 2009 ). Educational research emphasizes the importance of innovation in organizational competition and taking advantage, the continuation and survival of the organization (Thurlings et al., 2015 ).

Not only individual, but also collective innovation is necessary for implementing the innovation (Buske, 2018 ). With a growing focus on creating collaborative communities of practice and professional learning in education organizations to enhance outcomes, innovation is recognized as a social process that benefits from social interaction and feedback for continual improvement (Andiliou & Murphy, 2010 ; Greany, 2018 ).

In the light of the constantly evolving nature of the education system, the growing need for innovation, and the demanded growth of individual schools, the collaborative endeavors of the teaching staff within each school gain great importance (Buske, 2018 ). In this study, collective teacher innovation , as defined by OECD ( 2019 ), is used as a specific concept that encompasses the collaborative efforts of teachers to generate new teaching and learning ideas, embrace change, pursue innovative problem-solving approaches, and support each other in implementing original concepts.

Job Satisfaction

JS is defined as an individual’s emotional response to work experiences. Job satisfaction is related to whether the job reminds pleasant and positive feelings in employees (Mercer, 1997 ). Weiqi ( 2007 ) suggests that teacher job satisfaction can increase enthusiasm and improve students’ interpersonal communication. There are a number of studies examining the factors that affect job satisfaction, which can be divided as internal and external factors (Bektaş, 2017 ). Internal factors include recognition, achievement, work, advancement, and responsibility while external factors consists of monthly salary, company policies, technical competence, interpersonal relations, and working conditions (Wernimont, 1966 ). TALIS 2018 defines teacher job satisfaction as the feeling of accomplishment and contentment experienced by teachers in their profession. It is divided into two dimensions: job satisfaction from the working environment and job satisfaction from the profession (OECD, 2019 ). Earlier studies revealed that various factors affect teachers’ job satisfaction, including factors at the level of school, teacher, and student. In JS research conducted on teachers, external factors include working conditions such as collaboration between colleagues (Shah, 2012 ). Among internal factors, work motivation (Arifin, 2015 ; Hutabarat, 2015 ), self-efficacy beliefs (Caprara et al., 2006 ; Zheng et al., 2019 ), teaching competencies (Arifin, 2015 ) and meeting basic workplace needs are included (Dreer, 2021 ). Consequently, it is possible to say that teacher job satisfaction has a multidimensional structure and it changes according to school conditions (Liu et al., 2021 ). Teachers’ job satisfaction should be taken seriously by every participant in the education system. Since the most important human resource of the education system is the teacher, the most important task in improving and developing education in terms of quality and quantity belongs to the teacher. To increase the quality and quantity of education, it is vital to solve teachers’ problems and create suitable conditions for teachers’ job satisfaction. Ensuring teachers continue to work efficiently requires conditions that lead to teachers’ satisfying performance (Sadeghi et al., 2013 ). Teachers’ perception of the status of the teaching profession and society’s perceived support of the profession are necessary for job satisfaction (Poppleton & Riseborough, 1988 ).

Developing Models

Previous studies have indicated that SOCUT is linked to various teacher outcomes, as revealed in the research conducted (An et al., 2021 ; McLean et al., 2019 ; Torsney et al, 2019 ). Among these outcomes, teachers’ JS has been identified as particularly significant, as highlighted in the work of Turner et al. ( 2011 ). In addition, it has been discovered that teachers with high SOCUT have positive attitudes towards school and profession (Kılınç et al., 2012 ). In this context, a relationship between SOCUT and JS has been found out in variety of studies (Fokkens-Bruinsma & Canrinus, 2014 ) which indicate that teachers with high SOCUT level have also high JS (Liu et al., 2023 ). We performed this study to provide unique insights that IP and TEAMIN are important in the relationship between SOCUT and JS in teachers’ job satisfaction. In the available literature JS, which refers to an individual’s overall contentment and fulfillment with their job, is a significant determinant that impacts employees’ willingness and ability to engage in innovative activities (Sena, 2020 ). Studies show that job satisfaction and innovative behaviors are positively related (Yu et al., 2007 ). In addition to being crucial for an organization’s smooth working, innovations expand members’ advantages. These include aligning job demands effectively, providing essential resources, improving communication, and fostering job satisfaction (Messmann & Mulder, 2011 ). Moreover, there is empirical evidence that instructional practices were positively related to job satisfaction (Von der Embse et al., 2016 ). Based on the available literature, we developed the model in Fig.  1 to examine whether TEAMIN and IP mediate the relationship between SOCUT and teacher JS.

Conceptual model

Rationale and Contextual Background

There are two main objectives of this research one of which is to explore direct and indirect relationships between SOCUT and JS through hidden variables called TEAMIN and IP as mediators. Watt and Richardson ( 2008 ) identify seven dimensions that contribute to individuals’ motives for pursuing a career in teaching. According to Lin et al. ( 2012 ) among these dimensions, SOCUT is a predominant factor that influences career choice. In addition to this, as noted by Liu et al. ( 2021 ) a positive correlation has been observed between teacher motivation and JS In this context, this research, which focuses on teachers’ JS, will offer a new and fresh perspective to the literature on social benefit motivations related to the careers of teachers that are job satisfaction-oriented. Secondly, this study concerns about the mediator role of TEAMIN and IP in the relationship between teachers’ SOCUT and JS in educational processes where a highly centralized organizational structure is dominant.

In recent years, Ministry of National Education in Türkiye (MoNE) has maintained the central management system in its usual way, but at the same time it has initialized a good deal of studies on innovative thinking in schools (İlhan, 2020 ). Principals and teachers are encouraged to think innovatively and take more responsibility in their teaching processes, that’s why conditions for team innovativeness have begun to emerge in schools. In addition, Turkish culture is characterized by high tendency of uncertainty avoidance and collectivism (Hofstede et al., 2005 ). In Türkiye, collective thinking is acquired by children at an early age, and the fundamental idea is that collective ideas about individuals and the interests of society are prioritized. Therefore, contributing to society enable teachers to realize their social value.

Consequently, teachers often experience a sense of fulfillment by influencing the society positively through their teaching. In this respect, teachers are expected to develop innovative skills in their students by collaborative works. On the other hand, there is a need to explore SOCUT related to TEAMIN, IP, and JS in Turkish schools. The results of this study may have significant consequences for the countries with similar cultural characteristics with Türkiye. Liu et al. ( 2021 ) reveals that most of the studies on SOCUT and JS were conducted in the Western societies, and the number of studies are still insufficient in Asian countries although it tends to show an increase.

We propose the following hypotheses based on the theoretical foundation and literature review mentioned above.

SOCUT has an impact on teachers’ JS.

There is a positive relationship between IP and JS.

There is a positive relationship between TEAMIN and JS.

IP and TEAMIN have a mediating role in the relationship between SOCUT and JS.

Data Source and Sample

In this study, a dataset of TALIS 2018 is used, which was collected by the OECD September 2017 and July 2018 (OECD, 2019 ). The TALIS is one of the large-scale studies that enable cross-cultural data on teaching and teachers’ work that can inform about developments in policy and practice. This study utilised data of TALIS 2018, which involved primary, middle and high schools from 48 participating countries with a focus on teachers. TALIS required all participating countries to conduct a “core” survey at the lower secondary level of education (OECD, 2019 ). In this study, we used these “core” data. Based on our research questions, we used data teacher questionnaires at ISCED-2 level gathered in Türkiye. Data collected in Türkiye included 3952 teachers. After accounting for missing values, the structural equation modeling analysis 2539 teachers from Türkiye. The sample group comprises 52.2% women (1325) and 47.8% men (1214). A small majority of teachers (5%) have education levels below ISCED level 3, while the majority (79%) hold education at ISCED level 3. The remaining 20% have education at ISCED level 4. The years of experience of the teachers, categorized by their age ranges, are depicted in Fig.  2 .

Years continuing being a teacher by teacher age groups

As anticipated, the teaching experience of teachers aged below 25 years is low. However, it is noteworthy that teachers aged 50–59 and those aged 60 and over possess the least amount of teaching experience in the sample. Within the sample, the proportion of teachers between the ages of 30–39 is higher than that of other age groups, comprising 39.3%. This is followed by the proportion of teachers aged 40–49, which stands at 33.5%. The age group with the lowest proportion consists of teachers aged 25 and under (0.9%).

Dependent variable

The research evaluates job satisfaction with the profession (JSPRO) as the dependent variable, with a reliability coefficient of ( ω  = 0.863). TALIS 2018 defines teachers’ willingness to adopt innovative practices and their perceptions of incentives for innovation adoption. (OECD, 2019 ). In the TALIS 2018 cycle, innovation was acknowledged as a “cross-cutting” factor for the learning environment in schools, and it was included in the theme for the first time (OECD, 2019 ). The latent variable T3JSPRO comprises of four items (refer to Supplementary Appendix A). It is evaluated using a four-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (4) to assess the teachers’ feedback. The factors that drive individuals to become teachers are closely linked to how satisfied they feel in their job later on. However, it’s worth noting that the overall satisfaction can be influenced by the atmosphere and environment of the school they work in (Ainley & Carstens, 2018 ).Whether teachers are classified as “highly engaged persisters”, “highly engaged switchers”, or “lower engaged desisters” can indicate how long they are likely to stay in the teaching profession, their perceptions of the profession, and which types of motivators—either intrinsic or extrinsic—will be most effective in fostering their growth and development (Watt & Richardson, 2008 ). In the light of these informations, in TALIS 2018, indicators of job satisfaction and teacher perceptions of the value of the teaching profession were redesigned and measured with T3JSPRO. T3JSPRO demonstrated a perfect fit for the Türkiye sample at ISCED-2 level (RMSEA = 0.000, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.001, SRMR = 0.002) (OECD, 2019 ).

Independent Variable

In this study, the variable under investigation is the social utility motivation for teaching (T3SOCUT) is an independent variable. T3SOCUT is a latent variable consisting of three items (refer to Supplementary Appendix A) with a reliability coefficient of ( ω  = 0.812). The items were measured using a four-point Likert-type scale, where the response categories ranged from “Not important at all” (1) to “Of high importance” (4). Liu et al. ( 2023 ) demonstrated that social utility motivation affects job satisfaction among middle school teachers in China using data from TALIS 2018. Similarly, Chang and Sung ( 2024 ) recently illustrated in their study that social utility motivation influences teachers’ job satisfaction in a sample from Taiwan. T3SOCUT demonstrated a perfect fit for the Türkiye sample at ISCED-2 level (RMSEA = 0.000, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.000, SRMR = 0.000) (OECD, 2019 ).

Mediating Variables

The mediating variables of this study were T3TEAM ( ω  = 0.956) and T3TPRA (α = 0.899). T3TEAM is a latent variable consisting of four items measured on a four-point Likert scale, with response categories ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (4), and it represents team innovativeness. T3TEAM demonstrated a perfect fit (RMSEA = 0.049, CFI = 0.995, TLI = 0.986, SRMR = 0.006) for the Türkiye sample at ISCED-2 level (OECD, 2019 ). In TALIS 2018, psychological and a sociological perspective integrated on teacher innovativeness. T3TEAM scale has organisational component beside an individual (cognitive) component to reflect teacher group’s perception on innovation (Ainley & Carstens, 2018 ).

TALIS 2018 defined T3TPRA as a composite variable consisting of three subscales: T3CLAIN, T3COGAC, and T3CLASM, which measure the clarity of instruction, cognitive activation, and classroom management, respectively. Each subscale has four items measured on a four-point Likert scale, with response categories ranging from “never or almost never” (1) to “always” (4). The composite variable IP was created using the whole scale scores of 12 items (refer to Supplementary Appendix A), and it is also a latent variable according to TALIS 2018. TALIS 2018 focus on instructional practices in general rather than subject-specific instructional practices. Teachers’ background and perceptions of their instructional practices, teaching practices and general teaching practices (i.e., classroom management, cognitive activation, and clarity of instruction) were some of indicators of T3TPRA (Ainley & Carstens, 2018 ). Classroom management is seen as a positive disciplinary environment in the classroom in the TALIS 2018. Cognitive activation involves educational tasks that prompt students to assess, blend and utilize knowledge within the context of problem solving. Support from teachers is crucial aspect of teaching that impacts students’ academic success. This includes various practices such as offering additional assistance when necessary, valuing and addressing students’ ideas and inquiries, showing care and encouragement, and providing emotional support. In the TALIS 2018 assessment, teacher support is evaluated through the clarity of instruction scale (Ainley & Carstens, 2018 ). T3CLAIN (RMSEA = 0.000, CFI = 1.003, TLI = 1.001, SRMR = 0.002), T3COGAC (RMSEA = 0.000, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.001, SRMR = 0.002) and T3CLASM (RMSEA = 0.049, CFI = 0.996, TLI = 0.975, SRMR = 0.006) demonstrated a perfect fit for the Türkiye sample at ISCED-2 level (OECD, 2019 ).

Control Variable

The years of teaching experience (TT3G11B, metric) is also added as a control variable in this study to avoid potential bias and control for potential effects on the outcome variable. Teaching experience has been found to impact job satisfaction, and as certain studies (Klassen & Chiu, 2010 ) suggest, teachers tend to become less satisfied with their jobs as they gain more experience. By including teaching experience as a control variable for the dependent variable (JSPRO), unbiased estimations of the dependent variables can be obtained.

Descriptive Statistics and Preliminary Results

Before the mediator analysis was done through structural equation modeling (SEM), necessary assumptions were checked. For this purpose, firstly, univariate and multivariate outliers were examined. Then, cases outside the range of ± 3.0 were deleted from the data (Raykov & Marcoulides, 2008 ). Also, the Mahalanobis distances were calculated to determine the multivariate outliers and values other than the critical value ( p  < 0.001) were deleted. Lastly, the skewness and kurtosis values of the scales were examined for 2549 participants. The skewness and kurtosis values were found to be between − 1.5 and + 1.5; in this way, the data were assumed to be normally distributed (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2013 ).

To create a mediation model, all variables (independent, dependent, and mediator) must have a significant relationship with one another. However, these relationships should be also moderate as they may lead to multicollinearity. When the relationships between variables exceed 0.80, it indicates multicollinearity issues (Iacobucci et al., 2007 ). As shown in Table  1 , the correlations between the variables are positive and statistically significant at varying levels of 0.01.

Following the preliminary analyses, the base model (without mediator variables) and a model with one mediator variable were tested as the initial step of the conceptual SEM model. The model-fit was then evaluated using Mplus 8.5 generated indices, which included the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). A value of RMSEA and SRMR less than 0.08 and CFI and TLI greater than 0.90 were considered acceptable fits (Browne & Cudeck, 1993 ; Hu & Bentler, 1999 ; Marsh et al., 2004 ). RMSEA should report with a 90% confidence interval (Kline, 2005 ). The lower limit of the confidence interval for RMSEA smaller than 0.05 is an indication of model fit. Besides, the upper confidence interval limit for RMSEA greater than 0.10 indicates poor model fit. We also reported the χ 2 values were also reported; however, χ 2 is affected by sample sizes and tends to be significant with large sample sizes (Hu & Bentler, 1999 ).

Two models were tested, which are Model 1 (base model-no mediation) and Model 2 (with mediation), to reveal the kind of mediation (partial or complete). Full mediation is revealed when the independent variable predicts the dependent variable significantly, and with the mediator presented, this direct relation becomes insignificant, while the indirect effect is significant (Hayes, 2009 ; Shrout & Bolger, 2002 ). In partial mediation, the relationship between the independent and dependent variables is still statistically significant if the mediator is removed from a model. The structural model was analyzed, which examines the effect of social utility motivation on job satisfaction with the profession, presented in Fig.  3 .

Base model (Model 1) results. Standardized regression coefficients are given with standard errors in parenthesis. *** p  < 0.001

The base model demonstrated a good fit for the data ( χ 2  = 132.765 [df = 19], p  < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.049, CFI = 0.929, TLI = 0.896, SRMR = 0.033) except chi-square, presented in Table  1 . Social utility motivation for teaching is a statistically significant predictor of job satisfaction. Besides, paths and standardized coefficients among the base model were also examined, and path coefficients were interpreted according to Kline’s ( 2005 ) guideline, which uses reference values of ≥ 0.10 as small, ≥ 0.30 as medium, and ≥ 0.50 as highly significant effects. It was observed that SOCUT has a moderate and significant relationship with JSPRO ( β  = 0.363, SE = 0.030, p  < 0.001).

A mediation model was constructed to analyze the proposed direct and indirect effects of SOCUT on JSPRO. In this model, SOCUT was determined as the independent variable, TEAMIN and IP as mediating variables, and JSPRO as the dependent variable. First, the baseline model (Model 1) was tested in order to examine the effect of SOCUT on JSPRO without mediation. Next, meadiation models with single mediator were conducted to see the mediating role of TEAMIN (Model 2) and IP (Model 3), and to determine the impact of the mediator variable, 10,000 bootstraps were performed. Finally structural models were conducted to see the mediating role of both mediator variables, TEAMIN and IP. According to Preacher and Hayes’s ( 2008 ) upper and lower limit rule was used with the aim of evaluating the significance of the indirect effect. This rule suggests that if the indirect impact is significant, then the interval of the indirect effect should not include zero (0). Model fit indices for Model 1, Model 2, Model 3 and Model 4 are given in Table  2 .

Table 2 displays model-fit values of conceptual models without a mediator variable (Model 1), with single meaditor variable (Model 2 and Model 3) and with two mediator variables (Model 4). The four conceptual models showed a good fit for the data when the model fit values were examined in detail. Model 1 and Model 3 showed a better fit in terms of RMSEA and SRMR values whereas according to CFI and TLI values, Model 1 showed a better fit relatively. The direct and indirect paths and standardized coefficients among the models were also examined.

As demonstrated in Table  3 , for Model 2, SOCUT has a moderate and significant relationship with JSPRO ( β  = 0.353, SE = 0.029, p  < 0.000). As reported in the analysis, this indicates that teachers’ social motivation influences their job satisfaction. The results also reveal that SOCUT is a weak yet significant predictor of TEAMIN ( β  = 0.133, SE = 0.025, p  < 0.000). TEAMIN is a weak but significant predictor of JSPRO ( β  = 0.128, SE = 0.026, p  < 0.000), indicating that teachers with higher TEAMIN tend to experience more job satisfaction. Subsequently, the standardized indirect effects in the structural model (refer to Fig.  4 ) were analyzed, and SOCUT was found to affect positively JSPRO through TEAMIN ( β  = 0.017, SE = 0.004, p  < 0.001). Although the mediation effect of TEAMIN is low, the results of the current study indicate that teachers who tend to have high social utility motivation also have a higher job satisfaction thanks to their interest in teamwork. Given that TALIS 2018 assesses educators’ perceptions of innovation within both individual and collaborative contexts, the impact of their innovation perception on job satisfaction, facilitated by motivation, can be explained by Model 2. Put differently, teachers who perceive themselves as innovative are likely to experience elevated levels of job satisfaction. Furthermore, higher motivation among teachers is associated with increased job satisfaction, particularly when coupled with a positive perception of innovation. TEAMIN, the mediating variable of the Model 2, explains approximately 2% of the total variation in job satisfaction with the profession.

Single mediation model (Model 2) results. Standardized regression coefficients are given with standard errors in parenthesis. *** p  < 0.001

Likewise Model 2, SOCUT is positively related with IP at a weak but significant ( β  = 0.154, SE = 0.025, p  < 0.000) in Model 3. IP among teachers is a moderate predictor of JSPRO ( β  = 0.293, SE = 0.025, p  < 0.001), suggesting that instructional practice influences their perceptions of job satisfaction. IP is a weak but significant mediator in the relationship between SOCUT and JSPRO ( β  = 0.044, SE = 0.008, p  < 0.000). Analysis of indirect paths reveals that social utility motivation for teaching instructional practice positively affects teachers’ JS, which can increase their perceptions of job satisfaction. TALIS 2018 addresses classroom management, cognitive activation, and clarity of instruction in the context of instructional practices. Teachers with high level of motivation typically cultivate a positive disciplinary atmosphere in their classrooms, integrate and apply knowledge in the context of problem solving, demonstrate substantial support for their students, and experience higher levels of satisfaction in their professional roles, can be explained by Model 3. IP, the mediating variable of the Model 3, explains approximately 4% of the total variation in job satisfaction with the profession (refer to Fig. 5 ).

Single mediation model (Model 3) results. Standardized regression coefficients are given with standard errors in parenthesis. *** p  < 0.001

Lastly, for Model 4, both mediator variables have significant effect on JSPPRO. SOCUT has a moderate and significant relationship with JSPRO ( β  = 0.319, SE = 0.029, p  < 0.000) likewise both Model 2 and Model 3. The results also reveal that SOCUT is a weak yet significant predictor of TEAMIN ( β  = 0.133, SE = 0.026, p  < 0.000), showing that social utility motivations of teachers influence their team innovation attempts. Likewise, SOCUT is positively related with IP at a weak but significant ( β  = 0.154, SE = 0.025, p  < 0.000), indicating that SOCUT affects teachers’ instructional practices such as clarity of instruction, cognitive activation, and classroom management in the classroom. IP among teachers is a moderate predictor of JSPRO ( β  = 0.290, SE = 0.024, p  < 0.001), suggesting that instructional practice influences their perceptions of job satisfaction. TEAMIN is a weak but significant predictor of JSPRO ( β  = 0.130, SE = 0.024, p  < 0.000), indicating that teachers with higher TEAMIN tend to experience more job satisfaction. Subsequently, the standardized indirect effects in the structural model (refer to Fig.  6 ) were analyzed, and SOCUT was found to affect positively JSPRO through TEAMIN ( β  = 0.017, SE = 0.004, p  < 0.001). Although the mediation effect of team innovation is low, the results of the current study indicate that teachers who tend to have high social utility motivation also have a higher job satisfaction thanks to their interest in teamwork. Similarly, IP is a weak but significant mediator in the relationship between SOCUT and JSPRO ( β  = 0.045, SE = 0.008, p  < 0.000). Analysis of indirect paths reveals that social utility motivation for teaching instructional practice positively affects teachers’ JS, which can increase their perceptions of job satisfaction. TEAMIN and IP, the mediating variables of the study, explain 6% of the total variation in job satisfaction with the profession. The variance explained by both mediator variables remained consistent in models where they were considered both separately and together. It can be concluded that neither mediator variable exert suppressive effect on the other.

Multiple mediation model (Model 4) results. Standardized regression coefficients are given with standard errors in parenthesis. *** p  < 0.001

Comparing Model 2, Model 3, and Model 4, we see that TEAMIN, one of the mediators, has a higher impact on the total effect than IP. In Model 2, where TEAM is the mediator, the total effect is 0.370. In Model 3, where IP is the mediator, the total effect is 0.370. In Model 4, the calculated total effect is 0.381. It can be seen that both mediator variables are effective in explaining the total effect. The increase in the total effect in Model 4 indicates that the contribution of both variables to the model is significant. However, the contribution of IP in the explanation of the mediation effect is higher than that of TEAM. Based on this, it can be said that IP (having a positive disciplinary atmosphere in their classrooms, integrating and applying knowledge in the context of problem solving, demonstrating substantial support for their students) is relatively more effective than TEAMIN in increasing the job satisfaction of highly motivated teachers.

Thereafter, the control variable in the structural model was analyzed, and the outcomes reveal that the total years of teaching experience have a significant negative association with job satisfaction ( β  =  − 0.061, SE = 0.023, p  < 0.001). This implies that as teachers acquire more experience, they are likely to view their work environment as less innovative.

In conclusion, the SEM analysis demonstrates that social utility motivation for teaching has a moderate and statistically significant total effect on job satisfaction with the profession ( β  = 0.381, SE = 0.029, p  < 0.001). Furthermore, the partial mediation model used in the study explains 40% of the overall variance in job satisfaction among teachers and offers further evidence for the link between team innovation and teaching practices in schools as perceived by teachers.

This research aims to investigate the effects of SOCUT’s teacher outcomes on several organizational variables. The study examines whether TEAMIN and IP mediate the relationship between SOCUT and teacher JS. The research was carried out by the responses of 2539 teachers participating throughout Türkiye.

Analysis results show that SOCUT increases teachers’ JS, which supports the literature showing that SOCUT contributes to all components of the school, especially students and teachers (Kılınç et al., 2012 ; Richardson & Watt, 2014 ; Turner et al., 2011 ). In other words, our research is in line with the studies revealing that SOCUT increases teachers’ JS. Similarly, the available research reveals that JS is positively associated with SOCUT (Kılınç et al., 2012 ). Given the available evidence, the results of the study provide substantial information on that SOCUT increases JS. Based on the findings derived from the study, when teachers believe that the work they do impacts the development of children positively and benefits the society with SOCUT, their job satisfaction is positively affected due to their strong social responsibilities no matter what difficulties they encounter (An et al., 2021 ; Fokkens-Bruinsma & Canrinus, 2014 ; McLean et al., 2019 ; Pepe et al., 2017 ; Torsney et al., 2019 ). Job satisfaction is closely intertwined with the enduring presence of teachers. However, it also engenders a profound impact on the welfare of teachers and their students, fostering a comprehensive combination within educational institutions and fortifying the esteemed standing of the teaching career (Toropova et al., 2021 ).

The current study presents findings that there is relationship between teachers’ perceptions of instructional practices and job satisfaction. According to Caprara et al. ( 2006 ), teachers report that they become more motivated when they evaluate their practices as meaningful. Furthermore, Opdenakker and Van-Damme’s ( 2006 ) study establishes a connection between high job satisfaction among teachers and their emphasis on implementing innovative practices in the classroom. This finding is consistent with other studies in the literature that support the relationship between job satisfaction and innovative practices. In the studies mentioned above, it has been discovered that teachers have relatively higher JS when their SOCUT is high in general. The research findings are also consistent with the previous literature, which shows that IP contributes to positive multifaceted results in school organization (Darling-Hammond, 2000 ; Rincón-Gallardo & Fleisch, 2016 ; Schleicher, 2016 ). Therefore, current research findings also contribute relatively to the literature focusing on the consequences of teachers’ IP at school, which increases teacher JS (Klassen et al., 2009 ).

It is discovered in the study that there is an essential relationship between teachers’ perceptions of team innovation practices (TEAMIN) and their perceptions of job satisfaction (JS). The research of Buyukgoze et al, ( 2022 ) supports our findings regarding the relationship between TEAMIN and JS. Wang et al. ( 2020 ) provide evidence that JS increases when teachers are involved in collaborative practices at school. Reynolds et al. ( 2014 ) also emphasizes that school innovation is one of the necessary conditions for educational effectiveness. Due to the relatively fewer number of studies conducted directly between TEAMIN and JS, further investigation on these two subjects is needed. Therefore, it seems that this study will guide new researchers and shed light on this gap in the literature.

This study presents notable information on that IP and TEAMIN have essential roles in teachers’ job satisfaction in the relationship between SOCUT and JS. In this study, it is found that the direct effect of SOCUT on job satisfaction is high due to teachers’ belief that they contribute to society and children, and their social responsibility. Based on this finding, it is evident that SOCUT plays a positive role in increasing the perceptions of JS. Hence, the studies in which the relationship between SOCUT and JS was discovered (Fokkens-Bruinsma & Canrinus, 2014 ; Liu et al., 2023 ; Turner et al., 2011 ) are consistent with the current study findings which indicate that innovative practices (IP) and collaborative teaming (TEAMIN) serve as intermediary relationships to social utility motivation for teaching (SOCUT) and job satisfaction (JS). The study suggests that when teachers believe that their work positively impacts children’s development and benefits society, they are more likely to experience job satisfaction. This sense of social responsibility is attributed to coordinated teaching and pedagogical work through effective teamwork.

Current study adds to the collaborative research by expanding on the existing literature that validates the connections between the theoretical constructs and the independent and dependent variables. The findings of the study reinforce these connections and highlight the importance of further collaborative research in the field. It was hypothesized that IP and TEAMIN have a partially mediating effect in the relation between SOCUT and JS. Teachers’ social responsibility to contribute to society through teaching can lead to a positive perception of job satisfaction. However, more than job satisfaction is needed to ensure higher IP and TEAMIN. In other words, while IP and TEAMIN are definitely linked to SOCUT and JS, higher IP and TEAMIN may not necessarily guarantee job satisfaction. Therefore, it is suggested that future research should focus on exploring the impact of various organizational and individual characteristics on this relationship to better comprehend the factors that influence the constructs examined in this study.

The research reveals fundamentally that SOCUT affects teachers’ JS both directly and indirectly. Based on this preliminary result, one of the ways to increase teachers’ JS is to take measures in order to strengthen SOCUT in schools. In this process attempt to increase teachers’ IP levels, TEAMIN’s efforts to develop new ideas in teaching and learning will also contribute to teachers’ increasing JS.

Limitations and Future Research

This study has certain limitations in terms of measuring its findings. Specifically, the research utilized data from the 2018 TALIS application conducted by the OECD. First of all, it should be noted that the measures of social utility motivation for teaching, instructional practice, collective team innovation, and the assessment of job satisfaction in this study rely on the participating teachers’ self-evaluations, subjective thoughts, and perceptions. In this study, first of all, direct, indirect and mediated relationships between variables were examined using a cross-sectional design. Therefore, a cause-and-effect relationship cannot be established between the research variables. In the future, researchers could also examine changes in the relationships between variables over time using a longitudinal research design. Moreover, given our focus on the impact of SOCUT on JS, the interactive effects of other motivational factors and sources were not tested in this study. As other sources of motivation, for example, social utility motivation will affect job satisfaction, future research should emphasize this aspect to get a more comprehensive picture (Chang & Sung, 2024 ). In order to contribute to our findings to produce more robust and powerful inferences, researchers need more replication with studies focused on school and teacher development. By conducting further research using mixed methods and experimental designs in future studies, scholars can obtain more comprehensive insights into the impact of social utility motivation on teaching, instructional practice, collective team innovation, and job satisfaction. Finally, we only investigated the mediating effect of TEAMIN and IP. Therefore, we suggest that researchers should examine the effects of other organizational behavior variables in future studies. It is important to note that the study relied only on teacher questionnaire data from the Turkish Island region and has certain limitations. Besides, the partial intermediary model that will be established in future studies can be compared according to the countries participating in TALIS.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study established a model detailing the relationships between SOCUT and JS mediated by IP and TEAMIN. Teachers’ social responsibility to contribute to society through teaching can lead to a positive perception of job satisfaction. Given the role of a teacher’s social responsibility, this study may provide a method for enhancing teachers’ job satisfaction. We would also like to highlight two crucial findings and related recommendations here. First, our results confirm that social good motivation is a significant factor in job satisfaction. The research basically reveals that SOCUT affects teachers’ JS both directly and indirectly. Based on this preliminary result, one of the ways to increase teachers’ JS is to take measures to strengthen SOCUT in schools. While more research is needed to investigate how teachers’ SOCUT is reflected in their teachers’ JS, it is easy to assume that such a situation increases teachers’ JS. Such an issue, therefore, needs to be considered in the context of current efforts to increase teachers’ SOCUT. More support from education offices and policymakers in increasing teachers’ JS should be considered. Secondly, in increasing teachers’ IP, TEAMIN’s efforts to develop new ideas in teaching and learning would also contribute to increasing teachers’ JS. This raises the issue of the nature of these IPs and the development of TEAMIN in schools. Therefore, we recommend further qualitative studies in many aspects, particularly on teachers’ job satisfaction. More than job satisfaction is needed to ensure higher IP and TEAMIN. In other words, while IP and TEAMIN are indeed linked to SOCUT and JS, higher IP and TEAMIN may not guarantee job satisfaction. Therefore, it is suggested that future research should focus on exploring the impact of various organizational and individual characteristics on this relationship to understand better the factors influencing the constructs examined in this study. However, school administrators and policymakers should be aware that building innovative communities in schools and IP can benefit teachers’ job satisfaction and other positive outcomes already highlighted in the literature.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the authors.

Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning ınternational survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework . https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en

An, Y., Li, L., & Wei, X. (2021). What influences teachers’ self-efficacy in East Asia? Evidence from the 2018 teaching and learning ınternational survey. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49 (5), 1–13.

Google Scholar  

Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5 (3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003

Article   Google Scholar  

Arifin, H. M. (2015). The influence of competence, motivation, and organisational culture to high school teacher job satisfaction and performance. International Education Studies, 8 (1), 38–45.

Bektaş, Ç. (2017). Explanation of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction via mirror mode. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5 (3), 627–639. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i3.118

Blömeke, S., Nilsen, T., & Scherer, R. (2021). School innovativeness is associated with enhanced teacher collaboration, innovative classroom practices, and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113 (8), 1645.

Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41 , 1069–1077.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

Buske, R. (2018). The principal as a key actor in promoting teachers’ innovativeness—Analyzing the innovativeness of teaching staff with variance-based partial least square modeling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29 (2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1427606

Buyukgoze, H., Caliskan, O., & Gumus, S. (2022). Linking distributed leadership with collective teacher innovativeness: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and professional collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership . https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221130879

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44 (6), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001

Chang, T. J., & Sung, Y. T. (2024). Does teacher motivation really matter? Exploring the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy in the relationship between motivation and job satisfaction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00803-4

Chen, J., Bellibaş, M. Ş, & Gümüş, S. (2023). Impact of school climate and resources on principal workload stress and job satisfaction: Multinational evidence from TALIS 2018 data. Journal of Educational Administration, 61 (5), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2022-0128

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 , 1.

Dreer, B. (2021). Teachers’ well-being and job satisfaction: The important role of positive emotions in the workplace. Educational Studies . https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1940872

Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Canrinus, E. T. (2014). Motivation for becoming a teacher and engagement with the profession: Evidence from different contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 65 , 65–74.

Greany, T. (2018). Innovation is possible, it’s just not easy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46 (1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659297

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the New Millenium. Communication Monographs, 76 , 408–420.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind . New York.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.

Hutabarat, W. (2015). Investigation of teacher job-performance model: Organizational culture, work motivation and job-satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 11 (18), 295–304.

Iacobucci, D., Neela, S., & Xiaoyan, D. (2007). A meditation on mediation: evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology , 17 (2), 139–153.

İlhan, A. (2020). Türkiye’de üstün yetenekli olmak. Çocuk Ve Medeniyet, 5 (10), 483–494.

Kılınç, A., Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2012). Factors influencing teaching choice in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (3), 199–226.

Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y. F., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34 (1), 67–76.

Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (3), 741.

Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation . Sage publications.

Lam, P., Foong, Y. Y., & Moo, S. N. (1995). Job satisfaction and withdrawal cognition among preservice teachers. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 23 (2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0311213950230208

Lin, E., Shi, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, S., & Hui, L. (2012). Initial motivations for teaching: Comparison between preservice teachers in the United States and China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (3), 227–248.

Liu, S., Keeley, J. W., & Sui, Y. (2023). Multi-level analysis of factors influencing teacher job satisfaction in China: Evidence from the TALIS 2018. Educational Studies, 49 (2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1837615

Liu, S., Keeley, J. W., Sui, Y., & Sang, L. (2021). Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71 , 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101099

Lopes, J., & Oliveira, C. (2020). Teacher and school determinants of teacher job satisfaction: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31 (4), 641–659.

Manuel, J., & Hughes, J. (2006). ‘It has always been my dream’: Exploring pre-service teachers’ motivations for choosing to teach. Teacher Development, 10 (1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530600587311

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut-off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11 (3), 320–341.

McKenzie, P., & Santiago, P. (Eds.). (2005). Education and training policy teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers . OECD Publishing.

McLean, L., Taylor, M., & Jimenez, M. (2019). Career choice motivations in teacher training as predictors of burnout and career optimism in the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85 (1), 204–214.

Mercer, D. (1997). Job satisfaction and the secondary headteacher: The creation of a model of job satisfaction. School Leadership and Management, 17 (1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439770168

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4 , 63–84.

Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15 (1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.010

OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS . Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved May, 2022 from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf

OECD. (2018). Teaching and learning ınternational survey (TALIS) 2018: Teacher questionnaire . OECD. Retrieved May 2020, from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2018%20MS-Teacher-Questionnaire-ENG.pdf

OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report . Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf

Opdenakker, M.-C., & van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22 (1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.008

Pepe, A., Addimando, L., & Veronese, G. (2017). Measuring teacher job satisfaction: Assessing invariance in the teacher job satisfaction scale (TJSS) across six countries. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13 (3), 396.

Poppleton, P., & Riseborough, G. (1988). Teaching in the UK in the Mid-1980s: Secondary teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions, roles, classroom practices, and work satisfactions . American Educational Research Association.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–891.

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis . Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research: A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25 (2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885450

Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2014). Why people choose teaching as a career: An expectancy-value approach to understanding teacher motivation. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), teacher motivation (pp. 3–19). Routledge.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Rincón-Gallardo, S., & Fleisch, B. (2016). Bringing effective instructional practice to scale: An introduction. Journal of Educational Change, 17 , 379–383.

Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88 (5), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1995.9941309

Sadeghi, K., Amani, J., & Mahmudi, H. (2013). A structural model of the impact of organizational culture on job satisfaction among secondary school teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22 , 687–700.

Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform: Lessons from around the world . OECD.

Sena, A. (2020). The influence of organizational culture, job satisfaction, and professional commitment on innovative behavior of flight instructors at the civil flight school in Indonesia. Warta Ardhia, 46 (1), 1–17.

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10 (1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Shah, M. J., Akhtar, G., Zafar, H., & Riaz, A. (2012). Job satisfaction and motivation of teachers of public educational institutions. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3 (8), 271–281.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7 , 422–445.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics . Pearson.

Thomson, M. M., & Palermo, C. J. (2018). Using an expectancy-value model to understand teaching motivation among nontraditional preservice teachers: A phenomenological study approach. Action in Teacher Education, 40 (2), 151–168.

Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior. Review of Educational Research, 85 (3), 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949

Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73 (1), 71–97.

Torsney, B. M., Lombardi, D., & Ponnock, A. (2019). The role of values in preservice teachers’ intentions for professional engagement. Educational Psychology, 39 (1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1504892

Turner, J. C., Warzon, K. B., & Christensen, A. (2011). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers’ practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (3), 718–762. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211403536

Utterback, J. M. (1971). The process of technological innovation within the firm. Academy of Management Journal, 14 (1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/254712

Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49 (2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369651

Von der Embse, N. P., Sandilos, L. E., Pendergast, L., & Mankin, A. (2016). Teacher stress, teaching-efficacy, and job satisfaction in response to test-based educational accountability policies. Learning and Individual Differences, 50 , 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.001

Wang, K., Li, Y., Luo, W., & Zhang, S. (2020). Selected factors contributing to teacher job satisfaction: A quantitative investigation using 2013 TALIS data. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19 (3), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1586963

Watt, H., & Richardson, P. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18 (5), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2008.06.002

Weinert, F. E., Schrader, F. W., & Helmke, A. (1989). Quality of instruction and achievement outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 13 (8), 895–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90072-4

Weiqi, C. (2007). The structure of secondary school teacher job satisfaction and its relationship with attrition and work enthusiasm. Chinese Education and Society, 40 (5), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932400503

Wernimont, P. F. (1966). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50 (1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022938

Yu, P., Wu, J. J., Chen, I. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2007). Is playfulness a benefit to work? Empirical evidence of professionals in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, 39 (3/4), 412. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2007.013503

Zheng, X., Yin, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher efficacy in China: The mediation of satisfaction and trust. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28 , 509–518.

Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the indicators of quality. In Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 157–260).

Download references

Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Educational Administration, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey

Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş

Department of Measurement and Evaluation in Educational Sciences, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey

Fulya Barış Pekmezci

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Assistant Prof. Behiye Dağdeviren ERTAŞ] and [Assistant Prof. Fulya Barış Pekmezci], the first draft of the manuscript was written by [Assistant Prof. Behiye Dağdeviren ERTAŞ and all authors commented on previous versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behiye Dağdeviren Ertaş .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

There is no conflict of interest between the authors.

Ethical Approval

As all authors, we accept ethical responsibilities.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Ertaş, B.D., Pekmezci, F.B. Career Motivation and Job Satisfaction in Türkiye: Mediating Role of Teacher İnnovativeness and İnstructional Practice. Asia-Pacific Edu Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00846-1

Download citation

Accepted : 15 March 2024

Published : 24 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00846-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Career motivation
• Job satisfaction
• Teacher innovativeness
• Instructional practice
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• West Virginia News
• National News
• International News
• Local Sports
• Sports Columns
• Ohio Sports
• West Virginia Sports
• National Sports
• Letters to the Editor
• Anniversaries
• Engagements
• Special Sections
• Coronavirus
• Classifieds
• Garage Sales
• Become a Newspaper Carrier
• Statement of Values
• Terms of Service
• Submit News
• Browse notices
• Place a notice
• Sponsored Content

• Today's Paper

Subscribe Today

Ohio cancer research to roast main street bank ceo for charity.

ST. CLAIRSVILLE — Ohio Cancer Research will be holding its 28th annual Grand Illusions Saute — a yearly fundraising event to raise money for the charitable organization.

The event will be held at Undo’s West at 6 p.m. May 22. President and CEO of Main Street Bank Richard Lucas is slated to be the guest of honor. The fundraiser aims to honor and roast Lucas and Main Street Bank. The funds raised at this event will go toward basic cancer research, public information and awareness. Individual tickets range from $125 and $200 and tables range from $1,250-$50,000. Sponsors for the fundraiser are Encovs Insurance, Kimball Midwest, and Medical Mutual.

Last year’s guests of honor were founders of Joe’s Tires LLC, Roy and Martha Hershberger. Other past guests of honor included St. Clairsville attorney Michael Shaheen and Richard L. Riesbeck, president and CEO of Riesbeck Food Markets LLC.

“For 27 years, Ohio Cancer Research is proud to have honored and sizzled (OK, just singed, but never fully roasted), the most prominent and successful business and civic leaders in the Ohio Valley to raise funds for basic cancer research, public information, and awareness,” the OCR states in a press release. “Formed in 1982, Ohio Cancer Research is dedicated to finding a cure and improving the quality of life for those going through treatment. Talented researchers have been or are being funded at many of Ohio’s world-class institutions.”

For further information or to place an order, call 614-224 -1127, email [email protected] or visit ohiocancer.org.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

• Daily Newsletter
• Breaking News

Twin nurses reflect on decades at Ohio Valley Medical Center

Bid for belmont school demo advertised.

BELMONT — Village officials recently learned that the abatement and demolition of the old Belmont School building ...

ST. CLAIRSVILLE — Ohio Cancer Research will be holding its 28th annual Grand Illusions Saute — a yearly ...

Earth Day: How one shopper tries to avoid ‘pointless plastic’ in stores

Warmer weather brings road construction

Every mile tells a story

Starting at $4.73/week..

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Sunak accused of making mental illness ‘another front in the culture wars’

Charities say high rates of people signed off work are caused by crumbling public services after years of underinvestment

Rishi Sunak has been accused of making mental ill health “another front in the culture wars”, as critics warned his plan to curb benefits for some with anxiety and depression was an assault on disabled people.

In a speech on welfare , the prime minister said he wanted to explore withdrawing a major cash benefit claimed by people living with mental health problems and replacing it with treatment.

However, charities said treatment was not available now for many, with 1.9 million on the NHS waiting list for mental health services and some experiencing worsening conditions while they remain without help.

Scope, the disability equality charity, said the proposals were “dangerous and risk leaving disabled people destitute”, as well as making people’s ill – health worse by increasing their anxiety. James Taylor, the charity’s director of strategy, said the speech “feels like a full-on assault on disabled people”.

Launching a review of the personal independence payment (Pip), a non-means-tested benefit helping disabled people with the extra costs of their health problems, Sunak said Britain was suffering from a “sicknote culture”.

He added the review would consider asking for more medical evidence before awarding the benefit, look at whether some payments should be one-off rather than ongoing, and examine whether to stop cash payments for some mental health conditions.

The prime minister said it would seek to be “more precise about the type and severity of mental health conditions that should be eligible for Pip”, and that it was “not clear they have the same degree of increased living costs as those with physical conditions”.

Sunak added: “When you look at the numbers, half of people becoming inactive over the last year citing depression and anxiety, tripling in the number of people that have been signed off as sick in the last decade, that doesn’t quite strike us as right.”

The announcement led to an outcry from disability charities, which said the rates of people being signed off work and claiming benefits were caused by crumbling public services, poor quality jobs and high rates of poverty among disabled households.

Charities also raised the alarm about Sunak’s rhetoric on mental ill health, after the prime minister said there was a “risk of over-medicalising what are essentially the everyday worries and challenges of life” in the welfare system.

Dr Sarah Hughes, the chief executive of the mental health charity Mind, said rhetoric that conjures up the image of a “mental health culture that has gone too far … is harmful, inaccurate and contrary to the reality for people up and down the country”.

“The truth is that mental health services are at breaking point following years of underinvestment, with many people getting increasingly unwell while they wait to receive support,” she said.

Labour said people were already crying out for NHS mental health support, and there was an “unprecedented crisis in mental health care”.

Wes Streeting, the shadow health secretary, said: “For the Conservatives to be attempting to make mental ill health another front for their culture wars is not just tone deaf, it’s shameless and irresponsible. Instead of attempting to cover up the scale of the problem, the next Labour government will give people the support they desperately need.”

Sunak set out his proposed changes to disability benefits at the Centre for Social Justice thinktank in London. He said “something has gone wrong” since the pandemic to increase the number of economically inactive people who are long-term sick, especially with mental health conditions.

“Most worrying, the biggest proportion of long-term sickness came from young people … parked on welfare,” Sunak said.

He said the country could not afford the “spiralling” disability welfare bill of £69bn, which was now more than the core schools budget, and claimed the Pip budget was forecast to increase by 50% in the next four years.

Other measures he set out included:

Shifting responsibility for issuing fit notes, formerly known as sicknotes, away from GPs to other “work and health professionals” in order to encourage more people to return to work.

Confirming plans to legislate “in the next parliament” to close benefit claims for anyone who has been claiming for 12 months but is not complying with conditions on accepting available work.

Asking more people on universal credit working part-time to look for more work by increasing the earnings threshold from £743 a month to £892 a month, so people paid below this amount have to seek extra hours.

Confirming plans to tighten the work capability assessment to require more people with “less severe conditions” to seek some form of employment.

Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, told Sky News on Friday: “If you go to the GP and say you are feeling a little bit depressed, and you’re signed off, in 94% of occasions, a box is ticked that says you’re not capable of work whatsoever.

“What we want to do is change the system so that that individual will be referred to – the government is setting up something called Work Well – where they will get both the healthcare support they need, but also a work coach who will be involved to either help them stay in work if they are in employment, or to help them get into work if they’re not.”

Trade unions for doctors and nurses expressed concerns about Sunak’s suggestion that there was a risk of “over-medicalising” mental health conditions, although he insisted that clinical decisions about diagnoses were always a matter for professionals.

The British Medical Association said the prime minister should focus on getting people access to the medical help they needed to get back to work rather than “pushing a hostile rhetoric on ‘sicknote culture’”.

Prof Pat Cullen, the general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, said: “Nursing staff are the largest single workforce in health and care, but they themselves are suffering from increasingly poor long-term health.

“The prime minister’s overtures about ‘sicknote culture’ will be deeply offensive to a profession hit hard by long Covid and a spiralling mental health crisis. Issues of population health are not ones that a government can simply instruct away.”

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said the current and next government would have to find a way of either funding the rising bill for disability benefits or cutting them but that it was still unclear what was behind the increase in claims.

Sam Ray-Chaudhuri, an economist at the IFS, said: “A year or so ago, it seemed plausible that the rapid rise in numbers claiming health-related benefits was a transitory pandemic-related phenomenon. That explanation now appears unlikely, and today’s new forecasts reflect this fact.

“The rising cost of these benefits, and what might be done in response, will be a pressing concern for the next government and make the already tough fiscal situation harder still. Unfortunately, designing the right policy response is made much more difficult by the lack of clarity on what is fuelling the rise.”

• Rishi Sunak
• Mental health
• Universal credit

More on this story

Sunak accused of launching ‘full-on assault on disabled people’

Half a million unpaid carers in UK not claiming £4,200 a year benefit

Thousands of disabled people ‘will get £2,800 a year less under universal credit’

Iain Duncan Smith urges ministers to pause carers’ fines

UK state pensions and benefits: what do the changes in April mean for you?

Labour urged to end two-child benefits cap as research reveals policy pushing families into poverty

UK families to benefit by up to £3,000 from changes to child benefit tax

Young carers in England and Wales ‘forced out of education’ by benefit rules

Child benefit: budget changes mean more cash for families

Most viewed.