attributes of a good research report

Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review

• Regular Article
• Open access
• Published: 18 September 2021
• Volume 31 , pages 679–689, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Drishti Yadav   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-0323 1  

82k Accesses

28 Citations

72 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This review aims to synthesize a published set of evaluative criteria for good qualitative research. The aim is to shed light on existing standards for assessing the rigor of qualitative research encompassing a range of epistemological and ontological standpoints. Using a systematic search strategy, published journal articles that deliberate criteria for rigorous research were identified. Then, references of relevant articles were surveyed to find noteworthy, distinct, and well-defined pointers to good qualitative research. This review presents an investigative assessment of the pivotal features in qualitative research that can permit the readers to pass judgment on its quality and to condemn it as good research when objectively and adequately utilized. Overall, this review underlines the crux of qualitative research and accentuates the necessity to evaluate such research by the very tenets of its being. It also offers some prospects and recommendations to improve the quality of qualitative research. Based on the findings of this review, it is concluded that quality criteria are the aftereffect of socio-institutional procedures and existing paradigmatic conducts. Owing to the paradigmatic diversity of qualitative research, a single and specific set of quality criteria is neither feasible nor anticipated. Since qualitative research is not a cohesive discipline, researchers need to educate and familiarize themselves with applicable norms and decisive factors to evaluate qualitative research from within its theoretical and methodological framework of origin.

Similar content being viewed by others

Good Qualitative Research: Opening up the Debate

Beyond qualitative/quantitative structuralism: the positivist qualitative research and the paradigmatic disclaimer.

What is Qualitative in Research

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

“… It is important to regularly dialogue about what makes for good qualitative research” (Tracy, 2010 , p. 837)

To decide what represents good qualitative research is highly debatable. There are numerous methods that are contained within qualitative research and that are established on diverse philosophical perspectives. Bryman et al., ( 2008 , p. 262) suggest that “It is widely assumed that whereas quality criteria for quantitative research are well‐known and widely agreed, this is not the case for qualitative research.” Hence, the question “how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research” has been continuously debated. There are many areas of science and technology wherein these debates on the assessment of qualitative research have taken place. Examples include various areas of psychology: general psychology (Madill et al., 2000 ); counseling psychology (Morrow, 2005 ); and clinical psychology (Barker & Pistrang, 2005 ), and other disciplines of social sciences: social policy (Bryman et al., 2008 ); health research (Sparkes, 2001 ); business and management research (Johnson et al., 2006 ); information systems (Klein & Myers, 1999 ); and environmental studies (Reid & Gough, 2000 ). In the literature, these debates are enthused by the impression that the blanket application of criteria for good qualitative research developed around the positivist paradigm is improper. Such debates are based on the wide range of philosophical backgrounds within which qualitative research is conducted (e.g., Sandberg, 2000 ; Schwandt, 1996 ). The existence of methodological diversity led to the formulation of different sets of criteria applicable to qualitative research.

Among qualitative researchers, the dilemma of governing the measures to assess the quality of research is not a new phenomenon, especially when the virtuous triad of objectivity, reliability, and validity (Spencer et al., 2004 ) are not adequate. Occasionally, the criteria of quantitative research are used to evaluate qualitative research (Cohen & Crabtree, 2008 ; Lather, 2004 ). Indeed, Howe ( 2004 ) claims that the prevailing paradigm in educational research is scientifically based experimental research. Hypotheses and conjectures about the preeminence of quantitative research can weaken the worth and usefulness of qualitative research by neglecting the prominence of harmonizing match for purpose on research paradigm, the epistemological stance of the researcher, and the choice of methodology. Researchers have been reprimanded concerning this in “paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences” (Lincoln & Guba, 2000 ).

In general, qualitative research tends to come from a very different paradigmatic stance and intrinsically demands distinctive and out-of-the-ordinary criteria for evaluating good research and varieties of research contributions that can be made. This review attempts to present a series of evaluative criteria for qualitative researchers, arguing that their choice of criteria needs to be compatible with the unique nature of the research in question (its methodology, aims, and assumptions). This review aims to assist researchers in identifying some of the indispensable features or markers of high-quality qualitative research. In a nutshell, the purpose of this systematic literature review is to analyze the existing knowledge on high-quality qualitative research and to verify the existence of research studies dealing with the critical assessment of qualitative research based on the concept of diverse paradigmatic stances. Contrary to the existing reviews, this review also suggests some critical directions to follow to improve the quality of qualitative research in different epistemological and ontological perspectives. This review is also intended to provide guidelines for the acceleration of future developments and dialogues among qualitative researchers in the context of assessing the qualitative research.

The rest of this review article is structured in the following fashion: Sect.  Methods describes the method followed for performing this review. Section Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Studies provides a comprehensive description of the criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. This section is followed by a summary of the strategies to improve the quality of qualitative research in Sect.  Improving Quality: Strategies . Section  How to Assess the Quality of the Research Findings? provides details on how to assess the quality of the research findings. After that, some of the quality checklists (as tools to evaluate quality) are discussed in Sect.  Quality Checklists: Tools for Assessing the Quality . At last, the review ends with the concluding remarks presented in Sect.  Conclusions, Future Directions and Outlook . Some prospects in qualitative research for enhancing its quality and usefulness in the social and techno-scientific research community are also presented in Sect.  Conclusions, Future Directions and Outlook .

For this review, a comprehensive literature search was performed from many databases using generic search terms such as Qualitative Research , Criteria , etc . The following databases were chosen for the literature search based on the high number of results: IEEE Explore, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The following keywords (and their combinations using Boolean connectives OR/AND) were adopted for the literature search: qualitative research, criteria, quality, assessment, and validity. The synonyms for these keywords were collected and arranged in a logical structure (see Table 1 ). All publications in journals and conference proceedings later than 1950 till 2021 were considered for the search. Other articles extracted from the references of the papers identified in the electronic search were also included. A large number of publications on qualitative research were retrieved during the initial screening. Hence, to include the searches with the main focus on criteria for good qualitative research, an inclusion criterion was utilized in the search string.

From the selected databases, the search retrieved a total of 765 publications. Then, the duplicate records were removed. After that, based on the title and abstract, the remaining 426 publications were screened for their relevance by using the following inclusion and exclusion criteria (see Table 2 ). Publications focusing on evaluation criteria for good qualitative research were included, whereas those works which delivered theoretical concepts on qualitative research were excluded. Based on the screening and eligibility, 45 research articles were identified that offered explicit criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research and were found to be relevant to this review.

Figure  1 illustrates the complete review process in the form of PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA, i.e., “preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses” is employed in systematic reviews to refine the quality of reporting.

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the search and inclusion process. N represents the number of records

Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Studies

Fundamental criteria: general research quality.

Various researchers have put forward criteria for evaluating qualitative research, which have been summarized in Table 3 . Also, the criteria outlined in Table 4 effectively deliver the various approaches to evaluate and assess the quality of qualitative work. The entries in Table 4 are based on Tracy’s “Eight big‐tent criteria for excellent qualitative research” (Tracy, 2010 ). Tracy argues that high-quality qualitative work should formulate criteria focusing on the worthiness, relevance, timeliness, significance, morality, and practicality of the research topic, and the ethical stance of the research itself. Researchers have also suggested a series of questions as guiding principles to assess the quality of a qualitative study (Mays & Pope, 2020 ). Nassaji ( 2020 ) argues that good qualitative research should be robust, well informed, and thoroughly documented.

Qualitative Research: Interpretive Paradigms

All qualitative researchers follow highly abstract principles which bring together beliefs about ontology, epistemology, and methodology. These beliefs govern how the researcher perceives and acts. The net, which encompasses the researcher’s epistemological, ontological, and methodological premises, is referred to as a paradigm, or an interpretive structure, a “Basic set of beliefs that guides action” (Guba, 1990 ). Four major interpretive paradigms structure the qualitative research: positivist and postpositivist, constructivist interpretive, critical (Marxist, emancipatory), and feminist poststructural. The complexity of these four abstract paradigms increases at the level of concrete, specific interpretive communities. Table 5 presents these paradigms and their assumptions, including their criteria for evaluating research, and the typical form that an interpretive or theoretical statement assumes in each paradigm. Moreover, for evaluating qualitative research, quantitative conceptualizations of reliability and validity are proven to be incompatible (Horsburgh, 2003 ). In addition, a series of questions have been put forward in the literature to assist a reviewer (who is proficient in qualitative methods) for meticulous assessment and endorsement of qualitative research (Morse, 2003 ). Hammersley ( 2007 ) also suggests that guiding principles for qualitative research are advantageous, but methodological pluralism should not be simply acknowledged for all qualitative approaches. Seale ( 1999 ) also points out the significance of methodological cognizance in research studies.

Table 5 reflects that criteria for assessing the quality of qualitative research are the aftermath of socio-institutional practices and existing paradigmatic standpoints. Owing to the paradigmatic diversity of qualitative research, a single set of quality criteria is neither possible nor desirable. Hence, the researchers must be reflexive about the criteria they use in the various roles they play within their research community.

Improving Quality: Strategies

Another critical question is “How can the qualitative researchers ensure that the abovementioned quality criteria can be met?” Lincoln and Guba ( 1986 ) delineated several strategies to intensify each criteria of trustworthiness. Other researchers (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016 ; Shenton, 2004 ) also presented such strategies. A brief description of these strategies is shown in Table 6 .

It is worth mentioning that generalizability is also an integral part of qualitative research (Hays & McKibben, 2021 ). In general, the guiding principle pertaining to generalizability speaks about inducing and comprehending knowledge to synthesize interpretive components of an underlying context. Table 7 summarizes the main metasynthesis steps required to ascertain generalizability in qualitative research.

Figure  2 reflects the crucial components of a conceptual framework and their contribution to decisions regarding research design, implementation, and applications of results to future thinking, study, and practice (Johnson et al., 2020 ). The synergy and interrelationship of these components signifies their role to different stances of a qualitative research study.

Essential elements of a conceptual framework

In a nutshell, to assess the rationale of a study, its conceptual framework and research question(s), quality criteria must take account of the following: lucid context for the problem statement in the introduction; well-articulated research problems and questions; precise conceptual framework; distinct research purpose; and clear presentation and investigation of the paradigms. These criteria would expedite the quality of qualitative research.

How to Assess the Quality of the Research Findings?

The inclusion of quotes or similar research data enhances the confirmability in the write-up of the findings. The use of expressions (for instance, “80% of all respondents agreed that” or “only one of the interviewees mentioned that”) may also quantify qualitative findings (Stenfors et al., 2020 ). On the other hand, the persuasive reason for “why this may not help in intensifying the research” has also been provided (Monrouxe & Rees, 2020 ). Further, the Discussion and Conclusion sections of an article also prove robust markers of high-quality qualitative research, as elucidated in Table 8 .

Quality Checklists: Tools for Assessing the Quality

Numerous checklists are available to speed up the assessment of the quality of qualitative research. However, if used uncritically and recklessly concerning the research context, these checklists may be counterproductive. I recommend that such lists and guiding principles may assist in pinpointing the markers of high-quality qualitative research. However, considering enormous variations in the authors’ theoretical and philosophical contexts, I would emphasize that high dependability on such checklists may say little about whether the findings can be applied in your setting. A combination of such checklists might be appropriate for novice researchers. Some of these checklists are listed below:

The most commonly used framework is Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) (Tong et al., 2007 ). This framework is recommended by some journals to be followed by the authors during article submission.

Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) is another checklist that has been created particularly for medical education (O’Brien et al., 2014 ).

Also, Tracy ( 2010 ) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2021 ) offer criteria for qualitative research relevant across methods and approaches.

Further, researchers have also outlined different criteria as hallmarks of high-quality qualitative research. For instance, the “Road Trip Checklist” (Epp & Otnes, 2021 ) provides a quick reference to specific questions to address different elements of high-quality qualitative research.

Conclusions, Future Directions, and Outlook

This work presents a broad review of the criteria for good qualitative research. In addition, this article presents an exploratory analysis of the essential elements in qualitative research that can enable the readers of qualitative work to judge it as good research when objectively and adequately utilized. In this review, some of the essential markers that indicate high-quality qualitative research have been highlighted. I scope them narrowly to achieve rigor in qualitative research and note that they do not completely cover the broader considerations necessary for high-quality research. This review points out that a universal and versatile one-size-fits-all guideline for evaluating the quality of qualitative research does not exist. In other words, this review also emphasizes the non-existence of a set of common guidelines among qualitative researchers. In unison, this review reinforces that each qualitative approach should be treated uniquely on account of its own distinctive features for different epistemological and disciplinary positions. Owing to the sensitivity of the worth of qualitative research towards the specific context and the type of paradigmatic stance, researchers should themselves analyze what approaches can be and must be tailored to ensemble the distinct characteristics of the phenomenon under investigation. Although this article does not assert to put forward a magic bullet and to provide a one-stop solution for dealing with dilemmas about how, why, or whether to evaluate the “goodness” of qualitative research, it offers a platform to assist the researchers in improving their qualitative studies. This work provides an assembly of concerns to reflect on, a series of questions to ask, and multiple sets of criteria to look at, when attempting to determine the quality of qualitative research. Overall, this review underlines the crux of qualitative research and accentuates the need to evaluate such research by the very tenets of its being. Bringing together the vital arguments and delineating the requirements that good qualitative research should satisfy, this review strives to equip the researchers as well as reviewers to make well-versed judgment about the worth and significance of the qualitative research under scrutiny. In a nutshell, a comprehensive portrayal of the research process (from the context of research to the research objectives, research questions and design, speculative foundations, and from approaches of collecting data to analyzing the results, to deriving inferences) frequently proliferates the quality of a qualitative research.

Prospects : A Road Ahead for Qualitative Research

Irrefutably, qualitative research is a vivacious and evolving discipline wherein different epistemological and disciplinary positions have their own characteristics and importance. In addition, not surprisingly, owing to the sprouting and varied features of qualitative research, no consensus has been pulled off till date. Researchers have reflected various concerns and proposed several recommendations for editors and reviewers on conducting reviews of critical qualitative research (Levitt et al., 2021 ; McGinley et al., 2021 ). Following are some prospects and a few recommendations put forward towards the maturation of qualitative research and its quality evaluation:

In general, most of the manuscript and grant reviewers are not qualitative experts. Hence, it is more likely that they would prefer to adopt a broad set of criteria. However, researchers and reviewers need to keep in mind that it is inappropriate to utilize the same approaches and conducts among all qualitative research. Therefore, future work needs to focus on educating researchers and reviewers about the criteria to evaluate qualitative research from within the suitable theoretical and methodological context.

There is an urgent need to refurbish and augment critical assessment of some well-known and widely accepted tools (including checklists such as COREQ, SRQR) to interrogate their applicability on different aspects (along with their epistemological ramifications).

Efforts should be made towards creating more space for creativity, experimentation, and a dialogue between the diverse traditions of qualitative research. This would potentially help to avoid the enforcement of one's own set of quality criteria on the work carried out by others.

Moreover, journal reviewers need to be aware of various methodological practices and philosophical debates.

It is pivotal to highlight the expressions and considerations of qualitative researchers and bring them into a more open and transparent dialogue about assessing qualitative research in techno-scientific, academic, sociocultural, and political rooms.

Frequent debates on the use of evaluative criteria are required to solve some potentially resolved issues (including the applicability of a single set of criteria in multi-disciplinary aspects). Such debates would not only benefit the group of qualitative researchers themselves, but primarily assist in augmenting the well-being and vivacity of the entire discipline.

To conclude, I speculate that the criteria, and my perspective, may transfer to other methods, approaches, and contexts. I hope that they spark dialog and debate – about criteria for excellent qualitative research and the underpinnings of the discipline more broadly – and, therefore, help improve the quality of a qualitative study. Further, I anticipate that this review will assist the researchers to contemplate on the quality of their own research, to substantiate research design and help the reviewers to review qualitative research for journals. On a final note, I pinpoint the need to formulate a framework (encompassing the prerequisites of a qualitative study) by the cohesive efforts of qualitative researchers of different disciplines with different theoretic-paradigmatic origins. I believe that tailoring such a framework (of guiding principles) paves the way for qualitative researchers to consolidate the status of qualitative research in the wide-ranging open science debate. Dialogue on this issue across different approaches is crucial for the impending prospects of socio-techno-educational research.

Amin, M. E. K., Nørgaard, L. S., Cavaco, A. M., Witry, M. J., Hillman, L., Cernasev, A., & Desselle, S. P. (2020). Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16 (10), 1472–1482.

Article   Google Scholar  

Barker, C., & Pistrang, N. (2005). Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: Implications for conducting and evaluating research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35 (3–4), 201–212.

Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11 (4), 261–276.

Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2 (2), 1–13.

CASP (2021). CASP checklists. Retrieved May 2021 from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. The Annals of Family Medicine, 6 (4), 331–339.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). Sage Publications Ltd.

Google Scholar  

Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38 (3), 215–229.

Epp, A. M., & Otnes, C. C. (2021). High-quality qualitative research: Getting into gear. Journal of Service Research . https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520961445

Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. In Alternative paradigms conference, mar, 1989, Indiana u, school of education, San Francisco, ca, us . Sage Publications, Inc.

Hammersley, M. (2007). The issue of quality in qualitative research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30 (3), 287–305.

Haven, T. L., Errington, T. M., Gleditsch, K. S., van Grootel, L., Jacobs, A. M., Kern, F. G., & Mokkink, L. B. (2020). Preregistering qualitative research: A Delphi study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 , 1609406920976417.

Hays, D. G., & McKibben, W. B. (2021). Promoting rigorous research: Generalizability and qualitative research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 99 (2), 178–188.

Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12 (2), 307–312.

Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (1), 42–46.

Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84 (1), 7120.

Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2006). Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (3), 131–156.

Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23 (1), 67–93.

Lather, P. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (1), 15–34.

Levitt, H. M., Morrill, Z., Collins, K. M., & Rizo, J. L. (2021). The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68 (3), 357.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986 (30), 73–84.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Sage Publications.

Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91 (1), 1–20.

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2020). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Health Care . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867.ch15

McGinley, S., Wei, W., Zhang, L., & Zheng, Y. (2021). The state of qualitative research in hospitality: A 5-year review 2014 to 2019. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62 (1), 8–20.

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, US.

Meyer, M., & Dykes, J. (2019). Criteria for rigor in visualization design study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26 (1), 87–97.

Monrouxe, L. V., & Rees, C. E. (2020). When I say… quantification in qualitative research. Medical Education, 54 (3), 186–187.

Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 250.

Morse, J. M. (2003). A review committee’s guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 13 (6), 833–851.

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24 (4), 427–431.

O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89 (9), 1245–1251.

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 , 1609406919899220.

Reid, A., & Gough, S. (2000). Guidelines for reporting and evaluating qualitative research: What are the alternatives? Environmental Education Research, 6 (1), 59–91.

Rocco, T. S. (2010). Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. Human Resource Development International . https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2010.501959

Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (1), 9–25.

Schwandt, T. A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2 (1), 58–72.

Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5 (4), 465–478.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22 (2), 63–75.

Sparkes, A. C. (2001). Myth 94: Qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qualitative Health Research, 11 (4), 538–552.

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence.

Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17 (6), 596–599.

Taylor, E. W., Beck, J., & Ainsworth, E. (2001). Publishing qualitative adult education research: A peer review perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 33 (2), 163–179.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19 (6), 349–357.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16 (10), 837–851.

Download references

Open access funding provided by TU Wien (TUW).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Informatics, Technische Universität Wien, 1040, Vienna, Austria

Drishti Yadav

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drishti Yadav .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Yadav, D. Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 31 , 679–689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Download citation

Accepted : 28 August 2021

Published : 18 September 2021

Issue Date : December 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Qualitative research
• Evaluative criteria
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Research Report
• Post last modified: 11 January 2022
• Reading time: 25 mins read
• Post category: Research Methodology

What is Research Report?

Research reporting is the oral or written presentation of the findings in such detail and form as to be readily understood and assessed by the society, economy or particularly by the researchers.

As earlier said that it is the final stage of the research process and its purpose is to convey to interested persons the whole result of the study. Report writing is common to both academic and managerial situations. In academics, a research report is prepared for comprehensive and application-oriented learning. In businesses or organisations, reports are used for the basis of decision making.

Table of Content

• 1 What is Research Report?
• 2 Research Report Definition
• 3.1 Preliminary Part
• 3.2 Introduction of the Report
• 3.3 Review of Literature
• 3.4 The Research Methodology
• 3.5 Results
• 3.6 Concluding Remarks
• 3.7 Bibliography
• 4 Significance of Report Writing
• 5 Qualities of Good Report
• 6.1 Analysis of the subject matter
• 6.2 Research outline
• 6.3 Preparation of rough draft
• 6.4 Rewriting and polishing
• 6.5 Writing the final draft
• 7 Precautions for Writing Research Reports
• 8.1.1 Technical Report
• 8.1.2 Popular Report
• 8.2.1 Written Report
• 8.2.2 Oral Report

Research Report Definition

According to C. A. Brown , “A report is a communication from someone who has information to someone who wants to use that information.”

According to Goode and Hatt , “The preparation of report is the final stage of research, and it’s purpose is to convey to the interested persons the whole result of the study, in sufficient detail and so arranged as to enable each reader to comprehend the data and to determine for himself the validity of the conclusions.”

It is clear from the above definitions of a research report, it is a brief account of the problem of investigation, the justification of its selection and the procedure of analysis and interpretation. It is only a summary of the entire research proceedings.

In other words, it can be defined as written documents, which presents information in a specialized and concise manner.

Contents of Research Report

Although no hard and fast rules can be laid down, the report must contain the following points.

• Acknowledgement
• Table of contents
• List of tables
• List of graphs
• Introduction
• Background of the research study
• Statement of the problem
• Brief outline of the chapters
• Books review
• Review of articles published in books, journals, periodicals, etc
• Review of articles published in leading newspapers
• Working papers / discusssion paper / study reports
• Articles on authorised websites
• A broad conclusion and indications for further research
• The theoretical framework (variables)
• Model / hypothesis
• Instruments for data collection
• Data collection
• Pilot study
• Processing of data
• Hypothesis / model testing
• Data analysis and interpretation
• Tables and figures
• Conclusions
• Shortcomings
• Suggestions to the problems
• Direction for further research

Preliminary Part

The preliminary part may have seven major components – cover, title, preface, acknowledgement, table of contents, list of tables, list of graphs. Long reports presented in book form have a cover made up of a card sheet. The cover contains title of the research report, the authority to whom the report is submitted, name of the author, etc.

The preface introduces the report to the readers. It gives a very brief introduction of the report. In the acknowledgements author mention names of persons and organisations that have extended co-operation and helped in the various stages of research. Table of contents is essential. It gives the title and page number of each chapter.

Introduction of the Report

The introduction of the research report should clearly and logically bring out the background of the problem addressed in the research. The purpose of the introduction is to introduce the research project to the readers. A clear statement of the problem with specific questions to be answered is presented in the introduction. It contains a brief outline of the chapters.

Review of Literature

The third section reviews the important literature related to the study. A comprehensive review of the research literature referred to must be made. Previous research studies and the important writings in the area under study should be reviewed. Review of literature is helpful to provide a background for the development of the present study.

The researcher may review concerned books, articles published in edited books, journals and periodicals. Researcher may also take review of articles published in leading newspapers. A researcher should study working papers/discussion papers/study reports. It is essential for a broad conclusion and indications for further research.

The Research Methodology

Research methodology is an integral part of the research. It should clearly indicate the universe and the selection of samples, techniques of data collection, analysis and interpretation, statistical techniques, etc.

Results contain pilot study, processing of data, hypothesis/model testing, data analysis and interpretation, tables and figures, etc. This is the heart of the research report. If a pilot study is planned to be used, it’s purpose should be given in the research methodology.

The collected data and the information should be edited, coded, tabulated and analysed with a view to arriving at a valid and authentic conclusion. Tables and figures are used to clarify the significant relationship. The results obtained through tables, graphs should be critically interpreted.

Concluding Remarks

The concluding remarks should discuss the results obtained in the earlier sections, as well as their usefulness and implications. It contains findings, conclusions, shortcomings, suggestions to the problem and direction for future research. Findings are statements of factual information based upon the data analysis.

Conclusions must clearly explain whether the hypothesis have been established and rejected. This part requires great expertise and preciseness. A report should also refer to the limitations of the applicability of the research inferences. It is essential to suggest the theoretical, practical and policy implications of the research. The suggestions should be supported by scientific and logical arguments. The future direction of research based on the work completed should also be outlined.

Bibliography

The bibliography is an alphabetic list of books, journal articles, reports, etc, published or unpublished, read, referred to, examined by the researcher in preparing the report. The bibliography should follow standard formats for books, journal articles, research reports.

The end of the research report may consist of appendices, listed in respect of all technical data. Appendices are for the purpose of providing detailed data or information that would be too cumbersome within the main body of the research report.

Significance of Report Writing

Report writing is an important communication medium in organisations. The most crucial findings might have come out through a research report. Report is common to academics and managers also. Reports are used for comprehensive and application oriented learning in academics. In organisations, reports are used for the basis of decision making. The importance of report writing can be discussed as under.

Through research reports, a manager or an executive can quickly get an idea of a current scenario which improves his information base for making sound decisions affecting future operations of the company or enterprise. The research report acts as a means of communication of various research findings to the interested parties, organisations and general public.

Good report writing play, a significant role of conveying unknown facts about the phenomenon to the concerned parties. This may provide new insights and new opportunities to the people. Research report plays a key role in making effective decisions in marketing, production, banking, materials, human resource development and government also. Good report writing is used for economic planning and optimum utilisation of resources for the development of a nation.

Report writing facilitates the validation of generalisation. A research report is an end product of research. As earlier said that report writing provides useful information in arriving at rational decisions that may reform the business and society. The findings, conclusions, suggestions and recommendations are useful to academicians, scholars and policymakers. Report writing provides reference material for further research in the same or similar areas of research to the concerned parties.

While preparing a research report, a researcher should take some proper precautions. Report writing should be simple, lucid and systematic. Report writing should be written speedily without interrupting the continuity of thought. The report writing should sustain the interest of readers.

Qualities of Good Report

Report writing is a highly skilled job. It is a process of analysing, understanding and consolidating the findings and projecting a meaningful view of the phenomenon studied. A good report writing is essential for effective communication.

Following are the essential qualities of good report:

• A research report is essentially a scientific documentation. It should have a suggestive title, headings and sub-headings, paragraphs arranged in a logical sequence.
• Good research report should include everything that is relevant and exclude everything that is irrelevant. It means that it should contain the facts rather than opinion.
• The language of the report should be simple and unambiguous. It means that it should be free from biases of the researchers derived from the past experience. Confusion, pretentiousness and pomposity should be carefully guarded against. It means that the language of the report should be simple, employing appropriate words, idioms and expressions.
• The report must be free from grammatical mistakes. It must be grammatically accurate. Faulty construction of sentences makes the meaning of the narrative obscure and ambiguous.
• The report has to take into consideration two facts. Firstly, for whom the report is meant and secondly, what is his level of knowledge. The report has to look to the subject matter of the report and the fact as to the level of knowledge of the person for whom it is meant. Because all reports are not meant for research scholars.

Steps in Writing Research Report

Report writing is a time consuming and expensive exercise. Therefore, reports have to be very sharply focused in purpose content and readership. There is no single universally acceptable method of writing a research report.

Following are the general steps in writing a research report:

Analysis of the subject matter

Research outline, preparation of rough draft, rewriting and polishing, writing the final draft.

This is the first and important step in writing a research report. It is concerned with the development of a subject. Subject matter should be written in a clear, logical and concise manner. The style adopted should be open, straightforward and dignified and folk style language should be avoided.

The data, the reliability and validity of the results of the statistical analysis should be in the form of tables, figures and equations. All redundancy in the data or results presented should be eliminated.

The research outline is an organisational framework prepared by the researcher well in advance. It is an aid to logical organisation of material and a reminder of the points to be stressed in the report. In the process of writing, if need be, outline may be revised accordingly.

Time and place of the study, scope and limitations of the study, study design, summary of pilot study, methods of data collection, analysis interpretation, etc., may be included in a research outline.

Having prepared the primary and secondary data, the researcher has to prepare a rough draft. While preparing the rough draft, the researcher should keep the objectives of the research in mind, and focus on one objective at a time. The researcher should make a checklist of the important points that are necessary to be covered in the manuscript. A researcher should use dictionary and relevant reference materials as and when required.

This is an important step in writing a research report. It takes more time than a rough draft. While rewriting and polishing, a researcher should check the report for weakness in logical development or presentation. He should take breaks in between rewriting and polishing since this gives the time to incubate the ideas.

The last and important step is writing the final draft. The language of the report should be simple, employing appropriate words and expressions and should avoid vague expressions such as ‘it seems’ and ‘there may be’ etc.

It should not used personal pronouns, such as I, We, My, Us, etc and should substitute these by such expressions as a researcher, investigator, etc. Before the final drafting of the report, it is advisable that the researcher should prepare a first draft for critical considerations and possible improvements. It will be helpful in writing the final draft. Finally, the report should be logically outlined with the future directions of the research based on the work completed.

Precautions for Writing Research Reports

A research report is a means of conveying the research study to a specific target audience. The following precautions should be taken while preparing a research report:

• Its hould belong enough to cover the subject and short enough to preserve interest.
• It should not be dull and complicated.
• It should be simple, without the usage of abstract terms and technical jargons.
• It should offer ready availability of findings with the help of charts, tables and graphs, as readers prefer quick knowledge of main findings.
• The layout of the report should be in accordance with the objectives of the research study.
• There should be no grammatical errors and writing should adhere to the techniques of report writing in case of quotations, footnotes and documentations.
• It should be original, intellectual and contribute to the solution of a problem or add knowledge to the concerned field.
• Appendices should been listed with respect to all the technical data in the report.
• It should be attractive, neat and clean, whether handwritten or typed.
• The report writer should refrain from confusing the possessive form of the word ‘it’ is with ‘it’s.’ The accurate possessive form of ‘it is’ is ‘its.’ The use of ‘it’s’ is the contractive form of ‘it is.
• A report should not have contractions. Examples are ‘didn’t’ or ‘it’s.’ In report writing, it is best to use the non-contractive form. Therefore, the examples would be replaced by ‘did not’ and ‘it is.’ Using ‘Figure’ instead of ‘Fig.’ and ‘Table’ instead of ‘Tab.’ will spare the reader of having to translate the abbreviations, while reading. If abbreviations are used, use them consistently throughout the report. For example, do not switch among ‘versus,’ and ‘vs’.
• It is advisable to avoid using the word ‘very’ and other such words that try to embellish a description. They do not add any extra meaning and, therefore, should be dropped.
• Repetition hampers lucidity. Report writers must avoid repeating the same word more than once within a sentence.
• When you use the word ‘this’ or ‘these’ make sure you indicate to what you are referring. This reduces the ambiguity in your writing and helps to tie sentences together.
• Do not use the word ‘they’ to refer to a singular person. You can either rewrite the sentence to avoid needing such a reference or use the singular ‘he or she.’

Types of Research Report

Research reports are designed in order to convey and record the information that will be of practical use to the reader. It is organized into distinct units of specific and highly visible information. The kind of audience addressed in the research report decides the type of report.

Research reports can be categorized on the following basis:

Classification on the Basis of Information

Classification on the basis of representation.

Following are the ways through which the results of the research report can be presented on the basis of information contained:

Technical Report

A technical report is written for other researchers. In writing the technical reports, the importance is mainly given to the methods that have been used to collect the information and data, the presumptions that are made and finally, the various presentation techniques that are used to present the findings and data.

Following are main features of a technical report:

• Summary: It covers a brief analysis of the findings of the research in a very few pages. 
• Nature: It contains the reasons for which the research is undertaken, the analysis and the data that is required in order to prepare a report. 
• Methods employed: It contains a description of the methods that were employed in order to collect the data. 
• Data: It covers a brief analysis of the various sources from which the data has been collected with their features and drawbacks 
• Analysis of data and presentation of the findings: It contains the various forms through which the data that has been analysed can be presented. 
• Conclusions: It contains a brief explanation of findings of the research. 
• Bibliography: It contains a detailed analysis of the various bibliographies that have been used in order to conduct a research. 
• Technical appendices: It contains the appendices for the technical matters and for questionnaires and mathematical derivations. 
• Index: The index of the technical report must be provided at the end of the report.

Popular Report

A popular report is formulated when there is a need to draw conclusions of the findings of the research report. One of the main points of consideration that should be kept in mind while formulating a research report is that it must be simple and attractive. It must be written in a very simple manner that is understandable to all. It must also be made attractive by using large prints, various sub-headings and by giving cartoons occasionally.

Following are the main points that must be kept in mind while preparing a popular report:

• Findings and their implications : While preparing a popular report, main importance is given to the findings of the information and the conclusions that can be drawn out of these findings.
• Recommendations for action : If there are any deviations in the report then recommendations are made for taking corrective action in order to rectify the errors.
• Objective of the study : In a popular report, the specific objective for which the research has been undertaken is presented.
• Methods employed : The report must contain the various methods that has been employed in order to conduct a research.
• Results : The results of the research findings must be presented in a suitable and appropriate manner by taking the help of charts and diagrams.
• Technical appendices : The report must contain an in-depth information used to collect the data in the form of appendices.

Following are the ways through which the results of the research report can be presented on the basis of representation:

• Writtenreport
• Oral report

Written Report

A written report plays a vital role in every business operation. The manner in which an organization writes business letters and business reports creates an impression of its standard. Therefore, the organization should emphasize on the improvement of the writing skills of the employees in order to maintain effective relations with their customers.

Writing effective written reports requires a lot of hard work. Therefore, before you begin writing, it is important to know the objective, i.e., the purpose of writing, collection and organization of required data.

Oral Report

At times, oral presentation of the results that are drawn out of research is considered effective, particularly in cases where policy recommendations are to be made. This approach proves beneficial because it provides a medium of interaction between a listener and a speaker. This leads to a better understanding of the findings and their implications.

However, the main drawback of oral presentation is the lack of any permanent records related to the research. Oral presentation of the report is also effective when it is supported with various visual devices, such as slides, wall charts and whiteboards that help in better understanding of the research reports.

Business Ethics

( Click on Topic to Read )

• What is Ethics?
• What is Business Ethics?
• Values, Norms, Beliefs and Standards in Business Ethics
• Indian Ethos in Management
• Ethical Issues in Marketing
• Ethical Issues in HRM
• Ethical Issues in IT
• Ethical Issues in Production and Operations Management
• Ethical Issues in Finance and Accounting
• What is Corporate Governance?
• What is Ownership Concentration?
• What is Ownership Composition?
• Types of Companies in India
• Internal Corporate Governance
• External Corporate Governance
• Corporate Governance in India
• What is Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)?
• What is Assessment of Risk?
• What is Risk Register?
• Risk Management Committee

Corporate social responsibility (CSR)

• Theories of CSR
• Arguments Against CSR
• Business Case for CSR
• Importance of CSR in India
• Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility
• Developing a CSR Strategy
• Implement CSR Commitments
• CSR Marketplace
• CSR at Workplace
• Environmental CSR
• CSR with Communities and in Supply Chain
• Community Interventions
• CSR Monitoring
• CSR Reporting
• Voluntary Codes in CSR
• What is Corporate Ethics?

Lean Six Sigma

• What is Six Sigma?
• What is Lean Six Sigma?
• Value and Waste in Lean Six Sigma
• Six Sigma Team
• MAIC Six Sigma
• Six Sigma in Supply Chains
• What is Binomial, Poisson, Normal Distribution?
• What is Sigma Level?
• What is DMAIC in Six Sigma?
• What is DMADV in Six Sigma?
• Six Sigma Project Charter
• Project Decomposition in Six Sigma
• Critical to Quality (CTQ) Six Sigma
• Process Mapping Six Sigma
• Flowchart and SIPOC
• Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility
• Statistical Diagram
• Lean Techniques for Optimisation Flow
• Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
• What is Process Audits?
• Six Sigma Implementation at Ford
• IBM Uses Six Sigma to Drive Behaviour Change
• Research Methodology
• What is Research?

What is Hypothesis?

• Sampling Method

Research Methods

• Data Collection in Research

Methods of Collecting Data

• Application of Business Research
• Levels of Measurement
• What is Sampling?
• Hypothesis Testing
• What is Management?
• Planning in Management
• Decision Making in Management
• What is Controlling?
• What is Coordination?
• What is Staffing?
• Organization Structure
• What is Departmentation?
• Span of Control
• What is Authority?
• Centralization vs Decentralization
• Organizing in Management
• Schools of Management Thought
• Classical Management Approach
• Is Management an Art or Science?
• Who is a Manager?

Operations Research

• What is Operations Research?
• Operation Research Models
• Linear Programming
• Linear Programming Graphic Solution
• Linear Programming Simplex Method
• Linear Programming Artificial Variable Technique
• Duality in Linear Programming
• Transportation Problem Initial Basic Feasible Solution
• Transportation Problem Finding Optimal Solution
• Project Network Analysis with Critical Path Method
• Project Network Analysis Methods
• Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
• Simulation in Operation Research
• Replacement Models in Operation Research

Operation Management

• What is Strategy?
• What is Operations Strategy?
• Operations Competitive Dimensions
• Operations Strategy Formulation Process
• What is Strategic Fit?
• Strategic Design Process
• Focused Operations Strategy
• Corporate Level Strategy
• Expansion Strategies
• Stability Strategies
• Retrenchment Strategies
• Competitive Advantage
• Strategic Choice and Strategic Alternatives
• What is Production Process?
• What is Process Technology?
• What is Process Improvement?
• Strategic Capacity Management
• Production and Logistics Strategy
• Taxonomy of Supply Chain Strategies
• Factors Considered in Supply Chain Planning
• Operational and Strategic Issues in Global Logistics
• Logistics Outsourcing Strategy
• What is Supply Chain Mapping?
• Supply Chain Process Restructuring
• Points of Differentiation
• Re-engineering Improvement in SCM
• What is Supply Chain Drivers?
• Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model
• Customer Service and Cost Trade Off
• Internal and External Performance Measures
• Linking Supply Chain and Business Performance
• Netflix’s Niche Focused Strategy
• Disney and Pixar Merger
• Process Planning at Mcdonald’s

Service Operations Management

• What is Service?
• What is Service Operations Management?
• What is Service Design?
• Service Design Process
• Service Delivery
• What is Service Quality?
• Gap Model of Service Quality
• Juran Trilogy
• Service Performance Measurement
• Service Decoupling
• IT Service Operation
• Service Operations Management in Different Sector

Procurement Management

• What is Procurement Management?
• Procurement Negotiation
• Types of Requisition
• RFX in Procurement
• What is Purchasing Cycle?
• Vendor Managed Inventory
• Internal Conflict During Purchasing Operation
• Spend Analysis in Procurement
• Sourcing in Procurement
• Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Procurement
• Blacklisting of Suppliers in Procurement
• Total Cost of Ownership in Procurement
• Incoterms in Procurement
• Documents Used in International Procurement
• Transportation and Logistics Strategy
• What is Capital Equipment?
• Procurement Process of Capital Equipment
• Acquisition of Technology in Procurement
• What is E-Procurement?
• E-marketplace and Online Catalogues
• Fixed Price and Cost Reimbursement Contracts
• Contract Cancellation in Procurement
• Ethics in Procurement
• Legal Aspects of Procurement
• Global Sourcing in Procurement
• Intermediaries and Countertrade in Procurement

Strategic Management

• What is Strategic Management?
• What is Value Chain Analysis?
• Mission Statement
• Business Level Strategy
• What is SWOT Analysis?
• What is Competitive Advantage?
• What is Vision?
• What is Ansoff Matrix?
• Prahalad and Gary Hammel
• Strategic Management In Global Environment
• Competitor Analysis Framework
• Competitive Rivalry Analysis
• Competitive Dynamics
• What is Competitive Rivalry?
• Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy
• What is PESTLE Analysis?
• Fragmentation and Consolidation Of Industries
• What is Technology Life Cycle?
• What is Diversification Strategy?
• What is Corporate Restructuring Strategy?
• Resources and Capabilities of Organization
• Role of Leaders In Functional-Level Strategic Management
• Functional Structure In Functional Level Strategy Formulation
• Information And Control System
• What is Strategy Gap Analysis?
• Issues In Strategy Implementation
• Matrix Organizational Structure
• What is Strategic Management Process?

Supply Chain

• What is Supply Chain Management?
• Supply Chain Planning and Measuring Strategy Performance
• What is Warehousing?
• What is Packaging?
• What is Inventory Management?
• What is Material Handling?
• What is Order Picking?
• Receiving and Dispatch, Processes
• What is Warehouse Design?
• What is Warehousing Costs?

You Might Also Like

What is questionnaire design characteristics, types, don’t, what is measure of dispersion, what is measure of skewness, ethics in research, sampling process and characteristics of good sample design, types of errors affecting research design, what is sample size determination, formula, determining,, what is experiments variables, types, lab, field, types of charts used in data analysis, leave a reply cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

World's Best Online Courses at One Place

We’ve spent the time in finding, so you can spend your time in learning

Digital Marketing

Personal growth.

Development

• Research Report: Definition, Types + [Writing Guide]

One of the reasons for carrying out research is to add to the existing body of knowledge. Therefore, when conducting research, you need to document your processes and findings in a research report. 

With a research report, it is easy to outline the findings of your systematic investigation and any gaps needing further inquiry. Knowing how to create a detailed research report will prove useful when you need to conduct research.  

What is a Research Report?

A research report is a well-crafted document that outlines the processes, data, and findings of a systematic investigation. It is an important document that serves as a first-hand account of the research process, and it is typically considered an objective and accurate source of information.

In many ways, a research report can be considered as a summary of the research process that clearly highlights findings, recommendations, and other important details. Reading a well-written research report should provide you with all the information you need about the core areas of the research process.

Features of a Research Report 

So how do you recognize a research report when you see one? Here are some of the basic features that define a research report. 

• It is a detailed presentation of research processes and findings, and it usually includes tables and graphs. 
• It is written in a formal language.
• A research report is usually written in the third person.
• It is informative and based on first-hand verifiable information.
• It is formally structured with headings, sections, and bullet points.
• It always includes recommendations for future actions. 

Types of Research Report 

The research report is classified based on two things; nature of research and target audience.

Nature of Research

• Qualitative Research Report

This is the type of report written for qualitative research . It outlines the methods, processes, and findings of a qualitative method of systematic investigation. In educational research, a qualitative research report provides an opportunity for one to apply his or her knowledge and develop skills in planning and executing qualitative research projects.

A qualitative research report is usually descriptive in nature. Hence, in addition to presenting details of the research process, you must also create a descriptive narrative of the information.

• Quantitative Research Report

A quantitative research report is a type of research report that is written for quantitative research. Quantitative research is a type of systematic investigation that pays attention to numerical or statistical values in a bid to find answers to research questions. 

In this type of research report, the researcher presents quantitative data to support the research process and findings. Unlike a qualitative research report that is mainly descriptive, a quantitative research report works with numbers; that is, it is numerical in nature. 

Target Audience

Also, a research report can be said to be technical or popular based on the target audience. If you’re dealing with a general audience, you would need to present a popular research report, and if you’re dealing with a specialized audience, you would submit a technical report. 

• Technical Research Report

A technical research report is a detailed document that you present after carrying out industry-based research. This report is highly specialized because it provides information for a technical audience; that is, individuals with above-average knowledge in the field of study. 

In a technical research report, the researcher is expected to provide specific information about the research process, including statistical analyses and sampling methods. Also, the use of language is highly specialized and filled with jargon. 

Examples of technical research reports include legal and medical research reports. 

• Popular Research Report

A popular research report is one for a general audience; that is, for individuals who do not necessarily have any knowledge in the field of study. A popular research report aims to make information accessible to everyone. 

It is written in very simple language, which makes it easy to understand the findings and recommendations. Examples of popular research reports are the information contained in newspapers and magazines. 

Importance of a Research Report 

• Knowledge Transfer: As already stated above, one of the reasons for carrying out research is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge, and this is made possible with a research report. A research report serves as a means to effectively communicate the findings of a systematic investigation to all and sundry.  
• Identification of Knowledge Gaps: With a research report, you’d be able to identify knowledge gaps for further inquiry. A research report shows what has been done while hinting at other areas needing systematic investigation. 
• In market research, a research report would help you understand the market needs and peculiarities at a glance. 
• A research report allows you to present information in a precise and concise manner. 
• It is time-efficient and practical because, in a research report, you do not have to spend time detailing the findings of your research work in person. You can easily send out the report via email and have stakeholders look at it. 

Guide to Writing a Research Report

A lot of detail goes into writing a research report, and getting familiar with the different requirements would help you create the ideal research report. A research report is usually broken down into multiple sections, which allows for a concise presentation of information.

Structure and Example of a Research Report

This is the title of your systematic investigation. Your title should be concise and point to the aims, objectives, and findings of a research report. 

• Table of Contents

This is like a compass that makes it easier for readers to navigate the research report.

An abstract is an overview that highlights all important aspects of the research including the research method, data collection process, and research findings. Think of an abstract as a summary of your research report that presents pertinent information in a concise manner. 

An abstract is always brief; typically 100-150 words and goes straight to the point. The focus of your research abstract should be the 5Ws and 1H format – What, Where, Why, When, Who and How. 

• Introduction

Here, the researcher highlights the aims and objectives of the systematic investigation as well as the problem which the systematic investigation sets out to solve. When writing the report introduction, it is also essential to indicate whether the purposes of the research were achieved or would require more work.

In the introduction section, the researcher specifies the research problem and also outlines the significance of the systematic investigation. Also, the researcher is expected to outline any jargons and terminologies that are contained in the research.  

• Literature Review

A literature review is a written survey of existing knowledge in the field of study. In other words, it is the section where you provide an overview and analysis of different research works that are relevant to your systematic investigation. 

It highlights existing research knowledge and areas needing further investigation, which your research has sought to fill. At this stage, you can also hint at your research hypothesis and its possible implications for the existing body of knowledge in your field of study. 

• An Account of Investigation

This is a detailed account of the research process, including the methodology, sample, and research subjects. Here, you are expected to provide in-depth information on the research process including the data collection and analysis procedures. 

In a quantitative research report, you’d need to provide information surveys, questionnaires and other quantitative data collection methods used in your research. In a qualitative research report, you are expected to describe the qualitative data collection methods used in your research including interviews and focus groups. 

In this section, you are expected to present the results of the systematic investigation. 

This section further explains the findings of the research, earlier outlined. Here, you are expected to present a justification for each outcome and show whether the results are in line with your hypotheses or if other research studies have come up with similar results.

• Conclusions

This is a summary of all the information in the report. It also outlines the significance of the entire study. 

• References and Appendices

This section contains a list of all the primary and secondary research sources. 

Tips for Writing a Research Report

• Define the Context for the Report

As is obtainable when writing an essay, defining the context for your research report would help you create a detailed yet concise document. This is why you need to create an outline before writing so that you do not miss out on anything. 

• Define your Audience

Writing with your audience in mind is essential as it determines the tone of the report. If you’re writing for a general audience, you would want to present the information in a simple and relatable manner. For a specialized audience, you would need to make use of technical and field-specific terms. 

• Include Significant Findings

The idea of a research report is to present some sort of abridged version of your systematic investigation. In your report, you should exclude irrelevant information while highlighting only important data and findings. 

• Include Illustrations

Your research report should include illustrations and other visual representations of your data. Graphs, pie charts, and relevant images lend additional credibility to your systematic investigation.

• Choose the Right Title

A good research report title is brief, precise, and contains keywords from your research. It should provide a clear idea of your systematic investigation so that readers can grasp the entire focus of your research from the title. 

• Proofread the Report

Before publishing the document, ensure that you give it a second look to authenticate the information. If you can, get someone else to go through the report, too, and you can also run it through proofreading and editing software. 

How to Gather Research Data for Your Report  

• Understand the Problem

Every research aims at solving a specific problem or set of problems, and this should be at the back of your mind when writing your research report. Understanding the problem would help you to filter the information you have and include only important data in your report. 

• Know what your report seeks to achieve

This is somewhat similar to the point above because, in some way, the aim of your research report is intertwined with the objectives of your systematic investigation. Identifying the primary purpose of writing a research report would help you to identify and present the required information accordingly. 

• Identify your audience

Knowing your target audience plays a crucial role in data collection for a research report. If your research report is specifically for an organization, you would want to present industry-specific information or show how the research findings are relevant to the work that the company does. 

• Create Surveys/Questionnaires

A survey is a research method that is used to gather data from a specific group of people through a set of questions. It can be either quantitative or qualitative. 

A survey is usually made up of structured questions, and it can be administered online or offline. However, an online survey is a more effective method of research data collection because it helps you save time and gather data with ease. 

You can seamlessly create an online questionnaire for your research on Formplus . With the multiple sharing options available in the builder, you would be able to administer your survey to respondents in little or no time. 

Formplus also has a report summary too l that you can use to create custom visual reports for your research.

Step-by-step guide on how to create an online questionnaire using Formplus  

• Sign into Formplus

In the Formplus builder, you can easily create different online questionnaires for your research by dragging and dropping preferred fields into your form. To access the Formplus builder, you will need to create an account on Formplus. 

Once you do this, sign in to your account and click on Create new form to begin. 

• Edit Form Title : Click on the field provided to input your form title, for example, “Research Questionnaire.”
• Edit Form : Click on the edit icon to edit the form.
• Add Fields : Drag and drop preferred form fields into your form in the Formplus builder inputs column. There are several field input options for questionnaires in the Formplus builder. 
• Edit fields
• Click on “Save”
• Form Customization: With the form customization options in the form builder, you can easily change the outlook of your form and make it more unique and personalized. Formplus allows you to change your form theme, add background images, and even change the font according to your needs. 
• Multiple Sharing Options: Formplus offers various form-sharing options, which enables you to share your questionnaire with respondents easily. You can use the direct social media sharing buttons to share your form link to your organization’s social media pages.  You can also send out your survey form as email invitations to your research subjects too. If you wish, you can share your form’s QR code or embed it on your organization’s website for easy access. 

Conclusion  

Always remember that a research report is just as important as the actual systematic investigation because it plays a vital role in communicating research findings to everyone else. This is why you must take care to create a concise document summarizing the process of conducting any research. 

In this article, we’ve outlined essential tips to help you create a research report. When writing your report, you should always have the audience at the back of your mind, as this would set the tone for the document. 

Connect to Formplus, Get Started Now - It's Free!

• ethnographic research survey
• research report
• research report survey
• busayo.longe

You may also like:

21 Chrome Extensions for Academic Researchers in 2022

In this article, we will discuss a number of chrome extensions you can use to make your research process even seamless

Assessment Tools: Types, Examples & Importance

In this article, you’ll learn about different assessment tools to help you evaluate performance in various contexts

How to Write a Problem Statement for your Research

Learn how to write problem statements before commencing any research effort. Learn about its structure and explore examples

Ethnographic Research: Types, Methods + [Question Examples]

Simple guide on ethnographic research, it types, methods, examples and advantages. Also highlights how to conduct an ethnographic...

Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection

Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. try formplus and transform your work productivity today..

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Report – Example, Writing Guide and Types

Research Report – Example, Writing Guide and Types

Table of Contents

Research Report

Definition:

Research Report is a written document that presents the results of a research project or study, including the research question, methodology, results, and conclusions, in a clear and objective manner.

The purpose of a research report is to communicate the findings of the research to the intended audience, which could be other researchers, stakeholders, or the general public.

Components of Research Report

Components of Research Report are as follows:

Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for the research report and provides a brief overview of the research question or problem being investigated. It should include a clear statement of the purpose of the study and its significance or relevance to the field of research. It may also provide background information or a literature review to help contextualize the research.

Literature Review

The literature review provides a critical analysis and synthesis of the existing research and scholarship relevant to the research question or problem. It should identify the gaps, inconsistencies, and contradictions in the literature and show how the current study addresses these issues. The literature review also establishes the theoretical framework or conceptual model that guides the research.

Methodology

The methodology section describes the research design, methods, and procedures used to collect and analyze data. It should include information on the sample or participants, data collection instruments, data collection procedures, and data analysis techniques. The methodology should be clear and detailed enough to allow other researchers to replicate the study.

The results section presents the findings of the study in a clear and objective manner. It should provide a detailed description of the data and statistics used to answer the research question or test the hypothesis. Tables, graphs, and figures may be included to help visualize the data and illustrate the key findings.

The discussion section interprets the results of the study and explains their significance or relevance to the research question or problem. It should also compare the current findings with those of previous studies and identify the implications for future research or practice. The discussion should be based on the results presented in the previous section and should avoid speculation or unfounded conclusions.

The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the study and restates the main argument or thesis presented in the introduction. It should also provide a brief overview of the contributions of the study to the field of research and the implications for practice or policy.

The references section lists all the sources cited in the research report, following a specific citation style, such as APA or MLA.

The appendices section includes any additional material, such as data tables, figures, or instruments used in the study, that could not be included in the main text due to space limitations.

Types of Research Report

Types of Research Report are as follows:

Thesis is a type of research report. A thesis is a long-form research document that presents the findings and conclusions of an original research study conducted by a student as part of a graduate or postgraduate program. It is typically written by a student pursuing a higher degree, such as a Master’s or Doctoral degree, although it can also be written by researchers or scholars in other fields.

Research Paper

Research paper is a type of research report. A research paper is a document that presents the results of a research study or investigation. Research papers can be written in a variety of fields, including science, social science, humanities, and business. They typically follow a standard format that includes an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion sections.

Technical Report

A technical report is a detailed report that provides information about a specific technical or scientific problem or project. Technical reports are often used in engineering, science, and other technical fields to document research and development work.

Progress Report

A progress report provides an update on the progress of a research project or program over a specific period of time. Progress reports are typically used to communicate the status of a project to stakeholders, funders, or project managers.

Feasibility Report

A feasibility report assesses the feasibility of a proposed project or plan, providing an analysis of the potential risks, benefits, and costs associated with the project. Feasibility reports are often used in business, engineering, and other fields to determine the viability of a project before it is undertaken.

Field Report

A field report documents observations and findings from fieldwork, which is research conducted in the natural environment or setting. Field reports are often used in anthropology, ecology, and other social and natural sciences.

Experimental Report

An experimental report documents the results of a scientific experiment, including the hypothesis, methods, results, and conclusions. Experimental reports are often used in biology, chemistry, and other sciences to communicate the results of laboratory experiments.

Case Study Report

A case study report provides an in-depth analysis of a specific case or situation, often used in psychology, social work, and other fields to document and understand complex cases or phenomena.

Literature Review Report

A literature review report synthesizes and summarizes existing research on a specific topic, providing an overview of the current state of knowledge on the subject. Literature review reports are often used in social sciences, education, and other fields to identify gaps in the literature and guide future research.

Research Report Example

Following is a Research Report Example sample for Students:

Title: The Impact of Social Media on Academic Performance among High School Students

This study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and academic performance among high school students. The study utilized a quantitative research design, which involved a survey questionnaire administered to a sample of 200 high school students. The findings indicate that there is a negative correlation between social media use and academic performance, suggesting that excessive social media use can lead to poor academic performance among high school students. The results of this study have important implications for educators, parents, and policymakers, as they highlight the need for strategies that can help students balance their social media use and academic responsibilities.

Introduction:

Social media has become an integral part of the lives of high school students. With the widespread use of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat, students can connect with friends, share photos and videos, and engage in discussions on a range of topics. While social media offers many benefits, concerns have been raised about its impact on academic performance. Many studies have found a negative correlation between social media use and academic performance among high school students (Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Paul, Baker, & Cochran, 2012).

Given the growing importance of social media in the lives of high school students, it is important to investigate its impact on academic performance. This study aims to address this gap by examining the relationship between social media use and academic performance among high school students.

Methodology:

The study utilized a quantitative research design, which involved a survey questionnaire administered to a sample of 200 high school students. The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and was designed to measure the frequency and duration of social media use, as well as academic performance.

The participants were selected using a convenience sampling technique, and the survey questionnaire was distributed in the classroom during regular school hours. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.

The findings indicate that the majority of high school students use social media platforms on a daily basis, with Facebook being the most popular platform. The results also show a negative correlation between social media use and academic performance, suggesting that excessive social media use can lead to poor academic performance among high school students.

Discussion:

The results of this study have important implications for educators, parents, and policymakers. The negative correlation between social media use and academic performance suggests that strategies should be put in place to help students balance their social media use and academic responsibilities. For example, educators could incorporate social media into their teaching strategies to engage students and enhance learning. Parents could limit their children’s social media use and encourage them to prioritize their academic responsibilities. Policymakers could develop guidelines and policies to regulate social media use among high school students.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the negative impact of social media on academic performance among high school students. The findings highlight the need for strategies that can help students balance their social media use and academic responsibilities. Further research is needed to explore the specific mechanisms by which social media use affects academic performance and to develop effective strategies for addressing this issue.

Limitations:

One limitation of this study is the use of convenience sampling, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other populations. Future studies should use random sampling techniques to increase the representativeness of the sample. Another limitation is the use of self-reported measures, which may be subject to social desirability bias. Future studies could use objective measures of social media use and academic performance, such as tracking software and school records.

Implications:

The findings of this study have important implications for educators, parents, and policymakers. Educators could incorporate social media into their teaching strategies to engage students and enhance learning. For example, teachers could use social media platforms to share relevant educational resources and facilitate online discussions. Parents could limit their children’s social media use and encourage them to prioritize their academic responsibilities. They could also engage in open communication with their children to understand their social media use and its impact on their academic performance. Policymakers could develop guidelines and policies to regulate social media use among high school students. For example, schools could implement social media policies that restrict access during class time and encourage responsible use.

References:

• Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245.
• Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M., & Cochran, J. D. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 8(1), 1-19.
• Pantic, I. (2014). Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 652-657.
• Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948-958.

Note*: Above mention, Example is just a sample for the students’ guide. Do not directly copy and paste as your College or University assignment. Kindly do some research and Write your own.

Applications of Research Report

Research reports have many applications, including:

• Communicating research findings: The primary application of a research report is to communicate the results of a study to other researchers, stakeholders, or the general public. The report serves as a way to share new knowledge, insights, and discoveries with others in the field.
• Informing policy and practice : Research reports can inform policy and practice by providing evidence-based recommendations for decision-makers. For example, a research report on the effectiveness of a new drug could inform regulatory agencies in their decision-making process.
• Supporting further research: Research reports can provide a foundation for further research in a particular area. Other researchers may use the findings and methodology of a report to develop new research questions or to build on existing research.
• Evaluating programs and interventions : Research reports can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of programs and interventions in achieving their intended outcomes. For example, a research report on a new educational program could provide evidence of its impact on student performance.
• Demonstrating impact : Research reports can be used to demonstrate the impact of research funding or to evaluate the success of research projects. By presenting the findings and outcomes of a study, research reports can show the value of research to funders and stakeholders.
• Enhancing professional development : Research reports can be used to enhance professional development by providing a source of information and learning for researchers and practitioners in a particular field. For example, a research report on a new teaching methodology could provide insights and ideas for educators to incorporate into their own practice.

How to write Research Report

Here are some steps you can follow to write a research report:

• Identify the research question: The first step in writing a research report is to identify your research question. This will help you focus your research and organize your findings.
• Conduct research : Once you have identified your research question, you will need to conduct research to gather relevant data and information. This can involve conducting experiments, reviewing literature, or analyzing data.
• Organize your findings: Once you have gathered all of your data, you will need to organize your findings in a way that is clear and understandable. This can involve creating tables, graphs, or charts to illustrate your results.
• Write the report: Once you have organized your findings, you can begin writing the report. Start with an introduction that provides background information and explains the purpose of your research. Next, provide a detailed description of your research methods and findings. Finally, summarize your results and draw conclusions based on your findings.
• Proofread and edit: After you have written your report, be sure to proofread and edit it carefully. Check for grammar and spelling errors, and make sure that your report is well-organized and easy to read.
• Include a reference list: Be sure to include a list of references that you used in your research. This will give credit to your sources and allow readers to further explore the topic if they choose.
• Format your report: Finally, format your report according to the guidelines provided by your instructor or organization. This may include formatting requirements for headings, margins, fonts, and spacing.

Purpose of Research Report

The purpose of a research report is to communicate the results of a research study to a specific audience, such as peers in the same field, stakeholders, or the general public. The report provides a detailed description of the research methods, findings, and conclusions.

Some common purposes of a research report include:

• Sharing knowledge: A research report allows researchers to share their findings and knowledge with others in their field. This helps to advance the field and improve the understanding of a particular topic.
• Identifying trends: A research report can identify trends and patterns in data, which can help guide future research and inform decision-making.
• Addressing problems: A research report can provide insights into problems or issues and suggest solutions or recommendations for addressing them.
• Evaluating programs or interventions : A research report can evaluate the effectiveness of programs or interventions, which can inform decision-making about whether to continue, modify, or discontinue them.
• Meeting regulatory requirements: In some fields, research reports are required to meet regulatory requirements, such as in the case of drug trials or environmental impact studies.

When to Write Research Report

A research report should be written after completing the research study. This includes collecting data, analyzing the results, and drawing conclusions based on the findings. Once the research is complete, the report should be written in a timely manner while the information is still fresh in the researcher’s mind.

In academic settings, research reports are often required as part of coursework or as part of a thesis or dissertation. In this case, the report should be written according to the guidelines provided by the instructor or institution.

In other settings, such as in industry or government, research reports may be required to inform decision-making or to comply with regulatory requirements. In these cases, the report should be written as soon as possible after the research is completed in order to inform decision-making in a timely manner.

Overall, the timing of when to write a research report depends on the purpose of the research, the expectations of the audience, and any regulatory requirements that need to be met. However, it is important to complete the report in a timely manner while the information is still fresh in the researcher’s mind.

Characteristics of Research Report

There are several characteristics of a research report that distinguish it from other types of writing. These characteristics include:

• Objective: A research report should be written in an objective and unbiased manner. It should present the facts and findings of the research study without any personal opinions or biases.
• Systematic: A research report should be written in a systematic manner. It should follow a clear and logical structure, and the information should be presented in a way that is easy to understand and follow.
• Detailed: A research report should be detailed and comprehensive. It should provide a thorough description of the research methods, results, and conclusions.
• Accurate : A research report should be accurate and based on sound research methods. The findings and conclusions should be supported by data and evidence.
• Organized: A research report should be well-organized. It should include headings and subheadings to help the reader navigate the report and understand the main points.
• Clear and concise: A research report should be written in clear and concise language. The information should be presented in a way that is easy to understand, and unnecessary jargon should be avoided.
• Citations and references: A research report should include citations and references to support the findings and conclusions. This helps to give credit to other researchers and to provide readers with the opportunity to further explore the topic.

Advantages of Research Report

Research reports have several advantages, including:

• Communicating research findings: Research reports allow researchers to communicate their findings to a wider audience, including other researchers, stakeholders, and the general public. This helps to disseminate knowledge and advance the understanding of a particular topic.
• Providing evidence for decision-making : Research reports can provide evidence to inform decision-making, such as in the case of policy-making, program planning, or product development. The findings and conclusions can help guide decisions and improve outcomes.
• Supporting further research: Research reports can provide a foundation for further research on a particular topic. Other researchers can build on the findings and conclusions of the report, which can lead to further discoveries and advancements in the field.
• Demonstrating expertise: Research reports can demonstrate the expertise of the researchers and their ability to conduct rigorous and high-quality research. This can be important for securing funding, promotions, and other professional opportunities.
• Meeting regulatory requirements: In some fields, research reports are required to meet regulatory requirements, such as in the case of drug trials or environmental impact studies. Producing a high-quality research report can help ensure compliance with these requirements.

Limitations of Research Report

Despite their advantages, research reports also have some limitations, including:

• Time-consuming: Conducting research and writing a report can be a time-consuming process, particularly for large-scale studies. This can limit the frequency and speed of producing research reports.
• Expensive: Conducting research and producing a report can be expensive, particularly for studies that require specialized equipment, personnel, or data. This can limit the scope and feasibility of some research studies.
• Limited generalizability: Research studies often focus on a specific population or context, which can limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations or contexts.
• Potential bias : Researchers may have biases or conflicts of interest that can influence the findings and conclusions of the research study. Additionally, participants may also have biases or may not be representative of the larger population, which can limit the validity and reliability of the findings.
• Accessibility: Research reports may be written in technical or academic language, which can limit their accessibility to a wider audience. Additionally, some research may be behind paywalls or require specialized access, which can limit the ability of others to read and use the findings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

Institutional Review Board – Application Sample...

Evaluating Research – Process, Examples and...

Report writing

• Introduction

What is a report?

What makes a successful report, how are reports read, checklist for successful reports.

• Types of Report
• Structuring your report
• Writing up your report

Useful links for report writing

• Study Advice Helping students to achieve study success with guides, video tutorials, seminars and one-to-one advice sessions.
• Maths Support A guide to Maths Support resources which may help if you're finding any mathematical or statistical topic difficult during the transition to University study.

• Academic Phrasebank Use this site for examples of linking phrases and ways to refer to sources.
• Academic writing LibGuide Expert guidance on punctuation, grammar, writing style and proof-reading.
• Reading and notemaking LibGuide Expert guidance on managing your reading and making effective notes.
• Guide to citing references Includes guidance on why, when and how to use references correctly in your academic writing.

Students often ask, "What's the difference between an essay and a report?" It can be confusing because university assignments can mix the features of both (e.g. an essay that allows sub-headings) and some assignments may not officially be called a report, but seem very "report-like" in their structure and criteria.

The guidance on this page will explain some of the key differences between essays and reports, and how the main features of reports make them economical to read. Understanding how reports are read and the features that make them effective will help you in any report-style assignment.

A report is a piece of informative writing that describes a set of actions and analyses any results in response to a specific brief. A quick definition might be: "This is what I did and this is what it means." You may be given an assignment which is not called a report but shares many of the same features; if so, aspects of this guide will be helpful.

It may help to know some of the key differences between reports and essays:

• Badly structured
• Inappropriate writing style
• Incorrect or inadequate referencing
• Doesn't answer the brief
• Too much/too little/irrelevant material
• Expression not clear
• Doesn't relate results to purpose
• Unnecessary use of jargon

How can you make sure your report does what it's meant to do, and does it well?

Make sure you know which sections your report should have and what should go in each . Reports for different disciplines and briefs will require different sections: for instance, a business report may need a separate Recommendations section but no Methods section. Check your brief carefully to make sure you have the correct sections. See the page on 'Structuring your report' in this guide to learn more about what goes where.

Remember that reports are meant to be informative : to tell the reader what was done, what was discovered as a consequence and how this relates to the reasons the report was undertaken. Include only relevant material in your background and discussion.

A report is an act of communication between you and your reader. So  pay special attention to your projected reader , and what they want from the report. Sometimes you will be asked to write for an imaginary reader (e.g. a business client). In this case it's vital to think about why they want the report to be produced (e.g. to decide on the viability of a project) and to make sure you respond to that. If it's your tutor, they will want to know that you can communicate the processes and results of your research clearly and accurately, and can discuss your findings in the context of the overall purpose.

Write simply and appropriately . Your method and findings should be described accurately and in non-ambiguous terms. A perfectly described method section would make it possible for someone else to replicate your research process and achieve the same results. See the page in this guide on 'Writing up your report' for more on this.

Spend time on your discussion section . This is the bit that pulls the whole piece together by showing how your findings relate to the purpose of the report, and to any previous research.

Every idea and piece of information you use that comes from someone else's work  must be acknowledged with a reference . Check your brief, or department handbook for the form of referencing required (usually a short reference in the body of the text, and a full reference in the Reference List at the end).

Be clear about the scope of the report . The word count will help you to understand this. For instance, a 5000 word report will be expected to include a lot more background and discussion than a 1000 word report - this will be looking for more conciseness in the way you convey your information.

This is not to suggest that you should spend less time on writing up your findings. But it does show that the sections you may think of as less important (like the  abstract or introduction ) are actually often the places a reader gets their first impressions. So it's worth getting them right.

• Does it answer the needs of the projected reader?
• Has the material been placed in the appropriate sections?
• Has all the material been checked for accuracy?
• Are graphs and tables carefully labelled?
• Is data in graphs or tables also explained in words and analysed?
• Does the discussion/conclusion show how the results relate to objectives set out in the introduction?
• Has all irrelevant material been removed?
• Is it written throughout in appropriate style (i.e. no colloquialisms or contractions, using an objective tone, specific rather than vague)?
• Is it jargon-free and clearly written?
• Has every idea taken from or inspired by someone else's work been acknowledged with a reference?
• Have all illustrations and figures taken from someone else's work been cited correctly?
• Has it been carefully proof-read to eliminate careless mistakes?
• << Previous: Home
• Next: Types of Report >>
• Last Updated: May 14, 2024 8:51 AM
• URL: https://libguides.reading.ac.uk/reports

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Saudi J Anaesth
• v.13(Suppl 1); 2019 Apr

Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key

Milind s. tullu.

Department of Pediatrics, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

This article deals with formulating a suitable title and an appropriate abstract for an original research paper. The “title” and the “abstract” are the “initial impressions” of a research article, and hence they need to be drafted correctly, accurately, carefully, and meticulously. Often both of these are drafted after the full manuscript is ready. Most readers read only the title and the abstract of a research paper and very few will go on to read the full paper. The title and the abstract are the most important parts of a research paper and should be pleasant to read. The “title” should be descriptive, direct, accurate, appropriate, interesting, concise, precise, unique, and should not be misleading. The “abstract” needs to be simple, specific, clear, unbiased, honest, concise, precise, stand-alone, complete, scholarly, (preferably) structured, and should not be misrepresentative. The abstract should be consistent with the main text of the paper, especially after a revision is made to the paper and should include the key message prominently. It is very important to include the most important words and terms (the “keywords”) in the title and the abstract for appropriate indexing purpose and for retrieval from the search engines and scientific databases. Such keywords should be listed after the abstract. One must adhere to the instructions laid down by the target journal with regard to the style and number of words permitted for the title and the abstract.

Introduction

This article deals with drafting a suitable “title” and an appropriate “abstract” for an original research paper. Because the “title” and the “abstract” are the “initial impressions” or the “face” of a research article, they need to be drafted correctly, accurately, carefully, meticulously, and consume time and energy.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ] Often, these are drafted after the complete manuscript draft is ready.[ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] Most readers will read only the title and the abstract of a published research paper, and very few “interested ones” (especially, if the paper is of use to them) will go on to read the full paper.[ 1 , 2 ] One must remember to adhere to the instructions laid down by the “target journal” (the journal for which the author is writing) regarding the style and number of words permitted for the title and the abstract.[ 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12 ] Both the title and the abstract are the most important parts of a research paper – for editors (to decide whether to process the paper for further review), for reviewers (to get an initial impression of the paper), and for the readers (as these may be the only parts of the paper available freely and hence, read widely).[ 4 , 8 , 12 ] It may be worth for the novice author to browse through titles and abstracts of several prominent journals (and their target journal as well) to learn more about the wording and styles of the titles and abstracts, as well as the aims and scope of the particular journal.[ 5 , 7 , 9 , 13 ]

The details of the title are discussed under the subheadings of importance, types, drafting, and checklist.

Importance of the title

When a reader browses through the table of contents of a journal issue (hard copy or on website), the title is the “ first detail” or “face” of the paper that is read.[ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 13 ] Hence, it needs to be simple, direct, accurate, appropriate, specific, functional, interesting, attractive/appealing, concise/brief, precise/focused, unambiguous, memorable, captivating, informative (enough to encourage the reader to read further), unique, catchy, and it should not be misleading.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 12 ] It should have “just enough details” to arouse the interest and curiosity of the reader so that the reader then goes ahead with studying the abstract and then (if still interested) the full paper.[ 1 , 2 , 4 , 13 ] Journal websites, electronic databases, and search engines use the words in the title and abstract (the “keywords”) to retrieve a particular paper during a search; hence, the importance of these words in accessing the paper by the readers has been emphasized.[ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 14 ] Such important words (or keywords) should be arranged in appropriate order of importance as per the context of the paper and should be placed at the beginning of the title (rather than the later part of the title, as some search engines like Google may just display only the first six to seven words of the title).[ 3 , 5 , 12 ] Whimsical, amusing, or clever titles, though initially appealing, may be missed or misread by the busy reader and very short titles may miss the essential scientific words (the “keywords”) used by the indexing agencies to catch and categorize the paper.[ 1 , 3 , 4 , 9 ] Also, amusing or hilarious titles may be taken less seriously by the readers and may be cited less often.[ 4 , 15 ] An excessively long or complicated title may put off the readers.[ 3 , 9 ] It may be a good idea to draft the title after the main body of the text and the abstract are drafted.[ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]

Types of titles

Titles can be descriptive, declarative, or interrogative. They can also be classified as nominal, compound, or full-sentence titles.

Descriptive or neutral title

This has the essential elements of the research theme, that is, the patients/subjects, design, interventions, comparisons/control, and outcome, but does not reveal the main result or the conclusion.[ 3 , 4 , 12 , 16 ] Such a title allows the reader to interpret the findings of the research paper in an impartial manner and with an open mind.[ 3 ] These titles also give complete information about the contents of the article, have several keywords (thus increasing the visibility of the article in search engines), and have increased chances of being read and (then) being cited as well.[ 4 ] Hence, such descriptive titles giving a glimpse of the paper are generally preferred.[ 4 , 16 ]

Declarative title

This title states the main finding of the study in the title itself; it reduces the curiosity of the reader, may point toward a bias on the part of the author, and hence is best avoided.[ 3 , 4 , 12 , 16 ]

Interrogative title

This is the one which has a query or the research question in the title.[ 3 , 4 , 16 ] Though a query in the title has the ability to sensationalize the topic, and has more downloads (but less citations), it can be distracting to the reader and is again best avoided for a research article (but can, at times, be used for a review article).[ 3 , 6 , 16 , 17 ]

From a sentence construct point of view, titles may be nominal (capturing only the main theme of the study), compound (with subtitles to provide additional relevant information such as context, design, location/country, temporal aspect, sample size, importance, and a provocative or a literary; for example, see the title of this review), or full-sentence titles (which are longer and indicate an added degree of certainty of the results).[ 4 , 6 , 9 , 16 ] Any of these constructs may be used depending on the type of article, the key message, and the author's preference or judgement.[ 4 ]

Drafting a suitable title

A stepwise process can be followed to draft the appropriate title. The author should describe the paper in about three sentences, avoiding the results and ensuring that these sentences contain important scientific words/keywords that describe the main contents and subject of the paper.[ 1 , 4 , 6 , 12 ] Then the author should join the sentences to form a single sentence, shorten the length (by removing redundant words or adjectives or phrases), and finally edit the title (thus drafted) to make it more accurate, concise (about 10–15 words), and precise.[ 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 ] Some journals require that the study design be included in the title, and this may be placed (using a colon) after the primary title.[ 2 , 3 , 4 , 14 ] The title should try to incorporate the Patients, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcome (PICO).[ 3 ] The place of the study may be included in the title (if absolutely necessary), that is, if the patient characteristics (such as study population, socioeconomic conditions, or cultural practices) are expected to vary as per the country (or the place of the study) and have a bearing on the possible outcomes.[ 3 , 6 ] Lengthy titles can be boring and appear unfocused, whereas very short titles may not be representative of the contents of the article; hence, optimum length is required to ensure that the title explains the main theme and content of the manuscript.[ 4 , 5 , 9 ] Abbreviations (except the standard or commonly interpreted ones such as HIV, AIDS, DNA, RNA, CDC, FDA, ECG, and EEG) or acronyms should be avoided in the title, as a reader not familiar with them may skip such an article and nonstandard abbreviations may create problems in indexing the article.[ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 12 ] Also, too much of technical jargon or chemical formulas in the title may confuse the readers and the article may be skipped by them.[ 4 , 9 ] Numerical values of various parameters (stating study period or sample size) should also be avoided in the titles (unless deemed extremely essential).[ 4 ] It may be worthwhile to take an opinion from a impartial colleague before finalizing the title.[ 4 , 5 , 6 ] Thus, multiple factors (which are, at times, a bit conflicting or contrasting) need to be considered while formulating a title, and hence this should not be done in a hurry.[ 4 , 6 ] Many journals ask the authors to draft a “short title” or “running head” or “running title” for printing in the header or footer of the printed paper.[ 3 , 12 ] This is an abridged version of the main title of up to 40–50 characters, may have standard abbreviations, and helps the reader to navigate through the paper.[ 3 , 12 , 14 ]

Checklist for a good title

Table 1 gives a checklist/useful tips for drafting a good title for a research paper.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 ] Table 2 presents some of the titles used by the author of this article in his earlier research papers, and the appropriateness of the titles has been commented upon. As an individual exercise, the reader may try to improvise upon the titles (further) after reading the corresponding abstract and full paper.

Checklist/useful tips for drafting a good title for a research paper

Some titles used by author of this article in his earlier publications and remark/comment on their appropriateness

The Abstract

The details of the abstract are discussed under the subheadings of importance, types, drafting, and checklist.

Importance of the abstract

The abstract is a summary or synopsis of the full research paper and also needs to have similar characteristics like the title. It needs to be simple, direct, specific, functional, clear, unbiased, honest, concise, precise, self-sufficient, complete, comprehensive, scholarly, balanced, and should not be misleading.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 17 ] Writing an abstract is to extract and summarize (AB – absolutely, STR – straightforward, ACT – actual data presentation and interpretation).[ 17 ] The title and abstracts are the only sections of the research paper that are often freely available to the readers on the journal websites, search engines, and in many abstracting agencies/databases, whereas the full paper may attract a payment per view or a fee for downloading the pdf copy.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 ] The abstract is an independent and stand-alone (that is, well understood without reading the full paper) section of the manuscript and is used by the editor to decide the fate of the article and to choose appropriate reviewers.[ 2 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 13 ] Even the reviewers are initially supplied only with the title and the abstract before they agree to review the full manuscript.[ 7 , 13 ] This is the second most commonly read part of the manuscript, and therefore it should reflect the contents of the main text of the paper accurately and thus act as a “real trailer” of the full article.[ 2 , 7 , 11 ] The readers will go through the full paper only if they find the abstract interesting and relevant to their practice; else they may skip the paper if the abstract is unimpressive.[ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 ] The abstract needs to highlight the selling point of the manuscript and succeed in luring the reader to read the complete paper.[ 3 , 7 ] The title and the abstract should be constructed using keywords (key terms/important words) from all the sections of the main text.[ 12 ] Abstracts are also used for submitting research papers to a conference for consideration for presentation (as oral paper or poster).[ 9 , 13 , 17 ] Grammatical and typographic errors reflect poorly on the quality of the abstract, may indicate carelessness/casual attitude on part of the author, and hence should be avoided at all times.[ 9 ]

Types of abstracts

The abstracts can be structured or unstructured. They can also be classified as descriptive or informative abstracts.

Structured and unstructured abstracts

Structured abstracts are followed by most journals, are more informative, and include specific subheadings/subsections under which the abstract needs to be composed.[ 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 17 , 18 ] These subheadings usually include context/background, objectives, design, setting, participants, interventions, main outcome measures, results, and conclusions.[ 1 ] Some journals stick to the standard IMRAD format for the structure of the abstracts, and the subheadings would include Introduction/Background, Methods, Results, And (instead of Discussion) the Conclusion/s.[ 1 , 2 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 17 , 18 ] Structured abstracts are more elaborate, informative, easy to read, recall, and peer-review, and hence are preferred; however, they consume more space and can have same limitations as an unstructured abstract.[ 7 , 9 , 18 ] The structured abstracts are (possibly) better understood by the reviewers and readers. Anyway, the choice of the type of the abstract and the subheadings of a structured abstract depend on the particular journal style and is not left to the author's wish.[ 7 , 10 , 12 ] Separate subheadings may be necessary for reporting meta-analysis, educational research, quality improvement work, review, or case study.[ 1 ] Clinical trial abstracts need to include the essential items mentioned in the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials) guidelines.[ 7 , 9 , 14 , 19 ] Similar guidelines exist for various other types of studies, including observational studies and for studies of diagnostic accuracy.[ 20 , 21 ] A useful resource for the above guidelines is available at www.equator-network.org (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research). Unstructured (or non-structured) abstracts are free-flowing, do not have predefined subheadings, and are commonly used for papers that (usually) do not describe original research.[ 1 , 7 , 9 , 10 ]

The four-point structured abstract: This has the following elements which need to be properly balanced with regard to the content/matter under each subheading:[ 9 ]

Background and/or Objectives: This states why the work was undertaken and is usually written in just a couple of sentences.[ 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 ] The hypothesis/study question and the major objectives are also stated under this subheading.[ 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 ]

Methods: This subsection is the longest, states what was done, and gives essential details of the study design, setting, participants, blinding, sample size, sampling method, intervention/s, duration and follow-up, research instruments, main outcome measures, parameters evaluated, and how the outcomes were assessed or analyzed.[ 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17 ]

Results/Observations/Findings: This subheading states what was found, is longer, is difficult to draft, and needs to mention important details including the number of study participants, results of analysis (of primary and secondary objectives), and include actual data (numbers, mean, median, standard deviation, “P” values, 95% confidence intervals, effect sizes, relative risks, odds ratio, etc.).[ 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17 ]

Conclusions: The take-home message (the “so what” of the paper) and other significant/important findings should be stated here, considering the interpretation of the research question/hypothesis and results put together (without overinterpreting the findings) and may also include the author's views on the implications of the study.[ 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17 ]

The eight-point structured abstract: This has the following eight subheadings – Objectives, Study Design, Study Setting, Participants/Patients, Methods/Intervention, Outcome Measures, Results, and Conclusions.[ 3 , 9 , 18 ] The instructions to authors given by the particular journal state whether they use the four- or eight-point abstract or variants thereof.[ 3 , 14 ]

Descriptive and Informative abstracts

Descriptive abstracts are short (75–150 words), only portray what the paper contains without providing any more details; the reader has to read the full paper to know about its contents and are rarely used for original research papers.[ 7 , 10 ] These are used for case reports, reviews, opinions, and so on.[ 7 , 10 ] Informative abstracts (which may be structured or unstructured as described above) give a complete detailed summary of the article contents and truly reflect the actual research done.[ 7 , 10 ]

Drafting a suitable abstract

It is important to religiously stick to the instructions to authors (format, word limit, font size/style, and subheadings) provided by the journal for which the abstract and the paper are being written.[ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 ] Most journals allow 200–300 words for formulating the abstract and it is wise to restrict oneself to this word limit.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 22 ] Though some authors prefer to draft the abstract initially, followed by the main text of the paper, it is recommended to draft the abstract in the end to maintain accuracy and conformity with the main text of the paper (thus maintaining an easy linkage/alignment with title, on one hand, and the introduction section of the main text, on the other hand).[ 2 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] The authors should check the subheadings (of the structured abstract) permitted by the target journal, use phrases rather than sentences to draft the content of the abstract, and avoid passive voice.[ 1 , 7 , 9 , 12 ] Next, the authors need to get rid of redundant words and edit the abstract (extensively) to the correct word count permitted (every word in the abstract “counts”!).[ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 ] It is important to ensure that the key message, focus, and novelty of the paper are not compromised; the rationale of the study and the basis of the conclusions are clear; and that the abstract is consistent with the main text of the paper.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 22 ] This is especially important while submitting a revision of the paper (modified after addressing the reviewer's comments), as the changes made in the main (revised) text of the paper need to be reflected in the (revised) abstract as well.[ 2 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 22 ] Abbreviations should be avoided in an abstract, unless they are conventionally accepted or standard; references, tables, or figures should not be cited in the abstract.[ 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 ] It may be worthwhile not to rush with the abstract and to get an opinion by an impartial colleague on the content of the abstract; and if possible, the full paper (an “informal” peer-review).[ 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 17 ] Appropriate “Keywords” (three to ten words or phrases) should follow the abstract and should be preferably chosen from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) list of the U.S. National Library of Medicine ( https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/search ) and are used for indexing purposes.[ 2 , 3 , 11 , 12 ] These keywords need to be different from the words in the main title (the title words are automatically used for indexing the article) and can be variants of the terms/phrases used in the title, or words from the abstract and the main text.[ 3 , 12 ] The ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; http://www.icmje.org/ ) also recommends publishing the clinical trial registration number at the end of the abstract.[ 7 , 14 ]

Checklist for a good abstract

Table 3 gives a checklist/useful tips for formulating a good abstract for a research paper.[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 22 ]

Checklist/useful tips for formulating a good abstract for a research paper

Concluding Remarks

This review article has given a detailed account of the importance and types of titles and abstracts. It has also attempted to give useful hints for drafting an appropriate title and a complete abstract for a research paper. It is hoped that this review will help the authors in their career in medical writing.

Financial support and sponsorship

Conflicts of interest.

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

The author thanks Dr. Hemant Deshmukh - Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College & KEM Hospital, for granting permission to publish this manuscript.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Section 1- Evidence-based practice (EBP)

Chapter 6: Components of a Research Report

Components of a research report.

Partido, B.B.

Elements of  research report

The research report contains four main areas:

• Introduction – What is the issue? What is known? What is not known? What are you trying to find out? This sections ends with the purpose and specific aims of the study.
• Methods – The recipe for the study. If someone wanted to perform the same study, what information would they need? How will you answer your research question? This part usually contains subheadings: Participants, Instruments, Procedures, Data Analysis,
• Results – What was found? This is organized by specific aims and provides the results of the statistical analysis.
• Discussion – How do the results fit in with the existing  literature? What were the limitations and areas of future research?

Formalized Curiosity for Knowledge and Innovation Copyright © by partido1. All Rights Reserved.

What Should Be the Characteristics of a Good Research Paper?

by team@blp

In miscellaneous.

When people want to get answers to various issues, they search for information on the problems. From their findings, they expand them, aiming to agree or refute them. Research papers are common assignments in colleges. 

They follow specific research and writing guidelines to answer particular questions or assigned topics. They look into the critical topic of credible research sources and argue their findings in an orderly manner. To be termed as good, the research paper must bear the following characteristics.

In this Article

Gives credit to previous research work on the topic

• It’s hooked on a relevant research question.

It must be based on appropriate, systematic research methods

• The information must be accurate and controlled.
• It must be verifiable and rigorous.

Be careful with the topic you choose

Decide the sources you want to use, create your thesis statement , plan your points, write your paper, characteristics of a good research paper.

Writing a research paper aims to discover new knowledge, but the knowledge must have a base. Its base is the research done previously by other scholars. The student must acknowledge the previous research and avoid duplicating it in their writing process.

A college student must engage in deep research work to create a credible research paper. This makes the process lengthy and complex when choosing your topic, selecting sources, and developing its design. In addition, it requires a great deal of knowledge to piece everything together. Fortunately, Studyclerk will give you professional help anytime you need it. If you do not have enough knowledge and time to write a paper on your own, you can ask for  research paper help  by StudyClerk, where experienced paper writers will write your paper in no time. You can trust their expert writers to handle your assignment well and get a well-written paper in a short time.

It’s hooked on a relevant research question .

All the time a student spends researching multiple sources is to answer a specific research question. The question must be relevant to the current needs. This question guides them into the information they use or the line of argument they take.

The methodology of research a student chooses will determine the value of the information they get or give. The methods must be valid and credible to provide reliable outcomes. Whether the student chooses a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed approach, they must all be valuable and relevant. 

The information must be accurate and controlled .

A good research paper cannot be generalized information but specific, scientific information. That is why they must include references and record tests or information accurately. Moreover, they must keep the information controlled by staying within the topic from the first step of research to the last. 

It must be verifiable and rigorous .

The student must use information or write arguments that can be verified. If it’s a test, it must be replicable by another researcher. The sources must be verifiable and accurate. Without rigorous deep  research strategies , the paper cannot be good. They must put a lot of labor into both the writing and research processes to ensure the information is credible, clear, concise, original, and precise. 

How to write a good research paper

To write a good research paper, you must first understand what kind of question you have been assigned. Then, you will choose the best topic that you will love to write about. The following points will help you write a good research paper.

You must select a topic you love. Go for a topic that will be easier to research, which will give you a broader area of study. 

Your instructor doesn’t restrict you on the sources you must use. Broaden your mind so that you don’t limit yourself to specific sources of information. Sometimes you will get helpful information from sources you slightest thought as good.

Write your central statement to base your position on the research. Make it coherent contentious, and let it be a summary of your arguments.

Create an outline that will guide you when arguing your points

• Start  with the most vital points and smooth the flow.
• Pay attention to  paragraph structure  and let your arguments be clear.
• Finish with a compelling conclusion, and don’t forget to cite your sources.

A research paper requires extensive research methods to get solid points for supporting your stand. First, the sources you use must be verifiable by any other researcher. You must ensure your research work is original for your paper to be credible. Third, each point should be coherent with each paragraph. Finally, your research findings must be tagged on the research question and provide answers that apply to the current society. 

Author’s Bio

Helen Birk is an online freelance writer who holds an outstanding record of helping numerous students do their academic assignments. She is an expert in essays and thesis writing, and students simply love her for her high-quality work. In addition, she enjoys cycling, doing pencil sketching, and listening to spiritual podcasts in her free time.

Discover How Much Homework To Expect In a College Literature Class

Explore How Much Homework To Expect In A College Literature Class Students who attend literature classes often seek help with literature homework. The reason for this necessity is that people are not accustomed to reading printed books anymore. Though literature helps...

Balancing Work and Study: 9 Things to Keep in Mind

Image Source Balancing work and study can be a tough challenge, especially when you're trying to excel in both. Whether you're a student working to support your education or a professional pursuing further studies, managing these responsibilities requires careful...

How to Study for an Online Master’s Degree in Education: 10 Tips

Image Source Pursuing a Master's in Education online can be a transformative experience that combines flexibility with a rigorous academic curriculum. This mode of learning allows you to advance your career in education without the constraints of traditional on-campus...

9 Reasons to Pursue an Online Ed.D Program

Image Source The Doctor of Education, commonly known as the Ed.D, is a prestigious degree aimed at those aspiring to reach the highest levels of achievement in educational practice and administration. Unlike traditional doctoral programs focused primarily on research,...

Tips for Writing Exam Essays

Writing essays for exams can feel like a huge challenge. You're under time pressure, feeling stressed, and expected to produce a well-organized, persuasive piece of writing. While some students may be tempted to seek out a top essay writing service for quick...

Write Your Successful Business Management Essay

Business Management Essay Writing: Step to Success A business essay is a short piece in which the author highlights some problems or business ideas and his achievements. Applicants, students and employees can write such an essay. Features of the business management...

How to Choose the Best Dissertation Writing Company

Guide on How to Choose the Best Dissertation Writing Company For many years the students have been ordering help with dissertations. Many such services have become extremely popular approximately 10 years ago and since then such websites only gain in popularity. For...

Guide on Where Can I Buy a Custom Essay Online?

Explore Where Can I Buy a Custom Essay Online? How to write an essay? Such a question is a main problem for schoolchildren and students because more and more often teachers offer to write a text in the essay genre. This type has become very popular, so we have...

Summer Office Wear For Men: A Style Guide For Teachers

As we dive into the scorching summer months, the struggle to maintain a professional appearance while staying cool and comfortable in the classroom becomes all too real. With global warming, expect harsh temperature changes with every seasonal transition.   But don’t...

From Application to Offer: Navigating the Job Search Journey

Embarking on the job search journey can be an exhilarating yet daunting process. From crafting your application to the moment you receive that much-anticipated job offer, each step requires careful planning, preparation, and execution. This comprehensive guide aims to...

WANT MORE AMAZING CONTENT?

• Free GRE Practice Questions
• 100+ Personal Statement Templates
• 100+ Quotes to Kick Start Your Personal Statement
• 390 Adjectives to Use in a LOR

• Research Process

The Top 5 Qualities of Every Good Researcher

• 3 minute read
• 192.3K views

Table of Contents

What makes a good researcher? Is it some undefinable, innate genius, or is it something that we can practice and build upon? If it was just the former, then there would be far fewer innovations in the history of humankind than there have been. A careful look at researchers through the ages reveals that they all have certain attributes in common that have helped contribute to their success.

The characteristics of a good researcher:

1. curiosity.

They ask questions. An endless thirst for knowledge is what sets the best of the best apart from the others. Good researchers constantly strive to learn more, not just about their own field, but about other fields as well. The world around us is fascinating, be it the physics behind the way light refracts, or the anthropological constructions of our society. A good researcher keeps exploring the world and keeps searching for answers.

2. Analytical ability and foresight

They look for connections. Information is useless without interpretation. What drives research forward is finding meaning in our observations and data. Good researchers evaluate data from every angle and search for patterns. They explore cause and effect and untangle the tricky web that interconnects everyday phenomena. And then take it one step further to ask, ‘What is the bigger picture? How will the research develop in the future?’

3. Determination

They try, try, and try again. Research can be a frustrating experience. Experiments may not pan out how we expect them to. Even worse, sometimes experiments may run smoothly until they are 95% complete before failing. What sets an average researcher apart from a truly good one? The truly good researcher perseveres. They accept this disappointment, learn from the failure, reevaluate their experiment, and keep moving forward.

4. Collaboration

Teamwork makes the dream work. Contrary to the common perception of the solitary genius in their lab, research is an extremely collaborative process. There is simply too much to do for just one person to do it all. Moreover, research is becoming increasingly multidisciplinary. It is impossible for just one person to have expertise in all these fields. In general, research is conducted in teams , with each researcher having their individual roles and responsibilities. Being able to coordinate, communicate, and get along with team members is a major factor that can contribute to one’s success as a researcher.

5. Communication

They get their message across. Communication skills are an essential asset for every researcher. Not only do they have to communicate with their team members, but they also have to communicate with co-authors, journals, publishers, and funders. Whether it is writing a crisp and effective abstract, presenting at a conference, or writing a persuasive grant proposal to secure research funding, communication appears everywhere in a researcher’s life. The message in the old adage, ‘If a tree falls in the forest, but no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?’ applies to research too. A discovery could be groundbreaking, but what is the use if the researcher can’t communicate this discovery to the rest of the world?

These are just a few of the skills required by researchers to make it to the top of their field. Other attributes like creativity and time management are also worth mentioning. Nevertheless, having one or more of these top five characteristics will make the research process smoother for you and increase the chances of positive results. Set yourself up for success by building up these skills, focusing on excellence, and asking for help when you need it. Elsevier Author Services is here to aid you at every step of the research journey. From translation services by experts in the field, to preparing your manuscript for publication, to helping you submit the best possible grant proposal, you can trust us to guide you in your journey to doing great research.

• Manuscript Preparation

What is the Background of a Study and How Should it be Written?

• Publication Process

Writing an Effective Cover Letter for Manuscript Resubmission

You may also like.

Descriptive Research Design and Its Myriad Uses

Five Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Biomedical Research Paper

Making Technical Writing in Environmental Engineering Accessible

To Err is Not Human: The Dangers of AI-assisted Academic Writing

When Data Speak, Listen: Importance of Data Collection and Analysis Methods

Choosing the Right Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers

Why is data validation important in research?

Writing a good review article

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Your Article Library

Top 11 characteristics of a good report.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

This article throws light upon the top eleven characteristics of a good report. The characteristics are: 1. Simplicity 2. Clarity 3. Brevity 4. Positivity 5. Punctuation 6. Approach 7. Readability 8. Accuracy 9. Logical Sequence 10. Proper Form 11. Presentation.

Characteristic # 1. Simplicity:

The language shall be as simple as possible so that a report is easily understandable. Jargons and technical words should be avoided. Even in a technical report there shall be restricted use of technical terms if it has to be presented to laymen.

Characteristic # 2. Clarity:

The language shall be lucid and straight, clearly expressing what is intended to be expressed. For that the report has to be written in correct form and following correct steps.

Characteristic # 3. Brevity:

A report shall not be unnecessarily long so that the patience of the reader is not lost and there is no confusion of ideas. But, at the same time, a report must be complete. A report is not an essay.

Characteristic # 4. Positivity:

As far as possible positive statements should be made instead of negative ones. For example, it is better to say what should be done and not what should not be done.

Characteristic # 5. Punctuation :

Punctuations have to be carefully and correctly used otherwise the meaning of sentences may be misunder­stood or misrepresented.

Characteristic # 6. Approach:

There are two types of approaches: (a) Per­son—When a report is written based on personal enquiry or obser­vations, the approach shall be personal and the sentences shall be in the first person and in direct speech, (b) Impersonal—When a report is prepared as a source of information and when it is merely factual (e.g. a report on a meeting), the approach shall be impersonal and the sentences shall be in the third person and in indirect speech.

Characteristic # 7. Readability:

The keynote of a report is readability. The style of presentation and the diction (use of words) shall be such that the readers find it attractive and he is compelled to read the report from the beginning to the end.’ Then only a report serves its purpose. A report on the same subject matter can be written differ­ently for different classes of readers.

Characteristic # 8. Accuracy:

A report shall be accurate when facts are stated in it. It shall not be biased with personal feelings of the writer.

Characteristic # 9. Logical Sequence:

The points in a report shall be arranged with a logical sequence, step by step and not in a haphazard manner. A planning is necessary before a report is prepared.

Characteristic # 10. Proper Form:

A report must be in the proper form. Some­times there are statutory forms to follow.

Characteristic # 11. Presentation:

A report needs an attractive presentation. It depends on the quality of typing or printing as well as quality of paper used. Big companies make very attractive and colourful Annual Reports.

Related Articles:

• Principles of a Good Research Report
• Report Control System in Large Organisations | Preparation of a Report

Comments are closed.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 14 May 2024

Design of a new nanocomposite based on Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6− anionic cluster anchored on NiZn 2 O 4 ceramics as a promising material towards the electrocatalytic hydrogen storage

• Mohammad Ali Rezvani 1 ,
• Hadi Hassani Ardeshiri 1 , 2 ,
• Alireza Gholami 2 ,
• Masomeh Aghmasheh 1 &
• Amir Doustgani 3  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  11038 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Environmental sciences
• Inorganic chemistry

Extensive research efforts have been dedicated to developing electrode materials with high capacity to address the increasing complexities arising from the energy crisis. Herein, a new nanocomposite was synthesized via the sol–gel method by immobilizing K 6 ZnW 12 O 40 within the surface of NiZn 2 O 4 . ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 was characterized by FT-IR, UV–Vis, XRD, SEM, EDX, BET, and TGA-DTG methods. The electrochemical characteristics of the materials were examined using cyclic voltammogram (CV) and charge–discharge chronopotentiometry (CHP) techniques. Multiple factors affecting the hydrogen storage capacity, including current density (j), surface area of the copper foam, and the consequences of repeated cycles of hydrogen adsorption–desorption were evaluated. The initial cycle led to an impressive hydrogen discharge capability of 340 mAh/g, which subsequently increased to 900 mAh/g after 20 cycles with a current density of 2 mA in 6.0 M KOH medium. The surface area and the electrocatalytic characteristics of the nanoparticles contribute to facilitate the formation of electrons and provide good diffusion channels for the movement of electrolyte ions throughout the charge–discharge procedure.

Similar content being viewed by others

Chemical short-range disorder in lithium oxide cathodes

High-performance fibre battery with polymer gel electrolyte

Enhancing lithium-metal battery longevity through minimized coordinating diluent

Introduction.

While hydrogen is considered as a highly promising alternative fuel for energy production and consumption systems due to its clean-burning properties, its relatively low volumetric energy density has hindered its sorption abilities under ambient conditions. Thus, the consideration of hydrogen storage is crucial for the widespread utilization of hydrogen due to its lower costs, less environmental damages, and the availability of the primary sources 1 , 2 , 3 . The combustion of hydrogen results in the production of water as a byproduct, thereby bestowing numerous environmental benefits upon it 4 , 5 . To address the demand for the advancement of sustainable energy, the focal point is directed towards the storage systems of clean energy, specifically hydrogen 6 , 7 . A significant amount of effort has been dedicated to the exploration of new nanomaterials that possess the ability to enhance the capacity for hydrogen storage across various operational conditions. The storage of hydrogen is achieved through three distinct methods, which comprise the storage of compressed gas within containers, the storage of hydrogen in the form of liquid or solid 8 . Due to the necessity for high pressure and the construction of sizable containers, the viability of compressed hydrogen storage is limited from an economic standpoint. Factors such as the substantial expense associated with the construction of a large hydrogen storage container, the requirement for ample space to accommodate the hydrogen storage containers, the considerable weight of the containers, and the elevated pressure required for hydrogen liquefaction contribute to this limitation 9 , 10 . The storage of hydrogen in liquid form, also known as cryogenic storage, necessitates a reduction in temperature to 20 °C. To ensure temperatures remain below freezing point, a hydrogen storage container must be adequately insulated 11 . Despite recent advancements in liquefaction techniques, this approach is not widely employed today due to its exorbitant cost. Conversely, solid-state hydrogen storage presents numerous advantages, encompassing enhanced safety measures, a heightened capacity for voluminous storage, as well as lower operating temperatures and pressures. Among the different methods and limitations mentioned, electrochemical hydrogen storage emerges as the most effective method amidst various approaches, due to its ability to produce and retain hydrogen in-situ, while functioning under normal pressure and temperature conditions 12 . Polyoxometalates (POMs) have recently attracted considerable interest in the field of hydrogen storage due to their notable chemical and structural variability, redox potential, surface charge, thermal stability, and adjustable acidity 13 , 14 . POMs are a class of inorganic compounds that consist of metal-oxo clusters, typically containing a combination of transition metals and oxygen atoms. Some common structures of POMs, e.g., Keggin [{XM 12 O 40 } 3/4− ] (X = P, Si, B and M = and M = Mo, W) 15 , sandwich [{M 4 (H 2 O) 2 (XW 9 O 34 ) 2 } n− (X = P, Si, Ga, etc.) 16 , Anderson [{AM 6 O 24 } 9/10− ] (A = Mn, Fe, Cr, Al, I, etc. and M = Mo, W) 17 , Wells–Dawson [{X 2 M 18 O 62 } 6− ], (X = P, Si and M = Mo, W) 18 , Evans–Showell [{Co 2 Mo 10 H 4 O 38 } 6 ] 19 , etc. Among their various configurations, Keggin-type POMs have been designed for the purpose of catalyzing the hydrogen storage systems. This is made possible by their possession of multiple redox-active metal centers and bridging oxygen atoms, which enable them to accept and denote electrons during the reaction 20 , 21 . Nevertheless, there are certain drawbacks associated with utilization of POMs in industrial applications, including a limited surface area (5 m 2  g −1 ) and poor reusability due to its high solubility 22 , 23 . Hence, the immobilization of Keggin-type POMs on the surfaces of metal oxides and polymers emerges as a promising approach to enhance their catalytic properties and mechanical durability. To design an innovative heterogeneous catalyst that possesses high stability and impressive reusability, a range of materials based on metallic oxides were employed as careers for the support of POMs, e.g., MgCo 2 O 4 ,NiZn 2 O 4 ,CuCo 2 O 4 , NiCo 2 O 4 , etc 24 , 25 . The NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles have become a preferred material for use in the heterogenization of POMs due to their non-toxic nature, low cost of fabrication, eco-friendly properties, and the specific capacities that arise from the synergistic impact of Ni and Zn ions 26 . In our research, we endeavor to investigate novel characteristics of Keggin-type POMs by substituting different metals. The Keggin structure consists of a spherical conglomerate of polymeric units of MO 6 (M = Mo, W), wherein the corners and edges are shared, along with a central tetrahedron (PO 4 ). Furthermore, POMs typically exhibit a weakly basic and nucleophilic nature, unless the surface charge is enhanced through metal substitution or by reducing the POMs. This research has validated that the incorporation of Zn metal into the tetrahedral unit of Keggin-type polyoxometalate leads to a substantial enhancement of the hydrogen storage. Herein, a new and efficient nanocomposite was synthesized based on Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6− and NiZn 2 O 4 with hydrogen storage capability. The physicochemical characteristics of the as-prepared nanocomposite was characterized through several analyses. Subsequently, the hydrogen storage capacity was examined via CV and CHP techniques, exploring various factors. This study presents a potential method for hydrogen storage using the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite.

Experimental section

All chemicals and solvents used in this investigation were procured from commercial sources and utilized in accordance with the specified instructions. Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O, \(\ge 98\%)\) , nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O, \(97\mathrm{\%})\) , sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na 2 WO 4 ·2H 2 O, \(99\%\) ), phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Moreover, potassium chloride (KCl, ≥ 99%), citric acid monohydrate (HOC(COOH)(CH 2 COOH) 2 ·H 2 O), urea (CH 4 N 2 O), ethanol (EtOH, 96%), and potassium hydroxide (KOH, ≥ 98%) were provided from Merck chemical company.

Characterizations methods

The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were acquired using the Thermo-Nicolet-iS 10 spectrometer in the solid state from 400 to 4000 cm −1 . The investigation of the optical characteristics was conducted through the utilization of a Shimadzu UV–Vis double beam spectrometer, specifically the UV-2450 model originating from Japan. This analysis was performed within the spectral range spanning from 200 to 700 nm. The measurement of X-ray diffraction (XRD) was executed by Bruker D8 Advance, which was outfitted with a crystal monochromator made of graphite. The XRD employed a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA, utilizing CuKα radiation with a wavelength of 0.15406 nm. The field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) by LEO 1455 VP (voltage of 10.00 kV) was employed to examine the particle size and surface morphologies of the samples, along with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) for elemental mappings. In addition, a simultaneous analysis of thermogravimetry (TGA) and derivative thermal gravimetry (DTG) was conducted on a NETZSCH STA 409 PC/PG Germany spectrometer. Additionally, the measurement of the specific surface area was carried out by BET device, specifically the Belsorp-Mini II, manufactured by Microtrace. The electrochemical analyses involving cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CHP) were performed using a Sama 500 potentiostat (Isfahan, Iran).

Preparation of the ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite

Synthesis of keggin-type [znw 12 o 40 ] 6– clusters.

0.12 g (2.5 mmol) of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O and 1.38 g (25 mmol) of Na 2 WO 4 ·2H 2 O were completely dissolved in 15 mL of DW, separately. Afterward, the prepared solution of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O was added gradually to Na 2 WO 4 ·2H 2 O solution. Following this, the pH value was adjusted at 5.5 using buffer of acetate (1 M). The obtained solution was refluxed for 6 h and after cooling to room temperature, a saturated solution prepared from KCl (5.00 g in 10 mL of DW) was added and stirred for 60 min. Following a few days of aging, the resulting solid precipitate was washed using ethanol and water, and then was dried at 80 °C for 4 h.

Synthesis of NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles

In order to synthesize NiZn 2 O 4 ceramics 27 , the subsequent procedures were performed: Initially, Ni(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O (0.30 g) was dissolved in 20 mL of DW as a Ni precursor. Subsequently, this solution was added drop-wise to the Zn(NO 3 ) 2 .6H 2 O solution (0.12 g in 20 mL of DW) with a molar ratio of 1:2 under magnetic stirring (referred to as solution A). Additionally, a mixture of citric acid solution (0.50 g in 15 mL of DW) and urea (0.32 g in 20 mL of DW) was prepared with a molar ratio of 1:2, employing sonication (referred to as solution B). The obtained solution was then heated to the temperature of 75 °C. Afterward, the combination of solutions A and B was carried out under constant agitation for 5 h at 80 °C, leading to the formation of a green gel. The resulting gel was subjected to calcination at a temperature of 500 °C for 4 h in a furnace, resulting in the generation of NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles powder.

Synthesis of ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite

In order to prepare the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite, the following method was performed via the sol–gel method. In a typical procedure, the gradual addition of Keggin-type ZnW 12 O 40 solution (0.09 g in 20 mL of DW) to the prepared gel consisting of NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles (prior to complete gelling) was conducted. Subsequently, the resulting solution was subjected to magnetic agitation at 80 °C for 60 min, leading to the formation of a gray gel. Following this, the gray gel that was acquired was subjected to calcination process in a furnace, wherein it was exposed to a temperature of 500 °C for 4 h, resulting in the formation of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 powder.

Electrochemical hydrogen storage study

The CHP technique was employed to determine the hydrogen storage capacity of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite electrodes in a three-electrode electrochemical cell comprising a reference electrode (Hg/HgO electrode), a counter electrode (Pt plate), and a working electrode (bare and modified copper foam). For the purpose of preparing the electrolyte solution, the aqueous electrolyte with a molarity of 6.0 M KOH was provided. To prepare 6 M KOH, 16.83 g of solid KOH was dissolved in distilled water and then added to the desired volume in a 50 mL of volumetric flask. A working electrode was created by coating a bare copper plate ((porous per inch) PPI: 95, 1  \(\times \)  2 cm 2 ) with a thin layer of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite powders at a temperature of 100 °C for 60 min, without the use of any binder. The working electrode was prepared in the following manner: the synthesized samples were dispersed in EtOH using an ultrasonic bath. Subsequently, the dispersion was applied onto the Cu foam through the drop cast method, and coated Cu foam was dried in an oven for 10 h. The electrochemical cell was assembled and operated at room temperature. By applying a constant current between the working and counter electrodes, the potential of the ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite electrode was measured in relation to the reference electrode. In the following, the charge–discharge galvanostatic technique was executed on the SAMA-500 device at the designated current density of 2 mA. Moreover, The CV analysis for the achieved electrodes was carried out in analogous assembled cells at a scan rate of 0.10 Vs −1 . Scheme 1 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of the procedure for preparing the working electrode and a view of the electrochemical cell.

Schematic illustration of working electrode (sample/Cu substrate) and a view of the electrochemical cell.

Results and discussion

Characterization of znw 12 o 40 @nizn 2 o 4 nanocomposite, ft-ir spectra.

The successful preparation of the ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite was accomplished through the FT-IR spectroscopic analysis. The sequence FT-IR spectra of (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite can be found in Fig.  1 with a spectral range of 400–4000 cm −1 . As pointed out in Fig.  1 a, the characteristic peaks at 525 and 1137 cm −1 are attributed to the stretching vibrations of Zn–O and Ni–O–Zn groups, respectively 28 . Additionally, the characteristic peak at 869 cm −1 is assigned to the stretching vibration band of Ni–O–H functional group. Furthermore, the absorption bands positioned at 3430 and 1634 cm −1 are associated with the bending and stretching vibrations of H–O–H molecules, respectively. It is worth noting that the absorption of air moisture during the preparation of sample pellets is the cause of these phenomena 29 . These observations have thus provided valuable evidence concerning the influence of hydration on the structure of matter. The corresponding vibrational frequencies of the prepared [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– anionic clusters are observed at 1106, 938, 869, and 785 cm −1 , which are related to the stretching vibrations of Zn-Oa (central bond), W = Od (terminal bond), W–O b –W (corner-sharing bond), and W–Oc–W (edge-sharing bond), respectively (Fig.  1 b) 30 , 31 . As illustrated in Fig.  1 c, peaks associated with the presence of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– were observed in the resulting as-prepared nanocomposite, exhibiting a certain degree of displacement. Furthermore, it was observed that the characteristic [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– peaks displayed a partial coverage by the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 bands at 1348, 1454, and 482 cm −1 . The findings provided an initial validation for the nanocomposite of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– supported on NiZn 2 O 4 ceramics solid. As a result, the successful immobilization of Keggin-type POM on NiZn 2 O 4 matrix can be effectively demonstrated via the FT-IR surveys.

FT-IR spectra of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 4 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite.

UV–Vis analysis

In order to investigate the charge transfer mode of the materials, the UV–Vis spectra of the (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite were displayed in Fig.  2 . As illustrated in Fig.  2 a, the absorption peaks in the region of 300–400 nm are possibly caused due to the ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT) of oxygen (2p) to metal species (O 2−  → Zn 2+ and/or O 2−  → Ni 2+ ) and π → π* transitions of metals. According to the spectrum of Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– (Fig.  2 b), absorption peaks at 257 and 315 nm can be attributed to the LMCT of tetrahedral oxygen (2p) to tungsten (O 2− (2p)  → W 6+ ) and bridge oxygens (2p) to tungsten (O 2− b/c  → W 6+ ), respectively 32 , 33 . Furthermore, the shifts towards shorter hypochromic wavelengths (blue-shifts) can be seen compared to the pure components of as-prepared nanocomposite material (Fig.  2 c).

UV–Vis spectra of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 4 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 .

Bandgap determination

The estimation of the bandgap energies of the materials has been conducted using the classical Tauc relation, in adherence to the subsequent methodology 34 :

where A represents a constant known as the band tailing parameter, \(\alpha \) denotes the absorption coefficient, Eg refers to the energy of the optical band gap, h represents the Planck constant, v signifies the frequency of the photon, and n represents the power factor of the transition mode 35 . The curves of (αhv) 2 versus hv for (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite are pointed out in Fig.  3 . The relationship between (αhv) 2 and hυ (energy) exhibits a linear pattern within a specific area. Extending this linear pattern will result in the intersection of the (hυ)-axis, providing the determination of the optical energy gap (Eg). Based on the calculations conducted, the bandgap energies of NiZn 2 O 4 , Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6 , and ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite were determined to be 5.92, 5.54, and 5.50, correspondingly. Lower band gap of as-prepared nanocomposite typically exhibits higher carrier densities compared to materials with larger band gaps. This is because a smaller band gap allows more electrons to be excited from the valence to the conduction band, resulting in a higher concentration of free charge carriers.

Band gap energies (Eg) of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 4 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 using experimental data of UV–Vis.

The investigation of the XRD pattern of materials was conducted in order to examine the phase and dimensions of both grains and nanoparticles based on Rayleigh scattering (Fig.  4 ). According to the data presented in Fig.  4 a, the prominent diffraction peaks observed at 2θ = 31.5, 34.3, 36.1, 43.1, 47.7, 56.8, 62.9, 68.1, and 69.0° can be attributed to the crystallographic planes denoted as (100), (002), (400), (102), (200), (110), (103), (112), and (201) within the hexagonal phase of NiZn 2 O 4 36 , 37 . Furthermore, there are prominent diffraction peaks observed at angles of 2θ = 8.3°, 11.8°, 18.8°, 20.5°, 23.8°, 2.26°, 28.5°, 30.3°, 33.8°, 34.8°, 36.9°, 40.6°, 41.2°, 45.9°, 48.4°, 50.3°, 57.4°, 58.7°, 60.0°, 66.4°, and 73.7°, which correspond to the crystal planes of (100), (110), (211), (220), (310), (311), (321), (320), (400), (420), (421), (511), (432), (442), (620), (541), (711), (633), (722), (653), and (842) (Fig.  4 b) 38 . These peaks are indicative of the presence of potassium zinc tungsten oxide and suggest the existence of Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6− species, as confirmed by the JCDD card No. 00-043-0001. The diffraction pattern of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite reveals the presence of the majority of characteristic peaks associated with ZnW 12 O 40 -heteropolyoxo and NiZn 2 O 4 within the structure of the nanocomposite, albeit with a slight shift (Fig.  4 c). Upon formation of the composite, there exists the potential for alterations in individual crystal planes and potential variations in grain population orientations that result in crystal planes exhibiting specific Miller index orientations. Additionally, it is plausible that the peaks of the pure amorphous background material may coincide with similar peaks. The displacement and disappearance of certain [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– peaks can primarily be attributed to the rearrangement of Keggin clusters anions during the self-assembly process of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– species and ceramic ions. Furthermore, the variation in atomic radius between the NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles and the [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– serves as another factor leading to the reduction in intensity and shift of multiple peaks. Ultimately, the utilization of the Debye-Scherer formula enables the determination of the average crystallite size of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite, which is calculated to be approximately 32.9 nm 39 , 40 . Besides, the X-ray peak broadening analysis was implemented to investigate the dimensions of the crystals and the lattice strain through the Williamson–Hall (W–H) in the subsequent manner 41 , 42 :

XRD patterns of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 4 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite.

In this formula, β hkl corresponds to the broadening of the instrumental peak, D represents the size of the crystallites (nm), K is the factor of shape which is equivalent to 0.89, λ corresponds to the wavelength of X-rays (0.15406 nm), θ denotes the reflection angle, and ε stands for the strain in the lattice. The plot in Fig.  5 illustrates the relationship between β hkl cosθ and 4sinθ for the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 . By employing linear regression, the measurements for the size of the crystalline particles (D) and the crystal lattice (ε) were ascertained through the inclination of the line. The lattice strain for (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite were calculated as − 5.17 \(\times \) 10 –3 , 2.42 \(\times \) 10 –4 , and 1.6 \(\times \) 10 –3 , respectively. The presence of a horizontal line exhibiting both positive and negative slopes can be ascribed to the phenomenon of lattice expansion and compression, respectively. The W–H curve of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite exhibits a positive slope, indicating lattice expansion resulting from slight variations in the ionic radius of the constituent elements. Additionally, the size of the crystal in the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 was found to be about 33 nm, a measurement consistent with the dimensions obtained using the Scherer formula.

W–H plots of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 4 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite.

Morphological observations

The FE-SEM analysis was employed to analyze the surface morphology, estimate the size of the particles, determine the orientation of the particles on the substrate, and identify potential particle accumulation. Figure  6 illustrates the surface morphology obtained from the FE-SEM analysis of (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite. The arrangement of particles in NiZn 2 O 4 is observed to be in the form of clumps, resulting in a spherical and relatively uniform shape (Fig.  6 a). The surface image of ZnW 12 O 40 –heteropolyoxo revealed irregular accumulations of spherical particles in the nanometer scale (Fig.  6 b) 43 . In addition, the FE-SEM image of ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite exhibits that the polyoxometalate is heterogeneously immobilized on NiZn 2 O 4 with a spherical morphology (Fig.  6 c,d). These findings indicate that [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– species was anchored on the surface of NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles. Additionally, the particle size distribution can be analyzed through the histogram depicted in Fig.  6 e. Based on the findings, it is evident that the particles are in the range of 30–35 nm. It should be noted that the average size of ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles is about 33 nm.

FE-SEM images of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 4 , ( c , d ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 , and ( d ) the particle size distribution of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles.

Mapping and EDX micrographs

The dispersion of elements was evaluated through Mapping analysis, which was further confirmed by EDX micrographs. The examination conducted by the EDX analysis successfully demonstrates the integration of O, K, W, Ni, and Zn within the structure of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 with corresponding weight percentages of 29.91, 16.52, 16.83, 27.74, and 9.00 wt%, respectively (Fig.  7 i). As illustrated in Fig.  7 a–h, the elemental Mapping of constituents in the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 aligns with the percentages documented by the EDX analysis. Also, elemental Mapping also displayed that metal oxide nanoparticles were decorated with [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– anionic clusters.

Elemental mapping images ( a – h ) and ( i ) EDX micrographs of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 .

Specific surface area and pore size distribution

The absorption–desorption isotherm of N 2 gas and surface characteristics, inclusive of the surface area and pore diameter of the materials were evaluated by the BET and BJH techniques. Figure  8 exhibits the absorption–desorption isotherm of type (II) according to the IUPAC classification, which is characterized by the presence of a microporous or non-porous structure. The specific surface area and pore volume of as-prepared nanocomposite were determined to be 16.572 m 2  g −1 and 0.023584 cm 3  g −1 , respectively. Additionally, the findings derived from the BET analysis indicated an average pore diameter of 5.69 nm for the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 as a potential material for the electrocatalytic hydrogen storage. The specific surface area and porous volume of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 are summarized in Table 1 .

( a ) Adsorption–desorption isotherm of N 2 and ( b ) BJH pore size distribution of ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite.

TGA-DTG analysis

The TGA-DTG analysis of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6− anionic clusters during pyrolysis in the N 2 atmosphere is illustrated in Fig.  9 . The TGA curve of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6− exhibits several distinct peaks, signifying that Keggin-type ZnW 12 O 40 experiences several notable weight reduction processes whilst undergoing pyrolysis (Fig.  9 a). A significant weight loss (3.90%) was observed at room temperature up to 300 °C, which could be mainly related to the decomposition of adsorbed water molecules. Moreover, a notable weight loss (3.79%) was attributed to the desorption of crystallization water of H 6 [ZnW 12 O 40 ]·6H 2 O clusters incorporated into the ZnW 12 O 40 nanostructure during synthesis. The enhanced mass reduction (92.31%) observed at 559 °C can be ascribed to the withdrawal of oxygen from ZnW 12 O 40 , resulting in its decomposition 44 . Moreover, the TGA-DTG curve for ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite are illustrated in Fig.  9 b. The curve shows a two-step decomposition process. The first weight loss (2.79%) at ~ 100 °C is corresponds to the elimination of adsorbed water during the synthesis of as-prepared ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite. The second major weight loss (56.3%) between 250 and 450 °C corresponds to the elimination of capping agent, such as citric acid and urea according to synthesis 45 .

TGA–DTG curve of ( a ) Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– and ( b ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite from room temperature to 600 °C.

Electrochemical study results

Cyclic voltammetry.

The electrochemical characteristics of the provided samples were examined by charge–discharge chronopotentiometry (CHP) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) methodologies. Figure  10 illustrates the CV curves of the (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 in relation to the potential/current of the redox reaction within the range of − 8.0 to − 1.0 V at a constant scan rate of 100.0 mV/s for 20 cycles. As depicted in Fig.  10 a, the CV measurements of NiZn 2 O 4 nanoceramics exhibits the ability to undergo reversible and continuous multi-electron redox reactions on anodic/cathodic sweeps. Furthermore, Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– anionic cluster s possess the capability to perform reversible and continuous multi-electron redox, and there are also tungsten ions with different valence states of W VI and W V (Fig.  10 b). As seen in Fig.  10 c, the redox process of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 electrode is under surface control. This phenomenon may be attributed to the presence of Keggin polyanions and the pore structure of the layer.

Cyclic voltammetry curves of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 40 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 as working electrodes.

Chronopotentiometry measurements

A set of CHP measurements were conducted in order to examine the electrochemical properties of materials. The measurements were carried out with the following specifications: [KOH](aq) = 6.0 M, a scan rate of 100 mV s −1 , and a three-electrode system comprised of a working counter (Pt) and a reference electrode (Hg/HgO), along with a working electrode formed from the prepared products as active materials. For detailed examination of hydrogen storage capacity, an investigation was conducted on the electrochemical hydrogen storage of bare copper foam, which served as a substrate. It was imperative to present a desorption diagram of the first cycle of the copper foam to demonstrate that it does not affect the discharge capacity of the as-prepared nanocomposite. As indicated in Fig.  11 , the discharge capacity of the bare Cu foam revealed a negligible capacity for hydrogen storage ( \(\sim \)  0.9 mAh/g), which can be disregarded in all stages of the test. As a result, the copper foam can be used as a substrate throughout all electrochemical hydrogen storage procedures.

Electrochemical hydrogen storage capacity of copper substrate before coating.

During the adsorption process, splitting of the water within the electrolyte occurs in immediate proximity to the working electrode. The electrolyte is comprised of H + ions that have the potential to be assimilated by the samples that have been prepared on the working electrode or lead to the reformation and dispersion of hydrogen molecules on the surface of the electrode 46 , 47 . The resultant reactions can be attributed to the quasi-reversible electrochemical reaction as follows:

In the process of desorption, the release of H + ions occur from the samples and they subsequently react with OH − ions, resulting in the formation of H–O–H molecules. The elucidation of potential reactions taking place during the discharge process can be presented as follows:

The hydrogen storage capacity (HSC) of the materials can be calculated using the following equation (Eq. (7)): HSC = It/m, where I represent the applied current (mA), t is the charge–discharge time (h), and m is the amount of the coated nanocomposite (g) 48 . Figure  12 a–c illustrates the electrochemical hydrogen storage of (a) NiZn 2 O 4 , (b) ZnW 12 O 4 , and (c) ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite as active materials on working electrodes. After carrying out multiple absorption–desorption cycles at varying currents, a current of 2 mA was identified as the optimal value. The discharge capacity of each cycle demonstrates an increase compared to the preceding cycle when a current of 2 mA is administered. This positive trend persists until the capacity attains its highest achievable value. This enhancement can be attributed to the emergence of new sites that facilitate the absorption–desorption of hydrogen. In the applied of current of 2 mA, the discharge capacity of the NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles experienced a significant increase from approximately 110 to 420 mAh/g after 20 cycles (Fig.  12 a). Furthermore, the Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6 cluster exhibited a notable discharge capacity ( \(\sim \)  360 mAh/g) during the initial cycle, and the storage capability progressively amplified to about 790 mAh/g after 20 cycles (Fig.  12 b). As seen in Fig.  12 c, the discharge capacity of the ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite has demonstrated a significant enhancement from 340 to 900 mAh/g under identical experimental conditions after 20 runs. The data presented in this research demonstrates a positive correlation between the surface area and the electrochemical hydrogen storage capacity. As a result, the ZnW 12 O 40 @NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite proves to be a preferred active material for hydrogen adsorption and desorption due to its larger surface area, allowing for a stronger interaction with H 2 molecules. Further, it can be inferred that the remarkable efficacy of electrochemical hydrogen storage can be ascribed to the synergistic influence of ZnW 12 O 40 and NiZn 2 O 4 nanostructures.

Electrochemical discharge curves of ( a ) NiZn 2 O 4 , ( b ) ZnW 12 O 40 , and ( c ) ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite at a current density of 2 mA.

The discharge capacity of several materials was documented in Table 2 alongside their corresponding formula structures. Among the diverse nanoparticles and composites, the optimum efficiency was associated with ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite under experimental condition.

Conclusions

In the current study, a new nanocomposite was synthesized successfully through the incorporation of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– anionic clusters onto NiZn 2 O 4 particles and applied in the electrochemical hydrogen storage process. The as-prepared nanocomposite indicates a spherical morphology with an average diameter of approximately 32.9 nm, which was calculated by the Scherer equation. Different parameters, such as discharge capacity of the bare copper foam, and the influence of repeated hydrogen adsorption–desorption cycles were discussed. The electrochemical findings revealed that the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite exhibits a remarkable capacity and outstanding reversibility in comparison to individual ZnW 12 O 40 and NiZn 2 O 4 nanoparticles for the purpose of hydrogen storage. The highest hydrogen discharge capability of the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 was achieved \(\sim \)  340 mAh/g during the 1st cycle, and the storage capacity enhanced to approximately 900 mAh/g at the end of 20 cycles using a current density of 2 mA. Hence, the ZnW 12 O 40 /NiZn 2 O 4 nanocomposite can effectively contribute to the field of energy storage as a promising and innovative candidate material.

Data availability

Data will available when requested from outers or from corresponding author.

Abdalla, A. M. et al. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 165 , 602–627 (2018).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Abe, J. O., Popoola, A. P. I., Ajenifuja, E. & Popoola, O. M. Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 44 , 15072–15086 (2019).

Guilbert, D. & Vitale, G. Hydrogen as a clean and sustainable energy vector for global transition from fossil-based to zero-carbon. Clean Technol. 3 , 881–909 (2021).

Article   Google Scholar  

Lopion, P., Markewitz, P., Robinius, M. & Stolten, D. A review of current challenges and trends in energy systems modeling. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 96 , 156–166 (2018).

Jiang, H. et al. Formation of organic sulfur compounds through SO 2-initiated photochemistry of PAHs and dimethylsulfoxide at the air-water interface. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22 , 4237–4252 (2022).

Article   ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Dou, Z., Chen, H., Liu, Y., Huang, R. & Pan, J. Removal of gaseous H 2 S using microalgae porous carbons synthesized by thermal/microwave KOH activation. J. Energy Inst. 101 , 45–55 (2022).

Nazemi, A., Steeves, A. H., Kastner, D. W. & Kulik, H. J. Influence of the greater protein environment on the electrostatic potential in metalloenzyme active sites: The case of formate dehydrogenase. Phys. Chem. B. 126 , 4069–4079 (2022).

Alinavaz, S., Ghiyasiyan-Arani, M., Dawi, E. A. & Salavati-Niasari, M. Sonochemical synthesis, characterization and investigation of the electrochemical hydrogen storage properties of Ho 3 Fe 5 O 12 /Mg 2 Al(OH) 7 nanocomposites. J. Energy Storage. 66 , 107369 (2023).

Kaur, M. & Pal, K. Review on hydrogen storage materials and methods from an electrochemical viewpoint. J. Energy Storage. 23 , 234–249 (2019).

Sulaiman, N. N. & Ismail, M. Study the effect of SrFe 12 O 19 on MgH 2 /LiAlH 4 composite for solid-state hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 42 , 29830–29839 (2017).

Aziz, M. Liquid hydrogen: A review on liquefaction, storage, transportation, and safety. Energies. 14 , 5917 (2021).

Gholami, T. & Pirsaheb, M. Review on effective parameters in electrochemical hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 46 , 783–795 (2021).

Horn, M. R. et al. Polyoxometalates (POMs): From electroactive clusters to energy materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 14 , 1652–1700 (2021).

Stamate, A. E., Pavel, O. D., Zavoianu, R. & Marcu, I. C. Highlights on the catalytic properties of polyoxometalate-intercalated layered double hydroxides: A review. Catalysts. 10 , 57 (2020).

Khalafi, N., Rezvani, M. A. & Jafarian, V. Facile synthesis of new hybrid nanocomposite sandwich-type polyoxometalate@ lead (II) oxide@ polyvinyl alcohol as an efficient and reusable amphiphilic nanocatalyst for ODS of real fuel. Adv. Powder Technol. 34 (1), 103877 (2023).

Shojaei, A. F., Rezvani, A. M. & Heravi, M. A green, reusable and highly efficient solid acid catalyst for the oxidation of aldehydes to the corresponding carboxylic acids using H 2 O 2 and KMnO 4 : H 5 PV 2 Mo 10 O 40 (10-molybdo-2-vanadophosphoric heteropolyacid). J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 76 (11), 1513–1522 (2011).

Shojaei, A. F., Rezvani, M. A. & Heravi, M. H 5 PV 2 Mo 10 O 40 as an efficient catalyst for the oxidation of thiols to the corresponding disulfides using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 76 (7), 955–963 (2011).

Zhong, R. et al. Wells-Dawson arsenotungstate porous derivatives for electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes and electrocatalytically active materials. Inorg. Chem. 60 , 9869–9879 (2021).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Rezvani, M. A. & Khandan, S. Synthesis and characterization of a new nanocomposite (FeW 11 V@CTAB-MMT) as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for oxidative desulfurization of gasoline. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 32 , 1–13 (2018).

Li, D., Ma, P., Niu, J. & Wang, J. Recent advances in transition-metal-containing Keggin-type polyoxometalate-based coordination polymers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 392 , 49–80 (2019).

Yang, M. et al. Preparation and application of Keggin polyoxometalate-based 3D coordination polymer materials as supercapacitors and amperometric sensors. ChemNanoMat. 7 , 299–306 (2021).

Kholdeeva, O. A., Maksimchuk, N. V. & Maksimov, G. M. Polyoxometalate-based heterogeneous catalysts for liquid phase selective oxidations: Comparison of different strategies. Catal. Today. 157 , 107–113 (2010).

Chamack, M., Mahjoub, A. R. & Aghayan, H. Catalytic performance of vanadium-substituted molybdophosphoric acid supported on zirconium modified mesoporous silica in oxidative desulfurization. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 94 , 565–572 (2015).

Salavati-Niasari, M., Farzaneh, F. & Ghandi, M. Oxidation of cyclohexene with tert-butylhydroperoxide and hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by alumina-supported manganese (II) complexes. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 186 , 101–107 (2002).

Salavati-Niasari, M. Synthesis and characterization of host (nanodimensional pores of zeolite-Y)-guest [unsaturated 16-membered octaaza-macrocycle manganese (II), cobalt (II), nickel (II), copper (II), and zinc (II) complexes] nanocomposite materials. Chem. Lett. 34 , 1444–1445 (2005).

Liu, Y., Niu, Z., Lu, Y., Zhang, L. & Yan, K. Facile synthesis of CuFe 2 O 4 crystals efficient for water oxidation and H 2 O 2 reduction. J. Alloy. Compd. 735 , 654–659 (2018).

Kumar, Y. A., Kumar, K. D. & Kim, H. J. Facile preparation of a highly efficient NiZn 2 O 4 –NiO nanoflower composite grown on Ni foam as an advanced battery-type electrode material for high-performance electrochemical supercapacitors. Dalton Trans. 49 , 3622–3629 (2020).

Xie, T., Xu, L., Liu, C. & Wang, Y. Magnetic composite ZnFe2O4/SrFe12O19: Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic activity under visible light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 273 , 684–691 (2013).

Aghmasheh, M., Rezvani, M. A., Jafarian, V. & Aghasadeghi, Z. High oxidation desulfurization of fuels catalyzed by vanadium-substituted phosphomolybdate@polyaniline@chitosan as an inorganic-organic hybrid nanocatalyst. Inorg. Chem. 62 , 5468–5478 (2023).

Hori, B. S., Rezvani, M. A., Ardeshiri, H. H. & Panahiniya, Z. Synthesis and characterization of new nanocomposite based on di-substituted Keggin-type phosphotungstate@ceramic as a new and high-performance nanocatalyst for O 2 evolution from water oxidation reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 48 , 33548–33557 (2023).

Rezvani, M. A., Ghasemi, K., Ardeshiri, H. H. & Aghmasheh, M. Deep oxidative desulfurization of gas oil by iron (III)-substituted polyoxometalate immobilized on nickel (II) oxide,((n-C4H9) 4N) 4H [PW 11 FeO 39 ]@NiO, as an efficient nanocatalyst. Sci. Rep. 13 , 15233 (2023).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Nomiya, K., Kato, K. & Miwa, M. Preparation and spectrochemical properties of soluble vanadophosphate polyanions with bicapped-Keggin structure. Polyhedron. 5 , 811–813 (1986).

Vishnuvarthan, M. et al. Spectroscopic investigation into the nature of the active sites for epoxidation reactions using vanadium-based aluminophosphate catalysts. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 138 , 167–175 (2011).

Siwatch, P., Sharma, K. & Tripathi, S. K. Facile synthesis of NiCo 2 O 4 quantum dots for asymmetric supercapacitor. Electrochim. Acta. 329 , 135084 (2020).

Makuła, P., Pacia, M. & Macyk, W. How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. 9 , 6814–6817 (2018).

Google Scholar  

Aghmasheh, M., Rezvani, M. A., Jafarian, V. & Ardeshiri, H. H. Synthesis and characterization of a new nanocatalyst based on Keggin-type polyoxovanadate/nickel-zinc oxide, PV 14 /NiZn 2 O 4 , as a potential material for deep oxidative desulfurization of fuels. Energy Fuels. 37 (13), 9474–9486 (2023).

Shen, B. et al. Cactus-like NiCo 2 O 4 @Nickel-plated fabric nano-flowers as flexible free-standing supercapacitor electrode. Appl. Surf. Sci. 609 , 155189 (2023).

Anyushin, A. V., Abramov, P. A., Gushchin, A. L., Vincent, C. & Sokolov, M. N. An improved method for the synthesis of [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– and its reaction with [Pt(OH) 4 ·(H 2 O) 2 ]: Crystal structures of (H 2 NMe 2 ) 5 H [ZnW 12 O 40 ]·3.5 H 2 O and K 6 Na 2 [PtW 6 O 24 ]·11H 2 O. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 62 , 397–403 (2017).

Shaterian, M., Ardeshiri, H. H., Mohammadi, R., Aghasadeghi, Z. & Karami, M. Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical evaluation of SnFe 2 O 4 @MWCNTS nanocomposite as a potential hydrogen storage material. Heliyon 9 , e16648 (2023).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Moradi, S., Ardeshiri, H. H., Gholami, A. & Ghafuri, H. Synthesis and characterization of new biocatalyst based on LDH functionalized with l-asparagine amino acid for the synthesis of tri-substituted derivatives of 2, 4, 5-(H1)-imidazoles. Heliyon. 9 , e22185 (2023).

Zak, A. K., Majid, W. A., Abrishami, M. E. & Yousefi, R. X-ray analysis of ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson-Hall and size–strain plot methods. Solid State Sci. 13 , 251–256 (2011).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Prabhu, Y., Rao, K. V., Kumar, V. S. S. & Kumari, B. S. X-ray analysis of Fe doped ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson–Hall and size-strain plot methods. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2 , 268–274 (2013).

Guo, K. K. et al. Exploring the coordination modes of a Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6– anionic cluster: Bonding patterns, crystal structure, and semiconducting properties. Inorg. Chem. 60 , 9097–9109 (2021).

Zhou, T. et al. Investigation of Na 6 V 10 O 28 as a promising rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries cathode. Chem. Eng. J. 445 , 136789 (2022).

Nitika, R. A. & Kumar, V. Investigation on anneal-tuned properties of ZnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles for use in humidity sensors. Appl. Phys. A. 127 , 609 (2021).

Zhu, J. S. et al. An in-situ Raman study of intermediate adsorption engineering by high-index facet control during the hydrogen evolution reaction. Inorg. Chem. Front. 7 , 1892–1899 (2020).

Liu, D. et al. High-performance urea electrolysis towards less energy-intensive electrochemical hydrogen production using a bifunctional catalyst electrode. J. Mater. Chem. A. 5 , 3208–3213 (2017).

Mohassel, R., Soofivand, F., Dawi, E. A., Shabani-Nooshabadi, M. & Salavati-Niasari, M. ErMnO 3 /Er 2 Mn 2 O 7 /ZnO/GO multi-component nanocomposite as a promising material for hydrogen storage: Facile synthesis and comprehensive investigation of component roles. J. Energy Storage. 65 , 107285 (2023).

Baladi, M., Valian, M., Ghiyasiyan-Arani, M. & Salavati-Niasari, M. Role of morphology in electrochemical hydrogen storage using binary DyFeO 3 –ZnO nanocomposites as electrode materials. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 46 , 21026–21039 (2021).

Henao, J., Pacheco, Y., Sotelo, O., Casales, M. & Martinez-Gómez, L. Lanthanum titanate nanometric powder potentially for rechargeable Ni-batteries: Synthesis and electrochemical hydrogen storage. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8 , 759–765 (2019).

Sedighi, F., Ghiyasiyan-Arani, M. & Behpour, M. Ternary nanocomposites of Ce2W2O9/CoWO4/porous carbon; design, structural study and electrochemical hydrogen storage application. Fuel. 310 , 122218 (2022).

Liu, E. et al. Enhanced electrochemical hydrogen storage capacity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes by TiO 2 decoration. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 36 , 6739–6743 (2011).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, 451561319, Iran

Mohammad Ali Rezvani, Hadi Hassani Ardeshiri & Masomeh Aghmasheh

Catalysts and Organic Synthesis Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran

Hadi Hassani Ardeshiri & Alireza Gholami

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Amir Doustgani

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Mohammad Ali Rezvani: Corresponding author, supervision, organising and supervising the course of the project or the article and taking the responsibility. Hadi Hassani Ardeshiri: Investigation, approved the version to be published. Alireza Gholami: Investigation. Masomeh Aghmasheh: Investigation. Amir Doustgani: Organising and supervising the course of the project or the article and taking the responsibility.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ali Rezvani .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Rezvani, M.A., Ardeshiri, H.H., Gholami, A. et al. Design of a new nanocomposite based on Keggin-type [ZnW 12 O 40 ] 6− anionic cluster anchored on NiZn 2 O 4 ceramics as a promising material towards the electrocatalytic hydrogen storage. Sci Rep 14 , 11038 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61871-0

Download citation

Received : 16 March 2024

Accepted : 10 May 2024

Published : 14 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61871-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Keggin-type polyoxometalate
• Assembled nanocomposite
• Hydrogen storage
• NiZn 2 O 4 nanoceramics

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.