literature review on mental health courts

• Open access
• Published: 27 July 2016

The effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact: a systematic review protocol

• Desmond Loong 1 ,
• Sarah Bonato 2 &
• Carolyn S. Dewa 1 , 3  

Systematic Reviews volume  5 , Article number:  123 ( 2016 ) Cite this article

5274 Accesses

3 Citations

Metrics details

Mental health courts were created to help criminal defendants who have a mental illness that significantly contributes to their criminal offense. Despite the increasing number of mental health courts around the world, data about their effectiveness have only begun to emerge in the past decade. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the current evidence on the effectiveness of mental health courts. Specifically, this review will address the question, “How effective are mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact?”

Methods/design

Eight electronic databases will be searched, specifically PsycINFO, Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Social Work Abstracts, and Criminal Justice Abstracts. A multi-phase screening process will be used to identify relevant search hits. Articles that pass the three-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched. Full-text articles that are rated to have low to moderate risk of bias will be summarized into two tables, one containing a brief description of the study and the other reporting the results of relevant outcomes measured.

By synthesizing the results of the studies, this systematic review will help illuminate gaps in the literature, direct future research, and inform policy makers.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016036084

Peer Review reports

In the mid-1990s, courts across Canada and the USA reported significant increases in the number of defendants with mental illness entering the criminal court system [ 1 , 2 ]. In some jurisdictions, this increase has been in excess of 10 % per year [ 2 ]. As a response to this growing problem, mental health courts were created to help criminal defendants who do not meet not-guilty-for-reason-of-insanity criteria but who have a mental illness that is a significant contributing factor to their criminal conduct [ 3 ].

Mental health court diversion programs are characterized by three key components: screening, assessment, and negotiation between court diversion and criminal justice staff [ 4 ]. Screening involves the identification of defendants who are suspected of having a mental illness. Assessment involves the evaluation of identified defendants by a mental health professional. The last component involves court diversion staff negotiating with prosecutors, defense attorneys, the courts, and community-based mental health providers to work towards having charges reduced or even waived [ 4 ].

Although the number of mental health courts continues to increase across North America and abroad, data have only begun to emerge in the past decade suggesting that mental health courts reduce recidivism and improve client outcomes [ 1 , 2 ].

Purpose of systematic review

The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to look at the current evidence on the effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing client rearrest rates and contact with police. Specifically, this review will address the question, “How effective are mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact?” This review will contribute to the literature by examining the evidence on whether mental health court clients benefit from their linkage to mental health services in the community by helping them live in the community independently and stay out of the legal system.

Previous reviews and rationale

Although systematic reviews on mental health courts have been published, with 2011 and 2015 being the most recent [ 5 – 7 ], there are several limitations with these three previous reviews that this systematic review will address.

Firstly, this systematic review will report on the current evidence on the effectiveness of mental health courts by collecting data on peer-reviewed studies up until February 2016. The 2011 reviews by Sartechi et al. [ 6 ] and Lange et al. [ 5 ] are based on data collected up until July 2009 and January 2011, respectively. The 2015 paper by Honegger [ 7 ] reviews data collected up to August 2014.

Secondly, this review will employ a more comprehensive search strategy than previous reviews. This review will use truncated word search commands and database-specific adjacency operators that were not used by previous reviews. Truncated search commands broaden a search strategy to capture variations in spelling for a particular word. This means a keyword can be comprehensively searched in one single command as opposed to the multiple search commands required to account for each variation of spelling. Adjacency commands, on the other hand, help to look for a string of words that are within a specified number of words apart. This allows key phrases to be searched without having to worry about the order of words the author(s) may use and all the different combinations.

Lastly, this review will not be using geographical search limitations. Previous reviews focused on specific geographical locations, such as North America [ 5 ] or the USA [ 7 ]. Given mental health courts exist in many jurisdictions around the world [ 1 ], the use of geographical limitations are arguably too narrow of a view.

This systematic literature review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [ 8 ]. Because this review will only use publically available information, an ethics review board approval will not be required.

Eligibility criteria

For the purposes of this review, mental health courts will be defined as specialized courts dedicated to persons with serious mental illness who have committed a crime [ 2 ]. Court support services will be defined as services provided to clients to help navigate the court system and utilize mental health services [ 9 ]. Recidivism will be defined as rearrests, and police contact will be defined as any kind of client involvement with police in the community for suspected violations of the law by the client (as opposed to contacts resulting from being a victim of a crime).

The following eligibility criteria will be used to screen for relevant peer-reviewed articles:

The study reports on a mental health court(s).

The study reports on adults (18 years or older) with mental disorders who have been charged for committing a crime.

The study reports program outcome measures on recidivism and/or police contact.

The following exclusion criteria will be used:

The study reports only on juvenile courts.

The study reports solely on drug courts.

The study population does not have identified mental disorders.

There are no outcome measures reported.

There is no comparison group.

The article is not reporting on original research.

The study is a case study.

The study only re-reports findings from an already included publication of the same author using the same dataset.

Search strategy

Electronic databases.

In total, eight electronic databases will be searched for this systematic review:

PsycINFO (an index of journal articles, books, chapters, and dissertations in psychology, social sciences, behavioral sciences, and health sciences)

Medline (an index of biomedical research and clinical sciences journal articles)

Medline In-Process (an index of biomedical research and clinical sciences journal articles awaiting to be indexed into Medline)

Embase (an index of biomedical research and abstracts from biomedical, drug, and medical device conferences)

Web of Science (an index of journal articles, editorially selected books, and conference proceedings in life sciences and biomedical research)

CINAHL (an index of journal articles, books, dissertations, and conference proceedings in nursing, biomedicine, health sciences librarianship, alternative medicine, consumer health, and allied health disciplines)

Social Work Abstracts (an index of abstracts in social work and human services)

Criminal Justice Abstracts (an index of abstracts in criminal justice and criminology)

Specific to each database, the finalized search strategies will be developed and executed with a professional health science librarian. Medline, Medline In-Process, PsycINFO, Embase, and Social Work Abstracts will be searched using the OVID platform. Web of Science will be searched using the Thomson Reuters search interface. Lastly, CINAHL and Criminal Justice Abstracts will be searched using the EBSCO platform. Across all databases, search results will be limited to English language journals and published articles in peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Search results will not be limited by publication year.

Search term development

PsycINFO will be used to develop the finalized search terms for this systematic review. The main rationale is because PsycINFO has the largest index of journals relating to both mental health and justice. In the first step, a search will be executed using the preliminary keywords shown in Table  1 . Keyword searches are particularly useful when the subject heading for a particular topic is not known and allows for queries of keywords that appear anywhere in an article’s index record [ 10 ]. The results of the preliminary keyword search will then be screened for relevancy using the eligibility criteria outlined previously. Articles that are found to be relevant will be examined for the keywords under which they are indexed. PsycINFO subject headings will also be identified to broaden the search if required. The development of search terms will stop when no new keywords are found from newly identified articles. Each new article, identified with each new tested term, will be examined for new relevant search terms. In an iterative process, every keyword will be tested individually for inclusion into the search strategy. In the last step, the final search strategy will be adapted and executed for the remaining seven databases. When searching in Medline, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) will be examined. MeSH terms are important to consider because they are the US National Library of Medicine’s predefined and authorized vocabulary thesaurus used to index journal articles in Medline and PubMed [ 11 ]. Because MeSH terms follow a hierarchical structure, these terms allow for searches at various levels of specificity [ 11 ]. That is, all terms follow a tree structure from broad to specific, and this will allow for broadening the search if needed. Preliminary search strategies for each of the databases are included in Tables  1 , 2 , and 3 .

Study selection

A multi-phase screening process will be used to identify relevant search hits using the eligibility criteria mentioned previously. Phase 1 will involve screening articles by title. Citations that pass the first phase will then be evaluated for relevance based on their abstracts. The full-text articles that pass the first and second screening will be evaluated for content. The entire multi-phase screening process will be done independently by two reviewers. Using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (ƙ), the inter-rater reliability between both raters will be calculated and corrected for chance [ 12 ].

Articles with rating disagreements will be discussed until a consensus is reached. The reference lists of all accepted studies will also be hand searched. Articles identified through this process will be subjected to the same multi-phase screening process described previously using the same eligibility criteria.

Risk of bias assessment

Articles that pass the three-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias. A 6-item risk of bias checklist adapted from Cochrane [ 13 ] and Dewa et al.’s [ 14 ] Risk of Bias Assessment tool will be used:

Adequate sequence generation

Group assignments of participants follow rules that are based on chance.

Allocation concealment

Schedule of random assignments are kept concealed from personnel involved in study enrollment.

Participants and personnel are masked of the knowledge of which intervention was received.

Incomplete outcome data

There is no significant difference between groups who withdraw from the study.

Selective reporting

Study results are not selectively reported.

Recruitment strategy

The recruitment process is open to all potential participants who meet the study eligibility criteria.

Each of the six aforementioned criteria will be given one of three possible scores: −1 (if there is a high risk of bias), +1 (if there is a low risk of bias), or 0 (if there is not enough information to assess risk). The minimum and maximum for any one article is −6 and +6, respectively. Total scores of 2 and below will be categorized as high risk of bias and scores between 3 and 4 points will be considered as moderate risk. Articles that score 5 points and above will be considered as low risk of bias.

All full-text articles that are rated as low to moderate risk of bias will be summarized in two summary tables. The first summary table will contain a brief description of the study. This will include the name of the authors, the journal name, the year the study was published in, description of the study population, the study design employed, and the type of recidivism or police outcomes that were measured. The second summary table will report the results of the outcomes that were measured.

This systematic literature review seeks to examine the current evidence on the effectiveness of mental health courts. Specifically, it seeks to answer, “How effective are mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact?” This review will illuminate gaps in the evidence with respect to recidivism and police contacts and also help guide the direction of future research. Furthermore, this review will help inform policy makers in the establishment or continuation of mental health courts in their respective jurisdictions.

Abbreviations

PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Schneider RD. Mental health courts and diversion programs: a global survey. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010;33(4):201–6.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Schneider RD, Bloom H, Heerema M. Mental health courts: decriminalizing the mentally Ill. Toronto: Irwin Law; 2007.

Google Scholar  

Desmond BC, Lenz PJ. Mental health courts: an effective way for treating offenders with serious mental illness. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 2010;34(4):525–30.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Steadman HJ, Barbera SS, Dennis DL. A national survey of jail diversion programs for mentally ill detainees. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994;45(11):1109–13.

CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Lange S, Rehm J, Popova S. The effectiveness of criminal justice diversion initiatives in North America: a systematic literature review. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2011;10:200–14.

Article   Google Scholar  

Sarteschi C, Vaughn MG, Kim K. Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: a quantitative review. J Crim Just. 2011;39:12–20.

Honegger LN. Does the evidence support the case for mental health courts? A review of the literature. Law Hum Behav. 2015;39(5):478–88.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care: a program framework for: mental health diversion/court support services. In . ; 2006.

Columbia University Libraries. Keyword search. [Internet]. Available from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/help/clio/keyword.html . Accessed 1 Nov 2015.

University of Oxford. MeSH terms explained; 2005. [Internet]. Available from http://learntech.physiol.ox.ac.uk/cochrane_tutorial/cochlibd0e914.php ]. Accessed 1 Nov 2015.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46.

Higgins JPT, Green S. Eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]; 2011. [Internet]. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org . Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, Joosen MC. The effectiveness of return-to-work interventions that incorporate work-focused problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review. BMJ open. 2015;5(6):e007122.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This work was funded by Dr. Dewa’s Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Public Health Agency of Canada Applied Public Health Chair (FRN#: 86895). The funders had no role in the design of this study nor will they have a role in its completion. Any views expressed or errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Availability of data and materials

Authors’ contributions.

DL, SB, and CSD were responsible for the study design. DL and CSD were responsible for the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ information

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Ethics approval and consent to participate, author information, authors and affiliations.

Centre for Research on Employment and Workplace Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, M5S 2S1, Canada

Desmond Loong & Carolyn S. Dewa

Library Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, M5S 2S1, Canada

Sarah Bonato

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, 2103 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA

Carolyn S. Dewa

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn S. Dewa .

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Loong, D., Bonato, S. & Dewa, C.S. The effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 5 , 123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0291-8

Download citation

Received : 15 April 2016

Accepted : 17 June 2016

Published : 27 July 2016

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0291-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Mental health courts
• Police contact

Systematic Reviews

ISSN: 2046-4053

• Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
• General enquiries: [email protected]

Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism and Police Contact: A Systematic Review

• Original PAper
• Published: 07 June 2019
• Volume 55 , pages 1073–1098, ( 2019 )

Cite this article

• Desmond Loong 1 ,
• Sarah Bonato 2 ,
• Jan Barnsley 3 &
• Carolyn S. Dewa   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-3905 1 , 4  

3608 Accesses

8 Citations

6 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Mental health courts were created to help criminal defendants who have a mental illness that significantly contributes to their criminal offense. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the current evidence to address the question, “How effective are mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact?” Systematic literature searches of eight electronic databases were performed. A total of 2590 unique citations were identified. Of these, 20 studies were included in the final analysis. The results of this systematic review suggest there is some evidence to show that mental health courts help to reduce recidivism rates, but the effect on police contact is less clear. Results also suggest case managers or access to vocational and housing services may be important components of effective mental health courts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

The effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact: a systematic review protocol

Sentencing and Deterrence

Assessing the Effect of Mental Health Courts on Adult and Juvenile Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis

Data availability.

All the published papers used in this manuscript are publicly available. There are no data available.

Abbreviations

Assertive community treatment

Forensic assertive community treatment

Mental health court

Peer review of electronic search strategies

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Treatment as usual

Traditional criminal court

Anestis, J. C., & Carbonell, J. L. (2014). Stopping the revolving door: Effectiveness of mental health court in reducing recidivism by mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services, 65 (9), 1105–1112.

Article   Google Scholar  

Burns, B. (2013). Mental health: Court liaison nurses meet in Christchurch. Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, 19 (6), 33-33 31p.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1973). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research . Skokie: R. McNally College Publishing Company.

Google Scholar  

Christy, A., Poythress, N. G., Boothroyd, R. A., Petrila, J., & Mehra, S. (2005). Evaluating the efficiency and community safety goals of the broward county mental health court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23 (2), 227–243.

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 37–46.

Cosden, M., Ellens, J. K., Schnell, J. L., Yamini-Diouf, Y., & Wolfe, M. M. (2003). Evaluation of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21 (4), 415–427.

Cowell, Alexander J., Broner, Nahama, & Dupont, Randolph. (2004). The cost-effectiveness of criminal justice diversion programs for people with serious mental illness co-occurring with substance abuse: Four case studies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20 (3), 292–315.

Cusack, K. J., Morrissey, J. P., Cuddeback, G. S., Prins, A., & Williams, D. M. (2010). Criminal justice involvement, behavioral health service use, and costs of forensic assertive community treatment: A randomized trial. Community Mental Health Journal, 46 (4), 356–363.

Desmond, B. C., & Lenz, P. J. (2010). Mental health courts: an effective way for treating offenders with serious mental illness. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 34 (4), 525–530.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dewa, C. S., Loong, D., Bonato, S., & Joosen, M. C. (2015). The effectiveness of return-to-work interventions that incorporate work-focused problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders: A systematic literature review. British Medical Journal Open, 5 (6), e007122.

Dirks-Linhorst, P. A., & Linhorst, D. M. (2012). Recidivism outcomes for suburban mental health court defendants. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37 (1), 76–91.

Gordon, J. A., Barnes, C. M., & VanBenschoten, S. W. (2006). The dual treatment track program: A descriptive assessment of a new “In-House” jail diversion program. Federal Probation, 70 (3), 9–18.

Han, W., & Redlich, A. D. (2016). The impact of community treatment on recidivism among mental health court participants. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D. C.), 67 (4), 384–390.

Herinckx, H. A., Swart, S. C., Ama, S. M., Dolezal, C. D., & King, S. (2005). Rearrest and linkage to mental health services among clients of the clark county mental health court program. Psychiatric Services, 56 (7), 853–857.

Hiday, V. A., Ray, B., & Wales, H. (2016). Longer-term impacts of mental health courts: recidivism two years after exit. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D. C.), 67 (4), 378–383.

Hiday, V. A., Wales, H. W., & Ray, B. (2013). Effectiveness of a short-term mental health court: Criminal recidivism one year postexit. Law and Human Behavior, 37 (6), 401–411.

Honegger, L. N. (2015). Does the evidence support the case for mental health courts? A review of the literature. Law and Human Behavior, 39 (5), 478–488.

Lamberti, J. S., Weisman, R., & Faden, D. I. (2004). Forensic assertive community treatment: Preventing incarceration of adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D. C.), 55 (11), 1285–1293.

Lange, S., Rehm, J., & Popova, S. (2011). The effectiveness of criminal justice diversion initiatives in North America: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 200–214.

Lim, Loraine, & Day, Andrew. (2014). Mental health diversion courts: A two year recidivism study of a South Australian mental health court program. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32 (4), 539–551.

Loong, D., Bonato, S., & Dewa, C. S. (2016). The effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev, 5 (1), 123.

Lowder, E. M., Desmarais, S. L., & Baucom, D. J. (2016). Recidivism following mental health court exit: Between and within-group comparisons. Law and Human Behavior, 40 (2), 118–127.

McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 40–46.

McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164 (9), 1395–1403.

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2006). A Program Framework for: Mental Health Diversion/Court Support Services .

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6 (7), e1000097.

Moore, M. E., & Hiday, V. A. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law and Human Behavior, 30 (6), 659–674.

Ryan, S., Brown, C. K., & Watanabe-Galloway, S. (2010). Toward successful postbooking diversion: What are the next steps? Psychiatric Services (Washington, D. C.), 61 (5), 469–477.

Sarteschi, C., Vaughn, M. G., & Kim, K. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 12–20.

Schneider, R. D. (2010). Mental health courts and diversion programs: A global survey. [Introductory]. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 33 (4), 201-206.

Schneider, R. D., Bloom, H., & Heerema, M. (2007). Mental health courts: decriminalizing the mentally ill . Toronto: Irwin Law.

Shafer, M. S., Arthur, B., & Franczak, M. J. (2004). An analysis of post-booking jail diversion programming for persons with co-occurring disorders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22 (6), 771–785.

Steadman, H. J., Barbera, S. S., & Dennis, D. L. (1994). A national survey of jail diversion programs for mentally ill detainees. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 45 (11), 1109–1113.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Steadman, H. J., & Naples, M. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23 (2), 163–170.

Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., & Vesselinov, R. (2011). Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: A multisite study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68 (2), 167–172.

The Cochrane Collaboration. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. In J. Higgins, S. Green & (Eds.) Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org/

Trupin, Eric, & Richards, Henry. (2003). Seattle’s mental health courts: Early indicators of effectiveness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26 (1), 33–53.

University of Minnesota. Classification of Crimes Retrieved July 29, 2017, from https://open.lib.umn.edu/criminallaw/chapter/1-4-classification-of-crimes/

Verhaaff, A., & Scott, H. (2015). Individual factors predicting mental health court diversion outcome. Research on Social Work Practice, 25 (2), 213–228.

Download references

Dr. Dewa gratefully acknowledges the support provided by her CIHR/PHAC Applied Public Health Chair. Any views expressed or errors are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of any of the funders.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Centre for Research on Employment and Workplace Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, M5S 2S1, Canada

Desmond Loong & Carolyn S. Dewa

Library Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, M5S 2S1, Canada

Sarah Bonato

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Toronto, M5T 3M6, Canada

Jan Barnsley

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Grange Building, 2230 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA

Carolyn S. Dewa

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

DL and CSD led the conception, design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. SB collaborated on the design and data acquisition. JB collaborated on the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn S. Dewa .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 Additional file 1 – PRISMA 2009 Checklist (PDF 327 kb)

Supplementary material 2 additional file 2 – risk of bias assessment checklist (pdf 26 kb), rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Loong, D., Bonato, S., Barnsley, J. et al. The Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism and Police Contact: A Systematic Review. Community Ment Health J 55 , 1073–1098 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00421-9

Download citation

Received : 21 September 2018

Accepted : 30 May 2019

Published : 07 June 2019

Issue Date : October 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00421-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Mental health courts
• Justice system
• Police contact
• Mental illness
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Does the evidence support the case for mental health courts? A review of the literature

Affiliation.

• 1 Stony Brook University.
• PMID: 26030451
• DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000141

Mental health courts divert offenders with mental illness away from incarceration in return for participation in monitored mental health treatment. Since their inception in the late 1990 s, the proliferation of these problem-solving courts has outpaced the research on their effectiveness. A review of the literature was conducted, yielding 20 articles from peer-reviewed journals. Mental health courts were evaluated for their ability to improve psychiatric symptoms, connect individuals with behavioral health services, improve overall quality of life, and reduce recidivism rates. A majority of articles reported favorable recidivism outcomes for participants, with few evaluating their impact on therapeutic outcomes. At the present time, mental health courts represent an emerging practice, but have not yet reached the level of an evidence-based model. Existing studies of mental health courts suffer from methodological limitations, specifically, a lack of experimental design, use of nonrepresentative samples, and assessment over short timeframes. Moreover, the inherently idiosyncratic nature of these courts and the variance in reporting of court-specific eligibility criteria make cross-article comparison more difficult. It is recommended that future mental health court research examine the impact of available community services, as well as consider the effect of criminogenic risk factors, on therapeutic and recidivism outcomes.

(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Publication types

• Crime / prevention & control
• Criminals / psychology*
• Mental Disorders / therapy*
• Mental Health Services*
• Mentally Ill Persons / legislation & jurisprudence*
• Quality of Life
• Secondary Prevention

• University Home
• Library Home
• SOPHIA Home
• < Previous

Home > MSW > MSW_PAPERS > 721

Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers

What is the impact of mental health courts a systematic literature review.

Rachel Dean , St. Catherine University Follow

Date of Paper

Type of paper.

Clinical research paper

Degree Name

Master of Social Work (M.S.W.)

Social Work

First Advisor

Colin Hollidge

Department/School

Mental health court programs have proliferated in the United States in the past few decades in response to the growth of persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Research has previously been conducted on the impact of these programs, but few studies have been done to identify themes among the research as a whole in regard to their impact on three main goals: reducing recidivism, improving mental health and connecting participants to treatment and services. This systematic review was designed to explore the question: what is the impact of mental health court programs on recidivism, connection to treatment services, and clinical outcomes for participants? Database searches of SocINDEX, Academic Search Premier, Criminal Justice Abstracts and Social Work Abstracts were conducted in September and October of 2016 using a combination of the following search terms: “mental health court NOT juvenile” AND “outcome” or “effect” or “impact” or “effectiveness” AND “recidivism” or “re-arrest” or “clinical” or “treatment”. The search resulted in 13 articles meeting inclusion criteria, which were subsequently used in the final review.( The three main themes of recidivism, connection to treatment services and clinical outcomes each were evaluated to identify subthemes. These subthemes were: mental health courts have a positive impact on reducing recidivism, the importance of graduation from the program as opposed to being terminated or opting-out, the maintenance of a positive effect on recidivism beyond the supervision period, and finally, that mental health courts reduce the need for crisis services or hospitalization and increase the therapeutic treatment intensity for participants.) The research found conflicting findings regarding mental health courts’ impact on clinical outcomes.

Recommended Citation

Dean, Rachel. (2017). What is the Impact of Mental Health Courts? A Systematic Literature Review. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/721

  Email Author

Since June 27, 2017

Included in

Social Work Commons

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Collections
• Disciplines

Author Corner

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

A Review of Literature on Mental Health Court Goals, Effectiveness, and Future Implications

Journal title, journal issn, volume title.

This article provides a review of literature on mental health courts, including court operations, effectiveness, and related issues. Mental health courts are intended to reduce criminal justice system involvement among those suffering from mental health disorders. These courts have proliferated across the United States in the last 30 years, growing to over 470 nationwide. Mental health courts incorporate multidisciplinary teams of criminal justice system practitioners and stakeholders to supervise and connect participants to treatment services. Mental health court evaluations generally show reductions in recidivism and improvement in participant quality of life. However, limitations in research methodology reduce the validity of many studies.

Description

Item.page.type, item.page.format, collections.

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Model Programs Guide Literature Review: Mental Health Court

Additional details, related topics, similar publications.

• The Efficacy of the PSYCHOPATHY.COMP Program in Reducing Psychopathic Traits: A Controlled Trial with Male Detained Youth
• The Long-term Collateral Consequences of Juvenile Justice Involvement for Females
• Prosecuting Cold Cases Using DNA

Trending News

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

• Health Law & Managed Care
• Estates & Trusts
• Labor & Employment
• Litigation / Trial Practice
• 9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

In a win for plaintiffs, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently reversed a district court’s dismissal of key claims in the case of Ryan S. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. The case provides useful guidance for future litigants bringing claims under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), challenging stricter restrictions placed on mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) treatments compared to medical/surgical (M/S) treatments under the same plan.

Plan Coverage Terms and Disputed Benefit Restrictions

As background, UnitedHealth Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (United) administered the plaintiff’s benefit plan, which covered 70% of the costs for outpatient, out-of-network MH/SUD treatments up to an out-of-pocket maximum and thereafter provided 100% coverage. Despite these coverage provisions, the plaintiff alleged that he faced multiple claim denials when he sought reimbursement for outpatient substance use disorder treatments he completed between 2017 and 2019. United, exercising its authority as the plan administrator, denied many of the patient’s claims, citing reasons such as non-coverage under the plan, insufficient documentation, and inadequate detail in the submitted documents. These denials left the plaintiff personally responsible for hundreds of thousands of dollars in charges. Accordingly, the plaintiff filed a putative class action against United, alleging three types of claims: violations of MHPAEA, fiduciary duty breaches under ERISA, and a failure to follow plan terms as required by ERISA.

Proceedings in the District Court

In the district court, the crux of the plaintiff’s complaint turned on the assertion that United’s denials were part of a broader, more stringent review process applied exclusively to MH/SUD claims. In addition to his own denied claims, the plaintiff cited as support for his arguments a 2018 report by the California Department of Managed Healthcare that had concluded that United applied a more stringent review process for MH/SUD claims. Specifically, that report had concluded that United used an algorithmic process called the Algorithms for Effective Reporting and Treatment (ALERT) to assess treatment frequency and progress for MH/SUD claims, triggering additional reviews that led to denials. Crucially, United did not use this specialized scrutiny for M/S claims. The plaintiff contended that these facts suggested not only a violation of MHPAEA, which mandates that limitations placed on MH/SUD benefits be no more restrictive than those on M/S benefits, but also a breach of United’s fiduciary duties under ERISA. The plaintiff alleged that United failed to act solely in the interest of plan participants and beneficiaries.

The district court disagreed and dismissed the case, concluding that the plaintiff had not adequately alleged that his claims had received categorical denials based on this more stringent process nor had he identified analogous M/S claims that received more favorable processing. In the district court’s view, the plaintiff needed to provide more specific comparative evidence to plausibly claim unequal treatment between MH/SUD and M/S benefits under the health plan.

The Ninth Circuit’s Reversal

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed the dismissal of both the MHPAEA and ERISA fiduciary duty claims. The Ninth Circuit held it sufficient for the plaintiff to allege that the plan applies a more restrictive process to MH/SUD claims than to M/S claims, without needing to demonstrate a categorical denial practice or to identify specifically analogous M/S claims. This interpretation, the court held, better aligned MHPAEA’s core protection — to ensure that MH/SUD benefits are not subjected to more restrictive conditions or processes than M/S benefits. The Ninth Circuit further clarified that the critical issue in analyzing MHPAEA claims at the pleading stage is whether the alleged discriminatory process impacts the parity between MH/SUD and M/S benefits under the same classification. Applying this framework, the court reasoned that the plaintiff had adequately pled that such a discriminatory process was in place by citing specific instances of denied claims and referencing the state agency report, which included findings about the use of specific algorithms that assessed MH/SUD treatment differently than M/S treatment. Similarly, the Ninth Circuit also held that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged a breach of United’s fiduciary duty under ERISA, as a violation of MHPAEA on its face suggests an ERISA breach of fiduciary duty.

Notably, however, the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court’s dismissal of the claim that United had violated specific terms of the plaintiff’s benefit plan. While the allegations contained in the plaintiff’s complaint could, the Ninth Circuit noted, establish (if proven) a MHPAEA and related ERISA fiduciary duty violation, such allegations were insufficient to automatically establish a violation of a specific plan term. Rather, the court reasoned, the plaintiff must point to specific plan terms that mandated identical review processes for all types of claims. Here, the plaintiff had failed to identify any such plan term, a pleading failure that was fatal to his claim for violation of plan terms.

Conclusion: Guidance for Future Litigants Seeking to Enforce MHPAEA

The Ninth Circuit’s ruling sets a significant precedent for future litigants seeking to enforce MHPAEA. Initially, it simplifies the proof required to establish a MHPAEA violation, making clear that plaintiffs need not necessarily prove categorical denials or pinpoint favorably treated comparable M/S claims. Instead, demonstrating a more restrictive process for MH/SUD claims versus M/S claims may suffice. Additionally, the case clarifies that when asserting claims that plan administrators have failed to follow plan terms, plaintiffs must clearly link their allegations to violations of specific plan terms. Moreover, the case also comes in the wake of another recent  case out of the Tenth Circuit  that similarly reversed a district court dismissal of a MHPAEA claim.

Collectively, both cases signal the expanding reach of MHPAEA enforcement, and telegraph key steps plaintiffs should take at the pleading stage. To wit, future plaintiffs would be well-advised to document any process disparities, leverage findings from state agency reports or independent studies where applicable and link any purported MHPAEA and ERISA violations to specific plan terms to satisfy their pleading obligations under those laws.

Listen to this post

Current legal analysis, more from arentfox schiff llp, upcoming legal education events.

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins

40 Facts About Elektrostal

Written by Lanette Mayes

Modified & Updated: 02 Mar 2024

Reviewed by Jessica Corbett

Elektrostal is a vibrant city located in the Moscow Oblast region of Russia. With a rich history, stunning architecture, and a thriving community, Elektrostal is a city that has much to offer. Whether you are a history buff, nature enthusiast, or simply curious about different cultures, Elektrostal is sure to captivate you.

This article will provide you with 40 fascinating facts about Elektrostal, giving you a better understanding of why this city is worth exploring. From its origins as an industrial hub to its modern-day charm, we will delve into the various aspects that make Elektrostal a unique and must-visit destination.

So, join us as we uncover the hidden treasures of Elektrostal and discover what makes this city a true gem in the heart of Russia.

Key Takeaways:

• Elektrostal, known as the “Motor City of Russia,” is a vibrant and growing city with a rich industrial history, offering diverse cultural experiences and a strong commitment to environmental sustainability.
• With its convenient location near Moscow, Elektrostal provides a picturesque landscape, vibrant nightlife, and a range of recreational activities, making it an ideal destination for residents and visitors alike.

Known as the “Motor City of Russia.”

Elektrostal, a city located in the Moscow Oblast region of Russia, earned the nickname “Motor City” due to its significant involvement in the automotive industry.

Home to the Elektrostal Metallurgical Plant.

Elektrostal is renowned for its metallurgical plant, which has been producing high-quality steel and alloys since its establishment in 1916.

Boasts a rich industrial heritage.

Elektrostal has a long history of industrial development, contributing to the growth and progress of the region.

Founded in 1916.

The city of Elektrostal was founded in 1916 as a result of the construction of the Elektrostal Metallurgical Plant.

Located approximately 50 kilometers east of Moscow.

Elektrostal is situated in close proximity to the Russian capital, making it easily accessible for both residents and visitors.

Known for its vibrant cultural scene.

Elektrostal is home to several cultural institutions, including museums, theaters, and art galleries that showcase the city’s rich artistic heritage.

A popular destination for nature lovers.

Surrounded by picturesque landscapes and forests, Elektrostal offers ample opportunities for outdoor activities such as hiking, camping, and birdwatching.

Hosts the annual Elektrostal City Day celebrations.

Every year, Elektrostal organizes festive events and activities to celebrate its founding, bringing together residents and visitors in a spirit of unity and joy.

Has a population of approximately 160,000 people.

Elektrostal is home to a diverse and vibrant community of around 160,000 residents, contributing to its dynamic atmosphere.

Boasts excellent education facilities.

The city is known for its well-established educational institutions, providing quality education to students of all ages.

A center for scientific research and innovation.

Elektrostal serves as an important hub for scientific research, particularly in the fields of metallurgy, materials science, and engineering.

Surrounded by picturesque lakes.

The city is blessed with numerous beautiful lakes, offering scenic views and recreational opportunities for locals and visitors alike.

Well-connected transportation system.

Elektrostal benefits from an efficient transportation network, including highways, railways, and public transportation options, ensuring convenient travel within and beyond the city.

Famous for its traditional Russian cuisine.

Food enthusiasts can indulge in authentic Russian dishes at numerous restaurants and cafes scattered throughout Elektrostal.

Home to notable architectural landmarks.

Elektrostal boasts impressive architecture, including the Church of the Transfiguration of the Lord and the Elektrostal Palace of Culture.

Offers a wide range of recreational facilities.

Residents and visitors can enjoy various recreational activities, such as sports complexes, swimming pools, and fitness centers, enhancing the overall quality of life.

Provides a high standard of healthcare.

Elektrostal is equipped with modern medical facilities, ensuring residents have access to quality healthcare services.

Home to the Elektrostal History Museum.

The Elektrostal History Museum showcases the city’s fascinating past through exhibitions and displays.

A hub for sports enthusiasts.

Elektrostal is passionate about sports, with numerous stadiums, arenas, and sports clubs offering opportunities for athletes and spectators.

Celebrates diverse cultural festivals.

Throughout the year, Elektrostal hosts a variety of cultural festivals, celebrating different ethnicities, traditions, and art forms.

Electric power played a significant role in its early development.

Elektrostal owes its name and initial growth to the establishment of electric power stations and the utilization of electricity in the industrial sector.

Boasts a thriving economy.

The city’s strong industrial base, coupled with its strategic location near Moscow, has contributed to Elektrostal’s prosperous economic status.

Houses the Elektrostal Drama Theater.

The Elektrostal Drama Theater is a cultural centerpiece, attracting theater enthusiasts from far and wide.

Popular destination for winter sports.

Elektrostal’s proximity to ski resorts and winter sport facilities makes it a favorite destination for skiing, snowboarding, and other winter activities.

Promotes environmental sustainability.

Elektrostal prioritizes environmental protection and sustainability, implementing initiatives to reduce pollution and preserve natural resources.

Home to renowned educational institutions.

Elektrostal is known for its prestigious schools and universities, offering a wide range of academic programs to students.

Committed to cultural preservation.

The city values its cultural heritage and takes active steps to preserve and promote traditional customs, crafts, and arts.

Hosts an annual International Film Festival.

The Elektrostal International Film Festival attracts filmmakers and cinema enthusiasts from around the world, showcasing a diverse range of films.

Encourages entrepreneurship and innovation.

Elektrostal supports aspiring entrepreneurs and fosters a culture of innovation, providing opportunities for startups and business development.

Offers a range of housing options.

Elektrostal provides diverse housing options, including apartments, houses, and residential complexes, catering to different lifestyles and budgets.

Home to notable sports teams.

Elektrostal is proud of its sports legacy, with several successful sports teams competing at regional and national levels.

Boasts a vibrant nightlife scene.

Residents and visitors can enjoy a lively nightlife in Elektrostal, with numerous bars, clubs, and entertainment venues.

Promotes cultural exchange and international relations.

Elektrostal actively engages in international partnerships, cultural exchanges, and diplomatic collaborations to foster global connections.

Surrounded by beautiful nature reserves.

Nearby nature reserves, such as the Barybino Forest and Luchinskoye Lake, offer opportunities for nature enthusiasts to explore and appreciate the region’s biodiversity.

Commemorates historical events.

The city pays tribute to significant historical events through memorials, monuments, and exhibitions, ensuring the preservation of collective memory.

Promotes sports and youth development.

Elektrostal invests in sports infrastructure and programs to encourage youth participation, health, and physical fitness.

Hosts annual cultural and artistic festivals.

Throughout the year, Elektrostal celebrates its cultural diversity through festivals dedicated to music, dance, art, and theater.

Provides a picturesque landscape for photography enthusiasts.

The city’s scenic beauty, architectural landmarks, and natural surroundings make it a paradise for photographers.

Connects to Moscow via a direct train line.

The convenient train connection between Elektrostal and Moscow makes commuting between the two cities effortless.

A city with a bright future.

Elektrostal continues to grow and develop, aiming to become a model city in terms of infrastructure, sustainability, and quality of life for its residents.

In conclusion, Elektrostal is a fascinating city with a rich history and a vibrant present. From its origins as a center of steel production to its modern-day status as a hub for education and industry, Elektrostal has plenty to offer both residents and visitors. With its beautiful parks, cultural attractions, and proximity to Moscow, there is no shortage of things to see and do in this dynamic city. Whether you’re interested in exploring its historical landmarks, enjoying outdoor activities, or immersing yourself in the local culture, Elektrostal has something for everyone. So, next time you find yourself in the Moscow region, don’t miss the opportunity to discover the hidden gems of Elektrostal.

Q: What is the population of Elektrostal?

A: As of the latest data, the population of Elektrostal is approximately XXXX.

Q: How far is Elektrostal from Moscow?

A: Elektrostal is located approximately XX kilometers away from Moscow.

Q: Are there any famous landmarks in Elektrostal?

A: Yes, Elektrostal is home to several notable landmarks, including XXXX and XXXX.

Q: What industries are prominent in Elektrostal?

A: Elektrostal is known for its steel production industry and is also a center for engineering and manufacturing.

Q: Are there any universities or educational institutions in Elektrostal?

A: Yes, Elektrostal is home to XXXX University and several other educational institutions.

Q: What are some popular outdoor activities in Elektrostal?

A: Elektrostal offers several outdoor activities, such as hiking, cycling, and picnicking in its beautiful parks.

Q: Is Elektrostal well-connected in terms of transportation?

A: Yes, Elektrostal has good transportation links, including trains and buses, making it easily accessible from nearby cities.

Q: Are there any annual events or festivals in Elektrostal?

A: Yes, Elektrostal hosts various events and festivals throughout the year, including XXXX and XXXX.

Elektrostal's fascinating history, vibrant culture, and promising future make it a city worth exploring. For more captivating facts about cities around the world, discover the unique characteristics that define each city . Uncover the hidden gems of Moscow Oblast through our in-depth look at Kolomna. Lastly, dive into the rich industrial heritage of Teesside, a thriving industrial center with its own story to tell.

Was this page helpful?

Our commitment to delivering trustworthy and engaging content is at the heart of what we do. Each fact on our site is contributed by real users like you, bringing a wealth of diverse insights and information. To ensure the highest standards of accuracy and reliability, our dedicated editors meticulously review each submission. This process guarantees that the facts we share are not only fascinating but also credible. Trust in our commitment to quality and authenticity as you explore and learn with us.

Share this Fact:

• Today's news
• Reviews and deals
• Climate change
• 2024 election
• Fall allergies
• Health news
• Mental health
• Sexual health
• Family health
• So mini ways
• Unapologetically
• Buying guides

Entertainment

• How to Watch
• My watchlist
• Stock market
• Biden economy
• Personal finance
• Stocks: most active
• Stocks: gainers
• Stocks: losers
• Trending tickers
• World indices
• US Treasury bonds
• Top mutual funds
• Highest open interest
• Highest implied volatility
• Currency converter
• Basic materials
• Communication services
• Consumer cyclical
• Consumer defensive
• Financial services
• Industrials
• Real estate
• Mutual funds
• Credit cards
• Balance transfer cards
• Cash back cards
• Rewards cards
• Travel cards
• Online checking
• High-yield savings
• Money market
• Home equity loan
• Personal loans
• Student loans
• Options pit
• Fantasy football
• Pro Pick 'Em
• College Pick 'Em
• Fantasy baseball
• Fantasy hockey
• Fantasy basketball
• Download the app
• Daily fantasy
• Scores and schedules
• GameChannel
• World Baseball Classic
• Premier League
• CONCACAF League
• Champions League
• Motorsports
• Horse racing
• Newsletters

New on Yahoo

• Privacy Dashboard

15 men brought to military enlistment office after mass brawl in Moscow Oblast

Local security forces brought 15 men to a military enlistment office after a mass brawl at a warehouse of the Russian Wildberries company in Elektrostal, Moscow Oblast on Feb. 8, Russian Telegram channel Shot reported .

29 people were also taken to police stations. Among the arrested were citizens of Kyrgyzstan.

A mass brawl involving over 100 employees and security personnel broke out at the Wildberries warehouse in Elektrostal on Dec. 8.

Read also: Moscow recruits ‘construction brigades’ from Russian students, Ukraine says

We’re bringing the voice of Ukraine to the world. Support us with a one-time donation, or become a Patron !

Read the original article on The New Voice of Ukraine

Recommended Stories

Former nba guard darius morris dies at 33.

Former NBA guard Darius Morris has died at the age of 33. He played for five teams during his four NBA seasons. Morris played college basketball at Michigan.

Timberwolves coach Chris Finch calls Jamal Murray's heat-pack toss on court 'inexcusable and dangerous'

Murray made a bad night on the court worse during a moment of frustration on the bench.

The FDIC change that leaves wealthy bank depositors with less protection

Affluent Americans may want to double-check how much of their bank deposits are protected by government-backed insurance. The rules governing trust accounts just changed.

Former House Speaker Paul Ryan says he’s not voting for Trump : 'Character is too important'

Ryan says he would be writing in a Republican candidate instead of voting for Donald Trump.

Ranking the best situations for the rookie quarterbacks: Start with Michael Penix in Atlanta at No. 1

It’s key to note that we’re not saying the “best team” or “best roster.” Instead, we’re talking about the best confluence of factors that can outline a path for survival and then success.

Phil Mickelson on the majors: 'What if none of the LIV players played?'

Phil Mickelson hints that big changes could be coming to LIV Golf's rosters, and the majors will need to pay attention.

Blockbuster May trade by Padres, MVP Ohtani has arrived, Willie Mays’ 93rd birthday & weekend recap

Jake Mintz & Jordan Shusterman discuss the Padres-Marlins trade that sent Luis Arraez to San Diego, as well as recap all the action from this weekend in baseball and send birthday wishes to hall-of-famer Willie Mays.

Heat's Pat Riley unhappy with Jimmy Butler's remarks on Celtics and Knicks, implies he needs to play more

Miami Heat president Pat Riley rebuked comments Jimmy Butler made about the Boston Celtics and New York Knicks, while also implying that his star needs to play more.

These 3 stocks are poised to benefit from the massive energy transition

The energy transition will benefit companies providing electrical needs for surging demand. Analysts point to these three stocks as a Buy.

NBA playoffs: Officials admit they flubbed critical kick-ball call in controversial final minute of Pacers-Knicks

Tuesday's last-2-minute report should be interesting.

Social Security just passed Medicare as the government's most pressing insolvency risk

An annual government report offered a glimmer of good news for Social Security and a jolt of good news for Medicare even as both programs continue to be on pace to run dry next decade.

No one was airing Angel Reese and Kamilla Cardoso's WNBA preseason debuts, so an X user livestreamed it

The quality was choppy, but it was better than what the WNBA had.

The Scorecard: Andy Pages looks set to go down as one of the best fantasy baseball waiver wire pickups of 2024

Fantasy baseball analyst Dalton Del Don delivers his latest batch of hot takes as we enter Week 6 of the season.

Ex-Ole Miss QB and Denver Broncos draft pick Chad Kelly suspended at least nine games by CFL

Kelly allegedly harassed a female strength and conditioning coach who sued him and the Toronto Argonauts in February.

NBA playoffs: Predictions for Celtics-Cavaliers and every second-round series

Our NBA staff makes its picks for Knicks-Pacers and every second-round series.

The best budgeting apps for 2024

Budgeting apps can help you keep track of your finances, stick to a spending plan and reach your money goals. These are the best budget-tracking apps available right now.

Fed’s Kashkari: Rates will stay high for 'extended period' and can't rule out a hike

Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari said interest rates will likely stay at current levels for an "extended period" and didn't rule out a hike if inflation stalls near 3%.

NFL Power Rankings, draft edition: Did Patriots fix their offensive issues?

Which teams did the best in the NFL Draft?

The best RBs for 2024 fantasy football according to our analysts

The Yahoo Fantasy football analysts reveal their first running back rankings for the 2024 NFL season.

Edmunds bought a Fisker Ocean, warns others not to make the same mistake

Edmunds bought a Fisker Ocean and details the highs and lows of ownership while warning others not to make the same mistake.