shared parental responsibility essay

Equal Parenting and the Quality of Parent-Child Attachments

The link between quantity of time and quality of parent-child relationships.

Posted March 9, 2013

• A Parent's Role
• Find a family therapist near me

Although the term, "shared parenting " is usually used to describe arrangements where parents share child care responsibilities following divorce as much as possible, the notion of "equal parenting" refers to parenting arrangements after divorce where parents seek to fairly and equally divide their post-divorce responsibilities toward their children. Although shared parenting provides a number of benefits to children, it is equal parenting that is the optimal arrangement for most children of divorce. This includes children caught in the middle of high parental conflict. Recent research has shown that conflict is reduced in equal parenting households, from the perspective of both children (Fabricius, 2011) and parents (Bauserman, 2012), and in cases where inter-parental conflict is not reduced, equal parenting seems to ameliorate most of the negative effects of such conflict on children (Fabricius, 2011).

Child development experts have written that psychologically, the quality of attachment relationships is a major factor associated with the well-being of very young children. Thus some believe that the quality of parent-child relationships counts for much more than merely quantity of time that children spend with each parent after divorce. But children form close bonds with those who care for them, in their first year of life and beyond. This suggests that quantity of contact is at least as important as quality.

I would emphasize that quality of relationships is largely dependent on having a sufficient quantity of time to develop and nurture those primary relationships. Equal parental responsibility provides a context and climate for the continuation or development of high quality parent-child relationships, allowing both parents to remain authoritative, responsible, involved, attached, emotionally available, supportive, and focused on children’s day-to-day lives. Attachment bonds are formed through mutual participation in daily routines, including bedtime and waking rituals, transitions to and from school, and extracurricular and recreational activities. There is a direct correlation between quantity of time and quality of parent-child relationships, as high quality relationships between parents and children are not possible without sufficient, routine time to develop and sustain a quality relationship. And children’s adjustment is furthered by primary relationships with both mothers and fathers (Fabricius et al, 2011). For children, primary attachment bonds are not possible within the constraints of “access” or "visitation."

The idea that children form primary bonds with only one primary parent, espoused by some child psychologists, is reflected in comments such as, “children have one primary attachment figure, the person they prefer to offer them comfort in times of anxiety or pain.” Those who promote such a view cut off the possibility that children develop multiple primary attachments, meaning that they are secure in turning to more than one person (usually equally to the mother and father) to offer them comfort in times of anxiety or pain, and also to share times of joy. Clearly, when both parents are involved, attached and influential in children’s growth and development, children form primary attachment bonds with both parents.

Quality of parent-child attachments is also largely dependent on the well-being of parents. Parent well-being is furthered with equal or shared parenting, as neither parent is threatened with the loss of his or her children (Bauserman, 2012). The highest rate of depression among adults is among parents who have a dependent child but are unable to maintain a meaningful relationship with that child.

I am persuaded, by the weight of the scientific evidence, that equal parenting is a viable option to the present destructive adversarial "winner-take-all" “primary parent”divorce system, for both young and older children, and for those in high conflict as well as cooperative households. Bauserman's (2012) meta-analysis of 50 studies shows that parental conflict goes down with joint custody. He found that in almost all areas of comparison, joint custody was associated with better parental adjustment rates.

Quality of relationships with children are compromised not only in cases where a parent feels disenfranchised as a non-residential parent, but also in situations in which a parent is overwhelmed by sole custodial and caregiving responsibility for his or her children. The constraints of traditional “access” relationships are well documented; closeness, warmth, and mutual understanding are elusive when parenting within the constraints of thin slices of time. Meaningful relationships are developed and sustained through emotional connectedness, and this is made possible through the emotional stability and security of meaningful (fair and equal) parenting time. At the same time, quality of parent-child relationships is enhanced when parents do not feel burdened or overwhelmed by the demands of sole parental responsibility; studies have consistently reported that joint custody parents report significantly less burden and stress in their lives than sole custody/primary residence parents, as sole responsibility for day-to-day attention to the child’s needs is not placed on either the mother or the father, resulting in better quality parent-child relationships, although it comes as no surprise that the highest and lowest levels of parental satisfaction with parenting arrangements after divorce are found in sole custody / primary residence families: custodial or primary residential parents report the highest levels of satisfaction with parenting after divorce arrangements while non-custodial/non-residential parents report the lowest. Between these extremes lies equal parenting, where both mothers and fathers report satisfaction. The marked imbalance in parental satisfaction levels between primary residential and equal parenting arrangements does not bode well for the exercise of parental rights and responsibilities after divorce, as one parent remains at a significant disadvantage in regard to quality of life and well-being. Parental quality of life is an important and significant determinant of the quality of parent-child relationships; optimally, both parents’ interests vis-à-vis their children should be satisfied.

Bauserman, R. (2012). "A meta-analysis of parental satisfaction, adjustment, and conflict in joint custody and sole custody following divorce," Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 53, 464-488.

Fabricius, W.V. et al (2011). “Parenting time, parent conflict, parent-child relationships, and children’s physical health.” In Kuehnle, K. & Drozd, L. (Eds.), Parenting Plan Evaluations: Applied Research for the Family Court. New York: Oxford University Press.

Edward Kruk, Ph.D. , is Professor Emeritus of Social Work at the University of British Columbia, specializing in child and family policy.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Teletherapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Coronavirus Disease 2019
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Children and family law: 'How can you share parenting with an abusive parent?'

The family law system is supposed to put children’s safety first, but in many ways they become further endangered when they enter it

I nvestigative journalist Jess Hill interviewed dozens of abused women, domestic abuse-sector workers, male perpetrators, children’s advocates and system experts over five years in order to write her award-winning book See What You Made Me Do. Here she answers some questions about child protection arising from the murders in Brisbane of Hannah Clarke and her three children, Aaliyah, 6, Laianah, 4 and Trey, 3.

How does domestic abuse impact children?

It’s common knowledge that one woman a week is killed by a current or former partner in Australia, but not so common that a child is murdered by a parent every fortnight . While not all of these are a result of domestic abuse situations, most are, and it’s shocking. Why isn’t the child homicide stat commonly known? Because even in these enlightened times, we still can’t see children as individuals. In the public mind, children are subsidiaries of their parents.

Despite the voluminous research on children’s development, we still can’t seem to conceive that kids experiencing domestic abuse have unique wants and needs that not only differ from their parents but from their siblings, too. One child may be acutely aware of the abuse, and may take on the role of family protector. Their sibling may refuse to acknowledge it at all, even when physical violence occurs right in front of them. Another sibling may identify strongly with the abusive parent and start imitating their behaviours. This is a particularly tragic scenario that we see play out so often: the victim parent leaves the abusive parent, only to have their child replace the perpetrator as the violent oppressor in the family. Truly one of the saddest places I’ve ever visited was a room in the children’s court at Parramatta where parents were applying for intervention orders against their own children.

What about kids that grow up with coercive control?

The critical thing for people (and particularly our justice system) to understand is that children don’t just witness incidents of domestic abuse. Their development is shaped by the abusive dynamic. That’s why exposure to domestic abuse is increasingly being recognised as child abuse. Critically, there doesn’t need to be any physical violence present for kids to be deeply affected. We now understand, thanks to recent research from Dr Emma Katz in the UK, that children are harmed by coercive control in similar ways to their victim parent: they may be isolated from extended family, forced to obey trivial demands, degraded and threatened.

Just as it is for their victim parent, it can be the little things that are the most frightening: one teenage girl told me that one of the worst things her father did was make this particular creepy smile. These are the kinds of things that haunt children, the signals that remind them that danger is ever-present and the threat is something they must continually manage. Their perspective, like that of their victim parent, is being virtually colonised by the perpetrator parent. They have to develop ways to resist that, to hold on to their own sense of self, and to develop independence and competence. Coercive control is as much a trap for children as it is for their victim parent.

What are some of the long-term psychological impacts for children?

The answer to this question, like all of these, could fill a book! But to tackle just one aspect of this, let’s talk about complex trauma. Children who grow up with prolonged abuse may develop what’s known as “ complex trauma ”, or C-PTSD. As Dr Bessel can der Kolk describes it, kids with complex trauma “develop a view of the world that incorporates their betrayal and hurt. They anticipate and expect the trauma to recur and respond with hyperactivity, aggression, defeat or freeze responses to minor stresses.” This conditioning can start in infancy. Babies are not oblivious to abuse; they are acutely aware of their surroundings – particularly the emotional state of their primary caregiver.

Children (and later, adults) with complex trauma can harbour deep distrust for others, or may find that their “trust” is commonly betrayed, which can lead to major problems with intimacy and friendship. Other common symptoms of complex trauma include suicidal thoughts, feelings of detachment from one’s own body and mind, shame and guilt, the feeling of being like an alien, helplessness and hopelessness, self-harm and substance abuse. The thing is, their view of the world is not disordered – it is a product of the incredible strategies they developed (like dissociation, for example) to physically and psychologically survive their childhood. These strategies may have worked for them in the abusive environment, but they are maladaptive to life outside of that environment. The problem is, many in the psychiatric world don’t acknowledge complex trauma, and thus misdiagnose children and adults with bipolar disorder, ADD, borderline personality disorder or oppositional defiant disorder.

Why is family law reform such a priority when it comes to protecting children?

I don’t think people fully understand how dangerous the family law system can be for children.

In previous centuries, judges could order an abused woman to return to her husband. The idea that a court would make such an order seems unthinkable now – but that is exactly what the family law system still does to children. Even when kids openly disclose abuse – and have their testimony corroborated by police, social workers, teachers and doctors – a family law judge may still order them to see or live part-time with their abusive parent. Worse still, they may even be ordered into the full-time custody of a parent they have openly pleaded to be protected from.

Once a family law order is made, it is virtually impossible for children to resist. If they run away, their custodial parent can apply for a recovery order, and the court can then order federal police to track them down and return them to their custodial parent. One teenager I interviewed, “Carly”, was pursued by federal police when she ran away from her father, who was controlling and intimidating towards her and had been violent to her mother and brother. She had to threaten suicide before the police would relent, on the proviso she was taken to hospital. After she was released she stayed for four months in a refuge, where despite asking for schoolwork, she received no schooling. Eventually, she was allowed to return to her mother – but only because the court decided she was old enough to make her own decision.

Another teenager, “Alex”, also became suicidal after years of routine physical abuse from his father, whose sole custody he was ordered into when he was a toddler, after the mother’s allegations against the father were disbelieved by the court. Alex ran away to his mother, with whom he was allowed only limited contact. When the family court requested he see another family report writer (to assess his claims and his mental state for the court), that writer concluded he didn’t really want to die and that his threats were “stress related”. They recommended he be returned to his father, that contact be cut off with the mother, and that if he ran away again to his mother, she should be incarcerated. After he was ordered by the court to return to his father, Alex had to run away to police three times before he was taken seriously. Alex fought hard to be returned to his mother when he was 14. Now as a young adult he’s been diagnosed with PTSD; he can’t work, he can’t study. He’s now on the disability support pension.

The threat to children is not just anecdotal. The Australian Law Reform Commission review found that one in five parents reported safety concerns for their children and/or themselves as a result of court-ordered contact with the other parent.

When family law orders are made, children are ordered to comply – even when they are openly terrified. So they kick and scream at handovers. They plead with their protective parent not to hand them over. They hide under the bed at handover time. They call police. They self-harm. They may even be prevented by the court from accessing medical care and counselling. This is how weird – and destructive – parts of the family law system has become.

Protective parents spend several years – and sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars – trying to protect them. Sometimes it’s to no avail – they watch helplessly as their children develop medical conditions and regress into traumatised states, with no power to intervene. When an abused parent leaves, they do so to protect themselves and their children. But in the end, because the family law system is so dangerously inconsistent, they can’t guarantee that they will be able to protect their children. That’s why so many abused parents stay long past the time they would like to have left.

Why are children being ordered into the care of abusive parents?

So much of this comes back to the pro-contact ideology of the court. The Family Law Act states that when the court is considering how to allocate parenting, they must apply the presumption that the best interests of the child are served by both parents having equal-shared parental responsibility. That might be the case for regular families, but in the family law system, the vast majority of families are not regular. Up to 85% of families going through the family law system report histories of family violence, including emotional abuse, and half report physical violence. Despite this, only 3% of cases result in no contact with one parent, and around 79% end up with orders to share parental responsibility. But how can you share parental responsibility with an abusive parent?

This presumption of equal-shared parental responsibility is, in theory, not supposed to apply where the child’s safety is at risk. But in reality, we see allegations (and even proven histories) of domestic/child abuse being minimised, dismissed and disbelieved. They are seen as inconvenient, a barrier to making orders for shared parenting.

I have to add here that within the family law system, there are judges that prioritise child safety, and family report writers who provided nuanced assessments of families. If you’re leaving domestic abuse and entering the family law court, you may be lucky enough to get a judge and a report writer who believe you, and act to protect your children. But for too many families, that is not the case.

The standard operating procedure in so many of these cases can beggar belief. It is truly bizarre, for example, to see judges reject evidence from counsellors and doctors that corroborates the disclosure of a child or the testimony of their parents. Parents who apply for a no-contact order – even when they can prove a history of domestic abuse – are routinely warned by their own lawyers that unless they allow some contact, they may lose custody altogether. As Zita Adut Deng Ngor, CEO of Women’s Legal Services South Australia, says: “It is always a delicate balancing act in terms of how far you push the issue of domestic and family violence. It can actually harm your client, if you push too hard with the wrong judicial officer.” What does that say about how the system responds to the parenting risks associated with domestic abuse?

What would be the most effective result of the family law inquiry to ensure the safety of children?

Honestly, I don’t know what it would take to reform the family law system. Policy changes alone won’t fix it – this is a cultural problem that is throughout the family law system. Even if the government follows the Australian Law Reform Commission recommendation to revoke the presumption of shared parental responsibility, that in itself won’t change the minds of experts and judges who routinely minimise the impact of domestic abuse and disbelieve victims and their children. The Gillard government made significant changes to the Family Law Act in an attempt to reprioritise children’s safety, but we keep seeing the same old stories repeating. Child makes disclosure, child is disbelieved, protective parent fights to limit the abusive parent’s access, and they either end up losing custody altogether or being coerced to agree to shared parenting arrangements that are unsafe for them and their children.

Ultimately, it may be that the recommendation from the law reform commission – to abolish the federal family law courts and replace it with specialist state-based family courts, which would be better connected with state-based child protection agencies – is the only way to truly change the culture of family law in this country.

In Australia, if you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault, domestic or family violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au . In the UK, visit the National Domestic Abuse Helpline website here or call 0808 2000 247 . In the US, visit the National Domestic Violence Hotline website here or call 1-800-799-7233 .

• Domestic violence

Most viewed

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

SHARED PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY : NEED OF THE HOUR

A parent is the most important person in the life of a child. The concept of who is a parent is a vast and subjective concept. In common parlance, a parent is the father or the mother of a child who takes care of the child, raises him / her up and provides him / her with love, care and affection. In the legal sense, the term parent may be interpreted in various ways. However, defining who is a parent becomes imperative in deciding the purview of parental responsibility and protecting the rights of a child as well. With the increase in the breakdown of marriages, joint family systems and the increased number of divorces, the worst impact falls on the children. The concept of parental responsibility has acquired importance in this background and there is a need to enact a suitable legislation and / or amend the existing laws which govern the custody and guardianship matters to fill the vacuum created in the society and must provide new norms towards shared parental responsibility. In light of the present situation where there is no extended family support for child care anymore; having a legal framework defining the roles and responsibilities of parents is essential to safeguard the welfare principle and the interests of the children.

Related Papers

Journal of Child Custody

Philip Marcus

Kayreen T . H . Stephenson

Dieter Martiny

Frans Mahlobogwane

The Children's Act 38 of 2005 provides the legal basis for the reshaping of the exercise of parental responsibilities and rights. In previous case law the custody of a child was assigned to the parent who had been the primary caretaker during the subsistence of the marriage relationship, although the overriding factor remained the best interests of the child. This model has proved to be insufficient in order to promote the need for a child to be brought up in a stable family environment or, where this is not possible, in an environment that is as close as possible to a caring family environment; including the child's right to maintain close contact with both parents. Facing this shortfall, the legislature adopted a "parenting-plan" model in terms of the Children's Act, which attempts to help parents to set aside their differences and work out a plan which is in their child's best interests. The parenting plan further attempts to help parents in exercising their parental responsibilities and rights over their children. The purpose of this article is to analyse this legal solution in an effort to ascertain whether it really promotes the best interests of the child, namely, promoting his/her right of growing up in a close relationship with both parents.

Http Dx Doi Org 10 1300 J087v43n03_07

Edward Kruk

Ethics and Social Welfare

Philip Cook

SSRN Electronic Journal

Machteld Vonk

Kuala Lumpur : Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2020

Mausooma Farooq

adam mcnally

Why are distinctions made between the mother and the father in constitutional provisions? Is this a pre-conception? Religion? Stereotypes? This essay will evaluate certain aspects in accordance with a fundamental status in law to parental rights. I will draw particular attention to the Constitution of Ireland of 1937 which, in Article 42, states that 'the inalienable right and duty of parents to provide, according to their means, for the religious and moral, intellectual, physical and social education of their children.' I shall compare such with Article 31 of the Italian Constitution which states that: “The Republic assists the formation of the family and the fulfilment of its duties, with particular consideration for large families, through economic measures and other benefits. The Republic protects mothers, children and the young by adopting necessary provisions.”

Kacper Zajac

The purpose of this essay is to set out the concept of being a parent under the law of England and Wales.

RELATED PAPERS

Indo-Iranian Journal of Scientific Research (IIJSR)

IIJSR Journal

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT)

IJERT Journal

IRJET Journal

stephen morison

shide salimi

Renata Evangelista

MATEC Web of Conferences

Noor Mahmudah

David Vaile

2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)

Philip Worrall

dakir mudzakir

Journal of intensive care medicine

Mostafa Mohammadi

Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

Gabrielle Taylor

FEBS Letters

John Cobley

Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics

Avishek Kumar

عبدالكريم احمد النعير

Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Oludele Solaja

Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism

Mazarina Devi

Data in Brief

AMELIA FARRES

Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University

Ismi Rajiani

Innovation in Aging

Kristina Tiainen

Osmangazi tıp dergisi

Raziye Akcılar

Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Medicina Tropical

Deborah Guedes

jkjhygffg bhhnhfgf

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Gerry Mugford

Stefan Goedecker

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Speak to our legal team now

What is equal shared parental responsibility in Australia?

What is equal shared parental responsibility.

Equal Shared Parental Responsibility (ESPR) is the legal presumption that both parents, even after separation or divorce, have equal responsibility for making major long-term decisions about their child’s life.

It does not necessarily mean parents will have equal time with the child.

Key Principles:

• Best Interests of the Child: The court prioritises the child’s best interests when considering ESPR. This presumption exists because it’s often regarded as beneficial for a child to have meaningful involvement with both parents.
• Genuine Consultation: Parents are expected to consult with each other and genuinely try to reach an agreement on major decisions.
• Not Absolute: There are specific situations where ESPR is not applicable (see below).

What Does Presumption Of Equal Shared Parental Responsibility Mean?

Equal Shared Parental Responsibility is a legal presumption within the Family Law Act that, unless there’s evidence to the contrary, the court must presume that it is in the best interests of a child for their parents to have equal shared parental responsibility.

This presumption highlights the value of children having meaningful relationships with both parents, even after separation.

When the Presumption Does NOT Apply

The court will not apply the presumption of ESPR if there are reasonable grounds to believe:

One parent (or someone in their household) has engaged in abuse of the child or the other parent.

There are concerns about a parent's ability to care for the child properly.

It would be impractical for parents to consult on decisions, such as if they live far apart or have severe communication difficulties.

Equal Shared Parental Responsibility Before 2024

Before May 2024, there was a strong presumption of Equal Shared Parental Responsibility (ESPR) in Australian family law. Here’s what that meant and its implications:

Key Features

• Presumption, Not Mandate: The court started from the position that ESPR was in the child’s best interests, emphasizing both parents’ continued involvement in major decisions. It wasn’t a guarantee of equal time with the child but focused on shared decision-making power.
• Family violence or abuse
• Risk to the child’s safety
• One parent’s inability to make decisions in the child’s best interests
• Encouraging Cooperation: Even when the presumption was overturned, the court still encouraged parents to communicate and make decisions together in the child’s best interests whenever possible.

Practical Implications

• Negotiations: The presumption of ESPR often influenced discussions between separating parents. It meant shared decision-making about significant aspects of the child’s life was the starting point for creating parenting plans.
• Less Court Intervention: Ideally, the presumption reduced the need for court orders as parents were encouraged to find cooperative arrangements to meet the child’s needs.
• Potential Challenges: In some cases, the presumption could lead to conflict where parents had difficulty communicating or agreeing on major decisions. This might have necessitated mediation or even court intervention.

Any Questions? Speak to One of Our Lawyers.

Equal Shared Parental Responsibility After 2024

After May 2024, there is no longer a legal presumption of Equal Shared Parental Responsibility (ESPR) in Australia. Here’s what you need to know:

Changes to the Law

• Repeal of the Presumption: The Family Law Amendment Bill 2023 removed the presumption of ESPR. This means courts no longer start from the assumption that both parents should share decision-making power equally.
• Focus on Best Interests: The core principle of prioritising the child’s best interests is now the law’s central focus. Courts will examine each case individually to determine the arrangements most beneficial for the child, without any preconceived notions.

What This Means in Practice

• No Automatic ESPR: Parents will not automatically be assigned equal shared parental responsibility after separation.
• Individualised Assessment: The court will consider each family’s specific circumstances to determine the appropriate division of parental responsibility. This could still result in arrangements similar to ESPR if it best suits the child.
• Flexibility: Removing the presumption allows for more tailored arrangements, particularly in cases where shared decision-making might not be practical or safe.
• Safety Prioritised: With no presumption in place, the court can place greater emphasis on a child’s safety and wellbeing, especially in matters related to family violence or abuse.

Possible Outcomes After 2024

• Continued Shared Responsibility: Many parents might still reach agreements that involve elements of shared responsibility where it aligns with the child’s needs.
• Sole Parental Responsibility: In certain situations where safety is a concern or shared decision-making would harm the child, the court might order sole parental responsibility for one parent.
• Specific Orders: The court can make detailed orders specifying which parent has responsibility for particular decisions (e.g., one parent decides on health, the other on education)

Why the Change Occurred

• Addressing Misconceptions: “Equal shared parental responsibility” was often misinterpreted as meaning equal time, leading to confusion and conflict.
• Emphasising Best Interests: The change emphasises that the child’s best interests are unique to each case and should be the sole determining factor in decisions about parental responsibility.

Related Posts

What is supervised contact, parent refuses to sign a passport application, helpful things to know about a recovery order.

• Parenting & Family Parenting Family Pregnancy
• Courses Marriage Save My Marriage Pre Marriage
• Quizzes Relationship Quizzes Love Quizzes Couples Quiz
• Find a Therapist

Exploring the Meaning and Impact of Parental Responsibilities

Callen Winslow explores relationship complexities and the human experience. Drawing on psychology, he believes in everyone's potential for growth and fulfillment.

In This Article

In families, parents have important jobs. They take care of their children with love, and sometimes things can be a bit confusing. Just like a strong, happy marriage is important for a good family, knowing how to be a good parent is really important for your child’s happiness. 

But what exactly are these “parental responsibilities”? Is it only about giving food, a home, and schooling, or is it also about feelings and thoughts? Knowparents rights and responsibilities, the different parts of being a parent, and how they affect how your child grows.

What is parental responsibility?

Parental responsibility means taking care of and looking after your child. It’s about providing them with the things they need, like food, a place to live, and education. But it’s also about helping them grow emotionally and mentally, making sure they feel loved and supported. 

Parental responsibility involves making decisions for your child’s well-being and guiding them as they learn and develop. It’s a big job that includes both practical tasks and emotional support , all aimed at helping your child become a happy and healthy individual.

Who has parental responsibility?

Parental responsibility is usually held by a child’s biological parents. However, it can also be given to adoptive parents, legal guardians, or individuals named in a court order. In cases of divorce or separation, both parents typically retain parental responsibility unless determined otherwise by a court. 

It’s a legal and moral duty to ensure the child’s welfare, including making important decisions for them. While it’s often shared by parents, it’s ultimately about providing a safe and nurturing environment for the child’s growth and development.

What are parental rights?

Parental rights encompass the legal and inherent privileges that parents hold in relation to their children. These rights are established to ensure the well-being and upbringing of the child. So, what are the rights of parents exactly? Here are a few key points about parental rights:

Decision-making

One fundamental aspect of parental rights is the authority to make decisions concerning the child’s upbringing. 

This includes choices about education, healthcare , religious upbringing, and other important matters that impact the child’s life. Parents have the right to make decisions that they believe are in the best interest of their child.

Physical custody

Parental rights often encompass the right to physical custody of the child. This involves having the child live with them and providing for their day-to-day needs, such as food, shelter, clothing, and emotional support. Custody arrangements can vary based on factors like the child’s age and the parents’ circumstances.

Visitation and access

Even if one parent has primary physical custody, the other parent usually retains the right to visitation or access. This ensures that both parents can maintain a meaningful relationship with the child, even if they don’t live together.

Protection and care

Parental rights include the responsibility to protect and care for the child’s safety and well-being. This involves creating a safe environment, addressing their emotional and physical needs, and shielding them from harm or neglect.

Legal recognition

Parental rights are legally recognized and protected by laws and regulations. These rights serve as a foundation for a parent’s role in their child’s life and are considered essential for the child’s healthy development. 

However, in cases of abuse, neglect, or other harmful circumstances, the state may intervene to protect the child’s best interests.

7 prime parental responsibilities

Parental responsibilities encompass a wide range of duties and obligations that parents have towards their children. Here are 7 important parental responsibilities:

1. Providing basic needs

At the core of parental responsibilities is the obligation to provide the essential physical needs of children. This includes ensuring they have access to nutritious food, appropriate clothing, and a safe and comfortable living environment. 

Meeting these needs not only sustains their physical health but also establishes a foundation of security that promotes emotional well-being.

2. Education and learning

Parents play a pivotal role in their children’s education. Beyond enrolling them in schools, parents should actively engage in their learning journey. This involves assisting with homework, encouraging a curious mindset, and fostering a love for knowledge. 

By supporting their academic endeavors, parents empower their children to develop cognitive skills and pursue lifelong learning.

3. Emotional support

Emotional well-being is integral to a child’s development. Parents need to be attuned to their children’s feelings, offering a safe space for expression and validation. 

By providing empathy, active listening, and unconditional love, parents help children build self-esteem, resilience, and the ability to navigate their emotions in healthy ways.

4. Healthcare and safety

Parents are entrusted with safeguarding their children’s physical health and safety. This encompasses scheduling regular medical check-ups and vaccinations and promptly addressing health concerns. Equally important is ensuring a secure environment that minimizes risks and educates children about safety measures.

5. Setting boundaries and discipline

Establishing boundaries and implementing effective discipline strategies are vital for a child’s social and moral development. 

By setting clear expectations and consistently enforcing consequences, parents teach their children about responsibility, accountability, and respect for rules, which are crucial life skills.

6. Teaching values and morals

Parents are instrumental in shaping their children’s ethical foundation . They impart values such as honesty, empathy, integrity, and compassion through their own behavior and conversations. 

These values serve as a moral compass that guides children in making ethical decisions and fostering positive relationships.

7. Preparing for independence

Parental responsibilities extend beyond childhood, preparing children for independent adulthood. Parents should gradually delegate age-appropriate responsibilities, such as chores, financial literacy, and problem-solving. 

This equips children with practical skills and confidence to manage life’s challenges as they transition into self-sufficient adults.

Parental responsibility in divorce or separation

Parental responsibility takes on a distinct dimension in the context of divorce or separation. 

When parents decide to end their relationship, their parenting responsibilities remain focused on the best interests of their children, despite the changing family dynamics. Here’s an overview of parental responsibility in divorce or separation:

Child custody arrangements

One of the primary considerations is determining child custody arrangements. This involves deciding where the child will primarily reside and how visitation or access to the non-custodial parent will be structured. 

Custody arrangements can be joint (shared) or sole (one parent has primary custody), depending on the circumstances and what is deemed best for the child’s well-being.

Parenting plan

Often required by the court, a parenting plan outlines the details of how parental responsibilities will be shared post-divorce or separation. This includes scheduling visitation, decision-making procedures, and how the parents will communicate and cooperate regarding the child’s upbringing.

Decision-making authority

Even if parents are no longer together, both typically retain the right to participate in important decisions affecting the child. 

These decisions might include matters related to education, healthcare, religion, and extracurricular activities. Open communication and collaboration are crucial to ensure that the child’s best interests are upheld.

Maintaining stability

Amid the changes associated with divorce or separation, maintaining stability for the child is paramount. Parents should strive to provide a consistent routine , stable living environment, and minimal disruptions to the child’s daily life. This helps mitigate the emotional impact of the separation.

Supporting emotional well-being

Divorce or separation can be emotionally challenging for children. Parents have a responsibility to address their emotional needs by providing reassurance, open communication, and a safe space for them to express their feelings. Both parents should avoid placing the child in the middle of conflicts.

Respecting the child’s relationship with the other parent

Encouraging a positive and nurturing relationship between the child and the non-custodial parent is essential. This includes facilitating regular visitation, respecting visitation schedules, and refraining from making negative comments about the other parent.

Adapting and co-parenting

Parental responsibility after divorce requires flexibility and a willingness to co-parent effectively. This means being open to adjustments in the parenting plan as the child’s needs change and collaborating on important decisions.

Legal compliance

Adhering to court orders and agreements is imperative. Failing to meet parental responsibilities, such as disregarding visitation schedules or not abiding by custody arrangements, can have legal consequences and negatively impact the child’s stability.

When does parental responsibility end?

Parental responsibility typically ends when a child reaches the age of legal adulthood, which is usually 18 years old in many jurisdictions. 

At this point, the child is considered capable of making their own decisions and taking responsibility for their own well-being. However, there are several situations that could lead to parenting responsibility ending before the child turns 18:

Legal adulthood

In most jurisdictions, parental responsibility ends when a child reaches the age of legal adulthood, usually around 18 years old. At this point, the child is considered capable of making their own decisions and taking care of themselves.

Emancipation

Parental responsibility can end earlier if a minor is granted emancipation by a court. Emancipation may occur if the minor gets married, joins the military, or demonstrates the ability to manage their own affairs independently.

When a child is adopted, the parental responsibilities of their biological parents come to an end. The adoptive parents assume legal and practical responsibilities for the child’s well-being.

Court orders and termination

In cases of extreme circumstances, such as abuse, neglect, or endangerment, a court may terminate the legal obligations of parents, effectively ending parental responsibility. This can lead to the child being placed in foster care or adopted by another family.

Commonly asked questions

Check out the FAQs about parental rights and responsibilities. Learn the distinctions, reasons behind parental responsibilities, how parental rights can be lost, court involvement, and proof of legal responsibility of parents.

What is the difference between parental rights and parental responsibility?

Parental rights refer to the legal privileges and authority parents have over their children, such as making decisions about their upbringing, education, and well-being. 

Parental responsibility, on the other hand, encompasses the duties and obligations that parents have towards their children, including providing for their basic needs, ensuring their safety, and promoting their emotional and physical development.

In this video, family Law specialist Christina Blacklaws breaks down the main responsibilities of a parent and how a step-parent can legally gain them too.

Why do parents have responsibility?

Parents have a responsibility to their children to ensure their well-being, growth, and development. It’s a moral and legal obligation that recognizes the dependency and vulnerability of children. 

Responsible parenting creates a foundation for children to become capable and well-adjusted individuals, contributing positively to society.

How does a father lose parental responsibility?

A father can lose parental responsibility through legal processes like adoption, the termination of parental rights by a court, or if the child is adopted by a stepfather and the biological father’s rights are relinquished.

Do you have to go to court to get parental responsibility?

While parental responsibility is typically assumed by biological or adoptive parents automatically, in some cases, court involvement is necessary. Unmarried fathers, for instance, might need to go to court to establish parental responsibility. 

Additionally, in cases of divorce or separation, courts may decide on custody, visitation, and decision-making responsibilities if parents can’t agree.

What is proof of parental responsibility?

Proof of parental responsibility can vary depending on the context. Legal documents, such as birth certificates or court orders, might serve as proof. 

Additionally, consistent involvement in a child’s life, financial support, and active decision-making in important matters demonstrate a parent’s commitment to their responsibilities.

Responsible parenting, nurtured childhood

Understanding parental rights and parenthood responsibilities is crucial for fostering healthy family dynamics. 

Whether it’s differentiating rights from responsibility for parents, comprehending the reasons behind parental obligations, or substantiating claims, this knowledge empowers individuals to ensure the well-being of their children and make informed decisions. 

By grasping these fundamental aspects, parents can contribute to their children’s growth and development in a meaningful and responsible manner.

Share this article on

Callen Winslow is a passionate writer who focuses on the complexities of relationships and the human experience. Drawing on his background in psychology, he believes that everyone has the potential for personal growth and fulfillment Read more in their relationships. When not writing, Callen can often be found indulging his love of art and sculpture or exploring his fascination with astronomy through stargazing. Read less

Want to have a happier, healthier marriage?

If you feel disconnected or frustrated about the state of your marriage but want to avoid separation and/or divorce, the marriage.com course meant for married couples is an excellent resource to help you overcome the most challenging aspects of being married.

Take Course

Learn More On This Topic

By Ritamaria Laird, Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor

By Michael Jacobs

By Rachael Pace

By Noah Williams

By Mihle Hlazo

By Angela Welch, Marriage & Family Therapist

By Kaida Hollister

By Ruth George, Licensed Clinical Social Worker

Relationship

Approved by christiana njoku, licensed professional counselor, you may also like.

Approved By Milica Markovic, Psychologist Coach MA

By Sylvia Smith

Emotional Intimacy

Approved by angela welch, marriage & family therapist.

Approved By Jenni Jacobsen, Licensed Clinical Social Worker

Recent Articles

By Callen Winslow

By Calantha Quinlan

Popular topics on parenting family.

Essay on Responsibility Towards Parents

Students are often asked to write an essay on Responsibility Towards Parents in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Responsibility Towards Parents

Understanding responsibility.

Responsibility is an important part of life. It means doing what you should do, even when it’s hard. For example, we have a responsibility towards our parents. This means we should respect them, help them, and care for them.

Respecting Parents

One of the main responsibilities towards parents is respect. We should always speak politely to our parents. We should listen to what they say and follow their advice. They have more experience than us and they want the best for us.

Helping Parents

Another responsibility is to help our parents. This can be in small ways, like helping with household chores. Or it can be in big ways, like supporting them when they are old or sick. Helping our parents shows that we care about them.

Caring for Parents

The final responsibility is to care for our parents. This means looking after their health and happiness. We should spend time with them, make them feel loved, and make sure they are well. This is a way to thank them for all they have done for us.

In conclusion, our responsibility towards our parents is very important. It involves respect, help, and care. By fulfilling these responsibilities, we can show our parents how much we love and appreciate them.

250 Words Essay on Responsibility Towards Parents

Responsibility is a big word. It means doing what you should do, even when no one is watching. When we talk about our responsibility towards our parents, it means caring for them and respecting them.

Respect for Parents

Respect is the first thing we owe our parents. We should always talk to them politely. We should listen to their advice because they have more experience than us. We should never raise our voice or argue with them. This is how we show them respect.

Caring for our parents is another important responsibility. When they are sick, we should look after them. We should help them with their work when they are tired. We should not let them do all the house chores alone. We can help them by doing small tasks like cleaning our room or washing our dishes.

Helping Parents Financially

When we grow up and start earning, we should also help our parents financially. They have spent their money on our education and well-being. It’s our turn to take care of them now. We should not let them worry about money in their old age.

Spending Time with Parents

Spending time with our parents is also our responsibility. We should talk to them and listen to their stories. We should eat at least one meal with them every day. This will make them feel loved and valued.

To sum up, our responsibility towards our parents includes respect, care, financial help, and spending time with them. If we fulfill these responsibilities, we can make our parents happy and proud.

500 Words Essay on Responsibility Towards Parents

Responsibility is a big word that means doing what you should do. It’s about being dependable and trustworthy. When we talk about responsibility towards our parents, it means doing what we can to make their lives better. This might involve helping them in their daily chores, respecting their wishes, or simply giving them our time and attention.

Why Responsibility Towards Parents is Important

Parents are the most important people in our lives. They love us, care for us, and provide us with everything we need. They spend their lives making sure we are happy and successful. It is only fair that we show them the same love and respect in return. Being responsible towards our parents is a way of showing them that we appreciate all that they have done for us.

Showing Love and Respect

One of the most important ways we can be responsible towards our parents is by showing them love and respect. This can be as simple as listening to them when they talk, being polite, and not arguing with them. We should also respect their opinions, even if we don’t always agree with them. By doing these things, we are showing our parents that we value them and their wisdom.

Helping with Daily Chores

Parents work hard to take care of us. They cook for us, clean our homes, and do many other chores. As children, we can help our parents by doing some of these tasks. This can include washing the dishes, cleaning our rooms, or helping with the shopping. These small acts of help can make a big difference in our parents’ lives. It shows them that we understand their hard work and are willing to share the load.

Spending Time With Parents

Parents love spending time with their children. It makes them happy and gives them a sense of satisfaction. We can show responsibility towards our parents by spending quality time with them. This can include playing games, going for walks, or simply chatting with them. This not only makes our parents happy but also strengthens our bond with them.

In conclusion, being responsible towards our parents is about showing them love, respect, and appreciation. It’s about helping them with daily chores and spending quality time with them. By doing these things, we are not only making our parents’ lives easier but also showing them that we value and appreciate them. Remember, our parents have given us the best of everything, it is our duty to give them the best of ourselves. We should always try to be the best children we can be, not just because it’s our responsibility, but because they deserve it.

Note: This essay is exactly 500 words as per the requirement.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Responsibility Of Youth
• Essay on Responsibility For Students
• Essay on Responsibility For Health

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.