income (GNI) per
capita (2011 PPP US$)
Answer: Table 1.6 shows that I) Sri Lanka has the highest per capita income in the world, followed by Myanmar (ii) Myanmar has the lowest life expectancy at birth, while Sri Lanka has the highest (iii) Sri Lanka has the highest literacy rate for people aged 15 and older, while Bangladesh has the lowest rate (iv) Country with the highest gross enrollment ratio is Sri Lanka; the lowest is Pakistan (v) Sri Lanka is ranked first in the world according to the HDI, whereas Nepal is last.
13. The following table shows the proportion of adults (aged 15-49 years) whose BMI is below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 ) in India. It is based on a survey of various states for the year 2015-16. Look at the table and answer the following questions.
|
|
|
A.Compare the nutritional level of people in Kerala and Madhya Pradesh.
Kerala’s population has a greater nutritional level than Madhya Pradesh’s population, both male and female.
B. Can you guess why around one-fifth of people in the country are undernourished even though it is argued that there is enough food in the country? Describe in your own words.
Despite the fact that there is enough food available, 40% of the population is undernourished. The major reasons are
Here we have provided some important questions that can be framed from the in-text notes of chapter 1 Development for Social Science class 10 Economics.
Q. What is meant by the term Development? Does everyone benefit from it?
Solution: Development is a process that guarantees everyone has a high quality of life in terms of contentment, harmony, and meeting their basic needs. It has to do with people’s goals, advancement, and betterment. All facets of society would profit from this definition of development since it emphasizes the concept of basic needs. As long as fundamental needs like food, shelter, healthcare, and education are met, more individuals will be able to make meaningful decisions.
The earlier ideas of development, which were solely focused on economic expansion, did not help the environment or the impoverished; instead, they led to an unbalanced ecology and a large divide between the rich and the poor. Therefore, the essence of development would be justified by a definition that strives to improve people’s quality of life.
Q. How is Sustainability and Development Related?
Solution: Using natural resources in a way that allows for their continued use by both current and future generations is known as sustainable development. Sustainable development is the need of the hour as it ensures that the resources are available for future generations. Because natural resources would not be available for future generations if they are not exploited responsibly, sustainability is a crucial concern for development. A nation’s inability to progress may eventually be caused by the depletion of its resources.
NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Social Science Economics |
Found this article helpful?
Let’s connect via chat or call our senior expert counselor at +91-9625869989 t o learn more about the different streams and options available. We would love it if we could add some of your insights. If you have a definite goal of scoring the highest marks, then you can resolve your doubts via our app (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.adda247.app&referrer=invite_code=8973023) and youtube class assistance ( https://www.youtube.com/c/Adda247School )
Q. What is the development definition in Class 10 Economics Chapter 1? A broad definition of development includes raising real per capita income, raising people’s standards of living, and lowering rates of illiteracy, poverty, and crime, among other things. Q. How do I acquire the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 SST Economics Chapter 1 in an online PDF format? Ans. you can download the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 SST Economics Chapter 1 PDF from the link provided in the article. Q. How can using NCERT Solutions for Adda247’s Economics Chapter 1 for Class 10 SST benefit you? Ans. The following are some benefits of using Adda247’s NCERT Solutions for Class 10 SST Economics:
Sharing is caring!
A broad definition of development includes raising real per capita income, raising people's standards of living, and lowering rates of illiteracy, poverty, and crime, among other things.
Ans. you can download the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 SST Economics Chapter 1 PDF from the link provided in the article.
Ans. The following are some benefits of using Adda247’s NCERT Solutions for Class 10 SST Economics: Students are given both the NCERT solution and a video explanation. A PDF is also provided, which can be downloaded and saved for future use.
Soumyadeep specializes in content creation for board exams, catering to the demands of CBSE, ICSE, and other state boards students. He has two years of experience in the education industry. He has a graduate degree in Zoology Honours, he delivers content across several domains, including CUET (UG and PG), NEET, JEE, and universities.
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Ncert solutions.
School syllabus.
Get all your queries solved in one single place. We at Adda247 school strive each day to provide you the best material across the online education industry. We consider your struggle as our motivation to work each day.
ESSAY ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 . “Last but not the least, the key to environmental problem lies in changing life styles that will minimise waste and pollution?
2. Rapid extraction of minerals and other natural resources would adversely impact the future development prospects. Do you agree?
3. Should the average temperature of the earth be treated as the natural resources for all the people?
|
|
|
|
| |
B | Edible oil | |
C | Banana |
|
|
|
1. | Rice | 20 km |
2. | Redgram | 200 km |
3. | Ghee | 50km |
4. | Vegetables | 10km |
5. | Fruits | 10km |
6. | Cooking oil | 50km |
7. | Wheat | 200km |
8. | Dry fruits | 1000km |
9. | Milk & curries | 50km |
10. | Provisions | 100km |
4. Why do you think the effects of climate change may be felt by all countries?
5. What are the lessons to be drown from the alternate PDS initiative at Zaheerabad mandal in Telangana State?
6. “Environment is crucial for the lives and livelihood of the local communities and the lifestyles of local communities are harmonious with the environment”. Explain?
More articles.
Sustainable Development Goals
Search here results.
Please enable JavaScript to use this page or visit this page for a non javascript version.
View all UCL’s published research related to the SDGs.
View all SDG research →
Simon Knowles Head of Coordination (SDGs) [email protected]
Inequality threatens long-term social and economic development, harms poverty reduction and destroys people’s sense of fulfillment and self-worth.
The incomes of the poorest 40 per cent of the population had been growing faster than the national average in most countries. But emerging yet inconclusive evidence suggests that COVID-19 may have put a dent in this positive trend of falling within-country inequality.
The pandemic has caused the largest rise in between-country inequality in three decades. Reducing both within- and between-country inequality requires equitable resource distribution, investing in education and skills development, implementing social protection measures, combating discrimination, supporting marginalized groups and fostering international cooperation for fair trade and financial systems.
Inequalities based on income, sex, age, disability, sexual orientation, race, class, ethnicity, religion and opportunity continue to persist across the world. Inequality threatens long-term social and economic development, harms poverty reduction and destroys people’s sense of fulfillment and self-worth. This, in turn, can breed crime, disease and environmental degradation.
We cannot achieve sustainable development and make the planet better for all if people are excluded from the chance for a better life.
Women and children with lack of access to healthcare die each day from preventable diseases such as measles and tuberculosis or in childbirth. Older persons, migrants and refugees face lack of opportunities and discrimination – an issue that affects every country in the world. One in five persons reported being discriminated on at least one ground of discrimination prohibited by international human rights law.
Discrimination has many intersecting forms, from religion, ethnicity to gender and sexual preference, pointing to the urgent need for measures to tackle any kind of discriminatory practices and hate speech.
In today’s world, we are all interconnected. Problems and challenges like poverty, climate change, migration or economic crises are never just confined to one country or region. Even the richest countries still have communities living in abject poverty. The oldest democracies still wrestle with racism, homophobia and transphobia, and religious intolerance. Global inequality affects us all, no matter who we are or where we are from.
It can – and should be – achieved to ensure a life of dignity for all. Political, economic and social policies need to be universal and pay particular attention to the needs of disadvantaged and marginalized communities.
Reducing inequality requires transformative change. Greater efforts are needed to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, and invest more in health, education, social protection and decent jobs especially for young people, migrants and refugees and other vulnerable communities.
Within countries, it is important to empower and promote inclusive social and economic growth. We can ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of income if we eliminate discriminatory laws, policies and practices.
Among countries, we need to ensure that developing countries are better represented in decision-making on global issues so that solutions can be more effective, credible and accountable.
Governments and other stakeholders can also promote safe, regular and responsible migration, including through planned and well-managed policies, for the millions of people who have left their homes seeking better lives due to war, discrimination, poverty, lack of opportunity and other drivers of migration.
Goal 10 targets.
Source: The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023
10.1 By 2030, progressively achieve and sustain income growth of the bottom 40 per cent of the population at a rate higher than the national average
10.2 By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status
10.3 Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies and action in this regard
10.4 Adopt policies, especially fiscal, wage and social protection policies, and progressively achieve greater equality
10.5 Improve the regulation and monitoring of global financial markets and institutions and strengthen the implementation of such regulations
10.6 Ensure enhanced representation and voice for developing countries in decision-making in global international economic and financial institutions in order to deliver more effective, credible, accountable and legitimate institutions
10.7 Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies
10.A Implement the principle of special and differential treatment for developing countries, in particular least developed countries, in accordance with World Trade Organization agreements
10.B Encourage official development assistance and financial flows, including foreign direct investment, to States where the need is greatest, in particular least developed countries, African countries, small island developing States and landlocked developing countries, in accordance with their national plans and programmes
10.C By 2030, reduce to less than 3 per cent the transaction costs of migrant remittances and eliminate remittance corridors with costs higher than 5 per cent
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States (UNOHRLLS)
dpicampaigns 2024-08-20T08:00:00-04:00 20 Aug 2024 |
The swift spread of a new virulent strain of the mpox virus across Africa triggered the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it once again a public health emergency of international concern last week. Read Full [...]
Mpox is “not the ‘new COVID’” and European governments need to show strong political commitment to eliminate it, while standing in solidarity with Africa, a top official of the UN World Health Organization (WHO) said on [...]
dpicampaigns 2024-08-18T08:00:00-04:00 18 Aug 2024 |
Acute malnutrition is escalating among children in Government-controlled areas in Yemen, UN agencies and partners said in a report published on Sunday. Read Full Story on UN News
Inefficient Water Management (Argentina) California Water Markets (California, USA) Drought Water Banks (California,USA) The Public Trust Doctrine and Water Allocation (Colorado, USA) Controlling Pollution through Disclosure Strategies (Indonesia) Liberalization of Water Markets (Jakarta, Indonesia) Paying for Forest Water Services (Costa Rica) Water Pricing in Marin County (California) Proposition 65's Effects on Lead in Drinking Water (California) Dealing with Drought (Australia)
Smart. Open. Grounded. Inventive. Read our Ideas Made to Matter.
Through intellectual rigor and experiential learning, this full-time, two-year MBA program develops leaders who make a difference in the world.
A rigorous, hands-on program that prepares adaptive problem solvers for premier finance careers.
A 12-month program focused on applying the tools of modern data science, optimization and machine learning to solve real-world business problems.
Earn your MBA and SM in engineering with this transformative two-year program.
Combine an international MBA with a deep dive into management science. A special opportunity for partner and affiliate schools only.
A doctoral program that produces outstanding scholars who are leading in their fields of research.
Bring a business perspective to your technical and quantitative expertise with a bachelor’s degree in management, business analytics, or finance.
A joint program for mid-career professionals that integrates engineering and systems thinking. Earn your master’s degree in engineering and management.
An interdisciplinary program that combines engineering, management, and design, leading to a master’s degree in engineering and management.
A full-time MBA program for mid-career leaders eager to dedicate one year of discovery for a lifetime of impact.
This 20-month MBA program equips experienced executives to enhance their impact on their organizations and the world.
Non-degree programs for senior executives and high-potential managers.
A non-degree, customizable program for mid-career professionals.
Teaching Resources Library
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Communications Earth & Environment volume 5 , Article number: 443 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
26 Accesses
Metrics details
The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 12 contains ambitions to reduce human and ecological harm from chemicals, including those in waste, but current official indicators (measurable parameters used to evaluate sustainable development conditions) do not measure variables relevant to these goals, such as impact to humans or the environment from chemicals. Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers from around the world comprise rich datasets on chemicals in industrial waste that can and should be used to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 12. However, translation of these data to inform evaluation of the subsequent human and ecological impacts is impeded by gaps in assessment models. Here, data from Canada’s Pollutant Release and Transfer Register – the National Pollutant Release Inventory is used in a case study to offer perspectives on future directions to fill these gaps. The use of such Pollution Release and Transfer Registers will substantially advance the ability to quantify progress towards the Sustainable Development Goal 12 aims of sound management of chemicals in waste and, importantly, human health and ecological harm reduction.
Introduction.
In 2015, 193 United Nations (UN) member countries adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) that called for universal (local to global) scale action on the three interconnected social, economic, and environmental imperatives 1 . With 15 years to achieve the goals, the stage was set for extensive progress tracking using the myriad SDG targets and indicators defined by the UN 2 . In the development of the Global Indicator Framework for the SDGs, the United Nations Statistics Division recommended that official SDG indicators meet certain criteria and should be: relevant to the target (on a national and global scale), based on sound/well-documented methodology, measurable by cost-effective and practical means, easy to communicate and access, and limited in number and focused on globally relevant outcomes 3 . Within the Global Indicator Framework, SDG 12, which aims to “Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns”, includes several targets related to the sound management of chemicals and wastes, and recognizes that while chemicals play an important part in modern society and economy, their sound management means that they are produced and consumed in ways that minimize their release (to air, water, land and waste) and thus minimize significant adverse impacts on the environment and human health 1 (see Table 1 ).
However, some criticism has arisen regarding these targets and their official indicators, insofar as they are the product of compromise and expediency and, as a result, are watered down, vague, and inaccurate as measurements of progress towards SDGs 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 . Officially, performance towards target 12.4 is measured by an indicator counting the number of parties that comply with obligations to transmit information prescribed by international chemicals management agreements (Table 1 ), but says nothing about the variables that need to be measured to assess whether the target is being reached (i.e., direct measurements of chemicals releases and wastes, and their human/environmental impacts). For example, Gasper et al. 4 highlighted that indicator 12.4.1 falls short in terms of its ability to speak to the actual reductions in hazardous chemicals and waste called for by target 12.4, and noted that the selection of reporting compliance to international agreements as an indicator prioritizes the counting of reports over the content and quality of those reports. The authors observed that this indicator choice was influenced by debate favouring a production efficiency-centered perspective due to business interests and by the technical feasibility of this indicator in that established methodology and data exist. Fukuda-Parr and McNeill 5 echoed that the disconnect between the target (hazardous chemical and waste reductions) was the result of the interplay of both political and technical considerations, and that SDG indicators for the environment (such as SDG 12) slipped in terms of sustainability ambition because of their narrowed, business-friendly scope which favours interests of continued growth but more efficient growth through “clean production”, as opposed to reducing growth, total production and consumption (and thus total hazardous waste generation and chemical release), and respecting absolute planetary boundaries. The authors recommended that data availability should not preclude selecting indicators based on their accurate reflection of SDG ambitions. Bengtsson et al. and Marcos et al. 6 , 7 furthered this line of thinking and noted that by only tracking sustainable production and consumption efficiency (as official indicators do), progress toward the overarching sustainability objectives of SDG 12 (curtail overall/total chemical and waste volumes to minimize adverse ecosystem impacts) would be inadequate. Indeed, SDG 12.4 indicators lack any absolute frame of reference relevant to the achievement of sustainability and alone do not truly inform SDG 12 progress in light of planetary (nor any lower geographic scale) boundaries for chemical pollution as defined by Rockstrom et al. and many others 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , which describe biophysical boundaries for the safe operating space of key Earth Systems that characterize the current Holocene state 13 .
One answer to these progress-tracking shortcomings can be found in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s recent publication of a framework on the role of global pollutant release and transfer registries (PRTRs) and their application in sustainability analysis 14 , 15 , 16 . Briefly, PRTRs are inventories of industrial/institutional point source releases (to the environment) and transfers (to waste management) of a wide range of chemicals 17 , 18 . While there are inherent limitations and uncertainties in PRTR data (i.e., reporting requirement coverage only of relevant sectors and substances, data quality of facility-reported data, etc.) 14 , 19 , 20 , the framework delineates the value of PRTRs in the sustainability analysis context in that they can directly inform on variables relevant to SDG target 12.4. For example, PRTR data can provide trends on a local to global scale of chemical releases to air, water, and land, as well as disposals and transfers for recycling or treatment, enabling analysis on study themes such as evaluation of environmental policies, transboundary movement of pollutants in waste, shifts in waste management practices and impacts to the environment and/or human health; the minimization of which is the main goal of SDG 12.4 14 , 16 . Supplementary Fig. 1 shows an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development framework to emphasize the connection between PRTR data attributes and SDG 12 analyses and variables of interest, which is also discussed in Berthiaume 21 .
Indeed, in Canada, the National Pollutant Release Inventory has been implicated in over 220 research publications (between 1994 and 2019) on some of the aforementioned SDG analytical themes 19 . However, the focus of these works has only been on analyses of releases to air and water, whereas analyses using transfers and disposals data have seldom (if ever) been done, despite now having a clear role in SDG analysis per the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development framework. Recent efforts have been made to raise awareness about the availability and applicability of the under-utilized National Pollutant Release Inventory transfers and disposals data in SDG 12.4 analysis 21 , 22 . Specifically, this work set a precedent for using PRTR transfer and disposal data to produce snapshots, trends and to evaluate environmental policies, characterize transboundary movements of pollutants in waste, and revealed that in the Canadian context, actual environmental performance diverged from performance of the official indicator. That is, despite achievements in reporting information to international agreements on pollutants in waste, the intended reductions of pollutants in waste moving out of Canada were not necessarily achieved, suggesting that the official indicator is not telling the whole SDG 12.4 story, whereas integrating PRTR transfer and disposal data into the SDG progress tracking can give a more complete picture.
Whereas previous work demonstrated the availability and usefulness of PRTR transfer and disposal data in evaluating environmental policies and transboundary movement, opportunities remain to apply PRTR transfer and disposal in other ways suggested in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development framework. Here, attention is focused on using this transfers and disposals data to inform on impacts to human and ecosystem health from chemicals in waste, evaluate shifts in waste management practices from least to most preferred, and identify gaps and opportunities to improve these analyses for measuring progress towards SDG 12.4 and the stated intention of minimizing harm from chemicals in waste.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development has proposed that one of the aims of using PRTRs in sustainability analysis is to gain insights into whether human and ecosystem impacts from chemical releases are being reduced/minimized; the essence of SDG target 12.4. The burgeoning approach to achieve this aim using PRTR data, at least for release data, is to use life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods and/or related chemical footprint tools, such as (among others) USEtox 23 , 24 , the US EPA’s Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) 25 , or more recently, environmentally-extended multi-region input-output models (EE-MRIO) like EXIOBASE 26 , 27 , as demonstrated by recent works on national chemical footprints 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 . These LCIA models translate release quantities (e.g. PRTR data on releases to air, water, and land) into estimates of exposure and hazard to sentinel ecosystem receptors by accounting for substance toxicities, fate, and transport (in various environmental compartments). A crux to these approaches is that they focus on quantifying and comparing impacts of direct releases to air, water, and sometimes soil from within the institutional activity boundary. This boundary is sometimes extended to where resources are extracted or products are consumed, but generally do not also account for impacts (releases/emissions) resulting from downstream industrial waste management (waste management) practices. The excluded industrial waste management practices comprise those described by PRTR disposals and transfers data (e.g., underground injection, off-site recycling, off-site landfilling, etc.)—with the exception of land application, which can be considered a direct emission to land/agricultural soil 24 , 26 , 32 , 33 . In fact, LCIA methods tend to handle industrial pollutant transfers and disposals to waste management using simple mass balance metrics, counting most of these (other than on-site land application and recycling) as negative inputs to the system (originating industrial facility), meaning they subtract the mass of the pollutant transferred off-site to a waste management practice from the system but do not appear to account for the associated-yet-off-site downstream impact (i.e., from short/long-term emissions to air, water, land) from those industrial transfers 34 . This gap hinders the ability to gain insights into human and environmental health impacts from chemicals transferred to off-site waste management streams, both from the lens of quantifying the level harm from substances in each of these waste management practices, and the lens of quantifying how preferable one waste management practice may be, over another (as discussed in the next section). Moreover, questions also remain about how the LCIA outputs of relative impact gradations (per chemical) compare in an absolute sense to sustainability thresholds for impacts from chemicals in waste management. That is, can chemicals-in-waste footprints be developed and linked to planetary (or lower scale) boundaries? While such planetary boundaries are often subject to large uncertainties and debate 11 , 35 , the concept of integrating an absolute impact limit, and not only focusing on relative impact comparisons is still valid and would ideally be part of a future improved framework for evaluating human and environmental health impacts from pollutants (and their movement) in waste. Such shifts in narrative from measuring relative impacts to measuring absolute impacts vis-à-vis biophysical limits are emerging in the context of chemical releases, as discussed by Fang et al., among others 11 , 13 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , but this discourse is not yet apparent in the literature for chemicals in industrial waste. Consequently, this hinders the ability to track progress towards SDG 12.4 using the rich sets of existing, publicly available PRTR transfers data, and is a missed opportunity.
To illustrate this occlusion using a hypothetic example, we can look at the quantities of various substances being transferred to waste management in Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory across 2013–2022 21 using USEtox (v2.13) 23 , 24 , 39 (a consensus-based LCIA model endorsed by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC)). Using approaches described in previous studies that use USEtox characterization factors to calculate national chemical impact footprints 28 , 29 , we can leverage the human health and ecological characterization factors in USEtox for ‘emissions to natural land,’ where available for National Pollutant Release Inventory substances, as a simplistic proxy to quantify the potential impacts from their “emissions” to waste management practices (i.e., their transfers to National Pollutant Release Inventory waste management categories described in Supplementary Table 1 ). It is important to acknowledge certain caveats and limitations to USEtox generally (e.g. steady-state dynamics at the global/continental scale and limitations on substance and environmental compartment/receptor coverage, input parameters for substance toxicity and fate, etc.) 40 ) and additional uncertainty specifically from using the emissions-to-natural-land characterisation factor as a proxy for potential waste management impacts, given that it was not designed for this purpose, and thus not an accurate measure of actual waste management impacts. Nonetheless, with this initial (albeit imperfect) characterization factor for the impact of anticipated downstream exposures from the various National Pollutant Release Inventory substances being transferred off-site to waste management, we can compare results by human or ecological impact score over time to the trends by quantity alone. Figure 1 shows the change in ranking of substances from the perspective of total quantity transferred to off-site waste management between 2013 and 2022 (centre), the corresponding human health impact proxy score (left) and corresponding ecological impact proxy score (right), and helps visualize the message that a substance’s toxicities, fate, and transport properties affect the level of impact it may have. For example, by total quantity, lead (in teal) ranks second, but by corresponding human health impact (if these quantities were released directly to land), lead ranks 112th, suggesting that this may not be a top priority for human health risk management in this context. By contrast, pyrene ranks 65th by quantity and moves to 2nd by human health impact, suggesting that risk management focus may be well-placed on pyrene in this context. Zinc and cadmium (orange and red, respectively) also demonstrate substantial rank changes when looking from the perspective of quantity versus human health or ecological impact, whereas sulphuric acid does not change rank (note that a USEtox ecological impact CF for sulphuric acid “emissions to land” was not available). The resulting trends by quantity for chemicals going to off-site waste management is variable but roughly increasing over 2013–2022, influenced by a range of substances (Fig. 2 panes a and c), suggesting to policymakers that the magnitude of the issue is not decreasing, and the culprit comprises a range of chemicals and their waste management. Meanwhile, the proxy human impact metric also suggests an upward trend (+5%) but is primarily influenced by sulphuric acid (Fig. 2 , pane b), refining the message to policymakers that substantial gains in SDG progress in terms of minimizing human health impact may be achievable through sulphuric acid policy alone. By contrast, the ecotoxicity impact results (Fig. 2 , pane d), suggest a variable but roughly downward trend (−2%), owing to an altogether different mixture of substances, including zinc, cadmium, copper, nickel, suggesting to policymakers that SDG progress is potentially on track (or at least headed in the right direction) for ecological harm reductions from chemicals in waste. While it is not an accurate representation of human and ecological impacts of transfers to various waste management practice, this hypothetical case demonstrates that the insights into impacts from substances undergoing waste management could diverge when the toxicity and exposure (fate and transport) properties of these substances are considered. Note that there were limitations in availability of characterization factors for all National Pollutant Release Inventory substances in this case, emphasizing the need for appropriate LCIA approaches to be developed for a range of waste-relevant substances and waste management practices to quantify potential impacts more accurately than the “emissions to land” proxy illustrated here.
a Sum quantity (kg) between 2013 and 2022; b sum of human health impact score (unitless) using USEtox “emissions to land” CF for human health impacts; c sum Ecological impact score using USEtox “emissions to land” CF for ecological impacts (right). Note 1: not all substances have USEtox CFs for both human health and ecological impacts; i.e. for sulphuric acid, only a human health impact CF was available. Note 2: several substances have been highlighted in colour to emphasize their rank changes (or stability) from the perspective of quantity, human health, or ecological impact.
Bar charts and trends (ordinary least squares) by a Quantity (limited to substances with a USEtox human health characterization factor (CF) for emissions to land); b Human health impact (calculated using the USEtox human health CF for emissions to land); c Quantity (limited to substances with a USEtox ecological CF for emissions to land); d Ecological impact (calculated using the USEtox ecological CF for emissions to land). Colour coded by substance (legends at right).
Note also that absolute sustainability limits are not apparent nor integrated into current LCIA methods, which primarily intend to produce relative rankings of chemical impacts, not absolute ones against key benchmarks. However, at least one multi-media fate and transport model, RAIDAR (Risk Assessment Identification and Ranking) 41 , does include a comparison of model outputs to user-assigned risk benchmarks and provides a potential template for incorporating sustainability limits here (i.e. planetary (or lower scale) boundaries). Doing so could reveal previously hidden focus areas (i.e., substances yielding the highest relative impacts versus those with the highest quantities) for managing chemicals in waste more soundly (i.e. minimizing harm), accelerating progress towards the aim of SDG 12.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development described PRTR data as valuable for measuring progress toward SDG 12.4 and 12.5 because it could show if shifts were occurring over time from pollutant disposals or releases toward preferred waste management techniques 14 , 16 . However, while the hierarchy of ‘most preferred’ to ‘least preferred’ waste management practices (generally known as the waste management hierarchy) appears to be an accepted concept in Canada and beyond 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 (see Supplementary Fig. 2 ), a consensus on the exact composition, order, and relative scale of the hierarchy is lacking and subject to context-specific differences (e.g., industrial sector and regulatory differences, etc.) 46 making its practical application to PRTR data challenging. Moreover, a literature scan suggests several additional points relevant to this discussion. First is that none of the existing hierarchies appear to comprise all the National Pollutant Release Inventory waste management practices (i.e. categories/sub-categories—see Supplementary Table 1 ), which are also reflected in the United Nations’ Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal 47 , and other PRTRs, like the US Toxics Release Inventory 48 . For example, none appear to comprise enough hierarchical granularity to address the range of PRTR-relevant waste management types of treatment (i.e., biological, chemical, physical, etc.) or disposal (i.e., underground injection, tailings or waste rock management, landfilling, or land application, etc.). Second, the basis of the waste management hierarchy is currently limited to philosophical concepts, whereas a quantitative/measurable approach to rank or compare the National Pollutant Release Inventory-relevant waste management practices relative to each other, or within the context of absolute sustainability thresholds, is not apparent. For example, is recycling a few, many times, or not at all more environmentally sound than disposal to underground injection that is regulatorily constrained to limit exposures 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ? Are such waste management practice relativities true for all substances, or are they different given the variable fate and transport properties of the substances subject to these waste management practices (likely the latter)? Such gaps hinder quantitative/accurate evaluation of how much one waste management is “preferred” over another, especially in contexts of varying substance mixtures. Third, as discussed by Hird 54 , the concept of waste management hierarchy does not seem to include consideration for the distance waste travels when it is transferred off-site for waste management. Moreover, the travel destination itself, regardless of how far, may also introduce exposure concerns due to varying regulatory stringencies (or lack thereof) across the globe on the proper handling of hazardous waste 55 . While the Basel Convention aims to discourage international transfers of hazardous wastes, particularly to less regulatorily-stringent nations, also known as waste havens, and previous work using National Pollutant Release Inventory data demonstrated Canada’s compliance to this aspect of the Basel Convention, this point is nonetheless an important consideration when accounting for the impacts of pollutants being transferred off-site from their source of origin. For example, in the lens of the current waste management hierarchy, how ought two equal quantities of sulphuric acid be compared: one amount travelling across the globe destined for recycling (i.e., long-distance but more “preferred” waste management practice) versus the same amount that travels to a local landfill (i.e., negligible distance but less “preferred” waste management practice)?
Such analytical conundrums are visible in Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4 , which show the shifts in rank (by quantity) of waste management practices for National Pollutant Release Inventory off-site transfers over 2013–2022 (domestic and international, respectively), where consistent trends in shifts from one waste management practice to another, and insights into the shifts/trends in impact (due to substance toxicities, fate, and transport in the ecosystem from waste management compartments as discussed above) are not apparent. However, generally speaking, these views do show that comparatively larger quantities appear to have stayed in Canada but went to “less preferred” disposal operations, whereas smaller quantities have gone abroad (i.e. generally travelling longer distances than domestic transfers) to “more preferred” recycling and recovery.
Considering the above critiques on the status quo for both lacking a means to quantify the waste management hierarchy and the impacts on humans and their environment from chemicals going to the practices identified in this hierarchy, the question then becomes: what would an improved way of doing things look like? A new framework, or enhancement of existing LCIA models (e.g., new characterization factors), seems in order to quantify the impacts of a range of pollutants being transferred to various waste management practices, also accounting for both the impacts of distance travelled and for context-specific regulatory realities (e.g., regulatory constraints that mitigate impacts from various waste management practices), to better understand the until-now qualitative hierarchy of waste management practices. While doing so comprehensively and accurately is beyond scope here, the hypothetical case from the previous section can be extended here by leveraging existing early thinking on these concepts. This proof-of-concept illustration can support the justification for advancing models in this way and the potential insights awaiting if these gaps are filled.
Outside of LCIA, semi-quantitative weighting schemes for certain waste management practices already exist in the context of environmental justice, estimating the pollution burden to populations in proximity to facilities carrying out these waste management practices and evaluating the impact of chemicals in products. These may be partly transferrable here. For example, the approach used by California’s CalEnviroScreen to quantify the relative degrees of human impact from proximity to various waste management activities assigns weighting factors to permitted (i.e., regulated) hazardous facilities on a scale of 2–10, with 10 being the least preferred (active landfill) to 2 being most preferred (an inactive waste management facility). Additional weighting factors for facilities with US EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permits (indicating the presence of hazardous waste) and yet more weightings for compliance violations are also incorporated 56 , 57 . These weights are not substance-specific but somewhat waste management practice-specific and are used in pollution burden estimations as a means to account for ambiguous aggregate “environmental effects” on communities who live near these waste management operations, but where direct chemical exposures and effects are not measured. Another example of existing approaches to quantifying the relative gradations of the waste management hierarchy can be found in the CiP_CAFE model (Chemicals in Products – Comprehensive Anthropospheric Fate Estimation). This is a dynamic substance flow model with a conceptual framework that accounts for downstream emissions to the environment from pollutants (albeit in products and not direct transfers from industrial activities) going to various waste management practices at end-of-life (e.g., engineered landfill, dumping at simple landfills, wastewater treatment, municipal solid waste incineration, metal recyclers, etc.), and also accounts for impacts from the distances travelled by pollutants (again, albeit in products) 58 . Neither of these examples is amenable to translating the entire National Pollutant Release Inventory transfers and disposals dataset because of various limitations (e.g., neither model is currently structured to input pollutant transfer and disposal data from institutions, nor do they include all of the waste management practice options inventoried by the National Pollutant Release Inventory (see Supplementary Table 1 ), etc.). However, they nonetheless point to early thinking on approaches for quantitatively weighting exposures/impacts from substances going to different waste management practices and can inform future directions for model advancements.
In the meantime, we can leverage this early thinking to extend the hypothetical example discussed in previous sections and refine the USEtox-based proxy metric for characterizing impacts from waste management practices. For example, instead of using the USEtox characterization factor for “emissions to land” to compute potential human health and ecological impacts from National Pollutant Release Inventory substances being transferred or disposed of between 2013 and 2022, a range of hypothetical weighting factors (one per waste management practice) can be used to better reflect their fate. Specifically, advancing from the assumption that all waste management practices in the National Pollutant Release Inventory are equal in character to USEtox’s “emissions to land”, hypothetical waste management weighting factors can be inferred from a merged interpretation of accepted waste management hierarchies, where 1= “least preferred” = disposals to landfills = USEtox characterization factor for emissions to land, and all other categories can be weighted by increments of (−0.2 × difference in hierarchy rank from landfill) as shown in Fig. 3 . Additional weights to account for the distance travelled by off-site transfers can be derived based on the premise that onsite disposals (not discussed in this study but discussed previously 21 ) would be most closely related to direct on-site releases to land, therefore = USEtox characterization factor for “emissions to land” = 1. Subsequent off-site travel distances can be inferred using regional groups ranked from shortest to farthest, as shown in Fig. 3 , accepting that these assumptions ignore potentially large variabilities within and between these groups, and acknowledging that travel distances would not necessarily exacerbate the toxicity/exposure from the specific pollutants (other than the potential for accidental spills while in transit), but would more generally contribute to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions from transportation.
In both schema, 1 = disposals to on-site landfill = USEtox characterization factor for direct “emissions to land.” Note: Residual management = tailings management, waste rock management, and underground injection.
While the results from Fig. 2 use the USEtox characterization factor of on-site “emissions to land”, Supplementary Fig. 5 clarifies the actual regional destinations of National Pollutant Release Inventory off-site transfers, which is going to various waste management practices in various regions, and not directly to land. Using the actual regional destinations and integrating the hypothetical weighting schema described above gives the resulting rank changes as shown in Supplementary Fig. 6 (for human health impacts) and Supplementary Fig. 7 (for ecological impacts) and shows similar shifts in rankings as seen in Supplementary Fig. 1 . Rank changes appear to be more influenced by waste management practice than travel distance in this hypothetical scenario, but this observation may or may not hold true if accurate weighting schema were to be applied. Nonetheless, this view points to potential changes in policy priorities and the need to develop more accurate weightings to understand relative and absolute risks from industrial pollutants in the waste management stream.
Trends show that while total quantities of National Pollutant Release Inventory substances going to off-site waste management practices went up over time (see Fig. 4 pane a), the proxy human health impacts weighted by waste management practices alone, by travel type alone, or by both waste management + travel category also increased but at varying rates (16%, 5%, 13%, respectively) (Fig. 4b–d ). The human health impact trends are largely influenced by the large sulphuric acid quantities going to various recycling methods intracontinentally and intraprovincially (see Supplementary Fig. 8, pane a ), with a dampened influence of substances (such as pyrene,) going to landfill domestically. This view may steer policymakers towards sulphuric acid management improvements that focus on the reduction of long-distance (intracontinental) travel for certain high-volume recycling (recovery of acids) transfers that contribute substantially to the human health impacts (e.g. blue triangle at top right quadrant of Supplementary Fig. 8 pane a). This, even though recycling is a “preferred” according to the conventional waste management hierarchy. At the same time, this view may also steer policymakers away from prioritizing shifts in waste management practices to more “preferred” methods for substances like chromium (among others), as many of the instances of substances going to disposal by land application (i.e., least preferred) score relatively low in terms of waste management + travel weighted impact for both human health and ecological harm (e.g. bottom left quadrants of Supplementary Fig. 8 a, b). Moreover, the absolute values of the combined weighted scores (i.e., waste management + travel weighted) were lower than the initial proxy that assumed these were on-site “emissions to land”, emphasizing that trends alone do not tell the full story and there is a need for both a broader view to understand these impacts relative to those from direct releases, and a frame of reference to understand the meaning of the absolute impact scores and thus understand if SDG 12 intentions of minimizing harm from chemicals in waste are being achieved. Such context could come from a threshold of concern/benchmark for ecological and/or human health impacts and could elevate the urgency of these issues if the data indicated threshold exceedances (or vice versa if data indicated low potential for exceedance), and help policymakers justify prioritization (or not) of specific risk management action. By contrast, ecological impacts weighted by waste management practices, travel type, and waste management practice + travel type decreased by −11, −1 and −10%, respectively (Fig. 4 , panes f–h), the latter of which reflects the relatively greater but overall decreasing quantities of zinc going to somewhat “local” landfills (i.e. intraprovincial movement only), as well as the relatively lower influence of zinc, copper, nickel, and manganese recycling despite some intracontinental transfers (see top right quadrant of Supplemental Fig. 8 , pane b). In this case, the addition of benchmarks to qualify the absolute values of these data would let policymakers know whether these downward trends indicate sufficient SDG progress, or if despite the downward direction, more action is needed, which could be focused on the above key influences (i.e. intracontinental zinc recycling, and “local” zinc landfilling.
Bar charts and trends (ordinary least squares) by a Quantity (limited to substances with a USEtox human health (HH) characterization factor (CF) for emissions to land), colour-coded by waste management practice; b HH impact scores calculated with USEtox using waste management practices weighting schema described in Fig. 3 , colour-coded by waste management sub-type; c HH impact scores using USEtox “emissions to land” CF and Fig. 3 travel weighting schema, colour-coded by travel type; d waste management practice and travel-weighted HH impact score; e – h Same as ( a – d ) respectively, but for ecological (Eco) impacts, and using USEtox Eco impact CFs.
While many assumptions in this hypothetical case would need validation/correction before actual conclusions could be drawn, we nonetheless can see how waste management practice and travel distance weighting can change the perspectives on relative and absolute progress towards sustainability, and in general can conclude that quantity alone is not an accurate indicator. This takeaway message can hopefully help motivate the development of a future validated LCIA approach.
Current official SDG 12 indicators are rooted in criteria that ensure they are globally feasible, applicable, and action-oriented, but also appear to be a compromise between political and technical considerations. This interplay and these constraints have limited the ability to accommodate complex, relevant measures and thus leave information gaps on actual progress towards SDG 12 objectives. PRTRs are publicly accessible, national-scale systems that contain (among other things) data on transfers and disposals of industrial chemicals in waste, and despite inherent uncertainty and limitations, they have the potential to inform on SDG 12 progress, which the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development supports. The perspectives shown here via the hypothetical case study using Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory, highlighted practical opportunities for translating PRTR data on chemicals in waste into understandable indicators of human and ecological impacts relevant to SDG 12, which can fill information gaps on true SDG 12.4 progress, and help decision-making on the sound management of chemicals. However, before these opportunities can be seized, key areas for future research need to be addressed. Chief among these is the need for LCIA or other impact assessment models to account for the implications from industrial (or other institutional) pollutants going to waste management practices, towards (i) reaching consensus on international classification and hierarchy of waste management types and associated impacts, and (ii) developing consensus on indicator metrics (or model outputs) that incorporate absolute sustainability thresholds such as planetary (or lower scale) biophysical limits for chemical impacts. Moreover, finding solutions to account for additional ecosystem impacts (i.e. climate change) from travel distances to off-site waste management destinations is also needed. By addressing these analytical impediments, PRTRs can be more fully leveraged to inform on local/national to global-scale progress toward shifting to preferred waste management for industrial chemicals, unveiling previously hidden priorities and informing decision-making for managing chemicals in waste more soundly (i.e. minimizing human and ecosystem harm). With such improvements, PRTRs can fill the information gaps left by official SDG 12.4 indicators and ultimately contribute to the assurance, or even acceleration, of progress towards SDG 12.
USEtox 2.13 was downloaded from https://usetox.org/model/download/usetox2.13 23 , 24 . The midpoint characterization factors for human effects (total of cancer and non-cancer effects) and for ecotoxicity effects (potentially affected fraction of a range of freshwater species) were used, where available matches to National Pollutant Release Inventory substances were found. Matching was based on either CAS or substance name (in the case of metals). National Pollutant Release Inventory substances for which no USEtox match was found were excluded from this analysis, including H 2 S, phosphorous, and hydrochloric acid, among others.
National Pollutant Release Inventory data (2013–2022) on transfers and off-site disposals was obtained from Canada’s open data portal in the form of the all-years csv files and the comprehensive database ( https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/40e01423-7728-429c-ac9d-2954385ccdfb ) 21 .
United Nations. A/RES/70/1 - Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . United Nations. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (2015).
United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs—Sustainable Development . No date. The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/#goal_section
UN Statistics Division. Discussion paper on Principles of Using Quantification to Operationalize the SDGs and Criteria for Indicator Selection . https://unstats.un.org/unsd/post-2015/activities/egm-on-indicator-framework/docs/Background%20note_Principles%20of%20using%20quantification%20to%20operationalize%20the%20SDGs%20and%20criteria%20for%20indicator%20selection_Feb2015.pdf (2015).
Gasper, D., Shah, A. & Tankha, S. The framing of sustainable consumption and production in SDG 12. Glob. Policy 10 , 83–95 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. & McNeill, D. Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDGs: introduction to special issue. Glob. Policy 10 , 5–15 (2019).
Bengsston, M., Alfredsson, E., Cohen, M., Lorek, S. & Schroeder, P. Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency. Sustain. Sci. 13 , 1533–1547 (2018).
Marcos, A., Hartmann, P. & Barrutia, J. M. In Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future (eds. Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. M., Doni, F. & Salvia, A. L.) (Springer, 2022).
Rockstrom, J. E. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 , 472–475 (2009).
Diamond, M. L. et al. Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution. Environ. Int. 78 , 8–15 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Persson, L. M. et al. Confronting unknown planetary boundary threats from chemical pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 , 12619–12622 (2013).
Persson, L. M. et al. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 , 1510–1521 (2022).
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 , 1259855 (2015).
Ryberg, M. W., Marchman, A. M., Owsianiak, M. & Hauschild, M. Z. Downscaling the planetary boundaries in absolute environmental sustainability assessments—a review. J. Clean. Prod. 276 , 123287 (2020).
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Framework on the Role of Pollutant Release and Trasnfer Registers (PRTRs) in Global Sustainability Analysis . https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2017)7&doclanguage=en . (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2017).
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. On the Use of PRTR Information in Evaluating Progress Towards Meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: an Action Plan for Data Analysis and Moving Forward . https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO(2019)33&docLanguage=En . (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2019).
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Using PRTR Information to Evaluate Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goal 12, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Series on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers , No. 25. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/pollutant-release-transfer-register/using-prtr-information-evaluate-progress-towards-sustainable-development-goal-12.pdf (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, 2021).
United Nations. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making, and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters . https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1998/06/19980625%2008-35%20AM/Ch_XXVII_13p.pdf (1998).
Government of Canada. About the National Pollutant Release Inventory . https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/national-pollutant-release-inventory/about-national-pollutant-release-inventory.html (2021).
Berthiaume, A. Use of the National Pollutant Release Inventory in environmental research: a scoping review. Environ. Rev. 29 , 329–339 (2021).
Wine, O. et al. Using pollutant release and transfer register data in human health research: a scoping review. Environ. Rev. 22 , 51–65 (2013).
Berthiaume, A. Unveiling under-utilized public data on Canadian industrial pollutant transfers and disposals. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2377327 (2024).
Government of Canada. Bulk Data Files for All Years—Releases, Disposals, Transfers and Facility Locations . https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/40e01423-7728-429c-ac9d-2954385ccdfb (2023).
Rosenbaum, R. K. et al. USEtox—The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13 , 532–546 (2008).
Fantke, P. et al. Exposure and toxicity characterization of chemical emissions and chemicals in products: global recommendations and implementation in USEtox. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 26 , 899–915 (2021).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) Model . https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/rsei-methodology-document-v2311-March2023.pdf (2023).
Laurent, A. & Owsianiak, M. Potentials and limitations of footprints for gauging environmental sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 25 , 20–27 (2017).
Leclerc, A., Berthet, E., Stadler, K., Wood, R. & Laurent, A. Toward global and national toxicity footprints. J. Ind. Ecol. 00 , 1–17 (2023).
CAS Google Scholar
Sorme, L., Palm, V. & Finnveden, G. Using E-PRTR data on point source meissions to air and water—first steps towards a national chemical footprint. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 56 , 102–112 (2016).
Nordborg, M. et al. Updated indicators of Swedish national human toxicity and ecotoxicity footprints using USEtox 2.01. Environ. Imp. Assess. Rev. 62 , 110–114 (2017).
Erhart, S. & Erhart, K. Application of North European characterisation factors, population density and distance-to-coast grid data for refreshing the Swedish human toxicity and ecotoxicity footprint analysis. Environ. Imp. Assess. Rev. 92 , 106686 (2022).
Berthiaume, A., Arnot, J. & Toose, L. Risk-based prioritization of organic substances in the Canadian National Pollutant Release Inventory using an evaluative regional-scale multimedia mass balance model. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 18 , 1722–1732 (2022).
Finnevden, G. & Potting, J. Encyclopedia of Toxicology , Vol. 3, 3rd edn, 74–77 (2014).
Verones, F. et al. LC-IMPACT: a regionalized life cycle damage assessment method. J. Ind. Ecol. 24 , 1201–1219 (2020).
Ecoinvent. No date. Ecovinvent Database . https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/
Fang, K., Heijungs, R. & De Snoo, G. R. Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint–boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework. Ecol. Econ. 114 , 218–226 (2015).
Vanham, D. et al. Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs. Sci. Total Environ . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133642 (2019).
Ryberg, M. W., Owsianiak, M., Richardson, K. & Hauschild, M. Z. Challenges in implementing a Planetary Boundaries based Life-Cycle Impact Assessment methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 139 , 450–459 (2016).
Sala, S., Crenna, E., Secchi, M. & Sanyé-Mengual, E. Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries. J. Environ. Manag. 269 , 110686 (2020).
Rosenbaum, R. K. et al. USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess . 13 , 532–546 (2008).
Fantke, P. et al. USEtox® 2.0 User Manual (Version 2). http://usetox.org (2015).
Arnot, J. A. & Mackay, D. Policies for chemical hazard and risk priority setting: can persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity and quantity information be combined? Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 , 4648–4654 (2008).
Commission of the European Communities. Taking Sustainable Use of Resources Forward: A Thematic Strategy on the Prevention and Recycling of Waste. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0666 (2005).
[CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. State of Waste Management in Canada . https://ccme.ca/en/res/state_waste_mgmt_in_canada-secured.pdf (2014).
Van Ewijk, S. & Stegemann, J. A. Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput. J. Clean. Prod. 132 , 122–128 (2016).
Zhang, C. et al. An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 803 , 149892 (2022).
[USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. Sustainable Materials Management: Non-Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Hierarchy . https://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-materials-management-non-hazardous-materials-and-waste-management-hierarchy (2023).
[UNEP] United Nations Environment Programme. Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal . https://www.basel.int/Portals/4/download.aspx?d=UNEP-CHW-IMPL-CONVTEXT.English.pdf (2019).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Common TRI Terms . https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/common-tri-terms (2024).
British Columbia. Oil and Gas Activities Act [SBC 2008] Chapter 36. https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/08036_01 (2008).
British Columbia. Oil and Gas Waste Regulations B.C. Reg. 46/2018. https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/32_254_2005 (2018).
Alberta Oil and Gas Conservation Act, RSA 2000, c O-6. https://canlii.ca/t/55xvl (2023).
Alberta Energy Regulator. Directive 051: Injection and Disposal Wells . https://static.aer.ca/prd/documents/directives/Directive051.pdf (2023).
The Oil and Gas Conservation Act, RSS 1978, c O-2. https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/stat/rss-1978-c-o-2/latest/rss-1978-c-o-2.html (2023).
Hird, M. Canada’s Waste Flows (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2021).
Lepawsky, J. Mapping chemical discardscapes of electronics production. Geoforum 132 , 113–124 (2022).
Faust, J. et al. California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool, Version 2.0 (CalEnviroScreen 2.0): Guidance and Screening Tool (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, 2014).
Zeise, L. & Blumenfeld, J. CalEnviroscreen 4.0 . https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 (California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), 2021).
Li, L. & Wania, F. Tracking chemicals in products around the world: introduction of a dynamic substance flow analysis model and application to PCBs. Environ. Int. 94 , 674–686 (2016).
Download references
Thank you to the following people for your insightful reviews of this manuscript: Anne Monnette, Sarah Bennett, and Ivan Lee of Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Myra Hird of Queen’s University.
Authors and affiliations.
Science and Risk Assessment Directorate, Environment and Climate Change Canada, 351 St. Joseph blvd., Gatineau, QC, Canada
Alicia Berthiaume
Department of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alicia Berthiaume realized all aspects of research conceptualization, data processing and analysis, and manuscript drafting and editing.
Correspondence to Alicia Berthiaume .
Competing interests.
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review information.
Communications Earth & Environment thanks Arman Bidarbakhtnia and Amani Rweyendela for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Clare Davis and Alice Drinkwater. A peer review file is available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Peer review file, supplemental information, rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Berthiaume, A. Overcoming challenges measuring SDG 12 progress using national registers to track chemicals in waste. Commun Earth Environ 5 , 443 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01595-1
Download citation
Received : 21 March 2024
Accepted : 01 August 2024
Published : 19 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01595-1
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.
Iqbal Younus , Wahda Al-Hinkawi , Sabeeh Farhan; Immunity of cities: A strategy in sustainable urban development (assessing a plan of reconstructing old Mosul-case study). AIP Conf. Proc. 19 August 2024; 3105 (1): 050098. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213835
Download citation file:
Urban areas face increasing threats from many sources; the most prominent are environmental, economic, society, policy, and other unexpected changes in its urban elements, which may threaten its stability, development, and growth trends. These threats need more attention from the designing, planning, and administration of cities to cope with the challenges and enhance the validity of urban areas to survive, adapt and grow. The research examines the concept of cities’ immunity adopting it as a norm for the evaluation and continuous success of cities when addressing catastrophes. It is a vast term adopted by cities that face shocks and pressures. Its principle is resilience and enhancement aiming at developing and achieving sustainable growth and survival. The natural and acquired immunity, together with the mechanisms to gain immunity and response to adapt at different levels, depend on the specificity of each city and the related chances and challenges, reaching an immune product characterized by creativity, innovation, continuity, and acceptance. The research followed an analytical and descriptive approach on two levels: introducing the theoretical level, The concept of immunity, urban immunity, and impregnable cities, arriving at a comprehensive theoretical framework for the concept of urban immunity, and the role that concept levels play in enhancing the immunity of cities, where the research assumes that "the immunity of cities increases with the increase in the achievement of administrative, morphological, infrastructure, environmental, economic and social levels." The practical level includes an evaluation of the reconstruction plan for the old city of Mosul. Many international institutions and organizations worked on this plan to reconstruct the city after the military operations and the numerous disasters that the city witnessed. The objective of analyzing the reconstruction plan is to explain the implementation of immunity, arriving at the essential conclusions; The reconstruction process is participation at different levels, competition, and development to enhance the resilience of the old city of Mosul. Thus, the study recommends directing the reconstruction operations in all its stages towards urban sustainability, based on the vision of the war as an opportunity for urban and architectural advancement and redressing past mistakes.
Publish with us - request a quote.
This feature is available to subscribers only.
Sign In or Create an Account
Ncert book solutions for class 10 economics understanding economic development chapter 1 development – cbse free pdf download.
NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Economics Chapter 1 provide a clear knowledge about the economic development that takes place in our economy. The idea of development or progress has always been with people. They have aspirations or desires about what they would like to do and how they would like to live. Similarly, people have ideas about what a country should be like. In this chapter, students will understand the various aspects of development that a country needs. The NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Economics Chapter 1 – Development contain the answers to the exercises given at the end of the book of Chapter 1. These solutions will help students to write their answers in an effective way during the CBSE exams.
The solutions for Chapter 1 of Understanding Economic Development are given below. Students should also check NCERT Solutions for Class 10 for other subjects.
Exercises Page No. 16
1. Development of a country can generally be determined by
Answer: d. all of the above
2. Which of the following neighbouring countries has better performance in terms of human development than India?
Answer: b. Sri Lanka
3. Assume there are four families in a country. The average per capita income of these families is Rs. 5000. If the income of three families is Rs. 4,000, Rs. 7,000 and Rs. 3,000, respectively, what is the income of the fourth family?
Answer: d. Rs. 6,000
(4000+7000+3000+x) ÷ 4 = 5000
14000+x = 5000 × 4
x = 20000-14000
4. What is the main criterion used by the World Bank in classifying different countries? What are the limitations of this criterion, if any?
Answer: World Bank uses the per capita income to classify different countries. The per capita income is calculated by dividing the total income of the country by the population of the country. For the year 2017, the countries with a per capita income of US $12,056 per annum were declared rich countries, and the countries with a per capita income of US $ 955 or less are called low-income countries.
The limitations of the criterion are
5. In what respects is the criterion used by the UNDP for measuring development different from the one used by the World Bank?
Answer: The criterion used by UNDP is different from the one used by the World Bank because UNDP compares countries based on the educational level of the people, their health status and per capita income. This is in contrast with the method used by the World Bank because it only calculates the per capita income for measuring development.
6. Why do we use averages? Are there any limitations to their use? Illustrate with your own examples related to development.
Answer: Different countries have different populations, so calculating the average helps in getting an estimated answer which can be used to compare different things at different levels. There are limitations in calculating averages because we cannot know the difference in the income of the people and the unfair distribution of income in a country or state.
For example, if we calculate the per capita income of two countries, A and B, with 5 people each, the salary of five people in country A is Rs.23,000, Rs.22,000, Rs.23,500, Rs.28,000 and Rs.25,000, and the income of people living in country B is Rs.1,50,000, Rs. 22,000, Rs.50,000, Rs.4,000, Rs.2,500. The average income of country A will be Rs.24,300, and that of country B will be Rs.45,700. This proves that the average of country B is higher than that of country A, and yet there is a disparity in the income distribution between country B, and the income is evenly distributed in country A.
7. Kerala, with lower per capita income, has a better human development ranking than Haryana. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. Do you agree? Discuss.
Answer: Kerala, with lower per capita income, has a better human development ranking than Haryana. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. This is true because the literacy rate, infant mortality rate, healthcare facilities, etc., are better in Kerala in comparison to Haryana. The per capita income is only calculated by calculating the average income of the state, irrespective of any other factor.
8. Find out the present sources of energy that are used by the people in India. What could be the other possibilities fifty years from now?
Answer: The present sources of energy used by people in India include firewood, coal, petroleum, crude oil and natural gas. The other possibilities fifty years from now can be using solar energy and wind energy as sources of various energy forms. This is because the current usage of energy sources may result in the loss of natural resources for future generations.
9. Why is the issue of sustainability important for development?
Answer: Sustainable development refers to using natural resources in a manner that they can be used by the present and future generations. The issue of sustainability is important for development because if natural resources are not used carefully, they may not be available for future generations. The depletion of resources of a country may ultimately result in a lack of development of the country.
10. “The Earth has enough resources to meet the needs of all but not enough to satisfy the greed of even one person.” How is this statement relevant to the discussion of development? Discuss.
Answer: Development not just depends on the economic factors of a country but is also dependent on resources that are available for the people of a country to use. The statement, “The Earth has enough resources to meet the needs of all but not enough to satisfy the greed of even one person”, is completely relevant in terms of the development of a country because natural resources are non-renewable resources. It is the responsibility of the people to use them to meet their needs and not to satisfy their greed. If natural resources are not used wisely now, future generations may not be able to use them for their needs, which will result in the downfall of the development of a country.
11. List a few examples of environmental degradation that you may have observed around you.
Answer: A few examples of environmental degradation that we can observe around us are
The increased pollution in the environment has resulted in global warming, the melting of glaciers, and worsening atmospheric conditions.
12. For each of the items given in Table 1.6, find out which country is at the top and which is at the bottom.
Answer: As per table 1.6, Sri Lanka tops in all four categories. It has the highest Gross National Income, Life Expectancy at birth, mean years of schooling of people aged 25 and above and HDI rank in the world. Nepal has the lowest Gross National Income among the given countries. Pakistan has the least Life Expectancy at birth and ranks the lowest HDI rank in the world among the given countries. The mean years of schooling of people aged 25 and above are the lowest for Myanmar and Nepal.
13. The following table shows the proportion of adults (aged 15-49 years) whose BMI is below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 ) in India. It is based on a survey of various states for the year 2015-16. Look at the table and answer the following questions.
|
|
|
Answer: The nutritional level of people in Kerala is higher than the nutritional level of people in Madhya Pradesh.
Answer: One-fifth of the population in the country is undernourished even though it is argued that there is enough food in the country because of the following reasons:
Chapter 1 of NCERT Social Science Economics textbook – Understanding Economic Development will introduce students to the idea of development in terms of an economy. It defines basic concepts like development, literacy rate, IMR, HDI, per capita income, and sustainable development. Furthermore, the chapter assesses different perspectives on development, interprets the different indicators of development, compares economic and non-economic indicators of development, and analyses the merits and demerits of PCI as a development indicator. Moreover, it also identifies the significance of sustainable development.
Students will also read about the following:
‘Understanding Economic Development’ is an important book for Class 10 SST Economics. Apart from this chapter, the full set of NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Social Science is given on the linked page.
Also, explore –
What are the topics covered in ncert solutions for class 10 economics chapter 1, what are the key highlights of ncert solutions for class 10 economics chapter 1, are ncert solutions for class 10 economics chapter 1 adequate to prepare for the cbse exams, leave a comment cancel reply.
Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Request OTP on Voice Call
Post My Comment
Well explained study material easy to understand thanks
This help me alot thanks
Thanks a lot these study materials are easy to understand and helped me lot to clear my concept
These help me a lot thanks
Register with byju's & watch live videos.
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Revolution in renewables: integration of green hydrogen for a sustainable future.
2. green hydrogen foundations, 2.1. green hydrogen value chain, 2.1.1. production through electrolysis, 2.1.2. purification, 2.1.3. storage, 2.1.4. transport, 2.1.5. end uses, 2.2. ress for green hydrogen production, 3. evolving market dynamics.
Project Name | Capacity | Status | Country | Brief Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
NortH2 Project [ ] | 10 GW | Developing | Netherlands | Consortium with Shell, aims to produce 1 MMT of hydrogen annually using offshore wind. |
H2Mare Project [ ] | Not specified | Developing | Germany | 32 partners, adding electrolyzers to wind turbines for green hydrogen, operational by 2025. |
AquaVentus [ ] | 10 GW | Developing | Germany | Generates hydrogen using offshore wind for a European network, completion by 2035. |
Murchison Renewable Hydrogen Project [ ] | 5 GW | Developing | Australia | Uses wind and solar for hydrogen, targets 2 MMT of ammonia by 2028. |
Western Green Energy Hub (WGEH) [ ] | 50 GW | Developing | Australia | Integrates wind and solar for 3.5 MMT of hydrogen and 20 MMT of ammonia annually. |
Beijing Jingneng Inner Mongolia [ ] | 5 GW | Operational | China | Utilizes wind and solar for 0.4–0.5 MMT hydrogen yearly. |
NEOM Green Hydrogen Plant [ ] | 4 GW | Developing | Saudi Arabia | Combines solar and wind for daily production of 600 MMT hydrogen, operational by 2026. |
Appalachian Hydrogen Hub (ARCH2) [ ] | Not specified | Developing | USA | Uses natural gas for clean hydrogen, includes infrastructure for CO storage. |
Mid-Atlantic Hydrogen Hub (MACH2) [ ] | Not specified | Developing | USA | Focuses on renewable hydrogen for decarbonization, reducing 1 MMT carbon per year. |
California Hydrogen Hub (ARCHES) [ ] | Not specified | Developing | USA | Produces hydrogen from renewables and biomass, reducing 2 MMT carbon annually. |
Gulf Coast Hydrogen Hub (HyVelocity) [ ] | Not specified | Developing | USA | Uses gas with carbon capture for hydrogen, aims to cut 7 MMT carbon yearly. |
St. Gabriel Green Hydrogen Plant [ ] | Not specified | Operational | USA | Plug Power and Olin Corp project, initially producing 15 MMT of hydrogen daily. |
Calistoga Resiliency Center [ ] | 293 MWh | Developing | USA | The largest utility-scale green hydrogen energy storage project in the USA, designed to provide long-duration storage. |
4.1. long-term operational strategies for grid-connected hydrogen systems, 4.2. long-term operational strategies for islanded hydrogen systems, 5. short-term operational strategies, 5.1. short-term operational strategies for grid-connected hydrogen systems, 5.2. short-term operational strategies for islanded hydrogen systems, 6. conclusions and outlook, 6.1. conclusions, 6.2. outlook, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
AEL | PEM | SOEC | AEM | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Technological readiness | Mature | Commercialized | Demonstration | Prototype |
OER | ||||
HER | ||||
Efficiency (%) | 50–78 | 50–83 | 70–90 | 40–70 |
Current density (A/cm ) | 0.2–0.8 | 1–4 | 0.2–1 | 0.2–2 |
Productivity index (kg H /kWh) | 0.8–1.2 | 1.2–1.8 | 1.8–2.5 | 0.8–1.5 |
Voltage ranges (V) | 1.4–3.0 | 1.4–2.5 | 1.0–1.5 | 1.4–2.0 |
Response time at stand-by | seconds | milliseconds | minutes | seconds |
Operating temperature (°C) | 60–90 | 50–80 | 700–1000 | 40–60 |
Cell pressure (bar) | ≤30 | ≤100 | 1–25 | ≤35 |
Hydrogen purity (%) | 99.5–99.9998 | 99.9–99.9999 | 99.9–99.999 | 99.9–99.9999 |
Stack lifetime (hour) | 60,000–100,000 | 20,000–80,000 | <20,000 | >30,000 |
Cost (U.S.$/kW) | 500–1400 | 1100–1800 | 2800–5600 | N/A |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Zhang, J.; Li, J. Revolution in Renewables: Integration of Green Hydrogen for a Sustainable Future. Energies 2024 , 17 , 4148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164148
Zhang J, Li J. Revolution in Renewables: Integration of Green Hydrogen for a Sustainable Future. Energies . 2024; 17(16):4148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164148
Zhang, Jimiao, and Jie Li. 2024. "Revolution in Renewables: Integration of Green Hydrogen for a Sustainable Future" Energies 17, no. 16: 4148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164148
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Explore all metrics
With the rapid advancement and ongoing evolution of data information technology, the methods and approaches for data collection have become increasingly varied. The synthesis of heterogeneous big data to minimize information loss during the aggregation process poses a significant challenge. In practical applications, fuzzy dimensionality reduction characterization has proven to be an effective approach for handling heterogeneous big data. In this study, a novel approach is proposed for characterizing and evaluating heterogeneous big data using an interval intuitionistic fuzzy framework. We establish the interval intuitionistic fuzzy transformation method for large-scale quantitative data by defining satisfaction intervals, dissatisfaction intervals, and hesitation intervals. To integrate calculation and processing for linguistic evaluation information with different granularities, a transformation formula that handles multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information and interval intuitionistic fuzzy numbers is introduced. The proposed formula aggregates heterogeneous attribute values into interval intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. We employ interval intuitionistic fuzzy entropy to determine the objective weight of each evaluation indicator. Subsequently, the interval intuitionistic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation information for each alternative scheme, enabling effective ranking based on the information, is derived. Finally, the applicability of our proposed method is verified through a case study conducted on forest land in the county area of Fujian province. This case study comprehensively assesses and ranks the forest land quality in 16 sample plots. The evaluation serves as a theoretical framework for advancing sustainable development and conservation initiatives about forest land within the county.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Prakash, D.: Role of social forestry in sustainable development—a micro level study. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Stud. 3 (1), 351–364 (2011)
Google Scholar
Marco, A.N., Boniface, M., Zahabu, E.: The role of forests in the mitigation of global climate change: emprical evidence from Tanzania. Environ. Chall. 4 , 100170 (2021)
Article Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Yi, A.J., Lan, F.: The influence of silviculture investment in fixed assets on forest water conservation in China. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 54 (3), 220–229 (2019)
Kabak, M., Dağdeviren, M.: Prioritization of renewable energy sources for turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Energ. Convers. Manage. 79 , 25–33 (2014)
Tzeng, G.H., Jen, W., Hu, K.C.: Fuzzy factor analysis for selecting service quality factors-a case of the service quality of city bus service. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 4 (4), 911–921 (2002)
Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 20 (1), 87–96 (1986)
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Theory and Applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1999)
Xu, Z.S., Cai, X.Q.: Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Ma. 9 (4), 359–381 (2010)
Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 31 , 343–349 (1989)
Wang, Z.J., Li, K.W., Xu, J.H.: A mathematical programming approach to multi-attribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment information. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (10), 12462–12469 (2011)
Wang, Z.J., Li, K.W.: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making framework with incomplete preference over alternatives. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (18), 13509–13516 (2012)
Wan, S.P., Xu, G.L., Wang, F., Dong, J.Y.: A new method for Atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM with incomplete attribute weight information. Inform. Sci. 316 , 329–347 (2015)
Wan, S.P., Dong, J.Y.: A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80 (1), 237–256 (2014)
Yue, Z.L., Jia, Y.Y.: A group decision making model with hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy information. Comput. Ind. Eng. 87 , 202–212 (2015)
Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S.: Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inform. Sci. 372 , 407–427 (2016)
Zhang, G.Q., Ma, J., Lu, J.: Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk. A. 23 (4), 517–527 (2009)
Wan, S.P., Li, D.F.: Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees. Omega 41 (6), 925–940 (2013)
Wan, S.P., Dong, J.Y.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees. Inform. Fusion 26 , 49–65 (2015)
Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Wang, X.X., Liao, H.C.: Managing consensus reaching process with self-confident double hierarchy linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Ma. 20 (1), 51–79 (2021)
Xu, J., Wan, S.P., Dong, J.Y.: Aggregating decision information into Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 41 (1), 331–351 (2016)
Zhang, Q.Q., Zhou, Z.Z., Zhao, W.W., Huang, G.H., Liu, G.F., Li, X.F., Wu, J.D.: Effect of slope position on leaf and fine root C, N and P stoichiometry and rhizosphere soil properties in Tectona grandis plantations. J. For. Res. 34 (6), 1997–2009 (2023)
Kim, D.H., Kim, H., Kim, E.G., Seok, H.D.: Analysis of the effect of climate change on site index of Korean white pine. For. Sci. Technol. 10 (2), 73–79 (2014)
Brockerhoff, E., Barbaro, L., Castagneyrol, B., et al.: Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 26 (13), 3005–3035 (2017)
Millette, T.L., Sullivan, J.D., Henderson, J.K.: Evaluating forestland uses: a GIS-based model. J. Forest. 95 (9), 27–32 (1997)
Wang, L., Zhou, Y., Li, Q., Zuo, Q., Gao, H.R., Liu, J.Y., Tian, Y.: Forest land quality evaluation and the protection zoning of subtropical humid evergreen broadleaf forest region based on the PSOTOPSIS model and the local indicator of spatial association: a case study of hefeng county, Hubei province, China. Forests 12 (325), 325 (2021)
Zhang, Z.Y., Liu, P.J., Tang, X.M.: Evaluation of forest land quality based on rough set and C5.0 decision tree. J. Northwest AF Univ. 45 (3), 96–102 (2017)
Meng, X.Y.: Tree measuring science. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing (2006)
Pan, X.H., Wang, Y.M.: Evaluation of renewable energy sources in China using an interval type-2 fuzzy large-scale group risk evaluation method. Appl. Soft Comput. 108 , 107458 (2021)
Liu, Z.: Credal-based fuzzy number data clustering. Granular Comput. 8 (6), 1907–1924 (2023)
Liu, Z.: An effective conflict management method based on belief similarity measure and entropy for multi-sensor data fusion. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56 (12), 15495–15522 (2023)
Liu, Z., Cao, Y., Yang, X.L., Liu, L.S.: A new uncertainty measure via belief Rényi entropy in dempster-shafer theory and its application to decision making. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2023.2253342
Wang, H.L., Mahmood, T., Ullah, K.: Improved CoCoSo method based on frank softmax aggregation operators for t-spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25 (3), 1275–1310 (2023)
Guo, L.J., Yao, Z.Q., Lin, M.W., Xu, Z.S.: Fuzzy TOPSIS-based privacy measurement in multiple online social networks. Complex. Intell. Syst. 9 (6), 6089–6101 (2023)
Sun, H., Yang, Q.H., Wu, Y.Q.: Evaluation and design of reusable takeaway containers based on the AHP–FCE model. Sustainability 15 (2191), 2191 (2023)
Liu, Y., Guan, X.: Mixed correlation coefficient between probability hesitation fuzzy sets and applications. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 26 , 154–167 (2023)
Tao, Y.F., Peng, Y., Wu, Y.H.: Linguistic dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations and their application in group decision-making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25 (3), 1105–1130 (2023)
Xie, J.L., Xu, X.Q., Li, F.: Novel intuitionistic fuzzy distance based on tendency and its application in emergency decision-making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25 (6), 2295–2311 (2023)
Su, W.H., Zhang, L., Zeng, S.Z., Jin, H.H.: A fuzzy-social network multi-criteria group decision-making framework for selection of renewable energy project: a case of China. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24 (2), 1059–1078 (2022)
Pan, X.H., Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.-S.: A large-scale group decision-making method for site selection of waste to energy project under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Sustain. Cities Soc. 71 (25), 103003 (2021)
Sun, T., Liu, C.Z.: Fuzzy comprehensive model of manufacturing industry transfer risk based on economic big data analysis. B. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. 70 (2), 1–8 (2022)
Cheng, X.T., Xu, Z.S., Gou, X.J.: A large-scale group decision-making model considering risk attitudes and dynamically changing roles. Expert Syst. Appl. 245 , 123017 (2024)
Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C., Herrera, F.: Consensus model handling minority opinions and noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision-making under double hierarchy linguistic preference relations. IEEE T. Cybern. 51 (1), 283–296 (2021)
Cheng, X.T., Zhang, K., Wu, T., Xu, Z.S., Gou, X.J.: An opinions-updating model for large-scale group decision-making driven by autonomous learning. Inform. Sci. 662 , 120238 (2024)
Yue, Z.L.: The comprehensive evaluation of urban environmental quality based on intuitionistic fuzzy set. Math. Pract. Theo. 08 , 51–58 (2008)
Yue, Z.L., Jia, Y.Y., Huang, X.L.: Multiple attribute decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy set. Info. Manag. Algorithms 32 , 1019 (2007)
Yue, Z.L., Jia, Y.Y., Ye, G.D.: An approach for multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy information. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzz. 17 (3), 317–332 (2009)
Yue, Z.L.: An approach to aggregating interval numbers into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information for group decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (5), 6333–6338 (2011)
Yue, Z.L.: A group decision making approach based on aggregating interval data into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Appl. Math. Model. 38 (2), 683–698 (2014)
Xu, Z.S.: Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control Decision 22 (2), 215–219 (2007)
Yue, Z.L.: Aggregating crisp values into intuitionistic fuzzy number for group decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 38 (11), 2969–2982 (2014)
Wei, C.P., Wang, P., Zhang, Y.Z.: Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Info. Sci. 181 (19), 4273–4286 (2011)
Herrera, F., Martinez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. 8 (6), 746–752 (2000)
Xu, Z.S.: Uncertain multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2004)
Yager, R.R.: OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making. IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 34 (5), 1952–1963 (2004)
Bliemel, F.: Theil’s forecast accuracy coefficient: a clarification. J. Market. Res. 10 (4), 444–446 (1973)
Li, P.Y., Qian, H., Wu, J.H.: Application of set pair analysis method based on entropy weight in groundwater quality assessment—a case study in dongsheng city, northwest China. J. Chem. N.Y. 8 (2), 851–858 (2018)
Lu, H.F., Xu, J.M., Li, G.Y., Liu, W.S.: Site classification of eucalyptus urophylla × eucalyptus grandis plantations in China. Forests 11 (8), 871 (2020)
Yu, K.Y., Liu, J., Lai, R.W., Yang, Z.Q., Wei, Q.G.: Chinese fir commercial forests’ forestland productivity in miniang watershed based on 3S technologies. J. Fujian Coll. For. 29 , 326–331 (2009)
Chen, L.X., Shi, G.X.: Study on improving the quality of forest land of larch plantations. J. Northeast For. Univ. 26 , 6–11 (1998)
Singh, R.K., Lyes, B.: A fuzzy TOPSIS based approach for e-sourcing. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 24 (3), 437–448 (2011)
Li, D.F., Huang, Z.G., Chen, G.H.: A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 59 (4), 561–572 (2010)
Download references
This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 22BGL303): Research on dynamic game strategy and long-term win-win mechanism of cooperative management on collective forest land.
Funding was provided by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22BGL303).
Authors and affiliations.
College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China
Junzhe Zhang, Jian Lin & Tao Wu
Center for Agroforestry Mega Data Science, School of Future Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Jian Lin .
Competing interests.
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, and there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Zhang, J., Lin, J. & Wu, T. An Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Characterization Method Based on Heterogeneous Big Data and Its Application in Forest Land Quality Assessment. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01765-5
Download citation
Received : 30 November 2023
Revised : 02 April 2024
Accepted : 13 April 2024
Published : 19 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01765-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Here we have arranged some Important Case Base Questions for students who are searching for Paragraph Based Questions Development. Contents. Case Study Questions Class 10 Social Science Economics Chapter 1 Development Case Study 1: Case Study 2: Case Study 3: Case Study 4: Case Study 5: At Case Study Questions there will given a Paragraph.
CBSE Class 10 Case Study Questions Class 10 Social Science Geography Chapter 1 Resources and Development. Resources and Development Case Study Questions with Solution. ... Cast Study 2. Sustainable development is a global imperative, seeking to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their ...
Social Inclusivity: Sustainable development aims to ensure that economic benefits and opportunities are accessible to all members of society , particularly marginalized and vulnerable groups. It emphasizes social equity, poverty reduction, and the promotion of basic human rights, education, healthcare, and access to clean water and sanitation.
The SDG Book Club aims to use books as a tool to encourage children ages 6-12 to interact with the principles of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through a curated reading list of books ...
Khejri Tree. 16.2.2 Management of forest. We need to consider if the goals of all the above stakeholders with regard to the management of the forests are the same. Forest resources are often made available for industrial use at rates far below the market value while these are denied to the local people.
Sustainable Development Class 10 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document is a student project on sustainable development. It includes an introduction, history of sustainable development, needs and importance, examples, pillars, desired outcomes, sustainability principles, principles of a sustainable society, sustainable development goals, and ...
Promote Sustained Inclusive And Sustainable Economic Growth, Full And Productive Employment And Decent Work For All. Download Case Study.
All the students are advised to study from 149. Sustainable Development Class 10 Notes on a weekly basis to create a strong foundation of all the topics and memorise them in a way so that you remember them for a longer period of time. About 149. Sustainable Development Class 10 Notes PDF. All the students can have access to Class 10 149.
Sustainable development_CBSE Project Report Social Science Class 10 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. This document outlines a student project report on sustainable development. It includes an index listing the topics that will be covered in the report such as the meaning of sustainable development, issues related to sustainable development, its ...
CBSE Class 10 Science Chapter 16 Sustainable Management Of Natural Resource Notes. Download PDF. The management of human and natural landscape interactions is referred to as "natural resource management" (NRM). It combines land use planning, biodiversity preservation, water management, and the long-term viability of many enterprises ...
The publication presents 16 SDG Good Practices from across the globe, received in response to the first open call for good practices, success stories and lessons learned in SDG implementation, promoted by UN DESA between 2018 and 2019. Sorted by geographical region, this publication describes the diverse examples in detail, featuring updates and reflections on the impact and adaptations to the ...
Give 2 Examples of Sustainable Development. The two examples of sustainable development are: 1.Solar energy: Harnessing the solar energy to reduce pollution in the environment. 2.Crop Rotation : Planting different types of crops on the same land on a rotational basis for improving soil fertility.
Following the SDGs exhibition of 2016, we commissioned an externally-led study to review evidence from a selection of programmes across the British Council's portfolio. This included three case studies to illustrate impact and lessons learned. As well as highlighting success and good practice, the case studies provide useful guidance for ...
Planning and Sustainable Development in Indian Context 67 Target Area Planning The planning process has to take special care of those areas which have remained economically backward. As you know, the economic development of a region depends upon its resource base. But sometimes resource-rich region also remain backward.
Chapter 1 of the NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Social Science Economics offers a comprehensive understanding of the economic development that occurs in our economy. People and growth have long been associated with each other. They have goals or wishes for the kind of work and lifestyle they would like to lead.
Abstract. Sustainable development (SD) has become a popular catchphrase in contemporary development discourse. However, in spite of its pervasiveness and the massive popularity it has garnered over the years, the concept still seems unclear as many people continue to ask questions about its meaning and history, as well as what it entails and implies for development theory and practice.
Sustainable -Development with Equity. As a measure of development, Human Development Index (HDI) is an improvement over the two long-standing measurement of growth viz.- Gross Domestic Production (GDP) and per capita income. The GDP is an indicator of the value of goods and services produced in the country and per capita income is the annual ...
New UCL master's course to accelerate sustainable energy solutions | Sustainable Development Goals - UCL - University College London. Fourth Gold Athena Swan award recognises UCL's commitment to equity and inclusion | Sustainable Development Goals - UCL - University College London. New UCL MSc to equip ecologists with cutting-edge data ...
Reducing both within- and between-country inequality requires equitable resource distribution, investing in education and skills development, implementing social protection measures, combating ...
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CASE STUDIES. (Updated 4/08) These "executive summaries" of actual attempts to pursue some aspect of sustainable development were created by the students of an undergraduate senior seminar at Colby College. All are designed to be two pages or less and are fully referenced for those who wish to consult the original sources.
Introduction. This paper focuses on the concept of sustainable development. The term is rather new, as it became commonly used about 20 years ago. In discussion over the years, it has been defined and refined. My main interest has been to make a case study of inhabitants' opinions on the development of their own village.
Teaching Resources Library Vermont City Electric. The Mission. The mission of the MIT Sloan School of Management is to develop principled, innovative leaders who improve the world and to generate ideas that advance management practice. Find Us. MIT Sloan School of Management 100 Main Street Cambridge, MA 02142 617-253-1000.
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 12 contains ambitions to reduce human and ecological harm from chemicals, including those in waste, but current official indicators (measurable ...
The grassland class lost 21,385.28 hectares; this area was associated with the class of agricultural areas and urban areas. ... A Study Case of the Bustillos Basin Using Remote Sensing ... The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, within its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), addresses in Goal 15 combating desertification and land ...
The research examines the concept of cities' immunity adopting it as a norm for the evaluation and continuous success of cities when addressing catastrophes. It is a vast term adopted by cities that face shocks and pressures. Its principle is resilience and enhancement aiming at developing and achieving sustainable growth and survival.
In this chapter, students will understand the various aspects of development that a country needs. The NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Economics Chapter 1 - Development contain the answers to the exercises given at the end of the book of Chapter 1. These solutions will help students to write their answers in an effective way during the CBSE exams.
This study investigates how social enterprises in East London drive sustainability in the fashion industry, focusing on the following two case studies: Making for Change and Stitches in Time. The research uses the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework and social capital theory to assess how these enterprises integrate TBL principles and leverage social capital to promote sustainable practices.
In recent years, global efforts towards a future with sustainable energy have intensified the development of renewable energy sources (RESs) such as offshore wind, solar photovoltaics (PVs), hydro, and geothermal. Concurrently, green hydrogen, produced via water electrolysis using these RESs, has been recognized as a promising solution to decarbonizing traditionally hard-to-abate sectors ...
This case study comprehensively assesses and ranks the forest land quality in 16 sample plots. The evaluation serves as a theoretical framework for advancing sustainable development and conservation initiatives about forest land within the county. ... All the data in this paper are from a small-class survey in a county of Fujian Province ...