unit 6 case study opparis by anonymous

• Mobile Site
• Staff Directory
• Advertise with Ars

Filter by topic

• Biz & IT
• Gaming & Culture

Front page layout

Policy —

“who’s isis” anonymous’ #opparis campaign against islamic state goes awry, anon mass-reporting of twitter accounts submits thousands with no isis connection..

Sean Gallagher - Nov 22, 2015 10:50 pm UTC

A group associated with the Anonymous hacktivist movement launched what they claimed was a "total war" against the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or Daesh), encouraging people to join in an effort allegedly targeting social media accounts associated with the terror organization in response to the attacks in Paris a week ago. Multiple "ops" have been launched in an attempt to crowdsource efforts to disrupt ISIS social media and even hack its members. But there has also been a rash of accusations between those associated with different operations, and it's not clear that any of them are achieving anything other than drawing attention to Anonymous again.

Seriously, after #OpISIS there have been too many fame whores. It's not about the follows or RTs. It's about the truth. Have some integrity. — Anonymous (@GroupAnon) November 22, 2015

In a video release, self-proclaimed members of #OpParis announced that they had taken down 20,000 Twitter accounts associated with ISIS. Individuals associated with the operation also claim to have alerted law enforcement to planned ISIS attacks in the US and Paris.

However, many of the accounts targeted by an automated Twitter reporting script that the group has distributed via links from its chat channel have nothing to do with the Islamic State. And the FBI has discounted that information, releasing a statement that "we do not have specific or credible information of an attack at this time." The US attack claimed to have been uncovered by Anonymous members was allegedly targeting a WWE wrestling event in Atlanta tonight.

Nearly all of the accounts in the current list being distributed by the operation via Pastebin  to a Twitter reporting script being used by some Anonymous members have already been suspended. Another list of about 4,000 accounts posted by Anonymous members and reviewed by Ars includes Twitter accounts that have posted messages sympathetic to ISIS, but in the majority they are not specifically ISIS. Some are actually those of Palestinians, and others appear to be accounts "trolling" ISIS. Others appear to be merely accounts in Arabic.

In a blog post , the hacktivist th3j35t3r (who has a long history of conflict with Anonymous) claimed that Anonymous was duping media outlets with the #OpParis campaign and called the operation a "comedy of errors" (among other things). He posted a communication he claimed to have received from the owner of the Twitter account connected with #OpParis (though the post appears to have been deleted from @OpParisOfficial's timeline) admitting that the identity of the targeted accounts wasn't entirely nailed down:

According to a report by the Daily Dot , Twitter is ignoring additional lists of accounts being submitted by Anonymous members because a review of them has shown them to be "wildly inaccurate." Twitter and other social networking sites, including Telegram, have been working to remove any public accounts related to ISIS. Twitter uses staffers who speak Arabic to review accounts in question.

Meanwhile, some of the people coming to the IRC chat channel associated with the operation don't seem to really understand what's going on. One person logging into the channel asked, "Who's ISIS?" The people managing the channel also demanded that others only speak English in the chat and not "clutter up the channel with only mandarin or Spanish or something."

In the meantime, ISIS supporters aren't sitting by idly. A new Telegram group is being used to spread information on how to secure accounts and devices against the usual brands of Anonymous attacks.

reader comments

Channel ars technica.

• THREAT ALERTS

Radware's ERT has been investigating OpParis, an Anonymous revenge campaign against ISIS for the Paris attacks on November 13, 2015. This campaign is an aggressive operation targeting supporters and sympathizers of the Paris attacks. Retaliation on French based companies following the Anonymous response to the attack in Paris is expected.

Additional Information

For additional information regarding the threat, read the full Threat Alert .

Download Now

Contact Radware Sales

Our experts will answer your questions, assess your needs, and help you understand which products are best for your business.

Already a Customer?

We’re ready to help, whether you need support, additional services, or answers to your questions about our products and solutions.

Connect with experts and join the conversation about Radware technologies.

What are you looking for?

• Cloud Application Protection Services
• Application Protection for Any Cloud
• Bot Management
• API Protection
• Client-Side Protection
• On-Prem Application Delivery & Security

Free Assessment Tools

• API Vulnerability Scanner
• Bad Bot Analyzer
• Bad Bot Vulnerability Scanner
• Application Vulnerability Analyzer

Products & Services

• Cloud WAF Service
• Bot Manager
• Web DDoS Protection
• Alteon Integrated WAF
• Kubernetes WAF

By Industry

• Financial Services
• Open Banking
• End-to-End DDoS Protection
• Multi Layered DDoS Protection
• Encrypted Attack Protection
• Advanced Cloud Network Analytics
• Cloud Firewall-as-a-Service
• DNS DDoS Protection
• Cloud DDoS Protection Service
• Threat Intelligence
• ERT Services
• Cyber Controller
• End to End Public Cloud Protection
• Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
• Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
• Cloud Threat Detection & Response (CTDR)
• Public Cloud Application Protection
• Cross-Cloud Visibility & Reporting
• Cloud Native Protector
• Application Delivery Across Hybrid Environments
• Application Delivery & Automation for DevOps
• Secured Application Delivery
• SSL Inspection, Offloading and Acceleration
• Alteon Automation For Self-service and Private Clouds
• SSL Inspection
• LinkProof NG
• DDoS Protection
• Application Protection for Service Providers
• 5G Protection Solution
• Application Delivery for Service Providers
• Managed Security Services
• DefenseFlow
• Cloud DDoS Peak Protection Service
• MSSP Portal
• White Papers
• Data Sheets
• Solution Briefs
• Infographics
• Integration Guides
• Webinars & Virtual Events
• In Person Events
• Application Delivery
• Application Protection

Software Downloads

• Alteon VA for Network Administrators
• Alteon VA for Developers

Security Research Center

• Threat Alerts
• Threat Analysis Center
• Live Threat Map
• Security Research & Reports

Local Websites

• English (US)

Watch CBS News

Anonymous vs. ISIS: Who has the upper hand in social media war?

By Brian Mastroianni

November 24, 2015 / 5:53 AM EST / CBS News

Just a few days after the terrorist attacks in Paris , a group associated with the hackers' collective known as Anonymous announced #OpParis , its social media-driven campaign against ISIS.

"This is only the beginning, ISIS. We will hunt you, take down your sites, accounts, emails and expose you ... You will be treated like a virus and we are the cure," stated a masked activist in a video posted on YouTube. "We are Anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. ISIS, it is too late to expect us."

The campaign was touted as an all-out online assault against ISIS -- also known as the Islamic State, ISIL, or Daesh, its Arabic acronym -- and it was cheered by many people around the world outraged by the Paris attacks.

Anonymous said managed to "take down" 20,000 Twitter accounts of ISIS sympathizers within days. But how effective has the Web-based operation really been in counteracting the terrorist group's effective reach?

The results are mixed, experts say. While some sympathizers with the extremist group have found their social media presences at least temporarily neutered, some criticism has been levied at Anonymous hackers for just courting splashy headlines.

#Anonymous preparing to unleash waves of attacks on IS after #ParisAttacks #OpISIS #OpParis https://t.co/HcxuOqClKN pic.twitter.com/3iKLrPoydc — Anonymous (@YourAnonCentral) November 16, 2015

Critics also say some of the social media accounts caught in the group's dragnet via a Twitter reporting script appear to have had nothing to do with ISIS.

Given the amorphous nature of Anonymous -- it consists of an unknown number of hackers with no official leader or spokesperson -- it's perhaps not surprising that the call to digital arms resulted in a pile-on.

Gabrielle Coleman, Wolfe Chair in Scientific and Technological Literacy at McGill University in Montreal, who has studied the group, says Anonymous was more effective in its response to the "Charlie Hebdo" killings earlier this year.

"You look at what is happening with this current iteration (of Anonymous's operations) and you see that it doesn't have much of an effect, which has nothing to do with Anonymous, per se, and more to do with the fact that ISIS has grabbed and secured global media attention in so many channels," Coleman told CBS News. "#OpISIS (which followed 'Charlie Hebdo') had a better track record as opposed to #OpParis because they had been at it longer and that was a smaller team of people."

Coleman suggested that, now, so many people have joined the Anonymous cause, creating an unwieldy network of hackers and activists, that efforts to target ISIS have become "chaotic."

"Anonymous initially had a smaller crew, basically doing quality control," she said. "It's tough, but Twitter has said a little bit of this, that it's really heard to know the exact percentage of accounts that are taken down really have direct ISIS affiliation."

Think of ISIS's social media presence as a hydra from Greek mythology -- a many-headed serpent that regenerated heads once they were lobbed off. As one account is taken down from Twitter or Telegram or other platforms, another can be created to replace it quite easily.

That being said, Coleman said online efforts against the terrorist group could have an impact down the road.

"Right now, it's kind of chaotic, kind of crazy, and not well-controlled. But, after a few weeks or months, most people go away, and then the die-hards stay," Coleman added. "The die-hards can institute better quality control. That was the kind of social metabolism with the first #OpISIS, but whether that will happen (with this operation) remains to be seen."

More than your average Twitter battle, the social media front could be significant in the war on ISIS since the terrorist group has been so effective at spreading its message and recruiting followers through digital channels.

"What is interesting is that this group of young extremists who are part of ISIS, or ISIL , is that they are young and computer savvy and are using social media incredibly effectively," Scott J. White, an associate professor who specializes in national security and is the director of computing and security technology at Drexel University, told CBS News. "They are winning the propaganda campaign because they actually tell their attackers to take a video on their phones, show a video of the attack, have documentation and show those videos to display how successful they are."

White said that the fight between Anonymous and ISIS is something of a Millennial-generation battle consisting of two sides raised in a social media age. Both groups have a sophisticated understanding of the power of technology and its ability to disseminate information quickly and widely.

"When it comes to Anonymous, they are able to shut down (ISIS sites and accounts) and show that they are vulnerable, maybe not so clever, and prove that ISIS is as vulnerable as anybody else," White said. "On the other hand, you have security services out there that use the same Twitter and Facebook accounts, that monitor the activities of these organizations. On one hand it's a success, but then it potentially shuts down an avenue of intelligence gathering that could be useful for intelligence agencies."

Experts say this new era of social cyber warfare also raises the possibility of online vigilante justice -- or injustice.

"People go into these forums and try to cull intelligence data themselves," Coleman said. "We see this quite a bit in the hunt for pedophilia, Anonymous and other non-Anonymous people are essentially hunting these people out. I think this is a development that will stay with us as citizens -- this citizen intelligence-gathering. They are able to send this information to the FBI, and stuff like that. It's unknown whether or not this is fruitful, but it's obviously helpful to have this flow train of more eyes out there. It could be potentially beneficial."

However, another recent Anonymous operation outing alleged members of the KKK drew criticism and some backpedaling after a number of people claimed they were wrongly accused.

"In the initial chaos, mistakes do come from the Anonymous campaign, just by virtue of the fact that there are so many people (posting)," Coleman said. In that case, she said, the erroneous names appeared to have been posted by an account that later vanished. "My reading is that first account wasn't an Anonymous account but someone who said 'I fight racism, I like what Anonymous is doing.' Or maybe that person was actually trying to discredit Anonymous by releasing these inaccurate names." In the murky world of hackers it's hard to know for sure.

Moreover, despite Anonymous' declaration of "war," White said civilian Web user capabilities don't approach those of government intelligence agencies, which have a higher level "robust electronic surveillance system."

That being said, this wave of civilian-led digital attacks on a force like ISIS marks a new development fighting terrorism, just as ISIS's use of social media propaganda marked a new development in waging it.

"The groups engaging in terrorism have not changed what they are doing, just how they are doing it. Terror is terror, the whole point is to get a government and a people to change social, political, or economic policies by use of violence," White said. "The vehicle of dissemination has changed. Dissemination of information has changed on both sides -- whether ISIS or Anonymous. The dissemination of material to attack an adversary has changed dramatically. That's what makes this so fascinating."

• Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Brian Mastroianni covers science and technology for CBSNews.com

More from CBS News

How Anonymous Are Your Anonymized Data? The AnyMApp Case Study

• Conference paper
• First Online: 12 December 2023
• Cite this conference paper

• Ana Ferreira   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0953-9411 9 ,
• Francisco Bischoff   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5301-8672 9 ,
• Rute Almeida   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-5002 9 , 10 ,
• Luís Nogueira-Silva   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5519-707X 10 , 11 ,
• Ricardo Cruz-Correia   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-5158 9 &
• Joana Muchagata   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-6033 9  

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1958))

Included in the following conference series:

• International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

339 Accesses

Privacy is a Fundamental Human Right and data anonymization is an essential process that aims to render data unidentifiable, therefore, private. The aim of this work is to test the anonymity of the first data collected via AnyMApp, a platform to anonymously perform online usability tests. Due to time and resource constraints, the authors opted to identify open-source free tools, which were evaluated recently for their usability and functionalities. Even being a highly ranked anonymization tool (ARX), the use of this tool in our data setting was not straightforward and required guidance from tutorials. In the end, it was not possible to run any of the anonymization models available in ARX in our dataset because there were no quasi-identifier attributes within the collected data. There were sensitive data collected though, with medical diagnosis information, but not able to cause privacy concerns when added with all the other non-identifiable and non-sensitive attributes. Despite our results for this use-case, we will keep verifying/anonymizing collected data from AnyMApp because we will have different use-cases and health-related data that can be more complex and comprise quasi-identifiers and sensitive attributes that we nee to guarantee that are anonymized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Valli Kumari, V., Varma, N.S., Sri Krishna, A., Ramana, K.V., Raju, K.V.S.V.N.: Checking anonymity levels for anonymized data. In: Natarajan, R., Ojo, A. (eds.) ICDCIT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6536, pp. 278–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19056-8_21

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Vovk, O., Piho, G., Ross, P.: Evaluation of anonymization tools for health data. In: Bellatreche, L., Chernishev, G., Corral, A., Ouchani, S., Vain, J. (eds.) MEDI 2021. CCIS, vol. 1481, pp. 302–313. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87657-9_23

Pinnmaneni, N., Dodda, S., Muvva, S.C.: Anonymization and pseudo-anonymization for E-health care (2021)

Google Scholar  

Li, X.-B., Qin, J.: Anonymizing and sharing medical text records. Inf. Syst. Res. 28 (2), 332–352 (2017)

Article   Google Scholar  

Pawar, A., Ahirrao, S., Churi, P.P.: Anonymization techniques for protecting privacy: a survey. In: 2018 IEEE Punecon (2018)

Ferreira, A., Chilro, R., Cruz-Correia, R.: AnyMApp framework: anonymous digital twin human-app interactions. In: HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and Interaction. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17615-9_15

Donker, T., Petrie, K., Proudfoot, J., Clarke, J., Birch, M.R., Christensen, H.: Smartphones forsmarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 15 (11), e247 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2791.PMID:24240579;PMCID:PMC3841358

Gordon, M.L., Gatys, L., Guestrin, C., Bigham, J.P., Trister, A., Patel, K.: App usage predicts cognitive ability in older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019), vol. 168, PP. 1–12. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300398

Nogueira-Silva, L., et al.: Development of a mobile health app for the management of hypertension, including treatment adherence assessment, using image detection technology – inspirers-HTN. J. Hypertens. 39 , e380 (2021)

General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council L 119. Official Journal of the European Union

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financed by project AnyMApp - Anonymous Digital Twin for Human-App Interactions (EXPL/CCI-COM/0052/2021) (FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

CINTESIS@RISE, FMUP-MEDCIDS, Porto, Portugal

Ana Ferreira, Francisco Bischoff, Rute Almeida, Ricardo Cruz-Correia & Joana Muchagata

PaCeIT- Patient Centered Innovation and Technologies, CINTESIS, FMUP-MEDCIDS, Porto, Portugal

Rute Almeida & Luís Nogueira-Silva

Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João - Internal Medicine Department, Porto, Portugal

Luís Nogueira-Silva

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Crete and Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Constantine Stephanidis

Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Margherita Antona

Stavroula Ntoa

University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Gavriel Salvendy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Ferreira, A., Bischoff, F., Almeida, R., Nogueira-Silva, L., Cruz-Correia, R., Muchagata, J. (2024). How Anonymous Are Your Anonymized Data? The AnyMApp Case Study. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_54

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_54

Published : 12 December 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-49214-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-49215-0

eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research