what is your ideal society essay

• Phone: +91 8466016171
• Whatsapp: +91 8208375580
• Email: contact@leapscholar.com

Ideal Society IELTS Essay: Sample Opinions & Solutions for Practice

• Updated On December 14, 2023
• Published In IELTS Preparation 💻

International English Language Testing System is a widely accepted English proficiency test taken by students intending to pursue foreign education or employment abroad. The test assesses the candidate’s ability to communicate in English and is based on four parameters: reading, writing, speaking and listening. 

Table of Contents

The Writing Task consists of two tasks- 1 and 2. In Task 2, candidates should respond to a given statement and justify their opinion with examples. One of the most common topics is the ideal society IELTS essay. Here we have compiled a detailed guide on the vocabulary to be used, sample questions and answers that can be followed, and the kind of approach for Writing Task 2. Candidates must utilise this for their preparation. 

Vocabulary for Writing Task 2 

Linking words is an essential grammatical tool that helps construct a sentence and connects part of a text. Moreover, linkers can also help candidates put forth their opinion. In addition, they are beneficial for other reasons. They are underlined below for easier understanding:

• The paragraph has a smooth transition 
• Ideas are flowing in a logical manner 
• Help in expressing opinion or purpose
• They help in constructing a suitable conclusion
• Linkers help explain a point in-depth. Furthermore, they can be used to describe examples. 

However, candidates must know that linking words cannot be used everywhere. They must come naturally in a sentence, or the composition of the sentence might sound awkward. Moreover, examiners evaluate the ideal society IELTS essay of students by assessing the accuracy, range, and usage of linkers. However, linkers belong to different categories, and it is vital to understand when and where they can be used. This can help score well in the Writing Task 2: 

Crack IELTS Exam in first attempt

Attend Leap’s free masterclass to get tips, tricks and advance strategies to crack IELTS exam in first attempt

• To add information
• To provide examples
• Highlighting key points 
• Consequences and results
• Reasons and causes 
• Contrasts 

To add information  Candidates must support their main points in the essay. While writing an ideal society IELTS essay, it is essential to let the examiner know that additional information is coming up. They can do so with the help of linkers such as:

• Furthermore
• Additionally
• In addition
• Not only…but also

Listing Lists are often used to present pointers in a paragraph sequentially. They can help the essay look more appealing. Here are a few connectors that one can use to list their paragraph:

• Finally, lastly, or last but not the least

To provide examples Examples are often used to substantiate ideas. Candidates must make sure to use a range of linking words to support their examples:

• For instance
• For example
• To cite an example
• To illustrate
• In other words

Highlighting key points  Candidates must stress their main pointers in an ideal society IELTS essay. They can do so with the help of these connectors:

• Specifically
• In particular
• Particularly

Consequences and results When one needs to explain the consequence of something, one can use these connectors:

• As a result
• Consequently
• For this reason

Causes and reasons It is essential always to provide reasons for a statement that is put forward. One can do so with these linking words:

Contrasts  Often in Writing Task 2, one may need to provide opposing ideas. However, it is most pertinent in the discussion essays, where one needs to provide in-depth details. The below-mentioned linking words will help candidates show the examiner when they are going to introduce an opposing pointer:

• Nevertheless
• On the other hand
• Even though

Conclusion An ideal society IELTS essay must have a concluding sentence. These connectors can be the most useful then:

• To conclude
• In conclusion

Providing opinion Candidates must put forward their opinion comprehensively. Using the following linkers can help one address their opinion in a better way:

• In my opinion
• I agree/concur

How to Approach Writing Task 2? 

Candidates can score well in Writing Task 2 if they plan out their essay and structure it. However, this requires practice. Furthermore, they should follow the below-mentioned pointers while approaching

Writing Task 2:  Understand the question  First and foremost, it is crucial to understand what type of question it is and what it is asking. Moreover, candidates must distinguish whether the essay is an opinion, discussion, double questions or advantages and disadvantages.  

Structure the essay One must structure the essay by dividing it into the introduction, main body paragraphs 1 and 2, and conclusion. 

• Introduction
• Main body paragraph 1 

In the opening paragraph, candidates should just paraphrase the question in order to start interacting with it. Candidates must begin with a topic sentence and then elaborate on it. However, one must substantiate it with examples. This should have the main idea discussed in the introduction. 

• Main body paragraph 2 

In this paragraph, candidates must substantiate the points raised in the previous paragraph. They can also use this section to give examples or add new points that will strengthen their core argument.

• Conclusion 

In conclusion, they must summarise their main points and finish their essay on a clear, concise note. 

Write in your own words  It is one of the essential skills that candidates must hone as it is applicable for reading and writing. This will help boost one’s band score. In addition, they must use various synonyms while paraphrasing. Besides, candidates must also paraphrase the question in the introduction and write the ideal society IELTS essay in their own words. They are advised to not resort to writing memorised essays. 

Begin with an opening statement  Candidates must begin their essay with an opening statement that describes what they might talk about in a few words. Of course, it needs to be specific. 

State your opinion  One must clearly state their opinion while answering different parts of the task. However, one must highlight their position in their introduction. 

Sample Question with Answers for Ideal Society Topic

Candidates must practise sample questions and answers for ideal society IELTS essay as this will give them a stronghold over the writing and vocabulary. Moreover, this will help them attempt the essay with ease and improve their overall band score. They are underlined below for easier understanding: 

T hroughout history, people have dreamt of living in a perfect society. However, there is still no agreement about what a perfect society would be like. Why do people want to build a perfect society in the modern world? What can people do to help create an ideal society? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.  Write at least 250 words.

In the contemporary era, everyone wants to live a comfortable and holistically fulfilling life. People have wanted to create a fairer, egalitarian society from time immemorial. There is, however, no unanimity on what an ideal society might look like. The major reasons behind this yearning for a utopia are improved standards of living and socioeconomic equality. In an ideal civilization where the inhabitants help each other, accept and respect different values and cultures, prosperity follows, thus, automatically leading to a better quality of life. For instance, most developed countries like Europe and USA have laws that guarantee and safeguard the safety and equality of all their citizens regardless of colour, caste or gender. Additionally, in such a community where everyone is allowed to work and contribute, followed by an equal distribution of wealth, the class difference is eliminated leading to an improvement in everyone’s standard of living.  Democracy, education and nonviolence are fundamental tenets of a perfect society and people can play a crucial role in shaping up such a society by teaching the value of these to the youth. Since today’s children are tomorrow’s future, they must learn to accept that different people can follow a different religion or culture and respect that. It is not possible to change each individual that exists; however, parents can play their part in providing exemplary education by inculcating the values of acceptance and respect. Moreover, people must uphold and support the principles of democracy. The elected government must ensure that everyone has fundamental human rights and the citizens in return must respect their duties such as paying taxes. While most people do this, numerous locals practice tax evasion which can hinder the possibility of having a better place to live by having free education, health care services, etc.  In conclusion, people have always longed to reside in a reliable society that provides safety and treats each person equally. The government and people must work together by implementing and following rules and regulations to attain the same.

Points to Remember:

While writing an ideal society IELTS essay, candidates must ask themselves questions such as: 

• What was the society like in the past? 
• What developments have taken place? 
• What is a community? 
• Can society be improved? 

For instance, the question may ask, “People often think of establishing an ideal society, but most of the time, this does not happen. What is your opinion of an ideal society, and how can it be created?”.  Here, candidates must put forth their opinion of: 

• What an ideal society is and reiterated in the introduction 
• Candidates’ opinion of a perfect society and what it is like 
• What makes an ideal society? 
• Ways to create it 
• In conclusion, stating if this can be achieved in reality 

Tips to Score Well in Writing Task 2 

To ace in Writing Task 2, we have underlined a list of tips that candidates can implement to attain a good score. Nevertheless, the vocabulary usage mentioned above is essential, but that is not all.  They must follow these tips ardently: 

• Proper time management 
• Be conversant with the marking criterion. 
• Remember to paraphrase the questions. 
• Plan out the essay  
• Explain the points in-depth
• Read, listen and converse in English 
• Learn new words
• Revise and check for spelling errors or grammatical mistakes 

To crack IELTS, candidates must follow a systematic approach towards Writing Task 2. They must be conversant in vocabulary as well. Moreover, as writing is one of the most challenging sections in IELTS, candidates require regular and rigorous practice to achieve a firm grip over it. Apart from that, following the tips mentioned ardently will help tackle this section. Furthermore, aspiring students planning their study abroad program may require additional funding, as immigration to a foreign country is often costly. To fund your studies in a hassle-free way, you can approach Leap Scholars. Our financial products are crafted for ambitious students who chase the best international education. 

Frequently Asked Questions

1. how can i improve my score in writing task 2 .

Ans: Students who aspire to achieve a higher band score in ideal society IELTS essay must use a wide range of vocabulary for the topic, have proper time management as well as should be aware of the language and tonality of their essays

2. What are the common topics in IELTS Writing Task 2?

Ans: Some of the most common topics in IELTS writing task 2 are: Technology, food, family, economics, crime & punishment and business & money. 

3. How can I prepare well for Writing Task 2? 

Ans: The most common problem candidates face while attempting the writing task 2 is a lack of clear strategy. To avoid that, they should practise sample and previous year questions to boost their confidence. They can also use other resources available both online and offline to ensure they get their desired band score.

Know more about IELTS

Get free speaking practice samples.

• Describe a Skill That you can teach other people
• Describe a Place you Visited Where the Air was Polluted
• Describe a Famous Person that you are Interested in
• Describe a Course That You Want to Learn
• Describe a Person who Solved a Problem in Smart Way
• Describe a Prize That You Received
• Describe a Volunteering Experience You Have Had
• Describe a Piece of Good News
• Describe Something you Taught to Your Friend
• Talk About an Interesting Old Person you Met Recently
• Describe a Dinner you Really Enjoyed
• Describe a Story or Novel That Was Interesting to You
• Describe a Time When you Shared Something with Others
• Describe a Toy you Liked in Childhood
• Describe an Interesting Neighbour
• Describe a Competition You Would Like to Take Part In
• Describe an interesting activity that you remember enjoying most in your Primary School
• Describe Your Childhood Friend
• Describe an Object You Find Particularly Beautiful
• Describe a Place Where you are Able to Relax
• Describe a person you know who likes to talk a lot
• Describe a place where you would like to go to relax
• Describe a period when you were busy
• Describe a long-term goal you would like to achieve
• Describe a situation when you helped someone
• Describe a job you would not like to do in the future
• Describe a time when you used a map
• Describe a skill that you learned in your childhood
• Describe an unusual holiday you had
• Describe an exciting activity that you experienced with someone else
• Describe a person who is good at making people feel welcome in his/her home
• Describe A Time You Successfully Did Something Difficult
• Describe Something in Your Country That You Are Interested In
• Describe a Beautiful City
• Describe something you do regularly that helps you work and study better
• Describe a photo that you took and are proud of
• Describe a party that you enjoyed
• Describe a useful object in your home that you can’t live without
• Describe a good advertisement that you think is useful
• Describe an occasion when someone or something made noise
• Describe a sportsperson that you admire
• Describe something that you picked up that was thrown by someone else
• Describe a time that something changed your life in good ways
• Describe a successful person who you once studied or worked with

Get Free Reading Practice Samples

• William henry perkin reading answers
• Why zoos are good reading answers
• Bioluminescence reading answers
• Classifying societies reading answers
• Artificial artists reading answers
• Jargon reading answers
• The Origins of Laughter Reading Answers
• The Innovation of Grocery Stores Reading Answers
• All About the Otter Reading Answers
• The Triune Brain Reading Answers
• Saving the Soil Reading Answers
• Trans Fatty Acids Reading Answers
• A Disaster of Titanic Proportions Reading Answers
• Why Companies Should Welcome Disorder Reading Answers
• Book Review Reading Answers
• Tea Times Reading Answers
• Why are Finland's Schools Successful Reading Answers
• Intelligence and Giftedness Reading Answers
• Animal Minds Parrot Alex Reading Answers
• Crop Growing Skyscrapers Reading Answers
• Secrets of the Swarm Reading Answers
• Walking with Dinosaurs Reading Answers
• The Development of Travel Under the Ocean Reading Answers
• What's so Funny Reading Answers
• The Culture of Chimpanzee Reading Answers
• Clutter Bugs Beware Reading Answer
• Stepwells Reading Answers
• Glaciers Reading Answers

Get Free Writing Practice Samples

• Advantages and Disadvantages Essay with Sample Answers
• Agree and Disagree Essay with Sample Answers
• Problem Solution Essay Topic with Sample Answers
• Every year several languages die out
• Positive or Negative Development Essay with Sample Answers
• Honesty is the best policy essay
• Online shopping essay
• Environment essay topics
• Prevention is better than cure essay

Get Free Listening Practice Samples

• Family excursions listening answers
• Public library listening answers
• Hiring a public room listening answers
• Notes on social programme listening answers
• Accommodation request form listening answers
• Transport survey listening answers
• Mic house agency repairs listening answers
• Holiday rentals listening answer
• Job enquiry listening answers
• Homestay application listening answers
• Library information listening answers
• Free activities in the burnham area listening answers

IELTS Important Information

• IELTS Exam Date
• IELTS Exam Fee
• IELTS Modules
• IELTS Speaking Practice Test
• IELTS Writing Practice Test
• IELTS Reading Practice Test
• IELTS Listening Practice Test
• IELTS Test Centres
• IELTS Results
• Types of IELTS
• IELTS Pattern
• IELTS Exam Eligibilty
• IELTS Slot Booking
• IELTS Band Score
• IELTS Registration
• IELTS Books
• IELTS Preparation
• IELTS Practice Test
• IELTS Speaking Cue Card
• IELTS Speaking Part 1
• IELTS Writing Task 1
• IELTS Writing Task 2
• Task 1 Pie Chart
• Task 1 Table Chart
• Task 1 Bar Graph
• Task 1 Line Graph
• Task 1 Diagram
• IELTS Computer Based Test
• IELTS Paper Based Test
• IELTS One Skill Retake
• IELTS for UKVI
• IELTS Vocabulary

IELTS Test Centre and Dates in India

• IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Hyderabad
• IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Bangalore
• IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Chennai
• IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Amritsar
• IELTS Centre and Dates in Ludhiana
• IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Mumbai
• IELTS Test Centres and Dates in Ahmedabad
• IELTS Centre and Dates in Delhi
• IELTS Test Centres and Dates in Chandigarh
• IELTS Center and Dates in Pune

Manisha Angre

Experienced IELTS prep trainer and education management industry veteran. Specializes in public speaking, international education, market research, mentoring, and management.

Related Posts

A Guide on Most Common English Words Used in Daily Life

Top IELTS Tips and Tricks For Best IELTS Scores 2024

60+ IELTS Essay Topics 2024: IELTS Writing Task 2 Samples & Tips

Trending now.

Your complimentary articles

You’ve read one of your four complimentary articles for this month.

You can read four articles free per month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please

Question of the Month

What would make the best society, the following answers to this central philosophical question each win a random book..

The closest to perfection would be an interdependent Confederation of societies, each containing between one and two hundred citizens, depending upon factors such as location and climate. These villages would be more or less evenly distributed across the globe, having access to roughly equivalent amounts of arable land. Thirty per cent of all land would be designated wilderness, and no societies would be allowed to colonise these areas, but antisocial individuals would be free to inhabit the wilderness following a life-style of total lonesomeness.

Each society would be run according to a consensus of members, on a Rousseauian model of full participation of all members over 14 and council decree. Dissenting members will be invited to move to alternative societies, set up their own on land proportionate to the size of the dissenting group, or to take to the wilderness. Councils may legislate on shared interests, but there will be no laws restricting private activities provided these do not infringe upon the same freedoms of others.

Whilst each society would decide its own rules, the Confederation would respect a universal constitution according to which no-one can own anything they have not made. Communal products could be exchanged freely amongst individuals or between societies. There would be no money, and no hoarding of mutually-owned resources, on pain of banishment to the wilderness. Every year there would be a Global Festival of Gratitude and Giving, during which gifts would be freely exchanged and art, music, dances and games would celebrate and renew the freedom of the Earth from human domination.

According to the constitution, animals culled from the wild may be eaten during the winter in cold climates and during illness. But there would be no domestication or other infringement upon the freedom of animals. Killing would be allowed only if human life is in danger, or to stabilize populations and environmental harmony. All waste would be recycled, and energy derived only from renewable sources such as wind and tide.

If one society threatens aggression against another, the Global Confederation would boycott it for 50 years. Members would be invited to join alternative societies, but may emigrate only to one that has received no other members of the rogue society. All political relationships will be entirely internal to each society and there would be no alliances formed between societies. Societies attempting to form political allegiances or extend their power beyond their own members will be boycotted. Individuals would be free to travel to and form relationships with individuals of other societies, but any group growing too large for its arable resources would have to redistribute.

Helen Williams, Coley Sirgar, Swansea

The perfect society would be one in which everybody got whatever they wanted. Obviously, this is impossible to achieve. So we can only strive for the best possible society. This logically would be the one in which everyone got as much of what they want as it is possible to equitably achieve. Achieving this would be the equivalent of finding the lines of best fit through a series of points for various graphs. For example, if we all have different opinions about the ideal length of a working day, then in the best society the length of the working day would be the mean of all our ideals. Generally, in the best possible society, all parameters would be set at the average of our individual ideals about that thing. It won’t be the perfect society for anyone, but on the whole, it’ll be the least bad for everyone.

Clearly, there are some huge practical difficulties to achieving this society – so huge as to render the full achievement of it an impossibility. Nevertheless, it is an ideal we can work towards. Indeed, it would seem that society is slowly moving in this direction. The biggest step we have taken in many countries towards this society of the average is the democratic election of leaders – and as our administrations become more transparent and accountable, populations are able to exert greater pressure on their governments to act more in line with the collective will. We can imagine in the not too distant future being able to register our views online and by phone; and thus we will be able to easily and rapidly vote on many more issues than we do currently. Just as we now vote on X-Factor , we might soon be voting on important political issues: where reality TV is currently leading the way, genuine reality will follow on behind. So the best society would involve a whole lot more reality TV.

Kevin Andrew, Tadcaster, North Yorkshire

There will be no government as we currently know it. Government is overkill. We’ve tried it, and for the most part it has failed. Mostly, government is about manipulating political and economic power. It does not produce a good society. To quote Henry David Thoreau in On Civil Disobedience : “I heartily accept the motto, ‘That government is best which governs least’; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically… [further] ‘That government is best which governs not at all’.” There may be courts to mediate disputes. These disputes will be limited to the basics: the only laws needed are laws concerning basic decency and respect, following this formula: No killing or hurting another person or damaging their property. This would included ecological destruction, which damages everyone.

Each local community will cooperate with as many or few other communities as it chooses: nothing will ever be forced. Each communities will produce what it needs. Factories will be owned by the workers, and excess profits will go to support the needed services and the well-being of the community, further excess going to greater projects benefiting the wider world. No community should number more than a few thousand. Any system over a million people will always fail; a community kept under 10,000 will likely succeed. No community will be able to possess the manpower or wealth to threaten other communities.

Kraig Mottar, by Email

The best society would not penalise people, working or not, for disabilities or mental illness. This is not their fault. It would transform its idea of beauty from the Platonically idealistic, discarding ‘ideal forms’ for forms that are both realistic and which embrace humanity’s highest aspirations. Life chances would be evenly distributed rather than a concentrated in the 20-65 age range. No longer would people be thrown on the scrap-heap for being ill, disabled, too old etc: rather, there would be a just way of distributing resources to all. This could be implemented in various ways to adjust to society’s changing needs.

This society would be rights-based but not ignore the need for cultural deviation from norms. Democracy would be a norm; but global society would be wide enough to embrace it in different forms. There may need to be an anarchic element; but educational systems should also help people through life at every step. Big Business would be required to act with equity with regard to product quality and customer service. It would not be so easy to inflict disabilities on people via various ‘suffering pipelines’ such as the army, drug damage, etc: but neither would unjust blame be put on people/companies/societies. Unfortunately, suffering would still exist because the physical world is in a fundamental state of increasing entropy, ie disorganisation.

The general principle is that there would be a massive healing of society in terms of its function and functionality . However, social function would be tempered with endless creativity and lots of fun. Society would not be cut on ‘utilitarian’ lines, in the sense of people being shoehorned into the most financially profitable but emotionally profitless careers; instead everybody would be able to develop their capabilities and talents. Thus in this society people would be able to fulfil roles at their level of abilities without ruling out their potential to completely jump out of the box!

Kate Hillier, Colchester, Essex

The best society would be run by nurses. Nurses are the caring profession; theirs is an ethics of caring that will see you from the cradle to the other place.

Just think – all of them with PhDs in caring, taking collegiate responsibility for everything. Thus all waste products wiped up efficiently and carefully disposed of. Similarly, firstly there will be potty training of the finest calibre (warm but directive) even for the potential obsessives in adult life, who will have the best in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, possibly even by the same nurses – like learning, caring is a lifelong thing, a vocation! And for the psychological dissonances, there will be an empathic ear, an emotional ‘hand’ held tightly, unconditional positive regard!

Nurses, of course, need not be paid handsomely. Having long allowed their consciences to go beyond things like money or self-advancement, they would be the mainstay of a low-cost society. All care would be delivered in the local community, but given sufficient numbers of nurses, bicycles should be all that’s necessary. This would also have the beneficial effect of inducing contentment by provoking images of ‘the good old days’.

It might of course be crossing your mind to ask, What about the non-nurses? Well, in a post-capitalist, Nursist world it only remains for people to be cared for – indeed, to have an entitlement to it: most will carry a ‘cared for’ ration book to be filled in with dates, types, and depths of caring, when last cared for, and so on. The awkward question of what people care about has not yet been resolved, but is being fully discussed by the Nursing Administrative Board.

Due to the huge increase in the techniques of caring, plus, it must be said, a smidgeon of threat – ie, “there’s more than one way in which we can ‘care’ for you” – non-compliance in the new society would mostly be a thing of the past. For the small few who insist on self-assertion, there will be well-developed virtual reality alternatives. Here recalcitrants can be placed in a virtual helmet, where they will remain sweet. Consistent with virtual ethics, they must not be abandoned to their ‘other world’, and specially-trained carers will always be at hand to coax them back to reality. Nobody goes without in nursing world.

Liam Clarke, Brighton University

What would make the best society? An aggregate of people living together in a harmonious community with common values and customs . But although this appears an acceptable definition, harmony is a difficult if not impossible state to achieve in society, and the maintenance of harmony invariably impedes the achievement of individual ideals. So this definition is nothing more than an unachievable ideal.

Philosophy has long been a defender of this impossible ideal, yet it seems that many are still confused by the nature of the notion: an ideal may be desirable but wholly unobtainable, especially if it concerns social matters. Plato reported such an unreachable ideal in the Republic , as did More and Bacon; and it is disparaging to their works if one thinks they were so na ïve as to believe that what they wrote could be actualised. Yet people still criticise their work on just this basis.

Maybe a poet could better portray the way things are. D.H. Lawrence says of love: “We have pushed a process into a goal.” Love is an ideal we all wish to acquire; but as Lawrence says, it’s a process not a goal, and to believe it is something to acquire is actually a fallacy. We do not fall in love to reach something and then stop: love is ongoing. So too must we understand social improvement as a process, for if we begin to view the ideal society as a thing we can create, then we’re accepting that we’ll reach a point at which we can go no further, no longer improve. Instead then, we must formulate an ideal and work towards it, knowing that its perfect implementation is unattainable. At least we will be moving in the right direction.

With all this in mind, I offer up the suggestion that we work towards a society where due to advances in technology no one works any more – allowing us to sit around discussing philosophy, eating fine food and drinking fine wine!

Christopher Burr, Southbourne, Dorset

There are two broad categories of society: narcissistic and outward-looking . The first typically involves a search for peace, harmony and pleasure. Fine as these are, the prospect of nothing else until the Heat Death of the universe lacks something. I prefer the more outward-looking search for meaning . This has been approached through religion, which is unfortunately stuck in the Middle Ages. Philosophy has made some technical advances here, but on the big questions we have not advanced beyond the ancient Greeks, who were also the inventors of every modern political system. Advances in art follow technology: a Stone Age Beethoven would not have produced symphonies, as he lacked the orchestra, whose instruments are the products of technological knowledge.

In fact, the only direction in which any substantial advances have been made is through science: so the best society would be one conscientiously advancing through science. This not a new departure, as we are already doing this to some extent – we have already split the atom and put men on the moon.

Science advances through individuals: the Newtons, Darwins and Einsteins formulating new ways of looking at the world; followed by periods of consolidation, which form the basis for the next genius to emerge. There is no formula for producing geniuses, who seem to appear at random, but history does give us a lead. They do not often come from the governing classes, who are busy politicking to maintain status. They do not often come from the bottom of society either, as these are too busy struggling for survival and usually lack the education. Innovation is a middle class affair, and to a great extent so is the consolidation process. The Western mode of society has a proven track record in providing a middle class environment, so its world-wide introduction would therefore be recommended. Unfortunately, ecologists tell us that we’d need the resources of three Earths to bring our present six billion up to a Western lifestyle – so to speed the plough of progress we need to remember Malthus and put quality of life before our present witless chase of quantity.

G.E. Haines, Woodbridge, Suffolk

The best society would exist when a common concern for the collective became intrinsic to individual priorities and choices. It would also be in harmony with the environment. Poverty, disease, warfare and crime would be things of the past.

Such a society would be the result of a collective freedom of thought that had disentangled itself from doom religions, dead philosophies and greedy politicians. The conscious and subconscious fallacies embedded in the primitive mind by the assertions of those taken to be superior would be finally put to rest, especially in the discovery that man’s natural state is not one of war, and neither is Armageddon inevitable. Principles would transcend the national, cultural, religious and political. However, the chief characteristic which would make it better than all the societies we may compare it with, is that it could only exist because it has defeated the possibility of just getting worse .

What makes the best society is also determined by number. A society of one can be the absolute best. A society of two could also be the best. It may be that the best society is determined by the number of good relationships which can exist within it. So before we can say anything about what would make the best society, we must first determine the number of people in it.

Nick Kelly, Eastbourne

In thinking about the best society, I thought of the many noble attempts at creating utopian societies. They range across left- and right-wing, scientific and counter-cultural, and religious concepts. Whether it’s a Brook Farm, a phalanstere or a kibbutz, they all share a common trait: failure.

What of the great attempts by intellectuals to offer models of the best society: Plato’s Calliopolis; More’s Utopia and Marx’s communism, or Bellamy, Morris, St. Simon, Heinlein and Buckminster Fuller? Whatever their merits, they all seem radically and deeply flawed, most significantly, by lacking any truly practical way of instituting the necessary changes to bring those dreams into reality. Even the dystopian cautionary voices and visions of Huxley, Wells, Orwell, Atwood or Lowry seem to be practically far removed from actuality (thankfully).

And then it happened. Something strange occurred to me after watching Pixar’s Wall-E : perhaps humans are the central problem in our inability to realize a utopia. We are the whole reason for utopia – yet we also seem to be the reason why no such attempt is ever realized.

I am uncomfortable with this conclusion because it smacks of misanthropy; but the common element to all the above failed utopian (and dystopian) communities is that they are human-centered. Perhaps, then, the best society isn’t even human. Take this aggressive, self-centered and most destructive species out of the mix, and what’s left? Peace? Utopia? A technoutopia of machines could exemplify the very best of universal moral qualities such as courage, honesty, and, above all else, love. All this from robots. We humans have been building our utopian visions out of the wrong stuff.

Perhaps we need to rephrase the question from “What is the best society?” – a utopia – to “What is a good society?” – an eutopia . What would a good society look like? I submit it would be something like the one Socrates outlined in Book 3 of Plato’s Republic – its members living in harmony with nature and one another. But, as beautiful as that bucolic vision may sound, remember Glaucon’s retort: “Socrates,” he said, “you’ve fashioned a city fit for pigs.” Well, perhaps not pigs, but maybe machines.

Patrick Standen, Burlington, VT

Some suggestions:

1. Population propagation will need to be controlled.

2. There will be workable old and new ways to provide necessary and desirable goods and services.

3. There will be leaders and doers who try to arrange a just distribution of these resources and goods.

4. There will be leaders and doers who try to minimize wars and other conflicts, and also crime.

5. People will sometimes ill-treat others (unfortunately).

6. People will sometimes treat others well.

7. People will sometimes try to develop desirable intellectual and emotional abilities.

8. Wise people will accept stoically what they cannot change, change what they should and can, and strive for wisdom to know the difference.

9. Wise people will tackle conflicts between religious, political, philosophical and scientific beliefs with good will and tolerance, and be stoical when such conflicts seem ineliminable.

I set out to describe a better society (not the best one, if there is such a thing). However, I seem to have described societies we already have. So maybe this is the best of all possible worlds that could exist, here, now and forevermore?

Gordon Fisher, South Salem, NY

One of our readers ‘2bsirius’ asked the same question on her YouTube channel, provoking a range of video answers. To watch them, go to youtube.com/user/2bsirius , click on ‘videos’ and go to ‘What would make the best society?’

Next Question of the Month

The next question is: How Are We Free? Explain the nature of free will and other freedoms in less than 400 words. The prize is a random book from our book mountain. Subject lines or envelopes should be marked ‘Question Of The Month’, and must be received by 1st September. If you want a chance of getting a book, please include your physical address. Submission implies permission to reproduce your answer physically and electronically. So no freedom there, clearly.

This site uses cookies to recognize users and allow us to analyse site usage. By continuing to browse the site with cookies enabled in your browser, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy . X

• Collected Philosophy

Brian Kogelmann

October 25th, 2017, thinking small about the ideal society.

0 comments | 72 shares

Estimated reading time: 10 minutes

Brian Kogelmann on living better by living more apart

Political philosophers are in the business of thinking about what the ideal society looks like. Perhaps the most famous articulation of such an ideal can be found in John Rawls ’s A Theory of Justice . Here, Rawls introduces the notion of a society being well ordered . A well-ordered society is a society in which we all accept the same principles of justice and, moreover, our society’s basic institutions are regulated by these principles. To be an ideal society, Rawls argues, is also to be a well-ordered society.

There are good reasons for thinking that an ideal society is also a well-ordered society. Indeed, the reason Rawls introduces the notion of a well-ordered society in the first place is because he thinks such societies possess certain features that make for an attractive ideal. What are these features? For one, there is social unity : in such a society we all work together to bring about what justice requires. Here, politics looks more like a shared enterprise rather than a competition. As another feature, it is likely that the coercive institutions constituting such a society live up to public scrutiny when we ask why they require of us what they do: we all collectively know that our basic institutions were implemented to fulfil the demands of justice. And finally, Rawls argues that when we comply with the demands of justice in a well-ordered society, we realize our autonomy : we act in accordance with rules and institutions that we would self-legislate or give ourselves.

Though attractive as part of an ideal, the requirements of well-orderedness are quite demanding. Not only are they demanding, but they are utopian in a pejorative sense. Recall that part of the definition of well-orderedness is that we all agree on what justice requires. Rawls would later realize that this is not possible in a liberal society—and, importantly, the ideal society is a liberal society according to Rawls. The very institutions that compose a liberal society—allowing for freedom of thought, speech, and conscience—would lead us to endorse different and conflicting accounts of what justice demands. But when we disagree about what justice requires, those attractive features that come along with society being well ordered—social unity, public scrutiny, and autonomy—may be lost, for disagreements about justice are incompatible with the basic definition of well-orderedness. The ideal society does not look so ideal after all. What is the Rawlsian to do in response?

Perhaps they could offer the following revision: even though we do not all accept the same principles of justice, the ideal society is still organized around one conception of justice nonetheless. Here we retain a core feature of well-orderedness, insofar as society is regulated around one conception of justice; but we drop the other, namely, that we all agree with this conception. Now if the Rawlsian did this, then they still retain some attractive features that come along with the original definition of well-orderedness. Laws are still likely to live up to public scrutiny because we know why they were implemented: to carry out the demands of a conception of justice—though now, according to some, not the correct conception of justice. Social unity will be realized in a sense: though we do not all think the goal we pursue (implementing the governing conception of justice) is best (for we disagree about the conception of justice we try to implement), we still collectively pursue this goal nonetheless. But we will likely not realize our autonomy in such a society: many of us would not self-legislate the conception of justice we comply with. And, moreover, there seems something manifestly unfair about such a social order. Those whose most preferred conception of justice is the governing conception perpetually win out in the political process. Everyone else is a perpetual loser.

In response to these worries, maybe the Rawlsian gives up on the idea of justice all together. Why think the ideal society should be organized around one and only one conception of justice in the first place? Why not let politics be governed by the interests of the citizenry rather than abstract principles? Arguably, though, this path forward has greater costs than the one just examined. For there could be no public scrutiny in such a society, in that it would be difficult to know why our policies end up looking the way they do. Instead of policies reflecting the demands of a conception of justice they were implemented to serve, they will be the complex result of a log-rolling and bargaining process whose inner workings may be utterly mysterious to us. Moreover, social unity is also lost: if we do not all work to implement a conception of justice, then politics looks more like a competition than a shared enterprise. And finally, it is also hard to see how we could realize our autonomy in such a society: why think a politics that looks like this would result in rules that we would self-legislate?

What, then, is the Rawlsian to do? Abandon the project of articulating an ideal society? Or perhaps just temper expectations about what a realistically utopian ideal might actually look like? I do not think the Rawlsian need do either. Instead, they need to re-imagine what the ideal society looks like by rethinking some of the basic assumptions they make in their theorizing. One such assumption Rawlsians—and, indeed, almost all political philosophers—make is that the ideal society is a single political unit to be regulated by a single centralized government. According to the original definition of well-orderedness, it is everyone in society as a whole that endorses a single conception of justice. And it is the institutions constituting society as a whole that are regulated by a single conception of justice.

Many real world social and political orders, however, do not treat society as a single political unit to be regulated by a single centralized government. Think here of federalist structures like that of the United States of America. Though, arguably, the federalist structure has decayed over time and has been subject to more and more centralization, the de jure layout of the United States’ federalist structure separates society into several distinct governance units, who may then issue their own and oftentimes radically different policies that only those in their jurisdictions must follow. Different states can decide their own welfare policies, criminal laws and procedures, which public goods are to be provided, and so on.

Though unfamiliar to many political philosophers, the idea of decentralized governance structures is more familiar to economists and political scientists. In what is now a quite famous essay , authors Vincent Ostrom, Charles M. Tiebout, and Robert Warren examine the idea of polycentricity by taking a close look at governance structures in metropolitan areas. The authors begin by noting that metropolitan governance usually consists of overlapping jurisdictions of authority, duplication of functions concerning the provision of public goods and services, and many centres of decision-making that exist independent of one another. This is opposed to monocentric approaches to governance, where authority, decision-making, and the provision of public goods and services are limited to a single, centralized governance unit. Though many at the time argued that polycentric governance structures were wasteful because they often duplicated functions, the authors argued that there may be some non-obvious benefits to polycentricity. For instance, the decentralized nature of a polycentric regime may give rise to market-like competition among different political units, which can result in more efficient provision of public goods.

There are other benefits to polycentric governance structures, however, besides their ability to induce quasi-market competition. Namely, polycentricity allows for diverse preferences to be satisfied. Disagreement over how our schools should be run, whether we ought to be able to own guns, or whether we ought to be able to smoke marijuana need not result in winners and losers in the political process. In a polycentric governance structure, different political units can cater to diverse individual preferences. Instead of living in constant strife with one another, polycentricity allows us to live better together by, essentially, allowing us to live more apart.

This is a key lesson the Rawlsian can pick up on. For recall their main problem: there are attractive features that come along with a society being well ordered, but a society cannot be well ordered so long as we disagree about justice. But though society as a whole cannot realistically be well ordered, it is more likely that individual political units within an overarching polycentric governance structure can better approach well-orderedness when compared to centralized governments. Instead of living in a society where persons constantly fight over egalitarian versus libertarian schemes of redistribution, a polycentric governance structure allows both camps to have their day.

Now of course it is also utopian in a pejorative sense to think that individual governance units within a polycentric order will be well ordered: this would implausibly require that we perfectly sort ourselves into governance units according to the conceptions of justice we think are best. This is not the claim. Rather, the claim is that decentralized governance units better approach being well ordered when compared to single centralized governance units, in that a comparatively higher proportion of us residing in decentralized governance units agree that the demands of justice are being carried out when compared to the number of us residing in a single centralized governance unit who think this. This does not guarantee that those attractive features Rawls thought accompanied well-ordered societies will be met. But, plausibly, they will be met to a greater degree when compared to centralized political orders. Public scrutiny will be realized to a greater degree in that there will likely be greater coherence between the policies governing us and what we think justice requires. Our sense of social unity will be greater within our decentralized political units for there is greater agreement. And more of us will realize our autonomy, in that a greater number of us will live under laws that we would self-legislate, for a greater number of us think that we live in a society where the demands of justice are carried out.

Above I said that political philosophers often do not think in terms of polycentric governance systems. Instead, they usually think in terms of centralized governments regulating single political units. But there are some exceptions to this. In his famous (or perhaps infamous) Anarchy, State, and Utopia , Robert Nozick sketches his vision of the ideal society. And in many ways, it looks quite similar to what we just discussed: Nozick argues that utopia will consist of multiple utopias, where we can pursue our own conceptions of the good uninterrupted by others pursing their own accounts of the good. Famously, Rawls and Nozick were intellectual rivals. But as this essay shows, this may not be so. Once we recognize the fact that we disagree sharply with one another and that such disagreements are not going away anytime soon, then perhaps the Rawslian ideal society and the Nozickian ideal society don’t look so different after all.

This essay is based on the article ‘ Justice, Diversity, and the Well-Ordered Society ’ by Brian Kogelmann, published in The Philosophical Quarterly.

About the author

Brian Kogelmann is Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland. His research interests combine philosophy, politics, and economics.

Do Electrons Dream of Electric Sheep? October 18th, 2017

Related posts.

Against Principles

April 3rd, 2017.

Trying the Dead

February 8th, 2016.

Trust in the Dark

July 18th, 2016.

Knowing What’s Good for You

September 26th, 2016.

Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE [email protected]

The Concept of Ideal Society

Description and understanding of an ideal society are two contentious issues due to the divergent views put forward by scholars. While some sociologists focus on social components defining a perfect community, political scientists and economists underpin the significance of sociopolitical elements. Thus, an ideal society incorporates socioeconomic and political factors that drive and sustain life.

• Different scholars present a diverse interpretation of an ideal society based on philosophical or sociological components. They emphasize the elements making the world a better place for the benefit of all individuals.
• Literature reviews identify the motivations behind the establishment of an ideal society. For instance, Williams (2017) posits that gender issues shape the creation of a perfect community in which social and political systems distinguish gendered roles.

In Confucian tradition, an ideal society is founded on morality. A ‘moral community’ integrates individual desires and compels people to observe restraints.

• Innate honorable emotions confine individual desires in a perfect social setting. People abide by community regulations and collaborate to realize the public good.
• Trust is a fundamental principle which determines decency and encourages people to uphold social checks. According to Young-jin and Haeng-Hoon (2016), Confucius alludes that trust is the primary requirement for establishing and preserving a moral society, although economic and military power is essential.
• The central building blocks for an ideal society include the ability to promote goodness and abolish wickedness. Young-jin and Haeng-Hoon (2016) expound that individuals and rulers in a perfect community set a good example by confining personal longings to stimulate inborn moral sensations.
• Thus, members control their innate desires and moral emotions by complying with the social order. Furthermore, they contribute to the realization of public virtues and development of a life community. In this regard, people live to realize their nature completely and create a harmonious universe.

An ideal society upholds oneness and motivates people to acquire absolute knowledge. In this way, community members can identify social subjugation drivers and comprehend the void associated with the preeminence of birthrights claimed by the high castes.

• Swami Vivekananda is a prominent scholar who advanced the philosophy of oneness and absolute knowledge, mainly in India. Rayand Sethy (2020) postulate that Vivekananda envisions a perfect society based on caste. Although class is perceived as a political structure, Vivekananda represents it from a social custom perspective.
• An ideal community must outgrow political institutions and form a single caste by raising those in the lower levels to the highest category. In this regard, Rayand Sethy (2020) allude that all societal orders must overcome limitations observed in each and preserve inherent benefits.
• Absolute knowledge is the most fundamental tool needed to eliminate caste obstacles since it is a means to level up to class distinctions. People from different regions, such as Europe and India, must learn to create ideal humanity. An educated society promotes the spirit of parity and freedom.

An ideal society must maintain order in its sociopolitical systems. In this regard, a well-ordered culture includes accepting systematic principles of justice, which regulate societal institutions.

• John Rawls advances the idea of an ideal society based on justice and fairness. Community members enjoy freedoms endowed by the constitution or inherent privileges attributed to divine forces (Fanton, 2020). A just and fair society promotes impartiality and eliminates any discrimination against its community.
• Rawls’ philosophy exemplifies that an ideal society is based on social unity, public scrutiny, and autonomy. Communal harmony prevails when civic accord and people collaborate to advance fairness; politics is considered a shared initiative instead of competition (Fanton, 2020). Consequently, individuals realize sovereignty when they comply with rules and institutions.
• An ideal society must develop and uphold justice founded on a specific moral element, which regulates choices and alternatives concerning the distribution of rights and opportunities. It should also manage socioeconomic and political institutions.

In conclusion, an ideal society must promote social justice and protect constitutional and inherent rights. Community members will enjoy life without infringing on others’ privileges.

• A perfect culture would be one in which people can get whatever they wish. Although it is difficult to realize an unlimited degree of selection, community members can strive to find the best possible line of fit to accommodate freedom of choice. They can set parameters at an average based on individual ideals. The approach might not give a perfect society, but it would not be unsuitable for everyone.
• An ideal society would acknowledge individuals’ strengths and appreciate their weaknesses. This way, it would not judge people irrespective of their socioeconomic or political standards. Community members should live the best life in a perfect social order rather than being punished. A rights-based communal system would be preferred instead of deviating from normalized community standards.
• An ideal society should cultivate knowledge to help people identify and resolve daily life issues instead of providing one-time solutions. Only an educated community is able to develop an autonomous system based on progressive social, economic and political principles.

Fanton, M. (2020). Rawls’s point of view: A systematic reading of justice as fairness . Brazilian Political Science Review , 14 (2).

Kogelmann, B. (2017). Justice, diversity, and the well-ordered society . The Philosophical Quarterly, 67( 269), 663–684.

Ray, P., K., & Sethy, M., P. (2020). Swami Vivekananda: His philosophy and vision on ideal society. Asiatic Society for Social Science Research Journal, 2( 1), 45-57. Web.

Williams, S. J. (2017). Personal prefigurative politics: Cooking up an ideal society in the woman’s temperance and woman’s suffrage movements, 1870–1920. The Sociological Quarterly , 58 (1), 72-90. Web.

Young-jin, C., & Haeng-Hoon, L. (2016). The Confucian vision of an ideal society arising out of moral emotions, with a focus on the sishu Daquan. Philosophy East and West, 66( 2), 394-417. Web.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, February 10). The Concept of Ideal Society. https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-ideal-society/

"The Concept of Ideal Society." StudyCorgi , 10 Feb. 2022, studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-ideal-society/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) 'The Concept of Ideal Society'. 10 February.

1. StudyCorgi . "The Concept of Ideal Society." February 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-ideal-society/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "The Concept of Ideal Society." February 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-ideal-society/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "The Concept of Ideal Society." February 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-concept-of-ideal-society/.

This paper, “The Concept of Ideal Society”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: November 10, 2023 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Envisioning an Ideal Society — and How to Get There

Survey respondents imagine lifestyles with greater opportunity, meaning, and balance.

Network for Business Sustainability

B The Change

By Abby Litchfield

By envisioning the world 50 years from now, researcher Charlene Zietsma says , business leaders can imagine the future they want and brainstorm how to make it a reality. Imagining a perfect society or “utopia” can “free you from constraints,” Zietsma says. Then, the challenge becomes finding ways to make it real, starting now.

To help define that utopia, the Network for Business Sustainability asked its community of business managers and academic researchers to engage in a survey with three questions:

• what a perfect society would look like,
• how their life or work would change, and
• how they or their organization could move toward it.

We received 13 responses, roughly half from researchers and half from consultants and managers, and share highlights below in words and pictures. The word clouds identify the themes in response to each question.

A perfect society is more equal and ecologically sound.

A perfect society provides greater equality and access to opportunity, NBS members said. Almost two-thirds of respondents described it as a society where “every person can have a decent life,” as researcher Elke Schuessler wrote. A decent life means access to resources, like quality health care and education. It can also mean the ability to influence government and other institutions. Researcher Charlene Zietsma, in her survey response, described “Leadership … shared among those with different perspectives.”

A perfect society also is ecologically sound: A third of respondents described a world with significant environmental changes, particularly in the area of energy. “Innovation programs and government subsidies would create virtually free, perpetual energy,” wrote Taryn Mead of Western Colorado University. There will be “zero carbon transport everywhere,” wrote Giulia Cricenti of BSD Consulting.

The UN Sustainable Development Goals can serve as a framework for this society. A quarter of respondents referenced the SDGs specifically, but many more mentioned related concepts. A perfect society is one “that has attained the SDGs,” wrote consultant Bob Willard, who wrote a white paper that outlines what it will take to get there.

In this new world, people will relate in richer ways, respondents said. “There will be mutual respect,” wrote Christine Moser of VU Amsterdam. “Communities will be stronger, with people willingly contributing,” wrote Sal Huddin of Waqia Services. People would have the “opportunity to not just live, but thrive,” wrote Kiera Murphy, a B Corporation consultant.

Our lives will have meaning and balance.

In a perfect society, NBS members expect to have work that is meaningful — but takes less of their time. Almost half of the survey respondents described this kind of shift. “Full-time work [would be] less work,” wrote Tima Bansal of Ivey University, such as a four-day work week.

Additional time could be spent with family and community. “I would be more actively contributing to the community and participating in governance,” wrote Charlene Zietsma in her survey response. “I might be facilitating the civic participation of others.”

Work remains important, especially for those lucky enough to love their profession. But even those respondents would welcome the chance to balance work with other concerns. “My work could almost be the same,” commented Cricenti, “because I work supporting companies with sustainable development. But I could work less hours and also incorporate teaching activities. My family would have more time to be together and travel and less time stressed about work commitments.”

A perfect society would extend a sense of purpose and meaning to everyone. “People [would] contribute based on their talents and strengths,” wrote Stephanie Koonar of Peerspectives Consulting. Respondents may already have comfortable lives, but want others to thrive. “My life wouldn’t change, but others’ lives would,” said Koonar.

Many paths will move us to a perfect society.

For NBS members, utopian ideals are a driving purpose, not just abstract goals. They work toward them professionally — whether in academia or industry — and by modeling ethical behavior.

University faculty use the tools of their scholarship. Through their research, academics can understand best practices for sustainable shifts. Through their teaching and outreach, they can share these insights with those in positions to implement.

Consultants and managers also advocate for change, whether “creating an ESG mindset” (Estela Kurth of PUCRS) or getting a sustainable procurement process underway in companies and government (Willard). Utopian visioning can also be part of this process. “The company I work for could help companies to think about their own utopian scenarios and how they see themselves working towards the future they want,” wrote Cricenti.

Where is business in the perfect society?

The earlier NBS article on imagining utopia focused more directly on the role of business. But in the survey responses, business is less central than “people” — the most common word in the responses to our questions. People living, interacting with family, work, and community; people pursuing health, education, money, and meaning.

With the focus on human experience, institutions such as business and government appear less frequently. This picture might be different if more survey respondents came from the business world.

Perhaps a broader future survey will unpack how businesses can shape and support these visions of “the perfect society.”

A version of this article was published by the Network for Business Sustainability . B The Change gathers and shares the voices from within the movement of people using business as a force for good and the community of Certified B Corporations . The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the nonprofit B Lab.

Written by Network for Business Sustainability

NBS is dedicated to making business more sustainable. We do this by sharing evidence-based guidance for business leaders thinking ahead.

More from Network for Business Sustainability and B The Change

4 Business Models for the Circular Economy

The economic and environmental case for 4 circular approaches.

16 Apps for Social Change That Make it Simple to Impact the World

Sara Gifford

The Power of One Vote

How each voter can make a difference at the polls.

Lessons from the Circular Economy in Low-Income Settings

Local strategies emphasize labor and resourcefulness over efficiency and technological solutions, recommended from medium.

tedtrainertsw

Post Growth Perspectives

A (Friendly) Critique of the Degrowth Movement

Sufficient degrowth cannot be achieved without enormous and radical transition to some kind of simpler way..

Raz Godelnik

The myth of the regenerative business model

This is the time of regenerative business models, at least according to the interest a growing number of companies show in advancing….

AI Regulation

Stories to Help You Grow as a Designer

The New Chatbots: ChatGPT, Bard, and Beyond

Dark Matter

Dark Matter Laboratories

Introducing Life-Ennobling Economics (Part 1)

In this 2-part series we are excited to introduce a new area of our work. we have divided this first introductory publication into two….

Peter van Hees

Trend Horizon

By 2031, Democracies Embrace AI: Navigating Governance in the Age of Algocracy #Trend

Imagine waking up to a world where your morning news is curated by an ai understanding your interests better than you do, where traffic….

Clare Politano

Terran Collective

Bringing the vision to life: Hylo’s new website embodies our purpose, values, and agreements

We are excited to share our purpose, values, and agreements for hylo and to announce the birth of our new website.

Text to speech

• How It Works
• All Projects
• Write my essay
• Buy essay online
• Custom coursework
• Creative writing
• Custom admission essay
• College essay writers
• IB extended essays
• Buy speech online
• Pay for essays
• College papers
• Do my homework
• Write my paper
• Custom dissertation
• Buy research paper
• Buy dissertation
• Write my dissertation
• Essay for cheap
• Essays for sale
• Non-plagiarized essays
• Buy coursework
• Term paper help
• Buy assignment
• Custom thesis
• Custom research paper
• College paper
• Coursework writing
• Edit my essay
• Nurse essays
• Business essays
• Custom term paper
• Buy college essays
• Buy book report
• Cheap custom essay
• Argumentative essay
• Assignment writing
• Custom book report
• Custom case study
• Doctorate essay
• Finance essay
• Scholarship essays
• Essay topics
• Research paper topics
• Top queries link

Best Sociology Essay Examples

Ideal society.

1040 words | 4 page(s)

Thousands of people say that the modern society is not even close to being ideal. This is not surprising, since the sins and vices society’s individual members overshadow their best achievements. Drugs, prostitution, violence, and excessive commitment to material values are just some of the problems facing the modern world. Nevertheless, it is wrong to believe that our society cannot be perfect or that it cannot move closer to the ideal proposed by Thomas More. In his work “What Is the Ideal Society?” Thomas More outlines the most important features of an ideal society. In this society, work and pleasure are perfectly balanced. Everyone has a job, specialization, and a specific role. God and the immortal soul, laws that govern pleasures and a simple philosophy of life make up a picture of a perfect world. Our society is very close to that ideal, with a clear division of labor, a combination of work and pleasures, strong religious beliefs, and the variety of physical and thinking pleasures that make our lives more colorful.

An ideal society is impossible without a perfect balance of work and pleasure. In Thomas More’s perfect world, everyone has a job. “Most children are brought up to do the same work as their parents, since they tend to have a natural feeling for it. But if a child fancies some other trade, he’s adopted into a family that practices it” (More 856). In other words, in an ideal society, children are allowed to develop their inner abilities and talents in ways that benefit the community, in which they live. The Utopians spend six hours a day at work, with the rest of the time being devoted to entertainment and household chores. In our society, the work-entertainment balance is very much similar to that in the ideal world. Even though most people spend more than six hours at work, the work-life balance remains one of the most important factors of happiness in our society. Every society member has a specialization, profession, and work. Laziness is not encouraged, being considered as one of the most serious human vices. Everyone is free to obtain a profession or develop a trade based on his (her) abilities, preferences, and talents. Like the Utopians send their children to families that practice a specific trade, our society sends children and adolescents to schools, colleges, and universities, depending on their professional choices. Everyone has free time after a hard day at work. This time is spent on simple pleasures, entertainment, or family affairs. In this context, our society resembles the ideal proposed by Thomas More.

Use your promo and get a custom paper on "Ideal Society".

The work-life balance is not the only feature that makes our society close to an ideal. The Utopians strongly believe in God and the immortal soul. More writes that “we shall be rewarded or punished in the next world for our good or bad behavior in this one. Although these are religious principles, the Utopians find rational grounds for accepting them” (859). These are the principles on which the modern society rests. Almost all modern religions promote the idea of the immortal soul and the rewards or punishments that are awaiting each society member after his (her) death. Certainly, not everyone believes that he will be rewarded for his (her) achievements or punished for his (her) sins after death. Nevertheless, most members of our society have a fear of the unknown, which follows the event of death. Thousands of people go to churches, as they hope they will have a chance to justify their mistakes and sins. Many others pray at home, hoping that the kind God will hear and consider their words, when the decision to send them to heaven or hell is being made.

Every member of our society can create a personal heaven, by engaging in pleasures and enjoyable activities. Pleasures and entertainment remain an essential component of public and private life in the ideal society, as well as our world. “On this principle they think it right to […] obey public laws for regulating the distribution of “goods” – by which I mean the raw materials of pleasure” (More 860). They treat entertainment as an important element of happy living, but they also think of the ways, in which their pleasures impact the community’s wellbeing. In a similar fashion, our society tries its best to make entertainment and pleasures work for the benefit of every individual. Such laws are adopted and implemented in our society. We place certain legal limitations on the pleasures that are considered as immoral. For instance, all kinds of drugs are legally prohibited. The same goes for prostitution. At the same time, certain types of pleasures are regulated by the state. For example, gambling and lotteries are subject to heavy taxes, so that every society member thinks twice before participating in any of these entertainment activities. The goal of these regulations and laws is to promote morality in our society, while motivating every society member to work rather than gamble. Unfortunately, thousands of people are willing to pay huge taxes rather than refuse from an opportunity to win another thousand of dollars in a casino. Nevertheless, these laws and regulations help to maintain our society in a moral and legal order.

In conclusion, our society has accomplished quite a lot in its movement towards the ideal proposed by Thomas More. The work-life balance remains one of the defining features of the modern society, in which everyone works hard to have some free time for entertainment. God and religion govern individual and collective activities and everyday decisions. Thousands of people believe that their souls are immortal, while thousands of others are confident that they will face rewards and punishments for their achievements and vices, after they die. Like the Utopians, members of the modern society obey regulations and laws in their pursuit of entertainment and pleasures. Many entertainment activities are outlawed, while others are subject to taxation and state control. It is possible to say that these laws and regulations create an atmosphere of legal and moral order in our society. As such, our society has many features of the ideal world outlined in Thomas More’s work.

• More, Thomas. “What Is the Ideal Society?” Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Eds. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 856-868. Print.

Have a team of vetted experts take you to the top, with professionally written papers in every area of study.

Yale Program on Climate Change Communication

• About YPCCC
• Yale Climate Connections
• Student Employment
• For The Media
• Past Events
• YPCCC in the News
• Climate Change in the American Mind (CCAM)

Publications

• Climate Opinion Maps
• Climate Opinion Factsheets
• Six Americas Super Short Survey (SASSY)
• Resources for Educators
• All Tools & Interactives
• Partner with YPCCC

Home / Shifting views of an ideal society in the U.S.

Climate Note · Nov 11, 2020

Shifting views of an ideal society in the u.s., by jennifer carman , seth rosenthal , edward maibach , john kotcher , xinran wang , jennifer marlon and anthony leiserowitz, filed under: beliefs & attitudes and policy & politics.

Individuals’ attitudes toward climate change risks and solutions are shaped by personal and social factors other than knowledge of climate change alone (van der Linden, 2015) . One such factor is differing cultural worldviews, or values regarding how society should be structured and the role of government in addressing problems (e.g., Douglas, 1966; Leiserowitz, A., 2006; van der Linden, 2015). 

Two important types of cultural worldviews are egalitarianism and individualism . People with a more egalitarian worldview tend to believe that society should promote equality, social justice, participatory democracy, and diversity, and are generally more concerned about environmental hazards including climate change (Leiserowitz, 2006). They also tend to favor government actions to solve societal problems, including increased environmental regulations. In contrast, people with a more individualistic worldview are more likely to believe that society should promote individual liberty, autonomy, and opportunity (Leiserowitz, 2006). They tend to be less concerned about environmental hazards and favor greater freedom for industry. As a result, they generally oppose government intervention and environmental regulations.

Our Climate Change in the American Mind surveys have repeatedly included questions over the past 12 years that measure these worldviews among the American public. Here we report on how several key measures of these worldviews have changed among registered voters over time.

Democrats and Republicans tend to have very different cultural worldviews: Democrats tend to be more egalitarian, while Republicans tend to be more individualistic. Our data suggests that Democrats — particularly liberal Democrats — have become more egalitarian and less individualistic since 2008, whereas Republicans have remained highly individualistic.

Liberal Democrats increasingly say all basic needs (food, housing, health care, education) should ideally be guaranteed by the government for everyone. In 2020, about half of registered voters (47%) say that in an ideal society, the government would guarantee all basic human needs (including food, housing, health care, and education) for everyone. Strikingly, about eight in 10 liberal Democrats (83%) and about six in 10  moderate/conservative Democrats (59%) agreed with this statement in 2020. By contrast, only about three in 10 liberal/moderate Republicans (32%) and one in 10 conservative Republicans (11%) agree with this vision of an ideal society. From 2008 to 2020, liberal Democrats’ support for this statement increased by 21 percentage points, while moderate/conservative Democrats’ support remained essentially unchanged (+1 percentage point). Conversely, support for this statement decreased by 6 points among liberal/moderate Republicans and by 5 points among conservative Republicans.

Democrats increasingly say the world would be more peaceful if wealth were divided more equally among nations. In 2020, nearly half of registered voters (46%) say the world would be a more peaceful place if its wealth were divided more equally among nations. Majorities of liberal Democrats (72%) and moderate/conservative Democrats (66%) held this view, but only about three in ten liberal/moderate Republicans (31%) and fewer than two in 10 conservative Republicans (16%) held this view. From 2008 to 2020, support for this statement increased by 12 points among liberal Democrats and by 18 points among moderate/conservative Democrats. In contrast, support among liberal/moderate Republicans decreased by 12 points from 2008 to 2020, and among conservative Republicans it remained relatively low and steady throughout.

Democrats increasingly disagree that the government should spend less time trying to fix people’s problems. In 2020, half of registered voters (50%) say that if the government spent less time trying to fix everyone’s problems, we’d all be a lot better off. Republicans were particularly likely to support this statement, including eight in 10 conservative Republicans (80%) and about two in three liberal/moderate Republicans (65%). Support was much lower among Democrats, including 37% of moderate/conservative Democrats and about one in five liberal Democrats (22%). Moreover, support for this statement among registered voters overall has decreased significantly since 2008. However, this change has largely been driven by Democrats, who have become much less likely to support this statement, with agreement falling by 21 points among both liberal Democrats and moderate/conservative Democrats. Support among Republicans, however, did not change much over the 12-year period (liberal/moderate Republicans -4 percentage points, conservative Republicans -2 percentage points).

Democrats increasingly disagree that the government tries to do too many things for too many people, and we should just let people take care of themselves. Eight in 10 conservative Republicans (81%), and about six in ten liberal/moderate Republicans (59%), say our government tries to do too many things for too many people, and we should just let people take care of themselves. In contrast, only three in 10 moderate/conservative Democrats (29%) and half that many liberal Democrats (14%) agree. Since 2008, agreement among both liberal Democrats and moderate/conservative Democrats decreased by 13 points, while agreement among both conservative Republicans and liberal/moderate Republicans increased by 4 points.

Nearly seven in ten registered voters (69%) say that discrimination against minorities is a serious problem. In 2020, large majorities of liberal Democrats (93%) and moderate/conservative Democrats (85%), and six in 10 liberal/moderate Republicans (61%) say that discrimination against minorities is still a very serious problem in our society. In contrast, only four in 10 conservative Republicans (41%) agree with this statement. Overall, voters’ level of agreement with this statement in 2020 is similar to 2008, but has increased significantly since 2014 after an initial drop in 2010, during the early years of the Obama presidency.

Democrats and Republicans tend to have very different cultural worldviews about the ideal structure of society and the role of government. Democrats tend to be more egalitarian than individualistic, while the opposite is true for Republicans. Moreover, over the past 12 years, Democrats’ have become more egalitarian and less individualistic, whereas Republicans’ worldviews have remained mostly static. The shift among Democrats has led to  increasing support for strong government action to solve societal problems, from health care to climate change. Therefore, building a bipartisan consensus on climate change may be becoming more difficult, as the two parties increasingly have divergent views of the role of government in solving problems like climate change.

The data included in this report are based on data from 10 waves ( n = 10,436 registered voters) of the bi-annual Climate Change in the American Mind survey — a nationally-representative analysis of public opinion on climate change in the United States conducted by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication . Surveys were conducted from Fall 2008 to June 2017 using the Ipsos (formerly GfK) KnowledgePanel®, a representative online panel of U.S. adults (18+). Data for July 2020 ( n = 803 registered voters) were also collected separately by Yale and George Mason University using the Ipsos KnowledgePanel® omnibus survey. Datapoints for 2011, 2012, and 2013 report the average of results from two waves of data collected in each of those years. All questionnaires were self-administered by respondents in a web-based environment.

The average margin of error for each wave of data is +/- 3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Percentage values are weighted to align with U.S. Census parameters. For tabulation purposes, percentage points are rounded to the nearest whole number.

References:

Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo . London and New York: Routledge & Keagan Paul.

Van der Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41.  112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012

Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values. Climatic Change, 77 , 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9

Carman, J., Rosenthal, S., Maibach, E., Kotcher, J., Wang, X., Marlon, J., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020). Shifting views of an ideal society in the U.S. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.

Funding Sources

The research was funded by the 11th Hour Project, the Energy Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and the Grantham Foundation.

Climate Change in the American Mind

Related Work

Peer-reviewed article · apr 3, 2024, climate change belief systems across pol..., peer-reviewed article · mar 28, 2024, emotional signatures of climate policy s..., report · mar 26, 2024, international public opinion on climate ..., climate note · mar 21, 2024, the attitude-behavior gap on climate act..., report · mar 7, 2024, climate change in the irish mind, 2023, climate note · jan 17, 2024, support for climate justice across globa..., report · jan 11, 2024, climate change in the american mind: bel..., climate note · dec 14, 2023, global warming’s six americas, fall 20..., peer-reviewed article · dec 13, 2023, what predicts u.s. public support for cl..., report · nov 29, 2023, climate change in the american mind: pol..., climate note · nov 16, 2023, how many americans want an electric home..., report · nov 14, 2023, climate note · nov 7, 2023, who supports climate justice in the u.s...., climate note · oct 26, 2023, which republicans are worried about glob..., climate note · oct 18, 2023, what do americans think is the biggest t..., report · oct 3, 2023, climate change in the indonesian mind, report · sep 12, 2023, climate change in the american mind: cli..., climate note · aug 3, 2023, is distress about climate change associa..., climate note · aug 1, 2023, global warming’s six audiences: a cros..., climate note · jul 27, 2023, americans are becoming more worried abou..., climate note · jul 25, 2023, the prevalence of climate change psychol..., climate note · jul 20, 2023, messages about harms of fossil fuels inc..., climate note · jul 11, 2023, does climate change make you sneeze, report · jun 28, 2023, subscribe to our mailing list.

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Yale Program on Climate Change Communication:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

• Useful Links
• Advertise with us
• Institutions' Profiles
• Spoken English

ENGLISH ESSAY CLASS 10

Ideal Society

A society can be defined as a community that comprises people who share different ideas and backgrounds. Every man is a part of some society and every man wants his society to be perfect. An ideal society can be defined as a society where every individual is self content and lives a healthy and peaceful life. A society, to be termed as ideal, needs to fulfill certain criteria. First of all, an ideal or perfect society should have equality among men. Every man in the society should be treated equally, irrespective of their background or physicality. The rich and the powerful should not dominate the poor and the helpless. In an ideal society people are not judged by their financial status or appearances. In a perfect society every religion should be equally respected and everyone is free to practice his/her religion without any fear. There should not be any collision among the followers of different religious faith but everyone stays together in harmony. Selflessness, care and love among the people are other important features of an ideal society . In a perfect society man does not live for himself but lives for others. The individuals do not work for their own benefit but for the benefit of the entire society. Perfect government is also an essential requirement of an Ideal Society . The government of a perfect society should be efficient and respect the freedom, rights and liberties of its citizen. It should be fair and unbiased in all its decision makings. Proper health and health care is another important hallmark of a perfect society. Adequate measures should be taken by the government to ensure that citizens are kept healthy and free from diseases. All the people should have access to proper health care facilities, irrespective of their background. The environment in a perfect society is always clean and free from pollution. The water bodies are crystal clean and people are not afraid of taking bath in them. The air is also free of toxic matters and one could casually lie down all day in the sun without having to worry about getting infected with skin diseases. The ambiance is always pleasant and people can easily go out for picnic, travelling, adventure sports, nature studies, etc. In the real world, no society is perfect. Every society has certain ambiguities and limitations. It is only when we succeed in overcoming these loopholes and limitations, does the society become an ideal society.  

Essay Category

• General Essay Topics
• Back to your Class

Find your Way

• Our Services
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise with Us
• Service Providers

Help & Support

• Testimonials
• Essay Requests / Newsletter
• +91 94333 31596
• Arked Infotech 8J Ananda Palit Road Kolkata 700014
• Request an Essay
• Subscribe to Our Newsletter
• Contact Page

Home — Essay Samples — Life — Role Models — My Ideal Person: What it Means to Me

My Ideal Person: What It Means to Me

• Categories: Personality Role Models

About this sample

Words: 150 |

Published: Mar 17, 2023

Words: 150 | Pages: 0 | 1 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

• Expert in: Life

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 671 words

1 pages / 398 words

4 pages / 1890 words

2 pages / 1033 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Role Models

Sports have always been an integral part of human society, transcending cultural boundaries and serving as a platform for personal growth, physical fitness, and social interaction. In recent years, the role of role models in [...]

The concept of the role model has become increasingly important. With the rise of social media and the constant presence of celebrities in the public eye, it is essential to recognize and celebrate those who use their platform [...]

We often find ourselves seeking guidance and inspiration in our day-to-day lives. Whether it be pursuing our academic goals, finding a career path, or simply navigating through personal challenges, we all turn to someone we [...]

From a young age, my sister has been my role model and my hero. She has always been there for me, offering support, guidance, and a listening ear when I needed it most. Through her actions and words, she has taught me valuable [...]

These days, there are many people who look up to celebrities and worship them like gods, this causes many of those celebrities to feel the need to act more and wackier in order for them to stay relevant. The actions of [...]

My Role Model is Selena Gomez. Selena Gomez has many nicknames such as Conchita, Selenita, Sel and Selly. Selena Gomez was born on July 22nd 1992. Selena is currently 26 years old. Selena Gomez currently lives in San Fernando [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society Essay

An ideal woman in the contemporary society is successful in her career, and family life. The ideal woman is able to work and take care of her family for instance, she can clean, cook meals, take care of children and her husband.

However, the reality on the ground is different because the modern career woman cannot do all the home tasks alone. She has to delegate duties such as taking care of the children to others. Moreover, the ideal woman is expected to embody the role of a well-rounded woman who can manage her career and family well. The society scrutinizes her dressing, weight and beauty.

Men and women are equal in God’s eye, but they are not equal in the eyes of the society. A woman is expected to be competitive in her career, but she is criticized for neglecting her family and delegating her roles to helpers. On the other hand, if she decides to remain at home and attend to her family she is criticized for being traditional. Furthermore, many companies pay women less for equal amount of work than men.

Therefore, we cannot say women and men are equal. Nonetheless, women have gained more rights such as voting and that is a positive achievement. Moreover, women are portrayed in subservient roles to men in advertisements in the media. Thus, the relationship between men and women is asymmetrical. Therefore, women and men are not equal.

Women and men should be paid equally at the workplace especially if they have the same qualifications. Pay should be determined on merit and not on gender to bring about equality between men and women.

Today’s women have more freedoms and choices hence they are leading fulfilling lives. They have an opportunity to pursue their careers and have families. Fortunately, with the support of their spouses or family members women can run their careers. On the contrary, there are some women who are not living fulfilling lives as they try to live up to the expectations of an ideal woman hence experiencing stress or even depression.

Women face various challenges in the workplace, education and in relationships today. They are paid less than their male counterparts in spite of the advances they have made in the workplace. Women are prone to more stress as they try to balance work and family than men.

Furthermore, the issue of glass ceiling is still a major problem and many women are not able to rise to the top management levels in companies as they encounter many obstacles. Besides, women face challenges in school because many are locked out of male dominated courses. Some women are denied access to education especially in societies that prefer males.

The lucky women progress, but they may not reach their goals because of obstacles on their way. Women encounter sexual harassment in educational institutions. For some their education is disrupted and those who become pregnant risk losing the opportunity to continue their education after giving birth. Apart from the challenges in education, women face difficulties in their relationships. Some are not very lucky and face violence in their relationships.

The men in their lives may abuse them physically, emotionally and verbally. The abuse may leave the women seriously hurt. The other challenge women face in relationships is balancing between work and their relationship. The men may feel neglected and put pressure on the women to give them attention and that may be hard for the women as they have school or careers in addition.

Women have a choice of empowering themselves to compete with men. They should not shy away from careers perceived as male only. They should also advance their careers as the society allows them. The society has relaxed its strict restrictions on women and with the freedoms earned women can use them to advance their causes for the betterment of the society.

The women movement is still there, but it is not strong as it was in the earlier years. Feminism has attained a negative connotation and women are seen as fighting men. Feminism today looks like a woman who is able to juggle her career and family without having to subscribe to the traditional form of feminism.

I am a feminist; I want to see women get paid equal to men. I want women to be free and enjoy being women without having to work so hard to fit into the ideal image of a modern woman. Women should have equal opportunities as men.

Finally, society cannot be equal, free and productive as long as women are not free to participate. It is important to give men and women an equal opportunity to participate in developing the society.

Both men and women should be given support to function and thrive in the society without neglecting either gender. It is imperative to remember that men and women have different roles to fulfill in society and none can do without the other. Thus, they must be allowed to coexist equally in the society.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, October 30). An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-woman/

"An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society." IvyPanda , 30 Oct. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/the-woman/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society'. 30 October.

IvyPanda . 2023. "An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society." October 30, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-woman/.

1. IvyPanda . "An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society." October 30, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-woman/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "An Ideal Woman in the Contemporary Society." October 30, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-woman/.

• Neglecting Strategic Intelligence
• Challenges of Neglecting Strategic Intelligence
• Lucky Dube as the Icon in the Reggae Music Industry
• “To Twitter or Not to Twitter”: Critique of Robert’s W. Lucky Article
• Lucky Me Animal Rescue Adoption Event Budget Planning
• "To Twitter or Not to Twitter?" by Robert Lucky
• Feminism: Reflection of Cultural Feminism
• Australian Feminism Movements
• Feminism from a Historical Perspective
• Feminism Interview and the Major Aim of Feminism
• Arab Women in Media
• Gender Studies: Advertisement and Gender
• Gender Role Development and Friendship
• Gender minority in U.S.
• Human Sexuality: Relations and Norms