informative essay conflict management

Home — Essay Samples — Business — Management — Conflict Management

Essays on Conflict Management

The concept of conflict management and its usage in the organizations, review of the issue of conflict of interest in a workplace, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

The Purposes and Means of Conflict Management at Work

Negotiation and conflict resolution, mediation as third-party conflict management, "third party" term, let us write you an essay from scratch.

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Personal Negotiation Experience: a Reflection

Effective conflict management strategies, managing conflict in organizational change, relevant topics.

• Time Management
• Comparative Analysis
• Change Management
• Decision Making
• Leadership and Management
• Project Management
• Supply Chain Management
• Madam Cj Walker

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Essay on Conflict Management

Students are often asked to write an essay on Conflict Management in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Conflict Management

Introduction.

Conflict management is a crucial skill in life. It involves understanding and addressing disagreements effectively.

Understanding Conflict

Conflicts can arise due to different opinions or interests. They can be constructive if managed well.

Types of Conflict

Conflicts can be interpersonal, intrapersonal, or group-based. Each type requires different management tactics.

Conflict Management Skills

Key skills include active listening, empathy, negotiation, and problem-solving. These help in finding a solution.

Conflict management is essential for maintaining harmonious relationships. It promotes understanding and growth.

250 Words Essay on Conflict Management

Conflict management is a critical skill in any environment, particularly in interpersonal and organizational settings. It entails understanding and addressing disagreements to prevent escalation and maintain productive relationships.

The Nature of Conflict

Conflict is an inevitable part of human interaction, arising from differences in opinions, values, or interests. It can stimulate innovation and growth if managed correctly; conversely, it can lead to negative outcomes, such as stress or hostility, when mismanaged.

Conflict Management Styles

There are five primary conflict management styles: avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration. Each style has its strengths and weaknesses, and the appropriateness of each depends on the specific context and the relationship between the parties involved.

Effective Conflict Management

Effective conflict management requires emotional intelligence, active listening, and clear communication. It involves recognizing the conflict, understanding the perspectives of all parties, and finding a mutually beneficial resolution.

In conclusion, conflict management is a vital skill in maintaining harmonious relationships and fostering a positive environment. By understanding the nature of conflict and applying appropriate conflict management styles, individuals and organizations can turn potential discord into opportunities for growth and development.

500 Words Essay on Conflict Management

Conflict management is an inevitable part of human interaction, as different people with diverse viewpoints will inevitably clash. It is a multidimensional concept that involves understanding the origins of conflict, the strategies to handle it, and the skills to create beneficial resolutions. This essay explores the significance of conflict management, its techniques, and its role in fostering a productive environment.

Conflict arises from differences. It occurs when individuals or groups perceive that their needs, interests, or values are threatened by the actions or intentions of others. Conflicts can be constructive, fostering creativity and innovation, or destructive, leading to stress, hostility, and reduced productivity. Therefore, it is crucial to manage conflict effectively.

Conflict Management Techniques

There are several strategies for managing conflict. The choice of strategy depends on the nature of the conflict, the relationship between the parties involved, and the desired outcome.

1. Avoidance: This is a passive approach where the conflicting parties ignore the issue hoping it will resolve itself or disappear. Although it might provide temporary relief, it often exacerbates the problem in the long run.

2. Accommodation: One party willingly gives in to the other. This is useful when the issue is less important to one party, but it can lead to resentment if used excessively.

3. Competition: This is a win-lose approach where one party seeks to achieve their goals at the expense of others. It can lead to hostility and damage relationships.

4. Compromise: Both parties give up something to reach a mutually acceptable solution. This approach is practical when the conflict needs to be resolved quickly.

5. Collaboration: This is a win-win approach where parties work together to find a solution that satisfies all. It promotes mutual respect and understanding.

The Role of Communication in Conflict Management

Effective communication is crucial in conflict management. It involves active listening, empathy, and assertiveness. Active listening ensures understanding, empathy builds rapport and trust, and assertiveness allows individuals to express their needs and concerns without offending others.

Conflict Management and Organizational Productivity

Effective conflict management can significantly enhance organizational productivity. It reduces stress, improves teamwork, and fosters a culture of respect and understanding. It also promotes creativity and innovation by encouraging diverse viewpoints and open discussions.

Conflict is an inevitable part of human interaction, but it doesn’t have to be destructive. Effective conflict management strategies can transform conflicts into opportunities for growth and innovation. Therefore, individuals, teams, and organizations should invest in developing their conflict management skills to foster a harmonious and productive environment.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Comedy
• Essay on War Is Not a Solution of Any Problem
• Essay on War

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Conflict Management in the Army Essay Example

The purpose of this informative essay is to discuss conflict management and the ways the Army manages and resolves conflict. Within the Army, conflicts will occur and leadership must manage and resolve it as quickly as possible. In cases where unmanaged conflict occurs the whole unit will suffer in readiness and cohesion. Without conflict management, counterproductive leadership will occur and the leader will not be as effective in their role. An effective Army leader is skilled in managing conflict.

Conflict management is the ability to create and maintain relationships with others. Throughout the Army, Soldiers get into arguments. In order to maintain a positive work environment they must manage the conflict. There are five ways to manage conflict according to askinglot.com, “what are the five conflict management styles? The 5 Conflict Management Styles: Accommodating… Avoiding… Compromising, Collaborating, Competing.” Accommodating is conforming to the ideas of others. This is useful in situations where there are cultural conflicts arising between individuals. When avoiding conflict an individual will leave the conflict without attempting to resolve or manage it. This could occur if the two individuals are not compromising and the best course of action is to separate them. Compromising is the ability for two individuals to resolve their conflict by meeting on common ground. This style of conflict management allows Soldiers to meet in the middle of the conflict. Collaborating is working together in order to manage the conflict. Collaborating is useful when Soldiers are progressing towards a common goal. The final style of conflict management is competing. Competing style is a win or loss style. Leaders use this style when only one person’s idea is acceptable. 

Knowing how to manage conflict allows Noncommissioned Officers (NCOs) to become better leaders. To manage conflict effectively, each NCO must know the five styles. Without a basic understanding of each style, leaders will struggle to handle conflict. This is due to the interchangeability of each style. Not all styles are effect every type of conflict. In some conflicts, the avoiding style may the most effective way to manage; however, in other conflicts it may escalate the situation. NCOs that manage conflict effectively are better leaders for their Soldiers. In ADP 6-22, paragraph 5-57, states, “Leaders must often resolve conflicts… Effective leaders negotiate around interests rather than positions that tend to be static and unyielding.” This idea of negotiating to get around a conflict falls in line with the compromising style. By using styles of conflict management, a leader will be able to bring their team together and work efficiently towards completing the mission. Without resolving conflict, units are not able to uphold Army standards or accomplish their mission.

By better training Soldiers in conflict management, the Army, as a whole, will improve greatly. Throughout the Army career, many Soldiers will receive little to no training on conflict management. Currently there are only two training modules in the Army’s education portal, Joint Knowledge Online (JKO). These trainings are only approximately one hour each. The Army should implement more training for the entirety of the force. With increased training, NCOs would have greater knowledge and ability to, successfully, employ the conflict management styles. With better knowledge, NCOs will more effectively lead their soldiers and manage any conflicts that arise. Some NCOs may question why they need to learn conflict management or why it is important. Leaders must know the styles of conflict management in order to be ready for any situation. With an ever-expanding Army, many cultures and personalities are coming together in very close proximity. When many cultures are together, conflicts between Soldiers are going to happen. With a better knowledge of conflict management training, conflicts will be resolved faster, and teams and squads will be more cohesive and effective.

Related Samples

• Federalists Vs Anti-federalists Essay Example
• Essay on Character Of U.S. Presidents
• Should 16 Year Olds Be Allowed To Vote Essay Example
• Analysis of "Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do" Essay Example
• Rhetorical Analysis of Political Ads (Essay Sample)
• Essay Sample on Women in The Military
• Essay Sample about The Federalist Papers
• Essay Sample on Tyranny of the Minority
• Essay Sample: Is It Possible to Reform the Police
• Politicians in Ancient Rome History Essay Example

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

Conflict Management in the Army Essay Example

Conflict management is essential to the Army in keeping cohesion between units and Soldiers.  Conflict management is achievable through accommodating, compromising, collaborative, competitive and avoiding approaches to achieve conflict resolution.  In order to apply these approaches, identify the root cause of conflict.  Conflict left unresolved will create more issues in time and will affect unit cohesion.  When managing conflict properly, the parties will be more willing to work together in the future and will prevent additional conflicts from arising. 

In order to identify the root cause of conflict, you must first listen actively.  Listening actively will allow you to create a shared understanding between the Soldier and yourself.  Asking open ended questions will give the opportunity for the Soldier to truly explain what the issue is or what is bothering them.  While listening and coming up with assumptions, make sure to clarify that your assumptions are accurate to how the Soldier truly feels and why.  Once you have established the Soldier's true emotions and rationalization, then challenge your assumptions and perceptions.  Use your challenges to determine if there is a potential different reason for why the Soldier is behaving how the individual is.  Most importantly, have the soldier own their feelings, and determine the best plan of action to resolve their conflict. 

The first approach to resolution is through accommodation.  The accommodating approach “essentially entails giving the opposing side what it wants” (Dontigney, 2019).  This approach will not benefit your Soldier, it will only allow for one party to move past conflict, while the other Soldier becomes dissatisfied.  Although this will temporarily resolve the conflict, a continuous use of this approach is highly discouraged.  The Soldier will, over time, keep track of how often they had to give up their own goals for their conflicting parties' goals.  The accommodating approach will cause resentment between your Soldier and yourself.  The Soldier will feel as though his goals are not important to you.  Ultimately the Soldier will lose their trust in you. 

In order to keep your Soldiers’ best interest at heart, the compromising approach is slightly more suitable.  The compromising approach “calls for both sides of a conflict to give up elements of their position in order to establish an acceptable, if not agreeable, solution” (Dontigney, 2019).  The Soldier, although not elated with the approach, will feel a sense of accomplishment in obtaining a small portion of their goals.  This approach will prevail most typically when the two parties hold the same rank. 

When the two involved parties are of a different rank, the best approach to use is the collaborative approach.  The collaborative approach has both parties come together, open a dialog and create a shared goal that both sides will work together to achieve.  Even though the parties will be happy with the outcome, there is a slight downside to the approach.  Collaboration “calls for a significant time commitment not appropriate to all conflicts” (Dontigney, 2019).  Collaboration requires a shared understanding between the parties and a willingness to want to resolve the conflict. 

One of the less beneficial approaches to resolution is the avoiding approach.  The avoidance approach will not benefit the Soldier at all.  When the mediator ignores the Soldier’s goals, the outcome is unpredictable and is not influenced with alternate solutions.  The approach also does not teach the Soldier how to handle conflicts.  Continuous use of this approach will negatively impact the Soldiers growth, as well as your own.  The Soldier will develop low self esteem and will turn to this approach any time conflict arises in hopes of it resolving itself.  Learning to accept the conflict and working towards a solution will benefit the growth and leadership ability of the Soldier. 

The final approach to conflict resolution is through the competitive approach.  The competitive approach is more inclined for individuals who are highly assertive and require dominance.  In this approach, you achieve your Soldiers’ goals, while ignoring the other sides.  By using this approach, the Soldier will not learn how to create a shared understanding in the future.  The negative impact of not being able to create a shared understanding will not only affect their immediate future, but their long term future as they become a leader.  The competitive approach is useful in very limited situations.  Over time, the Soldier will learn to intimidate their peers into accepting the Soldier’s position of power.  Although having the ability to compete will, at times, benefit the Solider, it will also affect their status with peers.

Related Samples

• The Battle of the Bulge. World War II Essay Example
• What Started the Civil War Essay Example
• Diary of a Young Girl. The Idea of Optimism Essay Example
• Analysis Essay: The Successes and Failures of the Treaty of Versailles
• Japanese Internment Camps Essay Example
• Movie Review on Once Brothers (Yugoslavia History)
• Essay on Adolf Eichmann’s Trial
• Comparative Analysis: Perpetrators vs. Bystanders
• A Comparison of Life During Occupation: Nazi Essay Example
• The Nuremberg Trials Essay Example

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

Conflict Management Strategies Problem Solution Essay

Conflict management process, conflict mediation process.

An organization is made up of a group of individuals. These people usually come from different cultures and backgrounds. The knowledge and skills that these people possess are usually different.

Thus, they tend to have different values, beliefs, goals, and objectives. However, since they work together, they need to develop a team spirit in order to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization as well as their personal goals and objectives (BURMA, n.d.).

However, achieving this in a normal working environment is difficult due to the presence of conflicts. A Conflict is a situation that arises when two or more team members disagree on an idea or a given interest (Anderson, 2012).

A conflict can have positive or negative impacts in an organization or a project. This however depends on its nature and the manner in which the management handles the situation.

It is thus the role of the management to come up with effective strategies of managing conflict in a working environment. Thus, as a project leader, understanding the nature of a conflict shall be the main strategy that I would employ in the process of resolving a conflict.

Having a clear understanding of the nature of conflict shall be essential in determining whether I should encourage or discourage it. If the conflict leads to an improvement in the operations of the project, I would encourage it.

This is because it such a conflict is beneficial to the organization. Additionally, such a conflict increases the level of performance of employees. On the other hand, I would discourage a conflict that results in a decline in the performance of an organization.

Conflicts of this nature tend to reduce the overall performance of employees, demoralize them, and bring about tension within employees.

This makes it harder for individuals employees to achieve their targets, goals, and objectives as well as achieving the goals and objectives of the project or the organization.

To have a clear understanding of the type of conflict that is present, one needs to look at several indicators of conflict. Examples of these indicators include:

• The character displayed by an individual.
• Level of team work and cooperation.
• Aggression.

A careful examination of the above indicators in employees will give one an idea of whether there is conflict and whether this conflict is beneficial to an organization or the project.

Additionally, as a team leader, I would conduct further investigation on the issue. In this process, I would try to identify the specific responses of an individual in the process of a conflict. People are usually governed by their personalities, morals, and values (BURMA, n.d.).

These factors play a critical role in determining the response of an individual in the process of a conflict. These factors play a critical role in the responses that an individual displays in the course of a conflict.

An individual may choose to withdraw from the conflict. Such individuals usually do not want to get associated with the conflict despite the fact that their needs might be jeopardized.

An individual may decide to use force in the entire process. Such individuals usually aim at achieving their goals and objectives without caring about the impacts that this may have on other team members and the organization as a whole.

They also do not mind if people do not like them as long as they get things done their way. Other people try to maintain warm relationships with other team members.

Since they want to be liked by every team member, such individuals usually see conflicts as avenues of damaging the relationships that they have established at the workplace.

Other people use the compromising strategy to resolve a conflict. Here, they give out some of their needs in expectation that the other party will do the same in order to arrive at a neutral point.

Finally, other people may try to negotiate so that all the parties involved in the conflict benefit from the solution that is arrived at.

The above responses form the basis of the strategies that can be used to resolve a conflict within a working environment.

Thus, one needs to have a clear understanding of the characteristics of the team members and the responses that they have in the process of a conflict in determining the strategy that he/she will use to resolve the issue at hand.

However, before choosing a specific strategy to implement, a team leader needs to have a clear understanding of the relationship that exists between the parties involved and their individual goals and objectives as well as the goals and objectives of the organization.

Additionally, the manager needs to determine whether the parties involved are willing to compromise on their views. Finally, he/she needs to determine the impact that the conflict has on the organization.

In the process of resolving a conflict, the mediator also needs to understand that the withdrawal strategy is not an effective conflict management strategy, as the problem at hand will continue to prevail.

The same results shall be arrived at if the mediator uses the forceful method. However, the smoothing and compromising strategies can only be effective if the parties involved have common needs, goals, and objectives.

In addition, these strategies are only effective in the short term. Thus, the most effective strategy that can be used to resolve a conflict is negotiation.

Once this has been established, the process of defining the conflict should commence. Here, the cause of the conflict and the parties involved are identified.

Each party is given the chance to explain the cause of the problem from their own perspective. This step is followed by the conflict mapping process.

This step is critical as it shows the needs and fears of the people who are involved in the conflict. The needs of the parties include their interests, goals, and objectives.

On the other hand, their worries include factors such as being fired, punishment, development of undesirable relationships and loss of respect.

Once all this has been done, the parties involved need to clearly the reasons of the conflict. This gives the mediator a deeper understanding of the conflict. The parties are also supposed to view the conflict from the other person’s point of view.

This makes them to understand how the other party is feeling. The parties are thus expected to come up with several options that they feel will solve the problem at hand. At this point, the mediator can assist in coming up with suitable resolution options.

Finally, the parties are expected to agree on the best option that can resolve their conflict. The mediator can also assist in this process to ensure that the option that is chosen is beneficial to both parties and has the interest of the organization/the project.

This will ensure that the decision that is arrived at is sustainable in the short run and in the long run.

Negotiation is the main strategy that is used for conflict resolution. However, there are instances that the parties involved fail to come to an agreement in the process of negotiation.

In such a situation, the conflict at hand can only be solved via mediation. Mediation is the process through which a third party is included in the conflict resolution process (Moore, 1996).

In most cases, the third party has no authority to make a decision. However, there are instances where he/she may assist in the process of decision making the parties to arrive at a consensus.

Thus, as a team leader, I would advocate for mediation to be used as a conflict resolution strategy in an event where the conflict cannot be solved internally.

To ensure that the final decision that is arrived at is beneficial for both the parties involved and the organization, I would advocate the use of an independent mediator who will assist the parties involved to develop an agreement that is beneficial to the parties involved and the organization at large.

Before the mediation process commences, the parties involved must have confidence in the mediator. The mediator also needs to maintain a desirable relationship with the parties involved.

Once the process of mediation commences, the mediator needs to use a variety of skills and techniques to ensure that relevant information with regards to the case at hand is arrived at. This includes active listening, effective communication, and probing (Moore, 1996).

The mediator also needs to maintain a desirable environment and to put into consideration cultural and religious factors.

Once the factors that caused the conflict have been identified, the partied involved need to develop settlement options of which they are to agree on the best option that can be used to resolve the conflict.

Only in rare cases is the mediator required to assist in this process. However, the final decision that I agreed at should be beneficial to both parties and the organization at large.

Anderson, A. (2012). Positive & Negative Conflicts in the Workplace . Web.

BURMA (n.d.). Dealing with Conflict. Web.

Moore, C. (1996). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

• Mediation in IT Outsourcing
• Management Issues: Conflict Mediation
• The Process of Divorce Mediation
• Conflict Models or Theoretical Approaches
• Relationship with a Potential Vendor
• Relationship, Task and Process Conflicts at Workplace
• Effective Management of Conflicts in Organizations
• Conflict Resolution Within an Organization
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, April 4). Conflict Management Strategies. https://ivypanda.com/essays/conflict-management-strategies/

"Conflict Management Strategies." IvyPanda , 4 Apr. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/conflict-management-strategies/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Conflict Management Strategies'. 4 April.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Conflict Management Strategies." April 4, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/conflict-management-strategies/.

1. IvyPanda . "Conflict Management Strategies." April 4, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/conflict-management-strategies/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Conflict Management Strategies." April 4, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/conflict-management-strategies/.

Election Updates: Trump rallies in the South Bronx.

• Share full article

As the final protesters trickled out, police officers milled about and Donald Trump’s motorcade sped away in the distance, New York City park workers moved in with trash cans and grabbers and began cleaning Crotona Park, the site of the rally. “It’s not too bad,” said one worker between emptying his dust pan filled with trash. “It could be worse.”

Rally participants began streaming out of the Bronx park around 8 p.m. as Donald Trump ended his speech by saying he would “make America great again.” Scherie Murray, a Republican political consultant from Queens, called Trump’s speech “amazing.” “Trump is showing up in communities that Republicans don’t normally show up in,” Murray said.

Michael Gold

Donald Trump acknowledged he wasn’t sure of the reception he might get in deep-blue New York City. “I woke up, I said, I wonder will it be hostile or will it be friendly?” He looked out at the crowd. “It was a love fest!”

Tensions outside the rally have appeared to ease. Police blocked protesters from the entrance to the Trump rally using metal barricades. Many of the anti-Trump protesters across the street from the rally entrance have cleared out.

Donald Trump has made a number of promises during this speech in the Bronx that are the stuff of mayoral campaigns: to improve safety on the subways, to clear homeless encampments and to remove mentally ill people from streets and parks. These are much smaller pledges than the sweeping ones he routinely makes on the trail in swing states.

A huge cheer rang out in this crowd in New York, a sanctuary city that built a reputation as a beacon for immigrants, as Donald Trump pledged to carry out the largest deportation operation in American history.

Separated by two rows of police officers and a street, some pro-Trump protesters are chanting “USA” and telling the anti-Trump protesters to “Go back home.” An officer said the police were lined up to keep the two sides apart and keep everyone safe.

Dozens of New York Police Department officers on bikes and others with plastic handcuffs have lined up in front of the group protesting the rally. Police are pushing people onto the sidewalk.

Donald Trump’s event is essentially in a field inside Crotona Park in the Bronx, so it’s tough to fully gauge crowd size but it appears that more than a thousand people are in the grassy area in front of him, with a significant number still outside waiting to get through the security screening.

Donald Trump repeated a claim he has made before: that he believes many of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas on Oct. 7 are already dead. Trump, who often says he is the most pro-Israel president in history, has said Israel needs to finish its war quickly and has attacked Biden as being insufficiently supportive.

As Donald Trump began speaking about how he tried to build a wall at the southern border with Mexico while president, the crowd here in the South Bronx, which includes a considerable number of Hispanic immigrants, began chanting, “Build the wall!”

Derick Williams, 67, never thought Donald Trump would visit the Bronx. Williams is a Bronx native, but now lives in Bushwick and arrived to Crotona Park, where Trump is holding a rally tonight, five hours before the event began. He wanted to experience being around other Trump supporters, which he finds rare in New York. Usually, “you’re the thumb in the crowd,” he said. “For once, I feel like the majority.”

A crowd of protesters has sprung up across from the entrance to Trump’s rally. They’re gathered around a sign that reads: “Convict Trump Already!” About 15 police officers are separating the protesters from the rally entrance. There’s music and profane chanting. The occasional Trump supporter wanders over to challenge the crowd.

Donald Trump opened his rally in the Bronx tonight by essentially declaring his love for New York, calling it “the city I helped build and the city we all love.” Citing the hundreds of people cheering in front of him, he asked, “Who said we’re not going to win New York?” The state hasn’t voted for a Republican president since 1980, and Trump lost by double-digit gaps in 2016 and 2020.

Ahead of Donald Trump’s remarks in the Bronx tonight, the Rev. Rubén Díaz Sr., a former Democratic city councilman who opposes abortion rights and has a history of backing Republicans, expressed a sentiment shared by many voters at this rally: “No one has ever come to the Bronx like this. Only Donald Trump.” The borough is not a typical campaign spot for presidential candidates.

Standing outside the Trump rally, Theodore Kelley, 67, a retired truck driver who lives in the neighborhood around Crotona Park was angry that the rally was being held here. “I came to see what it was all about,” Kelley said. “I’m not expecting to see any of my neighbors here because they wouldn’t come to support Trump.”

George Santos, the disgraced former Republican congressman who was expelled from the House last year , is among several notable New York Republicans in attendance at Donald Trump’s rally tonight in the South Bronx.

Ahead of Donald Trump’s rally tonight in the Bronx, a diverse crowd of about 500 people have gathered inside Crotona Park, with at least a thousand more waiting in line to enter. It’s a sea of MAGA hats, which makes the occasional navy blue Yankees cap stand out.

There’s a carnival-like atmosphere outside tonight’s Trump rally in the South Bronx, with a line of people waiting to get in. A Trump impersonator attracted a crowd chanting “U.S.A.! U.S.A.!” Vendors are selling MAGA hats and anti-Joe Biden pins.

Chris Cameron

After losing a bruising, expensive Senate primary in Maryland, Representative David Trone endorsed his former opponent, Angela Alsobrooks , at a Democratic Party event today. Trone, who co-owns the country’s largest wine retailer, spent more than $60 million of his personal fortune on his failed Senate campaign.

A poll from Marquette Law School today shows Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at 17 percent support, representing a third poll that meets CNN’s requirements to participate in its debate on June 27. Kennedy needs four approved polls above 15 percent support by June 20. He must also get on the ballot in enough states to have a chance to win 270 electoral college votes. He is currently well below that threshold .

Nikki Haley saying she would vote for Donald J. Trump, after he insulted her husband and her marriage , recalls a similar situation in the 2016 campaign. Senator Ted Cruz, then running against Trump for the Republican nomination, denounced him in fiery exchanges for insulting tweets targeting Cruz’s wife, Heidi. Cruz held out on an endorsement after dropping out, but by October was phone-banking for Trump.

At a Trump rally in the Bronx, chants of ‘Build the wall.’

Miles from the rather somber Manhattan courtroom where he has spent much of the past five weeks as a criminal defendant, former President Donald J. Trump on Thursday stood at a park in the Bronx, surveyed the crowd and acknowledged he had been concerned over how he might be greeted at his first rally in New York State in eight years, and his first ever in the borough.

In front of him was a more diverse crowd than is typical of his rallies, with many Black and Hispanic voters sporting bright red “Make America Great Again” hats and other Trump-themed apparel ordinarily scarce in deep-blue New York City. Still more people stood outside, waiting to get past security.

“I woke up, I said, ‘I wonder, will it be hostile or will it be friendly?’” Mr. Trump said. “It was beyond friendly. It was a love fest.”

As is often the case during Mr. Trump's speeches, the truth was a bit more complex. As he spoke, more than 100 protesters demonstrated outside the fenced-off area of Crotona Park where he had staged the rally. A wave of elected officials denounced his visit to the city. And his insistence that he would carry New York in November — though perhaps not as laughable as it once might have sounded, judging from at least one recent poll — conveniently disregarded the thumping he took in the state in the 2016 and 2020 elections.

But as heated arguments took place outside his rally, Mr. Trump, who veered occasionally into lengthy New York-focused reminiscences that were lost on his supporters, seemed to relish the chance to appear in his hometown, seize media attention and know that New Yorkers would hear what he had to say, like it or not, one way or the other.

Throughout the rally, Mr. Trump, one of New York’s most famous native sons, who formally made Florida his home in 2019, embraced the chance to demonstrate his support in the city he left behind — and which he swore he still loved, even as he decried it as descending into chaos.

“New York was where you came to make it big. You want to make it big, you had to be in New York,” he said. “But sadly, this is now a city in decline.”

His remarks largely followed familiar patterns as he railed against the Biden administration and made explicit overtures to Black and Latino voters. He lamented the surge of migrants across the southern border and criticized President Biden’s economic policies as disproportionately hurting people of color, whose support he is eager to win from Democrats.

“African Americans are getting slaughtered. Hispanic Americans are getting slaughtered,” he said.

He also insisted that the migrant influx, which has prompted a crisis in New York, was disproportionately hurting “our Black population and our Hispanic population, who are losing their jobs, losing their housing, losing everything they can lose.”

Mr. Trump’s screeds against those crossing the border illegally and his vow to conduct the “largest deportation operation” in U.S. history — both staples of his campaign rallies — were met with cheers.

Unprompted, many in the crowd responded by chanting “Build the wall,” a reference to Mr. Trump’s effort during his presidency to build a wall on the southern border, and then, later, “Send them back.”

They did not appear to object to his broad assertion, which has no evidence, that those coming across the border were mentally ill criminals mounting an invasion of the United States.

“They want to get us from within,” Mr. Trump said. “I think they’re building an army.”

The approving reception for such anti-immigrant messaging was particularly striking in New York, a sanctuary city that has over decades built a reputation as a beacon for immigrants.

Some in the crowd said they were immigrants but were quick to clarify that they had crossed the border legally and that they disapproved of those who did not.

“I understand this country is built up of immigrants,” said Indiana Mitchell, 47, who said she was from the Dominican Republic. “But I came to this country in the right way. I didn’t come in through the backyard., I came in through the front door.”

Mr. Trump often discusses how the migrant crisis is playing out in New York during rallies in battleground states, where it remains a more abstract idea to many of his supporters.

But people at his Bronx rally said they had directly seen the impact on their neighborhoods of the surge of migrants, which has strained the municipal budget as the city provides housing and other social services.

Rafael Brito, a Queens resident who said he had come to the United States from the Dominican Republic, said he thought the migrant crisis had exacerbated crime and made it more difficult for his neighbors to get services they needed.

“The whole neighborhood has changed,” Mr. Brito, 51, said.

Outside the rally, those protesting said they had felt compelled to come to the park to make their voices heard in opposition to Mr. Trump’s views.

Melvin Howard, 65, a machinist who lives near Crotona Park, said he wanted to make clear his disapproval of the rally being held in his neighborhood and the views of the people attending it.

“These people shouldn’t be here in the South Bronx,” he said, pointing to a large number of white people in the crowd in a borough where the white population is less than 10 percent. “They are here to steal our Black votes. I don’t recognize any of them.”

As the protesters were demonstrating, the atmosphere became momentarily charged, with Trump supporters and anti-Trump protesters screaming obscenities at one another from across the street. The New York Police Department began separating both sides, lining the streets with metal barricades.

The Bronx remains one of the most Democratic counties in the country. President Biden won the borough by 68 percent in 2020, though Mr. Trump improved on his performance in 2016, when he lost by 79 percentage points.

But Mr. Trump brushed off those past results. “Don’t assume it doesn’t matter just because you live in a blue city,” he said. “You live in a blue city, but it’s going red very very quickly.”

Mr. Trump’s outing in the city where he spent most of his life seemed to elicit more reflectiveness than is characteristic of his stump speeches in battleground states.

He spent considerable time celebrating his history with New York, recounting his refurbishing an ice-skating rink in Central Park and his stewardship of a public golf course in the Bronx.

And he salted his speech with life lessons.

He expressed his admiration, at some length, for his father, a real-estate developer who Mr. Trump said loved to work and did so relentlessly, including on Sundays, and for the home builder William Levitt, who built Levittowns on Long Island and in other states. But Mr. Trump observed that Mr. Levitt had exited his business too early and was unable to make a comeback when he wanted to years later.

The reason, Mr. Trump said, was that he had squandered his momentum.

“You have to always keep moving forward,” Mr. Trump said. “And when it’s your time, you have to know it’s your time.”

Jeffery C. Mays contributed reporting.

Trump plays up his Putin ties in claiming he could get Gershkovich released.

Former President Donald J. Trump claimed that, if re-elected, he could draw on his relationship with President Vladimir V. Putin to press Russia into releasing Evan Gershkovich, the Wall Street Journal reporter who has been detained in a Moscow jail for more than a year.

Mr. Trump wrote in a social media post that Mr. Gershkovich would be “released almost immediately after the election, but definitely before I assume office,” suggesting that his securing Mr. Gershkovich’s release was contingent on his defeating President Biden in November.

“Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, will do that for me, but not for anyone else,” Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, added. Mr. Trump has frequently bragged about his positive relationship with Mr. Putin, whose strongman tendencies he has praised in interviews and on the campaign trail.

Asked about Mr. Trump’s post, a spokesman for the Kremlin, Dmitri S. Peskov, told reporters that “Putin has no contact with Donald Trump, of course.”

Mr. Gershkovich, who was arrested in March last year in Russia and charged with espionage shortly after, has been designated by the White House as “wrongfully detained,” a label signifying that the United States views him as the equivalent of a political hostage and believes the charges against him are fabricated.

Russia has not presented any evidence to support the spying charge, which Mr. Gershkovich and The Journal have vociferously rejected. The Biden administration has said it is working to secure his release.

T.J. Ducklo, a Biden campaign spokesman, criticized Mr. Trump over his claims that he turned down a deal to free Paul Whelan , a former Marine serving a 16-year sentence in Russia on what U.S. officials say are bogus espionage charges.

“For Donald Trump, these wrongfully imprisoned Americans are political weapons and props to use for his own gain. For Joe Biden, they are human beings whose loved ones and family members he has spent time with,” Mr. Ducklo said in a statement.

Mr. Gershkovich’s arrest was among a series of detentions of Americans in Russia over the past six years, which has raised concerns that Russia is hoping to use U.S. citizens as bargaining chips to secure the release of Russians being held in the West.

Mr. Trump often invokes his bond with Mr. Putin to bolster his claims that he could end the war in Ukraine, and that if he was still in office, the conflict would never have happened.

But while Mr. Trump has commented on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine many times, he had not spoken publicly about Mr. Gershkovich’s detention until last month, after he had been detained for more than a year.

In an interview with Time magazine , Mr. Trump explained his silence on the issue by saying: “I guess because I have so many things I’m working on. I have hundreds of things,” adding, “I probably have said very good things about him. Maybe it wasn’t reported.”

Mr. Trump also insisted then that he would be able to secure Mr. Gershkovich’s release more successfully than Mr. Biden because of his relationship with Mr. Putin. “I get along very well with Putin, but the reporter should be released and he will be released,” he said.

Russian officials have said that discussions about Mr. Gershkovich and other Americans detained in the country were being conducted “through a specialized closed channel.” The Kremlin spokesman, Mr. Peskov, on Thursday said that any conversations about Mr. Gershkovich’s release “must be conducted in complete silence and absolutely discreetly.” He added, “Only thus can they have a result.”

Mr. Ducklo sought to make a comparison between Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin.

“Trump has called journalists ‘enemies of the people’ and pledged to imprison reporters whose coverage he doesn’t like — not all that dissimilar to what’s happening right now to Evan Gershkovich in Russia,” he said in the statement.

Anton Troianovski contributed reporting.

The governor of Ohio calls a special legislative session to ensure Biden is on the ballot.

Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio has called a special session of the General Assembly to resolve an issue that the state’s top elections official has said would prevent President Biden from being placed on the November ballot there.

Frank LaRose, the Republican secretary of state, had previously said that he planned to exclude Mr. Biden from the ballot because he would be officially nominated after a deadline for certifying presidential nominees on the ballot. This is usually a minor procedural issue, and states have almost always offered quick solutions to ensure that major presidential candidates are not excluded.

But a legislative fix that would have moved the deadline stalled out after colliding with a partisan clash over foreign donations. Republicans in the Ohio Senate advanced a bill that would resolve the issue but attached a partisan measure that would ban foreign money in state ballot initiatives. The measure went nowhere, and the General Assembly adjourned on Wednesday without a solution in place.

Mr. DeWine, who is also a Republican, said in his statement announcing the special session that the legislature had “failed to take action on this urgent matter,” noting that Ohio had previously passed temporary extensions to its certification deadline for President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in 2012 and for President Donald J. Trump in 2020.

The governor said that the special session, which will begin on Tuesday, would be to pass legislation ensuring Mr. Biden is on the ballot, as well as legislation that would “prohibit campaign spending by foreign nationals.” Dan Tierney, a spokesman for Mr. DeWine, said that it would be up to the General Assembly whether the two measures would be in separate bills.

“It is important that when Ohioans cast their vote” for president, Mr. DeWine said, “they have the opportunity to cast a vote for either of the major-party candidates for those offices.”

Mr. LaRose, who had previously pushed for a legislative fix for the issue, lauded Mr. DeWine’s decision in a statement on social media, saying, “I applaud his decisive leadership in calling a special session to resolve this issue for the voters of our state.”

Other states had similar procedural issues this year where the late date of Mr. Biden’s nomination clashed with deadlines to get candidates on the ballot. Those states resolved the issue fairly quickly. In Alabama, for example, the State Legislature overwhelmingly passed a law granting an extension to the deadline. In Washington State, election officials said they would accept a provisional certification of Mr. Biden’s nomination.

But a legislative fix in Ohio had appeared all but dead earlier this week, with Jason Stephens, the House speaker, saying there was “just not the will” to pass a solution in the legislature. In a letter to the Democratic Party this week, Mr. LaRose also said he would not accept a provisional certification, adding that he would “instruct boards of elections to begin preparing ballots that do not include the Democratic Party’s nominees” unless the party offered a “legally acceptable remedy” for the issue.

Jeffery C. Mays

One of America’s most Democratic counties prepares for a Trump visit.

After weeks of being the headline-grabbing defendant in a criminal trial in Manhattan, Donald J. Trump will head to Crotona Park in the Bronx for a rally on Thursday where he no doubt hopes to take a more favorable star turn.

Predictably, many people in the Bronx are not happy about that.

“I wish he would just disappear,” said Noel Rivera, a retired subway track worker who was walking his dog in Crotona Park on Wednesday. “Nobody that I know supports him.”

Mr. Trump’s event on Thursday evening in the expansive park in the South Bronx is his first campaign rally in New York State since 2016.

His choice of the Bronx might seem odd, since it is one of the most deeply Democratic counties in the country.In 2020, President Biden won the Bronx by 68 percent. In 2016, Mr. Trump lost the Bronx by more than 300,000 votes.

Brian Hughes, a spokesman for the Trump campaign, said the rally is part of an effort by Mr. Trump to “make sure that constituents that are not traditionally Republican to get spoken to, are seen and are heard.”

Mr. Trump, a longtime New Yorker who now lives in Florida, has spent much of his recent weeks in Manhattan at his criminal trial on charges that he falsified business records to cover up a payment to a porn star, who said she had a sexual encounter with him in 2006. The defense rested without Mr. Trump taking the stand; closing arguments are scheduled for Tuesday.

At the rally, Mr. Trump is expected to talk about inflation and violent crime, said a campaign spokeswoman. The rally has a permit for 3,500 people, according to the Police Department.

“We’re making inroads across the city,” said Representative Nicole Malliotakis, the lone Republican member of New York City’s House delegation. “But you have to show up, and you have to talk to people about the issues that they care about. Right now those issues are the economy and public safety.”

The Bronx is 57 percent Hispanic, 28 percent Black and 8 percent white , according to census date. Recent polls show Mr. Trump gaining ground among some Black and Latino voters. Last year, a Republican councilwoman was elected to represent the Bronx for the first time in more than 40 years. Lee Zeldin, the Republican nominee for governor in 2022, came within six points of Gov. Kathy Hochul. But Ms. Hochul beat Mr. Zeldin by 55 percentage points in the Bronx.

Representative Ritchie Torres, a Bronx Democrat, said Mr. Trump owes the borough an apology because of his “catastrophic management” of the pandemic, which cost thousands of people in the borough their lives.

“He is so unpopular in the Bronx that he’s radioactive,” Mr. Torres said. “His approval ratings are lower than that of lead and arsenic .”

A protest elsewhere in the park is planned during Mr. Trump’s rally by Amanda Septimo, an assemblywoman from the Bronx, and Kirsten John Foy, president of the activism group Arc of Justice.

Mr. Foy said the rally, with prominent city unions, is designed to counter the narrative that Mr. Trump will do significantly better in places like the Bronx.

“He’s trying to distract and to deflect from the fact that he’s under criminal indictment,” Mr. Foy said. “The best way to get off the front page for being a criminal and get on the front page for being a candidate is to hold a rally in the media capital of the world.”

Most people in Crotona Park on Wednesday morning seemed unhappy that Mr. Trump was coming. Maggie Rodriguez, 57, an electrician who was walking her Chihuahua in the park, cringed at the site of the Trump team setting up for the rally.

“We won’t have a democracy anymore,” if Mr. Trump is re-elected, she said. “God bless America.”

But the feeling was not unanimous. Erica Perez, 37, a store clerk, said she liked that Mr. Trump had referenced the Bible.

“I’m happy he’s coming,” she said. “When Trump was president, America was better.”

Arsenio Colon, 79, a retired maintenance worker, said he used to vote Democrat but now supports Mr. Trump and the Republican Party because he likes its tough stance on foreign policy with China.

“Anytime the Democratic Party is on top, this country has more problems,” said Mr. Colon, who lives near the park. “This country needs a strong president all the time.”

As workers set up a stage for Mr. Trump on Wednesday, a campaign representative asked a New York Times reporter to leave and threatened to call the police, asserting that the permit allowed the campaign to eject uninvited guests from the public park.

Karoline Leavitt, a Trump spokeswoman, said park security and law enforcement “are notified to assist” when an “individual refuses to leave the permitted area.”

Mr. Rivera, who has lived in the Bronx since 1958, said he would need no encouragement to leave the area once the rally begins.

“He’ll be lucky if he gets 35 people from around here to support him,” he said.

Michael Gold and Chelsia Rose Marcius contributed reporting.

Jonathan Weisman

The G.O.P. and the Secret Service clash again over the convention protest zone.

The Republican National Committee, alarmed by what it sees as a significantly worsening security threat, asked on Thursday that the director of the Secret Service personally intervene and grant a request to move a designated protest zone farther away from convention participants in Milwaukee this summer.

Republicans have demanded for nearly a month that the Secret Service push back the protesters from the convention site. Now, seven weeks before the start of the convention on July 15, a letter from Todd R. Steggerda, a counsel to the R.N.C., has raised the stakes.

“Your failure to act now to prevent these unnecessary and certain risks will imperil tens of thousands of convention attendees, inexcusably forcing them into close proximity to the currently planned First Amendment Zone,” Mr. Steggerda wrote to Kimberly A. Cheatle, the director of the Secret Service, referring to a designated protest site at Pere Marquette Park , a small public park on the bank of the Milwaukee River, about a quarter-mile from the arena hosting the convention.

In his letter, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, Mr. Steggerda cited “an increased and untenable risk of violence” from a “rapidly deteriorating security environment,” and demanded that Ms. Cheatle intervene. The Secret Service is tasked with leading security for both major-party conventions this summer.

The Republican Party has previously argued that, in the current plan, those attending the convention will be forced to pass by the protesters on their way into the venue, increasing the opportunity for confrontation.

The Secret Service responded in a lengthy statement to Mr. Steggerda’s letter, saying that officials had held “multiple meetings” with the R.N.C. chairman, convention staff and concerned senators, but that the agency was “confident in the security plan being developed.”

Anthony Guglielmi, the chief of communications for the Secret Service, also castigated Mr. Steggerda for detailing security plans not yet finalized or released to the public, accusing him of jeopardizing the safety of convention-goers — precisely what Mr. Steggerda said he was concerned about.

“Publicly disclosing security information, as done in this letter, undermines our ability to maintain the integrity of our security plan and keep the convention, attendees and the public safe,” Mr. Guglielmi said.

Both parties are concerned about an acute political divide that has led to a sharp increase in threats of political violence . Much attention has been paid to expected protests — mainly from Palestinian rights activists — at the Democratic National Convention planned for August in Chicago.

But Republicans say the threat of violence has already emerged against supporters of their presumptive nominee, former President Donald J. Trump. A man set himself on fire last month in front of the Manhattan courthouse where Mr. Trump is on criminal trial, and on Wednesday, a suspicious package with two vials of blood prompted a lockdown at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington.

Some protesters have already vowed that they will not remain confined to the designated demonstration site in Milwaukee, just as some have said that they will not apply for permits in Chicago or be corralled there.

Some Milwaukee officials have also made it clear that they want the security perimeter to be as tight as possible to not interfere with the city’s summer activities, the most important economic time in Wisconsin.

Jeff Fleming, a spokesman for Milwaukee’s mayor, Cavalier Johnson, said the city was willing to listen to the concerns of convention planners. But he pushed back on Mr. Steggerda’s assertion that there was a “critical flaw” in the existing security plan.

“We recognize that the security zone is set based on the vast experience of all law enforcement partners,” he added. “If they were to say, ‘Oh, it has to be four additional blocks to the east or west,’ we would respect that decision. That is not what the law enforcement professionals are saying.”

Secret Service officials said the city, not the service, designates the protest zone.

“Our security perimeters are based on public safety metrics, including protective intelligence, risk and threat assessments,” Mr. Guglielmi added. “Our model is designed to ensure the highest level of security while minimizing impacts on the public.”

In light of the proximity of convention-goers to the protesters, Mr. Steggerda said the Secret Service should expand the convention’s walled-off security perimeter into Pere Marquette Park, and push the protest zone south about a half-mile to Zeidler Union Square, providing convention-goers “an essential — but modest — protective physical separation from the anticipated demonstrators.”

According to the letter, Secret Service officials have told convention planners that expanding the security perimeter would be legally impermissible — a point that Mr. Steggerda rejected.

“With less than two months before the convention and even less time before the U.S.S.S. finalizes the plan, it is imperative you take personal and immediate steps to fix this unacceptable flaw in the design of the security perimeter,” he wrote.

Maggie Astor

A political consultant who orchestrated fake Biden robocalls is indicted.

Grand juries in four New Hampshire counties have indicted a Democratic consultant who admitted to orchestrating robocalls in January that used an artificial-intelligence impersonation of President Biden to urge Democrats not to vote in the state’s presidential primary.

The consultant, Steven Kramer, faces about two dozen counts split between impersonating a candidate, a misdemeanor, and voter suppression, a felony. Each pair of charges is tied to a specific voter who received the robocall.

The indictments were handed up over the past month, and the New Hampshire attorney general, John M. Formella, announced them on Thursday.

Separately on Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission fined Mr. Kramer $6 million for trying to “defraud voters using call spoofing technology that violates the Truth in Caller ID Act.”

The F.C.C. also levied a $2 million fine against Lingo Telecom, the company through which the calls were routed, accusing it of “failing to follow our call authentication policies.”

Neither Mr. Kramer nor Lingo Telecom immediately responded to requests for comment.

The news of the indictments against Mr. Kramer was first reported by WMUR-TV in Manchester, N.H.

The criminal charges against Mr. Kramer — filed in Belknap, Grafton, Merrimack and Rockingham Counties — allege that he “knowingly attempted to prevent or deter” each voter from voting “based on fraudulent, deceptive, misleading or spurious grounds or information.” They also allege that, through his actions or another person’s actions for which he is legally responsible, he placed a call to each voter in which he “falsely represented himself as a candidate for office.”

Arraignments are scheduled in the four counties for June 5, 14, 17 and 26, according to charging documents provided by a spokesman for the New Hampshire Judicial Branch.

Mr. Kramer admitted in February that he had been behind the robocalls, which urged New Hampshire residents not to participate in the presidential primary in January because “your vote makes a difference in November, not this Tuesday.” The caller ID was falsified to show the number of a former chairwoman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party.

The former chairwoman, Kathleen Sullivan, praised the New Hampshire Justice Department on social media for its “fast work” and said she hoped the indictments served as a deterrent to similar robocalls in the future.

Mr. Kramer said he had hired Paul Carpenter, an itinerant magician and technology and marketing consultant, to produce the audio for the calls using an A.I. tool — a fact alluded to in the charging documents, which refer to Mr. Kramer being responsible for actions taken by another party.

Mr. Carpenter, who said in February that he had been unaware of how Mr. Kramer intended to use the audio, has not been charged.

Mr. Kramer claimed in February to have placed the calls in an effort to expose the dangers of A.I. in campaigns and to prompt regulatory action.

Mr. Carpenter disputed that claim, saying that Mr. Kramer had told him he wanted to assess the technology with an eye toward offering it as a service to future clients.

Mr. Kramer was working for Representative Dean Phillips of Minnesota, then a candidate in the Democratic presidential primary, around the time of the robocalls. But both he and Mr. Phillips said the campaign had been unaware of his actions, which Mr. Phillips condemned.

Neil Vigdor

A House candidate pitched herself as a ‘renter.’ She also owns a $1.2 million home.

Maggie Tamposi Goodlander, a former White House aide to President Biden who is running for an open House seat in New Hampshire, is drawing attention for having pitched herself as a renter while she also owns a $1.2 million home.

“I am a renter, and there should be more renters in Congress,” Ms. Goodlander, a Democrat running in the state’s Second District, told The Boston Globe in her first interview as a candidate.

But that declaration comes with an asterisk: the home that she and her husband, Jake Sullivan, Mr. Biden’s national security adviser, own in Portsmouth, N.H. Records show that the couple purchased that residence for roughly $1.2 million in 2018. A real estate listing website described the property as a “private oasis.”

Ms. Goodlander, who has deep political connections , had been teaching law at the University of New Hampshire and Dartmouth College after moving to Portsmouth, a seaside city, in 2018, but she returned to Washington to work in the Justice Department after Mr. Biden won the presidency.

The Portsmouth house is in a different district than the one that Ms. Goodlander is seeking to represent, though the state has only two. The house she rented just before getting into the race is in Nashua, N.H., in a district that runs the length of the state and includes all of its western portion.

There is no requirement for House members to live in the district they represent, though they must be a resident of the state they are representing at the time of their election.

The Daily Beast first reported on the million-dollar price tag of Ms. Goodlander’s Portsmouth home. A spokesman for her campaign did not immediately comment on Thursday.

Ms. Goodlander has dismissed concerns about her time spent living outside New Hampshire by underscoring her family’s deep roots in the state, which she also highlighted in a video announcing her candidacy . Her mother, Betty Tamposi, served as a Republican legislator in the New Hampshire Statehouse and ran for the same seat that Ms. Goodlander is now trying to win.

Ms. Goodlander said in her announcement video that Nashua “has been my family’s home for over a hundred years.” A home long owned by her family there was sold in 2008, according to the real estate website Zillow and public records.

That same year was the last time that Ms. Goodlander cast a ballot in the district that she is running to represent, voting absentee when she was an undergraduate at Yale University, records show.

The seat that Ms. Goodlander is running for is being vacated by Representative Ann McLane Kuster, a Democrat, who announced in March that she would not seek re-election.

The race, in a Democrat-leaning district, has drawn a long list of candidates from both parties. Becky Whitley, a Democratic state senator, and Colin Van Ostern, a former state executive councilor who managed Ms. Kuster’s first House campaign and was the party’s nominee for governor in 2016, are among those running in the Democratic primary.

The primary elections will be held in September.

Pizza deliveries and bodega stops: Trump’s Big Apple campaign.

Former President Donald J. Trump is accustomed to crisscrossing the country on his private jet, headlining rallies at big venues where he is met by roaring masses chanting his name. But often over the last month, his presidential campaign has ventured into politically hostile territory: New York City.

He stopped in to chat with the owner of a tiny Harlem bodega. He made an early-morning visit to a construction site in Midtown Manhattan, shaking hands with union members wearing hard hats and safety goggles. He delivered pizzas to and posed for snapshots with emergency workers at a firehouse just minutes away from Trump Tower.

You might be forgiven for wondering if Mr. Trump were actually running for mayor.

Since the start of his criminal trial in Manhattan on April 15, which requires he be in court for much of the week, Mr. Trump has held just three campaign rallies, only two of which took place in battleground states expected to determine the outcome of the election. He has made just as many modest stops in New York in front of smaller crowds.

The small-scale politicking, which New Yorkers are more accustomed to seeing from local politicians trying to gin up support, has been a study in contrasts to the raucous rallies that have defined his political brand since his 2016 campaign. And they have offered a markedly different atmosphere still from court, where Mr. Trump is bound by rules of conduct that keep him largely still and silent even as prosecutors accuse him of wrongdoing.

“It does feel like a local race,” said George Arzt, a longtime political consultant in New York City who once served as press secretary to Mayor Edward I. Koch . “It does feel like he’s almost going out there door to door.”

Mr. Trump, a born-and-bred New Yorker who moved to Florida in 2019, has repeatedly suggested these stops are part of a push to win his home state, which has overwhelmingly rejected him twice. But New York has not voted for a Republican president since 1984, and Democratic candidates defeated him by more than 20 percentage points in the last two elections. New York City itself is deeply Democratic.

Political observers and Trump aides have said that Mr. Trump’s campaign stops in New York City are as much about the message they are sending to a national audience as they are to New Yorkers. On Thursday, Mr. Trump is expected to return more to form, with a planned speech at a park in the Bronx that his campaign said it expected thousands to attend.

Brian Hughes, a campaign spokesman, suggested that the event, in Crotona Park, in a borough with large Black and Hispanic populations, would allow Mr. Trump to highlight to a national audience his strength among “voting blocs that you might argue are not traditional Republican voting blocs.”

Mr. Trump last month vowed that he would hold a rally at Madison Square Garden, the city’s marquee venue in Manhattan, meant for “honoring the police and honoring the firemen and everybody, honoring a lot of people.” Mr. Trump, who has been indicted in four cases, has repeatedly tried to showcase his support among emergency responders this year, including with his visit this month to a Manhattan firehouse.

Still, so far, Mr. Trump’s campaign visits in New York have largely been limited to small stops, ones that his advisers have said are borne somewhat out of necessity given the court schedule, which has generally allowed Wednesdays and weekends off.

On one Wednesday, Mr. Trump held rallies in Michigan and Wisconsin, two important swing states. He spent a Saturday at a rally at the Jersey Shore that attracted visitors from neighboring Pennsylvania, another key battleground. Yet even as Mr. Trump has lamented that the trial limits his ability to campaign, he has attended fund-raisers on some days when court was not in session, while on others, he has had no scheduled events.

Working within the trial schedule, Mr. Trump’s aides have also looked to use its constraints to their advantage. Advisers have argued that New York City, a diverse metropolis of more than eight million, offers an ideal backdrop for Mr. Trump to highlight issues he has made central to his platform, such as immigration, the economy and public safety.

“These same issues that are plaguing New York City are also plaguing all of the battleground states,” Jason Miller, a senior Trump adviser, said in an interview.

The Biden campaign has sought to capitalize on and draw attention to Mr. Trump’s scheduling limits. President Biden has been campaigning more often on Wednesdays , and he made light of the trial calendar in a video challenging Mr. Trump to debate . The campaign also began selling shirts with the slogan “Free on Wednesdays.”

Mr. Trump’s first campaign stop during the trial, just two days into the proceedings, was to a bodega in a heavily Hispanic area of Harlem that had been the site of a stabbing years earlier. The former president used the visit to highlight a set of overlapping issues and to build on his efforts to win over Latino voters.

After chatting with the store’s owner, Mr. Trump stood in front of cameras outside and criticized Mr. Biden’s economic policies as detrimental to small businesses. And fresh from appearing as a criminal defendant, Mr. Trump railed against the district attorney prosecuting him and Democrats in general for being overly lax on crime.

The visit drew more significant crowds than Mr. Trump’s other stops in the city. The blocks surrounding the bodega were lined with people standing behind police barricades hoping to catch a glimpse, some of them supporters and others merely curious.

That level of attention distinguishes the former president’s stops in the city from those made by most other politicians in and around New York.

Mr. Trump and his campaign have cited the onlookers as proof that he is politically popular in the city, particularly among Hispanics. Mr. Miller noted that the bodega’s neighborhood was an example of “communities that don’t normally have national political figures come and visit them.”

Other political observers have argued that the crowds in Harlem were more reflective of Mr. Trump’s celebrity status rather than agreement with his views.

“He is a celebrity first, and people are interested in him, even if they don’t agree with him,” said Bill de Blasio, a Democratic former mayor who ran a short-lived presidential bid for the 2020 nomination.

Still, Mr. de Blasio, a frequent Trump critic, acknowledged that the former president’s New York stops would help him broadcast his political message. And he noted that such retail politicking would energize any candidate — particularly one spending the day facing austere court proceedings.

Last month, Mr. Trump preceded his day in court with a visit to a construction site, where he shook hands with dozens of invited guests. Many were union workers. As he worked the line, people inside the construction site clambered on top of scaffolding and equipment to take photos and videos.

Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime New York political strategist who watched Mr. Trump evolve from tabloid fixture to celebrity to politician, said that such a stop was consistent with Mr. Trump’s decades-long effort to represent himself as the champion of working-class people.

“He is a guy who took tremendous pride in being able to be accepted by average working people,” Mr. Sheinkopf said. “He wants to make sure he doesn’t lose that touch. His appeal comes from being an elite who is not an elite.”

Nicholas Nehamas contributed reporting.

Reid J. Epstein

Reporting from Washington

As Trump campaigns in New York, Biden points Black voters to his rival’s past.

President Biden’s campaign on Thursday released a new advertisement aimed at Black voters . It comes as former President Donald J. Trump is planning a political event in the Bronx , a play by his campaign not necessarily to compete in New York State but to highlight Mr. Biden’s weakness with a key group of Democratic voters.

The ad will appear on digital platforms in New York City on Thursday, the Biden campaign said, and on television in battleground-state markets including Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Detroit and Macon, Ga.

What the ad says

It begins with Mr. Trump saying, “Of course, I hate these people” — a remark he made during a 1989 interview on CNN , referring to those who had been accused of a brutal rape of a jogger in what became known as the Central Park Five case.

Five Black and Latino men were wrongly convicted in the case, and at the time, Mr. Trump fueled racist reaction to the attack by taking out full-page advertisements in local newspapers, including The New York Times, calling for the death penalty to be reinstated .

Putting more than a little spin on the ball, the Biden ad uses that context to suggest Mr. Trump was saying in the 1989 interview that he hated all Black people. An ominous voice says: “Donald Trump disrespecting Black folks is nothing new.”

The clip then recounts Mr. Trump’s treatment of Black people: his family business’s documented bias at its rental properties decades ago; his response to the Central Park Five case; and his remarks as president defending white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va.

It closes as it began, with Mr. Trump saying, “Of course, I hate these people.”

What the ad is trying to do

The Biden campaign and its allies have for months struggled to reverse a decline in popularity with Black voters , particularly Black men.

By resurfacing Mr. Trump’s 35-year-old foray into the Central Park Five episode, Mr. Biden is trying to remind voters about a Trump past that they may have forgotten about or never been aware of to begin with.

It fits with the Biden campaign’s effort this week to disqualify Mr. Trump as unfit — Doug Emhoff, the husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, on Tuesday called the former president “a known antisemite” — and it reflects a recognition that Mr. Biden’s North-Star message on abortion rights may need broadening to reach all the voters he will need to win in November.

Nicholas Nehamas

A former high-ranking Trump official meets with Arab and Muslim American leaders.

As President Biden’s support among Arab and Muslim Americans withers over his backing of Israel in the war in Gaza, former President Donald J. Trump is making a long-shot push to take advantage.

On Tuesday, Richard Grenell, a former high-ranking official in the Trump administration, met for more than two hours with a group of about 40 Arab and Muslim American leaders at an Italian restaurant outside Detroit. Mr. Grenell was joined by the former president’s son-in-law Michael Boulos, who is married to Tiffany Trump and is Lebanese American, though the Trump campaign said it had not organized the meeting.

Many Arab and Muslim American voters have said they are so angry with Mr. Biden over his Israel policy that they will sit out the election, despite supporting him in large numbers in 2020. But Mr. Grenell told the group that it had the chance to exercise extraordinary political power by backing Mr. Trump instead, according to six people who attended the meeting.

Mr. Grenell argued that if Muslim and Arab Americans publicly swung their support to the former president — and helped him win Michigan, a key battleground state — they would demonstrate to both Republicans and Democrats that they could not be ignored.

“The door is open to start to explore,” said Yahya Basha, a Syrian American radiologist from Royal Oak, Mich., who helped organize the meeting. “Let’s go approach and see what Trump has to offer.”

Dr. Basha and others present described the meeting as light on policy details and said they needed to hear more before committing to support Mr. Trump. Several others who attended were already Trump supporters, but some had cast their ballots for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Mr. Grenell, who served as Mr. Trump’s acting director of national intelligence, even asked the former president if he would address the group on speaker phone, but Mr. Trump called back only after the meeting had ended, according to Ali Abdelaziz, who manages fighters in the Ultimate Fighting Championship and attended the meeting as a guest of Mr. Grenell.

“He wanted to talk to everyone at the meeting,” Mr. Abdelaziz said of Mr. Trump. “But he thanked us and promised he would bring peace.”

Details of the meeting were earlier reported by the website NOTUS. Mr. Grenell declined to comment. Michael Boulos and his father, Massad Boulos, who also attended, could not be reached.

Despite the meeting, Mr. Trump is unlikely to win the support of a majority of Arab and Muslim American voters. He was a staunch supporter of Israel during his term in office, called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” as a candidate in 2015 and then carried out a travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries, which he has talked of reviving .

Mr. Trump’s outreach to Muslim and Arab Americans “is patently absurd, gullible to the extreme and supremely naïve,” said Keith Ellison, the Democratic attorney general of Minnesota, who is Muslim. “The one thing you can trust Trump to do is to say what he needs to say to get what he wants.”

Abbas Alawieh, one of the leaders of a movement among Democrats pressuring Mr. Biden to change his policy on the war in Gaza, said Mr. Trump was “looking to exploit and capitalize upon the deep pain of Palestinian, Arab and Muslim American communities right now.”

“They’re losers, and they can try all they want,” Mr. Alawieh said of the Trump campaign. “We won’t be taken as fools here in Michigan. Whether or not Trump makes gains here is really more dependent on whether President Biden comes out more forcefully against this war.”

But even a small swing in support toward Mr. Trump could prove crucial in what is expected to be a tight election decided by a handful of voters in a few battleground states.

And Mr. Biden is facing serious backlash from Arab and Muslim Americans over the war in Gaza. Prominent community leaders have said their communications with the White House have broken down in the absence of a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. During the Democratic primaries, the protest movement against Mr. Biden garnered significant support in states with large Arab and Muslim populations, including Michigan and Minnesota.

Still, the outreach effort from Mr. Trump’s team is in its early stages.

Brian Hughes, a senior Trump adviser, said the meeting was “not authorized, sanctioned or requested by the Trump campaign or President Trump.” But Mr. Hughes acknowledged that outreach was being made, saying that Arab and Muslim Americans make up a “disaffected Democrat voting bloc” and that “our campaign is working to communicate to that community how successful President Trump was in his term at establishing a more stable, peaceful Middle East.”

Ammar Moussa, a spokesman for Mr. Biden, called Mr. Trump “the biggest threat to the Muslim and Arab community.”

“He and his allies believe we don’t belong in this country, and Trump is openly speaking about allowing Israel to bomb Gaza without any regard,” Mr. Moussa said. “Trump and his campaign are racists and Islamophobes. Period.”

At the meeting, attendees described Mr. Grenell as saying that Mr. Trump would not call for an immediate and permanent cease-fire, a demand of many Arab and Muslim American leaders, with Israeli and American hostages still being held by Hamas. And he declined to commit to a two-state solution with Hamas still in charge of Gaza.

But he did argue that Mr. Trump would “muscle” his way to peace, ending a war that has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives , five attendees said. He also defended Mr. Trump’s travel ban, saying it was a temporary measure narrowly targeted at nations that required “extreme vetting.”

At one point, Mr. Grenell expressed hopes that Gaza could eventually benefit from economic development, pointing out that it possesses a valuable waterfront on the Mediterranean Sea. (Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s other son-in-law, was criticized after making similar comments this year. Mr. Kushner also suggested that Palestinians be “moved out” of the territory.)

Those who attended the meeting said they expected Mr. Grenell to set up additional meetings, both in Michigan and other swing states. Several attendees also raised concerns over the long-running civil war in Syria.

Bishara Bahbah, who traveled from Arizona to Michigan for the meeting, said he was impressed that people with such close ties to Mr. Trump were making overtures.

“We had heavyweights there,” Mr. Bahbah said.

Jonathan Swan contributed reporting from Washington.

Advertisement