c 11 delete assignment operator

Copy assignment operator

A copy assignment operator of class T is a non-template non-static member function with the name operator = that takes exactly one parameter of type T , T & , const T & , volatile T & , or const volatile T & . A type with a public copy assignment operator is CopyAssignable .

[ edit ] Syntax

[ edit ] explanation.

• Typical declaration of a copy assignment operator when copy-and-swap idiom can be used
• Typical declaration of a copy assignment operator when copy-and-swap idiom cannot be used
• Forcing a copy assignment operator to be generated by the compiler
• Avoiding implicit copy assignment

The copy assignment operator is called whenever selected by overload resolution , e.g. when an object appears on the left side of an assignment expression.

[ edit ] Implicitly-declared copy assignment operator

If no user-defined copy assignment operators are provided for a class type ( struct , class , or union ), the compiler will always declare one as an inline public member of the class. This implicitly-declared copy assignment operator has the form T & T :: operator = ( const T & ) if all of the following is true:

• each direct base B of T has a copy assignment operator whose parameters are B or const B& or const volatile B &
• each non-static data member M of T of class type or array of class type has a copy assignment operator whose parameters are M or const M& or const volatile M &

Otherwise the implicitly-declared copy assignment operator is declared as T & T :: operator = ( T & ) . (Note that due to these rules, the implicitly-declared copy assignment operator cannot bind to a volatile lvalue argument)

A class can have multiple copy assignment operators, e.g. both T & T :: operator = ( const T & ) and T & T :: operator = ( T ) . If some user-defined copy assignment operators are present, the user may still force the generation of the implicitly declared copy assignment operator with the keyword default .

Because the copy assignment operator is always declared for any class, the base class assignment operator is always hidden. If a using-declaration is used to bring in the assignment operator from the base class, and its argument type could be the same as the argument type of the implicit assignment operator of the derived class, the using-declaration is also hidden by the implicit declaration.

[ edit ] Deleted implicitly-declared copy assignment operator

The implicitly-declared or defaulted copy assignment operator for class T is defined as deleted in any of the following is true:

• T has a non-static data member that is const
• T has a non-static data member of a reference type.
• T has a non-static data member that cannot be copy-assigned (has deleted, inaccessible, or ambiguous copy assignment operator)
• T has direct or virtual base class that cannot be copy-assigned (has deleted, inaccessible, or ambiguous move assignment operator)
• T has a user-declared move constructor
• T has a user-declared move assignment operator

[ edit ] Trivial copy assignment operator

The implicitly-declared copy assignment operator for class T is trivial if all of the following is true:

• T has no virtual member functions
• T has no virtual base classes
• The copy assignment operator selected for every direct base of T is trivial
• The copy assignment operator selected for every non-static class type (or array of class type) memeber of T is trivial

A trivial copy assignment operator makes a copy of the object representation as if by std:: memmove . All data types compatible with the C language (POD types) are trivially copy-assignable.

[ edit ] Implicitly-defined copy assignment operator

If the implicitly-declared copy assignment operator is not deleted or trivial, it is defined (that is, a function body is generated and compiled) by the compiler. For union types, the implicitly-defined copy assignment copies the object representation (as by std:: memmove ). For non-union class types ( class and struct ), the operator performs member-wise copy assignment of the object's bases and non-static members, in their initialization order, using, using built-in assignment for the scalars and copy assignment operator for class types.

The generation of the implicitly-defined copy assignment operator is deprecated (since C++11) if T has a user-declared destructor or user-declared copy constructor.

[ edit ] Notes

If both copy and move assignment operators are provided, overload resolution selects the move assignment if the argument is an rvalue (either prvalue such as a nameless temporary or xvalue such as the result of std:: move ), and selects the copy assignment if the argument is lvalue (named object or a function/operator returning lvalue reference). If only the copy assignment is provided, all argument categories select it (as long as it takes its argument by value or as reference to const, since rvalues can bind to const references), which makes copy assignment the fallback for move assignment, when move is unavailable.

[ edit ] Copy and swap

Copy assignment operator can be expressed in terms of copy constructor, destructor, and the swap() member function, if one is provided:

T & T :: operator = ( T arg ) { // copy/move constructor is called to construct arg     swap ( arg ) ;     // resources exchanged between *this and arg     return * this ; }   // destructor is called to release the resources formerly held by *this

For non-throwing swap(), this form provides strong exception guarantee . For rvalue arguments, this form automatically invokes the move constructor, and is sometimes referred to as "unifying assignment operator" (as in, both copy and move).

[ edit ] Example

Programming Tutorials

• How to Delete a Function in C++11 / 14?

In modern C++, the ‘delete’ keyword plays a crucial role in enhancing code safety and correctness. Introduced in C++11, this powerful feature allows programmers to explicitly forbid the use of certain functions, including automatically generated ones like default constructors and assignment operators. In this article, we will explore the practical applications of the ‘delete’ keyword and how it can be used.

Deleting Functions with the ‘delete’ Keyword

The ‘delete’ keyword can be applied to functions to make them uncallable, effectively preventing their use in a program. When a function is marked as deleted, any attempt to call it will result in a compile-time error. This is particularly useful for managing special member functions that the compiler might otherwise automatically generate.

Here’s a simple example of a function being deleted:

Practical Use Cases for the ‘delete’ Keyword

The ‘delete’ keyword is particularly useful for:

• Deleting compiler-generated functions like copy constructors, assignment operators, move constructors, move assignment operators, and default constructors.
• Deleting member functions to prevent implicit type conversions that could lead to data loss.
• Restricting object creation on the heap by deleting the new operator for a class.
• Deleting specific template specializations.

Deleting Copy Constructors and Assignment Operators in C++

Consider a User class where you want to disable copy semantics:

In the above class User , the Copy Constructor and Assignment Operator are deleted. If anybody tries to call these deleted functions, it will generate a compile-time error. For example,

Trying to copy an instance of User will result in a compile-time error:

Frequently Asked:

Apart from applying the delete keyword to compiler-generated functions, we can also apply it to other functions.

Deleting Member Functions in a class in C++

Implicit type conversions can be convenient but dangerous. They can lead to data loss or logical errors if types are converted unexpectedly. Deleting specific constructors can prevent these unwanted conversions. For example:

To prevent these conversions, declare these constructors as deleted:

Here we are deleting two constructors that could lead to implicit conversions:

• The first one prevents creating a User object with a double as the ID, which could lead to a narrowing conversion if the double value has no exact int representation.
• The second one prevents creating a User object with a char as the ID, which could be nonsensical if the char doesn’t represent an integer.

Now on creating User object with double and char will throw compile time error.

Restricting Object Creation on the Heap

To ensure that instances of a class are only created on the stack (not on the heap), you can delete the new operator:

This line ensures that the new operator cannot be used with the User class. As a result, the following code would trigger a compile-time error:

By deleting the new operator, you ensure that all User objects are automatically destroyed when they go out of scope, which can help manage resources more effectively and prevent memory leaks.

Deleting Specific Template Specializations

With the delete keyword, we can restrict certain template specializations of template classes or functions. Let’s see how to do that. Suppose we have a template class for a Complex Number.

We can use ComplexNumber with different types like int , double , and char , etc. For example,

To restrict the usage of ComplexNumber with double or char as template parameters, we need to explicitly delete those specializations. For example:

Now, attempting to use the ComplexNumber<> class with double or char as the template parameter will generate a compile-time error.

The complete ComplexNumber class with the deleted specializations is as follows:

Calling Following functions will result in error

Deleted Functions vs. Private Functions

While making functions private can also restrict their accessibility, deleted functions offer distinct advantages:

• Private member functions can still be called by other members of the same class, while deleted functions cannot be called at all.
• Deleted functions participate in name lookup. If a deleted function is found during compilation, the compiler does not continue to look for other overloads that might accept the arguments, preventing potential bugs and data loss.

The ‘delete’ keyword is a powerful feature in C++ that serves as a building block for safer and more maintainable code. By disabling certain functions or conversions, programmers can prevent a host of issues that could arise from inadvertent misuse. Use the ‘delete’ keyword to clearly communicate the intended use of your classes and functions, and to leverage the C++ type system for robust software development.

Related posts:

• What is shared_ptr in C++?
• Shared_ptr & Custom Deleter in Modern C++
• Smart Pointer vs Raw Pointer in C++
• How not to use Smart Pointers in C++?
• What is weak_ptr in Modern C++ & why do we need it?
• Using std::find & std::find_if with User Defined Classes
• C++11 Multithreading – Part 4: Data Sharing and Race Conditions
• C++11 Multithreading – Part 5: Using mutex to fix Race Conditions
• C++ Set example and Tutorial – Part 1
• C++11 Multithreading – Part 7: Condition Variables Explained
• C++11 Multithreading – Part 8: std::future , std::promise and Returning values from Thread
• Lambda Functions in C++
• std::bind in C++ – Explained with Examples
• The auto Keyword in C++11
• multimap Example and Tutorial in C++
• C++11 Multithreading – Part 9: std::async Tutorial & Example
• How to Capture Member Variables in Lambda function in C++?
• C++11 Lambda: Capture Variables by Reference or Value
• What is unique_ptr in C++?
• C++ : Check if given path is a file or directory using Boost & C++17 FileSystem Library

Share your love

2 thoughts on “how to delete a function in c++11 / 14”.

Excellent Definition.

nice explanation

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

cppreference.com

Copy assignment operator.

A copy assignment operator of class T is a non-template non-static member function with the name operator = that takes exactly one parameter of type T , T & , const T & , volatile T & , or const volatile T & . For a type to be CopyAssignable , it must have a public copy assignment operator.

[ edit ] Syntax

[ edit ] explanation.

• Typical declaration of a copy assignment operator when copy-and-swap idiom can be used.
• Typical declaration of a copy assignment operator when copy-and-swap idiom cannot be used (non-swappable type or degraded performance).
• Forcing a copy assignment operator to be generated by the compiler.
• Avoiding implicit copy assignment.

The copy assignment operator is called whenever selected by overload resolution , e.g. when an object appears on the left side of an assignment expression.

[ edit ] Implicitly-declared copy assignment operator

If no user-defined copy assignment operators are provided for a class type ( struct , class , or union ), the compiler will always declare one as an inline public member of the class. This implicitly-declared copy assignment operator has the form T & T :: operator = ( const T & ) if all of the following is true:

• each direct base B of T has a copy assignment operator whose parameters are B or const B & or const volatile B & ;
• each non-static data member M of T of class type or array of class type has a copy assignment operator whose parameters are M or const M & or const volatile M & .

Otherwise the implicitly-declared copy assignment operator is declared as T & T :: operator = ( T & ) . (Note that due to these rules, the implicitly-declared copy assignment operator cannot bind to a volatile lvalue argument.)

A class can have multiple copy assignment operators, e.g. both T & T :: operator = ( const T & ) and T & T :: operator = ( T ) . If some user-defined copy assignment operators are present, the user may still force the generation of the implicitly declared copy assignment operator with the keyword default . (since C++11)

The implicitly-declared (or defaulted on its first declaration) copy assignment operator has an exception specification as described in dynamic exception specification (until C++17) exception specification (since C++17)

Because the copy assignment operator is always declared for any class, the base class assignment operator is always hidden. If a using-declaration is used to bring in the assignment operator from the base class, and its argument type could be the same as the argument type of the implicit assignment operator of the derived class, the using-declaration is also hidden by the implicit declaration.

[ edit ] Deleted implicitly-declared copy assignment operator

A implicitly-declared copy assignment operator for class T is defined as deleted if any of the following is true:

• T has a user-declared move constructor;
• T has a user-declared move assignment operator.

Otherwise, it is defined as defaulted.

A defaulted copy assignment operator for class T is defined as deleted if any of the following is true:

• T has a non-static data member of non-class type (or array thereof) that is const ;
• T has a non-static data member of a reference type;
• T has a non-static data member or a direct or virtual base class that cannot be copy-assigned (overload resolution for the copy assignment fails, or selects a deleted or inaccessible function);
• T is a union-like class , and has a variant member whose corresponding assignment operator is non-trivial.

[ edit ] Trivial copy assignment operator

The copy assignment operator for class T is trivial if all of the following is true:

• it is not user-provided (meaning, it is implicitly-defined or defaulted) , , and if it is defaulted, its signature is the same as implicitly-defined (until C++14) ;
• T has no virtual member functions;
• T has no virtual base classes;
• the copy assignment operator selected for every direct base of T is trivial;
• the copy assignment operator selected for every non-static class type (or array of class type) member of T is trivial;

A trivial copy assignment operator makes a copy of the object representation as if by std::memmove . All data types compatible with the C language (POD types) are trivially copy-assignable.

[ edit ] Implicitly-defined copy assignment operator

If the implicitly-declared copy assignment operator is neither deleted nor trivial, it is defined (that is, a function body is generated and compiled) by the compiler if odr-used . For union types, the implicitly-defined copy assignment copies the object representation (as by std::memmove ). For non-union class types ( class and struct ), the operator performs member-wise copy assignment of the object's bases and non-static members, in their initialization order, using built-in assignment for the scalars and copy assignment operator for class types.

The generation of the implicitly-defined copy assignment operator is deprecated (since C++11) if T has a user-declared destructor or user-declared copy constructor.

[ edit ] Notes

If both copy and move assignment operators are provided, overload resolution selects the move assignment if the argument is an rvalue (either a prvalue such as a nameless temporary or an xvalue such as the result of std::move ), and selects the copy assignment if the argument is an lvalue (named object or a function/operator returning lvalue reference). If only the copy assignment is provided, all argument categories select it (as long as it takes its argument by value or as reference to const, since rvalues can bind to const references), which makes copy assignment the fallback for move assignment, when move is unavailable.

It is unspecified whether virtual base class subobjects that are accessible through more than one path in the inheritance lattice, are assigned more than once by the implicitly-defined copy assignment operator (same applies to move assignment ).

See assignment operator overloading for additional detail on the expected behavior of a user-defined copy-assignment operator.

[ edit ] Example

[ edit ] defect reports.

The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.

• Pages with unreviewed CWG DR marker
• Recent changes
• Offline version
• What links here
• Related changes
• Upload file
• Special pages
• Printable version
• Permanent link
• Page information
• In other languages
• This page was last modified on 9 January 2019, at 07:16.
• This page has been accessed 570,566 times.
• Privacy policy
• About cppreference.com
• Disclaimers

C++11/C++14 default and delete specifiers- 2020

"If you're an experienced C++ programmer and are anything like me, you initially approached C++11 thinking, "Yes, yes, I get it. It's C++, only more so." But as you learned more, you were surprised by the scope of the changes. auto declarations, range-based for loops, lambda expressions , and rvalue references change the face of C++, to say nothing of the new concurrency features. And then there are the idiomatic changes. 0 and typedefs are out, nullptr and alias declarations are in. Enums should now be scoped. Smart pointers are now preferable to built-in ones. Moving objects is normally better than copying them. - Effective Modern C++ by Scott Meyers

If a class is defined with any constructors, the compiler will not generate a default constructor. This is useful in many cases, but it is some times vexing. For example, we defined the class as below:

Then, if we do:

The compiler complains that we have no default constructor. That's because compiler did not make the one for us because we've already had one that we defined.

Then, compiler won't complain for this any more:

Suppose we have a class with a constructor taking an integer:

Then, the following three operations will be successful:

However, what if that was not we wanted. We do not want the constructor allow double type parameter nor the assignment to work.

C++11 allows us to disable certain features by using delete :

Then, if we write the code as below:

In that way, we could achieve what we intended.

C++11/C++14 New Features

Ph.D. / Golden Gate Ave, San Francisco / Seoul National Univ / Carnegie Mellon / UC Berkeley / DevOps / Deep Learning / Visualization

Sponsor Open Source development activities and free contents for everyone.

C++ Tutorials

• Sign In / Suggest an Article

Current ISO C++ status

Upcoming ISO C++ meetings

Upcoming C++ conferences

Compiler conformance status

ISO C++ committee meeting

June 24-29, St. Louis, MO, USA

July 2-5, Folkestone, Kent, UK

Quick Q: Most concise way to disable copy and move semantics

By Adrien Hamelin | Feb 20, 2018 08:40 AM | Tags: c++11 advanced

Quick A: Delete the move assignment.

Recently on SO:

Most concise way to disable copy and move semantics According to this chart (by Howard Hinnant): The most concise way is to =delete move assignment operator (or move constructor, but it can cause problems mentioned in comments). Though, in my opinion the most readable way is to =delete both copy constructor and copy assignment operator.

Share this Article

Add a comment, comments (0).

There are currently no comments on this entry.

22.3 — Move constructors and move assignment

In lesson 22.1 -- Introduction to smart pointers and move semantics , we took a look at std::auto_ptr, discussed the desire for move semantics, and took a look at some of the downsides that occur when functions designed for copy semantics (copy constructors and copy assignment operators) are redefined to implement move semantics.

In this lesson, we’ll take a deeper look at how C++11 resolves these problems via move constructors and move assignment.

Recapping copy constructors and copy assignment

First, let’s take a moment to recap copy semantics.

Copy constructors are used to initialize a class by making a copy of an object of the same class. Copy assignment is used to copy one class object to another existing class object. By default, C++ will provide a copy constructor and copy assignment operator if one is not explicitly provided. These compiler-provided functions do shallow copies, which may cause problems for classes that allocate dynamic memory. So classes that deal with dynamic memory should override these functions to do deep copies.

Returning back to our Auto_ptr smart pointer class example from the first lesson in this chapter, let’s look at a version that implements a copy constructor and copy assignment operator that do deep copies, and a sample program that exercises them:

In this program, we’re using a function named generateResource() to create a smart pointer encapsulated resource, which is then passed back to function main(). Function main() then assigns that to an existing Auto_ptr3 object.

When this program is run, it prints:

(Note: You may only get 4 outputs if your compiler elides the return value from function generateResource())

That’s a lot of resource creation and destruction going on for such a simple program! What’s going on here?

Let’s take a closer look. There are 6 key steps that happen in this program (one for each printed message):

• Inside generateResource(), local variable res is created and initialized with a dynamically allocated Resource, which causes the first “Resource acquired”.
• Res is returned back to main() by value. We return by value here because res is a local variable -- it can’t be returned by address or reference because res will be destroyed when generateResource() ends. So res is copy constructed into a temporary object. Since our copy constructor does a deep copy, a new Resource is allocated here, which causes the second “Resource acquired”.
• Res goes out of scope, destroying the originally created Resource, which causes the first “Resource destroyed”.
• The temporary object is assigned to mainres by copy assignment. Since our copy assignment also does a deep copy, a new Resource is allocated, causing yet another “Resource acquired”.
• The assignment expression ends, and the temporary object goes out of expression scope and is destroyed, causing a “Resource destroyed”.
• At the end of main(), mainres goes out of scope, and our final “Resource destroyed” is displayed.

So, in short, because we call the copy constructor once to copy construct res to a temporary, and copy assignment once to copy the temporary into mainres, we end up allocating and destroying 3 separate objects in total.

Inefficient, but at least it doesn’t crash!

However, with move semantics, we can do better.

Move constructors and move assignment

C++11 defines two new functions in service of move semantics: a move constructor, and a move assignment operator. Whereas the goal of the copy constructor and copy assignment is to make a copy of one object to another, the goal of the move constructor and move assignment is to move ownership of the resources from one object to another (which is typically much less expensive than making a copy).

Defining a move constructor and move assignment work analogously to their copy counterparts. However, whereas the copy flavors of these functions take a const l-value reference parameter (which will bind to just about anything), the move flavors of these functions use non-const rvalue reference parameters (which only bind to rvalues).

Here’s the same Auto_ptr3 class as above, with a move constructor and move assignment operator added. We’ve left in the deep-copying copy constructor and copy assignment operator for comparison purposes.

The move constructor and move assignment operator are simple. Instead of deep copying the source object (a) into the implicit object, we simply move (steal) the source object’s resources. This involves shallow copying the source pointer into the implicit object, then setting the source pointer to null.

When run, this program prints:

That’s much better!

The flow of the program is exactly the same as before. However, instead of calling the copy constructor and copy assignment operators, this program calls the move constructor and move assignment operators. Looking a little more deeply:

• Res is returned back to main() by value. Res is move constructed into a temporary object, transferring the dynamically created object stored in res to the temporary object. We’ll talk about why this happens below.
• Res goes out of scope. Because res no longer manages a pointer (it was moved to the temporary), nothing interesting happens here.
• The temporary object is move assigned to mainres. This transfers the dynamically created object stored in the temporary to mainres.
• The assignment expression ends, and the temporary object goes out of expression scope and is destroyed. However, because the temporary no longer manages a pointer (it was moved to mainres), nothing interesting happens here either.

So instead of copying our Resource twice (once for the copy constructor and once for the copy assignment), we transfer it twice. This is more efficient, as Resource is only constructed and destroyed once instead of three times.

Related content

Move constructors and move assignment should be marked as noexcept . This tells the compiler that these functions will not throw exceptions.

We introduce noexcept in lesson 27.9 -- Exception specifications and noexcept and discuss why move constructors and move assignment are marked as noexcept in lesson 27.10 -- std::move_if_noexcept .

When are the move constructor and move assignment called?

The move constructor and move assignment are called when those functions have been defined, and the argument for construction or assignment is an rvalue. Most typically, this rvalue will be a literal or temporary value.

The copy constructor and copy assignment are used otherwise (when the argument is an lvalue, or when the argument is an rvalue and the move constructor or move assignment functions aren’t defined).

Implicit move constructor and move assignment operator

The compiler will create an implicit move constructor and move assignment operator if all of the following are true:

• There are no user-declared copy constructors or copy assignment operators.
• There are no user-declared move constructors or move assignment operators.
• There is no user-declared destructor.

The implicit move constructor and implicit move assignment operator both do a memberwise move. That is, each member of the moved-from object is moved to the moved-to object.

The key insight behind move semantics

You now have enough context to understand the key insight behind move semantics.

If we construct an object or do an assignment where the argument is an l-value, the only thing we can reasonably do is copy the l-value. We can’t assume it’s safe to alter the l-value, because it may be used again later in the program. If we have an expression “a = b” (where b is an lvalue), we wouldn’t reasonably expect b to be changed in any way.

However, if we construct an object or do an assignment where the argument is an r-value, then we know that r-value is just a temporary object of some kind. Instead of copying it (which can be expensive), we can simply transfer its resources (which is cheap) to the object we’re constructing or assigning. This is safe to do because the temporary will be destroyed at the end of the expression anyway, so we know it will never be used again!

C++11, through r-value references, gives us the ability to provide different behaviors when the argument is an r-value vs an l-value, enabling us to make smarter and more efficient decisions about how our objects should behave.

Key insight

Move semantics is an optimization opportunity.

Move functions should always leave both objects in a valid state

In the above examples, both the move constructor and move assignment functions set a.m_ptr to nullptr. This may seem extraneous -- after all, if a is a temporary r-value, why bother doing “cleanup” if parameter a is going to be destroyed anyway?

The answer is simple: When a goes out of scope, the destructor for a will be called, and a.m_ptr will be deleted. If at that point, a.m_ptr is still pointing to the same object as m_ptr , then m_ptr will be left as a dangling pointer. When the object containing m_ptr eventually gets used (or destroyed), we’ll get undefined behavior.

When implementing move semantics, it is important to ensure the moved-from object is left in a valid state, so that it will destruct properly (without creating undefined behavior).

Automatic l-values returned by value may be moved instead of copied

In the generateResource() function of the Auto_ptr4 example above, when variable res is returned by value, it is moved instead of copied, even though res is an l-value. The C++ specification has a special rule that says automatic objects returned from a function by value can be moved even if they are l-values. This makes sense, since res was going to be destroyed at the end of the function anyway! We might as well steal its resources instead of making an expensive and unnecessary copy.

Although the compiler can move l-value return values, in some cases it may be able to do even better by simply eliding the copy altogether (which avoids the need to make a copy or do a move at all). In such a case, neither the copy constructor nor move constructor would be called.

Disabling copying

In the Auto_ptr4 class above, we left in the copy constructor and assignment operator for comparison purposes. But in move-enabled classes, it is sometimes desirable to delete the copy constructor and copy assignment functions to ensure copies aren’t made. In the case of our Auto_ptr class, we don’t want to copy our templated object T -- both because it’s expensive, and whatever class T is may not even support copying!

Here’s a version of Auto_ptr that supports move semantics but not copy semantics:

If you were to try to pass an Auto_ptr5 l-value to a function by value, the compiler would complain that the copy constructor required to initialize the function parameter has been deleted. This is good, because we should probably be passing Auto_ptr5 by const l-value reference anyway!

Auto_ptr5 is (finally) a good smart pointer class. And, in fact the standard library contains a class very much like this one (that you should use instead), named std::unique_ptr. We’ll talk more about std::unique_ptr later in this chapter.

Another example

Let’s take a look at another class that uses dynamic memory: a simple dynamic templated array. This class contains a deep-copying copy constructor and copy assignment operator.

Now let’s use this class in a program. To show you how this class performs when we allocate a million integers on the heap, we’re going to leverage the Timer class we developed in lesson 18.4 -- Timing your code . We’ll use the Timer class to time how fast our code runs, and show you the performance difference between copying and moving.

On one of the author’s machines, in release mode, this program executed in 0.00825559 seconds.

Now let’s run the same program again, replacing the copy constructor and copy assignment with a move constructor and move assignment.

On the same machine, this program executed in 0.0056 seconds.

Comparing the runtime of the two programs, (0.00825559 - 0.0056) / 0.00825559 * 100 = 32.1% faster!

Do not implement move semantics using std::swap

Since the goal of move semantics is to move a resource from a source object to a destination object, you might think about implementing the move constructor and move assignment operator using std::swap() . However, this is a bad idea, as std::swap() calls both the move constructor and move assignment on move-capable objects, which would result in an infinite recursion. You can see this happen in the following example:

This prints:

And so on… until the stack overflows.

You can implement the move constructor and move assignment using your own swap function, as long as your swap member function does not call the move constructor or move assignment. Here’s an example of how that can be done:

This works as expected, and prints:

Deleting the move constructor and move assignment

You can delete the move constructor and move assignment using the = delete syntax in the exact same way you can delete the copy constructor and copy assignment.

If you delete the copy constructor, the compiler will not generate an implicit move constructor (making your objects neither copyable nor movable). Therefore, when deleting the copy constructor, it is useful to be explicit about what behavior you want from your move constructors. Either explicitly delete them (making it clear this is the desired behavior), or default them (making the class move-only).

The rule of five says that if the copy constructor, copy assignment, move constructor, move assignment, or destructor are defined or deleted, then each of those functions should be defined or deleted.

While deleting only the move constructor and move assignment may seem like a good idea if you want a copyable but not movable object, this has the unfortunate consequence of making the class not returnable by value in cases where mandatory copy elision does not apply. This happens because a deleted move constructor is still declared, and thus is eligible for overload resolution. And return by value will favor a deleted move constructor over a non-deleted copy constructor. This is illustrated by the following program:

• Trending Now
• Foundational Courses
• Data Science
• Practice Problem
• Machine Learning
• System Design
• DevOps Tutorial

Assignment Operators in Programming

• Binary Operators in Programming
• Operator Associativity in Programming
• C++ Assignment Operator Overloading
• What are Operators in Programming?
• Assignment Operators In C++
• Bitwise AND operator in Programming
• Increment and Decrement Operators in Programming
• Types of Operators in Programming
• Logical AND operator in Programming
• Modulus Operator in Programming
• Solidity - Assignment Operators
• Augmented Assignment Operators in Python
• Pre Increment and Post Increment Operator in Programming
• Right Shift Operator (>>) in Programming
• JavaScript Assignment Operators
• Move Assignment Operator in C++ 11
• Assignment Operators in Python
• Assignment Operators in C
• Subtraction Assignment( -=) Operator in Javascript

Assignment operators in programming are symbols used to assign values to variables. They offer shorthand notations for performing arithmetic operations and updating variable values in a single step. These operators are fundamental in most programming languages and help streamline code while improving readability.

Table of Content

What are Assignment Operators?

• Types of Assignment Operators
• Assignment Operators in C++
• Assignment Operators in Java
• Assignment Operators in C#
• Assignment Operators in Javascript
• Application of Assignment Operators

Assignment operators are used in programming to  assign values  to variables. We use an assignment operator to store and update data within a program. They enable programmers to store data in variables and manipulate that data. The most common assignment operator is the equals sign ( = ), which assigns the value on the right side of the operator to the variable on the left side.

Types of Assignment Operators:

• Simple Assignment Operator ( = )
• Addition Assignment Operator ( += )
• Subtraction Assignment Operator ( -= )
• Multiplication Assignment Operator ( *= )
• Division Assignment Operator ( /= )
• Modulus Assignment Operator ( %= )

Below is a table summarizing common assignment operators along with their symbols, description, and examples:

Assignment Operators in C:

Here are the implementation of Assignment Operator in C language:

Assignment Operators in C++:

Here are the implementation of Assignment Operator in C++ language:

Assignment Operators in Java:

Here are the implementation of Assignment Operator in java language:

Assignment Operators in Python:

Here are the implementation of Assignment Operator in python language:

Assignment Operators in C#:

Here are the implementation of Assignment Operator in C# language:

Assignment Operators in Javascript:

Here are the implementation of Assignment Operator in javascript language:

Application of Assignment Operators:

• Variable Initialization : Setting initial values to variables during declaration.
• Mathematical Operations : Combining arithmetic operations with assignment to update variable values.
• Loop Control : Updating loop variables to control loop iterations.
• Conditional Statements : Assigning different values based on conditions in conditional statements.
• Function Return Values : Storing the return values of functions in variables.
• Data Manipulation : Assigning values received from user input or retrieved from databases to variables.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, assignment operators in programming are essential tools for assigning values to variables and performing operations in a concise and efficient manner. They allow programmers to manipulate data and control the flow of their programs effectively. Understanding and using assignment operators correctly is fundamental to writing clear, efficient, and maintainable code in various programming languages.

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• Programming

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Deleted functions (C++11)

Deleted function declaration is a new form of function declaration that is introduced into the C++11 standard. To declare a function as a deleted function, you can append the =delete; specifier to the end of that function declaration. The compiler disables the usage of a deleted function.