literature review of strategic human resource management

Literature Review of Strategic Human Resource Management

Ieee account.

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

Strategic Human Resource Management in the International Hospitality Industry. An Extensive Literature Review

• Conference paper
• First Online: 22 June 2021
• Cite this conference paper

• Ioannis Rossidis 3 ,
• Dimitrios Belias 4 &
• Labros Vasiliadis 5  

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

1841 Accesses

17 Citations

This review takes an evolutionary perspective on the development of strategic human resource management literature. Managing human resources strategically, provides to a hotel business the opportunity to develop its plans for recruitment, training, and compensation based on the goals of the organization, ensuring a greater chance of organizational success. The paper focuses on how the field has evolved to its current state, articulates many of the major findings and contributions, and discusses how its potential future evolution. This approach contributes to the field of strategic human resource management by analyzing cases and good practices from the international environment. The article is aimed at exploring human resource management from a strategic perspective, tracing and exploiting effective managerial approaches of hospitality industry in the global environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Altarawneh, I., & Aldehayyat, J. (2010). Strategic human resources management (SHRM) in Jordanian hotels. International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (10), 242–255.

Google Scholar  

Aspridis, G., Tselios, D., & Rossidis, I. (2018). Business Communications . Athens: Kritiki publishing.

Belias, D., Velissariou, E., & Rossidis, I. (2018). The contribution of HRM on the development of effective organizational culture in hotel units—The case of Greek hotels. In “ Exploring smart tourism: The cultural and sustainability synergies” Springer proceedings in business and economics .

Baum, T. (2015). Human resources in tourism: Still waiting for change? A 2015 reprise”. Tourism Management, 50, 204–212.

Article   Google Scholar  

Boxall, P., Purcell, J., & Wright, P. (2007). Human resource management: Scope, analysis and significance. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), The handbook of human resource management (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buller, P., & McEvoy, G. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human Resource Management Review, 22 (1), 43–56.

Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and Human Resource Management (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59 (3), 501–528.

Hall, M., Hall, C., Andrade, L., & Drake, B. (2009). Strategic human resource management; The evolution of the field. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 64–85.

Harvey, M., Novicevic, M., & Speier, C. (2000). Strategic global human resource management: The role of inpatriate managers. Human Resource Management Review., 10 (2), 153–175.

Huselid, M., & Becker, B. (2010). Bridging micro and macro domains: Workforce differentiation and strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 37 (2), 421–428.

Gannon, J., Roper, A., & Doherty, L. (2015). Strategic human resource management: Insights from the international hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 47, 65–75.

Graham, M., & Lennon, J. (2002). The dilemma of operating a strategic approach to human resource management in the Scottish visitor attraction sector. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 14 (5), 213–220.

Karatepe, O. (2013). High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: The mediation of work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 132–140.

Kaufman, B. (2014). The Development of Human Resource Management across Nations: Unity and Diversity . Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar.

Book   Google Scholar  

Kaufman, B. (2012). Strategic human resource management research in the United States: A failing grade after 30 years? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26 (2), 12–36.

Kearns, P. (2004). How strategic are you? The six “killer” questions. Strategic HR Review, 3 (3), 20–23.

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2009). Organizational behavior . New York: McGraw Hill.

Madera, J., Dawson, M., Guchait, P., & Belarmino, A. (2017). Strategic human resources management research in hospitality and tourism A review of current literature and suggestions for the future. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29 (1), 48–67.

Marchington, M., Carroll, M., & Boxall, P. (2003). Labour scarcity, the resource-based view, and the survival of the small firm: A study at the margins of the UK road haulage industry. Human Resources Management, 13 (4), 5–22.

Morris, S., Snell, S., & Wright, P. (2006). A resource-based view of international human resources: Towards a framework of integrative and creative capabilities. In G. K. Stahl & I. Bjorkman (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management , Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Myers, M. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management . London: Sage.

Papapdakis, V. (2016). Business strategy . Athens: Benou publications.

Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA; Rossidis, I., Belias, D., & Aspridis, G. (2020). Change management and leadership . Athens: Tziola publishing.

Rossidis, I., & Belias, D. (2020). Combining strategic management with knowledge management. Trends and international perspectives. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10 (3), 39–45.

Taylor, M., & Finley, D. (2008). Strategic human resource management in U.S. Luxury resorts-a case study. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 8 (1), 82–95.

Tracey, J. (2014). A review of human resources management research: The past 10 years and implications for moving forward. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26 (5), 679–705.

Úbeda-García, M., Marco-Lajara, B., García-Lillo, F., & Sabater-Sempere, V. (2013). Universalistic and contingent perspectives on human resource management: An empirical study of the Spanish hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 12 (1), 26–51.

Wright, P., & McMahan, G. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18 (2), 295–320.

Wright, P., & Boswell, W. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28 (3), 247–276.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of the Peloponnese, Tripolis, Greece

Ioannis Rossidis

Department of Business Administration, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Geopolis, Greece

Dimitrios Belias

General Department for National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Labros Vasiliadis

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Rossidis .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

Vicky Katsoni

University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Ciná van Zyl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Rossidis, I., Belias, D., Vasiliadis, L. (2021). Strategic Human Resource Management in the International Hospitality Industry. An Extensive Literature Review. In: Katsoni, V., van Zyl, C. (eds) Culture and Tourism in a Smart, Globalized, and Sustainable World. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72469-6_22

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72469-6_22

Published : 22 June 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-72468-9

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-72469-6

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Applied Economics, Management Science and Social Development (AEMSS 2024)

Strategic Human Resource Management: Catalyzing Organizational Behavior and Performance

This in-depth article offers a holistic review of the integral role Human Resource Management (HRM) plays in influencing and molding organizational behavior and performance. It delves into the various facets of HRM, including effective talent acquisition, development, and retention strategies, and critically examines their significant impact on both individual and collective behaviors within an organization. The scope of the discussion extends to encompass key aspects of organizational behavior such as leadership dynamics, employee motivation, organizational culture, and the intricacies of employee engagement. This exploration provides a thorough analysis of contemporary HRM practices and their pivotal influence on shaping organizational ethos and behavior. The article highlights the diverse range of HRM strategies, from recruitment methodologies to performance management systems, and assesses how these practices contribute to the overall development of a positive and productive workplace environment. Additionally, it examines the challenges and opportunities in the implementation of effective HRM strategies in the context of a rapidly evolving business landscape marked by technological advancements and changing workforce demographics. By providing insights into the transformative power of strategic HRM, this article emphasizes its crucial role in driving enhanced organizational performance, fostering a culture of continuous improvement, and achieving long-term business success. The goal is to offer a comprehensive understanding that helps practitioners, academicians, and policymakers recognize the value of HRM as a cornerstone in the quest for organizational excellence.

Download article (PDF)

Cite this article

The four building blocks of change

Large-scale organizational change has always been difficult, and there’s no shortage of research showing that a majority of transformations continue to fail. Today’s dynamic environment adds an extra level of urgency and complexity. Companies must increasingly react to sudden shifts in the marketplace, to other external shocks, and to the imperatives of new business models. The stakes are higher than ever.

So what’s to be done? In both research and practice, we find that transformations stand the best chance of success when they focus on four key actions to change mind-sets and behavior: fostering understanding and conviction, reinforcing changes through formal mechanisms, developing talent and skills, and role modeling. Collectively labeled the “influence model,” these ideas were introduced more than a dozen years ago in a McKinsey Quarterly article, “ The psychology of change management .” They were based on academic research and practical experience—what we saw worked and what didn’t.

Digital technologies and the changing nature of the workforce have created new opportunities and challenges for the influence model (for more on the relationship between those trends and the model, see this article’s companion, “ Winning hearts and minds in the 21st century ”). But it still works overall, a decade and a half later (exhibit). In a recent McKinsey Global Survey, we examined successful transformations and found that they were nearly eight times more likely to use all four actions as opposed to just one. 1 1. See “ The science of organizational transformations ,” September 2015. Building both on classic and new academic research, the present article supplies a primer on the model and its four building blocks: what they are, how they work, and why they matter.

Fostering understanding and conviction

We know from research that human beings strive for congruence between their beliefs and their actions and experience dissonance when these are misaligned. Believing in the “why” behind a change can therefore inspire people to change their behavior. In practice, however, we find that many transformation leaders falsely assume that the “why” is clear to the broader organization and consequently fail to spend enough time communicating the rationale behind change efforts.

This common pitfall is predictable. Research shows that people frequently overestimate the extent to which others share their own attitudes, beliefs, and opinions—a tendency known as the false-consensus effect. Studies also highlight another contributing phenomenon, the “curse of knowledge”: people find it difficult to imagine that others don’t know something that they themselves do know. To illustrate this tendency, a Stanford study asked participants to tap out the rhythms of well-known songs and predict the likelihood that others would guess what they were. The tappers predicted that the listeners would identify half of the songs correctly; in reality, they did so less than 5 percent of the time. 2 2. Chip Heath and Dan Heath, “The curse of knowledge,” Harvard Business Review , December 2006, Volume 8, Number 6, hbr.org.

Therefore, in times of transformation, we recommend that leaders develop a change story that helps all stakeholders understand where the company is headed, why it is changing, and why this change is important. Building in a feedback loop to sense how the story is being received is also useful. These change stories not only help get out the message but also, recent research finds, serve as an effective influencing tool. Stories are particularly effective in selling brands. 3 3. Harrison Monarth, “The irresistible power of storytelling as a strategic business tool,” Harvard Business Review , March 11, 2014, hbr.org.

Even 15 years ago, at the time of the original article, digital advances were starting to make employees feel involved in transformations, allowing them to participate in shaping the direction of their companies. In 2006, for example, IBM used its intranet to conduct two 72-hour “jam sessions” to engage employees, clients, and other stakeholders in an online debate about business opportunities. No fewer than 150,000 visitors attended from 104 countries and 67 different companies, and there were 46,000 posts. 4 4. Icons of Progress , “A global innovation jam,” ibm.com. As we explain in “Winning hearts and minds in the 21st century,” social and mobile technologies have since created a wide range of new opportunities to build the commitment of employees to change.

Reinforcing with formal mechanisms

Psychologists have long known that behavior often stems from direct association and reinforcement. Back in the 1920s, Ivan Pavlov’s classical conditioning research showed how the repeated association between two stimuli—the sound of a bell and the delivery of food—eventually led dogs to salivate upon hearing the bell alone. Researchers later extended this work on conditioning to humans, demonstrating how children could learn to fear a rat when it was associated with a loud noise. 5 5. John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner, “Conditioned emotional reactions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1920, Volume 3, Number 1, pp. 1–14. Of course, this conditioning isn’t limited to negative associations or to animals. The perfume industry recognizes how the mere scent of someone you love can induce feelings of love and longing.

Reinforcement can also be conscious, shaped by the expected rewards and punishments associated with specific forms of behavior. B. F. Skinner’s work on operant conditioning showed how pairing positive reinforcements such as food with desired behavior could be used, for example, to teach pigeons to play Ping-Pong. This concept, which isn’t hard to grasp, is deeply embedded in organizations. Many people who have had commissions-based sales jobs will understand the point—being paid more for working harder can sometimes be a strong incentive.

Despite the importance of reinforcement, organizations often fail to use it correctly. In a seminal paper “On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B,” management scholar Steven Kerr described numerous examples of organizational-reward systems that are misaligned with the desired behavior, which is therefore neglected. 6 6. Steven Kerr, “On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B,” Academy of Management Journal , 1975, Volume 18, Number 4, pp. 769–83. Some of the paper’s examples—such as the way university professors are rewarded for their research publications, while society expects them to be good teachers—are still relevant today. We ourselves have witnessed this phenomenon in a global refining organization facing market pressure. By squeezing maintenance expenditures and rewarding employees who cut them, the company in effect treated that part of the budget as a “super KPI.” Yet at the same time, its stated objective was reliable maintenance.

Even when organizations use money as a reinforcement correctly, they often delude themselves into thinking that it alone will suffice. Research examining the relationship between money and experienced happiness—moods and general well-being—suggests a law of diminishing returns. The relationship may disappear altogether after around $75,000, a much lower ceiling than most executives assume. 7 7. Belinda Luscombe, “Do we need $75,000 a year to be happy?” Time , September 6, 2010, time.com.

Would you like to learn more about our People & Organizational Performance Practice ?

Money isn’t the only motivator, of course. Victor Vroom’s classic research on expectancy theory explained how the tendency to behave in certain ways depends on the expectation that the effort will result in the desired kind of performance, that this performance will be rewarded, and that the reward will be desirable. 8 8. Victor Vroom, Work and motivation , New York: John Wiley, 1964. When a Middle Eastern telecommunications company recently examined performance drivers, it found that collaboration and purpose were more important than compensation (see “Ahead of the curve: The future of performance management,” forthcoming on McKinsey.com). The company therefore moved from awarding minor individual bonuses for performance to celebrating how specific teams made a real difference in the lives of their customers. This move increased motivation while also saving the organization millions.

How these reinforcements are delivered also matters. It has long been clear that predictability makes them less effective; intermittent reinforcement provides a more powerful hook, as slot-machine operators have learned to their advantage. Further, people react negatively if they feel that reinforcements aren’t distributed fairly. Research on equity theory describes how employees compare their job inputs and outcomes with reference-comparison targets, such as coworkers who have been promoted ahead of them or their own experiences at past jobs. 9 9. J. S. Adams, “Inequity in social exchanges,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1965, Volume 2, pp. 267–300. We therefore recommend that organizations neutralize compensation as a source of anxiety and instead focus on what really drives performance—such as collaboration and purpose, in the case of the Middle Eastern telecom company previously mentioned.

Developing talent and skills

Thankfully, you can teach an old dog new tricks. Human brains are not fixed; neuroscience research shows that they remain plastic well into adulthood. Illustrating this concept, scientific investigation has found that the brains of London taxi drivers, who spend years memorizing thousands of streets and local attractions, showed unique gray-matter volume differences in the hippocampus compared with the brains of other people. Research linked these differences to the taxi drivers’ extraordinary special knowledge. 10 10. Eleanor Maguire, Katherine Woollett, and Hugo Spires, “London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis,” Hippocampus , 2006, Volume 16, pp. 1091–1101.

Despite an amazing ability to learn new things, human beings all too often lack insight into what they need to know but don’t. Biases, for example, can lead people to overlook their limitations and be overconfident of their abilities. Highlighting this point, studies have found that over 90 percent of US drivers rate themselves above average, nearly 70 percent of professors consider themselves in the top 25 percent for teaching ability, and 84 percent of Frenchmen believe they are above-average lovers. 11 11. The art of thinking clearly, “The overconfidence effect: Why you systematically overestimate your knowledge and abilities,” blog entry by Rolf Dobelli, June 11, 2013, psychologytoday.com. This self-serving bias can lead to blind spots, making people too confident about some of their abilities and unaware of what they need to learn. In the workplace, the “mum effect”—a proclivity to keep quiet about unpleasant, unfavorable messages—often compounds these self-serving tendencies. 12 12. Eliezer Yariv, “‘Mum effect’: Principals’ reluctance to submit negative feedback,” Journal of Managerial Psychology , 2006, Volume 21, Number 6, pp. 533–46.

Even when people overcome such biases and actually want to improve, they can handicap themselves by doubting their ability to change. Classic psychological research by Martin Seligman and his colleagues explained how animals and people can fall into a state of learned helplessness—passive acceptance and resignation that develops as a result of repeated exposure to negative events perceived as unavoidable. The researchers found that dogs exposed to unavoidable shocks gave up trying to escape and, when later given an opportunity to do so, stayed put and accepted the shocks as inevitable. 13 13. Martin Seligman and Steven Maier, “Failure to escape traumatic shock,” Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1967, Volume 74, Number 1, pp. 1–9. Like animals, people who believe that developing new skills won’t change a situation are more likely to be passive. You see this all around the economy—from employees who stop offering new ideas after earlier ones have been challenged to unemployed job seekers who give up looking for work after multiple rejections.

Instilling a sense of control and competence can promote an active effort to improve. As expectancy theory holds, people are more motivated to achieve their goals when they believe that greater individual effort will increase performance. 14 14. Victor Vroom, Work and motivation , New York: John Wiley, 1964. Fortunately, new technologies now give organizations more creative opportunities than ever to showcase examples of how that can actually happen.

Role modeling

Research tells us that role modeling occurs both unconsciously and consciously. Unconsciously, people often find themselves mimicking the emotions, behavior, speech patterns, expressions, and moods of others without even realizing that they are doing so. They also consciously align their own thinking and behavior with those of other people—to learn, to determine what’s right, and sometimes just to fit in.

While role modeling is commonly associated with high-power leaders such as Abraham Lincoln and Bill Gates, it isn’t limited to people in formal positions of authority. Smart organizations seeking to win their employees’ support for major transformation efforts recognize that key opinion leaders may exert more influence than CEOs. Nor is role modeling limited to individuals. Everyone has the power to model roles, and groups of people may exert the most powerful influence of all. Robert Cialdini, a well-respected professor of psychology and marketing, examined the power of “social proof”—a mental shortcut people use to judge what is correct by determining what others think is correct. No wonder TV shows have been using canned laughter for decades; believing that other people find a show funny makes us more likely to find it funny too.

Today’s increasingly connected digital world provides more opportunities than ever to share information about how others think and behave. Ever found yourself swayed by the number of positive reviews on Yelp? Or perceiving a Twitter user with a million followers as more reputable than one with only a dozen? You’re not imagining this. Users can now “buy followers” to help those users or their brands seem popular or even start trending.

The endurance of the influence model shouldn’t be surprising: powerful forces of human nature underlie it. More surprising, perhaps, is how often leaders still embark on large-scale change efforts without seriously focusing on building conviction or reinforcing it through formal mechanisms, the development of skills, and role modeling. While these priorities sound like common sense, it’s easy to miss one or more of them amid the maelstrom of activity that often accompanies significant changes in organizational direction. Leaders should address these building blocks systematically because, as research and experience demonstrate, all four together make a bigger impact.

Tessa Basford is a consultant in McKinsey’s Washington, DC, office; Bill Schaninger is a director in the Philadelphia office.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Winning hearts and minds in the 21st century

Changing change management

Digital hives: Creating a surge around change